![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 44864-44869, November 22, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 through Expression of Chimeric Laminin
Chains in Vivo*
,
,
¶
From the
Renal Division, Department of Internal
Medicine and ¶ Department of Cell Biology and Physiology,
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and § Institute of Biomedicine/Anatomy, Biomedicum Helsinki,
University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland FIN-00014
Received for publication, August 26, 2002, and in revised form, September 16, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Lutheran blood group glycoprotein (Lu), also
known as basal cell adhesion molecule, is an Ig superfamily
transmembrane receptor for laminin Laminins are a family of extracellular matrix proteins that are
located primarily in basement membranes. They regulate various cellular
functions such as adhesion, motility, growth, differentiation, and
apoptosis through interaction with specific cell surface receptors (1,
2). The three subunits of laminins, designated The laminin In this study we prepared a soluble recombinant protein containing the
Lu extracellular domain (sol-Lu). Sol-Lu bound to laminin-10/11 in
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and specifically recognized the
laminin Proteins and Antibodies--
Mouse laminin-1 ( Preparation of Sol-Lu--
A cDNA expression plasmid
containing the full-length human Lu coding region, a V5 tag, and a
His6 tag was purchased from Invitrogen. To remove sequences
encoding the V5 tag and the transmembrane and intracellular domains,
nucleotides 904-1668 (GenBankTM accession number X83425)
were amplified by PCR with Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA) following the manufacturer's instructions and using the
primer combination: sense, 5'-GGCAGCCCCAGCCCGGAGTAT-3'; antisense,
5'-GGAATTCACCGGTCACTCCAGCCTGGGAGGTCTG-3'. The amplified fragment was
digested and then ligated into the XhoI and AgeI sites of the expression vector. The resulting expression vector containing the Lu extracellular domain and a His6 tag was
transfected into COS-7 cells (American Type Culture Collection,
Manassas, VA) using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen). Cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum (Invitrogen). The recombinant protein was purified from
serum-free culture medium by nickel column chromatography. The eluted
fractions were pooled and dialyzed against Ca2+ and
Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS( In Vitro Binding Assays--
Binding assays were carried out
with various concentrations (0-80 µg) of laminin-10/11 and laminin-1
coated onto the plastic surface of microtiter plates. Plates were
blocked with 1% BSA in PBS( Preparation of Chimeric Laminin Constructs--
cDNA clones
encoding full-length mouse laminin Generation of Knockout and Transgenic Mice--
Production of
Lama5 mutant mice and transgenic mice overexpressing
full-length laminin Immunohistochemistry--
Mouse embryos from timed matings were
frozen whole by immersing in OCT compound and quick-freezing in
2-methylbutane cooled in a dry ice/ethanol bath. Sections were cut at 7 µm in a cryostat and air-dried. For staining, sections were blocked
in 10% normal goat serum and then incubated with primary antibody. All
antibody incubations were in PBS containing 1% BSA, and all washes
were in PBS. Secondary antibodies were conjugated to fluorescein
isothiocyanate (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) or Cy3 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA).
After several washes, sections were mounted in 90% glycerol containing
0.1× PBS and 1 mg/ml p-phenylenediamine. Sections were
examined through a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope. Images were captured
with a Spot 2 cooled color digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments,
Sterling Heights, MI) using Spot Software version 2.1. Images were
imported into Adobe Photoshop 5.0 and Adobe Illustrator 9.0 for
processing and layout.
Sol-Lu Binding Assay on Tissue Sections--
Sol-Lu was adjusted
to 10 µg/ml with 1% BSA/PBS( Production of Recombinant Sol-Lu Protein and Its Binding to
Laminin-10/11--
To examine the binding of Lu to laminin
To test if sol-Lu binds to laminin-10/11 (
We also used sol-Lu to further characterize the nature of the
interaction between Lu and laminin Binding Specificity of Sol-Lu--
There is a possibility that Lu
also binds to other laminins or to unknown ligands. To test the
specificity of Lu binding, we performed histochemistry using sol-Lu as
a probe on tissue sections. Bound sol-Lu was detected by monoclonal
antibody against human Lu. Sol-Lu bound to basement membranes
containing the laminin Binding of Sol-Lu to the Laminin Binding of Lu to the Laminin Lack of Sol-Lu Binding to Endogenous Laminin Binding of Sol-Lu to Lu is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and has five
extracellular Ig-like domains, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic COOH-terminal domain of 40 amino acids (23). The cytoplasmic tail is absent in the human Lu isoform, B-CAM (21). In
previous in vitro studies, the interaction between Lu and
laminin-10/11 containing the We also produced a recombinant human Lu extracellular domain (sol-Lu)
in mammalian cells. Sol-Lu migrated at a higher molecular weight than
predicted from the deduced amino acid sequence, suggesting that it was
glycosylated. It reacted with a monoclonal antibody against human Lu
and bound to laminin-10/11 but not to laminin-1 (Fig. 1). We therefore
concluded that sol-Lu has binding properties similar to native cell
surface Lu and is an appropriate tool to investigate the Lu-binding
site on laminin Our previous study demonstrated that Lu is localized on the basal
surface of many epithelial cells and on the surface of a subset of
muscle cells, in all cases adjacent to basement membranes containing
laminin Until now, there has been no data addressing the structural basis of
laminin Interestingly, we found that the endogenous laminin Adhesion of sickled red blood cells to laminin
5. Lu is expressed on the surface
of a subset of muscle and epithelial cells in diverse tissues and is
thought to be involved in both normal and disease processes, including sickle cell disease and cancer. Here we investigated the binding of Lu
to laminin
5 in vivo and in vitro. We
prepared a soluble recombinant Lu (sol-Lu) composed of the Lu
extracellular domain and a His6 tag. Sol-Lu bound
specifically to laminin-10/11 (
5
1/
2
1) in enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assays and bound to bona fide basement membranes containing laminin
5 in tissue sections. Sol-Lu did not
bind to tissue sections of laminin
5 knockout embryos, despite the
fact that the four other
chains were present. To identify the
Lu-binding site on laminin
5, we prepared modified
5 cDNAs encoding chimeric laminins containing all or part of the laminin
1 G
domain in place of the analogous
5 regions. These constructs were
used to generate transgenic mice. Proteins derived from transgenes were
detected in basement membranes and were assayed for their ability to
bind Lu by examining the localization of endogenous Lu and the binding
of sol-Lu applied to tissue sections. Our results demonstrate that the
5 LG3 module is essential for Lu binding to laminin
5.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
, and
chains, assemble to form what is typically a cross-shaped structure.
Five
, four
, and three
chains have been identified. To date,
15 different laminin heterotrimers have been found to be synthesized
and secreted by cells (3-7), although many more combinations are
theoretically possible. Of the three laminin chain types, only the
chain has a large carboxyl-terminal globular (G)1 domain consisting of a
tandem array of five laminin-type G (LG) modules (LG1 through LG5) (8).
These LG modules contain binding sites for
1
integrins and heparin, as well as
-dystroglycan in some isoforms
(9).
5 chain is a component of the laminin-10 (
5
1
1)
and laminin-11 (
5
2
1) heterotrimers and is widely expressed (4,
10-12). We have shown that mice lacking laminin
5 die during late
embryogenesis with several developmental defects, including defects in
neural tube closure, digit separation, placentation, and kidney and
lung development (13-15). Laminin-10/11 is bound by several different
receptors, including integrin
3
1,
6
1, and
6
4
(16, 17) and dystroglycan (18). Another potential non-integrin receptor
for laminin
5 is the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein (Lu), which
is a member of the Ig superfamily. A splice variant of Lu is known as
basal cell adhesion molecule (B-CAM) (19, 20). Lu/B-CAM has been
studied primarily in the contexts of blood group antigens, sickle cell
disease, and cancer (20-26). Lee et al. (26)
proposed that sickle red blood cells adhere to endothelial basement
membranes by binding to laminin
5. They showed that sickle cells
bind to laminin preparations containing the
5 chain, and an antibody
to laminin
5 inhibits binding (26). Udai et al. (25)
demonstrated that the major laminin receptor present on sickle cells is
the Lu/B-CAM protein. Furthermore, K562 cells transfected with human Lu
adhere to laminin-10/11 but not to laminins lacking the
5 chain
(27). In our previous studies we made an antibody specific for mouse
Lu, and we determined its expression pattern (28). Lu is expressed on
the surface of a subset of muscle and epithelial cells in diverse
tissues. In epithelial cells, Lu is concentrated on the basal surface
adjacent to basement membranes containing laminin
5. In
Lama5
/
tissues, Lu is no longer localized to the basal
surface, suggesting that Lu binds directly to
5. In transgenic mouse
hearts that overexpress laminin
5, Lu levels are elevated,
suggesting that the increased
5 in cardiomyocyte basement membranes
recruits additional Lu to the cell surface through a direct
interaction. Although the laminin-binding site on Lu has been mapped to
a first approximation (20, 27, 29), there is little insight into the
structural basis for Ig superfamily members binding to laminins. To
understand better the interaction between Lu and the laminin
5
chain, it is important to determine the site of Lu binding on
5.
5 chain on tissue sections. To identify the binding site for
Lu on the laminin
5 chain in vivo, we produced transgenic mice expressing modified laminin
5 chains with LG module
substitutions derived from laminin
1. These chimeric
chains
incorporated into basement membranes; sol-Lu was then used in tissue
binding assays to narrow the Lu-binding site on
5 to the LG3 module.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
1
1) and
human laminin-10/11 (
5
1/
2
1) were purchased from Invitrogen.
Monoclonal antibody against human Lu (BRIC108) was purchased from
Biogenesis (Kingston, NH). Monoclonal antibody against human laminin
1 LG4-5 (163DE4) has been described previously (30). Polyclonal
antibodies against laminin
2 (31) and laminin-5 (
3
3
2) (32)
were gifts from Drs. Peter D. Yurchenco (Robert Wood Johnson Medical
School, Piscataway, NJ) and M. Peter Marinkovich (Stanford University,
Stanford, CA), respectively. Polyclonal antibodies against domain VI/V
of mouse laminin
1 chain (33) and domain IIIa of mouse laminin
4
chain (34) have been described. The production of rabbit antibodies
against recombinant LG4-5 of mouse laminin
5 chain followed the
procedures used before for
2LG4-5 (35). Drs. Rupert Timpl and Takako
Sasaki (Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany) provided these three antibodies. Polyclonal antiserum against domain
IIIb/IVa of mouse laminin
5 has been described (4). To produce a
recombinant immunogen containing the cytoplasmic tail of mouse Lu, the
cDNA segment encoding amino acids 564-622 (GenBankTM
accession number AF346663) was cloned into pGEX-5X-3 vector (Amersham
Biosciences) to generate a glutathione S-transferase fusion
protein. The fusion protein was purified on glutathione beads according
to the manufacturer's instructions. Rabbits were immunized with the
fusion protein by standard methods at Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). The
resulting antiserum stained tissues in the same fashion as our previous
antiserum (28) but did not require urea denaturation of the tissue for immunoreactivity.
)). The purity
of recombinant protein was defined by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1).
) and incubated with sol-Lu at 37 °C
for 1 h. After washing with PBS(
), the bound sol-Lu was detected
with a human Lu-specific monoclonal antibody, BRIC108.
After further washing, the bound antibodies were detected by addition
of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 (Roche
Diagnostics), followed by addition of 1 mg/ml
o-phenylenediamine and 0.001% H2O2.
The absorbance was measured at 492 nm by VERSAmax (Molecular Devices,
Sunnyvale, CA).
5 (generated in our laboratory)
and human laminin
1 (provided by Dr. Karl Tryggvason, Stockholm,
Sweden) chains were used to construct expression vectors encoding the
chimeric laminin
chains Mr51, Mr5G2, and Mr5G3. PCR was used to
introduce restriction sites at appropriate locations and to seamlessly
join amplified fragments with overlapping sequences by sequential PCR
(36). For all PCR, Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs) was used
according to the manufacturer's instructions. To construct Mr51, a
BsiWI site was first engineered at the junction between
5
domain I/II and G. The G domain of human
1 was amplified with
primers containing added BsiWI sites as follows: sense,
5'-CGGGATCCCGTACGCAAGCAGCTTCTATTAAAGTCGCCG-3', and antisense,
5'-GCTCTAGACGTACGGGCGCGCCTCAGGACTCGGTCCCAGGAC-3'. This product
was ligated to the cDNA encoding
5 domains VI through I/II. For
generating Mr5G2 and Mr5G3, we took advantage of a unique AgeI site at the end of
5G1. To construct Mr5G2,
5LG2
was amplified with sense,
5'-AAGCGCGCCTCTAGAGGGCGTTCAGGGGTACGACTG-3', and antisense, 5'-GAAGCTAACACTTCCCACTAGCAGGTCAGCGGT-3';
1LG3-5 was amplified with
sense, 5'-CTGCTAGTGGGAAGTGTTAGCTTCCTGAAAGGC-3', and antisense, 5'-AGGCGCGCCCGTACGTCAGGACTCGGTCCCAGGAC-3'. These two products were mixed and subjected to PCR again for 20 cycles to join them. To
construct Mr5G3,
5LG2-3 was amplified with sense, same primer as
for
5LG2, and antisense,
5'-CCGGGGCTCTCTGGCTGGTGTACAGCCTACGCT-3';
1LG4-5 was amplified
with sense, 5'-TGTACACCAGCCAGAGAGCCCCGGGCTTTTCCA-3', and
antisense, same as
1LG3-5. These two products were mixed and
subjected to PCR again for 20 cycles to join them. The segments encoding chimeric LG2-5 modules were ligated to the cDNA encoding
5 domains VI through LG1 to generate full-length chimeric cDNAs. These were then cloned into a modified widely active expression vector
miw (30), which contains a fusion of the chicken
-actin promoter and
the Rous sarcoma virus-long terminal repeat.
5 has been described (13, 28). Transgenic mice
expressing chimeric laminins were produced by the Mouse Genetics Core
facility at Washington University School of Medicine by standard
microinjection of DNA into pronuclei of (B6XCBA)F2 single-celled
embryos. The desired transgenes were separated from plasmid vector
sequences by digestion with NotI and agarose gel electrophoresis.
). Sections were blocked in 10%
normal goat serum and incubated with diluted sol-Lu. Bound sol-Lu was
detected with a monoclonal antibody against human Lu (BRIC108) and
methods described above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
5, we
prepared a soluble recombinant protein that is composed of the Lu
extracellular domain and a COOH-terminal His6 tag. As shown
in Fig. 1A, the purified
recombinant protein (sol-Lu) migrated as a single band in SDS-PAGE. The
identity of the purified protein was further defined by in
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a monoclonal antibody
against human Lu (data not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Solid phase binding assays of soluble Lu to
laminin-1 and laminin-10/11. A, Sol-Lu purified from
conditioned medium of COS-7 transfectants was subjected to SDS-PAGE on
a 7.5% gel under non-reducing conditions. Protein was stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Molecular mass standards are
indicated. B, dose-response binding of sol-Lu to laminins.
96-Well microtiter plates were coated with increasing concentrations of
mouse laminin-1 (open squares) or human laminin-10/11
(open circles) and were incubated with sol-Lu at 37 °C
for 1 h. Similar results were obtained in three independent
experiments. C, effects of EDTA, heparin, and high salt on
binding of sol-Lu to laminin-10/11. Wells of microtiter plates were
coated with 20 µg/ml laminin-10/11. EDTA, heparin, and high salt
(NaCl) were mixed with soluble Lu at 5 mM, 100 µg/ml, and
1 M, respectively. Each column represents the mean of
triplicate assays. Bars, S.D.
5
1/
2
1), we
performed solid phase binding assays. Bound sol-Lu was detected by monoclonal antibody against human Lu. The binding of Lu to
laminin-10/11 was observed at >5 µg/ml of coating concentration
(Fig. 1B). On the other hand, sol-Lu did not bind to
laminin-1 (
1
1
1). This specificity for laminins containing the
5 chain is consistent with published results (20, 27). We therefore
conclude that sol-Lu has binding properties similar to native cell
surface Lu and is an appropriate tool to investigate and identify
Lu-binding sites on the laminin
5 chain.
5. Divalent cations are required
for the binding of other laminin receptors such as integrins and
dystroglycan (37, 38), and the binding of dystroglycan is affected by
glycosaminoglycans (18, 37). In contrast, the binding of sol-Lu to
laminin
5 was not inhibited by EDTA or by heparin (Fig.
1C). However, high salt did inhibit the interaction (Fig.
1C), as is typical for biologically relevant
protein-protein interactions.
5 chain in tissue sections of an embryonic
day (E) 13.5 mouse embryo (Fig.
2, A and C). The
pattern of sol-Lu binding was identical to the expression of laminin
5 chain in tissues such as lung, intestine, kidney, and pharynx
(data not shown). There was no binding of sol-Lu to tissue sections
from Lama5
/
embryos (Fig. 2, B and
D). However, laminins
1,
2,
3, and
4 were
detected in Lama5
/
basement membranes (Fig. 2,
E-H). Together, these results suggest that Lu is a specific
receptor for the laminin
5 chain and does not bind to other
chains or to other basement membrane components.

View larger version (83K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Lu binds specifically to laminin
5. Sections containing the surface ectodermal
basement membrane of E13.5 Lama5 +/
(control) and
Lama5
/
embryos were stained with antiserum against
laminin
5 (A and B) and with sol-Lu
(C and D). E-H, expression of other
laminin
chains in the Lama5
/
mutant. Cryosections
were stained with antisera recognizing the four other laminin
chains, as indicated. Laminin
1-4 chains were expressed and
localized to basement membranes, but sol-Lu did not bind to them
(D). Bar, 100 µm.
5 Chain G Domain, in Vitro
Assays--
Although the laminin-binding site on Lu has been mapped to
the first three of the five extracellular Ig domains, the structural basis for laminin
5 binding to Lu is unknown. To approach
identification of the Lu-binding site, we prepared a chimeric construct
encoding laminin
5 domains VI through I/II linked to the human
laminin
1 G domain, designated Mr51 (Fig.
3). The construct encoding full-length
laminin
5, Mr5, was also prepared as a positive control. To force
expression of these transgenes in a variety of cell types, we used the
miw expression vector, which directs widespread expression in
transgenic mice (39).2 The
constructs were microinjected to generate transgenic mice. We obtained
two independent lines of mice that expressed the full-length laminin
5 protein. Transgene-derived protein presumably trimerizes with
and
chains and assembles into basement membranes. During embryogenesis, transgene-derived laminin
5 levels were significantly increased in heart and skeletal muscle (28). Five founder mice harboring the Mr51 transgene were also generated. Transgene-positive offspring of the five founders were tested for expression using the
anti-human laminin
1G domain monoclonal antibody, as well as our
polyclonal antiserum to mouse laminin
5, domains IIIb and IVa. E13.5
embryos from all five lines expressed Mr51 protein in a similar
fashion; high levels of chimeric protein were present in heart, and
moderate levels were present in lung, kidney, skeletal muscle, airway
epithelial, and brain pial basement
membranes.3 Because the
expression of endogenous laminin
5 was very low in embryonic heart
(Fig. 4A), and Mr5 and Mr51
were strongly expressed in embryonic heart (Fig. 4, C and
E), we chose heart for sol-Lu binding assays. Sol-Lu bound
to heart expressing Mr5 (Fig. 4D) but not to the control
heart or to heart expressing Mr51 (Fig. 4, B and
F). This indicates that the G domain of laminin
5 is required for sol-Lu binding, and we concluded that the G domain contains the Lu-binding site.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Diagram of the cDNA constructs used to
generate transgenic mice. Mr5, full-length mouse
laminin
5 chain. Mr51, the chimeric construct encoding
laminin
5 domains VI through I/II linked to the human laminin
1 G
domain (shaded). Both constructs were cloned into the
modified miw expression vector and used to produce transgenic
mice.

View larger version (127K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Binding of soluble Lu to heart sections.
Micrographs show sections of E13.5 heart from embryos carrying either
no transgene (A and B), the Mr5 transgene
(C and D), or the Mr51 transgene (E
and F). Tissue sections were incubated with sol-Lu at room
temperature for 1 h. Transgene products and bound sol-Lu were
detected with an antiserum against laminin
5 domain IIIb/IVa
(A, C, and E) and a monoclonal
antibody against human Lu (B, D, and
F), respectively.
5 Chain G Domain, in Vivo
Assay--
Next transgenic mice expressing Mr5 or Mr51 on the
Lama5
/
genetic background were generated. Mouse
genotypes were determined by PCR using appropriate primers. Mr5 was
able to rescue all Lama5
/
embryonic defects, but Mr51
could not.3 Mr5- and Mr51-derived proteins assembled into
basement membranes (Fig. 5, A
and B). As before, Mr51 was detected with a monoclonal antibody against human
1LG4-5, 163DE4 (Fig. 5D), which
did not cross-react with Mr5 (Fig. 5C). An antibody against
the intracellular domain of Lu demonstrated that Lu was basally
concentrated on epithelial cells in Lama5
/
, Mr5 tissue
(Fig. 5E), just as it is in wild-type (28). On the other
hand, Lu was diffuse in Lama5
/
, Mr51 tissue (Fig.
5F). These results show that Lu interacts with the laminin
5 G domain in vivo, because the G domain of
5, but not
the G domain of
1, was able to polarize Lu.

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Binding of endogenous Lu to the laminin
5 G domain in vivo.
Micrographs show E13.5 surface ectoderm in sections of a
Lama5
/
embryo with either the Mr5 (A, C, and
E) or Mr51 (B, D, and F) transgenes.
Sections were stained with an antiserum against laminin
5
(A and B), a monoclonal antibody human laminin
1 LG4-5 (C and D), or an antiserum specific
for Lu (E and F). Lu was only basally
concentrated when the
5 G domain was present (E).
Bar, 100 µm.
5 Expressed in
Embryonic Skeletal Muscle--
The basement membrane of embryonic
skeletal muscle, both extrasynaptic and synaptic, is rich in the
laminin
5 chain (40). Here we found that an antibody against laminin
5 LG4-5 stained the basement membranes of most E17.5 embryonic
tissues but did not stain skeletal muscle (Fig.
6, A-D, and data not shown).
This suggested that the COOH terminus of endogenous laminin
5 is
either cleaved by protease or masked in embryonic skeletal muscle. The sol-Lu binding assay was performed on sections containing E17.5 embryonic lung and skeletal muscle. The sol-Lu bound to laminin
5
expressed in lung but not in skeletal muscle (Fig. 6, E and F). These results suggest that the Lu-binding site of
laminin
5 is cleaved by protease in skeletal muscle and that the
binding site may be present in LG4-5. However, the lack of reactivity with the anti-LG4-5 antiserum does not reveal where the putative cleavage event occurs, only that it is NH2-terminal to the
most distal epitope recognized by the antiserum.

View larger version (122K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Sol-Lu does not bind laminin
5 expressed in embryonic skeletal muscle.
Micrographs show wild-type E17.5 lung (A, C, and
E) and skeletal muscle (B, D, and
F). Sections were stained with antiserum against laminin
5 domain IIIB/IVa (A and B) or LG4-5
(C and D). The laminin
5 chain expressed in
embryonic skeletal muscle was not reactive with antiserum to
5LG4-5
(D). E and F, when sol-Lu was applied
to sections, it bound to lung (E) but not to skeletal muscle
(F). These results suggest that laminin
5 in embryonic
skeletal muscle lacks
5LG4-5 and the Lu-binding site.
Bar, 100 µm.
5LG Modules--
To attempt to more
definitively narrow the binding site of Lu in laminin
5, we prepared
two new chimeric laminin cDNAs encoding laminin
5 domains VI
through either LG2 or LG3, linked to the human laminin
1 LG3-5 and
LG4-5 domains, respectively. These were cloned into the miw expression
vector and designated Mr5G2 and Mr5G3 (Fig.
7). The constructs were microinjected to
produce transgenic mice. We obtained one founder for each construct
that expressed the transgene. Tissues taken from 1-2-week-old mice were analyzed. The antibody against laminin
5 domain IIIb/IVa stained the basement membranes of skeletal muscle in all cases (Fig.
8, A, E, and
I). As described above, the endogenous laminin
5 chain in
skeletal muscle lacked immunoreactivity with anti-
5LG4-5, as did the
transgene-derived proteins (Fig. 8, B, F, and
J). However, Mr5G2 and Mr5G3 could be detected with the
monoclonal antibody against
1LG4-5, 163DE4 (Fig. 8, G and
K), indicating that the chimeric proteins are expressed and
incorporated into basement membranes. Sol-Lu bound to Mr5G3 (Fig.
8L) but not to Mr5G2 (Fig. 8H). This demonstrates
that
5LG3 is crucial for Lu binding.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Diagram of the chimeric cDNAs designed to
narrow the Lu-binding site. Mr5G2 and Mr5G3 are chimeric
constructs encoding laminin
5 domains VI through LG2 and LG3 linked
to the human laminin
1LG3-5 and LG4-5, respectively. Mr51
and Mr5 are described in Fig. 3.

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Identification of the Lu-binding site in
laminin
5. Micrographs show skeletal
muscle from wild-type (A-D), Mr5G2
(E-H), and Mr5G3 (I-L) pups.
Sections were stained with the following: antiserum against laminin
5 domain IIIb/IVa (A, E, and I);
antiserum against
5LG4-5 domain (B, F, and
J); antibody against human laminin
1 LG4-5 (C,
G, and K); and sol-Lu (D,
H, and L). Sol-Lu bound to Mr5G3 (L)
but not to Mr5G2 (H), indicating that
5LG3 is critical
for Lu binding. The endogenous laminin
5 chain in postnatal muscle
lacked reactivity with the antiserum against
5LG4-5 (B)
and lacked sol-Lu binding activity (C), similar to embryonic
skeletal muscle (Fig. 6). Bar, 50 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
5 chain has been well demonstrated (19,
20, 25, 27, 41). The extracellular domain of Lu contains
N-glycosylation consensus motifs. Recently it was reported
that Ig-like domains 1-3 are involved in binding to laminin
5 (27,
29), but the N-glycosylation motifs were not found to be
involved in laminin binding. A bacterial Lu recombinant protein that we
initially prepared did not bind to laminin-10/11 (data not shown),
suggesting that proper glycosylation is required to ensure proper folding.
5. It is interesting that the binding of sol-Lu to
laminin-10/11 was not inhibited by EDTA and heparin. Divalent cations
are required for the binding of other laminin receptors such as
integrins and dystroglycan (37, 38). The binding of dystroglycan is
also affected by glycosaminoglycans (18, 37). Lu therefore has
laminin-binding properties significantly different from integrins and dystroglycan.
5 (28). The localization of Lu suggested that Lu interacts
with the laminin
5 chain in vivo. In the present study we
examined whether there are other ligands for Lu. Soluble receptor
binding assays on tissues is a proven method to reveal the presence of
unknown ligands (42). Sol-Lu made it possible for us to perform binding
assays on tissue sections. When applied to wild-type tissue sections,
sol-Lu bound to basement membranes containing laminin
5. The binding
of sol-Lu totally disappeared from laminin
5 knockout tissues,
further demonstrating its specificity. The five laminin
chains
share similarities in sequence and domain structure (8, 10). Although
laminin
1
4 chains were detected in basement membranes in
Lama5
/
tissue, sol-Lu did not bind to them. This
suggests that only laminin
5 bears the specific sequence or
structure for Lu binding. Thus, whereas integrin
3
1,
6
1,
6
4, and
dystroglycan are promiscuous laminin receptors (2), Lu is a specific
receptor for laminin
5, at least during embryogenesis. Conditional
laminin
5 knockout mice being generated in our laboratory will allow
us to search for novel Lu ligands in adult tissues.
5 binding to Lu. We generated transgenic mice expressing
chimeric laminin
5/
1 chains that incorporated into basement
membranes. This allowed us to search for the Lu-binding site in the
context of a bona fide basement membrane. The
5LG3 module
was identified as being required for Lu binding, and we suggest that it
contains the binding site. However it is possible that Lu binding
requires not only
5LG3 but also
5LG1-2. LG modules are also
important ligands for other cellular receptors, such as integrins and
dystroglycan (9). Together with these and other laminin receptors, Lu
could regulate growth, adhesion, and differentiation of epithelial cells.
5 chain
expressed in embryonic skeletal muscle lacks reactivity with an
5LG4-5 antiserum and does not bind sol-Lu. The straightforward interpretation is that Lu binds to
5LG4-5. However, because sol-Lu binds to Mr5G3, which lacks
5LG4-5 but contains
1LG4-5 instead, the Lu-binding site must be in
5LG1-3. In skeletal muscle, it is
possible that
5LG4-5 is released by protease, and this somehow affects the binding affinity of Lu for
5LG1-3. It has been shown that the G domains of laminin
2,
3, and
4 chains are cleaved by proteolytic processing (9, 32, 43). The link region between
5LG3
and LG4 modules contains an RRXR sequence, which is a
furin-type cleavage site (8, 10). This site is also conserved in the
link region of human laminin
5 (44). Proteolytic processing appears
to have occurred in this link region in skeletal muscle and perhaps
affected Lu binding. Alternatively, protease cleavage sites may lie
further upstream, resulting in removal of the critical LG3 module.
5 via Lu is suspected
to contribute to the painful vaso-occlusion episodes that occur in
sickle cell patients (25, 26). In addition, Lu/B-CAM overexpressed in
some epithelial cancers may promote tumor metastasis (21, 22). In the
future, it is important to define at the amino acid level the critical
structural determinants of laminin
5 and Lu that mediate their
binding to each other. Toward this end, novel chimeric laminins are
being generated in our laboratory. With additional details about the
Lu-binding site, it may be possible to develop inhibitors that block
the binding of Lu to laminin
5 in vivo. Such inhibitors
may suppress vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease and tumor cell
metastasis in cancer.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Cong Li and Gloriosa Go for
technical assistance; the Mouse Genetics Core at Washington University
School of Medicine for generating and caring for transgenic mice;
Jacqueline L. Mudd for producing the Mr5 transgenic mice; Karl
Tryggvason for supplying the human laminin
1 cDNA; and Peter
Yurchenco, Peter Marinkovich, Rupert Timpl, and Takako Sasaki for
generously providing antibodies.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grants P50 DK045181 (to the George M. O'Brien Kidney Research Center) and R01 GM060432 from the National Institutes of Health and by Research Grants 6-FY99-232 and 1-FY02-192 from the March of Dimes (to J. H. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Washington
University School of Medicine, Renal Division, Box 8126, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-8235; Fax:
314-362-8237; E-mail: minerj@pcg.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208731200
2 Y. Kikkawa, C. L. Moulson, I. Virtanen, and J. H. Miner, unpublished data.
3 Y. Kikkawa and J. H. Miner, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
G, globular;
LG, laminin-type globular;
Lu, Lutheran blood group glycoprotein;
B-CAM, basal cell adhesion molecule;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
Sol-Lu, soluble Lu;
E, embryonic day;
PBS(
), Ca2+- and
Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Aumailley, M., and Smyth, N. (1998) J. Anat. 193, 1-21 |
| 2. | Colognato, H., and Yurchenco, P. D. (2000) Dev. Dyn. 218, 213-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Burgeson, R. E., Chiquet, M., Deutzmann, R., Ekblom, P., Engel, J., Kleinman, H., Martin, G. R., Meneguzzi, G., Paulsson, M., Sanes, J., Timpl, R., Tryggvason, K., Yamada, Y., and Yurchenco, P. D. (1994) Matrix Biol. 14, 209-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Miner, J. H.,
Patton, B. L.,
Lentz, S. I.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Snider, W. D.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
685-701 |
| 5. |
Koch, M.,
Olson, P. F.,
Albus, A.,
Jin, W.,
Hunter, D. D.,
Brunken, W. J.,
Burgeson, R. E.,
and Champliaud, M. F.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
605-618 |
| 6. |
Libby, R. T.,
Champliaud, M. F.,
Claudepierre, T., Xu, Y.,
Gibbons, E. P.,
Koch, M.,
Burgeson, R. E.,
Hunter, D. D.,
and Brunken, W. J.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
6517-6528 |
| 7. | Champliaud, M. F., Virtanen, I., Tiger, C. F., Korhonen, M., Burgeson, R., and Gullberg, D. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 259, 326-335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Timpl, R., Tisi, D., Talts, J. F., Andac, Z., Sasaki, T., and Hohenester, E. (2000) Matrix Biol. 19, 309-317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Talts, J. F., and Timpl, R. (1999) FEBS Lett. 458, 319-323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Miner, J. H.,
Lewis, R. M.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28523-28526 |
| 11. | Sorokin, L. M., Pausch, F., Durbeej, M., and Ekblom, P. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 210, 446-462[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Sorokin, L. M., Pausch, F., Frieser, M., Kroger, S., Ohage, E., and Deutzmann, R. (1997) Dev. Biol. 189, 285-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Miner, J. H.,
Cunningham, J.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1713-1723 |
| 14. | Nguyen, N. M., Miner, J. H., Pierce, R. A., and Senior, R. M. (2002) Dev. Biol. 246, 231-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Miner, J. H., and Li, C. (2000) Dev. Biol. 217, 278-289[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Kikkawa, Y.,
Sanzen, N.,
and Sekiguchi, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15854-15859 |
| 17. | Kikkawa, Y., Sanzen, N., Fujiwara, H., Sonnenberg, A., and Sekiguchi, K. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 869-876[Abstract] |
| 18. |
Shimizu, H.,
Hosokawa, H.,
Ninomiya, H.,
Miner, J. H.,
and Masaki, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11995-12000 |
| 19. |
El Nemer, W.,
Gane, P.,
Colin, Y.,
Bony, V.,
Rahuel, C.,
Galacteros, F.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Le Van Kim, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16686-16693 |
| 20. |
Zen, Q.,
Cottman, M.,
Truskey, G.,
Fraser, R.,
and Telen, M. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
728-734 |
| 21. |
Campbell, I. G.,
Foulkes, W. D.,
Senger, G.,
Trowadale, J.,
Garin-Chesa, P.,
and Retting, W. J.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
5761-5765 |
| 22. | Garin-Chesa, P., Sanz-Moncasi, M.-P., Campbell, I. G., and Rettig, W. J. (1994) Int. J. Oncol. 5, 1261-1266 |
| 23. |
Rahuel, C., Le,
Van Kim, C.,
Mattei, M. G.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Colin, Y.
(1996)
Blood
88,
1865-1872 |
| 24. |
El Nemer, W.,
Rahuel, C.,
Colin, Y.,
Gane, P.,
Cartron, J. P.,
and Le Vam Kim, C.
(1997)
Blood
89,
4608-4616 |
| 25. | Udai, M., Zen, Q., Cottman, M., Leonard, N., Jefferson, S., Daymont, C., Truskey, G., and Telen, M. J. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2550-2558[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Lee, S. P.,
Cunningham, M. L.,
Hines, P. C.,
Joneckies, C. C.,
Orringer, E. P.,
and Parise, L. V.
(1998)
Blood
92,
2951-2958 |
| 27. |
Parsons, S. F.,
Lee, G.,
Spring, F. A.,
Willig, T. N.,
Peters, L. L.,
Gimm, J. A.,
Tanner, M. J.,
Mohandas, N.,
Anstee, D. J.,
and Chasis, J. A.
(2001)
Blood
97,
312-320 |
| 28. | Moulson, C. L., Li, C., and Miner, J. H. (2001) Dev. Dyn. 222, 101-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
El Nemer, W.,
Gane, P.,
Colin, Y.,
D'Ambrosio, A. M.,
Callebaut, I.,
Carton, J.-P.,
and Le Van Kim, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
23757-23762 |
| 30. | Virtanen, I., Gullberg, D., Rissanen, J., Kivilaakso, E., Kiviluoto, T., Laitinen, L. A., Lehto, V. P., and Ekblom, P. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 257, 298-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Cheng, Y.-S.,
Champliaud, M.-F.,
Burgeson, R. E.,
Marinkovich, M. P.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31525-31532 |
| 32. |
Marinkovich, M. P.,
Lunstrum, G. P.,
Keene, D. R.,
and Burgeson, R. E.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
695-703 |
| 33. | Ettner, N., Gohring, W., Sasaki, T., Mann, K., and Timpl, R. (1998) FEBS Lett. 430, 217-221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Sasaki, T., Mann, K., and Timpl, R. (2001) FEBS Lett. 505, 173-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Talts, J. F., Mann, K., Yamada, Y., and Timpl, R. (1998) FEBS Lett. 426, 71-76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Elion, E. A. (1998) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds), Vol. 1 , pp. 3.17.1-10, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 37. |
Ervasti, J. M.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
809-823 |
| 38. | Humphries, M. J. (2000) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 311-339[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Suemori, H., Kadokawa, Y., Goto, K., Araki, I., Kondoh, H., and Nakatsuji, N. (1990) Cell Differ. Dev. 29, 181-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Patton, B. L.,
Miner, J. H.,
Chiu, A. Y.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1507-1521 |
| 41. | Rahuel, C., Colin, Y., Goossens, D., Gane, P., El, Nemer, W., Carton, J. P., and Le Van Kim, C. (1999) Immunogenetics 50, 271-277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Muller, U., Wang, D., Denda, S., Meneses, J. J., Pedersen, R. A., and Reichardt, L. F. (1997) Cell 88, 603-613[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Tsubota, Y., Mizushima, H., Hirosaki, T., Higashi, S., Yasumitsu, H., and Miyazaki, K. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 278, 614-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Durkin, M. E., Loechel, F., Mattei, M. G., Gilpin, B. J., Albrechtsen, R., and Wewer, U. M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 411, 296-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. X. Mahoney, T. S. Stappenbeck, and J. H. Miner Laminin {alpha}5 influences the architecture of the mouse small intestine mucosa J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2008; 121(15): 2493 - 2502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rahuel, A. Filipe, L. Ritie, W. El Nemer, N. Patey-Mariaud, D. Eladari, J.-P. Cartron, P. Simon-Assmann, C. Le Van Kim, and Y. Colin Genetic inactivation of the laminin {alpha}5 chain receptor Lu/BCAM leads to kidney and intestinal abnormalities in the mouse Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): F393 - F406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|