JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208731200 on September 18, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 44864-44869, November 22, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/47/44864    most recent
M208731200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kikkawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Miner, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kikkawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Miner, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of the Binding Site for the Lutheran Blood Group Glycoprotein on Laminin alpha 5 through Expression of Chimeric Laminin Chains in Vivo*

Yamato KikkawaDagger , Casey L. MoulsonDagger , Ismo Virtanen§, and Jeffrey H. MinerDagger ||

From the Dagger  Renal Division, Department of Internal Medicine and  Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and § Institute of Biomedicine/Anatomy, Biomedicum Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland FIN-00014

Received for publication, August 26, 2002, and in revised form, September 16, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Lutheran blood group glycoprotein (Lu), also known as basal cell adhesion molecule, is an Ig superfamily transmembrane receptor for laminin alpha 5. Lu is expressed on the surface of a subset of muscle and epithelial cells in diverse tissues and is thought to be involved in both normal and disease processes, including sickle cell disease and cancer. Here we investigated the binding of Lu to laminin alpha 5 in vivo and in vitro. We prepared a soluble recombinant Lu (sol-Lu) composed of the Lu extracellular domain and a His6 tag. Sol-Lu bound specifically to laminin-10/11 (alpha 5beta 1/beta 2gamma 1) in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and bound to bona fide basement membranes containing laminin alpha 5 in tissue sections. Sol-Lu did not bind to tissue sections of laminin alpha 5 knockout embryos, despite the fact that the four other alpha  chains were present. To identify the Lu-binding site on laminin alpha 5, we prepared modified alpha 5 cDNAs encoding chimeric laminins containing all or part of the laminin alpha 1 G domain in place of the analogous alpha 5 regions. These constructs were used to generate transgenic mice. Proteins derived from transgenes were detected in basement membranes and were assayed for their ability to bind Lu by examining the localization of endogenous Lu and the binding of sol-Lu applied to tissue sections. Our results demonstrate that the alpha 5 LG3 module is essential for Lu binding to laminin alpha 5.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Laminins are a family of extracellular matrix proteins that are located primarily in basement membranes. They regulate various cellular functions such as adhesion, motility, growth, differentiation, and apoptosis through interaction with specific cell surface receptors (1, 2). The three subunits of laminins, designated alpha , beta , and gamma  chains, assemble to form what is typically a cross-shaped structure. Five alpha , four beta , and three gamma  chains have been identified. To date, 15 different laminin heterotrimers have been found to be synthesized and secreted by cells (3-7), although many more combinations are theoretically possible. Of the three laminin chain types, only the alpha  chain has a large carboxyl-terminal globular (G)1 domain consisting of a tandem array of five laminin-type G (LG) modules (LG1 through LG5) (8). These LG modules contain binding sites for beta 1 integrins and heparin, as well as alpha -dystroglycan in some isoforms (9).

The laminin alpha 5 chain is a component of the laminin-10 (alpha 5beta 1gamma 1) and laminin-11 (alpha 5beta 2gamma 1) heterotrimers and is widely expressed (4, 10-12). We have shown that mice lacking laminin alpha 5 die during late embryogenesis with several developmental defects, including defects in neural tube closure, digit separation, placentation, and kidney and lung development (13-15). Laminin-10/11 is bound by several different receptors, including integrin alpha 3beta 1, alpha 6beta 1, and alpha 6beta 4 (16, 17) and dystroglycan (18). Another potential non-integrin receptor for laminin alpha 5 is the Lutheran blood group glycoprotein (Lu), which is a member of the Ig superfamily. A splice variant of Lu is known as basal cell adhesion molecule (B-CAM) (19, 20). Lu/B-CAM has been studied primarily in the contexts of blood group antigens, sickle cell disease, and cancer (20-26). Lee et al. (26) proposed that sickle red blood cells adhere to endothelial basement membranes by binding to laminin alpha 5. They showed that sickle cells bind to laminin preparations containing the alpha 5 chain, and an antibody to laminin alpha 5 inhibits binding (26). Udai et al. (25) demonstrated that the major laminin receptor present on sickle cells is the Lu/B-CAM protein. Furthermore, K562 cells transfected with human Lu adhere to laminin-10/11 but not to laminins lacking the alpha 5 chain (27). In our previous studies we made an antibody specific for mouse Lu, and we determined its expression pattern (28). Lu is expressed on the surface of a subset of muscle and epithelial cells in diverse tissues. In epithelial cells, Lu is concentrated on the basal surface adjacent to basement membranes containing laminin alpha 5. In Lama5 -/- tissues, Lu is no longer localized to the basal surface, suggesting that Lu binds directly to alpha 5. In transgenic mouse hearts that overexpress laminin alpha 5, Lu levels are elevated, suggesting that the increased alpha 5 in cardiomyocyte basement membranes recruits additional Lu to the cell surface through a direct interaction. Although the laminin-binding site on Lu has been mapped to a first approximation (20, 27, 29), there is little insight into the structural basis for Ig superfamily members binding to laminins. To understand better the interaction between Lu and the laminin alpha 5 chain, it is important to determine the site of Lu binding on alpha 5.

In this study we prepared a soluble recombinant protein containing the Lu extracellular domain (sol-Lu). Sol-Lu bound to laminin-10/11 in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and specifically recognized the laminin alpha 5 chain on tissue sections. To identify the binding site for Lu on the laminin alpha 5 chain in vivo, we produced transgenic mice expressing modified laminin alpha 5 chains with LG module substitutions derived from laminin alpha 1. These chimeric alpha  chains incorporated into basement membranes; sol-Lu was then used in tissue binding assays to narrow the Lu-binding site on alpha 5 to the LG3 module.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proteins and Antibodies-- Mouse laminin-1 (alpha 1beta 1gamma 1) and human laminin-10/11 (alpha 5beta 1/beta 2gamma 1) were purchased from Invitrogen. Monoclonal antibody against human Lu (BRIC108) was purchased from Biogenesis (Kingston, NH). Monoclonal antibody against human laminin alpha 1 LG4-5 (163DE4) has been described previously (30). Polyclonal antibodies against laminin alpha 2 (31) and laminin-5 (alpha 3beta 3gamma 2) (32) were gifts from Drs. Peter D. Yurchenco (Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ) and M. Peter Marinkovich (Stanford University, Stanford, CA), respectively. Polyclonal antibodies against domain VI/V of mouse laminin alpha 1 chain (33) and domain IIIa of mouse laminin alpha 4 chain (34) have been described. The production of rabbit antibodies against recombinant LG4-5 of mouse laminin alpha 5 chain followed the procedures used before for alpha 2LG4-5 (35). Drs. Rupert Timpl and Takako Sasaki (Max-Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Martinsried, Germany) provided these three antibodies. Polyclonal antiserum against domain IIIb/IVa of mouse laminin alpha 5 has been described (4). To produce a recombinant immunogen containing the cytoplasmic tail of mouse Lu, the cDNA segment encoding amino acids 564-622 (GenBankTM accession number AF346663) was cloned into pGEX-5X-3 vector (Amersham Biosciences) to generate a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein. The fusion protein was purified on glutathione beads according to the manufacturer's instructions. Rabbits were immunized with the fusion protein by standard methods at Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). The resulting antiserum stained tissues in the same fashion as our previous antiserum (28) but did not require urea denaturation of the tissue for immunoreactivity.

Preparation of Sol-Lu-- A cDNA expression plasmid containing the full-length human Lu coding region, a V5 tag, and a His6 tag was purchased from Invitrogen. To remove sequences encoding the V5 tag and the transmembrane and intracellular domains, nucleotides 904-1668 (GenBankTM accession number X83425) were amplified by PCR with Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) following the manufacturer's instructions and using the primer combination: sense, 5'-GGCAGCCCCAGCCCGGAGTAT-3'; antisense, 5'-GGAATTCACCGGTCACTCCAGCCTGGGAGGTCTG-3'. The amplified fragment was digested and then ligated into the XhoI and AgeI sites of the expression vector. The resulting expression vector containing the Lu extracellular domain and a His6 tag was transfected into COS-7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen). Cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen). The recombinant protein was purified from serum-free culture medium by nickel column chromatography. The eluted fractions were pooled and dialyzed against Ca2+ and Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline (PBS(-)). The purity of recombinant protein was defined by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1).

In Vitro Binding Assays-- Binding assays were carried out with various concentrations (0-80 µg) of laminin-10/11 and laminin-1 coated onto the plastic surface of microtiter plates. Plates were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS(-) and incubated with sol-Lu at 37 °C for 1 h. After washing with PBS(-), the bound sol-Lu was detected with a human Lu-specific monoclonal antibody, BRIC108. After further washing, the bound antibodies were detected by addition of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 (Roche Diagnostics), followed by addition of 1 mg/ml o-phenylenediamine and 0.001% H2O2. The absorbance was measured at 492 nm by VERSAmax (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).

Preparation of Chimeric Laminin Constructs-- cDNA clones encoding full-length mouse laminin alpha 5 (generated in our laboratory) and human laminin alpha 1 (provided by Dr. Karl Tryggvason, Stockholm, Sweden) chains were used to construct expression vectors encoding the chimeric laminin alpha  chains Mr51, Mr5G2, and Mr5G3. PCR was used to introduce restriction sites at appropriate locations and to seamlessly join amplified fragments with overlapping sequences by sequential PCR (36). For all PCR, Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. To construct Mr51, a BsiWI site was first engineered at the junction between alpha 5 domain I/II and G. The G domain of human alpha 1 was amplified with primers containing added BsiWI sites as follows: sense, 5'-CGGGATCCCGTACGCAAGCAGCTTCTATTAAAGTCGCCG-3', and antisense, 5'-GCTCTAGACGTACGGGCGCGCCTCAGGACTCGGTCCCAGGAC-3'. This product was ligated to the cDNA encoding alpha 5 domains VI through I/II. For generating Mr5G2 and Mr5G3, we took advantage of a unique AgeI site at the end of alpha 5G1. To construct Mr5G2, alpha 5LG2 was amplified with sense, 5'-AAGCGCGCCTCTAGAGGGCGTTCAGGGGTACGACTG-3', and antisense, 5'-GAAGCTAACACTTCCCACTAGCAGGTCAGCGGT-3'; alpha 1LG3-5 was amplified with sense, 5'-CTGCTAGTGGGAAGTGTTAGCTTCCTGAAAGGC-3', and antisense, 5'-AGGCGCGCCCGTACGTCAGGACTCGGTCCCAGGAC-3'. These two products were mixed and subjected to PCR again for 20 cycles to join them. To construct Mr5G3, alpha 5LG2-3 was amplified with sense, same primer as for alpha 5LG2, and antisense, 5'-CCGGGGCTCTCTGGCTGGTGTACAGCCTACGCT-3'; alpha 1LG4-5 was amplified with sense, 5'-TGTACACCAGCCAGAGAGCCCCGGGCTTTTCCA-3', and antisense, same as alpha 1LG3-5. These two products were mixed and subjected to PCR again for 20 cycles to join them. The segments encoding chimeric LG2-5 modules were ligated to the cDNA encoding alpha 5 domains VI through LG1 to generate full-length chimeric cDNAs. These were then cloned into a modified widely active expression vector miw (30), which contains a fusion of the chicken beta -actin promoter and the Rous sarcoma virus-long terminal repeat.

Generation of Knockout and Transgenic Mice-- Production of Lama5 mutant mice and transgenic mice overexpressing full-length laminin alpha 5 has been described (13, 28). Transgenic mice expressing chimeric laminins were produced by the Mouse Genetics Core facility at Washington University School of Medicine by standard microinjection of DNA into pronuclei of (B6XCBA)F2 single-celled embryos. The desired transgenes were separated from plasmid vector sequences by digestion with NotI and agarose gel electrophoresis.

Immunohistochemistry-- Mouse embryos from timed matings were frozen whole by immersing in OCT compound and quick-freezing in 2-methylbutane cooled in a dry ice/ethanol bath. Sections were cut at 7 µm in a cryostat and air-dried. For staining, sections were blocked in 10% normal goat serum and then incubated with primary antibody. All antibody incubations were in PBS containing 1% BSA, and all washes were in PBS. Secondary antibodies were conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) or Cy3 (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). After several washes, sections were mounted in 90% glycerol containing 0.1× PBS and 1 mg/ml p-phenylenediamine. Sections were examined through a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope. Images were captured with a Spot 2 cooled color digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI) using Spot Software version 2.1. Images were imported into Adobe Photoshop 5.0 and Adobe Illustrator 9.0 for processing and layout.

Sol-Lu Binding Assay on Tissue Sections-- Sol-Lu was adjusted to 10 µg/ml with 1% BSA/PBS(-). Sections were blocked in 10% normal goat serum and incubated with diluted sol-Lu. Bound sol-Lu was detected with a monoclonal antibody against human Lu (BRIC108) and methods described above.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Production of Recombinant Sol-Lu Protein and Its Binding to Laminin-10/11-- To examine the binding of Lu to laminin alpha 5, we prepared a soluble recombinant protein that is composed of the Lu extracellular domain and a COOH-terminal His6 tag. As shown in Fig. 1A, the purified recombinant protein (sol-Lu) migrated as a single band in SDS-PAGE. The identity of the purified protein was further defined by in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a monoclonal antibody against human Lu (data not shown).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Solid phase binding assays of soluble Lu to laminin-1 and laminin-10/11. A, Sol-Lu purified from conditioned medium of COS-7 transfectants was subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 7.5% gel under non-reducing conditions. Protein was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Molecular mass standards are indicated. B, dose-response binding of sol-Lu to laminins. 96-Well microtiter plates were coated with increasing concentrations of mouse laminin-1 (open squares) or human laminin-10/11 (open circles) and were incubated with sol-Lu at 37 °C for 1 h. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. C, effects of EDTA, heparin, and high salt on binding of sol-Lu to laminin-10/11. Wells of microtiter plates were coated with 20 µg/ml laminin-10/11. EDTA, heparin, and high salt (NaCl) were mixed with soluble Lu at 5 mM, 100 µg/ml, and 1 M, respectively. Each column represents the mean of triplicate assays. Bars, S.D.

To test if sol-Lu binds to laminin-10/11 (alpha 5beta 1/beta 2gamma 1), we performed solid phase binding assays. Bound sol-Lu was detected by monoclonal antibody against human Lu. The binding of Lu to laminin-10/11 was observed at >5 µg/ml of coating concentration (Fig. 1B). On the other hand, sol-Lu did not bind to laminin-1 (alpha 1beta 1gamma 1). This specificity for laminins containing the alpha 5 chain is consistent with published results (20, 27). We therefore conclude that sol-Lu has binding properties similar to native cell surface Lu and is an appropriate tool to investigate and identify Lu-binding sites on the laminin alpha 5 chain.

We also used sol-Lu to further characterize the nature of the interaction between Lu and laminin alpha 5. Divalent cations are required for the binding of other laminin receptors such as integrins and dystroglycan (37, 38), and the binding of dystroglycan is affected by glycosaminoglycans (18, 37). In contrast, the binding of sol-Lu to laminin alpha 5 was not inhibited by EDTA or by heparin (Fig. 1C). However, high salt did inhibit the interaction (Fig. 1C), as is typical for biologically relevant protein-protein interactions.

Binding Specificity of Sol-Lu-- There is a possibility that Lu also binds to other laminins or to unknown ligands. To test the specificity of Lu binding, we performed histochemistry using sol-Lu as a probe on tissue sections. Bound sol-Lu was detected by monoclonal antibody against human Lu. Sol-Lu bound to basement membranes containing the laminin alpha 5 chain in tissue sections of an embryonic day (E) 13.5 mouse embryo (Fig. 2, A and C). The pattern of sol-Lu binding was identical to the expression of laminin alpha 5 chain in tissues such as lung, intestine, kidney, and pharynx (data not shown). There was no binding of sol-Lu to tissue sections from Lama5 -/- embryos (Fig. 2, B and D). However, laminins alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 3, and alpha 4 were detected in Lama5 -/- basement membranes (Fig. 2, E-H). Together, these results suggest that Lu is a specific receptor for the laminin alpha 5 chain and does not bind to other alpha  chains or to other basement membrane components.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Lu binds specifically to laminin alpha 5. Sections containing the surface ectodermal basement membrane of E13.5 Lama5 +/- (control) and Lama5 -/- embryos were stained with antiserum against laminin alpha 5 (A and B) and with sol-Lu (C and D). E-H, expression of other laminin alpha  chains in the Lama5 -/- mutant. Cryosections were stained with antisera recognizing the four other laminin alpha  chains, as indicated. Laminin alpha 1-4 chains were expressed and localized to basement membranes, but sol-Lu did not bind to them (D). Bar, 100 µm.

Binding of Sol-Lu to the Laminin alpha 5 Chain G Domain, in Vitro Assays-- Although the laminin-binding site on Lu has been mapped to the first three of the five extracellular Ig domains, the structural basis for laminin alpha 5 binding to Lu is unknown. To approach identification of the Lu-binding site, we prepared a chimeric construct encoding laminin alpha 5 domains VI through I/II linked to the human laminin alpha 1 G domain, designated Mr51 (Fig. 3). The construct encoding full-length laminin alpha 5, Mr5, was also prepared as a positive control. To force expression of these transgenes in a variety of cell types, we used the miw expression vector, which directs widespread expression in transgenic mice (39).2 The constructs were microinjected to generate transgenic mice. We obtained two independent lines of mice that expressed the full-length laminin alpha 5 protein. Transgene-derived protein presumably trimerizes with beta  and gamma  chains and assembles into basement membranes. During embryogenesis, transgene-derived laminin alpha 5 levels were significantly increased in heart and skeletal muscle (28). Five founder mice harboring the Mr51 transgene were also generated. Transgene-positive offspring of the five founders were tested for expression using the anti-human laminin alpha 1G domain monoclonal antibody, as well as our polyclonal antiserum to mouse laminin alpha 5, domains IIIb and IVa. E13.5 embryos from all five lines expressed Mr51 protein in a similar fashion; high levels of chimeric protein were present in heart, and moderate levels were present in lung, kidney, skeletal muscle, airway epithelial, and brain pial basement membranes.3 Because the expression of endogenous laminin alpha 5 was very low in embryonic heart (Fig. 4A), and Mr5 and Mr51 were strongly expressed in embryonic heart (Fig. 4, C and E), we chose heart for sol-Lu binding assays. Sol-Lu bound to heart expressing Mr5 (Fig. 4D) but not to the control heart or to heart expressing Mr51 (Fig. 4, B and F). This indicates that the G domain of laminin alpha 5 is required for sol-Lu binding, and we concluded that the G domain contains the Lu-binding site.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Diagram of the cDNA constructs used to generate transgenic mice. Mr5, full-length mouse laminin alpha 5 chain. Mr51, the chimeric construct encoding laminin alpha 5 domains VI through I/II linked to the human laminin alpha 1 G domain (shaded). Both constructs were cloned into the modified miw expression vector and used to produce transgenic mice.


View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding of soluble Lu to heart sections. Micrographs show sections of E13.5 heart from embryos carrying either no transgene (A and B), the Mr5 transgene (C and D), or the Mr51 transgene (E and F). Tissue sections were incubated with sol-Lu at room temperature for 1 h. Transgene products and bound sol-Lu were detected with an antiserum against laminin alpha 5 domain IIIb/IVa (A, C, and E) and a monoclonal antibody against human Lu (B, D, and F), respectively.

Binding of Lu to the Laminin alpha 5 Chain G Domain, in Vivo Assay-- Next transgenic mice expressing Mr5 or Mr51 on the Lama5 -/- genetic background were generated. Mouse genotypes were determined by PCR using appropriate primers. Mr5 was able to rescue all Lama5 -/- embryonic defects, but Mr51 could not.3 Mr5- and Mr51-derived proteins assembled into basement membranes (Fig. 5, A and B). As before, Mr51 was detected with a monoclonal antibody against human alpha 1LG4-5, 163DE4 (Fig. 5D), which did not cross-react with Mr5 (Fig. 5C). An antibody against the intracellular domain of Lu demonstrated that Lu was basally concentrated on epithelial cells in Lama5 -/-, Mr5 tissue (Fig. 5E), just as it is in wild-type (28). On the other hand, Lu was diffuse in Lama5 -/-, Mr51 tissue (Fig. 5F). These results show that Lu interacts with the laminin alpha 5 G domain in vivo, because the G domain of alpha 5, but not the G domain of alpha 1, was able to polarize Lu.


View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Binding of endogenous Lu to the laminin alpha 5 G domain in vivo. Micrographs show E13.5 surface ectoderm in sections of a Lama5 -/- embryo with either the Mr5 (A, C, and E) or Mr51 (B, D, and F) transgenes. Sections were stained with an antiserum against laminin alpha 5 (A and B), a monoclonal antibody human laminin alpha 1 LG4-5 (C and D), or an antiserum specific for Lu (E and F). Lu was only basally concentrated when the alpha 5 G domain was present (E). Bar, 100 µm.

Lack of Sol-Lu Binding to Endogenous Laminin alpha 5 Expressed in Embryonic Skeletal Muscle-- The basement membrane of embryonic skeletal muscle, both extrasynaptic and synaptic, is rich in the laminin alpha 5 chain (40). Here we found that an antibody against laminin alpha 5 LG4-5 stained the basement membranes of most E17.5 embryonic tissues but did not stain skeletal muscle (Fig. 6, A-D, and data not shown). This suggested that the COOH terminus of endogenous laminin alpha 5 is either cleaved by protease or masked in embryonic skeletal muscle. The sol-Lu binding assay was performed on sections containing E17.5 embryonic lung and skeletal muscle. The sol-Lu bound to laminin alpha 5 expressed in lung but not in skeletal muscle (Fig. 6, E and F). These results suggest that the Lu-binding site of laminin alpha 5 is cleaved by protease in skeletal muscle and that the binding site may be present in LG4-5. However, the lack of reactivity with the anti-LG4-5 antiserum does not reveal where the putative cleavage event occurs, only that it is NH2-terminal to the most distal epitope recognized by the antiserum.


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Sol-Lu does not bind laminin alpha 5 expressed in embryonic skeletal muscle. Micrographs show wild-type E17.5 lung (A, C, and E) and skeletal muscle (B, D, and F). Sections were stained with antiserum against laminin alpha 5 domain IIIB/IVa (A and B) or LG4-5 (C and D). The laminin alpha 5 chain expressed in embryonic skeletal muscle was not reactive with antiserum to alpha 5LG4-5 (D). E and F, when sol-Lu was applied to sections, it bound to lung (E) but not to skeletal muscle (F). These results suggest that laminin alpha 5 in embryonic skeletal muscle lacks alpha 5LG4-5 and the Lu-binding site. Bar, 100 µm.

Binding of Sol-Lu to alpha 5LG Modules-- To attempt to more definitively narrow the binding site of Lu in laminin alpha 5, we prepared two new chimeric laminin cDNAs encoding laminin alpha 5 domains VI through either LG2 or LG3, linked to the human laminin alpha 1 LG3-5 and LG4-5 domains, respectively. These were cloned into the miw expression vector and designated Mr5G2 and Mr5G3 (Fig. 7). The constructs were microinjected to produce transgenic mice. We obtained one founder for each construct that expressed the transgene. Tissues taken from 1-2-week-old mice were analyzed. The antibody against laminin alpha 5 domain IIIb/IVa stained the basement membranes of skeletal muscle in all cases (Fig. 8, A, E, and I). As described above, the endogenous laminin alpha 5 chain in skeletal muscle lacked immunoreactivity with anti-alpha 5LG4-5, as did the transgene-derived proteins (Fig. 8, B, F, and J). However, Mr5G2 and Mr5G3 could be detected with the monoclonal antibody against alpha 1LG4-5, 163DE4 (Fig. 8, G and K), indicating that the chimeric proteins are expressed and incorporated into basement membranes. Sol-Lu bound to Mr5G3 (Fig. 8L) but not to Mr5G2 (Fig. 8H). This demonstrates that alpha 5LG3 is crucial for Lu binding.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Diagram of the chimeric cDNAs designed to narrow the Lu-binding site. Mr5G2 and Mr5G3 are chimeric constructs encoding laminin alpha 5 domains VI through LG2 and LG3 linked to the human laminin alpha 1LG3-5 and LG4-5, respectively. Mr51 and Mr5 are described in Fig. 3.


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Identification of the Lu-binding site in laminin alpha 5. Micrographs show skeletal muscle from wild-type (A-D), Mr5G2 (E-H), and Mr5G3 (I-L) pups. Sections were stained with the following: antiserum against laminin alpha 5 domain IIIb/IVa (A, E, and I); antiserum against alpha 5LG4-5 domain (B, F, and J); antibody against human laminin alpha 1 LG4-5 (C, G, and K); and sol-Lu (D, H, and L). Sol-Lu bound to Mr5G3 (L) but not to Mr5G2 (H), indicating that alpha 5LG3 is critical for Lu binding. The endogenous laminin alpha 5 chain in postnatal muscle lacked reactivity with the antiserum against alpha 5LG4-5 (B) and lacked sol-Lu binding activity (C), similar to embryonic skeletal muscle (Fig. 6). Bar, 50 µm.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lu is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and has five extracellular Ig-like domains, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic COOH-terminal domain of 40 amino acids (23). The cytoplasmic tail is absent in the human Lu isoform, B-CAM (21). In previous in vitro studies, the interaction between Lu and laminin-10/11 containing the alpha 5 chain has been well demonstrated (19, 20, 25, 27, 41). The extracellular domain of Lu contains N-glycosylation consensus motifs. Recently it was reported that Ig-like domains 1-3 are involved in binding to laminin alpha 5 (27, 29), but the N-glycosylation motifs were not found to be involved in laminin binding. A bacterial Lu recombinant protein that we initially prepared did not bind to laminin-10/11 (data not shown), suggesting that proper glycosylation is required to ensure proper folding.

We also produced a recombinant human Lu extracellular domain (sol-Lu) in mammalian cells. Sol-Lu migrated at a higher molecular weight than predicted from the deduced amino acid sequence, suggesting that it was glycosylated. It reacted with a monoclonal antibody against human Lu and bound to laminin-10/11 but not to laminin-1 (Fig. 1). We therefore concluded that sol-Lu has binding properties similar to native cell surface Lu and is an appropriate tool to investigate the Lu-binding site on laminin alpha 5. It is interesting that the binding of sol-Lu to laminin-10/11 was not inhibited by EDTA and heparin. Divalent cations are required for the binding of other laminin receptors such as integrins and dystroglycan (37, 38). The binding of dystroglycan is also affected by glycosaminoglycans (18, 37). Lu therefore has laminin-binding properties significantly different from integrins and dystroglycan.

Our previous study demonstrated that Lu is localized on the basal surface of many epithelial cells and on the surface of a subset of muscle cells, in all cases adjacent to basement membranes containing laminin alpha 5 (28). The localization of Lu suggested that Lu interacts with the laminin alpha 5 chain in vivo. In the present study we examined whether there are other ligands for Lu. Soluble receptor binding assays on tissues is a proven method to reveal the presence of unknown ligands (42). Sol-Lu made it possible for us to perform binding assays on tissue sections. When applied to wild-type tissue sections, sol-Lu bound to basement membranes containing laminin alpha 5. The binding of sol-Lu totally disappeared from laminin alpha 5 knockout tissues, further demonstrating its specificity. The five laminin alpha  chains share similarities in sequence and domain structure (8, 10). Although laminin alpha 1-4 chains were detected in basement membranes in Lama5 -/- tissue, sol-Lu did not bind to them. This suggests that only laminin alpha 5 bears the specific sequence or structure for Lu binding. Thus, whereas integrin alpha 3beta 1, alpha 6beta 1, alpha 6beta 4, and dystroglycan are promiscuous laminin receptors (2), Lu is a specific receptor for laminin alpha 5, at least during embryogenesis. Conditional laminin alpha 5 knockout mice being generated in our laboratory will allow us to search for novel Lu ligands in adult tissues.

Until now, there has been no data addressing the structural basis of laminin alpha 5 binding to Lu. We generated transgenic mice expressing chimeric laminin alpha 5/alpha 1 chains that incorporated into basement membranes. This allowed us to search for the Lu-binding site in the context of a bona fide basement membrane. The alpha 5LG3 module was identified as being required for Lu binding, and we suggest that it contains the binding site. However it is possible that Lu binding requires not only alpha 5LG3 but also alpha 5LG1-2. LG modules are also important ligands for other cellular receptors, such as integrins and dystroglycan (9). Together with these and other laminin receptors, Lu could regulate growth, adhesion, and differentiation of epithelial cells.

Interestingly, we found that the endogenous laminin alpha 5 chain expressed in embryonic skeletal muscle lacks reactivity with an alpha 5LG4-5 antiserum and does not bind sol-Lu. The straightforward interpretation is that Lu binds to alpha 5LG4-5. However, because sol-Lu binds to Mr5G3, which lacks alpha 5LG4-5 but contains alpha 1LG4-5 instead, the Lu-binding site must be in alpha 5LG1-3. In skeletal muscle, it is possible that alpha 5LG4-5 is released by protease, and this somehow affects the binding affinity of Lu for alpha 5LG1-3. It has been shown that the G domains of laminin alpha 2, alpha 3, and alpha 4 chains are cleaved by proteolytic processing (9, 32, 43). The link region between alpha 5LG3 and LG4 modules contains an RRXR sequence, which is a furin-type cleavage site (8, 10). This site is also conserved in the link region of human laminin alpha 5 (44). Proteolytic processing appears to have occurred in this link region in skeletal muscle and perhaps affected Lu binding. Alternatively, protease cleavage sites may lie further upstream, resulting in removal of the critical LG3 module.

Adhesion of sickled red blood cells to laminin alpha 5 via Lu is suspected to contribute to the painful vaso-occlusion episodes that occur in sickle cell patients (25, 26). In addition, Lu/B-CAM overexpressed in some epithelial cancers may promote tumor metastasis (21, 22). In the future, it is important to define at the amino acid level the critical structural determinants of laminin alpha 5 and Lu that mediate their binding to each other. Toward this end, novel chimeric laminins are being generated in our laboratory. With additional details about the Lu-binding site, it may be possible to develop inhibitors that block the binding of Lu to laminin alpha 5 in vivo. Such inhibitors may suppress vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease and tumor cell metastasis in cancer.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Cong Li and Gloriosa Go for technical assistance; the Mouse Genetics Core at Washington University School of Medicine for generating and caring for transgenic mice; Jacqueline L. Mudd for producing the Mr5 transgenic mice; Karl Tryggvason for supplying the human laminin alpha 1 cDNA; and Peter Yurchenco, Peter Marinkovich, Rupert Timpl, and Takako Sasaki for generously providing antibodies.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants P50 DK045181 (to the George M. O'Brien Kidney Research Center) and R01 GM060432 from the National Institutes of Health and by Research Grants 6-FY99-232 and 1-FY02-192 from the March of Dimes (to J. H. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Washington University School of Medicine, Renal Division, Box 8126, 660 South Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-8235; Fax: 314-362-8237; E-mail: minerj@pcg.wustl.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208731200

2 Y. Kikkawa, C. L. Moulson, I. Virtanen, and J. H. Miner, unpublished data.

3 Y. Kikkawa and J. H. Miner, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: G, globular; LG, laminin-type globular; Lu, Lutheran blood group glycoprotein; B-CAM, basal cell adhesion molecule; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Sol-Lu, soluble Lu; E, embryonic day; PBS(-), Ca2+- and Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum albumin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Aumailley, M., and Smyth, N. (1998) J. Anat. 193, 1-21
2. Colognato, H., and Yurchenco, P. D. (2000) Dev. Dyn. 218, 213-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Burgeson, R. E., Chiquet, M., Deutzmann, R., Ekblom, P., Engel, J., Kleinman, H., Martin, G. R., Meneguzzi, G., Paulsson, M., Sanes, J., Timpl, R., Tryggvason, K., Yamada, Y., and Yurchenco, P. D. (1994) Matrix Biol. 14, 209-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Miner, J. H., Patton, B. L., Lentz, S. I., Gilbert, D. J., Snider, W. D., Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., and Sanes, J. R. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 137, 685-701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Koch, M., Olson, P. F., Albus, A., Jin, W., Hunter, D. D., Brunken, W. J., Burgeson, R. E., and Champliaud, M. F. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 145, 605-618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Libby, R. T., Champliaud, M. F., Claudepierre, T., Xu, Y., Gibbons, E. P., Koch, M., Burgeson, R. E., Hunter, D. D., and Brunken, W. J. (2000) J. Neurosci. 20, 6517-6528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Champliaud, M. F., Virtanen, I., Tiger, C. F., Korhonen, M., Burgeson, R., and Gullberg, D. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 259, 326-335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Timpl, R., Tisi, D., Talts, J. F., Andac, Z., Sasaki, T., and Hohenester, E. (2000) Matrix Biol. 19, 309-317[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Talts, J. F., and Timpl, R. (1999) FEBS Lett. 458, 319-323[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Miner, J. H., Lewis, R. M., and Sanes, J. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28523-28526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Sorokin, L. M., Pausch, F., Durbeej, M., and Ekblom, P. (1997) Dev. Dyn. 210, 446-462[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Sorokin, L. M., Pausch, F., Frieser, M., Kroger, S., Ohage, E., and Deutzmann, R. (1997) Dev. Biol. 189, 285-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Miner, J. H., Cunningham, J., and Sanes, J. R. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1713-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Nguyen, N. M., Miner, J. H., Pierce, R. A., and Senior, R. M. (2002) Dev. Biol. 246, 231-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Miner, J. H., and Li, C. (2000) Dev. Biol. 217, 278-289[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kikkawa, Y., Sanzen, N., and Sekiguchi, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15854-15859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Kikkawa, Y., Sanzen, N., Fujiwara, H., Sonnenberg, A., and Sekiguchi, K. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 869-876[Abstract]
18. Shimizu, H., Hosokawa, H., Ninomiya, H., Miner, J. H., and Masaki, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11995-12000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. El Nemer, W., Gane, P., Colin, Y., Bony, V., Rahuel, C., Galacteros, F., Cartron, J. P., and Le Van Kim, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16686-16693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Zen, Q., Cottman, M., Truskey, G., Fraser, R., and Telen, M. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 728-734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Campbell, I. G., Foulkes, W. D., Senger, G., Trowadale, J., Garin-Chesa, P., and Retting, W. J. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 5761-5765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Garin-Chesa, P., Sanz-Moncasi, M.-P., Campbell, I. G., and Rettig, W. J. (1994) Int. J. Oncol. 5, 1261-1266
23. Rahuel, C., Le, Van Kim, C., Mattei, M. G., Cartron, J. P., and Colin, Y. (1996) Blood 88, 1865-1872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. El Nemer, W., Rahuel, C., Colin, Y., Gane, P., Cartron, J. P., and Le Vam Kim, C. (1997) Blood 89, 4608-4616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Udai, M., Zen, Q., Cottman, M., Leonard, N., Jefferson, S., Daymont, C., Truskey, G., and Telen, M. J. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 2550-2558[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Lee, S. P., Cunningham, M. L., Hines, P. C., Joneckies, C. C., Orringer, E. P., and Parise, L. V. (1998) Blood 92, 2951-2958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Parsons, S. F., Lee, G., Spring, F. A., Willig, T. N., Peters, L. L., Gimm, J. A., Tanner, M. J., Mohandas, N., Anstee, D. J., and Chasis, J. A. (2001) Blood 97, 312-320[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Moulson, C. L., Li, C., and Miner, J. H. (2001) Dev. Dyn. 222, 101-114[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. El Nemer, W., Gane, P., Colin, Y., D'Ambrosio, A. M., Callebaut, I., Carton, J.-P., and Le Van Kim, C. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23757-23762[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Virtanen, I., Gullberg, D., Rissanen, J., Kivilaakso, E., Kiviluoto, T., Laitinen, L. A., Lehto, V. P., and Ekblom, P. (2000) Exp. Cell Res. 257, 298-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Cheng, Y.-S., Champliaud, M.-F., Burgeson, R. E., Marinkovich, M. P., and Yurchenco, P. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31525-31532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Marinkovich, M. P., Lunstrum, G. P., Keene, D. R., and Burgeson, R. E. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 695-703[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Ettner, N., Gohring, W., Sasaki, T., Mann, K., and Timpl, R. (1998) FEBS Lett. 430, 217-221[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Sasaki, T., Mann, K., and Timpl, R. (2001) FEBS Lett. 505, 173-178[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Talts, J. F., Mann, K., Yamada, Y., and Timpl, R. (1998) FEBS Lett. 426, 71-76[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Elion, E. A. (1998) in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Ausubel, F. M. , Brent, R. , Kingston, R. E. , Moore, D. D. , Seidman, J. G. , Smith, J. A. , and Struhl, K., eds), Vol. 1 , pp. 3.17.1-10, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
37. Ervasti, J. M., and Campbell, K. P. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 809-823[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Humphries, M. J. (2000) Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 311-339[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Suemori, H., Kadokawa, Y., Goto, K., Araki, I., Kondoh, H., and Nakatsuji, N. (1990) Cell Differ. Dev. 29, 181-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Patton, B. L., Miner, J. H., Chiu, A. Y., and Sanes, J. R. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1507-1521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Rahuel, C., Colin, Y., Goossens, D., Gane, P., El, Nemer, W., Carton, J. P., and Le Van Kim, C. (1999) Immunogenetics 50, 271-277[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Muller, U., Wang, D., Denda, S., Meneses, J. J., Pedersen, R. A., and Reichardt, L. F. (1997) Cell 88, 603-613[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Tsubota, Y., Mizushima, H., Hirosaki, T., Higashi, S., Yasumitsu, H., and Miyazaki, K. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 278, 614-620[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Durkin, M. E., Loechel, F., Mattei, M. G., Gilpin, B. J., Albrechtsen, R., and Wewer, U. M. (1997) FEBS Lett. 411, 296-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
Z. X. Mahoney, T. S. Stappenbeck, and J. H. Miner
Laminin {alpha}5 influences the architecture of the mouse small intestine mucosa
J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2008; 121(15): 2493 - 2502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
C. Rahuel, A. Filipe, L. Ritie, W. El Nemer, N. Patey-Mariaud, D. Eladari, J.-P. Cartron, P. Simon-Assmann, C. Le Van Kim, and Y. Colin
Genetic inactivation of the laminin {alpha}5 chain receptor Lu/BCAM leads to kidney and intestinal abnormalities in the mouse
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): F393 - F406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page