![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 44932-44937, November 22, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, August 27, 2002, and in revised form, September 19, 2002
Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has
been suggested to be a key factor in the etiologies of many diseases
and in the normal process of aging. Although the presence of a repair system to remove this damage has been demonstrated, the mechanisms involved in this repair have not been well defined. In an effort to
better understand the physiological role of recombinant 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase/apurinic lyase (OGG1) in mtDNA repair, we constructed an expression vector containing the gene for OGG1 downstream of the
mitochondrial localization sequence from manganese-superoxide dismutase. This gene construct was placed under the control of a
tetracycline-regulated promoter. Transfected cells that conditionally expressed OGG1 in the absence of the tetracycline analogue doxycycline and targeted this recombinant protein to mitochondria were generated. Western blots of mitochondrial extracts from vector- and
OGG1-transfected clones with and without doxycycline revealed that
removal of doxycycline for 4 days caused an approximate 8-fold increase
in the amount of OGG1 protein in mitochondria. Enzyme activity assays
and DNA repair studies showed that the
doxycycline-dependent recombinant OGG1 is functional.
Functional studies revealed that cells containing recombinant OGG1 were
more proficient at repairing oxidative damage in their mtDNA, and this
increased repair led to increased cellular survival following
oxidative stress.
The importance of mitochondrial DNA
(mtDNA)1 for cellular
integrity and function is underscored by the fact that a variety of
diseases have been associated with mutations in mtDNA, including diabetes (1, 2), ischemic heart disease (3), Parkinson's disease
(4-6), Alzheimer's disease (7-9), and the normal process of aging
(10-12). The damage to mtDNA that leads to these mutations likely
results from exposure to reactive oxygen species (ROS). These noxious
agents are formed continuously in the mitochondria by electron leakage
from the respiratory chains. Although oxidative phosphorylation in
mitochondria is essential for producing the energy that is required to
sustain life, approximately 1-2% of the total oxygen processed by the
electron transport chains is reduced via one electron reduction to form
ROS such as superoxide. Therefore, mtDNA, which is located near the
electron transport chains, is continuously bombarded with these noxious
agents. Although there are substantial antioxidant defenses in
mitochondria to protect against the deleterious effects of ROS, damage
to mtDNA still occurs. Therefore, efficient repair mechanisms are
imperative to prevent these lesions from becoming permanent mutations.
Over the past decade, there have been substantial advances in the
understanding of the mechanisms involved in the repair of oxidative damage in mtDNA. Work from our laboratory and that of others
has established that repair of this damage is via a base excision
repair (BER) pathway (13-16). In support of this notion is the finding
that mitochondria contain the basic enzymes required for BER (17, 18),
including the glycosylase/AP lyase OGG1, which is necessary for the
initial steps in the removal of the mutagenic lesion 8-oxoguanine.
Because of its lyase activity, this enzyme may also play a role in
cleaning the 3' end of oxidative lesions to the sugar-phosphate
backbone. The human OGG1 gene encodes two major isoforms: Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that mitochondrial DNA
repair and cellular survival can be enhanced by targeting recombinant
OGG1 to mitochondria (27). However, to fully evaluate the potential of
using recombinant repair enzymes to alter mtDNA repair, it would be
very beneficial to have their expression under the control of an
inducible promoter. The tetracycline (Tet)-regulatable expression
system using control elements of the tetracycline resistance operon
encoded in Tn10 of Escherichia coli (28) has shown promise for conditional gene expression. This system relies on the presence or
absence of Tet or a commonly used analog, doxycyclin (Dox), to control
gene expression. For this study, we constructed a vector containing the
sequence for hOGG1 downstream of the manganese-superoxide dismutase mitochondrial targeting sequence under the control of the
Tet-response element and introduced it into HeLa cells transfected previously with pTet-Off plasmid. When hOGG1 was conditionally expressed, we investigated the level and location of the recombinant protein and its effect on mtDNA repair and cell survival following exposure to ROS. The results demonstrate that DNA repair proteins can
be conditionally expressed under the control of an inducible promoter
and targeted to mitochondria. The Tet-dependent
overexpression of OGG1 causes enhanced repair of oxidative damage to
mtDNA and increased cellular resistance to the lethal effects of
ROS.
The OGG1 Construct--
An EcoRI-XhoI
fragment containing the MTS and the OGG1 coding region (27)
was filled in with Klenow DNA polymerase and ligated into the
PvuII restriction site of the pTRE2hyg expression
vector (Clontech), which contained a
tetracycline-responsive element. The construct obtained was sequenced
to verify the integrity of the reading frame and the fidelity of the sequence.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
HeLa cells were obtained from
the American Type Culture Collection. The cells were transfected with
pTet-Off plasmid (Clontech) using FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. Stable transfectants were selected in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (Clontech), 2 mM
L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 800 µg/ml G418 (Geneticin), and
50 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma). Integration of the pTet-Off
plasmid was confirmed by PCR, and expression of the
Tet-dependent transactivator (tTa) was tested using
the luciferase assay system according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Promega) in the presence or absence of 1 µg/ml Dox
hydrocloride (Sigma). Transient transfections with pTRE2hyg/Luc
(Clontech) were performed using Polyfect
transfection reagent (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's
instructions. The plasmids pcDNA3.1/His/LacZ (Invitrogen) and
pEGFP-N3 (Clontech) containing Preparation of Mitochondrial Fractions--
One 150-mm dish of
each cell type (MTS-OGG1 and control
vector-transfected cells) at confluence was harvested and treated with
ice-cold digitonin (325 mM digitonin, 2.5 mM
EDTA, 250 mM mannitol, and 17 mM MOPS, pH 7.4)
for 80 s. The lysed cells were then added to mannitol-sucrose
buffer to a final strength of 1× (210 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM Tris,
pH 7.5). The suspension was then centrifuged for 10 min at 800 × g at 4 °C to pellet nuclei. The supernatant was
centrifuged two more times for 10 min at 800 × g at
4 °C to get rid of nuclear debris. The mitochondrial fraction was
pelleted by centrifugation at 20,000 × g at 4 °C
for 20 min. Isolated mitochondria were suspended in a buffer of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, 300 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, and 5 µl of
protease inhibitors mixture (Sigma) per ml. These suspensions were
briefly sonicated on ice and centrifuged once more at 5,000 × g to pellet any remaining debris, and the supernatant
protein was used for Western blot assays. The protein concentration was
determined using the Bio-Rad protein dye microassay according to the
manufacturer's recommendation (Bio-Rad).
Western Blot Analysis--
SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transfer of separated proteins to polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane were performed as described previously (27) with
some minor modifications. Blocking and antibody immunoblotting were
performed in 5% nonfat dry milk and Tris-buffered saline (TBS) with
0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T). TBS-T and TBS were used for washing. The
polyclonal anti-hOGG1 antibodies were from Novus Biologicals
(Littleton, CO); anti-cytochrome c monoclonal antibody was
purchased from Pharmingen. Complexes formed by these antibodies were
detected with horse radish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG or
anti-rabbit IgG antibodies (Promega, Madison, WI) using
chemiluminescent reagents (SuperSignal, Pierce).
OGG Activity Assays--
A 24-mer oligonucleotide with
8-oxoguanine at the 10th position (Trevigen) was end-labeled. The
labeling reaction contained 5 pmol of single-strand 8-oxoguanine
oligonucleotide, 5 pmol of Drug Preparation and Exposure--
For oxidative damage and
repair experiments, cells were grown in 100-mm dishes for 4 days in
medium with or without Dox until 70-80% confluence. Menadione sodium
bisulfite (2-methyl-1, 4-naphthoquinone sodium bisulfite, Sigma) was
dissolved in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS) at a concentration
of 800 µM for DNA repair experiments. Cells were rinsed
with HBSS and then exposed to the appropriate amount of menadione for
20 min in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator. Control cultures
were exposed to HBSS under the same conditions. After a 20-min
exposure, cells were rinsed and lysed immediately (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% SDS, and 0.3 mg/ml
proteinase K) or were allowed to repair for 2 or 6 h in regular
growth medium with or without Dox.
Quantitative and Neutral Southern
Blots--
MTS-OGG-transfected and vector-only transfected
cells were exposed to menadione as described above, and cell lysates
were incubated overnight at 37 °C. After addition of NaCl to a final concentration of 1 M, high molecular weight DNA was
extracted with an equal volume of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1),
precipitated with ammonium acetate and 2 volumes of cold ethanol, and
resuspended in water. DNA samples were digested with restriction
endonuclease XhoI (10 units/µg of DNA) and, at the same
time, treated with DNase-free RNase (~1.0 µg/ml) for 12-16 h at
37 °C. After digestion, samples were precipitated as before,
resuspended in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM
EDTA, pH 7.4), and precisely quantified using a Hoefer TKO 100 Mini-Fluorometer and TKO standards kit (Hoefer Scientific Instruments,
San Francisco, CA). Samples containing 5 µg of DNA were heated at
65 °C for 20 min and then cooled at room temperature for an
additional 20 min. A sodium hydroxide solution was then added to a
final concentration of 0.1 N, and samples were incubated
for 15 min at 37 °C. This produced single strand breaks at any
abasic or sugar-modified site in the DNA. Next, samples were combined
with 5 µl of loading dye, loaded onto a 0.6% alkaline agarose gel,
and electrophoresed at 30 V (1.5 V/cm of gel length) for ~16 h in an
alkaline buffer consisting of 23 mM NaOH, 1 mM
EDTA. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide to confirm equal
loading. After standard gel washing, the DNA was transferred to a
Zeta-Probe GT nylon membrane (Bio-Rad). The membranes were cross-linked
and hybridized with a 32P-labeled human mtDNA-specific
PCR-generated probe. Hybridization and subsequent washes were performed
according to the manufacturer's recommendations. DNA damage and repair
were determined as described previously (30). Neutral Southern blots
were performed the same way except that there was no alkaline
pretreatment of samples and NaOH was not included in the loading dye,
the 0.6% agarose gel, or the electrophoresis buffer. To confirm
integration into the genome of the pTRE2hyg/MTS-OGG1 plasmid, DNA
samples were digested with BamHI and HindIII, and
hybridization was performed with a 32P-labeled MTS-OGG1
fragment generated using the RadPrime labeling system (Invitrogen).
Clonogenic Assays--
Cells were counted with a hemocytometer,
and 250 cells were plated in each 60-mm dish to achieve sparse
distribution. These cells were incubated for 24 h in normal
culture medium to allow them to adhere to the culture vessel. Next,
they were exposed to menadione exactly as described above with the
exception that lower concentrations of the drug were used due to the
higher sensitivity of cells to oxidative stress when plated at the low
density required for the clonogenic assay. For each cell type, controls
(no menadione) and cultures receiving various concentrations of
menadione were studied in triplicate. After 20 min of treatment, the
menadione solution was replaced with normal culture medium (with or
without Dox), and cells were grown for 10 days. Then colonies formed
were stained with hematoxylin and counted.
Statistical Analysis--
The data are presented as the
means ± standard errors of three independent experiments. Data
were compared with the use of two-way analysis of variance followed by
Bonferroni analysis. Statistical significance was determined at the
0.001 level.
Generation of Double-transfected Cell Lines--
To fully evaluate
the potential of using recombinant hOGG1 to alter mtDNA repair, we used
HeLa cells transfected with MTS-OGG1 under the control of a
Tet-mediated promoter. Initially, HeLa cells were stably transfected
with the pTet-Off regulator plasmid. Following 2 weeks of selection,
individual clones were isolated, and the integration of the tTa
activator was confirmed by PCR amplification. Expression of tTa was
checked by Luc assay after transient transfection of Tet-Off clones
with a reporter plasmid pTRE2hyg/Luc. Selected clones were grown in the
absence and presence of Dox. Clones that expressed the lowest basal
level of luciferase and showed the highest induced level (> 50-fold
induction) of Luc activity after Dox removal were chosen for the second
transfection with the pTRE2hyg/MTS-OGG1 construct or control vector (pTRE2hyg).
Double-transfected clones were selected in hygromycin and grown in the
presence of Dox. DNA was isolated from cells transfected with
MTS-OGG1 or vector only, and the presence of the insert was confirmed in the MTS-OGG1-transfected clones by
hybridization with a 1.1-kb fragment containing a partial
MTS-OGG1 sequence (Fig. 1). A
clone of HeLa Tet-Off/MTS-OGG1-1 was chosen for subsequent study
because it exhibited the highest level of MTS-OGG1
incorporation into its genome and produced the greatest amount of OGG1
protein in mitochondria after induction (Fig.
2).
Dox-dependent Overexpression of OGG1 in
Mitochondria--
To show that the recombinant OGG1 enzyme was
targeted directly to mitochondria and that its expression was regulated
by Dox, mitochondrial extracts were isolated from MTS-OGG1
and vector-only transfected clones that were grown in media with or
without Dox. Mitochondria were isolated by differential centrifugation,
and Western blots were performed utilizing a polyclonal antibody to human OGG1. Even loading was confirmed by Coomassie Blue staining. The
Tet-Off/MTS-OGG1-1 Dox Dox-dependent OGG1 Activity in Mitochondria--
To
determine whether the recombinant OGG1 was functional in mitochondria,
OGG1 activity assays were performed. A labeled 24-bp duplex
oligonucleotide with 8-oxoguanine placed at the 10th position on one
strand was incubated with mitochondrial extracts isolated from
MTS-OGG1 and vector-transfected cells. As a positive
control, the bacterial glycosylase/AP-lyase formamidopyrimidine
DNA glycosylase (FPG) (Trevigen) was used. As shown in Fig.
3, the mitochondrial extracts isolated
from MTS-OGG1 (Dox Dox-mediated Overexpression of OGG1 in Mitochondria and mtDNA
Repair--
To test whether the conditional overexpression of
recombinant hOGG1 in the mitochondria has an effect on mtDNA repair
capacity, an analysis of DNA repair was performed. To detect mtDNA
damage and repair, a quantitative Southern blot technique was used as described under "Experimental Procedures." First, dose-response experiments were performed using different concentrations of menadione, which redox-cycles with complex I of the electron transport chains in
mitochondria and forms superoxide radical (31). A concentration of 800 µM menadione was chosen for the repair experiments
because it produced an appropriate amount of lesions (~1
lesion/104 normal nucleotides). There was no significant
difference in the initial break frequencies between clones that were
grown in the absence or presence of Dox. Repair experiments were
performed in which the MTS-OGG1 and vector transfectants were exposed
to 800 µM menadione for 20 min and either lysed
immediately or allowed to repair for 2 or 6 h in normal culture
media with or without Dox. Control cells were incubated in drug diluent
only. Total DNA was isolated from the lysed cells, and quantitative
Southern blot hybridizations were performed. As shown in Fig.
4A, the MTS-OGG1 (Dox The Effect of Conditional Overexpression of OGG1 in Mitochondria on
Cellular Viability--
To determine whether the increase in mtDNA
repair enhanced cellular survival following oxidative stress, a
clonogenic assay was performed. Because sparsely growing cells are more
sensitive to menadione than confluent monolayers, for these clonogenic
studies we used lower doses of menadione than were required for the DNA repair experiments. Drug exposure and cellular growth in the presence or absence of Dox were performed using techniques described under "Experimental Procedures." The colonies formed from cells that survived and proliferated following oxidative stress were counted after
10 days of culture. Fig. 5 shows that
there is a significant enhancement in survival in the MTS-OGG1
(Dox To our knowledge, this is the first report to show conditional
expression of a recombinant DNA repair enzyme that is targeted to
mitochondria. Previous studies by our laboratory showed that when a
vector containing the gene for hOGG1 fused to the
localization sequence from manganese-superoxide dismutase was stably
transfected into HeLa cells, repair of oxidative damage in mtDNA was
increased, and cellular survival was enhanced (27). Although this work provided some important new information concerning repair of oxidative damage in mtDNA, the results had to be interpreted with caution because
permanent transfection could have altered the genome of the cell in a
manner that influenced the findings. To overcome this problem, the
present experiments were initiated to find a "genetic switch" that
would allow the control of individual gene products quantitatively and
reversibly in a temporal manner. Among the several regulatory systems
currently available, the Tet-controlled system for the activation of
transcription seemed best suited to fulfill the requirements of our
study. Previously, this system has been used for conditional gene
expression in mammalian cell culture (38), in transgenic plants (39),
and in transgenic mice and other transgenic mammalian species (40, 41).
HeLa cells were selected for this study because we discovered
previously that these cells do not proficiently repair oxidative damage
to their mtDNA (27), and it has been reported that in these cells, the
Tet systems exhibit no measurable "intrinsic leakiness" (28, 32).
Repair of oxidative damage in the nucleus of these cells appears to be
normal. This makes these cells preferable to cells in which
OGG1 has been knocked out because those cells would be defective in both nuclear and mitochondrial repair. Although the reason
that HeLa cells are defective in the repair of oxidative damage in
mtDNA has yet to be fully elucidated, we believe a likely explanation
is that there is a defect in the formation of the alternatively spliced
transcript for mitochondrial localization. In support of this notion is
our finding that HeLa cells have low levels of OGG1 protein in their mitochondria.
For targeting OGG1 to mitochondria, we used the MTS from
manganese-superoxide dismutase because previous work from our
laboratory and the studies of others have found this to be a
particularly strong MTS that effectively directs other proteins,
including repair enzymes, to mitochondria (27, 33-35). We used the
Tet-Off system, in which the presence of Dox prevents transcriptional activation, for conditional expression of hOGG1 in mitochondria. This
system was used because in the clones we isolated, the amount of hOGG1
that could be produced was greater than that with the Tet-On system. In
the presence of Dox, the exogenous recombinant MTS-OGG1 expression in
mitochondria was low, and the cells behaved similarly in culture to the
HeLa Tet-Off cell line, transfected with vector only.
Both the results from enzyme activity assays and DNA repair studies
reveal that the Dox-dependent, expressed MTS-OGG1 is
functional. The mitochondrial extracts isolated from MTS-OGG1
(Dox The importance of mtDNA integrity for normal cellular homeostasis is
only beginning to be appreciated. Because increased oxidative lesions
are found in mtDNA in individuals with a variety of chronic diseases
(1-9), regulated expression of mitochondrial repair enzymes may
provide a beneficial gene therapeutic strategy for preventing or
delaying the symptoms of these diseases. Additionally, conditional
expression of repair enzymes may be a viable approach for protecting
normal cells during cancer therapy or sensitizing cancer cells to this
treatment. This work represents some of the initial steps down this path.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants ES03456, ES05865, and AG19602 and a Feasibility Grant from the
United States Army.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
251-460-6765; Fax: 251-414-8241; E-mail gwilson@usouthal.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208770200
The abbreviations used are:
mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA;
ROS, reactive oxygen species;
BER, base excision
repair;
OGG1, 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase/apurinic lyase;
8-OxoG, 8-oxoguanine;
MTS, mitochondrial targeting sequence;
AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic;
Tet, tetracycline;
Dox, doxycycline;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
EGFP, enhanced GFP;
Luc, luciferase;
tTa, Tet-dependent transactivator;
MOPs, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
h, human.
Conditional Targeting of the DNA Repair Enzyme hOGG1 into
Mitochondria*
,
,
,
, and
¶
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience,
College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688 and the § Department of Pediatrics, Wells Center for
Pediatric Research, Indiana University Medical School,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-hOGG1 and
-hOGG1, resulting from alternative splicing of the transcript
(19-21). Both forms have a putative mitochondrial localization signal,
and only
-hOGG1 has a nuclear localization signal (21). Recent
studies have shown that
-hOGG1 is targeted to mitochondria. The
importance of the Ogg1 DNA glycosylase in the repair of oxidative
damage was shown in Ogg1-deficient mice. These animals accumulate
abnormally high levels of 8-OxoG in their genomes (22). Furthermore, no
cleavage of 8-oxoG:C-containing substrate was detected in tissue
extracts from Ogg1 knockout mice, indicating that OGG1 is the only
mammalian glycosylase that can efficiently remove 8-OxoG from 8-oxoG:C
pairs. These findings correlate well with previous data on the
substrate specificity of the murine and human OGG1 enzyme (23, 24).
Although extracts of Ogg1-null mouse tissues were not able to excise
the damaged base in vitro, significant slow release of the
adducted base was observed from proliferating cells in vivo,
suggesting that there is an alternative repair pathway in those cells
(22). More recently, studies were reported by Bohr et al.
(25) that used Ogg1-null mice to show that OGG1 is more important in
mitochondrial than in nuclear DNA repair of oxidative damage (22).
Based on these studies, it is likely that OGG1 is the only glycosylase
for 8-OxoG removal in mouse mitochondria. Additionally, it was found
that mitochondrial OGG1 activity increased with age in the mouse liver (26), whereas the nuclear OGG1 activity decreased slightly over the
same time interval. This differential change with age in the mitochondrial and nuclear 8-OxoG glycosylase activities suggests that
the expression of these two isoforms may be differentially regulated.
When considered together, these findings indicate that BER initiated by
OGG1 is an essential enzyme required for protection of mtDNA against
oxidative damage.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase or
GFP genes under the control of constitutive promoters, respectively,
were used as reporter plasmids. The transfection efficiencies were
usually >30%, as determined by control transfection with pEGFP-N3.
Cells were harvested 48-72 h after transfection, and luciferase
activities were assayed. For normalization of transfection efficiency,
a control LacZ expression vector (pcDNA3.1/His/LacZ) was used.
Luciferase (Luc) values were normalized to
-galactosidase activities
by performing chlorophenol red
-D-galactosidase assays (29). Enzyme activities were adjusted to the protein content of the
cell lysates, which was determined by using the Bio-Rad protein dye
microassay according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Bio-Rad). The clone of HeLa Tet-Off that expressed the lowest basal
level of Luc in the presence of Dox and the highest induced level of
Luc activity in the absence of the antibiotic was selected for the
second transfection with pTRE2hyg/MTS-OGG1 plasmid. A pTRE2hyg vector
without the insert was used to transfect Tet-Off HeLa cells as a
control. After this second transfection, the colonies were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 800 µg/ml G418 and 250 µg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen), and the surviving ones were tested
for the integration of MTS-OGG1 insert by Southern hybridization. The
selected Tet-Off/MTS-OGG1 clones were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (Clontech), 800 µg/ml G418
(Geneticin), and 200 µg/ml hygromycin B and with (Dox+)
or without (Dox
) 1 µg/ml doxycyclin. Doxycyclin was
withdrawn from the medium of Dox-maintained clones 4 days before
any experiment.
-32P, T4 polynucleotide
kinase, and appropriate kinase buffer in a total volume of 20 µl
(incubation for 30 min at 37 °C followed by 2 min at 90 °C).
Complementary oligonucleotide (5 pmol) was then added at room
temperature to form duplex DNA. Equal amounts of protein from
mitochondrial fractions isolated from transfected cells grown in medium
with or without Dox were used in assays with the labeled duplex
oligonucleotide. Activity assays contained 0.2 pmol of labeled
duplex oligonucleotide, 3 µl of 10 × REC buffer (100 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 M KCl, 100 mM
EDTA, and 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin), and organelle extract or 5 units of control formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase enzyme (Trevigen)
in a total volume of 20 µl. Reaction mix was incubated for 3 and
6 h at 37 °C. Formamide/bromphenol (80%/0.2%) dye was added
to the mix, and reaction products were resolved in 20% acrylamide, 8 M urea gels.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The MTS-OGG1 insert is
incorporated into HeLa Tet-Off cells. A Southern blot was
performed on total DNA isolated from seven HeLa Tet-Off clones
transfected with the MTS-OGG1 construct or a clone transfected with
vector alone using the MTS-OGG1 sequence as a probe.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dox-regulated and targeted expression of OGG1
in mitochondria. HeLa Tet-Off/MTS-OGG1-transfected clones were
cultured with or without 1 µg/ml Dox for 4 days to regulate OGG1
protein expression. Mitochondrial fractions were isolated and analyzed
by Western blot analysis using anti-OGG1 antiserum. Twenty µg of
mitochondrial extracts isolated from vector- and
MTS-OGG1-transfected clones were loaded in each lane.
Immunodetection of cytochrome c (CytoC) was
performed to assure that the recombinant protein is in
mitochondria.
clone showed an increase in OGG1
protein (39 kDA) when compared with Dox+ Tet-Off/MTS-OGG1
repressed cells or vector-transfected cells (Fig. 2). This data
confirmed that the recombinant OGG1 enzyme was targeted to mitochondria
and that OGG1 gene expression was regulated by Dox.
) clones were better able to cleave the
DNA substrate than were the same cells grown in the presence of Dox and
vector-only transfected cells. Thus, this data reveal that the
conditionally expressed recombinant OGG1 protein, which is targeted to
mitochondria, is indeed functional.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Dox-regulated OGG1 activity in mitochondria.
Enzyme activity was measured using a labeled 24-mer containing
8-OxoG. Mitochondrial fractions were isolated from vector- and
MTS-OGG1-transfected clones that had been maintained with
and without Dox, and the extracts were incubated with labeled
substrate. A significant increase of 9-mer cleavage product was
observed in lanes containing extracts from MTC-OGG1
(Dox
) clones, indicating that OGG1 activity was
significantly higher in those clones. The data represent three
independent experiments. FPG, formamidopyrimidine DNA
glycosylase.
) clones repaired most of the damage within the
initial 6 h following drug removal, whereas the vector
transfectants and MTS-OGG1 (Dox+) clones did not repair an
appreciable amount of the damage to their mtDNA. The average amount of
repair from three separate experiments for each cell type is shown in
Fig. 4B. These results document that recombinant hOGG1, when
conditionally overexpressed and targeted to mitochondria, significantly
enhances mtDNA repair of oxidative damage.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of conditional expression of OGG1 in
mitochondria on the repair of oxidative damage to the sugar-phosphate
backbone in mtDNA. MTS-OGG1 and vector transfectants were treated
with 800 µM menadione for 20 min and lysed immediately or
allowed to repair for 2 or 6 h in normal culture medium with or
without Dox. Control cells were exposed to the drug diluent only. Total
DNA was isolated from the lysed cells, and quantitative alkaline
Southern blot hybridizations with mtDNA-specific probe were
performed. A, a representative autoradiograph.
C, control; h repair, hours of repair after
exposure to drug. B, a summation of the results of three
independent experiments (values are the means ± S.E. of three
separate experiments). An asterisk indicates a significant
difference (p < 0.001).
) transfectants. These viability data establish that
conditional transduction of OGG1 in mitochondria leads to increased
cellular survival after an oxidative challenge.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
OGG1 Dox-regulated expression and cell
survival and proliferation. Cells were maintained in the
Dox+ media for 4 days and then were plated at low density
into 60-mm dishes and allowed to adhere to the culture vessel for
24 h. Next, they were drugged with 25, 50, 75, or 100 µM menadione for 20 min and replenished with their normal
media with or without Dox. Cells in cultures were allowed to grow for
10 days, at which time the cultures were fixed and stained with
hematoxylin, and then colonies were counted. An average of the
results ± S.E. from three separate clonogenic assays is shown. An
asterisk indicates a significant difference
(p < 0.001).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
) cells were markedly better able to cleave substrate
than the same cells grown with Dox and vector-only transfected cells.
Mitochondrial DNA repair studies show that MTS-OGG1 (Dox
)
cells were significantly more proficient at repairing oxidative damage
in the mitochondrial genome. Combined with the viability studies, it
can be concluded that recombinant OGG1 was conditionally expressed
under the Dox-inducible promoter and targeted to mitochondria in an
active form. Furthermore, it enhanced the repair of oxidative damage to
the sugar-phosphate backbone in mtDNA, and this augmented repair
rendered the cells more resistant to oxidative stress. Thus, these
findings support previous work from our laboratory using cells that
constitutively overexpress OGG1 and provide a new opportunity for
dissecting the various components of BER in mitochondria. Recently,
much attention has been directed toward the identification and
characterization of enzymes involved in BER of mtDNA. Initial evidence
for a BER mechanism in mitochondria was provided by the isolation of a
mammalian mitochondrial endonuclease that specifically recognizes AP
sites and cleaves the DNA strand (36). Later, activities of an AP
endonuclease, a DNA ligase III, and a DNA polymerase were identified in
mitochondrial fractions from Xenopus oocytes (17).
Additionally, a mitochondrial oxidative damage endonuclease has been
isolated from rat liver mitochondria (37). Recently, it was
demonstrated that mitochondrial oxidative damage endonuclease is a
mitochondrial isoform of OGG1 (26). Although several of the enzymes
involved in mtDNA BER have been identified, a thorough understanding of
the exact roles these enzymes play is still incomplete. The
results from the present study emphasize the crucial role that hOGG1
plays in the efficient repair of oxidative damage in mtDNA. Future
studies will be directed toward the conditional expression of other
repair enzymes with glycosylase activity to other oxidative base
lesions and lyase activity to better understand the importance of these
activities in BER. Of particular interest is a second OGG activity,
originally termed OGG2, which has been identified and partially
characterized in HeLa cells (42). Also of immediate interest are two
orthologs of MutM/Nei, which have been identified in the human
genome data base and were originally named NEH1 and NEH2 (42). Both
enzymes have since been renamed as NEIL1 and NEIL2. NEIL1 functions as a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase with broad substrate specificity (42), whereas NEIL2 has DNA glycosylase/AP lyase activity, which primarily recognizes oxidized cytosine derivatives (43).
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Wallace, D. C.
(1999)
Science
283,
1482-1488 2.
Vialettes, B.,
Paquis-Flucklinger, V.,
and Bendahan, D.
(1997)
Diabetes Metab.
23 Suppl. 2,
52-56
3.
Wallace, D. C.
(2000)
Am. Heart J.
139,
S70-S85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Schapira, A. H.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1410,
159-170[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Bandmann, O.,
Sweeney, M. G.,
Daniel, S. E.,
Marsden, C. D.,
and Wood, N. W.
(1997)
J. Neurol
244,
262-265[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Wooten, G. F.,
Currie, L. J.,
Bennett, J. P.,
Harrison, M. B.,
Trugman, J. M.,
and Parker, W. D., Jr.
(1997)
Ann. Neurol.
41,
265-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Hutchin, T.,
and Cortopassi, G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6892-6895 8.
Davis, R. E.,
Miller, S.,
Herrnstadt, C.,
Ghosh, S. S.,
Fahy, E.,
Shinobu, L. A.,
Galasko, D.,
Thal, L. J.,
Beal, M. F.,
Howell, N.,
and Parker, W. D., Jr.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4526-4531 9.
Corral-Debrinski, M.,
Horton, T.,
Lott, M. T.,
Shoffner, J. M.,
McKee, A. C.,
Beal, M. F.,
Graham, B. H.,
and Wallace, D. C.
(1994)
Genomics
23,
471-476[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Schon, E. A.,
Bonilla, E.,
and DiMauro, S.
(1997)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
29,
131-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Ozawa, T.
(1997)
Physiol. Rev.
77,
425-464 12.
Hudson, E. K.,
Hogue, B. A.,
Souza-Pinto, N. C.,
Croteau, D. L.,
Anson, R. M.,
Bohr, V. A.,
and Hansford, R. G.
(1998)
Free Radic. Res.
29,
573-579[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Bogenhagen, D. F.
(1999)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
64,
1276-1281[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Sawyer, D. E.,
and Van Houten, B.
(1999)
Mutat. Res.
434,
161-176[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Croteau, D. L.,
Stierum, R. H.,
and Bohr, V. A.
(1999)
Mutat. Res.
434,
137-148[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Pettepher, C. C.,
LeDoux, S. P.,
Bohr, V. A.,
and Wilson, G. L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3113-3117 17.
Pinz, K. G.,
and Bogenhagen, D. F.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1257-1265 18.
Stierum, R. H.,
Dianov, G. L.,
and Bohr, V. A.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
3712-3719 19.
Aburatani, H.,
Hippo, Y.,
Ishida, T.,
Takashima, R.,
Matsuba, C.,
Kodama, T.,
Takao, M.,
Yasui, A.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Asano, M.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
2151-2156 20.
Takao, M.,
Aburatani, H.,
Kobayashi, K.,
and Yasui, A.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
2917-2922 21.
Nishioka, K.,
Ohtsubo, T.,
Oda, H.,
Fujiwara, T.,
Kang, D.,
Sugimachi, K.,
and Nakabeppu, Y.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
1637-1652 22.
Klungland, A.,
Rosewell, I.,
Hollenbach, S.,
Larsen, E.,
Daly, G.,
Epe, B.,
Seeberg, E.,
Lindahl, T.,
and Barnes, D. E.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13300-13305 23.
Roldan-Arjona, T.,
Wei, Y. F.,
Carter, K. C.,
Klungland, A.,
Anselmino, C.,
Wang, R. P.,
Augustus, M.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8016-8020 24.
Zharkov, D. O.,
Rosenquist, T. A.,
Gerchman, S. E.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28607-28617 25.
Bohr, V. A.,
Stevnsner, T.,
and de Souza-Pinto, N. C.
(2002)
Gene (Amst.)
286,
127-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
de Souza-Pinto, N. C.,
Eide, L.,
Hogue, B. A.,
Thybo, T.,
Stevnsner, T.,
Seeberg, E.,
Klungland, A.,
and Bohr, V. A.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
5378-5381 27.
Dobson, A. W., Xu, Y.,
Kelley, M. R.,
LeDoux, S. P.,
and Wilson, G. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37518-37523 28.
Gossen, M.,
and Bujard, H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5547-5551 29.
Eustice, D. C.,
Feldman, P. A.,
Colberg-Poley, A. M.,
Buckery, R. M.,
and Neubauer, R. H.
(1991)
BioTechniques
11,
739-740, 742-733
30.
Driggers, W. J.,
LeDoux, S. P.,
and Wilson, G. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22042-22045 31.
Frei, B.,
Winterhalter, K. H.,
and Richter, C.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
4438-4443[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Gossen, M.,
Freundlieb, S.,
Bender, G.,
Muller, G.,
Hillen, W.,
and Bujard, H.
(1995)
Science
268,
1766-1769 33.
Tamura, T.,
McMicken, H. W.,
Smith, C. V.,
and Hansen, T. N.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
222,
659-663[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Dobson, A. W.,
Grishko, V.,
LeDoux, S. P.,
Kelley, M. R.,
Wilson, G. L.,
and Gillespie, M. N.
(2002)
Am. J. Physiol.
283,
L205-L210 35.
Paul, R.,
Dalibart, R.,
Lemoine, S.,
and Lestienne, P.
(2001)
Mutat. Res.
486,
11-19[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Tomkinson, A. E.,
Bonk, R. T.,
and Linn, S.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
12532-12537 37.
Croteau, D. L.,
ap Rhys, C. M.,
Hudson, E. K.,
Dianov, G. L.,
Hansford, R. G.,
and Bohr, V. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27338-27344 38.
Resnitzky, D.,
Gossen, M.,
Bujard, H.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1669-1679 39.
Weinmann, P.,
Gossen, M.,
Hillen, W.,
Bujard, H.,
and Gatz, C.
(1994)
Plant J.
5,
559-569[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Kistner, A.,
Gossen, M.,
Zimmermann, F.,
Jerecic, J.,
Ullmer, C.,
Lubbert, H.,
and Bujard, H.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
10933-10938 41.
Stebbins, M. J.,
Urlinger, S.,
Byrne, G.,
Bello, B.,
Hillen, W.,
and Yin, J. C.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
10775-10780 42.
Hazra, T. K.,
Izumi, T.,
Boldogh, I.,
Imhoff, B.,
Kow, Y. W.,
Jaruga, P.,
Dizdaroglu, M.,
and Mitra, S.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
3523-3528 43.
Hazra, T. K.,
Kow, Y. W.,
Hatahet, Z.,
Imhoff, B.,
Boldogh, I.,
Mokkapati, S. K.,
Mitra, S.,
and Izumi, T.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
30417-30420
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Zhang, T. Mizumachi, J. Carcel-Trullols, L. Li, A. Naito, H. J. Spencer, P. M. Spring, B. R. Smoller, A. J. Watson, G. P. Margison, et al. Targeting human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) to mitochondria enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in hepatoma cells Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1629 - 1637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Rachek, S. I. Musiyenko, S. P. LeDoux, and G. L. Wilson Palmitate Induced Mitochondrial Deoxyribonucleic Acid Damage and Apoptosis in L6 Rat Skeletal Muscle Cells Endocrinology, January 1, 2007; 148(1): 293 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Rachek, N. P. Thornley, V. I. Grishko, S. P. LeDoux, and G. L. Wilson Protection of INS-1 Cells From Free Fatty Acid-Induced Apoptosis by Targeting hOGG1 to Mitochondria. Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 1022 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vartanian, B. Lowell, I. G. Minko, T. G. Wood, J. D. Ceci, S. George, S. W. Ballinger, C. L. Corless, A. K. McCullough, and R. S. Lloyd The metabolic syndrome resulting from a knockout of the NEIL1 DNA glycosylase PNAS, February 7, 2006; 103(6): 1864 - 1869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Druzhyna, S. I. Musiyenko, G. L. Wilson, and S. P. LeDoux Cytokines Induce Nitric Oxide-mediated mtDNA Damage and Apoptosis in Oligodendrocytes: PROTECTIVE ROLE OF TARGETING 8-OXOGUANINE GLYCOSYLASE TO MITOCHONDRIA J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21673 - 21679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. LeDoux and G. L. Wilson Mitochondrial DNA: A Critical Target for Genotoxic Agents Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 1, 2005; 2005(1): 261 - 263. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. I. Grishko, L. I. Rachek, D. R. Spitz, G. L. Wilson, and S. P. LeDoux Contribution of Mitochondrial DNA Repair to Cell Resistance from Oxidative Stress J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 8901 - 8905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. I. Rachek, V. I. Grishko, M. F. Alexeyev, V. V. Pastukh, S. P. LeDoux, and G. L. Wilson Endonuclease III and endonuclease VIII conditionally targeted into mitochondria enhance mitochondrial DNA repair and cell survival following oxidative stress Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2004; 32(10): 3240 - 3247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Szczesny, T. K. Hazra, J. Papaconstantinou, S. Mitra, and I. Boldogh Age-dependent deficiency in import of mitochondrial DNA glycosylases required for repair of oxidatively damaged bases PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10670 - 10675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||