|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M207669200 on September 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 45235-45242, November 22, 2002
The Shq1p·Naf1p Complex Is Required for Box H/ACA Small
Nucleolar Ribonucleoprotein Particle Biogenesis*
Pok Kwan
Yang ,
Giuseppe
Rotondo§¶,
Tanya
Porras ,
Pierre
Legrain§ , and
Guillaume
Chanfreau **
From the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and
the Molecular Biology Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
90095-1569 and § GIM-Biotechnologies, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France
Received for publication, July 30, 2002, and in revised form, September 10, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein
particles (snoRNPs) are essential cofactors in ribosomal RNA
metabolism. Although snoRNP composition has been thoroughly
characterized, the biogenesis process of these particles is poorly
understood. We have identified two proteins from the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yil104c/Shq1p and Ynl124w/Naf1p,
which are essential and required for the stability of box H/ACA
snoRNPs. Depletion of either Shq1p or Naf1p leads to a dramatic and
specific decrease in box H/ACA snoRNA levels in vivo. A
severe concomitant defect in ribosomal RNA processing is observed,
consistent with the depletion of this family of snoRNAs. Shq1p and
Naf1p show nuclear localization and interact with Nhp2p and Cbf5p, two
core proteins of mature box H/ACA snoRNPs. Shq1p and Naf1p form a
complex, but they are not strongly associated with box H/ACA snoRNPs.
We propose that Shq1p and Naf1p are involved in the early biogenesis
steps of box H/ACA snoRNP assembly.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Small nucleolar RNAs
(snoRNAs)1 are essential
cofactors in ribosomal RNA metabolism. Although a few snoRNAs are
necessary for discrete steps of the processing of the 35S pre-ribosomal
RNA precursor, most of them are required to target modifications of the
bases or of the sugar phosphate backbone within the ribosomal RNA
precursor (for review, see Refs. 1 and 2). snoRNAs can be divided into
two major structural families (3, 4) with different functions. Box C/D
snoRNAs have been shown to guide methylation of the 2'-hydroxyl groups
of the ribose moiety of numerous nucleotides in the 35S rRNA precursor
(5, 6). Box H/ACA snoRNAs guide the pseudouridylation of the rRNA
precursor (7, 8). These small nucleolar RNAs do not function as
isolated RNA molecules, but they assemble with protein complexes to
form ribonucleoprotein particles (snoRNPs). The protein composition of
the two major families of snoRNPs has been extensively characterized. The protein core of the box C/D snoRNP is composed of Nop1p, Nop58p, Nop56p, and Snu13p (9, 10) with Nop1p as the candidate
methyltransferase (2). The core of the box H/ACA snoRNP contains four
proteins, Gar1p, Nhp2p, Nop10p, and Cbf5p, which is presumably
responsible for the pseudouridyl synthetase activity (4, 11-15).
Although the RNA motifs required for the association of the snoRNP
proteins with the box H/ACA snoRNAs have been investigated (16, 17), little is known about the mechanisms by which the RNA and the protein
components become assembled into mature snoRNPs. Some box H/ACA snoRNAs
are generated from independent transcription units, whereas others are
embedded within the introns of other genes and must be processed from
the excised introns after splicing (1). Most independently transcribed
box H/ACA snoRNAs are likely processed at their 3' end by a complex
that includes the Nrd1p and Sen1p proteins, presumably associated with
RNA polymerase II (18). A few independently transcribed box H/ACA
snoRNAs also undergo 5' end processing by the double-stranded RNA
endonuclease Rnt1p (19). The packaging of box H/ACA snoRNAs into
snoRNPs is likely to occur at an early stage of biogenesis, since
unprocessed snoRNA precursor accumulation requires the presence of the
box H/ACA snoRNPs Nhp2p and Nop10p (13). After or during the course of
the maturation of the snoRNAs, the snoRNPs are exported to the
nucleolar compartment to function in ribosomal RNA processing and/or
modification. Whether fully mature or partially assembled snoRNPs
species are exported to the nucleolus is a matter of debate. Recently a
yeast putative RNA helicase was identified as an important factor for
biogenesis of both box C/D and H/ACA snoRNPs (20). However the precise
mechanisms by which the box C/D and box H/ACA snoRNPs assemble are
likely to be different since both the RNA and the protein components
differ. We present evidence that two novel essential yeast proteins,
Yil104c and Ynl124w, are required specifically for accumulation of box
H/ACA snoRNAs and interact with two components of the box H/ACA snoRNP,
Nhp2p and Cbf5p. Because these two proteins are nuclear but do not seem
to exhibit strong nucleolar localization, we propose that they
participate in the early biogenesis of these snoRNPs.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
The two-hybrid screen with Rnt1p as bait was performed as
described (21). Replacement of the YIL104C and
YNL124W promoters by a galactose promoter and an HA-epitope
was performed using a PCR-based procedure as described (22). For
in vivo depletion of Shq1p and Naf1p, after preculture in a
medium containing galactose, strains were shifted in a rich medium
containing 2% raffinose, 2% sucrose, and 2% galactose. RNA
extraction and acrylamide Northern blot analysis were performed as in
Chanfreau et al. (23). Agarose Northern blot was performed
using standard protocols. The list of oligonucleotides used for snoRNA
probes is indicated in Chanfreau et al. (19). The sequences
of the rRNA oligonucleotide probes are: 5' ETS,
CGGAATGGTACGTTTGATATCGCTG; 3' ETS, CCCGGATCATAGAATTC; A0
rRNA, ACTATCTTAAAAGAAGAAGCAACAAGC; A1-A2, CGGTTTTAATTGTCCTA; A2-A3,
ATGAAAACTCCACAGTG; ITS2, GGCCAGCAATTTCAAGTTA; 25 S, CTCCGCTTATTGATATGC; 18 S, CATGGCTTAATCTTTGAGAC.
Tandem affinity purification (TAP)-tagged strains were generated as
described (24), and immunoprecipitation of RNAs with IgG beads was
performed as described (12). Glycerol gradient sedimentation analysis
was performed as described (25) with the following modifications. For
each strain, 1 liter of cells was harvested at
A600 nm 1.0 and resuspended in 1.5 ml of
Buffer GG (5 mM MgCl2, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% Triton X-100, 1 mM dithiothreitol, protease inhibitors tablet from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). The cell paste was dropped in liquid
N2 to form frozen droplets. Frozen droplets were then ground for 20 min in a mortar in the presence of liquid N2.
Ground cells were thawed on ice, and the cell lysate was cleared by
centrifugation for 30 min at 17,000 rpm in a Beckman JA25.50 rotor.
Cleared lysates were then layered on a 10-36% glycerol gradient in
Buffer GG. Samples were centrifuged for 24 h at 36,000 rpm in a
Beckman SW-41 rotor. 500-µl fractions were collected of which 80 µl
were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid for Western blot analysis,
and the remainder was used for RNA extraction as described (19). Native
sedimentation coefficient markers (Amersham Biosciences) were included
in a gradient run in parallel and analyzed by silver staining.
In vitro translation of proteins was performed using a
TNT-T7 kit (Promega) using PCR products as in vitro
transcription-translation templates. For each open reading frame, the
upstream primer contained a T7 promoter, the Kozak translation
initiation sequence, and the beginning of the open reading frame,
whereas the reverse primer contained the end of the open reading frame,
the stop codon followed by a 20-nucleotide poly(T) tail at the 5' end.
PCR products were generated from genomic DNA using these two primers.
Calmodulin-binding protein-tagged versions of Shq1p were obtained by
PCR amplification of YIL104C using genomic DNA from the TAP-tagged
Yil104c yeast strain with an upstream oligonucleotide containing a T7
promoter, the Kozak translation initiation sequence, and the beginning
of the open reading frame and a reverse primer hybridizing to the calmodulin-binding protein tag at its 3' end and containing a stop
codon and a 20-nucleotide poly(T) tail at the 5' end. PCR templates
were incubated with reticulocyte lysate-T7 RNA polymerase mix from the
Promega TNT kit and either unlabeled or [35S]methionine
for 1 h. Calmodulin beads were washed 3 times for 5 min each with
1 ml of HEMN 200 buffer (40 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 200 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol with complete protease inhibitors from Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min.
Translated products were incubated with 50 µl of prepared beads and 1 ml of HEMN 200 buffer at room temperature for 2 h with rotation.
Beads were washed 4 times for 5 min with 1 ml of HEMN 200 buffer. Input
and precipitates were boiled in SDS loading buffer and loaded on SDS
gels. Indirect immunofluorescence was performed as described (26).
 |
RESULTS |
The Yil104c/Shq1p Protein Is Required for Box
H/ACA snoRNA Accumulation--
Yeast RNase III, Rnt1p, is
required for processing of a large number of small nucleolar RNAs from
both the box C/D and box H/ACA families (19, 23). To identify proteins
that may influence RNase III cleavage in vivo, a two-hybrid
screen was performed using Rnt1p as bait. Among the candidate clones,
we found three clones corresponding to different fragments of the
essential protein Yil104c (Fig.
1A). The junction of these
fusion proteins was sequenced and was shown to correspond to positions
170769, 170925, and 170961 of chromosome IX (Fig. 1B). The
YIL104C open reading frame spans positions 169979-171502 of
chromosome IX. Because each fusion was about 1-kilobase long, as
estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis, the portions of Yil104c that
interact with Rnt1p in the two-hybrid assay correspond to the
C-terminal 244, 192, and 180 amino acids of Yil104c (Fig.
1B). We tried to confirm the interaction between Yil104c and
Rnt1p by immunoprecipitation or in vitro pull-down experiments, but we failed to detect a specific interaction by these
methods (data not show). To characterize the function of Yil104c and
its possible connection to yeast RNase III, we replaced the
YIL104C endogenous promoter with a galactose-inducible
promoter and an N-terminal HA epitope tag using homologous
recombination. After preculture of the resulting strain in the presence
of galactose, we shifted the yeast culture into a medium lacking
galactose. The shift in culture conditions led to a rapid depletion of
the protein, most of it being depleted after 3 h of growth in a
medium lacking galactose (Fig.
2A). Because yeast RNase III
is involved in the processing of small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs
(19, 27), we examined the level of these species after Yil104c
depletion. We monitored the levels of various small RNAs from both the
box C/D and H/ACA families and from the spliceosomal RNA family.
Northern blot analysis showed that box H/ACA snoRNAs were rapidly
depleted after Yil104c depletion (Fig. 2B). In contrast, box
C/D snoRNAs and the RNA component of the RNase mitochondrial RNA
processing ribonuclease complex were not affected by Yil104c
depletion (Fig. 2B). The U5 spliceosomal small nuclear RNA
was also unaffected (data not shown). The apparent increase of the
level of the some box C/D snoRNAs such as snR40 is probably due to the
fact that after depletion of Yil104c, which leads to a ribosomal
RNA-processing defect and to ribosomal RNA depletion (see Fig.
3), other unaffected RNAs contribute proportionally more to the
total RNA mass. The specific depletion of box H/ACA snoRNAs was
unlikely to be due to a global depletion of box H/ACA snoRNP proteins,
since the level of the box H/ACA snoRNP protein Nhp2p did not decrease
significantly after Yil104c depletion (Fig. 2A). We named
Yil104c Shq1p because it is required for small nucleolar RNAs of the
box H/ACA family quantitative accumulation.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Rnt1p and a fragment of Yil104c interact in
the two-hybrid assay. A, two-hybrid interaction between
Rnt1p and Yil104c monitored by growth on minimal medium lacking
histidine. The Rnt1p open reading frame was cloned in the bait vector
(pAS ), and a fragment containing the C-terminal 244 amino acids
of Yil104c (pACTII-158) was obtained from the two-hybrid screen. Yeast
strains carrying the integrated reporter genes HIS3
and lacZ were transformed with either each empty vector
(pAS and pACTII) or the vectors containing RNT1
(pAS -Rnt1)and the fragment of YIL104C (pACTII-158) and
streaked on selective minimal medium lacking leucine and tryptophan
(LW, left) or minimal medium lacking leucine,
tryptophan, and histidine (LWH, right). The same
result was obtained using LacZ as a reporter gene (data not shown).
B, map of the protein fusions of Yil104c interacting with
Rnt1p in the two-hybrid assay. w, Watson strand;
c, Crick strand.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Shq1p is required for box H/ACA snoRNAs
accumulation. A, Western blot of HA-tagged Shq1p,
Nhp2p, and hexokinase (HK). Protein extracts were made
from a GAL:HA-SHQ1 strain at different
times after a shift into a medium lacking galactose
(Glu). B, Northern blots of total RNAs
extracted from a GAL:HA-SHQ1 strain and wild-type
(WT). Total RNAs were prepared from a
GAL:HA-SHQ1 strain at different times of culture
into a medium containing (Gal) or lacking (Glu)
galactose. The box C/D snoRNAs snR4 and snR70 and the spliceosomal
snRNA U5 were also monitored and found not affected by Shq1p depletion
(data not shown). MRP, mitochondrial RNA processing
ribonuclease.
|
|
We next investigated whether the depletion of box H/ACA snoRNAs in
Shq1p-depleted cells resulted in a defect in the processing of the
precursor of rRNA. Such a processing defect would be expected, since
depletion of the box H/ACA snoRNAs snR10 and snR30 is expected to block
or to reduce the efficiency of several steps of the ribosomal RNA-processing pathway leading to the production of the 18 S rRNA (indicated in Fig. 3A (28,
29). Northern blot analysis was performed on total RNAs isolated from
Shq1p-depleted cells followed by hybridization with 32P
end-labeled oligonucleotide probes specific for various intermediates and mature rRNA species (Fig. 3B). A strong accumulation of
the 35S pre-rRNA was observed after the depletion of Shq1p, indicating a global effect on the maturation process of this precursor. In agreement with this observation, the accumulation of the normal processing intermediates 32 S, 27 S A2, and 20 S was
strongly reduced. Furthermore, the aberrant 23 S intermediate, which
extends from the 5' end of the 35S pre-rRNA to the A3
cleavage site was more abundant in Shq1p-depleted cells (Fig.
3B). This species results from cleavage of the primary
transcript at the A3 site without prior cleavage at sites
A0, A1, and A2, and it is rapidly degraded as an aberrant intermediate. The appearance of this aberrant intermediate indicates a defect in the early cleavage events of the
primary transcript at the A0, A1, and
A2 sites. The rapid degradation of this aberrant
intermediate may be in part responsible for the observed defect in the
production of the mature 18 S rRNA (Fig. 3B). These results
indicate that the absence of Shq1p induces a defect or at least a delay
in the early processing steps of the 35S rRNA precursor required for
the production of the 18 S rRNA. This phenotype is likely due to the
rapid depletion of snR10 and snR30, which are required for these steps
(28, 29).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Shq1p is required for ribosomal RNA
processing. A, a schematic view of the ribosomal
RNA-processing pathway. The black rectangles indicate the
positions of the oligonucleotide probes used in B. B, ribosomal RNA processing defect in Shq1p-depleted cells.
RNAs extracted from wild-type (WT) and
GAL::SHQ1 yeast strains grown in medium
containing (Gal) or lacking (Glu) galactose were
run on denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gels, transferred to Nylon
membranes, and hybridized with oligonucleotide probes shown in
A. Shown are regions of the blots identifying precursors,
intermediates, and products that showed a processing defect.
|
|
The Ynl124w/Naf1p Protein Is Required for Box
H/ACA snoRNA Accumulation--
Exhaustive two-hybrid screen
analyses indicated that Shq1p interacts with an essential protein of
the yeast genome, Ynl124w (30). Ynl124w also interacted with the box
H/ACA snoRNP proteins Cbf5p and Nhp2p in the same study (30).
Furthermore, mass spectrometry analysis of proteins copurifying with an
overexpressed FLAG-tagged version of Cbf5p identified Ynl124w and Shq1p
(31). Naf1p also shows sequence similarities with the box H/ACA snoRNP
protein Gar1p and the RNA-binding protein Nrd1p in various regions of the protein sequence (Fig.
4A). These observations and
our results showing that Shq1p is required for box H/ACA snoRNA
accumulation suggested a role for Ynl124w in box H/ACA snoRNA
metabolism. We therefore analyzed the function of the Ynl124w protein
in vivo using the same procedure described for Shq1p,
i.e. conditional depletion of Ynl124w after the replacement
of the YNL124W endogenous promoter with a
galactose-inducible promoter and an N-terminal HA epitope tag. While
this study was in progress, the YNL124W open reading frame
became labeled in the Saccharomyces genome data base as
NAF1 (nuclear association factor 1). We will therefore use
the name Naf1p to describe the protein product of YNL124W. Upon depletion of Naf1p, we observed a rapid and specific depletion of
box H/ACA snoRNAs, whereas the level of other small RNA species remained unchanged (Fig. 4B). The level of Nhp2p was also
unaffected after Naf1p depletion (data not shown), as observed during
Shq1p depletion (Fig. 2A). We conclude that Shq1p and Naf1p
are similarly required for box H/ACA snoRNA accumulation. Not
surprisingly, depletion of Naf1p resulted in ribosomal RNA processing
defects (Fig. 4C) that were similar to those observed during
Shq1p depletion (Fig. 3B). Because of the similarities of
the phenotypes observed during Naf1p and Shq1p depletion, we checked
whether the stability of Naf1p requires the presence of Shq1p. We
constructed a yeast double-tagged strain (DT) where the
GAL:HA-SHQ1 strain also carries a TAP (32)-tagged
version of Naf1p. Upon depletion of Shq1p, the level of Naf1p remained
constant (data not shown), suggesting that the stability of Naf1p does
not require wild-type levels of Shq1p.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Naf1p is required for box H/ACA snoRNAs
accumulation and for rRNA processing. A, domain organization
of the Naf1p protein. Dark boxes represent the regions of
sequence similarities with Nrd1p. The gray box represents a
region rich in glutamine (Q Rich). B, Naf1p is
required for box H/ACA snoRNAs accumulation. Legends are as in Fig. 2,
except that a GAL::NAF1 strain was
used. C, ribosomal RNA-processing defect in Naf1p-depleted
cells. Legends are as in Fig. 3, except that a
GAL::NAF1 strain was used.
|
|
Shq1p and Naf1p Are Not Strongly Associated with Box
H/ACA snoRNPs--
A straightforward explanation for the
rapid depletion of box H/ACA snoRNAs upon Shq1p and Naf1p depletion
would be that Shq1p and Naf1p are integral components of box H/ACA
snoRNPs but that they had not been identified in previous work studying
the protein composition of box H/ACA snoRNPs. If this were the case, we
would expect Shq1p and Naf1p to associate strongly and specifically with box H/ACA snoRNAs, as described previously for core proteins of
box H/ACA snoRNPs (11-14). To test this hypothesis, we generated chromosomal TAP-tagged versions of Shq1p and Naf1p. The TAP-tagged versions of these two proteins were functional, since introduction of
the TAP tag at the C terminus of these proteins did not induce a
significant growth defect (data not shown). Extracts were first made
from these two strains followed by incubation with IgG beads to bind
the protein A portion of the TAP tag. After extensive washing, RNAs
were extracted from the precipitates and detected by Northern blots. As
a control for a weak association with box H/ACA snoRNAs, we used a
TAP-tagged Nop1p strain, since it was shown previously that a protein
A-tagged version of Nop1p is weakly associated with box H/ACA snoRNAs
at low salt concentrations (12). Northern blot analysis showed that a
small amount of box H/ACA snoRNAs were associated with Shq1p and Naf1p
but not significantly higher than with an untagged control (Fig.
5A). In contrast, a weak but
significant association could be detected with Nop1p. In addition,
Nop1p was strongly associated with box C/D snoRNAs at both salt
concentrations, whereas no significant association was found for Shq1p
and Naf1p. The lack of strong association of both Shq1p and Naf1p with
box H/ACA snoRNAs in whole-cell extracts suggests that Shq1p and Naf1p
are not integral components of box H/ACA snoRNPs.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Shq1p and Naf1p are not strongly associated
with box H/ACA snoRNAs. A, immunoprecipitation of RNAs in
untagged, Shq1p-TAP, Naf1p-TAP, and Nop1p-TAP strains whole-cell
extracts. After precipitation on IgG beads, RNAs were extracted,
fractionated on a 6% acrylamide gel, and detected by Northern blot
using oligonucleotide probes. Immunoprecipitations were performed at
either 150 or 500 mM NaCl. T represents 10% of
the total RNAs in the extract before IgG precipitation. B,
sedimentation profiles of Shq1p, Naf1p, and of box H/ACA snoRNPs. Total
extracts made from yeast strains carrying a TAP-tag versions of Shq1p
or Naf1p or a double-tag (Naf1-TAP, Shq1-HA) were loaded on 10-36%
glycerol gradients. Fractions were examined by Western and Northern
blot analysis. Left, bottom of the gradient;
right, top of the gradient. Sedimentation coefficient
markers were obtained from a gradient run in parallel on which native
molecular markers were loaded. The profiles shown for the snR42 snoRNA
are from fraction samples of the Naf1-TAP gradient, whereas the
profiles shown for the Nhp2p and U3 are from fraction samples of the
Shq1p-TAP gradient, but similar profiles were obtained in both
gradients.
|
|
To test whether Shq1p would associate specifically with the precursors
of box H/ACA snoRNAs rather than with the mature species, we
constructed a yeast strain carrying a deletion of RNT1 in
addition to the TAP-tagged Shq1p. The RNT1 deletion results
in accumulation of some box H/ACA snoRNA precursors (19). Northern blot
analysis of Shq1p-TAP precipitates in a rnt1 deletion
background failed to reveal a significant association with the box
H/ACA snoRNA precursors tested (snR36, snR43, and snR46, data not shown).
Overall, these results suggest that Shq1p and Naf1p are not strongly
associated with either precursors or mature box H/ACA snoRNAs. To
investigate further the relationships between Shq1p, Naf1p, and box
H/ACA snoRNPs, we prepared extracts from Shq1p-TAP- and Naf1-TAP-tagged
strains as well as from the double-tagged strain
(GAL:HA-SHQ1P, NAF1-TAP), and we
fractionated them by centrifugation on glycerol gradients. We followed
the sedimentation profiles of TAP-tagged Naf1p and Shq1p by Western
blot and compared them with the sedimentation profile of the snR42 box
H/ACA snoRNA and of the box H/ACA snoRNP protein Nhp2p. The peak of
Shq1p-TAP was found in fraction 18. Two peaks of Naf1p sedimentation
were observed, one of which was in the heavier fractions that may
correspond to the rRNA complexes, since rRNAs were also observed in
these fractions. The second peak corresponded to fraction 18, where the
bulk of Naf1p sediments and the major peak of Shq1p were also observed.
Box H/ACA snoRNP components (snr42 and Nhp2p) were found throughout
several fractions of the gradient, but no enrichment of these
components was found in fraction 18.
To confirm the cosedimentation of Shq1p and Naf1p in fraction 18, we
used the double-tagged strain where Shq1p is HA-tagged and Naf1p is
TAP-tagged. This strain allowed the detection of both proteins in the
same gradient fractions. Western blot analysis of sedimentation
profiles in this double-tagged strain confirmed the cosedimentation of
these two proteins in fraction 18. Strikingly, we found a third peak of
sedimentation of Naf1-TAP in the glycerol gradient fractions made from
this double-tagged strain. This third peak in fractions 6-7 overlapped
with the major position of box H/ACA snoRNPs. We also found that there
was much less Naf1p present in fraction 18 than in the single-tagged
Naf1-TAP strain. In contrast to the Naf1-TAP strain, where most of the
Naf1p protein was present in fraction 18, the bulk of the Naf1p protein
in the double-tagged strain was located in higher sedimentation
coefficient fractions and much less in fraction 18. This result is
possibly due to a deleterious effect of the double tag, since this
double-tagged strain showed a significant growth defect compared with a
wild-type strain or a single-tagged strain (data not shown). This
negative effect of the double tag might result in a stabilization of
transient interactions with box H/ACA snoRNPs that are otherwise not
revealed in a gradient made from a single tagged strain. This suggests that transient interactions may exist between Naf1p and box H/ACA snoRNPs. This result is consistent with immunoprecipitation results from Dez et al. (36) who showed that Naf1p
immunoprecipitates a small but significant amount of box H/ACA snoRNAs.
Overall these experiments suggest that Shq1p and Naf1p exist as a
complex of two or more proteins that are probably not associated with
box H/ACA snoRNPs and would correspond to fraction 18 of the gradient.
In addition, the result obtained with the double-tagged strain, which
showed a cosedimentation of Naf1p with box H/ACA snoRNPs, suggested
that Naf1p may interact transiently with box H/ACA snoRNPs and that
this interaction may be stabilized in the double-tagged strain.
In Vitro Translated Shq1p Interacts with Naf1p and Nhp2p in
Reticulocyte Lysates--
Two-hybrid studies suggested a direct
interaction between Shq1p and Naf1p and between Naf1p and both Nhp2p
and Cbf5p (30). In addition, genome-scale protein purification and mass
spectrometry studies showed that Shq1p as well as Naf1p copurified with
overexpressed FLAG-tagged Cbf5p, the pseudouridyl synthetase (31). This
result as well as our glycerol gradient sedimentation results (Fig.
5B) suggested an association between these proteins in
vivo. We tested for in vitro interactions between Shq1p
and either Naf1p, Nhp2p, or other box H/ACA snoRNP proteins (Cbf5p and
Gar1p) using an in vitro translation pull-down approach. We
translated Naf1p, Nhp2p, Cbf5p, and Gar1p in vitro in the
presence of [35S]methionine and incubated these labeled
proteins with unlabeled in vitro translated Shq1p, either
untagged or tagged at the C terminus with a calmodulin-binding protein
tag. The proteins were then mixed with calmodulin beads and extensively
washed, and the presence of the radiolabeled proteins associated with
the beads and hence with Shq1p was revealed by autoradiography (Fig.
6). This experiment showed that both
Naf1p and Nhp2p bind to Shq1p when these proteins are generated
in vitro by translation in reticulocyte lysates. In
contrast, in vitro translated Gar1p did not bind to in
vitro translated Shq1p, although we do not know whether in vitro translated Gar1p is folded properly and, therefore, active in this assay. The interaction between Shq1p and both Nhp2p and Naf1p
was specific since no binding was detected with beads and reticulocyte
lysate alone or with untagged in vitro translated Shq1p.
When in vitro translated Cbf5p was used in these studies, it
bound non-specifically to beads alone (data not shown), precluding any
analysis of the interaction between Shq1p and this particular protein.
These data demonstrate that Naf1p interacts with Shq1p in
vitro in reticulocyte lysates, as suggested from published two-hybrid studies (30). Although proteins present in the cell lysate
may bridge two proteins and result in indirect interactions, our
results also suggest that Shq1p can bind directly to Nhp2p, showing an
additional novel link between Shq1p and a component of the mature box
H/ACA snoRNPs.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Shq1p interacts with Nhp2p and Naf1p in
vitro. In vitro translated radiolabeled
Nhp2p, Naf1p, and Gar1p were incubated with either reticulocyte lysate
or with unlabeled in vitro translated Shq1p (with or without
a calmodulin binding domain). Mixtures were incubated with calmodulin
beads, and after washing, beads were boiled in SDS loading buffer and
loaded on protein gels. Input represents 30% of the crude in
vitro translation applied to each sample.
|
|
Shq1p and Naf1p Show Nuclear Localization--
To better
understand the function of Shq1p and Naf1p, we analyzed their
subcellular localization. We used the GAL-HA-tagged strains
described above to perform immunolocalization using the anti-hemagglutinin 12CA5 monoclonal antibody. When compared with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, the two
proteins clearly showed a nuclear localization pattern (Fig.
7). Shq1p seemed to be excluded from a
crescent-shaped nuclear territory, which was reminiscent of the
nucleolus, suggesting that it was not localized in the nucleolus. The
exclusion from the nucleolus would fit the result described above that
Shq1p and Naf1p are not core components of mature box H/ACA snoRNPs,
which are mainly localized in the nucleolus at the steady state. Our
results also fit with the observation that Naf1p is nucleoplasmic but
does not localize to the nucleolus (36, 37). The localization of Shq1p
does not fit with the whole-genome localization studies from the Snyder
group
(ygac.med.yale.edu/ygac-cgi/loc_oe_qry.pl?gene_name=yil104c& localization=),
who reported that a V5-tagged version of Shq1p is cytoplasmic. However,
given the function of Shq1p in box H/ACA snoRNA metabolism, it is more
likely that the nuclear localization that we observe is more
representative of its biological function and that the V5 tag used may
have interfered with proper localization of the protein.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Shq1p and Naf1p show nuclear
localization. Shown are indirect immunofluorescence analysis
of GAL::HA-SHQ1 and
GAL::HA-NAF1 strains (middle
panels), 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining
indicative of the DNA (left panels) and a merge picture
(right panels). Each picture is a merge between the
fluorescence or the 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining and the phase
image to show the location of the yeast cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have described two proteins, Shq1p and Naf1p, that are required
for box H/ACA snoRNA accumulation. In the absence of these proteins,
box H/ACA snoRNAs become depleted, resulting in a dramatic inhibition
of pre-ribosomal RNA processing and presumably in the inhibition of
ribosomal RNA pseudouridylation, as described previously for protein
members of the box H/ACA snoRNPs (12, 13). However, in contrast to
these core proteins, Shq1p and Naf1p are not associated with precursor
or mature box H/ACA snoRNAs. Moreover, although they are clearly
localized in the nucleus, they seem to be absent from the nucleolus.
Our data are consistent with results obtained in Dr. Yves Henry, Dr.
Michelle Caizergues-Ferrer, and Dr. David Tollervey's groups who
showed that Naf1p is a nucleoplasmic protein required for box H/ACA
snoRNA accumulation (36, 37).
We originally studied the function of Shq1p based on a two-hybrid
interaction with yeast RNase III, Rnt1p. Rnt1p has been shown to
process three box H/ACA snoRNAs at their 5' end (19). We failed to find
an interaction between Rnt1p and Shq1p by other means than the
two-hybrid assay, and the search of various yeast proteomics databases
did not indicate an interaction between these two proteins. It is
possible that the two-hybrid interaction between Rnt1p and Shq1p is
fortuitous and cannot be reproduced by other ways than the two-hybrid
assay. Another possibility is that Rnt1p interacts only with a
C-terminal domain of Shq1p but that interaction with the full-length
Shq1p protein cannot be observed. However, we think that given the
functions of both Rnt1p and Shq1p in early box H/ACA snoRNA metabolism,
it is likely that this two-hybrid interaction indicates a weak but
significant interaction, which could be relevant in early box H/ACA
snoRNA biogenesis. One possibility would be that Rnt1p recruits Shq1p
at the vicinity of the box H/ACA snoRNAs and that this recruitment
would help to enhance the rate of packaging of just-processed snoRNAs
into snoRNPs. This interaction would be relevant to only a few snoRNAs,
since most box H/ACA snoRNAs do not seem to be processed by Rnt1p (19). Another possibility would be that Shq1p helps to recruit Rnt1p at the
vicinity of the snoRNA precursors processed by Rnt1p. In this case, we
would expect to detect an accumulation of unprocessed snR36, snR43, and
snR46 upon Shq1p depletion. These extended unprocessed species were not
detected in RNAs extracted from Shq1p-depleted cells (data not shown).
However, since depletion of Shq1p results in a rapid depletion of
snoRNAs, it is possible that the rapid turnover of snoRNAs precursors
when they are no longer packaged into snoRNPs may mask any effect on
the processing efficiency. Thus, the potential role of the Rnt1p-Shq1p
interaction in the processing of box H/ACA snoRNAs may be difficult to
demonstrate. Finally, the recent demonstration of an interaction
between Rnt1p and Gar1p (33) strengthens the potential link between
Rnt1p and proteins of box H/ACA snoRNPs.
Based on the data presented in this study and on proteomics studies, we
can propose the following model to describe the function of Shq1p and
Naf1p in box H/ACA snoRNP biogenesis. Proteomics studies and our
in vitro interaction studies show that Shq1p and Naf1p
associate with each other and with some protein components of the box
H/ACA snoRNP such as Cbf5p, the putative pseudouridyl synthetase, and
Nhp2p. Our glycerol gradient cosedimentation data are also consistent
with the idea that Shq1p and Naf1p interact with each other and form a
complex. Naf1p was independently identified by Fatica and Tollervey as
a protein with an RNA binding motif and was shown to possess RNA
binding activity in vitro (37). The sequence similarities
between Naf1p and Gar1p and Nrd1p (Fig. 4A) also suggest a
role for Naf1p in box H/ACA snoRNA metabolism. Because Shq1p and Naf1p
are mainly localized in the nucleoplasm, we propose that they may
associate weakly and transiently with newly transcribed box H/ACA
snoRNAs in the nucleoplasmic compartment. In favor of this model, Dez
et al. (36) could show a weak but significant association of
Naf1p with box H/ACA snoRNAs. In addition, a double-tagged strain,
which shows a significant growth defect, also results in
cosedimentation of Naf1p with the box H/ACA snoRNPs, suggesting that
transient interactions between Naf1p and components of the box H/ACA
snoRNP may be stabilized in that strain. In this model Naf1p would
remain bound to partially or fully assembled snoRNPs, resulting in
partially dysfunctional snoRNPs and, therefore, in a growth defect.
In favor of a model of co-transcriptional recruitment, Fatica et
al. showed that Naf1p interacts with the phosphorylated CTD of RNA
polymerase II using GST-pull down and two-hybrid studies (37). In
addition to its RNA binding properties, the association of Naf1p with
the elongation form of RNA polymerase II further supports the
hypothesis that Naf1p and possibly Shq1p play an early role in box
H/ACA snoRNA biogenesis. The association of Shq1p and Naf1p with newly
transcribed box H/ACA snoRNAs would occur in a complex with Cbf5p and
Nhp2p (30, 31). This interaction could bring Cbf5p and Nhp2p at the
vicinity of box H/ACA snoRNAs to form the initial core of the box H/ACA
snoRNP and, thus, nucleate the formation of the mature snoRNP. In this
model, Cbf5p and Nhp2p would bind first and would then recruit Gar1p
and Nop10p. This model would fit in vitro reconstitution
results showing that the binding of human Gar1p is not a prerequisite
for binding of other box H/ACA snoRNP proteins (16) and with the fact
that Gar1p is not required for box H/ACA snoRNA stability in yeast
cells (11).
Whatever the role of these proteins, it seems likely that their
function is conserved among eukaryotes. Both proteins are essential in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and orthologs can be found in
other eukaryotic genomes. Shq1p seems to be the most conserved protein
of the two, since orthologs of Shq1p/Yil104c can be found in humans
(FLJ10539), Drosophila melanogaster (CG10055),
Caenorhabditis elegans (Y48A5A.1), and
Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Pi052p), whereas orthologs
of Naf1p/Shq2p are present in human (ALF), mice (SMPD3), and
S. pombe (Spbc30d10.15p), but no obvious orthologs
are indicated in the databases for D. melanogaster or
C. elegans. Whether a protein similar to Naf1p is truly
absent from these two organisms or whether an ortholog with a very weak
sequence similarity is present is not clear. Strikingly, Naf1p
shows limited similarities with ALF, a transcription factor with
similarity to the transcription factor TFIIA- / . This
sequence similarity between Naf1p and a putative transcription
factor further supports the model that Naf1p may associate with the
transcription machinery to interact with newly transcribed box H/ACA
snoRNAs. It seems likely that given the conservation of Shq1p and Naf1,
similar functions will be found for its orthologs in box H/ACA snoRNA
metabolism in higher eukaryotes. It would also be interesting to test
whether the human orthologs of Shq1p and Naf1p have any putative
function in telomerase RNA metabolism, since the human telomerase RNA
shows motifs that are characteristic of box H/ACA snoRNAs (15, 16, 34,
35). Thus, the function of the Shq1p and/Naf1p proteins could be
extended not only to box H/ACA snoRNA metabolism but also to human
telomerase RNA biogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Alessandro Fatica, Christophe Dez,
Yves Henry, Michelle Caizergues-Ferrer, and David Tollervey for
communication of results before publication, Yves Henry and Michelle
Caizergues-Ferrer for the generous gift of anti-Nhp2 antibodies, Carla
Koehler for anti-hexokinase antibodies, Adam Frankel for the gift of
the Nop1-TAP strain, Bertrand Séraphin for providing the TAP
plasmids, Anthony Henras and Douglas Black for critical reading of the
manuscript, and Jim Gober for use of the fluorescence microscope.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM61518 and by a Research Corp. Research Innovation Award (to G. C.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Present address: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., 522 PCTB, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Present address: Hybrigenics, 3-5 Impasse Reille, 75014 Paris, France.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry and
Biochemistry and the Molecular Biology Institute, UCLA, Box 951569, Los
Angeles, CA 90095-1569. Tel.: 310-825-4399; Fax: 310-206-4038; E-mail:
guillom@chem.ucla.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207669200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
snoRNP, small
nucleolar (sno) ribonucleoprotein particles;
HA, hemagglutinin;
TAP, tandem affinity purification;
NAF, nuclear association factor 1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Tollervey, D.,
and Kiss, T.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
337-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Kiss, T.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
3617-3622[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Balakin, A. G.,
Smith, L.,
and Fournier, M. J.
(1996)
Cell
86,
823-834[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Ganot, P.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
and Kiss, T.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
941-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Cavaille, J.,
Nicoloso, M.,
and Bachellerie, J. P.
(1996)
Nature
383,
732-735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Kiss-Laszlo, Z.,
Henry, Y.,
Bachellerie, J. P.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
and Kiss, T.
(1996)
Cell
85,
1077-1088[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Ganot, P.,
Bortolin, M. L.,
and Kiss, T.
(1997)
Cell
89,
799-809[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Ni, J.,
Tien, A. L.,
and Fournier, M. J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
565-573[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lafontaine, D. L.,
and Tollervey, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2650-2659[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Watkins, N. J.,
Segault, V.,
Charpentier, B.,
Nottrott, S.,
Fabrizio, P.,
Bachi, A.,
Wilm, M.,
Rosbash, M.,
Branlant, C.,
and Luhrmann, R.
(2000)
Cell
103,
457-466[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Girard, J. P.,
Lehtonen, H.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
Amalric, F.,
Tollervey, D.,
and Lapeyre, B.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
673-682[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Lafontaine, D. L.,
Bousquet-Antonelli, C.,
Henry, Y.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
and Tollervey, D.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
527-537[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Henras, A.,
Henry, Y.,
Bousquet-Antonelli, C.,
Noaillac-Depeyre, J.,
Gelugne, J. P.,
and Caizergues-Ferrer, M.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
7078-7090[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Watkins, N. J.,
Gottschalk, A.,
Neubauer, G.,
Kastner, B.,
Fabrizio, P.,
Mann, M.,
and Luhrmann, R.
(1998)
RNA (N. Y.)
4,
1549-1568
|
| 15.
|
Pogacic, V.,
Dragon, F.,
and Filipowicz, W.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
9028-9040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Dragon, F.,
Pogacic, V.,
and Filipowicz, W.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3037-3048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Henras, A.,
Dez, C.,
Noaillac-Depeyre, J.,
Henry, Y.,
and Caizergues-Ferrer, M.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
2733-2746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Steinmetz, E. J.,
Conrad, N. K.,
Brow, D. A.,
and Corden, J. L.
(2001)
Nature
413,
327-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Chanfreau, G.,
Legrain, P.,
and Jacquier, A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
284,
975-988[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
King, T. H.,
Decatur, W. A.,
Bertrand, E.,
Maxwell, E. S.,
and Fournier, M. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
7731-7746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Fromont-Racine, M.,
Rain, J. C.,
and Legrain, P.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
277-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Longtine, M. S.,
McKenzie, A., III,
Demarini, D. J.,
Shah, N. G.,
Wach, A.,
Brachat, A.,
Philippsen, P.,
and Pringle, J. R.
(1998)
Yeast
14,
953-961[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Chanfreau, G.,
Rotondo, G.,
Legrain, P.,
and Jacquier, A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3726-3737[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Rigaut, G.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Rutz, B.,
Wilm, M.,
Mann, M.,
and Seraphin, B.
(1999)
Nat. Biotechnol.
17,
1030-1032[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Billy, E.,
Wegierski, T.,
Nasr, F.,
and Filipowicz, W.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
2115-2126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Goldman, R. D.,
Leinwand, L. A.,
and Spector, D. L.
(1998)
Cells: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 106.103-106.107, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 27.
|
Chanfreau, G.,
Abou Elela, S.,
Ares, M., Jr.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2741-2751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Tollervey, D.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
4169-4175[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Morrissey, J. P.,
and Tollervey, D.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2469-2477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Ito, T.,
Chiba, T.,
Ozawa, R.,
Yoshida, M.,
Hattori, M.,
and Sakaki, Y.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
4569-4574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Ho, Y.,
et al..
(2002)
Nature
415,
180-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Gavin, A. C.,
Bosche, M.,
Krause, R.,
Grandi, P.,
Marzioch, M.,
Bauer, A.,
Schultz, J.,
Rick, J. M.,
Michon, A. M.,
Cruciat, C. M.,
et al..
(2002)
Nature
415,
141-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Tremblay, A.,
Lamontagne, B.,
Catala, M.,
Yam, Y.,
Larose, S.,
Good, L.,
and Abou Elela, S.
(2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
22,
4792-4802[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Mitchell, J. R.,
Cheng, J.,
and Collins, K.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
567-576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Dez, C.,
Henras, A.,
Faucon, B.,
Lafontaine, D.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
and Henry, Y.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
598-603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Dez, C.,
Noaillac-Depeyre, J.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
and Henry, Y.
(2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
7053-7065
|
| 37.
| Fatica, A., Dlakic, M., and Tollervey, D. (2002) RNA, in
press
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. N. Grozdanov, S. Roy, N. Kittur, and U. T. Meier
SHQ1 is required prior to NAF1 for assembly of H/ACA small nucleolar and telomerase RNPs
RNA,
June 1, 2009;
15(6):
1188 - 1197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Zamudio, B. Mittra, A. Chattopadhyay, J. A. Wohlschlegel, N. R. Sturm, and D. A. Campbell
Trypanosoma brucei Spliced Leader RNA Maturation by the Cap 1 2'-O-Ribose Methyltransferase and SLA1 H/ACA snoRNA Pseudouridine Synthase Complex
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 2009;
29(5):
1202 - 1211.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Singh, F. A. Gonzales, D. Cascio, N. Heckmann, G. Chanfreau, and J. Feigon
Structure and Functional Studies of the CS Domain of the Essential H/ACA Ribonucleoparticle Assembly Protein SHQ1
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 16, 2009;
284(3):
1906 - 1916.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Qiu, J. Eifert, L. Wacheul, M. Thiry, A. C. Berger, J. Jakovljevic, J. L. Woolford Jr., A. H. Corbett, D. L. J. Lafontaine, R. M. Terns, et al.
Identification of Genes That Function in the Biogenesis and Localization of Small Nucleolar RNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 1, 2008;
28(11):
3686 - 3699.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Reichow, T. Hamma, A. R. Ferre-D'Amare, and G. Varani
The structure and function of small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 12, 2007;
35(5):
1452 - 1464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Kittur, X. Darzacq, S. Roy, R. H. Singer, and U. T. Meier
Dynamic association and localization of human H/ACA RNP proteins
RNA,
December 1, 2006;
12(12):
2057 - 2062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hoareau-Aveilla, M. Bonoli, M. Caizergues-Ferrer, and Y. Henry
hNaf1 is required for accumulation of human box H/ACA snoRNPs, scaRNPs, and telomerase
RNA,
May 1, 2006;
12(5):
832 - 840.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Darzacq, N. Kittur, S. Roy, Y. Shav-Tal, R. H. Singer, and U. T. Meier
Stepwise RNP assembly at the site of H/ACA RNA transcription in human cells
J. Cell Biol.,
April 24, 2006;
173(2):
207 - 218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Richard, A. M. Kiss, X. Darzacq, and T. Kiss
Cotranscriptional Recognition of Human Intronic Box H/ACA snoRNAs Occurs in a Splicing-Independent Manner.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 1, 2006;
26(7):
2540 - 2549.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. TERNS and R. TERNS
Noncoding RNAs of the H/ACA Family
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
January 1, 2006;
71(0):
395 - 405.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. KISS, E. FAYET, B.E. JADY, P. RICHARD, and M. WEBER
Biogenesis and Intranuclear Trafficking of Human Box C/D and H/ACA RNPs
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol,
January 1, 2006;
71(0):
407 - 417.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ballarino, M. Morlando, F. Pagano, A. Fatica, and I. Bozzoni
The Cotranscriptional Assembly of snoRNPs Controls the Biosynthesis of H/ACA snoRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 1, 2005;
25(13):
5396 - 5403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Yang, C. Hoareau, C. Froment, B. Monsarrat, Y. Henry, and G. Chanfreau
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the Pseudouridylsynthetase Cbf5p and of the RNA Binding Protein Naf1p during H/ACA snoRNP Assembly
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 15, 2005;
25(8):
3295 - 3304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. HENRAS, R. CAPEYROU, Y. HENRY, and M. CAIZERGUES-FERRER
Cbf5p, the putative pseudouridine synthase of H/ACA-type snoRNPs, can form a complex with Gar1p and Nop10p in absence of Nhp2p and box H/ACA snoRNAs
RNA,
November 18, 2004;
10(11):
1704 - 1712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Dez, C. Froment, J. Noaillac-Depeyre, B. Monsarrat, M. Caizergues-Ferrer, and Y. Henry
Npa1p, a Component of Very Early Pre-60S Ribosomal Particles, Associates with a Subset of Small Nucleolar RNPs Required for Peptidyl Transferase Center Modification
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2004;
24(14):
6324 - 6337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. F. Fernandez, B. K. Pannone, X. Chen, G. Fuchs, and S. L. Wolin
An Lsm2-Lsm7 Complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Associates with the Small Nucleolar RNA snR5
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2004;
15(6):
2842 - 2852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|