Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205517200 on September 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 45259-45266, November 22, 2002
Functional Analysis of Toxoplasma gondii Protease
Inhibitor 1*
Meredith Teilhet
Morris
§,
Alexandra
Coppin¶,
Stanislas
Tomavo¶, and
Vern B.
Carruthers
From the
The W. Harry Feinstone Department of
Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 and the ¶ Laboratoire
de Chimie Biologique, CNRS UMR 8576, Université des Sciences et
Technologies de Lille, 59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
Received for publication, June 4, 2002, and in revised form, August 16, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have characterized a Kazal family serine
protease inhibitor, Toxoplasma gondii
protease inhibitor 1 (TgPI-1), in
the obligate intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii.
TgPI-1 contains four inhibitor domains predicted to inhibit trypsin,
chymotrypsin, and elastase. Antibodies against recombinant TgPI-1
detect two polypeptides, of 43 and 41 kDa, designated
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141, in tachyzoites,
bradyzoites, and sporozoites. TgPI-143 and
TgPI-141 are secreted constitutively from dense granules
into the excreted/secreted antigen fraction as well as the
parasitophorous vacuole that T. gondii occupies during
intracellular replication. Recombinant TgPI-1 inhibits trypsin,
chymotrypsin, pancreatic elastase, and neutrophil elastase.
Immunoprecipitation studies with anti-rTgPI-1 antibodies reveal that
recombinant TgPI-1 forms a complex with trypsin that is dependent on
interactions with the active site of the protease. TgPI-1 is the first
anti-trypsin/chymotrypsin inhibitor to be identified in bradyzoites and
sporozoites, stages of the parasite that would be exposed to
proteolytic enzymes in the digestive tract of the host.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Toxoplasma gondii commonly infects humans and
occasionally causes opportunistic disease. Recrudescence of a latent
infection in immunodeficient individuals can result in encephalitis
(1). Transplacental transmission of T. gondii can cause
spontaneous abortion, mental retardation, and blindness (2).
T. gondii is primarily acquired through the ingestion of
sporulated oocysts, containing sporozoites, shed by the definitive host
(felids) or by ingestion of undercooked meat harboring bradyzoite tissue cysts. The cyst wall is digested during transit through the
gastrointestinal tract, releasing the bradyzoites/sporozoites, which
penetrate the intestinal epithelium where they immediately differentiate into rapidly dividing tachyzoites. Tachyzoites
disseminate and proliferate during the acute stage of infection before
differentiating into bradyzoites, which encyst in muscle tissue and the
central nervous system thereby establishing a chronic infection
(3).
Because T. gondii transits through the digestive tract and
is resistant to physiological levels of trypsin (4), it has been
speculated that T. gondii secretes protease inhibitors that aid in protecting the parasite from the proteolytic enzymes, trypsin and chymotrypsin, found within the lower intestine. Previously, TgPI1 (5) was identified in
T. gondii. We have independently identified the same
protease inhibitor, termed TgPI-1. Until now, expression of protease
inhibitor polypeptides has not been demonstrated in bradyzoites or
sporozoites, stages of the parasite most likely to be exposed to the
proteolytic environment of the digestive tract.
As obligate intracellular parasites, host cell invasion and
subsequent proliferation are essential to the lifecycle of
T. gondii. During the lytic cycle of replication parasite
attachment to the host cell is accompanied by the discharge of
micronemes, small cigar-shaped vesicles located at the apical
end of the parasite. Next, rhoptry (ROP) proteins are discharged and
serve to aid in the establishment of the parasitophorous vacuole (PV),
a protected compartment within the host cell in which the parasites
reside. Once inside the host cell, the parasite releases proteins from dense granules (DGs) into the PV. Although ten DG proteins have been
identified (6, 7), the precise functions of DG proteins remain poorly understood.
N-terminal sequencing of proteins found in excreted/secreted antigen
(ESA) fractions reveal the presence of TgPI-1, a protein belonging to
the Kazal family of serine protease inhibitors. This family of protease
inhibitors is defined by a set of conserved disulfide bonds that form a
rigid structure exposing the reactive site P1 residue for interaction
with its target protease (8-10). TgPI-1 contains four inhibitor
domains, which are predicted to inhibit chymotrypsin, trypsin, and elastase.
Serine protease inhibitors are classified according to structure and
mechanism of inhibition (8-10). The SERPIN, Kunitz, and Kazal families
represent some of the most widely studied families of serine protease
inhibitors, some of which function in viral or parasite pathogenesis.
For example, several SERPINS identified from poxvirus have been shown
to inhibit inflammation and apoptosis and function in determination of
viral host range (11). A Kunitz family serine protease inhibitor
isolated from the hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicaum has
activity against chymotrypsin, pancreatic elastase, neutrophil
elastase, and trypsin and may contribute to the ability of the parasite
to evade the immune system and provide protection during its residence
within the small intestine (12). Kazal inhibitors have been found in
mammals (pancreatic secretory trypsin inhibitors, mammalian seminal
acrosin inhibitors) (13), birds (avian ovomucoids, chicken
ovoinhibitor) (8), leeches (leech-derived tryptase inhibitor) (14), and
insects (rhodniin) (15) and used extensively in vitro to
study the interactions of serine proteases with their substrates.
However, little work has been published on the function of Kazal
inhibitors in vivo.
Here we show that TgPI-1 protein is expressed in T. gondii
tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and is secreted from DGs.
Recombinant TgPI-1 (rTgPI-1) inhibits trypsin, chymotrypsin, pancreatic
elastase, and neutrophil elastase. The ability of TgPI-1 to target a
broad range of proteases, along with its expression and secretion
profile, suggests that it may play a critical function in the lifecycle
of T. gondii.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Trypsin (bovine pancreas),
-chymotrypsin
(bovine pancreas), elastase (porcine pancreas), glutamine, and a
ProteoMass peptide calibration kit were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO).
Human neutrophil elastase was from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA).
Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA, Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Lys-pNA,
and Suc-Ala-Ala-Ala-pNA were from Bachem (King of Prussia,
PA). PCR minispin columns, pQE30, nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column,
and pREP4(M15) cells were from Qiagen (Valencia, CA). BCA protein
quantitation reagent and SuperSignal West Pico chemiluminescence
substrate were from Pierce (Rockford, IL). Oregon green-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit and Texas red-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibodies were
from Jackson Laboratories (West Grove, PA). Avian myeloblastosis
virus reverse transcriptase was from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals (Lewes, UK). TaqDNA polymerase and sequencing
grade trypsin were from Promega (Madison, WI). Centricon C-20 and C-10
concentrators were from Millipore (Bedford, MA). All electrophoretic
equipment and reagents for two-dimensional electrophoresis were from
Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). All other reagents were from Fisher.
Parasite Culture and Purification--
T.
gondii strain RH and 2F tachyzoites were serially passaged
in vitro in human foreskin fibroblasts grown in DMEM
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine,
and penicillin/streptomycin (50 µg/ml). Parasites were purified by
membrane filtration as described previously (16). Bradyzoites and
sporozoites were purified as described previously (17, 18).
RT-PCR on Tachyzoite and Bradyzoite RNA--
Total RNA isolated
from encysted bradyzoites and tachyzoites was digested with DNase, and
the absence of DNA was checked by PCR before reverse transcription as
described (19). One microgram of purified total RNA was
reverse-transcribed for 1 h at 42 °C in a buffer containing 1 M oligo(dT)18 primer, 2 mM dNTP,
and 25 units of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse
transcriptase. The reaction mixture was heat inactivated at 70 °C
for 15 min. PCR amplifications were performed using 5 units of
TaqDNA polymerase in 100-µl reaction volumes containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton
X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTP,
and 100 pM of each primer. Thermal cycling conditions were:
1) denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min; 2) annealing at 50-60 °C
(depending on each primer pair); 3) elongation at 72 °C for 2 min;
4) at the end, an additional extension was done at 72 °C for
10 min. The primer pair for TgPI-1 was as follows: FTgPI-1.69
(GTGTTTGCTTCGCCCGAAACG) and RTgPI-1.369 (GTTGAGTCGCAATTCGCGAGT).
Identification of TgPI-1 in ESA--
Large-scale preparation of
ESA proteins was performed by incubating 5 × 109 2F
strain tachyzoites in 15 ml of DMEM containing 2 mM
glutamine, 10 mM HEPES, and 1% ethanol at 37 °C for 20 min followed by cooling on ice 5 min. Parasites were removed by
centrifugation (1000 × g, 10 min, 4 °C), and the
supernatant was concentrated to 400 µl using C-20 concentrators
according to the manufacturer's instructions.
ESA proteins were separated in the first dimension using the
PROTEAN isoelectric focusing system employing pH gradient
strips. 150 µg of ESA protein was mixed with rehydration buffer
containing 8 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 0.2% carrier ampholytes,
and 2 mM tri-butyl phosphine. Rehydration and isoelectric
focusing were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions
using an 11-cm ReadyStripTM (pH 4-7). Following focusing,
proteins were reduced and carboxymethylated by successive 10-min
treatments with equilibration buffer containing 2% dithiothreitol
followed by 2.5% iodoacetamide. Proteins were resolved in the second
dimension on a 10-20% linear gradient SDS-PAGE gel and stained with
colloidal Coomassie Blue (20).
The protein spot corresponding to TgPI-1 (preliminarily identified by
Western blotting) was excised, digested in-gel with sequencing grade
trypsin, and solvent-extracted as described previously (21). Extracted
peptides were dried down and redissolved in 2 µl of 50% acetonitrile
and 0.3% trifluoroacetic acid, mixed with matrix
(
-cyano-4-hydroycinnamic acid), and deposited on the mass
spectrometry (MS) target plate according to a general two-layer method
(22). MS was performed on a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer (PerSeptive Biosystem
Voyager DE-STR). The spectra of peptide mass fingerprints were
acquired in the positive reflection mode with delayed extraction. The
spectra were calibrated by external standard sample (ProteoMass peptide
calibration kit) deposited on the MS plate adjacent to the Tg-PI-1 spot.
Peptide mass fingerprinting data from MALDI-TOF were used to search
against NCBI data base via the MS-Fit algorithm
(prospector.ucsf.edu). The search resulted in a match to TgPI-1
(nine matching peptides at mass tolerance of 50 ppm, Mowse score
9.15 × 105, 22% sequence coverage).
Secretion Assays--
Secretion analyses were performed
essentially as described previously (23). Briefly, 3 × 109 tachyzoites were resuspended in invasion media (DMEM,
1.5 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, and
3% fetal bovine serum) and incubated for 2 min at 37 °C with 100 µM BAPTA-AM or invasion media alone before being
transferred to an ice water bath. Parasites were removed by
centrifugation (twice at 1000 × g for 3 min at 4 °C), and culture supernatants were concentrated 20-fold in C-10 concentrators, aliquoted, and stored at
80 °C until use.
Immunolocalization of TgPI-1--
Immunofluorescence of
intracellular parasites was performed essentially as described
previously (24). Briefly, intracellular parasites were allowed to
invade monolayers of HFF for various time intervals, fixed in 4%
formaldehyde, 0.027% glutaraldehyde, PBS for 20 min at 25 °C, and
fully permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, PBS. TgPI-1 was detected
using rabbit polyclonal sera (R
rTgPI-1) diluted 1:500. GRA4 and GRA1
were detected with Tg17-43 and 4G1.AH11, respectively, diluted 1:500.
Oregon green-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and Texas red-conjugated goat
anti-mouse secondary antibodies were used at 1:500 for detection.
Extracellular parasites were purified as described above, fixed in 3%
formaldehyde, 0.027% glutaraldehyde for 30 min, 4 °C, washed twice
with 10 ml of PBS, 4 °C, and resuspended in 1 ml of PBS. Fixed
parasites were added to eight-well chamber slides precoated with
poly-L-lysine (0.01% final), incubated at 25 °C for 25 min, and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, PBS for 15 min at
25 °C. Antibody staining was done exactly as described for
intracellular parasites.
Vacuole Fractionations--
Membranous fractions were isolated
from vacuoles as described previously (25). Briefly, tachyzoites were
inoculated onto HFF monolayers and incubated 16 h. Monolayers were
washed twice with PBS to remove extracellular tachyzoites, and vacuoles
were lysed by passage through 23- and 25-gauge syringes. Liberated tachyzoites were removed by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 10 min at 25 °C. The low speed supernatant was
centrifuged at 100,000 × g 2 h at 4 °C to
separate membranous fractions (pellet) and soluble components
(supernatant). Equivalent amounts of pellet and supernatant were
analyzed by Western blotting.
Expression and Purification of rTgPI-1--
The following
primers were used to amplify TgPI-1 from a cDNA library: FTgPI-1.66
(GACTGGATCCGCTTCGCCCGAAACGAAAG) and RTgPI-1.882 (GACTGGTACCTTGGTCATCCCAGATCTC). PCR products were gel-purified using
Qiagen spin columns, ligated into pQE30 vector digested with
KpnI-BamHI, and transformed into pREP4(M15)
cells. Positive transformants were confirmed by sequencing both strands
of the insert.
Bacteria harboring TgPI-1 in pQE30 were induced by addition of 1 M isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside, and
cells were pelleted, subjected to two freeze-thaw cycles, resuspended
in 4 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM
NaH2PO4, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole), and sonicated 10 times for 15 s
(Misonix XL). Lysed cells were centrifuged for 30 min, 10,000 × g at 4 °C, and the resulting supernatant was loaded onto
a 1-ml nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column. The column was washed with
10 volumes of wash buffer (50 mM
NaH2PO4, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole) and eluted into four 0.5-ml fractions with
elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, pH
8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole). For
activity assays, rTgPI-1 was dialyzed against PBS to exchange buffers.
Kinetic Analysis--
Proteases were incubated with increasing
concentrations of inhibitor in a volume of 5 µl and incubated at
4 °C (trypsin, 0.59 pmol; human neutrophil elastase, 20 pmol) or
25 °C (pancreatic elastase, 11.58 pmol; chymotrypsin, 0.56 pmol) for
15 min before addition of 175 µl of assay buffer (chymotrypsin assay
buffer: 0.1 M Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, containing 10 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA; trypsin assay buffer: 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.8, containing 0.1 M NaCl, 0.05% polyethylene glycol 4000, 0.4 mM
Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Lys-pNA, pancreatic elastase assay buffer;
0.1 M Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, containing 150 mM NaCl,
1 mM Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-pNA; human neutrophil
elastase buffer: 0.2 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 0.2 mM
Suc-Ala-Ala-Ala-pNA). Experiments were performed at least
twice, in triplicate, and reaction velocities were linear over the
course of the reaction. Initial velocities were measured by monitoring
absorbance at 405 nm on a VmaxTM
Molecular Devices kinetic microplate reader.
K
were determined graphically
by plotting [Vo/Vi]
1 versus [I], where Vo
is the velocity in the absence of inhibitor, Vi
is the reaction velocity in the presence of inhibitor and
[I] is inhibitor concentration.
K
were converted to
Ki according to the following formula:
Ki = K
/[1 + [s]/Km]. Varying concentrations of
substrate were incubated with a fixed amount of protease under the
conditions described above, and initial velocities were measured by
monitoring absorbance at 405 nm. Double-reciprocal Lineweaver-Burke
plots of 1/[v] versus 1/[s] were
used to determine Km of each substrate for its
partner protease.
Immunoprecipitations--
Protease-inhibitor complexes were
prepared by incubation of purified trypsin (400 ng) with ~1.5-fold
molar excess of rTgP1-1 (400 ng) in PBS for 30 min at 25 °C in a
final volume of 10 µl. Complexes were immunoprecipitated by addition
of 200 µl of radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (1 M
Tris, 1% Triton X-100, 5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA) and incubation with 2.5 µl of mouse anti-rTgPI-1 antisera for 16 h at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Protein G-Sepharose beads (2.5% final v/v) were added and incubated for 2 h at 25 °C. Beads were washed four
times with 1 ml of radioimmune precipitation assay buffer, aspirated, and resuspended in 100 µl of SB (0.2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 32 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 0.02 mg/ml bromophenol blue, 2%
2-mercaptoethanol).
SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting--
SDS-PAGE was performed on
12.5% minigels (Bio-Rad) under reducing conditions, and proteins were
transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for 40 min at 16 V using a
Transblot SD semi-dry transfer cell (Bio-Rad). Western blots were
developed by chemiluminescence as described previously (26).
 |
RESULTS |
TgPI-1 belongs to the Kazal Family of Protease
Inhibitors--
Previously, putative secretory proteins were
identified utilizing sub-cellular fractionation techniques and
isolation of excreted/secreted antigens (ESA) in parasite culture
supernatants (27). N-terminal sequencing of putative secretory proteins
revealed the presence of T.
gondii protease
inhibitor 1 (TgPI-1) in ESA. BLAST analysis of
the T. gondii expressed sequence tag (EST) database with the
TgPI-1 nucleotide sequence reveals that the TgPI-1 sequence was present
in the database with 13 tachyzoite ESTs and no bradyzoite ESTs.
The TgPI-1 gene is predicted to encode a 30-kDa protein containing four
protease inhibitor domains and an N-terminal signal sequence (Fig.
1A). TgPI-1 is predicted to be
a serine protease inhibitor belonging to the Kazal family whose members
characteristically have multiple protease specificity domains (8-10).
This family of protease inhibitors is defined by a set of conserved
disulfide bonds that form a rigid structure exposing the reactive site
P1 residue for interaction with its target protease (Fig.
1A). Alignment of the inhibitor domains of TgPI-1 with other
Kazal inhibitor domains reveals a highly conserved placement of
cysteine residues predicted to form the disulfide bonds important to
the three-dimensional structure of each domain (Fig. 1B).
Kazal inhibitors act as pseudosubstrates, binding tightly to their
target proteases (8-10).

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
TgPI-1 belongs to the Kazal family of serine
protease inhibitors. A, TgPI-1 contains a signal
sequence and four inhibitor domains. TgPI-1 has an N-terminal signal
sequence (SP) and four inhibitor domains that have been
modeled according to the three-dimensional structure of leech-derived
trypsin inhibitor using SwissModel software. This model is intended to
schematically depict the general structure of the inhibitor domains and
has not been rigorously optimized. Each domain is defined by three
disulfide bonds, generating a rigid structure in which the P1 residue
(indicated by the single-letter amino acid code) is left
exposed to interact with its cognate protease (indicated under each
domain). B, sequence alignment of Kazal family inhibitor
domains. TgPI-1a-d: protease inhibitor domains of TgPI-1
(accession #AF121778). NcPI: Neospora caninum
protease inhibitor (V. B. Carruthers, unpublished).
Rhd1 and Rhd2: the first and second protease
inhibitor domains of rhodniin (accession number Q06684).
Ldti: leech-derived trypsin inhibitor (accession number
P80424). Bdb3: Bdellin B-3 (accession number P09865). Kazal
family proteases are defined by conserved cysteines
(underlined). Reactive P1 residues (in boldface)
dictate the target protease. Disulfide linkages are indicated by
solid lines above the majority sequences.
|
|
TgPI-1 mRNA Is Detected in Both Bradyzoites and Tachyzoites,
and TgPI-1 Protein Is Expressed in Tachyzoites, Bradyzoites, and
Sporozoites--
RT-PCR was used to assess whether mRNA for TgPI-1
was present in tachyzoites, the rapidly dividing form of the parasite,
and bradyzoites, the slow growing form of the parasite. RNA was
purified from tachyzoites and bradyzoites and used in RT-PCR with
TgPI-1-specific primers. With both tachyzoite and bradyzoite mRNA,
RT-PCR with TgPI-1-specific primers yielded the expected product of 300 bp (Fig. 2A, lanes
3 and 4). As a control, the housekeeping gene T. gondii superoxide dismutase was included (Fig. 2A,
lanes 1 and 2). These results indicate that
mRNA for TgPI-1 is present in both tachyzoites and
bradyzoites.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
TgPI-1 is expressed in multiple life stages
of T. gondii. A, TgPI-1 mRNA is
present in tachyzoites and bradyzoites. Bradyzoite and tachyzoite
mRNA were used in RT-PCR with primers specific for T. gondii superoxide dismutase (TgSOD, lanes 1 and 2) or TgPI-1 (lanes 3 and 4).
B, TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 are
detected by Western blotting in tachyzoites and bradyzoites. Tachyzoite
(Tz) lysate (5 × 106/lane 1,
3 × 106/lane 2, 1 × 106/lane 3), bradyzoite lysate (1000 cysts,
~1 × 106 bradyzoites (Bz), lane
4), and fully sporulated oocysts (5 × 105
sporozoites (Sz), lane 5) were resolved by 12.5%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with R rTgPI-1
(lanes 1 and 5).
|
|
Antibodies were raised against recombinant TgPI-1 (rTgPI-1). Rabbit
antibodies generated against rTgPI-1 (R
rTgPI-1) recognize two
polypeptides in extracellular tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites, TgPI-143 and TgPI-141, named
according to their apparent molecular weight as determined by SDS-PAGE
(Fig. 2B, lanes 1-5).
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 Secretion into ESA Is
Unaffected by BAPTA-AM--
TgPI-1 possesses a hydrophobic N-terminal
sequence that has the properties of a signal sequence, suggesting that
it might be a secretory protein. In an effort to determine whether
TgPI-1 was secreted, two-dimensional gels of T. gondii ESA
were transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with R
rTgPI-1 (Fig.
3A). The polypeptide recognized by R
rTgPI-1 was excised from a sister gel stained with
colloidal Coomassie Blue (Fig. 3B), digested with trypsin, and subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). The resulting peptide
mass fingerprint was used to search the NCBI database and confirm the
identity of TgPI-1. These results suggest that TgPI-1 is secreted by
T. gondii.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
TgPI-1 secretion into ESA is calcium
independent. A, Western blot of two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis of ESA. ESA fractions were separated in the first
dimension using PROTEAN isoelectric focusing system employing pH
gradient strips (pH 4-7) and then resolved in the second dimension on
a 10-20% linear gradient SDS-PAGE gel, transferred to nitrocellulose,
and probed with rabbit TgPI-1 antibodies. An asterisk marks
residual signal from a previous blot. B, colloidal Coomassie
stain of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of ESA. A sister
two-dimensional gel of ESA was run as described in A and
stained with colloidal Coomassie. The circled band is
TgPI-1. C, secretion of the microneme protein, MIC2, is
blocked by BAPTA-AM. Tachyzoite (Tz) lysate
(105, lane 1), 5 ng of recombinant TgPI-1
(rTgPI-1; R, lane 2), ESA
(E, lane 3), and ESA from BAPTA-AM-treated
parasites (E/B, lane 4) were resolved by 12.5%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and analyzed by Western
blotting with rabbit anti-MIC2 antibodies. D, secretion of
the DG protein, GRA1, is unaffected by BAPTA-AM. The membrane from
C was stripped and probed with anti-GRA1 antibodies, mAb
Tg17-43. E, secretion of TgPI-143 and
TgPI-141 are unaffected by the calcium agonist BAPTA-AM.
The membrane from C was stripped and probed with
R rTgPI-1.
|
|
ESA fractions consist predominately of secreted micronemal and DG
proteins. Calcium chelators such as BAPTA-AM specifically block
microneme secretion without markedly affecting DG secretion (16). To
determine if TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 are of
micronemal or DG origin, ESA fractions obtained from untreated and
BAPTA-AM treated parasites were resolved by SDS-PAGE and probed with
R
rTgPI-1. As a control, release of the micronemal protein, TgMIC2
(115 kDa), which is proteolytically processed to sTgMIC2 (95 kDa)
coincident with its release into ESA (23), was assessed. Secretion of
sTgMIC2 into ESA is completely blocked when parasites are pretreated
with BAPTA-AM (Fig. 3C, lane 4). In contrast to TgMIC2, the DG protein, GRA1, is present in extracellular tachyzoites (Fig. 3D, lane 1), as well as ESA from untreated
and BAPTA-AM-treated parasites (Fig. 3D, lanes 3 and 4), indicating the constitutive nature of its secretion.
Like GRA1, TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 are
present in the ESA of untreated as well as BAPTA-AM- treated parasites (Fig. 3E, lanes 1, 3, and
4). These results are consistent with TgPI-143
and TgPI-141 being secreted into ESA via DGs.
Dual label indirect immunofluorescence of extracellular tachyzoites was
used to confirm the DG localization of TgPI-1. R
rTgPI-1 exhibited
punctate staining throughout the parasite (Fig.
4A), and this staining pattern
perfectly overlaps with the distribution of the DG protein, GRA1 (as
detected with mAb Tg17-43). Punctate granular staining was also
observed with single labeling for TgPI-1 and GRA1 (data not shown).
These results confirm the DG localization of TgPI-1 in extracellular
tachyzoites.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The kinetics of TgPI-1 secretion into the PV
follows DG discharge. Dual labeling indirect
immunofluorescence of T. gondii. Freshly harvested
extracellular tachyzoites (A) were fixed, and detergent
permeabilized and stained with antibodies to GRA1 (mAbTg17-43) and
TgPI-1 (R rTgPI-1). For intracellular parasites, monolayers were
fixed, semi-permeabilized to reveal the PV contents, and stained with
antibodies to DG proteins GRA1 (mAb Tg17-43) at 10 min (B)
and 1 h (C) post-invasion or GRA4 (mAb 4G1.AH11) at
24 h (D) post-invasion R rTgPI-1. Oregon-green
conjugated goat anti-rabbit and Texas-red conjugated goat anti-mouse
antibodies were used for detection. Merged images were deconvolved
using C-Imaging Systems software and overlaid onto the corresponding
phase contrast images. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|
TgPI-1 Secretion into the PV Follows the Kinetics of DG
Discharge--
After T. gondii has invaded host cells, DG
proteins discharge from lateral sites near the apical end of the
parasite, diffuse and surround the parasites, and eventually disperse
throughout the PV. To date, ten DG proteins (GRA1 through GRA8 and two
isoforms of NTPase) have been identified. It has been speculated that
DG proteins play a role in the maintenance and remodeling of the PV as
well as nutrient acquisition (28). Dual label immunofluorescence of
timed invasions was used to assess the kinetics of TgPI-1 secretion into the PV.
Freshly isolated tachyzoites were inoculated onto a monolayer of human
foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) for 1 min and incubated for varying
intervals of time before they were fixed, permeabilized, and probed
with R
rTgPI-1 and a mouse mAb against GRA1 (mAbTg17-43) or GRA4
(WU# 950). Ten minutes post-invasion, R
rTgPI-1 and mAb Tg17-43
exhibited intense staining on either side of the apical end of the
parasites (Fig. 4B) in 45% (45/101) of the PVs observed. At
60 min post-invasion, TgPI-1 and GRA1 are redistributed, completely surrounding the parasite residing within the PV (Fig. 4C) in
82% (125/152) of PVs, and by 24 h post-invasion, TgPI-1 and GRA4
completely filled the PV (Fig. 4D) in virtually all PVs (not
quantified). Similar patterns were also observed in single-labeling
experiments using R
rTgPI-1, mAb Tg17-43, or WU# 950 (data not
shown). These results indicate that the kinetics of TgPI-1 secretion
into the PV follows the timing of DG discharge.
TgPI-1 Remains Soluble after Secretion into the PV--
After
secretion into the PV, DG proteins can be targeted to the PV membrane
(29, 30) or the intravacuolar network of tubular membranes within the
PV (25) or remain soluble (31). The solubility characteristics of a DG
protein are important for predicting whether the protein will remain
confined to the host cell after parasite egress or whether it will be
released to potentially act in the extracellular environment of the
tissues surrounding the site of infection. Differential centrifugation
was used to determine the intravacuolar localization of
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141.
HFF monolayers were infected with tachyzoites for 24 h and washed
to remove extracellular parasites. Vacuoles containing 8-16 parasites
were mechanically lysed and centrifuged at low speed to remove the
intact parasites. The low speed supernatant was centrifuged at
100,000 × g to pellet membranes containing PV membrane and tubular membrane networks. The soluble and membrane fractions were
analyzed by Western blotting. As controls, GRA1, a soluble vacuole component (31), and GRA2, which distributes evenly between the
membrane and soluble fractions (32), were analyzed. As expected, GRA1
was observed exclusively within the soluble fraction (Fig. 5A, lanes 2 and
3), whereas GRA2 was distributed equally between the
membrane and soluble fractions (Fig. 5B, lanes 2 and 3). TgPI-143 and TgP1-141 were
detected exclusively within the soluble fractions (Fig. 5C,
lanes 2 and 3). These results indicate that
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 remain soluble after
secretion into the PV. In addition, TgPI-143 and
TgP1-141 do not appear to be proteolytically processed or
otherwise modified upon their release into the PV.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141
are soluble within the PV. Vacuoles containing 8-16 parasites
were mechanically lysed, and the contents were subjected to
ultracentrifugation and analyzed by Western blotting. A,
GRA1 remains in the soluble fraction. Tachyzoite (Tz) lysate
(105 cell equivalents/lane 1) along with equal
volumes of the supernatant (s) (lane 2) and
pellet (p) (lane 3) were resolved by 12.5%
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with antibodies to
GRA1 (mAbTg17-43). B, GRA2 is equally distributed between
the soluble and membrane fractions. The membrane from A was
stripped and probed with antibodies against GRA2 (R GRA2).
C, TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 remain in
the soluble vacuole fraction. The membrane from A was
stripped and probed with R rTgPI-1.
|
|
Recombinant TgPI-1 Is a Broad-spectrum Serine Protease
Inhibitor--
Based on homology with other Kazal family members,
TgPI-1 is predicted to contain four serine protease inhibitor domains
(Fig. 1A). In the Kazal family, the cognate protease is
dictated by the amino acid occupying the P1 position. TgPI-1 has two
domains where arginine residues, predicted to inhibit trypsin, occupy the P1 position and two additional domains containing leucine residues
at the P1 position. Leucine at P1 has been observed to inhibit
chymotrypsin and elastase (reviewed in Refs. 8, 10, and 33).
Recombinant TgPI-1 (rTgPI-1) was expressed, purified from
Escherichia coli, and tested for inhibitory activity against
trypsin, chymotrypsin, and elastase. Proteases were incubated with
increasing amounts of inhibitor, and Ki values were
determined by monitoring cleavage of the peptide substrate.
As predicted on the basis of the P1 position of each domain, rTgPI-1
inhibited chymotrypsin, trypsin, pancreatic elastase, and neutrophil
elastase. The strongest inhibitory activity was observed against
trypsin and chymotrypsin with Ki values of 0.035 and
0.35 nM, respectively (Table
I). Recombinant TgPI-1 (rTgPI-1) also
inhibits pancreatic elastase as well as human neutrophil elastase.
Although the Ki values for pancreatic elastase (Ki = 15 nM) and human neutrophil
elastase (Ki = 49 nM) were markedly
higher than the Ki values observed for both trypsin
and chymotrypsin (Table I), both proteases were significantly inhibited
by rTgPI-1. Pancreatic elastase was inhibited 80% when preincubated
with a 2-fold molar excess of inhibitor, whereas neutrophil elastase
was inhibited 50% in the presence of a 2-fold molar excess and almost
80% when 4-fold molar excess of inhibitor was added (data not
shown).
It is possible that the inhibition observed was actually due to
degradation of the test protease by a contaminating E. coli protease that co-purified with our inhibitors. To rule out this possibility, proteases were incubated with the inhibitors under the
same conditions used to assess inhibition. Protease/inhibitor mixes
were then separated on SDS-PAGE gels and stained to confirm that the
test protease was intact. In all cases, the protease amounts were
unchanged after incubation with the inhibitors (data not shown).
Recombinant TgPI-1 Forms a Stable Complex with Trypsin through
Active Site Interactions--
The closely related Kazal and Kunitz
inhibitors act as pseudosubstrates consisting of an exposed reactive
loop, which fits in the active site cleft of the target enzyme (33). In
most cases binding is rapid and tight. If TgPI-1 inhibits trypsin by the mechanism described above, it should be possible to isolate trypsin-rTgPI-1 complexes. Additionally, modification of the trypsin active site should inhibit complex formation. Trypsin-rTgPI-1 complexes
were isolated by incubation of inhibitor with enzyme followed by
immunoprecipitation with mouse anti-rTgPI-1 antibodies. Immunoprecipitated material was then analyzed by Western blotting with
rabbit anti-trypsin antibodies. As expected for complex formation, purified trypsin co-immunoprecipitated with rTgPI-1 and mouse anti-rTgPI-1 antibodies (Fig.
6A, lane 3).
Trypsin was not detected when mouse anti-rTgPI-1 antibodies were used
in immunoprecipitations in the absence of rTgPI-1 (Fig. 6A,
lane 2). Preincubation of trypsin with
(p-4-amidinophenyl)methylsulfonyl fluoride, a compound that
covalently modifies the trypsin active site (34), blocked complex
formation (Fig. 6B, lane 4). Furthermore,
preincubation of trypsin with soybean trypsin inhibitor, an inhibitor
known to interact with the active site of trypsin (35, 36), blocked complex formation between rTgPI-1 and trypsin (Fig. 6B,
lane 3). Preincubation of trypsin with buffers alone did not
interfere with the ability of rTgPI-1 to form a complex with trypsin
(Fig. 6B, lanes 1 and 2). These
experiments indicate that rTgPI-1 forms a complex with purified trypsin
through active site interactions.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
rTgPI-1 forms a complex with trypsin that is
dependent on residues within the active site of the protease.
A, recombinant TgPI-1 (rTgPI-1) forms a complex with
purified trypsin. 400 ng of rTgPI-1 alone (lane 1), 400 ng
of trypsin alone (lane 2), or 400 ng of trypsin and 400 ng
of rTgPI-1 was incubated (lane 3) for 30 min at 25 °C.
Complexes were immunoprecipitated with mouse anti-rTgPI-1 antibodies,
eluted from Protein G-Sepharose beads, resolved by 12.5% SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with rabbit antitrypsin
antibodies. B, modification of the trypsin active site
inhibits complex formation. Water (lane 1), PBS (lane
2), soybean trypsin inhibitor (STI) (lane
3), or (p-4-amidinophenyl)methylsulfonyl fluoride
(lane 4) was preincubated with trypsin prior to the addition
of rTgPI-1. Complex formation, immunoprecipitations, and Western
blotting were performed as described in A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Serine proteases and their cognate inhibitors play fundamental
roles in cellular biology with functions ranging from digestion, apoptosis, proteolytic processing, wound healing, and cellular and
extracellular remodeling (8-10, 33). Serine protease inhibitors can be
grouped into several families, including the SERPIN, Kazal, and Kunitz
families of inhibitors, based on their structural homologies and
mechanism of inhibition. The SERPINS have been most extensively studied, whereas little work has been published on the cellular biology
of the Kazal family of inhibitors.
Kazal inhibitors have been identified in a wide variety of organisms,
including birds, mammals, insects, and leeches (8, 13-15). Because
Kazal inhibitors act as pseudosubstrates, they have been used
extensively to elucidate interactions between serine proteases and
their substrates (8-10, 33); however, little work has centered on the
in vivo function of this family of inhibitors. We have
identified a Kazal inhibitor, TgPI-1, in T. gondii, a parasite amenable to genetic manipulation and easily cultured in
vitro under a wide variety of conditions.
Western blots indicate that two polypeptides, named
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 according to their
apparent molecular weight, are detected in Toxoplasma cell lysates by
antibodies raised against recombinant TgPI-1. Currently, the
relationship between TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 is
unknown. TgPI-143 may represent the full-length polypeptide
that is proteolytically processed to the smaller form,
TgPI-141. Alternatively, it is possible that the
full-length TgPI-141 is glycosylated to
TgPI-143. The ratio between TgPI-143 and
TgPI-141 can vary between lysate preparations, although it
is unclear why this is the case. The presence or absence of protease
inhibitors in the parasite purification protocol does not affect the
ratio of TgPI-143 to TgPI-141 (data not shown),
suggesting that the two species are not generated during sample preparation.
TgPI-143 and TgPI-141 are secreted into ESA
fractions by extracellular tachyzoites in a BAPTA-AM-insensitive
manner, a characteristic of DG proteins. Additionally, indirect
immunofluorescence of T. gondii as it invades host cells
reveals that TgPI-1 is secreted into the parasitophorous vacuole by
intracellular parasites. It is likely that TgPI-1 is also secreted by
bradyzoites and sporozoites in a manner similar to that observed in
tachyzoites. Dense granule proteins are constitutively secreted by
extracellular tachyzoites, and secretion into the PV is slightly
up-regulated upon invasion (24). In vitro studies indicate
that rTgPI-1 is active against trypsin, chymotrypsin, pancreatic
elastase, and neutrophil elastase. Knowledge regarding the expression
and secretion of TgPI-1 allows us to predict what types of host cell
tissues and proteases this broad-spectrum inhibitor is likely to encounter.
T. gondii infection is most often acquired through the
ingestion of sporozoites, encapsulated within sporulated oocysts, or by
ingestion of bradyzoite-laden tissue cysts contained within the muscle
tissue of an infected animal. Tachyzoites and bradyzoites are resistant
to physiological concentrations of trypsin (4), and it has been
hypothesized that protease inhibitors may be responsible for this
resistance. In vitro studies here show that recombinant TgPI-1 potently inhibits trypsin and chymotrypsin. Bradyzoite and
sporozoite expression of TgPI-1 is the first example of a protease
inhibitor expressed in a stage of the parasite exposed to the digestive
enzymes in the lower intestine. Furthermore, dense granule proteins
secreted by bradyzoites and sporozoites (including TgPI-1) would be
expected to come into contact with secreted proteases present within
the small intestine (trypsin and chymotrypsin) as the parasites
traverse the digestive tract. Upon examination of the lifecycle of
T. gondii, however, there are other potential functions for
TgPI-1.
After bradyzoites/sporozoites penetrate the intestinal epithelium, they
differentiate into rapidly dividing tachyzoites, which disseminate
throughout the body, proliferating within the PV of infected cells (3).
Some tachyzoites probably replicate in intestinal epithelial cells
shortly after initiation of infection. In this case, soluble TgPI-1
released from the vacuole upon host cell lysis could help protect the
parasite from digestive proteases of the gastrointestinal tract before
it enters adjacent cells. This protection would provide the parasite an
opportunity to proliferate within the intestinal epithelium before
disseminating throughout the host organism.
Interestingly, with the exception of the rhoptry protein, TgROP1, which
is degraded within hours of invasion, none of the known DG or rhoptry
(ROP) proteins is proteolytically modified after secretion into the PV.
This suggests that the PV is largely devoid of proteolytic activity.
However, tachyzoites express at least two surface proteases (23) and
one ROP-derived protease (TgSUB2)2 that presumably
occupy the PV. Thus, TgPI-1 may serve to inactivate parasite-derived
proteases in the PV, thereby preventing them from inappropriately
processing vacuolar protein substrates. It is also conceivable that
host-derived proteases occupy the PV and TgPI-1 might additionally
function to neutralize these proteases and prevent them from degrading
the vacuolar contents.
Neutrophils are one of the key immune effector cells of the innate
immune response that forms the first line of defense against microbial
infections. Recent studies suggest that chemokines rapidly recruit host
neutrophils to the site of T. gondii infection where these
cells play an essential role in controlling the early infection, possibly by secreting interleukin-12 to initiate the type 1 cytokine immune response (37-39). However, despite being capable of deploying a
battery of anti-microbial products, including cytokines, proteases, reactive oxygen intermediates, and nitric oxide, neutrophils fail to
prevent T. gondii tachyzoites from establishing the early
infection. This suggests the parasite possesses the ability to
neutralize or counteract anti-microbial products released by
neutrophils. Our observation that TgPI-1 effectively inhibits
neutrophil elastase activity suggests that it could contribute to the
ability of the parasite to survive the innate immune response and
establish long term infection. TgPI-1 secreted by extracellular
tachyzoites, as well as any soluble TgPI-1 released from the PV upon
host cell lysis, could inhibit proteases secreted by neutrophils
recruited to the site of infection. In this scenario, TgPI-1 could act
locally as an anti-inflammatory agent, inhibiting neutrophil proteases such as elastase.
SERPINS, the most extensively studied family of serine protease
inhibitors, have been shown to influence viral pathogenesis by
dictating viral host range, decreasing inflammation and inhibiting apoptosis (11, 40-42). In addition, a member of the Kunitz family of
serine protease inhibitors expressed by the hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicaum has been shown to inhibit chymotrypsin, pancreatic elastase, neutrophil elastase, and trypsin. The A. ceylanicaum Kunitz inhibitor (AceKI-1) may protect the
parasites during their transit through the digestive system or provide
protection against the host immune system (12). However, the natural
target proteases for these microbial SERPINS have not been identified.
Kazal inhibitors have been used extensively in vitro to
study the interactions of serine proteases with their substrates and
are known to bind quickly and tightly to their target proteases.
Exploitation of this characteristic tight binding may allow for
identification of the natural target protease of TgPI-1 in
vivo through co-immunoprecipitation studies. Indeed, we have shown
here that rTgPI-1 forms a complex with purified trypsin that is stable
under relatively stringent immunoprecipitation conditions (1 M Tris, 1% Triton-X-100, 5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2%
SDS, 100 mM NaCl2, 5 mM EDTA).
Additionally, the ability to generate gene-knockout mutants in T. gondii should provide additional insight into the function of
Kazal inhibitors in T. gondii and maybe provide evidence for
functions in other systems.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Michael White for providing T. gondii oocysts. We thank Corrine Mercier, David Sibley, and
Marie-France Cesbron-Delauw for antibodies. We also gratefully
acknowledge George Zhou for his help in identifying TgPI-1 in ESA and
thank David Sullivan, James Morris, Mae Huynh, and Viviana
Pszenny for critical reading of this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a Training Grant AI074417-06 from the National
Institutes of Health.
A Burroughs Wellcome Fund new investigator in molecular
parasitology. To whom correspondence should be addressed: The W. Harry Feinstone Dept. of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD
21205. Tel.: 410-614-5592; Fax: 410-955-0105; E-mail:
vcarruth@jhsph.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205517200
2
K. Kim, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TgPI, T.
gondii protease inhibitor;
rTgPI-1, recombinant TgPI-1;
ROP, rhoptry;
PV, parasitophorous vacuole;
DG, dense granules;
ESA, excreted/secreted antigen;
pNA, p-nitroaniline;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
RT, reverse transcription;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
MS, mass spectrometry;
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization time-of-flight;
BAPTA-AM, bis-(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetra-acetic
acid sodium salt;
HFF, human foreskin fibroblasts;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside;
EST, expressed
sequence tag;
R
rTgPI-1, rabbit antibody generated against
rTgPI-1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Luft, B. J.,
and Remington, J. S.
(1992)
Clin. Infect. Dis.
15,
211-222[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Carter, A. O.,
and Frank, J. W.
(1986)
Can. Med. Assoc. J.
135,
618-623[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Black, M. W.,
and Boothroyd, J. C.
(2000)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
64,
607-623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Sharma, S. P.,
and Dubey, J. P.
(1981)
Am. J. Vet. Res.
42,
128-130[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Pszenny, V.,
Angel, S. O.,
Duschak, V. G.,
Paulino, M.,
Ledesma, B.,
Yabo, M. I.,
Guarnera, E.,
Ruiz, A. M.,
and Bontempi, E. J.
(2000)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
107,
241-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Cesbron-Delauw, M.-F.,
and Capron, A.
(1993)
Res. Immunol.
144,
41-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Silverman, J. A.,
and Joiner, K. A.
(1997)
in
Host Response to Intracellular Pathogens
(Kaufmann, S. H. E., ed)
, pp. 315-339, R. G. Landes Company, Austin, TX
|
| 8.
|
Laskowski, M., Jr.,
and Kato, I.
(1980)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
49,
593-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Laskowski, M., Jr.,
Qasin, M. A.,
and Lu, S. M.
(2000)
in
Protein-Protein Recognition
(Hanes, B. D.
, and Glover, D. M., eds)
, pp. 228-279, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 10.
|
Roberts, R. M.,
Mathialagan, N.,
Duffy, J. Y.,
and Smith, G. W.
(1995)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene. Expr.
5,
385-436[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Turner, P. C.
(2001)
ASM News
67,
201-209
|
| 12.
|
Milstone, A. M.,
Harrison, L. M.,
Bungiro, R. D.,
Kuzmic, P.,
and Cappello, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
29391-29399[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kazal, L.,
Spicer, D.,
and Braninsky, R. A.
(1948)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
70,
3034-3040
|
| 14.
|
Stubbs, M. T.,
Morenweiser, R.,
Sturzebecher, J.,
Bauer, M.,
Bode, W.,
Huber, R.,
Piechottka, G. P.,
Matschiner, G.,
Sommerhoff, C. P.,
Fritz, H.,
and Auerswald, E. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19931-19937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
van de Locht, A.,
Lamba, D.,
Bauer, M.,
Huber, R.,
Friedrich, T.,
Kroger, B.,
Hoffken, W.,
and Bode, W.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5149-5157[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Carruthers, V. B.,
and Sibley, L. D.
(1999)
Mol. Microbiol.
31,
421-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Cornelissen, A. W.,
Overdulve, J. P.,
and Hoenderboom, J. M.
(1981)
Parasitology
83,
103-108[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Speer, C. A.,
Tilley, M.,
Temple, M. E.,
Blixt, J. A.,
Dubey, J. P.,
and White, M. W.
(1995)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
75,
75-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Dzierszinski, F.,
Popescu, O.,
Toursel, C.,
Slomianny, C.,
Yahiaoui, B.,
and Tomavo, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24888-24895[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Neuhoff, V.,
Arold, N.,
Taube, D.,
and Ehrhardt, W.
(1988)
Electrophoresis
9,
255-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Shevchenko, A.,
Wilm, M.,
Vorm, O.,
and Mann, M.
(1996)
Anal. Chem.
68,
850-858[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Onnerfjord, P.,
Ekstrom, S.,
Bergquist, J.,
Nilsson, J.,
Laurell, T.,
and Marko-Varga, G.
(1999)
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
13,
315-322[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Carruthers, V. B.,
Sherman, G. D.,
and Sibley, L. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14346-14353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Carruthers, V. B.,
and Sibley, L. D.
(1997)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
73,
114-123[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Labruyere, E.,
Lingnau, M.,
Mercier, C.,
and Sibley, L. D.
(1999)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
102,
311-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Wan, K. L.,
Carruthers, V. B.,
Sibley, L. D.,
and Ajioka, J. W.
(1997)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
84,
203-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Brydges, S. D.,
Sherman, G. D.,
Nockemann, S.,
Loyens, A.,
Daubener, W.,
Dubremetz, J. F.,
and Carruthers, V. B.
(2000)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
111,
51-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Lingelbach, K.,
and Joiner, K. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
1467-1475[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Lecordier, L.,
Mercier, C.,
Torpier, G.,
Tourvieille, B.,
Darcy, F.,
Liu, J. L.,
Maes, P.,
Tartar, A.,
Capron, A.,
and Cesbron-Delauw, M. F.
(1993)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
59,
143-153[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Ossorio, P. N.,
Dubremetz, J.-F.,
and Joiner, K. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15350-15357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Sibley, L. D.,
Niesman, I. R.,
Parmley, S. F.,
and Cesbron-Delauw, M.-F.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
1669-1677[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Mercier, C.,
Cesbron-Delauw, M. F.,
and Sibley, L. D.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2171-2180[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Bode, W.,
and Huber, R.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
204,
433-451[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Laura, R.,
Robison, D. J.,
and Bing, D. H.
(1980)
Biochemistry
19,
4859-4864[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Luthy, J. A.,
Praissman, M.,
Finkenstadt, W. R.,
and Laskowski, M., Jr.
(1973)
J. Biol. Chem.
248,
1760-1771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Laskowski, M., Sr.
(1968)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
146,
374-380[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Khan, I. A.,
Murphy, P. M.,
Casciotti, L.,
Schwartzman, J. D.,
Collins, J.,
Gau, J.,
and Yeaman, G. R.
(2001)
Am. Assn. Immunologists
1,
1930-1937
|
| 38.
|
Del Rio, L.,
Bennouna, S.,
Salinas, J.,
and Denkers, E. Y.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
167,
6503-6509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Bliss, S. K.,
Gavrilescu, L. C.,
Alcaraz, A.,
and Denkers, E. Y.
(2001)
Infect. Immun.
69,
4898-4905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Macen, J. L.,
Upton, C.,
Nation, N.,
and McFadden, G.
(1993)
Virology
195,
348-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Nash, P.,
Whitty, A.,
Handwerker, J.,
Macen, J.,
and McFadden, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20982-20991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Potempa, J.,
Korzus, E.,
and Travis, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15957-15960[Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Nelson, A. R. Jones, J. C. Carmen, A. P. Sinai, R. Burchmore, and J. M. Wastling
Modulation of the Host Cell Proteome by the Intracellular Apicomplexan Parasite Toxoplasma gondii
Infect. Immun.,
February 1, 2008;
76(2):
828 - 844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Deraison, C. Bonnart, F. Lopez, C. Besson, R. Robinson, A. Jayakumar, F. Wagberg, M. Brattsand, J. P. Hachem, G. Leonardsson, et al.
LEKTI Fragments Specifically Inhibit KLK5, KLK7, and KLK14 and Control Desquamation through a pH-dependent Interaction
Mol. Biol. Cell,
September 1, 2007;
18(9):
3607 - 3619.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|