|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208302200 on September 15, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 45323-45330, November 22, 2002
Intracellular Calcium and Myosin Isoform Transitions
CALCINEURIN AND CALCIUM-CALMODULIN KINASE PATHWAYS REGULATE
PREFERENTIAL ACTIVATION OF THE IIa MYOSIN HEAVY CHAIN PROMOTER*
David L.
Allen and
Leslie A.
Leinwand
From the Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental
Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309
Received for publication, August 13, 2002, and in revised form, September 9, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Intracellular calcium levels can have profound
effects on muscle biology via alterations in gene expression. In
particular, intracellular calcium levels increase during muscle
activation and are thought to underlie fast-to-slow shifts in muscle
gene expression. In the present work, we determined that increased intracellular calcium has a significant effect on the activity of the
adult fast myosin heavy chain (MyHC) promoters in the order of MyHC IIa
IId/x > IIb. We have identified the pathways by which the
calcium signal mediates increased activation of the MyHC IIa promoter.
Inhibition of calcineurin or calcium-calmodulin kinase greatly
attenuates ionophore-induced activation of the MyHC IIa promoter,
whereas protein kinase C inhibitors have no effect. Inhibition and
overexpression studies with members of the mitogen-activated protein
kinase family reveal roles for MEK1/MEK2 and MEKK1, but not p38 or
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Downstream mediators of these effects
are the activities of the MEF-2 and NFAT transcription factors, whose
binding sites in the MyHC IIa promoter are required for calcium-induced
activation of the MyHC IIa promoter.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mammalian skeletal muscle consists of a mosaic of different fiber
types. Four distinct fiber types, one slow (type I) and three fast
(IIa, IId/x, and IIb), are found in adult rodent skeletal muscle, and
these differ with respect to their fatigability and their strength and
speed of contraction. The functional, biochemical, and morphological
differences between muscle fiber types arise as a result of different
programs of fiber-specific gene expression that result in specific
contractile, metabolic, cytoskeletal, and regulatory proteomes
associated with each fiber type.
Skeletal muscle fibers demonstrate remarkable plasticity, and shifts in
fiber type can occur in response to a number of physiological and
pathological conditions, including muscle adaptation, aging, and
muscle disease (1). An increase in muscle activity such as endurance
exercise training induces muscle fiber adaptations through qualitative
and quantitative changes in fiber-specific contractile and metabolic
gene expression that result in slower contracting, more oxidative
muscle fibers (2). The stimuli that induce these shifts in
fiber-specific gene expression are currently not well defined. Likely
candidates include many of the consequences of increased or prolonged
muscle activation, including changes in the amount or pattern of muscle
mechanical and electrical activity; changes in intracellular
metabolites such as glycogen/glucose levels, hydrogen ions, or reactive
oxygen species; and increased secretion of autocrine/paracrine factors.
The amount and pattern of electrical activity induced in muscle fibers
by the motoneuron have been postulated to play a prominent role in
defining muscle gene expression and fiber type (3). One of the most
critical alterations in response to electrical activation of cells is
an increase in intracellular calcium levels. Depolarization-induced
increases in intracellular calcium and its effects on gene expression
have been studied in a number of electrically active cell types,
including cardiac myocytes, neurons, and pancreatic islet cells (4-8).
These studies have also identified several signaling molecules involved
in transducing the calcium signal, including serum response factor
(SRF),1 cyclic AMP-response
element-binding protein, protein kinase C, and various members of the
MAP kinase signaling family.
Not surprisingly, several skeletal muscle genes are sensitive to
electrical activity and/or intracellular calcium levels. Electrical
stimulation of myotubes in culture up-regulates glycogen phosphorylase
(9) but represses expression of the acetylcholine receptor (10) and
fast sarcoplasmic ATPase genes (11). Increases in intracellular calcium
up-regulate several skeletal muscle genes, including the myogenic
regulatory factor Myf-5, the inward rectifying potassium channel, and
the metabolic enzymes hexokinase II and cytochrome c
(12-15). With the exception of the K+ channel gene, this
up-regulation appears to be induced primarily at the level of
transcription (12-15).
In addition, recent evidence has implicated calcium signaling pathways
in slow versus fast fiber gene expression. These studies have demonstrated that prolonged low amplitude increases in
intracellular calcium, such as those produced by slow
motoneurons, result in maximal activation of calcineurin, which in turn
dephosphorylates members of the NFAT family of transcription factors,
allowing them to activate the promoters of such slow-specific
muscle genes as myoglobin and slow troponin I (16). Transgenic mouse
studies have also implicated calcineurin as well as CaM kinase and the MEF-2 family of transcription factors in the specification of slow/oxidative gene expression (17-19), although studies using plasmid
DNA injection failed to find a role for calcineurin in the
specification of slow or fast muscle gene expression in vivo (20).
Calcium-induced activation of calcineurin is also thought to underlie
the fast-to-slow transitions in myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform
expression, both in vitro and in vivo (21-26).
What is less clear is whether calcium signaling is involved in the
transition between fast fiber subtypes. MyHC isoform transitions
typically occur in a stereotypic pattern during muscle adaptation,
moving sequentially from IIb to IId/x to IIa to type I (1). Is
calcineurin involved only in the transition from fast to slow
(i.e. from IIa to type I MyHC expression), or is calcineurin
signaling required to move from IIb to IId/x and/or IId/x to IIa? The
IIa MyHC isoform is expressed in fibers with a high oxidative enzyme
profile more similar to that of type I MyHC-expressing fibers than IIb
or IId/x MyHC-expressing fibers, making it attractive to hypothesize
that IIa MyHC expression may share common elements with type I MyHC. We
recently demonstrated that the upstream promoter region of the IIa MyHC
gene was activated to a much greater extent by a constitutively active
calcineurin construct than the IId/x or IIb MyHC promoters, suggesting
that calcineurin signaling may play a role in transitions between fast
subtypes and that IIa MyHC regulation may share common elements with
type I MyHC expression (27). However, it is unclear whether expression
of the fast MyHC genes is also differentially sensitive to
intracellular calcium or whether other signaling pathways are involved
in transducing calcium-related signals into shifts in fast MyHC expression.
We examined the responsiveness of isolated segments of the adult mouse
skeletal MyHC promoters to calcium signaling in order to better
understand the role of intracellular calcium in shifts in fast
fiber-specific gene expression. We show that the adult skeletal MyHC
upstream promoter regions are differentially sensitive to increased
intracellular calcium, with IIa IId/x > IIb. We used
overexpression constructs and pharmacological inhibitors to identify
specific signaling pathways involved in calcium sensitivity of the
IIa MyHC promoter. Our data suggest that changes in intracellular calcium may play a role in the shifts in fast MyHC expression occurring
during increased muscle activation and identify several key
intracellular pathways that may be involved in this augmentation in vivo.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Promoter and Overexpression Plasmids--
Generation of
luciferase reporter constructs containing ~1 kb of the mouse IIa,
IId/x, and IIb MyHC promoter sequences was described previously (27).
Briefly, ~1 kb of the upstream promoter region for the IIa, IId/x,
and IIb MyHC genes was subcloned into the firefly luciferase plasmid
VR1255 (Vical). Site-directed mutagenesis of the MEF-2-binding AT-rich
region 1, CArG-like box, and proximal NFAT site in the IIa MyHC
promoter was accomplished using a mutagenesis kit (Stratagene).
"Sensor" constructs containing multimerized copies of the MEF-2 and
NFAT binding sites were kindly provided by Dr. Eric Olson, whereas the
multimerized SRE construct was obtained from Stratagene. Overexpression
constructs for MEF-2C, NFAT, SRF, HDAC4, HDAC5, and MEF-2-interacting
transcription repressor (MITR) were also provided by Dr. Eric
Olson, whereas the CMV-MEKK1 construct was obtained from Stratagene. A
differentiation-sensitive MEKK1 construct was created by Dr. Ulrika
Widegren by placing the cDNA for constitutively active MEKK1 under
the control of the IId/x MyHC promoter.
Cell Culture Transfections--
Mouse
C2C12 myoblasts (American Type Culture
Collection) were grown on gelatin-coated dishes in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) and 10% fetal bovine serum
(Hyclone). Cells were transfected at 70-80% confluence using
LipofectAMINE transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's
protocol (Invitrogen). In all experiments, the thymidine
kinase-Renilla luciferase construct pRLTK (Promega) was
co-transfected to correct for transfection efficiency. Myoblasts were
switched to differentiation medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium plus 1% horse serum 1-2 days post-transfection. After
2 days of differentiation, myotubes were either treated with
Me2SO vehicle alone or 0.4 µM of calcium
ionophore A23187 (Sigma) for 1-2 days.
Luciferase Assays--
A commercially available dual luciferase
assay system was used (Promega). Briefly, cells were lysed in 1×
passive lysis buffer and 10 µl of the cell lysate was assayed for
both firefly (MyHC promoter constructs and positive controls) and
Renilla (internal control) luciferase activity using a
standard luminometer. Values are reported as firefly luciferase
divided by Renilla luciferase levels.
Western Blotting--
C2C12 myotubes
were treated with either vehicle or A23187 for 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h and then scraped in lysis buffer stored at 70 °C until use.
Protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad)
and was adjusted to 1 mg/ml. Equal protein concentrations were
separated by gel electrophoresis using standard techniques. Proteins
were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a miniblot
transfer apparatus (Bio-Rad) and blocked for 1 h at room
temperature in 5% nonfat dry milk, 1% normal goat serum, and 1%
bovine serum albumin. Blots were incubated with a monoclonal antibody
to the autophosphorylated form of CaM kinase II (Promega) for 1 h
at room temperature, rinsed several times in phosphate-buffered saline
containing 1% Tween 20 (PBS-T), and then incubated for 2 h with
an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody
(Promega). Binding was visualized using a 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium kit (Vector Laboratories). Bands were
densitometrically scanned using NIH Image.
Mobility Shift Assays--
Nuclear extracts were isolated from
differentiated control and A23187-treated C2C12
myotubes using standard techniques (28). Briefly,
C2C12 myoblasts were grown to confluence and allowed to differentiate for 2 days. The medium was removed, and cells
were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline and then scraped into buffer A
(10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2,
10 mM KCl, and EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture) and
centrifuged at 1400 × g for 10 min. The cells were
resuspended in 5 volumes of buffer A, respun, and resuspended in 2 volumes of buffer A. Cells were lysed using a Dounce homogenizer A and
centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 min. The pellet was
centrifuged at 5000 × g for 20 min and resuspended in
buffer C (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 25% glycerol, 0.42 M NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitor mixture) and homogenized
with 3-5 strokes with a Dounce homogenizer type B. The resulting
homogenate was stirred on ice for 30 min and then microcentrifuged at
12,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant was dialyzed against Buffer D
(20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 0.1 M KCl,
0.2 mM EDTA, protease inhibitor mixture) for 5 h. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad). The resulting nuclear extract was stored at 70 °C until
use. Oligonucleotides containing the AT-rich-1 region or the proximal
NFAT region of the IIa promoter were labeled with [ -32P]dCTP and used for mobility shift reactions.
Briefly, 100,000 cpm of labeled probe was added to 10 µg of nuclear
extract in a reaction containing 1 µg of dI-dC and binding buffer
(100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 12.5% Ficoll)
for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction solution was then run on a
4% acrylamide gel at 300 V. The gel was then dried and placed on a
PhosphorImager screen overnight.
 |
RESULTS |
Responsiveness of the MyHC Promoters to Intracellular
Calcium--
We tested the responsiveness of the three adult fast MyHC
promoters to increased intracellular calcium in
C2C12 myotubes. Ionophore treatment for 36 h induced much greater activation of both human and mouse IIa MyHC
promoters (~10-20-fold, respectively; Fig.
1, A and B) than
the mouse IId/x and IIb MyHC promoters (Fig. 1C). Thus, the
activity of the IIa MyHC promoter, which is associated with more
oxidative fast fibers, was augmented to a greater extent by
intracellular calcium than the IId/x and IIb MyHC promoters.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Activation of fast MyHC promoters by calcium
ionophore. A, relative luciferase levels for 1000 bp of
the human type IIa MyHC promoter and 670 bp of the mouse IIa MyHC
promoter in control and A23187 ionophore-treated
C2C12 myotubes. A23187 treatment resulted in a
significant increase in the activity of both mouse and human promoters.
All values are normalized to Renilla luciferase levels.
B, -fold change in promoter activity following ionophore
treatment. The human and mouse IIa promoters were induced 8-13-fold
over untreated. C, activity of the mouse IIa, IId/x, and IIb
MyHC promoters is increased by ionophore treatment. The mouse adult
skeletal fast MyHC promoters were differentially activated by A23187
treatment, with IIa IId/x > IIb. D, shorter
durations (1 or 4 h) of ionophore treatment also stimulate IIa
MyHC promoter activity. All bars are the mean ± S.E.
of 3-5 experiments. *, significantly different from unstimulated
control, p < 0.05; , significantly different from
IIb, p < 0.05.
|
|
IIa MyHC Promoter Activity Is Increased by Shorter Durations of
Ionophore Treatment--
We wished to examine whether IIa MyHC
promoter activity could be increased in response to shorter periods of
ionophore stimulation compared with the 36-h treatment used in Fig. 1.
We used 1 and 4 h of ionophore stimulation and examined IIa MyHC
promoter activity at several time points poststimulation. Ionophore
stimulation of C2C12 myotubes for these shorter
periods resulted in a dose- and time-dependent increase in
IIa MyHC promoter activity (Fig. 1D). With 1 h of
ionophore stimulation, IIa promoter activity was not significantly
activated at 0 or 1 h poststimulation but was significantly
increased at 3 and 6 h poststimulation, increasing to about 2-fold
over the unstimulated control (Fig. 1D). By 12 h, IIa
MyHC promoter activation was decreasing, and by 24 h
post-stimulation IIa MyHC promoter activity had returned to base-line
values (Fig. 1D). With 4 h of ionophore stimulation,
IIa MyHC promoter activity was significantly increased immediately upon
cessation of ionophore stimulation and increased thereafter, reaching a
peak of ~4-fold stimulation over control at 6 h poststimulation
(Fig. 1D). After 12 h poststimulation, IIa MyHC
promoter activity was decreasing but was still ~2-fold elevated over
control even at 24 h poststimulation. Thus, stimulation for 4 h produced a more rapid and higher peaking response compared with
1 h of ionophore stimulation and did not fully return to base line
even 24 h after stimulation.
Calcineurin and CaM Kinase II Mediate Ionophore-induced IIa MyHC
Promoter Activation--
Increased intracellular calcium activates at
least three major signaling pathways: the calcineurin, CaM kinase, and
protein kinase C pathways. We used pharmacological inhibitors for each of these pathways to determine their role in ionophore-induced activation of the IIa MyHC promoter. In addition, we tested the effects
of calcineurin on endogenous MyHC IIa expression. Treatment with
cyclosporin A, an inhibitor of calcineurin, significantly attenuated
ionophore activation of the IIa MyHC promoter in
C2C12 myotubes (Fig.
2A), whereas overexpression of
a constitutively activated form of calcineurin increased endogenous IIa
MyHC protein expression (Fig. 2, B-D). Treatment of
myotubes with KN62, an inhibitor of CaM kinase II, also significantly
attenuated ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activity (Fig.
3A). Following activation of CaM kinase II by calcium and calmodulin, the enzyme autophosphorylates, allowing it to remain active independent of calcium levels. Ionophore treatment also resulted in a moderate increase in the
autophosphorylation of CaM kinase II at 1-3 h of ionophore treatment,
but autophosphorylation was decreased at longer treatment durations
(Fig. 3B). In contrast, inhibitors of protein kinase C
activity had no significant effect on ionophore-induced activation of
the IIa MyHC promoter (Fig. 4).
Staurosporine treatment tended to decrease ionophore-induced IIa MyHC
promoter activation, but the effect was highly variable and was not
statistically significant; the largest effect was seen at the highest
concentrations of staurosporine, which is less specific at high
concentrations (Fig. 4A). We therefore examined the effect
of a more specific protein kinase C inhibitor, chelerythrine, on
ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activation. Treatment with chelerythrine had no effect on ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activity (Fig. 4B), confirming that protein kinase C is not
involved in increasing IIa MyHC promoter activity in response to
increased intracellular calcium. Together these data support a role
for calcineurin and CaM kinase II but not protein kinase C in
calcium-induced activation of the IIa MyHC promoter.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Role of calcineurin in IIa MyHC gene
expression. A, C2C12 myotubes
transfected with the IIa MyHC promoter construct were treated with
ionophore and with and different concentrations of the calcineurin
inhibitor cyclosporin A. Data are expressed as a percentage of the
maximum response of the IIa MyHC promoter to A23187 without cyclosporin
A. Cyclosporin significantly inhibited ionophore induction of IIa MyHC
promoter activity even at the lowest concentration tested (125 nM). *, significantly different from ionophore treated
alone, p < 0.05. B, overexpression of a
constitutively active calcineurin gene significantly augments
endogenous IIa MyHC expression. The number of IIa-positive myotubes was
assessed using immunohistochemistry in five different regions of four
wells each in three experiments. Other wells were stained with
antibodies to all sarcomeric MyHC isoforms (F59), and the total number
of MyHC-positive myotubes was used to determine the percentage of
IIa-positive myotubes of the total. Ca-CN, constitutively
active calcineurin. , significantly different from
-galactosidase-transfected, p < 0.05. C,
immunohistochemical staining for IIa MyHC of
-galactosidase-transfected well. D, immunohistochemical
staining of constitutively active calcineurin field, demonstrating a
higher percentage of IIa-positive myotubes.
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CaM kinase pathway and ionophore induction of
IIa MyHC promoter activity. A,
C2C12 myotubes transfected with the IIa MyHC
promoter construct were treated with A23187 plus different
concentrations of KN62, an inhibitor of CaM kinase II. Data are
expressed as a percentage of the response due to treatment with A23187
alone without KN62 co-treatment. KN62 inhibited A23187 induction of the
IIa promoter in a dose-dependent manner. *, significantly
different from ionophore treated alone, p < 0.05. B, Western blotting for the autophosphorylated form of CaM
kinase II. The top shows a representative Western blot.
Bottom, quantification of densitometric scanning of each
band.
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Protein kinase C and IIa MyHC promoter
calcium sensitivity. A, C2C12
myotubes transfected with the IIa MyHC promoter construct and treated
with A23187 plus different concentrations of staurosporine, an
inhibitor of protein kinase C. Data are reported as a percentage of the
response due to treatment with A23187 alone without staurosporine
co-treatment. Staurosporine treatment tended to decrease IIa activation
in response to calcium ionophore A23187, but the decrease was variable
and not significant. *, significantly different from ionophore treated
alone, p < 0.05. B, effect of treatment
with a more specific inhibitor of protein kinase C, chelerythrine, at 1 µM. Chelerythrine had no effect on ionophore induction of
the IIa MyHC promoter.
|
|
MAP Kinase Pathways and Ionophore-induced IIa Promoter
Activity--
We also investigated the role of the MAP kinase pathways
in ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activation. Treatment of
C2C12 myotubes with UO126 or PD098059,
inhibitors of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase
pathway activators MEK1 and MEK1/2, respectively, significantly
attenuated ionophore stimulation of IIa MyHC promoter activity,
whereas SB230580, an inhibitor of p38, and wortmannin, a
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, did not (Fig.
5A). We also examined the
effects of overexpression of MEKK1, an activator of the c-Jun
N-terminal kinase pathway, on ionophore-induced IIa MyHC activation
using both a viral (CMV) and a differentiation-specific (IId/x MyHC)
promoter to drive MEKK1 expression. Co-transfection with CMV-MEKK1
almost completely abolished ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter
activation, whereas co-transfection with IId/x-MEKK1 augmented
ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activity (Fig. 5B). Transfection of C2C12 myoblasts with the
CMV-MEKK1 also resulted in a dramatic attenuation of myoblast
differentiation into myotubes (Fig. 5D), whereas IId/X-MEKK1
had no effect on differentiation (Fig. 5E). Thus, the effect
of MEKK1 on ionophore-induced promoter activity appeared to be
differentiation-dependent; CMV-MEKK1 attenuated ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activity indirectly by suppressing differentiation, whereas IId/x-MEKK1 did not affect myoblast
differentiation and augmented IIa promoter activity, most likely
through differentiation-independent mechanisms.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
MAP kinase pathways and ionophore-induced IIa
MyHC promoter activity. A, treatment with specific MAP
kinase pathway inhibitors and ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter
activity. C2C12 myotubes transfected with the
IIa MyHC promoter construct were treated with A23187 plus various
pharmacological inhibitors. Treatment with PD095059 (50 µM) or UO126 (10 mM), which inhibit MEK1 and
MEK1 and MEK2, respectively, significantly attenuated ionophore-induced
IIa MyHC promoter activation, whereas SB203580 (20 µM)
and wortmannin (1 mM), inhibitors of p38 and
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, had no effect. *, significantly
different from ionophore treated alone, p < 0.05. B, effects of MEKK1 on ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter
activation. C2C12 myotubes were transfected
with the IIa MyHC promoter construct and either a CMV-B-gal construct,
a CMV-MEKK1 construct, or a IId/x-MEKK1 construct and treated with
A23187. Co-transfection with either CMV-MEKK1 or IId/x-MEKK1 had
minimal effects on IIa MyHC promoter activity when treated with vehicle
alone. In contrast, CMV-MEKK1 co-transfection completely abolished IIa
responsiveness to A23187 treatment, whereas IId/x-MEKK1 co-transfection
augmented A23187 activation of the IIa MyHC promoter. *, significantly
different from unstimulated control, p < 0.05; ,
significantly different from CMV-MEKK1, p < 0.05; ,
significantly different from -galactosidase-transfected,
p < 0.05. C-E, immunofluorescence of
C2C12 myotubes transfected with either
CMV- -galactosidase (C), CMV-MEKK1 (D), or
IId/x-MEKK1 (E). Myotubes were stained with F59, an antibody
that recognizes all sarcomeric isoforms of MyHC, and counterstained
with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Transfection with CMV-MEKK1 results
in a significant attenuation of myotube differentiation, whereas
IId/x-MEKK1 has no effect on differentiation.
|
|
MEF and NFAT but Not SRF Augment Ionophore-induced IIa Promoter
Activity--
We next examined the role of three transcription factor
families implicated in calcium signaling pathways (MEF-2, NFAT, and SRF) on IIa MyHC promoter activation by ionophore treatment. Putative binding sites for all three factors are present in the IIa upstream promoter region (27). Co-transfection of MEF-2C or NFAT3 without ionophore treatment resulted in a small but consistent augmentation of
IIa MyHC promoter activity (Fig. 6,
A and B), as reported previously (27),
whereas co-transfection with SRF without ionophore treatment resulted
in a 3-fold increase in IIa MyHC promoter activity (Fig. 6C). When combined with ionophore treatment, co-transfection
of MEF-2C or NFAT3 resulted in a significant enhancement compared with
ionophore treatment alone (Fig 6, A and B). In
contrast, co-transfection with SRF did not alter ionophore-induced IIa
MyHC promoter activity when compared with treatment with ionophore alone (Fig. 6C).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Transcription factor co-transfection and
ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activation.
C2C12 myotubes were co-transfected with the IIa
promoter construct and CMV promoter-driven expression plasmids for
MEF-2C (A), NFAT3 (B), or SRF (C).
-Galactosidase co-transfection was used as a control.
Co-transfection with MEF-2C or NFAT3 without ionophore treatment
resulted in a modest (50-90%) increase in IIa promoter activity,
whereas SRF increased IIa MyHC promoter activity by ~3-4-fold
(C). Co-transfection with MEF-2C or NFAT3 significantly
potentiated IIa MyHC promoter activation in response to calcium
ionophore, whereas co-transfection with SRF did not affect
ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activity. D,
co-transfection with HDAC4, HDAC5, or MITR all attenuated A23187
activation of the IIa MyHC promoter. *, significantly different from
unstimulated control, p < 0.05; , significantly
different from -galactosidase-transfected plus ionophore treatment,
p < 0.05.
|
|
Activation of MEF-2 transcription factors by CaM kinase is thought to
be mediated through phosphorylation and removal of class II HDACs from
the nucleus (29). We therefore examined the role of HDAC
co-transfection on ionophore activation of the IIa MyHC promoter.
Co-transfection with HDAC4, HDAC5, or MITR resulted in a
significant attenuation of ionophore-induced IIa MyHC activation (Fig.
6D). Together with the MEF-2 co-transfection data, these results support a role for MEF-2 as well as NFAT in ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activation.
MEF-2 and NFAT Binding Sites Are Necessary for Ionophore-induced
IIa Promoter Activation--
We examined whether the effect of MEF-2
and/or NFAT was a direct one due to binding of these transcription
factors to the IIa MyHC promoter or was an indirect consequence of
MEF-2 and/or NFAT activation of other genes. To answer this question,
we used "sensor" constructs containing multimerized consensus
binding sites for MEF-2, NFAT, and SRF. Consistent with the
co-transfection data, activity of the MEF-2 and NFAT sensor
constructs was significantly increased by ionophore treatment, but SRF
sensor activity was not (Fig.
7A). Together, these data
strongly support a role for MEF-2 and NFAT but not SRF in
ionophore-induced activation of the IIa MyHC promoter.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
MEF-2 and NFAT binding are critical to
ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activation. A,
activation of sensor constructs in response to ionophore treatment.
Multimerized copies of the MEF-2, NFAT, or SRF consensus binding sites
linked to -galactosidase or luciferase reporter genes were used to
assess the effects of calcium ionophore A23187 on signaling through
these sites. Ionophore treatment increased MEF-2 and NFAT sensor
construct activation but not SRF sensor construct activity.
B, role of specific binding sites in the IIa MyHC promoter
on ionophore-induced IIa promoter activity. The schematic at the
left shows the three binding sites within the proximal 200 bp of the IIa MyHC promoter. All elements were mutated in the context
of the 670-bp IIa MyHC promoter. Mutation or deletion of the MEF-2
binding site or the NFAT binding site attenuated IIa MyHC promoter
activation by ~50%, whereas mutation of the CArG-like element had no
effect. * (in both A and B), significantly different from unstimulated
control, p < 0.05.
|
|
We used mutagenesis to alter the putative binding sites for these
factors within the 677-bp IIa MyHC promoter and transfected C2C12 myoblasts with these constructs to
determine their role in ionophore-induced activation. Mutation or
internal deletion of the MEF-2-binding AT-rich site or mutation of the
proximal NFAT site resulted in a significant attenuation of
ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter activation (Fig. 7B).
Deletion of the MEF-2 site and mutation of the NFAT site in the same
construct did not further attenuate ionophore-induced IIa MyHC
promoter activity (Fig. 7B), suggesting that other sites
contribute to this activation. Mutation of the CArG-like site had no
effect on ionophore-induced activation of the IIa MyHC promoter (Fig.
7B).
We examined whether ionophore treatment resulted in changes in the
binding activity of MEF-2 and/or NFAT proteins to their respective
binding sites on the IId promoter. Mobility shift assays using
oligonucleotides containing the MEF-2-binding AT-rich-1 region of the
IIa MyHC promoter demonstrated increased formation of three complexes
with nuclear extract proteins isolated from ionophore-treated
C2C12 myotubes compared with extract from
control C2C12 myotubes (Fig.
8A). Based on previous
research (30),2 the upper
binding activity is actually a doublet likely to represent binding of
MEF-2 family members in the uppermost band, whereas the slightly lower
band represents Oct-1 binding. The addition of a polyclonal antibody
against MEF-2 results in a supershift of the uppermost band in the
complex (Fig. 8A, lane 4,
Iono Ab). The third, lower complex
probably represents a palindrome-binding protein (Pal-BP)
previously identified by Lakich et al. (30). Binding of all
three protein complexes is greater in ionophore-treated myotube
nuclear extract compared with untreated myotube nuclear extracts (Fig. 8A). Mobility shift assays using
oligonucleotides containing the proximal NFAT binding region showed
much lower binding activity than the MEF-2 oligonucleotides; Fig.
8B is taken at a much higher exposure than Fig.
8A, suggesting that NFAT binding is much lower than MEF-2
binding in both control and ionophore-treated myotubes. Based on
previously published studies on NFAT binding, it is likely that the
uppermost binding activity is NFAT, whereas the lower band represents
nonspecific binding activity (31). The binding activity of NFAT is
increased in ionophore-treated myotube nuclear extract compared with
untreated myotube nuclear extract, but the difference is not as great
as that for MEF-2 (Fig. 8B). Finally, we used an
oligonucleotide containing a consensus binding site for the
ubiquitously expressed transcription factor Sp1 to examine
the specificity this response. In contrast to the results using the
AT-rich region or proximal NFAT site, binding of Sp1 was not increased
by ionophore treatment and, in fact, was slightly higher for the
control myotube extract (Fig. 8C).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mobility shift assays for the MEF-2 and NFAT
binding sites. A, mobility shift assays using an
oligonucleotide containing the AT-rich-1 MEF-2 binding site in the IIa
MyHC promoter. Lane P, probe alone;
lane C, unstimulated myotube nuclear extract;
Iono, ionophore-treated myotube nuclear extract;
Iono Ab, ionophore-treated myotube extract plus
polyclonal antibody to either MEF-2 or NFAT. Ionophore treatment
results in an increase in MEF-2 binding activity. B,
mobility shift assays using an oligonucleotide containing the proximal
NFAT binding site in the IIa MyHC promoter. Lanes are the
same as in A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
One of the most prominent signals believed to be involved in
regulating fiber-specific gene expression is intracellular calcium levels. In the present work, we determined whether expression of the
adult fast skeletal MyHC genes is sensitive to increases in
intracellular calcium. Of the three adult fast MyHC promoters, IIa
showed the greatest response, increasing by up to 20-fold, followed by
IId/x and then IIb (Fig. 1C). The increase in IId/x MyHC
promoter activity is in contrast to work by Meisner et al. (22), who demonstrated a decrease in IId/x MyHC RNA and protein in
response to prolonged ionophore treatment of myotubes in
vitro. In this earlier study, myotubes were stimulated with
ionophore for extended periods of time (2 weeks), whereas in the
present study we used much shorter durations of ionophore treatment
(~36 h). Thus, at least part of the difference between the results of
Meisner et al. (22) and the present work may be the
difference in treatment duration; the IId/x MyHC gene may be activated
during the early phase of adaptation to increased intracellular calcium levels but may eventually be down-regulated as myotubes shift toward a
more oxidative phenotype.
Previous studies have demonstrated that overexpression of calcineurin
in cultured myotubes increases slow MyHC protein levels and either does
not change or decreases fast MyHC expression (23, 24). However, the
three different fast MyHC subtypes were not distinguished in those
studies, so it cannot be determined whether there were differential
shifts within the fast fiber subtypes. Type IIb and/or IId/x MyHC could
have decreased while type IIa MyHC was increasing in these studies.
Previously, we demonstrated that constitutively active calcineurin
preferentially activated the IIa MyHC promoter, increasing it by
50-200-fold compared with 5-10-fold for the IId/x and IIb promoters
(27). Here we demonstrate that calcineurin overexpression also
increases expression of endogenous IIa MyHC protein (Fig. 2,
B-D). Furthermore, the IIa MyHC promoter is preferentially
activated to a greater extent than the other two fast MyHC promoters by
intracellular calcium levels in a calcineurin-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). These data suggest that
calcium-calcineurin signaling may be involved in the shift from IId/x
and IIb MyHC toward isoforms of MyHC associated with more oxidative
fibers (i.e. I and IIa) that are better suited to meet the
work demands involved in prolonged muscle activation.
Studies using transgenic mice have suggested that the calcium-activated
calcineurin-NFAT-MEF-2 and CaM kinase-MEF-2-HDAC signaling pathways are
involved in fast-to-slow fiber type transitions (16-19). However, it
was unclear from these studies whether these factors activated type I
expression or were involved in transitions between fast subtypes. Work
in vivo using calcineurin inhibitors has suggested that
inhibition of calcineurin causes a shift from type I to type IIa MyHC
expression only (25), but this was done in the rat soleus muscle, which
is normally 80-100% type I, and may not possess the full range of
adaptability across all fast fiber types. The present work demonstrates
that intracellular calcium and calcineurin are involved in
up-regulating IIa MyHC expression and thus may be involved in the
transition from IIb or IId/x fibers to IIa. Consistent with this
hypothesis, calcineurin-MEF-2 signaling was most active in the fastest,
least oxidative muscle fibers in vivo (i.e. IId/x
and IIb) during adaptation to increased usage (32), whereas treatment
of rat soleus with the endogenous calcineurin inhibitor Cain
shifted MyHC expression from type I to type IId/x and IIb (26).
We examined the role of two additional pathways activated by increased
intracellular calcium levels on MyHC promoter activity: CaM kinase and
protein kinase C. Our results show that CaM kinase II plays an early
role in IIa MyHC promoter activation (Fig. 3). In contrast, neither
staurosporine nor chelerythrine, two different protein kinase C
inhibitors, had a significant effect on IIa MyHC promoter induction by
ionophore treatment (Fig. 4). Protein kinase C has previously been
shown to inhibit slow MyHC expression in cultured chick myotubes in a
muscle-specific manner but did not appear to affect fast MyHC
expression (33), consistent with the present results.
We also showed that MEK1 and MEK2 play a role in IIa MyHC promoter
activation in response to ionophore treatment. The MAP kinase signaling
pathways play critical roles in many cell functions but are
particularly prominent in cell proliferation. However, since >80-90%
of the cells were in myotubes prior to treatment with ionophore or MEK
inhibitors, it is unlikely that the results were due to effects of the
MEK1/2 inhibitors on cell proliferation. These data therefore suggest
that the MEK1/2-extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway may
regulate calcium activation of the IIa MyHC gene within differentiated
muscle cells. However, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase
kinases are highly active in both proliferating myoblasts and in fully
differentiated myotubes, consistent with a role for this pathway in
postdifferentiation muscle gene expression (34). In addition, Ras and
Raf, which act upstream of MEK1 and 2, induce slow MyHC expression in
regenerating soleus muscle in vivo (35).
MEKK1 is an activator of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway.
Inhibition of differentiation by CMV-MEKK1 resulted in the loss in
calcium sensitivity of the IIa promoter, which in turn suggests that
molecules specific to differentiated myotubes/myofibers are necessary
for ionophore induction of the IIa MyHC gene. When the effects of MEKK1
were separated from its effects on cell proliferation using the
differentiation-activated IId/x MyHC promoter to drive MEKK1
expression, MEKK1 actually potentiated ionophore-induced IIa activity,
suggesting that the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway may be involved in
IIa MyHC activation in differentiated myotubes.
In contrast, neither p38 nor phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase appears to
play a role in the activation of the IIa MyHC promoter. The lack of a
role for p38 was somewhat surprising, given that p38 stimulates
transactivation activity of MEF-2 family members (36). Our results are
also at odds with those of Delling et al. (23), who showed
that transfection of C2C12 myotubes with a MKK6
construct, an activator of p38, results in up-regulation of fast MyHC
protein expression. Several isoforms of p38 are expressed in muscle,
and there has been some suggestion that SB203580 may not inactivate all
p38 isoforms (36), which may explain the effects observed in the
present work.
We present several pieces of data suggesting that the MEF-2 and NFAT
families of transcription factors are involved in activating the IIa
MyHC promoter in response to ionophore treatment. Together with the
data on the role of the calcineurin-NFAT-MEF-2 pathway on slow fiber
gene expression (16-18), these data are consistent with the hypothesis
that MEF-2 and NFAT transcription factors are involved in the
activation of genes associated with a more oxidative phenotype such as
type I and type IIa MyHC. In contrast, we found no evidence to suggest
that SRF is associated with ionophore-induced IIa MyHC promoter
activation. The SRF transcription factor has been implicated in
calcium-induced shifts in neuronal and myocardial gene transcription
(4, 6, 7). SRF is also expressed in a loading-dependent
manner in skeletal muscle (37, 38) and activates several
muscle-specific genes, including dystrophin (39) and -skeletal actin
(40). In addition, SRF is phosphorylated by CaM kinase II at several
sites (41). Nonetheless, SRF does not appear to be critical for IIa
MyHC promoter activation in response to ionophore treatment.
It has been proposed that changes in the expression of
activity-sensitive muscle genes may result from the cumulative effect of repeated exercise bouts on signaling pathways leading to transient increases in gene expression; when these bouts are repeated at regular
intervals as during a training regimen, these transient increases in
RNA levels reach a threshold beyond which changes in protein levels
occur that confer phenotypic changes upon the muscle (42). To date,
this has been demonstrated most effectively for metabolic genes such as
the GLUT-4 glucose transporter and various mitochondrial genes (42,
43). Endurance exercise has been shown to activate calcineurin-MEF-2
signaling in vivo (44), whereas marathon running in humans
also transiently induces the c-Jun N-terminal kinase and extracellular
signal-regulated kinase signaling pathways (45, 46). In the studies
above, we stimulated C2C12 myotubes with
calcium ionophore for 36 h in order to examine the maximal
response to increased intracellular calcium. However, to determine
whether durations of increased intracellular calcium that might more
closely parallel bouts of exercise could also stimulate IIa MyHC
promoter activity, we treated myotubes for either 1 or 4 h and
found that this resulted in a transient increase in IIa MyHC promoter
activity that was dose- and time-dependent (Fig.
1D). Treatment with ionophore for 1 h resulted in a
transient 2-fold increase in IIa MyHC promoter activity that returned
to normal by 24 h poststimulation. Treatment for 4 h resulted
in a much greater increase in IIa MyHC promoter activity, and activity remained elevated even 24 h poststimulation. These data show that shorter stimulation durations also result in up-regulation of IIa MyHC
expression and are consistent with the hypothesis that transient
changes in gene expression are a component of the adaptation of
skeletal muscle to increased usage.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Eric Olson for the generous gift
of various expression constructs, Priya Kumar for assistance with the
calcineurin transfection experiments, and Dr. Ulrika Widegren for
assistance in cloning the IId/x-MEKK1 construct.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant RO1-GM29090 (to L. A. L.) and an MDA research fellowship grant (to D. L. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular,
Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Campus Box
347, Boulder, CO 80309-0347. Tel.: 303-492-8371; Fax: 303-492-8907;
E-mail: allendl@stripe.colorado.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208302200
2
D. L. Allen and L. A. Leinwand,
unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SRF, serum response
factor;
MyHC, myosin heavy chain;
MEF-2, myocyte-specific enhancer
factor 2;
NFAT, nuclear factor/activator of T cells;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
CaM kinase, calcium-calmodulin kinase;
HDAC, histone
deacetylase;
MAP, mitogen activated protein;
MEKK1, mitogen-extracellular kinase kinase-1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Pette, D.,
and Staron, R. S.
(1997)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
170,
143-223[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Pette, D.
(1984)
Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.
16,
517-528
|
| 3.
|
Buonanno, A.,
and Fields, R. D.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
9,
110-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Miranti, C. K.,
Ginty, D. D.,
Huang, G.,
Chatila, T.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
3672-3684[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Johnson, C. M.,
Hill, C. S.,
Chawla, S.,
Triesman, R.,
and Bading, H.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
6189-6202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
McDonough, P. M.,
Hanford, D. S.,
Sprenkle, A. B.,
Mellon, N. R.,
and Glembotski, C. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24046-24053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Bernal-Mizrachi, E.,
Wice, B.,
Inoue, H.,
and Permutt, M. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25681-25689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
West, A. E.,
Chen, W. G.,
Dalva, M. B.,
Dolmetsch, R. E.,
Kornhauser, J. M.,
Shaywitz, A. J.,
Takasu, M. A.,
Tao, X.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
11024-11031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Vali, S.,
Carlsen, R.,
Pessah, I.,
and Gorin, F.
(2000)
J. Cell. Physiol.
185,
184-199[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Altiok, N.,
and Changeux, J-P.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
487,
333-338[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Thelen, M. H. M.,
Simonides, W. S.,
and Hardeveld, C.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
321,
845-848[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Friday, B. B.,
and Pavlath, G. K.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
303-310[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Shin, K. S.,
Park, J-Y.,
Kwon, H.,
Chung, C. H.,
and Kang, M-S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21227-21232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Freyssenet, D., Di,
Carlo, M.,
and Hood, D. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
9305-9311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Halseth, A. E.,
O'Doherty, R. M.,
Printz, R. L.,
Bracy, D. P.,
Granner, D. K.,
and Wasserman, D. H.
(2000)
J. Appl. Physiol.
88,
669-673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Chin, E. R.,
Olson, E. N.,
Richardson, J. A.,
Yang, Q.,
Humphries, C.,
Shelton, J. M., Wu, H.,
Zhu, W.,
Bassel-Duby, R.,
and Williams, R. S.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2499-2509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Wu, H.,
Naya, F. J.,
McKinsey, T. A.,
Mercer, B.,
Shelton, J. M.,
Chin, E. R,
Simard, A. R.,
Michel, R. N.,
Bassel-Duby, R.,
Olson, E. N.,
and Williams, R. S.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1963-1973[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Wu, H.,
Kanatous, S. B.,
Thurmond, F. A.,
Gallardo, T.,
Isotani, E.,
Bassel-Duby, R.,
and Williams, R. S.
(2002)
Science
296,
349-352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Naya, F. J.,
Mercer, B.,
Shelton, J.,
Richardson, J. A.,
Williams, R. S.,
and Olson, E. N.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4545-4548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Swoap, S. J.,
Hunter, R. B.,
Stevenson, E. J.,
Mitchell-Felton, H.,
Kansagra, N. V.,
Lang, J. M.,
Esser, K. A.,
and Kandarian, S. C.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
C915-C924
|
| 21.
|
Kubis, H-P.,
Haller, E-A.,
Wetzel, P.,
and Gros, G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4205-4210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Meisner, J. D.,
Gros, G.,
Scheibe, R. J.,
Scholz, M.,
and Kubis, H-P.
(2001)
J. Physiol.
533,
215-226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Delling, U.,
Tureckova, J.,
Lim, H. W., De,
Windt, L. J.,
Rotwein, P.,
and Molkentin, J. D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
6600-6611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Torgan, C. E.,
and Daniels, M. P.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1499-1508[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Bigard, X.,
Sanchez, H.,
Zoll, J.,
Mateo, P.,
Rousseau, V.,
Veksler, V.,
and Ventura-Clapier, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19653-19660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Serrano, A. L.,
Murgia, M.,
Pallafacchina, G.,
Calabria, E.,
Coniglio, P.,
Lomo, T.,
and Schiaffino, S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
13108-13113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Allen, D. L.,
Sartorius, C. A.,
Sycuro, L. K.,
and Leinwand, L. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
43524-43533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
Lebovitz, R. M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
McKinsey, T. A.,
Zhang, C-L., Lu, J.,
and Olson, E. N.
(2000)
Nature
408,
106-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Lakich, M. M.,
Diagana, T. T.,
North, D. L.,
and Whalen, R. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15217-15226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Neal, J. W.,
and Clipstone, N. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3666-3673[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Dunn, S. E.,
Simard, A. R.,
Bassel-Duby, R.,
Williams, R. S.,
and Michel, R. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
45243-454254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Dimario, J. X.,
and Funk, P. E.
(1999)
Dev. Dyn.
216,
177-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Wu, Z.,
Woodring, P. J.,
Bhakta, K. S.,
Tamura, K,
Wen, F.,
Feramisco, J. R.,
Karin, M.,
Wang, J. Y. J.,
and Puri, P. L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3951-3964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Murgia, M.,
Serrano, A. L.,
Calabria, E.,
Pallafacchina, G.,
Lomo, T.,
and Schiaffino, S.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
142-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Zhao, M.,
New, L.,
Kravchenko, V. V.,
Kato, Y.,
Gram, H.,
Padova, F.,
Olson, E. N.,
Ulevitch, R. J.,
and Han, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
21-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Fluck, M.,
Carson, J. A.,
Schwartz, R. J.,
and Booth, F. W.
(1999)
J. Appl. Physiol.
86,
1793-1799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Gordon, S. E.,
Fluck, M.,
and Booth, F. W.
(2001)
J. Appl. Physiol.
90,
1174-1183[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Marshall, P.,
Chartrand, N.,
and Worton, R. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
20719-20726[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Wei, L.,
Zhou, W.,
Wang, L.,
and Schwartz, R. J.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
H1736-H1743
|
| 41.
|
Fluck, M.,
Booth, F. W.,
and Waxham, M. N.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
270,
488-494[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Neufer, P. D.,
and Dohm, G. L.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
C1597-C1603[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Pilegaard, H.,
Ordway, G. A.,
Saltin, B.,
and Neufer, P. D.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
279,
E806-E814
|
| 44.
|
Wu, H.,
Rothermel, B.,
Kanatous, S.,
Rosenberg, P.,
Naya, F. J.,
Shelton, J. M.,
Hutcheson, J. A.,
DiMaio, J. M.,
Olson, E. N.,
Bassel-Duby, R.,
and Williams, R. S.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
6414-6423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Boppart, M. D.,
Asp, S.,
Wjtaszewski, J. F. P.,
Fielding, R. A.,
Mohr, T.,
and Goodyear, L. J.
(2000)
J. Physiol.
526,
663-669[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Yu, M.,
Blomstrand, E.,
Chibalin, A. V.,
Krook, A.,
and Zierath, J. R.
(2001)
J. Physiol.
536,
273-282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Shi, J. M. Scheffler, J. M. Pleitner, C. Zeng, S. Park, K. M. Hannon, A. L. Grant, and D. E. Gerrard
Modulation of skeletal muscle fiber type by mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling
FASEB J,
August 1, 2008;
22(8):
2990 - 3000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen
Making sense (and antisense) of myosin heavy chain gene expression. Comments on "Intergenic bidirectional promoter and cooperative regulation of the IIx and IIb MHC genes in fast skeletal muscle" by Rinaldi et al.
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
July 1, 2008;
295(1):
R206 - R207.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen, A. S. Cleary, K. J. Speaker, S. F. Lindsay, J. Uyenishi, J. M. Reed, M. C. Madden, and R. S. Mehan
Myostatin, activin receptor IIb, and follistatin-like-3 gene expression are altered in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of obese mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
May 1, 2008;
294(5):
E918 - E927.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Mutungi
The expression of NFATc1 in adult rat skeletal muscle fibres
Exp Physiol,
March 1, 2008;
93(3):
399 - 406.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Rose, C. Frosig, B. Kiens, J. F. P. Wojtaszewski, and E. A. Richter
Effect of endurance exercise training on Ca2+ calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II expression and signalling in skeletal muscle of humans
J. Physiol.,
September 1, 2007;
583(2):
785 - 795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Mu, L. D. Brown, Y. Liu, and M. F. Schneider
Roles of the calcineurin and CaMK signaling pathways in fast-to-slow fiber type transformation of cultured adult mouse skeletal muscle fibers
Physiol Genomics,
August 20, 2007;
30(3):
300 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Stupka, J. D. Schertzer, R. Bassel-Duby, E. N. Olson, and G. S. Lynch
Calcineurin-A{alpha} activation enhances the structure and function of regenerating muscles after myotoxic injury
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
August 1, 2007;
293(2):
R686 - R694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Meissner, K.-C. Chang, H.-P. Kubis, A. R. Nebreda, G. Gros, and R. J. Scheibe
The p38{alpha}/beta Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases Mediate Recruitment of CREB-binding Protein to Preserve Fast Myosin Heavy Chain IId/x Gene Activity in Myotubes
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2007;
282(10):
7265 - 7275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Eizema, D. E. van der Wal, M. M.M. van den Burg, H. W. de Jonge, and M. E. Everts
Differential Expression of Calcineurin and SR Ca2+ Handling Proteins in Equine Muscle Fibers During Early Postnatal Growth
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
March 1, 2007;
55(3):
247 - 254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen and T. G. Unterman
Regulation of myostatin expression and myoblast differentiation by FoxO and SMAD transcription factors
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
C188 - C199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Stupka, D. R. Plant, J. D. Schertzer, T. M. Emerson, R. Bassel-Duby, E. N. Olson, and G. S. Lynch
Activated calcineurin ameliorates contraction-induced injury to skeletal muscles of mdx dystrophic mice
J. Physiol.,
September 1, 2006;
575(2):
645 - 656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Raffaello, P. Laveder, C. Romualdi, C. Bean, L. Toniolo, E. Germinario, A. Megighian, D. Danieli-Betto, C. Reggiani, and G. Lanfranchi
Denervation in murine fast-twitch muscle: short-term physiological changes and temporal expression profiling
Physiol Genomics,
March 13, 2006;
25(1):
60 - 74.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Chin
Role of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinases in skeletal muscle plasticity
J Appl Physiol,
August 1, 2005;
99(2):
414 - 423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Oh, I. I. Rybkin, V. Copeland, M. P. Czubryt, J. M. Shelton, E. van Rooij, J. A. Richardson, J. A. Hill, L. J. De Windt, R. Bassel-Duby, et al.
Calcineurin Is Necessary for the Maintenance but Not Embryonic Development of Slow Muscle Fibers
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 1, 2005;
25(15):
6629 - 6638.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sugiura, N. Abe, M. Nagano, K. Goto, K. Sakuma, H. Naito, T. Yoshioka, and S. K. Powers
Changes in PKB/Akt and calcineurin signaling during recovery in atrophied soleus muscle induced by unloading
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
May 1, 2005;
288(5):
R1273 - R1278.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Allen, J. N. Weber, L. K. Sycuro, and L. A. Leinwand
Myocyte Enhancer Factor-2 and Serum Response Factor Binding Elements Regulate Fast Myosin Heavy Chain Transcription in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 29, 2005;
280(17):
17126 - 17134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Spangenburg
SOCS-3 Induces Myoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 18, 2005;
280(11):
10749 - 10758.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Lin, J.-L. Lin, C.-S. Lin, M.-C. Tsai, M.-J. Su, L.-P. Lai, and S. K. S. Huang
Activation of the Calcineurin-Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell Signal Transduction Pathway in Atrial Fibrillation
Chest,
December 1, 2004;
126(6):
1926 - 1932.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Jordan, H. Jiang, H. Li, and J. X. DiMario
Inhibition of ryanodine receptor 1 in fast skeletal muscle fibers induces a fast-to-slow muscle fiber type transition
J. Cell Sci.,
December 1, 2004;
117(25):
6175 - 6183.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Zebedin, W. Sandtner, S. Galler, J. Szendroedi, H. Just, H. Todt, and K. Hilber
Fiber type conversion alters inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium currents in murine C2C12 skeletal muscle cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
August 1, 2004;
287(2):
C270 - C280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Page, X. Wang, L. M. Sordillo, and S. E. Johnson
MEKK1 Signaling through p38 Leads to Transcriptional Inactivation of E47 and Repression of Skeletal Myogenesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 23, 2004;
279(30):
30966 - 30972.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Spangenburg, D. K. Bowles, and F. W. Booth
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Induced Transcriptional Activity of the Skeletal {alpha}-Actin Gene Is Regulated by Signaling Mechanisms Linked to Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels during Myoblast Differentiation
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2004;
145(4):
2054 - 2063.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. V. Chakkalakal, M.-A. Harrison, S. Carbonetto, E. Chin, R. N. Michel, and B. J. Jasmin
Stimulation of calcineurin signaling attenuates the dystrophic pathology in mdx mice
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
February 15, 2004;
13(4):
379 - 388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Rice and L. A. Leinwand
Skeletal myosin heavy chain function in cultured lung myofibroblasts
J. Cell Biol.,
October 13, 2003;
163(1):
119 - 129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. McCall, D. L. Allen, F. Haddad, and K. M. Baldwin
Transcriptional regulation of IGF-I expression in skeletal muscle
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2003;
285(4):
C831 - C839.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. G. Hogan, L. Chen, J. Nardone, and A. Rao
Transcriptional regulation by calcium, calcineurin, and NFAT
Genes & Dev.,
September 15, 2003;
17(18):
2205 - 2232.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. T Putman, M. Kiricsi, J. Pearcey, I. M MacLean, J. A Bamford, G. K Murdoch, W. T Dixon, and D. Pette
AMPK activation increases uncoupling protein-3 expression and mitochondrial enzyme activities in rat muscle without fibre type transitions
J. Physiol.,
August 15, 2003;
551(1):
169 - 178.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. V. Chakkalakal, M. A. Stocksley, M.-A. Harrison, L. M. Angus, J. Deschenes-Furry, S. St-Pierre, L. A. Megeney, E. R. Chin, R. N. Michel, and B. J. Jasmin
Expression of utrophin A mRNA correlates with the oxidative capacity of skeletal muscle fiber types and is regulated by calcineurin/NFAT signaling
PNAS,
June 24, 2003;
100(13):
7791 - 7796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Parsons, B. J. Wilkins, O. F. Bueno, and J. D. Molkentin
Altered Skeletal Muscle Phenotypes in Calcineurin A{alpha} and A{beta} Gene-Targeted Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2003;
23(12):
4331 - 4343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|