|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208447200 on September 15, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 45611-45618, November 22, 2002
Human Papilloma Virus 16 E6 Oncoprotein Inhibits Retinoic X
Receptor-mediated Transactivation by Targeting Human ADA3
Coactivator*
Musheng
Zeng ,
Ajay
Kumar §,
Gaoyuan
Meng §,
Qingshen
Gao ,
Goberdhan
Dimri ,
David
Wazer ,
Hamid
Band¶, and
Vimla
Band **
From the Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology,
Department of Radiation Oncology, New England Medical Center and the
Department of Biochemistry, Tufts University School of Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts 02111 and the ¶ Division of Rheumatology,
Immunology, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham & Women's
Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received for publication, August 19, 2002, and in revised form, September 10, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The expression of human papillomavirus (HPV) E6
oncoprotein is causally linked to high-risk HPV-associated human
cancers. We have recently isolated hADA3, the human homologue of yeast transcriptional co-activator yADA3, as a novel E6 target. Human ADA3
binds to the high-risk (cancer-associated) but not the low-risk HPV E6
proteins and to immortalization-competent but not to
immortalization-defective HPV16 E6 mutants, suggesting a role for the
perturbation of hADA3 function in E6-mediated oncogenesis. We
demonstrate here that hADA3 directly binds to the retinoic X receptor
(RXR) in vitro and in vivo. Using chromatin
immunoprecipitation, we show that hADA3 is part of activator complexes
bound to the native RXR response elements within the promoter of the
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene p21. We show that
hADA3 enhances the RXR -mediated sequence-specific transactivation of
retinoid target genes, cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II and
p21. Significantly, we demonstrate that E6 inhibits the RXR -mediated
transactivation of target genes, implying that perturbation of
RXR-mediated transactivation by E6 could contribute to HPV oncogenesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The human papilloma viruses are causally linked to more than 90%
of the cases of cervical cancer (1, 2). Numerous studies have defined
the critical roles of two
HPV1 oncogenes E6 and E7 in
oncogenesis. These oncogenes are invariably expressed in HPV-associated
carcinomas and cell lines derived from these cancers (3, 4). Intact E6
and E7 open reading frames are required for in vitro
immortalization of human epithelial cells by the HPV genome, and E6
and/or E7 genes are sufficient to immortalize these cells (5-8).
A crucial aspect of the oncogenic mechanism of E6 and E7 involves their
ability to inactivate two key cell cycle checkpoint proteins, p53 and
retinoblastoma protein, respectively (9, 10). While E6-induced loss of
p53 strongly correlates with E6-induced cellular transformation, recent
studies have identified additional cellular targets of E6 that are
likely to play important roles in HPV oncogenesis (11, 12). Defining
the roles of these novel E6 targets is of substantial importance to
fully understand the mechanisms of HPV-mediated oncogenesis.
Using the yeast two-hybrid interaction system, we recently identified
hADA3 as a novel E6-binding protein (13). hADA3 is the human homologue
of yeast transcriptional co-activator yADA3 (alteration/deficiency in
activation 3). We have demonstrated that hADA3 binds to the high-risk
(cancer-associated) but not to the low-risk HPV E6 proteins, and to
immortalization-competent but not to immortalization-defective HPV16 E6
mutants, implying a role for E6-induced hADA3 inactivation in oncogenic transformation.
Genetic studies in yeast have demonstrated that ADA3 functions as a
critical component of coactivator complexes that link transcriptional
activators, bound to specific promoters, to histone acetylation, and
basal transcriptional machinery (14-16). The core components of this
complex include the adapter proteins ADA3 and ADA2 and a histone
acetylase GCN5 (general control non-repressed 5) (17). Importantly,
hADA3 exists as a component of a yeast ADA-like complex that includes
hADA2 and hGCN5, indicating that the functional roles of ADA complex
are evolutionarily conserved (18). Studies of mammalian retinoic X
receptor (RXR) and growth hormone receptor when expressed in yeast have
shown a requirement for the components of yeast ADA complex including
the yADA3 gene product (19, 20). However, a functional role of hADA3 in
nuclear hormone receptor transactivation in mammalian cells has not yet been defined.
Given the important role of the inactivation of p53 transactivation in
E6-induced oncogenesis, our earlier studies focused on the novel role
of hADA3 as a p53 coactivator (13). Another group has also reported a
coactivator function of hADA3 for p53 (21). Our studies also
established that the interaction of hADA3 with E6 led to its
ubiquitin-mediated degradation (13). In view of the strong yeast
genetic data for a potential role of hADA3 as a coactivator for nuclear
hormone receptors, our isolation of hADA3 as an E6-binding protein
raised the possibility that E6 may inactivate the mammalian nuclear
hormone receptor function by targeting hADA3. In this study, we
examined if hADA3 associates with and functions as a coactivator for
human retinoic X receptors RXR and retinoic acid receptor (RAR )-mediated transactivation, and whether E6 abrogates this
function of ADA3. We report here that hADA3 directly binds to RXR
but not to RAR , allowing its in vitro and in
vivo association with RXR homodimers as well as RXR-RAR
heterodimers. Using the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, we
demonstrate that hADA3 is a component of the RXR -activator complexes
bound to native promoter of the cyclin-dependent kinase
inhibitor p21. Furthermore, hADA3 enhances the RXR -mediated transactivation of target genes, cellular retinoic acid-binding protein
II (CRBPII) and p21. Most significantly, we show that HPV16 E6 inhibits
RXR -dependent transactivation. Our results identify
RXR as a novel HPV E6 oncoprotein target and implicate the
deregulation of retinoid receptor function in HPV oncogenesis.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmid Constructs--
Generation of the expression constructs
of full-length hADA3 and FLAG-hADA3 in the pCR3.1 vector (Invitrogen)
has been described previously (13). The pGEX-4T-1-hADA3 construct
encoding the GST-hADA3 fusion protein and pCR3.1-encoding the HPV16 E6,
have also been described (13). The retinoid responsive luciferase reporter constructs CRBPII-RARE-Luc and p21-RARE-Luc were generated by
cloning the retinoic acid response element (RARE) from the CRBPII promoter (GCTGTCACAGGTCACAGGTCACAGGTCACAGTTCA)
or two copies of the RARE from the p21 promoter
(GGCAAAGGTGAAGTCCAGGGGAGGTCA) in pLuc vector (Stratgene). The
pEF-16E6-MYC construct, encoding the Myc-tagged HPV16 E6, was kindly
provided by Dr. M. Ishibashi (Aichi Cancer Center, Japan). The
pSG5-RXR, and pSG5-RAR expression constructs encoding the human RXR
and RAR , respectively, were obtained from Dr. P. Chambon (Institut
de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire). The
pCR3.1-RXR(LBD), encoding the ligand-binding domain of the human
RXR , was generated by PCR-based cloning.
Cells and Media--
Saos2, a p53-negative osteosarcoma cell
line (22) was grown in -MEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT). 76R-30, a p53-negative
radiation-transformed human mammary epithelial cell line, was grown in
DFCI-1 medium, as described previously (23).
In Vitro Binding between hADA3 and Retinoid Receptors--
The
pSG5-RXR and pSG5-RAR expression constructs were used as templates in a
rabbit reticulocyte lysate-based (TNT rabbit reticulocyte lysate system; Promega, WI) or an Escherichia
coli S-30 extract-based (PROTEIN-scriptTM-PRO:
Ambion, TX) coupled in vitro transcription-translation
system in the presence of [35S]methionine to generate
35S-labeled human RXR and RAR proteins. A GST fusion
protein of hADA3 was purified using the glutathione-Sepharose affinity
beads from lysates of E. coli transformed with
pGEX-4T-1-hADA3. Aliquots of 35S-labeled proteins were
incubated at 4 °C with 1 µg of GST or GST-hADA3 noncovalently
bound to glutathione beads in 300 µl of lysis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet
P40) for 2 h, in the absence or presence of 9-cis-retinoic acid
(9-cis-RA). The beads were washed with lysis buffer and bound proteins
were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE), and visualized by fluorography.
Co-immunoprecipitation of ADA3 with RXR or RAR --
5 × 105 Saos2 cells were plated in phenol red-free -MEM
medium supplemented with 10% charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum. After 48 h, the cells were transfected with the pCR3.1-hADA3
plasmid with or without pSG5 constructs encoding the human RXR or
RAR , using the FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
After 24 h, cells were either mock-treated or treated with 100 nM 9-cis-RA. Following a 24-h treatment, cell lysates were
prepared in a lysis buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and precleared with protein A-Sepharose
beads (Amersham Biosciences). 2-mg aliquots of lysate protein were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-RXR or anti-RAR antibody
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) followed by immunoblotting
with an anti-FLAG antibody (M2, Sigma) for detection of associated
hADA3. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Biosciences) was used
for detection.
Northern Blot Analysis of p21 mRNA
Expression--
Subconfluent 76R-30 cells grown in DFCI-1 medium were
treated with different concentration of 9-cis-RA for 24 h. Total
cellular RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The
32P-labeled p21 and 36B4 cDNA probes were used for
Northern blotting using standard procedures (24).
ChIP Assay to Detect the Native p21 Promoter-bound ADA3, RXR ,
and RAR --
Subconfluent 76R-30 cells grown in DFCI-1 medium were
treated with 100 nM 9-cis-RA for 24 h, and native
protein-DNA complexes were cross-linked by treatment with 1%
formaldehyde for 15 min. The ChIP assay was carried out as reported
earlier (25). Briefly, equal aliquots of isolated chromatin were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with a rabbit anti-hADA3 antibody
(13), or polyclonal antibodies against human RXR or RAR . The DNA
associated with specific immunoprecipitates or with negative control
preimmune serum was isolated and used as a template for the PCR to
amplify the p21 promoter sequences containing the retinoid response
element. The primers used were: 5'-primer, 5'-GAGGTCAGCTGCGTTAGAGG-3';
3'-primer, 5'-GCTCCCATCTACCTCACACC-3'. As a specificity control, the
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter was amplified from
the same templates using the following primers: 5'-primer,
AAAAGCGGGGAGAAAGTAGG; 3'-primer, CTAGCCTCCCGGGTTTCTCT.
Retinoid Receptor-dependent Transactivation of
Luciferase Reporters--
5 × 105 Saos2 or 76R-30
cells were plated per 100-mm dish in phenol red-free -MEM medium
supplemented with 10% charcoal-treated fetal bovine serum (Saos2
cells) or in DFCI-1 medium (76R-30 cells) for 48 h and transfected
with the expression plasmids, as indicated in the figure legends. Each
dish also received 20 ng of SV40 Renilla luciferase reporter
(pRL-SV40) to correct for differences in transfection. The total amount
of DNA was kept constant by adding the vector DNA. After 24 h, the
transfected cells were either mock-treated or treated with 100 nM 9-cis-RA for an additional 24 h. The luciferase activity was measured using a dual-luciferase kit (Promega, WI). Equal
aliquots of cell lysates (normalized based on Renilla
luciferase activity) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-RXR, anti-RAR , or anti-ADA3 antibodies to assess protein expression.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
There is an emerging consensus that cellular transformation by
viral oncoproteins disrupts multiple cellular pathways that control
cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and other critical
cellular traits. Identification and characterization of cellular
targets of human cancer-associated viral oncoproteins is therefore of
great interest in cancer research as well as in basic cell biology. We
previously identified human ADA3, homologue of the yeast ADA3
transcriptional coactivator, as a novel HPV E6 target (13). Genetic
analyses have shown a requirement for yeast ADA3 for transcriptional
activation by human RXR and other nuclear hormone receptors when these
were expressed in yeast (19). These findings prompted us to examine if
hADA3 functions as a coactivator for retinoid receptors in human cells
and whether E6 interaction with hADA3 would allow it to perturb the
retinoid receptor function.
RXR , but Not RAR , Directly Binds to hADA3 Protein in
Vitro--
As a first step, we examined if hADA3 indeed interacts with
and coactivates the retinoid receptor-mediated transactivation in
mammalian cells. The ligand binding domain (residues 266-455) of
RXR , which is known to mediate binding to coactivators (26), was
translated in vitro in rabbit reticulocyte lysates or
E. coli lysates, and its binding to GST-ADA3 was assessed in
the absence or presence of the RXR ligand 9-cis-RA. Whereas
RXR failed to bind to GST, as expected, a substantial level of
binding to GST-hADA3 was observed. When RXR was translated in rabbit
reticulocyte lysates, substantial binding to GST-hADA3 was seen in the
absence of retinoic acid; however, this binding was further enhanced by adding the ligand (Fig. 1A,
lanes 3 and 4, upper panel). Notably, the E. coli lysate-translated RXR protein bound to
GST-ADA3 only in the presence of the ligand (Fig. 1A,
upper panel, compare lanes 3 and 4 with lanes 7 and 8). It remains possible that
these differences are due to the presence of retinoids or some
modification of the RXR receptors in the rabbit reticulocyte
lysates. These experiments established that hADA3 can directly
interact with the RXR protein in a ligand-dependent
manner.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
In vitro interaction of hADA3 with
RXR and RAR . A,
35S-labeled RXR (residues 266-455) was generated by
in vitro translation using the rabbit reticulocyte lysate or
an E. coli. extract as indicated, and equal aliquots were
incubated with GST or GST-hADA3 coated on glutathione-Sepharose beads
in the presence (+) or absence ( ) of 100 nM 9-cis-RA.
Bound RXR protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by
fluorography. Input lanes contain 10% of the labeled lysate used in
binding reactions. Coomassie Blue staining (bottom panel)
shows the GST fusion proteins used in binding reactions. B,
35S-labeled RAR (full-length) and RXR (residues
266 455) proteins were generated by in vitro translation in
a rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Equal aliquots of lysates containing
labeled RXR and/or RAR as indicated, were incubated with GST or
GST-hADA3. Bound RAR and RXR proteins were detected by
fluorography, as above. Coomassie Blue staining (bottom
panel) shows the GST fusion proteins used in binding
reactions.
|
|
Next, we examined if hADA3 can also interact with the RAR protein as
such or in the presence of RXR . As RXR and RAR proteins are of
a similar size to be able to unambiguously visualize RAR and RXR
proteins in the same gel, we used the ligand-binding domain of RXR
in these experiments. As shown in Fig. 1B, RAR did not
show a detectable level of direct interaction with hADA3 (Fig.
1B, lane 4, upper panel). However,
when the ligand-binding domain of RXR was included in the binding
reaction, both RAR and RXR could be pulled down with GST-hADA3
(Fig. 1B, lane 5, upper panel).
Similar binding was observed when full-length RXR was used (data not
shown). Coomassie Blue staining of gels confirmed the presence of
respective GST fusion proteins in the binding reactions (Fig. 1,
A and B, lower panels). These results
indicate that while RAR does not directly interact with hADA3, it
can do so when present as a RXR/RAR heterodimer.
RXR and RAR Associate with hADA3 Protein in Vivo--
In
view of the in vitro binding, we used co-immunoprecipitation
analyses of transfected proteins to assess whether hADA3 interacts with
RXR and RAR in Saos2 cells. Anti-RXR immunoprecipitates from
transfected cell lysates were subjected to anti-FLAG immunoblotting to
detect co-immunoprecipitated FLAG-tagged hADA3. No hADA3 was detected
in anti-RXR immunoprecipitates if cells had been transfected only with
hADA3 or RXR constructs or when hADA3 plus RXR -transfected cells
had not been treated with 9-cis-RA (Fig.
2A, lanes 1-3, right panel). In contrast, hADA3 was readily detectable in
anti-RXR immunoprecipitates from hADA3 plus RXR -transfected cells
treated with 9-cis-RA (Fig. 2A, right panel,
lane 6). Anti-RXR immunoblotting of anti-RXR
immunoprecipitates demonstrated the immunoprecipitation of RXR in the
appropriate lanes (Fig. 2A, right lower panel), and anti-FLAG and anti-RXR blotting of whole cell lysates confirmed the
expected expression of hADA3 and RXR (Fig. 2A, left
panels).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
In vivo interaction of hADA3 with
RXR and RAR .
A, 5 × 105 Saos2 cells were seeded per
100-mm dish and transfected next day with 5 µg of pCR3.1-FLAG-hADA3
either alone or together with 5 µg of RXR , as indicated, using the
FuGENE 6 reagent. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were either
mock-treated or treated with 100 nM of 9-cis-RA. After
24 h of treatment, the cells were lysed and subjected to
immunoprecipitation with an anti-RXR antibody followed by either
anti-FLAG (upper right panel), or anti-RXR antibody
immunoblotting (I.B.) (lower right panel). IgH
refers to heavy chain of immunoglobulin. Whole cell lysates (5% input)
were directly blotted with anti-FLAG antibody (upper left
panel) and anti-RXR antibody (lower left panel) to
assess the expression of hADA3 and RXR respectively. B,
Saos2 cells were transfected with 5 µg each of pCR3.1-FLAG-hADA3,
RAR , and RXR either individually or in combination as indicated,
and processed as in A. Immunoprecipitation and
immunoblotting was as in A except that an anti-RAR
antibody was used instead of anti-RXR antibody.
|
|
Given the indirect, RXR -mediated binding of RAR to hADA3 in
vitro, we also examined if RAR can associate with hADA3 in the
presence of RXR , the strategy used similar to that used for RXR ,
except that immunoprecipitates were carried out using an anti-RAR
antibody. A substantial association between RAR and hADA3 was
observed if RXR was co-expressed, and cells were treated with 9-cis-RA
(Fig. 2B, lane 8, right upper panel).
Immunoblotting of anti-RAR immunoprecipitates (right lower
panel) showed the RAR protein in the appropriate lanes, and the
expected expression of hADA3 or RAR was confirmed by immunoblotting
of whole cell lysates (left panels). The above results
were confirmed in 293T cells (data not shown). Taken together, our
results demonstrate a direct interaction of hADA3 with RXR , which
allows it to associate with RXR homodimers as well as RXR/RAR heterodimers.
ADA3 Is Present in Activator Complexes Bound to RARE of the Native
p21 Promoter--
A crucial aspect of coactivator function involves
their ability to assemble into complexes with transcriptional
activators bound to specific promoters (27). To directly assess if
hADA3 is assembled into transcriptional activator complexes bound
to a native retinoid response element, we used the ChIP analysis of the
retinoid-responsive p21 promoter. As p21 is p53-responsive (28) and
hADA3 can function as a p53 coactivator (13, 21), we utilized 76R-30
cells, which lack p53 and fail to show a DNA damage-induced increase in
the transcription of p21, unlike their normal parental cells (23).
Initial experiments established that 9-cis-RA treatment of these cells
led to an increase in p21 mRNA when cells were grown in regular
DFCI-1 medium, without a need for retinoid deprivation (data not
shown). A detectable level of p21 mRNA is seen in 76R-30 cells in
the absence of stimulation (Fig.
3A, lane 1);
however, 9-cis-RA treatment led to a dose-dependent increase
in p21 mRNA (lanes 2-4), consistent with the presence of endogenous RXR and RAR mRNA and protein in these cells
(data not shown).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
hADA3 is a component of the coactivator
complex bound to native retinoid receptor-responsive promoter of the
p21 gene. A, induction of p21 mRNA in 76R-30
cells upon 9-cis-RA treatment. 76R-30 cells were grown in DFCI-1
medium, and either mock-treated or treated with indicated
concentrations of 9-cis-RA for 24 h. 15 µg of total cellular RNA
was resolved on a 1% agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and
hybridized with a 32P-labeled p21 cDNA probe. The p21
mRNA signals were visualized by autoradiography (upper
panel). The same blot was reprobed with a 32P-labeled
36B4 probe as a loading control (lower panel). B,
ChIP analysis of hADA3 binding to p21 promoter in 76R-30 cells. 76R-30
cells were either mock-treated ( ) or treated with 100 nM
of 9-cis-RA (+) for 24 h, formaldehyde fixed to cross-link the DNA
to native chromatin-associated protein complexes, and chromatin lysates
prepared as described under "Experimental Procedures." Equal
aliquots of chromatin lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation
with antibodies against RXR, RAR , and hADA3. Preimmune serum was
used as a control. The DNA associated with immunoprecipitates was
isolated and used as templates to PCR-amplify the p21 promoter region
containing RARE. The PCR products were resolved by agarose gel
electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. PCR amplification of
the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) promoter was used
as a specificity control.
|
|
For ChIP analysis, 76R-30 cells were either mock-treated or treated
with 100 nM 9-cis-RA for 24 h and then fixed with
formaldehyde to cross-link the native chromatin-associated protein
complexes with the DNA. The chromatin immunoprecipitation were carried
out with preimmune (negative control) or anti-ADA3 antibodies (and anti-RAR and RXR antibodies as positive controls), and the
co-immunoprecipitated DNA was used as a template for the PCR to amplify
the p21 promoter sequences that incorporate RARE (28). As shown in Fig.
3B, a clear PCR amplification product was observed in
chromatin immunoprecipitation carried out with anti-ADA3 antibodies but
not the preimmune serum (compare lane 7 with lane
9); the intensity of this band was significantly higher in the
chromatin immunoprecipitation of 9-cis-RA-treated cells (lane
8), indicating that ADA3 was in association with the native p21
promoter and that this association was enhanced in the presence of the
RXR ligand. As expected, PCR products were amplified in chromatin
immunoprecipitation carried out with anti-RXR and anti-RAR
antibodies; however, no further increase was seen upon ligand treatment
of cells (lanes 3-6). These results are consistent with a
ligand-independent binding of RXR and RXR/RAR to the p21 promoter, as
observed with other retinoid responsive promoters by gel retardation
assay (29). Amplification of promoter sequences of
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, which is not a target of
retinoids demonstrated the specificity of our results. Overall, these
results demonstrate that hADA3 becomes part of the activator complexes
bound to a retinoid response element in its native chromatin
configuration upon RXR ligand stimulation.
hADA3 Enhances the RXR -mediated and
RXR /RAR -mediated Transactivation of Reporters
Linked to Retinoid Response Elements--
Given the ability of
hADA3 to interact with RXR and with RXR /RAR heterodimers and
the previously defined role of ADA3 as a component of the ADA
coactivator complex (17), we examined if hADA3 functions as a
coactivator of transcription mediated by the RXR homodimer or the
RXR /RAR heterodimer. To assess the coactivator function of hADA3
for RXR , we transiently transfected Saos2 cells with a luciferase
reporter linked to the retinoid response element derived from the
CRBPII promoter; CRBPII is known to be transactivated by
RXR but not by RAR (30). Little CRBPII-luciferase activity was
detected in mock-treated cells (Fig.
4A, lane 1). In
contrast, 9-cis-RA treatment of cells transfected with RXR resulted
in about a 100-fold induction of the luciferase activity (lane
2). Importantly, co-transfection of hADA3 with RXR led to a
substantial, hADA3 dose-dependent increase in
ligand-induced luciferase reporter activity (lanes 4,
6, and 8). The reporter activity was not induced
if hADA3 was transfected without RXR (data not shown). Western blot
of cell lysates showed the expected expression of hADA3 and RXR
proteins (Fig. 4B). These results provided evidence that
hADA3 can function as a coactivator for RXR -mediated transcription
in mammalian cells.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
hADA3 enhances the
RXR -mediated transactivation of reporters
linked to RARE. A, Saos2 cells were deprived of
retinoids by growth in charcoal-treated phenol-free -MEM medium for
48 h, transfected with 100 ng of CRBPII-RARE-Luc and 40 ng of
RXR plasmids together with increasing amounts of pCR3.1-hADA3, using
the FuGENE 6 reagent. The total amount of DNA for each transfection was
kept constant by adding vector DNA. After 24 h, the cells were
either mock-treated ( ) or treated with 100 nM 9-cis-RA
(+) for 24 h prior to lysis. 20 ng of SV40 Renilla
luciferase reporter (pRL-SV40) was concurrently transfected and used to
correct for differences in transfection. Equal amounts of cell lysates
were used to measure the luciferase activity. Transactivation results
were calculated as fold activation over vector-transfected cell
lysates. Data indicates mean ± S.D. of triplicates of a
representative experiment. Experiments were repeated at least three
times. , vector DNA. B, levels of hADA3 (upper panel) and RXR
(lower panel) proteins were analyzed by Western blotting in
9-cis-RA-treated cell lysates of the experiment shown in A. C, Saos2 cells were transfected with 1 µg of p21-RARE-Luc
and 1 µg each of RXR and RAR , together with increasing amounts
of hADA3, using the FuGENE 6 reagent. After transfection, the cell
lysates were analyzed for the luciferase activity, as described in
A. D, protein levels of hADA3 (upper
panel), RXR (middle panel), and RAR (lower
panel) were analyzed by Western blotting in 9-cis-RA-treated
lysates of the experiment shown in C. E, 76R-30
cells were transfected with 0.5 µg of p21-RARE-Luc and 0.5 µg each
of RXR and RAR , together with increasing amounts of hADA3, using
the FuGENE 6 reagent. After transfection, the cell lysates were
analyzed for the luciferase activity, as described in A. F, protein levels of hADA3 (upper panel), RXR
(middle panel), and RAR (lower panel) were
analyzed by Western blotting in 9-cis-RA-treated lysates of the
experiment shown in E.
|
|
Next, we examined the transactivation of a retinoid-responsive promoter
that could be transactivated by RXR /RAR heterodimers. For this
purpose, we employed a luciferase reporter incorporating two copies of
the retinoid response element from the p21 promoter (28). When the
p21-luciferase reporter was transfected in Saos2 (Fig. 4, C
and D) or 76R-30 (Fig. 4, E and F)
cells together with RXR and RAR , a substantial ligand-inducible
increase (about 30-fold in Saos2 cells (Fig. 4C, compare
lane 1 with lane 2) and 100-fold in 76R-30 cells
(Fig. 4E, compare lane 1 with lane 2) in luciferase activity was observed. Importantly, cotransfection of
ADA3 together with RXR and RAR resulted in a dramatic, ADA3 dose-dependent, increase in 9-cis-RA-induced luciferase
activity in both Saos2 (Fig. 4C, lanes 4,
6, and 8) and 76R-30 cells (Fig. 4E,
lanes 4, 6, and 8). Immunoblotting of
cell lysates showed the expected expression of transfected proteins
(Fig. 4, D and F). Interestingly, although the
levels of ADA3 in 76R-30 cells were much lower than Saos2 cells
(probably due to lower transfection efficiency of 76R-30 cells as
compared with Saos2), the coactivator function of ADA3 is comparable in
both cells (Fig. 4, compare C and D with
E and F). Although the reason for this difference is currently unknown, it could reflect differences of cellular origin
(epithelial versus fibroblasts). Taken together, these results demonstrated that hADA3 can function as a coactivator for
RXR as well as the RXR /RAR heterodimer in mammalian cells.
HPV16 E6 Inhibits the Coactivator Function of hADA3--
Given the
ability of HPV16 E6 to interact with and induce the degradation of
hADA3 (13), we examined the effect of co-expressing E6 on
hADA3-induced increase in RXR -mediated transactivation of
CRBPII-RARE-Luc reporter. For this purpose, Saos2 cells were transfected with RXR and hADA3 together with either wild-type E6 or
a hADA3-non-binding E6 mutant 9-13. While hADA3 expectedly enhanced
the 9-cis-RA-induced, CRBPII luciferase reporter activity in
RXR -transfected cells (Fig.
5A, compare lane 2 with lane 4), neither E6 nor its mutant by itself had any
effect on the RXR -dependent reporter activity (Fig.
5A, lanes 11-16). Significantly, co-transfection of wild-type E6 dose-dependently inhibited the
hADA3-induced increase in RXR -mediated CRBPII luciferase reporter
activity (Fig. 5A, lanes 6 and 8); in
contrast, the hADA3 non-binding 9-13 E6 mutant had no effect (Fig.
5A, lane 10). As anticipated (Kumar et
al., Ref. 13), the expression of wild-type E6 but not its ADA3
non-binding mutant was accompanied by a reduction in hADA3 levels (Fig.
5B, compare lanes 2-5). Immunoblotting of cell
lysates confirmed the expected expression of hADA3 and RXR proteins
(Fig. 5B, lower panel, shown only for
9-cis-RA-treated cell lysates).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of the hADA3 coactivator function
by HPV16 E6. A, Saos2 cells were co-transfected with
100 ng of CRBPII-RARE-Luc and 40 ng of RXR , with or without 2.5 µg
each of pCR3.1-hADA3 and pCR3.1-16 E6 or its mutant, as indicated.
After the transfection, the cells were treated with 9-cis-RA, and the
luciferase activity was measured in cell lysates, as described in the
legend to Fig. 4. B, protein levels of hADA3
(upper panel) and RXR (lower panel)
were measured by Western blotting in 9-cis-RA-treated lysates of the
experiment shown in A. C, Saos2 cells were
co-transfected with 1 µg each of p21RARE-Luc, RXR , and RAR
plasmids, with or without 2.5 µg each of pCR3.1-hADA3 and/or
pCR3.1-16 E6 or its mutant, as indicated (+). After transfection, the
cells were processed as described in the legend to Fig. 4.
D, protein level of hADA3 (upper panel), RXR
(middle panel), and RAR (lower panel) were
analyzed by Western blotting in 9-cis-RA- treated lysates of the
experiment shown in C.
|
|
To further confirm the ability of E6 to inhibit the coactivator
function of ADA3 for retinoid receptor-mediated transactivation, we
utilized the p21 promoter-luciferase reporter; the cells were co-transfected with RXR and RAR . As with CRBPII reporter, the p21
luciferase reporter activity was dose-dependently inhibited by the expression of wild-type E6 but not its 9-13 mutant (Fig. 5C, lanes 6, 8, and 10).
Immunoblotting of cell lysates confirmed the expression of hADA3, RXR,
and RAR (Fig. 5D). Taken together, our results clearly
demonstrate that HPV16 E6 abrogates the coactivator function of hADA3
toward retinoid receptors RXR and RXR /RAR in human cells.
The results presented here have significant implications for the
potential role of ADA3-containing coactivator complexes in physiological pathways and in oncogenesis. While yeast ADA3 as a
component of ADA and other coactivator complexes has been clearly demonstrated to be important, little was known about hADA3 function in
mammalian systems except for its ability to function as a p53 coactivator, which others and we have recently uncovered (13, 21). Our
results that hADA3 functions as a coactivator for retinoid receptors in
mammalian cells, together with the ability of yeast ADA3 to function as
a coactivator of multiple mammalian nuclear hormone receptors when
these were expressed in yeast, strongly suggest that ADA3-containing
complexes may participate as coactivators for multiple nuclear hormone
receptors. While a recent study failed to detect mouse ADA3 association
with estrogen receptor (31), yeast ADA3 has been shown to coactivate
estrogen receptor (ER) function, and we have detected a direct
interaction between hADA3 and
ER.2 The presence of hGCN5 as
well as a hGCN5-related gene product P/CAF in hADA3-containing
complexes (18), direct interaction of P/CAF with p300/CBP (32), and the
interaction of hADA3 itself with p300 (21) suggest that hADA3 may form
multiple, distinct coactivator complexes, as also is the case in yeast
(17). Thus, it is likely that additional transcriptional activators
will emerge as targets of ADA3 coactivator function.
Our findings that HPV16 E6 abrogates the coactivator function of hADA3
have obvious implications for the potential role of the hADA3-mediated
biochemical pathways in oncogenesis. The role of presently known ADA3
targets (p53 and retinoid receptors) in cell growth and differentiation
is well established, and these pathways are frequently affected during
oncogenesis. Thus, if E6 indeed targets the various hADA3-containing
complexes and influences transcriptional pathways in which these
complexes play a role, this could represent a significant mechanism for
the role of E6 in HPV-mediated oncogenesis.
Our findings support the emerging concept that viral oncoproteins, such
as HPV E6, have attained an ability to perturb the function of multiple
transcriptional coactivators apparently by multiple mechanisms.
Notably, E6 oncoprotein has been demonstrated to associates with p300,
which serves as a coactivator for a number of transactivators,
including nuclear hormone receptors (33, 34). While the effect of HPV
E6 binding to p300 on nuclear receptor-mediated transcription has not been examined, E6 is known to abrogate the coactivator function for p300 toward p53 (33, 34). Recently, another
E6-binding protein AMF1 (also called G-protein pathway suppressor 2 or
GPS2), was shown to be a coactivator for p53 (35, 36). These studies
are consistent with the idea that E6 has attained an ability to perturb
multiple coactivators. How might the E6 perturbation of coactivator
function promote oncogenic transformation ? We envision that E6
interaction with hADA3 would disrupt the hADA3-containing HAT
complexes, prevent the recruitment of HAT activity to promoter
elements, and inhibit the expression of genes that mediate tumor
suppressor functions. The role of histone acetylation as a tumor
suppressor mechanism is supported by the propensity of CBP ± heterozygous mice to develop hematopoietic malignancies (37), and the
ability of RAR fusion oncogenes, which recruits histone deacetylases
to RAREs (38), to induce promyelocytic leukemia by inhibiting cell
differentiation. Indeed, histone deacetylase inhibitors together with
retinoid are now being assessed for treatment of such patients
(38-40). Thus, it is reasonable to postulate that ADA3, as a component
of HAT-containing coactivator complexes, plays a role in transcription
of genes. A large body of evidence supports an important role of
retinoids in cell differentiation and cell growth inhibition (41-44).
There is also increasing evidence that retinoids down-regulate the
telomerase in a pathway distinct from cell differentiation, implicating
the role of retinoids in replicative senescence (45, 46). Complementary in vivo studies have demonstrated the ability of retinoids
to inhibit tumor formation in carcinogenesis models, typically at the
step of tumor promotion (47, 48). Importantly, these studies have led
to clinical trials of retinoids in chemoprevention of a number of
epithelial and non-epithelial cancers (49).
In conclusion, we have shown hADA3 directly interacts with RXR and
functions as a coactivator for RXR and RAR /RXR -mediated transactivation. In addition, we show that HPV16 E6 by targeting hADA3
for degradation, abrogate the RXR -mediated transactivation, implicating disruption of retinoid receptor function in E6 oncogenesis. Given the evolutionary conservation of hADA3, it is likely that viral
oncoprotein-mediated inactivation of its function plays an important
role in oncogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. P. Chambon for RXR and RAR
expression constructs and M. Ishibashi for the Myc-tagged E6 construct.
We also thank Dr. Y. Zhao for technical help in certain experiments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA81076 and CA70195 (to V. B.) and CA87986, CA75075, and
CA76118 (to H. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipients of fellowships from the Massachusetts Department of
Public Health.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Radiation
Oncology, Box 824, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St.,
Boston, MA 02111. Tel.: 617-636-4776; Fax: 617-636-6205; E-mail:
VBAND@lifespan.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208447200
2
G. Meng, M. Zeng, Y. Zhao, D. Wazer, H. Band,
and V. Band, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HPV, human
papillomavirus;
RARE, retinoic acid response element;
RXR, retinoic X
receptor;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
ChIP, chromatin
immunoprecipitation;
MEM, minimal essential medium;
HAT, histone
acetyltransferase;
yADA3, yeast alteration/deficiency in activation 3;
CRBPII, cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II;
Luc, luciferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
zur Hausen, H.
(2000)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
92,
690-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
zur Hausen, H.
(1999)
Eur. J. Cancer
35,
1878-1885[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Schwarz, E.,
Freese, U. K.,
Gissmann, L.,
Mayer, W.,
Roggenbuck, B.,
Stremlau, A.,
and zur Hausen, H.
(1985)
Nature
314,
111-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Baker, C. C.,
Phelps, W. C.,
Lindgren, V.,
Braun, M. J.,
Gonda, M. A.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1987)
J. Virol.
61,
962-971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Band, V., De,
Caprio, J. A.,
Delmolino, L.,
Kulesa, V.,
and Sager, R.
(1991)
J. Virol.
65,
6671-6676[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Hawley-Nelson, P.,
Vousden, K. H.,
Hubbert, N. L.,
Lowy, D. R.,
and Schiller, J. T.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
3905-3910[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Munger, K.,
Phelps, W. C.,
Bubb, V.,
Howley, P. M.,
and Schlegel, R.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
4417-4421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Wazer, D. E.,
Liu, X. L.,
Chu, Q.,
Gao, Q.,
and Band, V.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
3687-3691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Dyson, N.,
Howley, P. M.,
Munger, K.,
and Harlow, E.
(1989)
Science
243,
934-937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Huibregtse, J. M.,
Scheffner, M.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
4129-4135[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Mantovani, F.,
and Banks, L.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
7874-7887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Ratsch, S. B.,
Gao, Q.,
Srinivasan, S.,
Wazer, D. E.,
and Band, V.
(2001)
Radiat. Res.
155,
143-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Kumar, A.,
Zhao, Y.,
Meng, G.,
Zeng, M.,
Srinivasan, S.,
Delmolino, L. M.,
Gao, Q.,
Dimri, G.,
Weber, G. F.,
Wazer, D. E.,
Band, H.,
and Band, V.
(2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
22,
5801-5812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Horiuchi, J.,
Silverman, N.,
Marcus, G. A.,
and Guarente, L.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
1203-1209[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Saleh, A.,
Lang, V.,
Cook, R.,
and Brandl, C. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5571-5578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Eberharter, A.,
Sterner, D. E.,
Schieltz, D.,
Hassan, A.,
Yates, J. R., 3rd,
Berger, S. L.,
and Workman, J. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
6621-6631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Wang, L.,
Liu, L.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
640-653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Kotani, T.,
Zhang, X.,
Schiltz, R. L.,
Howard, T.,
Yang, X. J.,
Howard, B. H.,
Qin, J.,
and Nakatani, Y.
(1998)
Cell
94,
35-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
vom Baur, E.,
Harbers, M., Um, S. J.,
Benecke, A.,
Chambon, P.,
and Losson, R.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1278-1289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Henriksson, A.,
Almlof, T.,
Ford, J.,
McEwan, I. J.,
Gustafsson, J. A.,
and Wright, A. P.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3065-3073[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Wang, T.,
Kobayashi, T.,
Takimoto, R.,
Denes, A. E.,
Snyder, E. L.,
el-Deiry, W. S.,
and Brachmann, R. K.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
6404-6413[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Chen, X., Ko, L. J.,
Jayaraman, L.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2438-2451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wazer, D. E.,
Chu, Q.,
Liu, X. L.,
Gao, Q.,
Safaii, H.,
and Band, V.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2468-2478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning
, pp. 7.43-7.52, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
|
| 25.
|
Christova, R.,
and Oelgeschlager, T.
(2002)
Nat. Cell. Biol.
4,
79-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Lemon, B. D.,
and Freedman, L. P.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9,
499-504[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Emerson, B. M.
(2002)
Cell
109,
267-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Liu, M.,
Iavarone, A.,
and Freedman, L. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31723-31728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Durand, B.,
Saunders, M.,
Leroy, P.,
Leid, M.,
and Chambon, P.
(1992)
Cell
71,
73-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Umesono, K.,
Kliewer, S. A.,
Borgmeyer, U.,
Ong, E. S.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1991)
Cell
66,
555-561[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Benecke, A.,
Gaudon, C.,
Garnier, J. M.,
vom Baur, E.,
Chambon, P.,
and Losson, R.
(2002)
Nucleic Acids Res.
30,
2508-2514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Yang, X. J.,
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Nishikawa, J.,
Howard, B. H.,
and Nakatani, Y.
(1996)
Nature
382,
319-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Zimmermann, H.,
Degenkolbe, R.,
Bernard, H. U.,
and O'Connor, M. J.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
6209-6219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Patel, D.,
Huang, S. M.,
Baglia, L. A.,
and McCance, D. J.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5061-5072[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Degenhardt, Y. Y.,
and Silverstein, S. J.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
151-160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Peng, Y. C.,
Kuo, F.,
Breiding, D. E.,
Wang, Y. F.,
Mansur, C. P.,
and Androphy, E. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
5913-5924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Kung, A. L.,
Rebel, V. I.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Ch'ng, L. E.,
Sieff, C. A.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Yao, T. P.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
272-277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Lin, R. J.,
Nagy, L.,
Inoue, S.,
Shao, W.,
Miller, W. H., Jr.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1998)
Nature
391,
811-814[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Minucci, S.,
Nervi, C., Lo,
Coco, F.,
and Pelicci, P. G.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
3110-3115[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
He, L. Z.,
Tolentino, T.,
Grayson, P.,
Zhong, S.,
Warrell, R. P., Jr.,
Rifkind, R. A.,
Marks, P. A.,
Richon, V. M.,
and Pandolfi, P. P.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
108,
1321-1330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Chambon, P.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
940-954[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Lotan, R.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
1987s-1990s[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Smith, M. A.,
Parkinson, D. R.,
Cheson, B. D.,
and Friedman, M. A.
(1992)
J. Clin. Oncol.
10,
839-864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Zhang, D.,
Holmes, W. F., Wu, S.,
Soprano, D. R.,
and Soprano, K. J.
(2000)
J. Cell. Physiol.
185,
1-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Yamada, O.,
Takanashi, M.,
Ujihara, M.,
and Mizoguchi, H.
(1998)
Leuk. Res.
22,
711-717[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Pendino, F.,
Flexor, M.,
Delhommeau, F.,
Buet, D.,
Lanotte, M.,
and Segal-Bendirdjian, E.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
6662-6667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Hill, D. L.,
and Grubbs, C. J.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
12,
161-181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
O'Dwyer, P. J.,
Ravikumar, T. S.,
McCabe, D. P.,
and Steele, G., Jr.
(1987)
J. Surg. Res.
43,
550-557[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Kurie, J. M.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Oncol.
11,
497-502[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Tungteakkhun, M. Filippova, J. W. Neidigh, N. Fodor, and P. J. Duerksen-Hughes
The Interaction between Human Papillomavirus Type 16 and FADD Is Mediated by a Novel E6 Binding Domain
J. Virol.,
October 1, 2008;
82(19):
9600 - 9614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. A. Shamanin, P. Sekaric, and E. J. Androphy
hAda3 Degradation by Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 Correlates with Abrogation of the p14ARF-p53 Pathway and Efficient Immortalization of Human Mammary Epithelial Cells
J. Virol.,
April 15, 2008;
82(8):
3912 - 3920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xia, S. Nagase, A. G. Montia, S. M. Kalachikov, M. Keniry, T. Su, L. Memeo, H. Hibshoosh, and R. Parsons
BAF180 Is a Critical Regulator of p21 Induction and a Tumor Suppressor Mutated in Breast Cancer
Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2008;
68(6):
1667 - 1674.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Grau, C. Popescu, L. Torroja, D. Ortuno-Sahagun, I. Boros, and A. Ferrus
Transcriptional Adaptor ADA3 of Drosophila melanogaster Is Required for Histone Modification, Position Effect Variegation, and Transcription
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 1, 2008;
28(1):
376 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Germaniuk-Kurowska, A. Nag, X. Zhao, M. Dimri, H. Band, and V. Band
Ada3 Requirement for HAT Recruitment to Estrogen Receptors and Estrogen-Dependent Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation
Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2007;
67(24):
11789 - 11797.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhao, R. B. Katzman, L. M. Delmolino, I. Bhat, Y. Zhang, C. B. Gurumurthy, A. Germaniuk-Kurowska, H. V. Reddi, A. Solomon, M.-S. Zeng, et al.
The Notch Regulator MAML1 Interacts with p53 and Functions as a Coactivator
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 20, 2007;
282(16):
11969 - 11981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Filippova, M. M. Johnson, M. Bautista, V. Filippov, N. Fodor, S. S. Tungteakkhun, K. Williams, and P. J. Duerksen-Hughes
The Large and Small Isoforms of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 Bind to and Differentially Affect Procaspase 8 Stability and Activity
J. Virol.,
April 15, 2007;
81(8):
4116 - 4129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Nag, A. Germaniuk-Kurowska, M. Dimri, M. A. Sassack, C. B. Gurumurthy, Q. Gao, G. Dimri, H. Band, and V. Band
An Essential Role of Human Ada3 in p53 Acetylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 23, 2007;
282(12):
8812 - 8820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. J. Jones, S. Dickerson, P. M. Bhende, H.-J. Delecluse, and S. C. Kenney
Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Infection Induces Retinoic Acid-responsive Genes through Induction of a Retinol-metabolizing Enzyme, DHRS9
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 16, 2007;
282(11):
8317 - 8324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kumar, Z. Lin, S. SenBanerjee, and M. K. Jain
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha-Mediated Reduction of KLF2 Is Due to Inhibition of MEF2 by NF-{kappa}B and Histone Deacetylases
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 15, 2005;
25(14):
5893 - 5903.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Liu, H. Yuan, B. Fu, G. L. Disbrow, T. Apolinario, V. Tomaic, M. L. Kelley, C. C. Baker, J. Huibregtse, and R. Schlegel
The E6AP Ubiquitin Ligase Is Required for Transactivation of the hTERT Promoter by the Human Papillomavirus E6 Oncoprotein
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 18, 2005;
280(11):
10807 - 10816.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Meng, Y. Zhao, A. Nag, M. Zeng, G. Dimri, Q. Gao, D. E. Wazer, R. Kumar, H. Band, and V. Band
Human ADA3 Binds to Estrogen Receptor (ER) and Functions As a Coactivator for ER-mediated Transactivation
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 24, 2004;
279(52):
54230 - 54240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Filippova, L. Parkhurst, and P. J. Duerksen-Hughes
The Human Papillomavirus 16 E6 Protein Binds to Fas-associated Death Domain and Protects Cells from Fas-triggered Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 11, 2004;
279(24):
25729 - 25744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|