![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 45630-45637, November 22, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Molecular Medicine and Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78245-3207
Received for publication, July 10, 2002, and in revised form, September 13, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Genetic studies have implicated the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae POL4 gene product in
the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by nonhomologous end joining.
Here we show that Pol4 preferentially catalyzes DNA synthesis on small
gaps formed by the alignment of linear duplex DNA molecules with
complementary ends, a DNA substrate specificity that is compatible with
its predicted role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Pol4 also
interacts directly with the Dnl4 subunit of the Dnl4-Lif1
complex via its N-terminal BRCT domain. This interaction stimulates the
DNA synthesis activity of Pol4 and, to a lesser extent, the DNA joining
activity of Dnl4-Lif1. Notably, the joining of DNA substrates that
require the combined action of Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 is much more
efficient than the joining of similar DNA substrates that require only
ligation. Thus, the physical and functional interactions between Pol4
and Dnl4-Lif1 provide a molecular mechanism for both the recruitment of
Pol4 to in vivo DNA double-strand breaks and the coupling
of the gap filling DNA synthesis and DNA joining reactions that
complete the microhomology-mediated pathway of nonhomologous end joining.
Mechanisms for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks
(DSBs)1 can be divided into
two classes based on the requirement for DNA sequence homology. In the
major homology-dependent pathway, repair involves an intact
duplex that is homologous to the broken molecule. This is the major DSB
repair pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is
mediated by members of the RAD52 epistasis group that includes
RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54,
RAD55, RAD57, RAD59, MRE11,
XRS2, and RDH54/TID1 (1).
Alternatively, broken DNA ends are simply brought together, processed,
and then ligated by repair mechanisms, known collectively as
nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (2). Unlike the major recombinational
repair pathway that faithfully restores the genetic information,
nonhomologous end joining frequently causes genetic alterations
that range from the loss or addition of a few nucleotides at the break
site to gross rearrangements such as chromosomal translocations
(2).
Genetic studies in S. cerevisiae have identified the
products of the HDF1, HDF2, RAD50,
MRE11, XRS2, DNL4, and LIF1
genes as key players in the major NHEJ pathway (3-14). HDF1
and HDF2 encode subunits of a heterodimeric DNA end-binding
complex that is functionally homologous to the mammalian Ku70-Ku80
complex (3-6). Similarly, the Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2 and Dnl4-Lif1 complexes appear to be functional homologs of the hRad50-hMre11-NBS1 (7, 8,
15-21) and DNA ligase IV-XRCC4 complexes (9-13, 22, 23), respectively. Congruent with genetic analysis in yeast, a recent biochemical study has reconstituted DNA end joining with the purified NHEJ factors Hdf1-Hdf2, Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2, and Dnl4-Lif1 and
demonstrated functional interactions among these complexes (24).
Recently, a novel yeast NHEJ gene, NEJ1, has been
identified, but the exact role of this gene product in NHEJ remains to
be determined (25-28).
Many of the genetic studies and the biochemical study with purified
NHEJ factors have focused on the joining of linear DNA molecules with
short complementary single strands at their termini (3, 4, 7-10, 12,
13, 24). However, the majority of DSBs generated by agents such as
ionizing radiation will have ends that are neither complementary nor
ligatable, indicating that end processing reactions will be critical
for the repair of in vivo DSBs by NHEJ. In fact
analysis of DNA molecules repaired by NHEJ has revealed that a
favored mode of end processing involves short tracts of DNA sequence
homology, so-called microhomologies, close to the break site that
presumably facilitate alignment of the DNA ends (14, 29, 30). Following
alignment, the processing of DNA ends by nucleases and DNA polymerases
to remove noncomplementary nucleotides and fill-in gaps is likely to be
required to generate ligatable termini (31, 32).
Interestingly, biochemical studies with purified human Mre11 have shown
that this nuclease can act on DNA ends to expose and align
microhomologies that can then be ligated (33, 34). However, the
efficiency of recircularization of linear plasmid DNA molecules with
complementary single-strand ends in vivo is not affected by
inactivation of yeast Mre11 nuclease activity (8, 35). This observation
suggests that, although the nuclease activity of Mre11 may not be
required for nonhomologous end joining, the Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2 complex
has another critical role in this repair pathway. Indeed, recent
biochemical studies have shown that the Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2 complex has
end bridging activity and functionally interacts with the Dnl4-Lif1
complex (24).
Recent genetic studies have shown that pol4 and
rad27 strains have no defect in the recircularization of
linear plasmid DNA molecules with complementary single-strand ends but
exhibit reduced joining of linearized plasmid DNA molecules with
noncomplementary termini (31, 32). These observations, together with
enzymatic properties of the DNA polymerase, Pol4 (32, 36, 37), and the
flap endonuclease, Fen-1 (Rad27) (38, 39), suggest that Pol4 and Fen-1
participate in microhomology-mediated NHEJ events requiring gap-filling
and nucleolytic processing steps prior to DNA joining. Pol4 is a member
of the functionally diverse Pol X family of nucleotidyl transferases
(see Fig. 1) (36, 37, 40-43). Within this family, mammalian Pol Plasmid Construction--
The S. cerevisiae
POL4 open reading frame was amplified from BJ5464 genomic
DNA by the polymerase chain reaction. After the DNA sequence of the
amplified product was verified, it was subcloned into the
Escherichia coli expression plasmids pGSTag (46) and pET28b
(Novagen) to generate the plasmids pGST-Pol4 and pET28b-Pol4, which
express Pol4 as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion and
His-tagged polypeptide, respectively. Using a similar strategy we
constructed the plasmids pGST-Pol4 Purification of His-tagged Pol4 and Pol4 Purification of GST Fusion Proteins--
An overnight culture (1 liter) of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring either
pGST-Pol4 or pGST-Pol4 Purification of Dnl4-Lif1--
His-tagged Lif1 and complexes
containing either Dnl4 and Lif1 or His-tagged Lif1 and Dnl4 were
purified from yeast cells as described previously (24).
Preparation of Yeast Cell Extracts--
The lysates were
prepared from the yeast strain BJ5464 and from the same strain
harboring the plasmids pADH-Dnl4 and pYES-Lif1 (24). The cells from
100-ml cultures were resuspended in 5 ml of Buffer A (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 1 mM
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine HCl, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin) and
lysed by mechanical shearing with glass beads. After centrifugation, the supernatant was used immediately for pull-down assays.
Coupled in Vitro Transcription and Translation--
Labeled Dnl4
was synthesized from a pBKS-Dnl4 template using T7 RNA polymerase and
[35S]methionine (Amersham Biosciences) in the TNT Quick
Coupled transcription/translation system (Promega). Dnl4 was partially
purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation (50) and then resuspended in
50 µl of Buffer A.
GST Pull-down Assays--
Glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (10 µl; Amersham Biosciences) were incubated with GST-Pol4,
GST-Pol4
To detect associations between Dnl4 and Pol4, beads with either
GST-Pol4 or GST as the ligand were incubated with 1.5 ml of yeast
lysate at 4 °C for 4 h. After collection by centrifugation, the
beads were washed extensively with Buffer A and then incubated for 15 min at 25 °C in 20-µl reaction mixtures containing 60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 50 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, and 0.5 µCi of [
To detect a direct interaction between purified Dnl4-Lif1 complex and
Pol4, beads (10 µl) with GST-Pol4, GST-Pol4 DNA Polymerase Assays--
Three oligonucleotides, 34M
(5'-TCCTCAAGAGTCGACCTGCAGGCATGCAAGCTTG-3', 34-mer), 5'
32P-labeled 17M (5'-CAAGCTTGCATGCCTGC-3', 17-mer), and 16M
(5'-GGTCGACTCTAGAGGA-3', 16-mer) were annealed by incubation at
70 °C for 10 min, 50 °C for 10 min, 40 °C for 10 min, 18 °C
for 10 min, and then on ice for 5 min to generate a linear duplex with
a single nucleotide gap.
Linear duplexes with complementary single-strand ends were constructed
by annealing the following pairs of oligonucleotides: 50M
(5'-GTAACAAAGTTTGGATTGCTACTGACCGCTCTCGTGCTCGTCGCTGCGTT-3', 50-mer) annealed to 41M
(5'-GCGACGAGCACGAGAGCGGTCAGTAGCAATCCAAACTTTGT-3', 41-mer) and 43M
(5'-GCCTCGCGACGCATGACTCTAAAGGGTTCTAATAGTGAGACAG-3', 43-mer) annealed to
5' 32P-labeled 50MM
(5'-GTCTGTCTCACTATTAGAACCCTTTAGAGTCATGCGTCGCGAGGCAACGC-3', 50-mer). Alignment of the complementary single strands generates a nonligatable nick in the unlabeled strand and a single-nucleotide gap
in the labeled strand (see Fig. 2C). A similar strategy was used to construct pairs of duplexes with single-strand extensions that,
when aligned, give differently sized gaps with and without single-strand flaps (see Fig. 3). Unless indicated, DNA concentrations are expressed as DNA molecules.
Equal amounts of the labeled and unlabeled duplexes (100 nM) were incubated with Pol Ligation Assay--
Linear duplexes with complementary
single-strand ends were constructed by annealing the following pairs of
oligonucleotides; 50M annealed to 5'-phosphorylated 41M and
5'-phosphorylated 43M annealed to 5' 32P-labeled 51M
(5'-GTCTGTCTCACTATTAGAACCCTTTAGAGTCATGCGTCGCGAGGCAACGCA-3', 51-mer). Alignment of the complementary single strands generates a ligatable nick in both the unlabeled and labeled strand.
Equal amounts of the labeled and unlabeled duplexes (100 nM) were incubated with Dnl4-Lif1 and, where indicated,
Pol4 and Pol4 DNA Synthesis Activity of Pol4--
Studies on the efficiency of
in vivo recircularization of linear plasmid DNA molecules
with noncomplementary single-strand ends have implicated Pol4 in a
subset of DNA joining events that involve end processing (32).
Full-length and truncated versions of Pol4 lacking the N-terminal BRCT
domain (Fig. 1) were expressed as
His-tagged polypeptides in E. coli and then purified to near homogeneity (Fig. 2A,
lanes 1 and 2). The DNA polymerase activity of
Pol4 was compared with that of Pol
Next we examined the DNA synthesis activity of Pol4 on differently
sized gaps generated by the alignment of linear duplex DNA molecules
with complementary ends (Fig. 3). There
was an inverse relationship between gap size and the amount of fully
filled-in product (Fig. 3). The presence or absence of a phosphate
group at the 5' end of the gaps did not effect Pol4 DNA synthesis
activity (data not shown). DNA synthesis by Pol4 was distributive, with the enzyme preferentially adding a single nucleotide, even with larger
gaps. Although a ladder of products corresponding to incompletely filled gaps were detectable, the fully filled-in product was the most
abundant species. With gaps sizes greater than a single nucleotide, strand displacement synthesis of one to two nucleotides occurred (Fig.
3, compare lanes 2 and 3). Interestingly,
the presence of a short 5' flap increased the amount of
strand displacement DNA synthesis about 2-fold (Fig. 3, compare
lane 3 with lanes 5 and 6). In
summary, the DNA substrate specificity of Pol4 is compatible with its
in vivo role in DSB repair because small gaps, possibly with
noncomplementary flaps, are predicted intermediates in the subpathway
of NHEJ that involves microhomology-mediated alignment of DNA ends (31,
32).
Pol4 Interacts the Dnl4-Lif1 Complex via the Dnl4 Subunit--
To
detect associations between Pol4 and NHEJ factors, we expressed and
purified Pol4 as a GST fusion protein (Fig.
4A, lane 2). In
affinity chromatography experiments with extracts from a wild type
yeast strain, no specific binding of the core NHEJ factors,
Hdf1-Hdf2, Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2, and Dnl4-Lif1, to GST-Pol4 beads
was observed (data not shown). We suspected that associations were not
detected because of the low endogenous levels of NHEJ factors.
Therefore, we performed a similar experiment with an extract from a
strain overexpressing Dnl4-Lif1 (24) and observed the specific binding
of Dnl4 to the GST-Pol4 resin (Fig. 4B). To determine
whether there is a direct interaction between Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1,
glutathione beads with GST-tagged full-length Pol4 (Fig. 4A,
lane 2), GST-tagged Pol4 lacking the N-terminal BRCT domain
(Fig. 4A, lane 4), or GST (Fig. 4A,
lane 1) as the ligand were incubated with purified Dnl4-Lif1
that was then labeled by adenylation (24). The binding of Dnl4-Lif1 to
the GST-Pol4 beads but not to either the GST-Pol4 Dnl4-Lif1 Specifically Stimulates the DNA Polymerase Activity of
Pol4--
To elucidate the functional consequences of the interaction
between Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1, we examined the effect of Dnl4-Lif1 on gap
filling DNA synthesis catalyzed by Pol4. As shown in Fig. 5A, Dnl4-Lif1
greatly stimulates DNA synthesis by Pol4 on nonligatable gaps formed by
the alignment of partial duplex oligonucleotides in a
concentration-dependent manner. Notably, Dnl4-Lif1 is much more effective at stimulating full-length Pol4 compared with either a
truncated version of Pol4 lacking the BRCT motif (Fig. 5A)
or Pol Pol4 Specifically Stimulates the DNA Joining Activity of
Dnl4-Lif1--
In assays with partial duplex oligonucleotides that
when aligned form a ligatable structure, Dnl4-Lif1 exhibited a low
activity that was stimulated by intact Pol4 (Fig.
7A) but not by
the truncated version of Pol4 lacking the N-terminal BRCT domain. At a
ratio of about 1:1, Pol4 increased Dnl4-Lif1-catalyzed DNA joining by about 2-fold. These results demonstrate that the stimulation of DNA
joining by Dnl4-Lif1 is mediated, at least in part, by the protein-protein interaction between Dnl4-Lif1 and Pol4, but the magnitude of this effect is less than that of Dnl4-Lif1 on Pol4 DNA
synthesis activity.
These observations suggest that the interaction between Pol4 and
Dnl4-Lif1 co-ordinates the gap filling DNA synthesis and ligation
reactions that complete NHEJ. To provide support for this model, we
compared the amount of ligated product produced by Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1
in assays with oligonucleotide duplexes that when aligned either form a
ligatable nick (Fig. 7A) or a single nucleotide gap (Fig.
7B). As shown in Fig. 7C, joining of the DNA
substrate that requires both DNA synthesis and ligation (15 fmol) was
significantly higher than the joining of the DNA substrate requiring
only ligation (0.5-1 fmol). This synergistic effect indicates that the
interaction between Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 not only enhances the catalytic
activity of both these enzymes but co-ordinates their action, ensuring
the efficient hand-over of pathway intermediates.
The preferred pathway for the repair of in vivo
DSBs by NHEJ appears to involve microhomologies that are
presumably revealed by nucleolytic digestion (14, 29, 30, 34). After
the alignment of short complementary sequences, it is likely that
single-strand flaps are removed and gaps are filled in to generate
ligatable structures (31, 32). Our biochemical studies have revealed differences in the DNA substrate specificity of the catalytic domain of
Pol4 compared with Pol Hdf1-Hdf2, Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2, and Dnl4-Lif1 complexes have been
identified as critical factors in the major NHEJ pathway in yeast
(3-14). Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2 stimulates DNA joining both by aligning DNA
ends and by recruiting Dnl4-Lif1 via a direct interaction between Xrs2
and Lif1 (24). Furthermore, DNA end joining mediated by these factors
is dependent on Hdf1-Hdf2 at physiological salt concentrations,
suggesting that Hdf1-Hdf2 binds to DNA ends and facilitates the
subsequent recruitment of Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2 and Dnl4-Lif1 (24). Although
these in vitro studies involved DNA substrates with
complementary single-strand ends, it seems likely that the same core
factors will bring together noncomplementary DNA ends within a
nucleoprotein complex and that the subsequent end-processing reactions
to generate a ligatable structure will occur within the context of the
nucleoprotein complex. Consistent with this idea, we have shown that
the interaction between Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 not only increases the
catalytic activity of both of these enzymes but also couples gap
filling DNA synthesis with DNA joining. Because Dnl4-Lif1 stimulates
Pol4 DNA synthesis on a gap within a linear duplex and the stimulatory
effect of Pol4 on Dnl4-Lif1 is much lower than that of Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2
(24), it seems unlikely that Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 have robust end
bridging activity. XRCC4, the human homolog of Lif1, preferentially
binds to DNA ends and nicked DNA (52). Thus, it is possible that Lif1 binding to DNA nicks or gaps stabilizes the assembly of the DNA polymerase-DNA ligase complex in a manner analagous to the functional interaction between Pol Analysis of the assembly of NHEJ factors at in vivo DSBs by
chromatin immunoprecipitation has shown that the recruitment of Dnl4 to
DSBs is dependent upon Hdf1-Hdf2 and Lif1 (55). Because inactivation of POL4 has no effect on the repair of DNA
breaks with cohesive ends (32), it appears that the Hdf1-Hdf2,
Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2, and Dnl4-Lif1 factors can form a functional
nucleoprotein complex in the absence of Pol4. Thus, the recruitment of
Pol4 to in vivo DSBs may be mediated via its interaction
with Dnl4. Our biochemical studies demonstrating that the BRCT domain
of Pol4 is critical for the interaction with Dnl4-Lif1 but not for Pol4
DNA synthesis activity provide a molecular explanation for genetic
studies showing that N-terminal deletions inactivate Pol4 function
in vivo (32). Interestingly, several members of the Pol
X family have an N-terminal BRCT domain (Fig. 1) (36, 37, 40-42,
45, 47, 48), suggesting that this may be a common mechanism for
recruiting these enzymes to their in vivo substrates. This
idea is supported by a recent report describing interactions between
the human Pol X family members, Pol µ and terminal transferase, and
DNA ligase IV-XRCC4 (56).
In summary, Pol4 efficiently fills in short gaps formed by the
alignment of complementary single strands at the ends of duplex DNA and
is specifically stimulated by Dnl4-Lif1. It will be interesting to
determine whether end bridging by Rad50-Mre11-Xrs2 (24) will further
stimulate the coupled DNA synthesis and ligation reaction mediated by
Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1. Moreover, genetic studies indicate that Pol4
participates in end joining events that require nucleolytic processing
(32). Future studies are necessary to determine whether Pol4
specifically associates with and/or modulates the activity of nucleases
such as Mre11 (33, 34) and Fen-1 (31) within the nucleoprotein
structure formed by NHEJ factors.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
catalyzes gap filling DNA synthesis in base excision repair (43, 44),
whereas terminal transferase adds nucleotides in a template-independent
manner during V(D)J recombination (45). The cellular functions of Pol µ and Pol
are less well understood (40-42). In this study we describe a functional interaction between Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1 that links
the gap-filling and ligation steps of NHEJ.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
BRCT and pET28b-Pol4
BRCT, which
encode tagged versions of Pol4 lacking the N-terminal 112 amino acids
encompassing the breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 C terminus (BRCT)
domain (see Fig. 1) that was originally identified in the breast cancer
susceptibility gene BRCA1 (47, 48) and the plasmid pGST-BRCT
that encodes the N-terminal 112-amino acid BRCT domain as a GST
fusion protein.
BRCT--
Overnight
cultures (100 ml) of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells harboring
either pET28b-Pol4 or pET28b-Pol4
BRCT were inoculated into 2 liters
of LB medium containing kanamycin (0.025 mg/ml) and chloramphenicol (0.034 mg/ml) and grown at 37 °C. At an absorbance at 600 nm of 0.5, isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM, and growth was continued at
25 °C for 4 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation,
flash frozen, and stored at
80 °C. Frozen cells were resuspended
in 40 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 10 mM
2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM benzamidine HCl, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin) and
lysed by sonication. After centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 20 min at
4 °C, the cleared lysate was supplemented with imidazole to a final
concentration of 20 mM prior to incubation with 1 ml of
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid-agarose beads (Qiagen) for 2 h at
4 °C. The beads were collected by centrifugation and then washed
extensively with lysis buffer containing 40 mM imidazole. His-tagged Pol4 polypeptides were eluted with lysis buffer containing 250 mM imidazole and then further purified to near
homogeneity by Resource Q and Resource S column chromatography.
Approximately 40 µg of Pol4 and 30 µg of Pol4
BRCT were obtained
from 2-liter cultures. Protein concentrations were measured by the
Bradford assay (49) using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
BRCT were inoculated into 10 liters of LB
medium containing ampicillin (0.1 mg/ml) and chloramphenicol (0.034 mg/ml) and grown at 37 °C. When the absorbance at 600 nm reached
0.6, isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a
final concentration of 0.5 mM, and growth was continued at
25 °C for 2 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation,
flash frozen, and stored at
80 °C. The frozen cells were
resuspended in 100 ml of lysis buffer and lysed by sonication. After
centrifugation, GST fusion proteins were purified from the cleared
lysate by glutathione-Sepharose 4B affinity chromatography, gel
filtration through a Superdex 75 column, and Resource S ion exchange
chromatography. Approximately 30 µg of nearly homogenous GST-Pol4 was
obtained from the 10-liter culture. A similar quantity of
GST-Pol4
BRCT was obtained, but this preparation also contained two
proteolytic fragments of the fusion protein. GST-BRCT and GST were
purified to near homogeneity from E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells
harboring either pGST-BRCT or pGSTag by glutathione-Sepharose 4B
affinity chromatography and gel filtration through a Superdex 75 column.
BRCT, GST-BRCT, or GST (10 µg of each) at 4 °C for
2 h. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the
beads were used for the pull-down assays.
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham
Biosciences). The reactions were stopped by the addition of SDS
sample buffer (51).
BRCT, or GST as the
ligand were incubated with 0.5 µg of purified Dnl4-Lif1 complex (24)
in Buffer A containing 2% bovine serum albumin in a final volume of 20 µl at 4 °C for 4 h. After collection by centrifugation, the
beads were washed extensively with Buffer A containing 150 mM NaCl and then incubated with [
-32P]ATP
as described above. To further characterize the interaction between
Dnl4 and Pol4, beads (10 µl) with the indicated ligand were incubated
with labeled in vitro translated Dnl4 supplemented with 2%
bovine serum albumin (22 µl) for 4 °C for 4 h. After
centrifugation, the supernatant was removed, and the beads were washed
with Buffer A. The beads were resuspended in 20 µl of SDS sample
buffer to yield the eluate (E). After electrophoresis through a 7.5%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel (51), labeled Dnl4 was detected using a
PhosphorImager screen.
, Pol4, Pol4
BRCT, and
Dnl4-Lif1 as indicated in reaction mixtures (10 µl) containing 35 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2,
0.05 mM of each of the four dNTPs, and 1 mM ATP
at 25 °C. The reactions were stopped by the addition of gel loading
buffer (95% (v/v) formamide, 0.09% (w/v) bromphenol blue, and 0.09%
(w/v) xylene cyanol). After separation by denaturing gel
electrophoresis, labeled DNA molecules in the dried gel were detected
and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis.
BRCT as described above. In assays to measure both DNA
synthesis and ligation, the 5' termini of unlabeled
oligonucleotides were phosphorylated.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
. As shown in Fig. 2B, Pol4 and Pol
have similar gap filling activity on a DNA substrate containing a single-nucleotide gap. In contrast, Pol4 was at least 4-fold more effective at filling in a single-nucleotide gap generated by the alignment of linear duplex DNA molecules with complementary ends
than Pol
(Fig. 2C, compare lanes 4 and
5 with lanes 6 and 7). Moreover, it
appears that this substrate specificity is an intrinsic property of the
Pol4 catalytic domain because deletion of the BRCT domain had no
significant effect on DNA synthesis activity (Fig. 2C,
compare lanes 2 and 3 with lanes 4 and
5).

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A schematic diagram of the Pol X family of
nucleotidyl transferases. The amino acid (a.a.)
sequences of yeast Pol4 and the human enzymes, Pol
, Pol
, Pol
µ, and terminal transferase (TdT) were obtained from
public databases. The positions of the conserved BRCT, lyase, and
nucleotidyltransferase domains are indicated (36, 37, 40-43, 47,
48).

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Gap filling DNA synthesis by purified Pol4,
Pol4
BRCT, and Pol
. A, analysis of purified Pol4,
Pol4
BRCT, and Pol
by SDS-PAGE. Pol4, Pol4
BRCT, and Pol
were expressed in and purified from E. coli cells as
described under "Materials and Methods." After SDS-PAGE, purified
Pol4, Pol4
BRCT, and Pol
polypeptides were stained with Coomassie
Blue. Lane 1, Pol4, 0.5 µg; lane 2,
Pol4
BRCT, 0.5 µg; lane 3, Pol
, 0.5 µg. The
positions of molecular mass standards (Bio-Rad) are indicated on the
left. B, DNA synthesis by Pol4, Pol4
BRCT, and
Pol
at a single-nucleotide gap within a linear DNA duplex. The DNA
substrate was constructed as described under "Materials and
Methods." The position of the labeled phosphate group is indicated by
an asterisk. Lane 1, DNA substrate alone. Pol4
(lanes 2-4), Pol4
BRCT (lanes 5-7), and Pol
(lanes 8-10) were incubated at the indicated
concentrations with the DNA substrate (100 nM) at 25 °C
for 2 h as described under "Materials and Methods." After
separation by denaturing gel electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides
in dried gels were detected by PhosphorImager analysis. The
arrows indicate the positions of the one-nucleotide fill-in
product (F, 18-mer) and substrate (S, 17-mer).
C, DNA synthesis by Pol4, Pol4
BRCT, and Pol
at a
single-nucleotide gap formed by the alignment of the complementary
single-strand ends of two DNA duplexes. The indicated DNA duplexes were
constructed as described under "Materials and Methods." Alignment
of the complementary single strands results in a one-nucleotide gap in
the bottom strand. Lane 1, substrate alone. Pol4
BRCT
(lanes 2 and 3), Pol4 (lanes 4 and
5), and Pol
(lanes 6 and 7) were
incubated at the indicated concentrations with the DNA substrate (100 nM of each DNA duplex) at 25 °C for 2 h. The
arrows indicate the positions of the one-nucleotide fill-in
product (F, 51-mer) and substrate (S,
50-mer).

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of gap size and 5' noncomplementary
bases on DNA synthesis by Pol4. DNA duplexes with the labeled
phosphate group indicated by an asterisk were constructed as
described under "Materials and Methods." The structures of the
labeled bottom strand generated by alignment of the complementary
single strands are described. Pol4 (56 nM) was incubated
with the indicated substrates (100 nM) at 25 °C for
2 h as described under "Materials and Methods." After
separation by denaturing gel electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides
in the dried gel were detected by PhosphorImager analysis. The
arrows indicate the positions of substrates (S)
and fill-in products of one, three, and five nucleotides
(F).
BRCT or the GST
beads (Fig. 4C) demonstrates that these protein factors
interact directly and suggests that this interaction is mediated by the
N-terminal BRCT domain of Pol4. In similar experiments, we did not
observe specific binding of purified Lif1 to GST-Pol4 beads (data not
shown), suggesting that the interaction is either mediated by Dnl4 or
requires complex formation between Dnl4-Lif1. Because Lif1 is required
for Dnl4 stability in yeast cells (9, 24), we examined the interaction of labeled in vitro translated Dnl4 with Pol4. Dnl4 bound to
glutathione beads with either GST-Pol4 (Fig. 4A, lane
2) or a GST fusion protein with only the N-terminal BRCT domain of
Pol4 (Fig. 4A, lane 3) as the ligand but did not
bind to glutathione beads with GST (Fig. 4A, lane
1) as the ligand (Fig. 4D). In similar experiments,
in vitro translated Lif1 did not bind specifically to Pol4
beads (data not shown). Thus, we conclude that Pol4 interacts directly with the Dnl4 subunit of the Dnl4-Lif1 complex via its N-terminal BRCT
motif.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Interaction between Pol4 and
Dnl4-Lif1. A, analysis of purified GST-Pol4,
GST-Pol4
BRCT, GST-BRCT, and GST by SDS-PAGE. GST-Pol4,
GST-Pol4
BRCT, GST-BRCT, and GST were expressed in and purified
from E. coli cells as described under "Materials and
Methods." After SDS-PAGE, the polypeptides were stained with
Coomassie Blue. Lane 1, GST, 0.4 µg; lane 2,
GST-Pol4, 0.5 µg; lane 3, GST-BRCT, 0.4 µg; lane
4, GST-Pol4
BRCT, 0.4 µg. The degradation products of
GST-Pol4
BRCT are indicated by asterisks. The
positions of molecular mass standards (Bio-Rad) are indicated on the
left. B, pull-down assays with yeast cell
extract. Extract from yeast strain BJ5464 harboring the plasmids
pADH-Dnl4 and pYES-Lif1 was incubated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B
beads liganded by either GST (lane 1) or GST-Pol4
(lane 2). After washing, the beads were incubated with
[
-32P]ATP to generate labeled DNA ligase-adenylate as
described under "Materials and Methods." C, pull-down
assays with purified Dnl4-Lif1 complex. Dnl4-Lif1 (0.5 µg) was
incubated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads liganded by either GST
(lane 1), GST-Pol4 (lane 2), or GST-Pol4
BRCT
(lane 3). After washing, the beads were incubated with
[
-32P]ATP to generate labeled DNA ligase-adenylate as
described under "Materials and Methods." D, pull-down
assays with Dnl4 labeled by coupled in vitro transcription
and translation. Labeled Dnl4 was incubated with glutathione-Sepharose
4B beads liganded by GST (lane 2), GST-Pol4 (lane
3), or GST-BRCT (lane 4) as described under
"Materials and Methods." One-fifth of the input labeled Dnl4 (I)
was loaded in lane 1. The bound proteins were eluted from
the beads with SDS sample buffer to yield the eluates (E).
After separation by SDS-PAGE, labeled polypeptides were detected by
PhosphorImager analysis. Labeled Dnl4 is indicated by the
arrows.
(data not shown). At a ratio of about 1:1, Dnl4-Lif1
increased Pol4-catalyzed DNA synthesis by 5-6-fold. When measured as a
function of time, Dnl4-Lif1 increased both the rate and extent of
Pol4-mediated DNA synthesis (Fig. 5B). Again the effect on
DNA synthesis was dependent on the BRCT domain of Pol4. These results
demonstrate that the stimulation of Pol4 DNA synthesis activity is
mediated, at least in part, by the protein-protein interaction between
Dnl4-Lif1 and Pol4. Dnl4-Lif1 also stimulated gap filling DNA synthesis by Pol4 on a linear duplex containing a single nucleotide nonligatable gap in a BRCT domain-dependent manner (Fig. 5C).
Because the stimulatory effect of Dnl4-Lif1 on DNA synthesis by Pol4
was similar whether the gap was within a linear DNA duplex or formed by
the alignment of linear duplex DNA molecules with complementary ends
(Fig. 5, A and C), it appears that the
stimulation of Pol4 activity by Dnl4-Lif1 is mediated by mechanisms
other than DNA end alignment. Finally, we examined whether the effect
of Dnl4-Lif1 on the DNA synthesis activity of Pol4 was influenced by
either increased gap size or the presence of a 5' flap. Dnl4-Lif1
stimulated the DNA synthesis activity of Pol4 on cohesive ended DNA
molecules that when aligned form a three-nucleotide gap either without
(Fig. 6A) or with a
three-nucleotide flap (Fig. 6B) but did not significantly alter the distribution of reaction products.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The effect of Dnl4-Lif1 on DNA synthesis by
Pol4 at a one-nucleotide gap. A, effect of Dnl4-Lif1
concentration on DNA synthesis by Pol4 at a one-nucleotide gap
generated by the alignment of linear duplex DNA molecules with
complementary ends. Lanes 1 and 8, DNA
substrate alone. Pol4 (7 nM) and Pol4
BRCT (7 nM) and the indicated DNA duplexes (100 nM of
each) that, when aligned, form a one-nucleotide gap in the labeled
bottom strand were incubated at 25 °C for 2 h with increasing
amounts of Dnl4-Lif1 where indicated. Lanes 2 and
9, no Dnl4-Lif1; lanes 3 and 10, 1.25 nM; lanes 4 and 11, 2.5 nM; lanes 5 and 12, 5 nM;
lanes 6 and 13, 10 nM; lanes
7 and 14, 20 nM. After separation by
denaturing gel electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides in dried gels
were detected and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis. The
arrows indicate the positions of the one-nucleotide fill-in
product (F, 51-mer) and substrate (S, 50-mer).
The results of three independent experiments are shown graphically.
, Pol4;
, Pol4
BRCT. B, time course of DNA synthesis
by Pol4 and Pol4
BRCT in the presence Dnl4-Lif1. Dnl4-Lif1 (40 nM) and the DNA duplexes (100 nM of each)
described above were incubated at 25 °C with either Pol4 (7 nM, lanes 1-4) or Pol4
BRCT (7 nM, lanes 6-9) for the indicated times.
Lane 5, DNA substrate alone. After separation by denaturing
gel electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides in dried gels were
detected and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis. The
arrows indicate the positions of the one-nucleotide fill-in
product (F, 51-mer) and substrate (S, 50-mer).
The results of the experiment are also shown graphically.
, Pol 4;
, Pol4
BRCT. C, effect of Dnl4-Lif1 concentration on
DNA synthesis by Pol4 at a one-nucleotide gap within a linear duplex
DNA molecule. Lane 1, DNA substrate alone. Pol4 (7 nM) and Pol4
BRCT (7 nM) and the indicated DNA duplex (100 nM) containing a one-nucleotide gap in the top strand were
incubated at 25 °C for 2 h with increasing amounts of Dnl4-Lif1
where indicated. Lanes 2 and 6, no Dnl4-Lif1;
lanes 3 and 7, 10 nM; lanes
4 and 8, 20 nM; lanes 5 and
9, 40 nM. After separation by denaturing gel
electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides in dried gels were detected
and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis. The arrows
indicate the positions of the one-nucleotide fill-in product
(F, 18-mer) and substrate (S, 17-mer). The
results of two independent experiments are shown graphically.
,
Pol4;
, Pol4
BRCT.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The effect of Dnl4-Lif1 on Pol4 DNA synthesis
at a three-nucleotide gap with and without 5'-noncomplementary
nucleotides. A, effect of Dnl4-Lif1 concentration on
DNA synthesis at a three-nucleotide gap. Pol4 (28 nM) and
the indicated DNA duplexes (100 nM of each) that, when
aligned, form a three-nucleotide gap in the labeled bottom strand were
incubated at 25 °C for 2 h with increasing amounts of Dnl4-Lif1
where indicated. B, effect of Dnl4-Lif1 concentration on DNA
synthesis at a three-nucleotide gap with a 5' flap. Pol4 (28 nM) and the indicated DNA duplexes (100 nM of
each) that, when aligned, form a three-nucleotide gap with a
three-nucleotide 5' flap in the labeled bottom strand were incubated at
25 °C for 2 h with increasing amounts of Dnl4-Lif1 where
indicated. Lane 1, no protein; lane 2, no
Dnl4-Lif1; lane 3, 1.25 nM Dnl4-Lif1; lane
4, 2.5 nM Dnl4-Lif1; lane 5, 5 nM Dnl4-Lif1; lane 6, 10 nM
Dnl4-Lif1; lane 7, 20 nM Dnl4-Lif1. After
separation by denaturing gel electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides
in dried gels were detected and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis.
The arrows indicate the positions of the fill-in products
(F, 51- and 53-mer) and substrate (S,
50-mer).

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of Pol4 on DNA joining by Dnl4-Lif1;
coupled DNA synthesis and ligation by Pol4 and Dnl4-Lif1.
A, effect of Pol4 concentration on Dnl4-Lif1 activity.
Dnl4-Lif1 (40 nM) and the indicated DNA duplexes (100 nM of each) that, when aligned, form a ligatable nick in the labeled bottom strand were incubated at 25 °C for
2 h with increasing amounts of Pol4 where indicated as described
under "Materials and Methods." Lane 1, no protein;
lane 2, no Pol4; lane 3, 11 nM Pol4;
lane 4, 22 nM Pol4; lane 5, 44 nM Pol4; lane 6, 88 nM Pol4. After
separation by denaturing gel electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides
in dried gels were detected and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis.
The arrows indicate the positions of the 92-mer ligation
product (L) and the 51-mer substrate (S). The
results of the experiment are also shown graphically.
, Pol 4;
,
Pol4
BRCT. B, coupled DNA synthesis and ligation. Pol4 (14 nM) and Dnl4-Lif1 (40 nM) were incubated as
indicated with the indicated DNA duplexes (100 nM of each)
that, when aligned, form a single nucleotide with a 5' phosphate
terminus in the labeled bottom strand. The arrows indicate
the positions of the 50-mer substrate (S), the 51-mer
gap-filling product (F), and the 92-mer ligation product
(L). C, the effect of DNA synthesis on DNA
joining by Dnl4-Lif1. Pol4 and Dnl4 (40 nM) were incubated
at 25 °C for 2 h with the one-nucleotide gap substrate
described for B and the ligatable substrate described for
A as indicated. After separation by denaturing gel
electrophoresis, labeled oligonucleotides in dried gels were detected
and quantitated by PhosphorImager analysis. The results of two
independent experiments are shown graphically.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, the prototypic member of the Pol X DNA
polymerase family (Fig. 1) (36, 37, 40-43) that are compatible with
the predicted role of the POL4 gene product in end joining
events that involve gap filling DNA synthesis (32). Specifically, Pol4
preferentially acts upon short gaps formed by the alignment of linear
duplexes with complementary single-strand ends.
and XRCC1, the partner protein of DNA ligase III
, on nicked DNA (53, 54).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Dr. Kelly Trujillo for
purified His-tagged Lif1 and His-Lif1/Dnl4 and to Dr. Sam Wilson for
purified human Pol
. We thank the other members of the A. E. Tomkinson laboratory for advice and help, in particular Dr. Ling Chen.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grants RO1 GM47251 and PO1 CA81020 (to A. E. T.) from the National Institutes of Health and San Antonio Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA54174.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Medicine and Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health
Science Center at San Antonio, 15355 Lambda Dr., San Antonio, TX
78245-3207. E-mail: Tomkinson@uthscsa.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206861200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: DSB, DNA double-strand break; BRCT, breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 C terminus; GST, glutathione S-transferase; NHEJ, nonhomologous end joining; Pol, polymerase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sung, P., Trujillo, K., and Van Komen, S. (2000) Mutat. Res. 451, 257-275[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Critchlow, S. E., and Jackson, S. P. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 394-398[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Boulton, S. J.,
and Jackson, S. P.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4639-4648 |
| 4. | Boulton, S. J., and Jackson, S. P. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 5093-5103[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Milne, G. T., Jin, S., Shannon, K. B., and Weaver, D. T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4189-4198[Abstract] |
| 6. | Siede, W., Friedl, A. A., Dianova, I., Eckhardt-Schupp, F., and Friedberg, E. C. (1996) Genetics 142, 91-102[Abstract] |
| 7. | Boulton, S. J., and Jackson, S. P. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1819-1828[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Moreau, S.,
Ferguson, J. R.,
and Symington, L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
556-566 |
| 9. | Herrmann, G., Lindahl, T., and Schar, P. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4188-4198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Ramos, W.,
Liu, G.,
Giroux, C. N.,
and Tomkinson, A. E.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
5676-5683 |
| 11. |
Schar, P.,
Herrman, G.,
Daly, G.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1912-1924 |
| 12. | Teo, S. H., and Jackson, S. P. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 4788-4795[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Wilson, T. E., Grawunder, U., and Lieber, M. R. (1997) Nature 388, 495-498[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Moore, J. K., and Haber, J. E. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2164-2173[Abstract] |
| 15. |
Bressan, D. A.,
Baxter, B. K.,
and Petrini, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
7681-7687 |
| 16. | Carney, J. P., Maser, R. S., Olivares, H., Davis, E. M., Le, Beau, L., Yates, J. R., Hays, L., Morgan, W. F., and Petrini, J. H. J. (1998) Cell 93, 477-486[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Stewart, G., Maser, R. S., Stankovic, T., Bressan, D. A., Kaplan, M. I., Jaspers, N. G. J., Byrd, P. J., Petrini, J. H. J., and Taylor, A. M. R. (1999) Cell 99, 577-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Usui, T., Ogawa, H., and Petrini, J. H. J. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 1255-1266[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Varon, R., Vissinga, C., Platzer, M., Cerosaletti, K. M., Chrzanowska, K. H., Saar, K., Beckmann, G., Seemanova, E., Cooper, P. R., Nowak, N. J., Stumm, M., Weemaes, C. M., Gatti, R. A., Wilson, R. K., Digweed, M., Rosenthal, A., Sperling, K., Concannon, P., and Reis, A. (1998) Cell 93, 467-476[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | D'Amours, D., and Jackson, S. P. (2000) Genes Dev. 15, 2238-2249 |
| 21. | Grenon, M., Gilbert, C., and Lowndes, N. F. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 844-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Grawunder, U., Wilm, M., Wu, X., Kulesza, P., Wilson, T. E., Mann, M., and Lieber, M. R. (1997) Nature 388, 492-495[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Critchlow, S. E., Bowater, R. P., and Jackson, S. P. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 588-598[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Chen, L., Trujillo, K., Ramos, W., Sung, P., and Tomkinson, A. E. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 1105-1115[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Valencia, M., Benetele, M., Vaze, M. B., Herrman, G., Kraus, E., Lee, S. E., Schar, P., and Haber, J. E. (2001) Nature 414, 666-669[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Ooi, S. L.,
Shoemaker, D. D.,
and Boeke, J. D.
(2001)
Science
294,
2552-2556 |
| 27. | Kegel, A., Sjostrand, J. O., and Astrom, S. U. (2001) Curr. Biol. 20, 1611-1617 |
| 28. |
Frank-Vaillant, M.,
and Marcand, S.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
3005-3012 |
| 29. |
Roth, D. B.,
and Wilson, J. H.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
4295-4304 |
| 30. |
Kramer, K. M.,
Brock, J. A.,
Bloom, K.,
Moore, J. K.,
and Haber, J. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1293-1301 |
| 31. |
Wu, X.,
Wilson, T. E.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
1303-1308 |
| 32. |
Wilson, T. E.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
23599-23609 |
| 33. | Paull, T. T., and Gellert, M. (1998) Mol. Cell. 1, 969-979[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Paull, T. T.,
and Gellert, M.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
6409-6414 |
| 35. | Furuse, M., Nagase, Y., Tsubouchi, H., Murakami-Murofushi, K., Shibata, T., and Ohta, K. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6412-6425[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Shimuzu, K.,
Santocanale, C.,
Ropp, P. A.,
Longhese, M. P.,
Plevani, P.,
Lucchini, G.,
and Sugino, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
27148-27153 |
| 37. |
Prasad, R.,
Widen, S. G.,
Singhal, R. V.,
Watkins, J.,
Prakash, L.,
and Wilson, S. H.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5301-5307 |
| 38. | Harrington, J. J., and Lieber, M. R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 1235-1246[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Lieber, M. R. (1997) BioEssays 19, 233-240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Dominguez, O., Ruiz, J. F., Lain de Lera, T., Garcia-Diaz, M., Gonzalez, M. A., Kirchhoff, T., Martinez, A. C., Bernad, A., and Blanco, L. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1731-1742[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Aoufouchi, S.,
Flatter, E.,
Dahan, A.,
Faili, A.,
Bertocci, B.,
Storck, S.,
Delbos, F.,
Cocea, L.,
Gupta, N.,
Weill, J. C.,
and Reynaud, C. A.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
3684-3693 |
| 42. |
Garcia-Diaz, M.,
Bebenek, K.,
Sabariegos, R.,
Dominguez, O.,
Rodriguez, T.,
Kirchhoff, T.,
Garcia-Palomero, E.,
Picher, A. J.,
Juarez, R.,
Ruiz, J. F.,
Kunkel, T. A.,
and Blanco, L.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
13184-13191 |
| 43. | Sobol, R. W., and Wilson, S. H. (2001) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 68, 57-74[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Sobol, R. W., Horton, J. K., Kuhn, R., Gu, H., Singhal, R. K., Prasad, R., Rajewsky, K., and Wilson, S. H. (1996) Nature 379, 183-186[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Gilfillan, S., Benoist, C., and Mathis, D. (1995) Immunol. Rev. 148, 201-219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. | Ron, D., and Dressler, H. (1992) BioTechniques 13, 866-868[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Koonin, E. V., Alschul, S. F., and Bork, P. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 266-267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Callebaut, I., and Mornon, J. P. (1997) FEBS Lett. 400, 25-30[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. |
Bardwell, L.,
Cooper, A. J.,
and Friedberg, E. C.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3041-3049 |
| 51. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Modesti, M., Hesse, J. E., and Gellert, M. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2008-2017[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. | Marintchev, A., Mullen, M., Maciejewski, M. W., Pan, B., Gryk, M. R., and Mullen, G. P. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 884-893[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. |
Caldecott, K. W.,
McKeown, C. K.,
Tucker, J. D.,
Ljunquist, S.,
and Thompson, L. H.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
68-76 |
| 55. | Teo, S.-H., and Jackson, S. P. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 165-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. |
Mahajan, K. N.,
Nick McElhinny, S. A.,
Mitchell, B. S.,
and Ramsden, D. A.
(2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
22,
5194-5202 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Matsuzaki, A. Shinohara, and M. Shinohara Forkhead-Associated Domain of Yeast Xrs2, a Homolog of Human Nbs1, Promotes Nonhomologous End Joining Through Interaction With a Ligase IV Partner Protein, Lif1 Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 213 - 225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |