Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205935200 on September 13, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 47, 45662-45669, November 22, 2002
Interactions of STAT3 with Caveolin-1 and Heat Shock Protein 90 in Plasma Membrane Raft and Cytosolic Complexes
PRESERVATION OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING DURING FEVER*
Mehul
Shah
,
Kirit
Patel
,
Victor A.
Fried
, and
Pravin B.
Sehgal
§¶
From the
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy and
§ Department of Medicine, New York Medical College,
Valhalla, New York 10595
Received for publication, June 14, 2002, and in revised form, August 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) initiates STAT3 signaling in
plasma membrane rafts with the subsequent transit of Tyr-phosphorylated STAT3 (PY-STAT3) through the cytoplasmic compartment to the nucleus in
association with accessory proteins. We initially identified caveolin-1
(cav-1) as a candidate STAT3-associated accessory protein due to its
co-localization with STAT3 and PY-STAT3 in flotation raft fractions,
and heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) due to its inclusion in cytosolic
STAT3-containing 200-400-kDa complexes. Subsequent immunomagnetic bead
pullout assays showed that STAT3, PY-STAT3, cav-1, and HSP90
interacted in plasma membrane and cytoplasmic complexes derived from
uninduced and stimulated Hep3B cells. This was a general property of
STAT3 in that these interactions were also observed in alveolar
epithelial type II-like cells, lung fibroblasts, and pulmonary arterial
endothelial cells. Exposure of Hep3B cells to the raft disrupter
methyl-
-cyclodextrin for 1-10 min followed by IL-6 stimulation for
15 min preferentially inhibited the appearance of PY-STAT3 in the
cav-1-enriched sedimentable cytoplasmic fraction, suggesting that these
complexes may represent a trafficking intermediate immediately
downstream from the raft. Because IL-6 is known to function in the body
in the context of fever, the possibility that HSP90 may help preserve
IL-6-induced STAT3 signaling at elevated temperature was investigated.
Geldanamycin, an HSP90 inhibitor, markedly inhibited IL-6-stimulated
STAT3 signaling in Hep3B hepatocytes cultured overnight at 39.5 °C
as evaluated by DNA-shift assays, trafficking of PY-STAT3 to the
nucleus, cross-precipitation of HSP90 by anti-STAT3 polyclonal
antibody, and reporter/luciferase construct experiments. Taken
together, the data show that IL-6/raft/STAT3 signaling is a chaperoned
pathway that involves cav-1 and HSP90 as accessory proteins and suggest
a mechanism for the preservation of this signaling during fever.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fever ("calor") is a common response of the body to infection
and injury (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Interleukin-6 (IL-6)1 is a major systemic
mediator of this "acute-phase" response that includes stimulation
of the liver to synthesize and secrete a large number of protective
plasma proteins such as anti-proteinases, clotting factors, complement
factors, and scavenger proteins that help to limit the site of injury
or infection (1, 2). Furthermore, IL-6 is itself a centrally acting
pyrogen (3-5). How is the major signaling pathway used by IL-6 to
enhance acute-phase plasma protein gene expression in hepatocytes, the
JAK-STAT3 pathway (Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of
transcription 3) (6-11), maintained during an increase in body
temperature? We report the identification of caveolin-1 (cav-1) and
heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) as STAT3-associated proteins at the level
of plasma membrane rafts and in high molecular mass cytoplasmic
complexes, and we explore their role in cytokine signaling at normal
and elevated temperatures.
In previous cell fractionation studies of human hepatoma Hep3B cells,
approximately 10% of the cellular STAT3 and STAT1 pools were observed
to be associated with a detergent-resistant plasma membrane raft
fraction which included the plasma membrane marker 5'-nucleotidase
(5'-ND), the integral raft proteins caveolin-1 (cav-1) and flotillin-1,
the IL-6-receptor chain gp130, the interferon (IFN)-
-receptor chain
, and the chaperone glucose-regulated protein 58 (GRP58) (12, 13).
Upon activation by cytokine or orthovanadate Tyr-phosphorylated (PY)
STAT3 and STAT1 were also found in association with the
detergent-resistant membrane raft fraction (12, 13). The departure of
PY-STATs from the membrane fraction into the cytoplasm was accompanied
by acquisition of DNA binding competence (11, 14). The raft disrupter
methyl-
-cyclodextrin (MCD) (15, 16) markedly inhibited IL-6 and
IFN-
signaling (12).
When characterized in the cytoplasm by gel filtration chromatography,
STAT3, a protein of monomer size 91 kDa, was largely in the form of
soluble 200-400 kDa and sedimentable 1-2 MDa "statosome" complexes (11, 14).2 In the
cytoplasm, IL-6-activated PY-STAT3 was also found in a broad
distribution of sizes from 200-400 kDa to 1-2 MDa (14). Moreover,
GRP58 was also identified as a STAT3-associated accessory protein in
the cytosolic 200-400-kDa complexes (13, 14).
In this report we provide evidence showing that IL-6/raft/STAT3
signaling is a chaperoned pathway that involves cav-1 and HSP90 as
accessory proteins. Furthermore, the association between HSP90 and
STAT3 appears to be part of a biological mechanism for the preservation
of this signaling pathway in liver cells at elevated temperature.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Lines--
The parental human hepatoma Hep3B cell line and
a derivative cell line ("Line 1") have been described earlier (14,
17-20). Line 1 Hep3B cells were used in the experiments reported here. Human lung alveolar epithelial type II-like cell line A549 (ATII-like) and human lung fibroblast strain CCD Lu-11 (LF) were a gift from Dr. Anuradha Ray, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh. ATII-like and LF cells were grown in 100-mm plastic Petri
dishes in a manner similar to growth of Hep3B cells. Cultures of
primary bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (BPAEC) in T-75
flasks were a gift from Dr. Susan Olson, New York Medical College, and
were used directly.
Cytokine Treatment--
Hep3B cells were grown to confluence in
100-mm Petri dishes at 37 °C as described earlier (14, 17-20). For
IL-6 or IFN-
treatment, cultures were washed twice with
phosphate-buffered saline, replenished with 5 ml of serum-free medium
for 1-2 h, and then exposed to the recombinant cytokine (10 ng/ml; R & D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN) for the indicated times. In some experiments confluent Hep3B cultures were incubated at 39.5 °C overnight (12-14 h), and cytokine stimulation was also carried out at
39.5 °C.
Cell Fractionation--
Cells were harvested by scraping into
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), washed twice with ice-cold
PBS, resuspended in ~0.8 ml of extract lysis buffer (ELB; 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.4 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 0.1 mM sodium
orthovanadate) per cell pellet derived from five 100-mm cultures, and
fractionated into cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions by gentle cell
breakage in a loose-fitting Dounce homogenizer as described earlier
(12-14, 17-19). All cell fractionation and gradient centrifugation
steps were carried out at 4 °C. Nuclei were removed from the cell
homogenate by two rounds of low speed centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 3 min in an IEC Centra GP8R centrifuge. The post-nuclear cytoplasm was
further fractionated by centrifugation at 15,000 × g
in an Eppendorf centrifuge for 15 min to yield the "P15 membrane
fraction" (P15, pellet fraction of post-nuclear cytoplasm centrifuged
at 15,000 × g for 15 min) which contained mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and plasma membrane (13). This P15
membrane pellet was washed once with 0.5 ml of ELB, resedimented, and
then resuspended in 50 µl of ELB. The supernatant from the initial
15,000 × g 15-min sedimentation was further
fractionated into pellet P100 (P100, pellet fraction of post-membrane
cytoplasm centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 60 min) and
cytosol S100 fractions (S100, supernatant of post-membrane cytoplasm
centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h) in a TL-100
Beckman ultracentrifuge. After removal of the S100 cytosol from the
centrifuge tube, the walls were wiped carefully, and then the P100
pellet was resuspended in 50 µl of ELB. Nuclear extracts were
prepared in high salt buffer containing 0.6 M NaCl as
described before (18, 19).
Enzymatic assays for 5'-nucleotidase (5'-ND, a marker for plasma
membrane) were carried out using kits purchased from Sigma. Additional
Western blot markers included caveolin-1, glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78/BiP), and nuclear pore-associated protein 62 (Nup62) (Organelle
Marker kit; Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY).
Western Blot Analyses of Proteins--
Western blotting was
carried out using 7.5, 10, or 12.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels under
reducing denaturing conditions in accordance with procedures and
protocols provided by Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY, and the
ECL detection kit (Amersham Biosciences) (14, 17-19). For quantitation
purposes, extensive previous calibration controls (14, 17-19) have
shown that detection of STAT1 and STAT3 proteins and their
Tyr-phosphorylated derivatives was linear with the amount of respective
protein in this assay. Routinely, multiple exposures of each blot were
obtained so as to ensure that each of the signals was within the linear
range; and in order to reduce quantitation errors, sample volumes in
different fractions were adjusted to provide signals of equivalent
strength each within the linear range of the assay. Western blot
signals were quantitated using a Hoefer Scientific GS-300 scanning densitometer.
DNA Gel-shift Assays--
STAT-specific DNA binding activity was
assayed using the m67 mutant serum-inducible element (SIE)
oligonucleotide derived from the c-fos promoter (purchased
from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) as described earlier
(14, 18). Briefly, this oligonucleotide yields the typical pattern of
SIE-oligonucleotide binding factor (SIF)-A, -B, and -C complexes in
gel-shift assays corresponding to the STAT3 homodimer, STAT1/3
heterodimer, and STAT1 homodimer, respectively (6-14). The SIE
oligonucleotide was 32P-end-labeled at its 5' end using T4
polynucleotide kinase and used in electrophoretic shift assays as
described earlier (14, 18). Typically the binding buffer (15-µl
reaction volume; 30 min of incubation at room temperature) contained 40 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 4% (v/v) Ficoll,
7% Me2SO, and 1 µg per reaction
poly(dI·dC)·poly(dI·dC) (Amersham Biosciences). DNA-protein
complexes were separated by electrophoresis through 5% PAGE
(acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio 30:0.8) in 0.2× TBE (0.02 M Tris, pH 8.3, 0.02 M boric acid, 0.25 mM EDTA) at 300 V at 4 °C for ~2 h and dried for
autoradiography. Antibody inhibition assays were performed as described
earlier (14, 18). Routinely, multiple exposures of each autoradiogram
were obtained on Kodak XAR5 film so as to be within the linear range of
exposure of the film. The signal intensities were quantitated using a
Hoefer Scientific GS-300 scanning densitometer. The identification of the respective SIF-A, -B, and -C bands as STAT3 homodimer, STAT3/1 heterodimer, and STAT1 homodimer in our experiments was confirmed using
respective antibody supershift assays (see Refs. 12-14 and additional data).
IL-6-responsive Reporter/Luciferase Construct
Assays--
Transfections into Hep3B cell cultures in 6-well plates
were carried out using the LipofectAMINE reagent (Polyfect, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, a
reporter/luciferase construct (p950M4) containing four copies of the
STAT3-binding DNA element from the human angiotensinogen promoter (5'
CGTTTCTGGGAACCT 3') cloned into pBL2Luc (Promega Biotech,
Madison, WI) (a gift from Dr. Ashok Kumar, Department of Pathology, New
York Medical College) was transfected into Hep3B cells (250-500
ng/well) together with the constitutive
-galactosidase expression
plasmid pCH110 (50 ng/well) and appropriate amounts of pBR322 or
Bluescript vector to give 1 µg of transfected DNA per well. After
incubation at 37 °C for 10-12 h, the cultures were either kept at
37 °C or incubated overnight at 39.5 °C. IL-6 (10 ng/ml)
induction was carried out for 6 h at the respective temperatures.
The cells were harvested in 300 µl of lysis buffer (Promega Biotech),
and 50-µl aliquots of the clarified extracts were used to assay
luciferase and
-galactosidase activity using respective assay
kits/reagents from Promega Biotech and Roche Diagnostics and the
manufacturer's protocols.
Antibody Reagents--
Murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to
STAT1, STAT3, and HSP90 were purchased from Transduction Laboratories
(Lexington, KY), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) to STAT3,
STAT5b, and caveolin-1, as well as a murine mAb to PY-STAT3 were
purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-PY-STAT1 and anti-PY-STAT3 pAbs were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Rabbit antiserum to recombinant human
glucose-regulated protein 58 (GRP58/ER-60/ERp57) was a gift from Drs.
Mohammed Bourdi and Lance Pohl (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda).
Immunopanning Using Protein A Magnetic Beads--
Protein A
magnetic beads were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA).
Prior to use in immunopanning experiments, the beads were blocked with
5% non-fat dry milk in PBS for 1 h and then washed three times
with PBS. Aliquots of the P15 membrane fraction (150 µl), the P100
pellet (150 µl), or the S100 cytosol (300 µl) were adjusted to
0.05% Triton X-100 in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM
dithiothreitol ("binding buffer") and incubated overnight at
4 °C with respective rabbit immunoglobulin (nonimmune rabbit serum
(NRS) or anti-caveolin-1 pAb or anti-STAT3 pAb) and then for 1 h
at 4 °C with the pre-blocked protein A magnetic beads. The magnetic
beads were washed 5 times with binding buffer containing 0.05% Triton
X-100 and then twice with binding buffer adjusted to 0.5% Triton
X-100. Immunopanned protein complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting under reducing denaturing conditions (14, 19).
Electron Microscopy--
All electron microscopy reagents were
purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Fort Washington, PA) and
used in accordance with the manufacturer's protocols. Briefly, pellets
of respective cellular fractions sedimented to the bottom of Eppendorf
tubes were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in PBS (Karnovsky's fixative) and then post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in PBS. The fixed pellets were embedded in LR White Hard resin, thin
sectioned using a Sorvall Porter-Blum MT2-8 Ultra-microtome, and
visualized using an Hitachi H-7000 electron microscope.
Protein Identification by Mass Spectroscopy--
Coomassie
Blue-stained protein bands were excised from SDS-PAGE gels using a
scalpel and digested in situ with trypsin (Promega, Madison,
WI) as described by Rosenfeld et al. (21) except that the
detergent Tween 20 was absent from the digestion buffers. The digest
containing the gel bits was extracted in 50% acetonitrile, 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid, concentrated using a SpeedVac to less than 10 µl, and desalted using a Zip-Tip (Millipore, Bedford, MA). An aliquot
of the digest was mixed with an equal volume of matrix material
(
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (Sigma) as a saturated solution
in 50% acetonitrile, 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid), and ion masses were
determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of
flight mass spectroscopy (Kratos KOMPACT MALDI III). Data bases were
searched at 0.08% mass accuracy with the MS-Fit algorithm (University
of California at San Francisco web site) to identify digested protein.
Additional Reagents--
MCD and filipin III were purchased from
Sigma. Geldanamycin (GA) was a gift from the Drug Synthesis & Chemistry
Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer
Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, National Institutes of Health.
Statistical Analyses--
These were carried out using the SPSS
10.0 software package for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and the
Student's t test (for paired samples, two-tailed).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of Candidate STAT3-associated Accessory
Proteins--
STAT proteins associate with different subcellular
fractions in Hep3B cells (11-14). In the experiment illustrated in
Fig. 1, Hep3B cells were fractionated
using hypotonic swelling, Dounce homogenization, and differential
centrifugation methods into the plasma membrane-enriched P15 fraction,
the post-membrane cytoplasmic P100 pellet and S100 cytosol fractions,
and the nuclear extract (NE). Fig. 1 shows that the P15 fraction was
highly enriched in the plasma membrane marker 5'-ND and contained the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker BiP, whereas the P100 cytoplasmic
pellet was depleted in both 5'-ND as well as BiP. The nuclear marker Nup62 was detected only in the nuclear extract. These marker
distributions were consistent with electron microscopic
characterization of the P15 and P100 fractions, which confirmed that
the former fraction contained cytoplasmic membranes, mitochondria, and
ER, and, most important, the P100 pellet appeared to be largely
membrane-free (data not shown). Fig. 1 further shows that,
as expected, the bulk of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5b in Hep3B cells was
present in the S100 cytosol (see quantitation in legend to Fig. 1).
However ~10% of each of the cellular STAT1 and STAT3 pools were
observed in the P15 and P100 pellet fractions (see quantitation in
legend to Fig. 1). Upon IL-6 treatment for 30 min, ~15% of cellular
STAT3, 5% of STAT1, 37% of PY-STAT3, and 56% of PY-STAT1
translocated to the nucleus (Fig. 1). Cytoplasmic PY-STAT3 was
associated with both the P100 pellet fraction and the S100 cytosol
(also see Fig. 6, below).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Characterization of Hep3B cell
fractions. Control and IL-6-treated (30 min) Hep3B cells were
fractionated as described under "Materials and Methods" into a P15
membrane fraction, the post-membrane cytoplasmic P100 pellet, and S100
cytosol and the NE fraction. Aliquots (5 µl each) from each fraction
were used to measure total protein by the micro-Bradford method and
5'-ND activity. Enzyme activity data are represented as the fraction in
each compartment as a percentage of the sum of that in the P15, P100,
S100, and NE compartments. Aliquots corresponding to 5% of the P15,
10% each of the P100 and NE compartments, and 2.5% of the S100
compartment of the IL-6-treated cells and a volume of the corresponding
fractions from untreated cells containing matching amounts of total
protein (27 µg in P15, 42 µg in P100, 44 µg in S100, and 20 µg
in NE) were Western-blotted, probed using different antibodies, and
quantitated by densitometry. The compartmental distribution expressed
as % of total in the cell for STAT3 in uninduced cells was 11, 7, 82, and <1% in the P15, P100, S100, and NE fractions, respectively,
whereas it was 10, 12, 63, and 15% in IL-6-treated cells. The
compartmental distribution for STAT1 in uninduced cells was 11, 9, 79, and 1% in the P15, P100, S100, and NE fractions, respectively, whereas
it was 8, 12, 75, and 5% in IL-6-treated cells. Additionally, thin
section electron microscopy was carried out on the P15 and P100
pellets. The P15 fraction contained cellular membranes and cytoplasmic
organelles, whereas the P100 fraction appeared to be membrane-free
(data not shown).
|
|
The co-purification of STAT proteins in detergent-resistant plasma
membrane flotation raft fractions, which also contained cav-1 (12),
raised the possibility that cav-1 may be a candidate STAT3-interacting
protein. Among additional candidate STAT3-interacting proteins, we
previously identified GRP58 in S100 cytosolic 200-400-kDa complexes
using an antibody-subtracted differential protein display approach (13, 14). We now report that polypeptide A4 enumerated in
Table I in Ref. 14 was HSP90 as identified using mass spectroscopic methods. Additional candidate STAT3-associated proteins in the 200-400-kDa complexes included proteins typically found on the cytosolic face of cellular membranes (adaptin subunits and the protein
Ire1P).3 The association
between STAT3 and adaptin subunits is consistent with a recent report
(22) showing the co-localization of STAT3 with
-adaptin-containing
AP-2 complexes at the level of the plasma membrane and in cytoplasmic
structures. In the present studies we have focused on an evaluation of
the interactions between and among STAT3, cav-1, and HSP90.
Association of STAT3 with Cav-1 and HSP90 in
Detergent-resistant Membrane and Cytoplasmic Complexes--
We
investigated whether the candidate accessory proteins cav-1 and HSP90
were present together with STAT3 in the same detergent-resistant physical unit using cross-immunomagnetic bead pullout assays in the
presence of Triton X-100 (final concentration, 0.5%) in plasma membrane and cytoplasmic complexes. Fig.
2A shows the distribution of
cav-1 species in the different Hep3B subcellular fractions. It is known
from previous reports (23, 24) that in SDS-PAGE the 21-kDa cav-1
protein located in the plasma membrane can appear as high molecular
mass species because oligomers of palmitoylated cav-1 can resist
complete dissociation. Fig. 2A shows that the P15 membrane
fraction from Hep3B cells contained cav-1 not only as the
21-kDa species (double arrowhead) but also as a 63-kDa and a
higher molecular mass species (single arrowheads). In
comparison, analyses of the S100 cytosol showed more of the 21-kDa
species together with a higher molecular mass species at ~100 kDa.
Remarkably, the membrane-free P100 pellet was highly enriched in the
21-kDa cav-1 species. The sedimentable P100 cav-1-enriched cytoplasmic fraction from Hep3B cells appears similar to the sedimentable supramolecular cav-1-containing non-membranous proteolipid complexes (large of size 40 × 26 nm by negative stain electron microscopy, and small of size 26 × 20 nm) isolated by Palade and colleagues (25) from the cytosol of rat pulmonary endothelial cells.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Association between STAT3 and cav-1 in Hep3B
hepatocytes. A, cav-1 in Hep3B cell fractions. Duplicate
groups of Hep3B cultures were fractionated into P15, P100, S100, and NE
fractions, and aliquots were assayed for cav-1 species by SDS-PAGE
under reducing denaturing conditions (12.5% polyacrylamide) and
Western blotting (20% of each of the P15 (10 µl out of 50 µl) and
P100 (10 µl out of 50 µl) fractions, and 10% of each
of the S100 (50 µl out of 500 µl) and NE (10 µl out of 100 µl)
fractions). Double arrowhead represents cav-1 monomer, and
single arrowheads point to modified/oligomeric cav-1.
B, cross-immunopanning (IP) of STAT3 by
anti-cav-1 pAb. Aliquots of the P15 (150 µl), P100 (150 µl), and
S100 (300 µl) fractions derived from uninduced Hep3B cells were
adjusted to 0.05% Triton X-100 and incubated overnight with non-immune
rabbit serum (NRS), anti-cav-1 pAb, or anti-STAT3 pAb as
indicated, and then immunopanned using protein-A magnetic beads
followed by washing in Triton X-100-containing buffers (5 times in
0.05% and then twice in 0.5%). Immunopanned proteins were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using anti-STAT3 mAb.
|
|
Fig. 2B shows that anti-cav-1 pAb cross-panned STAT3 from
detergent-treated P15, P100, and S100 fractions. Thus, cav-1 and STAT3
were associated with the same detergent-resistant physical unit not
only in the membrane fraction but also in the cytoplasmic P100 and S100
fractions. The detergent-resistant cross-immunoprecipitation of STAT3
by anti-cav-1 pAb from membrane and cytoplasmic fractions was not
restricted to Hep3B hepatocytes. We confirmed these observations in
uninduced alveolar type II-like lung epithelial cells (A549 line)
(ATII-like), in human lung fibroblasts (CCD Lu11 strain) (LF), and
bovine pulmonary endothelial cells (BPAEC) (Fig.
3).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Association between STAT3 and cav-1 in
lung-derived cell types. Respective P15, P100, S100, and NE
cellular fractions derived from ATII-like epithelial, LF, and BPAEC
cells were immunopanned (IP) using NRS or anti-cav-1
as indicated, and the blots were probed using anti-STAT3 mAb. Both
blots were also re-probed using anti-HSP90 mAb with similar results;
data from blot B are shown.
|
|
Does activated PY-STAT3 also associate with
cav-1-containing membrane raft and cytoplasmic complexes? Fig.
4A shows that anti-cav-1 pAb
cross-immunopanned PY-STAT3 from the isolated plasma membrane raft
fraction derived from IL-6-treated Hep3B cells. Fig. 4B
shows that PY-STAT3 in the P100 pellet and Fig. 4C shows
that PY-STAT3 in the S100 fractions of vanadate- or IL-6-stimulated
Hep3B cells were also cross-immunopanned by anti-cav-1 pAb. Thus,
PY-STAT3 was associated with cav-1 in complexes in the membrane raft
and in the cytoplasm.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Association between PY-STAT3 and cav-1 in
plasma membrane rafts and in the cytoplasmic P100 and S100 fractions.
A, the P15 membrane fraction derived from Hep3B cells
treated with IL-6 for 30 min (IL-6) and uninduced controls
( )(4 cultures per group) were resuspended in solubilizing
buffer containing 0.05% Triton X-100, adjusted to 60% (w/v) sucrose,
and subjected to equilibrium flotation through a discontinuous sucrose
gradient (60:45:13% w/v) in an SW50.1 rotor for at 35,000 rpm for
16 h as described under "Materials and Methods." The flotation
raft fraction at the 13/30% interface was obtained, washed once in
ELB, and resuspended in buffer containing 0.05% Triton X-100. Raft
fractions from uninduced and IL-6-induced cells were subjected to
immunopanning (IP) using anti-cav-1 pAb or non-immune
rabbit serum (NRS) and Western blotted using anti-PY-STAT3
mAb. B, aliquots (150 µl) of the P100 pellet fractions
derived from control Hep3B cells ( ) or those treated with
orthovanadate (0.3 mM; a general activator of STATs) for
4 h (VO4) (5 cultures per group) were
subjected to immunopanning using anti-cav-1 pAb or NRS and
Western-blotted using anti-PY-STAT3 mAb. C, aliquots (300 µl) of the S100 cytosol fraction derived from control Hep3B cells
( ) or cells treated with orthovanadate for 4 h
(VO4), IL-6 for 30 min (IL-6), or
IFN- for 30 min (IFN- ) (4 cultures per group) were
immunopanned using anti-cav-1 or NRS as indicated, and the Western
blots were probed using anti-PY-STAT3 mAb. Similar results were
obtained using anti-STAT3 pAb as the probe (data not shown).
Additionally, PY-STAT1 was also detected in the immunoprecipitates
derived from vanadate or IFN- -treated cells (data not shown).
|
|
Fig. 5 illustrates a composite of
experiments that confirm that HSP90 was also cross-precipitated by
anti-STAT3 pAb from the P15 membrane and the cytoplasmic P100 and S100
fractions. (We did not distinguish between HSP90
and -
in the
present analyses because although the anti-HSP90 mAb used for
developing the Western blots was raised against a peptide sequence of
the
species, it does not have the requisite
versus
specificity).4 HSP90 was also
included with STAT3 in complexes precipitated with anti-cav-1 pAb (Fig.
5). Moreover, anti-GRP58 pAb also cross-immunopanned HSP90 together
with STAT3 from S100 cytosolic complexes confirming our previous
observation that GRP58 was a STAT3-associated accessory protein (13,
14). STAT1 was also included in these cross-immunopanned complexes from
the P15, P100, and S100 fractions (Fig. 5). Additionally, HSP90 was
also included together with STAT3 in cross-immunoprecipitations by
anti-cav-1 pAb of the P15 membrane fractions from human LF and primary
BPAEC (Fig. 3B). Taken together, our magnetic bead immunopanning data indicate that STAT3, cav-1, and HSP90 interact, directly or indirectly, within detergent-resistant physical units in
the P15 membrane and cytoplasmic P100 and S100 compartments.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Associations between and among STAT3, HSP90,
cav-1, STAT1, and GRP58. Aliquots of the P15 (150 µl), P100 (150 µl), and S100 (300 µl) fractions from uninduced Hep3B cells were
immunopanned (IP) using NRS, anti-cav-1 pAb,
anti-STAT3 pAb, or anti-GRP58 as indicated, and the Western blots were
probed sequentially using anti-STAT3 mAb, anti-HSP90 mAb, and
anti-STAT1 mAb.
|
|
Trafficking of Activated STATs from Plasma Membrane Rafts to
Cytoplasmic Complexes--
The compounds MCD and filipin III extract
cholesterol from cav-1-containing cholesterol-rich plasma membrane
rafts disrupting raft integrity and function (15, 16). We have shown
previously that exposure of Hep3B cells to MCD for 15 min before IL-6
or IFN-
stimulation markedly inhibited cytokine signaling to the cytoplasmic P100 and S100 fractions and the nuclear compartments as
assayed using DNA-binding assays for activated STAT3 and STAT1. These
data suggested that almost all of IL-6 and IFN-
signaling was
initiated at the level of cholesterol-rich plasma membrane rafts (12).
We have investigated whether progressively shorter exposure to MCD
might provide kinetic trafficking data concerning the movement of
activated STATs from the P15 membrane raft fraction to the cytoplasmic
P100/S100 fractions and then to the nucleus. Fig.
6A shows an experiment in
which Hep3B cells were treated with MCD for 10, 5, or 1 min before
IL-6, and the cells were harvested 15 min after the beginning of IL-6
treatment and STAT-specific DNA binding activity assayed in the P15,
P100, S100, and NE fractions. Fig. 6B shows Western blot
analyses for PY-STAT3 of the respective fractions shown in Fig.
6A. The data in Fig. 6A show that a brief treatment of cells with MCD interrupted the downstream flow of DNA-binding competent STAT3 from the P15 plasma membrane fraction. In
the
1-min MCD-treated groups there was increased accumulation of
STAT3 DNA binding activity in the P15 fraction accompanied by a marked
inhibition in the downstream P100 and S100 fractions, with little
decrease in the nuclear extract. Similar data were obtained using
IFN-
except that the inhibition of PY-STAT1 DNA binding activity in
cells treated with MCD at
1 was selectively marked in the P100
fraction with minimal effects in the S100 and NE fractions (data not
shown).

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of a brief exposure to MCD on
IL-6-induced STAT3-specific DNA shift activity (A) and
PY-STAT3 content (B) in different Hep3B subcellular
fractions. A, effect of treating Hep3B cells with MCD before
cytokine on DNA binding activity in different cellular compartments.
Groups of Hep3B cultures (4 each) were treated with MCD (12.5 mM) for 10, 5, or 1 min before addition of IL-6 for another
15 min. The P15, P100, S100, and NE fractions were prepared, and
aliquots (10 µl for P15 and P100, 20 µl for S100, and 2 µl for
NE) assayed for DNA shift activity. The autoradiograms were quantitated
by densitometry. The compartmental distribution as % of total in the
cell of SIF-A DNA shift activity in Hep3B cells treated only with IL-6
was ~1, 16, 35, and 48% in the P15, P100, S100, and NE fractions,
respectively, in this and additional experiments. These respective
values were used at 100% to express the effect of MCD pretreatment on
DNA shift activity in each compartment as depicted in the figure.
B, Western blot analyses for PY-STAT3 in fractions
illustrated in A. Aliquots of the respective P15 (10 µl),
P100 (10 µl), S100 (50 µl), and NE (20 µl) fractions from
A were Western-blotted and probed with anti-PY-STAT3 pAb.
The data were quantitated by densitometry. The compartmental
distribution as % of total in the cell of PY-STAT3 in cells treated
with IL-6 alone for 15 min was 13, 18, 50, and 19% in the P15, P100,
S100, and NE fractions, respectively. These respective values were used
at 100% to express the effect of MCD pretreatment on PY-STAT3 in each
compartment as depicted in the figure.
|
|
Fig. 6B shows that a brief treatment with MCD selectively
and markedly decreased the content of Western blottable PY-STAT3 in the
P100 cytoplasmic pellet fraction. Additionally, PY-STAT3 in the P15
fraction of MCD-free IL-6-treated cells was DNA binding deficient,
consistent with the previous suggestion (12) that this pool of
raft-associated PY-STAT3 represented molecules very recently
Tyr-phosphorylated before the dimerization step and acquisition of DNA
binding competence. However, the PY-STAT3 retained in the P15 membrane
fraction in the
1-min MCD group was DNA binding competent suggesting
that MCD had inhibited/slowed the departure from the raft of PY-STAT3
which was already DNA binding competent at that location.
Treatment of Hep3B cells with filipin III for 15 min before IL-6 or
IFN-
also provided trafficking data similar to the effect of a brief
exposure to MCD (Fig. 7). The inhibitory
effect of filipin III on IFN-
signaling (Fig. 7, right
side) confirms the prior observations of Taniguchi and colleagues
(26). Moreover, in this experiment there was also increased
accumulation of SIF-A PY-STAT3 and SIF-C PY-STAT1 DNA binding activity
in the P15 membrane fraction of IL-6- or IFN-
-treated cells,
respectively, accompanied by an inhibition in the P100 and S100
fractions and a lesser effect in the nuclear compartment.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of filipin III on cytokine signaling
in Hep3B cells. Groups of Hep3B cultures (4 each) were treated
with filipin III (5 µg/ml) for 15 min before addition of IL-6 or
IFN- for another 15 min. The P15, P100, S100, and NE fractions were
prepared, and aliquots (10 µl for P15 and P100 and 20 µl for S100
and 5 µl for NE) were assayed for STAT-specific DNA shift activity.
The autoradiograms were quantitated by densitometry, and the effect of
filipin III pretreatment on DNA shift activity in each compartment is
expressed as % of that in control cells treated only with cytokine in
the same manner as in Fig. 6.
|
|
The data in Figs. 6 and 7 taken together suggest that raft integrity is
required for the efficient departure of activated STATs from the plasma
membrane. Moreover, the data in Fig. 6B showing the
selectively marked inhibition of PY-STAT3 levels in the P100 fraction
are consistent with a model in which this compartment may be located
immediately downstream of the site of action of MCD, i.e.
immediately downstream of the raft. This possibility is consistent with
a model, proposed previously by Palade and colleagues (25), in
endothelial cells that the cav-1-enriched sedimentable cytosolic
complexes represent membrane-free complexes departing the
rafts/caveolae.
Function of HSP90 in IL-6-Raft-STAT3 Signaling--
The
inhibitor GA binds in the ATP-binding pocket in HSP90 and inhibits
the physical and functional interactions of this chaperone with its
target proteins (27). We have used GA to probe the function of HSP90 in
STAT3 signaling. The design of these experiments involved maintaining
confluent Hep3B cultures at 37 °C or exposing them to 39.5 °C for
12-16 h to raise their levels of HSP90 (a temperature stress
equivalent to a fever of 103°F), followed by an evaluation of the
effects of a 15-min pretreatment with GA (typically at 20 µM) on various IL-6-induced STAT3-mediated responses at
the two temperatures. The Western blot data in Fig.
8A confirm the up-regulation
of HSP90 in Hep3B cells at the higher temperature as illustrated in
this instance in the P15 membrane and S100 cytosol fractions. Figs.
8B and 9A illustrate the effect of GA on the trafficking of IL-6-induced PY-STAT3 to the nucleus at the two temperatures. Whereas GA had a minimal effect at 37 °C, there was a
clear reduction in trafficking of PY-STAT3 to the nucleus at 39.5 °C in the presence of the HSP90 inhibitor. Figs.
8C and Fig. 9B
illustrate the effect of GA on IL-6-induced STAT3-specific DNA binding
activity in the nuclear extracts. DNA binding activity was observed
upon IL-6 treatment at both 37 and 39.5 °C, with a modest reduction
at the higher temperature (to 28% that at 37 °C). Whereas GA had a
minimal inhibitory effect on STAT3 DNA binding activity at 37 °C,
the inhibition in cells induced with IL-6 at 39.5 °C was
particularly marked.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of GA on IL-6-induced PY-STAT3 and DNA
shift activity in the nuclear compartment at 37 and 39.5 °C.
A, HSP90 levels assayed by Western blotting in the P15 and
S100 fractions from three different groups of Hep3B cells at 37 °C
or after overnight (14 h) exposure 39.5 °C. Aliquots of the
respective P15 (225 µg each) and S100 (45 µg each) were
Western-blotted and probed using an anti-HSP90 mAb reactive with both
the HSP90 and - species. B, GA inhibits PY-STAT3
nuclear trafficking at 39.5 °C. Hep3B cultures (3 per group) kept at
37 °C or exposed to 39.5 °C overnight were pretreated with GA (20 µM) for 15 min and then stimulated with IL-6 for 30 min.
The protein concentrations in the NE fractions were determined using
the micro-Bradford assay, and aliquots of the NE fraction (150 µg of
protein per sample) were Western-blotted and probed for PY-STAT3. This
experiment was replicated three times, and quantitative densitometric
data are summarized in Fig. 9A. C, STAT3-specific DNA
binding activity was assayed using the m67 SIE oligonucleotide in
protein-matched (20 µg) volumes of the NE fractions from IL-6 and
GA-treated cells as described in B. Three replications of
this experiment were quantitated densitometrically, and the numerical
data are summarized in Fig. 9B. Asterisk points to a
constitutive DNA shift activity.
|
|

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of GA on IL-6-induced PY-STAT3 and DNA
shift activity in the nuclear compartment at 37 and 39.5 °C.
A, nuclear trafficking of PY-STAT3. The nuclear content of
PY-STAT3 assayed by Western blotting in the experiment shown in Fig.
8B and two additional replications (n = 3)
was quantitated densitometrically (mean ± S.E.).
Panels a and b show the data
normalized to the IL-6-treated value at 37 °C, whereas
panel b' shows data normalized to the
IL-6-treated value at 39.5 °C. The statistically significant
(p < 0.05) paired two-way comparisons using a
two-tailed Student's t test were p =
0.014 for the comparison between IL-6 alone at the two temperatures and
p = 0.04 for the effect of GA at 39.5 °C.
B, nuclear DNA shift activity. The nuclear content of
DNA-binding competent PY-STAT3 (SIF-A) assayed in an oligonucleotide
shift assay in the experiment shown in Fig. 8C and two
additional replications (n = 3) was quantitated
densitometrically (mean ± S.E.). Panels a and
b show the data normalized to the IL-6-treated value at
37 °C, whereas panel b' shows data normalized to the
IL-6-treated value at 39.5 °C. The statistically significant
(p < 0.05) paired two-way comparisons using a
two-tailed Student's t test were p =
0.002 for the comparison between IL-6 alone at the two temperatures and
p = 0.001 for the effect of GA at 39.5 °C.
|
|
Immunopanning and Western blotting analyses data confirmed
that, as expected, GA disrupted the interaction between HSP90 and STAT3
in cells at both 37 and 39 °C in that anti-STAT3 pAb failed to
cross-immunoselect HSP90 from the S100 cytosol of cells treated with GA
(Fig. 10A, upper panel).
Furthermore, Fig. 10A, lower panel, confirms that
treatment of Hep3B with GA at 39.5 °C but not at 37 °C inhibited
the levels of IL-6-induced PY-STAT3 that could be immunoprecipitated
with anti-STAT3 pAb from the S100 cytosol. Fig. 10B
illustrates direct Western blot analyses without prior immunoprecipitation of PY-STAT3 in the S100 cytoplasmic fractions in
cells treated with IL-6 and GA at the two temperatures. The data
confirm that GA markedly inhibited PY-STAT3 activation by IL-6 at
39.5 °C in the cytoplasmic compartment with a lesser effect at
37 °C.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
GA disrupts the interaction between STAT3
and HSP90 at both 37 and 39.5 °C. A, aliquots of the S100
fraction from the 37 and 39.5 °C portions of experiments similar to
that shown in Fig. 8B (260 µg protein per sample) were
immunopanned (IP) using anti-STAT3 pAb and the
inclusion of HSP90 and PY-STAT3 in the immunoprecipitates assayed by
Western blotting. B, aliquots (protein-matched in each set)
of the S100 (45 µg) fractions illustrated in A above were
directly Western-blotted and probed for PY-STAT3.
|
|
To directly test whether HSP90 was involved in the function
of an IL-6-inducible STAT3-responsive liver-specific gene promoter at
normal and/or elevated temperatures, we evaluated the effect of GA on
the IL-6-induced up-regulation of a reporter/luciferase construct
containing four copies of the STAT3-binding element from the human
angiotensinogen promoter at 37 and 39.5 °C. Fig. 11 summarizes the pooled data from four
such experiments. The data show that IL-6 inducibility of this reporter
construct was maintained at 39.5 °C at a level approximately half
that at 37 °C. Whereas GA had an inhibitory effect on
IL-6-inducibility of this reporter construct at both temperatures
(37 °C, p = 0.001; 39.5 °C, p < 0.001), this inhibitor dramatically reduced reporter construct inducibility at 39.5 °C compared with that at 37 °C (10-fold
compared with 4-fold respectively; p = 0.002). These
data show that from a functional standpoint HSP90 not only contributes
toward assisting/chaperoning IL-6 signaling at 37 °C but has a major
role in maintaining this signaling at elevated temperature.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
GA inhibits activation of an STAT3-DNA
binding-element/luciferase reporter construct by IL-6. Hep3B cell
cultures in 6-well multiwell plates were transfected with p950M4
reporter/luciferase plasmid (250-500 ng per well) together with a
constitutive expression vector for -galactosidase (pCH110) (50 ng
per well) as described under "Materials and Methods." The
transfected cells were incubated at 37 °C for 10-12 h and then half
the cultures shifted to 39.5 °C for another 10-12 h. Duplicate
wells were pretreated with GA for 15 min and then with IL-6 for 6 h at the respective temperature, and the cell extracts were prepared,
and luciferase and -galactosidase activities were assayed. Within
each experiment, the luciferase data were normalized for
-galactosidase activity in each extract. Figure illustrates pooled
data (mean ± S.E.) from four independent experiments
(n = 4; with each experimental group in duplicate)
expressed in terms of the luciferase activity in cells treated with
IL-6 alone at 37 °C, as 100% in panels a and
b, and that in cells treated with IL-6 alone at 39.5 °C
in panel b'. The statistically significant
(p < 0.05) paired two-way comparisons using the
two-tailed Student's t test were p =
0.002 for the comparison between IL-6 alone at the two temperatures,
p = 0.001 for the effect of GA at 37 °C (4-fold
reduction), p < 0.001 for the effect of GA at
39.5 °C (10-fold reduction), and p = 0.002 for a
comparison of the difference in the effect of GA at the two
temperatures (4- versus 10-fold reduction).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report we identify cav-1 and HSP90 as STAT3-associated
accessory proteins at the level of the plasma membrane raft and in
cytoplasmic complexes, and we provide evidence for a functional role
for HSP90 as a chaperone in STAT3 signaling. The associations between
and among STAT3, cav-1, and HSP90 were observed in the membrane raft
and cytoplasmic fractions of human Hep3B hepatocytes, human lung
alveolar type II-like cells (A549 cell line), a human lung fibroblast
cell strain, and BPAEC. Thus these associations were observed in
different cell types and may represent a general feature of STAT3 signaling.
There is now increasing evidence that cytokine signaling is initiated
at the level of the plasma membrane in specialized cav-1-containing detergent-resistant microdomains (12, 13, 26, 28-32). The Janus
kinases JAK1, JAK2, and Tyk2, the STAT species STAT1, STAT3, and their
PY-activated versions, and the cytokine receptor chains gp130, IFNAR1,
IFNAR2, IFN-
R
, IFN-
R
, and IL-2R
have all been found in
cav-1-containing plasma membrane rafts in different cell types (12, 13,
26, 28-32). Functionally, we reported earlier that disruption of raft
integrity by MCD markedly inhibited IL-6 and IFN-
signaling (12),
and Taniguchi and colleagues (26) reported that filipin III could
markedly and reversibly inhibit IFN-
signaling (also see Ref. 32).
However, the mechanisms by which PY-STATs depart the plasma membrane
raft to enter the cytoplasm remain largely unexplored.
The observation that a brief exposure to the raft
disrupters MCD or filipin III resulted in accumulation of DNA binding
competent STAT3 and STAT1 in the P15 membrane fraction of IL-6 or
IFN-
-treated Hep3B cells is consistent with a role for raft
integrity in the departure of activated STATs from the plasma membrane.
The Western blotting data showing a marked selective depletion of
PY-STAT3 by brief MCD pretreatment in the cytoplasmic P100 sedimentable cav-1-enriched fraction of IL-6-treated cells is consistent with these
P100 complexes representing a trafficking intermediate immediately downstream of the membrane raft. A similar model has been previously proposed by Palade and colleagues (25) for the departure of cav-1-containing membrane-free supramolecular complexes from plasma membrane rafts/caveolae in bovine pulmonary endothelial cells.
With respect to STAT proteins in the cytoplasm, we reported
several years ago that STAT3, STAT1, and STAT5b existed in Hep3B and
rat liver cytoplasm in high molecular mass complexes of size 200-400
kDa ("statosome I") and 1-2 MDa ("statosome II") by gel filtration in association with accessory proteins (14). Upon IL-6
induction, PY-STAT3 also appeared in complexes with a broad size
distribution from 200-400 kDa to 1-2 MDa (14). Independently, Lackmann et al. (33) reported observing inactive STAT1 in
HeLa cell cytosol in complexes of size 150-300 kDa, and the inclusion of IFN-
-induced PY-STAT1 in complexes of the same size. Also independently, Yeung et al. (34) reported the association of PY-STAT3 and PY-STAT5a and -b in the cytosol of colony-stimulating factor-1-induced BAC1.2F5 macrophage line in complexes of size 150-600
kDa and >2 MDa. We have identified previously GRP58 as an accessory
protein associated with STAT3 in the 200-400-kDa cytosolic complexes
(13, 14). Subsequently GRP58, a thiol-dependent protein-disulfide isomerase and a chaperone, was also found in association with STAT3 and PY-STAT3 in purified plasma membrane raft
fractions (13). The function of GRP58 in STAT3 signaling remains
largely unexplored.
In the present study we have identified cav-1 and HSP90 as
STAT3-associated accessory proteins at the level of the plasma membrane
and in the cytoplasm. A precedent for an interaction of cav-1 and HSP90
with the same cellular signaling molecule has been established
previously in the case of endothelial cell nitric-oxide synthase
(reviewed in Refs. 35-37). In the case of STAT3, the function of cav-1
appears to involve raft/cytoplasmic trafficking. The function of HSP90
in IL-6-raft-STAT3 signaling appears to include preservation of
signaling at elevated temperature.
IL-6, which is itself a central pyrogen, functions in the body in the
context of fever (1-5). During acute infections and injury, IL-6
stimulates the synthesis and secretion of protective "positive
acute-phase" plasma proteins by the liver (1-5) in large part by
activating STAT3 (6-11). Thus, during the acute-phase response, the
hepatocyte, held at a high temperature in the body core during the
accompanying fever, needs to preserve its ability to respond to IL-6.
Our data show that HSP90 contributes to the continued maintenance of
IL-6-induced STAT3- dependent responses at 39.5 °C
(corresponding to a fever of 103 °C). We suggest that the protective
chaperone effect of HSP90 on STAT3 signaling is likely to be a general
phenomenon and to include responses to other cytokines in other cell
types during fever.
A further insight of physiological significance is the observation that
IL-6 itself through activation of STAT3 and CAAT enhancer-binding factor
up-regulates HSP90 gene expression (38, 39). Thus, IL-6
itself turns on a cellular mechanism that protects its signaling pathway from the deleterious effect of elevated body temperature.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Joseph D. Etlinger for numerous
insightful discussions including suggestions for experiments at
elevated body temperature (39.5 °C), Ann-Marie Snow for
assistance with electron microscopy, and Joanne Abrahams for help with
image analyses. We thank Dr. Ashok Kumar for providing the p950M4
4XSTAT3element/luciferase reporter construct, Dr. Susan Olson for BPAEC
cells, and Dr. Anuradha Ray for ATII-like and LF cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Research Grant CA-82647.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. Cell Biology
& Anatomy, Rm. 201, Basic Sciences Bldg., New York Medical College,
Valhalla, NY 10595. Tel.: 914-594-4196; Fax: 914-594-4825; E-mail:
pravin_sehgal@nymc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205935200
2
K. Patel, V. Kumar, and P. B. Sehgal,
unpublished data.
3
P. B. Sehgal and V. A. Fried,
unpublished data.
4
Correspondence from BD Biosciences.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IL, interleukin;
5'-ND, 5'-nucleotidase;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
ATII-like cells, alveolar epithelial type II-like cell line A549;
BiP, glucose-regulated protein 78 GRP78/BiP;
BPAEC, bovine pulmonary
arterial endothelial cells;
cav-1, caveolin-1;
ELB, extract lysis
buffer;
GA, geldanamycin;
GRP58, glucose-regulated protein 58 (also
called ER-60 and ERp57);
HSP90, heat shock protein 90;
IFN, interferon;
JAK, Janus kinase;
LF, lung fibroblast strain CCD Lu-11;
MCD, methyl-
-cyclodextrin;
NE, nuclear extract;
NRS, nonimmune rabbit
serum;
Nup62, nuclear pore-associated protein 62;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
SIE, m67 mutant of serum-inducible element
from c-fos promoter;
SIF, SIE oligonucleotide-binding
factor;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription protein
family;
pAb, polyclonal antibody;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
PY, Tyr-phosphorylated.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sehgal, P. B.,
Grieninger, G.,
and Tosato, G.
(1989)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
557,
1-583[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Mackiewicz, A.,
Koj, A.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1995)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
762,
1-522[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
LeMay, L. G.,
Vander, A. J.,
and Kluger, M. J.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
258,
R798-R803[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Rothwell, N. J.,
Busbridge, N. J.,
Lefeuvre, R. A.,
Hardwick, A. J.,
Gauldie, J.,
and Hopkins, S. J.
(1991)
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
69,
1465-1469[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Dinarello, C. A.,
Cannon, J. G.,
Mancilla, J.,
Bishai, I.,
Lees, J.,
and Coceani, F.
(1991)
Brain Res.
562,
199-206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Darnell, J. E.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1994)
Science
264,
1415-1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
(1997)
Science
277,
1630-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Leonard, W. J.,
and O'Shea, J. J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
16,
293-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Heinrich, P. C.,
Behrmann, I.,
Muller-Newen, G.,
Schaper, F.,
and Graeve, L.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
334,
297-314[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Wegenka, U. M.,
Buschmann, J.,
Lutticken, C.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Horn, F.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Cell
13,
276-288
|
| 11.
|
Sehgal, P. B.
(2000)
Cell. Signal.
12,
525-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Sehgal, P. B.,
Guo, G. G.,
Shah, M.,
Kumar, V.,
and Patel, K.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
12067-12074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Guo, G. G.,
Patel, K.,
Kumar, V.,
Shah, M.,
Fried, V. A.,
Etlinger, J. D.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(2002)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
22,
555-563[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Ndubuisi, M. I.,
Guo, G. G.,
Fried, V. A.,
Etlinger, J. D.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25499-25509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Teixeira, A.,
Chaverot, N.,
Schroder, C.,
Strosberg, A. D.,
Courand, P.-O.,
and Cazaubon, S.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
72,
120-128[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Gustavsson, J.,
Parpal, S.,
Karlsson, M.,
Ramsing, C.,
Thorn, H.,
Borg, M.,
Lindroth, M.,
Petersen, K. H.,
Magnusson, K.-E.,
and Stralfors, P.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1961-1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Wang, L.,
Rayanade, R. J.,
Garcia, D.,
Patel, K.,
Pan, H.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23159-23165[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Rayanade, R. J.,
Patel, K.,
Ndubuisi, M.,
Sharma, S.,
Omura, S.,
Etlinger, J. D.,
Pine, R.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4659-4662[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Rayanade, R. J.,
Ndubuisi, M. I.,
Etlinger, J. D.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
325-334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Helfgott, D. C.,
Tatter, S. B.,
Santhanam, U.,
Clarick, R. H.,
Bhardwaj, N.,
May, L. T.,
and Sehgal, P. B.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
948-953[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Rosenfeld, J.,
Capdeville, J.,
Guillemot, J. C.,
and Ferrara, P.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
203,
173-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Bild, A. H.,
Turkson, J.,
and Jove, R.
(2002)
EMBO J.
21,
3255-3263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Monier, S.,
Dietzen, D. J.,
Hastings, W. R.,
Lublin, D. M.,
and Kurzchalia, T. V.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
388,
143-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Okamoto, T.,
Schlege, A.,
Scherer, P. E.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5419-5422[Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Predescu, S. A.,
Predescu, D. N.,
and Palade, G. E.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1019-1033[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Takaoka, A.,
Mitani, Y.,
Suemori, H.,
Sato, M.,
Yokochi, T.,
Noguchi, S.,
Tanaka, N.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(2000)
Science
288,
2357-2360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Stebbins, C. E.,
Russo, A. A.,
Schneider, C.,
Rosen, N.,
Hartl, F. U.,
and Pavletich, N. P.
(1997)
Cell
89,
239-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Koshelnick, Y.,
Ehart, M.,
Hufnagel, P.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Binder, B. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28563-28567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Ju, H.,
Venema, V. J.,
Liang, H.,
Harris, M. B.,
Zou, R.,
and Venema, R. C.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
351,
257-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Sadir, R.,
Lambert, A.,
Lortat-Jacob, H.,
and Morel, G.
(2001)
Cytokine
14,
19-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Marmor, M. D.,
and Julius, M.
(2001)
Blood
98,
1489-1497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Subramaniam, P. S.,
and Johnson, H. M.
(2002)
J. Immunol.
169,
1959-1969[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Lackmann, M.,
Harpur, A. G.,
Oates, A. C.,
Mann, R. J.,
Gabriel, A.,
Meutermans, W.,
Alewood, P. F.,
Kerr, I. M.,
Stark, G. R.,
and Wilks, A. F.
(1998)
Growth Factors
16,
39-51[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Yeung, Y. G.,
Wang, Y.,
Einstein, D. B.,
Lee, P. S.,
and Stanley, E. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17128-17137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Gratton, J.-P.,
Fontana, J.,
O'Connor, D. S.,
Garcia-Cardena, G.,
McCabe, T. J.,
and Sessa, W. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
22268-22272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Fleming, I.,
and Busse, R.
(1999)
Cardiovasc. Res.
43,
532-541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Kone, B. C.
(2000)
Acta Physiol. Scand.
168,
27-31[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Stephanou, A.,
Isenberg, D. A.,
Akira, S.,
Kishimoto, T.,
and Latchman, D. S.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
189-195[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Stephan |