|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M209213200 on September 16, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 48, 45838-45846, November 29, 2002
Prostaglandin E2 Promotes Integrin
V 3-dependent Endothelial
Cell Adhesion, Rac-activation, and Spreading through
cAMP/PKA-dependent Signaling*
Olivier
Dormond ,
Manuela
Bezzi,
Agnese
Mariotti, and
Curzio
Rüegg§
From the Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie (CePO), University
of Lausanne Medical School, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Received for publication, September 9, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have recently reported that the
inhibition of endothelial cell COX-2 by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs suppresses V 3- (but not
5 1-) dependent Rac activation,
endothelial cell spreading, migration, and angiogenesis (Dormond, O.,
Foletti, A., Paroz, C., and Ruegg, C. (2001) Nat. Med. 7, 1041-1047). Here we investigated the role of the COX-2 metabolites
PGE2 and TXA2 in regulating human umbilical vein
endothelial cell (HUVEC) adhesion and spreading. We report that
PGE2 accelerated V 3-mediated
HUVEC adhesion and promoted Rac activation and cell spreading, whereas the TXA2 agonist U46619 retarded adhesion and inhibited spreading. We
show that the cAMP level and the cAMP-regulated protein kinase A (PKA)
activity are critical mediators of these PGE2 effects. V 3-mediated adhesion induced a transient
COX-2-dependent rise in cAMP levels, whereas the
cell-permeable cAMP analogue 8-brcAMP accelerated adhesion, promoted
Rac activation, and cell spreading in the presence of the COX-2
inhibitor NS-398. Pharmacological inhibition of PKA completely blocked
V 3-mediated adhesion. A constitutively
active Rac mutant (L61Rac) rescued
V 3-dependent spreading in the
presence of NS398 or U46691, but did not accelerate adhesion, whereas a
dominant negative Rac mutant (N17Rac) suppressed spreading without
affecting adhesion. 5 1-mediated HUVEC
adhesion, Rac activation, and spreading were not affected by
PGE2, U46691, 8-brcAMP, or the inhibition of PKA. In
conclusion, these results demonstrate that PGE2 accelerates
V 3-mediated endothelial cell adhesion
through cAMP-dependent PKA activation and induces
V 3-dependent spreading via cAMP-
and PKA-dependent Rac activation and may contribute to the
further understanding of the regulation of vascular integrins V 3 by COX-2/PGE2
during tumor angiogenesis and inflammation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tumor angiogenesis, i.e. the formation of new blood
vessels in response to angiogenic stimuli, promotes tumor progression by stimulating tumor cell survival, tumor invasion, and metastasis formation (1). Many molecules involved in mediating or regulating angiogenesis have been identified (2). They include growth factors
(i.e. vascular endothelial growth factors,
VEGF)1 and their cell surface
receptors, matrix-degrading enzymes (e.g. matrix
metalloproteinases), vascular remodeling ligands, and receptors (i.e. angiopoietins and Tie receptors) and adhesion
receptors of the integrin and cadherin families. Integrins are the main receptors for extracellular matrix proteins and consist of two non-covalently associated and subunits (3). Integrin ligand binding affinity and adhesion-promoting activity are regulated by
intracellular events ("inside out" signaling) (4). Upon ligand
binding, integrins rapidly cluster and recruit structural (e.g. -actinin, talin, vinculin) and signaling
(e.g. focal adhesion kinase, paxillin, c-Src) proteins to
form characteristic structures called focal contacts or focal adhesions
(5). Integrins and focal adhesions propagate tensional forces between
the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton necessary to stabilize
cell adhesion and initiate signaling events essential to cell survival,
proliferation and differentiation ("outside in" signaling) (6).
Integrin V 3 is highly expressed in
angiogenic endothelial cells but not, or to a much lower extent, in
quiescent endothelial cells (7-9). Several studies have demonstrated
that V 3 antagonists effectively inhibit
angiogenesis, including tumor angiogenesis. An
anti- V 3 function-blocking mAb or an
antagonistic RGD-based cyclic peptide suppressed cornea vascularization
(10), retinal neovascularization (11), and tumor angiogenesis (7, 13).
Tumstatin, an endogenous degradation fragment of collagen IV,
suppresses tumor angiogenesis by interacting with
V 3 and inhibiting protein synthesis in
endothelial cells (14). Furthermore, disruption of tumor vessels by
high doses of tumor necrosis factor and interferon is associated with the inhibition of the V 3 function in
endothelial cells (15).
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used
therapeutics for the treatment of pain and inflammation. NSAIDs act by
inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) activity and the synthesis of
prostaglandins and thromboxans (16). There are two known COX isoforms:
1) COX-1, which is ubiquitously expressed and contributes to tissue
homeostasis, and 2) COX-2, which is expressed in activated leukocytes
and cancer cells and promotes inflammation and cancer progression (17).
Prolonged intake of NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors, significantly
decreases the risk of developing colon cancer and suppresses the
progression of pre-malignant lesions (polyps) (18-20). Moreover,
NSAIDs suppress the progression of established experimental tumors in
mice (21, 22). Recent reports indicate that the anti-tumor activity of
NSAID involves the inhibition of tumor angiogenesis (23, 24). COX-2
inhibitors decrease VEGF production in fibroblasts and tumor cells and
prevent VEGF-induced MAPK activation in endothelial cells (23, 25),
block V 3-mediated endothelial cell
spreading and migration in vitro, and suppress fibroblast
growth factor 2-induced angiogenesis in vivo (26). This
latter effect was not associated with any detectable changes in either
integrin cell surface expression or integrin affinity. We identified
suppression of V 3-dependent
activation of the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac as the mechanism by which
NSAIDs suppress spreading. Exogenous administration of PGE2
or PGI2, but not TXA2, rescued this NSAID effect, thus
demonstrating that prostaglandins are critical regulators of
V 3-mediated endothelial cell spreading and migration.
Here, we extend these observations by reporting that prostaglandin
E2 accelerated V 3-mediated
endothelial cell adhesion through the cAMP-dependent
activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and induced spreading via cAMP-
and PKA-dependent activation of Rac. In contrast,
5 1-mediated endothelial cell adhesion was not regulated by PGE2, intracellular cAMP levels, or PKA activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents and Antibodies--
Bovine gelatin, bovine plasma
fibronectin, human plasma vitronectin, leupeptin, aprotinin, and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) were purchased from Sigma.
Butaprost, PGE1 alcohol, and sulprostone were purchased
from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). NS-398, PGE2,
8-brcAMP, forskolin, and H-89 were obtained from Biomol (Plymouth
Meeting, PA). U46619 was from Calbiochem. The anti-Rac mAb clone 102 was from BD Biosciences. The DNA molecular weight marker was from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals.
Cell Culture and Electroporation--
Human umbilical vein
endothelial cells (HUVEC) were prepared and cultured as previously
described (15) except for the use of M199 (Invitrogen) as a
basal medium. For electroporation, subconfluent HUVEC were collected
and incubated on ice for 5 min with 25 µg of L61Rac- or
N17Rac-encoding plasmids or empty plasmid and 5 µg of pEGFP-C1
plasmid (Clontech) in M199 medium without fetal calf serum and electroporated with a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad). HUVEC were
resuspended in complete medium and cultured for 48 h before use in
the experiments. Electroporation efficiency (routinely ~80%) was
assessed by the analysis of enhanced green fluorescent protein
fluorescence by flow cytometry.
Cell Adhesion Assay and Spreading Assays--
Maxisorp II Nunc
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) were
coated with fibronectin (5 µg/ml), gelatin (0.5%), or vitronectin
(0.5 µg/ml) in PBS overnight at 4 °C, and assays were done as
described previously (15). Briefly, HUVEC were resuspended in a
serum-free M199 medium and plated at 3 × 104
cells/well and incubated at 37 °C. At given times, unattached cells
were removed by rinsing the wells with warm PBS. Attached cells were
fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde (Fluka Chemie, Buchs, Switzerland),
stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma), and quantified by an optical
density reading at 620 nm (Packard Spectra Count). Results are
given as optical density values and represent the mean of duplicate
wells ± S.D. of specific adhesion (equal to the adhesion on an
extracellular matrix protein minus the adhesion on bovine serum
albumin). If not stated otherwise, pharmacological agents were added at
the time of plating and used at the following concentrations: NS-398,
100 µM; PGE2, 100 ng/ml; 8-brcAMP, 1 mM; H-89, 5 µM; U46619, 50 µM;
butaprost, 20 µM; PGE1 alcohol, 10 ng/ml;
sulprostone, 25 µM; and forskolin, 10 µM.
For spreading determination, the percentage of spread cells was counted
in three representative high power fields at different times after
plating. Non-spread cells were defined as small round cells with little or no membrane protrusions, whereas spread cells were defined as large
cells with extensive visible lamellipodia (26). Results represent the
percentage of spread cells in three high power fields ± S.D.
GTPase Assays--
HUVEC were plated on gelatin (0.5%)- or
fibronectin (5 µg/ml)-coated wells (Evergreen Scientific, Los
Angeles, CA) in M199 medium with 1% fetal calf serum. After 30 min (or
as indicated), cells were washed once with ice-cold PBS and immediately
lysed in buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris, pH
7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 µg/ml leupeptin. Cleared extracts were mixed
with 20 µg of GST·PAK in the presence of glutathione-agarose
beads (Sigma). After 1 h incubation at 4 °C, beads were
pelleted by centrifugation and washed three times in lysis buffer, and
the proteins were eluted in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and analyzed by
Western blotting using a monoclonal antibody to Rac. Total Rac was
determined in cell lysate. The ECL system was used for detection
(Amersham Biosciences).
Determination of Intracellular cAMP Concentrations--
HUVEC
were plated on fibronectin or gelatin-coated wells (Evergreen
Scientific) for 45 min. HUVEC were washed twice in PBS, and cellular
cAMP was extracted with 0.1 M HCl and quantified using an
enzyme immunoassay (Biomol) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Values were normalized to the protein concentration using a Bio-Rad
protein assay and expressed as fmol/µg protein.
Protein Kinase A Assay--
HUVEC were plated in a serum-free
medium in gelatin or fibronectin-coated wells (Evergreen Scientific).
At the indicated time, cells were washed once in cold PBS and lysed
with cold hypotonic extraction buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml aprotinin).
PKA activity was determined by the incorporation of phosphate in
Leu-Arg-Arg-Ser-Leu-Gly (Kemptide) using the non radioactive Peptag
system (Promega, Madison, WI). PKA activity was normalized to protein
concentration and expressed as picomoles of incorporated phosphate per
minute per microgram of protein.
Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction--
Total RNA
was prepared from HUVEC using the RNeasy system (Qiagen, Basel,
Switzerland). 2 µg of total RNA were reversed transcribed (Superscript II, Invitrogen), and cDNA was subjected to PCR
amplifications using primer pairs specific for E-prostanoid (EP)
subtypes EP1, EP2, EP3, and
EP4 cDNAs as described by Sheng et
al. (27). PCR primer sequences were as follows:
EP1F, 5'-ACCGACCTGGCGGGCCACCTGA-3'; EP1R,
5'-CGCTGAGCGTGTTGCACACCAG-3'; EP2F,
5'-TCCAATGACTCCCAGTCTGAGG-3'; EP2R,
5'-TGCATAGATGACAGGCAGCACG-3'; EP3F,
5'-GATCACCATGCTGCTCACTG-3'; EP3R,
5'-AGTTATGCGAAGAGCTAGTCC-3'; EP4F:
5'-GGGCTGGCTGTCACCGACCTG-3'; and EP4R,
5'-GGTGCGGCGCATGAACTGGCG-3' (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland). Amplification conditions were 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 62 °C and 1 min at 72 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
PGE2 Accelerates
V 3-mediated Cell Spreading and
Adhesion--
We have previously reported that NSAIDs suppressed
V 3-dependent endothelial cell
spreading and migration and that this effect was prevented by exogenous
addition of prostaglandins (i.e. PGE2 or
PGI2). These results identified COX-2 and derived
prostaglandins as critical regulators of vascular integrin
V 3 function (26). To investigate the role
of prostaglandins in the regulation of V 3 function in greater detail, we first
characterized the effects of PGE2 and TXA2, two prostanoids
implicated in the modulation of angiogenesis (28, 29), on the
integrin-mediated adhesion and spreading kinetics of human umbilical
vein endothelial cells. HUVEC attach on gelatin and vitronectin through
integrin V 3, whereas they predominantly
use integrin 5 1 to attach to fibronectin (15). On vitronectin and gelatin, half-maximal and maximal adhesion and
spreading were observed at 30-45 and 60 min after plating, respectively (Figs. 1A and 2,
top and middle panels). On
fibronectin, adhesion and spreading proceeded with a faster kinetics:
half-maximal and maximal levels were observed at 15 and 30 min after
plating, respectively (Figs. 1A and 2, bottom
panels). The addition of PGE2 during adhesion on
vitronectin or gelatin accelerated HUVEC cell attachment in a
dose-dependent manner to reach a kinetics similar to
adhesion on fibronectin (Fig. 1A, top
and middle panels). Sixty minutes
after plating, maximal adhesion was observed on both substrates
regardless of the presence or absence of PGE2. The
acceleration of HUVEC adhesion on gelatin and vitronectin induced by
PGE2 was paralleled by an acceleration in the spreading kinetics (Fig. 2). HUVEC spreading on
fibronectin was not further accelerated by PGE2. The TXA2
analogue U46619 caused a mild but consistent retardation of HUVEC
adhesion and the inhibition of spreading on vitronectin and gelatin,
resulting in a ~30% suppression of cell adhesion and an 80%
inhibition of spreading at 60 min at a dose of 50 µM
(Figs. 1B and 2). U46619 had no effect on HUVEC adhesion or
spreading to fibronectin (Figs. 1B and 2).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
PGE2 accelerates and U46691
delays
V 3-mediated
cell adhesion. HUVEC were plated on vitronectin, gelatin or
fibronectin in the absence or presence of PGE2
(A) or U46619 (B) at the indicated
concentrations. Attached cells were fixed at the indicated times and
revealed by crystal violet staining. Results are given as optical
density (O.D.) values and represent the mean of duplicate
determination ± S.D. (n = 3).
|
|

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PGE2 promotes and U46691
suppresses
V 3-mediated
cell spreading. HUVEC were plated on vitronectin, gelatin, or
fibronectin in the absence or presence of PGE2 (100 ng/ml)
or U46619 (50 µM), as indicated. Attached cells were
fixed at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after plating and stained by crystal
violet. Results represent the percentage of spread cells over total
adherent cells in three high power fields ± S.D.
(n = 2).
|
|
From these results we concluded that PGE2 accelerated the
initial V 3-dependent HUVEC
adhesion and spreading kinetics on gelatin and vitronectin, whereas
U46619 delayed adhesion and suppressed spreading.
5 1-mediated HUVEC adhesion and spreading on fibronectin were not affected.
HUVEC Express Functional PGE2 receptors EP2
and EP4--
PGE2 binds to and activates the
following four different E-prostanoid receptor subtypes:
EP1, EP2, EP3, and EP4
(30). To determine which EP receptor was involved in mediating the
PGE2 effect, we first determined the EP receptor subtype
mRNA expression by reverse transcription PCR. Amplification
products for EP2 and EP4, but not
EP1 and EP3, were obtained (Fig.
3A). To demonstrate the
functionality of EP2 and EP4 receptors, we
performed adhesion assays in the absence or presence of butaprost, a
selective EP2 receptor agonist, and PGE1
alcohol, a selective EP4 receptor agonist. Both agonists
accelerated HUVEC adhesion to gelatin with similar kinetics as observed
for PGE2 (Fig. 3B), although they had no effect
on HUVEC adhesion to fibronectin (data not shown). The EP3
agonist sulprostone had no effect (data not shown). Taken together,
these results identify EP2 and EP4 prostanoid
receptors as functional PGE2 receptors on HUVEC.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
HUVEC express functional PGE2
receptors EP2 and EP4. A,
expression of EP1, EP2, EP3, and
EP4 receptor mRNA in HUVEC was analyzed by reverse
transcription PCR. The amplified products were visualized by agarose
gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. M, DNA
molecular weight marker. B, HUVEC were plated on gelatin in
the absence or presence of 20 µM butaprost, an
EP2 agonist, 10 ng/ml PGE1 alcohol, an
EP4 agonist, and 100 ng/ml PGE2. Attached cells
were fixed at 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after plating and revealed by
crystal violet staining. Results are given as optical density values
(O.D.) and represent the mean of duplicate
determination ± S.D. (n = 3).
|
|
V 3-mediated Adhesion Results in a
COX-2-dependent Increase in cAMP
Levels--
PGE2 and TXA2 exert many of their
biological effects through G-protein-dependent
adenylcyclase (AC) (31). To test whether the PGE2 and
U46619 effects on V 3-mediated HUVEC
adhesion involved modulation of cAMP levels, we measured cAMP
concentrations in HUVEC in response to adhesion to gelatin or
fibronectin. Adhesion on gelatin caused a transient 2-fold rise in cAMP
levels (Fig. 4A,
left panel), whereas adhesion on fibronectin
caused a transient, 4-fold rise that was more prolonged compared with
the one on gelatin (Fig. 4A, right
panel). Peak cAMP concentrations were reached 15 min after
plating on both substrates and returned to pre-adhesion levels within
30 min on gelatin and within 60 min on fibronectin. Adhesion in the
presence of U46619 completely prevented the rise in cAMP level on
gelatin, but only marginally suppressed the cAMP increase on
fibronectin (Fig. 4A). HUVEC adhesion on gelatin or
fibronectin in the presence of exogenous PGE2 resulted in
identical maximal cAMP levels and kinetics (Fig. 4A). The
increase in cAMP levels observed in response to HUVEC adhesion to
gelatin was completely abolished by NS-398, and this effect was
reversed by the addition of exogenous PGE2, whereas the
rise in cAMP induced by adhesion to fibronectin was insensitive to
NS-398 treatment (Fig. 4B). To collect direct evidence for a
role of cAMP in accelerating V 3-dependent adhesion and
promoting spreading, we plated HUVEC on gelatin in the absence or
presence of the cell-permeable cAMP analog 8-brcAMP and NS-398 or
U46619. 8-brcAMP accelerated HUVEC adhesion, and this effect was
insensitive to NS-398 or U46619 (Fig. 4C). NS-398 slightly
delayed the initial kinetics of attachment and, after 1 h of
incubation, control and NS-398-treated HUVEC attached to identical
extents. The addition of 8-brcAMP induced strong HUVEC spreading in the
presence of NS-398 or U46619 (Fig. 4D). Similar results were
obtained by elevating cAMP levels with forskolin (data not shown).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Cell adhesion induces a transient cAMP rise
and 8-brcAMP promotes adhesion and spreading. HUVEC were plated on
gelatin or fibronectin in the absence or presence of 100 ng/ml
PGE2 or 50 µM U46619 (A) or 100 µM NS-398, 100 ng/ml PGE2, or a combination
thereof, as indicated (B). HUVEC were lysed before
(t = 0) and at 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after plating,
and the cAMP concentration in the lysates was determined using an
enzyme immunoassay. Results are given as fmol/µg protein, and values
represent the mean of duplicate determinations ± S.D.
(n = 3). C, HUVEC were plated on gelatin in
the absence or presence of 100 µM NS-398, 1 mM 8-brcAMP, 50 µM U46619, 1 mM
8-brcAMP, or combinations thereof, as indicated. Attached cells were
fixed at the indicated times and revealed by crystal violet staining.
Results are given as optical density (O.D.) values and
represent the mean of duplicate determinations ± S.D.
(n = 3). D, HUVEC plated under the same
conditions as described for panel C were fixed,
stained, and photographed 60 min after plating (n = 3).
|
|
Taken together, these data demonstrate that
V 3-mediated HUVEC adhesion results in a
transient and COX-2-dependent increase in cAMP levels,
whereas 5 1-mediated adhesion induces a
robust and COX-2 independent cAMP rise. Exogenous addition of 8-brcAMP also accelerates V 3-dependent
HUVEC adhesion in the presence of a COX-2 inhibitor.
Rac Mediates cAMP-induced Spreading but Not Adhesion--
The
small GTP-binding protein Rac is a critical regulator of cell spreading
(32). COX-2 activity and prostaglandin production are essential for
V 3-dependent Rac activation
in HUVEC (26). In light of the ability of 8-brcAMP to promote cell
spreading in the presence of NS-398, we asked the question of whether
8-brcAMP was able to reverse the inhibition of
V 3-mediated Rac activation caused by
NS-398. First, we analyzed the activation kinetics of Rac in HUVEC
plated on gelatin and fibronectin using a PAK pull-down assay. HUVEC
adhesion on gelatin and fibronectin resulted in rapid activation of Rac
with peak activities at 15 and 30 min, respectively (Fig.
5A). Next, we measured Rac
activity in HUVEC at 30 min after plating on gelatin in the absence or
presence of NS-398, 8-brcAMP, or a combination thereof. The addition of
NS-398 during adhesion completely inhibited Rac activation, and this
effect was nearly completely reversed by the concomitant addition of
8-brcAMP (Fig. 5B). The addition of 8-brcAMP during adhesion
resulted in a slight increase in Rac activity compared with adhesion on
gelatin alone.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
8-brcAMP promotes Rac activation and
Rac-dependent
V 3-mediated
spreading. A, HUVEC were plated on gelatin or
fibronectin and, after 13, 30, and 45 min, cells were lysed and total
and active Rac determined. B, HUVEC were plated on gelatin
in the absence or presence of 100 µM NS-398, 1 mM 8-brcAMP, and a combination thereof. After 30 min, cells
were lysed, and total and active Rac determined. (n = 2). The bars under the blots give the active Rac/total Rac
ratio determined from the scans of the blots. C, control
HUVEC and HUVEC overexpressing constitutive active (L61Rac) or dominant
negative (N17Rac) mutants were plated on gelatin in the presence of
8-brcAMP (1 mM) or U46691 (50 µM) as
indicated. Attached cells were fixed at the indicated times and
revealed by crystal violet staining. Results are given as optical
density (O.D.) values and represent the mean of duplicate
determinations ± S.D. (n = 2). D,
control HUVEC and HUVEC overexpressing L61Rac or N17Rac mutants were
plated on gelatin in the presence of NS-398 (100 µM),
U46691 (50 µM), and 8-brcAMP (1 mM) as
indicated. Attached cells were fixed 60 min after plating. Results
represent the percentage of spread cells over total adherent cells in
three high power fields ± S.D. (n = 2).
|
|
Next, we asked the question of whether Rac activation was involved in
mediating both the acceleration of
V 3-dependent HUVEC adhesion
and HUVEC spreading in response to 8-brcAMP. To address these questions
we electroporated HUVEC with an expression vector encoding for a
constitutive active (L61Rac) or a dominant negative form (N17Rac) of
Rac (26) and then tested the adhesive and spreading properties of these
cells. L61Rac did not accelerate HUVEC adhesion to gelatin, and N17Rac
did not delay it. Also, N17 Rac did not prevent the acceleration of
HUVEC adhesion induced by 8-brcAMP, and L61Rac did not prevent the
adhesion delay caused by U46691 (Fig. 5C). In contrast,
L61Rac fully reversed the inhibition of HUVEC spreading caused by
NS-398 and U46691, whereas N17Rac suppressed HUVEC spreading, and this
effect was not reversed by 8-brcAMP (Fig. 5D).
From these results we concluded that V 3-dependent
HUVEC spreading in response to cAMP elevation requires Rac activation, whereas cAMP-induced acceleration of
V 3-dependent HUVEC adhesion does not.
V 3-dependent HUVEC
Adhesion and Rac Activation Depend on PKA--
Protein kinase A was
reported to regulate
V 3-dependent angiogenesis
(33) and Rac-dependent migration of carcinoma cells (34).
Because elevated cAMP levels promote PKA activation, we next tested
whether HUVEC adhesion to gelatin or fibronectin promoted PKA
activation. A basal PKA activity was observed at the time of plating,
and adhesion on gelatin induced a transient increase in PKA activity
(Fig. 6A). NS-398 strongly
suppressed adhesion-induced PKA activation but did not inhibit basal
PKA activity, whereas the pharmacological PKA inhibitor H-89 fully
suppressed both basal and adhesion-induced PKA activity (Fig.
6A). PGE2 induced a robust PKA activation even
in the presence of NS-398 (Fig. 6A). HUVEC adhesion to
fibronectin induced a strong increase in PKA activity, which was
completely insensitive to NS-398 (Fig. 6B). To test whether
PKA activity was required for V 3- and
5 1-dependent HUVEC adhesion
and spreading, we plated cells on gelatin and fibronectin in the
absence or presence of H-89. H-89 strongly suppressed HUVEC adhesion to
gelatin, whereas it had no effect on HUVEC adhesion on fibronectin
(Fig. 6, C and D). Furthermore, the addition of 8-brcAMP did not reverse H-89-induced inhibition of cell adhesion on
gelatin (Fig. 5C). In PAK pull-down assays we investigated the requirement of PKA in V 3- and
5 1-dependent Rac activation. H-89 completely suppressed
V 3-dependent Rac activation,
whereas it did not affect 5 1-mediated Rac
activation (Fig. 6E). The addition of PGE2 or
8-brcAMP did not rescue inhibition of
V 3-dependent Rac activation
caused by H-89 (Fig. 6E). We next tested whether constitutively active Rac could rescue the suppression of
V 3-dependent HUVEC adhesion
caused by H-89. The result of this experiment demonstrated that
expression of L61Rac was not sufficient to rescue suppression of
V 3-dependent HUVEC adhesion
caused by H-89. HUVEC plated on fibronectin in the presence of H-89
spread normally (Fig. 6G), consistent with the full
activation of Rac in the presence of H-89 observed during HUVEC
adhesion to fibronectin (Fig. 6E, right panel).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
V 3-dependent
HUVEC adhesion requires PKA activation. A and
B, HUVEC were plated on gelatin (A) or
fibronectin (B) in the presence of 100 µM
NS-398 ± 100 ng/ml PGE2 or 5 µM H-89 as indicated,
and PKA activity was measured in the cell lysate at the indicated
times. Results are given as incorporated picomoles of PO4
per minute per microgram of protein, and values represent the
mean of duplicate determinations ± S.D. (n = 2).
C and D, HUVEC were plated on gelatin
(C) or fibronectin (D) in the presence of the PKA
inhibitor H-89 (5 µM), 1 mM 8-brcAMP, or a
combination thereof, as indicated. Attached cells were fixed at the
indicated times and revealed by crystal violet staining. Results are
given as optical density (O.D.) values and represent
the mean of duplicate determination ± S.D. (n = 3). E, HUVEC were plated on gelatin (left
panel) or on fibronectin (right panel)
in the absence or presence of 100 nM PGE2, 1 mM
8-brcAMP, and 5 µM H-89 as indicated. After 30 min, cells
were lysed, and active and total Rac were determined.
(n = 2). The bars under the blots give the
active Rac/total Rac ratio determined from the scans of the blots.
F, control HUVEC and HUVEC expressing L61Rac were plated on
gelatin in the absence or presence of 5 µM H-89. Attached
cells were fixed at the indicated times and revealed by crystal violet
staining. Results are given as optical density
(O.D.) values and represent the mean of duplicate
determination ± S.D. (n = 3). G, HUVEC
plated on fibronectin in the absence or presence of the PKA inhibitor
H-89 (5 µM) were scored for spreading. Results are given
as the percentage of spreading and represent the mean of triplicate
determination ± S.D. (n = 3).
|
|
From these experiments, we concluded that PKA activity mediates basal
and PGE2/8-brcAMP-stimulated
V 3-dependent HUVEC adhesion and Rac activation and that active Rac does not reconstitute cell adhesion in the absence of PKA activity. In contrast, PKA is not required for 5 1-dependent
cell adhesion and spreading.
 |
DISCUSSION |
COX-2 expression in tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment
promotes tumor progression, and this effect involves the induction of
tumor angiogenesis. Mice lacking COX-2 have deficient VEGF expression,
reduced tumor angiogenesis, and suppressed tumor growth (35). COX-2
inhibitors decrease VEGF production in fibroblasts and tumor cells and
prevent mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in response to VEGF
(23, 25, 35). Pharmacological inhibition of COX-2 in endothelial cells
blocks V 3-mediated Rac activation, resulting in reduced cell
spreading and migration in vitro and suppressed angiogenesis
in vivo (26). Two of the major COX-2-derived prostanoids,
PGE2 and TXA2, have been shown to promote angiogenesis (28,
29), but the mechanisms involved are only partially characterized. In
this study we have investigated the effect of PGE2 and TXA2 on V 3- and
5 1-mediated HUVEC adhesion and spreading.
Here we report the following. First, PGE2 accelerated HUVEC
adhesion, induced Rac-activation, and stimulated
Rac-dependent spreading mediated by integrin
V 3, whereas the TXA2 agonist U46691 delayed adhesion and inhibited spreading mediated by
V 3. PGE2 signaled to HUVEC
through EP receptors 2 and 4. Second,
V 3-mediated HUVEC adhesion resulted in a
COX-2/PGE2-dependent transient rise in cAMP
concentration and activation of the cAMP-dependent PKA. Third, V 3-mediated HUVEC adhesion
required PKA but not Rac activity, whereas
V 3-mediated spreading required both PKA
and Rac activities. Fourth, integrin
5 1-dependent HUVEC adhesion
and Rac activation and spreading were not regulated by
COX-2/PGE2 or TXA2 and did not depend on PKA activity.
Taken together, these observations demonstrate that
V 3-dependent HUVEC adhesion
and Rac-dependent spreading are positively regulated by
COX-2-derived PGE2 through cAMP/PKA-dependent
signaling, whereas 5 1-mediated adhesion
and spreading occur independently of this pathway.
There is increasing evidence indicating that cAMP levels can be
regulated by integrin ligation and, on the other hand, that cAMP
contributes to the modulation of integrin function. For example, activating anti- 1 integrin antibodies induces MCF-7
breast carcinoma cell migration by stimulating a rise in intracellular
cAMP concentration (36). The mechanism by which integrin ligation leads
to an increase in cAMP level is not completely known. Our results
suggest the existence of two distinct and integrin-specific mechanisms.
The first one involves V 3-mediated and
COX-2-dependent production of PGE2, the
stimulation of EP2/EP4 receptors, and the
activation of AC. This pathway is consistent with the requirement of
COX-2 activity to induce a cAMP rise in response to
V 3 ligation (Fig. 4A), cell
spreading (Fig. 4D), and migration (26) with the classical signaling pathway of prostaglandins (20). The stimulation of COX-2-dependent PGE2 production upon
V 3-dependent adhesion could result from the V 3-mediated activation of
phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and the production of arachidonic acid, the
substrate of COX. In this respect, it has been recently reported that
V 3 ligation induces membrane
translocation and activation of PLA2 with the subsequent release of
arachidonic acid in bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (37).
PLA2 appears to be stimulated by integrin ligation in several cell
types, and in some cases its activation has been linked to the
production of arachidonic acid, the activation of PKC, and cell
spreading (38, 39). The second mechanism involves
5 1-mediated,
COX-2/PGE2-independent activation of AC. This is supported
by the observation that NS-398 does not inhibit the increase in cAMP
concentration observed in HUVEC plated on fibronectin (Fig.
4B). 1 integrin ligation with the RGD cell binding sequence of fibronectin or with 1-activating
antibodies followed by mechanical stress has been reported to cause a
rapid increase in intracellular cAMP levels and PKA activity in
endothelial cells (40). G-protein subunit inhibitors suppressed
this effect, suggesting that integrin ligation and mechanical stress
may stimulate AC through the activation of integrin-coupled
heterotrimeric G-proteins (40).
cAMP modulates integrin-dependent cell adhesion and
migration, but, depending on the cell type and context, it can exert
stimulatory or inhibitory effects. For example, an increase in cAMP
levels was shown to promote adhesion of immature thymocytes to
fibronectin (41), to inhibit adhesion of mature T lymphocytes to
fibronectin (42), and to suppresses leukocyte adhesion and migration in response to chemoattractants (43). Our findings indicate that, in
endothelial cells, an elevation of cAMP accelerates
V 3-mediated adhesion and promotes
Rac-dependent spreading via activation of PKA. Recently,
cAMP-dependent PKA activation was reported to induce 1-integrin mediated MDA-435 breast carcinoma cell
migration in response to growth factors through the activation of Rac
and the inhibition of RhoA (34). There is also emerging evidence that PKA can positively and negatively regulate integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration of carcinoma and sarcoma-derived cell lines, endothelial cells, and neutrophils (33, 34, 44-46). The precise mechanisms by which PKA regulates integrin-dependent events
and Rac activity in particular remain, however, largely unknown.
Taken together, we propose the following working model for the
regulation of V 3-mediated endothelial
cell adhesion and spreading by PGE2. Upon
V 3-dependent adhesion there
is a transient rise in cAMP levels and PKA activity dependent on
COX-2-mediated production of PGE2 and on signaling through
EP2/EP4 receptors. Increased PKA activity accelerates
V 3-dependent adhesion through
a Rac-independent mechanism and stimulates
V 3-dependent spreading
through a Rac-dependent mechanism. In contrast, the rise in
cAMP levels and PKA activity observed after
5 1-mediated adhesion does not depend on
COX-2 or PGE2 and is not required for
5 1-dependent HUVEC adhesion and spreading.
This latter observation suggests that the ligation of integrin
5 1 may generate a cAMP rise and PKA
activation, which can then promote
V 3-dependent endothelial cell
adhesion and spreading/migration. Such a "cross-talk" is consistent
with a recent report demonstrating that ligation of integrin
5 1 stimulated
V 3-dependent endothelial cell
migration and angiogenesis (33). Optimal migration and angiogenesis is
likely to require intermediate cAMP levels and PKA activity, whereas
subthreshold or excessive PKA activity would result in static adhesion.
The regulation of cAMP levels may occur through modulation of cAMP
generation by AC or degradation by phosphodiesterase. Indeed, growth
factor-stimulated carcinoma cell migration was shown to require both
cAMP-dependent PKA activity and phosphodiesterase-mediated
cAMP degradation (12, 34).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that a PGE2-mediated
rise in cAMP promotes V 3-mediated
endothelial cell adhesion through the activation of PKA and induces
spreading via PKA-dependent Rac activation.
These results may contribute to the further understanding of the
regulation of vascular integrins V 3 by
COX-2/PGE2 during tumor angiogenesis and inflammation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The authors thank Dr. F. J. Lejeune for
continuous support, Dr. J. Collard, A. Hall and S. Klein for providing
reagents, and R. Driscoll for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Swiss National
Science Foundation (31-52946.97 and 31-63752.00), the Leenaards Foundation, and the Banque Centonale Vaudoise (BCV) Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of an M.D./Ph.D. fellowship (31-51279.97) from the Swiss
National Science Foundation.
§
Recipient of a SCORE-A award (32-41611.94) from the Swiss National
Science Grant. To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of the CePO, c/o Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research (ISREC), 155 Chemin des Boveresses, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-21-692-5853; Fax: 41-21-692-5872; E-mail: curzio.ruegg@isrec.unil.ch.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 16, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209213200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VEGF, vascular
endothelial growth factor;
AC, adenylcyclase;
COX, cyclooxygenase;
EP, E-prostanoid;
HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells;
NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs;
PAK, p21-activated kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PGE, prostaglandin E;
PGI, prostaglandin I;
PKA, protein kinase A;
PLA2, phospholipase A 2;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
TXA2, thromboxane A2.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Carmeliet, P.,
and Jain, R. K.
(2000)
Nature
407,
249-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
Davis, S.,
Gale, N. W.,
Rudge, J. S.,
Wiegand, S. J.,
and Holash, J.
(2000)
Nature
407,
242-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Hynes, R. O.
(1999)
Trends Cell Biol.
9,
M33-M37[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Kolanus, W.,
and Seed, B.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
725-731[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Sastry, S. K.,
and Burridge, K.
(2000)
Exp. Cell Res.
261,
25-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Giancotti, F. G.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1999)
Science
285,
1028-1032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Brooks, P. C.,
Montgomery, A. M.,
Rosenfeld, M.,
Reisfeld, R. A., Hu, T.,
Klier, G.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1994)
Cell
79,
1157-1164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Max, R.,
Gerritsen, R. R.,
Nooijen, P. T.,
Goodman, S. L.,
Sutter, A.,
Keilholz, U.,
Ruiter, D. J.,
and De Waal, R. M.
(1997)
Int. J. Cancer
71,
320-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Sipkins, D. A.,
Cheresh, D. A.,
Kazemi, M. R.,
Nevin, L. M.,
Bednarski, M. D.,
and Li, K.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
623-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Friedlander, M.,
Brooks, P. C.,
Shaffer, R. W.,
Kincaid, C. M.,
Varner, J. A.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1995)
Science
270,
1500-1502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Hammes, H. P.,
Brownlee, M.,
Jonczyk, A.,
Sutter, A.,
and Preissner, K. T.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
529-533[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
O'Connor, K. L.,
Shaw, L. M.,
and Mercurio, A. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1749-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Brooks, P. C.,
Stromblad, S.,
Klemke, R.,
Visscher, D.,
Sarkar, F. H.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
1815-1822[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Maeshima, Y.,
Sudhakar, A.,
Lively, J. C.,
Ueki, K.,
Kharbanda, S.,
Kahn, C. R.,
Sonenberg, N.,
Hynes, R. O.,
and Kalluri, R.
(2002)
Science
295,
140-143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Ruegg, C.,
Yilmaz, A.,
Bieler, G.,
Bamat, J.,
Chaubert, P.,
and Lejeune, F. J.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
408-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Vane, J. R.,
Bakhle, Y. S.,
and Botting, R. M.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
38,
97-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Dubois, R. N.,
Abramson, S. B.,
Crofford, L.,
Gupta, R. A.,
Simon, L. S.,
Van De Putte, L. B.,
and Lipsky, P. E.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
1063-1073[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Oshima, M.,
Dinchuk, J. E.,
Kargman, S. L.,
Oshima, H.,
Hancock, B.,
Kwong, E.,
Trzaskos, J. M.,
Evans, J. F.,
and Taketo, M. M.
(1996)
Cell
87,
803-809[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Steinbach, G.,
Lynch, P. M.,
Phillips, R. K.,
Wallace, M. H.,
Hawk, E.,
Gordon, G. B.,
Wakabayashi, N.,
Saunders, B.,
Shen, Y.,
Fujimura, T., Su, L. K.,
and Levin, B.
(2000)
N. Engl. J. Med.
342,
1946-1952[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Gupta, R. A.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Cancer
1,
11-21[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Goldman, A. P.,
Williams, C. S.,
Sheng, H.,
Lamps, L. W.,
Williams, V. P.,
Pairet, M.,
Morrow, J. D.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1998)
Carcinogenesis
19,
2195-2199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Shiff, S. J.,
and Rigas, B.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
445-450[Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Tsujii, M.,
Kawano, S.,
Tsuji, S.,
Sawaoka, H.,
Hori, M.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
705-716[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Masferrer, J. L.,
Leahy, K. M.,
Koki, A. T.,
Zweifel, B. S.,
Settle, S. L.,
Woerner, B. M.,
Edwards, D. A.,
Flickinger, A. G.,
Moore, R. J.,
and Seibert, K.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1306-1311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Jones, M. K.,
Wang, H.,
Peskar, B. M.,
Levin, E.,
Itani, R. M.,
Sarfeh, I. J.,
and Tarnawski, A. S.
(1999)
Nat. Med.
5,
1418-1423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Dormond, O.,
Foletti, A.,
Paroz, C.,
and Ruegg, C.
(2001)
Nat. Med.
7,
1041-1047[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Sheng, H.,
Shao, J.,
Washington, M. K.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18075-18081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Daniel, T. O.,
Liu, H.,
Morrow, J. D.,
Crews, B. C.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
4574-4577[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Form, D. M.,
and Auerbach, R.
(1983)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
172,
214-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Breyer, M. D.,
and Breyer, R. M.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens.
9,
23-29[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Coleman, R. A.,
Smith, W. L.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1994)
Pharmacol. Rev.
46,
205-229[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ridley, A. J.
(2001)
Trends Cell Biol.
11,
471-477[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Kim, S.,
Harris, M.,
and Varner, J. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
33920-33928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
O'Connor, K. L.,
and Mercurio, A. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
47895-47900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Williams, C. S.,
Tsujii, M.,
Reese, J.,
Dey, S. K.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
1589-1594[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Plopper, G. E.,
Huff, J. L.,
Rust, W. L.,
Schwartz, M. A.,
and Quaranta, V.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol. Res. Commun.
4,
129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Bhattacharya, S.,
Patel, R.,
Sen, N.,
Quadri, S.,
Parthasarathi, K.,
and Bhattacharya, J.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.
280,
L1049-L1056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Auer, K. L.,
and Jacobson, B. S.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
1305-1313[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Clark, E. A.,
and Hynes, R. O.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14814-14818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Meyer, C. J.,
Alenghat, F. J.,
Rim, P.,
Fong, J. H.,
Fabry, B.,
and Ingber, D. E.
(2000)
Nat. Cell. Biol.
2,
666-668[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Halvorson, M. J.,
and Coligan, J. E.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
4567-4574[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Shimizu, Y.,
van Seventer, G. A.,
Ennis, E.,
Newman, W.,
Horgan, K. J.,
and Shaw, S.
(1992)
J. Exp. Med.
175,
577-582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Laudanna, C.,
Campbell, J. J.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24141-24144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Whittard, J. D.,
and Akiyama, S. K.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
3265-3272[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Maier, G. D.,
Vellody, K.,
Meisinger, J.,
Djordjevic, A.,
Lozano, Y.,
and Young, M. R.
(1996)
Clin. Exp. Metastasis
14,
314-322[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Jones, S. L.
(2002)
J. Leukoc. Biol.
71,
1042-1048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Paulucci-Holthauzen, L. A. Vergara, L. J. Bellot, D. Canton, J. D. Scott, and K. L. O'Connor
Spatial Distribution of Protein Kinase A Activity during Cell Migration Is Mediated by A-kinase Anchoring Protein AKAP Lbc
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 27, 2009;
284(9):
5956 - 5967.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Finetti, R. Solito, L. Morbidelli, A. Giachetti, M. Ziche, and S. Donnini
Prostaglandin E2 Regulates Angiogenesis via Activation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 25, 2008;
283(4):
2139 - 2146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Shen, T. Koga, B.-C. Park, N. SundarRaj, and B. Y. J. T. Yue
Rho GTPase and cAMP/Protein Kinase A Signaling Mediates Myocilin-induced Alterations in Cultured Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2008;
283(1):
603 - 612.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Netherton, J. A. Sutton, L. S. Wilson, R. L. Carter, and D. H. Maurice
Both Protein Kinase A and Exchange Protein Activated by cAMP Coordinate Adhesion of Human Vascular Endothelial Cells
Circ. Res.,
October 12, 2007;
101(8):
768 - 776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Azim, H. Cao, X. Gao, M. Joo, A. B. Malik, R. B. van Breemen, R. T. Sadikot, G. Park, and J. W. Christman
Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by small GTPase Rac2 in bone marrow macrophages
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
September 1, 2007;
293(3):
L668 - L673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Lorenowicz, M. Fernandez-Borja, and P. L. Hordijk
cAMP Signaling in Leukocyte Transendothelial Migration
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
May 1, 2007;
27(5):
1014 - 1022.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-W. E. Chang, J. W. Marlin, T. W. Chance, and R. Jakobi
RhoA Mediates Cyclooxygenase-2 Signaling to Disrupt the Formation of Adherens Junctions and Increase Cell Motility
Cancer Res.,
December 15, 2006;
66(24):
11700 - 11708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Sands, H. D. Woolson, G. R. Milne, C. Rutherford, and T. M. Palmer
Exchange Protein Activated by Cyclic AMP (Epac)-Mediated Induction of Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 3 (SOCS-3) in Vascular Endothelial Cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 1, 2006;
26(17):
6333 - 6346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Alfranca, M. A. Iniguez, M. Fresno, and J. M. Redondo
Prostanoid signal transduction and gene expression in the endothelium: Role in cardiovascular diseases
Cardiovasc Res,
June 1, 2006;
70(3):
446 - 456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Hoang, L. Zhu, Y. Shi, P. Frost, H. Yan, S. Sharma, S. Sharma, L. Goodglick, S. Dubinett, and A. Lichtenstein
Oncogenic RAS mutations in myeloma cells selectively induce cox-2 expression, which participates in enhanced adhesion to fibronectin and chemoresistance
Blood,
June 1, 2006;
107(11):
4484 - 4490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Wang, H. Wang, J. Brown, T. Daikoku, W. Ning, Q. Shi, A. Richmond, R. Strieter, S. K. Dey, and R. N. DuBois
CXCL1 induced by prostaglandin E2 promotes angiogenesis in colorectal cancer
J. Exp. Med.,
April 17, 2006;
203(4):
941 - 951.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Fortemaison, S. Blancquaert, J. E. Dumont, C. Maenhaut, K. Aktories, P. P. Roger, and S. Dremier
Differential Involvement of the Actin Cytoskeleton in Differentiation and Mitogenesis of Thyroid Cells: Inactivation of Rho Proteins Contributes to Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate-Dependent Gene Expression but Prevents Mitogenesis
Endocrinology,
December 1, 2005;
146(12):
5485 - 5495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. K. Misra and S. V. Pizzo
Coordinate Regulation of Forskolin-induced Cellular Proliferation in Macrophages by Protein Kinase A/cAMP-response Element-binding Protein (CREB) and Epac1-Rap1 Signaling: EFFECTS OF SILENCING CREB GENE EXPRESSION ON Akt ACTIVATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 18, 2005;
280(46):
38276 - 38289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Howe, L. C. Baldor, and B. P. Hogan
Spatial regulation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase during chemotactic cell migration
PNAS,
October 4, 2005;
102(40):
14320 - 14325.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Mayoral, A. Fernandez-Martinez, L. Bosca, and P. Martin-Sanz
Prostaglandin E2 promotes migration and adhesion in hepatocellular carcinoma cells
Carcinogenesis,
April 1, 2005;
26(4):
753 - 761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Symowicz, B. P. Adley, M. M.M. Woo, N. Auersperg, L. G. Hudson, and M. S. Stack
Cyclooxygenase-2 Functions as a Downstream Mediator of Lysophosphatidic Acid to Promote Aggressive Behavior in Ovarian Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2005;
65(6):
2234 - 2242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Wang, F. G. Buchanan, H. Wang, S. K. Dey, and R. N. DuBois
Prostaglandin E2 Enhances Intestinal Adenoma Growth via Activation of the Ras-Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2005;
65(5):
1822 - 1829.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zaric and C. Ruegg
Integrin-mediated Adhesion and Soluble Ligand Binding Stabilize COX-2 Protein Levels in Endothelial Cells by Inducing Expression and Preventing Degradation
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 14, 2005;
280(2):
1077 - 1085.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Jiang, A. S. Weyrich, G. A. Zimmerman, and T. M. McIntyre
Endothelial Cell Confluence Regulates Cyclooxygenase-2 and Prostaglandin E2 Production That Modulate Motility
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 31, 2004;
279(53):
55905 - 55913.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Enserink, L. S. Price, T. Methi, M. Mahic, A. Sonnenberg, J. L. Bos, and K. Tasken
The cAMP-Epac-Rap1 Pathway Regulates Cell Spreading and Cell Adhesion to Laminin-5 through the {alpha}3{beta}1 Integrin but Not the {alpha}6{beta}4 Integrin
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 2004;
279(43):
44889 - 44896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Yang and D. Bleich
Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35403 - 35411.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G.A. Stouffer and S.S. Smyth
Effects of Thrombin on Interactions Between {beta}3-Integrins and Extracellular Matrix in Platelets and Vascular Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
November 1, 2003;
23(11):
1971 - 1978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Sanchez-Moreno, M. P. Cano, B. de Ancos, L. Plaza, B. Olmedilla, F. Granado, and A. Martin
High-Pressurized Orange Juice Consumption Affects Plasma Vitamin C, Antioxidative Status and Inflammatory Markers in Healthy Humans
J. Nutr.,
July 1, 2003;
133(7):
2204 - 2209.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Ellerbroek, K. Wennerberg, and K. Burridge
Serine Phosphorylation Negatively Regulates RhoA in Vivo
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 23, 2003;
278(21):
19023 - 19031.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Hatae, A. Kita, S. Tanaka, Y. Sugimoto, and A. Ichikawa
Induction of Adherent Activity in Mastocytoma P-815 Cells by the Cooperation of Two Prostaglandin E2 Receptor Subtypes, EP3 and EP4
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 9, 2003;
278(20):
17977 - 17981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|