Differences in Apparent Pore Sizes of Low and High
Voltage-activated Ca2+ Channels*
Mauro
Cataldi
§,
Edward
Perez-Reyes¶, and
Richard W.
Tsien
From the
Department of Molecular and Cellular
Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford,
California 94305-5345 and the ¶ Department of Pharmacology,
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908
Received for publication, April 23, 2002, and in revised form, August 26, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Pore size is of considerable interest in
voltage-gated Ca2+ channels because they exemplify a
fundamental ability of certain ion channels: to display large pore
diameter, but also great selectivity for their ion of choice. We
determined the pore size of several voltage-dependent
Ca2+ channels of known molecular composition with large
organic cations as probes. T-type channels supported by the
CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and CaV3.3
subunits; L-type channels encoded by the CaV1.2,
1, and
2
1 subunits; and
R-type channels encoded by the CaV2.3 and
3 subunits were each studied using a Xenopus oocyte
expression system. The weak permeabilities to organic cations were
resolved by looking at inward tails generated upon repolarization after
a large depolarizing pulse. Large inward NH
currents
and sizable methylammonium and dimethylammonium currents were observed in all of the channels tested, whereas trimethylammonium permeated only
through L- and R-type channels, and tetramethylammonium currents were
observed only in L-type channels. Thus, our experiments revealed an
unexpected heterogeneity in pore size among different Ca2+
channels, with L-type channels having the largest pore (effective diameter = 6.2 Å), T-type channels having the tiniest pore
(effective diameter = 5.1 Å), and R-type channels having a pore
size intermediate between these extremes. These findings ran counter to
first-order expectations for these channels based simply on their
degree of selectivity among inorganic cations or on the bulkiness of
their acidic side chains at the locus of selectivity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
T-type Ca2+ channels are found in many cell types and
are important for cellular functions as diverse as cell proliferation, cardiac pacemaker activity, and rhythmic firing of neural networks (1,
2). In contrast to the better studied high voltage-activated (HVA)1 Ca2+
channels (L-, N-, P/Q-, and R-type), T-type channels activate at
relatively negative membrane potentials and are often referred to as
"low voltage-activated" (LVA). The distinctive permeation properties of T-type Ca2+ channels were critical for their
original identification as distinct entities (3-16). In native
preparations, T-type channels are equally permeable to Ca2+
and Ba2+ ions, unlike all known HVA channels, for which
unitary Ba2+ fluxes are larger than those supported by
Ca2+ (17). Despite general agreement about these
differences (1), relatively little is known about the underlying basis
of ion selectivity and permeation in T-type channels. New impetus for
approaching such questions is provided by the molecular cloning of
three different pore-forming CaV subunits with biophysical
properties that clearly identify them as T-type channels (18-20),
CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and CaV3.3 (
1G,
1H, and
1I,
respectively, in the former voltage-dependent calcium
channel nomenclature). These subunits form a closely related family
with only limited sequence homology to the subfamilies of HVA channels
(~28%). In the regions thought to be important for permeation, the
CaV3 subunits and HVA channel are more similar (40%). The
CaV3 subunits also have "P-loops," each containing an
amino acid with an acidic side chain thought to be important for
permeation. However, instead of a set of four glutamates as in HVA
channels (EEEE locus), the corresponding amino acids in the three
T-type channel
1 subunits are glutamates in domains I
and II and aspartates in domains III and IV, forming a putative EEDD
locus (21-23).
Knowledge about the molecular differences between the pore-forming
regions of T-type channels and HVA channels has redirected attention to
differences in their permeation properties. Because current models of
ion permeation through voltage-dependent Ca2+
channels are based almost entirely on studies of L-type channels (24-26), characterizing permeation and selectivity in various T-type channels offers broader perspectives about mechanisms. A promising start was provided by Talavera et al. (27), who showed that the aspartates at the EEDD locus of a T-type
1 subunit
contribute to its distinctive selectivity properties (see also Ref.
28).
Here, we focus on pore size, a matter of fundamental importance to
understanding interactions between the pore-forming groups and permeant
ions. Even in the absence of direct evidence about channel structure
from x-ray crystallography, valuable information on minimal pore size
can be gathered by studies on the permeation of large organic cations
(17, 29-34). Early studies on the frog skeletal L-type
Ca2+ channel (35, 36) showed that the pore is permeable to
tetramethylammonium and thus has a minimal internal diameter of ~6
Å. There was also a brief report that T-type channels in neoplastic
B-lymphocytes are impermeable to tetramethylammonium (37). By contrast,
no systematic study of the pore size of Ca2+ channels of
known molecular composition has yet been reported.
Here, we used the Xenopus oocyte expression system to
determine the apparent pore size of calcium channels encoded by cloned CaV subunits. CaV1.2 (
1C), the
subject of the vast majority of recent permeation experiments, was
a logical starting point for comparison with the three T-type channel
subunits, CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and
CaV3.3. We also studied the pore size of channels encoded by the CaV2.3 subunit (
1E), which supports
the R-type current (38), of interest because this channel resembles
T-type channels in permeation and selectivity properties, although its
amino acid sequence is much closer to L- than T-type
1
subunits (39, 40).
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Molecular Biology--
For RNA preparation, the human
CaV3.2 (19) and rat CaV3.1 subunits
(GenBankTM/EBI accession numbers NM_021098 and AF027984,
respectively) subcloned in the pGEM-HEA vector were linearized with
AflII (18, 19), whereas the rat Cav3.3 subunit
(NM_020084) subcloned in the pSP73 vector (28) and the human
CaV2.3 (L27745) subunit subcloned in the pHBE vector (41)
were digested with EcoRI and HindIII,
respectively. All experiments using the CaV1.2 subunit (X15539) of L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels were performed
using the CARD5 isoform (42), a deletion mutant of the
CARD3 isoform subcloned in the pSP72 vector and digested
with XbaI. The rat
1a (43)
3
(44) accessory subunits (M25817 and NM_012828) were linearized with
XbaI and NotI, respectively, whereas the rabbit
2
1a subunit (M21948) (42) was digested with XhoI. Linearized DNAs were cleaned with
phenol/chloroform, and RNA was prepared in vitro with
commercial kits (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX) using the SP6 polymerase for
the
1a subunit or the T7 polymerase for all other channels.
Ca2+ Channel Expression in Xenopus Oocytes and
Electrophysiology--
Xenopus laevis females
(NASCO, Fort Atkinson, WI) were anesthetized by immersion in 0.2%
ice-cold Tricaine solution for 30-45 min, and then three to four
ovarian lobes were removed by abdominal incision, minced into small
fragments with sterile scissors, and digested for 1-1.3 h with 1 mg/ml
type I collagenase (Invitrogen) in nominally "calcium-free"
solution (82.5 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.6)
with NaOH). Stage V and VI oocytes were selected under a dissecting
microscope and kept overnight in calcium-containing solution (ND-96: 96 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 1.8 mM
CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
HEPES, and 2.5 mM sodium pyruvate with the addition of 1000 IU of penicillin and 100 IU of streptomycin). The day after surgical
isolation, selected oocytes were injected with ~50 nl of solution
containing 0.1 mg/ml RNA in water using a hydraulic injector
(WPI, Sarasota, FL). To reconstitute L-type Ca2+
channels, the CaV1.2 subunit was co-injected in equimolar
amounts with
1a and
2
1 as
accessory subunits. The human CaV2.3 subunit was
co-injected with the
3 accessory subunit, whereas no
accessory subunit was added to the T-type channel
subunits,
CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and CaV3.3.
Injected oocytes were kept in ND-96 solution at 18 °C for 2-6 days
before being used for electrophysiological recordings.
Whole cell oocyte currents were recorded with the two-microelectrode
technique using an oocyte OC-725-A amplifier (Warner Instruments Corp.,
Hamden, CT) and pClamp Version 6.1 software (Axon Instruments, Inc.,
Foster City, CA). Currents were elicited using the protocols described
under "Results," filtered at 500 Hz, digitized every 250 µs, and
stored on a Pentium III computer for off-line analysis. All of the
currents were leak-subtracted using a P/4 protocol. The experiments
were performed at room temperature using a 150-µl laminar flow
chamber continuously superfused with a gravity-fed multiline perfusion
system. Solution was continuously removed from the chamber using a soft
paper bridge. Perfusion flow averaged 1.9 ml/min; and as established in
test experiments, the entire chamber content was exchanged in ~1.3
min after switching from one solution to another.
Monovalent currents were recorded using nominally Ca2+-free
solutions containing 10 mM HEDTA, 10 mM HEPES,
14 mM tetraethylammonium Cl, and the selected
monovalent ion at 100 mM. The osmolarity was adjusted to
300 mosM with the addition of sucrose. To prevent the
influx of monovalent ions through the nonspecific cationic channels
present in the plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes (45), the
oocytes were preincubated for 10 min with the reversible blocker N-phenylanthranilic acid (500 µM; RBI,
Natick, MA), and this drug was added to all solutions used during the
experiments. To minimize changes in the recording conditions, the
duration of the experiments was kept short by using a high acquisition
frequency (0.6 Hz). In control experiments, no significant decrease in
current amplitude was observed in response to repetitive
depolarizations at a fixed voltage using this frequency.
Drugs and Chemicals--
All chemicals were of analytical grade
and were purchased from Sigma. All cations used in this study were
chloride salts, with the exceptions of lithium and tetramethylammonium,
which were used as hydroxide salts.
Statistical Analysis--
Statistical analysis was performed
using one-way analysis of variance, and the threshold for significance
was set at p < 0.01.
 |
RESULTS |
To estimate the minimal dimensions of the permeation pore, we
pursued the classical approach of recording the Ca2+
channel currents supported by a series of monovalent cations of
increasing size (17, 35). The experiments were carried out in buffered
Ca2+-free solutions to avoid the potent blocking effects of
Ca2+ ions on monovalent cation currents (35, 46). When
currents were evoked by a series of increasingly large depolarizing
steps, inward currents first grew in size as the channels activated, but became progressively smaller and eventually reversed when the
depolarization became strong enough to drive a net positive charge out
of the oocytes, presumably supported by K+ efflux. Fig.
1A compares currents carried
by Li+ ions in oocytes expressing the T-type channel
subunits, CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and
CaV3.3, or the HVA channel subunits, CaV1.2
(L-type) and CaV2.3 (R-type). As expected, each of these
channels became highly permeable to monovalent ions once divalent
cations were removed from the bath, and large inward currents were
recorded with Li+ as the external charge carrier (Fig. 1).
Despite obvious differences in activation and inactivation kinetics
from one channel to the next, Li+ current reversed at
around +5 mV in both L- and R-type channels and in each of the T-type
channel isoforms. This value is in good agreement with previous
determinations of Li+ current reversal in oocytes
expressing CaV1.2 (47) and leads to an estimated
PLi/PK of 1.46 using the
Hodgkin-Goldman-Katz formalism for bi-ionic permeation. In calculating
this permeability ratio, we assumed that the intracellular potassium
concentration in Xenopus oocytes is 120 mM (48)
and does not change significantly upon recording with KCl-filled
pipettes because of the large volume of the oocytes. Pooled results
from many oocytes displayed no significant difference in reversal
potential (Erev) among the various channel types
(Fig. 1B and Table I).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Li+ currents carried by LVA and
HVA channels. A, representative traces of the currents
carried by the L-type channel CaV1.2; the putative R-type
channel CaV2.3; and the three members of the T-type family,
CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and CaV3.3, with
Li+ as the charge carrier in divalent-free solutions. The
currents were elicited by 75-ms depolarizing pulses from a holding
potential of 80 mV, ranging up to +50 mV in 10-mV increments
(frequency of 0.6 Hz). Horizontal bar, 15 ms; vertical
bar, 0.5 µA. B, current-voltage plot for
Li+ currents in CaV1.2 ( ),
CaV2.3 ( ), CaV3.1( ), CaV3.2
( ), and CaV3.3 ( ). To make the comparison among
different channels easier, the currents were normalized as a percentage
of the maximal inward current. Each point is the mean ± S.E. of
the data obtained in at least six different oocytes.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Comparison of the Erev values obtained using Li+ as the
charge carrier and either a step or tail protocol
|
|
CaV3.2 and CaV1.2 Differ in Their
Permeability to Organic Cations--
To determine whether there is any
difference in the pore size of LVA and HVA Ca2+ channels,
we compared the relative permeabilities of L- and T-type channels to
organic cations (results with R-type channels are deferred to the end
of "Results"). Ammonium and its di-, tri-, and tetramethyl
substituents were chosen for two main reasons (49). First of all, given
their pKa values, all of these compounds are >95%
ionized at pH 7.4, allowing recordings at physiological pH without
complications due to pH-induced changes in the channel itself. Second
and more importantly, these compounds are expected to offer reliable
reagents to determine channel pore size because the progressive
addition of methyl groups produces a gradual increase in the size of
these molecules without introducing gross modifications in their
overall three-dimensional structure. For reference (49), the maximal
diameters and the volumes of these ions, respectively, are as follows:
NH
, 3.6 Å and 20.1 Å3;
methylammonium (MA), 3.8 Å and 35.1 Å3; dimethylammonium
(DMA), 4.6 Å and 49.7 Å3; trimethylammonium (TriMA), 6.0 Å and 64.2 Å3; and tetramethylammonium (TMA), 6.0 Å and
78.8 Å3. Interesting differences were found in
CaV1.2- and CaV3.2-expressing oocytes when
these ions were used as charge carriers for inward currents evoked by
depolarizing steps (Fig. 2).
NH
and MA clearly permeated through
both types of channels, but only CaV1.2-expressing oocytes
displayed clear inward DMA currents. This provided an initial clue that
channels supported by CaV3.2 and CaV1.2 differ
in their permeability.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Whole cell currents carried by ammonium and
its methyl-substituted derivatives in CaV1.2 and
CaV3.2. Representative traces of the whole cell
currents carried by NH , MA, DMA,
TriMA, and TMA as indicated in CaV3.2-expressing
(upper row) and CaV1.2-expressing (lower
row) oocytes are shown. The oocytes were held at 80 mV and
step-depolarized to the voltages indicated in 10-mV increments (75-ms
pulses, 0.6-Hz pulse frequency). In the case of CaV3.2, the
vertical bar indicates 2 µA for
NH and 1 µA for all of the other
cations, whereas in the case of CaV1.2, the amplitude of
the vertical bar is 1 µA in the
NH trace and 0.5 µA in all of the
other recordings. The time scale is set at 30 ms. Each set of traces
was obtained in a different oocyte and is representative of the
behavior of six different cells. To emphasize the monotonic decrease in
current size accompanying the increase in cation size, traces obtained
in oocytes with similar Li+ current are shown.
|
|
We looked more closely at the currents with TriMA and TMA as external
cations to develop a more quantitative picture of the cutoff sizes of
T- and L-type channels. The failure of these ions to support
significant inward currents during step depolarizations must be
cautiously interpreted because of the possibility that T- and L-type
channels are permeable to these cations, but not detectably so at
voltage levels sufficiently depolarized to activate the various
Ca2+ channels. As an indication that this was of concern
for CaV1.2, both TriMA and TMA supported clear inward
current tails after the depolarizing pulses upon
repolarization to
80 mV, where the driving force was larger (Fig. 2,
lower row). Accordingly, to improve the resolution of weak
permeabilities, we carried out additional experiments to look
systematically at inward current tails over a wide range of potentials.
This approach is illustrated in Fig. 3,
with tail currents recorded in the presence of 100 mM
Li+. Ca2+ channels were strongly activated by
application of a 5-ms depolarizing pulse to +70 mV, and then the inward
driving force was sharply increased by sudden repolarizations to a
range of voltage levels to generate inward tail currents through the
open channels. The large tail currents that resulted were outward at
repolarization levels at or positive to +10 mV, but increasingly
negative at levels at or below 0 mV. The values of reversal potential
determined with the tail protocol agreed with
Erev values obtained with step depolarizations
to within 2-3 mV (Table I). In no case were the differences
significant, validating the tail current procedure.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Tail currents carried by Li+ in
HVA and LVA channels. A, representative traces of tail
currents recorded in oocytes expressing the L-type channel
CaV1.2 or the T-type channels, CaV3.1,
CaV3.2, and CaV3.3, using Li+ as a
carrier ion and the voltage protocol depicted in the insets.
In particular, tail currents were elicited by increasing the membrane
potential from a holding potential of 80 mV to +70 mV for 5 ms to
maximally open the voltage-dependent calcium channels and
by stepping down the potential to values increasing from 30 to +30 mV
in repetitive episodes (10-mV increments, 50-ms pulse duration, 0.6-Hz
frequency). The horizontal bar is set at 15 ms, whereas the
vertical bar indicates 0.5 µA. B,
current-voltage plot derived from the data obtained in
CaV1.2 ( ), CaV3.1( ), CaV3.2
( ), and CaV3.3 ( ) using this tail protocol. To make
the comparison among different channel types easier, current
measurements were normalized to the value obtained when the potential
was stepped down to 20 mV. Each point represents the mean ± S.E. of the data obtained in at least five different oocytes.
|
|
Next, we proceeded to use the same tail current protocol to explore the
permeation of organic cations through the various voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, focusing first
on the CaV1.2 and CaV3.2 subunits. In oocytes
expressing either of these subunits, very large inward NH
currents and sizable MA and DMA currents were observed (Fig. 4 and Table
II). The contrasts became more dramatic
in considering even larger organic cations. In
CaV3.2-expressing oocytes, no inward tails were
detected with either external TriMA or TMA. In contrast, in
CaV1.2-expressing oocytes, TriMA carried small but
unmistakable inward currents that reversed around
30 mV, and TMA
supported extremely small tails negative to
60 mV (Fig. 4).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Tail currents carried by
NH and its methyl-substituted
derivatives in CaV1.2 and CaV3.2. A,
representative traces of tail currents carried by
NH , MA, DMA, TriMA, and TMA as
indicated in oocytes expressing the CaV3.2 LVA channels
(upper row) and the CaV1.2 HVA channels
(lower row). Tail currents were elicited by increasing the
membrane potential from a holding potential of 80 mV to +70 mV for 5 ms to maximally open the voltage-dependent calcium channels
and by stepping down the potential to values increasing from 30 to
+30 mV in repetitive episodes (10-mV increments, 0.6-Hz frequency).
B, current-voltage plots derived from the data
obtained in CaV3.2-expressing (left) and
CaV1.2-expressing (right) oocytes using this
tail protocol. The currents were normalized as the percentage of the
tail current recorded at 20 mV when each oocyte was switched to a 100 mM Li+ solution. Each point represents the
mean ± S.E. of the data obtained in at least five different
oocytes. The vertical bar indicates 2 µA in the case of
CaV3.2 and 0.5 µA in the case of
CaV1.2.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Erev and permeability ratios obtained in cloned HVA and LVA
channels using ammonium methyl-substituted organic cations as charge
carriers
The Erev and Pr
(versus Li+) values for NH , MA,
DMA, TriMA, and TMA in CaV1.2, CaV2.3, CaV3.1,
CaV3.2, and CaV3.3 are shown. Erev
values were determined by linear fitting using the current
determinations obtained with the tail protocol reported in Figs. 3-6.
Only three points comprising the closest to 0 nA and the ones
immediately before and immediately after were used to calculate the
fit. Permeability ratios (Pr) were calculated using
equation (1) and the experimental approach described in the legend to
Fig. 7. NP, not detectably permeant.
|
|
Measurements of reversal potential provided a more quantitative
assessment of the differences between channels. For
NH
, no significant difference was
observed in Erev between CaV1.2 and
CaV3.2 (Table II), suggesting that pore size was not
critical in allowing permeation of these small ions. In the
case of MA and DMA, Erev was ~20 mV more
negative for CaV3.2 than for CaV1.2. This
difference corresponds to a lower relative permeability of the T-type
channels for the intermediate-sized ions.
CaV3.1 and CaV3.3 Show Organic Cation
Permeability Similar to That of CaV3.2--
All of the
data reported in above point to the conclusion that the channel pore is
smaller in CaV3.2 than in CaV1.2. To establish whether a smaller pore size is a general feature of T-type channels, we
extended our studies to the two other members of the T-type channel
family, CaV3.1 and CaV3.3, using the tail
protocol to study their permeability to
NH
and its methyl-substituted
derivatives (Fig. 5). Despite clear
differences in the kinetic properties of tail currents carried by these
two channels, their permeability to organic cations was remarkably similar. Very large tails were observed when ammonium was the charge
carrier, and these currents reversed at approximately +20 mV, as in the
case of CaV3.2 and CaV1.2. Clear tails were
observed with MA and DMA, and, once again, the reversal potentials for these currents were remarkably similar to that observed in
CaV3.2-expressing oocytes, ranging at around
20 mV for MA
and
60 mV for DMA (Table II). No clear inward tails were observed
with TriMA and TMA as charge carriers. Indeed, with either of these
external cations, outward currents flowed through the channel at
potentials as negative as
80 mV. All of these data support the
conclusion that T-type channels constitute a homogeneous family with
regard to pore size, significantly different from L-type channels.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Tail currents carried by
NH and its methyl-substituted
derivatives in CaV3.1 and CaV3.3. A,
representative traces of tail currents carried by
NH , MA, DMA, TriMA, and TMA in oocytes
expressing CaV3.1 (upper row) or
CaV3.3 (lower row). Tail currents were elicited
using the protocol described in the legend to Fig. 4 and are depicted
in the insets. Each set of traces was obtained in a
different oocyte and is representative of the behavior of a group of at
least six different cells. The vertical bar is set at 1 µA
for CaV3.1 and at 0.5 µA for CaV3.3.
B, current-voltage plot derived from the data
obtained using this tail protocol in CaV3.1- and
CaV3.2-expressing oocytes for ammonium and each of the
cations of its methyl-substituted series. Using the same approach
described in the legend to Fig. 4, the currents were normalized to
Li+ currents measured at 20 mV. Each point represents the
mean ± S.E. of the data obtained in at least five different
oocytes.
|
|
Unusual Permeation Properties of CaV2.3--
As
mentioned in the Introduction, a large body of experimental evidence
suggests that CaV2.3-encoded channels may differ from the
other members of the HVA channel subfamily in displaying certain permeation properties typical of T-type channels. However, no information is available on the pore size of channels supported by
CaV2.3. To explore this, we used the same approach that
allowed us to establish a small pore size in T-type channels (Fig.
6). In CaV2.3-expressing
oocytes, large inward tail currents were observed when Li+
or NH
was present as the charge
carrier. The tail currents were smaller with external MA and DMA and
very small but clearly detectable with the larger cation TriMA. No inward tail currents whatsoever were observed with TMA as the external
cation. The reversal potential for Li+ and
NH
was not significantly different in
CaV2.3- and CaV1.2-expressing oocytes. By
contrast, MA, DMA, and TriMA currents reversed at significantly more
negative potentials in CaV2.3-expressing oocytes than in
CaV1.2-expressing oocytes. Thus, there were quantitative
differences in permeation properties between channels supported by
CaV2.3 and the best studied exemplar of the HVA
subfamily.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Tail currents carried by
NH and its methyl-substituted
derivatives in CaV2.3. A, tail currents carried
in CaV2.3 subunit-expressing oocytes by Li+,
NH , and its methyl-substituted
derivatives MA, DMA, TriMA, and TMA. Each set of traces was obtained in
a different oocyte and is representative of the behavior of a group of
at least five different oocytes. The vertical bar is set at
1 µA, and the time scale is set at 15 ms. Tail currents were elicited
using the same protocol described in the legend to Fig. 4.
B, current-voltage plot obtained by normalizing the
current to Li+ current measured in the same oocyte at 20
mV as described in the legend to Fig. 4. Each point represents the
mean ± S.E. of the data obtained in at least five different
oocytes. C, the same current-voltage data as in
B on an expanded scale.
|
|
Quantitative Comparison of Permeabilities of the Various
CaV Subunits--
To quantify and summarize differences in
the pore size of various voltage-dependent Ca2+
channels, we used the reversal potential measurements to calculate relative permeability ratios for each of the organic cations using the
reversal potentials obtained in the presence of Li+ as a
reference (see "Materials and Methods"). The implicit presumption here is that whichever cation is present in the extracellular bath, the
composition of relevant charge carriers in the intracellular compartment is similar and constant, a very reasonable assumption because the volume of the oocytes is so large. Using the data shown in
Figs. 3-6 and Table II, we calculated the permeability ratios for all
of the cations of the NH
methyl-substituted series for each of the
1 subunits and
plotted the values against the estimated cation mean diameter (Fig.
7).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Dependence of the permeability ratio on
cation volume. Shown are the permeability ratios of
NH , MA, DMA, TriMA, and TMA
versus Li+ in CaV1.2 ( ),
CaV2.3 ( ), CaV3.1 ( ), CaV3.2
( ), and CaV3.3 ( ) plotted as a function of the cation
mean diameter. Mean cation diameters were derived from the cation
volumes reported by Sun et al. (47). Oocytes were bathed
with the test cation, and tail currents were obtained; then, the
oocytes were washed with Li+ for 2 min, and another tail
protocol was run. Permeability ratios (Pr) were
calculated using Erev values and the following
equation (35): Px/PLi = ([Li]/[x])exp((Ex ELi)F/RT)), where [Li]
and [x] indicate the concentrations of Li+ and the test
cation, respectively; F is the Faraday constant;
R is the gas constant; T is the absolute
temperature; and Ex and ELi
are the reversal potentials of the test cation and Li+,
respectively. Data points were fitted using the equation
Pr = k(1 a/d)2/a for
a < d as in Dwyer et al.
(31), where d is the inferred minimal pore
diameter and a is the cation diameter. The following values
have obtained for d and k: CaV1.2,
k = 30.1971 and d = 6.1638, CaV2.3,
k = 35.00 and d = 5.3497;
CaV3.1, k = 42.4877 and d = 5.0752; CaV3.2, k = 42.00 and
d = 5.1028; and CaV3.3, k = 48.00 and d = 5.0512. §, p < 0.05 versus CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and
CaV2.3; *, p < 0.05 versus
CaV3.1, CaV3.2, CaV3.3, and
CaV2.3; #, p < 0.05 versus
CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and CaV3.3; ,
p < 0.05 versus CaV2.3.
|
|
There is close agreement between the permeability characteristics of
each of the three T-type channel subunits. Using a conventional theoretical analysis (Fig. 7 legend), the cutoff diameters were 5.08 Å for CaV3.1, 5.10 Å for CaV3.2, and
5.05 Å for CaV3.3. Their consistent behavior stands in
clear contrast to that of CaV1.2, as assessed by clear
differences in the relative permeability to individual permeant ion
species (MA or DMA) or by differences in the cutoff size: the estimated
cutoff diameter for CaV1.2 was 6.16 A. The plot of relative
permeability also shows that CaV2.3 occupies an
intermediate position between L- and T-type channels, inasmuch as the
relative permeability to DMA, TriMA, and TMA is larger in
CaV2.3 than in T-type channels, but smaller than in L-type
channels. Although the data for CaV2.3 are not readily fitted by the same theoretical function as used for the other channel
types, the intermediate nature of the behavior is clear.
 |
DISCUSSION |
T-type Channels Differ from L-type Channels in Pore Size--
This
study demonstrates a striking heterogeneity between various subfamilies
of voltage-gated Ca2+ channel with respect to their minimal
pore size, estimated by passage of large organic cations in the absence
of external Ca2+. Within the T-type channel subfamily, each
of the pore-forming subunits (CaV3.1, CaV3.2,
and CaV3.3) showed the same orderly behavior, a
monotonically negative relationship between the size of organic cations
and their relative permeability. The effective diameter of the
permeation pathways of CaV3.1, CaV3.2, and
CaV3.3 was estimated as 5.1 Å based on the ability of
these subunits to support the permeation of DMA, but not TriMA. This
stands in contrast with 6.2 Å, the estimated minimal pore size of
CaV1.2, an L-type channel subunit originally derived from
cardiac muscle. The very small amplitude of the currents carried by
CaV1.2 when expressed without any accessory subunit
precluded the analysis of the pore size of
CaV1.2 in isolation, but our results for CaV1.2 coexpressed in oocytes with the
1b and
2
1a accessory subunits are in good
agreement with earlier estimates for L-type channels in situ
both in cardiac myocytes (CaV1.2 in a native environment) (50) and in skeletal muscle fibers (CaV1.1) (35, 36). Thus, although the properties within each of the subfamilies appear homogeneous, T- and L-type channel classes show consistent differences in pore dimensions.
It was unexpected to find that T-type channels are smaller in their
minimal pore than L-type channels, given the known properties of T-type
channels: they do not show strong selectivity for Ca2+
relative to Ba2+; their selectivity for divalent cations
over monovalent cations is weaker than for HVA channels; and their
selectivity filter includes two aspartate residues, whose side chains
are less bulky than the corresponding glutamates in HVA channels. If
anything, these features would lead to the hypothesis that T-type
channels possess larger diameter pores than L-type channels. Likewise, the logical expectation for R-type channels was that their pore diameter would be larger than that of other HVA channels
(because they show little discrimination among divalent cations) or at least equal in size (because CaV2.3 is highly homologous to
other HVA
1 subunits). Once again, our observations of a
smaller cutoff size for organic cation permeation through R-type
channels ran counter to what might have been expected a
priori, although they do reinforce previous evidence that R-type
channels differ significantly from other HVA channels in their
selectivity properties but share some characteristics of T-type
channels (39).
Possible Determinants of Pore Size--
We have considered various
explanations for the differences in pore size (see also Ref. 27). One
possibility is that the minimal pore diameter is dependent on residues
at the EEDD locus itself. This would follow the precedent
of the selectivity filter of sodium channels, where alterations of
individual amino acid side chains of the DEKA locus have a strong
influence on pore size (49). At the EEEE locus of L-type calcium
channels (51), like the DEKA locus of sodium channels (52-54), side
chains protrude into the lumen of the pore. In the absence of divalent
cations, negatively charged carboxylate groups would separate from each other because of electrostatic repulsion, possibly finding favorable interactions with other structural components in the lining of the
pore. Because aspartate side chains are one methylene group shorter
than glutamate side chains, it is conceivable that the aspartates might
be less favorably stabilized in a configuration that allows passage
of large organic cations.
A second possibility is that the minimal pore diameter might be
determined by residues neighboring those at the EEEE or EEDD locus in
each repeat (termed "position 0"). Based on analysis of
CaV1.2, side chains at position
1 also appear to project
into the pore lumen (51) and clearly participate in controlling
permeation (55). If this is the case for the T-type channels, one may
consider the involvement of a conserved lysine at position
1 in
domain III. Once again, the Na+ channel provides precedent
for narrowing of a pore by a protruding lysine side chain (49). This
hypothesis is worth considering for CaV3.1,
CaV3.2, and CaV3.3, but it would not provide an
explanation for CaV2.3, in which the corresponding position
is occupied by a glycine, hardly a bulky residue (41, 56). Outside of
the P-loops, one may consider other regions of the channel that help shape the permeation pathway, including the boundary between the P-loops and S6 (57) and the S6 segment itself (58, 59).
A third alternative is that the smaller minimal diameter of
T-type channels arises from a different tertiary structure, possibly reflecting an adaptation in the rest of the channel to compensate for
the difference between an EEDD locus and an EEEE locus. The size of the
ion-binding pocket is critical in determining the Ca2+
selectivity of organic chelators and Ca2+-binding proteins
(60). To maintain a similar configuration of carboxylate oxygen groups
in T- and L-type channels and similar Ca2+-coordinating
capabilities, the smaller chain lengths of the aspartates may have
required a narrower spacing between the opposing pore walls. If this
were the case, it would not be a coincidence that the ~1.2-Å
difference in chain length between glutamate and aspartate agrees
closely with the difference in pore diameters. Although this line of
thinking is both simplistic and speculative, it illustrates how
differences in pore size might have physiological significance for
divalent cation selectivity in various types of Ca2+ channel.
Structural Clues Set Limits on Possible Models of Ca2+
Channel Permeation--
Our results establish that a relatively large
pore size is a general feature of voltage-gated Ca2+
channels. Even including the T-type subfamily, the estimated minimal
diameter of any of the Ca2+ channels is still much greater
than the 1.99-Å diameter of the dehydrated Ca2+ ion. It is
notable that this holds for T-type channels as well as L-type channels
(35, 36, 50) because T-type Ca2+ channels, like HVA
channels, are highly selective for their ion of choice under
physiological conditions. Taken together, these findings are relevant
to current efforts at approaching Ca2+ channel permeation
with experiments (55, 61, 62) and theoretical calculations
(63-67).
In the absence of crystal structures or any other direct structural
information about Ca2+ channel pores, it is natural to ask
whether Ca2+ selectivity and permeation could be explained
by analogy to current thinking about K+ channels using, as
a springboard, the elegant molecular structure of the bacterial KcsA
K+ channel (68). That structure has directly supported
earlier hypotheses that selectivity for K+ ions is
generated by a narrow passageway lined with oxygen groups acting as
ligands for the dehydrated ion (30, 69, 70). Turning back to
Ca2+ channels, the minimal diameter of the pore is much too
large to allow a snug fit with a completely dehydrated Ca2+
ion, even in the case of T-type channels. This precludes a strict extrapolation from K+ and KcsA channels to Ca2+
and Ca2+ channels. In considering how a rigid cage and a
snug fit might hold for Ca2+ channels, McCleskey and Almers
(35) suggested that the discrepancy between the minimal pore diameter
of an L-type channel and the diameter of an unhydrated Ca2+
ion might be made up by a closely associated water molecule. This
hypothesis was reminiscent of classical proposals that Na+
ions pass through the sodium channel selectivity filter along with a
single H2O (17, 29, 49) and still remains worthy of
consideration for L-type channels. However, the same combination of
Ca2+ ion + water molecule would exceed the narrower minimal
aperture of T-type channels. As an alternative to such scenarios, we
suggest that, across the spectrum of Ca2+ channels,
Ca2+ permeation can be accommodated within the prevailing
model for L-type channels (21). A generalized model might
propose the following: 1) that the ion permeation pathway in all
Ca2+ channels is generally much wider than the minimal pore
diameter; 2) that acidic side chains, be they glutamates or aspartates, protrude into the pore and provide a flexible complex to closely coordinate one or more Ca2+ ions when these are present;
and 3) that, in the absence of permeant divalent ions, the acidic side
chains swing partly out of the way, allowing passage of large organic
monovalent cations to varying degrees.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
M. C. expresses gratitude to N. Yang, Y. Cao, and E. Piedras-Rentería for advice and helpful discussions
and to M. Donato for continuous moral support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants NS24067 (to R. W. T.) and NS38691 (to E. P.-R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by fellowship grants from NATO-Consiglio Nazionale delle
Ricerche and the Leonardo di Capua Foundation. Present address: Unit of
Pharmacology, Dept. of Neuroscience, Federico II University of Naples,
via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Beckman Center, Rm. B105, Stanford, CA 94305-5345. Tel.: 650-725-7557; Fax: 650-725-2504; E-mail: rwtsien@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M203922200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HVA, high
voltage-activated;
LVA, low voltage-activated;
HEDTA, N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetic acid;
Erev, reversal potential;
MA, methylammonium;
DMA, dimethylammonium;
TriMA, trimethylammonium;
TMA, tetramethylammonium.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Tsien, R. W.,
Clozel, J. P.,
and Nargeot, J.
(1996)
Low Voltage-activated T-type Calcium Channels
, Adis International Ltd., Tottenhall, United Kingdom
|
| 2.
|
Huguenard, J. R.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
58,
329-348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Akaike, N.,
Kostyuk, P. G.,
and Osipchuk, Y. V.
(1989)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
412,
181-195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Armstrong, C. M.,
and Matteson, D. R.
(1985)
Science
227,
65-67[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Bean, B. P.
(1985)
J. Gen. Physiol.
86,
1-30[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Bossu, J. L.,
Feltz, A.,
and Thomann, J. M.
(1985)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
403,
360-368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Carbone, E.,
and Lux, H. D.
(1984)
Nature
310,
501-502[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Carbone, E.,
and Lux, H. D.
(1987)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
386,
571-601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Carbone, E.,
and Lux, H. D.
(1987)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
386,
547-570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Fox, A. P.,
Nowycky, M. C.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1987)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
394,
173-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Kostyuk, P. G.,
Shuba Ya, M.,
and Savchenko, A. N.
(1988)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
411,
661-669[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Loirand, G.,
Pacaud, P.,
Mironneau, C.,
and Mironneau, J.
(1986)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
407,
566-568[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Mitra, R.,
and Morad, M.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5340-5344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Nilius, B.,
Hess, P.,
Lansman, J. B.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1985)
Nature
316,
443-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Nowycky, M. C.,
Fox, A. P.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1985)
Nature
316,
440-443[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Tsien, R. W.,
Lipscombe, D.,
Madison, D. V.,
Bley, K. R.,
and Fox, A. P.
(1988)
Trends Neurosci.
11,
431-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Hille, B.
(1992)
Ionic Channels of Excitable Membranes
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 83-114, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
|
| 18.
|
Perez-Reyes, E.,
Cribbs, L. L.,
Daud, A.,
Lacerda, A. E.,
Barclay, J.,
Williamson, M. P.,
Fox, M.,
Rees, M.,
and Lee, J. H.
(1998)
Nature
391,
896-900[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Cribbs, L. L.,
Lee, J. H.,
Yang, J.,
Satin, J.,
Zhang, Y.,
Daud, A.,
Barclay, J.,
Williamson, M. P.,
Fox, M.,
Rees, M.,
and Perez-Reyes, E.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
103-109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Lee, J. H.,
Daud, A. N.,
Cribbs, L. L.,
Lacerda, A. E.,
Pereverzev, A.,
Klockner, U.,
Schneider, T.,
and Perez-Reyes, E.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
1912-1921[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Sather, W. A.,
Yang, J.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
4,
313-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Varadi, G.,
Strobeck, M.,
Koch, S.,
Caglioti, L.,
Zucchi, C.,
and Palyi, G.
(1999)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
34,
181-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Perez-Reyes, E.
(1999)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
56,
660-669[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
McCleskey, E. W.
(1999)
J. Gen. Physiol.
113,
765-772[Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Nonner, W.,
Chen, D. P.,
and Eisenberg, B.
(1999)
J. Gen. Physiol.
113,
773-782[Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Miller, C.
(1999)
J. Gen. Physiol.
113,
783-787[Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Talavera, K.,
Staes, M.,
Janssens, A.,
Klugbauer, N.,
Droogmans, G.,
Hofmann, F.,
and Nilius, B.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
45628-45635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Yang, N.,
Perez-Reyes, E.,
Aldrich, R. W.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
76, (suppl.),
A259 (abstr.)
|
| 29.
|
Hille, B.
(1971)
J. Gen. Physiol.
58,
599-619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Hille, B.
(1973)
J. Gen. Physiol.
61,
669-686[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Dwyer, T. M.,
Adams, D. J.,
and Hille, B.
(1980)
J. Gen. Physiol.
75,
469-492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Vyklicky, L.,
Krusek, J.,
and Edwards, C.
(1988)
Neurosci. Lett.
89,
313-318[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Zarei, M. M.,
and Dani, J. A.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
1446-1454[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Goulding, E. H.,
Tibbs, G. R.,
Liu, D.,
and Siegelbaum, S. A.
(1993)
Nature
364,
61-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
McCleskey, E. W.,
and Almers, W.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
7149-7153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Coronado, R.,
and Smith, J. S.
(1987)
Biophys. J.
51,
497-502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Fukushima, Y.,
and Hagiwara, S.
(1985)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
358,
255-284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Piedras-Renteria, E. S.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7760-7765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Bourinet, E.,
Zamponi, G. W.,
Stea, A.,
Soong, T. W.,
Lewis, B. A.,
Jones, L. P.,
Yue, D. T.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
4983-4993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Tottene, A.,
Volsen, S.,
and Pietrobon, D.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
171-178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Schneider, T.,
Wei, X.,
Olcese, R.,
Costantin, J. L.,
Neely, A.,
Palade, P.,
Perez-Reyes, E.,
Qin, N.,
Zhou, J.,
Crawford, G. D.,
Smith, R. G.,
Appel, S. H.,
Stefani, E.,
and Birnbaumer, L.
(1994)
Recept. Channels
2,
255-270[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Mikami, A.,
Imoto, K.,
Tanabe, T.,
Niidome, T.,
Mori, Y.,
Takeshima, H.,
Narumiya, S.,
and Numa, S.
(1989)
Nature
340,
230-233[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Ruth, P.,
Roehrkasten, A.,
Biel, M.,
Bosse, E.,
Regulla, S.,
Meyer, H. E.,
Flockerzi, V.,
and Hofmann, F.
(1989)
Science
245,
1115-1118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Castellano, A.,
Wei, X.,
Birnbaumer, L.,
and Perez-Reyes, E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
12359-12366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Cougnon, M.,
Bouyer, P.,
Hulin, P.,
Anagnostopoulos, T.,
and Planelles, G.
(1996)
Pfluegers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.
431,
658-667[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Hess, P.,
Lansman, J. B.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1986)
J. Gen. Physiol.
88,
293-319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Ellinor, P. T.,
Yang, J.,
Sather, W. A.,
Zhang, J. F.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1995)
Neuron
15,
1121-1132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Dascal, N.
(1987)
CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
22,
317-387[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Sun, Y. M.,
Favre, I.,
Schild, L.,
and Moczydlowski, E.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
110,
693-715[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Rosenberg, R. L.,
McCleskey, E. W.,
Hess, P.,
and Tsien, R. W.
(1988)
Curr. Top. Membr. Transp.
33,
393-413
|
| 51.
|
Wu, X. S.,
Edwards, H. D.,
and Sather, W. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
31778-31785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Perez-Garcia, M. T.,
Ranjan, R.,
Marban, E.,
and Tomaselli, G. F.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
1037-1047[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Tsushima, R. G., Li, R. A.,
and Backx, P. H.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
109,
463-475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Perez-Garcia, M. T.,
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Marban, E.,
and Tomaselli, G. F.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
300-304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Williamson, A. V.,
and Sather, W. A.
(1999)
Biophys. J.
77,
2575-2589[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Soong, T. W.,
Stea, A.,
Hodson, C. D.,
Dubel, S. J.,
Vincent, S. R.,
and Snutch, T. P.
(1993)
Science
260,
1133-1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Li, R. A.,
Velez, P.,
Chiamvimonvat, N.,
Tomaselli, G. F.,
and Marban, E.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
115,
81-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Durell, S. R.,
and Guy, H. R.
(1996)
Neuropharmacology
35,
761-773[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Lipkind, G. M.,
and Fozzard, H. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
8161-8170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Falke, J. J.,
Drake, S. K.,
Hazard, A. L.,
and Peersen, O. B.
(1994)
Q. Rev. Biophys.
27,
219-290[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Cibulsky, S. M.,
and Sather, W. A.
(2000)
J. Gen. Physiol.
116,
349-362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Cloues, R. K.,
and Sather, W. A.
(2000)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
524,
19-36 |