|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200250200 on September 18, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 48, 45984-45991, November 29, 2002
Gemfibrozil, a Lipid-lowering Drug, Inhibits the Induction of
Nitric-oxide Synthase in Human Astrocytes*
Kalipada
Pahan §,
Malabendu
Jana ,
Xiaojuan
Liu ,
Bradley S.
Taylor¶,
Charles
Wood , and
Susan M.
Fischer**
From the Department of Oral Biology, University of
Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583, the ¶ Department
of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, the School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska,
Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, and the ** University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Institute, Smithville, Texas 78957
Received for publication, January 9, 2002, and in revised form, September 4, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Gemfibrozil, a lipid-lowering drug,
inhibited cytokine-induced production of NO and the expression of
inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) in human U373MG astroglial cells
and primary astrocytes. Similar to gemfibrozil, clofibrate, another
fibrate drug, also inhibited the expression of iNOS. Inhibition of
human iNOS promoter-driven luciferase activity by gemfibrozil in
cytokine-stimulated U373MG astroglial cells suggests that this compound
inhibits the transcription of iNOS. Since gemfibrozil is known to
activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR- ), we
investigated the role of PPAR- in gemfibrozil-mediated inhibition of
iNOS. Gemfibrozil induced peroxisome proliferator-responsive element
(PPRE)-dependent luciferase activity, which was inhibited by the expression of hPPAR- , the dominant-negative mutant of human PPAR- . However, hPPAR- was unable to abrogate
gemfibrozil-mediated inhibition of iNOS suggesting that gemfibrozil
inhibits iNOS independent of PPAR- . The human iNOS promoter contains
consensus sequences for the binding of transcription factors, including
interferon- (IFN- ) regulatory factor-1 (IRF-1) binding to
interferon-stimulated responsive element (ISRE), signal transducer and
activator of transcription (STAT) binding to -activation site (GAS),
nuclear factor- B (NF- B), activator protein-1 (AP-1), and
CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP ); therefore, we
investigated the effect of gemfibrozil on the activation of these
transcription factors. The combination of interleukin (IL)-1 and
IFN- induced the activation of NF- B, AP-1, C/EBP , and GAS but
not that of ISRE, suggesting that IRF-1 may not be involved in
cytokine-induced expression of iNOS in human astrocytes. Interestingly,
gemfibrozil strongly inhibited the activation of NF- B, AP-1, and
C/EBP but not that of GAS in cytokine-stimulated astroglial cells.
These results suggest that gemfibrozil inhibits the induction of iNOS
probably by inhibiting the activation of NF- B, AP-1, and C/EBP
and that gemfibrozil, a prescribed drug for humans, may further find
its therapeutic use in neuroinflammatory diseases.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
It is now increasingly clear that glial cells (astrocytes and
microglia) in the central nervous system
(CNS)1 induce the expression
of inducible nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS) and the production of NO in
response to proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1
(IL-1 ), tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- ), and
interferon- (IFN- ) (1-4). Although the NO produced by iNOS has
bactericidal and tumoricidal properties, it also plays an important
role in pathophysiologies of inflammatory neurological diseases
including demyelinating disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis, experimental allergic encephalopathy), neurodegenerative disorder like
Alzheimer's disease, and in ischemic and traumatic brain injuries
associated with the activation of glial cells and the production of
proinflammatory cytokines (5-8). NO derived from activated glial cells
is assumed to contribute to oligodendrocyte degeneration in
demyelinating diseases and neuronal death during ischemia and trauma
(5, 6). Therefore, characterization of intracellular pathways required
to transduce the signal from the cell surface to the nucleus for the
induction of iNOS is an active area of investigation, since compounds
capable of antagonizing signaling steps for the induction of iNOS may
have therapeutic effect in NO-mediated pathophysiological conditions.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), members of the
nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, have been implicated in a variety
of human diseases (9). Three isotypes have been described to date,
PPAR- , PPAR- , and PPAR- (9). Activation of PPAR- mainly
leads to the induction of a variety of genes such as those coding for
the enzymes for - and -oxidation of fatty acids (10).
Gemfibrozil, an activator of PPAR- , has been often prescribed in
patients to lower the level of triglycerides (11, 12). This drug
decreases the risk of coronary heart disease by increasing the level of
high density lipoprotein cholesterol and decreasing the level of
low density lipoprotein cholesterol (11, 12). Activation of PPAR- is
also capable of modifying the stress response by activation of heat
shock factor 1 (HSF-1) and induction of HSP70 (13, 14). Recently it has
been shown that activation of HSP70 inhibits the expression of iNOS in
astrocytes (15), suggesting that the expression of iNOS may also be
regulated by activators of PPAR- . Therefore, we investigated the
effect of gemfibrozil on the expression of iNOS in cytokine-stimulated human U373MG astroglial cells and primary astrocytes. In the current work, we present evidence that gemfibrozil markedly inhibited the
expression of iNOS and the production of NO in human astrocytes independent of PPAR- . In addition, reporter gene assays reveal that
gemfibrozil specifically inhibited cytokine-induced activation of
NF- B, AP-1, and C/EBP but not that of GAS. These results raise
the possibility that gemfibrozil, a common lipid-lowering drug, may be
of therapeutic value in human neuroinflammatory diseases.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents--
Fetal bovine serum and DMEM/F-12 were from
Invitrogen. Human recombinant IFN- , IL-1 , and TNF- were
purchased from R & D Systems.
L-NG-Monomethylarginine (L-NMA) and
D-NG-monomethylarginine (D-NMA)
were obtained from Biomol. Gemfibrozil and clofibrate were obtained
from Sigma. Antibodies against human macrophage iNOS were obtained from
Calbiochem. 125I-Labeled protein A and
[ -32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Peroxisome proliferator-responsive element
(PPRE)-dependent reporter construct (tk-PPREx3-Luc) and
dominant-negative mutant of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein ( C/EBP ) were kindly provided by Dr. Ronald M. Evans of The Salk
Institute and Dr. Steve Smale of the University of California at Los
Angeles, respectively.
Preparation of Human Astrocytes--
Human CNS tissue was
obtained from the Human Embryology Laboratory, University of
Washington, Seattle. The CNS tissue from each specimen was processed
separately and independently, as were subsequent cell cultures; there
was no pooling of CNS tissue from distinct specimens. All the
experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional
Review Board (IRB number 224-01-FB) of the University of Nebraska
Medical Center. These cells were grown in a serum-free, defined medium
(B16) enriched with 5 ng of basic fibroblast growth factor per ml for
optimal growth of astrocytes and for the suppression of fibroblast
growth (16). By immunofluorescence assay, these cultures homogeneously
expressed glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Cells were
trypsinized, subcultured, and stimulated with cytokines in serum-free
DMEM/F-12 medium to induce the production of NO. The human U373MG
astrocytoma cell line, purchased from the American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC), was also maintained and stimulated under similar conditions.
Assay for NO Synthesis--
Synthesis of NO was determined by
assay of culture supernatant for nitrite, a stable reaction product of
NO with molecular oxygen, using Griess reagent (1-4). Briefly, 400 µl of culture supernatant was allowed to react with 200 µl of
Griess reagent and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The
optical density of the assay samples was measured
spectrophotometrically at 570 nm. Fresh culture medium served as the
blank in all experiments. Nitrite concentrations were calculated from a
standard curve derived from the reaction of NaNO2 in the
assay. Protein was measured by the procedure of Bradford (17).
Immunoblot Analysis for iNOS--
Immunoblot analysis for iNOS
was carried out as described earlier (2-4). Briefly, cells were
detached by scraping, washed with Hanks' buffer, and homogenized in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing protease inhibitors (1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml
aprotinin, 5 µg/ml antipain, 5 µg/ml pepstatin A, and 5 µg/ml
leupeptin). After electrophoresis the proteins were transferred onto a
nitrocellulose membrane, and the iNOS band was visualized by
immunoblotting with antibodies against human iNOS and
125I-labeled protein A (2-4).
RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis--
Cells were taken
out of the culture dishes directly by adding Ultraspec-II RNA reagent
(Biotecx Laboratories, Inc.), and total RNA was isolated using
Ultraspec-II RNA reagent (Biotecx Laboratories Inc.) according to the
manufacturer's protocol. For Northern blot analyses, 20 µg of total
RNA was electrophoresed on 1.2% denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gels,
electrotransferred to Hybond-Nylon Membrane (Amersham
Biosciences) and hybridized at 68 °C with
32P-labeled cDNA probe using Express Hyb hybridization
solution (Clontech) as described by the
manufacturer. The cDNA probe was made by polymerase chain reaction
amplification using two primers (forward primer, 5'-CTC CTT CAA AGA GGC
AAA AAT A-3'; reverse primer, 5'-CAC TTC CTC CAG GAT GTT GT-3') (2-4,
18). After hybridization filters were washed two or three times in
solution I (2× SSC, 0.05% SDS) for 1 h at room temperature
followed by solution II (0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS) at 50 °C for another
hour. The membranes were then dried and exposed to x-ray films (Eastman Kodak Co.). The same amount of RNA was hybridized with probe for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH).
Assay of iNOS Promoter-driven Reporter
Activity--
Construction of phiNOS(7.2)Luc, the 7.2-kb human iNOS
promoter-luciferase construct, has been described previously (19). Cells plated at 50-60% confluence in six-well plates were
cotransfected with 1 µg of phiNOS(7.2)Luc and 50 ng of pRL-TK (a
plasmid encoding Renilla luciferase, used as transfection efficiency
control; Promega) by LipofectAMINE Plus (Invitrogen) following
manufacturer's protocol (3, 4). Twenty-four h after transfection,
cells were treated with different stimuli for 12 h. Firefly and
Renilla luciferase activities were obtained by analyzing total cell
extract according to standard instructions provided in the Dual
Luciferase Kit (Promega) in a TD-20/20 Luminometer (Turner Designs).
Relative luciferase activity of cell extracts was typically represented
as the ratio of firefly luciferase value/Renilla luciferase value × 10 3.
Assay of Transcriptional Activities of Different Proinflammatory
Transcription Factors--
Cells plated at 50-60% confluence in
six-well plates were cotransfected with 1 µg of either pNF- B-Luc
(NF- B-dependent reporter construct), pAP-1-Luc
(AP-1-dependent reporter construct), pC/EBP -Luc (C/EBP -dependent reporter construct), pGAS-Luc
(GAS-dependent reporter construct), or pISRE-Luc
(ISRE-dependent reporter construct) and 50 ng of pRL-TK
using LipofectAMINE Plus. Construction of pC/EBP -Luc has been
described earlier (4). This C/EBP -sensitive promoter contains four
consensus C/EBP -binding sites. Other reporter constructs
(pNF- B-Luc, pAP-1-Luc, pGAS-Luc, and pISRE-Luc) were obtained from
Stratagene. After 24 h of transfection, cells were treated with
different stimuli for 6 h. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were obtained as described above.
Statistics--
Statistical comparisons were made using one-way
analysis of variance followed by Student's t test.
 |
RESULTS |
Gemfibrozil Inhibits the Expression of iNOS in Cytokine-stimulated
Human U373MG Astroglial Cells--
Cells were cultured in serum-free
media in the presence of IL-1 and IFN- . It is evident from
Table I that IL-1 and IFN- alone
were poor inducers of NO production. However, marked induction of NO
production was observed by the combination of IL-1 and IFN- . This
combination of cytokines was used to induce the production of NO in
subsequent studies. The inhibition of cytokine-induced production of NO
by arginase (an enzyme that degrades the substrate, L-arginine, of NOS) and L-NMA (a competitive
inhibitor of NOS) but not by D-NMA (a negative control of
L-NMA) suggests that the combination of IL-1 and IFN-
induces the production of NO in U373MG astroglial cells through
NOS-mediated arginine metabolism (Table I). Next we examined the effect
of gemfibrozil, an activator of PPAR- (20), on the cytokine-induced
nitrite production in U373MG glial cells. Gemfibrozil itself was
neither stimulatory nor much inhibitory to NO production in control
cells. However, gemfibrozil, when added 2 h before the addition of
cytokines, markedly inhibited cytokine-induced production of NO (Table
I).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Induction of NO production in human U373MG astroglial cells
U373MG glial cells preincubated in serum-free DMEM/F-12 for 1 h
with arginase, L-NMA or D-NMA received the
combination of IL-1 and IFN- . After 24 h of incubation,
nitrite concentrations in the supernatants were measured as described
under "Materials and Methods." Data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three different experiments. The concentrations of different
compounds were as follows: IL-1 , 10 ng/ml; IFN- , 10 units/ml;
arginase, 100 units/ml; L-NMA, 0.1 mM;
D-NMA, 0.1 mM; gemfibrozil, 200 µM.
|
|
To determine whether inhibition of cytokine-induced NO production by
gemfibrozil was simply due to delayed induction, we measured NO
concentrations in cytokine-stimulated cultures maintained up to 48 h. When cells were stimulated in the absence of gemfibrozil, NO was
detected in culture supernatants after 8 h and increased progressively thereafter for 48 h, the duration of the experiment (Fig. 1). However, when 200 µM gemfibrozil was added 2 h before the addition of
the combination of IL-1 and IFN- , production of NO was
significantly inhibited (Fig. 1). In our studies, maximal suppression
of NO production was observed when gemfibrozil was added 2 h
before the addition of cytokines (data not shown). When gemfibrozil was
added after the addition of cytokines, the extent of inhibition
progressively decreased (data not shown). It is evident from Fig.
2A that gemfibrozil
dose-dependently inhibited cytokine-induced production of
NO. Although at 50 µM concentration, gemfibrozil was not
a potent inhibitor of cytokine-induced NO production, it inhibited the
induction of NO production by more than 80% at 200 µM
concentration. To understand the mechanism of inhibition, we examined
the effect of gemfibrozil on protein and mRNA level of iNOS in
cytokine-stimulated cells. Consistent with the effect of gemfibrozil on
cytokine-induced production of NO, gemfibrozil
dose-dependently inhibited cytokine-induced expression of
iNOS protein (Fig. 2B) and mRNA (Fig.
2C).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Time course of cytokine-induced NO production
and its suppression by gemfibrozil in human U373MG astroglial
cells. Cells preincubated with 200 µM gemfibrozil
for 2 h in serum-free DMEM/F-12 received the combination of
IL-1 (10 ng/ml) and IFN- (10 units/ml). At different hours of
stimulation, the concentration of nitrite was measured in supernatants
using the "Griess reagent" as described under "Materials and
Methods." Data are expressed as the mean of two separate
experiments.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Gemfibrozil dose-dependently
inhibits the expression of iNOS in cytokine-stimulated human U373MG
astroglial cells. Cells preincubated with different concentrations
of gemfibrozil for 2 h in serum-free DMEM/F-12 received the
combination of IL-1 (10 ng/ml) and IFN- (10 units/ml).
A, after 24 h of stimulation, the concentration of
nitrite was measured in the supernatants. Data are mean ± S.D. of
three different experiments. a,
p < 0.001 versus
control; b, p < 0.005 versus
IL-1 +IFN- ; c, p < 0.001 versus IL-1 +IFN- . B, cell homogenates were
immunoblotted with antibodies against mouse macrophage iNOS as
described under "Materials and Methods." C, after 6 h of stimulation, total RNA was isolated, and Northern blot analysis
for iNOS mRNA was carried out as described under "Materials and
Methods."
|
|
Next we investigated the possibility whether gemfibrozil inhibited
cytokine-induced expression of iNOS mRNA by decreasing the
stability of iNOS mRNA. Human U373MG astroglial cells were stimulated with the combination of IL-1 and IFN- under serum-free condition. After 6 h of stimulation, cells were treated with
actinomycin D (an inhibitor of RNA synthesis) in the presence or
absence of 200 µM of gemfibrozil. At different h of
treatment with actinomycin D, the level of iNOS mRNA was analyzed
by Northern blot. It is apparent from figure
3, A and B, that
the relative rate of degradation of iNOS mRNA (iNOS/GAPDH) in the
presence or absence of gemfibrozil at different time periods remained
almost same suggesting that gemfibrozil-mediated inhibition of iNOS
mRNA is not due to any alteration of the stability of iNOS
mRNA.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of gemfibrozil on the stability of
iNOS mRNA in human U373MG astroglial cells. Cells were
stimulated with the combination of IL-1 (10 ng/ml) and IFN- (10 units/ml) under serum-free condition. After 6 h of stimulation by
cytokines, cells were treated with 3 µg/ml actinomycin D in
the presence or absence of gemfibrozil, and cells were analyzed for
iNOS RNA by Northern blot (A) at different hours of
treatment. B, the relative level of iNOS mRNA
(iNOS/GAPDH) at different hours of treatment was determined after
densitometric scanning of iNOS and GAPDH bands by a Fluor Chem 8800 Imaging System (Alpha Innotech Corp.). The data are expressed as the
average of two separate experiments.
|
|
Inhibition of Cytokine-induced Expression of iNOS by Clofibrate in
Human U373MG Astroglial Cells--
To investigate whether other
fibrate drugs are also capable of inhibiting cytokine-induced
production of NO and expression of iNOS in astrocytes, we examined the
effect of clofibrate. Clofibrate is also a hypolipidemic drug that
activates PPAR- and induces proliferation of peroxisomes in rats and
mice (9, 20, 21). Similar to gemfibrozil, clofibrate itself was neither
stimulatory nor much inhibitory to NO production; however, it
dose-dependently inhibited the production of NO (Fig.
4A) and the expression of iNOS
protein (Fig. 4B) in cytokine-stimulated U373MG astroglial cells. These studies suggest that fibrate drugs, in general, are inhibitory to cytokine-induced expression of iNOS in human astroglial cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Clofibrate dose-dependently
inhibits the expression of iNOS in cytokine-stimulated human U373MG
astroglial cells. Cells preincubated with different concentrations
of clofibrate for 2 h in serum-free DMEM/F-12 received the
combination of IL-1 (10 ng/ml) and IFN- (10 units/ml).
A, after 24 h of stimulation, the concentration of
nitrite was measured in the supernatants. Data are mean ± S.D. of
three different experiments. a, p < 0.001 versus control; b, p < 0.005 versus IL-1 + IFN- ; c, p < 0.001 versus IL-1 + IFN- . B, cell
homogenates were immunoblotted with antibodies against mouse macrophage
iNOS.
|
|
Inhibition of Cytokine-induced Production of NO by Gemfibrozil in
Human Primary Astrocytes--
Human primary astrocytes have been shown
to induce the expression of iNOS in the presence of different
proinflammatory cytokines (22-24). Since gemfibrozil potently
inhibited the expression of iNOS in human U373MG astroglial cells, we
examined the effect of gemfibrozil on cytokine-induced expression of
iNOS in human primary astrocytes. Different cytokines alone were poor
inducers of NO production (Table II).
However, the combination of IL-1 and IFN- markedly induced the
production of NO. The addition of TNF- to the combination of IL-1
and IFN- did not further increase the production of NO (Table II).
Although gemfibrozil itself had no effect on NO production in control
cells, preincubation of human primary astrocytes with 200 µM of gemfibrozil for 2 h markedly inhibited
cytokine-induced production of NO (Table II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Gemfibrozil inhibits the induction of NO production in human primary
astrocytes
Human primary astrocytes preincubated in serum-free DMEM/F-12 for
2 h with 200 µM gemfibrozil, received IL-1 ,
IFN- , and TNF- alone or in different combinations. After 24 h of incubation, nitrite concentrations in the supernatants. Data are
expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three different experiments. The
concentrations of different cytokines were as follows: IL-1 , 10 ng/ml; IFN- , 10 units/ml; TNF- , 10 ng/ml.
|
|
Gemfibrozil Inhibits Human iNOS Promoter-driven Luciferase Activity
in Cytokine-stimulated Human U373MG Astroglial Cells--
To
understand the effect of gemfibrozil on the transcription of iNOS gene,
U373MG glial cells were transfected with phiNOS(7.2)Luc, a construct
containing the human iNOS promoter fused to the luciferase gene (19),
and activation of this promoter was measured after stimulating the
cells with cytokines in the presence or absence of gemfibrozil. The
combination of IL-1 and IFN- induced iNOS promoter-driven
luciferase activity by about 3.9-fold (Fig.
5). Consistent with the effect of
gemfibrozil on the expression of iNOS, gemfibrozil itself had no effect
on iNOS promoter-driven luciferase activity but it
dose-dependently inhibited iNOS promoter-driven luciferase
activity in cytokine-stimulated cells (Fig. 5), suggesting that
gemfibrozil inhibits cytokine-induced production of NO and the
expression of iNOS mRNA by inhibiting the activation of iNOS promoter.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Gemfibrozil inhibits human iNOS
promoter-derived luciferase activity in cytokine-stimulated human
U373MG astroglial cells. Cells plated at 50-60% confluence in
six-well plates were cotransfected with 1 µg of phiNOS(7.2)Luc (a
construct containing the human iNOS promoter fused to the luciferase
gene) and 50 ng of pRL-TK (a plasmid encoding Renilla luciferase, used
as a transfection efficiency control) using the LipofectAMINE Plus
(Invitrogen). Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells received
different concentrations of gemfibrozil. After 2 h of incubation,
cells were stimulated with the combination of IL-1 (10 ng/ml) and
IFN- (10 units/ml) for 12 h under serum-free condition. Firefly
(ff-Luc) and Renilla (r-Luc) luciferase
activities were obtained by analyzing the total cell extract as
described under "Materials and Methods." Data are mean ± S.D.
of three different experiments. a, p < 0.001 versus control; b, p < 0.05 versus IL-1 + IFN- ; c,
p < 0.001 versus IL-1 + IFN- .
|
|
Role of PPAR- in Gemfibrozil-mediated Inhibition of iNOS in
Human U373MG Astroglial Cells--
Since gemfibrozil is a known
activator of PPAR- (9, 20, 21), a member of the nuclear hormone
receptor superfamily, we examined whether gemfibrozil inhibited the
induction of iNOS through the activation of PPAR- . PPARs bind to a
consensus sequence known as PPRE (9). Therefore, to study the
activation of PPAR, cells were transfected with tk-PPREx3-Luc, a
PPRE-dependent luciferase construct, and luciferase
activity was measured. As shown in Fig. 6A, gemfibrozil alone was able
to induce PPRE-dependent luciferase activity in a
dose-dependent manner and the maximum induction (~4-fold)
was observed at 100 µM or higher concentration of
gemfibrozil. In contrast, the combination of IL-1 and IFN-
capable of inducing iNOS inhibited PPRE-dependent
luciferase activity (Fig. 6A). However, gemfibrozil
treatment blocked the inhibitory effect of cytokines on the activation
of PPRE and stimulated PPRE-dependent luciferase activity
over basal level even in the presence of cytokines (Fig. 6A). To analyze the role of PPAR- in gemfibrozil-induced
activation of PPRE, we used hPPAR- , the dominant-negative mutant
of human PPAR- (25). Marked abrogation (p < 0.001)
of gemfibrozil-induced activation of PPRE (Fig. 6B) by the
expression of hPPAR- but not that of the empty vector suggests
that gemfibrozil induced PPRE-dependent reporter activity
through the activation of PPAR- in human astroglial cells.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The dominant-negative mutant of human
PPAR-
( hPPAR- )
inhibits gemfibrozil-induced PPRE-dependent luciferase
activity in human U373MG astroglial cells. A, cells
plated at 50-60% confluence in six-well plates were cotransfected
with 1 µg of tk-PPREx3-Luc, a PPRE-dependent luciferase
reporter construct, and 50 ng of pRL-TK using LipofectAMINE Plus.
Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with different
concentrations of gemfibrozil and/or the combination of IL-1 (10 ng/ml) and IFN- (10 units/ml). After 6 h of incubation, firefly
(ff-Luc) and Renilla (r-Luc) luciferase
activities were assayed. Data are mean ± S.D. of three different
experiments. *, p < 0.001 versus
200 µM gemfibrozil. B, cells were
cotransfected with 0.5 µg of either hPPAR- or an empty vector
and 1 µg of tk-PPREx3-Luc. All transfections also included 50 ng/µg
of pRL-TK. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated
with different concentrations of gemfibrozil. After 6 h of
incubation, firefly (ff-Luc) and Renilla (r-Luc)
luciferase activities were assayed. Data are mean ± S.D. of three
different experiments. a, p < 0.001 versus 100 µM gemfibrozil; b,
p < 0.001 versus 200 µM
gemfibrozil.
|
|
Next we examined whether hPPAR- can block the inhibitory effect
of gemfibrozil on the induction of iNOS. Cells were cotransfected with
phiNOS(7.2)Luc, hPPAR- , and pRL-TK (a plasmid encoding Renilla
luciferase, used as transfection efficiency control). After 24 h
of transfection, cells were incubated with gemfibrozil for 2 h
followed by stimulation with cytokines. Consistent, to the inhibitory
effect of gemfibrozil on the activation of iNOS promoter (Fig. 5), this
drug inhibited iNOS promoter-driven luciferase activity in empty
vector-transfected cells (Fig. 7).
However, despite the ability of hPPAR- to block
gemfibrozil-mediated activation of PPRE (Fig. 6B), the
expression of hPPAR- did not block the inhibitory effect of
gemfibrozil on iNOS promoter-driven luciferase activity in
cytokine-stimulated cells (Fig. 7). These results suggest that PPAR-
is not involved in gemfibrozil-mediated inhibition of iNOS in human
astroglial cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
hPPAR-
does not block gemfibrozil-mediated inhibition of iNOS promoter
activation in cytokine-stimulated human U373MG astroglial cells.
Cells were cotransfected with 0.5 µg of either hPPAR- or an
empty vector, 0.5 µg of phiNOS(7.2)Luc, and 50 ng of pRL-TK.
Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were incubated with
gemfibrozil for 2 h followed by stimulation with the combination
of IL-1 and IFN- . After 12 h of incubation, firefly
(ff-Luc) and Renilla (r-Luc) luciferase
activities were assayed. Data are mean ± S.D. of three different
experiments.
|
|
Effect of Gemfibrozil on the Activation of Proinflammatory
Transcription Factors in Human U373MG Astroglial Cells--
Different
proinflammatory transcription factors are known to be involved in the
transcription of iNOS (2-4, 26-30). Analysis of human iNOS promoter
shows that it has consensus sequences for binding of several
transcription factors such as NF- B, AP-1, C/EBP , IRF-1 binding to
ISRE, and STAT binding to GAS (29-31). Although several reports have
established the involvement of NF- B, AP-1, and STAT in the induction
of iNOS in human cells (29, 32, 33), the role of C/EBP in the
induction of human iNOS has not been established. Overexpression of
dominant-negative molecules provides an effective tool with which to
investigate the in vivo functions of different transcription
factors and signaling molecules. Therefore, we used the
dominant-negative mutant of C/EBP ( C/EBP ) (34) to inhibit the
activation of C/EBP . It is apparent from Fig.
8 that the expression of C/EBP
but not that of the empty vector inhibited iNOS promoter-driven
luciferase activity significantly (p < 0.005) in
cytokine-stimulated human U373MG astroglial cells, suggesting the
involvement of C/EBP in the induction of iNOS in human astroglial
cells.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
C/EBP
inhibits iNOS promoter-driven luciferase activity in
cytokine-stimulated human U373MG astroglial cells. Cells were
cotransfected with 0.5 µg of either C/EBP or an empty vector,
0.5 µg of phiNOS(7.2)Luc, and 50 ng of pRL-TK. Twenty-four hours
after transfection, cells were stimulated with the combination of
IL-1 and IFN- . After 12 h of incubation, firefly
(ff-Luc) and Renilla (r-Luc) luciferase
activities were assayed. Data are mean ± S.D. of three different
experiments. *, p < 0.005 versus
cytokine treatment of empty vector-transfected cells.
|
|
Since gemfibrozil inhibited cytokine-induced activation of human iNOS
promoter (Fig. 5), we decided to investigate the effect of gemfibrozil
on the activation of these proinflammatory transcription factors in
cytokine-stimulated human U373MG astroglial cells. Activation of these
transcription factors was monitored by transcriptional activity using
the expression of luciferase from respective reporter constructs. It is
evident from Fig. 9, A-D,
that the combination of IL-1 and IFN- induced NF- B-, AP-1-,
and C/EBP -dependent luciferase activities by 3-5-fold
and that of the GAS-dependent one by about 10-fold within
6 h of incubation. However, ISRE-dependent luciferase
activity was not induced in the presence of same cytokines under the
same condition (Fig. 9E). The combination of IL-1 and IFN- was also unable to induce the activation of ISRE within 12 or
18 h of incubation (data not shown). Gemfibrozil itself did not
induce the activation of any of these transcription factors (Fig. 9).
However, this fibrate drug markedly inhibited cytokine-induced activation of NF- B, AP-1, and C/EBP (Fig. 9, A-C).
This inhibitory effect was dose-dependent, and the maximum
inhibition was found at 150-200 µM concentration of
gemfibrozil. However, activation of C/EBP was much more sensitive
than that of NF- B and AP-1 to gemfibrozil (Fig. 9). In contrast,
gemfibrozil had no inhibitory effect on GAS-dependent
luciferase activities in cytokine-stimulated U373MG astroglial cells
(Fig. 9D). At 150 or 200 µM gemfibrozil, only
10-12% inhibition of GAS-dependent luciferase activity
was observed. Similar to the effect of hPPAR- on the inhibitory effect of gemfibrozil on the induction of iNOS, hPPAR- was also unable to reverse the inhibitory effect of gemfibrozil on
cytokine-induced activation of NF- B, AP-1, and C/EBP (data not
shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of gemfibrozil on
NF- B- (A), AP-1-
(B), C/EBP -
(C), GAS- (D) and ISRE
(E)-dependent luciferase activities in
cytokine-stimulated human U373MG astroglial cells. Cells plated at
50-60% confluence in six-well plates were cotransfected with 1 µg
of either pNF- B-Luc, pAP-1-Luc, pC/EBP -Luc, pGAS-Luc, or
pISRE-Luc and 50 ng of pRL-TK. After 24 h of transfection, cells
were incubated with different concentrations of gemfibrozil for 2 h and then stimulated with the combination of IL-1 and IFN- for
6 h under serum-free condition. Firefly (ff-Luc) and
Renilla (r-Luc) luciferase activities were obtained by
analyzing the total cell extract. Data are mean ± S.D. of three
different experiments.
|
|
Effect of Gemfibrozil on Cell Viability--
Human U373MG
astrocytoma cells were incubated with different concentrations (50, 100, 150, and 200 µM) of gemfibrozil under serum-free
condition as mentioned above, and their viability was determined by the
MTT assay. Gemfibrozil used at different concentrations did not
decrease the viability of the cells (data not shown). Therefore,
inhibition of the expression of iNOS by gemfibrozil was not due to any
change in viability of the cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The signaling events transduced by proinflammatory cytokines for
the induction of iNOS are poorly understood. A complete understanding of the cellular signaling mechanisms involved in the induction of iNOS
should identify novel targets for the therapeutic intervention in
NO-mediated neuroinflammatory diseases. The studies reported in this
manuscript clearly demonstrates that gemfibrozil, an activator of
PPAR- , reduces the induction of iNOS in human astrocytes. Since
astrocytes express PPAR- (35), and NO produced from iNOS has been
implicated in the pathogenesis of demyelinating and neurodegenerative diseases (5-7), our results provide a potentially important mechanism whereby activators of PPAR- may ameliorate neural injury. However, gemfibrozil inhibits the induction of iNOS in human astroglial cells
independent of PPAR- . This conclusion is based on the following observations. First, gemfibrozil induced PPRE-dependent
luciferase activity, suggesting that gemfibrozil can activate PPAR in
human astroglial cells. Second, gemfibrozil inhibited cytokine-induced activation of iNOS promoter suggesting that gemfibrozil inhibits the
transcription of iNOS. Third, the expression of hPPAR- , a
dominant-negative mutant of human PPAR- , blocked
gemfibrozil-mediated activation of PPRE suggesting that gemfibrozil
activates PPRE through PPAR- . Fourth, hPPAR- was unable to
block the inhibitory effect of gemfibrozil on the induction of iNOS
promoter activation, suggesting that gemfibrozil does not require
PPAR- to inhibit the induction of iNOS in human astroglial cells.
In contrast to the marked induction of iNOS mRNA by the cytokine
combination (Fig. 2), there was only a 3.9-fold induction of human iNOS
promoter in human astroglial cells (Fig. 5), suggesting that in
addition to transcriptional mechanisms posttranscriptional events could
also play a significant role in regulating the expression of iNOS gene.
Several authors have performed nuclear run-on assays to analyze the
induction rate of the human iNOS promoter in different human cell lines
(30, 36-38). These authors have shown that the endogenous iNOS
promoter displays a significant basal activity and that the induction
rate of only 2-10-fold by cytokines is much lower as seen for the
induction of the iNOS mRNA expression. Taken together, these
results suggest that human iNOS gene is regulated at the level of
transcription as well as posttranscription. However, in our experiment,
gemfibrozil does not alter the relative rate of degradation of human
iNOS mRNA in astroglial cells (Fig. 3), suggesting that gemfibrozil
may not couple to posttranscriptional pathways required for the
regulation of iNOS expression and that gemfibrozil inhibits the
expression of iNOS mRNA mainly at the level of transcription.
Proinflammatory cytokines (TNF- , IL-1 , or IFN- ) bind to their
respective receptors and induce iNOS expression via activation of
NF- B (2-4, 22, 26-28). The presence of multiple consensus sequences in the promoter region of iNOS for the binding of NF- B and
the inhibition of iNOS expression with the inhibition of NF- B activation (2-4, 22, 26-28) establishes an essential role of NF- B
activation in the induction of iNOS. Although TNF- or IL-1 alone
is capable of inducing the activation of NF- B, these cytokines alone
were not sufficient to induce the expression of iNOS in human cell
lines (39). The fact that a combination of cytokines is required to
induce the expression of iNOS suggests that activation of additional
transcription factors is also necessary for the expression of iNOS.
Consistently, apart from the consensus sequence for binding of NF- B,
the human iNOS promoter contains consensus sequences for the binding of
transcription factors including AP-1, C/EBP , IRF-1 binding to ISRE,
and STAT binding to GAS (29-31). The bulk of the work regarding the
involvement of these transcription factors in the transcriptional
regulation of the iNOS gene involved the murine system.
Although the role of these transcription factors in the transcription
of human iNOS has not been well established, several evidences point to
their possible involvement in the induction of iNOS in human cells.
Kleinert et al. (32) have shown that the cytokine mixture
induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK-2 in human DLD-1 cells.
This activated JAK-2 further induces the DNA binding activity of
STAT1 (32). Tyrophostin B42, a specific inhibitor of JAK-2 (33),
inhibits the phosphorylation of JAK-2, the activation of STAT1 , and
the induction of iNOS (32), suggesting that the JAK-2-STAT1 pathway
is an important activator of iNOS transcription. Moss and colleagues
(29) have recently shown that activation of both NF- B and AP-1 is an
important step for the transcription of iNOS in human cells. Mutation
in NF- B- as well as AP-1-binding site of the iNOS promoter reduces
the transcriptional activity of iNOS promoter (29). Furthermore, they
(29) have shown that MAP kinase pathways (ERK and p38) regulate the
expression of iNOS in human lung epithelial (A549) cells through the
modulation of NF- B and AP-1. Recently, we have found that activation
of C/EBP is also necessary for the induction of iNOS (4).
Overexpression of C/EBP , a truncated alternate C/EBP
translational product, LIP, which acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor
of C/EBP activity (34), inhibits the production of NO and the
expression of iNOS in mouse microglial cells (4). Consistently, here we
show that C/EBP also inhibits cytokine-induced activation of iNOS
promoter in human astroglial cells (Fig. 8).
Here we have found that the combination of IL-1 and IFN- markedly
induced the activation of NF- B, AP-1, C/EBP , and GAS but not that
of ISRE in human U373MG astroglial cells. Interestingly, gemfibrozil
suppressed cytokine-induced activation of NF- B, AP-1, and C/EBP
but not that of GAS. Since STAT binds to GAS (40) and JAK is known to
phosphorylate and activate STAT (40), our results suggest that
gemfibrozil may not inhibit the JAK-STAT pathway in human astrocytes.
On the other hand, IRF-1 binds to ISRE (41). IRF-1 has been found to be
involved in the induction of iNOS by IFN- in mouse macrophages (42).
Consistently, IFN- cannot induce iNOS in macrophages isolated from
IRF-1( / ) mice (43). Although the promoter of human iNOS gene
contains ISRE (30, 31, 44), the combination of IL-1 and IFN- did
not modulate the activation of ISRE in any significant way, suggesting that IRF-1 is unlikely to act as an important regulator of
cytokine-induced expression of iNOS in human astrocytes.
Fibrate drugs like gemfibrozil, clofibrate, and fenofibrate induce the
proliferation of peroxisomes in rats and mice (45, 46). Continuous
administration of fibrate drugs to the rats and mice for 40-50 weeks
also leads to the formation of hepatic tumor (45-47). However,
induction of hepatic tumor promotion by fibrate drugs has not been
demonstrated in human, other primates, and guinea pig (46, 48), species
that have lost their ability to synthesize ascorbate due to inherent
loss of the gulonolactone oxidase gene. Braun et al. (48)
have recently reported that the evolutionary loss of the gulonolactone
oxidase gene may contribute to the missing carcinogenic effect of
peroxisome proliferators in humans, since ascorbate synthesis is
accompanied by H2O2 production, and
consequently its induction can be potentially harmful. Furthermore, recent studies have also revealed that humans have considerably lower
levels of PPAR- in liver than rodents, and this difference may, in
part, explain the species differences in the carcinogenic response to
peroxisome proliferators (46). In addition, gemfibrozil does not
require PPAR- to inhibit the activation of proinflammatory transcription factors and the induction of iNOS in human astroglial cells. Taken together, these observations suggest that gemfibrozil as
an anti-neuroinflammatory drug may not cause human health problems.
NO, a short-lived and diffusible free radical, plays many roles as a
signaling and effector molecule in diverse biological systems; it is a
neuronal messenger and is involved in vasodilation as well as in
antimicrobial and antitumor activities (49). On the other hand, NO has
also been implicated in several CNS disorders, including inflammatory,
infectious, traumatic, and degenerative diseases (5-8, 50). There is
considerable evidence for the transcriptional induction of iNOS (the
high output isoform of NOS) in the CNS that is associated with
autoimmune reactions, acute infection, and traumatic brain injury
(5-8, 50). Once NO is formed, it spontaneously reacts with
O to form peroxynitrite (ONOO ), the
most reactive derivative of NO known so far (51). Both NO and
peroxynitrite are potentially toxic molecules to neurons and
oligodendrocytes that may mediate toxicity through the formation of
iron-NO complexes of iron-containing enzyme systems (52), oxidation of
protein sulfhydryl groups (51), nitration of proteins, and
nitrosylation of nucleic acids and DNA strand breaks (53).
In the CNS, iNOS is expressed mainly by activated astrocytes and
microglia, the two glial cell types involved in intracerebral immune
regulation. Astrocytes are the major glial cell population in the
central nervous system; therefore, induction of iNOS in astrocytes may
be an important source of NO in CNS inflammatory disorders associated
with neuronal and oligodendrocytes death. Therefore, gemfibrozil being
capable of attenuating the activation of proinflammatory transcription
factors and the expression of iNOS in human astrocytes may find
therapeutic application in neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative disorders.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Tom Dunn and associates of the
University of Nebraska Medical Center for help in preparing this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant NS39940 (to K. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Oral Biology,
University of Nebraska Medical Center, 40th and Holdrege,
Lincoln, NE 68583. Tel.: 402-472-1324; Fax: 402-472-2551; E-mail:
kpahan@unmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200250200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CNS, central
nervous system;
iNOS, inducible nitric-oxide synthase;
IL, interleukin;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
INF, interferon;
IRF-1, IFN- regulatory
factor-1;
PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor;
STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription;
NF- B, nuclear
factor- B;
AP-1, activator protein-1;
C/EBP , CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein ;
GAS, -activation site;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
L-NMA, L-NG-Monomethylarginine;
D-NMA, D-NG-monomethylarginine;
PPRE, peroxisome
proliferator-responsive element;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase;
JAK, Janus kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Feinstein, D. L.,
Galea, E.,
Roberts, S.,
Berquist, H.,
Wang, H.,
and Reis, D. J.
(1994)
J. Neurochem.
62,
315-321[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Pahan, K.,
Sheikh, F. G.,
Namboodiri, A. M. S.,
and Singh, I.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2671-2679[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Pahan, K.,
Sheikh, F. G.,
Liu, X.,
Hilger, S.,
McKinney, M.,
and Petro, T. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
7899-7905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Jana, M.,
Liu, X.,
Koka, S.,
Ghosh, S.,
Petro, T. M.,
and Pahan, K.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
44527-44533[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Mitrovic, B.,
Ignarro, L. J.,
Montestruque, S.,
Smoll, A.,
and Merril, J. E.
(1994)
Neuroscience
61,
575-585[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Merrill, J. E.,
Ignarro, L. J.,
Sherman, M. P.,
Melinek, J.,
and Lane, T. E.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
2132-2141[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Koprowski, H.,
Zheng, Y. M.,
Heber-Katz, E.,
Fraser, N.,
Rorke, L., Fu, Z. F.,
Hanlon, C.,
and Dietzshold, B.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
3024-3027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Akama, K. T.,
Albanese, C.,
Pestell, R. G.,
and Van Eldik, L. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5795-5800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Lemberger, T.,
Desvergne, B.,
and Wahli, W.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
12,
335-363[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Dreyer, C.,
Krey, G.,
Keller, H.,
Givel, F.,
Helftenbein, G.,
and Wahli, W.
(1992)
Cell
68,
879-887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Hsu, H. C.,
Lee, Y. T.,
Yeh, H. T.,
and Chen, M. F.
(2001)
J. Lab. Clin. Med.
137,
414-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Bloomfield, R. H.,
Davenport, J.,
Babikian, V.,
Brass, L. M.,
Collins, D.,
Wexler, L.,
Wagner, S.,
Papademetriou, V.,
Rutan, G.,
and Robins, S. J.
(2001)
Circulation
103,
2828-2833[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Amici, C.,
Sistonen, L.,
Santoro, M. G.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6227-6231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Elia, G.,
Amici, C.,
Rossi, A.,
and Santoro, M. G.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
210-217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Feinstein, D. L.,
Galea, E.,
Aquino, D. A., Li, G. C., Xu, H.,
and Reis, D. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17724-17732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
McCarthy, M.,
Wood, C.,
Fedoseyeva, L.,
and Whittemore, S.
(1995)
J. Neurovirol.
1,
275-285[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Pahan, K.,
Namboodiri, A. M. S.,
Sheikh, F. G.,
Smith, B. T.,
and Singh, I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7786-7791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Taylor, B. S.,
de Vera, M. E.,
Ganster, R. W.,
Wang, Q.,
Shapiro, R. A.,
Morris, S. M.,
Billiar, T. R.,
and Geller, D. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15148-15156[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Kliewer, S. A.,
Forman, B. M.,
Blumberg, B.,
Ong, E. S.,
Borgmeyer, U.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Umesono, K.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
7355-7359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Illingworth, D. R.,
and Bacon, S.
(1989)
Arteriosclerosis
9,
I121-I134[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Pahan, K.,
Liu, X.,
McKinney, M.,
Wood, C.,
Sheikh, F. G.,
and Raymond, J. R.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
74,
2288-2295[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Pahan, K.,
Liu, X.,
Wood, C.,
and Raymond, J. R.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
472,
203-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Zhao, M. L.,
Liu, J. S. H., He, D. K.,
Dickson, D. W.,
and Lee, S. C.
(1998)
Brain Res.
813,
402-405[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Roberts, R. A.,
James, N. H.,
Woodyatt, N. J.,
Macdonald, N.,
and Tugwood, J. D.
(1998)
Carcinogenesis
19,
43-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Xie, Q.-W.,
Kashiwabara, Y.,
and Nathan, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
4705-4708[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Pahan, K.,
Sheikh, F. G.,
Namboodiri, A. M. S.,
and Singh, I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12219-12226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Pahan, K.,
Raymond, J. R.,
and Singh, I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7528-7536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Kristof, A. S.,
Marks-Konczalik, J.,
and Moss, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8445-8452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Linn, S. C.,
Morelli, P. J.,
Edry, I.,
Cottongim, S. E.,
Szabo, C.,
and Salzman, A. L.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
272,
G1499-G1508[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Spitsin, S. V.,
Koprowski, H.,
and Michaels, F. H.
(1996)
Mol. Med.
2,
226-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Kleinert, H.,
Wallerath, T.,
Fritz, G.,
Ihrig-Biedert, I.,
Rodriguez-Pascual, F.,
Geller, D. A.,
and Forstermann, U.
(1998)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
125,
193-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Bright, J. J., Du, C.,
and Sriram, S.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
6255-6262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Descombes, P.,
and Schibler, U.
(1991)
Cell
67,
569-579[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Cullingford, T. E.,
Bhakoo, K.,
Peuchen, S.,
Dolphin, C. T.,
Patel, R.,
and Clark, J. B.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
70,
1366-1375[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Salzman, A. L.,
Linn, S. C.,
and Szabo, C.
(2000)
Int. J. Mol. Med.
6,
209-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Laubach, V. E.,
Zhang, C. X.,
Russell, S. W.,
Murphy, W. J.,
and Sherman, P. A.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
1351,
287-295[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
de Vera, M. E.,
Shapiro, R. A.,
Nussler, A. K.,
Mudgett, J. S.,
Simmons, R. L.,
Morris, S. M. Jr.,
Billiar, T. R.,
and Geller, D. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1054-1059[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Taylor, B. S.,
and Geller, D. A.
(2000)
Shock
13,
413-424[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1994)
Science
264,
1415-1421[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Coccia, E. M.,
Stellacci, E.,
Marziali, G.,
Weiss, G.,
and Battistini, A.
(2000)
Int. Immunol.
12,
977-985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Saura, M.,
Zaragoza, C.,
Bao, C.,
McMillan, A.,
and Lowenstein, C. J.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
289,
459-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Fujimura, M.,
Tominaga, T.,
Kato, I.,
Takasawa, S.,
Kawase, M.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Okamoto, H.,
and Yoshimoto, T.
(1997)
Brain Res.
759,
247-250[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Marks-Konczalik, J.,
Chu, S. C.,
and Moss, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22201-22208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Reddy, J. K.,
and Mannaerts, G. P.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
14,
343-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Gonzalez, F. J.,
Peters, J. M.,
and Cattley, R. C.
(1998)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
90,
1702-1709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Yeldandi, A. V.,
Rao, M. S.,
and Reddy, J. K.
(2000)
Mutat. Res.
448,
159-177[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Braun, L.,
Mile, V.,
Schaff, Z.,
Csala, M.,
Kardon, T.,
Mandl, J.,
and Banhegyi, G.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
458,
359-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Nathan, C.
(1992)
FASEB J.
6,
3051-3064[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Samdani, A. F.,
Dawson, T. M.,
and Dawson, V. L.
(1997)
Stroke
28,
1283-1288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Radi, R.,
Beckman, J. S.,
Bush, K. M.,
and Freeman, B. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4244-4250[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Drapier, J.-C.,
and Hibbs, J. B.
(1988)
J. Immunol.
140,
2829-2838[Abstract]
|
| 53.
|
Wink, D. A.,
Kasprazak, K. S.,
Maragos, C. M.,
Elespuru, R. K.,
Misra, M.,
Dunams, T. M.,
Cebula, T. A.,
Koch, W. A.,
Andrews, A. W.,
and Allen, J. S.
(1991)
Science
254,
1001-1003[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dasgupta, A. Roy, M. Jana, D. M. Hartley, and K. Pahan
Gemfibrozil Ameliorates Relapsing-Remitting Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Independent of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha}
Mol. Pharmacol.,
October 1, 2007;
72(4):
934 - 946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Jana, A. Jana, X. Liu, S. Ghosh, and K. Pahan
Involvement of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Mediated Up-Regulation of I{kappa}B{alpha} in Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Gemfibrozil in Microglia
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2007;
179(6):
4142 - 4152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dasgupta, M. Jana, X. Liu, and K. Pahan
Role of Very-late Antigen-4 (VLA-4) in Myelin Basic Protein-primed T Cell Contact-induced Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Microglial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 13, 2003;
278(25):
22424 - 22431.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Laurora, S. Pizzimenti, F. Briatore, A. Fraioli, M. Maggio, P. Reffo, C. Ferretti, M. U. Dianzani, and G. Barrera
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Ligands Affect Growth-Related Gene Expression in Human Leukemic Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
June 1, 2003;
305(3):
932 - 942.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dasgupta, Y. Zhou, M. Jana, N. L. Banik, and K. Pahan
Sodium Phenylacetate Inhibits Adoptive Transfer of Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice at Multiple Steps
J. Immunol.,
April 1, 2003;
170(7):
3874 - 3882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|