![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 48, 46243-46247, November 29, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota
Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Received for publication, August 5, 2002, and in revised form, September 27, 2002
Fanconi anemia (FA) is a heterogeneous autosomal
recessive disease characterized by congenital abnormalities,
pancytopenia, and an increased incidence of cancer. Cells cultured from
FA patients display elevated spontaneous chromosomal breaks and
deletions and are hypersensitive to bifunctional cross-linking agents.
Thus, it has been hypothesized that FA is a DNA repair disorder. We analyzed plasmid end-joining in intact diploid fibroblast cells derived
from FA patients. FA fibroblasts from complementation groups A, C, D2,
and G rejoined linearized plasmids with a significantly decreased
efficiency compared with non-FA fibroblasts. Retrovirus-mediated expression of the respective FA cDNAs in FA cells restored their end-joining efficiency to wild type levels. Human FA fibroblasts and
fibroblasts from FA rodent models were also significantly more
sensitive to restriction enzyme-induced chromosomal DNA double strand
breaks than were their retrovirally corrected counterparts. Taken
together, these data show that FA fibroblasts have a deficiency in both
extra-chromosomal and chromosomal DNA double strand break repair, a
defect that could provide an attractive explanation for some of the
pathologies associated with FA.
Fanconi anemia (FA)1 is
a fatal inherited autosomal recessive disease characterized by
progressive bone marrow failure and a significant predisposition toward
malignancies, particularly acute myelogenous leukemia (1, 2). Somatic
cell hybridization studies have shown that abnormalities in multiple
genes result in FA (3-5). To date, at least eight distinct
complementation groups have been identified (A, B, C, D1, D2, E, F, and
G), and all of the known FA genes have been cloned (6-12). With the
exception of FANCB, and FANCD1, none of
the FA genes contains sequence motifs of known function (12), and only
FANCD2 has been found to have a homolog in lower eukaryotic
organisms (5). Some of the FA genes encode proteins that interact to
form a complex in the nucleus. This complex is disrupted in cell lines
from complementation groups A, C, E, F, and G (13, 14). Yet despite
these findings, the exact biological functions of the FA proteins have
not yet been determined and the molecular mechanism(s) responsible for
FA have remained obscure (15).
Interestingly, although the molecular defect responsible for FA is
unclear, it has been well documented that cells from FA patients
display elevated levels of spontaneous chromosomal breaks and deletions
and have an increased sensitivity to the cytotoxic and clastogenic
effects of DNA cross-linking agents (16-19). Patient-derived FA
lymphoblasts have been shown to have significantly decreased plasmid-rejoining fidelity compared with normal lymphoblasts (20, 21).
Additionally, nuclear extracts from patient-derived FA fibroblasts have
substantially decreased plasmid-rejoining activity compared with
extracts from normal fibroblasts (22). These cellular features along
with the high susceptibility of FA patients to cancers have lead to the
hypothesis that this disorder results from defective DNA repair.
However, the absence of recognizable DNA binding sequence motifs in FA
genes and the lack of evidence showing direct interaction of FA gene
products with DNA cast doubt on the idea that FA proteins directly
participate in DNA repair. Recent results demonstrating a connection
between the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor and FA proteins suggest
that FA proteins may play an essential role in regulating the cellular
response to DNA damage (12, 15, 23-25).
We examined both extra-chromosomal and chromosomal DNA repair in intact
FA fibroblasts and retrovirally corrected FA fibroblasts from multiple
complementation groups and animal models. We found that fibroblasts
derived from FA patients of complementation groups A, C, D2, and G were
significantly deficient in the repair of both plasmid and chromosome
DNA double strand breaks and that this deficiency was corrected by the
expression of the respective FA cDNAs in these cells. Furthermore,
a similar defect in DNA double strand break repair was seen in cells
derived from two rodent models of FA and in wild type cells expressing
a dominant negative FANCC allele.
Cell Culture--
Cells were maintained in a humidified
5% CO2-containing atmosphere at 37 °C. All FA cell
lines were obtained from the Oregon Health Sciences University unless
otherwise noted. HT1080 are immortalized human sarcoma-transformed
fibroblast cells. MCF-7 (ATCC Cell Repository) and MA148 are
human-immortalized non-FA epithelial cells. CCL75.1, GM637, GM638,
GM847, and GM10603 (NIGMS, National Institutes of Health Human Genetic
Cell Repository) are immortalized human non-FA fibroblasts. PD.715.F
and PD.792.F are normal human-diploid fibroblasts. PD.220i, PD.20i, and
PD.20hygro (referred to as A', D', and D") are human immortalized FA
fibroblasts of complementation groups A, D2, and D2, respectively.
PD.20hygro:RV (referred to as D'-corrected) are PD.20hygro cells that
have been infected with the retrovirus that expresses the
FANCD2 cDNA. PD.720.F, 551-FAA, and PD.352.F (referred
to as A", C, and G) are human diploid FA fibroblasts from
complementation groups A, C, and G, respectively. 720-Retro, 551-FAC,
and 352-FAG (referred to as A"-corrected, C-corrected, and G-corrected)
are human primary FA fibroblasts that have been infected with
retroviruses that express the FANCA, FANCC, and
FANCG cDNAs, respectively. Murine MPF60T, MPF61T, and
MPF62T cells are embryonic fibroblasts derived from mice homozygous for
Fancc DNA End-Joining--
Experiments were carried out as described
previously (20) with the following exceptions. Plasmid pSV2Neo was used
as the substrate DNA. It was treated with the endonucleases
EcoRI to produce cohesive DNA ends and SmaI to
produce blunt ends. Linear plasmid was gel-purified and quantitated.
Five micrograms of plasmid pRSVEdl884 that encodes the SV40 large
T-antigen was co-transfected into cells along with 1.25 µg of
pSV2Neo. Plasmid DNA recovered after DpnI digestion was
electroporated into DH10B-electrocompetent bacteria.
Restriction Enzyme Electroporation--
Approximately
104 fibroblasts were collected and resuspended in 200 µl
of serum-free media along with restriction enzymes
PvuII or HinfI (Invitrogen) diluted in their
respective storage buffers to concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 40, and 60 units/50 µl. For heat inactivation, enzyme was diluted to the
appropriate concentration and incubated for 18 h at 70 °C. The
cell-enzyme mixture was electroporated with a BTX ECM 630 electroporator (Genetronic Inc., San Diego, CA) at an electrical field
strength of 0.75 kV/cm and a capacitance of 960 microfarads.
Cytotoxicity was examined using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay (29)
or clonogenic assay. For the SRB assay, electroporated cells were
plated into 24-well dishes followed by incubation for 24 h.
Percent cell survival was determined by comparing the optical density
at 564 nm for cells electroporated with 0 units of enzyme to the
optical density for cells electroporated with 10-60 units of enzyme.
For the clonogenic assay, electroporated cells were plated into 100-mm
dishes and allowed to grow and form colonies for 2-3 weeks. The number
of colonies from electroporation with 0 units of enzyme was compared
with the number of colonies obtained from electroporation with 10-60
units of enzyme.
Restriction Enzyme Poration Mediated by Streptolysin
O--
PvuII was introduced into cells by poration with
streptolysin O as described previously (30). Immediately afterward,
cells were plated into 24-well dishes and incubated for 24 h, and
percent survival was determined by the SRB assay as previously stated.
Green Fluorescent Protein Electroporation--
Twenty-five
micrograms of recombinant green fluorescent protein
(Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) was electroporated into
cells. After 6 h, cells were examined by confocal microscopy. The
uptake of the green fluorescent protein was determined by comparing the number of cells fluorescing at 522 nm (excitation 488 nm) to the number
of cells observed in the bright field.
Plasmid End-Joining in Intact Wild Type and FA
Fibroblasts--
DNA end-joining was examined within intact fibroblast
cells by electroporating linear plasmid DNA molecules into fibroblasts. Rejoined plasmids were recovered from fibroblasts and analyzed with a
bacterial reporter system. The frequency with which the linearized DNA
was rejoined was determined by comparing the number of bacterial
colonies obtained when fibroblasts were electroporated with linear
plasmid DNA to the number obtained when fibroblasts were electroporated
in a parallel experiment with circular plasmid DNA (20). An examination
of a number of wild type cell lines revealed that plasmids with
cohesive DNA ends were rejoined with ~28% efficiency and that there
were no significant differences among any of the cells examined (Table
I). In contrast, the rejoining efficiency
of the same plasmid substrate was only ~4% in fibroblasts derived
from FA patients from complementation groups A, C, D2, and G (Table I).
Additional experiments using blunt-ended plasmid DNA revealed similar
results. FA fibroblasts of complementation groups A, C, D2, and G had
rejoining frequencies with blunt-ended substrate of 3.0, 5.1, 3.1, and
4.4%, respectively, whereas the efficiency of rejoining of these
substrates in non-FA cells was ~30%. To verify that all rejoined
plasmids recovered by the bacterial reporter system were derived
exclusively from substrates processed within human cells, both
cohesive-ended and blunt-ended linearized plasmid substrate was
electroporated directly into bacteria. As expected, no bacterial
colonies were obtained from this control experiment (data not
shown).
Interestingly, we had previously found that nuclear extracts prepared
from fibroblasts derived from eight unrelated normal human donors
rejoined linear plasmids with an average efficiency of 26%, whereas
extracts from fibroblasts derived from three unrelated FA patients
rejoined these plasmids with efficiencies ranging from 4 to 12% (22).
An analysis revealed that the majority of products from both the
cell-free and intracellular rejoining reactions were precisely
rejoined, whereas a substantial minority had suffered small deletions
that spanned direct sequence repeats.
Plasmid rejoining was also examined in FA cell strains that had been
"corrected" through infection by retroviruses encoding the
corresponding FA cDNA. It has previously been demonstrated that
such correction restored resistance to cross-linking agents in these FA
cell strains (6, 8-11). As Table I reveals, in all four cases, the
retrovirally corrected FA cells rejoined cohesive-ended DNA with
frequencies similar to that seen in non-FA cells. Additionally, the
end-joining efficiency of blunt-ended DNA substrate was ~30% in
these cells. As was expected, infection of an FANCC cell strain with a
retrovirus encoding an FANCA cDNA had no effect on
plasmid-rejoining efficiency (data not shown).
Hypersensitivity of FA Fibroblasts to Restriction Enzyme-induced
Cell Death--
Cells cultured from FA patients display an increased
level of chromosomal abnormalities including spontaneous breaks and
deletions (1). This along with the severe plasmid-rejoining defect seen in FA fibroblasts prompted us to hypothesize that FA fibroblasts would
be sensitive to induced chromosomal DNA double strand breaks. To test
this hypothesis, intact FANCD2 cells and their retrovirus-corrected counterparts were electroporated with restriction endonucleases. This
treatment has been shown to create chromosomal DNA double strand
breaks, ultimately resulting in cell death (31-35). Fibroblasts were
electroporated with the restriction enzyme PvuII, which
creates blunt-ended chromosomal double strand breaks. Table
II shows that neither 10 nor 20 units of
PvuII had a significant effect on cell survival in several
non-FA fibroblast cell lines and strains. Conversely, a similar
treatment of FA fibroblasts from complementation groups A, C, D2, and G
with PvuII resulted in significantly less cell survival
(Table II). Retroviral correction with the corresponding FA cDNAs,
however, restored restriction enzyme resistance in FA cells. Heat
inactivation of PvuII prior to electroporation abolished their ability to induce cell death (data not shown). Similar results were obtained when the restriction enzyme HinfI, which
creates cohesive-ended chromosomal double strand breaks, was introduced into cells (data not shown).
Cell viability following these restriction enzyme treatments was
determined using the SRB assay (29). To ensure that this assay
accurately measured cytotoxicity, analogous experiments were analyzed
using clonogenic assays. A similar decrease in survival was seen in
FANCD2 fibroblasts compared with retrovirally corrected FANCD2 cells
when survival was determined through colony formation (data not shown).
To rule out the possibility that the decreased cell survival of FA
fibroblasts was caused by the deleterious affects of electroporation,
streptolysin O treatment was used to introduce PvuII into
cells (30). A decrease in cell survival similar to that observed
following enzyme electroporation was seen after streptolysin O-mediated
poration of PvuII (data not shown). Additionally, the SRB
and clonogenic assays both showed that cell death attributed to
poration alone was comparable in FA and non-FA cells following
electroporation and streptolysin O-mediated poration, resulting in
~40-60% killing in all cells examined.
As Table II reveals that although FA fibroblast cells from
complementation groups A, C, D2, and G displayed increased restriction enzyme-induced cell death, their retrovirus-corrected counterparts had
sensitivities similar to non-FA cells. To ensure that the reduced
sensitivity of retrovirus-corrected FA cells to restriction enzymes was
not because of a difference in transfection efficiency of porated
protein, we examined the extent to which they and their unmodified
counterparts took up recombinant green fluorescent protein. We found
that 69.8 ± 2.4% of uncorrected FANCD2 cells accumulated
significant levels of green fluorescent protein following electroporation compared with 71.2 ± 1.1% of the corrected
cells. Since both FA and retrovirus-corrected FA fibroblasts are able to take up similar amounts of electroporated protein, the observed sensitivity to restriction enzyme-induced cell death is not because of
increased restriction enzyme uptake. It is noteworthy that the percent
of cells taking up electroporated green fluorescent protein is roughly
similar to the number of FA cells killed after restriction enzyme
poration. This result suggests that all of the FA cells that take up
restriction enzymes are killed, although the non-FA cells and corrected
FA cells that take up restriction enzymes are relatively resistant to
their cytotoxic affects.
DNA End-Joining and Chromosomal Double Strand Break Sensitivity in
HT1080 Cells Expressing a Dominant Negative FANCC Allele--
The
finding that overexpression of a patient-derived FANCC
allele (L554P) rendered normal cells sensitive to the cross-linking agent diepoxybutane (28) prompted us to ask whether overexpression of
this dominant negative allele in HT1080 cells would also render them
deficient in plasmid rejoining and hypersensitive to restriction enzyme-induced cell death. As Fig.
1A indicates, transgenic
HT1080 fibroblasts expressing the L554P FANCC allele were
hypersensitive to diepoxybutane. Furthermore, these cells rejoined both
cohesive-ended and blunt-ended linearized plasmids with significantly
diminished efficiency (Fig. 1B). HT1080 cells expressing
L554P were also hypersensitive to restriction enzyme-induced cell death
following electroporation of PvuII (Fig. 1C). The
decreases in plasmid end-joining and cell survival following
restriction enzyme treatment were of similar magnitude to those
observed in the patient-derived FA fibroblasts of complementation
groups A, C, D2, and G. Overexpression of the wild type
FANCC allele in HT1080 cells had no effect on any of the
parameters examined (Fig. 1A-C).
Restriction Enzyme-induced Cell Death in Fibroblasts from Two
Rodent Models of FA--
We next examined whether the hypersensitivity
to restriction enzyme-induced cell death seen in human FA fibroblasts
was also observed in two rodent models of FA. Embryonic fibroblasts
derived from mice homozygous for a targeted deletion of exon 9 of the murine FA complementation group C gene
(Fancc The data presented herein support the conclusion that FA
fibroblasts have a dramatically reduced ability to rejoin double strand
breaks in both introduced plasmids as well as within their chromosomes.
These defects were observed in diploid fibroblasts from patients whose
cells belong to a number of different FA complementation groups. In all
cases tested, the re-introduction of the deficient FA gene into these
cells eliminated the aberrant phenotype. An inability to repair
restriction enzyme-induced chromosomal double strand breaks was also
observed in two different rodent models of FA as well as in a human
cell culture model of FA induced by overexpression of a dominant
negative allele of the FANCC gene. Taken together, these
findings provide robust support for the conclusion that FA fibroblasts
have a defect in cellular DNA double strand break repair.
The nature of the DNA double strand break repair defect in FA
fibroblasts, however, remains obscure. It is known that mammalian cells
use both recombinational and non-homologous end-joining pathways to
repair DNA double strand breaks. Thus, in principle, either mechanism
or conceivably both could be affected in FA fibroblasts. It is
not likely that the linearized plasmid substrates utilized in our
end-joining assays are repaired via a recombinational mechanism. Thus,
we can conclude that FA fibroblasts have a defect in a
non-recombinational DNA double strand break repair pathway. The
findings that V(D)J recombination and Ku-dependent
non-homologous end-joining are not affected in FA cells (20-22, 37)
indicate that this observed defect does not involve these pathways.
Instead, it appears that the deficiency resides in another currently
uncharacterized non-recombinational repair pathway.
It is tempting to speculate that the hypersensitivity of FA fibroblasts
to restriction enzyme-induced chromosomal double strand breaks is a
consequence of deficient non-recombinational repair of these lesions.
However, a number of findings suggest that this hypersensitivity could
reflect a deficiency in chromosomal homologous recombinational repair.
First, the BRCA1 protein, which is required for efficient
recombinational repair of chromosome double strand breaks, co-localizes
to nuclear foci with the FANCD2 protein in cells following exposure to
ionizing radiation (24). FANCD2 has also been shown to be
phosphorylated in an ATM-dependent manner following
induced DNA damage (25). Second, the FANCB and
FANCD1 genes are apparently identical to BRCA2, a
gene also required for efficient recombinational repair of chromosome
double strand breaks (12, 15, 38). Third, both the BRCA1 and BRCA2
proteins interact with the mammalian RecA homolog Rad51 (39), and cells deficient in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 have a significant defect in homologous recombination, display chromosomal instability, and are hypersensitive to DNA cross-linking agents as are FA cells (38, 40-45). Thus, it is
conceivable that FA cells have a defect in recombinational repair of
chromosomal DNA double strand breaks. It remains to be determined
whether the elevated sensitivity of FA cells to restriction
enzyme-induced cell death is a consequence of defective non-homologous
end-joining, defective recombinational repair, or both. It may be
possible to gain insight into this question by studying the repair of
double strand breaks induced into engineered chromosomal loci by
rare-cutting endonucleases such as the yeast I SceI enzyme.
An alternative explanation for the cytotoxicity observed in FA
fibroblasts following introduction of restriction enzymes is that cell
death may be due to improper checkpoint regulation following chromosomal damage. A recent report by Taniguchi et al. (25) shows that FANCD2 fibroblasts have radio-resistant DNA synthesis following induced DNA damage. Similarly, BRCA2/FANCD1-deficient Chinese
hamster ovary cells and BRCA1-deficient cells also display radio-resistant DNA synthesis after exposure to ionizing radiation (46,
47). Thus, given the association among FA proteins and BRCA1 and BRCA2
previously outlined, these data indicate that FA cells may have an S
phase checkpoint defect. Failed repair of DNA double strand breaks and
an inability to regulate an essential checkpoint may result in these FA
cells progressing through the cell cycle with unrepaired chromosomal
lesions that would ultimately lead to cell death.
Regardless of the nature of the defect, the deficiency in DNA double
strand break repair observed in FA fibroblasts may provide an
attractive explanation for some of the pathologies associated with FA.
Although this conclusion is derived from studies performed on
fibroblast cells and may not be applicable to all cell types, evidence
from lymphoblasts derived from FA patients also indicates a deficiency
in DNA double strand break repair (20, 21, 48). Additionally, an
examination of both fibroblasts and lymphoblasts derived from FA
patients has revealed no distinct differences in sensitivities to
DNA-damaging agents or chromosomal instability, the two main cellular
features of FA (16, 19, 49, 50). Thus, the cancer predisposition that
characterizes this disorder could result from chromosomal
rearrangements is due to defective repair of chromosome double strand
breaks that arise spontaneously or are created as intermediates in
normal cellular processes. Likewise, just as defective repair of
spontaneous DNA double strand breaks caused by oxygen is responsible
for the neuronal apoptosis observed in knock-out mice lacking a
functional non-homologous end-joining pathway (51), the defective DNA
double strand break repair we observe in FA cells could be responsible
for bone marrow failure observed in these patients. Therefore, one
exciting possibility is that pharmacological approaches may be
developed to activate the defective DNA double strand break repair
pathway in FA cells. Such therapeutic intervention could potentially
halt the inexorable loss of bone marrow stem cells that results in
fatal anemia in these patients, thereby extending their life span.
We thank Drs. Larry H. Thompson, Maureen E. Hoatlin, and Barbara Cox for kindly providing reagents used herein.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant AG16678 and the Breast Cancer Research Program Grant
DAMD17-99-1-9299 from the U. S. Department of Defense.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207937200
The abbreviations used are:
FA, Fanconi anemia;
SRB, sulforhodamine B.
A DNA Double Strand Break Repair Defect in Fanconi Anemia
Fibroblasts*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
exon9, heterozygous for Fancc
exon9,
and homozygous wild type, respectively (26). Genotypes of these cells
were verified by PCR analysis of genomic DNA. Chinese hamster ovary
cells AA8 and UV40 (Xrcc9 mutants) were kindly provided by Dr. Larry H. Thompson (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA) (27).
The patient-derived wild type and L554P FANCC alleles were
kindly provided by Dr. Maureen E. Hoatlin (Oregon Health Sciences
University and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR)
(28).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
DNA end-joining efficiency in FA and corrected FA fibroblasts
Decreased survival of FA cells following PvuII electroporation

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
HT1080 fibroblasts expressing the
patient-derived mutant FANCC allele L554P resemble FA
cells. A phenotypic analysis was performed on HT1080 cells
(black bars) as well as on HT1080 cells that overexpressed a
wild type FANCC allele (shaded bars) and HT1080
cells that overexpressed the L554P FANCC allele (white
bars). Data represent the mean of three experiments; error
bars depict the mean ± S.E. *, p < 0.005. A, sensitivity to diepoxybutane. B,
plasmid-rejoining efficiency. C, sensitivity to restriction
enzyme-induced DNA double strand breaks.
exon9) display chromosomal breaks and are
hypersensitive to DNA cross-linking agents in a manner similar to human
FA cell strains (26). As Fig.
2A indicates, these murine
fibroblasts were also hypersensitive to restriction enzyme-induced cell
death, whereas wild type murine embryo fibroblasts and murine embryo
fibroblasts heterozygous for the deleted Fancc allele were
resistant. Likewise, Chinese hamster ovary-derived UV40 cells (27),
which fail to produce functional Xrcc9 protein (the hamster homolog of
human FANCG protein) and have also been shown to be hypersensitive to
DNA cross-linking agents (36), were significantly more sensitive to
restriction enzyme-induced cell death than were cells of the wild type
parental cell line AA8 (Fig. 2B). These data indicate that
the FA-like rodent cells are as sensitive to restriction
enzyme-induced killing as human FA fibroblasts.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Mouse fibroblasts deficient in Fancc are
sensitive to restriction enzyme-induced DNA double strand breaks.
Data represent the mean of three experiments; error bars
depict the mean ± S.E., *, p < 0.005. A, restriction enzyme-induced cell death was measured in
mouse embryonic fibroblasts homozygous for an Fancc exon 9 deletion
allele (
), normal mouse fibroblasts (
), and mouse fibroblasts
heterozygous for the Fancc exon 9 deletion allele (
). B,
restriction enzyme-induced cell death was measured in Xrcc9-deficient
UV40 cells (
) and the UV40 parental cell line AA8 (
).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
University of Minnesota Medical School, 6-120 Jackson Hall, 321 Church
St., S. E., Minneapolis, MN 55455. Tel.: 612-625-8986; Fax:
612-625-8408; E-mail: campb034@tc.umn.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Auerbach, A. D.,
and Allen, R. G.
(1991)
Cancer Genet. Cytogenet.
51,
1-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
D'Andrea, A. D.,
and Grompe, M.
(1997)
Blood
90,
1725-1736 3.
Joenje, H.,
Oostra, A. B.,
Wijker, M.,
di Summa, F. M.,
van Berkel, C. G.,
Rooimans, M. A.,
Ebell, W.,
van Weel, M.,
Pronk, J. C.,
Buchwald, M.,
and Arwert, F.
(1997)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
61,
940-944[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Joenje, H.,
Levitus, M.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
D'Andrea, A. D.,
Garcia-Higuera, I.,
Pearson, T.,
van Berkel, C. G.,
Rooimans, M. A.,
Morgan, N.,
Mathew, C. G.,
and Arwert, F.
(2000)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
67,
759-762[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Timmers, C.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Hejna, J.,
Reifsteck, C.,
Lucas, L.,
Bruun, D.,
Thayer, M.,
Cox, B.,
Olson, S.,
D'Andrea, A. D.,
Moses, R.,
and Grompe, M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
241-248[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Strathdee, C. A.,
Gavish, H.,
Shannon, W. R.,
and Buchwald, M.
(1992)
Nature
356,
763-767[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
The Fanconi anaemia/Breast Cancer Consortium..
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
324-328[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Lo Ten Foe, J. R.,
Rooimans, M. A.,
Bosnoyan-Collins, L.,
Alon, N.,
Wijker, M.,
Parker, L.,
Lightfoot, J.,
Carreau, M.,
Callen, D. F.,
Savoia, A.,
Cheng, N. C.,
van Berkel, C. G.,
Strunk, M. H.,
Gille, J. J.,
Pals, G.,
Kruyt, F. A.,
Pronk, J. C.,
Arwert, F.,
Buchwald, M.,
and Joenje, H.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
320-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
de Winter, J. P.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
Rooimans, M. A.,
van Berkel, C. G. M.,
Bosnoyan-Collins, L.,
Alon, N.,
Carreau, M.,
Bender, O.,
Demuth, I.,
Schindler, D.,
Pronk, J. C.,
Arwert, F.,
Hoehn, H.,
Digweed, M.,
Buchwald, M.,
and Joenje, H.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
20,
281-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
de Winter, J. P.,
Leveille, F.,
van Berkel, C. G. M.,
Rooimans, M. A.,
van der Weel, L.,
Steltenpool, J.,
Demuth, I.,
Morgan, N. V.,
Alon, N.,
Bosnoyan-Collins, L.,
Lightfoot, J.,
Leegwater, P. A.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
Komatsu, K.,
Arwert, F.,
Pronk, J. C.,
Mathew, C. G.,
Digweed, M.,
Buchwald, M.,
and Joenje, J.
(2000)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
67,
1306-1308[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
de Winter, J. P.,
Rooimans, M. A.,
van der Weel, L.,
van Berkel, C. G. M.,
Alon, N.,
Bosnoyan-Collins, L.,
de Groot, J.,
Zhi, Y.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
Pronk, J. C.,
Arwert, F.,
Mathew, C. G.,
and Scheper, R. J.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
24,
15-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Howlett, N. G.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Olson, S.,
Cox, B.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
de Die-Smulders, C.,
Persky, N.,
Grompe, M.,
Joenje, H.,
Pals, G.,
Ikeda, H.,
Fox, E. A.,
and D'Andrea, A. D.
(2002)
Science
297,
606-609 13.
de Winter, J. P.,
van der Weel, L.,
de Groot, J.,
Stone, S.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
Arwert, F.,
Scheper, R. J.,
Kruyt, F. A. E.,
Hoatlin, M. E.,
and Joenje, H.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
2665-2674 14.
Medhurst, A. L.,
Huber, P. A.,
Waisfisz, Q.,
de Winter, J. P.,
and Mathew, C. G.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
10,
423-429 15.
Witt, E.,
and Ashworth, A.
(2002)
Science
297,
534 16.
Ishida, R.,
and Buchwald, M.
(1982)
Cancer Res.
42,
4000-4006 17.
Papadopoulo, D.,
Guillouf, C.,
Mohrenweiser, H.,
and Moustacchi, E.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8383-8387 18.
Auerbach, A. D.
(1993)
Exp. Hematol.
21,
731-733[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Carreau, M.,
Alon, N.,
Bosnoyan-Collins, L.,
Joenje, H.,
and Buchwald, M.
(1999)
Mutat. Res.
435,
103-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Escarceller, M.,
Rousset, S.,
Moustacchi, E.,
and Papadopoulo, D.
(1997)
Somatic Cell Mol. Genet.
23,
401-411[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Escarceller, M.,
Buchwald, M.,
Singleton, B. K.,
Jeggo, P. A.,
Jackson, S. P.,
Moustacchi, E.,
and Papadopoulo, D.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
279,
375-385[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Lundberg, R.,
Mavinakere, M.,
and Campbell, C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9543-9549 23.
Patel, K. J., Yu, V. P.,
Lee, H.,
Coircoran, A.,
Thistlethwaite, F. C.,
Evans, M. J.,
Colledge, W. H.,
Friedman, L. S.,
Ponder, B. A.,
and Venkitaraman, A. R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
347-357[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Garcia-Higuera, I.,
Taniguchi, T.,
Ganesan, S.,
Meyn, M. S.,
Timmers, C.,
Hejna, J.,
Grompe, M.,
and D'Andrea, A. D.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
249-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Taniguchi, T.,
Garcia-Higuera, I., Xu, B.,
Andeassen, P. R.,
Gregory, R. C.,
Kim, S.-T.,
Lane, W. S.,
Kastan, M. B.,
and D'Andrea, A. D.
(2002)
Cell
109,
459-472[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Whitney, M. A.,
Royle, G.,
Low, M. J.,
Kelly, M. A.,
Axthelm, M. K.,
Reifsteck, C.,
Olson, S.,
Braun, R. E.,
Heinrich, M. C.,
Rathbun, R. K.,
Bagby, G. C.,
and Grompe, M.
(1996)
Blood
88,
49-58 27.
Liu, N.,
Lamerdin, J. E.,
Tucker, J. D.,
Zhou, Z. Q.,
Walter, C. A.,
Albala, J. S.,
Busch, D. B.,
and Thompson, L. H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
9232-9237 28.
Youssoufian, H.,
Youlin, L.,
Martin, M. E.,
and Buchwald, M.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
957-962[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Skehan, P.,
Storeng, R.,
Scudiero, D.,
Monks, A.,
McMahon, J.,
Vistica, D.,
Warren, J. T.,
Bokesch, H.,
Kenney, S.,
and Boyd, M. R.
(1990)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
13,
1107-1112
30.
Bryant, P. E.
(1992)
Mutat. Res.
268,
27-34[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Harvey, A. N.,
Costa, N. D.,
Savage, J. R.,
and Thacker, J.
(1997)
Somatic Cell Mol. Genet.
23,
211-219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Kinashi, Y.,
Okayasu, R.,
Iliakis, G. E.,
Nagasawa, H.,
and Little, J. B.
(1995)
Radiat. Res.
141,
153-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Costa, M. D.,
Masson, W. K.,
and Thacker, J.
(1993)
Somatic Cell Mol. Genet.
19,
479-490[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Giaccia, A. J.,
Maclaren, R. A.,
Denko, N.,
Nicolaou, D.,
and Stamato, T. D.
(1990)
Mutat. Res.
236,
67-76[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Bryant, P. E.,
Birch, D. A.,
and Jeggo, P. A.
(1987)
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
52,
537-554
36.
Busch, D. B.,
Zdzienicka, M. Z.,
Natarajan, A. T.,
Jones, N. J.,
Overkamp, W. J.,
Collins, A.,
Mitchell, D. L.,
Stefanini, M.,
Botta, E.,
Albert, R. B.,
Liu, N.,
White, D. A.,
van Gool, A. J.,
and Thompson, L. H.
(1996)
Mutat. Res.
363,
209-221[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Smith, J.,
Andrau, J. C.,
Kallenbach, S.,
Laquerbe, A.,
Doyen, N.,
and Papadopoulo, D.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
281,
815-825[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Moynahan, M. E.,
Pierce, A. J.,
and Jasin, M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
263-272[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Venkitaraman, A. R.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
3591-3598 40.
Jachymczyk, W. J.,
von Borstel, R. C.,
Mowat, M. R.,
and Hastings, P. J.
(1981)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
182,
196-205[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Caldecott, K.,
and Jeggo, P. A.
(1991)
Mutat. Res.
255,
111-121[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Liu, N.,
Lamerdin, J. E.,
Tebbs, R. S.,
Schild, D.,
Tucker, J. D.,
Shen, M. R.,
Brookman, K. W.,
Siciliano, M. J.,
Walter, C. A.,
Fan, W.,
Narayana, L. S.,
Zhou, Z. Q.,
Adamson, A. W.,
Sorensen, K. J.,
Chen, D. J.,
Jones, N. J.,
and Thompson, L. H.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
783-793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Scully, R.,
Chen, J.,
Ochs, R. L.,
Keegan, K.,
Hoekstra, M.,
Feunteun, J.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
425-435[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Snouwaert, J. N.,
Gowen, L. C.,
Latour, A. M.,
Mohn, A. R.,
Xiao, A.,
DiBiase, L.,
and Koller, B. H.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
7900-7907[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Moynahan, M. E.,
Cui, T. Y.,
and Jasin, M.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
4842-4850 46.
Kraakman-van der Zwet, M.,
Overkamp, W. J. I.,
van Lange, R. E. E.,
Essers, J.,
van Duijn-Goedhart, A.,
Wiggers, I.,
Swaminathan, S.,
van Buul, P. P. W.,
Errami, A.,
Tan, R. T. L.,
Jaspers, N. G. J.,
Sharan, S. K.,
Kanaar, R.,
and Zdzienicka, M. Z.
(2002)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
22,
669-679 47.
Xu, B.,
Kim, S.,
and Kastan, M. B.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
3445-3450 48.
Runger, T. M.,
Sobotta, P.,
Dekant, B.,
Moller, K.,
Bauer, C.,
and Kraemer, K. H.
(1993)
Toxicol Lett.
67,
309-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Auerbach, A. D.,
and Wolman, S. R.
(1976)
Nature
261,
494-496[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
50.
Gruenert, D. C.,
and Cleaver, J. E.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
5399-5404[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Karanjawala, Z. E.,
Murphy, N.,
Hinton, D. R.,
Hsieh, C.-L.,
and Lieber, M. R.
(2002)
Curr. Biol.
12,
397-402[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Hinz, P. B. Nham, S. S. Urbin, I. M. Jones, and L. H. Thompson Disparate contributions of the Fanconi anemia pathway and homologous recombination in preventing spontaneous mutagenesis Nucleic Acids Res., June 28, 2007; 35(11): 3733 - 3740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sobeck, S. Stone, and M. E. Hoatlin DNA Structure-Induced Recruitment and Activation of the Fanconi Anemia Pathway Protein FANCD2 Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2007; 27(12): 4283 - 4292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sobeck, S. Stone, V. Costanzo, B. de Graaf, T. Reuter, J. de Winter, M. Wallisch, Y. Akkari, S. Olson, W. Wang, et al. Fanconi Anemia Proteins Are Required To Prevent Accumulation of Replication-Associated DNA Double-Strand Breaks Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2006; 26(2): 425 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Houghtaling, A. Newell, Y. Akkari, T. Taniguchi, S. Olson, and M. Grompe Fancd2 functions in a double strand break repair pathway that is distinct from non-homologous end joining Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2005; 14(20): 3027 - 3033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-G. Yang, Z. Herceg, K. Nakanishi, I. Demuth, C. Piccoli, J. Michelon, G. Hildebrand, M. Jasin, M. Digweed, and Z.-Q. Wang The Fanconi anemia group A protein modulates homologous repair of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2005; 26(10): 1731 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-H. Park, S. Margossian, A. A. Horwitz, A. M. Simons, A. D. D'Andrea, and J. D. Parvin Direct DNA Binding Activity of the Fanconi Anemia D2 Protein J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23593 - 23598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nakanishi, Y.-G. Yang, A. J. Pierce, T. Taniguchi, M. Digweed, A. D. D'Andrea, Z.-Q. Wang, and M. Jasin Human Fanconi anemia monoubiquitination pathway promotes homologous DNA repair PNAS, January 25, 2005; 102(4): 1110 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Lamerdin, N. A. Yamada, J. W. George, B. Souza, A. T. Christian, N. J. Jones, and L. H. Thompson Characterization of the hamster FancG/Xrcc9 gene and mutations in CHO UV40 and NM3 Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 237 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Donahue, R. Lundberg, R. Saplis, and C. Campbell Deficient Regulation of DNA Double-strand Break Repair in Fanconi Anemia Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 29487 - 29495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tonnies, S. Huber, J.-S. Kuhl, A. Gerlach, W. Ebell, and H. Neitzel Clonal chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of Fanconi anemia patients: gains of the chromosomal segment 3q26q29 as an adverse risk factor Blood, May 15, 2003; 101(10): 3872 - 3874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||