JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M207410200 on September 21, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 48, 46364-46373, November 29, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/48/46364    most recent
M207410200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, R.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Topper, J. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, R.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Topper, J. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Identification of a Novel Family of Cell-surface Proteins Expressed in Human Vascular Endothelium*

Ruey-Bing YangDagger , Chi Kin Domingos NgDagger , Scott M. WassermanDagger , Steven D. Colman§, Suresh Shenoy§, Fuad Mehraban§, László G. KömüvesDagger , James E. TomlinsonDagger , and James N. TopperDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Cardiovascular Research, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, California 94080 and the § Department of Collaborative Research, CuraGen Corporation, New Haven, Connecticut 06511

Received for publication, July 23, 2002, and in revised form, September 20, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Vascular endothelial cells (EC) play a key role in a variety of pathophysiologic processes, such as angiogenesis, inflammation, cancer metastasis, and vascular diseases. As part of a strategy to identify all genes expressed in human EC, a full-length cDNA encoding a potential secreted protein harboring 10 epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains and one CUB domain at the carboxyl terminus (termed, SCUBE1 for Signal peptide-CUB-EGF-like domain containing protein 1) was identified. SCUBE1 shares homology with several protein families, including members of the fibrillin and Notch families, and the anticoagulant proteins, thrombomodulin and protein C. SCUBE1 mRNA is found in several highly vascularized tissues such as liver, kidney, lung, spleen, and brain and is selectively expressed in EC by in situ hybridization. SCUBE1 is a secreted glycoprotein that can form oligomers and manifests a stable association with the cell surface. A second gene encoding a homologue (designated SCUBE2) was also identified and is expressed in EC as well as other cell types. SCUBE2 is also a cell-surface protein and can form a heteromeric complex with SCUBE1. Both SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 are rapidly down-regulated in EC after interleukin-1beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment in vitro and after lipopolysaccharide injection in vivo. Thus, SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 define an emerging family of human secreted proteins that are expressed in vascular endothelium and may play important roles in development, inflammation, and thrombosis.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Vascular endothelium (EC),1 the single layer of cells located at the interface between tissue and blood, plays an essential role in the maintenance of normal vascular physiology. Dysfunction of this cell type can lead to vascular diseases such as hypertension and atherosclerosis (1). The functional phenotype of EC is dynamically responsive to a variety of physiologic and pathophysiologic stimuli that include proinflammatory cytokines, growth factors, bacterial products, as well as biomechanical forces (2, 3). Many of these functions are mediated by proteins selectively expressed on the surface of ECs. For example, tissue factor expressed on the surface of EC in response to activation serves as a cofactor for factor VIIa to activate factor X and factor IX in the coagulation cascade (4). Conversely, the anticoagulant protein thrombomodulin is an EC surface molecule that binds thrombin, thereby activating protein C that in the presence of protein S degrades factor Va and VIIIa (5, 6). E-selectin is an EC-selective adhesion molecule that is rapidly induced on inflamed EC and plays a critical role in leukocyte recruitment (7). In addition, organ-selective EC surface molecules have been functionally identified in several tissues, and an endothelial marker responsible for tumor homing to the lungs has been identified (8-11). To begin to understand the repertoire of human EC surface molecules, we have combined comprehensive library sequencing with transcriptional profiling to identify EC-selective genes (12).

Approximately 100,000 cDNA fragments derived from EC were sequenced, and these sequences were then merged with public data bases to obtain ~10,000 independent gene assemblies putatively expressed in EC. To validate their endothelial expression, these genes were then represented on customized oligonucleotide microarrays (13), together with all of the non-redundant human genes from public data bases (12). Competitive hybridizations were performed utilizing both endothelial and non-endothelial cell types, and these analyses revealed ~400 genes that were uniquely expressed in EC. These included the majority of genes known to be expressed in an EC-selective pattern, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme, acetylated low density lipoprotein receptor, E-selectin, Tie-2, VEGFR2 (KDR), von Willebrand factor, NOS3, CD31, endothelin, VE-cadherin, EphB4, and ephrin-B2, and many uncharacterized genes.

One full-length cDNA identified by these approaches encoded a potential secreted protein harboring a signal peptide at the amino terminus followed by 10 EGF-like repeats and 1 CUB domain at the carboxyl terminus (termed SCUBE1 for Signal peptide-CUB- EGF-like domain containing protein 1). Interestingly, when overexpressed, SCUBE1 protein is not only secreted but is also tethered on the cell surface. Likewise, a second human gene encoding a homologue (designated SCUBE2) was also identified and appears to be expressed in EC and displayed onto cell surface in overexpressing 293T cells. SCUBE1 and SCUBE2, when singly or coexpressed, can manifest homo- and heterotypic interactions. Furthermore, SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 expression is down-regulated in EC after IL-1beta and TNF-alpha treatment in vitro and after LPS injection in vivo, suggesting a possible role of the SCUBE gene family in the inflammatory response. Previous work has described the apparent mouse homologues of Scube1 and Scube2 (14, 15). Based solely on their expression in a variety of embryonic tissues, it was proposed that the Scube gene family may play roles in development; however, no adult expression data were reported. Our results indicate that SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 define an emerging secreted and cell-surface protein family that is expressed in human vascular endothelium.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In Situ Hybridization-- The details of tissue preparation and in situ hybridization have been described earlier (16-18). Following the manufacturer's protocol, digoxigenin-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes were synthesized from DNA templates (nucleotides 2241-2529) using reagents supplied by Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Sectioning, pretreatment of the sections, and hybridization of the probes were done under strict RNase-free conditions. All reagents were prepared using diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated distilled water. 15-µm thick sections were collected on positively charged slides and dried at 55 °C overnight. The sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated in Histosolve and ethanol and rinsed in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated distilled water. The sections were treated at room temperature with 0.2 N HCl (20 min), 1.5% H2O2 (15 min), 0.3% Triton X-100 (15 min) followed by proteinase K treatment at 37 °C (30 min). The sections then were washed with triethanolamine buffer followed by acetylation with acetic anhydride. Following prehybridization in 2× SSC, containing 50% formamide at 37 °C (1 h), the sections were air-dried at room temperature. Sections were hybridized with the probes diluted in hybridization solution (2× SSC, containing 50% formamide, 10× Denhardt's, 0.001% SDS, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 0.005% sodium pyrophosphate, and 500 µg/ml yeast tRNA) at 55 °C overnight. Following hybridization, the sections were washed with 4× SSC (twice for 15 min) and 2× SSC (twice for 15 min). The sections then were treated with RNase A at 37 °C (30 min) followed by stringency washes in 2× SSC at 37 °C (15 min), 0.1× SSC at 42 °C (40 min), and finally in 0.1× SSC at room temperature (twice for 15 min). The sections were washed with maleate buffer (30 min) and then blocked with 10 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.6, containing 500 mM NaCl, 4% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% cold-water fish skin gelatin, and 0.05% Tween 20. The sections were then incubated with anti-digoxigenin antibody, conjugated to peroxidase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), for 1 h. The signal was amplified using TSA-Plus kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences), and the signal was detected with Vector Blue substrate (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Following incubation with substrate the sections were dehydrated in ethanol and Histosolve and coverslipped. Hybridization with the sense control probe did not result in detectable signal, indicating the specificity of hybridization.

Microscopy-- Slides were observed with an Olympus BX50 microscope (Olympus, Inc., Melville, NY), using DIC illumination. The microscope was equipped with a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera (Technical Instruments, San Francisco, Burlingame, CA). Digitized images (1280 × 1024-pixel resolution) were acquired using ACT-1 software (Nikon, Melville, NY). Images were resized, cropped, and assembled using Photoshop version 6.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA). Apart from equalizing the background intensities, no other digital modifications of the original digital images were carried out.

Identification of the Full-length Clones of Human SCUBE1 and SCUBE2-- To capture the diverse repertoire of genes expressed in EC, multiple libraries from EC under various stimuli (such as shear-stressed, proinflammatory cytokine-treated) were generated and normalized using methods described previously (19). Approximately 100,000 cDNA fragments were sequenced, and these sequences were then merged with public data bases to obtain ~10,000 EC gene independent assemblies. To validate their endothelial expression, these genes were then represented on custom oligonucleotide microarrays (13), together with all of non-overlapping human genes from public data bases (12). Competitive hybridizations were performed among both endothelial and non-endothelial cells. Clustering analyses revealed ~400 genes that were uniquely expressed in EC. One cDNA fragment encoding multiple copies of EGF-like domains was identified and subsequently mapped onto human chromosome 22q13. Based on gene prediction, two oligonucleotides (5'-CAG CGG GGC CCG CAT TGA GCA TGG GCG CGG-3' and 5'-CCC GGT TAT TTG TAG GGC CGC AGG AAC CGA-3') were used to amplify the entire open reading frame by PCR from a mixture of human cDNA libraries. The amplified SCUBE1 full-length cDNA was cloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen) and confirmed by sequencing. The clone containing full-length SCUBE2 was obtained from OriGene Technologies (Rockville, MD). Full-length sequences for SCUBE1 were deposited into GenBankTM with accession number AF525689, and the SCUBE2 sequence is the same as NM_020974 (except nucleotides 1287 to 1526 are spliced out in the clone we used).

Northern Blot Analysis-- The human Northern blot was purchased from Clontech and hybridized with a radiolabeled human SCUBE1 cDNA probe (nucleotides 2077-2851) per the manufacturer's protocol.

Construction of Expression Plasmids-- The epitope-tagged versions of SCUBE1 or SCUBE2 were constructed in the following expression vectors. The pcDNA4/Myc-His (Invitrogen) was used to add a Myc tag to the carboxyl terminus of SCUBE1 containing endogenous signal peptide. The pSecTag2 (Invitrogen) including Ig kappa -chain leader sequence was used to add a Myc tag at the carboxyl terminus of SCUBE2. The pFLAG-CMV-1 (Sigma) was used to include a FLAG tag at the amino terminus of target protein.

Cell Culture and Transfection-- Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates overnight before transfection. The transfection was performed by using FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The total amount of DNA was kept constant in all transfections by supplementing empty vector DNA. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were cultured as described previously (20).

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analyses-- Transfected cells were washed once with PBS and lysed for 15 min on ice in 0.5 ml of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 25 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 µg/ml leupeptin). Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 4 °C for 15 min at 10,000 × g. Cells lysates were incubated with 1 µg of indicated antibody and 20 µl of 50% (v/v) protein A-agarose (Pierce) for 2 h with gentle rocking. After three washes with lysis buffer, precipitated complexes were solubilized by boiling in Laemmli sample buffer, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked with PBS, pH 7.5, containing 0.1% gelatin and 0.05% Tween 20 and were blotted with the indicated antibodies. After two washes, the blots were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (The Jackson Laboratories) for 1 h. After washing the membranes, the reactive bands were visualized with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Biosciences).

Subcellular Fractionation-- Transfected cells were washed with PBS and lysed in hypotonic lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 10 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA). After incubation for 30 min on ice, cells were homogenized with 80 strokes in a tight fitting Dounce homogenizer. The lysed cells were then centrifuged at 1,000 × g (30 min, 4 °C), and the supernatant taken and further centrifuged at 100,000 × g (30 min, 4 °C) to obtain the cytosolic (S100) and membrane (P100) fractions. The P100 fraction was washed once with hypotonic lysis buffer, resuspended in 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 12, sonicated briefly, and then incubated on ice for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged again at 100,000 × g for 30 min to give washed fractions S100' and pellets P100'.

FACS Analysis-- Transfected cells were collected and suspended in PBS, 2% bovine serum albumin in a volume of 0.25 ml. A total of 1 µg of purified anti-FLAG M2 antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:100 dilution, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) was added sequentially; each were incubated for 45 min on ice. FACS analyses were performed with a FACScan (BD Biosciences).

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Administration-- LPS (Escherichia coli serotype O111:B4) was purchased from Sigma and dissolved in PBS at concentration of 1 mg/ml. LPS solution (5 mg/kg) or PBS was injected intraperitoneally into a group of three C67BL/6 mice, and at the indicated time points (3, 6, 24, and 48 h post-injection), the kidneys of these animals were harvested, washed in sterile cold PBS, and frozen in liquid nitrogen.

RNA Isolation, Semi-quantitative Reverse Transcription (RT)-PCR, and TaqMan Analyses-- Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells or harvested animal kidneys using TRIzol reagents (Invitrogen). First-strand cDNA synthesis using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) was prepared on 5 µg of total RNA. One-tenth of the first-strand cDNA reaction was used for each PCR as template. Alternatively, premade first-strand cDNAs from human tissues (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) were used as PCR template. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR primers specific for human SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 were as follows: SCUBE1-f2, AGT GTT CTC CAG GCT TCT TCT; SCUBE1-r2, CAG TGC TGG TTT TTG CAG TGT; SCUBE2-f2, AGA CCC CAG AAG CTT GGA ATA; SCUBE2-r2, TCC CCT CCA CAT CTT CTG TTT. GAPDH primers were obtained from Clontech. Real time TaqMan PCR analyses were performed using Applied Biosystems PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System. Normalization was performed using glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA levels as controls in parallel TaqMan reactions. The 5' and 3' primers and a fluorescence-labeled probe were designed as follows: SCUBE1 5' primer, AAC ACA CGG GTA CCG CCT CTT; SCUBE1 3' primer, GTA TTG TAG TGG TGT CCG GGA GA; SCUBE1 probe, CCA GGA CTG CGA GGC CAA AGT GCA T; SCUBE2 5' primer, CAG GAT TGT GAA ACC CGA GTT C; SCUBE2 3' primer, CGG ATA CAT CGG TGT GTG GTG; SCUBE2 probe, TGC TCG CCT GGG CAT TTC TAC AAC A; GAPDH primer-probe was purchased from BioSource International (Camarillo, CA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of a Gene Highly Expressed in EC-- The endothelial origin of a SCUBE1 cDNA fragment identified by genomic approaches was confirmed by in situ hybridization (Fig. 1). It was expressed in the luminal endothelial cells of the human umbilical vessels (Fig. 1a). Furthermore, localization of this gene to ECs was validated in cynomolgus monkey brain (Fig. 1b), lung (Fig. 1, c and d), and kidney (Fig. 1, e and f). In addition to endothelial expression in artery and vein, this gene is also expressed in microvascular endothelial cells in a variety of tissues (Fig. 1, b-f, and data not shown).


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Validation of the endothelial expression of a SCUBE1 cDNA fragment by in situ hybridization. The endothelial origin of one SCUBE1 cDNA fragment identified by genomic approach was confirmed by a highly sensitive in situ hybridization assay (16-18). Localization of this gene to the EC (blue stain) was demonstrated in human umbilical cord artery (a, inset, vein), monkey brain (b), lung (c and d), and kidney (e and f).

To obtain the full-length cDNA of this gene, the original cDNA fragment was mapped to human genomic sequence (www.ensembl.org) and was found to be localized on chromosome 22q13, where a human gene was predicted based on its homology to mouse Scube1 (14). Two oligonucleotides, based on this gene prediction, were used to amplify the entire open reading frame from human cDNAs. This cDNA contains an open reading frame of 2964 nucleotides and encodes a polypeptide of 988 amino acids (Fig. 2a). Hydropathy (21) and protein family analyses (22) predict one amino-terminal signal peptide (22 amino acids) followed by 10 EGF-like repeats and a CUB domain (Fig. 2). There is an apparent spacer region located between the 9th and 10th EGF-like repeats (Fig. 2b). This domain structure is identical to that of mouse Scube1, therefore, this human orthologue was designated SCUBE1 to be consistent with the literature (14). Mature SCUBE1 is predicted to contain 966 amino acids with calculated molecular mass of 106 kDa.


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Primary sequence and domain structure of human SCUBE1. a, primary sequence of the 988-amnio acid human SCUBE1 as deduced by the full-length cDNA clone. The signal peptide, EGF-like repeats, and CUB domain are marked or underlined. Potential glycosylation sites are indicated by dots. The margins of two deletion constructs in this study, D1 and D2, are marked. The estimated mature mass is 105,553 Da, and the pI is 6.7. b, hydrophobicity plot and domain structure of human SCUBE1. The plot was generated according to the coefficients proposed by Kyte and Doolittle (21). The region marked with the thick line indicates the putative signal peptide (see a). The lower panel shows the domain structure of SCUBE1 protein. In addition to the EGF-like repeats and the CUB domain, a spacer region is located between the 9th and 10th EGF-like repeat. FL, full-length; D1, deletion mutant 1; D2, deletion mutant 2; E, EGF-like repeats; CUB, CUB domain; SP, signal peptide.

Tissue Distribution of Human SCUBE1 Transcript-- A Northern blot containing poly(A)+-enriched mRNA (2 µg) from a variety of human adult tissues was hybridized with a human SCUBE1 cDNA radiolabeled probe. The expression level of the SCUBE1 transcripts was highest in liver, kidney, lung, and small intestine, followed by brain, colon, and spleen. The expression in remaining tissues was very low or undetectable (Fig. 3). Expression of SCUBE1 in several highly vascular tissues, such as liver, kidney, and lung, is consistent with the endothelial origin of SCUBE1 demonstrated by in situ hybridization (Fig. 1). The size of the primary transcript for SCUBE1 (4 kb) is consistent with both the predicted and cloned full-length cDNA (Fig. 2).


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Northern blot analysis of poly(A)+ mRNA from various human tissues for SCUBE1. Two micrograms of poly(A)-enriched mRNA from various human adult tissues were hybridized with SCUBE1 cDNA radiolabeled probe. The SCUBE1 probe identified an mRNA species of 4.0 kb. The lower panel shows the same blot hybridized with beta -actin probe as a control.

SCUBE1 Is a Secreted and Cell-associated Protein-- Because human SCUBE1 protein has a putative signal peptide at the amino terminus and because human SCUBE1 protein contains 10 EGF-like repeats that are found in many extracellular matrix proteins (ECM) (23, 24), we examined whether the SCUBE1 protein is a secretory and/or ECM protein. For this purpose, recombinant SCUBE1 protein was expressed by means of transient expression in human embryonic kidney 293T cells. The Myc epitope tag was added at the carboxyl terminus for the detection of the recombinant protein. Two days after transfection, the culture supernatants were collected, and cells were detached from dishes by EDTA treatment, and residual ECM proteins were extracted with Laemmli buffer. Samples collected from these three fractions were subjected to Western blot analyses using anti-Myc antibody. As shown in Fig. 4a, human SCUBE1 protein was detected in the conditioned cell culture medium (Medium) and in cells (Cell) but was not detected in the ECM fraction (Matrix) or in fractions from the control vector-transfected cells. These data demonstrate that the SCUBE1 protein is a secreted and cell-associated protein.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Human SCUBE1 can be a secreted protein. a, expression of SCUBE1 containing the endogenous signal peptide results in a secreted protein. 293T cells were transfected with an expression vector encoding human SCUBE1 Myc-tagged at the carboxyl terminus (SCUBE1.Myc). Forty eight hours post-transfection, conditioned medium was collected, and then cells were detached with PBS/EDTA. Extracellular matrix on the culture dish was extracted with Laemmli sample buffer. Samples from conditioned culture medium (Medium), cell lysates (Cell), and the extracellular matrix (Matrix) were separated by 4-20% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Recombinant SCUBE1 proteins were detected by Western blotting with anti-Myc antibody. b, secreted SCUBE1 is the same size as cell-associated form. 293T cells were transfected with the expression vector encoding dual FLAG- and Myc-tagged SCUBE1 at the amino and carboxyl terminus (Flag.SCUBE1.Myc). Two days after transfection, samples from conditioned culture medium (Medium), cell lysates (Cell), and the extracellular matrix (Matrix) were separated by 4-20% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Recombinant SCUBE1 proteins were detected by Western blotting with anti-FLAG M2 or anti-Myc antibody. c, secreted SCUBE1 is not a proteolytic product. Conditioned culture medium from cells transfected with dual-tagged Flag.SCUBE1.Myc was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG M2 antibody, and then the precipitates were immunoblotted with indicated antisera. IP, immunoprecipitation; WB, Western blot.

Because the CUB domain was recently described in two novel members of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) family that require proteolytic activation (25-28), we tested whether secreted SCUBE1 could be subject to proteolytic cleavage. A dual epitope-tagged SCUBE1 with FLAG and Myc tags added to the amino and carboxyl terminus, respectively, was transiently expressed in 293T cells. Forty eight hours post-transfection, samples from conditioned medium, cells, and ECM were individually immunoblotted with anti-FLAG or anti-Myc antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4b, the molecular weight of detected SCUBE1 protein is identical either by anti-FLAG or anti-Myc antibodies. These results suggest that the secreted SCUBE1 protein does not undergo further proteolytic processing. Consistent with this finding, the dual-tagged SCUBE1 protein immunoprecipitated by FLAG antibody from cell culture conditioned medium (Medium) showed the identical molecular size when blotted either with anti-FLAG or Myc antibodies separately (Fig. 4c).

Human SCUBE1 Is N-Glycosylated-- The molecular size of expressed SCUBE1 in 293T cells is about 130 kDa, slightly larger than the predicted size of the full-length SCUBE1 protein. Because human SCUBE1 possesses six putative N-linked glycosylation motifs (Fig. 2a), we hypothesized that SCUBE1 is subject to post-translational modification by glycosylation. Thus, we examined whether tunicamycin, an inhibitor of N-glycosylation, affected the molecular size of the protein. As shown in Fig. 5, tunicamycin treatment of cells resulted in a reduction in the molecular size of the precursor form of the SCUBE1 protein (lanes 2 and 5), indicating that the majority of SCUBE1 is glycosylated when expressed in 293T cells. To determine the contribution of the six putative N-linked glycosylation sites in the SCUBE1 protein, we compared the molecular size of the carboxyl-terminal deletion mutants (D1 and D2) with or without tunicamycin treatment. As shown in Fig. 5, the precursor form of mutant D1 (in which the carboxyl-terminal CUB domain is deleted) was detected at 110 kDa without tunicamycin (lane 3), whereas the protein size was shifted to a faster migrating band by treatment with tunicamycin (lane 6), indicating that the mutant D1 is glycosylated. However, tunicamycin treatment did not change the apparent molecular size of the precursor form of mutant D2 (lanes 4 and 7) (in which five of six putative N-linked glycosylation motifs in the protein are deleted) (Fig. 2b). Taken together, these data demonstrated that SCUBE1 is N-glycosylated at multiple sites within the carboxyl-terminal region.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Human SCUBE1 is a glycosylated protein. 293T cells were transfected with the expression vector encoding full-length FLAG-tagged or deletion mutants (D1 and D2) of human SCUBE1. Transfected cells were cultured in the absence (-) or in the presence of tunicamycin (5 µg/ml) for 24 h. Cell lysates from each culture were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-FLAG M2 antibody.

Homomeric Interactions of SCUBE1 Proteins-- Because families of secreted growth factors or cytokines are often capable of forming dimeric or higher ordered complexes (29, 30), and because SCUBE1 is a secretory protein, we hypothesized that oligomeric forms of SCUBE1 protein may exist. We constructed cDNAs encoding FLAG- or Myc-tagged SCUBE1 proteins, and we examined their association by co-immunoprecipitation assays from both singly and co-transfected 293T cells (Fig. 6a). Lysates of these cells were immunoprecipitated with the anti-Myc monoclonal antibody, and then the precipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody. A 130-kDa immunoreactive band recognized by anti-FLAG antibody was observed in the anti-Myc immunoprecipitates from cells co-expressing SCUBE1.Myc and Flag.SCUBE1 proteins but not from cells transfected with individual tagged constructs alone (Fig. 6a). Likewise, the reciprocal immunoprecipitation of Flag.SCUBE1 results in the co-precipitation of SCUBE1.Myc (Fig. 6a). We did not observe an association between SCUBE1 and IL-1R1, suggestion specificity of the homomeric interactions between SCUBE1 proteins (Fig. 6a). Furthermore, homomeric association of SCUBE1 proteins appears to require co-expression and is not an artifact formed only after cell lysis, because a mixture of lysates containing separately expressed tagged proteins is not sufficient for complex formation in this heterologous expression system (data not shown). These results demonstrate that human SCUBE1 proteins are capable of forming oligomeric complexes when co-expressed.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Homo-oligomerization of human SCUBE1 in transfected 293T cells. a, homomeric interaction of SCUBE1 proteins. The differential tagged constructs, Flag-SCUBE1 or SCUBE1.Myc, were singly or co-transfected in 293T cells. As a control, SCUBE1.Myc was expressed together with FLAG-tagged IL-1beta receptor 1 (Flag.IL-1R1). Immunoprecipitation (IP) and Western blot (WB) were performed using antisera as indicated. Experiments were performed three times with similar results. b, EGF-like repeats are sufficient for SCUBE1 homotypic associations. Full-length (FL) SCUBE1.Myc was expressed together with Flag.SCUBE1-FL, SCUBE1-D1, or SCUBE1-D2 (see Fig. 3) by transient transfection. Detergent lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myc antibody and then immunoblotted with anti-FLAG M2 antibody to determine the associated proteins. Cell lysates were also immunoblotted to examine the protein expression levels.

We then used carboxyl-deletion mutants (D1 and D2) to characterize which domains of SCUBE1 are necessary for SCUBE1 oligomerization. Two deletion constructs, FLAG-tagged SCUBE1-D1 or SCUBE1-D2 and full-length (FL) SCUBE1, were transiently co-expressed with SCUBE1.Myc in 293T cells (Fig. 6b). Immunoprecipitation of SCUBE1.Myc resulted in the co-precipitation of Flag.SCUBE1-D1 or Flag.SCUBE1-D2 (Fig. 6b). These data suggest that the first nine copies of the EGF-like repeats in the SCUBE1-D2 mutant protein are sufficient for SCUBE1 complex formation.

Human SCUBE1 Is a Peripheral Membrane Protein-- Because the majority of expressed SCUBE1 protein appears cell-associated (Fig. 4a), we next determined its subcellular distribution by biochemical fractionation. 293T cells transiently expressing FLAG-tagged SCUBE1 proteins were lysed in hypotonic buffer, and low and high speed centrifugation was performed to obtain a membrane fraction (P100) and a cytoplasmic fraction (S100). Subcellular distribution of SCUBE1 protein was monitored by anti-FLAG immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 7, most of the Flag.SCUBE1 protein was partitioned into the P100 membrane fraction, suggesting that SCUBE1 is membrane-bound. The presence of a small amount (less than 10%) of SCUBE1-D2 mutant protein in the cytosol may be due to some aberrant processing of this mutant or simply be a nonspecific effect of overexpression.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Membrane association of human SCUBE1 protein. 293T cells were transfected with the expression plasmids encoding indicated FLAG-tagged proteins. Two days after transfection, cells were collected and homogenized. Samples of supernatant were centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min to give soluble fractions (S100) and pellets (P100 membrane fraction). Pellets were further resuspended in original volumes of homogenization buffer with 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 12, sonicated briefly, and then incubated on ice for 30 min. Samples were centrifuged again at 100,000 × g for 30 min to give washed fractions S100' and pellets P100'. Each fraction was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis using anti-FLAG M2 antibody.

To assess the physical nature of SCUBE1 interaction with the plasma membrane, the P100 membrane fraction was treated with conditions that solubilize peripheral membrane proteins. All three forms of SCUBE1 protein were stripped off the membrane when incubated with 0.1 M Na2CO3, pH 12 (Fig. 7, S100'), whereas the Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR2), a single membrane-spanning receptor (31), was not released from the washed membranes (Fig. 7, P100'). These data indicate that membrane-bound SCUBE1 behaves like a peripheral membrane protein.

Spacer Region Is Critical for SCUBE1 Protein Secretion and Cell-surface Expression-- Because expression of FL SCUBE1 can result in a secreted protein, we examined whether or not the carboxyl domain plays a role in protein secretion. Two carboxyl-terminal deletion constructs, SCUBE1-D1 or SCUBE1-D2, were transiently expressed in 293T cells. The conditioned culture medium was collected and subjected to Western blotting analysis using anti-FLAG antibody. As shown in Fig. 8a, SCUBE1-D1 mutant (deleting the CUB domain) was expressed and secreted into the conditioned medium like the FL protein, whereas the SCUBE1-D2 mutant protein was not secreted (Fig. 8a). These data suggest that the spacer region, located between the 9th and the 10th EGF-like motif, is essential for SCUBE1 protein secretion, at least when overexpressed in 293T cells.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   The spacer region is critical for the secretion and surface expression of SCUBE1. a, the space region is required for SCUBE1 secretion. 293T cells were transfected with the expression plasmids encoding indicated FLAG-tagged SCUBE1 and IL-1R1 or JNK1 constructs as controls. Two days after transfection, conditioned culture medium was concentrated and separated on SDS-PAGE and Western-blotted with anti-FLAG M2 antibody. b, the spacer region is essential for cell-surface tethering of recombinant SCUBE1. The expression constructs Flag-SCUBE1-FL (top), -D1 (middle), or -D2 (bottom) were singly or co-transfected with SCUBE1.Myc plasmid in 293T cells. Twenty four hours post-transfection, cells were detached and stained with anti-FLAG M2 antibody as described under "Experimental Procedures." Experiments were performed twice with similar results.

To confirm that SCUBE1 is a secreted, peripheral membrane protein, we examined SCUBE1 cell-surface expression by flow cytometry analysis in intact cells. As shown in Fig. 8b, we confirmed the cell-surface expression of wild-type SCUBE1-FL or SCUBE1-D1 proteins (top and middle) by FACS analysis, whereas the SCUBE1-D2 deletion mutant is defective in cell-surface targeting when individually expressed (bottom). However, because SCUBE1-D2 mutant protein is capable of forming complexes with wild-type protein (Fig. 6b) and because wild-type SCUBE1-FL is a cell-surface protein (Fig. 8b), we next tested if co-expression with FL protein can restore the cell-surface targeting phenotype of SCUBE1-D2 mutant. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 8b (bottom), co-expression of wild-type SCUBE1.Myc resulted in the expression and targeting of SCUBE1-D2 mutant onto the cell surface as determined by flow cytometry.

Identification of a Second Member of SCUBE Family-- By utilizing homology searches, we identified a homologous human gene encoding a protein with identical domain structure to that of SCUBE1, designated SCUBE2. The mouse orthologue (Scube2) of this human gene was recently described (15). To compare the tissue expression patterns of human SCUBE1 and SCUBE2, each gene was examined by semi-quantitative PCR in a panel of human tissue cDNA (Fig. 9). Consistent with the Northern blot analysis (Fig. 3), SCUBE1 mRNA expression was restricted to few highly vascularized tissues such as liver, lung, and kidney (Fig. 9). In contrast, SCUBE2 transcript was expressed in a broad spectrum of human tissues (Fig. 9). Likewise, SCUBE2 message, but not SCUBE1, was also observed in several non-endothelial human primary cell types such as fibroblasts and renal mesangial cells (Fig. 10).


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Tissue distribution of SCUBE gene family determined by RT-PCR analyses. Human tissue cDNAs were amplified with primers specific for SCUBE1 or SCUBE2. Amplification of GAPDH was performed as a positive control. Sk., skeletal; PBL, peripheral blood leukocyte.


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Down-regulation of the SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 messages upon the treatment of proinflammatory cytokines in HUVEC. Several human primary cells and HUVEC treated with IL-1beta and TNF-alpha for 6 and 24 h were submitted for RT-PCR analyses. AOSMC, aortic smooth muscle cell.

The co-expression of the closely-related SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 mRNAs in cultured ECs (Fig. 10) raises the question of whether these proteins interact. To ascertain the formation of heteromeric complexes, differentially epitope-tagged SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 constructs were singly or co-transfected into 293T cells, and immunoprecipitations were performed. When Flag.SCUBE2 is co-expressed with either SCUBE1.Myc or SCUBE2.Myc, immunoprecipitation with FLAG antibody co-precipitates both proteins (Fig. 11). This interaction is not seen with tagged IL-1R1, indicating the specificity of this assay (Fig. 11).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Hetero- and homo-oligomerizations of SCUBE2 in transfected 293T cells. Indicated expression plasmids were singly or co-transfected in 293T cells. Detergent lysates of each transfection were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblotting (WB) using antibodies as indicated. Experiments were performed twice with similar results. The double bands seen for the Flag.SCUBE1 and Flag.IL-1R1 are due to the glycosylation of these proteins.

Down-regulation of the SCUBE Transcripts by Proinflammatory Cytokines in Vitro and LPS in Vivo-- Because vascular ECs are important cellular targets for the actions of proinflammatory cytokines (32), we determined whether or not expression of the endothelial Scube gene family could be altered in response to proinflammatory cytokines. Cultured HUVEC were exposed to IL-1beta or TNF-alpha for 6 and 24 h, respectively. Total RNAs isolated from cytokine-treated HUVEC were subjected to semi-quantitative RT-PCR to measure the expression level of SCUBE1 and SCUBE2. As shown in Fig. 10, SCUBE1 transcript was significantly down-regulated by both cytokine treatments with IL-1beta stimulation, demonstrating a more rapid response than that of TNF-alpha treatment. In contrast, SCUBE2 expression was only modestly depressed in response to 24 h of TNF-alpha treatment.

To validate further this observation in vivo, we investigated whether the expression of SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 was affected by systemic LPS administration in C57BL/6 mice. A group of animals (n = 3) was sacrificed after intraperitoneal injection of either LPS (5 mg/kg) or PBS vehicle at 3, 6, 24, and 48 h. Kidneys were collected and subjected to real time TaqMan analyses. As shown in Fig. 12, SCUBE1 RNA levels were dramatically down-regulated 3 h after injection of LPS and then quickly returned to untreated levels. SCUBE2 expression was also depressed by LPS injection, although with slightly slower kinetics, reaching the lowest level at 6 h postinjection and then recovering to untreated control levels over a 48-h period. These results indicate that both the Scube1 and Scube2 genes are dynamically responsive to inflammatory stimuli in vivo.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Depression of the Scube gene family expression upon the treatment of LPS in mice. A group of C57/BL6 mice (n = 3) were sacrificed after intraperitoneal injection of either LPS at 5 mg/kg or PBS vehicle at indicated time points. Kidneys were collected and submitted for the TaqMan analyses as described under "Experimental Procedures."


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this report we have identified a family of secreted proteins expressed in human vascular endothelial cells. Members of this gene family were named as SCUBE, based on their unique domain structures which consist of one Signal peptide, one CUB domain, and multiple EGF-like repeats (Fig. 2). SCUBE1 appears to be expressed selectively in endothelium. In situ hybridization demonstrated SCUBE1 expression in the EC lining the arteries, veins, and the microvessels of all organs examined (Fig. 1). Consistent with this finding, the highest levels of SCUBE1 expression are found in vascularized tissues (Fig. 3). In contrast, SCUBE2 is expressed in EC but is also found in additional cell types such as fibroblasts and renal mesangial cells and is expressed in a wide range of tissues (Figs. 9 and 10). Based on these disparate expression patterns, the SCUBE proteins may mediate distinct sets of functions in these various cell types and tissues.

The EGF-like repeat, a six-cysteine conserved motif, is found in many classes of proteins such as secreted growth factors, transmembrane receptors, adhesion molecules, signaling proteins, and components of the ECM (24). On the other hand, the CUB domain, which was named based on the first three identified proteins of this family, i.e. Complement proteins C1r/C1s, Uegf (sea urchin fibropellins), and Bmp1, is thought to mediate protein-protein interaction and has been found in a more limited set of proteins involved in developmental processes such as embryogenesis or organogenesis (33). A number of proteins with a role in embryonic development or immune responses have been identified that contain both the EGF-like and the CUB domains. These include Drosophila tolloid (34) and the mammalian tolloid-like proteins BMP1 (procollagen C proteinase) (35) and mTll (36), sea urchin fibropellins (37), the complement proteins C1s and C1r (37, 38), and the serum glycoprotein attractin (39, 40). Mouse Scube1 had been reported to be expressed prominently in the developing gonad, nervous system, somites, surface ectoderm, and limb buds (14), whereas mouse Scube2 was restricted to the embryonic neuroectoderm in mouse embryos ranging from 7.5 to 12.5 days post-coitum (15). Based on these expression patterns, it was hypothesized that the Scube gene family may play roles in the development of these organ systems (14, 15). In our studies, we have observed pan-endothelial expression of Scube1 in mouse 17.5 days post-coitum embryos by in situ hybridization (data not shown). These results are consistent with the pan-endothelial expression of SCUBE1 in the adult (Fig. 1). Thus, it appears that the endothelial restricted expression of this gene is acquired relatively late in development and persists into adulthood. These data suggest that this protein may have critical roles in both development and endothelial/vascular biology in the adult.

Based on cellular and biochemical studies, we have demonstrated that SCUBE1 proteins are capable of forming homomeric complexes and that the first nine EGF-like repeats are sufficient to maintain these interactions in 293T cells (Fig. 6). Because of the presence of both SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 in EC, we further investigated whether heteromeric complexes could form. These studies have indicated that both SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 can form homo- and heteromeric complexes with each other (Figs. 6 and 11). These data suggest that SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 may have related functions in EC.

The molecular mechanisms by which SCUBE proteins target to the cell surface and associate with the membrane remain unclear at present. We originally hypothesized that a short hydrophobic stretch within the CUB domain (Fig. 2b) may be responsible for the cell-surface association. However, this was disproved because the SCUBE1-D1 deletion mutant, which lacks the carboxyl CUB domain, still retains its ability to be secreted and cell surface-associated (Figs. 7 and 8). Surprisingly, the spacer region, located between the 9th and 10th EGF-like repeats, appears essential for SCUBE1 protein secretion and cell-surface targeting, because the SCUBE1-D2 deletion mutant, which is missing this spacer region as well as the rest of the carboxyl portion, is defective in secretion and cell-surface expression (Fig. 8). Interestingly, the defective phenotype of SCUBE1-D2 mutant protein can be effectively rescued by co-expression with FL SCUBE1 (Fig. 8b). This is consistent with the finding that SCUBE1-D2 mutant protein is still capable of forming a complex with the wild-type SCUBE1-FL protein (Fig. 6b) and suggests that this physical interaction with the wild-type protein may be playing a role in the "re-targeting" to cell surface (Fig. 8b). SCUBE1 is a glycoprotein (Fig. 5), and the deletion of multiple N-linked glycosylation sites in SCUBE1-D2 deletion mutant resulted in a loss of cell surface association (Fig. 8b). Thus, it may be that yet-to-be-identified lectins or mucin-like proteins with carbohydrate-binding capacity could serve as receptor(s) or binding site(s) for SCUBE proteins on EC. Alternatively, the EGF-like repeats of SCUBE proteins may form heteromeric complexes with other cell-surface proteins containing EGF-like repeats, much like the interactions seen in the transmembrane Notch receptors and their ligands, Delta and Serrate (41).

Data base searches identified members of the fibrillin family of ECM proteins as having significant homology to SCUBE proteins, based largely on their multiple EGF-like repeats. Interestingly, mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene cause Marfan syndrome, which is characterized in part by significant vascular abnormalities (42). Another protein family that contains multiple EGF-like repeats is the latent TGF-beta -binding protein (LTBP) family. Four different LTBP homologues, LTBPs 1-4, have been characterized (43, 44). LTBPs function to enhance secretion and stability of the latent TGF-beta complex, ensure correct folding of TGF-beta , and target the latent TGF-beta complex to the ECM of certain cells and tissues for storage or to the cell surface where activation takes place (43, 45, 46). To examine if SCUBE1 could have a similar role, we tested whether SCUBE proteins, like LTBPs, are capable of binding growth factors or cytokines. Flag.SCUBE1 was co-expressed individually with PDGF-D, IL-8, or IL-17F, all of which are expressed in or have functions in EC (27, 28, 47, 48). In our primary studies, Flag.SCUBE1 proteins were capable of forming stable complexes with PDGF-D and IL-17F but not with IL-8 (data not shown). Although the full significance of this interaction is currently unknown, this observation suggests that SCUBE1 proteins may potentially function to modulate the expression or function of certain growth factors.

An additional interesting domain feature of SCUBE1 is that it contains six Ca2+-binding EGF-like repeats (49), a motif found in many coagulation factors (e.g. fVII, IX, X, and XII) (50, 51) and anticoagulant proteins (e.g. thrombomodulin and protein C) (52, 53). As shown in Figs. 10 and 12, SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 transcripts were down-regulated in EC either by inflammatory cytokines in vitro or LPS injection in vivo. This is reminiscent of the suppression of EC cell-surface thrombomodulin and protein C expression, in response to IL-1beta , TNF-alpha , and LPS treatment (54-58). These data strongly suggest that SCUBE proteins are involved in the inflammatory responses and raise the interesting hypothesis that they may be modulators of thrombosis or coagulation.

In summary, we have identified a novel family of human EC-expressed secreted proteins termed SCUBE proteins. SCUBE1 appears to represent a novel Pan-endothelial expressed protein, and both SCUBE1 and SCUBE2 are found in EC. Although the precise functions are currently unknown, their unique structures, combined with their patterns of expression and modulation by inflammatory stimuli, point to potential roles in development, inflammation, and thrombosis.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Keith Abe and Francis Deguzman for excellent technical assistance in LPS administration and tissue collections. We also thank Drs. Neill Giese and Li Fang for providing the expression plasmids for PDGF-C and PDGF-D, and Dr. David R. Phillips for reading the manuscript and suggestions.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 650-246-7333; Fax: 650-244-9270; E-mail: Jamie.Topper@mpi.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207410200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: EC, endothelial cells; EGF, epidermal growth factor; TNF-alpha , tumor necrosis factor-alpha ; IL, interleukin; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; RT, reverse transcription; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; ECM, extracellular matrix proteins; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; FL, full length; TGF-beta , transforming growth factor-beta ; LTBP, latent TGF-beta -binding protein.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Cines, D. B., Pollak, E. S., Buck, C. A., Loscalzo, J., Zimmerman, G. A., McEver, R. P., Pober, J. S., Wick, T. M., Konkle, B. A., Schwartz, B. S., Barnathan, E. S., McCrae, K. R., Hug, B. A., Schmidt, A. M., and Stern, D. M. (1998) Blood 91, 3527-3561[Free Full Text]
2. Topper, J. N., and Gimbrone, M. A., Jr. (1999) Mol. Med. Today 5, 40-46[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Topper, J. N., Cai, J., Falb, D., and Gimbrone, M. A., Jr. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10417-10422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Rapaport, S. I., and Rao, L. V. (1992) Arterioscler. Thromb. 12, 1111-1121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Thompson, E. A., and Salem, H. H. (1986) J. Clin. Invest. 78, 13-17[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Esmon, C. T. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 946-955[Abstract]
7. Rosen, S. D., and Bertozzi, C. R. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 663-673[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Johnson, R. C., Zhu, D., Augustin-Voss, H. G., and Pauli, B. U. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 1423-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Arap, W., Kolonin, M. G., Trepel, M., Lahdenranta, J., Cardo-Vila, M., Giordano, R. J., Mintz, P. J., Ardelt, P. U., Yao, V. J., Vidal, C. I., Chen, L., Flamm, A., Valtanen, H., Weavind, L. M., Hicks, M. E., Pollock, R. E., Botz, G. H., Bucana, C. D., Koivunen, E., Cahill, D., Troncoso, P., Baggerly, K. A., Pentz, R. D., Do, K. A., Logothetis, C. J., and Pasqualini, R. (2002) Nat. Med. 8, 121-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Pasqualini, R., and Ruoslahti, E. (1996) Nature 380, 364-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Rajotte, D., Arap, W., Hagedorn, M., Koivunen, E., Pasqualini, R., and Ruoslahti, E. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 430-437[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Yang, R. B., Tomlinson, J. E., Conley, P. B., Hart, M. J., Komuves, L. G., Ziman, M., Lum, P. Y., Roberts, C., and Topper, J. N. (2002) Physiologist 45, 76
13. Hughes, T. R., Mao, M., Jones, A. R., Burchard, J., Marton, M. J., Shannon, K. W., Lefkowitz, S. M., Ziman, M., Schelter, J. M., Meyer, M. R., Kobayashi, S., Davis, C., Dai, H., He, Y. D., Stephaniants, S. B., Cavet, G., Walker, W. L., West, A., Coffey, E., Shoemaker, D. D., Stoughton, R., Blanchard, A. P., Friend, S. H., and Linsley, P. S. (2001) Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 342-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Grimmond, S., Larder, R., Van Hateren, N., Siggers, P., Hulsebos, T. J., Arkell, R., and Greenfield, A. (2000) Genomics 70, 74-81[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Grimmond, S., Larder, R., Van Hateren, N., Siggers, P., Morse, S., Hacker, T., Arkell, R., and Greenfield, A. (2001) Mech. Dev. 102, 209-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Komuves, L. G., Hanley, K., Lefebvre, A. M., Man, M. Q., Ng, D. C., Bikle, D. D., Williams, M. L., Elias, P. M., Auwerx, J., and Feingold, K. R. (2000) J. Invest. Dermatol. 115, 353-360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Komuves, L. G., Feren, A., Jones, A. L., and Fodor, E. (2000) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48, 821-830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Stelnicki, E. J., Komuves, L. G., Kwong, A. O., Holmes, D., Klein, P., Rozenfeld, S., Lawrence, H. J., Adzick, N. S., Harrison, M., and Largman, C. (1998) J. Invest. Dermatol. 110, 110-115[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Shimkets, R. A., Lowe, D. G., Tai, J. T., Sehl, P., Jin, H., Yang, R., Predki, P. F., Rothberg, B. E., Murtha, M. T., Roth, M. E., Shenoy, S. G., Windemuth, A., Simpson, J. W., Simons, J. F., Daley, M. P., Gold, S. A., McKenna, M. P., Hillan, K., Went, G. T., and Rothberg, J. M. (1999) Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 798-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. DiChiara, M. R., Kiely, J. M., Gimbrone, M. A., Lee, M. E., Perrella, M. A., and Topper, J. N. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 192, 695-704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Sonnhammer, E. L., Eddy, S. R., and Durbin, R. (1997) Proteins 28, 405-420[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Prigent, S. A., and Lemoine, N. R. (1992) Prog. Growth Factor Res. 4, 1-24[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Davis, C. G. (1990) New Biol. 2, 410-419[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Li, X., Ponten, A., Aase, K., Karlsson, L., Abramsson, A., Uutela, M., Backstrom, G., Hellstrom, M., Bostrom, H., Li, H., Soriano, P., Betsholtz, C., Heldin, C. H., Alitalo, K., Ostman, A., and Eriksson, U. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 302-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Gilbertson, D. G., Duff, M. E., West, J. W., Kelly, J. D., Sheppard, P. O., Hofstrand, P. D., Gao, Z., Shoemaker, K., Bukowski, T. R., Moore, M., Feldhaus, A. L., Humes, J. M., Palmer, T. E., and Hart, C. E. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 27406-27414[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Bergsten, E., Uutela, M., Li, X., Pietras, K., Ostman, A., Heldin, C. H., Alitalo, K., and Eriksson, U. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 512-516[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. LaRochelle, W. J., Jeffers, M., McDonald, W. F., Chillakuru, R. A., Giese, N. A., Lokker, N. A., Sullivan, C., Boldog, F. L., Yang, M., Vernet, C., Burgess, C. E., Fernandes, E., Deegler, L. L., Rittman, B., Shimkets, J., Shimkets, R. A., Rothberg, J. M., and Lichenstein, H. S. (2001) Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 517-521[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Davies, D. R., and Wlodawer, A. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 50-56[Abstract]
30. Sun, P. D., and Davies, D. R. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 24, 269-291[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Yang, R. B., Mark, M. R., Gray, A., Huang, A., Xie, M. H., Zhang, M., Goddard, A., Wood, W. I., Gurney, A. L., and Godowski, P. J. (1998) Nature 395, 284-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Mantovani, A., Bussolino, F., and Dejana, E. (1992) FASEB J. 6, 2591-2599[Abstract]
33. Bork, P., and Beckmann, G. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 231, 539-545[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Finelli, A. L., Bossie, C. A., Xie, T., and Padgett, R. W. (1994) Development 120, 861-870[Abstract]
35. Li, S. W., Sieron, A. L., Fertala, A., Hojima, Y., Arnold, W. V., and Prockop, D. J. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5127-5130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Clark, T. G., Conway, S. J., Scott, I. C., Labosky, P. A., Winnier, G., Bundy, J., Hogan, B. L., and Greenspan, D. S. (1999) Development 126, 2631-2642[Abstract]
37. Delgadillo-Reynoso, M. G., Rollo, D. R., Hursh, D. A., and Raff, R. A. (1989) J. Mol. Evol. 29, 314-327[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Leytus, S. P., Kurachi, K., Sakariassen, K. S., and Davie, E. W. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 4855-4863[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Duke-Cohan, J. S., Tang, W., and Schlossman, S. F. (2000) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 477, 173-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Duke-Cohan, J. S., Gu, J., McLaughlin, D. F., Xu, Y., Freeman, G. J., and Schlossman, S. F. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 11336-11341[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Rebay, I., Fleming, R. J., Fehon, R. G., Cherbas, L., Cherbas, P., and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1991) Cell 67, 687-699[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Dietz, H. C., Cutting, G. R., Pyeritz, R. E., Maslen, C. L., Sakai, L. Y., Corson, G. M., Puffenberger, E. G., Hamosh, A., Nanthakumar, E. J., Curristin, S. M., Stetten, G., Meyers, D. A., and Francomano, C. A. (1991) Nature 352, 337-339[CrossRef][Medline]