![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 48, 46622-46631, November 29, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, July 16, 2002, and in revised form, September 19, 2002
We investigated the role of the eight
acidic residues in the extracellular loops (exo-loops) of the
seven-transmembrane domain of the human Ca2+ receptor
(hCaR) in receptor activation by Ca2+ and in response to a
positive allosteric modulator, NPS R-568. Both in the context of the
full-length receptor and of a truncated receptor lacking the
extracellular domain (Rho-C-hCaR), we mutated each acidic
residue to alanine, singly and in combination, and tested the effect on
expression of the receptor, on activation by Ca2+, and on
NPS R-568 augmentation of sensitivity to Ca2+. Of the eight
acidic residues, mutation of any of three in exo-loop 2, Asp758, Glu759, and Glu767,
increased the sensitivity of both the full-length hCaR and of Rho-C-hCaR to activation by Ca2+. Mutation of all five
acidic residues in exo-loop 2, whether in the full-length receptor or
in Rho-C-hCaR, impaired cell surface expression of the mutant receptor
and thereby largely abolished response to Ca2+. Mutation of
Glu837 in exo-loop 3 to alanine did not alter
Ca2+ sensitivity of the full-length receptor, but in both
the latter context and in Rho-C-hCaR, alanine substitution of
Glu837 drastically reduced sensitivity to NPS R-568. Our
data point to a key role of three specific acidic residues in exo-loop
2 in hCaR activation and to Glu837 at the junction between
exo-loop 3 and transmembrane helix seven in response to NPS R-568. We
speculate on the basis of these results that the three acidic residues
we identified in exo-loop 2 help maintain an inactive conformation of
the seven-transmembrane domain of the hCaR.
The G protein-coupled [Ca2+]o receptor
(CaR)1 plays a central role
in the regulation of [Ca2+]o homeostasis (1, 2).
[Ca2+]o activates the CaR in the parathyroid,
thereby inhibiting parathyroid hormone secretion, and in the kidney,
causing increased urinary calcium excretion. The physiological
importance of the CaR in determining the level at which
[Ca2+]o is set in vivo has been
documented by the identification of inactivating mutations in the CaR
gene as the cause of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia and
activating mutations as the cause of autosomal dominant hypocalcemia
(3, 4). Naturally occurring CaR mutations identified in subjects with
autosomal dominant hypocalcemia generally cause increased CaR
sensitivity to [Ca2+]o rather than causing
constitutive activation (5).
The CaR belongs to a unique subfamily, family 3, of G protein-coupled
receptors (GPCR) with an unusually large N-terminal, extracellular
domain (ECD) comprised of Venus's-flytrap (VFT) and cysteine-rich
domains, in addition to the seven-transmembrane domain (7TM)
characteristic of all GPCR (6). Studies with chimeric family 3 GPCR
(7-10) and the three-dimensional structure of the metabotropic
glutamate type 1 receptor (mGluR1) determined by x-ray crystallography
(11) show that the VFT is the site of agonist binding in family 3 GPCR.
The precise site(s) for binding to the CaR, however, have not been identified.
The activation of family 3 GPCR can also be positively modulated by
compounds that bind to the 7TM domain and are presumed to act
allosterically (12). The phenylalkylamine, NPS R-568, a so-called
calcimimetic, increases the sensitivity of the receptor to
[Ca2+]o activation (13), acting as a positive
allosteric modulator by binding to the CaR 7TM region (14). A CaR
mutant lacking the ECD that responds minimally to
[Ca2+]o shows significant responsiveness when NPS
R-568 is added (14). This suggests that sites involved in
[Ca2+]o activation are present within the 7TM
domain and not only the ECD. Stretches of acidic residues within the
VFT have been considered likely sites of Ca2+ binding to
the CaR (15). Given that the 7TM domain also is capable of being
activated by [Ca2+]o, we decided to investigate
the role of acidic residues located in the extracellular loops of the
7TM domain in this activation. The exo-loops of the 7TM domain, like
the ECD, are presumptively exposed at the cell surface and therefore
could be involved in extracellular Ca2+ binding to and
activation of the CaR.
Site-directed Mutagenesis of the hCaR--
The
full-length hCaR cDNA cloned in the pCR3.1 expression vector and a
truncated receptor lacking the ECD, Rho-C-hCaR, were described
previously (5, 16). Rho-C-hCaR contains the first 20 amino acids of the
N terminus of bovine rhodopsin fused to amino acid residues
600-9032 of the wild type
hCaR (see Fig. 1). Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using the
QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene
Inc., La Jolla, CA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Parental hCaR cDNA in pCR3.1 vector was amplified using
Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase with mutagenic oligonucleotide
primers (sequences available on request) for 16 cycles in a DNA thermal
cycler (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). After digestion of the parental DNA
with DpnI for 1 h, the amplified DNA with incorporated
nucleotide substitution was transformed into Escherichia
coli (DH-5 Transient Transfection of Wild Type and Mutant Receptors in
HEK-293 Cells--
Transfections were performed using 12 µg of
plasmid DNA for each transfection in a 75-cm2 flask of
HEK-293 cells. DNA was diluted in serum-free DMEM (BioFluids Inc.,
Rockville, MD), mixed with diluted LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen), and the
mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The
DNA-LipofectAMINE complex was further diluted in 6 ml of serum-free DMEM and was added to 80% confluent HEK-293 cells plated in
75-cm2 flasks. After 5 h of incubation, 15 ml of
complete DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (BioFluids Inc.) was
added. 24 h after transfection, the transfected cells were split
and cultured in complete DMEM.
Phosphoinositide Hydrolysis Assay--
PI hydrolysis assay has
been described previously (16). Briefly, 24 h after transfection,
transfected cells from a confluent 75-cm2 flask were split.
Typically one-eighth of cells were plated in one well in a 6-well
plate, and whole cell lysate was prepared 48 h post-transfection
for Western blot assay. The remaining cells were plated in two 12-well
plates in complete DMEM containing 3.0 µCi/ml of
[3H]myo-inositol (PerkinElmer Life Sciences)
and cultured for another 24 h. Culture medium was replaced by 1×
PI buffer (120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 5.6 mM glucose, 0.4 mM MgCl2, 20 mM LiCl in 25 mM PIPES buffer, pH 7.2) and
incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After removal of PI buffer, the
cells were incubated for an additional 1 h with different
concentrations of Ca2+ in 1× PI buffer with or without 1 µM calcimimetic compound NPS R-568 or NPS S-568. The
reactions were terminated by the addition of 1 ml of acid-methanol
(1:1,000 v/v) per well. Total inositol phosphates were purified by
chromatography on Dowex 1-X8 columns, and the radioactivity for each
sample was counted with liquid scintillation counter.
Graphs of concentration dependence for stimulation of PI hydrolysis by
[Ca2+]o for each transfection were drawn by using
GraphPad Prism version 2.0 software. Each value on a curve is the mean of duplicate determinations unless otherwise indicated. The graphs shown in this paper are representative ones from at least three independent experiments.
Synthetic Chemistry--
The method for the synthesis of NPS
R-568 was reported previously (14). For the synthesis of NPS S-568,
racemic 1-(3-methoxyphenyl)ethylamine was prepared by reductive
amination of 3-methoxyacetophenone with ammonium acetate (17), and the
enantiomerically pure S-isomer was isolated through
crystallization with S-mandelic acid (18). The final
products were then obtained by reductive amination of 3-(2-chlorophenyl)propionaldehyde with the free base of
S-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)ethylamine using sodium
cyanoborohydride in tetrahydrofuran containing a trace of acetic acid
to provide S-568. The amine was isolated as the hydrochloric salt
following treatment of the free base with anhydrous hydrochloric acid
in dioxane. The specific rotations, proton NMR spectra and high
resolution mass spectra were consistent with the assigned structure.
Immunoblotting and Immunocytochemistry--
Confluent cells in
6-well plates were rinsed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and
scraped on ice in lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 6.8), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, and freshly added protease
inhibitors mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). For immunoblotting
of full-length receptors, 50 µg of protein/lane reduced with
For fluorescence immunocytochemistry, transfected cells grown on
duplicate coverslips precoated with 20 µg/µl Fibronectin (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) from human plasma were fixed with
paraformaldehyde (4%) in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline
(BioFluids Inc.) for 20 min with one set of the coverslips
permeabilized with methanol (100%). After 1 h of incubation at 37 C with mouse anti-rhodopsin N terminus antibody B6-30, the cells were
washed and incubated with fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse IgG
antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc., West Grove, PA) for 45 min at
room temperature. After washing, the cells on coverslips were mounted
on glass slides using ProLong Antifade (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene,
OR) and examined by two independent observers, who assessed staining
patterns without knowledge of the identity of cDNAs transfected,
with a fluorescent microscope (Zeiss Axiophot, Zeiss, Germany).
Calcium Response by Full-length hCaR and ECD Deletion Mutant,
Rho-C-hCaR--
We previously described construction of a mutant hCaR
truncated at residue 903 and with a deletion of most of the ECD
(residues 1-599). The first 20 amino acids of bovine rhodopsin were
fused to hCaR residue 600 to facilitate cell surface expression of this mutant construct designated Rho-C-hCaR (Fig.
1) (5, 19). We transfected wild type and
Rho-C-hCaR cDNAs into HEK-293 cells and analyzed their function by
[Ca2+]o-stimulated PI hydrolysis assay and their
expression on immunoblots stained with either anti-hCaR monoclonal
antibody ADD to detect full-length CaR or anti-rhodopsin N terminus
antibody B6-30 to detect Rho-C-hCaR. Fig.
2 shows that wild type hCaR responds to
[Ca2+]o with an EC50 value of
3.08 ± 0.04 mM (mean ± S.E., n = 5). Under reducing conditions, ADD antibody detected two major bands
of about 130 and 150 kDa (Fig. 2). Previous studies have shown that the
monomeric ~150-kDa band represents hCaR forms expressed at the cell
surface and modified with N-linked, complex carbohydrates; the ~130-kDa band represents high mannose-modified forms, trapped intracellularly and sensitive to endoglycosidase H digestion (3, 16,
20)
Rho-C-hCaR showed minimal response to [Ca2+]o in
the PI hydrolysis assay, suggesting that the ECD of the hCaR plays a
critical role in ligand binding and activation of the receptor. Rho-C-hCaR, however, is capable of responding to
[Ca2+]o upon addition of 1 µM NPS
R-568. This calcimimetic compound did not directly activate the
receptor but markedly potentiated Ca2+-stimulated responses
not only of the wild type hCaR but also of Rho-C-hCaR (Fig. 2). The
addition of 1 µM NPS S-568 has no effect on the response
to [Ca2+]o of either WT hCaR or Rho-C-hCaR (data
not shown). We found that imposing an activating mutation, F788C,
identified in a subject with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia (21) onto Rho-C-hCaR slightly increased the basal activity of the mutant receptor
and mimicked the effect of NPS R-568 in potentiating the
[Ca2+]o response. Immunoblot of Rho-C-hCaR
constructs shows a single band at ~36 kDa for the monomeric form of
the mutant receptor (Fig. 2, right panel). The immunoblot
confirms the expression of Rho-C-hCaR constructs but does not
distinguish between receptor proteins expressed at the cell surface and
those retained intracellularly. The ability of Rho-C-hCaR to respond to
extracellular calcium, however, indicates that at least some, if not
all, of the receptor protein is expressed at the cell surface.
Assay of Mutant hCaRs with Acidic Residues in the Extracellular
Loops Substituted by Alanine--
Although there is strong evidence
that the VFT domain of the ECD of family 3 GPCRs, including the CaR, is
responsible for agonist binding (7-10), the ability of Rho-C-hCaR to
respond to calcium upon addition of NPS R-568 or by imposing the F788C
mutation indicates the existence of calcium-binding site(s) in the 7TM domain of the hCaR as well. Acidic residues in the VFT have been speculated to be involved in calcium binding to and activation of the
CaR. This focused our attention on the eight acidic residues in the
extracellular loops of the 7TM domain of the CaR (two in exo-loop 1, five in exo-loop 2, and one in exo-loop 3; Fig. 1) to assess their
possible role in the activation of the receptor by calcium. We
constructed by site-directed mutagenesis mutant full-length hCaRs with
a single alanine mutation substituted for each of the respective acidic
residues in exo-loops 1-3. Fig. 3 shows
that the eight different mutants were expressed in the same pattern of
two major bands as the wild type, indicating that the hCaR is tolerant
of single alanine substitution in these sites without abolishing cell
surface expression. The density of upper bands of these mutants varied
slightly. Our recent study showed that different cell surface
expression levels of hCaRs affect the maximal response of the receptor
to [Ca2+]o but not the EC50 value of
the receptor (22). Fig. 3 shows that three of the eight mutants, namely
hCaR/D758A, hCaR/E759A, and hCaR/E767A, exhibited increased sensitivity
to [Ca2+]o. The EC50 values for these
activating mutants are 0.95 ± 0.05 mM (hCaR/D758A),
0.74 ± 0.02 mM (hCaR/E759A), and 1.83 ± 0.03 mM (hCaR/E767A) (mean ± S.E.; n = 3).
The maximal activation by calcium for mutants D758A and E759A was
50-60% of that of the WT hCaR. In contrast, alanine substitution for
each of the other five acidic residues did not change the sensitivity to calcium and in most cases minimally altered maximal response. E837A
showed the lowest maximal response (~70% of WT) of these five
mutants.
Because alanine substitution for several individual acidic residues
within exo-loop 2 led to increased sensitivity of the CaR, we created
additional mutants substituting alanine for multiple acidic residues in
exo-loop 2 to determine whether this would lead to further increases in
CaR sensitivity. As shown in Fig. 4, a
receptor with the cluster of four adjacent acidic residues Glu755, Glu757, Asp758, and
Glu759 mutated simultaneously to alanines (termed hCaR/4A)
showed increased sensitivity to [Ca2+]o but only
to a similar extent as the individual E767A mutant. However, changing
all five acidic residues in exo-loop 2 to alanines simultaneously
(termed hCaR/5A) not only did not lead to further increase in CaR
sensitivity but instead resulted in significantly impaired function of
the receptor with maximal activation <20% of wild type hCaR (Fig. 4).
As shown by the faint upper band on immunoblot of the 5A
mutant (Fig. 4, right panel), the loss of function of the 5A
mutant is due to poor cell surface expression.
We extended our study of exo-loop 2 alanine mutants by combining them
with the naturally occurring F788C mutation (hCaR/F788C) identified in
subjects with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia (21). In vitro
study shows that this mutation causes a left shift in the response of
the receptor to [Ca2+]o (Fig.
5). The F788C mutant receptor retains
increased sensitivity to [Ca2+]o when it is
combined with the E767A mutation (hCaR/F788C/E767A) or 4A mutations
(hCaR/F788C/4A), although maximal receptor activation is reduced.
However, combining the hCaR/F788C mutant with the 5A mutations
(hCaR/F788C/5A) resulted in complete loss of function in a
[Ca2+]o-stimulated PI hydrolysis assay (Fig. 5).
Loss of receptor function was due to a lack of cell surface expression
as reflected in absence of the upper band on immunoblot
(Fig. 5, right panel).
Assay of Mutant Rho-C-hCaRs with Acidic Residues in the
Extracellular Loops Substituted by Alanines--
We next tested the
effects of alanine substitution of acidic residues in the exo-loops of
Rho-C-hCaR that lacks the ECD. Mutant receptor function was tested by
using the intact cell [Ca2+]o-stimulated PI
hydrolysis assay with and without the addition of 1 µM
NPS R-568. Fig. 6A shows that
without addition of NPS R-568, most receptor constructs showed minimal
response to [Ca2+]o, even up to 30 mM. The E767A mutation, and to a much lesser extent, the 4A
mutation revealed a significant [Ca2+]o response
within the Rho-C-hCaR context. With the addition of 1 µM
NPS R-568, as shown before, Rho-C-hCaR was significantly activated by
[Ca2+]o. With NPS R-568, the E767A and 4A mutants
showed greater activation by [Ca2+]o than
Rho-C-hCaR, as did the E671A mutant (Fig. 6B). The D674A
mutant was also activated by [Ca2+]o in the
presence of 1 µM NPS R-568 but to a lower extent than
Rho-C-hCaR. Importantly, two mutant constructs, Rho-C-hCaR/5A and
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A, exhibited no response to
[Ca2+]o even in the presence of 1 µM NPS R-568. Studies with full-length hCaR/5A mutant
showed that it is very poorly expressed at the cell surface, thus the
lack of response of Rho-C-hCaR/5A could also reflect poor cell surface
expression. Full-length hCaR/E837A mutant, however, is expressed at the
cell surface and is clearly activated by [Ca2+]o.
Thus the lack of [Ca2+]o activation of the
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A mutant, even with addition of NPS R-568, was
unexpected. Immunoblotting showed that all Rho-C-hCaR constructs
are expressed, but unlike with full-length CaR, immunoblotting
alone does not distinguish between cell
surface-expressed and intracellular forms of receptor. Therefore
additional approaches were needed to assess cell surface expression of
the Rho-C-hCaR mutants, particularly Rho-C-hCaR/5A and Rho-
C-hCaR/E837A.
Immunocytochemistry of Cells Expressing Rho-C-hCaR/5A and
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A--
To document whether the Rho-C-hCaR/5A and
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A mutants were expressed at the cell surface,
immunocytochemistry was performed with the anti-rhodopsin N terminus
antibody B6-30, the epitope of which is located in the extracellular N
terminus. Fig. 7 shows that HEK-293 cells
transfected with wild type Rho-C-hCaR or Rho-C-hCaR/E837A were stained
by antibody B6-30 both under nonpermeabilized and permeabilized
conditions, indicating successful cell surface expression of these
receptors. In contrast, cells transfected with Rho-C-hCaR/5A were
stained only under permeabilized conditions (Fig. 7), indicating that
Rho-C-hCaR/5A was expressed intracellularly only.
Assay of Response to NPS R-568 by hCaR/E837A--
Given that the
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A mutant is expressed at the cell surface and yet does
not respond to [Ca2+]o in the presence of NPS
R-568, we considered the possibility that Glu837 may be
involved in the action of NPS R-568 on the hCaR and that mutating this
residue to alanine impairs NPS R-568 modulation of hCaR activation. To
test this possibility, we measured
[Ca2+]o-stimulated PI hydrolysis of cells
transfected with hCaR/E837A in the presence or absence of 1 µM NPS R-568, comparing it with two other alanine
mutants, hCaR/E757A and hCaR/E767A. Fig.
8A shows that NPS R-568 failed
to potentiate the response of hCaR/E837A to
[Ca2+]o, whereas the calcimimetic compound
significantly potentiated the response of hCaR/E757A to
[Ca2+]o and even further potentiated the already
left-shifted [Ca2+]o response of hCaR/E767A. To
evaluate further the effect of the E837A mutation on responsiveness to
NPS R-568, we tested a range of concentrations of NPS R-568 up to 100 µM in the PI hydrolysis assay at 2 mM
[Ca2+]o. Fig. 8B shows that
concentrations as low as 0.1 µM NPS R-568 enhanced the WT
hCaR response to [Ca2+]o and that the effect of
NPS R-568 reached a maximum at 10 µM. In contrast, the
hCaR/E837A mutant response to NPS R-568 was significantly
right-shifted. No significant enhancement of [Ca2+]o response by the hCaR/E837A mutant was
observed unless the concentration of NPS R-568 was 10 µM
or greater. Even at maximally effective concentrations of NPS R-568,
the enhancement of [Ca2+]o response of the
hCaR/E837A mutant was less than 50% of that seen with WT hCaR. This
difference in NPS R-568 effect was not a function of differences in
receptor expression as seen on immunoblot (Fig. 8B,
right panel).
We tested the hypothesis that acidic residues in the extracellular
loops of the 7TM domain of the hCaR are involved in
[Ca2+]o activation of the receptor by replacing
each of these residues with alanine and measuring the ability of the
respective mutant receptors to respond to
[Ca2+]o. Alanine mutagenesis of extracellular
loop acidic residues was done both in the context of the full-length
receptor and in Rho-C-hCaR, a mutant receptor lacking most of the ECD. Of the eight acidic residues in exo-loops 1-3, we identified three, Asp758, Glu759, and Glu767, all in
exo-loop 2, that based on the evidence summarized below appear to play
important roles in [Ca2+]o activation of the
receptor. We identified another acidic residue, Glu837 in
exo-loop 3, as critical for receptor responsiveness to the positive
allosteric modulator, NPS R-568. Interestingly, only these four of the
eight acidic residues in exo-loops 1-3 are identically conserved in
all CaR species sequenced to date. Glu755 is conservatively
substituted by aspartate, and Glu671, Asp674,
and Glu757 are nonconservatively substituted or deleted in
some species (23-26).
Mutation of Asp758, Glu759, and
Glu767 individually to alanine or in combination such as
the 4A mutant (Glu755, Glu757,
Asp758, and Glu759, all mutated to alanine)
increased the sensitivity of the full-length hCaR to
[Ca2+]o. The 4A and E767A mutants in the context
of Rho-C-hCaR, moreover, showed increased responses to
[Ca2+]o alone compared with Rho-C-hCaR and showed
a further augmentation in response to NPS R-568 compared with the
response elicited in Rho-C-hCaR by the combination of
[Ca2+]o and NPS R-568. By comparison, mutation of
any of the remaining five acidic residues in exo-loops 1-3 had no
major effect on the sensitivity of response of either full-length hCaR
or Rho-C-hCaR to [Ca2+]o.
Combined mutation of all five acidic residues in exo-loop 2, the 5A
mutant, drastically impaired [Ca2+]o response in
the context of the full-length receptor and abolished
[Ca2+]o response in the context of the
full-length receptor with the F788C mutation that enhances
[Ca2+]o sensitivity or in Rho-C-hCaR even when
NPS R-568 was added. Immunoblot of the full-length hCaR/5A mutant and
of the 5A mutant also containing the F788C substitution showed greatly diminished or absent expression, respectively, of the ~150-kDa band
that we and others have shown corresponds to the fully processed, cell
surface-expressed form of the CaR (3, 16, 20). Thus the lack of
[Ca2+]o response of the full-length 5A mutants
reflects the failure of these mutants to be expressed at the cell
surface and indicates that alanine substitution for all five exo-loop 2 acidic residues impairs normal folding and/or processing of the
full-length CaR. Immunoblot with the anti-rhodopsin B6-30 antibody
indicated that the Rho-C-hCaR/5A mutant protein is expressed in
transfected HEK-293 cells, but because Rho-C-hCaR does not undergo the
extensive glycosylation of the full-length hCaR, the immunoblot is
inadequate to distinguish between cell surface-expressed
versus intracellular forms. Immunocytochemistry performed
with the same antibody under cell permeabilized and nonpermeabilized
conditions showed clearly that the Rho-C-hCaR/5A mutant, unlike
Rho-C-hCaR, is not expressed at the cell surface, again explaining the
failure to respond to the combination of [Ca2+]o
and NPS R-568.
Ray and Northup (27) recently reported that HEK-293 cells transiently
transfected with the identical mutant, Rho-C-hCaR/5A, show poor
activation by metal ions and organic polycations in the presence of
NPS-R568 but retain responsiveness to the combination of
[Ca2+]o and poly-L-arginine. They
interpreted these results as evidence for a role of the five acidic
residues in exo-loop 2 in CaR response to [Ca2+]o
and to NPS R-568, but because they failed to provide evidence for cell
surface expression of the Rho-C-hCaR/5A mutant, this interpretation may
be incorrect. Our results show that the 5A mutation both in the context
of Rho-C-hCaR and of the full-length hCaR, which Ray and Northup did
not study, leads to poor cell surface expression. We did not study the
response of the mutants we made to organic polycations; hence we cannot
explain the basis for preservation of the poly-L-arginine
response of the Rho-C-hCaR/5A mutant observed by Ray and Northup, but
this response is surprising given our demonstration that the
Rho-C-hCaR/5A mutant is poorly expressed at the cell surface.
We observed that the Rho-C-hCaR/E837A mutant also failed to respond to
[Ca2+]o plus NPS R-568, but unlike the
Rho-C-hCaR/5A mutant, immunocytochemistry clearly showed that the
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A mutant is expressed at the cell surface. This prompted
us to examine the response of the full-length hCaR/E837A mutant to
[Ca2+]o and NPS R-568. The response of this
mutant to [Ca2+]o was comparable in sensitivity
and only moderately reduced in maximal activation by comparison with
wild type hCaR. But in contrast to wild type hCaR and other exo-loop
acidic residue mutants such as E757A and E767A, the E837A mutant failed
to respond to 1 µM NPS R-568. The sensitivity of the
mutant to and maximal activation by NPS R-568 were sharply reduced by
comparison with wild type hCaR, despite comparable levels of
expression. Without binding studies, we cannot conclude that
Glu837 is directly involved in binding NPS R-568, but our
data point to an important role for this acidic residue in exo-loop 3 in the action of this compound.
NPS R-568 has been shown to act as a positive allosteric modulator of
the CaR (13), i.e. it does not itself activate the receptor
but increases its sensitivity to agonists such as
[Ca2+]o. It acts selectively on the CaR and not
on related family 3 GPCR such as the mGluRs, and its site of action has
been localized to the 7TM domain of the receptor (8, 14). Positive allosteric modulators have been identified for other family 3 GPCR such
as mGluR1 (12) and GABAB receptor (28). The site of action
for the latter was not defined, but for positive allosteric modulators of mGluR1, residues in the third and fifth transmembrane helices of the 7TM domain were shown to be critical for selective response (12). A compound acting as a noncompetitive antagonist of
glutamate action on mGluR1 has also been identified (29). Two residues,
Thr815 and Ala818 in human mGluR1b, were shown
to be critical for selective response to the noncompetitive antagonist
CPCCOEt. Interestingly, these residues are located at the junction
between the extracellular surface and transmembrane helix seven, and
depending on exact alignment, Thr815 may be the residue in
human mGluR1b equivalent to Glu837 in the hCaR. Positive
allosteric modulators of family 3 GPCR have been speculated to act by
facilitating formation of the active conformation of the ECD, whereas
CPCCOEt has been speculated to act by blocking signal transmission from
the ECD to the 7TM domain. The mechanism of action of these agents
cannot be clarified, however, until their precise binding sites are
identified and the fundamental mechanism for family 3 GPCR activation
by agonists is defined.
Family 3 GPCR function as dimers (6), and x-ray crystallographic
studies of the VFT domain of the mGluR1 show that agonist binding leads
to closure of the VFT and to a conformational change in which one VFT
domain rotates 70 degrees relative to the other VFT about an axis
perpendicular to the dimer interface (11). How this rotation is
transmitted through the cysteine-rich domain (to which the VFT is
covalently linked) to the 7TM domain can be explained in at least two
ways: (a) the direct contact model, in which one or more
portions of the ECD directly bind to portion(s) of the 7TM domain,
particularly the extracellular loops, and (b) the indirect
or "peptide-linker" model, in which movement of the 7TM domains
occurs because of torsion exerted through the movement of the linker
between the VFT and first transmembrane domains (30). In either model,
the presumption is that movement of transmembrane helices within and
possibly between the two 7TM domains of the dimer is ultimately
responsible for receptor activation.
The present data do not permit us to discriminate definitively
between the direct contact and indirect models of receptor activation,
but they focus attention on sites within the 7TM domain that may be
critical in either case. Our data show that three acidic residues in
exo-loop 2, Asp758, Glu759, and
Glu767, all appear to be important for activation of the
CaR. One possible role for these amino acids would be their involvement
in directly binding Ca2+. Although considerable evidence
points to the VFT as the primary site of Ca2+ binding
(7-10), evidence for positive cooperativity in Ca2+
response is consistent with multiple sites for binding on the CaR,
including the possibility of lower affinity sites within the 7TM domain
(31). Our data showing that mutation of both Asp758 and
Glu759 or of Glu767 to alanine facilitates
activation of both full-length and ECD-deleted receptors rather than
diminishing Ca2+ response argues against a role for these
residues in directly binding Ca2+. Unfortunately, it was
not possible to evaluate the effect on Ca2+ response of
mutating all five acidic exo-loop 2 residues to alanine, because this
change severely impaired cell surface expression of the receptor. An
alternative explanation for the role of acidic residues in exo-loop 2 in CaR activation is that they are involved in maintaining an inactive
conformation of the 7TM domain. Mutation of these residues to alanine
may lead to a change in conformation of transmembrane helix 5 and/or 4 that facilitates receptor activation.
The Rho-C-hCaR, despite adequate cell surface expression, responds
poorly to even high (>20 mM)
[Ca2+]o. With addition of NPS R-568, however, a
dose-dependent activation by [Ca2+]o
is seen, albeit to levels only ~30% of that seen with the
full-length CaR. The ability of this positive allosteric modulator to
enhance not only the [Ca2+]o response of the
full-length receptor but also that of Rho-C-hCaR implies that its
action cannot be limited to an alteration in the conformation of the
ECD. One possibility consistent with our results is that binding of NPS
R-568 within the 7TM domain alters the configuration of the
transmembrane helices in a way that facilitates receptor activation.
Naturally occurring activating mutations within the 7TM domain such as
F788C in transmembrane helix five might act in the same way as NPS
R-568.
Although the present results do not permit more than a speculative
model of CaR activation, they do highlight the importance of acidic
residues in exo-loop 2 in activation of the receptor by
Ca2+ and of the cell surface-proximal portion of
transmembrane helix seven in the action of the positive allosteric
modulator NPS R-568. These results underscore the need for further
structural information not only of the ECD but also of the 7TM domain
of family 3 GPCR for their mechanism of activation to be understood.
We are grateful to Paul Goldsmith for expert
advice and to Kendra Jones for assistance with cell culture and transfections.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 10, Rm. 8C-101,
National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD
20892. Tel.: 301-496-9212; Fax: 301-402-0374; E-mail:
jianxinh@ intra.niddk.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M207100200
2
Rho-C-hCaR was incorrectly described by us
previously (5) as fusing the N-terminal 20 residues of bovine rhodopsin
to hCaR residue 599 rather than residue 600.
The abbreviations used are:
CaR, extracellular
Ca2+ receptor;
hCaR, human extracellular Ca2+
receptor;
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
mGluR1, metabotropic
glutamate receptor type 1;
PI, phosphoinositide;
ECD, extracellular
domain;
7TM, seven-transmembrane domain;
VFT, Venus's-flytrap;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
exo-loop, extracellular loop;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic
acid;
NPS R-568, (R)-N-(3-methoxy-
Identification of Acidic Residues in the Extracellular Loops of
the Seven-transmembrane Domain of the Human Ca2+ Receptor
Critical for Response to Ca2+ and a Positive Allosteric
Modulator*
§,
,
Molecular Pathophysiology Section, NIDCD,
and the ¶ Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, NIDDK, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
strain). The sequence of mutant receptors was
confirmed by automated DNA sequencing using a dRhodamine Terminator
Cycle sequencing kit and ABI PRISM-373A DNA sequencer (PE Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
-mercaptoethanol (5%) was separated on 5% SDS-PAGE gel. The
proteins on the gel were electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose
membrane and incubated with 0.1 µg/ml of protein A-purified mouse
monoclonal anti-hCaR antibody ADD (raised against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to residues 214-235 of hCaR protein). Subsequently, the
membrane was incubated with a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody
conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham Biosciences) at a
dilution of 1: 2,000. The hCaR protein was detected with an ECL
system (Amersham Biosciences). For immunoblotting of Rho-C-hCaR
constructs, 20 µg of protein/lane premixed with 5%
-mercaptoethanol for 1 h was separated on precast 4-20%
gradient gels (Invitrogen), and mouse monoclonal anti-rhodopsin N
terminus antibody B6-30, which was kindly provided by Paul Hargrave
(University of Florida), was used as the primary antibody.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (65K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram showing amino acid sequence
of the wild type hCaR and Rho-C-hCaR. The location of signal
peptide, glycosylation sites, the sequence of synthetic polypeptide
used to raise monoclonal antibody ADD, the beginning and end of the VFT
domain, and residue Phe788 in TM5 are indicated. All eight
acidic residues in the extracellular loops (exo-loops 1-3) are
indicated by residue numbers and shown as white letters in
black circles. The sequence of the first 20 amino acids of
bovine rhodopsin N terminus fused to the hCaR beginning at residue 600 and ending at residue 903 comprising Rho-C-hCaR is also
indicated.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Concentration dependence for
[Ca2+]o stimulation of PI hydrolysis in the
presence or absence of 1 µM NPS
R-568 (left panel) and immunoblot of CaR (right
panel) in transiently transfected HEK-293 cells expressing
WT hCaR, empty vector, Rho-C-hCaR, and Rho-C-hCaR/F788C.
Transfection, PI assay, SDS-PAGE, and immunoblot with monoclonal
anti-hCaR antibody ADD or monoclonal anti-rhodopsin N terminus antibody
B6-30 were performed as described under "Materials and Methods."
Molecular mass standards are indicated at the right of the
blots. Left panel, results of PI assay are expressed as
percentages of maximal response (wild type hCaR at 8 mM).
Right panel, immunoblot (ADD blot for full-length receptor
and Rho-C blot for Rho-C-hCaR) of whole cell lysate of transfected
HEK-293 cells. The immunoblots shown here and in Figs. 3-6 and 8 were
done using cells from the same transfection as the cells used for PI
hydrolysis assay. WT, wild type.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Concentration dependence for
[Ca2+]o stimulation of PI hydrolysis (left
panel) and ADD blot of CaR (right panel) in
transiently transfected HEK-293 cells expressing WT hCaR or mutant CaRs
with alanine substituted individually for each of the eight acidic
residues in extracellular loops 1-3. The methods and format for
presentation of results are as described in the legend to Fig. 2 except
that the maximal response is wild type (WT) hCaR at 30 mM.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Concentration dependence for
[Ca2+]o stimulation of PI hydrolysis (left
panel) and ADD blot of CaR (right panel) in
transiently transfected HEK-293 cells expressing WT hCaR, empty vector,
hCaR/E767A, hCaR/4A (Glu755, Glu757,
Asp758, and Glu759, all mutated to Ala), and
hCaR/5A (all five acidic residues in extracellular loop 2 mutated to
Ala). The methods and format for presentation of results are as
described in the legend to Fig. 2 except that the maximal response is
wild type (WT) hCaR at 30 mM.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Concentration dependence for
[Ca2+]o stimulation of PI hydrolysis (left
panel) and ADD blot of CaR (right panel) in
transiently transfected HEK-293 cells expressing WT hCaR, hCaR/F788C,
hCaR/F788C/E767A, hCaR/F788C/4A, and hCaR/F788C/5A. The methods
and format for presentation of results are as described in the legend
to Fig. 2.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Concentration dependence for
[Ca2+]o stimulation of PI hydrolysis in the
absence (A) or presence of 1 µM NPS R-568 (B) and
Rho-C blot of CaR (C) in transiently transfected
HEK-293 cells expressing Rho-C-hCaR, empty vector, Rho-C-hCaR/E767A,
Rho-C-hCaR/4A, Rho-C-hCaR/5A, Rho-C-hCaR/E671A, Rho-C-hCaR/D674A, and
Rho-C-hCaR/E837A. The methods and format for presentation of
results are as described in the legend to Fig. 2 (percentage of maximal
response Rho-C-hCaR at 30 mM + NPS R-568).

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Fluorescence immunocytochemistry, under
nonpermeabilized (A) or permeabilized
(B) conditions, of cells transfected with cDNAs
encoding Rho-C-hCaR, Rho-C-hCaR/5A, Rho-C-hCaR/E837A, and vector
only. Transfection, immunostaining with mono clonal anti-rhodopsin
N terminus antibody B6-30, and fluorescence microscopy were performed
as described under "Materials and Methods." Phase contrast
images for Rho-C-hCaR/5A and vector transfected cells under
nonpermeabilized conditions are shown to indicate the presence of
cells.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
A, concentration dependence for
[Ca2+]o stimulation of PI hydrolysis in the
absence or presence of 1 µm NPS R-568 (left panel) and ADD
blot of CaR (right panel) in transiently transfected HEK-293
cells expressing hCaR/E757A, hCaR/E767A, and hCaR/E837A. The methods
and format for the presentation of results are as described in the
legend to Fig. 2 except that the maximal response is hCaR/E757A at 30 mM without NPS R-568. B,
Concentration dependence for NPS R-568 stimulation of PI hydrolysis at
2 mM [Ca2+]o (left panel)
and ADD blot of CaR (right panel) in transiently transfected
HEK-293 cells expressing wild type (WT) hCaR and hCaR/E837A.
The results of PI assay are expressed as percentages of maximal
response (wild type hCaR at 50 µM NPS R-568). The results
are the means ± S.E. of triplicate determinations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-phenylethyl)-3-(2'-chlorophenyl)-1-propylamine
hydrochloride;
NPS S-568, (S)-N-(3-methoxy-
-phenylethyl)-3-(2'-chlorophenyl)-1-propylamine
hydrochloride.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Brown, E. M.,
and MacLeod, R. J.
(2001)
Physiol. Rev.
81,
239-297 2.
Brown, E. M.
(2000)
Cell Biochem. Biophys.
33,
63-95[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Bai, M.,
Quinn, S.,
Trivedi, S.,
Kifor, O.,
Pearce, S. H. S.,
Pollak, M. R.,
Krapcho, K.,
Hebert, S. C.,
and Brown, E. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19537-19545 4.
D'Souza-Li, L.,
Yang, B.,
Canaff, L.,
Bai, M.,
Hanley, D. A.,
Bastepe, M.,
Salisbury, S. R.,
Brown, E. M.,
Cole, D. E. C.,
and Hendy, G. N.
(2002)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
87,
1309-1318 5.
Zhao, X. M.,
Hauache, O.,
Goldsmith, P. K.,
Collins, R.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
448,
180-184[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Bockaert, J.,
and Pin, J. P.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1723-1729[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Hu, J.,
Hauache, O.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16382-16389 8.
Hammerland, L. G.,
Krapcho, K. J.,
Garrett, J. E.,
Alasti, N.,
Hung, B. C. P.,
Simin, R. T.,
Levinthal, C.,
Nemeth, E. F.,
and Fuller, F. H.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
55,
642-648 9.
Brauner-Osborne, H.,
Jensen, A. A.,
Sheppard, P. O.,
O'Hara, P.,
and Krogsgaard-Larsen, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18382-18386 10.
Malitschek, B.,
Schweizer, C.,
Keir, M.,
Heid, J.,
Froestl, W.,
Mosbacher, J.,
Kuhn, R.,
Henley, J.,
Joly, C.,
Pin, J. P.,
Kaupmann, K.,
and Bettler, B.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
448-454 11.
Kunishima, N.,
Shimada, Y.,
Tsuji, Y.,
Sato, T.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Kumasaka, T.,
Nakanishi, S.,
Jingami, H.,
and Morikawa, K.
(2000)
Nature
407,
971-977[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Knoflach, F.,
Mutel, V.,
Jolidon, S.,
Kew, J. N. C.,
Malherbe, P.,
Vieira, E.,
Wichmann, J.,
and Kemp, J. A.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
13402-13407 13.
Nemeth, E. F.,
Steffey, M. E.,
Hammerland, L. G.,
Hung, B. C. P.,
Van Wagenen, B. C.,
DelMar, E. G.,
and Balandrin, M. F.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
4040-4045 14.
Hauache, O. M., Hu, J.,
Ray, K.,
Xie, R.,
Jacobson, K. A.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
4156-4163 15.
Brown, E. M.,
Gamba, G.,
Riccardi, D.,
Lombardi, M.,
Butters, R.,
Kifor, O.,
Sun, A.,
Hediger, M. A.,
Lytton, J.,
and Hebert, S. C.
(1993)
Nature
366,
575-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Ray, K.,
Fan, G. F.,
Goldsmith, P. K.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31355-31361 17.
Borch, R. F.,
Bernstein, M. D.,
and Durst, H. D.
(1971)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
93,
2897-2904
18.
Sakai, K.,
Hashimoto, Y.,
Kinbara, K.,
Saigo, K.,
Murakami, H.,
and Nohira, H.
(1993)
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
66,
3414-3418
19.
Krautwurst, D.,
Yau, K. W.,
and Reed, R. R.
(1998)
Cell
95,
917-926[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Ray, K.,
Clapp, P.,
Goldsmith, P. K.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
34558-34567 21.
Watanabe, T.,
Bai, M.,
Lane, C. R.,
Matsumoto, S.,
Minamitani, K.,
Minagawa, M.,
Niimi, H.,
Brown, E. M.,
and Yasuda, T.
(1998)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
83,
2497-2502 22.
Hu, J.,
Mora, S.,
Colussi, G.,
Proverbio, M. C.,
Jones, K. A.,
Bolzoni, L., De,
Ferrara, M. E.,
Civati, G.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(2002)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
17,
1461-1469[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Nearing, J.,
Betka, M.,
Quinn, S.,
Hentschel, H.,
Elger, M.,
Baum, M.,
Bai, M.,
Chattopadyhay, N.,
Brown, E. M.,
Hebert, S. C.,
and Harris, H. W.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
9231-9236 24.
Naito, T.,
Saito, Y.,
Yamamoto, J.,
Nozaki, Y.,
Tomura, K.,
Hazama, M.,
Nakanishi, S.,
and Brenner, S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5178-5181 25.
Diaz, R.,
Hurwitz, S.,
Chattopadhyay, N.,
Pines, M.,
Yang, Y.,
Kifor, O.,
Einat, M. S.,
Butters, R.,
Hebert, S. C.,
and Brown, E. M.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
R1008-R1016[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Flanagan, J. A.,
Bendell, L. A.,
Guerreiro, P. M.,
Clark, M. S.,
Power, D. M.,
Canario, A. V. M.,
Brown, B. L.,
and Ingleton, P. M.
(2002)
Gen. Comp. Endocrinol.
127,
117-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Ray, K.,
and Northup, J.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
18908-18913 28.
Urwyler, S.,
Mosbacher, J.,
Lingenhoehl, K.,
Heid, J.,
Hofstetter, K.,
Froestl, W.,
Bettler, B.,
and Kaupmann, K.
(2001)
Mol. Pharmacol.
60,
963-971 29.
Litschig, S.,
Gasparini, F.,
Rueegg, D.,
Stoehr, N.,
Flor, P. J.,
Vranesic, I.,
Prézeau, L.,
Pin, J. P.,
Thomsen, C.,
and Kuhn, R.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
55,
453-461 30.
Margeta-Mitrovic, M.,
Jan, Y. N.,
and Jan, L. Y.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
14643-14648 31.
Ruat, M.,
Snowman, A. M.,
Hester, L. D.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5972-5975
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-u. Alam, J. P. Kirton, F. L. Wilkinson, E. Towers, S. Sinha, M. Rouhi, T. N. Vizard, A. P. Sage, D. Martin, D. T. Ward, et al. Calcification is associated with loss of functional calcium-sensing receptor in vascular smooth muscle cells Cardiovasc Res, November 6, 2008; (2008) cvn279v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. M. de Francisco, M. Izquierdo, J. Cunningham, C. Pinera, R. Palomar, G. F. Fresnedo, J. A. Amado, M. G. Unzueta, and M. Arias Calcium-mediated parathyroid hormone release changes in patients treated with the calcimimetic agent cinacalcet Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2895 - 2901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hu, J. Jiang, S. Costanzi, C. Thomas, W. Yang, J. H. M. Feyen, K. A. Jacobson, and A. M. Spiegel A Missense Mutation in the Seven-transmembrane Domain of the Human Ca2+ Receptor Converts a Negative Allosteric Modulator into a Positive Allosteric Modulator J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21558 - 21565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pi, P. Faber, G. Ekema, P. D. Jackson, A. Ting, N. Wang, M. Fontilla-Poole, R. W. Mays, K. R. Brunden, J. J. Harrington, et al. Identification of a Novel Extracellular Cation-sensing G-protein-coupled Receptor J. Biol. Chem., December 2, 2005; 280(48): 40201 - 40209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Silve, C. Petrel, C. Leroy, H. Bruel, E. Mallet, D. Rognan, and M. Ruat Delineating a Ca2+ Binding Pocket within the Venus Flytrap Module of the Human Calcium-sensing Receptor J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37917 - 37923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Arey, R. Seethala, Z. Ma, A. Fura, J. Morin, J. Swartz, V. Vyas, W. Yang, J. K. Dickson Jr., and J. H. M. Feyen A Novel Calcium-Sensing Receptor Antagonist Transiently Stimulates Parathyroid Hormone Secretion in Vivo Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 2015 - 2022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hu, S. J. McLarnon, S. Mora, J. Jiang, C. Thomas, K. A. Jacobson, and A. M. Spiegel A Region in the Seven-transmembrane Domain of the Human Ca2+ Receptor Critical for Response to Ca2+ J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 5113 - 5120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Mun, A. H. Franks, E. L. Culverston, K. Krapcho, E. F. Nemeth, and A. D. Conigrave The Venus Fly Trap Domain of the Extracellular Ca2+-sensing Receptor Is Required for L-Amino Acid Sensing J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 51739 - 51744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|