![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47035-47043, December 6, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Morse Institute of Molecular Genetics, Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, State University of New York Health
Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York 11203-2098
Received for publication, August 30, 2002, and in revised form, September 24, 2002
We have used synthetic oligomers of DNA and RNA
to assemble nucleic acid scaffolds that, when mixed with T7 RNA
polymerase, allow the formation of functional transcription complexes.
Manipulation of the scaffold structure allows the contribution of each
element in the scaffold to transcription activity to be independently determined. The minimal scaffold that allows efficient extension after
challenge with 200 mM NaCl consists of an 8-nt RNA
primer hybridized to a DNA template (T strand) that extends 5-10 nt
downstream. Constructs in which the RNA-DNA hybrid is less than or
greater than 8 bp are less salt-resistant, and the hybrid cannot
be extended beyond 12-13 bp. Although the presence of a complementary
nontemplate strand downstream of the primer does not affect salt
resistance, the presence of DNA upstream decreases resistance. The
addition of a 4-nt unpaired "tail" to the 5' end of the primer
increases salt resistance, as does the presence of an unpaired
nontemplate strand in the region that contains the 8-bp hybrid (thereby
generating an artificial transcription "bubble"). Scaffold
complexes having these features remain active for over 1 week in the
absence of salt and exhibit many of the properties of halted elongation
complexes, including resistance to salt challenge, a similar trypsin
cleavage pattern, and a similar pattern of RNA-RNA polymerase
cross-linking.
During the early stages of transcription, T7
RNAP1 (like all known RNAPs)
forms an unstable initiation complex (IC) that synthesizes and releases
short abortive initiation products before clearing the promoter and
forming a stable elongation complex (EC) (1-3). The transition is
accompanied by release of upstream promoter contacts, changes in the
size of the footprint of the polymerase on the DNA, increased
resistance to challenge with agents such as salt and heparin (which
disrupt and inactivate the IC), and changes in accessibility to
cleavage by a variety of proteases (4-7). Taken together, these
changes suggest that significant alterations in the organization of the
complex occur during the transition.
A variety of lines of evidence demonstrate that the transition is
complex and may involve multiple steps (6, 8-13). Recent fluorescence
probing and nuclease sensitivity experiments indicate that promoter
clearance and collapse of the upstream edge of the transcription bubble
occur when the RNA-DNA hybrid achieves a length of 8-9 bp (13, 14) but
that the length of the hybrid increases to 10 bp before the
transcription bubble collapses to yield a hybrid length of 8 bp, as is
observed during elongation (Ref. 13 and see below). The final phase
(between 10 and 14 nt) appears to involve displacement of the 5' end of
the RNA from the upstream end of the hybrid and its association with an
RNA product-binding site (11, 15).
Crystal structures have now been solved for free RNAP, for RNAP
complexed with a specific inhibitor of transcription (T7 lysozyme), for
a binary promoter-RNAP complex, and for an initiation complex that has
transcribed the first three bases in the template strand (16-19).
However, no structure has yet been published for an elongation complex
or for any intermediate complexes that may form during the transition
to an EC.
Biochemical studies have revealed a number of features of T7 RNAP
elongation complexes. In a halted EC the enzyme protects a 24-bp region
that extends ~19 bp upstream and ~5 bp downstream from the active
site from digestion with DNase I or MPE·Fe(II) (4, 20, 21). A
somewhat smaller region that extends ~13 bp upstream and ~8 bp
downstream is protected from digestion with exonuclease III or To gain understanding of the organization and properties of T7 RNAP
transcription complexes, we annealed together synthetic oligomers of
RNA and DNA to construct nucleic acid "scaffolds" that resemble the
structural elements thought to be present in an EC. Incubation of these
structures with T7 RNAP resulted in the formation of functional
transcription complexes that exhibit many of the properties of halted
elongation complexes. The use of such nucleic acid structures has
enabled us to characterize the contribution of each of the components
in the scaffold to transcription activity. Similar approaches have been
used to examine transcription complexes formed by multi-subunit RNAPs
such as Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and yeast polymerase
II (24, 25).
Assembly of Scaffolds and Transcription
Conditions--
Histidine-tagged T7 RNAP was purified as
described.2 Synthetic DNA
oligonucleotides were obtained from Macromolecular Resources (Fort
Collins, CO). RNA oligonucleotides were purchased from Dharmacon Research Inc. (Lafayette, CO). Where indicated, RNA and DNA oligomers were labeled at their 5' ends using [
To assemble scaffolds, oligonucleotides were taken up in water, mixed
together at a concentration of 10 µM each, heated to 70 °C for 5 min, and cooled slowly to room temperature. Except where
noted, RNAP-scaffold complexes were formed in a reaction volume of 10 µl containing transcription buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.9, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, 5 mM Extension of Primers and Analysis of Products--
Following
assembly, the complexes were challenged for 5-30 min with NaCl, as
indicated, and appropriate substrate(s) were then added (100 µM each). After a 2-min period for extension, the samples
were withdrawn, mixed with an equal volume of stop buffer (95%
formamide, 0.05 mM EDTA), and analyzed by electrophoresis in 20% polyacrylamide gels in the presence of 6 M urea. T7
RNAP elongation complexes halted 14 nt downstream from the start site of transcription (EC14) were formed by annealing together oligos DT6
and DT7 and incubation with RNAP in the presence of GTP, ATP, and UTP
as previously described (15)
Trypsin Cleavage--
Trypsin cleavage was performed in 10-µl
reactions containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, and 5 mM RNA-RNAP Cross-linking--
RNAP photocross-linking experiments
were carried out using a synthetic RNA oligonucleotide (DT11sU;
Dharmacon; Table I) that contained a photoreactive uridine derivative,
4-thio-UMP (sU). The RNA oligonucleotide was annealed to
template strand TS1 as described above to give sU-containing
scaffold 23. The RNAP-scaffold complexes were labeled by extension of
the RNA primer with [ Assembly of Functional Scaffold Complexes--
Two approaches
involving the use of artificial scaffolds were employed in previous
studies of multi-subunit RNAPs. One group of investigators explored the
use of minimal scaffold assemblies that consisted of a single-stranded
DNA template hybridized to an RNA primer (24). Other investigators
explored more complex structures that included duplex DNA upstream and
downstream of the primer and a mispaired nontemplate strand in the
region of the primer-template hybrid (an artificial transcription
bubble) (27, 28). To simplify studies of parameters that affect the function of T7 complexes, we initiated our studies using a scaffold that consists of a 28-nt template strand hybridized to an 8-nt RNA
primer and an 18-nt NT strand downstream (Fig.
1, scaffold 1). Such a scaffold had
previously been shown to allow the assembly of functional transcription
complexes with E. coli RNAP (24, 29). When incubated with
histidine-tagged T7 RNAP and the next incoming nucleotide, the 8-nt
primer was quantitatively extended to 9 nt (Fig. 1B, steps 1 and 2). Subsequent washing of immobilized complexes and incubation with
UTP and then CTP allowed further extension of the primer to 10 and 11 nt (steps 3 and 4). The incorporation of NTPs was template-specific,
because primers were extended only in the presence of the appropriate
substrate (data not shown).
Unlike binary promoter-RNAP complexes and initiation complexes, which
are rapidly inactivated by exposure to 200 mM NaCl, T7 RNAP
elongation complexes are resistant to salt challenge (1, 2, 9, 11, 30).
As shown in Fig. 1C, transcription complexes assembled on
the minimal scaffold are also resistant to challenge with 200 mM NaCl.
Effects of Removing the NT Strand of the DNA and of Changing the
Length of the RNA-DNA Hybrid--
Previous studies have shown that
whereas the binding region of the T7 promoter (
The length of the RNA-DNA hybrid in a halted T7 RNAP EC has been
determined to be ~8 bp (14, 15, 22). We determined the effects of
changing the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid on the behavior of scaffold
complexes as follows. To examine the effects of shortening the primer
we utilized a 7-nt RNA primer (RNA7, scaffold 3). To examine the
effects of increasing the length of the primer, we extended the 8-nt
RNA primer (RNA8) to 9 or 10 nt by the addition of GTP or GTP and UTP
(scaffolds 4 and 5). The ability of the polymerase to extend these
primers after challenge with 200 mM NaCl was determined as
described above. Shortening the RNA-DNA hybrid to 7 bp or extending it
to 9 or 10 bp resulted in significant decreases in salt resistance
(Fig. 2, scaffold 2 versus scaffolds 3-5).
Effects of Downstream DNA Configuration on Complex
Stability--
The observation in Fig. 2 that the presence of the NT
strand is not required to provide salt resistance to T7 RNAP complexes is in contrast to previous findings with E. coli RNA
polymerase RNAP (24) but not with yeast polymerase II (37). To examine the contribution of the downstream DNA in more detail, we varied the
length of the downstream DNA both in the presence and in the absence of
a complementary NT strand (Fig.
3A). As before, we observed
that the presence of the NT strand downstream from the primer did not
significantly affect activity (cf. scaffold 1 versus scaffold 2 and scaffold 6 versus scaffold
7). To determine the contribution of the template strand to salt
resistance, we progressively shortened the length of the downstream
strand from 20 nt (scaffold 2) to 2 nt (scaffold 9). A significant loss
in salt resistance was observed when this strand was shortened to
<5nt.
The resistance of transcription complexes to salt challenge is usually
interpreted as an indication of their stability (i.e. the
tendency of the components of the complex to remain together). To
determine whether the components of the T7 scaffold complexes remained
associated during the course of the reaction or whether the RNAP
dissociates from one template and then associates with another, we
examined primer extension under conditions in which the RNAP
concentration was either equimolar to the scaffold (1 µM
each) or 20-fold lower than the scaffold (50 nM) (Fig.
3C). Using scaffold 1 (which is highly resistant to salt
challenge), we found that when the concentrations of RNAP and scaffold
were equimolar, nearly 100% of the primers were extended, whereas when the concentration of polymerase was only 5% that of the scaffold, only
5% extension was observed. This indicates that there is little turnover of the RNAP after primer extension during the 40-min incubation period on this template. In contrast, when the NT strand protrudes only 2 nt downstream from the primer (scaffold 9), more than
50% of the primers are extended during the reaction, indicating that
the polymerase dissociates from this scaffold after extending the
primer and may subsequently associate with other scaffolds. Scaffolds
in which the NT strand extends 5 or 10 nt downstream from the 3' end of
the primer (scaffolds 7 and 8) exhibit an intermediate stability. From
these results, we conclude that the minimal length of the downstream
template strand that is required to confer maximal stability on the
transcription complex is 5-10 nt. This is consistent with the size of
the footprint of T7 RNAP in a halted EC (4, 14).
Previous studies have shown that on templates in which the two DNA
strands are covalently joined via a psoralen cross-link, T7 RNAP can
extend the RNA up to the site of the cross-link (23). In the
experiments above in which a complementary NT strand was present
(scaffolds 1 and 6), the 3' end of the RNA primer was separated by a
gap of 2 nt from the 5' end of the NT strand. To determine what happens
when primer extension in a scaffold complex results in an encounter
with the NT strand, we constructed templates in which the gap between
the 3' end of the primer and the 5' end of the downstream NT strand was
reduced from 2 to 1 or 0 nt (Fig. 3, scaffolds 1, 10, and 11, respectively). In the absence of salt, the primer was efficiently
extended by 1 nt in all three of these constructs (data not shown).
However, in the presence of 200 mM NaCl, primer extension
was significantly reduced when there was no gap (scaffold 11).
Toward the Assembly of a Complete Scaffold: Examining the Effects
of Upstream DNA, a Transcription "Bubble," and a 5' RNA
"Tail"--
In halted T7 RNAP elongation complexes, the RNA
product is displaced from the template strand of the DNA about 8 bp
upstream from the active site, but the 5' end of the product but does
not emerge to the surface until an additional 4 nt have been added, presumably because the RNA is involved in protective contacts with the
RNAP (14, 15, 38).
To explore the possible contribution of the displaced RNA to complex
stability, we modified the 8-nt RNA primer used above (RNA8) to include
a noncomplementary tail of 4 nt at its 5' end (Fig.
4; RNA12) and examined the properties of
complexes formed using these two different primers. A number of
templates were tested, including those in which the nature of the
upstream DNA was varied and those that included a noncomplementary NT
strand in the region of the RNA-DNA hybrid (thereby creating an
artificial transcription bubble).
With regard to the effects of upstream DNA, we observed that the
presence of single-stranded template DNA upstream of the primer
resulted in a significant decrease in salt resistance (scaffold 2 versus scaffold 12 and scaffold 16 versus
scaffold 17) and that salt resistance decreased even further if the
upstream DNA was made double-stranded by the addition of a
complementary NT strand (scaffolds 13, 14, 18, 19). In fact, the latter
complexes are so unstable that we were unable to detect their assembly
(as determined by failure to form labeled complexes that are retained
on Ni2+ agarose beads; data not shown). Strikingly, the
presence of a noncomplementary NT strand in the region of the RNA-DNA
hybrid stabilizes these complexes and allows the assembly of
functional, salt-resistant scaffolds having duplex DNA upstream
(scaffolds 15 and 20). Similar stabilizing effects of a noncollapsing
transcription bubble on the stability of halted ECs were observed
previously (11).
In all of the scaffolds that we were able to assemble, the presence of
a noncomplementary tail at the 5' end of the RNA primer resulted in a
slight but significant increase in salt resistance. This was
particularly apparent on scaffolds that had an intrinsically low salt
resistance (Fig. 4; cf. scaffold 12 versus
scaffold 17 and scaffold 15 versus scaffold 20). A complete
scaffold that contains upstream and downstream duplex DNA, an 8-bp
RNA-DNA hybrid, and a 4-nt 5' tail on the primer (scaffold 20) is
nearly as salt-resistant as complexes formed on scaffold 1 or a halted
elongation complex (EC14).
The RNA-DNA Hybrid May Only Be Extended to 12-13 bp--
Although
the length of the RNA DNA hybrid is 8 bp in halted elongation complexes
(11), recent studies have shown that during the transition to a stable
EC the length of the hybrid may reach 10 bp before the transcription
bubble collapses to 8 bp (13). When scaffold 2 (in which the
primer-template is 8 bp) was incubated in the presence of all four
NTPs, the primer could be efficiently extended to 12-13 nt but not
beyond (Fig. 5). It is apparently the
inability of the complex to accommodate an RNA-DNA hybrid greater than
12-13 bp, and not the length of the RNA product, that is limiting. In
scaffold 21 the two 5' terminal nt of the RNA8 primer do not pair with
the template strand; when this scaffold complex is incubated with all
four NTPs, the primer was poorly extended beyond 14 nt, 12-13 of which
are in an RNA-DNA hybrid. The same results were obtained with a bubble
scaffold (scaffold 20).
In earlier work with T7 RNAP, Daube et al. (27, 28) utilized
scaffolds that were similar to the complete scaffold used here but
observed inefficient extension of the primer. The length of the RNA-DNA
hybrid in the prior studies was 12 bp, and in view of the results
above, it seemed likely that this may have been responsible for the
poor performance of these constructs. To explore this, we constructed
scaffolds that were essentially the same as those used in the earlier
studies and examined their stability before and after extension (Fig.
5B).
Scaffold 22 is similar to the complete scaffold shown in Fig. 4
(scaffold 20) except that annealing of NT13 results in the formation of
a 12-nt transcription bubble in which there is a gap of 4 nt downstream
from the 3' end of the RNA (as opposed to a bubble length of 9 nt and a
gap of 1 nt in scaffold 20). Incubation with RNAP in the presence of
GTP, UTP, and CTP allows primer extension in scaffold 22 by 4 nt,
resulting in an RNA-DNA hybrid of 12 bp and a gap of 0, essentially the
same structure as used in previous studies. The RNA primer in these
constructs may not be extended further, even at low salt conditions,
because the same product is observed in the presence of all four rNTPs. The integrity of the RNAP-scaffold complex before and after primer extension was determined by labeling the RNA primer and the NT strand
and determining whether the labeled components incorporated into
His6-tagged T7 RNAP complexes were retained on
nickel-agarose beads or released into the wash buffer. Both components
were retained on the beads prior to extension but were released after
extension, indicating that dissociation of the complex had occurred. We
have also found that extension of the primer by 2 nt (resulting in a
10-bp hybrid) results in destabilization of the complex (data not shown).
Scaffold Complexes Exhibit a Trypsin Cleavage Pattern Similar to
That of a Halted EC--
Changes in the sensitivity of transcription
complexes to a variety of proteases before and after the transition
from an IC to an EC suggest that a significant structural
reorganization of the complex may occur during the transition (7).
Under native conditions, trypsin cleavage of free RNAP (97 kDa), a
binary RNAP-promoter complex, or an initiation complex that has
proceeded to +3 all result in the appearance of an 80-kDa fragment. In
contrast, cleavage of complexes halted at +15 or actively transcribing
in the presence of all four rNTPs result in the appearance of a novel,
higher molecular mass fragment of 88 kDa and reduction of the
abundance of the 80-kDa fragment. The 88-kDa fragment is therefore
characteristic of an EC (7).
We have repeated these experiments using free RNAP, a promoter complex,
a halted elongation complex (EC14), and a complex formed with scaffold
16 (Fig. 6A). In agreement
with prior observations, trypsin cleavage of free RNAP or a binary
complex resulted in the appearance of an 80-kDa fragment, whereas
cleavage of complexes that have advanced 14 nt downstream from the
start site resulted in generation of both the 80- and 88-kDa products.
Cleavage of the scaffold 16 complex resulted in a much more homogeneous
pattern comprising largely the 88-kDa fragment.
Previous work had shown that the 80-kDa trypsin fragment results from
cleavage after Arg173 and/or Lys180 (39). Using
N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis, we determined that the 88-kDa
fragment results from cleavage after Arg96 (data not
shown). In the crystal structures of a T7 RNAP-promoter complex and of
an IC, the former sites lie in a solvent exposed loop in the N-terminal
domain, whereas the latter site forms part of the AT-rich recognition
loop that is involved in upstream promoter contacts at The RNA Cross-links to RNAP in a Similar Manner in Scaffold
Complexes and in an EC--
As the nascent RNA is displaced from the
RNA-DNA hybrid in an EC it becomes associated with an element of the
RNAP (the specificity loop) that was earlier involved in promoter
recognition (15). Thus, in a halted EC the RNA nucleotide that lies 9 nt upstream from the active site may be cross-linked to a region that
includes amino acids 744-750. To determine the nature of RNA-RNAP
interactions in a scaffold complex, we synthesized an RNA primer that
contains a photoreactive uridine derivative, 4-thio-U, 9 nt upstream
from the 3' end and determined the location of the cross-link made to
the RNAP in complexes assembled with this RNA (Fig. 6B).
Analysis of the products that result from digestion of the cross-linked complex with NTCB and CNBr reveals that the base at In this work, we used synthetic oligomers of DNA and RNA to
assemble nucleic acid scaffolds that allow the formation of functional T7 RNAP transcription complexes. Manipulation of the scaffolds allowed
us to examine the contribution of each of the structural elements to
transcription activity and salt resistance. The minimal scaffold that
allowed efficient extension after challenge with 200 mM
NaCl consists of an 8-nt RNA primer hybridized to a DNA template that
extends 5-10 nt downstream. Constructs in which the RNA-DNA hybrid is
less than or greater than 8 bp are less salt-resistant, and the hybrid
cannot be extended beyond 12-13 bp. Although the presence of a
complementary NT strand downstream of the primer does not affect salt
resistance, the presence of either duplex or template strand DNA
upstream of the hybrid decreases salt resistance. The addition of a
4-nt unpaired tail to the 5' end of the primer increases salt
resistance, as does the presence of an unpaired NT strand in the region
that contains the 8-bp hybrid (thereby generating an artificial
transcription bubble). The minimal scaffold (scaffold 7), as well as
complexes containing upstream and downstream elements, together with
the bubble (scaffold 20), exhibit many of the properties of a
promoter-initiated elongation complex, including resistance to
challenge by salt, similar trypsin cleavage patterns, and a similar
pattern of RNA-RNAP cross-linking.
The features of the complete scaffold correspond closely to available
information concerning the organization of a halted T7 RNAP EC (14, 15,
22). The RNA-DNA hybrid length is 8 base pairs, there is a 1-nt gap
between the 3' end of the RNA and the displaced template strand, and
there is no gap between the displaced RNA at the upstream end of the
RNA-DNA hybrid and the trailing edge of the transcription bubble.
In Fig. 6 we show that although trypsin cleaves the IC at positions 173 and 180, these sites become less accessible in the EC and that cleavage
at Arg96 becomes more prominent. The reason for this switch
in cleavage sites is understandable in light of recent cross-linking
experiments that probe changes in the structural organization of the
transcription complex during the transition from an IC to an EC (40).
Whereas the cleavage sites at positions 173 and 180 are in a
solvent-exposed loop that is not in contact with nucleic acids in the
IC, after isomerization this region becomes associated with the
template and nontemplate strands of the DNA at the upstream edge of the transcription bubble (19, 40). In contrast, Arg96 is in
close association with the upstream region of the promoter prior to
isomerization, because it forms part of the AT-rich recognition loop
that contacts the promoter in the In previous work, the laboratory of Peter von Hippel explored the use
of similar "complete" scaffold templates to study elongation by T7
RNAP but observed poor efficiency of primer extension (27, 28). As
shown in Fig. 5, this is likely due to the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid
length used in the earlier studies (12 bp, as opposed to 8 bp in the
current study). We found that an 8-bp hybrid may only be extended to
12-13 bp and that further extension results in dissociation of the
complex. Liu and Martin (13) have shown that during initiation the
RNA-DNA hybrid may achieve a length of 10-11 bp before the bubble
collapses to 8 bp and the complex isomerizes to a stable EC. Structures
involving a hybrid of >8 bp may therefore represent an interesting
subject for studies of a strained IC that forms just before
isomerization to an EC.
The stable scaffold complexes described here remain active after
storage of up to 1 week in the absence of salt, suggesting that they
may prove useful in structural studies. Importantly, the scaffolds do
not involve a T7 promoter sequence and thus allow the characterization
of mutant phage RNAPs that are defective in promoter binding and/or the
early stages of transcription.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM38147 (to W. T. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology
and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson
Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11203-2098. Tel.: 718-270-1238; Fax:
718-270-2656; E-mail: pogo51@aol.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208923200
2
Tahirov, T., Temiakov, D., Anikin, M., Patlan,
V., McAllister, W. T., Vassylyev, D. G., and Yokoyama, S. (2002) 9 October 2002 (doi:1038/nature01129.
The abbreviations used are:
RNAP, RNA
polymerase;
IC, initiation complex;
EC, elongation complex;
nt, nucleotide;
NTCB, 2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.
Characterization of T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Complexes
Assembled on Nucleic Acid Scaffolds*
,
, and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
exonuclease, and this footprint is shifted downstream in the presence
of the incoming NTP (which stabilizes the EC in the post-translocation
state) (14). The RNA-DNA hybrid is ~8 bp (14, 15, 22) and is enclosed
in a transcription bubble of ~9 bp. The association of the displaced
nontemplate (NT) strand of the transcription bubble with the RNAP may
help to stabilize the complex (11). Fluorescence studies and
KMnO4 sensitivity indicate that the upstream edge of the
transcription bubble in the EC is very close (within 1 bp) to the point
at which the RNA is displaced from the template and that downstream
border is very close (within 1 bp) to the 3' end of the RNA (in the
active site) (14, 22). The latter conclusion is supported by the observation that on templates in which the two DNA strands have been
covalently joined by a psoralen cross-link, the RNA may be extended up
to the cross-link (23). The 5' end of the nascent RNA becomes
accessible to ribonuclease (emerges to the surface of the complex)
~4-6 nt after its displacement from the template, resulting in a
total protected RNA length of 12-14 nt (14, 15).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP and
polynucleotide kinase. The sequences of all oligomers are given in
Table I.
Synthetic DNA and RNA
-mercaptoethanol), 1 µM scaffold, and
an equimolar concentration of RNAP for 10-20 min at room temperature.
-mercaptoethanol at room temperature for 10 min. The reactions contained 1 µM T7 RNAP or T7 RNAP complexes and trypsin
at a 20:1 ratio (w/w, respectively). The reactions were stopped by the
addition of protein PAGE loading buffer and resolved in a 4-12%
Nu-PAGE gel using a MOPS buffer system (Invitrogen). The identities of the cleavage fragments were confirmed by Edman amino acid sequence analysis.
-32P]UTP and irradiated for 10 min on ice with a 6 W UV lamp (Cole-Parmer 9815 series, Chicago, IL)
using a 312-nm optical filter. The cross-linked products were
precipitated with an equal volume of saturated
(NH4)2SO4 and subjected either to
NTCB or CNBr cleavage as previously described (15).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Assembly of a functional T7 RNAP scaffold
complex. A, scaffold 1 was assembled by annealing
together an 8-nt RNA primer (RNA8) labeled at its 5' end with
-32P (asterisk), a 28-nt template strand
(TS1), and an 18-nt nontemplate strand (NT1),
resulting in a gap of 2 nt between the 3' end of the RNA primer and the
5' end of the downstream NT strand. B, complexes formed by
incubation of the scaffold with an equimolar amount of
His6-tagged T7 RNAP were immobilized on
Ni2+-agarose beads (15, 26) (step 1). The complexes were
washed with transcription buffer (step 1) and incubated with GTP for 2 min (step 2), washed again and incubated with UTP (step 3), and then
incubated with CTP (step 4). The aliquots were removed at each step and
analyzed by electrophoresis in 20% polyacrylamide gels. C,
RNAP-scaffold complexes formed as in A were challenged by a
5-min exposure to increasing concentrations of NaCl, and the ability of
the complexes to extend the RNA primer during the subsequent 2-min
incubation in the presence of the next template-directed nucleotide was
determined as above.
17 to
5) must be
double-stranded to allow promoter binding, the NT strand of the DNA in
the initiation region (
4 to +6) is not required for promoter function
and that removal of the NT strand downstream of
4 results in tighter
RNAP binding and increased rates of initiation (30-36). In a similar
manner, the NT strand downstream from the primer is not required for
transcription activity on the minimal scaffold, and complexes assembled
on a scaffold that lacks the NT strand (Fig.
2, scaffold 2) were as resistant to salt
challenge as complexes that were assembled on a scaffold in which the
NT strand was present (scaffold 1).

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effects of removing the NT strand of the DNA
and of changes in the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid. A,
scaffolds were assembled using either an 8-nt RNA primer (RNA8;
scaffolds 1 and 2) or a 7-nt RNA primer (RNA7; scaffold 3). To form
complexes involving scaffolds 4 and 5, the 8-nt RNA primer in scaffold
2 was extended 1 or 2 nt by incubation with GTP alone or with GTP and
UTP, respectively. Unincorporated substrates were removed by
centrifugation on quick spin columns. A T7 RNAP elongation complex
halted 14 nt downstream from the start site (EC14) was assembled by
annealing template and NT DNA strands that contain a consensus T7
promoter sequence (DT6 and DT7) and incubation with T7 RNAP in the
presence of GTP, ATP, and UTP (100 µM each).
B, RNAP-scaffold complexes were challenged by a 30-min
exposure to 200 mM NaCl, and the ability of the complexes
to extend the RNA primer was determined as for Fig. 1C. The
data were quantified by PhosphorImagerTM analysis and are
given as fraction of primer extended for each scaffold and for an
elongation complex halted at +14 (EC14).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of downstream DNA on complex
stability. A, scaffolds were assembled as described
above; the length of the template strand (in nt) or of duplex DNA (in
bp) downstream of the RNA primer is indicated. The length of the NT
strands is such that the gap between the 3' end of the primer and the
5' end of the NT strand in scaffolds 1 and 6 is 2 nt, whereas in
scaffolds 10 and 11 the gap is 1 or 0 nt, respectively. Scaffold 1 versus scaffold 2 and scaffold 6 versus scaffold
7 differ from each other by the presence or absence of a complementary
NT strand downstream. B, the ability of T7 RNAP assembled on
such scaffolds to extend the primer following a 30-min challenge with
200 mM NaCl was determined as described for Fig.
2B. C, to determine whether transcription
complexes remained associated during the course of the reaction,
scaffolds 7-9 (1 µM) were mixed either with an equimolar
concentration of RNA polymerase (1 µM) or a 20-fold lower
concentration of RNAP (0.05 µM). The ability of the
polymerase to extend the primer during a subsequent 40-min incubation
without NaCl was determined by gel electrophoresis of the
products.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effects of upstream DNA, a 5' RNA tail, and a
transcription bubble. A, scaffolds were assembled as
indicated. The template strand TS11 extends 10 nt upstream from the 5'
end of the RNA8 primer and 20 nt downstream from the 3' end. RNA12
differs from RNA8 by the addition of 4 nt at the 5' end, resulting in a
noncomplementary tail when this RNA is hybridized to the template.
Annealing of NT8 results in an artificial transcription bubble because
of the presence of a 9-nt segment that is not complementary to TS11 in
the region of the RNA-DNA hybrid. In all cases in which an NT strand is
present, there is a gap of 1 or 2 nt between the 3' end of the RNA
primer and the beginning of a complementary NT strand downstream, and
no gap between the complementary regions of the RNA and the NT strand
at the upstream end of the primer. B, the salt resistance of
RNAP-scaffold complexes was determined as described for Fig. 2.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The RNA-DNA hybrid may only be extended to 12 bp. A, scaffolds were assembled as shown. Template
strand TS2 is 2 nt shorter than TS1; when annealed to RNA8 (scaffold
21), this results in a noncomplementary 5' tail of 2 nt on the RNA
primer and an RNA-DNA hybrid length of 6 bp (as opposed to a tail of 0 nt and a hybrid length of 8 bp in scaffold 2). Both scaffolds were
incubated with RNAP in the presence of all 4 NTPs, and the products
were examined by gel electrophoresis. The primer in scaffold 2 was
extended to a limit length of 12-13 nt, corresponding to the formation
of a 12-13-bp RNA-DNA hybrid. The primer in scaffold 21 was extended
to a limit length of 14-15 nt, which also corresponds to a 12-13-bp
hybrid. B, RNAP complexes involving scaffold 22 were
incubated in the presence of GTP, UTP, and CTP (to give scaffold 22a)
or all four NTPs (lower left). RNAP-scaffold 22 complexes
were loaded onto Ni2+-agarose beads and incubated with GTP,
UTP, and CTP, and the integrity of the complexes before and after
extension was monitored by retention of the labeled primer and NT
strand on the beads (b) or their presence in the wash
(w) (lower right).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Organization of RNAP-scaffold complexes.
A, free T7 RNAP, a binary T7 RNAP-promoter complex,
EC14, and a T7 RNAP complex assembled with scaffold 16 (see Fig. 4)
were digested with trypsin at room temperature for 10 min. Digestion
products were resolved in a 4-12% Nu-PAGE gel using a MOPS buffer
system (Invitrogen). The peptides were identified by molecular mass and
by N-terminal sequence analysis (Ref. 39 and this work). B,
a scaffold for RNA-RNAP photocross-linking was prepared by annealing
RNA oligonucleotide DT11sU with DNA oligonucleotide TS1. The position of the photoreactive uridine
derivative (4-thio-U) in the RNA is indicated in bold type.
Following assembly with RNAP, the complex was radioactively labeled by
incorporation of [32P]UTP (asterisk); this
also brought the thio-U residue to the
9 position relative to the 3'
end of RNA. Cross-linking was initiated by exposure to UV irradiation.
Cross-linked products were digested with CNBr under single hit
conditions (29), and the products were separated in a 4-12% Nu-PAGE
gel using a MOPS buffer system. Lane 1 shows the initial
RNA-RNAP cross-linked product; lanes 2 and 3 show
cleavage patterns after 5 and 10 min of incubation with CNBr,
respectively. Molecular mass markers (Mark 12, Invitrogen) are
indicated on the left (Mw); assignment of the
cleavage products is shown at the right. The CNBr cleavage
map of T7 RNAP is shown to the right; the interval to which
the
9 cross-link (697-750) is formed is indicated in
black. Exhaustive NTCB digestion of the cross-linked product
made using scaffold 23. The cleavage products were separated as in
B. Lane 1 shows uncut RNAP-RNA sample; lane
2 contains molecular mass markers (MultiMark, Invitrogen); and
products of the cleavage reaction are in lane 3. The bands
were assigned as in Ref. 15. The NTCB cleavage map of T7 RNAP is shown
to the right; the interval to which the
9 cross-link is
formed is indicated in black (positions 724-839). Taken
together, the results of CNBr and NTCB cleavage map the site of
9 RNA
cross-link in the scaffold complex to the interval between positions
723 and 750.
17 (17, 18).
As noted below, changes in the accessibility of these sites to trypsin
are likely to reflect conformation changes in the enzyme that occur
during promoter release and the transition to an EC.
9 in the scaffold
complex forms a cross-link with the specificity loop in the interval
from residues 723 to 750, as is observed in the EC (15). The same
results were obtained with a complete scaffold that contains a
transcription bubble (data not shown).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
17 region, but these contacts are
released during the transition. Thus, the switch in cleavage sensitivity observed here is the signature of a transcription complex
that has cleared the promoter and isomerized to a stable EC. These
results are consistent with the results of UV laser cross-linking
experiments demonstrating that the interaction between the RNAP and the
promoter at
17 is a characteristic of a late IC that is lost upon the
transition to an EC (5).
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Martin, C. T.,
Muller, D. K.,
and Coleman, J. E.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
3966-3974[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Ling, M. L.,
Risman, S. S.,
Klement, J. F.,
McGraw, N. J.,
and McAllister, W. T.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
1605-1618 3.
McAllister, W. T.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Mol. Biol.
11,
15-25
4.
Ikeda, R. A.,
and Richardson, C. C.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
3614-3618 5.
Place, C.,
Oddos, J.,
Buc, H.,
McAllister, W. T.,
and Buckle, M.
(2000)
Biochemistry
38,
4948-4957
6.
Brieba, L. G.,
and Sousa, R.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
6826-6835[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Sousa, R.,
Patra, D.,
and Lafer, E. M.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
224,
319-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Guajardo, R.,
and Sousa, R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
265,
8-19[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Jia, Y.,
and Patel, S. S.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
4223-4232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Imburgio, D.,
Anikin, M.,
and McAllister, W. T.
(2002)
J. Mol. Biol.
319,
37-51[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Mentesana, P. E.,
Chin-Bow, S. T.,
Sousa, R.,
and McAllister, W. T.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
302,
1049-1062[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Jiang, M.,
Rong, M.,
Martin, C. T.,
and McAllister, W. T.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
310,
509-522
13.
Liu, C.,
and Martin, C. T.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
2725-2731 14.
Huang, J.,
and Sousa, R.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
303,
347-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Temiakov, D.,
Mentesana, P. E., Ma, K.,
Mustaev, A.,
Borukhov, S.,
and McAllister, W. T.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
14109-14114 16.
Sousa, R.,
Chung, Y. J.,
Rose, J. P.,
and Wang, B. C.
(1993)
Nature
364,
593-599[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Cheetham, G.,
Jeruzalmi, D.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1999)
Nature
399,
80-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Cheetham, G.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1999)
Science
286,
2305-2309 19.
Jeruzalmi, D.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4101-4113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Basu, S.,
and Maitra, U.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
190,
425-437[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Mookhtiar, K. A.,
Peluso, P. S.,
Muller, D. K.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Coleman, J. E.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
6305-6313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Liu, C.,
and Martin, C. T.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
308,
465-475[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Sastry, S. S.,
and Hearst, J. E.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
221,
1091-1110[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Sidorenkov, I.,
Komissarova, N.,
and Kashlev, M.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
55-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Kireeva, M. L.,
Komissarova, N.,
and Kashlev, M.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
299,
325-335[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Temiakov, D.,
Mentesana, P. E.,
and McAllister, W. T.
(2000)
in
Protein:DNA Interactions: A Practical Approach
(Travers, A. A.
, and Buckle, M., eds)
, pp. 351-364, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
27.
Daube, S. S.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1992)
Science
258,
1320-1324 28.
Daube, S. S.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
340-347[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Korzheva, N.,
Mustaev, A.,
Kozlov, M.,
Malhotra, A.,
Nikiforov, V.,
Goldfarb, A.,
and Darst, S. A.
(2000)
Science
289,
619-624 30.
Diaz, G. A.,
Rong, M.,
McAllister, W. T.,
and Durbin, R. K.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
10837-10843[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Martin, C. T.,
and Coleman, J. E.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
2690-2696[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Maslak, M.,
and Martin, C. T.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
4281-4285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Ujvari, A.,
and Martin, C. T.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
14574-14582[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Jia, Y.,
Kumar, A.,
and Patel, S. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30451-30458 35.
Villemain, J.,
Guajardo, R.,
and Sousa, R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
273,
958-977[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Ujvari, A.,
and Martin, C. T.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
273,
775-781[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Kireeva, M. L.,
Komissarova, N.,
Waugh, D. S.,
and Kashlev, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6530-6536 38.
Tyagarajan, K.,
Monforte, J. A.,
and Hearst, J. E.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
10920-10924[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Muller, D. K.,
Martin, C. T.,
and Coleman, J. E.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
5763-5771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Ma, K., Temiakov, D., Jiang, M., Anikin, M., and McAllister,
W. T. (August 16, 2002) J. Biol. Chem.
10.1074/jbc.M206658200
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Datta and P. H. von Hippel Direct Spectroscopic Study of Reconstituted Transcription Complexes Reveals That Intrinsic Termination Is Driven Primarily by Thermodynamic Destabilization of the Nucleic Acid Framework J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3537 - 3549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Graci, D. A. Harki, V. S. Korneeva, J. P. Edathil, K. Too, D. Franco, E. D. Smidansky, A. V. Paul, B. R. Peterson, D. M. Brown, et al. Lethal Mutagenesis of Poliovirus Mediated by a Mutagenic Pyrimidine Analogue J. Virol., October 15, 2007; 81(20): 11256 - 11266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Bandwar, N. Ma, S. A. Emanuel, M. Anikin, D. G. Vassylyev, S. S. Patel, and W. T. McAllister The Transition to an Elongation Complex by T7 RNA Polymerase Is a Multistep Process J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22879 - 22886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kashkina, M. Anikin, F. Brueckner, E. Lehmann, S. N. Kochetkov, W. T. McAllister, P. Cramer, and D. Temiakov Multisubunit RNA Polymerases Melt Only a Single DNA Base Pair Downstream of the Active Site J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21578 - 21582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Anand and S. S. Patel Transient State Kinetics of Transcription Elongation by T7 RNA Polymerase J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 35677 - 35685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kashkina, M. Anikin, T. H. Tahirov, S. N. Kochetkov, D. G. Vassylyev, and D. Temiakov Elongation complexes of Thermus thermophilus RNA polymerase that possess distinct translocation conformations Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 4036 - 4045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ma, D. Temiakov, M. Anikin, and W. T. McAllister Probing conformational changes in T7 RNA polymerase during initiation and termination by using engineered disulfide linkages PNAS, December 6, 2005; 102(49): 17612 - 17617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Esposito and C. T. Martin Cross-linking of Promoter DNA to T7 RNA Polymerase Does Not Prevent Formation of a Stable Elongation Complex J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44270 - 44276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Gong, E. A. Esposito, and C. T. Martin Initial Bubble Collapse Plays a Key Role in the Transition to Elongation in T7 RNA Polymerase J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44277 - 44285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jung and S. J. Lippard Multiple States of Stalled T7 RNA Polymerase at DNA Lesions Generated by Platinum Anticancer Agents J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 52084 - 52092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||