JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208923200 on September 25, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47035-47043, December 6, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/49/47035    most recent
M208923200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Temiakov, D.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Temiakov, D.
Right arrow Articles by McAllister, W. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Characterization of T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Complexes Assembled on Nucleic Acid Scaffolds*

Dmitri TemiakovDagger, Michael AnikinDagger, and William T. McAllister§

From the Morse Institute of Molecular Genetics, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, State University of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, New York 11203-2098

Received for publication, August 30, 2002, and in revised form, September 24, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have used synthetic oligomers of DNA and RNA to assemble nucleic acid scaffolds that, when mixed with T7 RNA polymerase, allow the formation of functional transcription complexes. Manipulation of the scaffold structure allows the contribution of each element in the scaffold to transcription activity to be independently determined. The minimal scaffold that allows efficient extension after challenge with 200 mM NaCl consists of an 8-nt RNA primer hybridized to a DNA template (T strand) that extends 5-10 nt downstream. Constructs in which the RNA-DNA hybrid is less than or greater than 8 bp are less salt-resistant, and the hybrid cannot be extended beyond 12-13 bp. Although the presence of a complementary nontemplate strand downstream of the primer does not affect salt resistance, the presence of DNA upstream decreases resistance. The addition of a 4-nt unpaired "tail" to the 5' end of the primer increases salt resistance, as does the presence of an unpaired nontemplate strand in the region that contains the 8-bp hybrid (thereby generating an artificial transcription "bubble"). Scaffold complexes having these features remain active for over 1 week in the absence of salt and exhibit many of the properties of halted elongation complexes, including resistance to salt challenge, a similar trypsin cleavage pattern, and a similar pattern of RNA-RNA polymerase cross-linking.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

During the early stages of transcription, T7 RNAP1 (like all known RNAPs) forms an unstable initiation complex (IC) that synthesizes and releases short abortive initiation products before clearing the promoter and forming a stable elongation complex (EC) (1-3). The transition is accompanied by release of upstream promoter contacts, changes in the size of the footprint of the polymerase on the DNA, increased resistance to challenge with agents such as salt and heparin (which disrupt and inactivate the IC), and changes in accessibility to cleavage by a variety of proteases (4-7). Taken together, these changes suggest that significant alterations in the organization of the complex occur during the transition.

A variety of lines of evidence demonstrate that the transition is complex and may involve multiple steps (6, 8-13). Recent fluorescence probing and nuclease sensitivity experiments indicate that promoter clearance and collapse of the upstream edge of the transcription bubble occur when the RNA-DNA hybrid achieves a length of 8-9 bp (13, 14) but that the length of the hybrid increases to 10 bp before the transcription bubble collapses to yield a hybrid length of 8 bp, as is observed during elongation (Ref. 13 and see below). The final phase (between 10 and 14 nt) appears to involve displacement of the 5' end of the RNA from the upstream end of the hybrid and its association with an RNA product-binding site (11, 15).

Crystal structures have now been solved for free RNAP, for RNAP complexed with a specific inhibitor of transcription (T7 lysozyme), for a binary promoter-RNAP complex, and for an initiation complex that has transcribed the first three bases in the template strand (16-19). However, no structure has yet been published for an elongation complex or for any intermediate complexes that may form during the transition to an EC.

Biochemical studies have revealed a number of features of T7 RNAP elongation complexes. In a halted EC the enzyme protects a 24-bp region that extends ~19 bp upstream and ~5 bp downstream from the active site from digestion with DNase I or MPE·Fe(II) (4, 20, 21). A somewhat smaller region that extends ~13 bp upstream and ~8 bp downstream is protected from digestion with exonuclease III or lambda  exonuclease, and this footprint is shifted downstream in the presence of the incoming NTP (which stabilizes the EC in the post-translocation state) (14). The RNA-DNA hybrid is ~8 bp (14, 15, 22) and is enclosed in a transcription bubble of ~9 bp. The association of the displaced nontemplate (NT) strand of the transcription bubble with the RNAP may help to stabilize the complex (11). Fluorescence studies and KMnO4 sensitivity indicate that the upstream edge of the transcription bubble in the EC is very close (within 1 bp) to the point at which the RNA is displaced from the template and that downstream border is very close (within 1 bp) to the 3' end of the RNA (in the active site) (14, 22). The latter conclusion is supported by the observation that on templates in which the two DNA strands have been covalently joined by a psoralen cross-link, the RNA may be extended up to the cross-link (23). The 5' end of the nascent RNA becomes accessible to ribonuclease (emerges to the surface of the complex) ~4-6 nt after its displacement from the template, resulting in a total protected RNA length of 12-14 nt (14, 15).

To gain understanding of the organization and properties of T7 RNAP transcription complexes, we annealed together synthetic oligomers of RNA and DNA to construct nucleic acid "scaffolds" that resemble the structural elements thought to be present in an EC. Incubation of these structures with T7 RNAP resulted in the formation of functional transcription complexes that exhibit many of the properties of halted elongation complexes. The use of such nucleic acid structures has enabled us to characterize the contribution of each of the components in the scaffold to transcription activity. Similar approaches have been used to examine transcription complexes formed by multi-subunit RNAPs such as Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and yeast polymerase II (24, 25).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Assembly of Scaffolds and Transcription Conditions-- Histidine-tagged T7 RNAP was purified as described.2 Synthetic DNA oligonucleotides were obtained from Macromolecular Resources (Fort Collins, CO). RNA oligonucleotides were purchased from Dharmacon Research Inc. (Lafayette, CO). Where indicated, RNA and DNA oligomers were labeled at their 5' ends using [gamma -32P]ATP and polynucleotide kinase. The sequences of all oligomers are given in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Synthetic DNA and RNA

To assemble scaffolds, oligonucleotides were taken up in water, mixed together at a concentration of 10 µM each, heated to 70 °C for 5 min, and cooled slowly to room temperature. Except where noted, RNAP-scaffold complexes were formed in a reaction volume of 10 µl containing transcription buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol), 1 µM scaffold, and an equimolar concentration of RNAP for 10-20 min at room temperature.

Extension of Primers and Analysis of Products-- Following assembly, the complexes were challenged for 5-30 min with NaCl, as indicated, and appropriate substrate(s) were then added (100 µM each). After a 2-min period for extension, the samples were withdrawn, mixed with an equal volume of stop buffer (95% formamide, 0.05 mM EDTA), and analyzed by electrophoresis in 20% polyacrylamide gels in the presence of 6 M urea. T7 RNAP elongation complexes halted 14 nt downstream from the start site of transcription (EC14) were formed by annealing together oligos DT6 and DT7 and incubation with RNAP in the presence of GTP, ATP, and UTP as previously described (15)

Trypsin Cleavage-- Trypsin cleavage was performed in 10-µl reactions containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 15 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Tween 20, and 5 mM beta -mercaptoethanol at room temperature for 10 min. The reactions contained 1 µM T7 RNAP or T7 RNAP complexes and trypsin at a 20:1 ratio (w/w, respectively). The reactions were stopped by the addition of protein PAGE loading buffer and resolved in a 4-12% Nu-PAGE gel using a MOPS buffer system (Invitrogen). The identities of the cleavage fragments were confirmed by Edman amino acid sequence analysis.

RNA-RNAP Cross-linking-- RNAP photocross-linking experiments were carried out using a synthetic RNA oligonucleotide (DT11sU; Dharmacon; Table I) that contained a photoreactive uridine derivative, 4-thio-UMP (sU). The RNA oligonucleotide was annealed to template strand TS1 as described above to give sU-containing scaffold 23. The RNAP-scaffold complexes were labeled by extension of the RNA primer with [alpha -32P]UTP and irradiated for 10 min on ice with a 6 W UV lamp (Cole-Parmer 9815 series, Chicago, IL) using a 312-nm optical filter. The cross-linked products were precipitated with an equal volume of saturated (NH4)2SO4 and subjected either to NTCB or CNBr cleavage as previously described (15).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Assembly of Functional Scaffold Complexes-- Two approaches involving the use of artificial scaffolds were employed in previous studies of multi-subunit RNAPs. One group of investigators explored the use of minimal scaffold assemblies that consisted of a single-stranded DNA template hybridized to an RNA primer (24). Other investigators explored more complex structures that included duplex DNA upstream and downstream of the primer and a mispaired nontemplate strand in the region of the primer-template hybrid (an artificial transcription bubble) (27, 28). To simplify studies of parameters that affect the function of T7 complexes, we initiated our studies using a scaffold that consists of a 28-nt template strand hybridized to an 8-nt RNA primer and an 18-nt NT strand downstream (Fig. 1, scaffold 1). Such a scaffold had previously been shown to allow the assembly of functional transcription complexes with E. coli RNAP (24, 29). When incubated with histidine-tagged T7 RNAP and the next incoming nucleotide, the 8-nt primer was quantitatively extended to 9 nt (Fig. 1B, steps 1 and 2). Subsequent washing of immobilized complexes and incubation with UTP and then CTP allowed further extension of the primer to 10 and 11 nt (steps 3 and 4). The incorporation of NTPs was template-specific, because primers were extended only in the presence of the appropriate substrate (data not shown).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Assembly of a functional T7 RNAP scaffold complex. A, scaffold 1 was assembled by annealing together an 8-nt RNA primer (RNA8) labeled at its 5' end with alpha -32P (asterisk), a 28-nt template strand (TS1), and an 18-nt nontemplate strand (NT1), resulting in a gap of 2 nt between the 3' end of the RNA primer and the 5' end of the downstream NT strand. B, complexes formed by incubation of the scaffold with an equimolar amount of His6-tagged T7 RNAP were immobilized on Ni2+-agarose beads (15, 26) (step 1). The complexes were washed with transcription buffer (step 1) and incubated with GTP for 2 min (step 2), washed again and incubated with UTP (step 3), and then incubated with CTP (step 4). The aliquots were removed at each step and analyzed by electrophoresis in 20% polyacrylamide gels. C, RNAP-scaffold complexes formed as in A were challenged by a 5-min exposure to increasing concentrations of NaCl, and the ability of the complexes to extend the RNA primer during the subsequent 2-min incubation in the presence of the next template-directed nucleotide was determined as above.

Unlike binary promoter-RNAP complexes and initiation complexes, which are rapidly inactivated by exposure to 200 mM NaCl, T7 RNAP elongation complexes are resistant to salt challenge (1, 2, 9, 11, 30). As shown in Fig. 1C, transcription complexes assembled on the minimal scaffold are also resistant to challenge with 200 mM NaCl.

Effects of Removing the NT Strand of the DNA and of Changing the Length of the RNA-DNA Hybrid-- Previous studies have shown that whereas the binding region of the T7 promoter (-17 to -5) must be double-stranded to allow promoter binding, the NT strand of the DNA in the initiation region (-4 to +6) is not required for promoter function and that removal of the NT strand downstream of -4 results in tighter RNAP binding and increased rates of initiation (30-36). In a similar manner, the NT strand downstream from the primer is not required for transcription activity on the minimal scaffold, and complexes assembled on a scaffold that lacks the NT strand (Fig. 2, scaffold 2) were as resistant to salt challenge as complexes that were assembled on a scaffold in which the NT strand was present (scaffold 1).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of removing the NT strand of the DNA and of changes in the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid. A, scaffolds were assembled using either an 8-nt RNA primer (RNA8; scaffolds 1 and 2) or a 7-nt RNA primer (RNA7; scaffold 3). To form complexes involving scaffolds 4 and 5, the 8-nt RNA primer in scaffold 2 was extended 1 or 2 nt by incubation with GTP alone or with GTP and UTP, respectively. Unincorporated substrates were removed by centrifugation on quick spin columns. A T7 RNAP elongation complex halted 14 nt downstream from the start site (EC14) was assembled by annealing template and NT DNA strands that contain a consensus T7 promoter sequence (DT6 and DT7) and incubation with T7 RNAP in the presence of GTP, ATP, and UTP (100 µM each). B, RNAP-scaffold complexes were challenged by a 30-min exposure to 200 mM NaCl, and the ability of the complexes to extend the RNA primer was determined as for Fig. 1C. The data were quantified by PhosphorImagerTM analysis and are given as fraction of primer extended for each scaffold and for an elongation complex halted at +14 (EC14).

The length of the RNA-DNA hybrid in a halted T7 RNAP EC has been determined to be ~8 bp (14, 15, 22). We determined the effects of changing the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid on the behavior of scaffold complexes as follows. To examine the effects of shortening the primer we utilized a 7-nt RNA primer (RNA7, scaffold 3). To examine the effects of increasing the length of the primer, we extended the 8-nt RNA primer (RNA8) to 9 or 10 nt by the addition of GTP or GTP and UTP (scaffolds 4 and 5). The ability of the polymerase to extend these primers after challenge with 200 mM NaCl was determined as described above. Shortening the RNA-DNA hybrid to 7 bp or extending it to 9 or 10 bp resulted in significant decreases in salt resistance (Fig. 2, scaffold versus scaffolds 3-5).

Effects of Downstream DNA Configuration on Complex Stability-- The observation in Fig. 2 that the presence of the NT strand is not required to provide salt resistance to T7 RNAP complexes is in contrast to previous findings with E. coli RNA polymerase RNAP (24) but not with yeast polymerase II (37). To examine the contribution of the downstream DNA in more detail, we varied the length of the downstream DNA both in the presence and in the absence of a complementary NT strand (Fig. 3A). As before, we observed that the presence of the NT strand downstream from the primer did not significantly affect activity (cf. scaffold 1 versus scaffold 2 and scaffold 6 versus scaffold 7). To determine the contribution of the template strand to salt resistance, we progressively shortened the length of the downstream strand from 20 nt (scaffold 2) to 2 nt (scaffold 9). A significant loss in salt resistance was observed when this strand was shortened to <5nt.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of downstream DNA on complex stability. A, scaffolds were assembled as described above; the length of the template strand (in nt) or of duplex DNA (in bp) downstream of the RNA primer is indicated. The length of the NT strands is such that the gap between the 3' end of the primer and the 5' end of the NT strand in scaffolds 1 and 6 is 2 nt, whereas in scaffolds 10 and 11 the gap is 1 or 0 nt, respectively. Scaffold 1 versus scaffold 2 and scaffold 6 versus scaffold 7 differ from each other by the presence or absence of a complementary NT strand downstream. B, the ability of T7 RNAP assembled on such scaffolds to extend the primer following a 30-min challenge with 200 mM NaCl was determined as described for Fig. 2B. C, to determine whether transcription complexes remained associated during the course of the reaction, scaffolds 7-9 (1 µM) were mixed either with an equimolar concentration of RNA polymerase (1 µM) or a 20-fold lower concentration of RNAP (0.05 µM). The ability of the polymerase to extend the primer during a subsequent 40-min incubation without NaCl was determined by gel electrophoresis of the products.

The resistance of transcription complexes to salt challenge is usually interpreted as an indication of their stability (i.e. the tendency of the components of the complex to remain together). To determine whether the components of the T7 scaffold complexes remained associated during the course of the reaction or whether the RNAP dissociates from one template and then associates with another, we examined primer extension under conditions in which the RNAP concentration was either equimolar to the scaffold (1 µM each) or 20-fold lower than the scaffold (50 nM) (Fig. 3C). Using scaffold 1 (which is highly resistant to salt challenge), we found that when the concentrations of RNAP and scaffold were equimolar, nearly 100% of the primers were extended, whereas when the concentration of polymerase was only 5% that of the scaffold, only 5% extension was observed. This indicates that there is little turnover of the RNAP after primer extension during the 40-min incubation period on this template. In contrast, when the NT strand protrudes only 2 nt downstream from the primer (scaffold 9), more than 50% of the primers are extended during the reaction, indicating that the polymerase dissociates from this scaffold after extending the primer and may subsequently associate with other scaffolds. Scaffolds in which the NT strand extends 5 or 10 nt downstream from the 3' end of the primer (scaffolds 7 and 8) exhibit an intermediate stability. From these results, we conclude that the minimal length of the downstream template strand that is required to confer maximal stability on the transcription complex is 5-10 nt. This is consistent with the size of the footprint of T7 RNAP in a halted EC (4, 14).

Previous studies have shown that on templates in which the two DNA strands are covalently joined via a psoralen cross-link, T7 RNAP can extend the RNA up to the site of the cross-link (23). In the experiments above in which a complementary NT strand was present (scaffolds 1 and 6), the 3' end of the RNA primer was separated by a gap of 2 nt from the 5' end of the NT strand. To determine what happens when primer extension in a scaffold complex results in an encounter with the NT strand, we constructed templates in which the gap between the 3' end of the primer and the 5' end of the downstream NT strand was reduced from 2 to 1 or 0 nt (Fig. 3, scaffolds 1, 10, and 11, respectively). In the absence of salt, the primer was efficiently extended by 1 nt in all three of these constructs (data not shown). However, in the presence of 200 mM NaCl, primer extension was significantly reduced when there was no gap (scaffold 11).

Toward the Assembly of a Complete Scaffold: Examining the Effects of Upstream DNA, a Transcription "Bubble," and a 5' RNA "Tail"-- In halted T7 RNAP elongation complexes, the RNA product is displaced from the template strand of the DNA about 8 bp upstream from the active site, but the 5' end of the product but does not emerge to the surface until an additional 4 nt have been added, presumably because the RNA is involved in protective contacts with the RNAP (14, 15, 38).

To explore the possible contribution of the displaced RNA to complex stability, we modified the 8-nt RNA primer used above (RNA8) to include a noncomplementary tail of 4 nt at its 5' end (Fig. 4; RNA12) and examined the properties of complexes formed using these two different primers. A number of templates were tested, including those in which the nature of the upstream DNA was varied and those that included a noncomplementary NT strand in the region of the RNA-DNA hybrid (thereby creating an artificial transcription bubble).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effects of upstream DNA, a 5' RNA tail, and a transcription bubble. A, scaffolds were assembled as indicated. The template strand TS11 extends 10 nt upstream from the 5' end of the RNA8 primer and 20 nt downstream from the 3' end. RNA12 differs from RNA8 by the addition of 4 nt at the 5' end, resulting in a noncomplementary tail when this RNA is hybridized to the template. Annealing of NT8 results in an artificial transcription bubble because of the presence of a 9-nt segment that is not complementary to TS11 in the region of the RNA-DNA hybrid. In all cases in which an NT strand is present, there is a gap of 1 or 2 nt between the 3' end of the RNA primer and the beginning of a complementary NT strand downstream, and no gap between the complementary regions of the RNA and the NT strand at the upstream end of the primer. B, the salt resistance of RNAP-scaffold complexes was determined as described for Fig. 2.

With regard to the effects of upstream DNA, we observed that the presence of single-stranded template DNA upstream of the primer resulted in a significant decrease in salt resistance (scaffold versus scaffold 12 and scaffold 16 versus scaffold 17) and that salt resistance decreased even further if the upstream DNA was made double-stranded by the addition of a complementary NT strand (scaffolds 13, 14, 18, 19). In fact, the latter complexes are so unstable that we were unable to detect their assembly (as determined by failure to form labeled complexes that are retained on Ni2+ agarose beads; data not shown). Strikingly, the presence of a noncomplementary NT strand in the region of the RNA-DNA hybrid stabilizes these complexes and allows the assembly of functional, salt-resistant scaffolds having duplex DNA upstream (scaffolds 15 and 20). Similar stabilizing effects of a noncollapsing transcription bubble on the stability of halted ECs were observed previously (11).

In all of the scaffolds that we were able to assemble, the presence of a noncomplementary tail at the 5' end of the RNA primer resulted in a slight but significant increase in salt resistance. This was particularly apparent on scaffolds that had an intrinsically low salt resistance (Fig. 4; cf. scaffold 12 versus scaffold 17 and scaffold 15 versus scaffold 20). A complete scaffold that contains upstream and downstream duplex DNA, an 8-bp RNA-DNA hybrid, and a 4-nt 5' tail on the primer (scaffold 20) is nearly as salt-resistant as complexes formed on scaffold 1 or a halted elongation complex (EC14).

The RNA-DNA Hybrid May Only Be Extended to 12-13 bp-- Although the length of the RNA DNA hybrid is 8 bp in halted elongation complexes (11), recent studies have shown that during the transition to a stable EC the length of the hybrid may reach 10 bp before the transcription bubble collapses to 8 bp (13). When scaffold 2 (in which the primer-template is 8 bp) was incubated in the presence of all four NTPs, the primer could be efficiently extended to 12-13 nt but not beyond (Fig. 5). It is apparently the inability of the complex to accommodate an RNA-DNA hybrid greater than 12-13 bp, and not the length of the RNA product, that is limiting. In scaffold 21 the two 5' terminal nt of the RNA8 primer do not pair with the template strand; when this scaffold complex is incubated with all four NTPs, the primer was poorly extended beyond 14 nt, 12-13 of which are in an RNA-DNA hybrid. The same results were obtained with a bubble scaffold (scaffold 20).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The RNA-DNA hybrid may only be extended to 12 bp. A, scaffolds were assembled as shown. Template strand TS2 is 2 nt shorter than TS1; when annealed to RNA8 (scaffold 21), this results in a noncomplementary 5' tail of 2 nt on the RNA primer and an RNA-DNA hybrid length of 6 bp (as opposed to a tail of 0 nt and a hybrid length of 8 bp in scaffold 2). Both scaffolds were incubated with RNAP in the presence of all 4 NTPs, and the products were examined by gel electrophoresis. The primer in scaffold 2 was extended to a limit length of 12-13 nt, corresponding to the formation of a 12-13-bp RNA-DNA hybrid. The primer in scaffold 21 was extended to a limit length of 14-15 nt, which also corresponds to a 12-13-bp hybrid. B, RNAP complexes involving scaffold 22 were incubated in the presence of GTP, UTP, and CTP (to give scaffold 22a) or all four NTPs (lower left). RNAP-scaffold 22 complexes were loaded onto Ni2+-agarose beads and incubated with GTP, UTP, and CTP, and the integrity of the complexes before and after extension was monitored by retention of the labeled primer and NT strand on the beads (b) or their presence in the wash (w) (lower right).

In earlier work with T7 RNAP, Daube et al. (27, 28) utilized scaffolds that were similar to the complete scaffold used here but observed inefficient extension of the primer. The length of the RNA-DNA hybrid in the prior studies was 12 bp, and in view of the results above, it seemed likely that this may have been responsible for the poor performance of these constructs. To explore this, we constructed scaffolds that were essentially the same as those used in the earlier studies and examined their stability before and after extension (Fig. 5B).

Scaffold 22 is similar to the complete scaffold shown in Fig. 4 (scaffold 20) except that annealing of NT13 results in the formation of a 12-nt transcription bubble in which there is a gap of 4 nt downstream from the 3' end of the RNA (as opposed to a bubble length of 9 nt and a gap of 1 nt in scaffold 20). Incubation with RNAP in the presence of GTP, UTP, and CTP allows primer extension in scaffold 22 by 4 nt, resulting in an RNA-DNA hybrid of 12 bp and a gap of 0, essentially the same structure as used in previous studies. The RNA primer in these constructs may not be extended further, even at low salt conditions, because the same product is observed in the presence of all four rNTPs. The integrity of the RNAP-scaffold complex before and after primer extension was determined by labeling the RNA primer and the NT strand and determining whether the labeled components incorporated into His6-tagged T7 RNAP complexes were retained on nickel-agarose beads or released into the wash buffer. Both components were retained on the beads prior to extension but were released after extension, indicating that dissociation of the complex had occurred. We have also found that extension of the primer by 2 nt (resulting in a 10-bp hybrid) results in destabilization of the complex (data not shown).

Scaffold Complexes Exhibit a Trypsin Cleavage Pattern Similar to That of a Halted EC-- Changes in the sensitivity of transcription complexes to a variety of proteases before and after the transition from an IC to an EC suggest that a significant structural reorganization of the complex may occur during the transition (7). Under native conditions, trypsin cleavage of free RNAP (97 kDa), a binary RNAP-promoter complex, or an initiation complex that has proceeded to +3 all result in the appearance of an 80-kDa fragment. In contrast, cleavage of complexes halted at +15 or actively transcribing in the presence of all four rNTPs result in the appearance of a novel, higher molecular mass fragment of 88 kDa and reduction of the abundance of the 80-kDa fragment. The 88-kDa fragment is therefore characteristic of an EC (7).

We have repeated these experiments using free RNAP, a promoter complex, a halted elongation complex (EC14), and a complex formed with scaffold 16 (Fig. 6A). In agreement with prior observations, trypsin cleavage of free RNAP or a binary complex resulted in the appearance of an 80-kDa fragment, whereas cleavage of complexes that have advanced 14 nt downstream from the start site resulted in generation of both the 80- and 88-kDa products. Cleavage of the scaffold 16 complex resulted in a much more homogeneous pattern comprising largely the 88-kDa fragment.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Organization of RNAP-scaffold complexes. A, free T7 RNAP, a binary T7 RNAP-promoter complex, EC14, and a T7 RNAP complex assembled with scaffold 16 (see Fig. 4) were digested with trypsin at room temperature for 10 min. Digestion products were resolved in a 4-12% Nu-PAGE gel using a MOPS buffer system (Invitrogen). The peptides were identified by molecular mass and by N-terminal sequence analysis (Ref. 39 and this work). B, a scaffold for RNA-RNAP photocross-linking was prepared by annealing RNA oligonucleotide DT11sU with DNA oligonucleotide TS1. The position of the photoreactive uridine derivative (4-thio-U) in the RNA is indicated in bold type. Following assembly with RNAP, the complex was radioactively labeled by incorporation of [32P]UTP (asterisk); this also brought the thio-U residue to the -9 position relative to the 3' end of RNA. Cross-linking was initiated by exposure to UV irradiation. Cross-linked products were digested with CNBr under single hit conditions (29), and the products were separated in a 4-12% Nu-PAGE gel using a MOPS buffer system. Lane 1 shows the initial RNA-RNAP cross-linked product; lanes 2 and 3 show cleavage patterns after 5 and 10 min of incubation with CNBr, respectively. Molecular mass markers (Mark 12, Invitrogen) are indicated on the left (Mw); assignment of the cleavage products is shown at the right. The CNBr cleavage map of T7 RNAP is shown to the right; the interval to which the -9 cross-link (697-750) is formed is indicated in black. Exhaustive NTCB digestion of the cross-linked product made using scaffold 23. The cleavage products were separated as in B. Lane 1 shows uncut RNAP-RNA sample; lane 2 contains molecular mass markers (MultiMark, Invitrogen); and products of the cleavage reaction are in lane 3. The bands were assigned as in Ref. 15. The NTCB cleavage map of T7 RNAP is shown to the right; the interval to which the -9 cross-link is formed is indicated in black (positions 724-839). Taken together, the results of CNBr and NTCB cleavage map the site of -9 RNA cross-link in the scaffold complex to the interval between positions 723 and 750.

Previous work had shown that the 80-kDa trypsin fragment results from cleavage after Arg173 and/or Lys180 (39). Using N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis, we determined that the 88-kDa fragment results from cleavage after Arg96 (data not shown). In the crystal structures of a T7 RNAP-promoter complex and of an IC, the former sites lie in a solvent exposed loop in the N-terminal domain, whereas the latter site forms part of the AT-rich recognition loop that is involved in upstream promoter contacts at -17 (17, 18). As noted below, changes in the accessibility of these sites to trypsin are likely to reflect conformation changes in the enzyme that occur during promoter release and the transition to an EC.

The RNA Cross-links to RNAP in a Similar Manner in Scaffold Complexes and in an EC-- As the nascent RNA is displaced from the RNA-DNA hybrid in an EC it becomes associated with an element of the RNAP (the specificity loop) that was earlier involved in promoter recognition (15). Thus, in a halted EC the RNA nucleotide that lies 9 nt upstream from the active site may be cross-linked to a region that includes amino acids 744-750. To determine the nature of RNA-RNAP interactions in a scaffold complex, we synthesized an RNA primer that contains a photoreactive uridine derivative, 4-thio-U, 9 nt upstream from the 3' end and determined the location of the cross-link made to the RNAP in complexes assembled with this RNA (Fig. 6B). Analysis of the products that result from digestion of the cross-linked complex with NTCB and CNBr reveals that the base at -9 in the scaffold complex forms a cross-link with the specificity loop in the interval from residues 723 to 750, as is observed in the EC (15). The same results were obtained with a complete scaffold that contains a transcription bubble (data not shown).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this work, we used synthetic oligomers of DNA and RNA to assemble nucleic acid scaffolds that allow the formation of functional T7 RNAP transcription complexes. Manipulation of the scaffolds allowed us to examine the contribution of each of the structural elements to transcription activity and salt resistance. The minimal scaffold that allowed efficient extension after challenge with 200 mM NaCl consists of an 8-nt RNA primer hybridized to a DNA template that extends 5-10 nt downstream. Constructs in which the RNA-DNA hybrid is less than or greater than 8 bp are less salt-resistant, and the hybrid cannot be extended beyond 12-13 bp. Although the presence of a complementary NT strand downstream of the primer does not affect salt resistance, the presence of either duplex or template strand DNA upstream of the hybrid decreases salt resistance. The addition of a 4-nt unpaired tail to the 5' end of the primer increases salt resistance, as does the presence of an unpaired NT strand in the region that contains the 8-bp hybrid (thereby generating an artificial transcription bubble). The minimal scaffold (scaffold 7), as well as complexes containing upstream and downstream elements, together with the bubble (scaffold 20), exhibit many of the properties of a promoter-initiated elongation complex, including resistance to challenge by salt, similar trypsin cleavage patterns, and a similar pattern of RNA-RNAP cross-linking.

The features of the complete scaffold correspond closely to available information concerning the organization of a halted T7 RNAP EC (14, 15, 22). The RNA-DNA hybrid length is 8 base pairs, there is a 1-nt gap between the 3' end of the RNA and the displaced template strand, and there is no gap between the displaced RNA at the upstream end of the RNA-DNA hybrid and the trailing edge of the transcription bubble.

In Fig. 6 we show that although trypsin cleaves the IC at positions 173 and 180, these sites become less accessible in the EC and that cleavage at Arg96 becomes more prominent. The reason for this switch in cleavage sites is understandable in light of recent cross-linking experiments that probe changes in the structural organization of the transcription complex during the transition from an IC to an EC (40). Whereas the cleavage sites at positions 173 and 180 are in a solvent-exposed loop that is not in contact with nucleic acids in the IC, after isomerization this region becomes associated with the template and nontemplate strands of the DNA at the upstream edge of the transcription bubble (19, 40). In contrast, Arg96 is in close association with the upstream region of the promoter prior to isomerization, because it forms part of the AT-rich recognition loop that contacts the promoter in the -17 region, but these contacts are released during the transition. Thus, the switch in cleavage sensitivity observed here is the signature of a transcription complex that has cleared the promoter and isomerized to a stable EC. These results are consistent with the results of UV laser cross-linking experiments demonstrating that the interaction between the RNAP and the promoter at -17 is a characteristic of a late IC that is lost upon the transition to an EC (5).

In previous work, the laboratory of Peter von Hippel explored the use of similar "complete" scaffold templates to study elongation by T7 RNAP but observed poor efficiency of primer extension (27, 28). As shown in Fig. 5, this is likely due to the length of the RNA-DNA hybrid length used in the earlier studies (12 bp, as opposed to 8 bp in the current study). We found that an 8-bp hybrid may only be extended to 12-13 bp and that further extension results in dissociation of the complex. Liu and Martin (13) have shown that during initiation the RNA-DNA hybrid may achieve a length of 10-11 bp before the bubble collapses to 8 bp and the complex isomerizes to a stable EC. Structures involving a hybrid of >8 bp may therefore represent an interesting subject for studies of a strained IC that forms just before isomerization to an EC.

The stable scaffold complexes described here remain active after storage of up to 1 week in the absence of salt, suggesting that they may prove useful in structural studies. Importantly, the scaffolds do not involve a T7 promoter sequence and thus allow the characterization of mutant phage RNAPs that are defective in promoter binding and/or the early stages of transcription.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM38147 (to W. T. M.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Both authors contributed equally to this work.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Microbiology and Immunology, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11203-2098. Tel.: 718-270-1238; Fax: 718-270-2656; E-mail: pogo51@aol.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208923200

2 Tahirov, T., Temiakov, D., Anikin, M., Patlan, V., McAllister, W. T., Vassylyev, D. G., and Yokoyama, S. (2002) 9 October 2002 (doi:1038/nature01129.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: RNAP, RNA polymerase; IC, initiation complex; EC, elongation complex; nt, nucleotide; NTCB, 2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid; MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Martin, C. T., Muller, D. K., and Coleman, J. E. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 3966-3974[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Ling, M. L., Risman, S. S., Klement, J. F., McGraw, N. J., and McAllister, W. T. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 1605-1618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. McAllister, W. T. (1997) Nucleic Acids Mol. Biol. 11, 15-25
4. Ikeda, R. A., and Richardson, C. C. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 3614-3618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Place, C., Oddos, J., Buc, H., McAllister, W. T., and Buckle, M. (2000) Biochemistry 38, 4948-4957
6. Brieba, L. G., and Sousa, R. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 6826-6835[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Sousa, R., Patra, D., and Lafer, E. M. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 319-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Guajardo, R., and Sousa, R. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 265, 8-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Jia, Y., and Patel, S. S. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 4223-4232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Imburgio, D., Anikin, M., and McAllister, W. T. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 319, 37-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Mentesana, P. E., Chin-Bow, S. T., Sousa, R., and McAllister, W. T. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 302, 1049-1062[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Jiang, M., Rong, M., Martin, C. T., and McAllister, W. T. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 310, 509-522
13. Liu, C., and Martin, C. T. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 2725-2731[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Huang, J., and Sousa, R. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 303, 347-358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Temiakov, D., Mentesana, P. E., Ma, K., Mustaev, A., Borukhov, S., and McAllister, W. T. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 14109-14114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Sousa, R., Chung, Y. J., Rose, J. P., and Wang, B. C. (1993) Nature 364, 593-599[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Cheetham, G., Jeruzalmi, D., and Steitz, T. A. (1999) Nature 399, 80-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Cheetham, G., and Steitz, T. A. (1999) Science 286, 2305-2309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Jeruzalmi, D., and Steitz, T. A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4101-4113[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Basu, S., and Maitra, U. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 190, 425-437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Mookhtiar, K. A., Peluso, P. S., Muller, D. K., Dunn, J. J., and Coleman, J. E. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 6305-6313[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Liu, C., and Martin, C. T. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 308, 465-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Sastry, S. S., and Hearst, J. E. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 221, 1091-1110[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Sidorenkov, I., Komissarova, N., and Kashlev, M. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 55-64[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kireeva, M. L., Komissarova, N., and Kashlev, M. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 299, 325-335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Temiakov, D., Mentesana, P. E., and McAllister, W. T. (2000) in Protein:DNA Interactions: A Practical Approach (Travers, A. A. , and Buckle, M., eds) , pp. 351-364, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
27. Daube, S. S., and von Hippel, P. H. (1992) Science 258, 1320-1324[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Daube, S. S., and von Hippel, P. H. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 340-347[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Korzheva, N., Mustaev, A., Kozlov, M., Malhotra, A., Nikiforov, V., Goldfarb, A., and Darst, S. A. (2000) Science 289, 619-624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Diaz, G. A., Rong, M., McAllister, W. T., and Durbin, R. K. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 10837-10843[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Martin, C. T., and Coleman, J. E. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 2690-2696[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Maslak, M., and Martin, C. T. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4281-4285[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Ujvari, A., and Martin, C. T. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 14574-14582[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Jia, Y., Kumar, A., and Patel, S. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 30451-30458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Villemain, J., Guajardo, R., and Sousa, R. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 958-977[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Ujvari, A., and Martin, C. T. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 775-781[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kireeva, M. L., Komissarova, N., Waugh, D. S., and Kashlev, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6530-6536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Tyagarajan, K., Monforte, J. A., and Hearst, J. E. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10920-10924[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Muller, D. K., Martin, C. T., and Coleman, J. E. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 5763-5771[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Ma, K., Temiakov, D., Jiang, M., Anikin, M., and McAllister, W. T. (August 16, 2002) J. Biol. Chem. 10.1074/jbc.M206658200


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Datta and P. H. von Hippel
Direct Spectroscopic Study of Reconstituted Transcription Complexes Reveals That Intrinsic Termination Is Driven Primarily by Thermodynamic Destabilization of the Nucleic Acid Framework
J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3537 - 3549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. D. Graci, D. A. Harki, V. S. Korneeva, J. P. Edathil, K. Too, D. Franco, E. D. Smidansky, A. V. Paul, B. R. Peterson, D. M. Brown, et al.
Lethal Mutagenesis of Poliovirus Mediated by a Mutagenic Pyrimidine Analogue
J. Virol., October 15, 2007; 81(20): 11256 - 11266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. P. Bandwar, N. Ma, S. A. Emanuel, M. Anikin, D. G. Vassylyev, S. S. Patel, and W. T. McAllister
The Transition to an Elongation Complex by T7 RNA Polymerase Is a Multistep Process
J. Biol. Chem., August 3, 2007; 282(31): 22879 - 22886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Kashkina, M. Anikin, F. Brueckner, E. Lehmann, S. N. Kochetkov, W. T. McAllister, P. Cramer, and D. Temiakov
Multisubunit RNA Polymerases Melt Only a Single DNA Base Pair Downstream of the Active Site
J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21578 - 21582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. S. Anand and S. S. Patel
Transient State Kinetics of Transcription Elongation by T7 RNA Polymerase
J. Biol. Chem., November 24, 2006; 281(47): 35677 - 35685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
E. Kashkina, M. Anikin, T. H. Tahirov, S. N. Kochetkov, D. G. Vassylyev, and D. Temiakov
Elongation complexes of Thermus thermophilus RNA polymerase that possess distinct translocation conformations
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2006; 34(14): 4036 - 4045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Ma, D. Temiakov, M. Anikin, and W. T. McAllister
Probing conformational changes in T7 RNA polymerase during initiation and termination by using engineered disulfide linkages
PNAS, December 6, 2005; 102(49): 17612 - 17617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. A. Esposito and C. T. Martin
Cross-linking of Promoter DNA to T7 RNA Polymerase Does Not Prevent Formation of a Stable Elongation Complex
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44270 - 44276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Gong, E. A. Esposito, and C. T. Martin
Initial Bubble Collapse Plays a Key Role in the Transition to Elongation in T7 RNA Polymerase
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44277 - 44285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Jung and S. J. Lippard
Multiple States of Stalled T7 RNA Polymerase at DNA Lesions Generated by Platinum Anticancer Agents
J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 52084 - 52092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available