|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206330200 on October 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47136-47148, December 6, 2002
Identification of Three NFAT Binding Motifs in the
5'-Upstream Region of the Human CD3 Gene That
Differentially Bind NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF- B p50*
Bassam M.
Badran ,
Steven M.
Wolinsky§,
Arsène
Burny , and
Karen E.
Willard-Gallo ¶
From the Laboratory of Experimental Hematology,
Faculty of Medicine, University of Brussels, 121 Blvd. de Waterloo,
Brussels B1000, Belgium and the § Division of Infectious
Diseases, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical
School, Chicago, Illinois 60611
Received for publication, June 25, 2002, and in revised form, September 24, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 (HIV-1)
infection of CD4+ T cells progressively abrogates T
cell receptor (TCR)·CD3 function and surface expression by
specifically interfering with CD3 gene transcription. Our data show that the loss of CD3
transcripts begins very early after infection and accumulates to a
>90% deficiency before a significant effect on surface receptor
density is apparent. Blocking TCR·CD3-directed NFAT activation with
cyclosporin A provokes a partial re-expression of CD3
gene transcripts and surface complexes in a time- and
dose-dependent manner. We have identified three NFAT
consensus sequences (5'-GGAAA-3') in the 5'-upstream region of the
human CD3 gene at: 124 to 120
(NFAT 1), 384 to 380 (NFAT 2), and +450
to +454 (NFAT 3) from the first transcription initiation
site. Using electrophoretic mobility shift and supershift assays, we
show that NFATc2 alone binds to the NFAT 2 motif;
however, complexes containing either NFATc2 or NFATc1 plus NF- B p50
bind to the NFAT 1 and NFAT 3 sites. We
further demonstrate that NFATc1 and NF- B p50 bind in the same
protein·DNA complex and that a fourth Ala added to the core sequence
(5'-GGAAAA-3') in NFAT 1, and
NFAT 3 is critical for their binding. Finally, we have
shown that an increase in the binding of nuclear NFATc2, NFATc1, and
NF- B p50 to these three motifs is correlated with a progressive loss
of CD3 transcripts after HIV-1 infection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
T cell receptor
(TCR)1·CD3 cell surface
density has been linked with the ability of the cell to elicit an
effective signal, suggesting that T cells regulate their responsiveness
to antigen-induced activation by increasing or decreasing the number of
cell surface complexes (1-4). The quantity of TCR·CD3
complexes present on the surface at any given time is a result
of the balance between receptor internalization, leading to
intracellular degradation or recycling to the surface, coupled with the
synthesis, processing, and exportation of newly formed receptors
(reviewed in Ref. 5). It is currently thought that two pathways
regulate antigen-induced TCR·CD3 down-regulation from the cell
surface: phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based
activation motifs present in the cytoplasmic tails of CD3 , CD3 ,
CD3 , and CD3 (6, 7) and protein kinase C (PKC)-mediated serine
phosphorylation of the di-leucine endocytosis motif in CD3 (8, 9). A
recent study has shown that the di-leucine motif in CD3 increases
ligand-induced receptor internalization and degradation 3- to 10-fold,
indicating that this chain plays a major role in TCR·CD3
down-modulation (10).
Defects in TCR·CD3 surface expression and function are increasingly
being reported in an expanding range of clinical conditions, including
both peripheral blood and tumor-infiltrating T cells in a wide variety
of cancer patients (reviewed in Refs. 11 and 12) and after viral
infection of CD4+ T cells (13-25). A common denominator
for TCR·CD3 down-modulation by the CD4+ T cell tropic
viruses that has emerged from in vitro (15, 20-22) and
in vivo studies (14, 23-25) is their ability to interfere with expression of one or more of the CD3 genes. We have
demonstrated that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1 (15, 16) and
HIV-2 (20)) infection of the human IL-2-dependent
CD4+ T cell line, WE17/10, progressively abrogates
TCR·CD3 function and surface expression by specifically interfering
with transcription of the CD3 gene. Our data have shown
that, when intracellular conditions favor expression of the viral
regulatory genes tat and/or nef in the absence of
rev, CD3 mRNA and TCR·CD3 surface density are down-regulated and TCR·CD3-mediated immune activities are
diminished (26).
Nef is a multifaceted viral regulatory protein that is capable of a
variety of different, independent functions, some of which have been
linked with TCR·CD3-controlled events. It has been shown to directly
associate with CD3 and lead to its down-modulation from the cell
surface (27, 28). Nef has also been shown to play a role in the
post-transcriptional down-modulation of CD4 via a di-leucine motif in
this receptor's membrane proximal cytoplasmic domain (29). This CD4
domain is strikingly similar to the di-leucine motif in CD3 (10,
30-32) and thus conditions favoring Nef expression could potentially
enhance the activity of the CD3 di-leucine motif.
The viral transcriptional transactivator protein Tat is also thought to
play an important role in the immune suppression observed after
infection by activating and suppressing the expression of a variety of
cellular immune response genes (33-37). The transcriptional control
elements for CD3 have remained elusive (the 5'-upstream region of this gene lacks a typical TATA or CAAT box), despite the
identification of promoter and enhancer sequences for the other
TCR·CD3 genes: TCR (38, 39), TCR (40,
41), TCR (42), TCR (43), CD3
(44), CD3 (45, 46), and the highly homologous
CD3 (47-49). However, the recurring defect in
CD3 gene transcripts observed after infection with a wide
variety of HIV-1 and HIV-2 isolates suggests that transcription of this cellular gene might be controlled by a mechanism similar to the virus.
The primary function of HIV-1 Tat is to promote transcription by
recruiting a kinase complex known as TAK (Tat-associated kinase) to the
transactivation response RNA element present at the 5'-ends of all
nascent HIV-1 transcripts and subsequently act in concert with cellular
transcription factors bound to the long terminal repeat (LTR) (reviewed
in Refs. 50 and 51). Among the many regulatory elements in the HIV-1
LTR, there are two adjacent NF- B binding sites that have been shown
to be a major cis-acting element for viral gene expression
(52). The NF- B/Rel family of transcription factors (p50, p65, RelB,
c-Rel, and p52) are induced in response to T cell activation signals to
bind to the NF- B consensus sequence (5'-GGGACTTTCC-3') (53) and
activate viral transcription (54). Members of the NFAT family of
transcription factors (NFATc1 (NFATc, NFAT2); NFATc2 (NFATp, NFAT1);
NFATc3 (NFATx, NFAT4); NFATc4 (NFAT3); and NFATc5 (TonEBP); approved
UCL/HGNC/HUGO Human Gene Nomenclature) share a common architecture with the NF- B/Rel family and bind to a five-nucleotide core sequence (5'-GGAAA-3'), which, in addition to being found alone
(55), is also contained within each NF- B consensus sequence (5'-GGGACTTTCC-3'). The promoter-enhancer regions of
several activation-associated genes, some of which have been shown to
be activated or suppressed after HIV-1 infection, possess NFAT binding
sites, including those encoding IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-8,
granulocyte-macrophage-colony-stimulating factor, tumor necrosis
factor- , as well as cell surface receptors such as FasL and CD40L
(reviewed in Ref. 56)).
Several groups have investigated the potential role of NFAT in HIV-1
replication and the interaction between Tat and NFAT and concluded that
the NFAT family of proteins may have distinct effects on HIV-1
replication. NFATc2 is thought to negatively regulate the LTR by
competing with the NF- B for its binding sites, whereas NFATc1 has
been shown to positively regulate HIV-1 LTR through the NF- B binding
sites (55). Recent studies suggest that virally induced immune
suppression may be due to the interaction of Tat with several
transcription factors, including Oct, Sp1, and NFAT (57, 58) as well as
through indirect effects on the transcriptional activity of NF- B and
AP-1 (59).
The data presented in this paper show that very early after HIV-1
infection in an IL-2-dependent T cell line, the majority (>90%) of CD3 transcripts are lost, and this occurs
before significant TCR·CD3 down-modulation from the surface is
apparent. Furthermore, treatment with the immunosuppressive drug,
cyclosporin A (CsA), which acts by blocking translocation of NFAT
proteins to the nucleus, partially reverses this CD3
transcription defect. We located three NFAT binding motifs
(5'-GGAAA-3') in the 5'-upstream region of the CD3 gene
(NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and NFAT 3)
and found that increased nuclear translocation and binding of NFAT family proteins to these three sites parallels the loss of
CD3 gene transcripts. Electrophoretic mobility shift
assays (EMSA) show that the NFAT 1 and
NFAT 3 motifs bind complexes containing either NFATc2 or
NFATc1 plus NF- B p50, whereas the NFAT 2 motif binds
NFATc2 containing complexes only.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture Conditions and Reagents--
The WE17/10 cell line
is a human interleukin 2 (IL-2)-dependent CD4+
T cell line (15, 60) that was established and is maintained in RPMI
1640 containing 20% fetal bovine serum, 1.25 mM
L-glutamine, 0.55 mM L-arginine,
0.24 mM L-asparagine, and 100 units of
recombinant human IL-2 per ml (Cetus Corp., Emeryville, CA). WE17/10
cells infected with the HIV-1 isolate LAI (61) or the molecular clone HXB2 (62) were used in previous experiments (15, 60). The human B
lymphocyte line, Raji, was obtained from the American Type Culture
Collection (Rockville, MD) and maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum.
WE17/10 cells were treated for 18 h with the calcium channel
blockers EGTA (2.5 M) and BAPTA/AM (1-10 µM,
bis-(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid), the PKC activator PMA (30 ng/ml, phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate), the calcium ionophores A23187 or ionomycin (30 ng/ml), and the protein kinase inhibitors herbimycin A (10 8
M) and staurosporine (1-30 ng/ml). Cells were also
treated with the immunosuppressive agent, cyclosporin A (0.1-1.0
µg/ml, CsA) for 1-7 days or stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3
antibody (1-10 µg/ml) for 2-3 days. HIV-1-infected TCR·CD3
cells were pretreated for 1 h with CsA followed by overnight
stimulation with PMA+Iono (in the continuous presence of CsA) to
achieve the maximum potential induction of NFAT translocation to the
nucleus in the presence of the inhibitor.
Flow Cytometry--
Cells were analyzed for CD3 surface
expression by flow cytometry as previously described (26). Briefly,
cells were labeled with the murine monoclonal antibody OKT.3 (directed
to CD3 ) in a two-step process (using 1 µg/ml of antibody to ensure
saturation binding) followed by the manufacturer's recommended
dilution of fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin
(BD Biosciences, Erembodegen, Belgium). The labeled cells were fixed in
2% paraformaldehyde, and fluorescence was analyzed on a FACSCalibur
(BD Biosciences).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
Nuclear extracts were
prepared from 2 × 107 cells according to a modified
version of the method described by Osborn (63). All buffers contained a
mixture of protease inhibitors (Complete, Roche Diagnostics, Brussels,
Belgium) to minimize proteolysis. The cellular pellet was washed with
ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline and then resuspended twice with 1 ml
of ice-cold buffer A (10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl). Cells were
collected by centrifugation (600 × g for 10 min),
resuspended, and incubated for 10 min with 40 µl of ice-cold lysis
buffer A containing 0.2% Nonidet P-40 (this step was repeated twice).
The pellet (nuclear fraction) was incubated with 30 µl of ice-cold extraction buffer C (20 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.9, 25%
glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 420 mM
NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA) for 20 min at 4 °C and then
centrifuged at 20,800 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. The
nuclear supernatants were diluted with 150 µl of buffer D (20 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.9, 20% glycerol, 50 mM
KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA) and stored frozen at 80 °C. Protein
concentrations were determined by the Bradford method (64).
EMSAs were performed as described by Van Lint et al. (65)
with some modifications. Single-stranded oligonucleotides were 5'-end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP (>5000 Ci/mmol,
Amersham Biosciences, AT Roosendal, Netherlands) using
T4-polynucleotide kinase, annealed, isolated on a polyacrylamide gel,
and extracted from the gel using the QIAXE II kit (Westburg, AE
Leusden, Netherlands) prior to their use in EMSA experiments. Nuclear
extracts (10 µg of protein) were preincubated for 10 min in a
reaction mixture containing 10 µg of bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, Bornem, Belgium), 1.5 µg of the nonspecific
competitor DNA poly(dI-dC) (Amersham Biosciences), 50 µM
ZnCl2, 0.25 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 60 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 10%
(v/v) glycerol. 15,000 cpm of the 32P-labeled probe was
subsequently added, and the mixture (final volume, 20 µl) was
incubated for a further 20 min at room temperature before being loaded
onto a 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel (1× Tris-glycine-EDTA
buffer, migrated at 50 V overnight). The radiolabeled proteins were
detected by autoradiography on Biomax MR film (Amersham Biosciences).
Oligonucleotide Probes--
Oligonucleotides encoding wild type
and mutated NFAT binding motifs in the 5'-upstream region of the human
CD3 gene were as follows: 5'-TCCTTAACGGAAAAACAAAA-3'
(NFAT 1wt), 5'-TCCTTAACCCTTAAACAAAA-3' (NFAT 1mut), 5'-TCCTTAACGGAAAGACAAAA-3'
(NFAT 1mut1), 5'-TCCTTAACGGAAAGCCAAAA-3'
(NFAT 1mut2), 5'-TCCTTAACGGAAAACCAAAA-3' (NFAT 1mut3), 5'-TCCTTAATGGAAAAACAAAA-3'
(NFAT 1mut4), 5'-GAGGTGGCTTTCCATTTGGA-3',
(NFAT 2wt), 5'-GAGGTGGCTAAGGATTTGGA-3' (NFAT 2mut), 5'-GAGGTGGTTTTCCATTTGGA-3'
(NFAT 2mut1), 5'-GAGGTGTTTTTCCATTTGGA-3'
(NFAT 2mut2), 5'-GAGGTGTCTTTCCATTTGGA-3' (NFAT 2mut3), 5'-GAGGTGGCTTTCCGTTTGGA-3'
(NFAT 2mut4), 5'-AAAGGAAAAAGTATATGTTC-3'
(NFAT 3wt), and 5'-AAAGGAAAGAGTATATGTTC-3' (NFAT 3mut1). Oligonucleotides encoding wild type and
mutated NFAT binding sites in the human IL-2 promoter were:
5'-AGAAAGGAGGAAAAACTGTT-3' (NFAT-IL-2wt),
5'-AGAAAGGACCTTAAACTGTT-3' (NFAT-IL-2mut).
Oligonucleotides encoding the wild type and mutated NF- B consensus
sequence (Santa Cruz, Boechout, Belgium) were:
5'-TTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3' (NF- Bwt) and
5'-TTGAGCTCACTTTCCCAGGC-3' (NF- Bmut). The
oligonucleotide for the Oct-1 binding site (Santa Cruz) was:
5'-TGTCGAATGCAAATCACTAG-3'.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
Antibodies directed to
the NFAT family proteins NFATc1 (SC-7294X) and NFATc2 (SC-7295X), the
NF- B family proteins p50 (SC-1190X), p65 (SC-109X), c-Rel
(SC-6955X), Rel-B (SC-226X), and p52 (SC-7386X), and the AP-1 family
proteins c-Jun (SC-1694X) and c-Fos (SC-52) (all from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) were preincubated with nuclear extracts for 1 h on
ice prior to the addition of the radiolabeled probe for the supershift
assay. In the super-supershift and double-supershift assays, the first
antibody was preincubated with the nuclear extract for 45 min on ice
followed by a subsequent incubation with the second antibody for an
additional 45 min on ice before a final 20-min incubation with the
radiolabeled probe at room temperature.
Quantitative Competitive RT-PCR--
Total cellular RNA was
extracted from 5 × 106 cells using the SV total RNA
isolation system (Promega Benelux, AJ Leiden, Netherlands) following
the manufacturer's recommendations and employing the optimal DNase
treatment to remove contaminating genomic DNA. The primers used to
specifically amplify the CD3 and CD3 genes
have been previously described (66, 67). Forward (F) and reverse (R) primer pairs are as follows: CD3 F
(5'-CATTGCTTTGATTCTGGGAACTGAATAGGAGGA-3') and
CD3 R (5'-GGCTGCTCCACGCTTTTGCCGGAGACAGAG-3'),
which yield a 647-bp product, and CD3 F
(5'-TTCCGGTACCTGTGAGTCAGC-3') and CD3 R
(5'-GGTACAGTTGGTAATGGCTGC-3'), which yield a 660-bp product.
Five micrograms of total RNA from uninfected and HIV-1-infected WE17/10
cells at various stages of TCR·CD3 down-modulation was
reverse-transcribed into cDNA in the presence of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (2.5 units/µl; Roche
Diagnostics, Brussels, Belgium), 0.5 mM of each dNTP, 1 unit/µl RNase inhibitor, 30 pmol of the forward primers for
CD3 or CD3 , 0.01 M
dithiothreitol, 20 µl of 5× first-strand buffer (250 mM
Tris-HCl, 200 mM KCl, 25 mM MgCl2,
2.5% Tween 20 (v/v), pH 8.3) in a total volume of 100 µl. The RT mix
was incubated at 30 °C for 10 min and 42 °C for 45 min.
An internal standard for use in the competitive RT-PCR assay was
constructed from a full-length cDNA sequence of the human CD3 gene subcloned from pJ6T3 -2 (68) into the
EcoRI site of pUC18 (Invitrogen, Merelbeke, Belgium), and
the resulting plasmid was called pUC18 . This recombinant plasmid was
then used to construct a competitor by cutting a 1071-bp
XhoI fragment from pV344 (69) and ligating it into
XhoI-digested pUC18 , producing the plasmid pUC18 c. The
competitor copy number was calculated using the concentration measured
by absorbance at 260 nm and the molecular weight of pUC18 c (i.e. 1 mol of the full-length pUC18 c DNA is equal to
4557 bp × 700 Da (the average molecular mass of a
deoxynucleotide base pair) = 3.1899 × 106).
Human CD3 gene expression was measured in a quantitative
competitive RT-PCR assay, where the target cDNA was co-amplified with the same stock dilution series of the pUC18 c competitor in all
experiments. For each target sequence, 20 sequential dilutions of the
pUC18 c competitor DNA (from a minimum of 3.3 × 103
to a maximum of 6.6 × 109 copies) were co-amplified
with 100 ng of cDNA, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Amersham
Biosciences), 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.4 µM of each primer, 15 mM MgCl2 in a final volume of 50 µl in Taq DNA polymerase buffer (Amersham Biosciences).
Amplification of CD3 was performed with an initial
denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 35 cycles of
amplification: 10 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 35 s,
annealing at 50 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for
30 s followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 65 °C for 20 s, and extension at 72 °C for
45 s with a 1-s/cycle automatic prolongation of the extension
period. Amplification of CD3 was performed with an
initial denaturation step of 5 min at 94 °C followed by 40 cycles of
denaturation at 94 °C for 20 s, annealing at 58 °C for
15 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. After amplification,
the samples were incubated at 72 °C for 7 min, separated on a 1%
agarose gel, and stained for 10 min with a freshly prepared ethidium
bromide solution (0.5 µg/ml).
 |
RESULTS |
Measurement of the Relative Amounts of CD3 mRNA in
Uninfected TCR·CD3+ and HIV-1-infected Cells with
Down-modulated TCR·CD3 Surface Complexes--
Our previous work,
using dot and Northern blot hybridization analyses, suggested that the
specific loss of CD3 transcripts after HIV-1 and HIV-2
infection does not parallel the down-regulation of TCR·CD3 complexes
from the surface at a ratio of 1:1 (15, 20). To better define the
relationship between the number of CD3 gene transcripts
and the density of TCR·CD3 complexes on the cell surface, we used
quantitative competitive RT-PCR to examine transcript levels in
uninfected and HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells. RNA was extracted from
cells at different stages in the progression from
TCR·CD3hi TCR·CD3lo TCR·CD3 (previously described in Ref. 16; in this
report the uninfected cells designated as 100% TCR·CD3+
are all TCR·CD3hi; whereas, the HIV-1-infected cells
described as 90% TCR·CD3+ (for example) are 10%
TCR·CD3 and 90% TCR·CD3lo). cDNAs,
reverse-transcribed from the native RNA preparation, were co-amplified
with serial dilutions of a competitor specific for the human
CD3 gene (pUC18 c), which had been engineered to produce a larger PCR product (Fig. 1,
upper band) than the cellular CD3 RNA (Fig. 1,
lower band).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Quantitative competitive RT-PCR for
CD3 . A, ethidium bromide
staining of CD3 RT-PCR products (647 bp) from total RNA
extracted from 100% TCR·CD3+ uninfected cells and 100%,
90%, 64%, 25%, and 5% TCR·CD3+ HIV-1-infected WE17/10
cells. The RNA was co-amplified with the same stock series of dilutions
of the CD3 competitor (pUC18 c, 1717 bp). B,
graphic representation of CD3 transcript numbers as
estimated by RT-PCR relative to the percentage of
TCR·CD3+ cells as determined by flow cytometry.
C, CD3 RT-PCR products from total RNA
extracted from 100% TCR·CD3+ uninfected cells,
TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected cells and the B cell line Raji
(negative control). D, CD3 RT-PCR products
(660 bp, using the same cDNAs as in A) and the B cell
line Raji (negative control).
|
|
Representative results comparing the relative amounts of RT-PCR
products from uninfected and HIV-1-infected cells expressing various
levels of TCR·CD3 surface receptors are shown in Fig. 1A.
In the uninfected 100% TCR·CD3+ cells, the competitor
was initially detected when 3.3 × 106 molecules were
added to the reaction mixture, followed by a corresponding decrease in
native CD3 transcripts until they are no longer
detectable in the presence of >6.6 × 108 molecules
of the competitor. The competitor was detected earlier (at 6.6 × 105 molecules) in RNA amplified from 100%
TCR·CD3+ HIV-1-infected cells (the mean fluorescence
revealed that these cells were actually 100% TCR·CD3lo
with a receptor density equal to 85% of the uninfected control cells
analyzed in parallel; data not shown) and indicated that these
TCR·CD3lo cells had already lost ±80% of their
CD3 gene transcripts. Amplification of RNA from 90%
TCR·CD3+ HIV-1-infected cells initially detected the
competitor at a concentration of 1 × 105 molecules,
revealing a further decline equivalent to a total loss of >90% of
CD3 gene transcripts. This extensive loss of transcripts
prior to significant TCR·CD3 down-modulation was consistent for cells
infected with a wide variety of viral variants. RNA extracted from
HIV-1-infected cell lines expressing 60-89% TCR·CD3+
(64% is shown in Fig. 1A) were competed at essentially the
same concentrations as the 90% TCR·CD3+ cells, most
likely due to the limited sensitivity of this series of competitor
concentrations once transcript numbers are low. Because the cells have
lost more than 90% of their CD3 gene transcripts before
substantial numbers of TCR·CD3 cells are detectable,
any changes in the remaining transcript levels (only 10% of normal
levels) would have a magnified effect on the number of surface receptor
complexes. The erosion of CD3 transcripts (represented
graphically in Fig. 1B) continues in 25 and 5%
TCR·CD3+ cells (Fig. 1A) and were completely
undetectable in HIV-1-infected TCR·CD3 cells and the B
cell line Raji (Fig. 1C). Under the same standardized RT-PCR
conditions, transcript levels for the highly homologous CD3 gene were unchanged in all of the RNA preparations
(Fig. 1D). These data demonstrate that the loss of
CD3 gene transcripts in HIV-1-infected cells begins very
early after infection and that a substantial drop in transcript levels
(>90% of the normal number) must occur before a significant effect is
observed on receptor surface density.
Cyclosporin A Partially Restores TCR·CD3 Expression on the
Surface of HIV-1-infected Cells--
We next asked whether
activators or inhibitors known to affect various steps in the TCR·CD3
activation pathway could arrest or reverse the loss of
CD3 gene transcripts after infection and thereby
partially or completely restore receptor surface expression. Uninfected
and HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells at different stages of receptor
down-modulation were treated with the PKC activator, PMA, the calcium
ionophores, A23187 and ionomycin (which can induce phosphorylation of
CD3 on Ser-126 without activation of PKC), a combination of
PMA plus ionophore (PMA+Iono), as well as immobilized anti-CD3 antibody
to mimic antigen-induced activation. Cells were also treated with the
calcium channel blocker EGTA and its membrane-permeant derivative
BAPTA/AM, the tyrosine-protein kinase inhibitor herbimycin A, the PKC
inhibitor staurosporine, and the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporin A
(CsA).
Cells, treated for various lengths of time and at a variety of
different drug concentrations, were screened by flow cytometry for
modulation of surface CD3, and representative data are shown in Fig.
2. As expected, activation by PMA,
PMA+Iono, or anti-CD3 resulted in further down-modulation of receptors
on TCR·CD3hi uninfected or TCR·CD3lo
HIV-1-infected cells but had no effect on the
TCR·CD3 -infected cells (Fig. 2, A and
B; histograms for anti-CD3 are not shown but were similar to
those shown for PMA or PMA+Iono). Staurosporine and herbimycin A had a
deleterious effect on cell viability after 48 h, but they had no
discernable positive or negative effect on receptor surface density
after treatment for 18-24 h where viability was not affected (the
histogram profiles shown in Fig. 2, A and B, for
staurosporine are identical to those for herbimycin A). Cells treated
with BAPTA/AM, but not EGTA, exhibited a slight but consistent
down-modulation of TCR·CD3 complexes on both uninfected and
HIV-1-infected cells, particularly noticeable as an increased number of
cells in the TCR·CD3lo range (Fig. 2, A and
B), but this intracellular calcium chelator also had a
deleterious effect on cell growth and viability.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Treatment with activators and inhibitors of
the TCR·CD3-directed pathway. Histogram overlays showing the
distribution of anti-CD3 antibody labeling on uninfected (A)
and HIV-1-infected (50% TCR·CD3+) (B) WE17/10
cells before and after treatment with 2.5 M EGTA, 10 µM BAPTA/AM, 10 ng/ml staurosporine A, 10 ng/ml PMA, and
10 ng/ml PMA + 30 ng/ml Iono. C, uninfected and HIV-1-infected cells
(34% TCR·CD3+) treated for 3 and 7 days with 0.1-1.0
µg/ml CsA. D, uninfected and HIV-1-infected (42%
TCR·CD3+) cells treated for 5 days with 0.1 µg/ml CsA.
E, CD3 RT-PCR products co-amplified with the
CD3 competitor (as described in Fig. 1) from HIV-1
infected (85% TCR·CD3+) cells before (top)
and after (bottom) CsA treatment (0.1 µg/ml).
|
|
The most consistent positive effect was observed after CsA treatment of
HIV-1-infected cells, which partially restored TCR·CD3 complexes on
the cell surface of HIV-1-infected cells in a time- and
dose-dependent manner. This effect is shown graphically as an increase in the percentage of TCR·CD3+ cells after
treatment with 0.1-1.0 µg of CsA for 3 or 7 days (Fig.
2C), as well as by histograms that illustrate the movement of cells from the negative to positive phenotype after 5 days of
treatment with 0.1 µg of CsA (Fig. 2D). CsA also provoked
a slight down-modulation of CD3 density on the surface of uninfected cells (Fig. 2D), which was augmented with increased time and
drug concentrations (Fig. 2C). No cytotoxicity was observed
in any of the CsA-treated cell cultures likely due to the fact that
WE17/10 cells were grown in the presence of an excess of exogenously
added IL-2 (70).
RNA from CsA-treated HIV-1-infected cells (85% TCR·CD3+)
was analyzed by quantitative competitive RT-PCR (to increase
sensitivity, intermediate competitor concentrations were added to the
serial dilutions shown in Fig. 1) in parallel with RNA from the
untreated control (Fig. 2E). CD3 transcripts
were initially detected at a competitor concentration of 8.3 × 104 for the CsA-treated cells compared with 4.9 × 104 for the untreated cells, which represents an
approximate 2-fold increase in transcript numbers. Taken together with
the fluorescence-activated cell sorting data, these results suggest
that CsA treatment has a net positive effect on CD3 gene
transcription in HIV-1-infected cells, resulting in the formation of
more complete TCR·CD3 complexes that can then be processed to the
cell surface. The cellular target of CsA is the calcium-regulated
phosphatase calcineurin, which controls nuclear translocation of the
NFAT family of transcription factors. Translocation of NFAT to the
nucleus, induced in response to antigen activation, is essential for
immune response-directed cytokine gene expression, and it is via this
pathway that CsA exerts its immunosuppressive activity.
Identification of Three NFAT Consensus Sequences in the Human
CD3 Gene--
Consequent to the up-regulation of CD3
transcripts observed after cyclosporin A treatment, we asked whether
there were any potential NFAT binding motifs in the 5'-upstream
sequence of the human CD3 gene. We identified three NFAT
consensus sequences (5'-GGAAA-3') at 124 to 120
(NFAT 1), 384 to 380 (NFAT 2), and +450
to +454 (NFAT 3) from the first transcription initiation site (Fig. 3A, based on the
published sequence NCB accession number X06026 (71)). We further asked
whether alignment of the 5'-upstream region of CD3 gene
with the 5'-LTRs of HIV-1 (Strain HXB2, NCB accession number K03455)
and HIV-2 (Strain BEN, NCB accession number M30502) would expose
regions of sequence homology. This analysis revealed that the second
motif, NFAT 2 (5'-TTTCC-3'), is nested in a region ( 412
to 372) that shares sequence similarity with the functional NF- B
cis-acting sequences located upstream from the SP1 binding
sites and the TATA promoter in both the HIV-1 and HIV-2 LTRs (Fig.
3B). However, the first NF- B consensus sequence in the
HIV-1 and HIV-2 LTRs varies from the potential site in CD3 by two nucleotides
(GGGACTTTCC in HIV compared with
GTGGCTTTCC in CD3 ) of which the
first three Gs are thought to be critical for NF- B binding (72, 73).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Sequence analysis of the human
CD3 gene. A, partial
sequence of the 5'-upstream region of the human CD3 gene
(NCB accession number X06026) (71). The potential transcription start
sites are indicated by a + with the most extreme 5' start
site labeled +1. Potential binding sites for NFAT are
capitalized and indicated in boldface type,
whereas the underlined nucleotide sequences define the
NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and NFAT 3
probes. B, the NF- B homology region in the 5'-upstream
region of the human CD3 gene identified by alignment with
the HIV-1HXB2 (accession number K03455) and
HIV-2BEN (accession number M30502) LTRs using
MegaAlign.
|
|
Nuclear Protein Complexes Bind to the NFAT 1 Motif in
CD3 --
An oligonucleotide probe extending from 132 to 113
(underlined in Fig. 3A) was used to examine the
in vitro binding of nuclear proteins to the
NFAT 1 motif by EMSA. Nuclear extracts of unstimulated
WE17/10 cells (100% TCR·CD3+), PMA+Iono-stimulated
WE17/10 cells (100% TCR·CD3lo), and receptor negative
HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells (TCR·CD3 ) were analyzed in
parallel. At least four bands (Fig. 4,
A-D), representing DNA·protein complexes with different
electrophoretic mobility levels bind to the NFAT 1 probe.
Nuclear extracts from uninfected, unstimulated cells contain only
nominal amounts of the lower molecular weight bands C and D (lane
1). Stimulation for 18 h with PMA+Iono (lane 2)
both down-regulated TCR·CD3 surface complexes (Fig. 2) and
induced binding of B and C and to a lesser extent A (but no D) to the
NFAT 1 probe. A similar binding profile was observed for
the TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected cells (Fig. 4, lane
3). The differential binding observed between nuclear extracts
from uninfected/unstimulated TCR·CD3+ cells and
TCR·CD3lo PMA+Iono-stimulated cells or
TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected cells was reproducible among
different preparations of nuclear extracts and specific, because
binding of the constitutively expressed Oct-1 transcription factor to
its consensus sequence did not vary (Fig. 4B, lanes
1-3).

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
EMSA competition experiments using the
NFAT 1 probe. A,
EMSAs were performed using the 32P-labeled
NFAT 1 probe and nuclear extracts from untreated 100%
TCR·CD3hi (lane 1) and PMA+Iono (each 30 ng/ml) stimulated 100% TCR·CD3lo uninfected (lane
2) and TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells
(lane 3). Nuclear extracts from
TCR·CD3 -infected cells were competed with a 4- and
20-fold molar excess of the homologous oligonucleotide (lanes
4 and 5), an oligonucleotide containing the NFAT
consensus sequence in the IL-2 promoter (lanes 6 and
7), an oligonucleotide containing the IL-2 promoter NFAT
consensus sequence mutated to abrogate NFAT binding (76) (lanes
8 and 9), and an oligonucleotide containing the
NFAT 1 sequence mutated from GGAA to CCTT (lanes
10 and 11). Bands A-D indicate the four
different protein·DNA complexes that specifically bind to the
NFAT 1 probe. B, binding of proteins from the
same nuclear extracts shown in A to a
32P-labeled Oct-1 probe in an EMSA performed as a control
(lanes 1-3).
|
|
The specificity of the complexes bound to the NFAT 1
probe was further investigated by competition experiments using the homologous oligonucleotide (NFAT 1; lanes 4 and 5), an oligonucleotide containing the NFAT consensus
sequence in the human IL-2 promoter (74, 75) (NFAT-IL-2wt;
lanes 6 and 7) or versions of
NFAT-IL-2wt and NFAT 1 mutated to abrogate
binding (76) (GGAA CCTT; NFAT-IL-2mut, lanes
8 and 9; NFAT 1mut, lanes 10 and 11). The homologous and the NFAT IL-2wt
probes efficiently compete for binding, whereas the NFAT
IL-2mut and the NFAT 1mut probes were unable
to compete. Furthermore, oligonucleotides containing the HIV-1 LTR
NF- B consensus sequence, either wild type (Fig. 3B) or
mutated (72) (GGG CTC, known to abrogate NF- B but not NFAT
binding), both efficiently compete for binding (data not shown). These
experiments indicate that the nuclear protein complexes binding to the
NFAT 1 probe in PMA+Iono-induced and HIV-1-infected cells
are specific for the NFAT but not the NF- B consensus sequence.
The Nuclear Protein Complexes Bound to NFAT 1 Contain
NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF- B p50--
Identification of some of the
proteins present in the complexes bound to the NFAT 1
probe was achieved using antibodies to the NFAT family members, NFATc1
and NFATc2, the NF- B family members, p50, p65, c-Rel, Rel B, and
p52, and the AP-1 family members, c-Fos and c-Jun, with nuclear
extracts from TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected cells in a
supershift assay (Fig. 5A).
Antibodies specific for NFATc1 (lane 2), NFATc2 (lane
3), and NF- B p50 (lane 4) all supershifted a
DNA·protein complex, whereas antibodies to c-Jun (lane
11), c-Fos (lane 12), p65, c-Rel, Rel B, and p52 do not
(the latter four were identical to c-Jun and c-Fos and are not shown).
The A complex can be supershifted with either the anti-NFATc1 or the
anti-p50 antibody, although the electrophoretic mobility of the
anti-p50-supershifted complex (upper A ) was slower than the
anti-NFATc1-supershifted complex (lower A ). The B and C complexes
were both supershifted to a similar electrophoretic mobility with the
anti-NFATc2 antibody only (B +C ). The C and D complexes expressed
at low levels in unstimulated, uninfected WE17/10 cells could be
supershifted entirely and exclusively with the anti-NFATc2 antibody
indicating that these lower molecular weight complexes contain NFATc2
but not NFATc1 or NF- B p50 (data not shown). These data suggested
that there were at least three different nuclear complexes bound to the
NFAT 1 probe in activated or infected cells, one
containing NFATc1 and NF- B p50 (band A; present at lower
concentrations) and the other two containing NFATc2 (bands B and C;
present at higher concentrations; the low molecular weight NFATc2
containing band D was detected only in the unstimulated, uninfected
cells).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Supershift and super-supershift analysis of
NFAT, NF- B, and AP-1 protein binding to the
NFAT 1 probe. A,
the 32P-labeled NFAT 1 probe was used in a
supershift assay with nuclear extracts from TCR·CD3
HIV-1-infected cells in the absence of antibodies (lane 1)
or in the presence of anti-NFATc1 (lane 2), anti-NFATc2
(lane 3), anti-NF- B p50 (lane 4), anti-c-Fos
(lane 11), and anti-c-Jun (lane 12) antibodies. A
super-supershift assay was performed by sequentially adding the
anti-NFATc1, anti-NFATc2, or anti-NF- B p50 antibodies (the order
they were added is indicated) to the binding reaction in the following
combinations: anti-NF- B p50 plus anti-NFATc1 (lanes 5 and
8), anti-NF- B p50 plus anti-NFATc2 (lanes 6 and 9), and anti-NFATc1 plus anti-NFATc2 (lanes 7 and 10). B, binding to the
32P-labeled NFAT 1 probe was examined in a
supershift assay using nuclear extracts from TCR·CD3
HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells untreated (lane 1) or treated
with CsA (0.1 µg/ml) and PMA+Iono (each 30 ng/ml) in the absence of
antibodies (lane 2) or in the presence of anti-NF- B p50
(lane 3), anti-NFATc1 (lane 4), anti-NFATc2
(lane 5) antibodies.
|
|
Confirmation of this observation was achieved by developing a modified
supershift assay where combinations of the anti-NFATc1, anti-NFATc2,
and anti-p50 antibodies were added sequentially to the binding
reaction. These experiments lead to two distinct results: 1) a
double-supershift where each antibody binds to a separate complex and
individually supershifts the band(s) and 2) a super-supershift where
the two antibodies bind to the same complex and their synergy further
increases its molecular weight thereby reducing its electrophoretic mobility. Combining the anti-NFATc1 and anti-NFATc2 antibodies (Fig.
5A, lanes 7 and 10) or the anti-NFATc2
and anti-p50 antibodies (lanes 6 and 9) in either
order produced double-supershifts where the A, B, and C complexes were
all supershifted (A and B +C ), migrating with the same
electrophoretic mobility as with the individual antibody alone
(lanes 2-4). Alternatively, both combinations of anti-NFATc1 + anti-p50 (lanes 5 and 8) produced a
super-supershift where the electrophoretic mobility of the A complex
(A ) was consistently further retarded compared with the anti-p50
antibody alone (upper A , lane 4). A second A band,
migrating with the same electrophoretic mobility as with the
anti-NFATc1 antibody alone (lower A , lane 2), was also
detected when the anti-p50 and anti-NFATc1 antibodies were used
together. This suggests that although some of the A complexes contain
NFATc1 and NF- B p50 others contain NFATc1 alone. Alternatively,
NF- B p50 could be present but inaccessible to the antibody in some
of the A complexes. Thus, as many as four different complexes present
in nuclear extracts from activated or infected cells bind to the
NFAT 1 probe, including: two abundant complexes that
contain NFATc2 (bands B and C) but not NFATc1 or NF- B p50 and two
low concentration complexes (band A) devoid of NFATc2, one which
contains NFATc1 and NF- B p50 and the other either NFATc1 alone or
NFATc1 and an inaccessible NF- B p50.
Uninfected TCR·CD3+ and HIV-1-infected
TCR·CD3 cells were treated with CsA and then stimulated
with PMA+Iono to achieve the maximum potential induction of nuclear
NFAT in the presence of CsA. In all cases, there was a >90%
inhibition of nuclear protein binding to the NFAT 1 probe
in EMSA binding studies (data not shown), which is in agreement with
the ability of CsA to block T cell activation (77). These extracts were
also used in a supershift assay with the NFAT 1 probe and
anti-NFATc1, anti-NFATc2, and anti-NF- B p50 antibodies (Fig.
5B). Binding of the NFATc1 and NF- B p50 containing A
complex was totally inhibited by CsA treatment (overexposure of the
gels did not detect the A complex either in the presence or absence of
the anti-NFATc1 and anti-p50 antibodies). The NFATc2-containing B and C
complexes were both largely inhibited by CsA, and although a faint B
complex could be detected in longer exposures, the normally weaker C
complex was readily detectable in lower exposures of the gels (Fig.
5B). This shift in the relative abundance of these two
complexes after treatment with CsA suggests that the higher molecular
weight B complex is more sensitive to CsA than the lower molecular
weight complex and may thus contain a second CsA-sensitive component.
The Quantity of Nuclear NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF- B p50 Is
Negatively Correlated with TCR·CD3 Surface Expression in
HIV-1-infected Cells--
The relationship between the presence of
NFATc1, NFATc2, and/or NF- B p50 in the nucleus and the concentration
of CD3 gene transcripts was assessed by examining
differential binding to the NFAT 1 probe of nuclear
extracts during the progression of HIV-1-infected cells from
TCR·CD3hi TCR·CD3lo TCR·CD3 (Fig.
6A). Characteristically, only
low levels of the NFATc2-containing complexes (bands C and D) were
detectable in the uninfected and unstimulated 100%
TCR·CD3+ cells (lane 1). Alternatively,
increased binding of the NFATc1/NF- B p50-containing complex (band A)
and NFATc2-containing complexes (bands B and C) to NFAT 1
occurs in parallel with a decrease in surface TCR·CD3 expression from
98% (lane 2) to 87% (lane 3) to 39%
(lane 4) to 0% (lane 5) of normal receptor
levels. A nonspecific band (indicated as NS) was also
detectable in these nuclear extracts, but this band could neither be
supershifted with the anti-NFATc1, anti-NFATc2, or anti-p50 antibodies
nor could it be competed for with the homologous oligonucleotide (data
not shown). This escalation in binding to the NFAT 1
probe is specific, because similar amounts of the constitutively
expressed Oct-1 protein from each extract bound to an Oct-1
sequence-specific probe (Fig. 6B). These results suggest
that a correlation exists between the quantity of NFATc2, and to a
lesser extent, NFATc1 and NF- B p50, in the nucleus and
down-modulation of CD3 transcripts and TCR·CD3
complexes after HIV-1 infection.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Correlation between TCR·CD3 surface
expression and binding of NFATc1, NFATc2, and
NF- B p50 to the
NFAT 1 probe. A,
EMSA experiments were performed with the 32P-labeled
NFAT 1 probe and nuclear extracts from 100%
TCR·CD3+ uninfected (lane 1) and 98%
(lane 2), 87% (lane 3), 39% (lane
4), and 0% TCR·CD3+ (lane 5)
HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells. B, the same nuclear extracts
were assessed using a 32P-labeled Oct-1 probe.
|
|
Differential Binding of NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF- B p50 to the
NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and NFAT 3
Motifs--
We next asked whether members of the NFAT and/or NF- B
protein families could also bind to the NFAT 2 and/or the
NFAT 3 motifs. EMSA experiments using the
NFAT 2 probe ( 392 to 372, underlined in
Fig. 3) and extracts from unstimulated cells, PMA+Iono-stimulated cells, and TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected cells bound in a
similar pattern to NFAT 1 (Fig. 4) except that only the
NFATc2-containing complexes (bands B, C and D) but not the
NFATc1/NF- B p50-containing complex (band A) were bound (data not
shown). Alternatively, binding to the NFAT 3 probe (+447
to +466, underlined in Fig. 3) was identical to
NFAT 1 with all four of the complexes bound (A-D; data not shown). An experiment using the NFAT 2 and
NFAT 3 probes in competition with the homologous or the
NFAT 1 and NFAT-IL-2 wild type and mutated probes
revealed that the binding of bands A-D to these three sequences was
highly specific (data not shown). The differential binding of NFATc1,
NFATc2, and NF- B p50 to the NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and NFAT 3 sequences was confirmed
in a supershift assay using antibodies to the NFAT, AP-1, and NF- B
family members and nuclear extracts from TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected
cells (Fig. 7). Only the anti-NFATc2
antibody specifically shifted the complex bound to the
NFAT 2 probe (Fig. 7A, lane 2,
bands B and C), whereas no band shift was
observed with antibodies to NFATc1 (lane 3), to the NF- B
proteins p50 (lane 4), p65, c-Rel, Rel B, or p52 (data for
the latter four antibodies were identical to p50 and are not shown) or
to the AP-1 proteins c-Jun (lane 5) and c-Fos (lane
6). This experiment revealed that NFATc2 but not NFATc1, AP-1, or
NF- B family proteins bind to the NFAT 2 sequence,
despite its homology with the NF- B region in the HIV-1 LTR. On the
contrary, a supershift assay using the NFAT 3 probe (Fig.
7B) was qualitatively similar to the NFAT 1
probe, with supershifted complexes observed for the anti-NFATc1 (band A, lane 2), anti-NFATc2 (bands B and C, lane 3),
and anti-NF- B p50 antibodies (band A, lane 4). We
compared the relative binding of the NFATc1 plus NF- B p50- and
NFATc2-containing complexes to the NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and NFAT 3 motifs (Fig.
7C) and found that NFAT 1 binds significantly
more of these protein complexes compared with NFAT 2 and
NFAT 3, with binding to the NFAT 3 probe
the weakest among the three motifs. Furthermore, there did not appear
to be cooperative recruitment of c-Jun and c-Fos in any of the
complexes bound to NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and
NFAT 3.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Comparative binding to the
NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and
NFAT 3 probes. A,
binding to the 32P-labeled NFAT 2 probe was
examined in a supershift assay using nuclear extracts from
TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells without antibody
(lane 1) or with anti-NFATc1 (lane 2),
anti-NFATc2 (lane 3), anti-NF- B p50 (lane 4),
anti-c-Jun (lane 5), or anti-c-Fos (lane 6)
antibodies. B, binding to the 32P-labeled
NFAT 3 probe was examined in a supershift assay using
nuclear extracts from TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10
cells without antibody (lane 1) or with anti-NFATc1
(lane 2), anti-NFATc2 (lane 3), or anti-NF- B
p50 (lane 4) antibodies. C, the relative quantity
of proteins bound to the 32P-labeled NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and NFAT 3 probes was examined
using nuclear extracts from uninfected 100% TCR·CD3+
(lanes 1, 3, and 5) and
TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells (lanes
2, 4, and 6).
|
|
Sequence Variation Is Responsible for the Differential Binding of
NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF- B p50 to the NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and NFAT 3 Motifs--
In an
effort to understand the basis for the qualitative and quantitative
differences in binding to the NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and NFAT 3 motifs, a series of
mutant probes were constructed and used in EMSA experiments (the
mutations are listed with a summary of the results in Table
I, and the gels are shown in Fig.
8). We noted that the nucleotides
bordering the core 5'-GGAAA-3' sequence differed by an AA immediately
following the core sequence in NFAT 1 and
NFAT 3 in contrast to a GC in NFAT 2, suggesting that these nucleotides could potentially play a role in the
binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50. Alternatively, a T rather than an A
preceding the core sequence is thought to facilitate stronger binding
of NFAT family proteins (56), and this nucleotide was C, T, or A in the
NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and NFAT 3
sequences, respectively. Our rationale was that if these three
nucleotides do play an important role in binding, then successively
mutating the NFAT 1 sequence to look like the
NFAT 2 sequence and vise versa should alter binding
accordingly.

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mutation analysis of the
NFAT 1,
NFAT 2, and
NFAT 3 probes. A,
EMSAs were performed using nuclear extracts from
TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells and the
32P-labeled NFAT 1 and NFAT 2
probes mutated as shown in Table I (lanes 1-10).
B, binding to the 32P-labeled
NFAT 2mut1 probe was examined in a supershift assay using
nuclear extracts from TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10
cells and anti-NFATc1 (lane 2), anti-NFATc2 (lane
3), and anti-NF- B p50 (lane 4) antibodies.
C, EMSA binding to the 32P-labeled
NFAT 3wt (lane 1) and NFAT 3mut1
(lane 2) probes using nuclear extracts from
TCR·CD3 HIV-1-infected WE17/10 cells.
|
|
Mutation of the first A following the core sequence in
NFAT 1 to a G (NFAT 1mut1; Fig.
8A, lane 2) completely abrogated binding of
NFATc1 and NF- B p50 (band A), significantly decreased the binding of
NFATc2 (bands B and C) compared with the wild type sequence
(NFAT 1wt, lane 1) and provided a pattern
similar to that of wild type NFAT 2
(NFAT 2wt, lane 6). Additionally mutating the
second A to a C in NFAT 1 (NFAT 1mut2,
lane 3) changed the 3' sequence to that of
NFAT 2 and reduced NFATc2 binding even further. Mutation
of the outside A only in the AA pair of NFAT 1
(NFAT 1mut3, lane 4) had a less dramatic effect on the quantity of NFATc2 bound compared with the inside A
(lane 2) and did not abrogate binding of NFATc1 and NF- B
p50, although quantitatively all of the complexes were significantly reduced. Mutation of the C preceding the core sequence in
NFAT 1 (NFAT 1mut4, lane 5) to a
T, creating the sequence 5'-TGGAAAAA-3', greatly enhanced
the amount of NFATc1, NFATc2, and NF- B p50 bound to this probe,
providing better binding than that observed with any of the wild type sequences.
Alternatively, the reverse mutations in NFAT 2 converted
the binding profile of this probe to one similar to
NFAT 1 with increased binding of NFATc2 (bands B and C)
and de novo binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50 (band A)
achieved by simply changing the 3' G (NFAT 2wt,
lane 6) to an A (NFAT 2mut1, lane
7). Adding a second A 3' of the core sequence in
NFAT 2 (NFAT 2mut2, lane 8)
further increased the binding of all three complexes (A, B, and C).
However, substituting the C for an A in the outside 3' position did not
confer binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50, although it did increase the
binding of NFATc2 (NFAT 2mut3, lane 9). Finally, mutation of the T preceding the core sequence to a C, creating
the 5'-CGGAAAGC-3', completely abrogated all binding (NFAT 2mut4, lane 10). Confirmation that the
specific binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50 was conferred by adding a
fourth A to the NFAT core sequence (5'-GGAAAA-3') was
demonstrated by a supershift assay using the NFAT 2mut2
probe (Fig. 8B). This experiment clearly shows that a simple
G A substitution 3' of the core sequence in NFAT 2 is
sufficient to confer binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50. Finally,
binding to the wild type NFAT 3 sequence is normally
weak, and mutation of the A following the core sequence to G completely
abrogated binding (NFAT 3mut1, Fig. 8C,
lane 2) compared with the wild type (NFAT 3wt,
lane 1).
Taken altogether, these mutation experiments demonstrate that a fourth
A added to the NFAT core sequence (5'-GGAAAA-3') is vital
for NFATc1 and NF- B p50 binding and important for the quantity of
NFATc2 that binds. They further illustrate the important role that the
T preceding the NFAT core sequence (5'-TGGAAAA-3') plays in
the quantity or stability of the bound complexes, including both those
containing NFATc2 and those containing NFATc1 alone or in association
with NF- B p50.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have previously demonstrated that T cell receptor
down-modulation, due to a defect in CD3 gene
transcription (15, 20), occurs in a two-phase progression after HIV-1
or HIV-2 infection and can be summarized by the formula
TCR·CD3hi TCR·CD3lo TCR·CD3 in which the forward progression is markedly
favored (16). The TCR·CD3hi to TCR·CD3lo
phase is characterized by a steady decrease in receptor density on all
cells from 100% to 50% of control values, prior to the subsequent
conversion of individual cells to the TCR·CD3 phenotype
(16). The RT-PCR data presented in this study provide further insight
into the molecular events generating this progression by showing that
the initial conversion from TCR·CD3hi to
TCR·CD3lo involves a substantial (80-90%) decrease in
the number of CD3 gene transcripts.
These data answer a fundamental question of why the
progression, viewed from the cell surface, appears to be very slow by showing that transcriptional down-modulation is actually initiated very
early (or most likely immediately) after infection with a considerable
and rapid erosion of transcripts until a threshold is reached where the
normal number of complete TCR·CD3 complexes can no longer be
assembled and exported to the cell surface (78). The individual
TCR·CD3 proteins have been shown to be synthesized in great excess,
followed by rapid degradation if they are not stabilized through
incorporation into partial or complete complexes (79). The CD3
protein forms a stable complex with CD3 (80) and thus can persist
both in complete TCR·CD3 complexes, which are continuously recycled
to the cell surface in the absence of antigen stimulation, as well as
in partially formed complexes in the endoplasmic reticulum. Thus,
recycling and partial complex formation precludes an immediate and
deleterious effect on surface receptor expression during the initial
stages of CD3 transcript loss.
Our earlier studies examining TCR·CD3 expression over time
post-infection found a minor modulation of receptor density immediately following the acute phase of infection (first 4-6 weeks) (15, 16, 20).
These studies also revealed that an initial 4- to 5-fold drop in p24
antigen levels in the culture supernatant occurred coincident with
down-modulation from TCR·CD3hi TCR·CD3lo, with a further 4- to 5-fold reduction
accompanying the transition from TCR·CD3lo TCR·CD3 (16). However, a subsequent extensive
examination of productively infected cells did not reveal a direct
relationship between intracellular p24 antigen levels and TCR·CD3
surface density (26). Furthermore, non-productively infected cells
expressing the multiply spliced, virally encoded tat,
nef, and rev regulatory gene transcripts also
demonstrated the same progressive loss of surface TCR·CD3 complexes
(26). Treatment of productively infected cells with antisense
oligonucleotides targeted to tat, nef, and
rev revealed that the relative level of tat and
nef gene transcripts could be directly correlated with a
loss of CD3 transcripts (26). Antisense
oligonucleotides directed to the splice acceptor of the tat
gene were particularly efficient in provoking a coordinate down-regulation of virus expression in concert with an up-regulation of
surface TCR·CD3 complexes (26). One interpretation of our previous
data in light of the RT-PCR results presented here is that
Tat-dependent viral gene expression and the availability of
Tat and/or Tat-dependent cellular transcription factors
(81) plays an important role in initiating and maintaining the
escalating CD3 transcription defect.
HIV-1 is known to activate its CD4+ T cell host and trigger
the expression of a variety of antigen-induced immune response genes as
a means of facilitating virus integration, replication, and expression
(82, 83). CD3 plays an important role in both tyrosine- and
PKC-mediated TCR·CD3 down-modulation, and it seems likely that HIV-1
could exert its effect on receptor expression via these normal immune
pathways. We asked whether it was possible to restore CD3
transcription in HIV-1-infected cells by activating or inhibiting steps
in the TCR·CD3-directed activation pathway and found that the
immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A could partially restore TCR·CD3
surface expression on infected cells. CsA inhibits the
calcium-regulated phosphatase calcineurin, which dephosphorylates NFAT
family proteins in response to antigen activation. Dephosphorylation of
NFAT proteins is a prerequisite for their translocation to the nucleus,
where they function as major players in the transcriptional activation
of a wide array of cytokine genes possessing NFAT binding motifs
(5'-GGAAA-3') (56). Four NFAT sites are located in the HIV-1 LTR, one
within each of the two NF- B consensus sequences, and an additional
two in the negative regulatory element (52). The HIV-1 B sequences
have been shown to play an important role in the transcriptional
regulation of viral gene expression (84, 85) and to competitively bind
NF- B and NFAT family proteins (55, 58, 83). The up-regulation of
TCR·CD3 surface expression observed on CsA-treated HIV-1-infected cells suggested that NFAT might also be directly or indirectly involved
in the elusive transcriptional control mechanisms that regulate
expression of the CD3 gene.
A search of the 5'-upstream region and exon 1 of the human
CD3 gene revealed three potential binding motifs for NFAT
family proteins (NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and
NFAT 3). The NFAT 1 motif is located in a
DNase I-hypersensitive site that has been designated as the putative
promoter for CD3 (71, 86, 87), whereas the
NFAT 2 motif is nested in a region with sequence homology
to the HIV-1 B elements. Three different molecular weight complexes
(A, B, and C) could be induced by PMA+Iono or HIV-1 infection to
specifically but differentially bind to these motifs in the
CD3 gene. NFATc2 was shown to be present in both the B and C complexes, as well as in the low abundance D complex found in
unstimulated cells. The different electrophoretic mobilities of the
three complexes could be correlated with the binding of NFATc2 as a
monomer or dimer (56, 88) and/or the presence of other currently
unidentified factors, potentially including an additional CsA-sensitive
protein in the B complex. The B complex might be the active complex,
with the C complex an intermediate stage in assembly and the D complex
representing the low level of NFATc2 known to be present in the nucleus
of resting T cells (89). Alternatively, the C complex could be a
positive transcription complex and the additional protein(s) bound in
the B complex could provide a negative signal.
The highest molecular weight A complex was found to contain NFATc1 and
NF- B p50 (but not NFATc2). To determine whether NFATc1 and NF- B
p50 were present in the same protein·DNA complex, we designed a
modified supershift assay whose purpose was to reduce the molecular
mobility of one or more complexes containing both proteins by the
sequential addition of the two different antibodies (referred to as a
super-supershift assay). This experiment demonstrated that some of the
A complexes contain both NFATc1 and NF- B p50, whereas others contain
either NFATc1 alone or an inaccessible NF- B p50. The relatively
small impact on the molecular mobility afforded by the additional
binding of the anti-NFATc1 antibody in the super-supershift over the
band in the anti-p50 antibody simple supershift can be explained by the
nature of these antibodies. The anti-NFATc1 used was a mouse monoclonal
antibody, whereas the anti-p50 employed was a goat polyclonal antibody.
Therefore, the single isotype of the anti-NFATc1 antibody directed to
only one epitope of this protein in combination with the repertoire of
anti-p50 antibody molecules potentially bound to NF- B p50 contributed relatively little additional weight to this already extremely high molecular mass protein·DNA complex, thereby slightly but consistently decreasing its electrophoretic mobility.
The super-supershift approach was designed to demonstrate
the dual binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50 in a single complex, because both NFAT and NF- B family proteins are translocated to the nucleus after PMA+Iono stimulation or HIV-1 infection where the preferential and most abundant binding partner for p50 would be another NF- B family member such as p65 (supershifts using a NF- B consensus sequence probe detected abundant amounts of NF- B p50 and p65 in
these nuclear extracts, data not shown). In light of the relatively low
levels of the NFATc1·NF- B p50 complex present, we thought it was
important to provide the NFAT 1 DNA binding site in the
reaction mixture to favor their coordinate binding. Further evidence in
support of the dual binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50 to
NFAT 1 and NFAT 3 but not
NFAT 2 was provided by the EMSA experiments using mutant
oligonucleotides. Changing the fourth A in the NFAT 1 and
NFAT 3 motifs (5'-GGAAAA-3' to
5'-GGAAAG-3') completely abrogated binding of the NFATc1-
and NF- B p50-containing complex, whereas adding a fourth A to the NFAT 2 motif (5'-GGAAAG-3' to
5'-GGAAAA-3') conferred binding to this sequence. It seems
unlikely that simply altering a single nucleotide would have such a
dramatic effect on the concurrent binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50
binding unless they were present in the same complex.
These data are the first demonstration of a NFAT family
member and a NF- B family member binding together in the same
protein·DNA complex. NFAT and NF- B normally compete for binding to
the B site, and this has been demonstrated to be true for the HIV-1 LTR B sites (58). The NF- B/Rel family of transcription factors are defined by a ~300-amino acid region called the Rel homology domain, which contains the residues involved in nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and protein-protein interactions (53, 90). NF- B p50 and
p65 preferentially form a heterodimer, although they are also capable
of forming p50/p50 or p65/p65 homodimers. The formation of homo- and
heterodimers leading to dimerization is known to be required for
binding of the NF- B family proteins to DNA (91). Crystal structures
have shown that NF- B p50 optimally binds to the 5'-GGAAA-3' half
site and p65 the 5'-GGAA-3' half site, which are separated by a
non-contact base in the palindromic B sequence (92). Although not
all of the known physiological targets have this 10-bp B consensus
sequence, NF- B proteins are still capable of binding to these
non-ideal sequences with similar affinities (56).
A Rel homology domain, with about 20% sequence homology to
the NF- B Rel domain, is also found in all of the NFAT proteins (93,
94). Structural studies have shown that the minimal DNA binding domain
of NFATc1 is essentially identical to the N-terminal specificity domain
of NF- B p50, the region involved in the majority of its base
specific contacts with DNA (93, 95, 96). NFAT proteins normally bind as
monomers in cooperation with other transcription factors such as AP-1.
However, they have also been shown to bind as dimers to certain
NF- B/Rel sites (56), and the HIV-1 LTR B sites are an example of
NFATc2 forming both monomeric and dimeric complexes (55, 58, 97). Other
common features between the NFAT and NF- B proteins include their
responsiveness to immune activation and their regulation by cytoplasmic
to nuclear translocation.
The NFAT 1 and NFAT 3 probes do not contain
a palindromic purine-rich sequence similar to those found in the HIV-1 B elements, which if present could potentially explain the dual binding of NFATc1 and NF- B p50. Furthermore, the supershift assay performed on the CsA-treated cells revealed that NF- B p50 does not
bind to the NFAT 1 motif in the absence of NFATc1,
suggesting that NF- B p50 binding is completely dependent upon the
presence of NFATc1. It was quite intriguing to discover that proteins
from these two different transcription factor families bind together to
DNA sequences whose only common component is the presence of an
extended NFAT binding motif where the fourth adenosine
(5'-GGAAAAA-3') was found to be crucial for their binding.
This core motif is also the only component common between the
NFAT 1 and NFAT 3 but not the
NFAT 2 probes and thus emerges as the requisite sequence
for binding of the NFATc1·NF- B p50 complex. Sites in which the
5'-GGAAA-3' core sequence is preceded by a T rather than an A bind NFAT
proteins more strongly (56), and although this was found to be true for
NFAT 1 by replacing the preceding C with a T, the low
level and lack of NFATc1 and NF- B p50 binding to
NFAT 2 (5'-TGGAAAG-3') suggests that the fourth A plays the greatest role in qualitative binding.
The dimerization relationships between the different NF- B proteins
and the combinatorial binding associated with the NFAT family proteins
allows a relatively small number of transcription factors to establish
an extraordinarily complex and extensive regulatory network with
different biological consequences dependent upon selective binding
controlled by the flanking sequences. This may be just one more example
of how the NFAT family proteins gain specificity and regulatory
function through their coordinate binding with other transcription
factors. NF- B p50 could potentially partner with NFATc1 to provide
the binding stability it needs and normally acquires through coordinate
binding with other transcription factors such as AP-1. The flexibility
of binding with different partner proteins may be fundamental to the
ability of NFAT proteins to integrate distinct signals through
cooperative binding with specific nuclear partners on divergent
consensus sequences in diverse genes and different chromatin structures.
In this study, we have shown that a loss of
CD3 gene transcripts is initiated early after HIV-1
infection and rapidly accumulates to a defect of >90% of normal
transcript numbers, leading to a down-modulation of surface TCR·CD3
expression and function. We identified three NFAT binding motifs
(NFAT 1, NFAT 2, and NFAT 3)
in the upstream region of the CD3 gene and have shown
that they differentially bind complexes containing NFATc2, NFATc1, and
NF- B p50. Furthermore, we found that a significant and progressive
increase in these protein·DNA complexes could be negatively
correlated with CD3 gene transcript numbers. The NFAT 1 site binds the greatest abundance of these
transcription factors, which, together with its location in a DNase
I-hypersensitive site (86), suggests it may play an active role in
CD3 gene transcription. Normal activation via the
TCR·CD3 complex initiates a cascade of molecular events leading to
multiple signaling pathways that are integrated to induce the
expression of specific cytokine genes. A sustained signal also changes
the normal balance in receptor expression, favoring TCR·CD3
internalization and degradation rather than recycling and de
novo synthesis (5). Although the accumulation of NFAT family
proteins in the nucleus has a positive influence on cytokine gene
transcription, it also potentially negatively regulates
CD3 gene transcription as a means of controlling
continued TCR·CD3 directed signaling. Thus, HIV-1 may have acquired
the ability to intercede in both the positive and negative downstream pathways triggered by the TCR·CD3 as a means of controlling viral gene expression and latency.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are indebted to Dr. F. Barré-Sinoussi for the HIV-1 LAI isolate and Dr. M. J. Crumpton for the pJ6T3 -2 clone containing human CD3 .
The reagent HXB2 was obtained through the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division
of AIDS, NIAID, NIH (from Drs. B. Hahn and G. M. Shaw).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Belgian Fonds
National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS-FRSM Grant 3.4584.01 and
FNRS-Télévie Grants 7.4554.01 and 7.4584.01), the European Commission (Grant QLK2-2000-01040), the National Institutes of Health
(Grant HD37356), and a collaborative grant from the International Brachet Foundation (Grant R 97/8-05).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.:
32-2-541-3739; Fax: 32-2-541-3453; E-mail: kwillard@ulb.ac.be.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206330200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TCR, T cell
receptor;
PKC, protein kinase C;
HIV-1, -2, human immunodeficiency
virus, types 1 and 2;
IL, interleukin;
LTR, long terminal repeat;
CsA, cyclosporin A;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
BAPTA/AM, bis-(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
PMA+Iono, PMA with
ionomycin;
RT, reverse transcriptase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lanzavecchia, A.,
Lezzi, G.,
and Viola, A.
(1999)
Cell
96,
1-4[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Viola, A.,
and Lanzavecchia, A.
(1996)
Science
273,
104-106[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Viola, A.,
Salio, M.,
Tuosto, L.,
Linkert, S.,
Acuto, O.,
and Lanzavecchia, A.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1775-1779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Itoh, Y.,
Hemmer, B.,
Martin, R.,
and Germain, R. N.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
2073-2080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Alcover, A.,
and Alarcon, B.
(2000)
Crit. Rev. Immunol
20,
325-346[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Luton, F.,
Buferne, M.,
Davoust, J.,
Schmitt-Verhulst, A. M.,
and Boyer, C.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
63-72[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
D'Oro, U.,
Vacchio, M. S.,
Weissman, A. M.,
and Ashwell, J. D.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
619-628[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Lauritsen, J. P.,
Christensen, M. D.,
Dietrich, J.,
Kastrup, J.,
Odum, N.,
and Geisler, C.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
260-267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Dietrich, J.,
Hou, X.,
Wegener, A. M.,
and Geisler, C.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2156-2166[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
von Essen, M.,
Menne, C.,
Nielsen, B. L.,
Lauritsen, J. P.,
Dietrich, J.,
Andersen, P. S.,
Karjalainen, K.,
Odum, N.,
and Geisler, C.
(2002)
J. Immunol.
168,
4519-4523[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Zier, K.,
Gansbacher, B.,
and Salvadori, S.
(1996)
Immunol. Today
17,
39-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Whiteside, T. L.
(1999)
Cancer Immunol. Immunother.
48,
346-352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Lusso, P.,
Malnati, M., De,
Maria, A.,
Balotta, C.,
DeRocco, S. E.,
Markham, P. D.,
and Gallo, R. C.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
147,
685-691[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Furukawa, M.,
Yasukawa, M.,
Yakushijin, Y.,
and Fujita, S.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
152,
5768-5775[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Willard-Gallo, K. E.,
Van de Keere, F.,
and Kettmann, R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6713-6717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Willard-Gallo, K. E.,
Delmelle-Wibaut, C.,
Segura-Zapata, I.,
Janssens, M.,
Willems, L.,
and Kettmann, R.
(1996)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
12,
715-725[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Trimble, L. A.,
and Lieberman, J.
(1998)
Blood
91,
585-594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Geertsma, M. F.,
van Wengen-Stevenhagen, A.,
van Dam, E. M.,
Risberg, K.,
Kroon, F. P.,
Groeneveld, P. H.,
and Nibbering, P. H.
(1999)
J. Infect. Dis.
180,
649-658[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Stefanova, I.,
Saville, M. W.,
Peters, C.,
Cleghorn, F. R.,
Schwartz, D.,
Venzon, D. J.,
Weinhold, K. J.,
Jack, N.,
Bartholomew, C.,
Blattner, W. A.,
Yarchoan, R.,
Bolen, J. B.,
and Horak, I. D.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1290-1297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Segura, I.,
Delmelle-Wibaut, C.,
Janssens, M.,
Cleuter, Y.,
Van den Broeke, A.,
Kettmann, R.,
and Willard-Gallo, K. E.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
5207-5213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Yssel, H.,
de Waal, M. R.,
Duc, D.,
Blanchard, D.,
Gazzolo, L.,
de Vries, J. E.,
and Spits, H.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
2279-2289[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
de Waal, M.,
Yssel, H.,
Spits, H.,
de Vries, J. E.,
Sancho, J.,
Terhorst, C.,
and Alarcon, B.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
145,
2297-2303[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Tsuda, H.,
and Takatsuki, K.
(1984)
Br. J. Cancer
50,
843-845[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Suzushima, H.,
Hattori, T.,
Asou, N.,
Wang, J. X.,
Nishikawa, K.,
Okubo, T.,
Anderson, P.,
and Takatsuki, K.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
6084-6088[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Matsuoka, M.,
Hattori, T.,
Chosa, T.,
Tsuda, H.,
Kuwata, S.,
Yoshida, M.,
Uchiyama, T.,
and Takatsuki, K.
(1986)
Blood
67,
1070-1076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Willard-Gallo, K. E.,
Furtado, M.,
Burny, A.,
and Wolinsky, S. M.
(2001)
Eur. J. Immunol.
31,
969-979[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Howe, A. Y.,
Jung, J. U.,
and Desrosiers, R. C.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
9827-9834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Schaefer, T. M.,
Bell, I.,
Fallert, B. A.,
and Reinhart, T. A.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
3273-3283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Garcia, J. V.,
and Miller, A. D.
(1991)
Nature
350,
508-511[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Craig, H. M.,
Pandori, M. W.,
and Guatelli, J. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11229-11234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Greenberg, M.,
DeTulleo, L.,
Rapoport, I.,
Skowronski, J.,
and Kirchhausen, T.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1239-1242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Letourneur, F.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1992)
Science
255,
79-82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Buonaguro, L.,
Barillari, G.,
Chang, H. K.,
Bohan, C. A.,
Kao, V.,
Morgan, R.,
Gallo, R. C.,
and Ensoli, B.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
7159-7167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Zagury, D.,
Lachgar, A.,
Chams, V.,
Fall, L. S.,
Bernard, J.,
Zagury, J. F.,
Bizzini, B.,
Gringeri, A.,
Santagostino, E.,
Rappaport, J.,
Feldman, M.,
Burny, A.,
and Gallo, R. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
3851-3856[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Zauli, G.,
Gibellini, D.,
Celeghini, C.,
Mischiati, C.,
Bassini, A., La,
Placa, M.,
and Capitani, S.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
2216-2224[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Ott, M.,
Emiliani, S.,
Van Lint, C.,
Herbein, G.,
Lovett, J.,
Chirmule, N.,
McCloskey, T.,
Pahwa, S.,
and Verdin, E.
(1997)
Science
275,
1481-1485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Westendorp, M. O., Li-,
Weber, M.,
Frank, R. W.,
and Krammer, P. H.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
4177-4185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Luria, S.,
Gross, G.,
Horowitz, M.,
and Givol, D.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
3307-3312[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Winoto, A.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
729-733[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
McDougall, S.,
Peterson, C. L.,
and Calame, K.
(1988)
Science
241,
205-208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Krimpenfort, P., De,
Jong, R.,
Uematsu, Y.,
Dembic, Z.,
Ryser, S.,
von Boehmer, H.,
Steinmetz, M.,
and Berns, A.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
745-750[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Kappes, D. J.,
Browne, C. P.,
and Tonegawa, S.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2204-2208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Bories, J. C.,
Loiseau, P.,
d'Auriol, L.,
Gontier, C.,
Bensussan, A.,
Degos, L.,
and Sigaux, F.
(1990)
J. Exp. Med.
171,
75-83[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Clevers, H.,
Lonberg, N.,
Dunlap, S.,
Lacy, E.,
and Terhorst, C.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
2527-2535[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Rellahan, B. L.,
Jensen, J. P.,
and Weissman, A. M.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1529-1534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Wang, L.,
Bronstein, N.,
Hsu, V.,
and Baniyash, M.
(1995)
Int. Immunol.
7,
1627-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Georgopoulos, K.,
van den, E. P.,
Bier, E.,
Maxam, A.,
and Terhorst, C.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
2401-2407[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Van den Elsen, P.,
Shepley, B. A.,
Borst, J.,
Coligan, J. E.,
Markham, A. F.,
Orkin, S.,
and Terhorst, C.
(1984)
Nature
312,
413-418[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Tunnacliffe, A.,
Olsson, C.,
Buluwela, L.,
and Rabbitts, T. H.
(1988)
Eur. J. Immunol.
18,
1639-1642[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Garber, M. E.,
and Jones, K. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
11,
460-465[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Bieniasz, P. D.,
Grdina, T. A.,
Bogerd, H. P.,
and Cullen, B. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7791-7796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Pereira, L. A.,
Bentley, K.,
Peeters, A.,
Churchill, M. J.,
and Deacon, N. J.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
663-668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Chytil, M.,
and Verdine, G. L.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol
6,
91-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Gerondakis, S.,
Grumont, R.,
Rourke, I.,
and Grossmann, M.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
10,
353-359[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Kinoshita, S., Su, L.,
Amano, M.,
Timmerman, L. A.,
Kaneshima, H.,
and Nolan, G. P.
(1997)
Immunity
6,
235-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Rao, A.,
Luo, C.,
and Hogan, P. G.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
15,
707-747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Chun, R. F.,
Semmes, O. J.,
Neuveut, C.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
2615-2629[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Macian, F.,
and Rao, A.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3645-3653[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Westendorp, M. O.,
Shatrov, V. A.,
Schulze-Osthoff, K.,
Frank, R.,
Kraft, M.,
Los, M.,
Krammer, P. H.,
Droge, W.,
and Lehmann, V.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
546-554[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Willard-Gallo, K. E.
(1986)
in
Recent Progresses in Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis
(Galteau, M. M.
, and Siest, G., eds)
, pp. 205-214, Presses Universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, France
|
| 61.
|
Barre-Sinoussi, F.,
Chermann, J. C.,
Rey, F.,
Nugeyre, M. T.,
Chamaret, S.,
Gruest, J.,
Dauguet, C.,
Axler-Blin, C.,
Vezinet-Brun, F.,
Rouzioux, C.,
Rozenbaum, W.,
and Montagnier, L.
(1983)
Science
220,
868-871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Shaw, G. M.,
Hahn, B. H.,
Arya, S. K.,
Groopman, J. E.,
Gallo, R. C.,
and Wong-Staal, F.
(1984)
Science
226,
1165-1171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Osborn, L.,
Kunkel, S.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
2336-2340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Van Lint, C.,
Ghysdael, J.,
Paras, P. J.,
Burny, A.,
and Verdin, E.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
2632-2648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Geisler, C.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
148,
2437-2445[Abstract]
|
| 67.
|
Long, H.,
Gaffney, P.,
Mortari, F.,
and Miller, J. S.
(1996)
Exp. Hematol.
24,
1402-1408[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 68.
|
Krissansen, G. W.,
Owen, M. J.,
Verbi, W.,
and Crumpton, M. J.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
1799-1808[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 69.
|
Van den, B. A.,
Cleuter, Y.,
Chen, G.,
Portetelle, D.,
Mammerickx, M.,
Zagury, D.,
Fouchard, M.,
Coulombel, L.,
Kettmann, R.,
and Burny, A.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
9263-9267[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 70.
|
Dautry-Varsat, A.,
Hemar, A.,
Cornet, V.,
and Duprez, V.
(1988)
Blood
72,
588-592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 71.
|
Tunnacliffe, A.,
Buluwela, L.,
and Rabbitts, T. H.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
2953-2957[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 72.
|
Hazan, U.,
Thomas, D.,
Alcami, J.,
Bachelerie, F.,
Israel, N.,
Yssel, H.,
Virelizier, J. L.,
and Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
7861-7865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 73.
|
Schmidt, A.,
Hennighausen, L.,
and Siebenlist, U.
(1990)
J. Virol.
64,
4037-4041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 74.
|
Yang, T.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Chow, C. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
39569-39576[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 75.
|
Boise, L. H.,
Petryniak, B.,
Mao, X.,
June, C. H.,
Wang, C. Y.,
Lindsten, T.,
Bravo, R.,
Kovary, K.,
Leiden, J. M.,
and Thompson, C. B.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1911-1919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 76.
|
Jain, J.,
Burgeon, E.,
Badalian, T. M.,
Hogan, P. G.,
and Rao, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4138-4145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 77.
|
Emmel, E. A.,
Verweij, C. L.,
Durand, D. B.,
Higgins, K. M.,
Lacy, E.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1989)
Science
246,
1617-1620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 78.
|
Rubin, B.,
Alibaud, L.,
Huchenq-Champagne, A.,
Arnaud, J.,
Toribio, M. L.,
and Constans, J.
(2002)
Scand. J. Immunol.
55,
111-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 79.
|
Minami, Y.,
Weissman, A. M.,
Samelson, L. E.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
2688-2692[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 80.
|
Hall, C.,
Berkhout, B.,
Alarcon, B.,
Sancho, J.,
Wileman, T.,
and Terhorst, C.
(1991)
Int. Immunol.
3,
359-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 81.
|
Price, D. H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
2629-2634[Free Full Text]
|
| 82.
|
Zack, J. A.,
Arrigo, S. J.,
Weitsman, S. R., Go, A. S.,
Haislip, A.,
and Chen, I. S.
(1990)
Cell
61,
213-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 83.
|
Kinoshita, S.,
Chen, B. K.,
Kaneshima, H.,
and Nolan, G. P.
(1998)
Cell
95,
595-604[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 84.
|
Kingsman, S. M.,
and Kingsman, A. J.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
240,
491-507[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 85.
|
Gaynor, R.
(1992)
AIDS
6,
347-363[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 86.
|
Tunnacliffe, A.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
459-464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 87.
|
Flanagan, B. F.,
Wotton, D.,
Tuck-Wah, S.,
and Owen, M. J.
(1990)
Immunogenetics
31,
13-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 88.
|
McCaffrey, P. G.,
Goldfeld, A. E.,
and Rao, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30445-30450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 89.
|
Sica, A.,
Dorman, L.,
Viggiano, V.,
Cippitelli, M.,
Ghosh, P.,
Rice, N.,
and Young, H. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30412-30420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 90.
| Rothwarf, D. M., and Karin, M. (1999) Sci. STKE.
http://stke.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sigtrans;1999/5/re1.
|
| 91.
|
Baeuerle, P. A.,
and Henkel, T.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Immunol
12,
141-179[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 92.
|
Berkowitz, B.,
Huang, D. B.,
Chen-Park, F. E.,
Sigler, P. B.,
and Ghosh, G.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
24694-24700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 93.
|
Wolfe, S. A.,
Zhou, P.,
Dotsch, V.,
Chen, L.,
You, A., Ho, S. N.,
Crabtree, G. R.,
Wagner, G.,
and Verdine, G. L.
(1997)
Nature
385,
172-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 94.
|
Northrop, J. P., Ho, S. N.,
Chen, L.,
Thomas, D. J.,
Timmerman, L. A.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Admon, A.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1994)
Nature
369,
497-502[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 95.
|
Ghosh, G.,
van Duyne, G.,
Ghosh, S.,
and Sigler, P. B.
(1995)
Nature
373,
303-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 96.
|
Muller, C. W.,
Rey, F. A.,
Sodeoka, M.,
Verdine, G. L.,
and Harrison, S. C.
(1995)
Nature
373,
311-317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 97.
|
McCaffrey, P. G.,
Jain, J.,
Jamieson, C.,
Sen, R.,
and Rao, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1864-1871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Xue, P. B. Thippegowda, G. Hu, K. Bachmaier, J. W. Christman, A. B. Malik, and C. Tiruppathi
NF-{kappa}B regulates thrombin-induced ICAM-1 gene expression in cooperation with NFAT by binding to the intronic NF-{kappa}B site in the ICAM-1 gene
Physiol Genomics,
June 1, 2009;
38(1):
42 - 53.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Tone, Y. Kojima, K. Furuuchi, M. Brady, Y. Yashiro-Ohtani, M. L. Tykocinski, and M. Tone
OX40 Gene Expression Is Up-Regulated by Chromatin Remodeling in Its Promoter Region Containing Sp1/Sp3, YY1, and NF-{kappa}B Binding Sites
J. Immunol.,
August 1, 2007;
179(3):
1760 - 1767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cardoso, V. Durbecq, J.-F. Laes, B. Badran, L. Lagneaux, F. Bex, C. Desmedt, K. Willard-Gallo, J. S. Ross, A. Burny, et al.
Bortezomib (PS-341, Velcade) increases the efficacy of trastuzumab (Herceptin) in HER-2-positive breast cancer cells in a synergistic manner
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
December 1, 2006;
5(12):
3042 - 3051.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Badran, K. Kunstman, J. Stanton, M. Moschitta, A. Zerghe, H. Akl, A. Burny, S. M. Wolinsky, and K. E. Willard-Gallo
Transcriptional Regulation of the Human CD3{gamma} Gene: The TATA-Less CD3{gamma} Promoter Functions via an Initiator and Contiguous Sp-Binding Elements
J. Immunol.,
May 15, 2005;
174(10):
6238 - 6249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|