![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47292-47299, December 6, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
,
,
,
¶
From the
Department of Food Science and Technology,
Department of Molecular Biotechnology, and Institute of Biotechnology,
Chonnam National University, Kwang-Ju, 500-757 and the
§ Department of Food Science and Technology, School of
Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University, Suwon 441-744, South Korea
Received for publication, July 10, 2002, and in revised form, September 6, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cytolytic hemolysin, a gene product of
vvhA, is a putative virulence factor of the pathogenic
bacterium Vibrio vulnificus. We have previously shown that
hemolysin production is repressed by adding glucose to culture media
and that production can be restored by adding cAMP. In this study,
hemolysin activity and the level of vvh transcript were
determined to reach a maximum in late exponential phase and were
repressed when cells entered stationary phase. Northern blot and primer
extension analyses revealed that vvhA is cotranscribed with
a second gene, vvhB, located upstream of vvhA.
Transcription of the vvhBA operon begins at a single site
and is under the direction of a single promoter, Pvvh. A crp null mutation decreased
hemolysin production and the level of vvhBA transcript by
reducing the activity of Pvvh, indicating that
the Pvvh activity is under the positive control
of cAMP receptor protein (CRP). A direct interaction between CRP and
the regulatory region of the vvhBA operon was demonstrated
by gel-mobility shift assays. The CRP binding site, centered at 59.5 bp
upstream of the transcription start site, was mapped by deletion
analysis of the vvhBA promoter region and confirmed by
DNase I protection assays. These results demonstrate that the
vvhBA expression is activated by CRP in a growth-dependent manner and that CRP exerts its effects by
directly binding to DNA upstream of
Pvvh.
The pathogenic marine bacterium Vibrio vulnificus is
the causative agent of food-borne diseases such as gastroenteritis in healthy persons and life-threatening septicemia in immunocompromised individuals (1-3). V. vulnificus infections are remarkable
for their invasiveness, severe tissue damage, and rapidly fulminating course of disease. The characterization of somatic as well as secreted
products of V. vulnificus has yielded a large list of putative virulence factors, whose known or putative functions are
consistent with disease pathology (4).
Among the putative virulence factors is the cytolytic hemolysin encoded
by the vvhA gene. Hemolysin can lyse red blood cells from a
variety of animal species by forming small pores in the cytoplasmic
membrane. Hemolysin also shows cytolytic activity against cultured cell
lines (5, 6). Purified hemolysin, which has an estimated molecular mass
of 51 kDa, is heat-labile and toxic for Chinese hamster ovary cells
(7-9). When injected intravenously, the purified toxin is lethal in
mice at levels of ~3 µg/kg body weight. It has been reported that
hemolysin may bind to cholesterol and induce the release of
K+ ions and to a lesser extent Na+ ions from
liposome (10). Although there is a substantial body of literature
concerning the biochemical and pathogenic properties of hemolysin, only
a few studies have addressed the mechanisms whereby expression of the
virulence factor is modulated (11).
A 3.4-kb DNA fragment of V. vulnificus strain EDL174, which
encodes VvhA, has been cloned, and its nucleotide sequence has been
reported (6). This DNA fragment contains two genes, vvhB and
vvhA. The vvhA gene encodes hemolysin, but the
function of the vvhB gene product is unknown. In a previous
report (11), we showed that hemolysin production in V. vulnificus is repressed by adding glucose to culture media
and that expression is derepressed by the addition of cAMP. These
results suggested that hemolysin synthesis is regulated by cAMP-CRP
(cAMP receptor protein)1
controlled catabolite repression. However, until now, no definitive analysis of the role of the CRP in vvhA expression has been
reported. Neither the promoter(s) of the vvhA gene nor CRP
binding sites upstream of vvhA has been previously
identified. Furthermore, the question of whether CRP directly or
indirectly affects hemolysin production has not been previously addressed.
This lack of the information on vvhA regulation makes it
difficult to understand how hemolysin levels are modulated. Therefore, in an effort to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of vvhA
expression at a molecular level, we examined the influence of growth
phase on hemolysin synthesis. We demonstrated that the vvhBA
genes are cotranscribed, that transcription is growth phase dependent,
and that vvhBA transcription is initiated at a single site.
The effects of a crp null mutation on hemolysin production,
the cellular level of vvhBA transcript, and the activity of
Pvvh were also examined. Finally, binding of CRP
directly to the upstream portion of vvhBA was demonstrated,
and the site for CRP binding was determined.
Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Media--
The strains and
plasmids used in this study are listed below (see Table II).
Escherichia coli strains used for plasmid DNA replication or
conjugational transfer of plasmids were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB)
broth or on LB broth containing 1.5% (w/v) agar. Unless noted
otherwise, V. vulnificus strains were grown in LB medium
supplemented with 2.0% (w/v) NaCl (LBS). When appropriate, antibiotics
were added to media at the following concentrations: ampicillin (100 µg/ml), kanamycin (50 µg/ml), and tetracycline (10 µg/ml).
General Genetic Methods--
Procedures for the isolation of
plasmid DNA, genomic DNA, and transformation were carried out as
described by Sambrook et al. (12). Restriction and
DNA-modifying enzymes were used as recommended by the manufacturer (New
England BioLabs, Beverly, MA). DNA fragments were purified from agarose
gels using the Geneclean II kit (Bio 101, Inc., Vista, CA). DNA cloning
and manipulation were conducted in E. coli DH5 Measurement of Cell Growth and Hemolysin
Activities--
Cultures of V. vulnificus strains were
grown at 30 °C with aeration. 5-ml samples were removed at regular
intervals for determination of cell densities, hemolysin activity, and
cellular protein concentrations. Growth was monitored by measuring
the A600 of the cultures. Cultures with
an A600 > 0.8 were diluted prior to
measurement. Hemolysin activities were determined as previously
described (5, 11). A hemolytic unit was defined as the reciprocal of
the maximal dilution showing 50% hemolysis of a suspension (1%, v/v)
of human red blood cells. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford (13), with bovine serum albumin as the standard. Averages and standard errors of the mean (S.E.) were calculated from at
least three independent determinations.
RNA Purification and Northern Blot Analysis of the vvhBA
Transcript--
Total cellular RNAs from V. vulnificus
strain ATCC29307 and an isogenic crp mutant, KC74, were
isolated using a TRIzol reagent kit according to the manufacturer's
instructions (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD). For Northern blot
analysis, RNA was separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, transferred
to nylon membrane, and hybridized as previously described (14). A
series of reactions was performed according to standard procedures (12)
with 20 µg of total RNA for Northern dot blot analyses. Two DNA
probes, VVHAP and VVHBP, were labeled with [ Primer Extension Analysis--
Primer extension experiments were
carried out with SuperScript II RNase H Overexpression and Purification of V. vulnificus CRP--
The
coding region of crp was amplified using chromosomal DNA of
V. vulnificus ATCC29307 as the template and oligonucleotide primers, HIS-CRP021 and
HIS-CRP0222 (see Table I).
The 0.6-kb PCR product was digested with BamHI and
EcoRI and then ligated with a 6× histidine-tagging
expression vector, pRSET A (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), digested with
the same enzymes. The resulting plasmid, pHK0201, encodes CRP
with a His6 tag at the amino terminus.
His-tagged CRP protein was expressed in E. coli
BL21, and the protein was purified by affinity chromatography according
to the manufacturer's procedure (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). The final
concentration of the purified protein was adjusted to 0.6 µg per
microliter of elution buffer and kept frozen until use.
Construction of a Set of vvh-luxAB Transcriptional
Fusions--
A set of vvh-luxAB transcriptional fusion
reporters were created by subcloning a series of DNA fragments that
overlapped the vvhBA promoter region into pHK0011 (Fig.
6A). The later plasmid carries the promoterless
luxAB luciferase genes (15). The subcloned fragments were
amplified via PCR using pHK0202 (Fig. 1) as the template. Primer VVH004
(see Table I) contained a BamHI restriction site followed by
bases corresponding to the 5'-end of the vvhA coding region.
VVH004 was used in conjunction with one of the following primers to
amplify DNA upstream of vvhA: VVH001 (for pHK0012), VVH002
(for pHK0013), or VVH003 (for pHK0014) (Table I). The primers were designed to
amplify 824-, 724-, and 690-bp lengths, respectively, of DNA upstream
of vvhA. A KpnI restriction site was added to
these primers to facilitate cloning of the DNA fragments. The PCR
products were digested with BamHI and KpnI and
inserted into pHK0011 that had been digested with the same enzymes, to
create the three vvh-luxAB reporter constructs.
The reporter fusion of pHK0015, which carries 480 bp of
vvhBA upstream DNA, was constructed using primers VVH005 and
VVH001. All constructions were confirmed by DNA sequencing.
Measurement of Cellular Luminescence--
The
vvh-luxAB reporters were mobilized into ATCC29307
and the crp mutant by conjugation. Cultures were grown to
late exponential phase (A600 of 1.2), then 1-ml
samples were taken from each culture, diluted 100-fold with
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and placed into cuvettes. 10 µl
of a 0.3% (v/v) decanal stock solution was then added to each cuvette.
The decanal stock solution was prepared by adding decanal to a 1:1
mixture of water and ethanol. Cellular luminescence was measured with a
Lumat model 9501 luminometer (Berthold, Wildbad, Germany). Data are
expressed as arbitrary relative light units.
Gel-mobility Shift Assay--
Gel shift assays to measure
binding of CRP to the regulatory region of vvhBA were
performed as described by Sambrook et al. (12). The 188-bp
upstream region of the vvh gene, extending from residues
DNase I Protection Assay--
DNase I protection assays were
performed as described previously (16) with slight modifications. 300 ng of the same labeled 188-bp DNA, used for the mobility shift assay,
was suspended in 20 µl of reaction solution containing 1× binding
buffer (16), 1 µg of poly(dI-dC), 100 µM cAMP,
and various concentrations of CRP. The reaction mixtures were incubated
at 25 °C for 20 min. 20 µl of 10 mM MgCl2
and 5 mM CaCl2 mix were then added along with 1 µl of a DNase I solution (10 ng/µl, Sigma, St Louis, MO). Samples
were then incubated for 1 min at 25 °C, the reactions were stopped
by the addition of 80 µl of stop solution (12), and the DNA products
were purified by ethanol precipitation. The purified DNA products were
resolved on a sequencing gel alongside sequencing ladders of pHK0202
generated using VVH011 as primer. Gels were processed as described for
the primer extension analyses.
Northern Blot Analysis of the vvhBA Operon--
A 6.5-kb DNA
fragment from V. vulnificus ATCC29307, which carries the
entire vvhBA operon, was cloned in pHK02022
(Table II). As shown in Fig.
1, an open reading frame for
vvhB is present upstream of the vvhA
coding region. The function of the vvhB gene product has not
yet been determined. To determine whether vvhBA is expressed
as a single transcript or as two independent transcripts, Northern blot
analyses were performed. When total RNA was isolated from log phase
ATCC29307 cells and hybridized with the VVHAP DNA probe, only a single
~2.0-kb transcript was detected (Fig.
2A). Based on the DNA sequence
of vvhBA, it was anticipated that a vvhA mRNA
would be ~1.5 kb in length. Cotranscription of vvhA and
vvhB was predicted to produce a 2.0-kb transcript. Therefore, it appeared that a single mRNA coded for both VvhB and
VvhA. To test this possibility, Northern blot analysis was performed
again using VVHBP as a DNA probe. VVHBP also hybridized to a 2.0-kb RNA
(Fig. 2B). These combined results demonstrated that the
vvhBA genes are transcribed as a transcriptional operon rather than as two independent genes.
Growth Phase-dependent Expression of vvhBA--
To
examine whether the production of hemolysin is influenced by growth
phase, the hemolysin activities of ATCC29307 cultures were analyzed at
various growth stages (Fig.
3A). Hemolysin activity appeared at the beginning of growth and reached a maximum in the late-exponential phase. Hemolysin activity then decreased in the stationary phase. Growth phase regulation of hemolysin production could
be manifest at either the transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels. To distinguish between these two possibilities, levels of
vvhBA mRNA were monitored during growth. The same amount
of total RNA was isolated from ATCC29307 cells at different stages of
growth. The results indicated that vvhBA mRNA levels
decreased as the bacterial culture entered stationary phase (Fig.
3B). This result suggested that decreased hemolysin activity
in the stationary phase correlated with a decrease in the level of
vvhBA mRNA.
The decrease in vvhBA mRNA in stationary phase could be
the result of a decrease in the rate of mRNA transcription
initiation or decreased mRNA stability. Northern blot analysis
demonstrated that the 2.0-kb vvhBA transcript, observed in
log phase cultures, was not detected in the total RNAs isolated from
the stationary phase cells (Fig. 2, A and B).
This result agreed well with our previous observation that growth
phase-dependent production of hemolysin is regulated at the
level of transcription (Fig. 3B). It was possible that
vvhBA mRNA stability was decreased in stationary phase.
The likelihood for this seemed low, however, because we could not
detect any partial degradation products of vvhBA mRNA with either the VVHAP or VVHBP DNA probe (Fig. 2, A and
B). These results indicated that a decrease in the level of
transcription initiation at the vvhBA promoter is the sole,
or at least the major, mechanism whereby hemolysin activity is
down-regulated in the stationary phase.
Effect of a Mutation in the crp Gene on Hemolysin
Production--
A previous study suggested that cAMP-CRP catabolite
repression may play a role in the regulation of hemolytic activity in V. vulnificus (11). To confirm and expand these earlier
results, we examined hemolysin production by a crp mutant,
KC74. The crp mutant was constructed by allelic exchange in
ATCC29307 (15). Cultures of ATCC29307 and the crp mutant
were grown to log phase, and the hemolysin activities of each culture
were determined. Although hemolysin activity was present at about 2.0 units per µg of cellular protein in the wild-type strain, KC74
appeared to produce much less hemolysin. The residual level of
hemolysin activity in KC74 corresponded to approximately one-thirtieth
of that in the wild-type strain (Fig.
4A). Down-regulation of
hemolysin due to the disruption of crp suggested that CRP
acts as a positive regulator of vvhBA.
To rule out the possibility that the decreased hemolytic activity in
the crp mutant was due to polar effects of the
crp insertion on downstream genes, we determined if
reintroduction of crp on a plasmid could complement the
mutation. For this purpose, plasmid pKC0004 was constructed by
subcloning crp into pRK415 (15, 17). The resulting plasmid,
pKC0004, was transferred into KC74 by conjugation. The hemolytic
activity expressed by KC74 (pKC0004) was, at least, equivalent to that
of ATCC29307 (Fig. 4, A and B). Therefore, the
decreased hemolytic activity of KC74 resulted from inactivation of
crp rather than reduced expression of any genes downstream of crp.
To characterize the role of CRP in more detail, the levels of
vvhBA mRNA in the wild-type strain and KC74 were
compared by Northern dot blot analysis. When VVHBP was used as the DNA
probe, the vvhBA transcript was almost undetectable in KC74
(Fig. 4B). The vvhBA transcript was readily
detectable in the wild-type strain and in KC74 (pKC0004). Therefore,
levels of vvhBA mRNA correlated with hemolysin
production for all three strains (Fig. 4). These results indicated that
CRP exerted its effects on the production of hemolysin at the level of
vvhBA transcription. Overall, these results led us to
conclude that the expression of vvhBA in V. vulnificus is under the positive control of CRP, at least in log- phase cultures.
Identification of a Transcription Start Site of vvhBA--
The one
or more transcription start sites of vvhBA were mapped by a
primer extension analysis. For this purpose, RNAs were prepared
from strain ATCC29307 and KC74 harvested log phase and stationary phase
cells. A single reverse transcript was produced from primer extension
of RNA isolated from log phase and stationary phase cultures (Fig.
5). Using several different sets of
primers, we were unable to identify any other transcription start sites by primer extension (data not shown). This indicated that the same
transcription start site was used for the transcription of vvhBA in both log and stationary phases. The 5'-end of the
vvhBA transcript is located 115-bp upstream of the
translational initiation codon of VvhB and is subsequently
designated +1. The putative promoter upstream of the transcription
start site was named Pvvh. Based on the
intensity of the reverse transcripts, Pvvh activity was significantly decreased in stationary phase. This observation supported our hypothesis that the decrease in the level of
hemolysin activity in stationary phase is mainly due to the reduced
activity of the vvhBA promoter.
In contrast, primer extension analysis, performed with RNA prepared
from either log phase or stationary phase cells of KC74, failed to
produce a visible product (Fig. 5). This result was not unexpected,
because the vvhBA transcript was not detectable in Northern
analysis of KC74 RNA (Fig. 4B). Although other explanations are possible, these data, combined with other results, indicate that
vvhBA transcription is directed by the same promoter,
Pvvh, in log and stationary phase cells and that
CRP affects the level of hemolysin production by activating
Pvvh.
Deletion Analysis of the vvhBA Promoter Region--
To delineate
the cis DNA sequences in the Pvvh
promoter region required for CRP activation, transcriptional fusions of
the putative vvhBA regulatory region were made to the
reporter gene, luxAB. The pHK-reporter fusions are shown in
Fig. 6. The reporter constructs were
transferred into the wild-type strain and KC74. Culture luminescence
was used to quantify the capacity of each vvh upstream
fragment to activate transcription of the vvhBA operon.
For the wild-type strain containing pHK0012, a plasmid that carries an
intact regulatory region, luminescence activity was about 1.5 × 106 relative light units (Fig. 6B). The light
produced in the crp mutant carrying pHK0012 was
significantly reduced, supporting the hypothesis that the expression of
the Pvvh is dependent on CRP. Luminescence was
also reduced in the strains that carried pHK0013. Moreover, the levels
of luminescence in ATCC29307 (pHK0013) and KC74 (pHK0013) did not
significantly differ. Similar results were observed when the
luminescence was compared between the wild-type and KC74 cells
containing pHK0014 (Fig. 6B). These data indicated that the
sequences necessary for activation of Pvvh by CRP are absent from the vvh upstream regions carried on
pHK0013 and pHK0014. Because the vvhBA upstream region on
pHK0013 was deleted up to
When transformed with pHK0015, the levels of luminescence in the
wild-type and crp mutant were comparable to those observed in the cells containing pHK0012. The magnitude of the decrease in
luminescence from pHK0015 in the crp mutant was similar to that observed in cells carrying pHK0012. This result suggests that the
vvhB coding region does not harbor any cis-acting
elements essential for vvhBA transcription. In addition to
this, no significant difference was observed when the luminescence was
compared between E. coli cells containing either pHK0012 or
pHK0015 (data not shown). This observation indicates that VvhB does not
affect the activity of Pvvh at least in E. coli.
CRP Interaction with the vvhBA Promoter in Vitro--
It was
apparent that CRP affects the expression of vvhBA and that
sequences located about 63 bp upstream of the vvhBA
transcription start are required for CRP to activate
Pvvh. However, there were still several possible
ways for CRP to affect the activity of Pvvh. One
was by binding directly to the 63-bp region upstream of the
vvhBA to stimulate open complex formation of
Pvvh. A second possibility was that CRP either
increased or decreased the cellular level of one or more unidentified
trans-acting factors that may bind directly to the
vvhBA regulatory region. To determine if CRP directly binds
the vvhBA promoter, we measured binding of purified CRP to
the 188-bp DNA fragment encompassing the residue Identification of CRP Binding Site Using in Vitro DNase I
Protection Analysis--
To determine the precise location of the CRP
binding site in the vvhBA regulatory region, a DNase I
footprinting experiment was performed using the same 188-bp DNA
fragment used for the gel-shift assays. DNase I footprinting revealed a
clear protection pattern in the upstream region of vvhBA
between
Because purified His-tagged CRP protein was used for the gel-mobility
shift and DNase I protection assays, it was possible, although
unlikely, that the protection resulted from the effects of the His on
the recombinant protein. Therefore, it was determined whether
His-tagged CRP could complement the crp mutation of KC74. For this purpose, a plasmid, pHK0004, was constructed by subcloning the
DNA fragment-encoding His-tagged CRP into pRK415. The levels of
hemolytic activity and vvhBA transcript in KC74 containing pHK0004 were restored to levels comparable to those of the wild-type strain (data not shown). Therefore, protection of the vvhBA
upstream region by the His-tagged CRP protein resulted from the binding of functional CRP rather than any effects of His6 on CRP
binding site or CRP itself.
In summary, we have found that the V. vulnificus vvhBA genes
are transcribed as a single transcriptional unit, under the control of
a single promoter Pvvh, and that transcription
is growth phase-dependent. Also, the activity of the
Pvvh is under the positive control of CRP, and
CRP exerts its effects by binding directly to a CRP binding site in the
vvhBA upstream region.
A variety of endotoxins and exotoxins, including polysaccharide
capsules (20), an elastolytic protease (21), and a phospholipase A2
(22), have been implicated as putative virulence factors for V. vulnificus. Another putative virulence factor is a cytolytic hemolysin (5, 6). Several different lines of evidence have led to the
hypothesis that hemolysin is an important, if not essential, virulence
factor for V. vulnificus. The role of hemolysin as a potential virulence factor has been established primarily by using the
purified protein in animal models (7). However, when the pathogenesis
of an isogenic mutant deficient in hemolysin production was compared
with a wild-type strain, it appeared that hemolysin is less important
than would have been predicted from examining the effects of the
purified proteins on animals (23). It is noteworthy, however, that
vvhBA is expressed at low levels under certain conditions,
such as in stationary phase cultures (this study) or in the presence of
glucose (11). Although other explanations are possible, the lack of
significant difference in virulence between the vvhA mutant
and the wild-type parent could be due to down-regulation of hemolysin
production under particular conditions. This possibility strongly
underscores the need to verify expression levels of putative virulence
factors during infection to understand the roles of the factors in pathogenesis.
In the present study, it was found that CRP activates the expression of
the V. vulnificus hemolysin gene by binding directly to the
vvhBA promoter, Pvvh. CRP (in
conjunction with cAMP) plays a central role in carbon catabolite
repression, by which a rapidly metabolizable carbon source, present in
the growth medium, represses the synthesis of many enzymes required to
metabolize other carbon sources. This global regulatory system has been
well described especially for enteric bacteria (24). Besides regulating the synthesis of these catabolic enzymes, a direct role for CRP in
regulating the expression of numerous virulence factors has been
established for a number of pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae. A
crp mutation leads to a reduced production of hemolysin, a
potential virulence factor of avian-pathogenic E. coli (25).
Our recent work has revealed that expression of V. vulnificus
vvpE-encoding elastase is under the positive control of cAMP-CRP
(15). In contrast, CRP protein negatively regulates the expression of
cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus genes in V. cholerae, a species closely related to V. vulnificus
(26). In Salmonella typhimurium there is evidence that CRP
plays a crucial role in the regulation of virulence gene expression and
pathogenesis (27, 28).
From the standpoint of bacterial pathogenesis, the finding that
numerous virulence factors are regulated by cAMP-CRP is, perhaps, not
surprising. When bacteria invade the human body, many environmental changes, such as differences in type and concentrations of nutrients, would be encountered. Sensing concentrations of cAMP could be used by
bacteria to recognize and respond to new environments that are
encountered within an infected host. Responses to environmental signals
often involve coordinated alterations in the expression of sets of
genes and operons. Frequently, the products of environmentally regulated genes are virulence factors (29). Like many other symbiotic
and pathogenic microorganisms, V. vulnificus exists in two
distinct habitats: seawater and the human body. Previously, we reported
that hemolytic activity can be increased, in a
dose-dependent manner, by addition of cAMP (11). This
observation, combined with the results of this study, suggests that the
intracellular level of cAMP is a limiting factor for hemolysin
synthesis. Therefore, cAMP is a major factor dictating hemolysin
production by V. vulnificus.
Recently, we have identified the toxR gene of V. vulnificus. This gene is a homolog of V. cholerae toxR
known to regulate V. cholerae virulence genes encoding
cholera toxin, toxin-coregulated pilus (30), and other virulence
factors. A toxR null mutation decreased hemolysin production
in V. vulnificus by 50% (30). This suggests that ToxR can
up-regulate production of the V. vulnificus hemolysin.
However, when transcription of vvhBA was compared between a
wild-type strain and an isogenic toxR mutant, no significant differences in vvhBA mRNA levels were detected (data not
shown). Consistent with this result, no ToxR binding sites are present in the vvhBA regulatory region. ToxR is known to bind to
tandem TTTGAT repeats found in the upstream region of the V. cholerae ctx (31, 32) and to inverted repeats found upstream of
toxT (33, 34). These observations suggest that ToxR
regulates hemolysin production at a post-transcription level, although
it has not yet been established if ToxR directly or indirectly affects
vvhBA expression. Combined with the positive regulation of
the vvhBA promoter by CRP, post-transcriptional regulation
may permit tighter regulation of hemolysin production in response to
environmental and growth phase regulatory signals.
The exact type of sigma factor associated with RNA polymerase for the
transcription of Pvvh has not yet been
determined. We sequenced several hundred base pairs of DNA upstream of
vvhBA and compared this sequence with several putative
promoter sequences (Fig. 8). Based on homology to the consensus
E. coli
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, and
restriction mapping was used to confirm that transformants contained
the appropriate plasmids. PCR amplification of DNA was performed using
a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Norwalk, CT) and
following standard protocols.
-32P]dCTP
using the Prime-a-gene labeling system (Promega, Madison, WI) and used
for hybridizations, as previously described (Fig. 1) (14). The VVHAP
probe was prepared by labeling the 1.0-kb SacII-PstI DNA fragment internal to
vvhA. A 0.7-kb DNA fragment containing the coding region of
vvhB was amplified by PCR using oligonucleotide primers,
VVH002 and VVH004 (see Table I), and then labeled for VVHBP probe. The
blots were visualized and quantified using a phosphorimaging analyzer
(model BAS1500, Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and the Image
Gauge (version 3.12) program.
reverse
transcriptase (Invitrogen) according to Sambrook et al. (12). A 23-base oligonucleotide (VVH9901, see Table I) complementary to
the open reading frame of vvhB was used as the primer. The primer was end-labeled with [
-32P]ATP using T4
polynucleotide kinase. The cDNA products were purified and resolved
on a sequencing gel alongside sequencing ladders generated with the
same primer used for the primer extension. The nucleotide sequence of
pHK0202 (see Table II) was determined using the dideoxy-chain
termination method with TopTM DNA polymerase (Bioneer,
Seoul, Korea) following the manufacturer's protocols. The gels were
dried, visualized, and then quantified as described above for Northern analysis.
Oligonucleotides used in this study
167 to +27 with respect to the +1 transcription start site, was
amplified by PCR using the 32P-labeled VVH011 and unlabeled
VVH010 as primers. The labeled 188-bp DNA (7 nM) fragment
was incubated with varying concentrations of purified His-tagged CRP
protein for 30 min at 37 °C in a 20-µl reaction mixture
containing, 1× binding buffer (16), 200 µM cAMP, and 1 µg of poly(dI-dC) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Following the incubations,
3 µl of loading buffer (12) was added to each reaction, and the
samples were separated by electrophoresis on a 6% nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel. For competition analyses, the same but unlabeled
188-bp DNA fragment was used as a competitor DNA. Various amounts of
competitor DNA were added to the reaction mixture containing 7 nM of the labeled DNA prior to the addition of 300 nM CRP.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Strains and plasmids used in this study

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the V. vulnificus vvhBA operon cloned on pHK0202. The
arrows represent the transcriptional directions and the
coding regions of vvhBA genes. DNA probes, VVHAP and VVHBP,
used for Northern blot and Northern dot blot analyses are depicted as
closed bars.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Northern blot analysis of the
vvhBA transcript. Total RNAs from strain
ATCC29307 were separated and hybridized to 32P-labeled DNA
probes corresponding to the internal regions of vvhA
(A) or vvhB (B). For both panels,
total RNAs were prepared from cultures grown to exponential phase
(A600 1.2, L), and to stationary
phase (A600 2.4, S). The
numbers to the left of A correspond to
molecular size markers in kb. The arrow on the right
side indicates the 2.0-kb vvhBA transcript.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Growth kinetics and growth
phase-dependent expression of vvhBA.
Samples of the cultures were removed at the time points as indicated.
Growth of the wild-type strain is indicated by the filled
squares. Samples were analyzed for hemolysin activity
(A) and for vvhA mRNA (B). The
relative amounts of the vvhBA transcript in each
dot are expressed relative to the amount of the
vvhBA transcript after 6 h of incubation.
, cell
density;
, hemolysin activity.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
CRP dependence of hemolysin production by
V. vulnificus. Hemolysin activities
(A) and relative amounts of the vvhBA transcript
(B) were determined for the wild-type strain and the
isogenic crp mutant, KC74, as indicated. Complementation of
the crp mutation by functional crp (pKC0004) is
also presented. For both panels, samples removed at an
A600 of 1.2 were analyzed for hemolysin activity
and vvhBA transcript. Error bars represent the
S.E. WT, wild-type.

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Identification of a transcription start site
of the vvhBA operon. The transcription start
sites were determined by the primer extension of the RNA derived from
wild-type and crp mutant (KC74) strains as indicated. Total
RNAs were isolated from log phase (L,
A600 1.2) and stationary phase (S,
A600 2.4) cultures of each strain. Lanes
G, A, T, and C represent the
nucleotide sequencing ladders of pHK0202. The asterisk
indicates the site of the transcription start. WT,
wild-type.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Deletion analysis of the vvhBA
promoter region. A, construction of
vvh-lux fusion pHK-plasmids. PCR fragments carrying the
regulatory region of vvhBA and truncated derivatives thereof
were subcloned into pHK0011 (15) to create each pHK-reporter construct.
Filled blocks, the vvh coding regions; open
blocks, luxAB DNA; solid lines, the upstream
region of vvhBA. The wild-type vvhBA regulatory
region is shown on top with the proposed
10 region,
35
region, and CRP binding site (CB). The
10 and the
35
regions were proposed on the basis of the transcription start site
(P) as determined by the primer extension analysis.
B, cellular luminescence values were determined for
wild-type (filled bars) and the crp mutant
(open bars) containing each pHK-reporter, as indicated.
Cultures in log phase of growth were used to measure cellular
luminescence values. Error bars represent the S.E.
63, it is reasonable to conclude that the
cis-acting element important for activation of
Pvvh by CRP extends about 63-bp upstream of the
vvhBA transcription start.
63. As shown in Fig.
7A, addition of CRP at a
concentration of 100 nM resulted in a shift of the 188-bp
DNA fragment to a single band with slower mobility. CRP binding was
specific, because assays were performed in the presence of 1 µg of
poly(dI-dC) as a nonspecific competitor. In a second gel-mobility shift
assay, the same, but unlabeled, 188-bp DNA fragment was used as a
self-competitor to confirm specific binding of CRP to the
vvhBA promoter (Fig. 7B). The unlabeled 188-bp
DNA competed for binding of CRP in a dose-dependent manner
(Fig. 7B). It was apparent from these results that CRP binds
specifically to the vvhBA regulatory region.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Specific binding of V. vulnificus CRP protein to the vvhBA
promoter. The 188-bp DNA fragment of the vvhBA
upstream region was radioactively labeled and then used as a probe DNA.
A, increasing amounts of CRP (0, 100, 200, and 300 nM in lanes 1-4, respectively) were added to
the radiolabeled probe (7 nM). B, for
competition analysis, the same, but unlabeled, 188-bp DNA fragment was
used as competitor DNA. Various amounts of competitor DNA were added to
a reaction mixture containing 7 nM labeled DNA, prior to
the addition of CRP. Lane 1, probe DNA alone; lanes
2-5, probe DNA incubated with 300 nM of CRP and 0, 350, 700, or 1400 nM of competitor DNA, respectively.
50 and
66 (Fig. 8A). Several nucleotides
showed enhanced cleavage, which is frequently observed in DNase I
protection analysis of CRP binding sites (18). The protected region
overlapped with a consensus sequence for CRP binding, extending from
52 to
67 (Fig. 8B). This CRP binding site is centered
59.5 bp upstream from the transcriptional start site of
vvhBA. This position for CRP binding indicates that the Pvvh is a class I CRP-dependent
promoter. For class I CRP-dependent promoters, CRP binding
sites are centered near integral turns of the helix
(i.e. n × 10.5 bp) from the transcription
start site (19). These observations confirmed that CRP activates
Pvvh directly, by binding to the upstream region
of vvhBA.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
CRP binding site for the vvhBA
promoter. A, DNase I protection analysis
of CRP binding to the wild-type vvh regulatory region.
Lane 1, no CRP added; lanes 2-4, CRP at 100, 200, and 300 nM, respectively. Lanes G,
A, T, and C represent nucleotide
sequencing ladders of pHK0202. Nucleotides showing enhanced cleavage in
the presence of CRP are indicated by the thick lines, and
the region protected by CRP is indicated by the open box
(not all hypersensitive and protected bands are indicated).
B, sequence analysis of the vvhBA upstream
region. The transcription start site is indicated by the bent
arrow (P). The region protected from DNase I by CRP and
the putative promoter region (
10 and
35) are underlined
with continuous and broken lines, respectively.
Conserved nucleotide sequences for CRP binding (24) are indicated by
capital letters above the V. vulnificus DNA sequence. The ATG translation initiation codon and
putative ribosome binding site (AGGA) are indicated in
boldface.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 promoter, a putative promoter
sequence consisting of
10 and
35 segments separated by 17 nucleotides, located 6-bp upstream from the transcription start site,
was identified. The putative
35 region (TTTATA) has 67% homology to
the E. coli
35 consensus sequence (TTGACA) for promoters
recognized by RNA polymerase with RpoD (
70). The
sequence of the
10 region (TATTAA) also revealed substantial homology
to the
10 consensus sequence (TATAAT). The homology of
Pvvh with the E. coli consensus
sequences suggests that Pvvh is most probably
recognized by the V. vulnificus homolog of the
70 RNA polymerase holoenzyme. RpoD or
70
is the major housekeeping sigma factor in E. coli.
Consistent with this assertion, neither the cellular level of
vvhBA transcript nor hemolysin activity was affected by a
mutation in rpoS, which encodes an alternative sigma factor,
RpoS (
38) (data not shown). However, additional work is
needed to determine if the Pvvh is transcribed
by the RNA polymerase using RpoD as a sigma factor.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the 21C Frontier Microbial Genomics and Applications Center Program, Ministry of Science & Technology (Grant MG02-0201-004-2-1-1) (to S. H. C.), Republic of Korea.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 82-62-530-2146; Fax: 82-62-530-2149; E-mail: shchoi@chonnam.ac.kr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206893200
2 S. H. Choi, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviation used is: CRP, cAMP receptor protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Blake, P. A., Weaver, R. E., and Hollis, D. G. (1980) Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 34, 341-367[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Klontz, K. C., Lieb, S., Schreiber, M., Janowski, H. T., Baldy, S. M., and Gunn, R. A. (1988) Ann. Intern. Med. 109, 318-323[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Tacket, C. O., Brenner, F., and Blake, P. A. (1984) J. Infect. Dis. 149, 558-561[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Linkous, D. A., and Oliver, J. D. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 174, 207-214[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Shinoda, S., Miyoshi, S., Tamanaka, H., and Miyoshi, N. N. (1985) Microbiol. Immunol. 29, 583-590[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Yamamoto, K.,
Wright, A. C.,
Kaper, J. B.,
and Morris, J. G. Jr.
(1990)
Infect. Immun.
58,
2706-2709 |
| 7. |
Gray, L. D.,
and Kreger, A. S.
(1985)
Infect. Immun.
48,
62-72 |
| 8. |
Kreger, A.,
and Lockwood, D.
(1981)
Infect. Immun.
33,
583-590 |
| 9. |
Wright, A. C.,
Morris, J. G. Jr.,
Maneval, D. R. Jr.,
Richardson, K.,
and Kapar, J. B.
(1985)
Infect. Immun.
50,
922-924 |
| 10. | Yamanka, H., Katsu, T., Satoh, T., Shimatani, S., and Shinoda, S. (1987) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 44, 253-258 |
| 11. |
Bang, Y. B.,
Lee, S. E.,
Rhee, J. H.,
and Choi, S. H.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
7639-7642 |
| 12. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd. Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y. |
| 13. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Jeong, K. C.,
Jeong, H. S.,
Lee, S. E.,
Chung, S. S.,
Rhee, J. H.,
Starks, A. M.,
Escudero, G. M.,
Gulig, P. A.,
and Choi, S. H.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
5096-5106 |
| 15. |
Jeong, H. S.,
Jeong, K. C.,
Choi, H. K.,
Park, K.-J.,
Lee, K.-H.,
Rhee, J. H.,
and Choi, S. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13875-13880 |
| 16. | González-Gil, G., Kahmann, R., and Muskhelishvili, G. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 2877-2885[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Keen, N. T., Tamaki, S., Kobayashi, D., and Trollinger, D. (1988) Gene 70, 191-197[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Kim, S. Y.,
Nam, T. W.,
Shin, D.,
Koo, B. M.,
Seok, Y. J.,
and Ryu, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25398-25402 |
| 19. | Ebright, R. H. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 8, 797-802[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Wright, A. C.,
Simpson, L. M.,
Oliver, J. D.,
and Morris, J. G. JR.
(1990)
Infect. Immun.
58,
1769-1773 |
| 21. | Kothary, M. H., and Kreger, A. S. (1987) J. General Microbiol. 133, 1783-1791 |
| 22. |
Testa, J.,
Daniel, L. W.,
and Kreger, A. S.
(1984)
Infect. Immun.
45,
458-463 |
| 23. |
Wright, A. C.,
and Morris, J. G. Jr.
(1991)
Infect. Immun.
59,
192-197 |
| 24. |
Botsford, J.,
and Harman, J. G.
(1992)
Microbiol. Rev.
56,
100-122 |
| 25. | Nagai, S., Yagihashi, T., and Ishihama, A. (1998) Vet. Microbiol. 60, 227-238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Skorupski, K.,
and Taylor, R. K.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
265-270 |
| 27. | Curtiss, R., III, and Kelly, S. M. (1987) Infect. Immun. 55, 386-405 |
| 28. |
O'Byrne, C. P.,
and Dorman, C. J.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
905-912 |
| 29. |
Miller, V. L.,
and Mekalanos, J. J.
(1988)
J. Bacteriol.
170,
2575-2583 |
| 30. |
Lee, S. E.,
Shin, S. H.,
Kim, S. Y.,
Kim, Y. R.,
Shin, D. H.,
Chung, S. S.,
Lee, Z. H.,
Lee, J. Y.,
Jeong, K. C.,
Choi, S. H.,
and Rhee, J. H.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
3405-3415 |
| 31. | Miller, V. L., Taylor, R. K., and Mekalanos, J. J. (1987) Cell 48, 271-279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Pfau, J. D., and Taylor, R. K. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 20, 213-222[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Higgins, D. E., and DiRita, V. J. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 14, 17-29[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Higgins, D. E.,
and DiRita, V. J.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1080-1087 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. C. Lee, J. H. Lee, M. W. Kim, B. S. Kim, M. H. Oh, K.-S. Kim, T. S. Kim, and S. H. Choi Vibrio vulnificus rtxE Is Important for Virulence, and Its Expression Is Induced by Exposure to Host Cells Infect. Immun., April 1, 2008; 76(4): 1509 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Rhee, H. G. Jeong, J. H. Lee, and S. H. Choi AphB Influences Acid Tolerance of Vibrio vulnificus by Activating Expression of the Positive Regulator CadC. J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2006; 188(18): 6490 - 6497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Rhee, K.-S. Kim, and S. H. Choi CadC Activates pH-Dependent Expression of the Vibrio vulnificus cadBA Operon at a Distance through Direct Binding to an Upstream Region J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2005; 187(22): 7870 - 7875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Ramos, M. Martinez-Bueno, A. J. Molina-Henares, W. Teran, K. Watanabe, X. Zhang, M. T. Gallegos, R. Brennan, and R. Tobes The TetR Family of Transcriptional Repressors Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 2005; 69(2): 326 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Jeong, M. H. Lee, K.-H. Lee, S.-J. Park, and S. H. Choi SmcR and Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Coactivate Vibrio vulnificus vvpE Encoding Elastase through the RpoS-dependent Promoter in a Synergistic Manner J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45072 - 45081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Lee, K.-J. Park, A. Y. Lee, S. G. Park, B. C. Park, K.-H. Lee, and S.-J. Park Regulation of fur Expression by RpoS and Fur in Vibrio vulnificus J. Bacteriol., October 1, 2003; 185(19): 5891 - 5896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lee, N. Y. Park, M. H. Lee, and S. H. Choi Characterization of the Vibrio vulnificus putAP Operon, Encoding Proline Dehydrogenase and Proline Permease, and Its Differential Expression in Response to Osmotic Stress J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2003; 185(13): 3842 - 3852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||