Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208453200 on September 18, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47613-47618, December 6, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/49/47613    most recent
M208453200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tewari, R.
Right arrow Articles by Crisanti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tewari, R.
Right arrow Articles by Crisanti, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Function of Region I and II Adhesive Motifs of Plasmodium falciparum Circumsporozoite Protein in Sporozoite Motility and Infectivity*

Rita TewariDagger , Roberta SpaccapeloDagger §, Francesco Bistoni§, Anthony A. Holder, and Andrea CrisantiDagger ||

From the Dagger  Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, Imperial College Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom, the § Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Perugia, 06100, Italy, and the  Division of Parasitology, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom

Received for publication, August 19, 2002, and in revised form, September 12, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium falciparum contains two conserved motifs (regions I and II) that have been proposed to interact with mosquito and vertebrate host molecules in the process of sporozoite invasion of salivary glands and hepatocytes, respectively. To study the function of this protein we have replaced the endogenous circumsporozoite protein gene of Plasmodium berghei with that of P. falciparum and with versions lacking either region I or region II. We show here that P. falciparum circumsporozoite protein functions in rodent parasite and that P. berghei sporozoites carrying the P. falciparum CS gene develop normally, are motile, invade mosquito salivary glands, and infect the vertebrate host. Region I-deficient sporozoites showed no impairment of motility or infectivity in either vector or vertebrate host. Disruption of region II abolished sporozoite motility and dramatically impaired their ability to invade mosquito salivary glands and infect the vertebrate host. These data shed new light on the role of the CS protein in sporozoite motility and infectivity.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The malaria sporozoite has the unique ability to selectively invade the salivary glands of the mosquito vector and the vertebrate host cells (1). At this developmental stage the surface of the parasite is mainly covered by the circumsporozoite (CS)1 protein (2-4). In all malaria species the CS protein shows a similar structural organization consisting of a variable central region of repeats and two highly conserved motifs, regions I and II, placed at the amino- and carboxyl-terminal ends of the molecule, respectively. Region I is based around the short amino acid motif KLKQP. This motif is identical in all malaria parasites so far described in mammals (5). In the avian parasite such as Plasmodium gallinaceum the CS protein lacks region I. Region II is a 20-amino acid motif EWSXCXVTCGXG(V/I)XXRX(K/R) that shares sequence homologies to the type 1 repeat of human thrombospondin (TSP) (6). One to seven copies of this motif have now been found in a number of proteins involved in the complement pathway (properdin, C6, C7, C8A, C8B, and C9) as well as adhesive extracellular matrix proteins like ADAMTS, mindin, F-spondin, or SCO-spondin and micronemal proteins of apicomplexan parasites (7-13). One of these micronemal proteins, the thrombospondin-related adhesive protein (TRAP), contains a single TSP type 1 repeat and is expressed at the sporozoite stage of malaria parasites (8, 14).

Several proteins containing a TSP type 1 motif, including TRAP have the ability to selectively recognize glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (12, 13, 15, 16). Similarly, recombinant forms of CS protein, as well as synthetic peptides encompassing region II, specifically bind to highly sulfated GAGs such as heparin and heparan sulfate (11, 17-21). It is intriguing that sporozoites express two distinct molecules, TRAP and CS protein, both containing a TSP type 1 repeat and having similar adhesive properties. The reasons for this are not clear. Gene disruption and biochemical evidence indicate that TRAP functions as a parasite receptor molecules and plays a crucial role in gliding, a form of substrate-dependent forward locomotion intimately linked to the process of sporozoite invasion of mosquito salivary glands and vertebrate host cells (22-24). The function of the CS protein is far less well established. The location on the parasite surface, the presence of the highly conserved region I and II sequences, and the adhesive property for GAGs have suggested that the CS protein ought to play an important role in the processes of sporozoite recognition and invasion of mosquito salivary glands and vertebrate host cells (17, 18, 25-27). Disruption of the CS gene did not add to the knowledge on the CS protein as receptor in the sporozoites. Plasmodium berghei parasites in which the CS gene has been targeted fail to develop into mature oocysts, and very few sporozoites if any are produced (28). The elucidation of the function of CS protein and its conserved motifs, regions I and II, would be of great importance for a better understanding of sporozoite interactions with mosquito salivary glands and vertebrate host cells. This information will also be useful to unravel functional relationships between TRAP and CS protein.

To examine the role of CS protein and its conserved motifs, we have generated transgenic P. berghei parasites in which the endogenous CS protein gene (PbCS) has been replaced with either the P. falciparum CS protein gene (PfCS) or with versions of PfCS without either region I or II. These parasites were studied throughout development in the mosquito as well as for their ability to infect mice.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA Constructs-- The targeting constructs pPfCSP, pPfCSP(RI-), and PfCSP(RII-) used in this study contained the following structural elements: (i) a 5'-untranslated region (UTR) of the PbCS gene encompassing nucleotides 1-1130 immediately upstream of the PbCS start codon; (ii) the WT or mutated versions of PfCS coding sequence (1660 bp) from Plasmodium falciparum Wellcome strain linked to 250 nucleotides of its 3'-UTR; and (iii) the 3'-UTR sequence of PbCS gene encompassing nucleotides 1-1150 downstream of its stop codon in which the DHFR-TS transcription unit (5400 bp) was inserted at its HindIII site (+302) (29). Deletions of region I (KLKQP) and region II (WSPCSVTCGNGIQVRIK) were introduced in the PfCS coding sequence by site-directed mutagenesis (Sculptor in vitro mutagenesis kit, Amersham Biosciences) and verified by sequence analysis.

Parasite Transformation-- The P. berghei ANKA strain (clone 2.34) was transformed in electroporation experiments by using 50-70 µg of a DNA insert. Plasmid DNA was digested to release the targeting inserts (~9.2 kb) from the plasmid backbone and purified by gel electrophoresis and phenol/chloroform extraction. Purified schizonts were transformed with the constructs pPfCSP, pPfCSP(RI-), and pPfCSP(RII-) using a Bio-Rad electroporator set at 1.1 kV and 25 microfarads and subsequently injected intravenously in phenylhydrazine (to increase reticulocyte production)-treated Wistar rats as described previously (29). Pyrimethamine-resistant parasites were selected in the recipient rats and BALB/c mice as described previously (29) and cloned in BALB/c mice by limiting dilution.

Southern Blot Analysis-- Genomic DNA was isolated from parasites as previously described (29). For Southern blot analysis 5 µg of genomic DNA was digested with EcoRV, separated on agarose gel, and blotted onto a nylon Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Biosciences). The following DNA fragments were used as probes: (a) a 1.1-kb 5'-UTR sequence of PbCS amplified using the primers 5'-UTR1CS (TTT AAA TAT ATG CGT GTA TAT ATA G) and 5'-UTR2CS (CGC TTT TAC TTT GTC CAG GTA TTA TGC); (b) a-666 bp fragment amplified from PbCS coding sequence with the primers CSFor81 (CCA GGA TAT GGA CAA AAT AAA) and CSRev83 (ATT GTT ATT ACC ACC TGG C); (c) a 510-bp fragment amplified from PfCS with the primers PFCS3 (GGA CAA GGT CAC AAT ATG CC) and PFCS5 (CAT ATA TAT TTC TAC AAT TAA TCG); (d) a 1.1-kb fragment amplified from the 3'-UTR sequence of PbCS gene with the primers 3'-UTR1CS (ATA AAC ATT ACG CAT GAT TAT A) and 3'-UTR2CS (GAG TAC TCA CGA ATC CGA AAT AAG); and (e) a 520-bp fragment amplified from the DHFR-TS gene with the primers TgFor123 (AGA GGG GCA TCG GCA TCA AC) and TgRev124 (TTG AAA GAA TGT CAT CTC CG). All hybridization experiments were carried out as described (24). Parasite chromosomes were separated by pulse-field gel electrophoresis using a CHEF DRIII apparatus (Bio-Rad) set at 60-600 s and 4 V/cm and run for 48 h. The gel was blotted and hybridized with probes b and c to detect PbCS and PfCS sequences.

Parasite Development in the Mosquito-- Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes (strain sd 500) were fed for 1 h on WT and transgenic infected Balb/c mice having a parasitemia ranging from 6 to 7%. Mosquitoes were dissected at day 8, 14, and 21 post infection and processed to reveal the presence of oocysts and sporozoites in the guts and salivary glands. The dissection procedures and parasite counts were carried out in RPMI 1640 medium without serum.

Parasite Infectivity in Mice-- Increasing numbers of WT and transgenic salivary gland and gut sporozoites were resuspended in RPMI and injected intravenously in the tail vein of naïve C57BL/6 (minimum age of 6 weeks). At regular time intervals (12 h) after sporozoite injection (for up to day 15), blood samples were withdrawn from the tail of injected animals and analyzed on Giemsa-stained thin smears to reveal the presence of parasites. The pre-patent period was assessed by determining the number of days between sporozoite injection, and the time when at least three to five parasites could be detected by analyzing a minimum of 10,000 erythrocytes on Giemsa-stained blood smears.

Immunofluorescence-- Freshly dissected 21-day post-infection oocyst sporozoites resuspended in RPMI were spotted onto microscope multiwell slides. Sporozoites were incubated for 30 min either at room temperature or at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation time the excess of medium was removed, and slides were air-dried and kept at -20 °C. For immunofluorescence (IF) analysis the parasite samples were fixed in 1% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline. Nonspecific binding was prevented by treating the slides for 30 min with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Triton X-100. Sporozoites were incubated for 1 h with either the monoclonal antibody 7E4 directed against PbTRAP (24) or monoclonal antibody 3D11 directed against PbCS (2) or the rabbit serum NANP raised against a fusion protein between PfCS and PMMSA (30). The slides were subsequently incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulins, Becton Dickinson). IF analysis was carried out by using a Leica TCS SP 2 confocal microscope.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Development of Transgenic Parasites-- We have designed DNA constructs to achieve the deletion of the endogenous PbCS, the insertion of wild type (WT) or mutated PfCS versions, and the insertion of the selectable marker transcription unit, in a single transformation event. This strategy has several advantages. It generates non-reversible molecular events in contrast to gene targeting mediated by single crossover homologous recombination (22) and overcomes the parasite repair mechanism that has been shown in P. berghei to correct small mutations within the targeted gene with WT sequences (31). The replacement of the endogenous CS protein gene with a largely divergent homologous gene allows the structure-function analysis to be focused on the conserved motifs, thus facilitating the study of the transgenic parasites carrying a deletion of either region I or II. Moreover, the detection of the PfCS protein in P. berghei sporozoites offers the opportunity to analyze the expression of the replaced gene in single sporozoites. The construct pPfCSP contained the entire PfCS coding sequence, whereas the constructs pPfCSP(RI-) and pPfCSP(RII-) carried a PfCS sequence without region I or II, respectively (Fig. 1A). Transformation, selection, and cloning experiments (24, 29) yielded the transgenic parasite clones CSP-9 (replacement with PfCS), CSP(RI-)-6 (replacement with PfCS without region I) and CSP(RII-)-7 (replacement with PfCS without region II). Southern blot analysis demonstrated that the three targeting constructs correctly integrated in the transgenic parasites thereby placing the PfCS coding sequences under the control of the endogenous PbCS regulatory sequences and directing the downstream insertion of the selectable marker DHFR-TS (Fig. 1B). Probe a, encompassing 1.1 kb of the 5'-UTR of PbCS, hybridized with a single band of 4.2 kb in the digest of WT parasites in agreement with the predicted position of the EcoRV sites in the PbCS locus. The same probe hybridized with a single band of about 4.8 kb in the EcoRV digest of the transgenic parasites. The size shift is due to the insertion of PfCS coding sequence and its 3'-UTR that together exceeded the size of the endogenous PbCS gene by 560 nucleotides. This result was confirmed by the observation that probe b, encompassing the coding sequence of PbCS, hybridized with a single band of 4.2 kb in the WT digest but failed to show any reactivity with the DNA of the transgenic parasites. Probe c, encompassing the coding sequence of PfCS, hybridized only with a 4.8-kb band in the transgenic parasite digests. The hybridization pattern of probe d, encompassing the coding sequence of DHFR-TS, and probe e, encompassing the 3'-UTR of PbCS, indicated that the DHFR-TS transcription unit had correctly integrated in CSP-9, CSP(RI-)-6, and CSP(RII-)-7 (Fig. 1B). Chromosome blots hybridized with probes b and c confirmed that, in the transgenic parasites, the PfCS coding sequences had selectively replaced the endogenous PbCS gene on chromosome 4 (Fig. 1C). The integrity of the inserted DNA was confirmed by PCR and sequence analysis (data not shown).


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The PbCS locus and the integration of PfCS. A, map of the pPfCSP construct and schematic representation of the WT and targeted PbCS locus. To direct the 5' recombination event, a 1.1-kb 5'-UTR sequence (light gray box) of PbCS (dashed box pointing upward) was inserted in front of the 1.6-kb WT PfCS coding sequence linked to 250 nucleotides of its 3'-UTR (dark gray box). A 302-bp sequence corresponding to the PbCS 3'-UTR (black box) was placed downstream of PfCS to minimize unforeseen problems in transcriptional regulation and stability. A further 848 bp of the PbCS 3'-UTR (dashed box pointing downward) was inserted downstream of the DHFR-TS transcription unit (white box), to provide the end for the 3' recombination event. E indicates the position of the EcoRV cleavage sites. Thick black lines (a-e) indicate the position of the probes used in Southern blot experiments. The lower panel shows the alignment of PbCS protein region I and II motifs with the corresponding PfCS protein sequences carried by the transformation constructs pPfCSP, pPfCSP(RI-), and pPfCSP(RII-). Deletions of region I (KLKQP) and region II (WSPCSVTCGNGIQVRIK) were introduced in the PfCS coding sequence by site-directed mutagenesis. B, Southern blot analyses of the parasites. Genomic DNA from WT and transgenic parasites was digested with EcoRV, and hybridized with five different probes denoted a-e below each panel, to ascertain the correct integration of the constructs. Size markers are in kilobases (kb). C, Southern blot analyses of chromosomes from WT and transgenic parasites separated by pulse-field gel electrophoresis. The position of chromosome 4 migration is indicated by an arrow.

Development of the Transgenic Parasites in the Mosquito-- Blood stage parasites from CSP-9, CSP(RI-)-6, and CSP(RII-)-7 replicated normally in mice and generated gametocytes that developed into fertile gametes and morphologically normal ookinetes (data not shown). A. stephensi mosquitoes were fed on mice infected with these three different transgenic parasites. The development of the parasite in the mosquito was monitored starting from day 8 post infection, examining the oocyst where the expression of CS is first detected. Sporozoite-containing oocysts were detected in the gut at day 14 post infection (Fig. 2A). In four independent experiments CSP-9, CSP(RI-)-6, and CSP(RII-)-7 generated an average of 78, 104, and 67 oocysts per gut, respectively, values that were very similar to those observed for WT P. berghei parasites (Table I). This indicates that, unlike a CS knock-out where no sporozoites were detected in oocysts (28), parasite development in the gut was not affected by the replacement with PfCS gene or with the variants without regions I or II. Compared with WT parasites, clones CSP-9 and CSP(RI-)-6 showed a 10- to 16-fold reduction in the number of salivary gland sporozoites, whereas a 290-fold reduction was observed with CSP(RII-)-7 parasites (Table I). P. falciparum and P. berghei WT sporozoites infected equally well the salivary glands of the mosquitoes utilized in this study (data not shown) thus arguing against the possibility that the reduced infectivity of the transgenic sporozoites is due to a salivary gland refractoriness of our laboratory mosquito strain for the selected PfCS coding sequence. The infectivity of CSP-9 sporozoites was high enough to assess the effect of the deletion of regions I and II. Compared with CSP-9 and CSP(RI-)-6, CSP(RII-)-7 showed a greater than 95% reduction in the number of salivary gland sporozoites; statistical analysis indicated that such a difference is significant (p < 0.05). We further investigated the phenotype of the transgenic sporozoites by analyzing the expression of PfCS protein by immunofluorescence (IF) and by assessing their ability to glide on glass surfaces, which reflects their motility status. This analysis demonstrated an initial normal location of the CS protein in all transgenic parasites. Freshly dissected gut sporozoites from each of the transgenic clones showed a uniform and bright surface staining when incubated with an antiserum against PfCS protein (data not shown). Following incubation at 37 °C for 1 h, more than 50% of CSP-9 and CSP(RI-)-6 gut sporozoites (21 days post infection) showed CS protein-reactive trails from gliding on a glass surface (Fig. 2B). The shape of the trails, which consist of the immunoreactive CS material, indicated that about 10% of the sporozoites were able to form one or more complete loops, whereas the rest of the sporozoites left trails of variable shape and length. The frequencies of motile parasites were similar for WT, CSP-9, and CSP(RI-)-6 sporozoites and in agreement with previous reports on the motility of gut sporozoites (14). In contrast, CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites did not show any form of gliding motility upon temperature switch to 37 °C. At this temperature the uniform PfCS protein surface staining observed at 25 °C was replaced by clumps of immunoreactive material either outside the parasite body or in proximity to its surface (Fig. 2B). The inability of CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites to glide was analyzed further by IF to study the expression and the location of TRAP, a micronemal parasite-encoded molecule that is implicated in sporozoite motility (22-24). TRAP expression was not altered in CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites, a typical TRAP staining pattern with antibody-reactive material distributed within the cytoplasm both anterior and posterior to the nucleus (14) was observed in WT and in all transgenic sporozoites (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Oocyst development and sporozoite motility. A, phase-contrast microphotographs of mosquito guts containing WT and transgenic parasite oocysts, showing no significant morphological differences. B, confocal immunofluorescence (IF) microphotographs of WT and transgenic gut sporozoites incubated at 37 °C and developed using antibodies directed against PbCS protein, PfCS protein, and PbTRAP. Motile sporozoites shed circular trails of material recognized by antibodies directed against CS.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Parasite development in mosquitoes
Values represent the mean ± S.E. of four different independent experiments, each with a minimum of 50 mosquitoes.

Infectivity of the Transgenic Parasites for the Vertebrate Host-- The role of regions I and II for parasite infectivity of the mammalian host was investigated following intravenous injection into naïve C57BL/6 mice of either salivary gland or gut sporozoites both collected at day 21 post infection. In addition, infected mosquitoes carrying the different transgenic parasites were allowed to feed on naïve mice. A blood stage infection was initiated in a substantial fraction of the mice by as few as 100 WT salivary gland sporozoites (Table II), whereas with 1000 sporozoites all mice were infected. When 5000 sporozoites were inoculated, the number of days between injection of sporozoites and the first appearance of the parasites in the blood (the pre-patent period), decreased from 5.0 to 3.5 days. Identical rates of infection and pre-patent periods were observed by injecting similar numbers of CSP-9 and CSP(RI-)-6 salivary gland sporozoites (Table II). CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites always failed to infect the mice (Table II). The infectivity of gut sporozoites was much less efficient than salivary gland sporozoites. This observation is in agreement with earlier reports showing that gut sporozoites are less infective than salivary gland sporozoites (32). Although a fraction of mice was infected with WT, CSP-9, and CSP(RI-)-6 gut sporozoites, the region II-deleted parasites CSP(RII-)-7 always failed to infect the mice even after the injection of 1 million sporozoites (Table III). Similarly, CSP(RII-)-7-infected mosquitoes failed to initiate infection in the mice after blood feeding. These findings clearly indicate that, although the deletion of region I of CS protein does not impair sporozoite infectivity, region II has a critical role in this process.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Infectivity of salivary gland sporozoites

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Infectivity of midgut sporozoites


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Our data have important implications for understanding the function of the CS protein and its domains in the process of sporozoite motility and infectivity. All transgenic parasite lines developed normally to the oocyst stage. CSP-9 sporozoites infected mosquito salivary glands less efficiently than WT P. berghei sporozoites. Possibly the sequence changes introduced outside the conserved region I and II by replacing PbCS with PfCS could have reduced the ability of the PfCS protein to function optimally within the P. berghei background during sporozoite invasion of A. stephensi salivary glands. The removal of region I did not modify CSP(RI-)-6 sporozoite motility and infectivity for mosquito salivary gland compared with CSP-9 parasites. This last finding would rule out a role of this motif in the process of sporozoite recognition of a mosquito salivary gland ligand. Such a conclusion is in agreement with the notion that the CS protein expressed by CSP(RI-)-6 sporozoites has a structural organization similar to the P. gallinaceum CS protein (5). The absence of region I in P. gallinaceum CS protein does not affect parasite development into oocyst and sporozoite invasion of salivary glands.

The removal of region II almost abolished the ability of sporozoites to infect salivary glands. A role of region II in the process of CS protein recognition of salivary gland ligands could not be inferred on the basis of these findings. The deletion of this sequence also abolished sporozoite gliding thus making it difficult to assess whether the impairment of salivary gland invasion was the direct consequence of disrupting a crucial receptor-ligand interaction or indirectly due to the lack of motility. CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites did not glide upon temperature switch to 37 °C as indicated by the lack of CS protein trails and the clumps of CS-reactive material along the surface and outside the parasite body. In these sporozoites the flow of CS protein from the apical complex to the caudal end of the parasite appeared to be replaced by a spatial, uncoordinated capping process.

The phenotype of CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites sheds new light on the composition and the function of the sporozoite locomotion machinery. TRAP has been previously hypothesized to function in the process of sporozoite motility by linking host ligands bound to its adhesive domains (TSP type 1 repeat sequence and A domain) with the parasite actin-myosin motor (23, 24, 33). Notably, TRAP knock-out P. berghei sporozoites do not move (22). This phenotype is identical to that of CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites thus indicating that TRAP alone is necessary but not sufficient for sporozoite motility. Our findings now demonstrate that for sporozoites to move TRAP must be functionally coupled to a CS protein containing an intact region II. This could be achieved through a direct interaction or be mediated by additional parasite molecular partners. The deletion of region II in the CS protein could impair sporozoite motility either by disrupting these interactions or by impairing the ability of the CS protein to directly mediate attachment of the sporozoites to host ligands. The disruption of region II also abolished sporozoite infectivity for the vertebrate host as shown by the observation that CSP(RII-)-7 sporozoites always failed to infect the mice (Table II).

CSP-9 and CSP(RI-)-6 sporozoites infected C57BL/6 mice equally well as the parental WT parasites thus demonstrating that the PfCS protein is able to complement the activity of the endogenous P. berghei CS protein very efficiently. The disruption of region I did not impair sporozoite infectivity in the vertebrate host. This was a surprise, because region I is present in the CS protein of mammalian parasite and is absent in avian parasites. Sporozoites of mammalian parasites infect host hepatocytes, whereas avian parasites selectively invade and develop inside the macrophages. This correlation between CS protein structure and sporozoite infectivity for different host cell types has suggested a role of region I in sporozoite recognition and entry of vertebrate hepatocytes. If this were the case our findings indicate that this function can be complemented by region II at least in the parasite-vertebrate host combination utilized in this study. This would be in agreement with previous reports showing that the ligand of region I could be a GAG-related molecule sharing structural similarities with the ligand of region II (21, 34, 35).

The P. falciparum CS protein has been regarded as one of the best vaccine candidates for malaria (1, 36). Transgenic P. berghei sporozoites expressing P. falciparum CS protein represent a unique tool to systematically assess formulation, regimen, and molecular composition of a human malaria vaccine using a high throughput animal experimental model.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. C. K. Cemal and Dr. F. Gouze for the supply of materials and assistance; I. Morris, Dr. M. Arai, and D. Bacon for illustrations and photographs. We are also grateful to Dr. K. Robson and Dr. L. Miller for discussing the manuscript and Dr. U. Frevert for disclosing data before publication.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-207-594-5426; Fax: 44-207-594-5439; E-mail: acrs@ic.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208453200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CS, circumsporozoite; TSP, thrombospondin; TRAP, thrombospondin-related adhesive protein; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; UTR, untranslated repeat; WT, wild type; DHFR-TS, dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase; IF, immunofluorescence.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Nussenzweig, V., and Nussenzweig, R. S. (1989) Adv. Immun. 45, 283-334[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Yoshida, N., Nussenzweig, R. S., Potocnjak, P., Nussenzweig, V., and Aikawa, M. (1980) Science 207, 71-73[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Aikawa, M., Yoshida, N., Nussenzweig, R. S., and Nussenzweig, V. (1981) Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 126, 2494-2495
4. Yoshida, N., Potocnjak, P., Nussenzweig, V., and Nussenzweig, R. S. (1981) J. Exp. Med. 154, 1225-1236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. McCutchan, T. F., Kissinger, J. C., Touray, M. G., Rogers, M. J., Li, J., Sullivan, M., Braga, E. M., Krettli, A. U., and Miller, L. H. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 11889-11894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Lawler, J., and Hynes, R. O. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1635-1648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Goundis, D., and Reid, K. B. (1988) Nature 335, 82-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Robson, K. J. H., Hall, J. R. S., Jennings, M. W., Harris, T. J. R., Marsh, K., Newbold, C. I., Tate, V. E., and Weatherall, D. J. (1988) Nature 355, 79-82
9. Gobron, S., Monnerie, H., Meiniel, R., Creveaux, I., Lehmann, W., Lamalle, D., Dastugue, B., and Meiniel, A. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 1053-1061[Abstract]
10. Kuno, K., Iizasa, H., Ohno, S., and Matsushima, K. (1997) Genomics 46, 466-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Gantt, S. M., Clavijo, P., Bai, X., Esko, J. D., and Sinnis, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19205-19213[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Adams, J. C., and Tucker, R. P. (2000) Dev. Dyn. 218, 280-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Adams, J. C. (2001) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 25-51[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Robson, K. J. H., Frevert, U., Reckmann, I., Cowan, G., Beier, J., Scragg, I. G., Takehara, K., Bishop, D. H. L., Pradel, G., Sinden, R. E., Saccheo, S., Müller, H. M., and Crisanti, A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3883-3894[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Rostand, K. S., and Esko, J. D. (1997) Infect. Immun. 65, 1-8[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Bernfield, M., Gotte, M., Park, P. W., Reizes, O., Fitzgerald, M. L., Lincecum, J., and Zako, M. (1999) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 729-777[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Pancake, S. J., Holt, G. D., Mellouk, S., and Hoffman, S. L. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 1351-1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Frevert, U., Sinnis, P., Cerami, C., Shreffler, W., Takacs, B., and Nussenzweig, V. (1993) J. Exp. Med. 177, 1287-1298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Sinnis, P., Clavijo, P., Fenyö, D., Chait, B. T., Cerami, C., and Nussenzweig, V. (1994) J. Exp. Med. 180, 297-306[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Sinnis, P., and Sim, K.-L. B. (1997) Trends Microbiol. 5, 52-58[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ying, P., Shakibaei, M., Patankar, M. S., Clavijo, P., Beavis, R. C., Clark, G. F., and Frevert, U. (1997) Exp. Parasitol. 85, 168-182[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Sultan, A. A., Thathy, V., Frevert, U., Robson, K. J., Crisanti, A., Nussenzweig, V., Nussenzweig, R. S., and Menard, R. (1997) Cell 90, 511-522[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Spaccapelo, R., Naitza, S., Robson, K. J., and Crisanti, A. (1997) Lancet 350, 335[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Wengelnik, K., Spaccapelo, R., Naitza, S., Robson, K. J., Janse, C. J., Bistoni, F., Waters, A. P., and Crisanti, A. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5195-5204[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Cerami, C., Frevert, U., Sinnis, P., Takacs, B., Clavijo, P., Santos, P., and Nussenzweig, V. (1992) Cell 70, 1021-1033[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Sidjanski, S. P., Vanderberg, J. P., and Sinnis, P. (1997) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 90, 33-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Pinzon-Ortiz, C., Friedman, J., Esko, J., and Sinnis, P. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 26784-26791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Menard, R., Sultan, A. A., Cortes, C., Altszuler, R., van Dijk, M. R., Janse, C. J., Waters, A. P., Nussenzweig, R. S., and Nussenzweig, V. (1997) Nature 385, 336-340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Waters, A. P., Thomas, A. W., van Dijk, M. R., and Janse, C. J. (1997) Methods 13, 134-147[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Holder, A. A., Lockyer, M. J., and Hardy, G. W. (1988) Parasitology 97, 373-382
31. Nunes, A., Thathy, V., Bruderer, T., Sultan, A. A., Nussenzweig, R. S., and Menard, R. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2895-2902[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Vanderberg, J. P. (1975) J. Parasitol. 61, 43-50[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Morrissette, N. S., and Sibley, L. D. (2002) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 21-38[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Rathore, D., McCutchan, T. F., Garboczi, D. N., Toida, T., Hernaiz, M. J., LeBrun, L. A., Lang, S. C., and Linhardt, R. J. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 11518-11524[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Rathore, D., Sacci, J. B., de la Vega, P., and McCutchan, T. F. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 7092-7098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Nussenzweig, R. S., and Zavala, F. (1997) N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 128-130[Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
G. Mlambo and N. Kumar
Transgenic Rodent Plasmodium berghei Parasites as Tools for Assessment of Functional Immunogenicity and Optimization of Human Malaria Vaccines
Eukaryot. Cell, November 1, 2008; 7(11): 1875 - 1879.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
J. E. Garcia, A. Puentes, and M. E. Patarroyo
Developmental Biology of Sporozoite-Host Interactions in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: Implications for Vaccine Design
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2006; 19(4): 686 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. Tewari, S. A. Ogun, R. S. Gunaratne, A. Crisanti, and A. A. Holder
Disruption of Plasmodium berghei merozoite surface protein 7 gene modulates parasite growth in vivo
Blood, January 1, 2005; 105(1): 394 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Rathore, S. C. L. Hrstka, J. B. Sacci Jr., P. De la Vega, R. J. Linhardt, S. Kumar, and T. F. McCutchan
Molecular Mechanism of Host Specificity in Plasmodium falciparum Infection: ROLE OF CIRCUMSPOROZOITE PROTEIN
J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 40905 - 40910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/49/47613    most recent
M208453200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tewari, R.
Right arrow Articles by Crisanti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tewari, R.
Right arrow Articles by Crisanti, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement