|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206636200 on September 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47619-47625, December 6, 2002
A Single Amino Acid Difference between Human and Monkey
Interleukin (IL)-1 Dictates Effective Binding to Soluble Type II
IL-1 Receptor*
Dirk E.
Smith ,
Randal R.
Ketchem,
Heather
Moore,
Zachary
Anderson§,
Blair R.
Renshaw,
Della J.
Friend, and
John E.
Sims
From the Amgen Corporation, Seattle, Washington 98101
Received for publication, July 3, 2002, and in revised form, September 23, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Soluble type II interleukin (IL)-1 receptor
(sIL1R-II) binds human IL-1 with high affinity and neutralizes its
activity. Recombinant sIL1R-II is considered a potentially useful
anti-IL-1 therapeutic, and preclinical studies have been undertaken
with this molecule in primates. To better understand the
cytokine-receptor interactions occurring in this nonhuman context,
monkey IL-1 and IL1R-II were cloned, and their binding abilities were
examined in vitro. IL-1 from cynomolgus monkey was
capable of binding and activating the human type I IL-1 receptor.
However, unlike human IL-1 , it was unable to effectively bind and
become neutralized by sIL1R-II. Human and cynomolgus IL-1 proteins
are 96% identical, differing by only six amino acids. Structural and
mutational analysis revealed that the unique sIL1R-II binding ability
of human IL-1 is due to a single amino acid difference compared with
monkey IL-1 .
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Interleukin (IL)-11 is a
multi-functional proinflammatory cytokine that mediates innate and
adaptive immune responses in multiple cell types. It is believed to
play a role in numerous diseases including arthritis, asthma/allergy,
osteoporosis, and stroke (see Ref. 1 for review). The IL-1 family
actually consists of two proteins with similar biological activity,
IL-1 and IL-1 , as well as a nonsignaling ligand termed the IL-1
receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) (see Ref. 2 for review). All three
proteins exhibit a similar tertiary structure comprised of 12 strands that make up a barrel-shaped -trefoil with pseudo-3-fold
symmetry (3). IL-1 is thought to be the primary circulating cytokine
that mediates the systemic effects of IL-1.
IL-1 exerts its biological action by binding and activating the
membrane-associated IL1R-I (4). A second receptor, termed the IL-1R
accessory protein (AcP), is not involved in direct ligand binding but
is required for IL-1 signal transduction by complexing with IL-1 and
the IL1R-I (5). IL1R-I and AcP both contain extracellular portions with
three Ig-like domains and cytoplasmic portions containing conserved
signaling motifs (6). A third IL-1 receptor exists termed the type II
IL-1R (IL1R-II) that has a extracellular structure similar to that of
IL1R-I and AcP but that contains a truncated cytoplasmic tail incapable
of signaling. This receptor acts as a decoy by binding IL-1 with high
affinity and neutralizing its activity (7). IL1R-II can also be
proteolytically cleaved, which releases the extracellular domain from
the cell surface. This creates a soluble form of the receptor
(sIL1R-II) that possesses high affinity for IL-1 , but only low
affinity for IL-1 , and virtually no affinity for IL-1ra. For this
reason, sIL1R-II is considered an ideal antagonist of the IL-1 system
(8).
Animal models and ex vivo studies with human cells have
demonstrated that sIL1R-II may be useful as a therapeutic agent (9, 10), and recombinant human sIL1R-II is being developed as a therapeutic
for inflammatory disease. Preclinical studies have been undertaken to
evaluate the toxicologic and pharmacokinetic effects of this receptor
in nonhuman primates. Among these have been the examination of the
interaction between cynomolgus and rhesus monkey IL-1 and human
sIL1R-II. Surprisingly, we found that monkey IL-1 lacks the sIL1R-II
binding ability of human IL-1 . A structural and mutational analysis
revealed this to be due to a single amino acid difference between the
two cytokines.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of Monkey Genes--
IL-1 and IL-1 genes were
cloned from cynomolgus monkey by reverse transcription-PCR using
sequences previously deposited into GenBankTM (accession
numbers AB000553 and D63353, respectively). Primers were designed to
amplify a cDNA corresponding to the predicted (based on analogy to
the human sequence) mature form of each IL-1. The products were
amplified from cDNA from cynomolgus primary cells isolated from
whole blood (kindly provided by Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories,
Everett, Washington). Briefly, PBMCs were isolated from heparinized
blood by density centrifugation. T cells were removed by rosetting with
2-aminoethylisothiouronium bromide (AET)-treated sheep
erythrocytes and further density centrifugation. The cells were
cultured in RPMI with 10% fetal bovine serum and were incubated for
3.5 h in lipopolysaccharide and human CD40L (both at 1 µg/ml),
and total RNA was extracted and used for cDNA synthesis. The
sequence of rhesus monkey IL-1 was also present in
GenBankTM (accession number MMU19845). The predicted mature
protein sequences for cynomolgus and rhesus IL-1 are identical
except for the presence of an additional serine at the C terminus of rhesus IL-1 . The IL1R-II gene was amplified by PCR from either activated cynomolgus PBMC cDNA (described above) or cDNA made from total RNA extracted from a rhesus monkey tonsil biopsy (tissue kindly provided by Tom McVittie of the University of Maryland). PCR
primers were derived from the publicly available IL1R-II sequence from
the African green monkey (accession number U64092). For all cDNAs,
multiple PCR products or subclones were sequenced from each species to
obtain consensus sequences free of PCR-introduced errors.
Mammalian Expression and Purification--
Cynomolgus and rhesus
IL-1 proteins were expressed from cDNAs corresponding to the
predicted mature portion of the cytokines (amino acids 117-268 and
117-269, respectively). A construct for expression of cynomolgus
IL-1 was also made using the predicted mature portion of this
cytokine (amino acids 113-271). All of the IL-1 constructs were cloned
in a mammalian expression vector (pDC409) (11) and were engineered with
a heterologous initiating methionine to drive translation of the open
reading frame. Cynomolgus and rhesus IL1R-II sequences were found to be
identical at the amino acid level. Soluble rhesus IL1R-II was expressed
from a cDNA encoding amino acids 1-346 (C terminus indicated in
Fig. 1). The sequence was cloned in the 2a5ib plasmid (12) for stable expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
Monkey IL-1s were expressed in COS1 cells (ATCC identification number
CRL-1650) for 1 week (grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
with 5% fetal bovine serum) following transfection with DEAE-dextran.
The IL-1s were purified from culture medium using human sIL1R-I
covalently attached to Affi-Gel-10 resin (Bio-Rad). Eluted fractions
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and pure fractions were pooled and dialyzed
into PBS, and concentration was determined by amino acid analysis.
Rhesus sIL1R-II was affinity-purified using human IL-1 covalently
attached to Affi-Gel-10 (Bio-Rad). Pure elution fractions were pooled
and dialyzed into PBS, and concentrations were determined by amino acid analysis.
Escherichia coli Expression and Purification--
For expression
in E. coli, cynomolgus or human mature IL-1 was cloned in
pGEX4T-1 (Amersham Biosciences) with an N-terminal glutathione
S-transferase fusion. A Factor Xa cleavage recognition sequence was integrated upstream of the first amino acid of IL-1 . Glutathione S-transferase proteins from E. coli
lysates (strain DH10B) were bound to glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham
Biosciences) and cleaved on-column with Factor Xa (Novagen, Madison,
WI). Cleaved IL-1 was eluted with PBS, and the Factor Xa was removed
with affinity agarose (Novagen). Purified IL-1 proteins were dialyzed against PBS and quantitated by the BCA method (Pierce).
IL1R-II Plate Binding Assay--
Human sIL1R-II (at 50 ng/ml)
was bound to immobilized M25 antibody (a non-neutralizing anti-IL1R-II
Ab) on Maxisorp 96-well enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plates (Nalge
Nunc International, Rochester, NY). Similarly, rhesus sIL1R-II protein
(at 100 ng/ml) was captured on plates with immobilized M3 antibody (a
non-neutralizing antibody that binds rhesus IL1R-II). Human IL-1
(R & D Systems) that had been biotin-conjugated was added to the
plate at 10 ng/ml in the presence or absence of unlabeled competitor
IL-1 from different sources. Bound IL-1 was detected and quantitated
using streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) at 667 ng/ml followed by
the addition of a peroxidase substrate/chromogen solution
(Kirkegaard and Perry Labs, Gaithersburg, MD). Color development
was arrested with phosphoric acid (1 M), and the optical
density values were determined using a spectrophotometer plate reader.
Human type II IL-1R protein was expressed in Chinese hamster ovary
cells and purified as described for rhesus IL1R-II. M3 and M25
anti-human IL1R-II antibodies were produced at Immunex. All of the
samples were diluted in PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 with 0.1% bovine
serum albumin.
Soluble Receptor Binding--
1 × 106 COS1
cells were transiently transfected with 1 µg of expression plasmid
for human or cynomolgus mature IL-1 using DEAE-dextran. After
48 h the cells were placed in Cys- and Met-free medium for 45 min
and then metabolically labeled for 6 h at 37 °C using 1 ml of
medium containing [35S]methionine and
[35S]cysteine (Amersham Biosciences). The media
containing the labeled cytokines were collected and spun for 10 min at
12,000 rpm to pellet cells and debris. The labeled media were
precleared with protein G-agarose beads (Roche Molecular Biochemicals),
and 750 µl was used in a binding reaction with 2 µg of soluble
recombinant receptor protein (either human IL1R-1-Fc or untagged human
or monkey sIL1R-II), 4 µg of M3 anti-human IL1R-II antibody for the sIL1R-II-containing reactions, and 100 µl of a 1:1 suspension of
protein G-agarose:PBS. Human type I IL-1R-Fc fusion was expressed in
COS1 cells and purified by protein A affinity chromatography. The
no-receptor control reactions were precleared but incubated in the
absence of any receptor, antibody, or protein G-agarose. The samples
were incubated overnight with rotation at 4 °C and then washed three
times with RIPA buffer (1.0% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1%
SDS, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl).
The agarose beads were resuspended in 50 µl of protein sample buffer with 5% -mercaptoethanol, vortexed, and boiled for 5 min. For SDS-PAGE analysis of the binding reactions, 20 µl was loaded onto 4-20% gradient Tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen). Following
electrophoresis, the gels were fixed, treated with Amplify (Amersham
Biosciences), and exposed to autoradiograph film.
A375 Antiproliferation Assay--
E. coli-produced
human and cynomolgus IL-1 proteins were used for all assays. A375
human melanoma cells were obtained from ATCC (identification number
CRL-1872) and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 5%
fetal bovine serum, nonessential amino acids, and sodium pyruvate
(Invitrogen). The cells were added to 96-well tissue culture plates at
1 × 104 cells/well in the presence or absence of
IL-1. The cells were grown for 72 h and then washed with PBS and
stained for 4-6 h with Alamar Blue (a fluorescent metabolic indicator
from BioSource International, Camarillo, CA). Fluorescence units were
measured using a SPECTRAFluor fluorescent plate reader (560 nm
excitation, 595 nm emission) (Tecan, Research Triangle, NC). For the
experiments designed to measure sIL1R-II inhibition of IL-1
bioactivity, human affinity-purified sIL1R-II was added to the cells
immediately prior to IL-1 addition, and the culture was grown and
analyzed as described.
Structural Modeling--
The human type II IL-1 receptor model
was built using Modeler (13) based on Protein Data Bank (14) entries
1itb chain B (15) and 1ira chain Y (16). Multiple structures were calculated to cover conformational space. After removing outliers, six
structures remained and were shown to represent conformational space.
They formed a structural ensemble with a C RMSD of 6.87 Å. From
this ensemble a representative structure was chosen with a 1.68 Å C
RMSD from mean ensemble structure. The monkey IL-1 structure was
modeled based on Protein Data Bank entries 1hib (17), 1iob (18), 21bi,
31bi, and 41bi (19). Ten initial structures were built and evaluated
for errors; all were found suitable for inclusion in the structure
ensemble, with C RMSD of 0.25 Å. The representative structure
chosen was 0.11 Å C RMSD from the mean structure. Human IL-1 was
taken from the crystal structure 1itb chain A, which has a resolution
of 2.5 Å.
Because no IL1R-II·IL-1 complex crystal structure existed,
the human and monkey IL-1 structures were docked onto human IL1R-II using Protein Data Bank identification number 1itb as a template (1itb
is a complex of type I IL-1 receptor with IL-1 ). First, IL1R-II was
aligned and superimposed with IL1R-I, after which the IL1R-I chain was
deleted. This produced a model of human IL-1 complexed with human
IL1R-II. Next, monkey IL-1 was aligned and superimposed to human
IL-1 , after which the human IL-1 chain was deleted. This produced
a model of monkey IL-1 complexed with human IL1R-II. Surface
electrostatic differences were then calculated between human and monkey
IL-1 using the Molecular Operating Environment from the Chemical
Computing Group (Montreal, Canada). The surface electrostatics were
calculated on IL-1 only in the presence of IL1R-II using an interior
dielectric of 5, an exterior dielectric of 80, and 0 salt concentration.
IL-1 Mutagenesis--
Site-directed mutagenesis of human and
monkey IL-1 was performed using the QuikChange XL system
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Human and cynomolgus wild type IL-1
glutathione S-transferase fusions were used as parental
constructs into which all changes were introduced. A natural
HindIII site adjacent to amino acids 13 and 15 provided a
means for readily screening the correct recombinants. Mutant IL-1
proteins were subsequently expressed and purified from E. coli as described above.
Affinity Measurements--
The affinities were determined by
surface plasmon resonance using a Biacore 3000 instrument (Biacore AB,
Uppsala, Sweden) at 25 °C with a research grade CM5 sensor chip
(Biacore). A capture system was employed with ~8800 response units of
goat anti-human IgG, Fc chain-specific antibody (Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) immobilized using
standard amine-coupling chemistry. Immobilized capture antibody alone
was used as a reference surface. Ig fusions of human and rhesus soluble
IL-1 receptors were expressed by transient transfection of COS cells
and purified by chromatography on protein A-Sepharose. IL1R-I-Fc at 1 µg/ml or IL1R-II-Fc at 2 µg/ml in HBS-EP (10 mM HEPES,
150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.005% (v/v)
surfactant P20, pH 7.4; Biacore) with 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin
was injected over the immobilized antibody surface at 10 µl/min for 2 min to obtain a density of ~200 response units. Recombinant IL-1
(Amgen) in HBS-EP with 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin was injected over
both the receptor and reference surfaces at concentrations ranging from
10 to 100 times the KD down to 0.1 times the
KD at a flow rate of 50 µl/min. Duplicate
injections of each sample and triplicate injections of a buffer blank
were injected in random order. Most IL-1 ·IL-1R complexes were
allowed to associate for 2-3 min, and IL-1 completely dissociated
within 5 min. Complexes with slow off-rates associated for 5 min and
dissociated for 30 min before regeneration with a single 30-s injection
of 10 mM glycine HCl, pH 1.5, at a flow rate of 50 µl/min. The saturation maximum response
(Rmax) was ~30 response units for all
combinations. The data were fit globally to a simple 1:1 interaction
model with local Rmax or with a steady state
model using BIAEvaluation 3.1 Software.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning and Expression of Monkey IL-1 and IL-1R Genes
To determine sIL1R-II binding by monkey IL-1 in in
vitro assays, the cDNAs for cynomolgus monkey (Macaca
fascicularis) and rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta),
IL-1 and IL1R-II were cloned and expressed. Sequences for both of
these Old World monkey IL-1 cDNAs were previously published (20,
21) and were available from GenBankTM (accession numbers
D63353 and MMU19845). The cynomolgus IL-1 cDNA was obtained from
activated PBMCs and was found to have two nucleotide substitutions
relative to the publicly available cynomolgus sequence (accession
number D63353). One is a silent change at nucleotide position 240 (the
A of ATG = 1), and the other, at position 389, results in a Ser to
Asn change at amino acid 130 (indicated on Fig.
1). Cynomolgus IL-1 is 96% identical to human IL-1 . The rhesus IL-1 protein sequence (accession number MMU19845) is identical to that of cynomolgus except that it is one
amino acid longer at the C terminus. IL-1 was also cloned from
cynomolgus monkey, and the cDNA corresponding to the mature portion
of the protein (amino acids 113-271) matched the previously published
monkey sequence (accession number AB000553) exactly. Monkey IL-1s were
expressed in COS cells and used in the form of conditioned medium.
Despite the lack of either a signal peptide or prodomain, the IL-1
proteins were exported into the COS1 culture medium (see Fig. 3).
Alternatively, the IL-1 proteins were expressed in E. coli
as cleavable glutathione S-transferase fusions, and the
cleaved forms were purified.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Alignments of human and monkey
IL-1 and IL1R-II. A, mature
IL-1 sequence. Residues differing between the species are
shaded and discussed further in the text. Cynomolgus and
rhesus mature IL-1 are identical except that rhesus IL-1
possesses an additional serine at the C terminus. The residue in
cynomolgus IL-1 that differs from the publicly available sequence is
indicated (*). B, full-length IL1R-II sequences. Cynomolgus
and rhesus IL1R-II were found to be identical (not shown). The
arrow indicates the C terminus utilized for soluble
expression constructs.
|
|
Unlike the case with IL-1 , there was no sequence publicly available
for rhesus or cynomolgus type II IL-1R. Nonetheless, the use of PCR
primers based on the African green monkey type II IL-1 receptor allowed
us to clone the monkey cDNAs. The sequences of the proteins were
found to be 95.6% identical to the human (Fig. 1) and completely
identical between the two primates. Therefore, a single "monkey"
IL1R-II was utilized for binding and functional assays. Soluble monkey
IL1R-II was expressed and purified from Chinese hamster ovary cells as
an untagged protein. Although not utilized in these studies, we also
cloned the IL1R-II gene from African green monkey (Cercopithecus
aethiops) and found that there were numerous differences between
the DNA sequence we obtained and the previously published sequence (22)
(accession number U64092). These discrepancies corresponded to eight
amino acid changes. The African green monkey amino acid sequence that
we obtained is identical to cynomolgus, rhesus, and human IL1R-II at
each of the eight sites.
In Vitro Binding to Soluble IL1R-II
Plate Binding--
To compare the ability of human and monkey IL-1
to bind soluble IL1R-II, a plate binding assay was developed. As shown
in Fig. 2, all three sources of
recombinant human IL-1 tested were able to bind in a comparable
manner to either human or monkey sIL1R-II. Surprisingly, cynomolgus
IL-1 bound poorly to both human and monkey sIL1R-II. This was true
when using purified protein (from E. coli) as well as
unpurified protein in the form of COS supernatants. The same result was
obtained with the rhesus IL-1 that differs from cynomolgus by only a
single amino acid. These experiments were performed across a wide range
of immobilized receptor and ligand concentrations with similar results
(not shown). Additionally, cynomolgus IL-1 was tested in the form of
COS supernatants at several dilutions and also found to be unable to
bind monkey or human sIL1R-II (not shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
IL1R-II plate binding assay. Immobilized
human or monkey sIL1R-II was bound with biotin-conjugated human IL-1
(at 10 ng/ml), which was detected using streptavidin-horseradish
peroxidase and a color substrate. The ability of various forms of
unconjugated IL-1 to compete for IL1R-II binding was tested. Human
IL-1 (recombinant, R & D Systems) was added at 50 ng/ml. E. coli-produced human and cynomolgus IL-1 were also added at 50 ng/ml. Human, cynomolgus, and rhesus IL-1 from COS were added as
1:10 dilutions of conditioned medium from 5 day cultures of transfected
COS1 cells. IL-1 concentrations in undiluted medium were estimated
(by Western blot analysis) to be ~3 µg/ml (not shown). Competition
for IL1R-II binding is expressed as a percentage of inhibition of the
signal obtained in the absence of competitor.
|
|
Soluble Receptor Binding--
To address the possibility that
receptor immobilization could be affecting the results, we performed a
solution binding experiment. Radiolabeled IL-1s were incubated with
recombinant soluble receptor proteins. Receptor complexes were
immunoprecipitated and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The presence of a
correctly sized IL-1 band in lanes representing precipitated
receptor indicated a productive receptor-ligand interaction. For these
experiments cynomolgus IL-1 was used because the single amino acid
difference between the cynomolgus and rhesus proteins did not appear to
affect receptor binding in the plate binding assay. The results of this
experiment are shown in Fig. 3 and are
consistent with the plate binding results. No band is observed when the
control supernatants are incubated with human sIL1R-II; however, human
IL-1 but not cynomolgus IL-1 is detected in the
immunoprecipitated human sIL1R-II reaction. Similarly, when using
monkey sIL1R-II, it is only the human IL-1 that exhibits detectable
binding to the precipitated receptor. Both human and monkey IL-1 appear
to bind human IL1R-1. These results are independent of receptor
immobilization or IL-1 purification and support the initial observation
that monkey IL-1 does not bind well to sIL1R-II. It does appear,
however, that monkey IL-1 is capable of binding human IL1R-I.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Soluble receptor binding. COS1 cells
were transiently transfected with expression plasmids encoding human
(hu) or cynomolgus (cyno) IL-1 or empty
vector. After 48 h, the cells were metabolically labeled with
[35S]Met and [35S]Cys, and the harvested
medium was precleared with protein G. Untagged soluble type II IL-1
receptors from human and monkey were added, along with a nonblocking
anti-IL1R-II antibody, and the bound IL-1 was precipitated using
protein G-agarose. Control precipitations were performed using
human IL1R-I-Fc followed by protein G-agarose. The no-receptor control
reactions were precleared but incubated in the absence of any receptor,
antibody, or protein G-agarose. The recovered receptor complexes were
washed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. 10 µl of
the no-receptor control reactions were also run alongside to indicate
bands corresponding to human and cynomolgus IL-1 . The mature human
IL-1 runs as a doublet of ~17 and 19 kDa. Cynomolgus IL-1 is
expressed as a single band that migrates at the predicted 17.3 kDa.
|
|
A375 Functional Assay
The results from the soluble receptor binding experiment indicated
that cynomolgus IL-1 is capable of binding human IL1R-I. Human and
cynomolgus IL-1 were used in an anti-proliferation cell assay to
determine the biological activity of cynomolgus IL-1 as well as to
establish a cell-based system for better understanding the interaction,
or lack thereof, between sIL1R-II and monkey IL-1 . A375 human
melanoma cell proliferation is inhibited in this assay by IL-1 through
an IL-1R-dependent mechanism (23). The number of viable
cells following culture in the presence of IL-1 correlates inversely
with increasing amounts of IL-1 bioactivity.
Purified recombinant human and cynomolgus IL-1 were titrated in the
assay to determine their relative level of bioactivity. As seen in Fig.
4, introduction of both human and monkey
IL-1 at 2.5 and 5 ng/ml, respectively, resulted in a significant
inhibition of A375 proliferation, indicating that both cytokines were
active. Further dilution of the IL-1s resulted in a corresponding
reduction in this activity that was nearly identical between the two
cytokines. The calculated IC50 values (defined as the
concentration of IL-1 at which approximately a 50% reduction in the
number of viable cells occurs) are 0.068 and 0.063 ng/ml for the human
and cynomolgus cytokines, respectively. This result indicates that the
recombinant human and monkey IL-1 s are active and have nearly
equivalent levels of activity through the human type I IL-1R.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of human and cynomolgus
IL-1 s in the A375 bioassay. Human IL-1
was added to the A375 cells at a starting concentration of 2.5 ng/ml
and titrated in 2-fold dilutions through 5 × 10 4
ng/ml. Cynomolgus IL-1 was titrated similarly starting from a
concentration of 5.0 ng/ml. Viable cells were quantitated after 72 h using Alamar Blue and are expressed as mean fluorescence units.
|
|
Structural Analysis
The results presented so far suggest that because human but not
monkey IL-1 is capable of binding human and monkey type II IL-1R,
the difference must be accounted for by sequence differences in the
IL-1 molecules. To understand this better, we generated a
three-dimensional model (Fig. 5) of the
interaction between IL-1 and IL1R-II based upon the published
crystal structure of the IL-1 /IL1R-I interaction (15) (see
"Experimental Procedures" for details). The six amino acid
differences between the human and monkey IL-1 proteins (highlighted
on the alignment in Fig. 1) were identified in the model and analyzed
for potential receptor contacts. Four of the amino acids, which differ
between the species (Asn7, Ser13,
Gln15, and Met36; the reference was the human
sequence), showed solvent accessibility differences and were predicted
to make contact with the receptor. The Met/Leu change at position 36 is
a conservative change because both amino acids are hydrophobic and
differ little in size. The Asn to His change at position 7 does not
appear to affect the surface electrostatics significantly. In contrast,
the Ser to Ala change at position 13 and the Gln to Leu change at
position 15 are both polar to nonpolar changes with partial charge
differences that induce surface electrostatic differences. Serine 13 lies on the edge of the receptor-interacting region and was calculated to be within a distance of 4.5 Å or less of only one IL1R-II residue. Glutamine 15 lies in close proximity to the receptor and is within 4.5 Å of seven receptor residues. This analysis led to the hypothesis that
these two sites are the most likely to influence IL-1 binding to the
IL1R-II and, of the two, the Gln15 site may play the more
significant role because it is in contact with more receptor
residues.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Three-dimensional structural model of
IL-1 bound to IL1R-II. The model was
calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures." This is a
side view with IL1R-II shown on the left. The strands of
the individual Ig domains are highlighted in yellow. The
top of the figure represents the N terminus of the receptor.
IL-1 is shown with the strands highlighted in dark
gold. The six residues that differ between human and monkey
are indicated on the IL-1 structure (human sequence shown), and the
two changes that were deemed most likely to be important (S13A and
Q15L) are highlighted in magenta. The three residues showing
no binding contact with the receptor (based on solvent exposure
differences between bound and unbound IL-1 ) are highlighted in
cyan.
|
|
Mutational Analysis
To test the hypothesis derived from the structural modeling, we
used site-directed mutagenesis to exchange amino acids 13 and 15 between human and monkey IL-1 . We wanted to determine whether human
IL-1 could lose affinity for sIL1R-II when the monkey amino acids
are introduced and, conversely, whether monkey IL-1 will acquire
sIL1R-II-binding ability when the human amino acids are introduced.
Both single and double amino acid changes were made in each IL-1 .
The mutant IL-1s were first examined in the A375 biological assay to
test for inhibition by sIL-1R-II. Initially, titrations of each IL-1
were carried out in the absence of sIL1R-II to determine whether or not
they still retained activity and to identify active doses still below
saturating concentrations (not shown). Interestingly the Ser to Ala
change at position 13 diminished the potency of human IL-1 by
~70% relative to the wild type. Similarly, the Ala to Ser change at
the same site in monkey IL-1 caused a 15% reduction in activity.
The Gln to Leu changes at position 15 and the 13/15 double mutants
behaved differently with respect to IL-1 activity. The monkey IL-1
with Gln15 and the monkey double mutant were both ~50%
more active. The human IL-1 was 80% less active when the glutamine
was changed to leucine. Despite these effects on bioactivity, all of
the IL-1 mutants were still active and therefore capable of binding
and signaling through the type I IL-1R.
The A375 biological assay was repeated using doses of each IL-1
identified as being submaximal, to which increasing amounts of soluble
human IL1R-II was added. Forms of IL-1 able to become neutralized by
the type II receptor were apparent as a reduction in bioactivity in the
presence of soluble receptor. The results are shown in Fig.
6. Whereas the wild type and Ser to Ala
mutant of human IL-1 were both still inhibitable by soluble type II receptor, the single Gln to Leu mutation and the double mutation both
abolished this inhibition, even at the highest dose of soluble receptor. Conversely, wild type monkey IL-1 or the Ala to Ser mutant
were both still recalcitrant to sIL-1R-II inhibition. However, the
single Leu to Gln change or the double mutant containing this change
both bestowed the ability to become inhibited by sIL1R-II. The results
clearly demonstrate that the glutamine at position 15 in mature human
IL-1 is essential for neutralization by sIL1R-II.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of IL-1 mutations on sIL1R-II
inhibition. A375 cells were plated in 96-well tissue culture
dishes at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well.
Recombinant IL-1 (wild type and mutant) was added to the cells in
duplicate at a concentration of 2.5 ng/ml for human IL-1s (shown in the
top panel), and 1.25 ng/ml for cynomolgus IL-1s (shown in
the bottom panel). For each experiment, human
sIL1R-II was added starting at 10 µg/ml and titrated in 2-fold
dilutions. Following 72 h of culture, cell growth was quantitated
using Alamar Blue. The no IL-1 control indicates the level
of fluorescence observed in the absence of IL-1 and therefore
represents the level of viability attained following complete
inhibition of IL-1 activity.
|
|
Affinity Measurements
To demonstrate that the effects of the position 15 IL-1
mutations on sIL1R-II inhibition were related to binding affinity, we
performed Biacore-based affinity measurements. Wild type human and
monkey IL-1 as well as the Gln to Leu mutants of each species were
utilized for these experiments. Each IL-1 was examined for binding to
both human IL1R-I as well as human IL1R-II, and binding affinities were
derived. The results are presented in Table
I.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Receptor binding affinities for human and monkey IL-1 mutants
Calculated apparent dissociation constants (KD) for
binding of human and monkey IL-1 cytokines to human IL1R-I and
IL1R-II. KD values were derived using surface
plasmon resonance as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
numbers represent averages from duplicate experiments.
|
|
The affinities of human and monkey wild type IL-1 were
nearly identical for the human type I IL-1 receptor, and both
KD values were in the nanomolar range. The effects
of the Gln to Leu mutations on IL1R-I binding were consistent with the
results observed in the A375 bioassay. The human Gln to Leu mutant
bound with a 20-fold lower affinity than wild type IL-1 . Conversely, monkey IL-1 with the change from Leu to Gln actually had a 10-fold higher affinity (KD = 4.7 × 10 10
M) than wild type IL-1 from either species. The
affinities obtained for IL-1 binding to human IL1R-II also reflected
the activities observed in the bioassay. Wild type monkey IL-1 bound
IL1R-II with extremely low affinity (KD = 1.9 × 10 6 M); however, the Leu to Gln mutant
bound with essentially the same high affinity (KD = 5.9 × 10 10 M) as human IL-1 ,
primarily because of a much slower dissociation rate (not shown). The
effect on human IL-1 binding affinity was just as profound, although
in the opposite direction. The dissociation constant of human IL-1
with the Gln to Leu change dropped to 1.2 × 10 6
M. These results confirm that the ability of sIL1R-II to
inhibit the different forms of human and monkey IL-1 correlates with actual binding affinities. While performing these binding measurements we also tested recombinant cynomolgus
IL-1ra2 for binding to human
IL1R-II (data not shown). The results were as expected; the binding
interaction was very weak (KD between
10 7 and 10 8 M), which revealed
that at least this aspect of the monkey IL-1 system paralleled the
human system.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have examined the ability of monkey IL-1 to bind and become
neutralized by sIL1R-II. Although human IL-1 binds sIL1R-II with
high affinity, the monkey cytokine is unable to do so because of a
single IL-1 amino acid difference. It is striking that a single
amino acid is able to confer such an essential quality with regards to
receptor binding and neutralization. The glutamine at position 15 of
human IL-1 lies within the beginning of a hairpin loop immediately
following the first strand. This is within a region on the side of
the IL-1 barrel referred to as site A, which is present in IL-1 ,
IL-1 , and IL-1ra. This site forms a contact between the cytokine and
the first and second Ig domains of the type I receptor. Previous
mutational studies of human IL-1 have identified this region as
being critical for IL1R-I interaction (15, 24). Evans et al.
(25) found that when Gln15 was changed to Gly, the ligand
lost 100% of its IL1R-I binding ability. Although we did in fact
observe that the Gln to Leu change diminished human IL-1 activity in
the A375 assay, biological activity was not completely abolished. It
may be that a change to Leu, the side chain of which is similar in size
to that of the original Gln, is less disruptive than a change to the
smaller glycine. The same authors (25) found that when the
Gln15 was changed to His, IL-1 exhibited greater
activity than wild type, indicating that different substitutions can
have different effects on type I IL-1 receptor binding. Specific amino
acid substitutions may also confer different consequences with respect
to type I versus type II receptor binding, depending on the
nature of the interacting residues on each receptor surface.
The lack of effective sIL1R-II binding by monkey IL-1 was unexpected
both because of the degree of homology with human IL-1 and because a
previous study with rhesus monkeys suggested that human sIL1R-II is
efficacious in a model of acute
inflammation.3 We have
recently discovered that significant levels of soluble AcP protein are
present in the serum of humans and monkeys and that soluble AcP is able
to enhance the binding affinity between monkey IL-1 and
sIL1R-II.3 This provides a possible mechanism to explain
how sIL1R-II may be capable of inhibiting monkey IL-1 in
vivo.
A comparative study of multiple cytokine sequences in nonhuman primates
noted that the level of sequence conservation with human orthologs
varied considerably (21). Despite the high degree of sequence homology,
IL-1 and IL-1 were among the most diverged cytokines between
human and monkey. This suggests that different evolutionary patterns
may be associated with different cytokines. The degree of intricate
regulation inherent in the IL-1 system may affect its evolution
differently among species. The subtle IL-1 sequence difference
between humans and the Old World monkeys in this study confers upon the
human IL-1 system an even tighter degree of regulation. This is due to
a higher affinity for the soluble IL1R-II that allows neutralizing
complexes to form through a 1:1 interaction. In monkeys, inhibition of
circulating IL-1 may require higher levels of sIL1R-II as well as
sufficient levels of soluble AcP.
Glutamine at position 15 is not unique to human; it is also present in
the IL-1 sequence from mouse, rabbit, sheep, dolphin, etc. (not
shown). It is certainly possible, however, that its essentiality for
high affinity receptor binding is only in the context of the entire
IL-1 sequence, which will differ across species at multiple sites.
It is tempting to speculate, however, that this difference between
human and monkey IL-1 is a fairly recent event in primate evolution,
potentially linked to the particular evolution of the human immune
system. Out of this curiosity we decided to clone and compare the
IL-1 sequence from chimpanzee, the closest related primate to
humans. The gene sequence was amplified from cDNA made from
lipopolysaccharide-activated chimp PBMC
RNA.4 The predicted mature
portion of chimpanzee IL-1 was identical to human IL-1 (not
shown); therefore, one would predict that the sIL1R-II binding
capability of human IL-1 is not entirely unique to our species.
Nonetheless, this study has revealed that there can be profound
differences when examining cytokine-receptor interactions between
humans and other primates. It also further strengthens the notion that
sIL1R-II has become a very effective, naturally occurring antagonist of
IL-1 in humans. Further development of this molecule as an
anti-inflammatory therapeutic remains a promising prospect.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Duke Virca for help in purifying
IL-1 and IL-1R proteins and Richard Armitage and Brian MacDuff for
isolation of cynomolgus PBMCs.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AY172102 (cynomolgus type II IL-1R), AY172100 (rhesus type II
IL-1R), AY172101 (African green monkey type II IL-1R), AY172103 (cynomolgus IL-1b), and AY172104 (Chimpanzee IL-1b).
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Amgen Corp., 51 University St., Seattle, WA 98101. E-mail:
smithde@amgen.com.
§
Present address: Dept. of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy,
Pharmacology, and Physiology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206636200
2
The cloning, expression, and purification of
cynomolgus IL-1ra is described elsewhere (see footnote 3).
3
Smith, D. E., Virca, H. R., Friend, D.,
Moore, H., Chen, H., Farese, A. M., MacVittie, T. J., Virca, G. D., and
Sims, J. E. (2002) Immunity, in press.
4
Chimpanzee PBMCs were kindly provided by Robert
E. Druilhet (New Iberia Research Center, New Iberia, LA).
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IL, interleukin;
sIL1R-II, soluble type II IL-1 receptor;
IL1R-I, type I IL-1 receptor;
IL-1ra, IL-1 receptor antagonist;
AcP, accessory protein;
PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell;
C RMSD, root mean square
deviation of the carbon positions.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Dinarello, C. A.
(1998)
Int. Rev. Immunol.
16,
457-499[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Auron, P. E.
(1998)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
3-4,
221-237
|
| 3.
|
Murzin, A. G.,
Lesk, A. M.,
and Chothia, C.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
223,
531-543[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Sims, J. E.,
Gayle, M. A.,
Slack, J. L.,
Alderson, M. R.,
Bird, T. A.,
Giri, J. G.,
Colotta, F., Re, F.,
Mantovani, A.,
Shanebeck, K.,
Grabstein, K. H.,
and Dower, S. K.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6155-6159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Greenfeder, S. A.,
Nunes, P.,
Kwee, L.,
Labow, M.,
Chizzonite, R. A.,
and Ju, G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13757-13765[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Bowie, A.,
and O'Neill, L. A.
(2000)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
67,
508-514[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Colotta, F.,
Dower, S. K.,
Sims, J. E.,
and Mantovani, A.
(1994)
Immunol. Today
15,
562-566[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Mantovani, A.,
Locati, M.,
Vecchi, A.,
Sozzani, S.,
and Allavena, P.
(2001)
Trends Immunol.
22,
328-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Bessis, N.,
Guery, L.,
Mantovani, A.,
Vecchi, A.,
Sims, J. E.,
Fradelizi, D.,
and Boissier, M. C.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
867-875[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Attur, M. G.,
Dave, M. N.,
Leung, M. Y.,
Cipolletta, C.,
Meseck, M.,
Woo, S. L.,
and Amin, A. R.
(2002)
J. Immunol.
168,
2001-2010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Giri, J. G.,
Kumaki, S.,
Ahdieh, M.,
Friend, D. J.,
Loomis, A.,
Shanebeck, K.,
DuBose, R.,
Cosman, D.,
Park, L. S.,
and Anderson, D. M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3654-3663[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Morris, A. E.,
Lee, C. C.,
Hodges, K.,
Aldrich, T. L.,
Krantz,
Smidt, P. S.,
and Thomas, J. N.
(1997)
Animal Cell Technology
, pp. 529-534, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA
|
| 13.
|
Marti-Renom, M. A.,
Stuart, A. C.,
Fiser, A.,
Sanchez, R.,
Melo, F.,
and Sali, A.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.
29,
291-325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Berman, H. M.,
Westbrook, J.,
Feng, Z.,
Gilliland, G.,
Bhat, T. N.,
Weissig, H.,
Shindyalov, I. N.,
and Bourne, P. E.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
235-242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Vigers, G. P.,
Anderson, L. J.,
Caffes, P.,
and Brandhuber, B. J.
(1997)
Nature
386,
190-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Schreuder, H.,
Tardif, C.,
Trump-Kallmeyer, S.,
Soffientini, A.,
Sarubbi, E.,
Akeson, A.,
Bowlin, T.,
Yanofsky, S.,
and Barrett, R. W.
(1997)
Nature
386,
194-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Camacho, N. P.,
Smith, D. R.,
Goldman, A.,
Schneider, B.,
Green, D.,
Young, P. R.,
and Berman, H. M.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
8749-8757[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Shaanan, B.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
Cohen, G. H.,
Gilliland, G. L.,
Veerapandian, B.,
Davies, D. R.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1992)
Science
257,
961-964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Veerapandian, B.,
Gilliland, G. L.,
Raag, R.,
Svensson, A. L.,
Masui, Y.,
Hirai, Y.,
and Poulos, T. L.
(1992)
Proteins
12,
10-23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Totsuka, K.,
Takakura, H.,
Hashimoto, O.,
and Tatsumi, M.
(1998)
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.
116,
40-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Villinger, F.,
Brar, S. S.,
Mayne, A.,
Chikkala, N.,
and Ansari, A. A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
3946-3954[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Liu, C.,
Hart, R. P.,
Liu, X.-J.,
Clevenger, W.,
Maki, R. A.,
and De Souza, E. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20965-20972[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Itoh, S.,
Hattori, T.,
Hayashi, H.,
Mizutani, Y.,
Todo, M.,
Takii, T.,
Yang, D.,
Lee, J. C.,
Matsufuji, S.,
Murakami, Y.,
Chiba, T.,
and Onozaki, K.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
162,
7434-7440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Grutter, M. G.,
van Oostrum, J.,
Priestle, J. P.,
Edelmann, E.,
Joss, U.,
Feige, U.,
Vosbeck, K.,
and Schmitz, A.
(1994)
Protein Eng.
7,
663-671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Evans, R. J.,
Bray, J.,
Childs, J. D.,
Vigers, G. P.,
Brandhuber, B. J.,
Skalicky, J. J.,
Thompson, R. C.,
and Eisenberg, S. P.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11477-11483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|