|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206521200 on September 6, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47626-47635, December 6, 2002
Distribution of PG-M/Versican Variants in Human Tissues and
de Novo Expression of Isoform V3 upon Endothelial Cell
Activation, Migration, and Neoangiogenesis in Vitro*
Sabrina
Cattaruzza §¶,
Monica
Schiappacassi§¶,
Åsa
Ljungberg-Rose§,
Paola
Spessotto§,
Daniela
Perissinotto§,
Matthias
Mörgelin ,
Maria Teresa
Mucignat§,
Alfonso
Colombatti§**, and
Roberto
Perris §
From the Department of Evolutionary and Functional
Biology, University of Parma, Viale delle Scienze 11/A,
43100 Parma, Italy, § Division for Experimental Oncology 2, National Cancer Institute, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico-Instituto
di Ricerca e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Via Pedemontana Occidentale
12, Aviano (PN) 33081 Italy, Department for Cell and Molecular
Biology, University of Lund, Box 94, S-22100 Lund, Sweden, and
** Department of Technical and Biomedical Sciences & the
Microgravity, Aging, Training, and Immobility Centre of Excellence,
University of Udine, Piazzale Kolbe Udine, 35100 Italy
Received for publication, July 1, 2002, and in revised form, September 5, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have carried out a comprehensive molecular
mapping of PG-M/versican isoforms V0-V3 in adult human tissues and
have specifically investigated how the expression of these isoforms is
regulated in endothelial cells in vitro. A survey of 21 representative tissues highlighted a prevalence of V1 mRNA;
demonstrated that the relative frequency of expression was V1 > V2 > V3 V2; and showed that <15% of the tissues
transcribed significant levels of all four isoforms. By employing novel
and previously described anti-versican antibodies we verified a
ubiquitous versican deposition in normal and tumor-associated vascular
structures and disclosed differences in the glycanation profiles of
versicans produced in different vascular beds. Resting endothelial
cells isolated from different tissue sources transcribed several of the
versican isoforms but consistently failed to translate these mRNAs
into detectable proteoglycans. However, if stimulated with tumor
necrosis factor- or vascular endothelial growth factor,
they altered their versican expression by de novo
transcribing the V3 isoform and by exhibiting a moderate V1/V2
production. Induced versican synthesis and de novo V3
expression was also observed in endothelial cells elicited to migrate
in a wound-healing model in vitro and in angiogenic
endothelial cells forming tubule-like structures in Matrigel or fibrin
clots. The results suggest that, independent of the degree of
vascularization, human adult tissues show a limited expression of
versican isoforms V0, V2, and V3 and that endothelial cells may
contribute to the deposition of versican in vascular structures, but
only following proper stimulation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
PG-M/versican is an evolutionarily conserved proteoglycan
(PG)1 known to be
precociously expressed during embryonic development (1-3) and
present throughout adult life in the majority of the connective and
nervous tissues (4-13). It was initially isolated and characterized
biochemically and ultrastructurally from bovine aorta and chick embryo
fibroblasts (14-18) and subsequently cloned and sequenced in cultured
chick and human cells (19-21). Parallel studies in several animal
species established that three isoforms, denoted V1, V2, and V3 could
be generated by alternative splicing from a larger transcript denoted
V0 (21-24). Tissue-restricted splice variants were also detected
during some phases of embryonic development (25). The four primary
versican isoforms vary in their relative content of the two
glycosaminoglycan attachment domains, i.e.
glycosaminoglycan- and glycosaminoglycan- , which are
differentially omitted in the V2 and V1 isoforms and are entirely absent in the V3 one, contributing thereby to a significant side chain polymorphism in different versican variants.
In the adult, versican seems to be particularly enriched in
vascular structures, where it links to components of the subendothelial basement membrane and to the elastic fibrils (26-29). In these tissue
compartments, it is likely to be implicated in both the normal
hemostasis of blood vessels as well as to be involved in some of
the pathological conditions that may affect these tissue structures. In
fact, versican is abundantly produced by vascular smooth muscle cells
and its expression is enhanced during atherosclerosis and restenosis
causing a higher sequestering of low density lipoprotein in
these formations (27, 30-36). The PG has also been shown to be
produced by one murine-transformed endothelial cell type, although it
is presently unclear to what extent it affords a constitutive translational product of normal and diseased human endothelium. Similarly, no information is currently available about how endothelial versican expression may be modulated by factors influencing the activation state/differentiation of the cells, e.g. those
operating during processes of inflammation, angiogenesis, and wound
healing. Finally, due to the unavailability of immunological reagents
that would distinguish the isoforms V0 and V3 from V1 and V2, there is
currently scarce information about the relative tissue distribution of
the four versican variants.
To define the precise transcriptional map of versican isoforms in
humans and to address their potential role in the pathophysiology of
vascular tissues, we have determined the patterns of expression of
these transcripts in the major organs/tissues of the adult and in
primary vascular cells under resting and activated conditions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies--
A panel of anti-versican mAbs was produced
according to standard procedures by immunizing Balb/c female mice with
isolated bovine aorta versicans and screening the hybridomas against
the immunogen and related antigens. Specificity of these mAbs has partially been described elsewhere (3, 37) and further details about
their reactivities were determined here by enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay, dot-blot assays, and immunoblotting on intact and
enzyme-digested PGs, including versicans from various bovine and human
sources, aggrecans from cartilage tissues of various animal species,
fibromodulin, decorin, and biglycan. An antiserum produced against a
recombinant fragment corresponding to the N-terminal, hyaluronan-binding globular domain of versican (named anti-Vc; Ref. 38)
was kindly provided by Richard Le Baron (Division of Life Sciences,
University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX). Monoclonal
antibody (mAb) 5D5 (3, 5) was a kind gift of Firoz Rahemtulla
(Laboratory of Dental Research, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL).
mAb 12C5 reacting with a conserved epitope contained within the
N-terminal G1 versican domain (13) was purchased from the Developmental
Studies Hybridoma Bank (Iowa University, IA). mAb 2B1, known to bind
specifically to the C-terminal G3 domain of human versican (39,
40)2 was purchased from
Seikagaku Corporation (Japan). Anti-decorin mAb 6B6 was purchased from
Seikagaku Corporation and mAb CS56 from Sigma. The anti-human perlecan
antibody 7E1 was kindly received from Renato Iozzo (Department of Cell
Biology and Pathology, The Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia,
PA). Antiserum As73 against human collagen type VI was produced by
immunization of rabbits with tetrameric pepsin-digested placental
collagen type VI. The hybridoma clone H/FN-7 producing a mAb against
human fibronectin was purchased from the American Tissue Culture
Collection (Rockville, MA).
Solid-phase Binding Assays and TEM/Rotary
Shadowing--
Bovine aorta versicans were isolated as previously
described (37, 41). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with the various antibodies and enzyme digestions was perfomed as described in previous
studies (3).3 Ultrastructural
analyses of antibody bindings to versicans were carried by rotary
shadowing and negative stainings performed as previously detailed (11,
41).
Primary Vascular and Non-vascular Cells--
Primary human
endothelial cells including HUVEC (umbilical cord), HIAEC (iliac
artery), pulmonary artery, coronary artery, adult dermis
microvasculature, neonatal dermis microvasculature, adult aorta, and
primary human smooth muscle cells, including aorta and uterus
were obtained from BioWhittaker Inc. (Walkersville, MD) at the first to
third passage. HUVEC were also isolated according to standard
procedures from umbilical cords collected in the laboratory. Endothelial cells were maintained in endothelial growth medium (BioWhittaker Inc.) supplemented with L-glutamine (Sigma)
and were consistently used prior to the fourth passage. Aorta and uterine smooth muscle cells were grown in smooth muscle growth medium
(BioWhittaker Inc.). Hs913T (human fibrosarcoma) and Human intestinal
smooth muscle cells were obtained from the American Tissue Culture
Collection and were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with
10-20% fetal calf serum.
Growth Factor and Cytokine Stimulations--
For stimulation
with cytokines and growth factors, endothelial cells were pre-grown
under low-nutrient conditions for 24 h in basal growth medium
supplemented with 1% fetal calf serum. The following day, the cells
were washed twice with PBS and incubated in serum-containing medium in
the presence or absence of 50 ng/ml TNF- (Chemicon International,
Inc., Temecula, CA) or 100 ng/ml VEGF (Chemicon International, Inc.)
for 4-48 h. Total RNA was extracted at 4, 8, 16, and 24 h and
processed for RT-PCR (see below).
RT-PCR--
Total cellular RNA was isolated from the different
cell types using the RNA Fast kit (Molecular Systems, San Diego, CA)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. Total RNAs from the majority
of human adult tissues were purchased from Clontech
Laboratories. Cartilage RNA was kindly provided by Dr. Paul Di Cesare
(The Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY). RNA was also isolated
with the above kit from healthy skeletal muscle kindly obtained from Dr. Carlo Minetti (G. Gaslini Pediatric Institute, Genova, Italy) and
from mesenteric veins obtained from routine autopsies performed at the
National Cancer Institute of Aviano. RT reactions were performed with 1 µg of total RNA using AMV-Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Madison,
WI). RNA was reverse-transcribed into first-strand cDNA using
random hexamer primers. The primers for the PCR amplification of
versican isoforms were: PGM-A, 5'-GGCTTTGACCAGTGCGATTAC-3'; PGM-B, 5'-TCAACATCTCATGTTCCTCCC-3'; PGM-C,
5'-TTCTTCACTGTGGGTATAGGTCTA-3'; PGM-D, 5'-CCAGCCATAGTCACATGTCTC-3'. The
sizes of the amplifications products were 405 bp for V0 splice form
(primers PGM-B + PGM-C), 336 bp for V1 (primers PGM-A + PGM-C), 498 bp
for V2 (primers PGM-B + PGM-D) and 429 bp for V3 (primers PGM-A + PGM-D). Taq DNA polymerase was obtained from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. RT-PCR amplification of a 400-bp fragment of
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA served as positive
internal control. Amplification products were resolved on 2% agarose
gels stained with ethidium bromide.
RNase Protection Assay--
Two sets of probes capable of
discriminating between the four versican splice forms (3) were prepared
by RT-PCR from total RNA isolated from Hs913T cells using primers PGM-B
(sense) + PGM-C (antisense) and PGM-A (sense) + PGM-D (antisense). The
probes were cloned into a pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI).
[32P]UTP-labeled antisense riboprobes were synthesized
from a SP6 promoter using 25 units of SP6 RNA polymerase (Promega) and
were hybridized overnight with 10 µg of total RNA of each human
tissue. The degree of intactness and calibration of the amount of input RNA were ascertained by using a human -actin probe as reference. Post-hybridization procedures were performed using RPA II kit (Ambion)
according to the instructions provided by the supplier. The
RNase-protected fragments were run on a sequencing gel and autoradiographed, and the specific signals were quantified by computer-aided densitometric scanning. Probe AD allowed the
identification of the V3 isoform (429 bp), whereas probe BC hybridized
with the V0 (405 bp), V2 (244 bp), and V1 (161 bp) ones. Assessment of the relative levels of expression of the protected transcripts was
accomplished by analyzing autoradiograms in the linear exposure range
by computer-assisted densitometry using a Philips CCD video camera and
the software GelScan. Densities of the autoradiographic bands obtained
for each individual isoform were plotted accounting for the specific
intensities in 32P activities of the diversely sized
fragments. Direct comparison of the relative levels of expression of
the individual isoforms in each individual tissue/organ are reported as
percent adopting the signal detected for the prevailing isoform of that
given tissue/organ as 100%. The nature of the splicing sites of human
versican allowed for a direct comparison of the expression levels of
the V0-V2 isoforms in the same autoradiograms, whereas the protected
signal for the V3 isoform was normalized to that obtained in the same autoradiogram for the cumulative expression of V0-V2 mRNAs.
Angiogenesis Assay--
For simulation of angiogenesis,
endothelial cells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized, and resuspended in
endothelial growth medium at a density of 1-5 × 105
cells/ml. Human fibrinogen (kindly received from Luigi De Marco, The
National Cancer Institute of Aviano) was diluted at 20 µg/µl in
endothelial growth medium. An aliquot of 25 µl of this solution containing the resuspended cells was allowed to solidify by addition of
1 µg of human purified thrombin (kindly provided by Luigi De Marco)
in Lab-Tek® plates (Nalge-Nunc International, Naperville, IL). The
formed clots were equilibrated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 15 min and covered with 100 µl of medium and supplemented or not with
50 ng/ml TNF- or 100 ng/ml VEGF. Cultures were maintained for 24-72
h before being fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, stained
immunocytochemically, and photographed. An alternative assay involved
Matrigel; a stock concentration of the specific batch (Becton Dickinson
Labware, Bedford MA; 12.3 mg/ml) which was diluted at 1:1 with ice-cold
serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, gently mixed, and
dispensed into 6-well tissue culture plates (1 ml/well) or 48-well
plates (0.15 ml/well). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min to
form a uniform layer and cell suspensions of a similar density as
indicated above were then seeded on top of the gels in the
appropriate growth medium. Cultures were maintained under standard cell
culture conditions for up to 72 h before being fixed and stained
as described above. All cultures were routinely monitored by phase
contrast microscopy and photographed at different time intervals. Total
RNA was extracted from tubule-forming endothelial cells using the RNA
Fast Isolation kit and utilized for RT-PCR as described above.
"Wound Healing-like" Assay--
For wound-healing simulation
assays, HUVECs were seeded at 80% confluence in uncoated 6-well plates
and grown to confluence. Confluent monolayers were starved for 4 h
in strongly reduced levels of serum (1%), wounded by scraping away a
swath of cells with a P1000 pipette tip and further cultured for up to
48 h. After scraping, cells were rinsed twice with PBS to remove
wound-derived cell aggregates and debris and either immediately fixed
in 4% paraformaldehyde or fixed after 4, 8, or 24 h of culture
and processed for indirect immunostaining. Alternatively, unfixed cells
at the above time intervals were processed for the isolation of total RNA to be used for RT-PCR analyses.
Immunocytochemistry--
Healthy and tumor tissue specimens were
obtained from surgical specimens of mammary carcinoma, hepatocarcinoma,
colon carcinoma, melanoma, leiomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, malignant
fibrohistocytoma, and liposarcoma performed at the National Cancer
Institute of Aviano, or from routine autopsies carried out at the same
institute. Tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS,
embedded in OTC compound (Miles Laboratories) and cryosectioned.
Sections were air-dried, incubated with primary antibodies (undiluted
supernatant or purified Igs and ascites fluids at 1:100 dilution in PBS
with 0.1 mg/ml BSA) at 4 °C overnight, washed and further incubated for 2 h at room temperature with fluorescein- or Texas
Red-conjugated polyvalent goat or rabbit anti-mouse Ig antibodies
(Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA) diluted
1:50-1:100 in PBS/BSA. In some cases, to confirm the identity of the
intralesional neoangiogenic vessels, sections from soft tissue sarcoma
specimens where double-labeled with anti-versican antibodies and an
anti-PECAM (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule) (Chemicon
International, Temecula, CA) antibody, or anti-versican antibodies and
biotinylated Ulex europeaus I lectin (revealed by
fluorescently tagged streptavidin; Amersham Bisociences). In a
number of other cases, incubation of tissue sections with anti-versican
antibodies was preceded by digestions with collagenase or testicular
hyaluronidase as previously described (3) to ascertain that
immunolabelings were not compromised by epitope masking. For
immunocytochemical staining, cells grown on plastic Lab-Tek® chamber
slides, Matrigel or fibrin clots were washed twice in PBS with BSA
0.1% w/v (Sigma) and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min.
Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation with 2% v/v
normal goat serum (Zymed Laboratories Inc.) in PBS/BSA
0.1% w/v followed by incubation with primary antibodies for 1 h
at room temperature. Cells were washed and incubated with fluorescein-
or Texas Red-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted 1:100 in PBS/BSA.
An alternative staining procedure adopted for immunolabeling with the
"fixation-sensitive" mAb 5D5 (3) consisted in direct incubation of
live cells with the antibody diluted 1:50 in PBS/BSA at room
temperature, followed by fixation with paraformaldehyde and incubation
with secondary antibodies as described above. In both cases, stained
cells were finally were mounted with Mowiol 4-88
(Calbiochem-Novabiochem) supplemented with 2.5 g/ml DABCO (Sigma) as an
anti-fading agent.
Immunoblotting--
Bovine aorta versicans and nasal cartilage
aggrecan were solubilized in SDS-containing sample buffer in the
presence of -mercaptoethanol and resolved by SDS-PAGE on 3-8%
gradient gels. Separated PGs were electrotransferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes, which were subsequently saturated with
-casein and processed for immunoblotting using the panel of
anti-versican antibodies as previously described (3). For
immunochemical detection of versicans produced by activated endothelial
cells, cell lysates were prepared from HUVEC grown for 48 h in the
presence of 50 ng/ml TNF- or 100 ng/ml VEGF. Lysis buffer was
composed of 50 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl, 2% Triton X-100, and
protease inhibitors. After lysis, the cell extract was subjected to
centrifugation at 13,000 g for 30 min in the cold. Proteins were then
fractionated by SDS/PAGE in a 4-20% polyacrylamide gel under reducing
and non-reducing conditions and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose
membranes overnight. Blots were blocked with dried milk in TBST
(Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20) and incubated at 4 °C overnight
with mAbs 12C5 or 2B1 (at 1:500 dilution in the blocking buffer). The
membranes were washed, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies
(at 1:1000 dilution in TBST) and further processed for chemiluminescent detection (ECL chemiluminescence kit; Amersham Biosciences) as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Versican Isoform mRNA Expression in Normal Adult
Tissues--
As a first step, to define the expression pattern of
versicans in human vascular structures, we determined the overall
distribution pattern of the four versican isoforms in a panel human
adult tissues by conventional RT-PCR and RNase protection. The first
approach asserted a ubiquitous transcription of the versican gene, the resulting transcripts of which were detected in 20 of the 21 tissues examined (Table I). The V1 isoform was
found to be the most widespread, expressing in 19 of the 21 tissues,
whereas the V2 one was the least frequently transcribed (Table I). More
than 50% of the tissues/organs examined expressed detectable levels of
all alternatively spliced transcripts, whereas 4 of the tissues/organs
examined, namely liver, uterus, spleen, and cartilage expressed solely
the V1 isoform (Table I). A more precise quantitative analysis of the
expression levels of the different versican isoforms was then performed
in the same tissues or organs by RNase protection. The latter assays
confirmed the prevalence of the V1 isoform, showing that, on average,
it accounted for more than 70% all versican mRNA transcribed by
each individual tissue or organ. These experiments also showed that the
parental V0 isoform represented the one showing the lowest expression
levels (Fig. 1). Furthermore, in several tissues, certain mRNAs that were detected by RT-PCR were found to
be actually transcribed at minute levels, when accurately assessed. This finding thereby reduced the number of tissues or organs deemed to
express significant quantities of all isoforms from 11 to a mere 3, including mammary gland, heart, and kidney (Fig. 1).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Quantitative analysis of versican isoform
expression in healthy adult human tissues as determined by RNase
protection. A, schematic diagram illustrating the
primer combinations used for the quantification of the different
versican transcripts (sizes of fragments are indicated within
brackets). B-E, relative levels of V0-V3
mRNA expression in the tissues indicated by the corresponding
number listed in the boxed area (upper left). The relative
level of transcription of each isoform in a given organ/tissue was
derived by normalization against the signal obtained for the
organ/tissue that showed the highest expression of that specific
isoform (see Experimental Procedures). Insets show
representative protected bands in the indicated tissues.
|
|
Immunohistochemical Evidence for the Deposition of Versican
Glycanation Variants in Normal Vascular Structures--
The above
isoform mapping at the mRNA level corroborated previous findings
suggesting that versicans V1 and V2 are the most widely distributed in
human adult tissues. Because data on the tissue distribution of the
core proteins of these isoforms have been reported elsewhere (8), we
sought here to make use of a panel of mAbs produced against versicans
to disclose possible differences in the distribution of putative
glycanation variants of this PG in
vascular tissues (Table II; Fig.
2). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay/dot-blotting (Table II), transmission electron microscopy/rotary
shadowing data (data not shown), combined with differential enzyme
digestions were initially employed to assert that the mAbs indeed
recognized glycanation traits of the PGs. The experiments also
confirmed that the antibodies largely failed to react with several
other ECM PGs (Table II), as further demonstrated by additional
immunoblotting experiments involving intact and pre-digested bovine
aorta versicans (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (185K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Representative micrographs illustrating the
tissue distribution of the putative glycanation variants of versicans
V0-V2, as determined by indirect immunostaining of cryostate tissue
sections with the indicated antibodies. MAb 2B1 was consistently
used as a reference antibody to ascertain the constitutive versican
expression in the examined tissues.
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Antibody specificity and constitutive
versican isoform expression. A, Western blotting of bovine
aorta versican resolved by SDS-PAGE in 3-8% gradient gels and reacted
with indicated anti-versican antibodies (2B3, 5C12, 4F3, 1D1, 2E12,
2G5, 2C12, and 4C5). The lane labeled "4C5-Ag"
exemplifies the complete lack of cross-reactivity of these antibodies
with cartilage aggrecans (chondroitinase-digested bovine nasal
cartilage aggrecan was the one resolved in this specific lane). Lane
labeled "4C5-Chase" exemplifies the characteristic V1/V2
banding pattern observed for the chondroitinase-digested bovine aorta
versicans (by Western blotting it is possible to visualize the smaller
amounts of V1 present in bovine aorta; 3, 37) consistently seen with
the anti-versican antibodies described in this study (see Table II).
B, ultrastructural mapping of the binding site of mAb 5D5
(arrows) on versicans from bovine aorta. In the enlargement
of a single versican molecule the arrow points to the more
precise location of the 5D5 epitope of the core protein of a putative
V2 isoform (as defined by length measurements of the molecule; Refs. 3,
11, 37, and 42). Due to the symmetrical appearance of the two
globular domains it is not possible to define the G1 - G3 orientation
of the illustrated versican molecule. C, representative
RT-PCR amplifications of versican isoform transcripts detected in
resting, primary vascular cells. Table in D summarizes the
versican isoform expression in these cells as determined by RT-PCR.
Mr standards were unreduced ferritin (440 kDa),
thyroglobulin (669 kDa), and mouse IgG immunoglobulin (~950
kDa).
|
|
We also further characterized the previously described anti-versican
core protein antibody, mAb 5D5, by ultrastructural means, such as to
define its potential utility for examining vascular versicans. Present
and previously reported length measurements of the "rotary
shadowed" core proteins isolated from bovine aorta, in conjunction
with biochemical and immunochemical data (3, 5, 37, 41), indicated that
mAb 5D5 reacted with an epitope common to V0, V1, and V2 isoforms and
presumably reside within the initial segment of one of the globular
domains (Fig. 3B; no attempt was made to define which of
these was the one implicated).
Immunolabeling of tissue sections with this mAb and the panel of
anti-versican antibodies described hitherto detected a substantial versican deposition in most tissues expressing significant mRNA levels (Table II; Fig. 2). These observations thereby confirmed previous immunochemical mappings of versicans V1 and V2 (8). The
immunostaining patterns further highlighted the abundance of versican
in vascular structures of all tissues and organs and disclosed tissue
compartment-specific compositional differences based on direct
comparisons of the patterns obtained with antibodies reacting with
either core protein- or glycan moiety-associated epitopes (Table II;
Fig. 2). The diverse versican variants revealed by these immunoprobes
were not necessarily linked to diverse glycosaminoglycan compositions,
but rather were associated with divergent oligosaccharide profiles. For
instance, mAbs 5C12 and 2C12 reacting with epitopes on
fucose-containing oligosaccharide moieties of versicans failed to stain
larger vessels of the dermis and skeletal muscle (Table II; Fig. 2).
Conversely, mAb 2G5 reactive with an epitope present on
N-linked-type oligosaccharides that appared unique for
versicans, labeled larger vessels of these tissues, but failed to stain
capillaries of any of the tissues/organs examined (Table II; Fig.
2).
We could also conclude that the differences in the observed
staining patterns were not attributed to a diverse expression of
different versican isoforms produced by these vascular structures because both mAb 2B1 and an antiserum reactive with the canonical N-terminal G1 domain consistently detected the PGs in all types of
vascular structures, and did so in a rather uniform manner (Table II;
data not shown). Although less likely, it cannot be precluded that some
differences in immunolabeling may have been a result of a different
accessibility of the epitopes in situ.
Versican Isoform Transcription in Isolated Endothelial
Cells--
The in situ versican analysis indicated that not
only could different isoforms be differentially distributed in human
tissues/organs and their vascular compartments, but that a second
level of polymorphism could be provided by different glycanation traits
of the PGs deposited in these structures. However, these observations
did not clarify whether versican, which is known to be a primary PG of
smooth muscle cells, was also produced and secreted by endothelial
cells. To approach this problem, we examined the versican
transcription/translation in a number of primary human endothelial
cells isolated from both arterial and venular blood vessels. These
experiments showed that most endothelial cell types examined herein
transcribed certain levels of two or all three of the V0-V2 isoforms,
but consistently failed to express V3 (Fig. 3, C and
D). However, immunohistochemistry with a number of
antibodies directed against the globular or non-globular domains of
versican failed to detect a significant secretion of any of these
isoforms in cells maintained in resting conditions (Fig.
4, A and D). In
contrast, a corresponding staining of isolated vascular and
non-vascular smooth muscle cells with the same set of antibodies
confirmed their deposition of elaborate versican-rich matrices (data
not shown). Immunostaining of endothelial cells with antibodies to
decorin, perlecan, collagen type VI, fibronectin, and native
chondroitin sulfates ascertained that the endothelial cells were
capable of synthesizing other PG and non-PG endothelial growth
medium molecules (not shown). Hence, the lack of versican synthesis in resting endothelial cells was not directly associated with
a compromised ability of the cells to produce and release this type of
macromolecules in the adopted culture conditions.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Versican isoform transcription/translation in
primary endothelial cells following growth factor/cytokine
treatment. Upper table summarizes the pattern of
isoform expression as determined by RT-PCR in three primary endothelial
cell types. A-F show representative confocal
laser microscopic immunolocalizations of versican expression in HIAEC
(A-C) and human pulmonary
(D-F) artery endothelial cells in resting
conditions (A and D) and following a 48-h
treatment with VEGF (B and E) or TNF-
(C and F), as revealed by staining with mAb 5D5
(analogous results were obtained with other anti-versican
antibodies).
|
|
Modulation of Versican Expression by TNF- and VEGF--
To
determine whether expression of versican required activation of the
cells, such as those elicited by cytokines and growth factors during
inflammatory and wound-healing processes, and also implied an
alteration in the isoform expression, resting endothelial cells were
treated for different time periods with TNF- or VEGF. In all
endothelial cell types tested, and independently of the stimulating
agent, transcription of the V3 isoform was induced within 4 h
following stimulation (Fig. 4). A switch in isoform expression was also
noted in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells after treatment with
both TNF- and VEGF, which coincidently elicited a down-regulation of
the parental V0 isoform (Fig. 4). In endothelial cells, de
novo expression of the V3 isoform was accompanied by the
capability of the stimulated cells to secrete detectable amounts of
versicans with different glycanation traids (Fig. 4, B,
C, E, and F; data not shown). However,
there was no possibility of discriminating between synthesis/secretion
of the V1 and V2 isoforms from that of the parental V0 one, based
solely upon the observed reactivity of the available antibodies.
Notable was also the fact that, in contrast to the situation in smooth muscle cells, most of the versican synthesized by the endothelial cells
was retained within the cytoplasm. This apparent intracellular retention did not seem to be influenced by the cell density and, hence,
did not appear to depend on the degree of cell-cell contact.
We next examined whether stimulated endothelial cells were also capable
of translating the up-regulated V3 mRNA. For this purpose, cell
lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted in parallel with
anti-G1 (mAb 12C5 or anti-Vc antiserum) and anti-G3 antibodies (mAb
2B1). In both cases a band at 65 kDa was detected in stimulated, but
not in untreated, endothelial cells (Fig.
5).

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Western blotting with anti-G1 and anti-G3
versican antibodies (mAbs 12C5 and 2B1, respectively) of endothelial
cell lysates resolved by SDS-PAGE on 4-20% gradient gels under
non-reducing conditions. Cell extracts were prepared from HUVEC
prior to (resting) or after (stimulated) a 72-h
stimulation with VEGF or TNF .
|
|
Versican Expression in Endothelial Cells Migrating in
Vitro--
The transition from stationary to motile status in
endothelial cells engaged in wound-healing processes is known to cause overall changes in gene expression. Therefore, to determine whether endothelial cells also altered their versican isoform expression and
initiated synthesis of the PG when triggered to migrate, we adopted the
classical in vitro model of "wound healing" simulation, i.e. the so-called "scratch assay." HUVEC were allowed
to grow to confluence under normal conditions and then a central area of the monolayer was scraped away. Within 24 h, endothelial cells had migrated to repopulate the empty culture surface area and under
these conditions, the V3 isoform became detectable by RT-PCR already at
10 h following wounding (Fig.
6A). V3 expression further increased during the subsequent 14 h needed to complete the full coverage of the blotted surface area by the migrating cells (Fig. 6A). During this time interval, there was also a progressive
V0/V2 versican synthesis, as detected by immunolabeling with mAb 5D5 (Fig. 6B). Conversely, there was no obvious evidence for a
significant secretion of the macromolecules, which seemed to remain
confined to the cytoplasm.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Changes in versican isoform expression in
endothelial cells induced to migrate in a wound-healing model in
vitro. A shows representative phase-contrast
micrographs and the corresponding RT-PCR detection of versican isoform
expression in HUVEC repopulating the central area of the culture dish
at the indicated time intervals following scraping of a confluent
monolayer. B shows representative immunofluorescent
detection of versican V0/V2 expression in the same cells at the
indicated time intervals, as revealed by staining with mAb 5D5.
|
|
Versican Production by Neoangiogenic Endothelial
Cells--
Immunohistochemical stainings of soft tissue sarcoma
lesions demonstrated that versican expression was not only restricted to normal vessels, but occurred in tumor-associated capillaries and in
the stromal component of the lesions (Fig.
7, A and B). This
suggested that neoangiogenic endothelial cells were fully capable of
producing versican. This observation prompted us to investigate whether
induction of capillary formation in primary endothelial cells, which is
known to involve both cell movement and changes in cell-cell contact,
was also effective in altering the transcription/translation of
endothelial versican. For this purpose, HIAEC and HUVEC were grown in
Matrigel or fibrin clots, in the presence or absence of VEGF and
examined for their ability to transcribe and synthesize versican. In
these conditions, cells organized into capillary-like structures within
72 h after plating (Figs. 7, C and D, and 8,
A and B); maintained their constitutive V0-V2
isoform transcription, with the exception of HUVEC that consistently
failed to express the V1; and additionally attained the ability to
transcribe the V3 isoform (Fig. 7). Immunocytochemical stainings of
these endothelial formations further demonstrated that neoangiogenic
endothelial cells acquired the capability to translate the versican
mRNA into final PGs (Fig. 8,
C-F). In fact, positive staining with mAb 5D5
was seen in HIAEC and their versican secretion was slight enhanced in
the presence of VEGF. Notably, most of the secreted versican appeared
to remain associated with the tubule-like structures.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Versican deposition in neoangiogenic vessels
of human soft tissue sarcoma lesions and patterns of isoform expression
in primary endothelial cells forming capillary-like structures in
vitro. A, micrograph showing the characteristic versican
deposition detected by mAb 5D5 in neovessels and stroma of a metastatic
fibrosarcoma lesion that had formed in the lung of the patient.
B, similar staining of a leiomyosarcoma primary lesion with
mAb 5C12. C and D, tubule-like structures formed
by HIAEC (A) and HUVEC (B) after 72 h
culture in Matrigel.
|
|

View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Versican synthesis and secretion by
angiogenic HIAEC and HUVEC forming tubular structures in fibrin clots
as shown in Fig. 7. HIAEC and HUVEC were cultured in
fibrin matrices in the absence (C and D) or
presence (E and F) of VEGF. Versican deposition
was visualized by immunostaining with mAb 5D5.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previous studies have shown that versican is a ubiquitous
endothelial growth medium component of human adult connective,
supportive, and nervous tissues and that it is detectable in most of
the principal organs of the body. Characteristically, cells with
mesenchymal/fibroblastic traits are believed to express the V1 isoform
as their predominant versican PG (6, 7, 12, 17, 42), whereas the V2
isoform has been proposed to be particularly enriched in adult human, bovine, and rat brains (5, 10, 13, 22, 43, 44). Both the V0 and V3
isoforms are known to be expressed in a limited number of tissues (23,
24, 35). Our comprehensive RT-PCR analysis of the versican isoform
expression in the adult corroborates the data reported in these
previous investigations, but refutes some other previous
observations/conclusions. For instance, although we were able to assert
the hypothesized ubiquity of the V1 isoform in the human body, we did
not find evidence for V0 expression in some other tissues/organs such
as liver. In this latter organ, V3 was also absent, suggesting that
different isoform patterns may exist during fetal life and adulthood.
This notion was particularly evident when considering that the V0
isoform appeared to be the prevalent one during early embryonic
development (2, 3), but was seemingly the least represented in adult tissues.
The quantitative analysis of isoform expression also showed that
versican V0 was indeed found to be transcribed in the tissues previously reported to express this isoform, but its actual
transcriptional levels in these tissues could be considered largely
negligible. Similarly, versican V3 was found to be rather scarcely
expressed in tissues to be considered of "reference" for this
isoform, such as skin and brain. In addition, the greater levels of V1
versus V2 mRNA found here in normal human adult brain,
and the higher amounts of V2 molecules reported to be extractable from
bovine and rat brains (10, 44), indicate that these isoforms could be
differentially translated in different species. A precise tissue distribution mapping of the V0 and V3 isoforms at the protein level
awaits the availability of probes that would be capable of
discriminating between these isoforms and distinguish them from V1 and V2.
Lower Mr (50-70 kDa) versican polypeptides free
of glycosaminoglycan chains have been identified immunochemically in
brain, skin, and cartilage (5, 12, 13, 39, 45) using the anti-G1 mAb
12C5, but not in bovine brain using an antiserum directed against the N
terminus of versican (10), or when using the anti-G3 mAb 2B1 in these
different tissues. Thus, it is generally believed that the molecule
detected in these previous studies corresponds to a G1-containing
proteolytic fragment of versican, which may be analogous to the glial
hyaluronate-binding protein originally discovered in brain extracts
(45). Hence, it would not represent the intact V3 isoform.
ADAMTS-generated G1-containing versican fragments have recently
been identified in human aorta (46), thereby demonstrating a naturally
occurring proteolysis mechanism by which versican fragments
encompassing the G1 domain could be generated in vivo.
Previous studies on transformed endothelial cells of the mouse (47) and
on normal and diseased blood vessels in vivo (8, 32) have
suggested that versican could represent a widespread constitutive ECM
component of the adult endothelium. The five different endothelial cell
types examined here were indeed found to exhibit a diverse versican
isoform expression in their resting conditions, reinforcing the idea
that endothelial cells of diverse vascular beds may exhibit different
phenotypic characteristics. However, when explanted, the cells were not
capable of synthesizing detectable amounts of versican in their
non-stimulated state, irrespective of their proliferation status
(i.e. when growing at low density or to confluency) and the
presence of serum factors. These observations suggested to us two
notions. First, mature endothelial cells are not specified to
produce versican cell-autonomously. Second, the previously noted
augmentation in versican expression by smooth muscle cells and lung
fibroblasts upon stimulation with cytokines and growth factors, such
as interleukin 1 (48), platelet-derived growth factor,
TGF- (42), and heparin (activating fibroblast growth factors;
Ref. 49) may be essential for sustaining endothelial versican synthesis.
Isolated endothelial cells constitutively transcribed several of the
versican isoforms with the exception of V3. Following activation by the
pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF- , or by the primary endothelial growth
factor VEGF, this pattern was altered and a de novo
expression of V3 mRNA could be detected. The translated isoform
could also be identified by immunochemistry using the combination of
anti-G1 and anti-G3 antibodies, which detected an identically sized
SDS-PAGE band. Due to the dual identification of the polypeptide with
the above antibodies, it is unlikely that the immunoblotted band
represented two distinct proteolytic fragments derived from the core
protein termini of a larger versican isoform. Stimulated endothelial
cells were also found to initiate versican synthesis upon growth factor
or cytokine induction, but these PGs did not appear to be fully
secreted suggesting that the post-translational machinery was only
partly activated. Versicans produced by stimulated cells were not
characterized biochemically, but the different reactivity of
anti-glycan moiety antibodies suggested that they were only to a
certain extent post-translationally modified as those deposited
in situ.
The significance of the up-regulated V3 expression in activated
endothelium is presently unknown. However, recent data on V3-overproducing rat smooth muscle cells show a negative effect of this
isoform in cell growth and migration but an apparent ability to enhance
the cell-substratum avidity of the manipulated cells (50). Furthermore,
if overexpression of this versican isoform is forced in vivo
by retroviral transfer into a ballooned rat carotid artery, it promotes
neointima formation and the assembly of well structured elastic fibers
(51). Overall, these previous findings suggest that induced
expression of versican V3 in endothelial cells could influence their
interaction with the microenvironment. However, it is presently unclear
how this would occur since there is no unambiguous biochemical data in
the literature demonstrating that this versican isoform is actually
secreted by the cells. In fact, even when overexpressed in
versican-producing cells in vitro and in vivo, V3
appears to be retained within the cytoplasm (50, 51),4 despite comprising both
globular domains embodying the necessary "secretion-promoting
information". Thus, the possibility remains that V3 may not be
secreted because of not being fully processed in the Golgi apparatus
and, if so, that its effect on cell behavior may be mediated by its
modulation of intracellular processes.
In conclusion, we find that in primary human endothelial cells,
synthesis and secretion of one or more of the versican isoforms seems
to be associated with both migratory and differentiation-like processes
of the cells and is subordinate to their cell cycle progression. In
fact, whether cells were stimulated by TNF- or VEGF, involved in
neoangiogenic processes, or engaged in a wound healing situation, they
consistently initiated versican production and transcribed additional
isoforms. In particular, in all cases, there was a de novo
expression of V3. Whether this was simply a causal effect of the
mitosis-associated migration/differentiation program evoked within the
cells or whether it is a prerequisite for the ensuing of this program
remains to be determined. Tissue injury is, however, known to be
associated with an up-regulation of versican (35, 44) and other PGs,
such as decorin, biglycan, and syndecans, as well as with changes in
the glycanation profiles of these PGs. Thus, it is highly probable that
trauma also modulates the transcription pattern of versican by
triggering that of novel isoforms such as V3.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to a number of colleagues who
have provided various antibodies and purified proteoglycans and to Yuri
Sheinan and Michela Zambon for assistance with the immunohistochemical stainings.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Italian Ministry
of Health (FSN RF99 and RF00), Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro
(AIRC), and intramural research funds provided by the University of
Parma.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
These authors contributed equally to this work.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
39-0521-906601; Fax: 39-0521-905657; E-mail: rperris@cro.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206521200
2
T. Shinomura, personal communication.
3
D. Perissinotto, manuscript in preparation.
4
T. Shinomura, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PG, proteoglycan;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
DABCO, 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane;
HIAEC, human iliac artery endothelial cells;
HUVEC, human umbilical
vein endothelial cells;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor;
RT, reverse
transcriptase;
SDS, sodium dodecyl sulfate;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Landolt, R. M.,
Vaughan, L.,
Winterhalter, K. H.,
and Zimmermann, D. R.
(1995)
Anal. Biochem.
155,
275-285[CrossRef]
|
| 2.
|
Stigson, M.,
Löfberg, J.,
and Kjellén, L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3246-3253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Perissinotto, D.,
Iacopetti, P.,
Pettway, Z.,
Gabriele, E.,
Zambon, M.,
Bellina, I.,
Colombatti, A.,
Pettway, Z.,
Bronner-Fraser, M.,
Shinomura, T.,
Kimata, K.,
Löfberg, J.,
Mörgelin, M.,
and Perris, R.
(2000)
Development
127,
2823-2842[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Habuchi, H.,
Kimata, K.,
and Susuki, S.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
1031-1040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Perides, G.,
Rahemtulla, F.,
Lane, W. S.,
Asher, R. A.,
and Bignami, A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23883-23887[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Yamagata, M.,
Shinomura, T.,
and Kimata, K.
(1993)
Anat. Embryol.
187,
433-444[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Carrino, D. A.,
Dennis, J. E.,
Drushel, R. F.,
Haynesworth, S. E.,
and Caplan, A. I.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
298,
51-60[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Bode-Lesniewska, B.,
Dours-Zimmermann, M. T.,
Odermatt, R. F.,
Briner, J.,
Heitz, P. U.,
and Zimmermann, D. R.
(1996)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
44,
303-312[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Henderson, D. J.,
and Copp, A. J.
(1998)
Circ. Res.
83,
523-532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Schmalfeldt, M.,
Dours-Zimmermann, M. T.,
Winterhalter, K. H.,
and Zimmermann, D. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15758-15764[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ericksen, G.,
Carlstedt, I.,
Mörgelin, M.,
Uldbjerg, N.,
and Malmström, A.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
340,
613-620[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Sorrell, J. M.,
Carrino, D. A.,
Baber, M. A.,
and Caplan, A. I.
(1999)
Anat. Embryol.
199,
45-56[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Asher, R. A.,
Morgenstern, D. A.,
Shearer, M. C.,
Adcock, K. H.,
Pesheva, P.,
and Fawcett, J. W.
(2002)
J. Neurosci.
22,
2225-2236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Oegema, T. R. Jr.,
Hascall, V. C.,
and Eisenstein, R.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1312-1318[Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
McMurtrey, J.,
Radhakrishnamurthy, B.,
Dalferes, E. R., Jr.,
Berenson, G. S.,
and Gregory, J. D.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
1621-1626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Kaapor, R.,
Phelps, C. F.,
and Wight, T. N.
(1986)
Biochem. J.
240,
575-583[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Kimata, K.,
Oike, Y.,
Tani, K.,
Shinomura, T.,
Yamagata, M.,
Uritani, M.,
and Suzuki, S.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
13517-13525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Shinomura, T.,
Jensen, K. L.,
Yamagata, M.,
Kimata, K.,
and Solursh, M.
(1990)
Anat. Embryol.
181,
227-233[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Shinomura, T.,
Nishida, Y.,
Ito, K.,
and Kimata, K.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14461-14469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Shinomura, T.,
Zako, M.,
Ito, K.,
Uijta, M.,
and Kimata, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10328-10333[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Zimmermann, D. R.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
2975-2981[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Dours-Zimmermann, M. T.,
and Zimmermann, D. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32992-32998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Ito, K.,
Shinomura, T.,
Zako, M.,
Ujita, M.,
and Kimata, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
958-965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Zako, M.,
Shinomura, T.,
Ujita, M.,
Ito, K.,
and Kimata, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3914-3918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Zako, M.,
Shinomura, T.,
and Kimata, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9325-9331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Aspberg, A.,
Adam, S.,
Kostka, G.,
Timpl, R.,
and Heinegård, D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20444-20449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Wight, T. N.,
Lara, S.,
Riessen, R.,
LeBaron, R.,
and Isner, I.
(1997)
Am. J. Pathol.
151,
963-973[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Isogai, Z.,
Aspberg, A.,
Keene, D. R.,
Ono, R. N.,
Reinhardt, D. P.,
and Sakai, L. Y.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
4565-4572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Dalferes, E. R. Jr.,
Radhakrishnamurtly, B.,
Ruiz, HA.,
and Berenson, G. S.
(1987)
Exp. Mol. Pathol.
47,
363-376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Lark, M. W.,
Yeo, T. K.,
Mar, H.,
Lara, S.,
Hellstrom, I.,
Hellstrom, K. E.,
and Wight, T. N.
(1988)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
36,
1211-1221[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Yao, L. Y.,
Moody, C.,
Schonherr, E.,
Wight, T. N.,
and Sandell, L. J.
(1994)
Matrix Biol.
14,
213-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Riessen, R.,
Isner, J. M.,
Blessing, E.,
Loushin, C.,
Nikol, S.,
and Wight, T. N.
(1994)
Am. J. Pathol.
144,
2658-2664
|
| 33.
|
Matsuura, R.,
Isaka, N.,
Imanaka-Yoshida, K.,
Yoshida, T.,
Sakakura, T.,
and Nakano, T.
(1996)
J. Pathol.
180,
311-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Evanko, S. P.,
Raines, E. W.,
Ross, R.,
Gold, L. I.,
and Wight, T. N.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
152,
533-546[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Lemire, J.,
Braun, K. R.,
Maurel, P.,
Kaplan, E. D.,
Schwartz, S. M.,
and Wight, T. N.
(1999)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
19,
1630-1639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Lee, R. T.,
Yamamoto, C.,
Feng, Y.,
Potter-Perigo, S.,
Briggs, W. H.,
Landschulz, K. T.,
Turi, T. G.,
Thompson, J. F.,
Libby, P.,
and Wight, T. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13847-13851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
| Mazzucato, M., Cozzi, M. R., Pradella, P., Perissinotto, D.,
Malmström, A., Mörgelin, M., Spessotto, P., Colombatti, A.,
De Marco, L., and Perris, R. (2002) FASEB J., in
press
|
| 38.
|
Le Baron, R. G.,
Zimmermann, D. R.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1992)
Hyaluronate binding properties of versican.
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10003-10010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Isogai, Z.,
Shinomura, T.,
Yamakawa, N.,
Takeuchi, J.,
Tsuji, T.,
Heinegård, D.,
and Kimata, K.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
3902-3908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Schonherr, E.,
Jarvelainen, H. T.,
Sandell, L. J.,
and Wight, T. N.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
17640-17647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Paulus, W.,
Baur, I.,
Dours-Zimmermann, M. T.,
and Zimmermann, D. R.
(1996)
J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.
55,
528-533[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Milev, P.,
Maurel, P.,
Chiba, A.,
Mevissen, M.,
Popp, S.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Margolis, R. K.,
and Margolis, R. U.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
247,
207-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Asher, R.,
Perides, G.,
Vanderhaegen, J.-J.,
and Bignami, A.
(1991)
J. Neurosci. Res.
28,
410-421[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Sandy, J. D.,
Westling, J.,
Kenagy, R. D.,
Iruela-Arispe, M. L.,
Verscharen, C.,
Rodroiguez-Mazaneque, J. C.,
Zimmermann, D. R.,
Lemire, J. M.,
Fisher, J. W.,
Wight, T. N.,
and Clowes, A. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13372-13378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Morita, H.,
Takeuchi, T.,
Suzuki, S.,
Maeda, K.,
Yamada, K.,
Eguchi, G.,
and Kimata, K.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
265,
61-68[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Tufvesson, E.,
and Westergren-Thornsson, G.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem.
77,
298-309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Tan, E. M. L.,
Dodge, G. R.,
Sorger, T.,
Kovalszky, I.,
Unger, G. A.,
Yang, L.,
Levine, E. M.,
and Iozzo, R. V.
(1991)
Lab. Invest.
64,
474-482[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Lemire, J. M.,
Merrilees, M. J.,
Braun, K. R.,
and Wight, T. N.
(2002)
J. Cell. Physiol.
190,
38-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Merrilees, M.,
Lemire, J. M.,
Fisher, J. W.,
Kinsella, M. G.,
Braun, K. R.,
Clowes, A. W.,
and Wight, T. N.
(2002)
Circ. Res.
90,
481-487[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. T. Read, M. Rahmani, S. Boroomand, S. Allahverdian, B. M. McManus, and P. S. Rennie
Androgen Receptor Regulation of the Versican Gene through an Androgen Response Element in the Proximal Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 2, 2007;
282(44):
31954 - 31963.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Faggian, A. J. Fosang, M. Zieba, M. J. Wallace, and S. B. Hooper
Changes in versican and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans during structural development of the lung
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
August 1, 2007;
293(2):
R784 - R792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Koyama, T. Hibi, Z. Isogai, M. Yoneda, M. Fujimori, J. Amano, M. Kawakubo, R. Kannagi, K. Kimata, S. Taniguchi, et al.
Hyperproduction of Hyaluronan in Neu-Induced Mammary Tumor Accelerates Angiogenesis through Stromal Cell Recruitment: Possible Involvement of Versican/PG-M
Am. J. Pathol.,
March 1, 2007;
170(3):
1086 - 1099.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Pukkila, A. Kosunen, K. Ropponen, J. Virtaniemi, J. Kellokoski, E. Kumpulainen, R. Pirinen, J. Nuutinen, R. Johansson, and V.-M. Kosma
High stromal versican expression predicts unfavourable outcome in oral squamous cell carcinoma
J. Clin. Pathol.,
March 1, 2007;
60(3):
267 - 272.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Kodama, Hasengaowa, T Kusumoto, N Seki, T Matsuo, Y Ojima, K Nakamura, A Hongo, and Y Hiramatsu
Prognostic significance of stromal versican expression in human endometrial cancer
Ann. Onc.,
February 1, 2007;
18(2):
269 - 274.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Blais, C. L. Addison, R. Edge, T. Falls, H. Zhao, K. Wary, C. Koumenis, H. P. Harding, D. Ron, M. Holcik, et al.
Perk-Dependent Translational Regulation Promotes Tumor Cell Adaptation and Angiogenesis in Response to Hypoxic Stress
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2006;
26(24):
9517 - 9532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Sheng, G. Wang, D. P. La Pierre, J. Wen, Z. Deng, C.-K. A. Wong, D. Y. Lee, and B. B. Yang
Versican Mediates Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2006;
17(4):
2009 - 2020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yamaguchi, K. Kitaya, N. Daikoku, T. Yasuo, S. Fushiki, and H. Honjo
Potential Selectin L Ligands Involved in Selective Recruitment of Peripheral Blood CD16(-) Natural Killer Cells into Human Endometrium
Biol Reprod,
January 1, 2006;
74(1):
35 - 40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Frevert and P. L. Sannes
Matrix proteoglycans as effector molecules for epithelial cell function
Eur. Respir. Rev.,
December 1, 2005;
14(97):
137 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. A. Carroll, L. L. Nikitenko, R. Bicknell, and A. L. Harris
Antiangiogenic Activity of a Domain Deletion Mutant of Tissue Plasminogen Activator Containing Kringle 2
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
April 1, 2005;
25(4):
736 - 741.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bjornson, J. Moses, A. Ingemansson, B. Haraldsson, and J. Sorensson
Primary human glomerular endothelial cells produce proteoglycans, and puromycin affects their posttranslational modification
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
April 1, 2005;
288(4):
F748 - F756.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Sheng, G. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Liang, J. Wen, P.-S. Zheng, Y. Wu, V. Lee, J. Slingerland, D. Dumont, et al.
The Roles of Versican V1 and V2 Isoforms in Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
March 1, 2005;
16(3):
1330 - 1340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. N. Corps, A. H. N. Robinson, T. Movin, M. L. Costa, D. C. Ireland, B. L. Hazleman, and G. P. Riley
Versican splice variant messenger RNA expression in normal human Achilles tendon and tendinopathies
Rheumatology,
August 1, 2004;
43(8):
969 - 972.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. N. Wight and M. J. Merrilees
Proteoglycans in Atherosclerosis and Restenosis: Key Roles for Versican
Circ. Res.,
May 14, 2004;
94(9):
1158 - 1167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wu, L. Chen, L. Cao, W. Sheng, and B. B. Yang
Overexpression of the C-terminal PG-M/versican domain impairs growth of tumor cells by intervening in the interaction between epidermal growth factor receptor and {beta}1-integrin
J. Cell Sci.,
May 1, 2004;
117(11):
2227 - 2237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|