Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202103200 on September 18, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47662-47670, December 6, 2002
Metal Ion-mediated Agonism and Agonist Enhancement in
Melanocortin MC1 and MC4 Receptors*
Birgitte
Holst
§¶,
Christian E.
Elling§, and
Thue W.
Schwartz
§
From the
Laboratory for Molecular Pharmacology,
Institute of Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum
Institute, Blegdamsvej 3, Copenhagen DK-2200 and § 7TM
Pharma A/S, Rønnegade 2, Copenhagen, DK-2100, Denmark
Received for publication, March 4, 2002, and in revised form, September 9, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
An endogenous metal-ion site in the melanocortin
MC1 and MC4 receptors was characterized mainly in transiently
transfected COS-7 cells. ZnCl2 alone stimulated
signaling through the Gs pathway with a potency of 11 and 13 µM and an efficacy of 50 and 20% of that of
-melanocortin stimulating hormone (
-MSH) in the MC1 and MC4
receptors, respectively. In the presence of peptide agonist, Zn(II)
acted as an enhancer on both receptors, because it shifted the
dose-response curves to the left: most pronounced was a 6-fold increase
in
-MSH potency on the MC1 receptor. The effect of the metal ion
appeared to be additive, because the maximal cAMP response for
-MSH
in the presence of Zn(II) was 60% above the maximal response for the
peptide alone. The affinity of Zn(II) could be increased through
binding of the metal ion in complex with small hydrophobic chelators.
The binding affinities and profiles were similar for a number of the
2,2'-bipyridine and 1,10-phenanthroline analogs in complex with Zn(II)
in the MC1 and MC4 receptors. However, the potencies and efficacies of
the metal-ion complexes were very different in the two receptors, and
close to full agonism was obtained in the MC1 receptor. Metal
ion-chelator complexes having antagonistic properties were also
found. An initial attempt to map the metal-ion binding site in the MC1
receptor indicated that Cys271 in extracellular loop 3 and
possibly Asp119 at the extracellular end of TM-III, which
are both conserved among all MC receptors, are parts of the site. It is
concluded that the function of the MC1 and MC4 receptors can be
positively modulated by metal ions acting both as partial agonists and
as potentiators for other agonists, including the endogenous peptide ligand
-MSH at Zn(II) concentrations that could be physiological. Furthermore, the metal ion-chelator complexes may serve as leads in the
development of novel melanocortin receptor modulators.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The melanocortins, adrenocorticotropic hormone and
-,
-, and
-melanocyte-stimulating hormone
(MSH),1 are all derived from
the precursor protein pro-opiomelanocortin. They are peptide hormones
and neuropeptides, which exert their function through the five
different members of the melanocortin receptor MC family, MC1 to MC5.
These receptors are widely distributed both in the periphery and in the
central nervous system. The physiological functions of the receptors
cover a correspondingly diverse spectrum ranging from regulation of
pigmentation (MC1 receptor), adrenal cortical steroidogenesis
(MC2/adrenocorticotropic hormone receptor), and exocrine secretion (MC5
receptor) to energy homeostasis, appetite regulation, and penile
erection (MC3 and -4 receptors) (1, 2). The focus on this receptor
family has greatly increased following the discovery of the involvement
of initially the MC4 receptor and later the MC3 receptors in appetite
regulation and metabolic control (3-7). Mice with a genetically
disrupted MC4 receptor display an obese phenotype characterized by
excessively increased food intake and a decreased metabolic rate (4,
8). A similar phenomenon of pathological obesity is seen in humans with
inactivating mutations of the MC4 receptor (9, 10). Both observations
indicate that the MC4 receptor could be a useful target in the
treatment of obesity and type II diabetes and, that agonists for this
receptor would be needed. Importantly, intra-cerebrospinal injection of
peptide agonists for the melanocortin receptors does reduce obesity in
animal models, an effect that was reversible by co-injection of the
corresponding antagonists (11). However, only very recently have the
first high potency non-peptide agonists been described for the
melanocortin receptors (12).
Metal ions are required for the function of numerous proteins. Zn(II)
is known to serve as a part of the active site in, for example
metalloenzymes, and to act as a stabilizer of protein structure, for
example in the Zn(II) finger binding motif of transcription factors.
More recently it has been discovered that zinc ions also bind with high
affinity to and modulate the function of a number of membrane proteins,
particularly in neural tissues. This has been shown to be the
case for ion channels such as the glutaminergic N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor and the
nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (13-15); for membrane transporters
such as the dopaminergic and glutaminergic transporter (16, 17); and
for 7TM receptors such as the tachykinin NK3 receptor, the
2-adrenergic receptor, and the galanin receptor
(18-20). Zn(II) is present in high concentrations in several regions
of the brain, where it is stored in synaptic vesicles of the nerve
terminals and is co-released with neurotransmitters in micromolar
concentrations to the synaptic gap upon neuronal activation (21,
22).
In 7TM receptors both antagonist and agonist binding sites have been
re-engineered into metal-ion sites, where free metal ions and metal
ions in complex with small organic metal-ion chelators have been
demonstrated to mimic the action of the antagonist or of the agonist,
respectively (23-25). Because the geometry of metal-ion binding sites
in general is very well characterized in respect of distance and
angles, such metal-ion sites have provided important information about
the structure and potential activation mechanism of 7TM receptors (23,
25-27) and recently of 12TM transporter molecules (16, 28). The
antagonistic metal-ion sites provide important pieces of structural
information due to the distance constraints such sites impose upon the
molecular models of the 7TM receptors (27), for which only a single
high resolution x-ray structure of the inactive form is otherwise
available (29). The few agonistic metal-ion sites, which as yet have
been described, provide the first distance constraints in the active
conformation of 7TM receptors. For example, introduction of a metal-ion
binding site that constrained the third and the seventh transmembrane segment in a well-defined conformation result in 25% partial agonism (24, 25).
In the present study we find that both the MC1 receptor and the MC4
receptor possess endogenous metal-ion sites through which Zn(II) can
function both as a partial agonist and as an enhancer or potentiator
for the peptide agonists (Fig. 1). The
high affinity of the metal-ion site suggests that the metal ion-induced
modulation of the endogenous melanocortin receptor activity is of
physiological relevance. Moreover, not only free Zn(II) but also the
metal ion in complex with small organic, hydrophobic chelators could
activate the MC receptors even with higher efficacy and potency than
the free metal ion, suggesting a possible route for the design of novel
modulating agents for this receptor family.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Serpentine and helical wheel model of the MC1
receptor. The potential metal ion-chelating residues that
are mutated in the present study are indicated in white on
red. A putative disulfide bridge between Cys265
and Cys273 is indicated in extracellular loop 3 (see
"Discussion"). Note the ultra short extracellular loop 2, which is
characteristic for all melanocortin receptors. A few highly conserved
"fingerprint" residues in each transmembrane segment are indicated
in black on gray. A generic numbering system for
7TM receptor residues is used throughout this report (56).
|
|
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The peptides
-MSH and NDP-
-MSH were
purchased from Peninsula (St. Helens, Merseyside, UK). The metal ion
chelators 2,2'-bipyridine, 1,10-phenanthroline,
4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (1a), 5-phenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (1b), 5-chloro-1,10-phenanthroline (1c),
2,9-dimethanol-1,10-phenanthroline (1e), and
2,9-bis(trichloromethyl)-1,10-phenanthroline (1f) were all obtained
from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). 5-Amino-1,10-phenanthroline was
obtained from Polysciences Europe GmbH (Eppelheim, Germany), whereas the three 2,2'-bipyridine analogs were kindly donated from 7TM
Pharma A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark). The Zn(II)-chelator complexes were
prepared by dissolving the chelator compounds either in ethanol or in
Me2SO and mixing with aqueous solutions of
ZnCl2 to a final molar ratio of 3:1 in the case of
1,10-phenanthroline and 2,2'-bipyridine and 2:1 for the rest of the compounds.
Molecular Biology--
The human MC4 receptor cDNA was
cloned by PCR from brain cDNA library, whereas the mouse MC1
receptor was kindly provided by Dr. Roger Cone (Vollum Institute,
Portland, OR). The cDNA were cloned into the eukaryotic expression
vector pcDNA1 or pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Mutations
were constructed by PCR using the overlap expression method (30). The
PCR products were digested with appropriate restriction endonucleases,
purified, and cloned into the pcDNA3. All PCR experiments were
performed using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
according to the instructions of the manufacturer. All mutations were
verified by restriction endonuclease mapping and subsequent DNA
sequence analysis using an ABI 310 automated sequencer.
Transfections and Tissue Culture--
COS-7 cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium 1885 supplemented with 10% fetal
calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and 0.01 mg/ml gentamicin. The
expression plasmids containing the cDNAs encoding the wild-type or
the mutated receptors were transiently expressed after transfection
according to the calcium phosphate precipitation method (31), and
assays were performed 48 h after transfection. The malignant
melanoma cell line COLO 829 was grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented
with 2 mM L-glutamine adjusted to contain 1.5 g/liter sodium bicarbonate, 4.5 g/liter glucose, 10 mM
HEPES, 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate, and 10% fetal bovine serum.
Binding Assay--
One day after transfection, the cells were
transferred and seeded in multiwell plates for assay. The number of
cells plated per well was chosen so as to obtain 5-10% binding of the
radioligand added. Two days after transfection the cells were assayed
in competition binding assays using 125I-NDP-
-MSH as a
tracer. Radioligand was bound in a buffer composed of 0.5 ml of 50 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.4, supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2, 5 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% bovine
serum albumin, and displaced in a dose-dependent manner by
unlabeled ligands. The assay was performed in duplicate for 3 h at
25 °C and stopped by washing twice in the buffer. Cell-associated,
receptor-bound radioligands were determined by the addition of lysis
buffer (48% urea, 2% Nonidet P-40 in 3 M acetic acid).
The concentration of radioligands in the assay corresponds to a final
concentration of ~20 pM. The metal ion-chelating
compounds were added in a 2-fold molar excess to ensure that no free
metal ion was present.
cAMP Assay--
COS-7 cells (2.5 × 105 cells
per well) or the melanoma cell line (2 × 105 cells
per well) were incubated for 24 h with 2 µCi of
[3H]adenine (Amersham Biosciences, TRK 311) in 1 ml of
medium. Cells were washed twice and incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in
1 ml of freshly prepared binding buffer supplemented with 1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (Sigma, I5879), 40 µg/ml
bacitracin, and various concentrations of ligands or 50 µM forskolin. After incubation, cells were placed on ice,
medium was removed, and cells were lysed with 1 ml of 5% (w/v)
trichloroacetic acid, supplemented with 0.1 mM cAMP and 0.1 mM ATP for 30 min. The lysis mixtures were loaded onto a
Dowex 50W-X4 (Bio-Rad, 142-1351) column (Bio-Rad, poly-prep columns, 731-1550), which was washed with 2 ml of water and placed onto the top
of alumina columns (Sigma, A9003) and washed again with 10 ml of water.
The columns were eluted with 6 ml of 0.1 M imidazole (Sigma, I0125) into 15 ml of scintillation fluid (Highsafe III). Columns were re-used up to 10 times. Dowex columns were regenerated by
adding 10 ml of 2 N HCl followed by 10 ml of water; the
alumina columns were regenerated by adding 2 ml of 1 M
imidazole, 10 ml of 0.1 M imidazole, and finally 5 ml of
water. Determinations were made in triplicates.
Data Analysis--
IC50 and EC50 values
were determined by non-linear regression using the Prism 3.0 software
(GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Values of the dissociation and
inhibition constants (Kd and Ki)
were estimated from competition binding experiments using the equation,
Kd = IC50
L and
Ki = IC50/(1 + L/Kd), where L is the
concentration of the radioactive ligand. For determination of
statistical significant correlation, the Spearman test was applied.
 |
RESULTS |
Effect of Zn(II) on Ligand Binding--
Competition binding
studies were performed for both the MC1 and MC4 receptors in
transiently transfected COS7 cells using 125I-NDP-
-MSH
as radioligand. Zn(II) displaced the 125I-NDP-
-MSH with
an IC50 value of 13 µM in the MC1 receptor
and 19 µM in the MC4 receptor, corresponding to the
affinity observed for example in bis-His metal-ion sites, previously
engineered in 7TM receptors (Fig. 2 and
Table I) (23, 26). However, in the
dose-response experiments Zn(II) only displaced ~50% of the
maximally bound 125I-NDP-
-MSH, whereas the peptide
ligands
-MSH and NDP-
-MSH displaced the radioligand fully,
i.e. down to ~5% unspecific binding (Fig. 2). In
receptors with artificially engineered metal-ion binding sites, for
example in the NK1 receptor and the kappa opioid receptor, Zn(II) has
previously been shown to fully displace the employed radioligands (23,
26, 27). In the MC1 and the MC4 receptors, Zn(II) in complex with, for
example, the metal-ion chelator 1c (see below) also displaced the
radioligand fully (Fig. 2). Cu(II) competed for radioligand binding
with an affinity at 66 µM for the MC1 receptor and 93 µM for the MC4 receptor, i.e. in both cases
~5-fold lower affinity than Zn(II).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Competition binding experiment for Zn(II) in
the wild-type MC1 and MC4 receptor. Displacement of
125I-NDP- -MSH by Zn(II) (squares) and
compound 1c (Zn-5-chloro-1,10-phenanthroline) (circles) in
the MC1 receptor (A) and in the MC4 receptor (B).
The basal level is defined by competition with 10 6
M -MSH. Whole cell binding experiments were performed in
transiently transfected COS-7 cells. Data are mean ± S.E. from
seven independent experiments made in duplicate.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Ligand affinities in the MC1 and MC4 receptors
Kd and Ki values from receptor
competition binding assays for peptide ligands, Zn(II) and
Zn(II)-chelator complexes in the MC1 and MC4 receptors.
|
|
Effect of Zn(II) on Signal Transduction--
In a melanoma
cell line expressing the human MC1 receptor, Zn(II) stimulated cAMP
production with an efficacy similar to that of MSH and with a potency
of 79 µM. However, to ensure that the effect of Zn(II)
was in fact mediated through the MC receptor, the further functional
characterization was performed in transiently transfected COS7 cells
(Fig. 3). Here, Zn(II) acted as a partial agonist both in cells transfected with the MC1 receptor and the MC4
receptor. On the MC1 receptor, Zn(II) had an efficacy of ~50% as
compared with
-MSH (Fig.
4A), whereas on the MC4
receptor Zn(II) showed only 20% efficacy compared with
-MSH (Fig.
4B). The potency of Zn(II) was 11 and 13 µM
for the MC1 and the MC4 receptors, respectively (EC50
values), which corresponds to the affinity for Zn(II) determined in the
competition binding experiments. In contrast, Cu(II) had no
specific stimulatory effect on either the MC1 or the MC4 receptor. In
mock transfected cells Zn(II) only showed a minimal stimulatory effect
and only at very high concentration (Fig. 4B). In cells
transfected with two other G
s-coupled receptors the
2-adrenergic and the V2 receptor Zn(II) had no stimulatory
effect.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Cyclic AMP accumulation in response to Zn(II)
and -MSH in a human melanoma cell line.
Dose-response curves for -MSH (circles) and Zn(II)
(squares). Data are mean ± S.E. from five independent
experiments. The Emax is 4 .7 fmol/105 cells, and EC50 is 7.5 nM
for -MSH; the Emax is 5.2 fmol/105 cells and EC50 is 79 µM
for Zn(II).
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
cAMP accumulation in response to Zn(II) in
COS7 cells transiently transfected with the MC1 or MC4 receptors.
A and B, dose-response curves for Zn(II)
(squares) alone in the MC1- and MC4-transfected cells and
for comparison the response observed in mock transfected cells is shown
in B (triangles). In C and
D are shown dose-response curves for Zn(II) administrated
together with a sub-maximal dose of a full agonist for the MC1 receptor
-MSH (10 6 M) and for the MC4 receptor
NDP- -MSH (10 8 M). Data are mean ± S.E. from three to seven independent experiments made in
duplicate.
|
|
According to basic pharmacological theory (32), a partial agonist
should behave as an antagonist of the full agonist and dose-dependently bring the cAMP turnover down to the level
observed with maximal occupancy of the partial agonist alone,
i.e. Zn(II). However, the Zn(II)-mediated inhibition of the
agonist-induced cAMP accumulation was in fact biphasic. As shown in
Fig. 4C, Zn(II) in concentrations from 1 to 10 µM inhibited the
-MSH-induced cAMP stimulation on the
MC1 receptor down to ~60% of the
-MSH response. However, at
higher concentrations of zinc ions an increase in the cAMP accumulation
to ~160% of the maximal
-MSH response was observed. In the MC4
receptor a similar biphasic pattern was observed, although the
inhibitory component was more pronounced, because Zn(II) in
concentrations from 1 to 10 µM inhibited NPD-
-MSH (
-MSH has a potency at 350 nM on the MC4 receptor in
COS-7 cells, therefore, the more potent agonist NDP-
-MSH was used on
the MC4 receptor)-induced cAMP production down to ~35% (Fig.
4D). As in the MC1 receptor, at higher concentrations the
inhibitory effect of the metal ion apparently disappeared, and from 10 to 100 µM Zn(II) the cAMP accumulation was increased to
the level observed with NPD-
-MSH alone (Fig. 4D). These
experiments indicate that Zn(II) functions not only as a partial
agonist on the MC1 and MC4 receptors but apparently also as a
potentiator of the agonistic function of the peptide agonists,
-MSH
and NDP-
-MSH. This was directly studied by performing dose-response
experiments with
-MSH/NDP-
-MSH in the presence and absence of
Zn(II). Addition of a constant concentration of Zn(II)
(10
4 M) shifted the dose-response curve for
-MSH and NDP-
-MSH to the left in the MC1 and the MC4 receptors,
respectively, indicating that Zn(II) does act as an enhancer or
potentiator of the peptide agonist (Fig.
5). The enhancing effect of Zn(II) was
most pronounced in the MC1 receptor, where the
-MSH potency
(EC50 in respect of cAMP stimulation) without Zn(II) was
116 nM, and in the presence of zinc (10
4
M) it was increased to 20 nM (Fig.
5A). Zn(II) at 10
4 M gave ~50%
of the maximal
-MSH-induced stimulation; however, as shown in Fig. 4
the combination of Zn(II) and
-MSH gave a supra-maximal, additive
response, because the dose-response curve for
-MSH was basically
shifted upward in the presence of Zn(II) (Fig. 5A). A
similar, but smaller, enhancing and additive effect of Zn(II) on the
-MSH stimulation of cAMP accumulation was observed in the MC4
receptor; however, instead of a 6-fold shift in potency only a 2-fold
shift of the dose-response curve for
-MSH from 1.1 to 0.6 nM was observed (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Zn(II) modulation of agonist dose-response
curves in the MC1 and MC4 receptors. A, -MSH-induced
cAMP accumulation for the MC1 receptor in the presence
(circles) and absence (squares) of Zn(II) at a
concentration of 10 4 M. B,
NDP- -MSH-induced cAMP accumulation in the presence and absence of
Zn(II) at a concentration of 10 4 M. The
experiments in each panel were performed in parallel in transiently
transfected COS-7 cells. Data are mean ± S.E. from four
independent experiments made in duplicate.
|
|
The Effect of Metal Ion Chelator Complexes on the Melanocortin
Receptors--
Previously we have found that metal ions may bind to
metal-ion sites in receptors in complex with certain small organic,
hydrophobic metal-ion chelators (24, 25). In the melanocortin
receptors, Zn(II) in complex with 1,10-phenanthroline and with 2, 2'
bipyridine bound with affinities similar to that of the free metal ion,
i.e. with Ki values of 24 and 22 µM, respectively, at the MC1 receptor (Table I). However,
in contrast to the free metal ion, the complex between the chelator and
the metal ions inhibited the radioligand as efficiently as the peptide
agonists did, i.e. down to the unspecific level (Fig. 2).
Six 1,10-phenanthroline analogs and three 2,2'-bipyridine analogs were
tested for their ability to bind to and activate both the MC1 and the
MC4 receptors (Tables I and II). In
general, the tested 1,10-phenanthroline analogs in complex with Zn(II)
showed a 2- to 20-fold increase in affinity compared with the
unmodified Zn(II)-1,10-phenanthroline. Only the compound 1f where the
1,10-phenanthroline was substituted with trichloromethyl groups in
positions 2 and 9, i.e. in the position next to the metal
ion chelating nitrogens, bound the MC1 receptor with approximately the
same affinity as the Zn(II)-1,10-phenanthroline or free Zn(II).
Similarly, most of the 2,2'-bipyridine analogs in complex with zinc had
an increased affinity for the MC1 and MC4 receptor compared with
Zn(II)-2,2'-bipyridine (Table I). Interestingly, the two melanocortin
receptors had a very similar pharmacological profile for the metal
ion-chelator complexes when tested in competition binding analysis.
That is, the affinity of the different metal ion-chelator complexes to
the MC1 and the MC4 receptors correlated closely, with an r
value of 0.89 (p < 0.0001, Spearman test). This could
indicate that the metal-ion site is conserved among the MC
receptors.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Agonist efficacy and potency for Zn(II) and Zn(II) chelator compounds
in the MC1 and MC4 receptors
Efficacy was determined as the cAMP response to 100 µM of
the ligands expressed as percentage of maximum Zn(II)-induced
stimulation.
|
|
Zn(II)-1,10-phenanthroline and Zn(II)-2,2'-bipyridine as well as the
analogs were tested for their ability to activate the receptors (Table
II). In contrast to the findings in the competition binding
experiments, the MC1 and MC4 receptors exhibited very different
pharmacological profiles for the metal ion chelator compounds when
tested in the functional assay. Thus, despite the fact that the metal
ion-chelator complexes bound with very similar affinity in the two
receptors, seven out of the eleven complexes acted as agonists on the
MC1 receptor but only two on the MC4 receptor. Furthermore, the most
efficacious complex on the MC1 had no effect on the MC4 receptor. The
molecular structure of the chelators was important for the degree of
activation they induced on the MC1 receptor. Zn(II)-1,10-phenanthroline
and Zn(II)-2,2'-dipyridine had a lower efficacy than the free zinc ion
(Fig. 6A and Table II).
However, when these simple chelators were chemically modified, higher
efficacies could be obtained. One of the compounds, 1c (Zn-(5-chloro-1,10-phenanthroline), was not only 2-fold more potent than the free metal ion but also had a higher efficacy reaching 167%
of the maximally Zn(II)-induced cAMP production (Fig. 6A). Other Zn(II)-chelator complexes, 1d (Zn-(5-amino-1,10-phenanthroline), and the three bipyridine derivatives activated the MC1 receptor with an
efficacy slightly lower than zinc but better than the chelator
scaffolds without substitutions.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
cAMP accumulation induced by metal ion
chelators in complex with Zn(II) in the MC1 and MC4 receptors.
A, cAMP accumulation induced by Zn(II) (squares)
and Zn(II) in complex with the metal-ion chelators, 1,10-phenanthroline
(triangles), and the 1,10-phenanthroline analog 1c
(circles) in the MC1 receptor. B, cAMP
accumulation induced by Zn(II) (squares) and Zn(II) in
complex with the 2b analog of 2,2'-bipyridine (circles) in
the MC4 receptor. The experiments were performed in transiently
transfected COS-7 cells. Data are mean ± S.E. for three to seven
independent experiments made in duplicate. C, structures of
a number of metal ion chelators for which their ability to bind to and
stimulate the MC1 and/or the MC4 receptor is shown in A and
B or in Tables I and II.
|
|
On the MC4 receptor, where the free Zn(II) was only a 20% partial
agonist, none of the metal-ion complexes had a higher efficacy than
free Zn(II). However, two of the 2,2'-bipyridine compounds, 2b and 2c,
stimulated the receptor with a higher potency than the free zinc ion
and with appreciable efficacies of 62 and 53% that of the free metal
ion (Fig. 6B).
The compounds that bound to the melanocortin receptors but did not
activate the receptors would be expected to function as antagonists.
The dose-response curve on the MC1 receptor for one of these, compound
1b, is shown in Fig. 7. As expected the
metal ion-chelator complex inhibited the
-MSH-stimulated cAMP
production with a potency of 1.1 µM, which is similar to
the affinity of the compound determined in the binding assays. For
comparison, the biphasic inhibition stimulation curve for the free
Zn(II) is also shown.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Antagonistic properties of a metal-ion
chelator in complex with Zn(II) in the MC1 receptor. Inhibition of
the -MSH-induced cAMP accumulation by compound 1b in complex with
Zn(II) in transiently transfected COS-7 cells. Data are mean ± S.E. from three to seven independent experiments made in duplicate. The
complex, biphasic inhibition/enhancement curve for the free metal ion,
Zn(II), is shown for comparison.
|
|
Attempt to Locate the Metal-ion Binding Site in the MC1
Receptor--
Fourteen potential metal binding residues (cysteines,
histidines, and acidic residues), located in the extracellular part of
the transmembrane segments, in the extracellular loops, or in the
membrane-close part of the N-terminal extension of the MC1 receptor,
were substituted with a residue without metal ion-coordinating properties, i.e. either with an alanine or with another,
more structurally conservative substitution (Fig. 1). Dose-response curves with respect to stimulation of cAMP production were performed for both Zn(II) and
-MSH in each of the mutant receptors, and the
EC50 values for the two agonists are listed in Table
III.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Effect of receptor mutagenesis on the MC1 receptor for -MSH- and
Zn(II)-inducedagonism determined in cAMP accumulation
|
|
Most of the mutations affected neither the zinc-induced nor the
-MSH-induced stimulation of cAMP production. In two cases, Glu92 and Glu100, the Ala substitutions were
not tolerated, but substitution with the structurally more similar but
non-metal binding Gln residue revealed no or only minor effect on the
potency of the two agonists (Table III). Substitution of
His258 located on the close interface between TM-VI and
TM-VII eliminated both
-MSH and Zn(II) stimulation, conceivably due
to misfolding of the receptor.
Cys residues located in the extracellular part of 7TM
receptors are frequently but not always involved in the formation of structurally stabilizing disulfide bridges (33). In the MC receptors, one Cys residue is located in the N-terminal segment close to the start
of TM-I, and surprisingly even three Cys residues are found in the
extracellular loop 3. Ala substitution of Cys33 in the
N-terminal segment affected neither
-MSH nor Zn(II) stimulation of
the receptor, indicating that this Cys residue is not involved in
disulfide bridge formation (Fig. 8 and
Table III) or that such a bridge is not important for agonist
stimulation of the receptor. In contrast, substitution of
Cys265 and Cys273 located in extracellular loop
3, in both cases eliminated both
-MSH and Zn(II) stimulation of the
mutant receptors, indicating that these Cys residues are important for
the structure and function of the receptor, for example by forming an
intra-loop disulfide bridge (Table III). Interestingly, Ala
substitution of the last cysteine residue in extracellular loop 3, Cys271, gave a molecular phenotype, where the
-MSH
stimulation of cAMP production was almost identical to that observed in
the wild-type MC1 receptor, whereas Zn(II) stimulation was eliminated
(Fig. 8 and Table III). This indicates that Cys271 is part
of the agonistic metal-ion site in the MC1 receptor but not directly
involved in peptide agonist binding.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of mutations of Cys residues on
the -MSH- and Zn(II)-induced stimulation of
cAMP production in the MC1 receptor. A, -MSH-induced
cAMP accumulation in wild-type MC1 receptor (squares),
[C33A]-MC1(triangles), and [C271A]-MC1
(circles). B, Zn(II)-induced cAMP accumulation in
wild-type MC1 receptor (squares),
[C33A]-MC1(triangles), and [C271A]-MC1
(circles). The experiments were performed in transiently
transfected COS-7 cells. Data are mean ± S.E. from three to seven
independent experiments made in duplicate. The
Emax values for the employed constructs were 8.7 fmol/105 cells for wild-type MC1, 8.6 fmol/105
cells for [C33A]-MC1, and 5.8 fmol/105 cells for
[C271A]-MC1.
|
|
The inner face of TM-III is an important interaction area for agonists
in rhodopsin-like 7TM receptors in general. In the MC receptors, three
potential metal-binding residues are found in this location:
Asp115, Asp119, and Cys123.
Substitution of Asp115 and Cys123 had only a
minor effect on
-MSH and Zn(II) stimulation of the receptor (Table
III). In contrast, both Ala and Asn substitution of Asp119
eliminated not only
-MSH stimulation, which is in agreement with
reports in the literature (34, 35), but also Zn(II) stimulation (Table
III). Although it cannot be directly demonstrated here, it is possible
that Asp119 could be important not only for
-MSH binding
and action but also for the binding and action of Zn(II).
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study activation of both the MC1 and the MC4
melanocortin receptors was achieved by zinc ions both alone and in
complex with small hydrophobic metal ion-chelating compounds. The free
metal ion was able to induce 20 and 50% partial agonism as compared
with
-MSH in the MC4 and the MC1 receptors, respectively. Furthermore, it was found that Zn(II) modulates the
-MSH function to
increase both its potency and efficacy at concentrations, which indicates a possible physiological importance especially in the CNS.
The observation that Zn(II) binds and stimulates two different melanocortin receptors suggests that this could be a common feature among all members of this subfamily of rhodopsin-like 7TM receptors. This notion is supported by the similar pharmacological profile observed in the MC1 and MC4 receptors with respect to Zn(II) being both
a partial agonist and a potentiator of
-MSH action and by the
similar affinity profiles for a series of different metal ion-chelator
complexes in the two different receptors.
Attempt to Map the Activating Metal-ion Site--
Our mutational
analysis of fourteen potential metal-ion binding residues in the MC1
receptor identified only a single Cys residue in the loop between TM-VI
and TM-VII as being part of the activating metal-ion site. That is, the
mutant receptor responded normally to
-MSH but not at all to Zn(II)
(Fig. 8). The potency of Zn(II) in the wild-type MC receptors and our
general experience with metal-ion site engineering in 7TM receptors
would suggest that the metal ion binds in a bidentate or perhaps even a
tridentate metal-ion site (23, 26). Thus, it is most likely that there is at least one more residue involved in the coordination of the zinc
ion. Substitution of four other possible metal ion-coordinating residues impaired not only the zinc-induced activation but also the
-MSH-induced receptor activation. One or more of these residues could potentially be part of the activating metal-ion site, besides being important for the
-MSH action. Among these residues, we find
Asp119 in TM-III (AspIII:05) to be the most attractive
candidate for having such a dual role. The inner face of the
extracellular end of TM-III is a classic location for agonist
interactions in rhodopsin-like 7TM receptors, with the important
amine-binding AspIII:08 of, for example, the monoamine and opioid
receptors being perhaps the most well characterized case (36, 37). In
the melanocortin receptors, AspIII:05 (Asp119 in the MC1
receptor) has previously been described as a crucial interaction point
for the binding and function of peptide agonists (34, 35). The
carboxylic group of the aspartic acid has been suggested to form a salt
bridge with the functionally important Arg8 of the
melanocortin peptide ligands. In the present study we can confirm that
AspIII:05 is important for peptide agonist function, in this case in
the MC1 receptor.
In a scenario where Zn(II) would bind between Asp119 at the
extracellular end of TM-III and Cys271 in extracellular
loop 3 and thereby activate the receptor, it would be envisioned that
part of the loop would bend down toward Asp119 at position
III:05. In this connection it is important to note that especially in
the MC receptors this is a likely possibility. The reason being that
extracellular loop 2, which in nearly all other 7TM receptors is rather
long and occupies the space between TM-III, -V, and VI, because it is
connected to the top of TM-III by a disulfide bridge (to CysIII:01), is
in fact not present in the melanocortin receptors, because TM-IV
basically continues directly into TM-V with a "mini-loop"
consisting of only one or two residues (Fig. 1). Thus, the inner face
of the extracellular end of TM-III, including AspIII:05, which in the
x-ray structure of rhodopsin is covered by layers of
-strands from
extracellular loop 2, is freely exposed in the MC receptors to interact
with extracellular ligands and, for example, with residues such as Cys271 in extracellular loop 3 through an intercalated
metal ion. Extracellular loop 3 obviously connects TM-VI and -VII, and
much evidence, including EPR spectroscopy in combination with
site-directed spin labeling, fluorescence spectroscopy, and metal-ion
site engineering, suggests that interchanges in the movement between
TM-III, -VI, and -VII are the most crucial conformational changes
involved in activation of 7TM receptors (25, 38-41). The fact that
mutational substitution of the two other cysteines in extracellular
loop 3 leads to impairment of both
-MSH and Zn(II) stimulation is
here interpreted as an indication that these residues probably are
involved in a structurally important disulfide bridge. This is in
agreement with the occurrence of natural loss of function mutations of
these two Cys residues in the MC4 receptor leading to obesity (42).
However, we cannot rule out the possibility that these residues instead
are involved more directly in both peptide and metal-ion binding.
However, it would be most unusual to have three freely exposed
thiol-containing side chains in close proximity in an extracellular loop.
A Possible Physiological Relevance of Zn(II) Modulation on
Melanocortin Receptors--
The melanocortin system is unique among
7TM receptors in the sense that MC receptor activity is regulated by
two endogenous peptides with opposing activities: the
pro-opiomelanocortin-derived melanocortin agonists, and, on the other
hand, the Agouti protein and Agouti-related peptide, which act as
antagonists or inverse agonists on MC receptors (43, 44). The present
data suggest that endogenous zinc ions could be a third player in the
regulation of the melanocortin receptor activity. On its own, Zn(II)
acts as a partial agonist activating the receptors expressed in
transfected COS-7 cells with an efficacy of 20-50% of that of the
peptide agonist
-MSH. In the melanoma cell line, Zn(II) appears to
be as efficacious as
-MSH (Fig. 3); however, the low expression level of receptors and overall difficulty in working with these cells
prevented us from further characterization of the metal-ion effect in
this system. At higher concentrations Zn(II) modulates the
-MSH-induced receptor stimulation as an enhancer or potentiator, which is evident both in the lack of total displacement of the peptide
ligands by the free metal ions (Fig. 2) and in the functional potentiating effect (Fig. 5). In this connection it should be noted
that in the brain Zn(II) is found stored in synaptic vesicles and can
be co-released with the neurotransmitter to reach concentrations of up to 300 µM in the synaptic cleft (45). Vesicular
zinc is found also in the hypothalamus, and its staining pattern
suggests an overlap with the MC4 receptors (46-50).
It may be relevant that mice lacking metallothioneins I and II exhibit
a phenotype characterized by obesity, high food intake, and increased
levels of leptin (48). A similar complex of symptoms is observed in the
MC4 knock-out mice. In this case, however, the symptoms are much more
pronounced. Metallothioneins are proteins serving to protect the body
from toxic effect of heavy metals by sequestering an excess level of
the metal ions (49). Whether there is a direct connection between
metallothionein and MC4 receptor, apart from the fact that they are
both zinc binding and involved in obesity, is yet unclear.
It is suggested in the literature that zinc is able to modify the
immune system (50). Likewise, it is well described that
-MSH may
affect the immune system through the MC1 receptors (51); however, it is
not possible to conclude that zinc under physiological conditions
modulates the MC1 receptor function.
Metal Ion-Chelator Complexes as Leads for Novel Melanocortin
Receptor Modulators--
Several of the MC receptors are highly
interesting as potential drug targets, especially in the control of
food intake but also, for example, for the treatment of erectile
dysfunction (6, 52). More or less selective, high affinity peptide
ligands have been developed for all of the MC receptors (53).
Importantly, however, based on the cyclic, non-selective oligopeptide
melanotan II, Patchett and coworkers (12) have recently been able to
develop selective, nanomolar affinity non-peptide compounds, which are full agonists on the human MC4 receptor. It is likely that these compounds will lead to the discovery of non-peptide ligands for other
MC receptors as well.
The activating metal-ion site of the melanocortin receptors described
in the present study could possibly be used as an anchor site for the
development of a novel class of compounds, i.e. metal ion
chelators, that can modulate the function of these receptors. Although
the metal-ion affinity and the binding profiles of the site in the MC1
and MC4 receptors are very similar, it was possible to obtain not only
selectivity but also close to full agonism through only minor chemical
modifications of the chelator. Most interestingly, binding of the metal
ion potentiates the binding and function of the endogenous peptide
agonist on the MC receptors. Such an effect can be achieved through a
direct modification of the state of the receptor by the potentiating
compound, for example, through stabilization of a conformation of the
receptor with an increased tendency to be bound to the G protein, which
is essential for high affinity agonist binding (54, 55). In the case of the melanocortin receptors, it is even possible that the enhancement is
obtained through binding of the metal ion in between the receptor and
the peptide, because the ligands all have a metal-ion binding imidazole
side chain, which is part of the core His-Phe-Arg-Trp sequence.
Whatever the molecular mechanism may be, compounds that can increase
the potency of the endogenous ligand and that even have additive
effects leading to supra-maximal stimulation of the target receptor
will be useful pharmacological tools and could possibly be developed
into interesting drug candidates.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Susanne Hummelgaard, Mette
Simons, and Heidi Pedersen for expert technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported in part by grants from The Novo
Nordisk Foundation and the Danish Medical and Science Research Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Recipient of a postdoctoral stipend from the Danish Medical
Research Council. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
45-3532-7606; Fax: 45-3532-7610; E-mail: b.holst@molpharm.dk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202103200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
-MSH,
-melanocortin stimulating hormone;
MC receptor, melanocortin
receptor;
NDP-
-MSH, [Nle4-D(Phe)7]-
-melanocortin stimulating
hormone;
TM, transmembrane segment.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Wikberg, J. E.
(1999)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
375,
295-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Marks, D. L.,
and Cone, R. D.
(2001)
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
56,
359-375[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Robinson, S. W.,
Dinulescu, D. M.,
and Cone, R. D.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
34,
687-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Huszar, D.,
Lynch, C. A.,
Fairchild-Huntress, V.,
Dunmore, J. H.,
Fang, Q.,
Berkemeier, L. R., Gu, W.,
Kesterson, R. A.,
Boston, B. A.,
Cone, R. D.,
Smith, F. J.,
Campfield, L. A.,
Burn, P.,
and Lee, F.
(1997)
Cell
88,
131-141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Chen, A. S.,
Marsh, D. J.,
Trumbauer, M. E.,
Frazier, E. G.,
Guan, X. M., Yu, H.,
Rosenblum, C. I.,
Vongs, A.,
Feng, Y.,
Cao, L.,
Metzger, J. M.,
Strack, A. M.,
Camacho, R. E.,
Mellin, T. N.,
Nunes, C. N.,
Min, W.,
Fisher, J.,
Gopal-Truter, S.,
MacIntyre, D. E.,
Chen, H. Y.,
and Van Der Ploeg, L. H.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
26,
97-102[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Schwartz, M. W.,
Woods, S. C.,
Porte, D., Jr.,
Seeley, R. J.,
and Baskin, D. G.
(2000)
Nature
404,
661-671[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Marsh, D. J.,
Hollopeter, G.,
Huszar, D.,
Laufer, R.,
Yagaloff, K. A.,
Fisher, S. L.,
Burn, P.,
and Palmiter, R. D.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
21,
119-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Ste, M. L.,
Miura, G. I.,
Marsh, D. J.,
Yagaloff, K.,
and Palmiter, R. D.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
12339-12344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Farooqi, I. S.,
Yeo, G. S.,
Keogh, J. M.,
Aminian, S.,
Jebb, S. A.,
Butler, G.,
Cheetham, T.,
and O'Rahilly, S.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
271-279[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Vaisse, C.,
Clement, K.,
Durand, E.,
Hercberg, S.,
Guy-Grand, B.,
and Froguel, P.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
106,
253-262[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Fan, W.,
Boston, B. A.,
Kesterson, R. A.,
Hruby, V. J.,
and Cone, R. D.
(1997)
Nature
385,
165-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Van der Ploeg, L. H.,
Martin, W. J.,
Howard, A. D.,
Nargund, R. P.,
Austin, C. P.,
Guan, X.,
Drisko, J.,
Cashen, D.,
Sebhat, I.,
Patchett, A. A.,
Figueroa, D. J.,
DiLella, A. G.,
Connolly, B. M.,
Weinberg, D. H.,
Tan, C. P.,
Palyha, O. C.,
Pong, S. S.,
MacNeil, T.,
Rosenblum, C.,
Vongs, A.,
Tang, R., Yu, H.,
Sailer, A. W.,
Fong, T. M.,
Huang, C.,
Tota, M. R.,
Chang, R. S.,
Stearns, R.,
Tamvakopoulos, C.,
Christ, G.,
Drazen, D. L.,
Spar, B. D.,
Nelson, R. J.,
and MacIntyre, D. E.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
99,
11381-11386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Hollmann, M.,
Boulter, J.,
Maron, C.,
Beasley, L.,
Sullivan, J.,
Pecht, G.,
and Heinemann, S.
(1993)
Neuron
10,
943-954[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Westbrook, G. L.,
and Mayer, M. L.
(1987)
Nature
328,
640-643[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Peters, S.,
Koh, J.,
and Choi, D. W.
(1987)
Science
236,
589-593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Norregaard, L.,
Frederiksen, D.,
Nielsen, E. O.,
and Gether, U.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4266-4273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Vandenberg, R. J.,
Mitrovic, A. D.,
and Johnston, G. A.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
189-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Rosenkilde, M. M.,
Lucibello, M.,
Holst, B.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
439,
35-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Katz, A., Wu, D.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1992)
Nature
360,
686-689[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Swaminath, G.,
Steenhuis, J.,
Kobilka, B.,
and Lee, T. W.
(2002)
Mol. Pharmacol.
61,
65-72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Smart, T. G.,
Xie, X.,
and Krishek, B. J.
(1994)
Prog. Neurobiol.
42,
393-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Assaf, S. Y.,
and Chung, S. H.
(1984)
Nature
308,
734-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Elling, C. E.,
Nielsen, S. M.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1995)
Nature
374,
74-77[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Holst, B.,
Elling, C. E.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
58,
263-270[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Elling, C. E.,
Thirstrup, K.,
Holst, B.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12322-12327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Thirstrup, K.,
Elling, C. E.,
Hjorth, S. A.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7875-7878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Elling, C. E.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6213-6219[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Loland, C. J.,
Norregaard, L.,
Litman, T.,
and Gether, U.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U. S. A.)
99,
1683-1688[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Palczewski, K.,
Kumasaka, T.,
Hori, T.,
Behnke, C. A.,
Motoshima, H.,
Fox, B. A., Le, T., I,
Teller, D. C.,
Okada, T.,
Stenkamp, R. E.,
Yamamoto, M.,
and Miyano, M.
(2000)
Science
289,
739-745[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Horton, R. M.,
Hunt, H. D., Ho, S. N.,
Pullen, J. K.,
and Pease, L. R.
(1989)
Gene
77,
61-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Gether, U.,
Johansen, T. E.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7893-7898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Kenakin, T. P.
(1993)
Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interactions
, Raven Press, New York
|
| 33.
|
Elling, C. E.,
Raffetseder, U.,
Nielsen, S. M.,
and Schwartz, T. W.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
667-675[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Yang, Y. K.,
Fong, T. M.,
Dickinson, C. J.,
Mao, C., Li, J. Y.,
Tota, M. R.,
Mosley, R.,
Van Der Ploeg, L. H.,
and Gantz, I.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
14900-14911[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Yang, Y.,
Dickinson, C.,
Haskell-Luevano, C.,
and Gantz, I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23000-23010[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Surratt, C. F.,
Johnson, P. S.,
Moriwaki, A.,
Seidleck, B. K.,
Blaschak, C. J.,
Wang, J. B.,
and Uhl, G. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20548-20553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Strader, C. D.,
Gaffney, T.,
Sugg, E. E.,
Candelore, M. R.,
Keys, R.,
Patchett, A. A.,
and Dixon, R. A. F.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
5-8[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Farrens, D. L.,
Altenbach, C.,
Yang, K.,
Hubbell, W. L.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1996)
Science
274,
768-770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Gether, U.,
Lin, S.,
Ghanouni, P.,
Ballesteros, J. A.,
Weinstein, H.,
and Kobilka, B. K.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6737-6747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Gether, U.,
Lin, S.,
and Kobilka, B. K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28268-28275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Sheikh, S. P.,
Zvyaga, T. A.,
Lichtarge, O.,
Sakmar, T. P.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1996)
Nature
383,
347-350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Barsh, G. S.,
Farooqi, I. S.,
and O'Rahilly, S.
(2000)
Nature
404,
644-651[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Dinulescu, D. M.,
and Cone, R. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6695-6698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
He, L.,
Gunn, T. M.,
Bouley, D. M., Lu, X. Y.,
Watson, S. J.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
Duke-Cohan, J. S.,
and Barsh, G. S.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
27,
40-47[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Huang, E. P.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13386-13387[Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Perez-Castejon, C.,
Vera-Gil, A.,
Barral, M. J.,
Perez-Castejon, M. J.,
and Lahoz, M.
(1994)
Histol. Histopathol.
9,
259-262[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Cowley, M. A.,
Pronchuk, N.,
Fan, W.,
Dinulescu, D. M.,
Colmers, W. F.,
and Cone, R. D.
(1999)
Neuron
24,
155-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Beattie, J. H.,
Wood, A. M.,
Newman, A. M.,
Bremner, I.,
Choo, K. H.,
Michalska, A. E.,
Duncan, J. S.,
and Trayhurn, P.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
358-363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Palmiter, R. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8428-8430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Rink, L.,
and Gabriel, P.
(2001)
Biometals
14,
367-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Luger, T. A.,
Brzoska, T.,
Scholzen, T. E.,
Kalden, D. H.,
Sunderkotter, C.,
Armstrong, C.,
and Ansel, J.
(2000)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
917,
232-238[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Wessells, H.,
Fuciarelli, K.,
Hansen, J.,
Hadley, M. E.,
Hruby, V. J.,
Dorr, R.,
and Levine, N.
(1998)
J. Urol.
160,
389-393[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Hadley, M. E.,
and Haskell-Luevano, C.
(1999)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
885,
1-21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Lazareno, S.,
Popham, A.,
and Birdsall, N. J.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
58,
194-207[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Leppik, R. A.,
Mynett, A.,
Lazareno, S.,
and Birdsall, N. J.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
57,
436-445[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Schwartz, T. W.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Biotech.
5,
434-444[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Mol