Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208154200 on September 30, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 49, 47732-47740, December 6, 2002
Characterization of a Novel Mammalian Groucho Isoform
and Its Role in Transcriptional Regulation*
Maina
Lepourcelet and
Ramesh A.
Shivdasani
From the Departments of Medical Oncology and Cancer Biology,
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Departments of Medicine, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received for publication, August 9, 2002, and in revised form, September 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Wnt/
-catenin/Tcf pathway serves important
functions in embryonic development and is constitutively activated in
human colorectal cancer. The nuclear output of Wnt signaling is
mediated by a complex between DNA-binding proteins of the TCF family
and the transcriptional coactivator
-catenin. Groucho proteins act to repress transcriptional activation by
-catenin-Tcf
complexes, probably by interacting directly with Tcf transcription
factors. We have identified several splice forms of the mouse Groucho
Grg1 gene expressed in the developing intestine. Prominent
among these is a novel and abundant isoform, Grg1-S, which we
characterize in this report. Grg1-S has highest homology with the TLE
family of large Groucho proteins but features only the amino-terminal Q
and glycine- and proline-rich domains typical of the Groucho/AES subfamily. Grg1-S is expressed in development and in several adult mouse tissues. Expression in the adult small intestine is highest at
the base of the crypts of Lieberkuhn. Grg1-S acts to antagonize
-catenin activity in Xenopus axis duplication and
luciferase reporter assays in mammalian cells. Taken together, these
findings suggest that Grg1-S may operate in conjunction with
-catenin and Tcf factors to regulate vertebrate gut epithelial cell differentiation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Wnt signaling regulates many developmental processes, including
embryonic polarity and cell fate specification, by virtue of distinct
signal transduction mechanisms (1, 2). In the absence of Wnt signals,
the multifunctional protein
-catenin is continually phosphorylated
and thereby targeted for degradation. Activation of the canonical Wnt
pathway retards
-catenin turnover and makes it available to interact
with Tcf/LEF transcription factors and transactivate target genes. Two
principal modes of regulation are recognized for
Tcf-dependent genes as follows: the first controls
-catenin stability and, consequently, its intracellular
concentration; the second modulates their expression at the level of
DNA-protein complexes (3).
Tcf/LEF proteins are bipartite factors that bind DNA and may act as
either transcriptional repressors or activators depending on
alternative protein associations (4). Transcriptional activation is
driven in part by
-catenin, whereas repression is mediated by
corepressors that may interact either with
-catenin (5-7) or
directly with Tcf proteins (8-11). An important class of Tcf corepressors belongs to the Groucho protein family (12-14), which includes several highly conserved members. Groucho proteins were originally implicated in Drosophila neuronal and sex
determination (15, 16) and are classified into two subgroups. The first group, designated Groucho/transducin-like
enhancer-of-split
(TLE),1 contains the five
domains illustrated in Fig. 1A. Two of these, the
amino-terminal, glutamine-rich Q domain and a carboxyl-terminal string
of tandem WD40 repeats, are highly conserved and are separated by a
variable region including glycine- and
proline-rich (GP), casein kinase II and
cdc2 phosphorylation sites, nuclear
localization sequence (CcN), and serine- and
proline-rich (SP) domains. Several distinct mammalian genes
are recognized and are named transducin-like enhancer (TLE) in man or
Groucho-related gene (Grg) in the mouse. The second group, designated
amino-terminal enhancer-of-split (AES), contains the products of distinct gene loci and harbors only Q
and GP domains. Besides a difference in protein size, the two Groucho
subgroups share limited conservation within the GP domain and
carboxyl-terminal portions of the Q domain. The mechanism by which
Groucho proteins repress Tcf-dependent genes is poorly understood and may involve association with histone deacetylases (16,
17). Besides the Tcf/LEF family, Groucho proteins also serve as
corepressors for many other transcription factors (15).
The role of Tcf/
-catenin gene regulation is well established in
human colorectal cancer (18-20) and is increasingly appreciated in
development and homeostasis of the vertebrate intestine. Sox 17, an
early regulator of vertebrate endoderm differentiation, interacts
physically with
-catenin to repress Wnt signaling (21), and Tcf4
knockout mice have severely reduced cell proliferation in prospective
crypts in the small intestine mucosa (22). Although such observations
contribute toward an emerging picture of Wnt signaling in normal and
malignant gut epithelial differentiation, the place of Groucho proteins
in this scheme has been explored in much less detail. Characterizing
the spectrum of Groucho proteins expressed in the developing intestine
is one prerequisite to this end. Additionally, accumulating evidence
highlights the considerable extent to which Tcf/
-catenin gene
regulation makes physiologic use of mRNA splicing variants. All Tcf
genes encode a large coterie of complex variants (3) that may regulate
pathway functions either subtly (23) or profoundly. In intestinal
crypts Tcf4 stimulates endogenous expression of a dominant negative
form of Tcf1 that provides negative feedback for
-catenin gene
regulation (24), whereas in colon tumors it preferentially activates a full-length LEF1 for apparent positive feedback (25).
To identify Groucho family members expressed in the fetal gut, we used
degenerate PCR cloning, followed by screening a developing mouse gut
cDNA library, and we isolated multiple independent isoforms encoded
by the mouse Grg1 gene. The variety of spliced forms
suggests the possibility of complex transcriptional regulation by
Grg1. One novel Grg1 variant, which is expressed abundantly
and designated Grg1-S, defines a third subgroup within the Groucho
protein family. Grg1-S acts to repress
-catenin/Tcf-mediated gene
activation in vitro and in vivo. It is expressed
in the developing gut and in the adult small intestine, where it is
most highly detected near the base of the crypts of Lieberkuhn. These
findings define a new class of active Groucho proteins and suggest that
Grg1-S may be a physiologic regulator of Tcf-dependent and
other genetic pathways.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cloning of Grg1 mRNA Species--
A 442-bp fragment was
first obtained by RT-PCR on reverse-transcribed mRNA from 14.5 dpc
mouse small intestine, using degenerate primers corresponding to the
conserved WD domain of Groucho proteins, 5'-CARATGCARCCNGTNCCNTTYCCN-3'
and 5'-TCCCANACNGCRATRTTNCCRTC-3'. A search against the Celera mouse
genome data base pointed to errors in the mGrg1 sequence deposited in
GenBankTM (GenBankTM accession number gi:
6755802) and indicated 100% match with the mGrg1 gene
locus; the deduced peptide sequence is identical to that of human TLE1
(GenBankTM accession number gi: 13640384). A 193-bp
subfragment (probe 193), amplified using the PCR primers
5'-TAAGGTGTGGGACATCAGCC-3' and 5'-TGTCAGCTCTGCCTTTATGC-3', was used to
screen a 13.5-dpc mouse gut cDNA library (26) and to recover one
clone containing part of the open reading frame and the 3'-UTR (Fig.
1A). We extended this clone in the 5'-direction by RT-PCR
and then used a 250-bp fragment derived from its 5' terminus to screen
the same fetal gut cDNA library and isolate Grg1-L
GPWD and the
full-length Grg1-S clones (Fig. 1A). Grg1-S and previously
identified Grg1 transcripts are identical in the short portion of the
5'-UTR that is described for Grg1-L (GenBankTM accession
number gi: 6755802). A primer specific to this UTR (5'-GGAGGATAGAGCTATCCCG) was then used in conjunction with one complementary to the 3'-UTR of Grg1-L (5'-GACAGGCAGCAGGTAGCTCC-3') for
RT-PCR on reverse-transcribed mRNA from the 14.5-dpc mouse gut.
Several amplified fragments hybridized with probe 193 on Southern
analysis (Fig. 3C), and each of these RT-PCR products was
subcloned into the PCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen) and sequenced. This led
us to identify the presumptive full-length Grg1-L transcript and three
splice variants of differing relative abundance, which we designate
Grg1-L
WD, Grg1-L
GP, and Grg1-L
LZ2 according to the missing subdomains.
Plasmid Expression Constructs--
The open reading frame (ORF)
of Grg1-L was subcloned by PCR into the BamHI and
SacII sites of pCDNA3 (Invitrogen) in-frame with a
carboxyl-terminal Myc epitope using primers
5'-TCGGGATCCATGTTCCCGCAGAGCCGC-3' and 5'-
GAACCGCGGGTAGATGACCTCATAAACGGTAG-3'. The Grg1-S ORF was cloned into
pCDNA3 using the reverse primer 5'- GAACCGCGGATCTGGCTTGCCCGGCCTC-3' and the same forward primer, and into the HindIII and
NotI sites of the expression plasmid pMH (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) in-frame with a carboxyl-terminal hemagglutinin (HA)
epitope using a similar PCR strategy.
mRNA Expression Analysis--
Total RNA was extracted from
whole mouse embryos or from the colon, jejunum, ileum, duodenum, and
stomach of adult and 14.5-dpc fetal mice using Trizol reagent
(Invitrogen). 30 µg of RNA from each source was resolved on
denaturing formaldehyde gels, transferred onto Hybond N nylon membranes
(Amersham Biosciences), and hybridized in Church buffer (27) at
65 °C with the following probes (Fig. 1A): 3'Grg1-L
(3'-UTR of Grg1-L generated by restriction digestion from a cDNA
library-derived clone), 3'Grg1-S (3'-UTR specific to Grg1-S, generated
by PCR with the primers GATAACAGGAGCTGTCTGTC and
CATTGCACATTCCTAATACAGTG), and 5'Grg1, which is common to both Grg1-S
and Grg1-L in the amino-terminal coding region. Adult mouse tissues
were evaluated on a commercial blot (Clontech).
Membranes were washed to a final stringency of 0.1× SSC and 0.1% SDS
for 30 min at 65 °C and exposed to autoradiography film. For
in situ hybridization, antisense RNA probes were labeled
with digoxigenin or, in independent experiments, with
35S-UTP, and hybridizations were performed as described
previously (26, 28).
Transfections and Luciferase Reporter Assays--
293 cells were
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone) and seeded in 12-well tissue
culture plates at a density of 105 cells/well. The next day
cells were transfected over 5 h using LipofectAMINE reagent
(Invitrogen) and 2.12 µg of plasmid DNA as follows: 100 ng of the
reporter OT (containing 3 Tcf consensus binding sites upstream of
firefly luciferase cDNA) or OF (mutated in the Tcf-binding site),
800 ng of XTcf3 or hTcf4, 200 ng of
-catenin, 20 ng of pRl-TK
Renilla as an internal transfection control, and 0.2-1 µg
of Grg1-S and/or Grg1-L, always completed to 1 µg with the empty
vector if necessary. Cells were harvested 36 h later in passive
lysis buffer (Promega), and the luciferase activity was monitored using
a dual luciferase assay system (Promega).
Immunofluorescence--
COS-7 cells were seeded at
105/ml on chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International) and
transfected with Myc epitope-tagged forms of either Grg1-S or Grg1-L
using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) for 5 h. 24 h later cells
were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed in 3%
paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and treated
with 50 mM NH4Cl. After a blocking step in PBS
supplemented with 10% each of goat and fetal bovine sera, slides were
incubated sequentially with 2 µg/ml purified anti-Myc antibody (Clone
9E10, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) diluted in PBS, 5% fetal calf
serum, and with 0.5 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-mouse IgG (Transduction Laboratories) for 1 h each. Nuclei
were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Coimmunoprecipitation--
COS-7 cells were seeded at
105/ml and transfected with either HA epitope-tagged Grg1-S
and/or Myc epitope-tagged Grg1-L over 5 h using LipofectAMINE. 300 µl of cell lysates, prepared as described previously (14), were
cleared by centrifugation and incubated overnight at 4 °C with 50 µl of either anti-HA (clone 12AC5) or anti-Myc (clone 9E10) hybridoma
supernatants, followed by 50 µl of protein G-agarose beads (Sigma)
for 3 h. Beads were washed 3 times in 1 ml of lysis buffer, and
bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting according
to standard procedures (29).
Xenopus Axis Duplication Assay--
Capped mRNAs were
synthesized in vitro using linearized plasmid templates and
the mMESSAGE mMACHINE kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Xenopus
embryos were collected, fertilized, cultured, and staged as described
previously (30). Synthetic mRNAs (4.6 nl) were injected in the
equatorial region of one blastomere on the prospective ventral side at
the 4-cell stage. Embryos were incubated at 19 °C until untreated
sibling tadpoles reached Nieuwkoop-Faber stage 39, fixed overnight in
0.1 M MOPS, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM
MgSD4 7H2O, 3.7% formaldehyde (30), scored for
axis duplication, and stored in ethanol. Uniform criteria were applied
to distinguish between partial and complete axis duplications as
described in the legend to Fig. 6.
Accession Numbers--
All cDNA sequences are deposited in
GenBankTM, with accession numbers AY155195 to AY155200.
 |
RESULTS |
The Mouse Grg1 Gene Encodes Multiple Splice Variants--
Groucho
proteins function as corepressors of several transcription factors,
including those of the Tcf family (12, 13) and may hence regulate gut
epithelial differentiation. To identify Groucho family genes expressed
in the developing gut, we used a combination of cDNA library
screening and RT-PCR on mRNA harvested from the 14.5 dpc mouse
small intestine. Several distinct transcripts (Fig.
1A, for details see
"Experimental Procedures") share nearly identical sequences,
implying that they are mRNA splicing variants of the same gene.
Based on data base searches, we conclude that each of these transcripts
is encoded by the mouse Grg1 gene, and we have named them
accordingly (Fig. 1A). Grg1-L (for "long") encodes the
longest protein containing all the typical Groucho/TLE domains, whereas
four other transcripts correspond to alternative splice forms that are
predicted to encode variant Groucho/TLE proteins. Because the latter
species were isolated by RT-PCR and likely comigrate with the
full-length Grg1-L mRNA on Northern analysis, their precise
abundance and biological significance are presently unclear.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The mouse Grg1 gene encodes
multiple splice variants. A, schema of mGrg1
transcripts isolated from a fetal gut cDNA library (Grg1-L GPWD
and Grg1S) and by RT-PCR cloning (Grg1-L, Grg1-L WD, Grg1-L GP, and
Grg1-L LZ2). Open reading frames are depicted by gray
boxes and are positioned relative to the characterized Groucho/TLE
subdomains. Grg1-L encodes a 770-amino acid protein that contains all
five typical domains; Grg1-L LZ2 encodes a 650-residue protein
missing the second leucine zipper and the GP domain; Grg1-L GP (696 amino acids) lacks only the GP domain; and the predicted 653-residue
Grg1-L WD protein carries a deletion of the last 122 amino acids in
the WD domain. Clone Grg1-L GPWD, which is missing a 5' end, features
the following two internal splices: one removing the GP domain and the
second removing amino acids 479-660 from the WD domain. All positions
are numbered relative to the Grg1-L peptide sequence. Grg1-S is a
2063-bp transcript that features a unique 3'-UTR and a longer 5'-UTR
and encodes a 199-residue protein with the same amino terminus as the
other variants. The probes 3'Grg1-L, 3'Grg1-S, 5'Grg1, and 193 used for
Northern or Southern analysis are also represented (white
boxes). B, inferred organization of the
mGrg1 gene locus. Gray boxes correspond to coding
regions, white boxes to untranslated regions, and the
lines to distinct splice positions. Exons 1-4 encode the
first 78 Q domain residues, including the first leucine zipper motif;
exons 5 and 6 encode the second leucine zipper; exons 7 and 8 encode
the GP domain, and the intervening intron is included in the
Grg1-S 3'-UTR. The black box represents the last
8 amino acids of Grg1-S, which are not present in Grg1-L. The CcN, SP,
and WD domains are encoded by exons 9-11, 12-14, and 15-20,
respectively.
|
|
In contrast, one transcript, isolated as a 2063-bp full-length clone
from a mouse fetal gut cDNA library, encodes a short protein
containing Q and GP domains that are identical to those of Grg1-L. This
species, which we designate Grg1-S (for "short"), contains a long
5'-UTR including an in-frame stop codon and is characterized by a novel
3'-UTR that restricts the ORF to only the Q and GP domains. A search of
the mouse genome data base (www.celera.com) with Grg1-S and Grg1-L
sequences allowed us to infer the structure of the mouse
Grg1 locus on chromosome 4 and the origins of each of the
different splice forms (Fig. 1B). The gene spans ~100 kb and is composed of at least 20 exons, the first 7 of which produce Grg1-S. Reported Grg1-L clones are up to 2 kb shorter than the 4.3-kb
length predicted by Northern analysis, indicating that a large portion
of the 5'-UTR remains uncharacterized. Moreover, oligonucleotides from
the 3' end of Grg1-L and position 443 in the 5'-UTR of Grg1-S fail to
amplify a product by RT-PCR, whereas in combination with other
oligonucleotides, the reverse primer for this experiment readily
amplified the complete Grg1-L open reading frame depicted in Fig.
1A. We hence suspect that Grg1-L results from use of an
alternative, noncoding first exon.
mGrg1-L shares highest homology with human TLE1, showing 87.5%
nucleotide and 95.6% amino acid identity, which suggests that these
genes may be orthologous. In comparing mGrg1-S with the human genome
sequence, we identified two related loci, one of which corresponds to
the TLE1 gene on chromosome 9 and reveals exon-intron
organization similar to that described for mGrg1 (Fig. 1B). The second locus, which is on the X chromosome (PAC
323B6: emb Z83841), shows 87.4% nucleotide identity, lacks introns, and with an ORF disrupted by a stop codon, most likely represents a
pseudogene. By using oligonucleotides complementary to the 3'-UTR of a
presumptive human Grg1-S mRNA species, we obtained an RT-PCR product from the 293 human cell line, and DNA sequencing confirms that
it corresponds to a human Grg1-S transcript. In Northern analysis of
human cell lines, this product recognizes a single band (data not
shown). Thus, the human TLE1 locus also enables transcription of Grg1-S. High conservation between mouse and man within
the ORF and the entire 3'-UTR suggests an important role for this newly
identified mRNA.
Grg1-S Defines a New Subtype of Groucho Proteins--
Groucho
proteins are divided broadly into two subgroups, which are the products
of distinct genes. Groucho/TLE proteins such as Grg1-L feature five
recognized domains, whereas Groucho/AES proteins contain only two
domains related to Q and GP (Fig. 2). The
AES group shares less homology with the TLE group in the second half of
the Q domain and in the GP domain, and the implication that these
subfamilies thus serve distinct cellular functions has received
experimental support (13, 31). In contrast, Grg1-S is nearly identical
to the entire NH2 terminus of Grg1-L, with the exception of
the last 8 amino acids generated by alternative splicing within exon 7 (Figs. 1B and 2). This agrees with its apparent origin as a
splicing variant; however, Grg1-S is more closely related to the AES
subfamily in size. These features distinguish Grg1-S from Groucho/TLE
and AES forms described previously (16) and define it as a
novel, naturally occurring Groucho protein subtype.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Grg1-S defines an additional subgroup in the
Groucho protein family. Schematic representation of the three
Groucho protein subgroups, with clear areas showing highly
conserved regions and gray shading indicating areas less
conserved between the AES and TLE subfamilies. The Q and GP domains of
Grg1-S and Grg1-L are identical, as shown in the sequence alignment
between assorted proteins of the Groucho/TLE family, XGrg4
(GenBankTM accession number gi: U18775) and hTLE1
(GenBankTM accession number gi: M99435), or of the
Groucho/AES family, mAES-1 (GenBankTM accession number gi:
X73359) and XGrg5 (GenBankTM accession number gi: U18776).
Residues conserved in Grg1-S are shaded in black. The last 8 amino acids of Grg1-S differ from Grg1-L because of alternative
splicing.
|
|
Expression of Grg1-S and Grg1-L mRNAs--
To ascertain the
level of Grg1-S mRNA expression, we performed Northern analysis. In
adult mouse tissues the 5'Grg1 probe, common to most isoforms,
identifies discrete 4.3- and 2.3-kb mRNA species of roughly equal
abundance, with predominant expression in liver and lung and detectable
expression in heart, brain, kidney, and testis (Fig.
3A, middle panel).
In contrast, the specific 3'Grg1-S probe identifies only the 2.3-kb
transcript, in much the same distribution (Fig. 3A,
left panel). Interestingly, this tissue expression pattern
strongly resembles that previously identified for mTcf4 (26). A probe
specific for the 3'-UTR of Grg1-L identifies only the 4.3-kb transcript
(Fig. 3A, right panel). The common 5' probe is
the only one to detect a weak 2.3-kb signal in skeletal muscle, which
may reflect cross-hybridization with some other transcript.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression pattern of mouse Grg1-S
and Grg1-L. Northern analysis was performed
sequentially with three different DNA probes: 3'Grg1-L specific to the
Grg1-L 3'-UTR, 3'Grg1-S specific to the Grg1-S
3'-UTR, and 5'Grg1 common to all Grg1 transcripts (see Fig.
1A). A, expression in adult mouse tissues
(H, heart; B, brain; S, spleen;
L, lung; Li, liver; M, skeletal
muscle; K, kidney; and T, testis). B,
expression in mouse whole embryos from 11.5 to 15.5 dpc. An actin probe
confirmed equal RNA loading, and transcript sizes are indicated in
kilobases (kb). C, relative expression levels of
different Grg1-L splice variants. RT-PCR was performed on 14.5-dpc
mouse gut RNA and blotted with probe 193 (see "Experimental
Procedures" and Fig. 1A). Sizes of the PCR products and
identity of the corresponding splice variants, determined by cloning,
are indicated.
|
|
Northern analysis at different stages of mouse fetal development
identifies the same two major mRNA species of 2.3 and 4.3 kb with
nearly constant levels between 11.5 and 15.5 dpc (Fig. 3B).
However, in contrast to adult tissues, where the two transcripts are
present in nearly equal proportion, the level of Grg1-L mRNA slightly exceeds that of Grg1-S (Fig. 3B, middle
panel). The 3'Grg1-S probe recognizes an additional 9-kb
transcript of unclear significance (Fig. 3B, left
panel). Taken together, these observations indicate that Grg1-S is
a major mRNA species encoded by the mouse Grg1 locus and
expressed in several adult tissues. Grg1-S and Grg1-L mRNA levels
do not appear to be developmentally regulated in the midgestation mouse embryo.
mRNAs represented through hybridization with the 3'Grg1-L probe
should be interpreted cautiously because all the Grg1-L mRNAs have
an identical 3'-UTR and could be quite similar in size. To estimate the
relative abundance of the splice variants detected by RT-PCR on the
14.5-dpc mouse gut, we analyzed the products of this RT-PCR by Southern
analysis (Fig. 3C) prior to their cloning. Grg1-L
GP and
full-length Grg1-L are the two predominant isoforms, whereas variants
missing either the second leucine zipper and GP domain or a portion of
the WD domain are relatively minor species.
Grg1-S exhibits nearly similar expression along the rostro-caudal axis
of the developing (14.5 dpc) and adult mouse gut (Fig. 4, A and B), with
possibly lower levels in the colon. However, the 9-kb transcript
detected weakly in the whole embryo is more readily observed in the
developing gut, raising the possibility that Grg1 encodes two major
fetal intestinal mRNA species with common 3'-UTR sequences. To
localize Grg1-S mRNA in the gut with greater precision, we
performed in situ hybridization on sections of the adult
small intestine using a specific 3'-UTR probe and observed strongest
expression at the base of the crypts of Lieberkuhn (Fig.
4C). Cells that reside here constitute the proliferative compartment of the intestinal mucosa, maintain a brisk cellular turnover throughout life, respond to epithelial injury, and are the
target of defects in mice lacking Tcf4 gene function (22, 32, 33).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of Grg1-S
in the gastrointestinal tract. Northern analysis with the
Grg1-S 3'-UTR probe on total RNA extracted from mouse gut
tissues. A, fetal gut at 14.5 dpc (S, stomach;
SI, small intestine; C, colon). B,
adult gut (C, colon; I, ileum; J,
jejunum; D, duodenum; and S, stomach).
C, mRNA in situ hybridization on sections of
adult mouse small intestine (jejunum) stained with a
digoxigenin-labeled antisense riboprobe corresponding to the
Grg1-S 3'-UTR (right two panels) or the
corresponding sense probe (left panel), and counterstained
with methyl green. Arrows point to the regions of highest
Grg1-S mRNA expression near the base of the crypts of Lieberkuhn.
Original magnification, left two panels, ×100; right
panel, ×200. Experiments with 35S-UTP-labeled
riboprobes yielded the same conclusions.
|
|
Grg1-S Is Located in Both Cytosol and Nucleus and Physically
Interacts with Itself and with Grg1-L--
Groucho/TLE proteins
contain a nuclear localization signal within the CcN domain and are
present in the cell nucleus (34), whereas Groucho/AES proteins may be
found either in the cytosol or in the nucleus (13, 35). To determine
the subcellular locations of Grg1-L and Grg1-S, we transfected COS
cells with Myc epitope-tagged expression constructs and assessed
protein expression by indirect immunofluorescence (Fig.
5A). Whereas Grg1-L is
exclusively and predictably nuclear, Grg1-S is found in both the
cytosol and nucleus despite the absence of a CcN domain. This
bicompartmental distribution is observed at even the lowest levels of
Grg1-S transfection. Grg1-S thus defines not only a novel subtype of
Groucho proteins but also shows unexpected subcellular localization.
Cotransfection of Grg1-L and Grg1-S did not visibly modify the location
of either protein, nor did cotransfection of Grg1-S with different
Tcf-family members result in movement of the cytosolic Grg1-S fraction
to the nucleus (data not shown).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Subcellular localization and physical
associations of Grg1-S and Grg1-L. A, COS cells were
transfected with Myc epitope-tagged Grg1-L or Grg1-S constructs and
processed for immunofluorescence (left panels); the nucleus
is revealed in corresponding 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
(DAPI)-stained images (right panels). Grg1-L is
detected exclusively in the nucleus (arrow), whereas Grg1-S
is detected in both cytosol (arrowhead) and nucleus, even
upon transfection of minimal amounts of Grg1-S plasmid. B
and C, lysates of COS cells transfected with the indicated
epitope-tagged constructs were immunoprecipitated (IP) with
either anti-HA (lanes 1-3) or anti-Myc antibodies
(lanes 4-6), and the immunoprecipitated proteins were
analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated
antibodies. Myc-tagged Grg1-S is immunoprecipitated by anti-HA antibody
when the two epitope-tagged Grg1-S forms are cotransfected (lane
3) but not when either is transfected alone (lane 1).
Likewise, HA-tagged Grg1-S is detected in Myc immunoprecipitants in the
converse experiment, revealing the presence of Grg1-S homopolymers in
cells. Similarly, experiments with epitope-tagged Grg1-L constructs
reveal heteropolymerization of Grg1-S and Grg1-L (C).
Protein expression levels (lanes 7-9) were determined by
immunoblotting 1/20 (B) or 1/10 (C) of the total
cell extract used for the immunoprecipitation.
|
|
Groucho proteins can form homo- and hetero-oligomers through
interactions that require the Q domain and are necessary for transcriptional regulation (36, 37). To test the ability of Grg1-S to
interact with itself or with Grg1-L, we performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments after overexpressing hemagglutinin (HA) epitope-tagged Grg1-S with Myc epitope-tagged forms of either Grg1-S or Grg1-L in COS
cells (Fig. 5, B and C). Both Grg1-S and Grg1-L
are present in Grg1-S immune complexes (Fig. 5, B,
lane 3 and C, lane 1), and Grg1-S is
identified in both Grg1-S and Grg1-L complexes (Fig. 5, B,
lane 6, and C, lane 4). Thus, Grg1-S
possesses the capacity for both nuclear localization and protein
interactions to form Grg1-S homopolymers and Grg1-S-Grg1-L
heteropolymeric complexes.
Grg1-S Functions as a Repressor of
-Catenin-mediated Gene
Activation--
Groucho proteins interact with Tcf factors as negative
regulator of the
-catenin/Tcf transcriptional pathway (13). Based on
the findings described above, we considered two possible functions: (i)
that Grg1-S could repress
-catenin/Tcf-mediated gene activation, or
(ii) that it may behave as a dominant antagonist of repression mediated
by other Groucho proteins such as Grg1-L. We first performed axis
duplication assays in Xenopus embryos, where
-catenin
accumulates early on the prospective dorsal side and formation of the
dorso-ventral axis requires activation of
-catenin/Tcf target genes
(13, 38). Forced expression of
-catenin mRNA on the future
ventral side leads to formation of a secondary longitudinal axis that is readily recognized at later developmental stages (Fig.
6A) and allows interrogation
of the biological function of Grg1-S.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Grg1-S inhibit
-catenin-induced axis duplication in
Xenopus embryos. A, capped mRNAs
were injected in the equatorial region of one ventral blastomere of 4 cell-stage Xenopus embryos, and duplicated axes were scored
at stage 39 according to three groups as follows: complete axis
duplication, where a second head with differentiated eyes is identified
unambiguously (arrows); partial axis duplication, where the
secondary axis is incomplete and additional eyes are not detected
(arrowheads); and normal embryos, without overt evidence of
duplicated axes. B, histogram showing the percentage of
embryos with normal or duplicated axes after injection of the indicated
mRNAs. The results are pooled from several independent experiments,
which gave consistent results, and the total number of scored embryos
(n) is indicated.
|
|
In accordance with published results, Grg1-L behaves as a weak but
consistent antagonist of 
catenin/Tcf activation (Fig. 6B, reduction of complete axis duplications from 15 to
4.3%); this activity is observed only with the relatively low dose of 50 pg of
-catenin mRNA. The repressive effect is not released upon coinjection of Grg1-S mRNA; instead, introducing Grg1-S (0.5 or 1 ng) and Grg1-L (1 ng) mRNAs together inhibits
-catenin-induced axis duplication almost completely (from 15% fully
duplicated embryos to 0.8 and 0%, respectively, and from 44% partial
duplications to 35.6 and 4.6%, respectively). Grg1-S by itself also
represses 
catenin-mediated axis duplication in Xenopus
embryos (reduction of partial duplications from 44 to 24.6% and of
complete duplications from 15 to 2.1%). Thus, Grg1-S does not act as a
negative regulator (derepressor) of Grg1-L function but rather mimics
its activity. These effects are dose-dependent and could
result from additive or cooperative interactions.
To determine the specificity of the observed effects, we coinjected
each mRNA with Siamois, an endogenous target and
downstream effector of
-catenin/Tcf signaling in Xenopus
embryos (39). Neither Grg1-S nor Grg1-L blocks the axis duplication
induced by Siamois. These results show that Grg1-repressive
function selectively targets the upstream activity of
-catenin,
presumably in conjunction with endogenous Tcfs. XTcf3 is essential to
Xenopus axis formation and probably interacts with
endogenous Groucho proteins to prevent association with
-catenin and
hence repress ectopic axis formation (40). We therefore propose that
Grg1-S exerts its apparent transcriptional repressive effects by
interfering with
-catenin/XTcf3-induced gene activation.
To test this hypothesis, we performed luciferase reporter assays in 293 cells using the reporter construct OT, which contains three consensus
Tcf-binding sites (41). Cotransfection of
-catenin and XTcf3
activates the reporter to levels that are not observed with a control
reporter (OF) containing three defective Tcf-binding sites or with
transfection of either construct alone. Cotransfection of Grg1-L (data
not shown) or Grg1-S (Fig. 7) represses
the transactivation provided by
-catenin in a
dose-dependent manner, consistent with the repressive
function revealed in the Xenopus experiments. Based on these
findings and the prominent expression of Grg1-S in intestinal crypts,
we also tested if Grg1-S could antagonize transcriptional activation
mediated by Tcf4. Indeed, forced expression of Grg1-S in 293 cells
inhibits Tcf4/
-catenin-induced reporter gene activation (Fig. 7).
Repression in this instance is of the same magnitude as with XTcf3 but
is not enhanced with increasing amounts of Grg1-S.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Grg1-S inhibits reporter gene activation
induced by -catenin and XTcf3 or hTcf4. Transfection of the
indicated plasmids was performed in duplicate in 293 cells, and cell
lysates were assayed for firefly luciferase activity. Results shown are
from one study and are representative of at least three independent
experiments. Addition of Grg1-S plasmid abrogates the luciferase
activity induced by -catenin and either XTcf3 or hTcf4E. The
reporter construct OF (black box), which carries mutations
in the Tcf-binding sites, is not activated. Luciferase values are
corrected for transfection efficiency using an internal control
transfection of pRl-TK, a plasmid expressing Renilla
luciferase under control of the thymidine kinase promoter. Ratios of
firefly:Renilla luciferase were determined and normalized to
values from those samples in which the OT reporter was transfected
alone and arbitrarily set at 1. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.
|
|
In normal Xenopus embryos, base-line transcriptional
repression by XTcf3 is thought to be countered by accumulation of
-catenin on the prospective dorsal side (38, 40). Furthermore,
dorsal overexpression of XGrg-4, a Groucho/TLE protein, represses the Siamois promoter and partially ventralizes embryos (13).
Although we thus considered the possibility that Grg1-S might influence Xenopus axis formation directly, injection of Grg1-S on the
dorsal side does not affect the endogenous axis (data not shown),
revealing its lack of intrinsic ventralizing function. Native
Xenopus Groucho proteins (42, 43) possibly already saturate
potential protein interaction sites or perhaps Grg1-S fails to undergo
required modifications on the prospective dorsal side.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Groucho proteins act as corepressors of a wide variety of
transcription factors (44-47) and thus regulate many developmental and
tumorigenic pathways. For example, they act as negative regulators of
Wnt signaling, apparently by countering
-catenin/Tcf-mediated activation of target genes (16). Inappropriate stabilization of

catenin leads to cellular transformation and may be the central deregulation in colorectal and other human cancers (18, 48-50). Tcf4
activity is negatively regulated in part by its own induction of a
dominant inhibitory Tcf1 isoform in gut and mammary epithelia (24) and
reinforced by selective activation of a promoter that drives expression
of full-length LEF1 in colonic tumors (25). Other mammalian Tcf/LEF
genes also encode multiple splice variants (3). Although the
significance of much of this alternative mRNA splicing remains
unclear, it is important to characterize the full spectrum of
structurally distinct and biologically active Tcf and Groucho proteins.
This is especially true because Groucho proteins are already recognized
in two distinct forms and may interact in complex transcriptional
regulatory networks within several distinct pathways. Here we report
the presence of several splicing variants of the mGrg1 gene
and characterize Grg1-S, a new type of Groucho protein with unique
features and intrinsic transcriptional repression activity.
Mouse Grg1 is the first Groucho gene reported to encode
multiple splice forms. In adult tissues, the two major mRNA species are Grg1-L and Grg1-S. Grg1-L is most closely related to human TLE-1,
whereas Grg1-S is a newly identified transcript that encodes a third
subgroup of naturally occurring Groucho isoforms. Grg1-S is related in
size and structure to the AES subfamily but is identical to the amino
terminus of Grg1-L and encompasses the entire Q and GP domains. Its
functions are best considered in the context of the established roles
of the five characterized Groucho/TLE subdomains. For example, the Q
domain has been implicated previously (36, 51) in mediating Groucho
polymerization, and its retention in Grg1-S is consistent with our
detection of both Grg1-S-Grg1-L and homomeric Grg1-S complexes. Such
complexes may be important in Grg1-S biological functions, as
oligomerization is required for Groucho/TLE-mediated repression (36,
51-53). In contrast, absence of the carboxyl-terminal WD domain might
preclude association with many other cellular factors (15, 16).
Subcellular localization has been reported previously (13) for the
AES-like protein Grg5 and for an artificially truncated form of XGrg4
that contains only the Q and GP domains and hence resembles Grg1-S;
both are excluded from cell nuclei. In contrast, Grg1-S lacks a CcN
domain, yet localizes measurably to the nucleus in mammalian cells,
similar to mouse Grg (35). Together with its lack of a consensus
nuclear localization signal, this finding raises the possibility that
Grg1-S nuclear transport is driven by association with other cellular
proteins or after other modifications. TLE1, the human ortholog of
Grg1-L, displays different affinities for the nuclear compartment
depending on its phosphorylation state (54), and the same may hold for
Grg1-S. We have noted that Myc epitope-tagged Grg1-L and Grg1-S migrate
with higher than predicted molecular mass on SDS-PAGE (data not shown),
which suggests the presence of post-translational changes. It remains
to be determined whether such modifications are relevant to Grg1-S
function and whether subcellular localization may be subject to
external influences.
Groucho/TLE proteins interact with some DNA-binding factors such as
Engrailed, Hairy, Runt-related factor and AML1 at least partly through
the carboxyl-terminal WD domain (55-58), whereas mouse Grg5 associates
with Tcf1 through the most amino-terminal ~100 amino acids (31).
However, biological effects of Groucho proteins, and indeed of other
transcriptional coregulators, can vary with cellular, protein, and
promoter context. For instance, AES subfamily proteins behave as
corepressors (37, 59, 60) or coactivators (13). Grg5 potentiates the
repressive effect of TLE1 on HNF3
transcriptional activity (61) and
is thus the only short, AES-type Groucho protein reported to interfere
with large Groucho function. We therefore tested the possibilities that
Grg1-S may function either to repress transcription directly or to
interfere with Grg1-L activity. First, we used coimmunoprecipitation to
demonstrate that Grg1-S can associate physically with Grg1-L and hence
potentially modulate its activity. Second, in both axis duplication
assays in Xenopus embryos and luciferase reporter assays in
cultured mammalian cells, Grg1-S by itself causes transcriptional repression of Tcf/
-catenin-dependent gene activation.
Brantjes et al. (31) recently reported that an artificially
truncated form of XGrg4 that contains only the Q and GP domains
represses Tcf/
-catenin-dependent reporter activation;
this result is consistent with our findings with Grg1-S, a naturally
occurring Groucho isoform. Combining Grg1-L and Grg1-S leads to
slightly increased repression, which is likely explained by an additive
effect, and there is no evidence for synergy or cross-modulation
between these two isoforms. The Groucho GP domain may mediate
interaction with histone deacetylases and is required for efficient
repression (17). Thus, like some of its AES relatives, Grg1-S carries
sequences that endow it with intrinsic transcriptional repression
function. However, we cannot exclude the formal possibility that
overexpressed Grg1-S actually potentiates the function of some
endogenous repressor, including Grg1-L, perhaps by being recruited to
transcription factor-bound complexes at target gene promoters. Our
studies also do not address the properties of Grg1-S in relation to
other Groucho-regulated signaling pathways.
Although Grg1-S inhibits
-catenin/Tcf-mediated reporter gene
activation in 293 cells, we could not elicit the same effect in SW480
colon cancer cells, in which Tcf signaling is activated constitutively
(48). One possibility is that different cell types facilitate
alternative post-translational modifications that impart specificity in
protein-protein interactions. Consistent with this idea are the
following: (i) mGrg-5 interacts functionally with Tcf1 but not with
Lef-1 in COS cells (13); (ii) interaction of Grg4 with Pax5 is
associated with altered Grg4 phosphorylation states (53); and (iii)
interaction between Hes1 and RUNX1 leads to hyperphosphorylation of
Drosophila Groucho and promotes transcriptional repression
through increased chromatin association (62).
Besides Grg1-S, the alternative internal splicing described for
mGrg1 in Fig. 1A generates additional transcripts
whose roles are not known. Additionally, the gene probably employs
alternative promoters and at least one untranslated first exon. Two
independent factors suggest this to be the case. (i) The 4.3-kb size
estimated for Grg1-L RNA by Northern analysis exceeds that predicted
from the position of the polyadenylated tail and points to
heterogeneity in the 5'-UTR. (ii) Putative promoter regions are
identified 0.8 (transcription start site program TSSW prediction score,
12.25) and 5.5 kb (TSSW prediction score, 18.53)
(genomic.sanger.ac.uk/gf/gf.shtml) upstream of the Grg1-S initiation
codon. Our expression and functional data further indicate that Grg1-L
and Grg1-S mRNAs are present at comparable abundance, in the same
distribution, and the corresponding proteins show equivalent activity
in relation to Tcf/
-catenin gene regulation.
Most colorectal cancers harbor APC or
-catenin
mutations (63), which initiate tumors. As Tcf-mediated gene
transcription may depend critically on a balance between the opposing
activities of
-catenin and Groucho, it will be interesting to
determine the status of Grg1-S, Grg1-L, and other Groucho factors in
human colon cancers. The distribution of Grg1-S mRNA in
adult mouse tissues closely resembles that of mTcf4 (26, 64); its
prominence at the base of intestinal crypts is striking, and it can
repress Tcf4-induced transcriptional activation. These observations
point to a potential role for Grg1-S in gut epithelial physiology,
especially in light of the requirement for Tcf4 in maintaining crypt
stem cells (22). Independently, TLE1, a presumptive human Grg1-L ortholog, may also play a role in vertebrate gut development through interactions with the transcription factor HNF3
, as HNF3
-null mice show defective gut endoderm invagination (65, 66). To investigate
this potential role, we attempted to generate transgenic mice that
overexpress Grg1-S in differentiated villus enterocytes, under control
of the rat Fabpi and Fabpl promoters (67). None of six independent transgenic founder mice or their F1 progeny expressed detectable levels of epitope-tagged Grg1-S protein in the
intestine. Thus, either high Grg1-S expression in differentiated gut
epithelial cells is lethal, or this experiment may require the use of
other promoters that drive higher levels of transgene expression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to M. Isabel Dominguez and
Sarah Shoichet for assistance with Xenopus methods; to O. Destree, Xi He, Jeremy Green, and Bert Vogelstein for providing XTcf3,
-catenin, Siamois, and Tcf-dependent luciferase reporter
constructs, respectively; to Carmen Tam and Massimo Loda for assistance
with in situ hybridization; and to members of our laboratory
for thoughtful comments on the experiments and manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute-Novartis Drug Discovery Program.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AY155195-155200.
Scholar of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. To whom
correspondence should be addressed: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-632-5746; Fax: 617-632-5739; E-mail: ramesh_shivdasani@dfci.harvard.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208154200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TLE, transducin-like enhancer-of-split;
GP, glycine- and proline-rich;
SP, serine- and proline-rich;
Grg, Groucho-related gene;
AES, amino-terminal enhancer-of-split;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
UTR, untranslated region;
ORF, open reading frame;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
dpc, days post-coitum.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cadigan, K. M.,
and Nusse, R.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3286-3305[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Miller, J. R.,
Hocking, A. M.,
Brown, J. D.,
and Moon, R. T.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
7860-7872[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Hurlstone, A.,
and Clevers, H.
(2002)
EMBO J.
21,
2303-2311[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Barker, N.,
Morin, P. J.,
and Clevers, H.
(2000)
Adv. Cancer Res.
77,
1-24[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Bauer, A.,
Chauvet, S.,
Huber, O.,
Usseglio, F.,
Rothbacher, U.,
Aragnol, D.,
Kemler, R.,
and Pradel, J.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
6121-6130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Tago, K.,
Nakamura, T.,
Nishita, M.,
Hyodo, J.,
Nagai, S.,
Murata, Y.,
Adachi, S.,
Ohwada, S.,
Morishita, Y.,
Shibuya, H.,
and Akiyama, T.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1741-1749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Sakamoto, I.,
Kishida, S.,
Fukui, A.,
Kishida, M.,
Yamamoto, H.,
Hino, S.,
Michiue, T.,
Takada, S.,
Asashima, M.,
and Kikuchi, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32871-32878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Waltzer, L.,
and Bienz, M.
(1998)
Nature
395,
521-525[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Brannon, M.,
Brown, J. D.,
Bates, R.,
Kimelman, D.,
and Moon, R. T.
(1999)
Development
126,
3159-3170[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Sampson, E. M.,
Haque, Z. K., Ku, M. C.,
Tevosian, S. G.,
Albanese, C.,
Pestell, R. G.,
Paulson, K. E.,
and Yee, A. S.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
4500-4511[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Snider, L.,
Thirlwell, H.,
Miller, J. R.,
Moon, R. T.,
Groudine, M.,
and Tapscott, S. J.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
1866-1873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Cavallo, R. A.,
Cox, R. T.,
Moline, M. M.,
Roose, J.,
Polevoy, G. A.,
Clevers, H.,
Peifer, M.,
and Bejsovec, A.
(1998)
Nature
395,
604-608[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Roose, J.,
Molenaar, M.,
Peterson, J.,
Hurenkamp, J.,
Brantjes, H.,
Moerer, P.,
van de Wetering, M.,
Destree, O.,
and Clevers, H.
(1998)
Nature
395,
608-612[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Levanon, D.,
Goldstein, R. E.,
Bernstein, Y.,
Tang, H.,
Goldenberg, D.,
Stifani, S.,
Paroush, Z.,
and Groner, Y.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11590-11595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Fisher, A. L.,
and Caudy, M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1931-1940[Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Chen, G.,
and Courey, A. J.
(2000)
Gene (Amst.)
249,
1-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Chen, G.,
Fernandez, J.,
Mische, S.,
and Courey, A. J.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
2218-2230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Morin, P. J.
(1999)
Bioessays
21,
1021-1030[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Polakis, P.,
Hart, M.,
and Rubinfeld, B.
(1999)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
470,
23-32[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Wong, N. A.,
and Pignatelli, M.
(2002)
Am. J. Pathol.
160,
389-401[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Zorn, A. M.,
Barish, G. D.,
Williams, B. O.,
Lavender, P.,
Klymkowsky, M. W.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
487-498[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Moerer, P.,
van Donselaar, E.,
Huls, G.,
Peters, P. J.,
and Clevers, H.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
379-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Pukrop, T.,
Gradl, D.,
Henningfeld, K. A.,
Knochel, W.,
Wedlich, D.,
and Kuhl, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8968-8978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Roose, J.,
Huls, G.,
van Beest, M.,
Moerer, P.,
van der Horn, K.,
Goldschmeding, R.,
Logtenberg, T.,
and Clevers, H.
(1999)
Science
285,
1923-1926[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hovanes, K., Li, T. W.,
Munguia, J. E.,
Truong, T.,
Milovanovic, T.,
Lawrence Marsh, J.,
Holcombe, R. F.,
and Waterman, M. L.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
28,
53-57[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Lee, Y. J.,
Swencki, B.,
Shoichet, S.,
and Shivdasani, R. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1566-1572[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Sambrook, J.,
and Russel, D. W.
(2001)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 3rd Ed., Vol. 3
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYAppendix A1-12
|
| 28.
|
Magi-Galluzzi, C.,
Mishra, R.,
Fiorentino, M.,
Montironi, R.,
Yao, H.,
Capodieci, P.,
Wishnow, K.,
Kaplan, I.,
Stork, P. J.,
and Loda, M.
(1997)
Lab. Invest.
76,
37-51[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Bonifacino, J. S., Dasso, M., Harford, J. B., Lippincott-Schwartz, J., and Yamada, K. M.
(eds)
(1998)
Current Protocols in Cell Biology
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkSec 6.1.1 and 6.2.1
|
| 30.
|
Shoichet, S. A.,
Malik, T. H.,
Rothman, J. H.,
and Shivdasani, R. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4076-4081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Brantjes, H.,
Roose, J.,
van De Wetering, M.,
and Clevers, H.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
1410-1419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Potten, C. S.,
Booth, C.,
and Pritchard, D. M.
(1997)
Int. J. Exp. Pathol.
78,
219-243[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Stappenbeck, T. S.,
Wong, M. H.,
Saam, J. R.,
Mysorekar, I. U.,
and Gordon, J. I.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
702-709[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Stifani, S.,
Blaumueller, C. M.,
Redhead, N. J.,
Hill, R. E.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1992)
Nat. Genet.
2,
119-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Mallo, M.,
Gendron-Maguire, M.,
Harbison, M. L.,
and Gridley, T.
(1995)
Dev. Dyn.
204,
338-347[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Chen, G.,
Nguyen, P. H.,
and Courey, A. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7259-7268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Ren, B.,
Chee, K. J.,
Kim, T. H.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
125-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Larabell, C. A.,
Torres, M.,
Rowning, B. A.,
Yost, C.,
Miller, J. R., Wu, M.,
Kimelman, D.,
and Moon, R. T.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
1123-1136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Brannon, M.,
Gomperts, M.,
Sumoy, L.,
Moon, R. T.,
and Kimelman, D.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2359-2370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Molenaar, M.,
van de Wetering, M.,
Oosterwegel, M.,
Peterson-Maduro, J.,
Godsave, S.,
Korinek, V.,
Roose, J.,
Destree, O.,
and Clevers, H.
(1996)
Cell
86,
391-399[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
da Costa, L. T., He, T. C., Yu, J.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Morin, P. J.,
Polyak, K.,
Laken, S.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
5010-5014[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Choudhury, B. K.,
Kim, J.,
Kung, H. F.,
and Li, S. S.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
195,
41-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Molenaar, M.,
Brian, E.,
Roose, J.,
Clevers, H.,
and Destree, O.
(2000)
Mech. Dev.
91,
311-315[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Paroush, Z.,
Finley, R. L., Jr.,
Kidd, T.,
Wainwright, S. M.,
Ingham, P. W.,
Brent, R.,
and Ish-Horowicz, D.
(1994)
Cell
79,
805-815[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Dehni, G.,
Liu, Y.,
Husain, J.,
and Stifani, S.
(1995)
Mech. Dev.
53,
369-381[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Grbavec, D., Lo, R.,
Liu, Y.,
and Stifani, S.
(1998)
Eur. J. Biochem.
258,
339-349[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Yao, J.,
Liu, Y., Lo, R.,
Tretjakoff, I.,
Peterson, A.,
and Stifani, S.
(2000)
Mech. Dev.
93,
105-115[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Morin, P. J.,
van Wichen, D.,
de Weger, R.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Clevers, H.
(1997)
Science
275,
1784-1787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Morin, P. J.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Clevers, H.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1997)
Science
275,
1787-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Rubinfeld, B.,
Robbins, P., El-,
Gamil, M.,
Albert, I.,
Porfiri, E.,
and Polakis, P.
(1997)
Science
275,
1790-1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Pinto, M.,
and Lobe, C. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33026-33031[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Choi, C. Y.,
Kim, Y. H.,
Kwon, H. J.,
and Kim, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
33194-33197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Eberhard, D.,
Jimenez, G.,
Heavey, B.,
and Busslinger, M.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
2292-2303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Husain, J., Lo, R.,
Grbavec, D.,
and Stifani, S.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
317,
523-531[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Jimenez, G.,
Paroush, Z.,
and Ish-Horowicz, D.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3072-3082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Imai, Y.,
Kurokawa, M.,
Tanaka, K.,
Friedman, A. D.,
Ogawa, S.,
Mitani, K.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
252,
582-589[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Javed, A.,
Guo, B.,
Hiebert, S.,
Choi, J. Y.,
Green, J.,
Zhao, S. C.,
Osborne, M. A.,
Stifani, S.,
Stein, J. L.,
Lian, J. B.,
van Wijnen, A. J.,
and Stein, G. S.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
2221-2231[Abstract]
|
| 58.
|
McLarren, K. W.,
Theriault, F. M.,
and Stifani, S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1578-1584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
| |