![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 5, 3232-3235, February 1, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,From the CNRS UMR 6061, Université de Rennes 1, Faculté de Médecine, 2 Avenue Léon Bernard, 35043 Rennes Cedex, France
Received for publication, September 27, 2001, and in revised form, October 24, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In mammalian cells, certain mRNAs encoding
cytokines or proto-oncogenes are especially unstable, because of the
presence of a particular sequence element in their 3'-untranslated
region named ARE (A/U-rich element). AREs cause this instability by
provoking the rapid shortening of the poly(A) tail of the mRNA. The
deadenylation of mRNAs mediated by AREs containing repeats of the
AUUUA motif (class I/II AREs) is conserved in Xenopus
embryos. Here, we first extend these observations by showing that c-Jun
ARE, a representative of class III (non-AUUUA) AREs, also provokes the
deadenylation of a reporter RNA in Xenopus embryos. Next,
by immunodepletion and immunoneutralization experiments, we show that,
in Xenopus, the rapid deadenylation of RNAs that contain
the c-Jun ARE, but not an AUUUA ARE, requires EDEN-BP. This RNA-binding
protein was previously shown to provoke the rapid deadenylation of
certain Xenopus maternal RNAs. Finally, we show that
CUG-BP, the human homologue of EDEN-BP, specifically binds to c-Jun
ARE. Together, these results identify CUG-BP as a plausible
deadenylation factor responsible for the post-transcriptional control
of c-Jun proto-oncogene mRNA in mammalian cells.
The control of mRNA translation and/or stability, as a means
of regulating gene expression in eukaryotic cells, is now recognized as
a mechanism of widespread importance. In a large number of cases, this
control is exerted via the 3'-terminal poly(A) tail. In general,
mRNAs with a long poly(A) tail are much more actively translated
and stable than mRNAs that have a short or no poly(A) tail
(reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2). Cytoplasmic activities that alter the
length of the poly(A) tail are therefore potent regulators of gene
expression. These activities are often modulated by sequence elements
that reside within the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR)1 of mRNAs.
Among the sequence elements that provoke the shortening of the poly(A)
tail (deadenylation), and thereby destabilization, the best known in
mammalian somatic cells is probably the family of A/U-rich elements
(ARE) (for a review, see Ref. 3). AREs are present in the 3'-UTRs of
many unstable mRNAs such as those encoding proto-oncogenes or
cytokines. Based on their sequences, AREs have been divided into three
classes. Class I AREs, examplified by c-Fos ARE, contain several
(AUUUA) motifs interspersed within a less defined region. Class II
AREs, such as GM-CSF ARE, contain overlapping (AUUUA) motifs. Finally,
class III AREs, exemplified by c-Jun ARE, contain no AUUUA motif (3,
4).
It is highly probable that the three classes of AREs act by binding
specific factors that target rapid deadenylation. Several class I and
II (AUUUA-containing) ARE-binding factors have been identified. Two
factors, HuR and hnRNPD/AUF1 have been specifically studied.
Overexpression of HuR in a variety of cell lines leads to a
stabilization of class I/II ARE-containing RNAs (5-7). Cell lines
depleted of HuR by an antisense strategy were recently established. This depletion leads to a destabilization of class I/II ARE-containing RNAs (8, 9). These results strongly suggest that HuR, in binding to
AUUUA-containing AREs, stabilizes these RNAs. The function of
hnRNPD/AUF1 binding to AUUUA-containing AREs is less clear and may be
cell type-specific. Overexpression of this protein in K562 cells during
hemin-induced differentiation destabilizes class I/II ARE containing
RNAs (10), whereas overexpression of the same protein in NIH3T3 cells
stabilizes class I/II ARE-containing RNAs (11). To date, no factor
involved in the control of the stability of class III, non-AUUUA
ARE-containing RNAs has been characterized.
Xenopus embryos are a powerful biological model to identify
deadenylation factors for several reasons. First, in Xenopus
embryos, mRNA deadenylation and degradation, though functionally
coupled, are temporally uncoupled. Deadenylated RNAs are as stable as
their polyadenylated counterparts until the blastula stage, several hours after fertilization (12, 13). This allows these two phenomena to
be analyzed separately. Second, deadenylation-proficient cell-free
extracts can be made (14, 15) that permit several biochemical
manipulations. Finally, and most importantly, the functions of several
sequences and factors that target rapid deadenylation are conserved
between Xenopus and mammals. For instance, AUUUA AREs
provoke mRNA deadenylation in Xenopus embryos (13, 15), and the human and Xenopus oocyte poly(A)-specific
ribonucleases (PARN) are functionally equivalent (16). Accordingly,
studying deadenylation mechanisms in Xenopus embryos should
give important clues to understand these mechanisms in mammals.
In the present study, we have used Xenopus embryos to study
c-Jun ARE, a representative class III, non-AUUUA, ARE (4). We first
show that c-Jun ARE-dependent rapid deadenylation is conserved between mammals and Xenopus. Secondly, we show
that, in Xenopus embryos, the rapid deadenylation conferred
by c-Jun ARE requires EDEN-BP. EDEN-BP (EDEN-binding protein) is a
factor which by binding to a specific cis sequence named EDEN (embryo deadenylation element), targets certain maternal Xenopus
mRNAs to rapid deadenylation after fertilization (17). The maternal EDEN-containing mRNAs are in a polyadenylated form in unfertilized eggs because of a cytoplasmic polyadenylation that takes place during
oocyte maturation. Cytoplasmic polyadenylation requires a cis element
different from the EDEN, and named a CPE (cytoplasmic polyadenylation
element) (18, 19). We show that the requirement of EDEN-BP for rapid
deadenylation of c-Jun is specific, as inactivating EDEN-BP has no
effect on AUUUA ARE-mediated deadenylation. Finally, we show that the
human sequence homologue of EDEN-BP, CUG-BP (20), specifically binds to
c-Jun ARE, making it a plausible factor to be responsible for c-Jun
mRNA rapid deadenylation and degradation in mammalian cells.
Cloning Procedures--
c-Jun ARE (4, 21) was amplified
by RT-PCR from HeLa cell RNA with the following primers: sense,
GCTCTAGATCTGGCCTGCTTTCGTTAACTGTGTATG; antisense,
GTAATGGATCCTCTTTTTATTAGGAGCAGATACGCTAGCTTTATTAAATCTCTTATTTACAAACAACACTGGGC and was cloned into the BamHI and XbaI sites of
the pGbORF vector (12), giving the pGbORF-jun plasmid. Annealed primers
sense, CTAGAAGCTTAGATCTATTTATTTATTTATTTATTTATTTATTTATTTACTAGTGGTACC; antisense, CTAGGTACCACTAGTAAATAAATAAATAAATAAATAAATAAATAAATAGATCTAAGCTT were cloned in the XbaI and NheI sites of
the same vector to give the pGBORF-AUUUA plasmid.
The Xenopus EDEN-BP and human CUG-BP open reading frames
were amplified by RT-PCR using the pfu DNA polymerase
(Stratagene) and either Xenopus ovary RNA or HeLa cell RNA.
The sequences of the PCR primers were Xenopus sense,
TAGAAGATCTGCCATGAACGGCACAATGGACC; Xenopus antisense,
GCTCTAGATCAGTAGGGTTTGCTGTCATTC; Human sense, TAGAGGATCCGCCATGAACGGCACCCTGGACC; Human antisense,
GCTCTAGATCAGTAGGGCTTGCTGTCATTC. The PCR products were cloned into
the BglII and SpeI sites of the pT7TS vector
(22). All the constructions were fully sequenced.
In Vitro Transcription--
Capped, polyadenylated, and
radiolabeled GbEg2-410 (14), GbORF (12), GbORF-jun, and GbORF-AUUUA
transcripts were obtained by in vitro transcription using
EcoRV linearized matrices and T7 RNA polymerase with the
Promega Riboprobe kit. Large scale uncapped RNA for recombinant
proteins production were obtained from EcoRI-linearized
pT7TS matrices by in vitro transcription using the Promega
Ribomax kit.
Xenopus Methods--
Microinjections of 20-30 nl of in
vitro transcripts into Xenopus two-cell embryos were
done following standard procedures. Coinjections of in vitro
transcripts with purified antibodies are described
elsewhere.2 Deadenylation
proficient egg extracts have been described (14). Deadenylation
activities were analyzed either by incubating RNAs in the extracts at
22 °C for the indicated time, or by incubating the injected embryos
at 22 °C for the indicated times. After incubation, RNAs were
extracted, electrophoresed on a 4% acrylamide-urea gel, and
autoradiographed as described (14). UV cross-linking and antibody
methods have been described (14, 17).
c-Jun ARE Provokes Rapid Deadenylation of a Reporter RNA in Xenopus
Embryos--
To test whether the capacity of c-Jun ARE to target rapid
deadenylation in human cells (4) is conserved in Xenopus
embryos, this sequence element was cloned 3' of the globin open reading frame (ORF). The resulting plasmid was used as a template to synthesize a capped, polyadenylated transcript (GbORF-jun). This transcript was
injected into two-cell Xenopus embryos, and its
deadenylation behavior was analyzed by denaturing electrophoresis and
autoradiography (Fig. 1). A completely
deadenylated form of the GbORF-jun transcript could be detected as
early as 1 h after injection (lane 6), and the
transcript was predominantly deadenylated 3 h after injection (lane 8). In contrast, and as previously shown (12), no
completely deadenylated form of the reporter RNA alone (GbORF) could be
detected, even 3 h after injection (lane 4). The
deadenylation pattern of the GbORF transcript is evocative of default
deadenylation, a slow activity for which the only sequence specificity
is an absence of a CPE, which is stimulated during oocyte maturation
and persists after fertilization (23-25). These results show that
c-Jun ARE targets RNAs for rapid deadenylation in Xenopus
embryos, demonstrating a functional conservation of this sequence
element in vertebrates.
c-Jun ARE-dependent Rapid Deadenylation Is Dependent on
EDEN-BP in Xenopus--
As a representative class III ARE, c-Jun ARE
contains no AUUUA motif (see Introduction). Examination of its sequence
revealed the presence of a putative CPE UUUUUUAAUU, the element that
drives cytoplasmic polyadenylation in Xenopus maturing
oocytes (18, 19) and of numerous U/purine dinucleotides (Fig.
2). We have previously shown that an
EDEN, the element that drives RNA deadenylation in
Xenopus embryos is also enriched in U/purine dinucleotides (17, 26). This suggests therefore that c-Jun ARE acts as an EDEN
sequence to target rapid deadenylation in Xenopus embryos. In this case, c-Jun ARE-mediated RNA deadenylation would require active
EDEN-BP, the factor that specifically binds to EDEN sequences (17).
In Xenopus cytoplasmic eggs extracts, immunodepletion of
EDEN-BP completely abolishes EDEN-dependent RNA
deadenylation (17). In Fig. 3A
(upper bands) is shown the behavior of GbORF-jun RNA in
EDEN-BP- or mock-depleted extracts. In mock-depleted extracts (lanes 1-3), GbORF-jun RNA was deadenylated, as shown by
the appearance of a completely deadenylated form of the transcript
after 1.5 h of incubation, which was more evident after 3 h
of incubation. The deadenylation of GbORF-jun was strongly diminished
by EDEN-BP immunodepletion, as no completely deadenylated form of the
transcript was detected even after 3 h of incubation (lanes
4-6). In contrast, and as previously shown (17), immunodepletion
of EDEN-BP had no effect on the slow, default-type deadenylation of the
reporter GbORF transcript (lower bands). Therefore, c-Jun
ARE-dependent deadenylation in Xenopus egg
extracts specifically requires EDEN-BP.
The deadenylation of the GbORF-jun transcript is significantly less
efficient in extracts than in living embryos (compare Figs.
3A and 1). It could be argued therefore that in living
embryos the behavior of this transcript is mainly due to an
EDEN-BP-independent deadenylation mechanism. This hypothetical
mechanism would be lost while preparing cell-free extracts. To test
this hypothesis, we used purified antibodies directed against EDEN-BP
to immunoneutralize this protein in Xenopus living embryos.
EDEN-BP immunoneutralization specifically inhibits
EDEN-dependent deadenylation as measured using an
Eg2-derived probe (data not shown). When the GbORF-jun transcript was
injected together with anti-EDEN-BP antibodies, the deadenylation of
this RNA was abrogated (Fig. 3B, lanes 1-4). Indeed, in EDEN-BP immunoneutralized embryos, the GbORF-jun
transcript was further polyadenylated, as evidenced by the reduction of
its electrophoretic mobility. This is probably due to the action of the
putative CPE that is present in c-jun ARE (see Fig. 2). In contrast,
the deadenylation of the GbORF-jun transcript was maintained when this
transcript was injected with control, nonimmune antibodies (Fig.
3B, lanes 5-8).
The above data show that c-Jun ARE requires an active EDEN-BP to target
an mRNA to rapid deadenylation in Xenopus embryos. To
test if this requirement is specific for class III ARE, or if it
concerns any ARE, we analyzed the deadenylation behavior of an RNA
harboring an AUUUA ARE in EDEN-BP immunoneutralized embryos. It was
shown previously that RNAs containing repeats of the (AUUUA) motif were
deadenylated in Xenopus embryos, demonstrating the
conservation of class I/II ARE mediated deadenylation between Xenopus and mammals (13, 15). Accordingly, when the GbORF reporter RNA containing a eight (AUUUA) repeat (GbORF-AUUUA transcript) was injected with nonimmune antibodies, it was rapidly deadenylated (Fig. 3C, lanes 5-8). This behavior was not
affected by the injection of anti-EDEN-BP antibodies (lanes
1-4). Therefore, RNAs that contain c-Jun ARE, but not AUUUA-type
ARE, are rapidly deadenylated in Xenopus embryos by an
EDEN-BP-dependent pathway.
The Human Homologue of EDEN-BP Binds c-Jun ARE--
It can be
hypothesized that, as EDEN-BP is responsible for c-Jun ARE-mediated
rapid RNA deadenylation in Xenopus embryos, a human sequence
homologue of EDEN-BP may target c-Jun mRNA for rapid deadenylation
in human cells. This hypothesis requires that the human homologue of
EDEN-BP should bind to c-Jun ARE. The closest human sequence homologue
of EDEN-BP is CUG-BP, which is 88% identical to Xenopus
EDEN-BP at the amino acid level (20).
To test if CUG-BP can bind to c-Jun ARE, recombinant human CUG-BP and
Xenopus EDEN-BP were expressed in wheat germ extracts. The
capacity of these recombinant proteins to bind to c-Jun ARE were
assayed by UV cross-linking (Fig. 4). A
strong UV cross-linking signal was detected with wheat germ expressing
either EDEN-BP (lane 3) or CUG-BP (lane 5). In
contrast, no similar signal was observed with unprogrammed wheat germ
extracts (lane 1), demonstrating that the observed signals
are due to the recombinant proteins. To test the specificity of the
interaction between c-Jun ARE and EDEN-BP or CUG-BP, cross-linking to
c-Jun ARE was assayed in the presence of a 50-fold molar excess of
unlabeled RNA containing the Eg5 EDEN (17). The cross-linking signal
was strongly diminished by this excess of competitor (lanes
4 and 6). Hence, both EDEN-BP and CUG-BP can bind
specifically to c-Jun ARE.
In the present article, we show that the ability of c-Jun (class
III) ARE to provoke rapid RNA deadenylation is conserved between human
somatic cells and Xenopus embryos. Similar results on AUUUA
(class I/II) AREs have been published (13, 15). Hence, the function of
the three classes of AREs is conserved between mammalian somatic cells
and Xenopus embryos. It should be noticed however that
ARE-mediated deadenylation leads to mRNA degradation in
mammalian somatic cells, but not in early Xenopus embryos. Deadenylated mRNAs are stable in Xenopus embryos until
the blastula stage, several hours after fertilization (this study and
Refs. 12 and 15).
Next, we used immunodepletion and immunoneutralization experiments to
show that c-Jun ARE-mediated deadenylation in Xenopus embryos required EDEN-BP, both in vitro and in
vivo. Furthermore, we have shown that neutralizing EDEN-BP did not
affect the deadenylation of a AUUUA-containing reporter RNA. By
overexpressing hnRNPD/AUF1, Xu et al. (11) recently showed
that the different isoforms of this ARE-binding protein have different
destabilizing effects on class I and class II AREs. However, the
deadenylation mediated by c-jun ARE was not affected in these
experiments. Together therefore, these results show that mRNAs
containing different classes of AREs are regulated by different
trans-acting factors, and it is at least theoretically possible for the
cell to regulate the deadenylation of the various ARE-containing
mRNAs independently. This observation may be especially important
considering that c-Fos proto-oncogene mRNA contains several AUUUA
motifs (3), and that c-Fos and c-Jun proteins are subunits of the AP-1
transcription complex (27). Differential post-transcriptional
regulation of c-Jun and c-Fos would be a way to alter the composition
of the AP-1 complex, which may have important implications on its targets.
Having shown the requirement of EDEN-BP for c-Jun ARE-mediated
deadenylation in Xenopus embryos, it was tempting to
hypothesize that the closest human sequence homologue of EDEN-BP,
CUG-BP (20), is responsible for the post-transcriptional regulation of
c-Jun mRNA in human cells. In support of this hypothesis, we show
that CUG-BP indeed binds to c-Jun ARE. c-Jun ARE is enriched in
dinucleotides U/purine. This characteristic of the cis-element bound by
CUG-BP is in agreement with data obtained using a tri-hybrid assay
(28). In addition, in a UV cross-linking experiment, CUG-BP binds BRE sequences that consist mainly of U/purine repeats (29). It remains to
be demonstrated conclusively that CUG-BP is a deadenylation factor
in human cells, where it would regulate the expression of c-Jun
proto-oncogene. This may be attempted using an antisense RNA strategy
similar to that used for HuR protein (8, 9).
A role for CUG-BP in class III ARE-dependent deadenylation
could appear contradictory with the described nuclear function for this
protein as an alternative splicing regulator of the cardiac troponin T
and the insulin receptor pre-mRNAs (30, 31). However, CUG-BP has
been detected both in the nucleus and the cytoplasm (32). Moreover,
most ARE-binding factors are nucleus-cytoplasm shuttling proteins, with
different functions in these two compartments (reviewed in Ref. 33).
Accordingly, a dual role for CUG-BP as both a splicing regulator and a
deadenylation factor is conceivable.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
c-Jun ARE targets RNAs to rapid deadenylation
in Xenopus embryos. Capped, radiolabeled GbORF
and GbORF-jun transcripts were injected into Xenopus
embryos. RNAs were extracted at the indicated times. The adenylation
behavior of the injected transcripts was analyzed by denaturing
electrophoresis and autoradiography. The positions of the
polyadenylated (A+) and deadenylated (A
) RNAs
are indicated on the right of the gel, and the positions of
RNA molecular weight markers (34) are indicated on the
left.
![]()
View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Sequence of c-Jun ARE. The U/purine
dinucleotides are boxed in gray. The potential CPE (see
text) is overlined.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The rapid deadenylation mediated by c-Jun ARE
requires active EDEN-BP. A, capped, radiolabeled
GbORF-jun transcripts were incubated for the indicated times in an
extract previously immunodepleted of EDEN-BP (lanes 4-6) or
mock depleted (lanes 1-3). RNAs were extracted, and the
deadenylation behavior of the injected RNAs was analyzed by denaturing
electrophoresis and autoradiography. The positions of the
polyadenylated (A+) and deadenylated (A
) RNAs
are indicated on the left. B and C,
Xenopus two-cell embryos were coinjected with 100 ng of
either anti-EDEN-BP (lanes 1-4) or nonimmune
(NI) antibodies (lanes 5-8) and capped,
radiolabeled, polyadenylated GbORF-jun transcript (B) or
GbORF-(AUUU)8 (GbORF-AUUUA) transcript (C). RNAs
were extracted at the indicated times, and the adenylation behavior of
the injected transcripts was analyzed by denaturing electrophoresis and
autoradiography. The positions of the polyadenylated (A+)
and deadenylated (A
) RNAs are indicated on the
sides of the gel.

View larger version (65K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Human CUG-BP specifically binds c-Jun
ARE. Wheat germ extracts programmed to synthesize EDEN-BP or
CUG-BP or unprogrammed (U), as indicated, were processed for
UV cross-linking to the radiolabeled c-Jun ARE in the presence
(lanes 2, 4, 6) or the absence (lanes
1, 3, 5) of a 50-fold excess of
unlabeled RNA containing the Eg5 EDEN. The positions of molecular
weight markers are indicated on the left.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Paul Krieg for the gift of the pT7TS vector and Joan Steitz for communication of data before publication.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the European Union DG XII Biotechnology Program, Ministère chargé de la recherche ACC-SV4, Association de Recherche contre le Cancer, and Ligue Nationale contre le cancer. CNRS UMR 6061 is a component of IFR 97 Génomique Fonctionnelle et Santé.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33 0 299 33 62 75; Fax: 33 0 299 33 62 00; E-mail:
Luc.Paillard@univ-rennes1.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 13, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109362200
2 C. Le Clainche, D. Maniey, D. Ogereau, H. B. Osborne, and L. Paillard, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: UTR, untranslated region; PARN, poly(A)-specific ribonucleases; EDEN, embryo deadenylation element; CPE, cytoplasmic polyadenylation element; RT, reverse transcriptase; ARE, A/U-rich element.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sachs, A. B., and Buratowski, S. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 189-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Preiss, T., and Hentze, M. W. (1999) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 515-521[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Chen, C.-Y. A., and Shyu, A.-B. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 465-470[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Peng, S. S., Chen, C. Y., and Shyu, A. B. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1490-1499[Abstract] |
| 5. | Fan, X. C., and Steitz, J. A. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3448-3460[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Peng, S. S., Chen, C. Y., Xu, N., and Shyu, A. B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 3461-3470[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Levy, N.,
Chung, S.,
Furneaux, H.,
and Levy, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6417-6423 |
| 8. |
Wang, W.,
Furneaux, H.,
Cheng, H.,
Caldwell, M. C.,
Hutter, D.,
Liu, Y.,
Holbrook, N.,
and Gorospe, M.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
760-769 |
| 9. | Wang, W., Caldwell, M. C., Lin, S., Furneaux, H., and Gorospe, M. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 2340-2350[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Loflin, P.,
Chen, C. Y.,
and Shyu, A. B.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1884-1897 |
| 11. |
Xu, N.,
Chen, C.,
and Shyu, A.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
6960-6971 |
| 12. | Audic, Y., Omilli, F., and Osborne, H. B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 209-218[Abstract] |
| 13. |
Voeltz, G. K.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7537-7545 |
| 14. | Legagneux, V., Omilli, F., and Osborne, H. B. (1995) RNA 1, 1001-1008[Abstract] |
| 15. |
Voeltz, G.,
Ongkasuwan, J.,
Standart, N.,
and Steitz, J.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
774-788 |
| 16. | Korner, C. G., Wormington, M., Muckenthaler, M., Schneider, S., Dehlin, E., and Wahle, E. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 5427-5437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Paillard, L., Omilli, F., Legagneux, V., Bassez, T., Maniey, D., and Osborne, H. B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 278-287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Fox, C. A.,
Sheets, M. D.,
and Wickens, M.
(1989)
Genes Dev.
3,
2151-2162 |
| 19. |
McGrew, L. L.,
Dworkin-Rastl, E.,
Dworkin, M. B.,
and Richter, J. D.
(1989)
Genes Dev.
3,
803-815 |
| 20. |
Timchenko, L. T.,
Miller, J. W.,
Timchenko, N. A.,
DeVore, D. R.,
Datar, K. V.,
Lin, L.,
Roberts, R.,
Caskey, C. T.,
and Swanson, M. S.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
4407-4414 |
| 21. |
Chen, C.-Y. A.,
and Shyu, A.-B.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8471-8482 |
| 22. | Cleaver, O., Patterson, K., and Krieg, P. (1996) Development 122, 3549-3556[Abstract] |
| 23. |
Fox, C. A.,
and Wickens, M.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
2287-2298 |
| 24. |
Varnum, S. M.,
and Wormington, W. M.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
2278-2286 |
| 25. |
Stebbins-Boaz, B.,
and Richter, J. D.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5870-5880 |
| 26. |
Audic, Y.,
Omilli, F.,
and Osborne, H. B.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6879-6884 |
| 27. | Dam, H. v., and Castellazzi, M. (2001) Oncogene 20, 2453-2464[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Takahashi, N., Sasagawa, N., Suzuki, K., and Ishiura, S. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277, 518-523[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Good, P.,
Chen, O.,
Warner, S.,
and Herring, D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28583-28592 |
| 30. |
Philips, A. V.,
Timchenko, L. T.,
and Cooper, T. A.
(1998)
Science
280,
737-741 |
| 31. | Savkur, R., Philips, A., and Cooper, T. (2001) Nat. Genet. 29, 40-47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Roberts, R.,
Timchenko, N.,
Miller, J.,
Reddy, S.,
Caskey, C.,
Swanson, M.,
and Timchenko, L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13221-13226 |
| 33. | Shyu, A. B., and Wilkinson, M. F. (2000) Cell 102, 135-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Audic, Y., Omilli, F., Osborne, H. B., and Landais, L. (1997) BioTechniques 23, 612-616[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Graindorge, O. Le Tonqueze, R. Thuret, N. Pollet, H. B. Osborne, and Y. Audic Identification of CUG-BP1/EDEN-BP target mRNAs in Xenopus tropicalis Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 1861 - 1870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Barreau, S. Dutertre, L. Paillard, and H. B. Osborne Liposome-mediated RNA transfection should be used with caution RNA, October 1, 2006; 12(10): 1790 - 1793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C.M. Moraes, C. J. Wilusz, and J. Wilusz CUG-BP binds to RNA substrates and recruits PARN deadenylase RNA, June 1, 2006; 12(6): 1084 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Barreau, L. Paillard, and H. B. Osborne AU-rich elements and associated factors: are there unifying principles? Nucleic Acids Res., January 3, 2006; 33(22): 7138 - 7150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Ladd, G. Taffet, C. Hartley, D. L. Kearney, and T. A. Cooper Cardiac Tissue-Specific Repression of CELF Activity Disrupts Alternative Splicing and Causes Cardiomyopathy Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2005; 25(14): 6267 - 6278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Puga, B. Lainez, J. M. Fernandez-Real, M. Buxade, M. Broch, J. Vendrell, and E. Espel A Polymorphism in the 3' Untranslated Region of the Gene for Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2 Modulates Reporter Gene Expression Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2210 - 2220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Ladd and T. A. Cooper Multiple domains control the subcellular localization and activity of ETR-3, a regulator of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA processing events J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2004; 117(16): 3519 - 3529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kong, X. Ji, and S. A. Liebhaber The KH-Domain Protein {alpha}CP Has a Direct Role in mRNA Stabilization Independent of Its Cognate Binding Site Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2003; 23(4): 1125 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bonnet-Corven, Y. Audic, F. Omilli, and H. B. Osborne An analysis of the sequence requirements of EDEN-BP for specific RNA binding Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2002; 30(21): 4667 - 4674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Beckel-Mitchener, A. Miera, R. Keller, and N. I. Perrone-Bizzozero Poly(A) Tail Length-dependent Stabilization of GAP-43 mRNA by the RNA-binding Protein HuD J. Biol. Chem., July 26, 2002; 277(31): 27996 - 28002. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |