![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 5, 3274-3279, February 1, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, October 1, 2001, and in revised form, November 16, 2001
Recent studies have shown that trehalose plays a
protective role in yeast in a variety of stresses, including heat,
freezing and thawing, dehydration, hyperosmotic shock, and oxidant
injury. Because (a) heat shock and anoxia share mechanisms
that allow organisms to survive, (b) Drosophila
melanogaster is tolerant to anoxia, and (c) trehalose
is present in flies and is metabolically active, we asked whether
trehalose can protect against anoxic stress. Here we report on a new
role of trehalose in anoxia resistance in Drosophila. We
first cloned the gene trehalose-6-phosphate synthase
(tps1), which synthesizes trehalose, and examined the effect of tps1 overexpression as well as mutation on the
resistance of Drosophila to anoxia. Upon induction of
tps1, trehalose increased, and this was associated with
increased tolerance to anoxia. Furthermore, in vitro
experiments showed that trehalose reduced protein aggregation caused by
anoxia. Homozygous tps1 mutant (P-element insertion into
the third intron of the gene) leads to lethality at an early larval
stage, and excision of the P-element rescues totally the phenotype. We
conclude that trehalose contributes to anoxia tolerance in flies; this
protection is likely to be due to a reduction of protein aggregation.
The ability of organisms to sustain O2 deprivation is
limited. Irreversible injury may occur to mammalian tissues within
5-10 min of severe hypoxia or ischemia. Nervous tissue is particularly vulnerable to hypoxia (1). The range of tolerance of animals to hypoxia
is wide, and in contrast to mammalian sensitive tissues, there are
certain vertebrate or invertebrate animals that have an amazing
resistance to anoxic injury (2). For example, we and others (3-5) have
shown that the brain tissue of the turtle Pseudemys scripta
elegans is exceedingly resistant to anoxia, surviving hours of
experimental O2 deprivation with neurons continuing to fire
with very little change in their electrophysiologic properties. Another
example is the invertebrate Drosophila melanogaster:
although its response to O2 deprivation is different from
that of the turtle, the Drosophila also shows an extreme
resistance to anoxia as it recovers from hours of anoxia without
evidence of cell damage (6, 7).
The mechanisms underlying the susceptibility or tolerance to
O2 deprivation are not well understood. Clinical trials
using a variety of agents to treat cardiac or brain ischemic injury have not been successful so far (8). Indeed, several questions still
need to be addressed: 1) What mechanisms promote anoxia resistance in
the turtle or fruit fly? 2) If metabolic energy (ATP) is depleted
during anoxia, what mechanisms prevent protein degradation in the flies
after hours of anoxia? and 3) Do similar mechanisms operate in other
stress conditions, e.g. desiccation, heat, freezing, or
oxidant injury? Mechanisms that protect protein integrity must exist
and are likely to be operative during anoxia since the post-stress
behavior of this organism appears to be normal.
It is well known that there are at least two major types of substances
that play an important role in preserving proteins during heat shock:
heat shock proteins and organic compounds such as disaccharides. For
example, trehalose is a non-reducing disaccharide and is found in
diverse organisms such as bacteria, fungus, algae, and insects. It has
been shown to play a protective role in yeast in a variety of stress
conditions such as heat, freezing and thawing, dehydration,
hyperosmotic shock, and oxidant injury (9-11). Singer and Lindquist
(12) have demonstrated that trehalose reduces protein aggregation and
maintains proteins in a partially folded state, facilitating their
refolding by cellular chaperones at a later stage, possibly after the
stress condition is terminated. Though trehalose is absent in mammals,
it has been shown to improve the tolerance of human cells to
desiccation (13) and tissue tolerance to cryopreservation (14).
The possible involvement of trehalose in cellular protection against
anoxic damage has not been studied. Four reasons have led us to
hypothesize that trehalose may do so: 1) Anoxia, like heat stress,
induces an up-regulation of heat shock proteins; hence, anoxia may
share similar types of mechanisms that allow organisms to survive. 2)
We and others have shown that flies tolerate long term anoxia. 3) Flies
synthesize and catabolize trehalose. and 4) Trehalose has been shown
(as indicated above) to protect against heat shock.
The present studies were undertaken to investigate whether trehalose
plays an important role in protecting flies against anoxic stress. We
have tested whether overexpression or mutation of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase or tps11
gene, a gene that synthesizes trehalose in flies, increases or decreases tolerance to anoxia respectively, and if so,
whether trehalose can reduce protein aggregation caused by anoxia
in D. melanogaster.
D. melanogaster Stocks--
Flies were maintained on standard
Drosophila medium at temperatures of 24-25 °C or as
otherwise specified. The following GAL4 fly lines were used: 32B-GAL4
(3rd) for constitutive general expression, pGMR-GAL4 (2nd) for
specific eye tissue expression, and the heat shock inducible GAL4 line,
Hs-GAL4 (3rd). Fly stocks with balancer chromosomes used were Adv/CyO
and Adv/CyO; Sb/TM6B.
Cloning of Drosophila tps1 cDNA--
When yeast
tps1 cDNA was used to blast the
Drosophila data base, a gene with a 2427-bp open
reading frame was found. The Drosophila gene was found to be
30% similar to yeast tps1. Two primers in a conserved
domain (sense: 5'-cacgactaccatctcatgct-3' and antisense: 5'-ctccaggttcatgccatcgcg-3') were designed and used. PCR was performed, and its product, a 710-bp segment, was cloned into pCR-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) and used as a probe. A Drosophila cDNA
library, which was constructed in our laboratory, was screened using
the probe labeled with 32P (a random primer labeling kit,
Stratagene). Library screening yielded three positive clones of about
3000 bp, which were digested with EcoRI, subcloned into
pCR2.1, and sequenced.
Generation of Transgenic Fly Lines and Overexpression of tps1 in
Flies--
Fly tps1 cDNA was digested with
AceII and EcoRV, blunted, and ligated into pUAST
(digested with NotI and blunted). The right orientation was
confirmed by sequencing. The recombinant construct (UAS-tps1) was purified and microinjected into
w1118 embryos (concentration of 1 µg/µl) to generate
transgenic lines. pUAST-tps1 (2nd) and pUAST-tps1
(3rd) were crossed to 32B-GAL4 (3rd) and pGMR-GAL4 (2nd). Cultures were
maintained at 24-25 °C when crossed with Hs-GAL4 (3rd), although
lower incubation temperatures (18 ° or 15 °C) were required for
some cultures, as detailed below.
Confirmation of P-element Location--
Genomic DNA was
extracted from P838/CyO flies, digested with MspI,
self-ligated, and PCR-amplified with primer Pry4:
5'-caatcatatcgctgtctcactca-3' and Plw3-1: 5'-tgtcggcgtcatcaactcc-3'
(15). The PCR product was recovered from an agarose gel and cloned into
the pCR-TOPO vector and sequenced with primer SpepI:
5'-gacactcagaatactattc-3'. The resulting sequence was used to blast the
Drosophila genomic DNA data base.
Anoxia Test--
The procedure for inducing anoxia and measuring
recovery time has been described previously in detail (16). Briefly,
groups of 10-12 adult flies, age 3-5 days, were placed in a specially designed chamber and exposed to anoxia (O2
concentration = 0% with administration of 100% N2)
for 5 min prior to recovery in room air (O2 = 20.8%).
After the introduction of N2 in the chamber, flies became
uncoordinated within ~30 s (when O2 concentration was
about 1%), resulting in their fall to the bottom of the chamber, where
they remained motionless for the rest of the anoxic period. Recovery
time was measured as the latency between the end of a 5-min anoxia
treatment and the time point when flies recovered, which was usually a
very discrete event.
Measurement of Trehalose Concentration in Flies--
30 mg of
fly tissues or fly heads were homogenized with a plastic pestle in 0.25 ml of 0.25 M
Na2+CO3 NMR Measurement of Perchloric Acid-extracted Flies--
To
determine whether trehalose is in a metabolically active pool in the
fly, we resorted to NMR measurement of trehalose after [1-13C]glucose feeding. Tissues from frozen fly heads
(~400 mg) were extracted with 3 M perchloric acid (3:1
v/w) and centrifuged, and the supernatant was neutralized with 3 M KOH. Following centrifugation to remove perchlorate
salts, the supernatant was lyophilized, and the powder was dissolved in
a solution of deuterium oxide containing 50 mM potassium
phosphate (pH 7) and 3,3-trimethyl-sily phosphate (TSP) as a
chemical shift reference. NMR spectra were acquired at 8.4 tesla using
an AM360 NMR Spectrometer (Bruker Instruments, Bellerica, MA). Isotope
enrichments were measured in the 1H NMR spectrum
using the proton-observed, carbon
13-edited NMR pulse sequence (18). Briefly, two
subspectra are acquired in an interleaved fashion: one consists of all
proton resonances bound to 12C or 13C
(i.e. 12C + 13C), whereas the other
is acquired with inversion of protons bonded to 13C
(i.e. 12C Fly Protein Fractionation--
Flies were homogenized in chilled
extraction buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100, 60 mM PIPES, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM ethylene
glyco-bis( Isolation of Aggregated Protein--
Aggregate proteins
were isolated by differential centrifugation. The Triton-insoluble
fraction was twice resuspended in extraction buffer, sonicated, and
pelleted at 17,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The
resultant pellet was again resuspended in extraction buffer, sonicated,
and pelleted at 5,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The
purified pellet, consisting of aggregated proteins, was resuspended in extraction buffer and stored at Western Blot--
Protein determinations were carried out in
duplicate in each sample with the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit
(Sigma) using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Protein samples (5 µg) were electrophoresed through 4-10% Novex bis-Tris denaturing
gel (Invitrogen) and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked, and the membranes were incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies (anti- Trehalose Is Metabolically Active in Wild Type Flies--
To
assess whether trehalose is metabolically active in wild type flies,
trehalose 13C isotopic labeling was assessed in
13C-edited, 1H NMR spectra of acid extracts of
overnight fasted flies following a 2-h exposure to a solution of
[1-13C]glucose (Fig. 1).
The H1 Cloning of Drosophila tps1 cDNA--
A total of 200,000 plaque-forming units from a primary fly head cDNA library were
screened with the probe described above. Four positive clones were
isolated, subcloned, and sequenced. Of these clones, three gave
full-length cDNA of the tps1 gene. This gene encodes a
protein of 809 amino acids and contains both conserved domains of yeast
tps1 and tps2 (Fig.
2). Using Flybase and Gadfly, we found
that this gene is located on chromosome 2L at 24F01.
Overexpression of tps1 in Flies--
To study the function of
tps1, we overexpressed the tps1 gene using the
UAS-GAL4 system (15). We first cloned tps1 cDNA into
pUAST vector and generated a number of transgenic lines carrying the
UAS-tps1 transgene on each of the three main chromosomes of the fly. When each of these specific transgenic lines were crossed with
32B-GAL4 for constitutive generalized overexpression
(UAS-tps1/UAS-tps1 × 32B-GAL4/32B-GAL), all
larvae died at the stage of the first instar. Specific tissue
overexpression of tps1, using pGMR-GAL4, resulted in a rough
eye phenotype (Fig. 3C). The
ommatidia were smaller and disorganized. However, the number of
receptor cells in each ommatidia was normal with larger spaces present
between ommatidia (Fig. 3D). When we overexpressed
tps1 with the heat shock-inducible promoter Hs-GAL4 at
either 24 ° or 18 °C, flies died at a late pupa stage (Fig.
3E); however, animals survived and developed into the adult
stage when raised at 15 °C.
Overexpression of tps1 in Adult Flies: Trehalose Levels and
Tolerance to Anoxia--
Adult flies, grown at 15 °C, were used.
After hatching, these flies were first transferred to and kept at
18 °C for 2 consecutive days before they were tested for their
tolerance to anoxia. We used the same phenotypic assay we had validated
previously and used extensively (16). We tested flies with
tps1 overexpression and controls. Three kinds of
controls were used: w1118, w1118;
UAS-tps1/+ and w1118; Hs-GAL4/+, which were also
grown at 15 °C. As in our previous studies, an anoxia period of 5 min was used to determine the recovery latency and tolerance to
O2 deprivation. Overexpression of tps1 in adult
flies reduced the recovery time and rendered flies even more tolerant
to anoxia than the wild type flies. The recovery times from anoxia were
all significantly longer in the controls than in the transgenic flies
expressing tps1 and Hs-GAL4 (Fig. 4A). Parallel to the shortened
recovery times in the transgenic flies were the trehalose levels, which
were much higher in those flies containing Hs-GAL4 and tps1
than in the control flies (Fig. 4B).
Mutation of tps1 in Flies: Lethality in the First Instar Larval
Stage--
To further our understanding of tps1 function,
we needed to analyze the tps1 mutant. We used a homozygous
lethal line, P838/CyO, with a P-element in the tps1 gene
from the fly stock center. The location of the P-element was in the 3rd
intron of the tps1 gene, and this was confirmed as detailed
under "Experimental Procedures." In order to ascertain that the
lethality is caused by the P-element insertion, we first crossed the
P838/CyO to two other separate lines with deficiencies. The first
deficiency was a deletion between cytological locations 24F04 and
25A01-04, and the second was a deletion between 24C03-05 and
25A02-03. We found that there was complementation with the first
deletion but not with the second. In addition, excision of the
P-element by jumping the P838 P-element restores the viability of the
fly, indicating that lethality is due to P-element insertion into the
tps1 gene. The lethality occurred in the first instar larval
stage because about 1/4 of the larvae died in this stage when
virgin females P838/CyO were crossed to a male P838/Adv.
Long Term Anoxia and Protein Aggregation in Flies: Can Trehalose
Reduce Aggregation or Prevent Na+-K+ ATPase
from Aggregating?--
The data presented above showed that
overexpression of tps1 in flies almost doubled the trehalose
level and increased the tolerance to anoxia. To further explore the
mechanisms underlying the effect of trehalose, we investigated 1)
whether anoxia causes protein aggregation in flies and 2) whether
trehalose helps to reduce protein aggregation caused by anoxia. Wild
type flies (w1118) were treated with N2 for 0, 1, 3, 4 h, put on dry ice immediately, and stored in
To determine the fate of specific proteins, we examined the
solubility of Na+/K+ ATPase, which is known to
unfold and aggregate in low O2 conditions (19). This was
examined in flies subjected to 4 h of anoxia. Western blots of the
total aggregated protein fraction revealed much less aggregated
Na+/K+ ATPase in 0.5 M trehalose
than in buffer containing no trehalose (Fig.
6).
In this study, using Drosophila as a genetic model, we
have made four novel observations regarding the importance of trehalose and the tps1 gene in the tolerance to O2
deprivation. First, the fly has only one tps gene
(tps1), and this gene has domains that are conserved when
compared with both yeast genes, namely tps1 and
tps2. Second, overexpression of fly tps1 almost
doubled trehalose levels and reduced recovery time from anoxia,
enhancing their tolerance to anoxia. Third, eye-specific overexpression
of tps1 led to gross eye abnormalities, and mutation in
tps1 (P-element insertion) resulted in lethality at the
first instar larval stage. Fourth, although there was little effect on
protein aggregation in Drosophila when anoxia exposure was
less than 3 h, there was substantial aggregation at 4 h;
trehalose decreased this aggregation in vitro considerably
in a dose-response fashion.
Unicellular and multicellular organisms are endowed with
mechanisms that allow them to cope with environmental stresses,
especially when the stress is not too severe. The best example, which
has been studied for more than a decade, is the response to heat shock, which induces the production of specialized heat shock proteins (e.g. heat shock proteins and heat shock transcription
factors) that are important for cellular survival. However, the heat
shock response involves more than the induction of heat shock proteins. For example, there is evidence that organic compounds and solutes may
take part in this response. Sucrose and maltose have been known to
protect tissues and cells against temperature swings (20). Trehalose, a
glucose dimer, is known to protect yeast during heat, freezing,
dehydration, and oxidant injury (9, 10). In addition, trehalose is used
as a cryoprotectant of human lymphocytes, red blood cells, and lung
slices (14). Recently, it was shown that trehalose increases the
tolerance in human fibroblast cells in culture against desiccation
(13). Because trehalose seems to protect yeast and human cells, it is
well known now that there is considerable conservation of genetic
pathways from plant to yeast to man, and hypoxia and heat are two
environmental stresses to which organisms respond often in similar
ways, we elected to ask whether trehalose, which is present in a
metabolically active pool in Drosophila as we show in our
NMR work, also protects flies from anoxic stress. Our results
demonstrate that this is the case, and the evidence is based on several
observations. First, when trehalose was increased in adult flies, the
recovery from anoxia was enhanced. These are the first data showing
that in a whole organism, an increase in trehalose is beneficial and
can protect against anoxia. Second, trehalose markedly reduced protein
aggregation seen after 4 h of anoxia. In this regard, we tested
whether this reduction in protein aggregation could be seen with some
important proteins that have been shown in mammalian tissue to be
protected during anoxic stress (19). Indeed, we found that the
aggregation of the Na+/K+ ATPase protein
decreases in a major way with increasing amounts of trehalose
when trehalose was added to tissues taken from flies exposed to 4 h of anoxia. Third, although not necessarily related to anoxic stress
directly, when the gene that encodes for trehalose synthesis was
mutated with a P-element insertion, flies did not develop, and they
died early in the larval stage. This indicates that
tps1/trehalose are important as cell protectants in early life such as during the process of burrowing into food when larvae are
constantly or intermittently exposed to anoxia. Alternatively, it is
possible that the lack of tps1/trehalose is deleterious in
early fly development because of their involvement in functions that
are not related to protection from anoxia.
Although we show in this work that trehalose prevents anoxia-induced
aggregation, this does not argue against a similar function of other
disaccharides or small molecules such as glycerol. Indeed, we have
shown that sucrose does help against aggregation but to a lesser
degree. Interestingly, glycerol did not help in this activity.
Another important issue is the concentration of trehalose. The overall
average concentration of trehalose that we have measured in flies is
much less than 500 mM, but this does not imply that concentrations of that high magnitude cannot be reached in specific locations of the cytosol. Major intracytosolic gradients have been
shown to exist, such as for ATP and Ca2+ concentrations.
How does trehalose protect cells? Is it possible that
trehalose is used as another carbon source that enhances the metabolic machinery in cells? We doubt that trehalose acts mainly by providing an
alternative energy source for at least three reasons. (i) Studies from
yeast have shown that trehalose is not produced when nutrients are
abundant but that it is produced even in the absence of glucose in the
medium and when glycogen is metabolized (21). Furthermore, trehalose is
not used until all glycogen stores are depleted and yeast is close to
cell death (22). (ii) Trehalose has been found to suppress the
aggregation of denatured proteins and maintain them in a semifolded
state through hydrogen bond stabilization promoting refolding and
reattainment of bio-activity (23, 24). This stabilizing effect of
trehalose is accounted for by the change in the transfer of free energy
on unfolding: the interaction between trehalose and proteins is less
favorable with the denatured than with the native protein (25). Whether
trehalose protects proteins by interacting with these proteins or
whether there are intermediary components is not clear from this work.
However, it is possible that trehalose "prepares" proteins for the
chaperones to act upon and rescue them (26). (iii) Our results show
that protein aggregation, including the Na+/K+
ATPase, is reduced considerably and in a dose-response fashion when
trehalose is added with these proteins. Thus, the results from the
literature and our current study would strongly suggest that this
disaccharide has a function that can help in the refolding of proteins
when cells and tissues are exposed to stresses such as O2
deprivation, although we cannot rule out totally the idea that
trehalose may contribute metabolically as a carbon source in
extraordinary circumstances of energy depletion.
If trehalose can assist in refolding proteins and maintenance of
protein integrity during stress, why is it that overexpression of tps1
and trehalose at a relatively high temperature (at 18° and 24 °C)
leads to lethality, and why is it that trehalose leads to grossly
abnormal eye development when overexpressed with pGMR? The answers are
not totally apparent at present but may lie in the molecular
interactions between trehalose, heat shock proteins, and proteins that
are being refolded. Normally, trehalose suppresses the aggregation of
protein and prevents native protein from unfolding (12), thus
promoting interactions of the target protein with heat shock proteins
to enhance proper refolding to the native state. If trehalose is
present in large quantities during stress (or in the absence of
stress), it is believed that it would interfere with refolding of the
targeted proteins by heat shock proteins. Whether this is the reason
for larval lethality or the grossly abnormal eyes with higher
expression of trehalose is not known, but this is a possible
explanation. It is interesting to note that survival until first instar
larva or late pupae stage depends on the level of overexpression. With
the 32B-GAL4 promoter at 24 °C, early larvae died; with Hs-GAL4 at
18° and 24 °C, late pupae did hatch but died shortly after (Fig.
4E). It was only when the temperature was rather low during
development (15 °C) that we could obtain adult flies and test them.
In summary, we have shown that constitutive overexpression of
tps1 enhances anoxia tolerance. Furthermore, tps1
and trehalose seem to play a critical role during development, and a
mutation in the gene leads to early larval lethality. We hypothesize
that enhanced anoxia tolerance shown following tps1 and
trehalose overexpression is due to a reduction of protein aggregation
and the likelihood of protein denaturation during O2 deprivation.
We thank Dr. Michael Kashgarian for help with
protein analysis; we also thank Chuyan Tang and Xiaolan Fei for
help with fly stocks, P-element jumping, and embryo injection.
*
This work was supported by Grants PO1-NICHD32573,
RO1-NS35918, and RO1-HL66327 from the National Institutes of Health (to G. G. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: 401 Barker Hall-3204, Dept. of Molecular and
Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA
94720-3204.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 21, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109479200
The abbreviations used are:
tps1, trehalose-6-phosphate synthase;
tps2, trehalose-6-phosphate
phosphatase;
PIPES, piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid).
Role of Trehalose Phosphate Synthase in Anoxia Tolerance and
Development in Drosophila melanogaster*
,
§,
, and
**
Department of Pediatrics, Section of
Respiratory Medicine, ¶ Department of Psychiatry,
Howard
Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Genetics and Boyer Center for
Molecular Medicine, and the ** Department of Cellular and
Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine,
New Haven, Connecticut 06520
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and incubated
at 95 °C for 2 h to denature proteins. Solutions of 1 M acetic acid (0.15 ml) and 0.2 M sodium
acetate (0.6 ml) (pH 5.2) were mixed with the homogenates. The mixture
was centrifuged at room temperature for 10 min at 12,000 rpm. Aliquots
(200 µl) of the supernatant were placed into two tubes; one was used
as background, and the other was digested by trehalase (0.05 units/ml, 37 °C overnight). Glucose concentration was measured using
InfinityTM glucose reagent (Sigma) (17).
13C).
Digital subtraction of these two subspectra yield only those proton
resonances bonded to 13C (i.e. 2 ×13C). Each subspectrum was acquired with 13C
decoupling to simplify the spectrum. 1H spectra were
acquired as the summation of 256 transients, 16,000 data points,
and fully relaxed (repetition time/transient of 21 s). A low power
presaturation pulse was used to suppress the residual HDO resonance.
Free-induction decays were processed using an exponential filter (0.5 Hz), zero-filled to 32,000 data points, and Fourier-transformed. The
fractional 13C enrichment of the trehalose H1
at 5.2 ppm
was determined by integration of the resonances in the proton-observed,
carbon 13-edited subspectra and expressed as the ratio of
13C-H1
/[(13C + 12C)]-H1
).
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic
acid, 100 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.75 mg/liter leupeptin, and 0.1 mM
DL-dithiothreitol. The homogenate was centrifuged at
680 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to pellet nuclei and
large cellular fragments. The supernatant was centrifuged at
35,000 × g for 14 min at 4 °C to separate the
Triton-soluble from the insoluble protein fraction (19).
70 °C (19).
tubulin and anti-Na+/K+ ATPase, Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) and detected using horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody with enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
doublet resonance of trehalose was visible at 5.2 ppm,
whereas no resonance was detected for H1
, consistent with the
assignment of trehalose and indicating that free glucose
(13C-labeled or unlabeled) was not observed. Substantial
13C labeling of trehalose C1
was observed (40.4%).
Thus, the results indicate that wild type flies have significant levels
of trehalose and that the trehalose pool is metabolically active.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
13C isotopic labeling of
trehalose from [1-13C]glucose in wild type fly
heads. Upper spectrum, total intensity (12C + 13C) trehalose-H1
at 5.2 ppm. Lower
spectrum, the intensity of trehalose-H1
bonded to
13C only. Spectra were acquired using
1H-observed, 13C-edited NMR as described in
"Experimental Procedures." Only the region from 5.34 to 5.06 ppm is
shown.

View larger version (100K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Alignment of Drosophila TPS1
amino acid sequence to Saccharomyces cerevisiae
TPS1, TPS2, and Selaginella lepidophylla
TPS1. Drosophila TPS1 shows 29.7% identity
to S. cerevisiae TPS1 and 17.4 and 22.5%
identity to S. cerevisiae TPS2 and S. lepidophylla TPS1, respectively. (S. c TPS1, S. cerevisiae TPS1; S. c TPS2, S. cerevisiae
TPS2; S. l TPS1, S. lepidophylla TPS1; D
TPS1, Drosophila TPS1.)

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Overexpression of tps1 in
flies. A, wild-type eye; B, wild-type eye
section (×160); C, tps1-pGMR eye;
D, tps1-pGMR eye section (×160). Compared with
wild-type eye, the number of receptor cells in tps1-pGMR
ommatidia is the same, but the size of the ommatidia is smaller, and
larger spaces are present between ommatidia. E,
overexpression of tps1 with Hs-GAL4 at 24 ° and 18 °C
causes lethality at late pupa stage.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Overexpression of tps1 in
adult flies increases trehalose level and increases tolerance to
anoxia. Flies with overexpression of tps1 have a
shorter recovery time after being exposed to 5 min of anoxia
(A). W1118, W1118;
UAS-tps1/+ (3rd), W1118; Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd),
UAS-tps1/Hs-GAL4 (3rd), UAS-tps1/+ (2nd);
Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd) were all raised at 15 °C. Subsequently, 1-day-old
adult flies were collected and placed at 18 °C for 2 days. Anoxia
tests were performed at that time. The recovery times (means ± S.E.) after 5 min anoxia were shorter in UAS-tps1/Hs-GAL4
(3rd), UAS-tps1/+ (2nd); Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd) when compared with
W1118, W1118; UAS-tps1/+ (3rd),
W1118; Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd). *, p < 0.005 as
compared with controls. Flies with overexpression of tps1
contain more trehalose than controls (B). W1118,
W1118; UAS-tps1/+ (3rd), W1118;
Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd), UAS-tps1/Hs-GAL4 (3rd),
UAS-tps1/+ (2nd); Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd) were treated in the same
way as in the previous experiment. Total trehalose (means ± S.E.
glucose equivalents in 30 mg of flies) in UAS-tps1/Hs-GAL4
(3rd), UAS-tps1/+ (2nd); Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd) almost doubled over
that in W1118, W1118; UAS-tps1/+
(3rd), W1118; Hs-GAL4/+ (3rd). *, p < 0.005 as compared with controls.
80 °C.
Of 18 mg of total protein extracted from flies, we found increased
amounts of aggregated proteins in flies after 3 h but especially
after 4 h of anoxia (mean ± S.E.: 1931 ± 96 µg) as
compared with flies that were not exposed to anoxia (415 ± 21 µg, Fig. 5A). Protein
aggregation in samples from flies subjected to 4 h of anoxia was
reduced with increasing trehalose concentration (Fig. 5B).
Interestingly, protein aggregation was also decreased with other
disaccharides, such as 0.5 M sucrose (765 ± 41 µg),
although not to the same degree as with trehalose (470 ± 36 µg). However, glycerol at a similar concentration did not seem to
have any effect on the solubility of proteins.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Anoxia increases the aggregate protein
subfraction and trehalose reduces this protein aggregation in
vitro. Flies were subjected to 0, 1, 3, or 4 h of
anoxia (A). Aggregated proteins were extracted from 18 mg of
total proteins. The aggregate subfraction increases with the time of
anoxia, especially after 4 h (means ± S.E.). **,
p < 0.002; ***, p < 0.0001. In 18 mg
of total proteins from flies subjected to 4 h of anoxia, the
addition of trehalose to protein extraction buffer reduces aggregate
subfraction (means ± S.E.) in a dose-dependent manner
(B). **, p < 0.002; ***, p < 0.0001

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Western blot of total (T),
soluble (S), and aggregated (A)
proteins prepared with the addition of 0, 0.3, and 0.5 M
trehalose. Flies were subjected to 4 h of anoxia, and 5 µg
of aggregated proteins were prepared by adding 0, 0.3, and 0.5 M trehalose. Although the same amount of
Na+/K+ ATPase seemed to be present in total
proteins, much less Na+/K+ ATPase was present
in the aggregated proteins with 0.5 M trehalose as compared
with those lacking trehalose. Note that
-tubulin did not change in
each of T, S, or A proteins as a
function of trehalose.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept.
of Pediatrics, Section of Respiratory Medicine, Yale University School
of Medicine, Fitkin Memorial Pavilion, Rm. 506, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT 06520; Tel.: 203-785-5444; Fax: 203-785-6337; E-mail: Gabriel.haddad@yale.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Vannucci, R. C.
(2000)
Am. J. Perinatol.
17,
113-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Haddad, G. G.,
Sun, Y.,
Wyman, R. J.,
and Xu, T.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10809-10812 3.
Young, R. S.,
During, M. J.,
Donnelly, D. F.,
Aquila, W. J.,
Perry, V. L.,
and Haddad, G. G.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
264,
R716-R719 4.
Jiang, C.,
Xia, Y.,
and Haddad, G. G.
(1992)
J Physiol. (Lond.)
448,
599-612 5.
Xia, Y.,
Jiang, C.,
and Haddad, G. G.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
262,
R595-R603 6.
Haddad, G. G.
(2000)
J. Appl. Physiol.
88,
1481-1487 7.
Ma, E., Gu, X. Q., Wu, X., Xu, T.,
and Haddad, G. G.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
685-693[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Svedjeholm, R.,
Hakanson, E.,
Szabo, Z.,
and Vanky, F.
(2001)
Eur. J. Cardiothorac Surg.
19,
611-618 9.
Soto, T.,
Fernandez, J.,
Vicente, S. J,
Cansado, J.,
and Gacto, M.
(1999)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
65,
2020-2024 10.
Benaroudj, N.,
Lee, D. H.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
24261-24267 11.
Krallish, I.,
Jeppsson, H.,
Rapoport, A.,
and Hahn-Hagerdal, B.
(1997)
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
47,
447-451[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Singer, M. A.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
639-648[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Guo, N.,
Puhlev, I.,
Brown, D. R.,
Mansbridge, J.,
and Levine, F.
(2000)
Nat. Biotechnol.
18,
168-171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Bull, D. A.,
Connors, R. C.,
Reid, B. B.,
Albanil, A.,
Stringham, J. C.,
and Karwande, S. V.
(2000)
J. of Surg. Res.
90,
144-148
15.
Sullivan, W.,
Ashburner, M.,
and Hawley, R. S.
(2000)
Drosophila Protocols
, p. 429, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
16.
Ma, E.,
and Haddad, G. G.
(1997)
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
46,
325-328[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Schulze, U.,
Larsen, M. E.,
and Villadsen, J.
(1995)
Anal. Biochem.
228,
143-149[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Fitzpatrick, S. M.,
Hetherington, H. P.,
Behar, K. L.,
and Shulman, R. G.
(1990)
J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.
10,
170-179[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Aufricht, C., Lu, E.,
Thulin, G.,
Kashgarian, M.,
Siegel, N. J.,
and Van Why, S. K.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
274,
F268-F274 20.
Meyer-Fernandes, J. R.,
Arrese, E. L.,
and Wells, M. A.
(2000)
Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.
30,
473-478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Lillie, S. H.,
and Pringle, J. R.
(1980)
J. Bacteriol.
143,
1384-1394 22.
Wiemken, A.
(1990)
Antonie Leeuwenhoek
58,
209-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Hottiger, T., De,
Virgilio, C.,
Hall, M. N.,
Boller, T.,
and Wiemken, A.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
219,
187-193[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Allison, S. D.,
Chang, B.,
Randolph, T. W.,
and Carpenter, J. F.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
365,
289-298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Xie, G.,
and Timasheff, S. N.
(1997)
Biophys. Chem.
64,
25-43[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Viner, R. I.,
and Clegg, J. S.
(2001)
Cell Stress Chaperones
6,
126-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. FEALA, J. H. OMENS, G. PATERNOSTRO, and A. D. MCCULLOCH Discovering Regulators of the Drosophila Cardiac Hypoxia Response Using Automated Phenotyping Technology Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., March 1, 2008; 1123(1): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Elnitsky, S. A. L. Hayward, J. P. Rinehart, D. L. Denlinger, and R. E. Lee Jr Cryoprotective dehydration and the resistance to inoculative freezing in the Antarctic midge, Belgica antarctica J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2008; 211(4): 524 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Meunier, Y. H. Belgacem, and J.-R. Martin Regulation of feeding behaviour and locomotor activity by takeout in Drosophila J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2007; 210(8): 1424 - 1434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Rinehart, S. A. L. Hayward, M. A. Elnitsky, L. H. Sandro, R. E. Lee Jr, and D. L. Denlinger Continuous up-regulation of heat shock proteins in larvae, but not adults, of a polar insect PNAS, September 19, 2006; 103(38): 14223 - 14227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liu, J. Roy, and E. A. Johnson Identification and function of hypoxia-response genes in Drosophila melanogaster Physiol Genomics, March 13, 2006; 25(1): 134 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. G. Haddad Tolerance to low O2: lessons from invertebrate genetic models Exp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 91(2): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Crowe, L. M. Crowe, W. F. Wolkers, A. E. Oliver, X. Ma, J.-H. Auh, M. Tang, S. Zhu, J. Norris, and F. Tablin Stabilization of Dry Mammalian Cells: Lessons from Nature Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 810 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Broughton, M. D. W. Piper, T. Ikeya, T. M. Bass, J. Jacobson, Y. Driege, P. Martinez, E. Hafen, D. J. Withers, S. J. Leevers, et al. Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands PNAS, February 22, 2005; 102(8): 3105 - 3110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Cook, S. Fowler, O. Fiehn, and M. F. Thomashow From The Cover: A prominent role for the CBF cold response pathway in configuring the low-temperature metabolome of Arabidopsis PNAS, October 19, 2004; 101(42): 15243 - 15248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Chen and G. G. Haddad Role of trehalose phosphate synthase and trehalose during hypoxia: from flies to mammals J. Exp. Biol., August 15, 2004; 207(18): 3125 - 3129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Gibson, C. A. Tarling, S. Roberts, S. G. Withers, and G. J. Davies The Donor Subsite of Trehalose-6-phosphate Synthase: BINARY COMPLEXES WITH UDP-GLUCOSE AND UDP-2-DEOXY-2-FLUORO-GLUCOSE AT 2 A RESOLUTION J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 1950 - 1955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Chen, K. L. Behar, T. Xu, C. Fan, and G. G. Haddad Expression of Drosophila Trehalose-Phosphate Synthase in HEK-293 Cells Increases Hypoxia Tolerance J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49113 - 49118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schluepmann, T. Pellny, A. van Dijken, S. Smeekens, and M. Paul Trehalose 6-phosphate is indispensable for carbohydrate utilization and growth in Arabidopsis thaliana PNAS, May 27, 2003; 100(11): 6849 - 6854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||