![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 5, 3537-3543, February 1, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§¶,
,
**,
¶,
, and

From the
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center,
Science Park Research Division, Smithville, Texas 78957 and the
Molecular Biology Institute and the Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCLA,
Los Angeles, California 90095-1569
Received for publication, September 12, 2001, and in revised form, November 15, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein arginine methylation is a prevalent
posttranslational modification in eukaryotic cells that has been
implicated in signal transduction, the metabolism of nascent pre-RNA,
and the transcriptional activation processes. In searching the human
genome for protein arginine N-methyltransferase (PRMT)
family members, a novel gene has been found on chromosome 1 that
encodes for an apparent methyltransferase, PRMT6. The polypeptide chain
of PRMT6 is 41.9 kDa consisting of a catalytic core sequence
common to other PRMT enzymes. Expressed as a glutathione
S-transferase fusion protein, PRMT6 demonstrates
type I PRMT activity, capable of forming both
The family of protein arginine N-methyltransferases
(PRMTs)1 catalyze the
sequential transfer of a methyl group from AdoMet to the side
chain nitrogens of arginine residues within proteins to form methylated
arginine derivatives and
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (1). To date, two
distinct PRMT activities have been found in mammalian cells. Type I
PRMT activity is defined by the formation of asymmetric
Within recent years the number of PRMT family members has been
increasing (9). Currently, known type I enzymes include the catalytic
chain of PRMT1 (10, 11) and its yeast homologue arginine
methyltransferase 1 (also known as heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein methyltransferase 1) (12, 13), the zinc finger-containing enzyme PRMT3 (14, 15), and the coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase CARM1/PRMT4 (5). Several
endogenous type I substrates have been determined (3, 4, 16-25). The majority of type I arginine methylation occurs within glycine- and
arginine-rich (GAR) domains (1, 10, 14, 26, 27). The only type II PRMT
identified to date is the Janus kinase-binding protein JBP1/PRMT5
(28-30). Its homologue in budding yeast is Hsl7 (histone
synthetic lethal 7) (31) and Skb1
in fission yeast (32, 33). Known substrates to contain symmetric
The crystal structure of the rat PRMT3 catalytic core (amino acids
201-528) in complex with
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine determined at 2.0 Å resolution represents the first solved structure of a PRMT (37).
Shortly thereafter, the crystal structure of RMT1 (amino acids 22-348)
was determined at 2.9 Å resolution (38). These structures reflect a
striking structural conservation of the PRMT catalytic core (37, 38).
In addition to the sequences of the conserved
AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase motifs I, post-I, II,
and III, the suggested site for arginine binding contains several amino
acids that appear to be conserved throughout the PRMT family (37, 38).
These proposed active site residues might aid in recognizing novel PRMTs.
The recent sequencing of the entire human genome and its public
availability has provided a first glimpse at all of the genes coding
for a variety of protein families (39, 40). In searching the human
genome for PRMT family members, a novel gene coding for what appears to
be the sixth known human PRMT enzyme was identified. A recombinantly
expressed form of this new PRMT, referred to now as PRMT6, exhibits
type I PRMT activity and can methylate itself. PRMT6 does not recognize
the same substrates as PRMT4/CARM1 and displays limited substrate
overlap with PRMT1. As a GFP fusion protein, PRMT6 resides in the
nucleus of HeLa cells along with PRMT1, PRMT2, and PRMT4, whereas PRMT3
and PRMT5 GFP fusions localize exclusively to the cytoplasm.
Isolation of the Full-length PRMT6 Transcript--
To obtain the
full-length sequence of PRMT6, we used the reported partial human
kidney expressed sequence tag BC002729 (GenBankTM) to
engineer primers for 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends. The first
primer sequence was 5'-GGA CCG AAA CGT CCG AGT AGC ATC G-3', and the
second "nested" primer sequence was 5'-TGG TCC CGT TCC CGC TTA GTC
CTC CG-3'. We used kidney RACE-Ready cDNA® (Ambion) to isolate
the 5' coding region of PRMT6. Full-length PRMT6 was amplified by the
PCR from human kidney cDNA using the following oligonucleotide set: 5'-CAT GGA TCC ATG TCG CAG CCC AAG AAA AGA AAG
C-3' and 5'-TGA GAA TTC TCA GTC CTC CAT GGC AAA GTC-3'. The resulting PCR fragment was digested with BamHI and
EcoRI and subcloned in-frame into the BamHI and
EcoRI sites of pGEX-6P1 (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
Northern Blot Analysis--
A human poly(A)+ RNA
blot (Origene Technologies, Inc.) was probed with DNA corresponding to
the open reading frames of PRMT1 and PRMT6, which were liberated from
the appropriate GST fusion vectors by restriction enzyme digestion. DNA
probes were labeled with [32P]dCTP using a Prime-it II®
kit (Stratagene, Inc.). Northern blot analysis was performed following
standard procedures described in Ref. 41. Probed blots were exposed
overnight at Preparation of the GST-PRMT6 Fusion Protein--
GST-PRMT6 was
overexpressed in Escherichia coli DH5 Subcloning of GFP Fusion Vectors Harboring the
PRMTs--
pGEX-PRMT1 (13) was digested with BamHI and
SalI, and the resulting 1.1-kb fragment was cloned into the
BglII and SalI sites of pEGFP-C1
(CLONTECH, Inc.). The PRMT2 gene was PCR-amplified from human expressed sequence tags T77642 and T75034 to yield a single
1.3-kb product with the primer set: 5'-GAG CCT AAG GGA TCC ATG GCA ACA
TCA GGT-3' and 5'-C CAA ATA AAG CAT GAA TTC TCA TCT CCA G-3'. The PRMT2
PCR product was digested with BamHI and EcoRI and
cloned into pGEX-2T (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) to make pGEX-PRMT2.
The coding region of PRMT2 was amplified by PCR using the
oligonucleotide set: 5'-CGT GGA TCC GCA ACA TCA GGT GAC TGT CCC-3' and
5'-CTA GAA TTC AAC TGT CAT CTC CAG-3'. pGEX-PRMT2 was used as a
template, and the amplified band of 1.3 kb was digested with
BamHI and EcoRI and cloned into the
BglII and EcoRI sites of pEGFP-C1. pGEX-PRMT3
(15) was digested with BamHI and SacI, and the
resulting 1.6-kb insert was cloned into the BglII and
SacI sites of pEGFP-C1. pGEX-PRMT4 (a gift from Michael
Stallcup at the University of Southern California) was used as a
template to amplify the coding region of PRMT4 by PCR using the primer
set: 5'-TGA GAT CTC ACC ATG GCA GCG GCG GCA GCG ACG GC-3' and 5'-AGT
AAG CTT ACT CCC ATA GTG CAT GGT GTT-3'. The amplified band of 1.8 kb
was digested with BglII and HindIII and cloned
into the BglII and HindIII sites of pEGFP-N1
(CLONTECH, Inc.). Using the restriction enzymes
BamHI and ApaI, PRMT5 was shuttled from the
pTKB175 vector (a gift from Sidney Pestka at the Robert Wood Johnson
Medical School) to the SuperLinker® vector (pSL301) (Invitrogen).
pSL301-PRMT5 was digested with BamHI and SalI,
and the resulting 2.2-kb fragment was cloned into the BglII and SalI sites of pEGFP-C3 (CLONTECH,
Inc.). pGEX-PRMT6 (see above) was digested with BamHI and
EcoRI, and the resulting 1.3-kb fragment was cloned into the
BglII and EcoRI sites of pEGFP-C1.
Protein Concentration Determination--
A modification of the
Lowry procedure was used to determine protein concentrations of GST
fusions and AdOx-treated RAT1 cell extracts following precipitation
with 1.0 ml of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (43). A stock solution
of bovine serum albumin was used as a protein standard.
In Vitro Methylation of Substrates--
GST-GAR has been
described previously (1). GST-Npl3 was a gift from Pam Silver and was
described previously (38). GST-PABPf harbors 100 amino acids of the
PABP1 protein, and the expression construct was generated by PCR from a
HeLa cell cDNA template using the following oligonucleotide set:
5'-TGC GGA TCC GCA AGT GTA CGA GCT GTT CCC-3' and 5'-TAA GAA TTC TTA
ACG CTG TGT TGA CAT GAC TCG-3'. The resulting PCR fragment was cloned
into the BamHI and EcoRI sites of pGex-6P-1
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). GST fusion proteins were prepared as
described above. Recombinant forms of these protein substrates often
undergo partial proteolysis during the course of their purification and
consequently appear as either a smear or multiple bands on
SDS-PAGE gels. The preparation of AdOx-treated and untreated
RAT1 extracts and their subsequent pretreatment with bovine pancreatic
RNase A (10 mg/ml; Sigma) has been described previously (15).
All methylation reactions were carried out in the presence of
S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine
([3H]AdoMet; 79 Ci/mmol from a 12.6 µM
stock solution in dilute HCl/ethanol 9:1, pH 2.0-2.5; Amersham
Biosciences, Inc.) and PBS (described above). Additional information
pertaining to reaction conditions is described in each of the figure legends.
Electrophoresis and Fluorography of Methylation
Reactions--
After the assay, an equal volume of 2× SDS-PAGE sample
buffer (120 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1.43 M
2-mercaptoethanol, 4% SDS, 24% glycerol, 0.002% bromphenol blue) was
added to the reaction, heated at 100 °C for 5 min, and separated on
slab gels prepared from 8.0% (w/v) acrylamide, 1.4% (w/v)
N,N-methylenebisacrylamide (1.5-mm Amino Acid Analysis of Methylated GST-GAR--
Methylation
reactions were quenched by the addition of 30 µl of 25% (w/v)
trichloroacetic acid to precipitate proteins in 6 × 50-mm glass
vials. Precipitated proteins were centrifuged at 4000 × g for 40 min at 25 °C. The supernatant was discarded, and
the pellets were washed once with an equal volume of cold acetone
( Identification of a Novel PRMT Gene--
The PRMT family of
enzymes exhibits amino acid conservation within the characteristic
methyltransferase motifs I, post-I, II, and III (45), and in other
portions of the polypeptide chain. A search of the publicly available
human genome sequence (39) using the gapped BLAST method (46) provided
by the National Center for Biotechnology Information for sequences that
match known PRMT sequences identified a novel locus (AK001421) cited as
coding for the 316-amino acid hypothetical protein FLJ10559. A GST
fusion protein of this hypothetical protein was generated and found to
display no arginine methyltransferase activity when assayed on a number
of PRMT1 and PRMT4 substrates (data not shown). Upon further scrutiny
of the DNA sequence, we identified similarities between a region
upstream of the sequence encoding the predicted initiator methionine
and those encoding the common N terminus of the PRMT family of
proteins, suggesting that a portion of the N-terminal end of the
predicted protein was missing. To obtain the complete open reading
frame we performed 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends on human
kidney cDNA and identified additional 5' sequence. The newly
obtained open reading frame codes for a 375-amino acid protein, now
referred to as PRMT6. The recombinant form of PRMT6 is an active enzyme
(see below). It has a calculated polypeptide molecular mass of 41.9 kDa
and is 46% identical to a putative PRMT in Arabidopsis
thaliana (BAB01859) as its closest homologue.
The alignment of the common sequences shared by all human PRMT family
members is shown in Fig. 1. PRMT6 shares
with other PRMTs conserved amino acid sequences within the
AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase motifs I, post-I, II,
and III, as well as amino acids outside of the these regions with some
notable exceptions (45). Table I lists
the percentage of identity shared between each catalytic core portion
of all PRMTs. PRMT6 is most similar to PRMT2 in the catalytic core
region, sharing 38% sequence identity; however, it does not contain an
N-terminal Src homology 3 domain found in the PRMT2 sequence.
Much like PRMT1, PRMT6 is comprised solely of the PRMT catalytic
core without any additional domains.
PRMT6 Expression Pattern--
Northern analysis of PRMT6 reveals
that it is highly expressed in kidney and testes (Fig.
2A). When compared, the
expression levels of PRMT1 and PRMT6 display some degree of tissue
specificity. In addition, at least 80 expressed sequence tags from a
variety of different tissues have been identified for PRMT6, and a
virtual Northern blot
(www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SAGE/sagevn.cgi) generated from
a serial analysis of gene expression tag at the 3' end of the PRMT6 cDNA sequence also suggests a broad expression pattern for this transcript. The hybridized band in the PRMT6 Northern blot was
more diffuse than that displayed by PRMT1 (Fig. 2, A and
B), suggesting that PRMT6 may run as two transcripts of
similar size. Indeed, when we performed Northern analysis on an RNA
sample subjected to an extended separation, we do see two bands (2.4 and 2.6 kb) for PRMT6 (Fig. 2C). A comparison of human PRMT6
expressed sequence tags revealed no alternative splicing events,
implying that the two transcripts may arise from different lengths of
5'- or 3'-untranslated regions.
PRMT6 Is a Type I Protein Arginine
N-Methyltransferase--
Several PRMTs have been shown to catalyze
type I methylation of arginine residues within proteins; these enzymes
include PRMT1 (10), PRMT3 (14), and PRMT4 (48). The only known type II PRMT enzyme is PRMT5 (30). To determine the type of activity of PRMT6,
GST-PRMT6 was assayed for methyltransferase activity using GST-GAR as a
substrate. The fusion protein is able to catalyze the formation of both
PRMT6 Substrate Specificity--
Two distinct classes of in
vitro protein substrates have been described for protein arginine
N-methyltransferases: those that are methylated by PRMT1
(and PRMT3) and those that are methylated by PRMT4 (5). As a new member
of the PRMT family, PRMT6 was tested for its substrate specificity
using as methyl acceptors the known PRMT1 substrates GST-GAR and the
yeast protein Npl3, as well as a PRMT4 substrate, PABPf, which is a
100-amino acid region of PABP1 that was identified in a screen for
PRMT4 substrates.2 PRMT6
preferentially methylated the recombinant forms of GAR and Npl3
substrates, thus displaying substrate specificity similar to that of
PRMT1 (Fig. 4).
To identify the subtleties in PRMT6 substrate specificity, we also
tested the ability of this enzyme to methylate proteins in a RAT1 cell
extract prepared from cells either treated or untreated with AdOx (Fig.
5). AdOx treatment of mammalian cells
results in an increase in type I methyl acceptors by inhibiting the
breakdown of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine, the
product inhibitor of AdoMet-dependent methylation reactions
(15, 26). In comparing panels A and B of Fig. 5,
we observe a substantial increase in methyl acceptors upon AdOx
treatment of RAT1 cells for all three enzymes. To our surprise, the
substrate specificity differences between PRMT1, PRMT4, and PRMT6 are
more pronounced in untreated cells as compared with AdOx-treated cells.
RNase treatment of the cell extracts also substantially alters the
observed methylation patterns for all three enzymes in untreated cells
as compared with AdOx-treated cells, although each enzyme demonstrates
higher activity in hypomethylated cell extracts.
In AdOx-treated RAT1 cell extracts, we found that PRMT4 and PRMT6 also
methylate some of the same polypeptides recognized by PRMT1 (Fig.
5B). Nevertheless, one of the most heavily methylated substrates observed for PRMT6 in AdOx-treated cells (Fig.
5B, lanes 10 and 11), indicated
by a single asterisk, does not appear to be a substrate for either
PRMT1 (lanes 4 and 5) or PRMT4 (lanes 7 and 8), demonstrating at least one unique methyl
acceptor in cell extracts for PRMT6. This polypeptide appears to be a
less significant substrate in untreated cell extracts (Fig.
5A, lanes 5 and 6), suggesting that it
may represent an endogenous substrate. We also observed an additional
methylated polypeptide in all PRMT6-containing lanes in Fig. 5,
indicated by two asterisks, which is present even in
incubations lacking cell extract. This band corresponds to the
full-length GST-PRMT6 enzyme with a calculated molecular mass of
69 kDa. This polypeptide was excised from the SDS-PAGE gel,
acid-hydrolyzed, and subjected to cation exchange chromatography as
described under "Experimental Procedures." We found that it contained both The Subcellular Localization of PRMT6--
One way to
differentiate the functions of the growing number of PRMTs that may
exist within a cell at any given time is by their localization. PRMT1,
although implicated as having cytosolic roles (24, 49), appears to be
localized and to function in the nucleus (3, 10, 14, 50, 51). A FLAG
(peptide epitope DYKDDDDK) epitope-tagged form of PRMT2 has recently
been shown to localize to the nucleus (52). PRMT3 and PRMT5, on the
other hand, have been shown to be predominantly localized in the
cytoplasm (14, 29). PRMT4 and PRMT6 have yet to be localized to a
specific region of an intact cell. In an attempt to obtain a
comparative overview of the subcellular localization of the PRMTs as a
whole, we made GFP fusion constructs of all the described arginine
methyltransferase enzymes and studied their cellular localization by
confocal microscopy as shown in Fig. 6.
GFP fusion proteins of PRMT6 display a strong nuclear localization, as
does PRMT4. PRMT1 and PRMT2 GFP fusions appear to be largely localized
to the nucleus, but significant fluorescence is observed in the
cytosol. The fluorescence signals from PRMT3 and PRMT5 GFP fusions are
excluded from the nucleus. The concordance of these results for the GFP
fusions of PRMT1, PRMT2, PRMT3, and PRMT5 with previous determinations
of the native proteins described above support the conclusion that the
localization of the GFP fusions of PRMT4 and PRMT6 observed here
reflect the situation in intact cells for these proteins.
As the sixth member of the protein arginine
N-methyltransferase family, PRMT6 shares both similarities
and differences with its sibling enzymes. All of the PRMTs contain
several regions of sequence conservation, including a pair of tyrosine
residues in their respective N termini, AdoMet-dependent
methyltransferase motifs I, post-I, II, and III, as well as the
invariant "THW loop" (37, 38) within their respective C termini
(Fig. 1). Similar to the majority of PRMTs, a recombinant form of PRMT6
demonstrates type I methyl transfer activity. As a GFP fusion protein,
it localizes to the nucleus, similar to the state seen for PRMT4.
However, PRMT6 is currently the only automethylating enzyme in the PRMT family.
Out of six potentially active mammalian PRMTs in vivo, five
catalytic chains, PRMT1 (10), PRMT3 (14), PRMT4 (5), PRMT5 (28), and
PRMT6, demonstrate methyl transfer activity in vitro as
recombinant proteins. Because the majority of substrates that have been
tested as methyl acceptors in vitro contain GAR domains (1,
3, 6, 10-12, 14, 15, 29, 53-55), it is difficult to distinguish
substrate specificity within the PRMT family.
By compiling data on the sequence surrounding actual methylated
residues, a consensus sequence can be generated for the type I PRMTs.
Many known PRMT substrates fit the consensus
(F/G)GGRGG(G/F), with only the underlined arginine and
glycine residues found in all methylated sites (56). As more substrates
are being identified for the different PRMTs, it is becoming clear that
such a consensus may not accurately depict the enzyme substrate
preference. We have shown that Sam68 can be methylated by PRMT1 on both
RGRG repeats and PRG repeats (4). Analysis of the methylated sites in
poly(A)-binding protein II revealed unique sites of methylation in RXR
sequences and indicated that a glycine residue following an arginine is
not necessary for a type I reaction (22). In addition, PRMT4 methylates
histone H3, a substrate whose methylated arginine residues do not fit
the consensus sequence (F/G)GGRGG(G/F) (5, 48). PRMT6
appears to behave more like PRMT1 in this respect (Figs. 3 and 4).
The complexes in which PRMTs are found also aid in distinguishing their
different cellular roles. PRMT1, which appears to be the dominant type
I methyltransferase in mammalian cells (11), has been shown to interact
with the tumor suppressor protein BTG1 (10), the anti-apoptotic protein
TIS21 (10), the interleukin enhancer-binding factor 3 transcription
factor (3), the intracytoplasmic domain of the IFNAR1 chain of the
interferon- The features that make each PRMT family member unique, whether it is a
particular domain, a distinct interaction, or a discrete substrate,
will invariably shape our understanding of PRMT enzymatic function.
Gene knockouts, such as RMT1 in yeast (6, 7, 12, 13) and PRMT1 in mouse
(61), have been successful in demonstrating the role of methylation in
mRNA trafficking and fetal development, respectively.
Investigations of other PRMT gene knockouts will hopefully elucidate
novel pathways involving arginine methylation.
-NG-monomethylarginine and asymmetric
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine
derivatives on the recombinant glycine- and arginine-rich substrate in
a processive manner with a specific activity of 144 pmol methyl groups
transferred min
1 mg
1 enzyme. A comparison
of substrate specificity reveals that PRMT6 is functionally distinct
from two previously characterized type I enzymes, PRMT1 and PRMT4. In
addition, PRMT6 displays automethylation activity; it is the first PRMT
to do so. This novel human PRMT, which resides solely in the nucleus
when fused to the green fluorescent protein, joins a family of enzymes
with diverse functions within cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine
residues, whereas type II activity is defined by the formation of
symmetric
-NG,N'G-dimethylarginine
residues. The methylation of arginine residues has been implicated in
the regulation of signal transduction (2-4), transcription (5), RNA
transport (6, 7), and possibly splicing (8).
-NG,N'G-dimethylarginine
are myelin basic protein (34, 35) and small ribonucleoproteins
D1 and D3 (8, 36).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C.
cells (Invitrogen)
by induction with a final concentration of 0.4 mM isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Washed cells were
resuspended in 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 4.3 mM
Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM
KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and 100 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride/g of cells and subsequently broken by
four 30-s sonicator pulses (50% duty; setting 4) on ice with a
Sonifier cell disruptor W-350 (SmithKline Corp.). The resulting lysate
was centrifuged for 40 min at 23,000 × g at 4 °C.
The GST fusion protein was then batch-purified from extracts by binding
to glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) and
washed in PBS per the manufacturer's instructions in the presence of
100 µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The purified
proteins were eluted from the beads with 30 mM glutathione,
50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, and 2% glycerol.
10.5-cm resolving gel) using the buffer system described by Laemmli
(42) at a constant current of 35 mA for ~4 h (42). Following
electrophoresis, the gels were stained in Coomassie Brilliant Blue
R-250 for 20-30 min, destained in a 10% methanol (v/v), 5% acetic
acid (v/v) solution to visualize protein bands, and then soaked in
EN3HANCE (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) per the
manufacturer's instructions. Gels were dried in vacuo, and
radioactivity was visualized by fluorography (gels were exposed to film
at
80 °C for the times indicated in the figure legends).
20 °C). After an additional centrifugation for 20 min, the
acetone was discarded, and the pellets were allowed to dry. Acid
hydrolysis was carried out on the dried pellet in a Waters Pico-Tag
vapor-phase apparatus containing 200 µl of 6 N HCl for 20 h in vacuo at 110 °C. The hydrolyzed samples were
resuspended in 100 µl of water mixed with 1 µmol each of
-NG-monomethylarginine (Sigma product M7033;
acetate salt) and asymmetric
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine
(Sigma product D4268; hydrochloride) as standards. Hydrolyzed amino
acids and standards were loaded onto a Beckman AA-15 sulfonated
polystyrene cation exchange column (0.9 cm × 11 cm) that was
pre-equilibrated with Na+ citrate buffer (0.35 M in Na+, pH 5.27) at 55 °C and regenerated
with 0.2 N NaOH. Approximately 1 ml/min column fractions
were collected for analysis. 3H radioactivity was detected
by adding 200 µl from each fraction to 400 µl of water, mixing with
5 ml of fluor, and counting on a scintillation counter. Unlabeled
methylarginine standards were detected by analyzing 100 µl of every
other fraction by a ninhydrin method described previously (44).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (111K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequence alignment of the human
PRMT family. The catalytic core regions common to all PRMT family
members are shown. Amino acids boxed in black
match the primary structure of PRMT6. Signature methyltransferase
motifs are boxed, and amino acids are highlighted in
gray. The accession numbers for the protein sequences used
in this alignment are as follows: AAF62893 for PRMT1-v2 (361 amino acids); AAH00727 for PRMT2 (433 amino acids); AAC39837 for PRMT3
(512 amino acids); NT_011176.3 contains a gene comprised of 16 exons on
chromosome 19 that codes for PRMT4 (608 amino acids), the apparent
human homologue to the mouse CARM1, AF117887; AAF04502 for PRMT5 (637 amino acids); and AY043278 for PRMT6 (375 amino acids).
Sequence identity between all PRMT family members

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Northern analysis comparing the expression of
PRMT6 and PRMT1 mRNA in different tissues. The expression
levels of PRMT6 (A) and PRMT1 (B) in various
human tissues were examined by hybridization to a multiple tissue
Northern blot. C, Northern analysis of MCF7 cell RNA,
subjected to extended agarose separation, reveals that there are two
PRMT6 transcripts that run as a doublet at 2.4 and 2.6 kb. The probes
were generated through the restriction enzyme liberation of the
respective full open reading frame from GST fusion constructs.
Overnight exposures are depicted. The positions of RNA size markers are
shown.
-NG-monomethylarginine and asymmetric
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine,
thus substantiating that PRMT6 is a type I enzyme, as shown in Fig.
3A. We find a specific
activity of 144 ± 11 pmol methyl groups transferred
min
1 mg
1 PRMT6 (Fig. 3B). The
total incorporation is linear during the 60-min assay. As expected, we
observe an initial accumulation of the monomethyl species followed by a
greater rate of accumulation of the final dimethylarginine product
(Fig. 3B). Because the amount of available RG sites on
the GST-GAR substrate (1800 pmol) is much larger than the total
accumulation of methylarginine seen at 60 min (10.9 pmol), it appears
that this reaction is processive. Otherwise, we would expect
predominantly
-NG-monomethylarginine to form
within this time period because the enzyme would catalyze a single
methylation reaction and then release its protein substrate.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
PRMT6 is a processive type I protein arginine
N-methyltransferase. Purified GST-PRMT6 (2 µg)
was incubated with 5 µg of GST-GAR (1) in the presence of 1.0 µM [3H]AdoMet for 1 h at 37 °C in a
final reaction volume of 30 µl of PBS. Subsequent amino acid analysis
was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures."
A, methylation reactions were conducted for 20, 40, and 60 min. Unlabeled amino acid standards reacted with ninhydrin to form
Ruheman's Purple elute from the cation exchange column first with
asymmetric
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine
followed by
-NG-monomethylarginine. The
diamonds indicate radioactivity, and Ruheman's Purple is
shown as a solid line. B, the total radioactivity
as well as an integration of each radioactive peak was quantitated to
calculate the total pmol methyl groups transferred and the amount of
asymmetric
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine
(ADMA) and
-NG-monomethylarginine
(
-MMA) formed at each time point.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A demonstration of PRMT6 in vitro
substrate specificities. Recombinant PRMT6 (1 µg), PRMT1
(1 µg), and PRMT4 (1 µg) arginine methyltransferases were incubated
with GST (1 µg), GST-GAR (1 µg), GST-Npl3 (1 µg), and GST-PABPf
(1 µg) in vitro in the presence of 0.5 µM
[3H]AdoMet for 30 min at 37 °C in a final volume of 30 µl of PBS. A, for quantification purposes the set of
methylation substrates were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with
Coomassie. B, methylation of substrate set with recombinant
PRMT6. C, methylation of substrate set with recombinant
PRMT1. D, methylation of substrate set with recombinant
PRMT4. In B-D, the methylated proteins were visualized by
fluorography (approximately a 12-h exposure) following separation by
SDS-PAGE. The molecular mass markers are shown on the right
in kDa.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
PRMT1, PRMT4, and PRMT6 exhibit differential
substrate specificities in RAT1 cell extracts. RAT1 cell extracts
(10 µg) with or without RNase A treatment were incubated with either
5 µg of GST-PRMT1, 12 µg of GST-PRMT4, or 10 µg of GST-PRMT6 in
the presence of 0.5 µM [3H]AdoMet for 60 min at 37 °C in a final volume of 50 µl of PBS. A,
reactions were run on SDS-PAGE and fluorographed for a 5-day exposure.
B, the same assay was performed as in A, but the
RAT1 cell extracts were prepared from cells treated with AdOx as
described previously (15). C, the corresponding
Coomassie-stained gel is shown. A single asterisk marks the
position of a unique PRMT6 substrate. Two asterisks mark the
position of GST-PRMT6, which is automethylated. The molecular mass
markers are shown on the left in kDa.
-NG-monomethylarginine and
asymmetric
-NG,NG-dimethylarginine
amino acid derivatives (data not shown). These results indicate that
GST-PRMT6 is capable of methylating itself as well as other protein
substrates. To confirm that the methylation occurred on the PRMT6
portion of the fusion protein and not on the GST moiety, we cleaved
GST-PRMT6 after automethylation with PreScission ProteaseTM
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). The tritium label associated with PRMT6
and not GST (data not shown). Automethylation of PRMT6 is not seen in
Fig. 4B because of the relatively short exposure time.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The intracellular localizations of GFP
fusions of PRMT catalytic chains. PRMT1, PRMT2, PRMT3, PRMT4,
PRMT5, and PRMT6 cDNAs were cloned in-frame with GFP. The resulting
constructs were transfected into HeLa cells, and protein localization
was observed by confocal fluorescence microscopy. Each panel
is marked with the identity of the GFP-PRMT fusion used for the
transfection. All the PRMTs were fused to the C-terminal end of
GFP, except for PRMT4, which was an N-terminal fusion. The
bar represents 20 µm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
,
receptor (49), the signal transducer and activator
of transcription 1 (24), the transcription activation domain 2 of p160
(57), and the helicase domain of the hepatitis C virus nonstructural
protein 3 (58), suggesting that it is involved in several cell
signaling pathways. PRMT2 interacts with the methyl acceptor
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein E1B-AP5 through its Src
homology 3 domain (52). PRMT4, like PRMT1, complexes to the activation
domain 2 portion of p160 and potentiates transcription in reporter gene assays (5, 57). PRMT5, initially referred to as Skb1Hs (59), has been
shown to form protein-protein interactions in vitro with the
Jak kinases Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and Tyk2 (28), the hepatitis C virus
nonstructural 3 protein (29), and the membrane-bound chloride channel
pICln (60). The polypeptides that copurify with immunoprecipitated
forms of PRMT5 have not been identified (28) but may corroborate its
known interactions with other proteins. PRMT3 and PRMT6 have not yet
been shown to complex with other polypeptides, although it is plausible
that the zinc finger domain of PRMT3 (15), much like the Src homology 3 domain of PRMT2 (52), may mediate its protein-protein interactions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Kent Claypool at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center for help with the confocal fluorescence microscopy, Michael Stallcup at the University of Southern California, and Sidney Pestka at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School for plasmids pGEX-CARM1 and pTKB175-JBP1, respectively. We also thank Pam Silver for giving us GST-Np13.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Welch Foundation Grant G-1495 and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Center Grant ES07784 (to M. T. B.) and by NIH Grant GM26020 (to S. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ Predoctoral student supported by the UCLA Dissertation Year Fellowship.
¶ Supported by United States Public Service Institutional Award T32 GM07185.
** Postdoctoral fellow supported in part by the postdoctoral fellowships program from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: UT M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center, Dept. of Carcinogenesis, Science Park-Research Div.,
P.O. Box 389, Smithville, TX 78957. Tel.: 512-237-9539; Fax:
512-237-2475; E-mail: mbedford@sprd1.mdacc.tmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 27, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108786200
2 Mark T. Bedford, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: PRMT, protein arginine N-methyltransferase; [3H]AdoMet, S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine; CARM1, coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1; JBP1, Janus kinase-binding protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GAR, glycine- and arginine-rich; AdOx, adenosine dialdehyde; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Gary, J. D., and Clarke, S. (1998) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 61, 65-131[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Altschuler, L., Wook, J. O., Gurari, D., Chebath, J., and Revel, M. (1999) J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 19, 189-195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Tang, J.,
Kao, P. N.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19866-19876 |
| 4. |
Bedford, M. T.,
Frankel, A.,
Yaffe, M. B.,
Clarke, S.,
Leder, P.,
and Richard, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16030-16036 |
| 5. |
Chen, D., Ma, H.,
Hong, H.,
Koh, S. S.,
Huang, S. M.,
Schurter, B. T.,
Aswad, D. W.,
and Stallcup, M. R.
(1999)
Science
284,
2174-2177 |
| 6. |
McBride, A. E.,
Weiss, V. H.,
Kim, H. K.,
Hogle, J. M.,
and Silver, P. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3128-3136 |
| 7. |
Yun, C. Y.,
and Fu, X. D.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
707-718 |
| 8. | Friesen, W. J., Massenet, S., Paushkin, S., Wyce, A., and Dreyfuss, G. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 1111-1117[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | McBride, A. E., and Silver, P. A. (2001) Cell 106, 5-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Lin, W. J.,
Gary, J. D.,
Yang, M. C.,
Clarke, S.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15034-15044 |
| 11. |
Tang, J.,
Frankel, A.,
Cook, R. J.,
Kim, S.,
Paik, W. K.,
Williams, K. R.,
Clarke, S.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7723-7730 |
| 12. |
Gary, J. D.,
Lin, W. J.,
Yang, M. C.,
Herschman, H. R.,
and Clarke, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12585-12594 |
| 13. | Henry, M. F., and Silver, P. A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 3668-3678[Abstract] |
| 14. |
Tang, J.,
Gary, J. D.,
Clarke, S.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16935-16945 |
| 15. |
Frankel, A.,
and Clarke, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32974-32982 |
| 16. |
Brostoff, S.,
and Eylar, E. H.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
68,
765-769 |
| 17. |
Kumar, A.,
Williams, K. R.,
and Szer, W.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
11266-11273 |
| 18. | Kim, S., Merrill, B. M., Rajpurohit, R., Kumar, A., Stone, K. L., Papov, V. V., Schneiders, J. M., Szer, W., Wilson, S. H., Paik, W. K., and Williams, K. R. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 5185-5192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Lischwe, M. A.,
Roberts, K. D.,
Yeoman, L. C.,
and Busch, H.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
14600-14602 |
| 20. | Lischwe, M. A., Cook, R. G., Ahn, Y. S., Yeoman, L. C., and Busch, H. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 6025-6028[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Wong, G., Muller, O., Clark, R., Conroy, L., Moran, M. F., Polakis, P., and McCormick, F. (1992) Cell 69, 551-558[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Smith, J.,
Rucknage, P.,
Schierhorn, A.,
Tang, J.,
Nemeth, A.,
Linder, M.,
Herschman, H. R.,
and Wahle, E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13229-13234 |
| 23. |
Siebel, C. W.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13641-13646 |
| 24. | Mowen, K. A., Tang, J., Zhu, W., Schurter, B. T., Shuai, K., Herschman, H. R., and David, M. (2001) Cell 104, 731-741[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Belyanskaya, L. L.,
Gehrig, P. M.,
and Gehring, H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18681-18687 |
| 26. |
Najbauer, J.,
Johnson, B. A.,
Young, A. L.,
and Aswad, D. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10501-10509 |
| 27. |
Rajpurohit, R.,
Lee, S. O.,
Park, J. O.,
Paik, W. K.,
and Kim, S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1075-1082 |
| 28. |
Pollack, B. P.,
Kotenko, S. V., He, W.,
Izotova, L. S.,
Barnoski, B. L.,
and Pestka, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31531-31542 |
| 29. |
Rho, J.,
Choi, S.,
Seong, Y. R.,
Cho, W. K.,
Kim, S. H.,
and Im, D. S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11393-11401 |
| 30. |
Branscombe, T. L.,
Frankel, A.,
Lee, J. H.,
Cook, J. R.,
Yang Zh, Z.,
Pestka, S.,
and Clarke, S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
32971-32976 |
| 31. | Lee, J.-H., Cook, J. R., Pollack, B. P., Kinzy, T., G., Norris, D., and Pestka, S. (2000) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 274, 105-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Gilbreth, M.,
Yang, P.,
Bartholomeusz, G.,
Pimental, R. A.,
Kansra, S.,
Gadiraju, R.,
and Marcus, S.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14781-14786 |
| 33. |
Bao, S.,
Qyang, Y.,
Yang, P.,
Kim, H., Du, H.,
Bartholomeusz, G.,
Henkel, J.,
Pimental, R.,
Verde, F.,
and Marcus, S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14549-14552 |
| 34. |
Baldwin, G. S.,
and Carnegie, P. R.
(1971)
Science
171,
579-581 |
| 35. | Stoner, G. L. (1984) J. Neurochem. 43, 433-447[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Brahms, H.,
Raymackers, J.,
Union, A.,
de Keyser, F.,
Meheus, L.,
and Luhrmann, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17122-17129 |
| 37. | Zhang, X., Zhou, L., and Cheng, X. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 3509-3519[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Weiss, V. H., McBride, A. E., Soriano, M. A., Filman, D. J., Silver, P. A., and Hogle, J. M. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 1165-1171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Lander, E. S., et al.. (2001) Nature 409, 860-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Venter, J. C.,
et al..
(2001)
Science
291,
1304-1351 |
| 41. | Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1999) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , pp. 4.0.1-4.9.13, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
| 42. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Bailey, J. (1967) Techniques in Protein Chemistry , 2nd Ed. , Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam |
| 44. |
Gary, J. D.,
and Clarke, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4076-4087 |
| 45. |
Niewmierzycka, A.,
and Clarke, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
814-824 |
| 46. |
Altshul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402 |
| 47. | Deleted in proof |
| 48. | Schurter, B. T., Koh, S. S., Chen, D., Bunick, G. J., Harp, J. M., Hanson, B. L., Henschen-Edman, A., Mackay, D. R., Stallcup, M. R., and Aswad, D. W. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 5747-5756[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Abramovich, C., Yakobson, B., Chebath, J., and Revel, M. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 260-266[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Scott, H. S., Antonarakis, S. E., Lalioti, M. D., Rossier, C., Silver, P. A., and Henry, M. F. (1998) Genomics 48, 330-340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Nikawa, J., Nakano, H., and Ohi, N. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 171, 107-111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Kzhyshkowska, J., Schutt, H., Liss, M., Kremmer, E., Stauber, R., Wolf, H., and Dobner, T. (2001) Biochem. J. 358, 305-314[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. | Valentini, S. R., Weiss, V. H., and Silver, P. A. (1999) RNA 5, 272-280[Abstract] |
| 54. |
Shen, E. C.,
Henry, M. F.,
Weiss, V. H.,
Valentini, S. R.,
Silver, P. A.,
and Lee, M. S.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
679-691 |
| 55. |
Klein, S.,
Carroll, J. A.,
Chen, Y.,
Henry, M. F.,
Henry, P. A.,
Ortonowski, I. E.,
Pintucci, G.,
Beavis, R. C.,
Burgess, W. H.,
and Rifkin, D. B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3150-3157 |
| 56. | Rawal, N., Rajpurohit, R., Lischwe, M. A., Williams, K. R., Paik, W. K., and Kim, S. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1248, 11-18[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 57. |
Koh, S. S.,
Chen, D.,
Lee, Y. H.,
and Stallcup, M. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
1089-1098 |
| 58. |
Rho, J.,
Choi, S.,
Seong, Y. R.,
Choi, J.,
and Im, D. S.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
8031-8044 |
| 59. |
Gilbreth, M.,
Yang, P.,
Wang, D.,
Frost, J.,
Polverino, A.,
Cobb, M. H.,
and Marcus, S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13802-13807 |
| 60. |
Krapivinsky, G., Pu, W.,
Wickman, K.,
Krapivinsky, L.,
and Clapham, D. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10811-10814 |
| 61. |
Pawlak, M. R.,
Scherer, C. A.,
Chen, J.,
Roshon, M. J.,
and Ruley, H. E.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4859-4869 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. M. Lakowski and A. Frankel A Kinetic Study of Human Protein Arginine N-Methyltransferase 6 Reveals a Distributive Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 10015 - 10025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tadesse, J. Deschenes-Furry, S. Boisvenue, and J. Cote KH-type splicing regulatory protein interacts with survival motor neuron protein and is misregulated in spinal muscular atrophy Hum. Mol. Genet., February 14, 2008; 17(4): 506 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. Iberg, A. Espejo, D. Cheng, D. Kim, J. Michaud-Levesque, S. Richard, and M. T. Bedford Arginine Methylation of the Histone H3 Tail Impedes Effector Binding J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3006 - 3010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Chin, P.-O. Esteve, M. Pradhan, J. Benner, D. Patnaik, M. F. Carey, and S. Pradhan Automethylation of G9a and its implication in wider substrate specificity and HP1 binding Nucleic Acids Res., December 18, 2007; 35(21): 7313 - 7323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Bedford Arginine methylation at a glance J. Cell Sci., December 15, 2007; 120(24): 4243 - 4246. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|