Differences in the Molecular Mechanisms Involved in the
Transcriptional Activation of the CHOP and Asparagine
Synthetase Genes in Response to Amino Acid Deprivation or
Activation of the Unfolded Protein Response*
Alain
Bruhat
§,
Julien
Averous
,
Valérie
Carraro
,
Can
Zhong¶,
Andreas M.
Reimold
,
Michael S.
Kilberg¶, and
Pierre
Fafournoux
From the
Unité de Nutrition et
Métabolisme Protéique, Institut National de la
Recherche Agronomique de Theix, 63122 Saint Genès Champanelle,
France, the ¶ Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Center for Mammalian Genetics, University of Florida College of
Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0245, and the
Rheumatic
Diseases Division, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas, Texas 75390-8884
Received for publication, June 20, 2002, and in revised form, August 22, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
A promoter element called the amino acid response
element (AARE), which is essential for the induction of
CHOP (a CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-related gene)
transcription by amino acid depletion, has been previously
characterized. Conversely, the human asparagine synthetase
(AS) promoter contains two cis-acting elements
termed nutrient-sensing response elements (NSRE-1 and NSRE-2) that are required to activate the gene by either amino acid deprivation or the
endoplasmic reticulum stress response. The results reported here
document the comparison between CHOP and AS
transcriptional control elements used by the amino acid pathway. We
first establish that the AS NSRE-1 sequence shares
nucleotide sequence and functional similarities with the
CHOP AARE. However, we demonstrate that the
CHOP AARE can function independently, whereas
AS NSRE-1 is functionally weak by itself and instead
requires the presence of NSRE-2. Furthermore, AS NSRE-2 can
confer endoplasmic reticulum stress responsiveness to the
CHOP AARE. Using activating transcription factor-2-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, we also show that lack
of this transcription factor does not abolish the amino acid inducibility of AS transcription, but this transcription
factor is necessary to obtain the full AS response to amino
acid starvation. Collectively, these results document that there are
significant differences in the molecular mechanisms involved in the
transcriptional activation of CHOP and AS by
amino acid limitation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The molecular mechanisms involved in the control of gene
expression in response to amino acid deprivation have been extensively studied in yeast (1, 2). In addition to specific control of genes
involved in the synthesis of individual amino acids, yeast employs a
general control process whereby a subset of genes are coordinately
regulated by starvation of the cell for any single amino acid. In
mammalian cells, specific examples of enzymes, transporters, and
mRNAs that are regulated by amino acid availability have been
reported (3, 4). At the molecular level, most of the results have been
obtained studying the transcriptional regulation of asparagine
synthetase (AS)1
and CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein) gene expression in
response to amino acid deprivation.
AS is expressed in most mammalian cells and is responsible
for the biosynthesis of asparagine from aspartate and glutamine. The
level of AS mRNA increases in response not only to
asparagine starvation, but also to deprivation of any individual
essential amino acid (5-7). Guerrini et al. (8) used
promoter deletion and mutation to analyze the proximal promoter of the
human AS gene. They identified the palindromic sequence
5'-CATGATG-3' at nucleotides
70 to
64 as necessary for the
AS promoter regulation by amino acid availability. Recently,
Barbosa-Tessmann et al. (9) identified, in the AS
5'-flanking region, a "minimum control unit" (nt
111 to
34)
that yields basal as well as endoplasmic reticulum stress
response (ERSR)- and amino acid-regulated transcription. Using
mutation analysis, gel shift assays, and in vivo
footprinting experiments, Barbosa-Tessmann et al.
demonstrated that two cis-elements termed nutrient-sensing
response elements (NSRE-1, 5'-TGATGAAAC-3', nt
68 to
60; and
NSRE-2, 5'-GTTACA-3', nt
48 to
43) in the AS promoter
sequence are essential for transcriptional activation by amino acid
limitation or the ERSR. NSRE-1/NSRE-2 in either direction can transfer
amino acid responsiveness to a reporter driven by a minimum promoter
(see Fig. 4 of Ref. 9). Moreover, gel shift experiments and
overexpression of dominant-negative mutants suggest that activation of
the AS gene by either amino acid limitation or the ERSR
could involve ATF-4 and C/EBP
binding to the NSRE-1 site (10,
11).
Dormant under normal growth conditions, the CHOP gene, also
known as GADD153, is induced to high levels during the
cellular stress caused by a wide variety of stresses, agents, and
nutrient deprivation (12-14). The induction of CHOP is
generally linked to activation of the ERSR, itself presumably mediated
by the accumulation of malfolded proteins (15). CHOP encodes
a nuclear protein related to the C/EBP family of transcription factors
(16). Members of the C/EBP family have been implicated in the
regulation of processes relevant to energy metabolism, cellular
proliferation, differentiation, and expression of cell type-specific
genes (17, 18). By forming heterodimers with members of the C/EBP
family, the CHOP protein can influence gene expression both as a
dominant-negative regulator of C/EBP binding to one class of DNA
targets and by directing CHOP·C/EBP heterodimers to other sequences
(19-22).
Although many of the pathway steps linking amino acids to gene
regulation remain unknown, it has been demonstrated that amino acid
limitation regulates CHOP expression through a specific
pathway independent of the ER stress signaling cascade (23). The
regulation of CHOP expression by amino acid
concentration has both transcriptional and post-transcriptional
components (24). Recently, an amino acid response element (AARE) was
localized between nucleotides
313 and
295 in the CHOP
promoter. This 19-bp DNA control element, which is essential for amino
acid activation of the CHOP promoter, can regulate a basal
promoter in response to starvation of several individual amino acids
(25). Through block substitution mutagenesis, the sequence
5'-ATTGCATCA-3' was identified as the minimum core sequence essential
for the CHOP AARE activity. The CHOP AARE is related to C/EBP- and ATF/cAMP response element-binding
protein-binding sites and was described to bind in vitro to
ATF-2 under starved and non-starved conditions. Using
ATF-2-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts and an ATF-2
dominant-negative mutant, the expression of ATF-2 was shown to be
essential for the transcriptional activation of CHOP by
leucine starvation (25). In parallel, it has recently been hypothesized
that the transcription factor ATF-4 could also be involved in the amino
acid regulation of CHOP expression (26).
The objective of the work presented here was to determine whether
transcriptional activation of CHOP and AS in
response to amino acid limitation occurs by a common mechanism. Using
mutation analysis, we first established the minimum core consensus
sequence in the 9-bp CHOP AARE that is required to confer
amino acid responsiveness as 5'-(R/C)TT(R/T)CRTCA-3'. We show that a
promoter containing multiple copies of AS NSRE-1 is
regulated in response to leucine starvation and therefore can, in this
circumstance, function alone as an AARE. However, although the
CHOP AARE and AS NSRE-1 share structural and
functional similarities, we demonstrate that lack of ATF-2 reduces (but
does not abolish) the transcriptional activation of AS by
leucine starvation, whereas the activation of CHOP is completely prevented. Furthermore, if the AS NSRE-2 sequence
is placed 10 nt downstream of the AARE core in the CHOP
promoter, regulation by both amino acid limitation and the ERSR pathway is observed.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Culture and Treatment Conditions--
HeLa cells were
cultured at 37 °C in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/nutrient
mixture F-12 (DMEM/F-12) (Sigma) containing 10% fetal bovine serum.
When indicated, DMEM/F-12 lacking leucine was used. In all experiments
involving amino acid starvation, 10% dialyzed calf serum was used.
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) deficient in ATF-2 were produced
from decapitated, eviscerated, day 14.5 ATF-20/0
embryos (27) using a 3T3 protocol until cells passed through crisis,
typically by passage 18 (28).
DNA Transfection and Luciferase Assay--
Cells were plated in
12-well dishes and transfected by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation
method as described previously (24). Two micrograms of luciferase
plasmid were transfected into the cells along with 0.1 µg of
pCMV-
Gal, a plasmid carrying the bacterial
-galactosidase gene
fused to the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early enhancer/promoter
region, as an internal control. Cells were then exposed to the
precipitate for 16 h, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline,
and incubated with DMEM/F-12 containing 10% calf serum. Twenty-four
hours after transfection, cells were amino acid-starved for 16 h.
After starvation, cells were harvested in 150 µl of lysis buffer
(Promega) and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 2 min.
Twenty microliters of the supernatant were assayed for luciferase
activity (Prodemat, Anduze, France).
-Galactosidase activity was
measured as described previously (29). Relative luciferase activity is
given as the ratio of relative luciferase units to relative
-galactosidase units. All values are the means calculated from the
results of at least three independent experiments.
Nuclear Extract Preparation--
Nuclear extracts were prepared
from HeLa cells as described previously (25).
Oligonucleotides--
Oligonucleotides were from MWG
Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany). When double-stranded
oligonucleotides were required, equal numbers of moles of complementary
strands were heated to 90 °C for 1 min and annealed by slow cooling
to room temperature.
Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
Gel mobility shift assays were
performed as described previously (25). To test the effect of
anti-ATF-2 antibody, 1 µl of anti-ATF-2 serum (sc-6233X, Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) was added to the incubation mixture at room temperature
1 h prior to addition of the labeled probe. Each mobility shift
experiment was repeated three times to confirm the reproducibility of
the results.
Plasmid Constructions--
TATATK-LUC,
containing the minimum herpes simplex virus promoter for thymidine
kinase (TK; nt
40 to +50), was generated as previously described (25). Plasmids 1×-, 2×-, and
5×CHOPAARE-TATATK-LUC were constructed by
inserting SstI-XhoI double-stranded
oligonucleotides containing one, two, and five iterations of the
CHOP AARE sequence, respectively, into the
TATATK-LUC plasmid (see Fig. 3). In the same way, one, two,
and five copies of the AS NSRE-1 sequence (bottom strand, nt
57 to
75) (10) were inserted into the TATATK-LUC plasmid, producing 1×-, 2×-, and
5×ASNSRE-1-TATATK-LUC, respectively. Mutation
series in the CHOP AARE sequence and deletion and mutation series in the AS promoter were made by inserting
SstI-XhoI double-stranded mutated sequences into
the TATATK-LUC plasmid. pCHOP-LUC (nt
649 to
+91) was generated as previously described (25). Plasmid p3.4AS-LUC, containing a 3.4-kb fragment of the human
AS promoter region, was generated by PCR from cloned genomic
DNA (8) using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and primers and
antisense primers containing appropriate restriction sites at their
5'-ends. Amplified fragments were then cloned into the pGL3-basic
reporter construct (Promega) using the XhoI and
HindIII restriction sites. All luciferase plasmid constructs
were sequenced before utilization using the ABI PRISM Big Dye
terminator cycle sequencing reaction kit and the ABI PRISM 310 genetic
analyzer (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was prepared as previously
described (30). Northern blotting was performed according to the
procedure of Sambrook et al. (31). The membranes were
UV-cross-linked, and then prehybridization was carried out for 2 h
at 55 °C in 50% formamide, 6× SSC, 5× Denhardt's reagent, 0.5%
SDS, 0.1 mg/ml sonicated salmon sperm DNA, and 10 µg/ml yeast tRNA.
The human CHOP cDNA (BH1) and the human AS
cDNA were generously provided by Dr. N. J. Holbrook (32) and
Dr. C. Basilico (5), respectively. CHOP and AS
probes were labeled by random priming with [
-32P]dCTP
(Ready-To-Go DNA labeling beads, Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala,
Sweden). Hybridization was carried out for 16 h at 65 °C. The
membranes were washed for 15 min at 65 °C successively with 2× SSC
containing 0.1% SDS, 0.5× SSC containing 0.1% SDS, and 0.1× SSC
containing 0.1% SDS. Labeled bands were detected by autoradiography.
Autoradiogram signals were visualized using a PhosphorImager and
ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences). To control for either
variation in the amount of RNA in different samples or loading errors,
all blots were rehybridized with a DNA probe corresponding to
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA. Relative
CHOP or AS mRNA levels were determined as the
ratio of CHOP or AS mRNA to
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA.
Analysis of Gene Expression Using Real-time Reverse
Transcription-PCR--
Total RNA was prepared using an RNeasy mini-kit
(QIAGEN Inc.) and treated with DNase I (Amplification grade,
Invitrogen) prior to cDNA synthesis. RNA integrity was
electrophoretically verified by ethidium bromide staining. RNA (0.5 µg) was reverse-transcribed with 100 units of Superscript II Plus
RNase H
reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using 100 µM random hexamer primers (Amersham Biosciences)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Primers for
CHOP (forward primer, 5'-cctagcttggctgacagagg-3'; and
reverse primer, 5'-ctgctccttctccttcatgc-3') and AS (forward primer, 5'-tacaaccacaaggcgctaca-3'; and reverse primer,
5'-aagggcctgactccataggt-3') were used and yielded PCR products 200 bp
in size. To control for RNA quality and cDNA synthesis,
-actin
mRNA was also amplified with forward (5'-tacagcttcaccaccacagc-3')
and reverse (5'-aaggaaggctggaaaagagc-3') primers.
Quantification involved the use of standard curves that had been
prepared with plasmids containing specific sequences of each gene. We
cloned the PCR products of CHOP, AS, and
-actin into the pGEM-T-easy vector (Promega) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. For the construction of standard curves
for CHOP, AS, and
-actin, pGEM-T-easy plasmids
were prepared as a 10-fold serial dilution in water, from 4 ng to 0.4 pg.
PCR was carried out using a LightCyclerTM system (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), which allows amplification and detection (by fluorescence) in the same tube, with a kinetic approach. For
LightCycler PCRs, a master mixture of the following reaction components
was prepared to the indicated final concentrations: 10.4 µl of water, 1.6 µl of MgCl2 (3 mM), 1 µl of forward
primer (0.5 µM), 1 µl of reverse primer (0.5 µM), and 2 µl of LightCycler-FastStart DNA Master SYBR
Green I (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The LightCycler master mixture
(16 µl) was filled in the LightCycler glass capillaries, and 4 µl of cDNA (2 ng of reverse-transcribed total RNA) were added as
PCR template. Capillaries were closed, centrifuged, and placed into the
LightCycler rotor. The following LightCycler experimental run protocol
was used: denaturation program (95 °C for 10 min), amplification and
quantification program repeated 45 times (95 °C for 15 s,
60 °C for 5 s, and 72 °C for 8 s with a single
fluorescence measurement), melting curve program (69-95 °C with a
heating rate of 0.1 °C/s and a continuous fluorescence measurement),
and finally a cooling step to 40 °C. A negative control without
cDNA template was run with every assay to assess the overall
specificity. LightCycler quantification software (Version 3.5) was used
to compare amplification in experimental samples during the log linear
phase to the standard curve from the dilution series of control
plasmids. Relative results are reported in nanograms of CHOP
or AS/100 ng of
-actin. Each experiment was repeated
three times to confirm the reproducibility of the results.
 |
RESULTS |
The Nucleotides Required in the CHOP AARE Core Sequence to Mediate
Transcriptional Induction by Leucine Are Essential for the Binding of
ATF-2--
We have previously shown that the minimum core sequence in
the CHOP AARE able to render a heterologous promoter amino
acid responsive is 5'-ATTGCATCA-3' (25). To delineate more precisely the nucleotides essential for the transcriptional activity of the
CHOP AARE, we constructed a series of point mutants by
substituting each of the 9-bp core sequence nucleotides (nucleotides
N1-N9) with three different nucleotides (Fig.
1). A single copy of the 19-bp
CHOP AARE sequence with the corresponding mutation was
placed upstream of the minimum herpes simplex virus promoter for
TK. The mutant constructs were then transiently transfected
into HeLa cells, and the response to leucine was determined by
luciferase activity measurements under starved and non-starved
conditions. Among all the mutants, mt3 and mt4 of N1(A) in the 9-bp
core sequence and substitutions of N4(G) such as mt12 and mt14 and of
N6(A) such as mt19 showed responsiveness to amino acid starvation. In contrast, all substitutions of N2(T) (mt6-mt8), N3(T) (mt9-mt11), N5(C) (mt15-mt17), N7(T) (mt21-mt23), N8(C) (mt24-mt26), and N9(A) (mt27-mt29) abolished the amino acid inducibility. These results establish the minimum consensus sequence in the 9-bp CHOP
AARE that is required to confer amino acid responsiveness as
5'-(R/C)TT(R/T)CRTCA-3' (R = G or A).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Identification of the nucleotides in the
CHOP AARE core sequence required to mediate amino acid
responsiveness. HeLa cells were transfected with luciferase
constructs containing a single copy of the native (wild-type
(wt)) or mutant CHOP AARE (nt 313 to 295)
inserted 5' to the TK promoter. The position of the minimum
AARE core sequence (nt 310 to 302) is boxed in
gray, and each nucleotide of this sequence is numbered
(N1-N9). Each of the nucleotides in the core sequence was changed to
another nucleotide as indicated. Twenty-four hours after transfection,
cells were incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with and without 420 µM leucine and then harvested for preparation of cell
extracts and determination of luciferase activity. Relative luciferase
activities were determined as described under "Materials and
Methods." The relative -fold induction, defined as the ratio of the
relative luciferase activity of leucine-starved cells to that of
non-starved cells, is indicated in parentheses to the right
of the bars. Each data point represents the mean of at least three
independent experiments performed in triplicate. The resulting minimum
consensus sequence is shown at the bottom (R = G or A).
|
|
The core sequence of the CHOP AARE has been shown to bind
in vitro to a specific protein complex containing the
transcription factor ATF-2, which plays a critical role in the
transcriptional activation of CHOP by amino acids (25). To
assess the importance of the 9-bp core sequence nucleotides in the
binding of the protein complex, gel mobility shift assays were carried
out with the 19-bp wild-type CHOP AARE oligonucleotide as a
probe and mutant oligonucleotides as competitors. Among the three point
mutants corresponding to one nucleotide of the AARE core sequence (Fig.
1), one mutant was chosen for electrophoretic mobility shift assay
competition experiments (Fig.
2A). A major specific
DNA·protein complex was detected after incubation of non-starved HeLa
nuclear extracts with the 32P-labeled CHOP AARE
probe (lane 1). Oligonucleotides containing mt4 and mt12,
which did not lose the amino acid inducibility (Fig. 1), abolished the
binding of the protein complex to the DNA (lanes 4 and
5 and lanes 10 and 11, respectively).
On the other hand, oligonucleotides containing mt18, mt21, mt24, and
mt27, which abolished the amino acid responsiveness (Fig. 1), did not
compete for the formation of the AARE·protein complex (lanes
14 and 15, 16 and 17,
18 and 19, and 20 and 21,
respectively). Oligonucleotides containing mt6, mt9, and mt15, which
lost the amino acid inducibility (Fig. 1), competed weakly for complex
formation (lanes 6 and 7, 8 and
9, and 12 and 13, respectively).
However, with the same amount of competitor (50-fold molar excess),
oligonucleotides containing mt4 and mt12, which did not lose the amino
acid inducibility, completely abolished the binding of the protein
complex to the DNA. A supershift assay with the antibody against ATF-2
was performed to demonstrate directly the importance of individual
nucleotides within the 9-bp core sequence of the CHOP AARE
to ATF-2 binding (Fig. 2B). ATF-2 bound to the wild-type
form of the CHOP AARE as shown by the presence of an
ATF-2-supershifted DNA·protein complex (lane 3). If the
mt4-containing oligonucleotide was used as a probe, anti-ATF-2 antibody
supershifted the AARE mt4-bound complex (lane 6). In the
case of mt15 and mt27, which showed no response to the amino acid
availability, no ATF-2-supershifted DNA·protein complex was observed
(lanes 9 and 12). Taken together, these results
demonstrate that the nucleotides in the CHOP AARE core
sequence required to confer amino acid responsiveness are also
essential for the binding of ATF-2.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nucleotides in the CHOP AARE
core sequence required to confer amino acid responsiveness are
essential for the binding of ATF-2. A, gel mobility
shift assays of nuclear extracts from HeLa cells incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 containing 420 µM leucine. The 19-bp
wild-type CHOP AARE radioactive probe carried nucleotides
313 to 295 (wt). The 19-bp CHOP AARE and
different mutant AARE oligonucleotides were used as competitors at a
25- or 50-fold molar excess relative to the probe. The specific
DNA·protein complex is indicated by the arrow.
B, supershift assays using the antibody against ATF-2 and
nuclear extracts from HeLa cells incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12.
HeLa nuclear extracts were first incubated with 1 µl of rabbit
nonimmune serum or anti-ATF-2 antiserum, and then the preincubation
mixture was incubated with the 19-bp wild-type (wt) or
mutant (mt4, mt15, and mt27) CHOP AARE probe as
described under "Materials and Methods." The 19-bp CHOP
AARE radiolabeled probes contained sequence 313 to 295.
|
|
The AS Promoter Region (nt
68 to
60) Shares Structural
and Functional Similarities with the CHOP AARE--
The promoter
of the human AS gene has been shown to contain two
cis-elements, NSRE-1 and NSRE-2, which are both required to mediate the transcriptional activation of the gene in response to amino
acid starvation (9). Sequence analysis of NSRE-1 (5'-GTTTCATCA-3' on
the bottom strand) revealed that it contains a sequence with high
similarity to the 9-bp CHOP core consensus sequence
(5'-(R/C)TT(R/T)CRTCA-3') described above (Fig.
3A). Indeed the AS
promoter sequence on the bottom strand (nt
57 to
75) revealed a
high identity to the CHOP AARE on the top strand (nt
313 to
295), not only in the AARE core, but also in both of
the border sequences. By nucleotide substitutions, this AS
sequence had been shown by independent laboratories to be important for
the response to amino acid starvation (8, 9). Furthermore, previous
studies had shown that the CHOP AARE-like NSRE-1 sequence is
not functional in the absence of NSRE-2 (9). To determine whether there
are any circumstances under which NSRE-1 can, by itself, render a
heterologous promoter amino acid-responsive, synthetic AS
sequence oligonucleotides (nt
57 to
75) were inserted as one, two,
or five copies immediately upstream of the minimum TK
promoter (Fig. 3B). One or two copies of the AS
sequence caused a very slight increase in transcription following amino
acid deprivation (rows 5 and 6), whereas one or two copies of the CHOP AARE were sufficient to induce the
luciferase activity (5- and 14-fold, respectively) in the absence of
leucine (rows 2 and 3). However, five copies of
the 19-bp AS promoter region (row 7) produced
about the same strong amino acid response as obtained with five copies
of the CHOP AARE (row 4). Therefore, we conclude
that multiple copies of the AS NSRE-1 sequence can render a
basal promoter amino acid-responsive and that it can be
considered as an AARE. However, the CHOP AARE is notably
more sensitive to amino acid starvation than is AS NSRE-1
alone. To determine whether it is the number of the NSRE-1 copies (five copies) or the distance of the fifth copy from the remainder of the
promoter, three or four copies were mutated to leave one or two
functional copies of the NSRE-1 sequence at a length equal to the
construct containing five functional copies (rows 8 and 9). The data illustrate that having one or two functional
copies of the NSRE-1 sequence at positions 4 and 5 did not result in activated transcription. Therefore, only when NSRE-1 is present in at
least three copies does it have AARE-like capability. Moreover, kinetic
analysis of luciferase activity driven by five copies of either the
CHOP AARE or AS NSRE-1 revealed that induction of the activity was detectable 8 h after starvation and that a
maximum induction level was reached after 16 h (data not shown).
Taken together, these results show that five copies of the
CHOP AARE and the AS NSRE-1 share functional
similarities in response to leucine starvation.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
AS NSRE-1 and the CHOP
AARE have activating effects on promoter activity in response to
leucine starvation. A, shown is a sequence comparison
of the CHOP AARE (top strand, nt 313 to 295) with
AS NSRE-1 (bottom strand, nt 57 to 75). Identical
nucleotides are boxed in gray. The minimum AARE
core sequence is boxed, and each nucleotide of this sequence
is numbered (N1-N9). The positions of mutations in the AS
AARE sequence that resulted in a loss of amino acid responsiveness are
indicated by asterisks (see Fig. 8 of Ref. 9) or
underlined (MS8) (see Fig. 4 of Ref. 8). The
minimum core consensus sequence is represented. B, HeLa
cells were transfected with luciferase constructs containing one, two,
or five native (black) or mutant (white)
copies of the CHOP AARE or AS NSRE-1 inserted 5'
to the TK promoter. Twenty-four hours after transfection,
cells were incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with and without 420 µM leucine and then harvested for preparation of cell
extracts and luciferase activity determination. Relative luciferase
activities were determined as described under "Materials and
Methods." The relative -fold induction, defined as the ratio of the
relative luciferase activity of leucine-starved cells to that of
non-starved cells, is indicated in parentheses to the right
of the bars. Each data point represents the mean of at least three
independent experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|
Role of the Core and Border Sequences in the CHOP AARE and AS
NSRE-1--
To examine the respective role of the 9-bp AARE core and
border sequences, chimeric AAREs were constructed in which the core sequences of the CHOP AARE and AS NSRE-1 were
exchanged (Fig. 4). These 19-bp chimeric
AAREs were inserted in a single copy upstream of the TK
promoter. The constructs were transiently transfected into HeLa cells,
and the response to leucine deprivation was determined by luciferase
assay. Fusion of the AS border 1 and 2 sequences to the
CHOP core sequence caused a decrease in the amino acid inducibility (compare rows 1 and 3), whereas the
CHOP border sequences did not increase the amino acid
responsiveness of a single copy of the AS core (compare
rows 2 and 3). These data demonstrate that only
the CHOP border sequences play a role in achieving the amino
acid induction of the CHOP AARE.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Role of the core and border sequences in the
CHOP AARE and AS NSRE-1.
Oligonucleotides encoding the CHOP AARE, AS
NSRE-1, or a chimeric AARE/NSRE-1 in which the 9-bp core sequence of
the CHOP AARE and AS NSRE-1 were exchanged were
inserted 5' to the TK promoter in luciferase constructs.
HeLa cells were transfected, incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with
and without 420 µM leucine, and then harvested for
preparation of cell extracts and luciferase activity determination.
Relative luciferase activities were determined as described under
"Materials and Methods." The relative -fold induction, defined as
the ratio of the relative luciferase activity of leucine-starved cells
to that of non-starved cells, is indicated in parentheses.
Each data point represents the mean of at least three independent
experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|
Lack of ATF-2 Reduces (but Does Not Abolish) the Transcriptional
Activation of AS by Leucine Starvation--
It has been shown
previously that ATF-2 has a critical role in the transcriptional
activation of CHOP by leucine starvation (25). To determine
the role of ATF-2 in the induction of AS expression, the
effect of leucine starvation on AS mRNA expression was
measured in MEFs deficient in ATF-2 and in the corresponding wild-type
cells. Fig. 5A shows that like
CHOP, AS exhibited a normal response to leucine
starvation (4-fold increase) and to an agent (tunicamycin) that induces
ER stress (33) in ATF-2+/+ cells (5-fold increase). Lack of
ATF-2 (ATF-2
/
) resulted in a strong decrease in the
AS mRNA inducibility (2-fold), whereas the amino acid
inducibility of CHOP mRNA was completely lost. On the
other hand, the induction of either AS or CHOP
mRNA by the ERSR (tunicamycin) was not severely affected in
ATF-2
/
cells (4-fold increase).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Lack of ATF-2 reduces (but does not abolish)
the transcriptional activation of AS by leucine
starvation. A, wild-type (+/+) and mutant ( / ) ATF-2
MEFs were incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with and without 420 µM leucine or for 6 h in medium containing 1 µg/ml
tunicamycin. Total RNA was extracted, and real-time reverse
transcription-PCR was performed as described under "Materials and
Methods." B, wild-type (+/+) and mutant ( / ) ATF-2 MEFs
were transfected with luciferase reporter constructs containing the
3.4-kb AS 5'-upstream region (AS (3.4)), the
CHOP promoter region from nt 649 to +91, two copies of the
AS AARE (2X AS NSRE-1), or one copy of the
CHOP AARE (1X CHOP AARE) inserted 5' to the
TK promoter. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells
were incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with and without 420 µM leucine and then harvested for preparation of cell
extracts and determination of luciferase activity. Relative luciferase
activities were determined as described under "Materials and
Methods." The relative -fold induction, defined as the ratio of the
relative luciferase activity of leucine-starved cells to that of
non-starved cells, is indicated in parentheses above the
bars.
|
|
To more directly compare the effects of ATF-2 on regulation of
AS and CHOP transcription by leucine deprivation,
luciferase constructs containing the 3.4-kb AS 5'-upstream
region (Fig. 5B, rows 1 and 5), the
CHOP promoter (nt
649 to +91) (rows 3 and 7), two copies of AS NSRE-1 (rows 2 and 6), or one copy of the CHOP AARE (rows
4 and 8) inserted immediately upstream of the TK promoter were transiently transfected into
ATF-2-deficient cells or into the corresponding wild-type MEF cells.
The response to leucine was determined by luciferase assay under
starved and non-starved conditions. Lack of ATF-2 caused a decrease in
the amino acid inducibility of the AS-luciferase constructs
(compare rows 1 and 5 and rows 2 and
6), whereas it abolished the amino acid responsiveness of
the CHOP-luciferase constructs (compare rows 3 and 7 and rows 4 and 8). Taken
together, these results provide evidence that in MEF cells, ATF-2 is
not essential in the specific amino acid pathway that leads to the
induction of AS transcription, but that ATF-2 is necessary
to obtain the full AS response to amino acid starvation and
is absolutely required for CHOP induction.
Difference between the CHOP AARE and AS NSRE in the Response to ER
Stress--
The CHOP and AS genes are
transcriptionally regulated by amino acid starvation and the ERSR (15,
34). Fig. 6A shows that CHOP and AS gene expression was highly induced by
leucine and by agents that induce ER stress such as tunicamycin.
Barbosa-Tessmann et al. (9) have recently shown that
activation of AS transcription by the amino acid response
and ERSR occurs through the same common genomic elements. To determine
whether the CHOP AARE is also involved in the ER stress
pathway, the inducibility via this sequence by tunicamycin was tested.
The results show that at a low tunicamycin concentration (0.25 µg/ml), but one that induced AS and CHOP genes in intact cells (Fig. 6A), transcription via the
CHOP AARE did not increase, whereas the AS NSRE
was responsive (Fig. 6B). A modest induction (2-fold) of
luciferase activity through the CHOP AARE was detected only
with very high tunicamycin concentrations. These observations
demonstrate that the CHOP sequence (nt
313 to
295)
functions more effectively as an AARE and confirm that the
AS NSRE genomic sequence (nt
75 to
34) can mediate the
response to both amino acid and ER stress pathways.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The CHOP AARE is specific
for the amino acid pathway, whereas AS NSRE-1/NSRE-2
senses ER stress as well. A, HeLa cells were incubated
for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 (control (C)) or in DMEM/F-12
lacking leucine ( Leu) or for 6 h in DMEM-F12
containing different concentrations of tunicamycin (Tu;
0.05, 0.125, 0.25, 0.375, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 µg/ml) as
indicated. Total RNA was extracted, and Northern blot analysis was
performed. The blots were hybridized with human probes corresponding to
AS, CHOP, or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase. Relative CHOP or AS mRNA
levels were determined as the ratio of CHOP or AS
mRNA to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA.
B, HeLa cells were transfected with luciferase
(LUC) constructs containing one copy of the CHOP
AARE or AS NSRE-1/NSRE-2 (nt 75 to 34) inserted 5' to
the TK promoter and incubated under the conditions described
for A. Relative luciferase activities were determined as
described under "Materials and Methods." The relative -fold
induction, defined as the ratio of the relative luciferase activity of
leucine-starved cells to that of non-starved cells, is indicated in
parentheses to the right of the bars. Each data point
represents the mean of at least three independent experiments performed
in triplicate.
|
|
Role of the AS NSRE-2 Sequence in Mediating The ERSR--
Given
the sequence similarity of the CHOP AARE and AS
NSRE-1 sequences, the possible decisive role of the AS
NSRE-2 sequence in permitting the AS response to ER stress
was investigated (Fig. 7A). As
reported previously (9), mutation of the NSRE-2 sequence in the
AS promoter resulted in a significant loss of induction by
either amino acid deprivation or ER stress (row 2).
Likewise, a functional NSRE-2 without the NSRE-1 sequence did not
permit induction (row 3). As described above, the
CHOP AARE alone did not mediate a response to ER stress
(row 4). However, if the AS NSRE-2 sequence was
placed downstream of the CHOP AARE, in a configuration similar to its physical relationship to NSRE-1 in the
AS promoter, ER responsiveness was conferred to the
CHOP AARE (row 5). Also noteworthy is the
NSRE-2-mediated enhancement of the CHOP AARE response to
leucine deprivation (5- versus 11.5-fold). Thus, the NSRE-2
sequence conveys both ER stress responsiveness and increased sensitivity to amino acid limitation.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of AS NSRE-2 and
GC-rich sequences on CHOP AARE activity. A,
HeLa cells were transfected with luciferase constructs containing one
copy of wild-type or mutant AS NSRE-1/NSRE-2 (nt 75 to
34), the CHOP AARE (nt 313 to 295), or a fusion of the
CHOP AARE with AS NSRE-2 inserted 5' to the
TK promoter. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells
were incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with and without leucine or
for 6 h in DMEM-F12 containing 0.5 µg/ml tunicamycin
(Tu) and harvested for luciferase activity determination
after the indicated incubation times. B, HeLa cells were
transfected with luciferase constructs containing deletion and mutation
series in the AS promoter, the CHOP AARE (nt
313 to 295), or a fusion of the CHOP AARE or the core
sequence of the CHOP AARE (boxed; nt 310 to
302) with AS NSRE-2 or GC box III inserted 5' to the
TK promoter. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells
were incubated for 16 h in DMEM/F-12 with and without 420 µM leucine. Relative luciferase activities were
determined as described under "Materials and Methods." The relative
-fold induction, defined as the ratio of the relative luciferase
activity of leucine-starved cells to that of non-starved cells, is
indicated. Each data point represents the mean of at least three
independent experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|
Another difference between the AS and CHOP
promoters is the presence of three upstream GC boxes (I-III) in the
AS proximal promoter (9). It has recently been demonstrated
that these three GC-rich sequences bind either Sp1 or Sp3, the former
supporting basal AS transcription and the latter supporting
both basal and stimulus-induced transcription (35). At least one GC box
is required for maximum transcription from the AS gene. To
determine whether the function of the CHOP AARE can be
enhanced by the presence of a GC box, the NSRE-1 sequence was replaced
with the CHOP AARE within the AS promoter (Fig.
7B). The presence of either the NSRE-2 sequence (compare
rows 3 and 4) or the GC box III sequence (compare rows 3 and 5) enhanced the basal transcription
from the CHOP AARE alone, but the GC box did not increase
the -fold induction after leucine deprivation either without the
NSRE-2 sequence (compare rows 3 and 5) or with
the NSRE-2 element (compare rows 4 and 6).
 |
DISCUSSION |
The human CHOP gene 5'-flanking region contains an AARE
(nt
313 to
295) that is required for increasing transcription of the gene following amino acid deprivation. Our single-nucleotide mutagenesis affecting the 9-bp core sequence (nt
310 to
302) demonstrated that the T residues at positions 2, 3, and 7; the C at
position 5; and the A at position 9 are required to confer amino acid
responsiveness and established that the minimum core consensus sequence
is 5'-(R/C)TT(R/T)CRTCA-3'. In the human AS gene, NSRE-1 is
one of the two cis-elements (the other being NSRE-2) required for increased transcription following amino acid deprivation. NSRE-1 differs from the 9-bp CHOP core consensus sequence by
only two nucleotides (the G at position 1 and the T at position 4), which seem not to be critical for the sensitivity to amino acid limitation. Barbosa-Tessmann et al. (9) have shown
that the transcriptional activation of AS in response to
amino acid starvation requires the presence of both NSRE-1 and NSRE-2.
We have demonstrated here that multiple copies of NSRE-1 alone can
functionally synergize with itself and confer amino acid
responsiveness, whereas one copy of the CHOP AARE is
sufficient to render a heterologous promoter amino acid-responsive.
However, although the 9-bp CHOP core consensus sequence has
an intrinsic ability to mediate the amino acid response, a functional
AARE cannot be restricted to this sequence. Previous studies have
documented, for example, that the ATF-binding site in the adenovirus E4
promoter (36, 37) includes this consensus sequence, but is not able to
mediate amino acid inducibility (see Fig. 5B of Ref. 25). It
became evident that the amino acid response is mediated by a set of
cis-elements rather than by a single 9-bp element. Accessory
elements, which have no intrinsic ability to mediate the amino acid
response by themselves, may boost the -fold responsiveness mediated by
the AARE core. Our results provide evidence that AS NSRE-2
can be considered as an accessory element because it is not able, by
itself, to mediate amino acid inducibility, but enhances the response
to amino acid limitation. In addition, when placed downstream of the
CHOP AARE, NSRE-2 confers responsiveness to ER stress.
However, the region immediately following the CHOP AARE does
not have a readily identifiable sequence that corresponds to NSRE-2. We
also documented that the border sequences of the CHOP AARE
core appear to contain some accessory elements, whereas the border
sequences of AS NSRE-1 do not.
Sequences of the CHOP AARE and AS NSRE-1 show
some homology to the specific binding sites of the C/EBP and ATF/cAMP
response element-binding protein transcription factors. We have
previously demonstrated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay studies
that the transcription factor ATF-2 and C/EBP
bind the
CHOP AARE under starved and non-starved conditions (25). Our
present data demonstrate that the nucleotides in the 9-bp
CHOP AARE core sequence required to confer amino acid
responsiveness are also essential for the binding of ATF-2. When
knockout cell lines for ATF-2 were tested, amino
acid-dependent expression of CHOP was blocked,
demonstrating that ATF-2 is essential for the transcriptional
activation of CHOP by leucine starvation (25). This result
was supported by the observation that expression of a dominant-negative
form of ATF-2 suppressed the starvation-dependent
transcription from a CHOP promoter-luciferase reporter
construct. In contrast, Siu et al. (10) have demonstrated by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay experiments that ATF-2 does not
bind to the NSRE-1 sequence. Our present studies provide evidence that
ATF-2 is necessary to obtain the full AS response. However,
in cells devoid of ATF-2 expression, AS expression remains
slightly inducible following amino acid starvation. We hypothesized
that ATF-2 could activate gene transcription either by interactions
with the transcriptional machinery or by direct effects on a chromatin
component (38). Using electrophoretic mobility shift assay experiments,
Siu et al. (10, 11) have recently demonstrated that both
C/EBP
and ATF-4 bind to NSRE-1 and that the amount of the C/EBP
and ATF-4 complexes increased when extracts from amino acid-deprived
cells were tested. Furthermore, expression of dominant-negative mutants of C/EBP
(10) or ATF-4 (11) block amino acid-regulated
transcription. In contrast, using knockout cell lines for C/EBP
, we
have previously demonstrated that C/EBP
is not essential for the
transcriptional activation of CHOP in response to amino acid
deprivation, although this factor binds in vitro to the
CHOP AARE (25). However, the binding of ATF-4 to the
CHOP AARE and the possible role of this transcription factor
in CHOP amino acid-regulated transcription remain to be demonstrated.
CHOP and AS are also transcriptionally regulated
by the ERSR (15, 34). The ERSR (also known as the unfolded protein
response) is an intracellular signaling pathway to remedy the
accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER (39). Transcriptional
control of CHOP by ER stress involves the binding of ATF-6
in the presence of NF-Y, TFII-I, and YY1 to the cis-acting
ERSR element (ERSE) located between nt
75 and
93 (40, 41). The
CHOP AARE does not have similarity to the ERSE consensus
sequence, which is 5'-CCAATN9CCACG-3' (40). Consistent with
this observation, we have demonstrated that the CHOP AARE
cannot mediate the response by the ERSR pathway. In the case of
AS, the promoter region lacks the ERSE consensus sequence.
However, the combination of NSRE-1 and NSRE-2 mediates increased
transcription following activation of the ER pathway (9). Because the
present data document that NSRE-2 can confer ER stress responsiveness
to the CHOP AARE, NSRE-2 appears to play a specific role in
sensing ER stress. However, AS NSRE-2 does not have
similarity to the ERSE consensus sequence. Therefore, the nucleotides
essential for the transcriptional activity of NSRE-2 and the identity
of the transcription factors that bind to it merit further investigation.
Collectively, from the results presented in this study, the
CHOP AARE and AS NSRE-1 sequences have some
structural and functional similarities. However, there are several
lines of evidence suggesting that there are differences in the
molecular mechanisms involved in the induction of CHOP and
AS following amino acid starvation. 1) The CHOP
AARE can function independently to some extent, whereas AS
NSRE-1 is functionally weak by itself and instead requires the presence
of NSRE-2 within a complex nutrient-sensing response unit. 2) The
cis-acting elements required for induction of the CHOP gene following amino acid starvation (AARE) or the ERSR
pathway (ERSE) are located in sequences separated by several hundred
base pairs, whereas the AS NSRE-1 and NSRE-2 sequences
required for activation of the gene following either amino acid
limitation or activation of the ERSR pathway are separated by
11 bp (9). 3) ATF-2 binds in vitro to the CHOP
AARE sequence and is essential for the transcriptional activation of
CHOP by leucine starvation, whereas this transcription
factor does not bind in vitro to the AS NSRE-1
sequence, but appears to be necessary to obtain the full AS
response. 4) We have previously shown that the amino acid specificity
with regard to the degree of induction of CHOP and AS is different (23).
The molecular mechanisms involved in the cellular response to amino
acid availability have just begun to be discovered. By first
identifying the genomic cis-elements and then the
corresponding transcription factors responsible for regulation of
specific target genes, it is anticipated that one can progress
backwards up the signal transduction pathway to understand the
individual steps required. The identification of different key
transcriptional regulators for CHOP (ATF-2) and for
AS (C/EBP
and ATF-4) suggests that, as described in
yeast, at least two independent pathways could lead to induced gene
transcription in mammals. Defining the precise cascade of molecular
events by which the cellular concentration of an individual amino acid
regulates gene expression will be an important contribution to our
understanding of metabolite control in mammalian cells. These studies
will provide insight into the role of amino acids in the regulation of
cellular functions such as cell division, protein synthesis, and proteolysis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from the Institut
National de la Recherche Agronomique (to A. B. and J. A.), National
Institutes of Health Grant DK-52064 (to M. S. K.), and the Arthritis
Foundation (to A. M. R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-4-7362-4150;
Fax: 33-4-7362-4755; E-mail: bruhat@clermont.inra.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206149200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AS, asparagine synthetase;
C/EBP, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein;
CHOP, C/EBP homologous protein;
nt, nucleotide(s);
ERSR, endoplasmic reticulum stress response;
NSRE, nutrient-sensing response element;
ATF, activating transcription
factor;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
AARE, amino acid response element;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
MEF, mouse embryonic
fibroblast;
TK, thymidine kinase;
ERSE, endoplasmic
reticulum stress response element.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hinnebusch, A. G.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
409-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Hinnebusch, A. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21661-21664[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Fafournoux, P.,
Bruhat, A.,
and Jousse, C.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
351,
1-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Laine, R. O.,
Hutson, R. G.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(1996)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
53,
219-248[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Gong, S. S.,
Guerrini, L.,
and Basilico, C.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
6059-6066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Hutson, R. G.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
303,
745-750
|
| 7.
|
Jousse, C.,
Bruhat, A.,
Ferrara, M.,
and Fafournoux, P.
(2000)
J. Nutr.
130,
1555-1560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Guerrini, L.,
Gong, S. S.,
Mangasarian, K.,
and Basilico, C.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
3202-3212[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Barbosa-Tessmann, I. P.,
Chen, C.,
Zhong, C.,
Siu, F.,
Schuster, S. M.,
Nick, H. S.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26976-26985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Siu, F.,
Chen, C.,
Zhong, C.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
48100-48107[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Siu, F.,
Bain, P. J.,
LeBlanc-Chaffin, R.,
Chen, H.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
24120-24127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Luethy, J. D.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
5-10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Sylvester, S. L.,
Rhys, C. M. J.,
Luethy-Martindale, J.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20119-20125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Schmitt-Ney, M.,
and Habener, J. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
40839-40845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Wang, X.-Z.,
Lawson, B.,
Brewer, J. W.,
Zinszner, H.,
Sanjay, A., Mi, L.-J.,
Boorstein, R.,
Kreibich, G.,
Hendershot, L. M.,
and Ron, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4273-4280[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Ron, D.,
and Habener, J. F.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
439-453[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
McKnight, S.,
Lane, M. D.,
and Gluecksohn-Waelsch, S.
(1989)
Genes Dev.
3,
2021-2024[Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Roesler, W. J.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
21,
141-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Batchvarova, N.,
Wang, X.-Z.,
and Ron, D.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4654-4661[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Fawcett, T. W.,
Eastman, H. B.,
Martindale, J. L.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14285-14289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Ubeda, M.,
Wang, X.-Z.,
Zinszner, H., Wu, I.,
Habener, J. F.,
and Ron, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1479-1489[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Sok, J.,
Wang, X.-Z.,
Batchvarova, N.,
Kuroda, M.,
Harding, H.,
and Ron, D.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
495-504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Jousse, C.,
Bruhat, A.,
Hardind, H. P.,
Ferrara, M.,
Ron, D.,
and Fafournoux, P.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
448,
211-216[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Bruhat, A.,
Jousse, C.,
Wang, X.-Z.,
Ron, D.,
Ferrara, M.,
and Fafournoux, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17588-17593[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Bruhat, A.,
Jousse, C.,
Carraro, V.,
Reimold, A.,
Ferrara, M.,
and Fafournoux, P.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
7192-7204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Harding, H. P.,
Novoa, I.,
Zhang, Y.,
Zeng, H.,
Wek, R.,
Schapira, M.,
and Ron, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
1099-1108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Maekawa, T.,
Bernier, F.,
Sato, M.,
Nomura, S.,
Singh, M.,
Inoue, Y.,
Tokunaga, T.,
Imai, H.,
Yokoyama, M.,
Reimold, A. M.,
Glimcher, L.,
and Ishii, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17813-17819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Todaro, G. J.,
and Green, H.
(1963)
J. Cell Biol.
17,
299-313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Hall, C. V.,
Jacob, P. E.,
Ringold, M.,
and Lee, F.
(1983)
J. Mol. Appl. Genet.
2,
101-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, p. 7.46, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 32.
|
Park, J. S.,
Luethy, J. D.,
Wang, M. G.,
Fargnoli, J.,
Fornace, A. J., Jr.,
McBride, O. W.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
116,
259-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Zinszner, H.,
Kuroda, M.,
Wang, X.-Z.,
Batchvarova, N.,
Lightfoot, R. T.,
Remotti, H.,
Stevens, J. L.,
and Ron, D.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
982-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Barbosa-Tessmann, I. P.,
Chen, C.,
Zhong, C.,
Schuster, S. M.,
Nick, H. S.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31139-31144[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Leung-Pineda, V.,
and Kilberg, M. S.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
16585-16591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Hurst, H. C.,
and Jones, N. C.
(1987)
Genes Dev.
1,
1132-1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Lin, Y. S.,
and Green, M. R.
(1988)
Proc. Acad. Natl. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3396-3400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Kawasaki, H.,
Schiltz, L.,
Chiu, R.,
Itakura, K.,
Taira, K.,
Nakatani, Y.,
and Yokoyama, K. K.
(2000)
Nature
405,
195-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kaufman, R. J.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1211-1233[Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Yoshida, H.,
Okada, T.,
Haze, K.,
Yanagi, H.,
Yura, T.,
Negishi, M.,
and Mori, K.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
6755-6767[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Parker, R.,
Phan, T.,
Baumeister, P.,
Roy, B.,
Cheriyath, V.,
Roy, A. L.,
and Lee, A. S.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
3220-3233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.