Modulation of the ERG K+ Current by the Tyrosine
Phosphatase, SHP-1*
Francisco S.
Cayabyab
§¶,
Florence W. L.
Tsui
, and
Lyanne C.
Schlichter
§**
From the
Cellular and Molecular Biology Division,
Toronto Western Research Institute, the § Department of
Physiology and the
Department of Immunology, University of
Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
Received for publication, August 19, 2002, and in revised form, September 30, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We reported previously (Cayabyab, F. S., and Schlichter, L. C. (2002) J. Biol. Chem.
277, 13673-13681) a functional interaction between the ERG-1
K+ channel and Src tyrosine kinase, which increased the
current. We now show that the tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1, which is
present in microglia, is increased after brain damage, and is activated by colony-stimulating factor-1, associates with ERG-1 and regulates the
current. Patch clamp recordings from the MLS-9 microglia cells were
made with pipette solutions containing a recombinant SHP-1 protein:
wild type (SHP-1 wild type (wt)), catalytically active (SHP-1 S6), or
the substrate-trapping mutant (SHP-1 Cys
Ser). SHP-1 wt and
SHP-1 S6 proteins decreased the current, an effect that was reversed by
the phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate, whereas SHP-1 Cys
Ser
increased the current. Moreover, transient transfection with cDNA
for SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6 decreased the ERG current without decreasing
the protein level. Tyrosine phosphorylation of ERG-1 was decreased by
transfection with SHP-1 wt and increased by SHP-1 Cys
Ser. The
decrease in current by active SHP-1 was partly attributed to changes in
the voltage dependence of activation and steady-state conductance,
whereas inactivation kinetics and voltage dependence were not affected.
Our results show that ERG-1 is a SHP-1 substrate constituting the first
report that an ion current is regulated by SHP-1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In excitable cells, K+ channels set the membrane
potential (Vm), which is crucial for regulating
excitability, Ca2+ influx, and secretion. Their roles in
non-excitable cells may be even more diverse. In addition to
controlling Vm and Ca2+ entry,
K+ channels contribute to ion homeostasis, cell cycle,
proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and to cell volume
regulation, which counteracts metabolically generated osmolytes. The
human ether-à-go-go-related gene
(HERG)1 was originally
thought to be heart-specific, where its natural mutations underlie one
type of life-threatening arrhythmia (2-4). However, HERG and
ether-à-go-go K+ channels are expressed in
certain cancers, leading to intense interest in their contributions to
proliferation and cell survival (5, 6). We recently provided the first
direct evidence of a functional role for HERG in cancer cells (7). HERG
was selectively up-regulated in primary leukemias and several
hematopoietic cell lines, and the HERG-channel blocker, E-4031, reduced
proliferation in some of the cell lines. HERG and the three known rat
ERG isoforms are expressed in the nervous system, and although ERG-2
was thought to be restricted to a small subpopulation of neurons (8),
we found ERG-2 mRNA in rat microglia (1). ERG channels in neurons can
modulate the resting potential (9), spike frequency (10), hormonal
secretion (11, 12), and neuritogenesis (9, 13), although some roles
have only been studied in cell lines. We previously identified ERG
currents and ERG-1 protein in the brain microglia cell line (MLS-9)
that we developed (1, 14, 15). Because MLS-9 cells lack the Kv1.3 and
classical inward-rectifier currents that are prevalent in primary
cultured microglia from which they are derived, ERG is expected to
perform most roles of K+ channels in these cells.
Microglia and other ERG-expressing cells have protein tyrosine
kinase-dependent signaling processes. We presented
previously (1) the first report that tyrosine phosphorylation of the
ERG protein modulates the ERG current. In MLS-9 cells, ERG-1 protein associates with, and is phosphorylated by, the cytosolic protein tyrosine kinase, Src. Phosphorylation is decreased by protein tyrosine
kinase inhibitors, and several means of inhibiting endogenous Src
activity reduce the current. Conversely, activating endogenous Src or
transfecting constitutively active v-Src increases the current and
alters its voltage dependence and kinetics, producing much more ERG
current at negative potentials. The ERG current is then poised to
promote microglial functions that require a negative membrane
potential. Thus, we wanted to identify protein tyrosine phosphatase(s)
that counter-modulate the ERG current. For several reasons, we
considered SHP-1, an SH2 (Src homology 2)-containing protein tyrosine
phosphatase, as a likely candidate. (i) SHP-1 is expressed
predominantly in hematopoietic cells (16), including microglia, and is
up-regulated in microglia after traumatic brain injury (17). (ii) SHP-1
is activated by tyrosine phosphorylation after the mitogen,
colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) binds to its receptor (18, 19).
Microglia proliferation is strongly stimulated by CSF-1 (20), a process
that was used to produce the cell line, MLS-9 (15). (iii) An
immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) consensus
(Leu-Thr-Tyr(P)829-Cys-Asp-Leu) (21-23) is present
in the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain in the carboxyl terminus of
ERG-1. ITIM is an SH2-binding motif that is present in a number of
cellular receptors (NK cell inhibitory receptors, antigen receptors,
CD22, and interleukin-3 receptors) that are associated with inhibitory
signaling within the immune system. (iv) Brains of homozygous
motheaten mice, which are SHP-1 null, have decreased numbers
of all subtypes of glia (24), suggesting that SHP-1 plays an important
role in the normal differentiation and distribution of astrocytes,
microglia, and oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system.
Despite this wealth of information, nothing is known about the actions
of SHP-1 on any ion channel. We have now exploited several SHP-1
variants to delineate the role of SHP-1 in modulating the ERG current.
Inactive SHP-1 apparently exists in a "closed" state and then
undergoes a conformational change to an "open" state on activation
(25). By using high pressure liquid chromatography size-exclusion and
sucrose density gradient sedimentation analyses, we showed previously
that the inactive wild type SHP-1 (SHP-1 wt) is a globular protein
(closed state) and the active SHP-1 S6 (lacking the amino-terminal SH2
domain) has an extended conformation (open state) (26). Mutation of the
catalytic cysteine residue (SHP-1 Cys
Ser) from the signature motif
eliminates enzymatic activity, while allowing normal substrate binding.
It can protect the target protein from dephosphorylation by trapping
the substrate (27) and thus the SHP-1 Cys
Ser mutant acts in a
dominant-negative manner (28). In the present study, we found that
SHP-1 protein interacts with and dephosphorylates the native ERG
protein in MLS-9 cells. We used the three types of SHP-1 protein (SHP-1
wt, SHP-1 S6, and SHP-1 Cys
Ser) to show that SHP-1 is a negative regulator of ERG current and to identify ERG-1 as bona fide
substrate for SHP-1. This is the first demonstration that SHP-1
regulates any ion channel.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Culturing the Microglia Cell Line, MLS-9--
The MLS-9 cell
line was derived by treating pure cultures of rat microglia with
colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) for several weeks and then
harvesting microglia colonies (15, 29). Like cultured rat microglia,
MLS-9 cells stain with isolectin B4 and the antibodies OX-42 and ED-1.
They are not labeled with antibodies against the astrocyte marker,
glial fibrillary acidic protein, or the fibroblast protein,
fibronectin. MLS-9 cultures were grown to 75-80% confluency in
endotoxin-free minimal essential medium (MEM) containing 5% horse
serum, 5% fetal bovine serum, and 50 µg/ml gentamycin. For
harvesting, they were washed twice with sterile phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) and then released from the flask by incubating (10 min,
37 °C) with sodium citrate solution (130 mM NaCl, 15 mM sodium citrate, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM D-glucose, pH 7.4). After adding an equal
volume of MEM to the cell suspension, the cells were centrifuged at 700 rpm for 10 min and then resuspended in MEM. All cell culture reagents
were from Invitrogen.
Patch Clamp Recordings--
Whole-cell patch clamp recordings of
ERG currents were made as described previously (1). An Axopatch 200A
amplifier (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA) was used with on-line
compensation for series resistance and capacitance. The signals were
filtered at 5 kHz and analyzed using pCLAMP 6.0 software (Axon
Instruments). Pipettes with resistances of 3-5 M
were made from
thin walled borosilicate glass capillaries (WPI, Sarasota, FL).
Recordings were from isolated bipolar MLS-9 cells with relatively small
series resistances (4-15 M
), which were compensated to <5 M
,
and because the currents were <1000 pA, the maximal voltage error was
5 mV. Only cells exhibiting adequate voltage control were included, as
judged by mono-exponential decays for the capacitive current and
deactivation at very negative potentials. Curve fitting for kinetics
and voltage dependence used non-linear least squares routines in
Microcal Origin Version 5.0 (Microcal Software, Northampton, MA).
MLS-9 cells were plated in MEM on sterile glass coverslips at about
30% confluency, allowed to adhere
3 h, and then superfused during
recordings with a solution containing (in mM) 130 potassium aspartate, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 40 sucrose, and 5 D-glucose (pH 7.4, 300 mOsm). The pipette
solution contained 130 potassium aspartate, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 2 K2ATP, titrated with KOH to pH 7.2 (290 mOsm). Aspartate was used as the major anion to
reduce contamination by Cl
currents (29). All recordings
were made at 20-23 °C.
Chemicals--
The HERG blocker, E-4031, was prepared as a 10 mM stock solution in distilled water, stored at
20 °C,
and then diluted in bath solution to the final concentration.
Previously, we used the specific Src-inhibiting peptide,
src40-58, and we showed that the scrambled peptide
(src40-58s) was an inactive control (1). Thus, in the
present study, we used cells containing the scrambled peptide,
src40-58s, as a negative time-matched control for
experiments in which pipette solutions were supplemented with the
recombinant proteins, SHP-1 wt, SHP-1 S6, and SHP-1 Cys
Ser. All
peptides (synthesized at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto,
Canada) were prepared as concentrated aqueous stock solutions in 0.1% bovine serum albumin, stored at
80 °C, and then thawed and diluted in pipette solution just before use. The final pipette concentration of
each protein was 0.1 mg/ml. Pervanadate was prepared as a 200 mM stock solution in distilled water, stored at
20 °C,
and then diluted in bath solution to the final concentration.
Transfecting MLS-9 Cells--
The properties of the recombinant
SHP-1 proteins with differing catalytic activity and the mammalian
expression plasmids, pABA-neo (containing SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6), p4AD
(containing SHP-1 wt), p4AE (containing SHP-1 Cys
Ser), and
pRSV
gal have been described (26, 30). Each dish of MLS-9 cells was
transiently transfected with 2 µg/ml of a vector alone (pABA-neo or
pRSV
gal) or with SHP-1 wt, SHP-1 S6, or SHP-1 Cys
Ser, along
with 1 µg/ml pEGFP cDNA, using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) as
described previously (31). Patch clamp recordings were made from green
fluorescent cells 24-48 h after transfection. For biochemical
analyses, cells were harvested 24 h after transfection by scraping
and then lysed in ice-cold modified RIPA buffer (see below), and the
protein concentration of each cell lysate was determined using the
Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analyses--
To monitor
the tyrosine phosphorylation of native ERG-1, the proteins were
immunoprecipitated using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, and then
Western blots were probed for ERG-1, as follows. MLS-9 cells were lysed
in a solubilization buffer (20 min, 4 °C) that contained 1% Triton
X-100, 25 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaF, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM
Na3VO4, and the protease inhibitors leupeptin
(2 µg/ml), aprotinin (2 µg/ml), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride
(1 mM). The lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 × g (15 min, 4 °C) to remove cellular debris. The
supernatant was cleared by incubation with protein A/G-agarose (3 mg/ml, 1 h) (Calbiochem) and centrifuged to remove the agarose.
Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were immunoprecipitated from 100 µg
of total protein by incubating overnight at 4 °C with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20, Medicorp, Montreal, Quebec,
Canada) and then incubating for 3 h in protein A/G-agarose,
followed by centrifugation. The immunoprecipitates were washed three
times with ice-cold solubilization buffer containing 0.1% Triton X-100
and then eluted in 50 µl of gel-loading buffer containing 120 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 2%
-mercaptoethanol, 25%
glycerol, 0.01% bromphenol blue, and 1 mM
Na3VO4. For Western analysis, protein
concentrations were measured as above, and then proteins were run on a
6.5% polyacrylamide gel, electrotransferred to nitrocellulose, and
blocked with 5% nonfat milk in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST).
The membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a polyclonal
anti-HERG (human homologue of ERG-1) antibody (1:160; Alomone Labs,
Jerusalem, Israel). After four washes with PBST, the membranes were
incubated (1 h, room temperature) with horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:3000; Cedarlane Labs,
Hornby, Ontario, Canada). Following another four washes with PBST,
labeled proteins were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL,
Amersham Biosciences) on XAR-2 film (Eastman Kodak Co.), and the
signals were quantified by densitometry (Bio-Rad model GS-670). In
parallel, Western blots were prepared using 50 µg of total protein
and probed with anti-cyclin D1/D2 (1:500;
Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.), and the signals were analyzed by
densitometry and used to normalize amounts of tyrosine-phosphorylated ERG-1. In addition, Western analysis was used to analyze the relative phosphotyrosine levels of ERG-1 protein using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10, Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) or
anti-HERG antibody on total cell lysates (20-40 µg) from vector control, SHP-1 wt, and SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants.
Co-immunoprecipitation analysis was also used to examine interactions
between native ERG-1 and SHP-1, between SHP-1 and Src tyrosine kinase,
and between ERG-1 and Src. MLS-9 cells were washed in PBS and then
lysed in 1 ml of ice-cold modified RIPA buffer, containing 1% Nonidet
P-40, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, aprotinin (1 µg/ml), leupeptin (1 µg/ml),
pepstatin (1 µg/ml), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF,
and complete protease inhibitor mixture tablets (2 tablets/100 ml;
Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Following a 20-min incubation on ice,
the lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. About 500 µg of solubilized protein was incubated
overnight at 4 °C with polyclonal anti-HERG antibody (1:83),
monoclonal anti-SHP-1 antibody (1:125; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa
Cruz, CA), or a monoclonal anti-Src antibody (1:125; Upstate
Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). The ERG-1, SHP-1, or Src
immunoprecipitates were incubated with 50 µl of a 50% slurry of
anti-rabbit or anti-mouse-agarose beads, as appropriate, and the
mixtures were rotated for 3 h or overnight at 4 °C. The
immunoprecipitates were washed three times in modified RIPA buffer,
eluted in 50 µl of gel-loading buffer, and separated by SDS-PAGE, as
described above. They were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-HERG
(1:160), anti-SHP-1 (1:250), or anti-Src antibody (1:250), with the
appropriate secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG) and visualized by ECL. Parallel Western
blots labeled with anti-cyclin D1/D2 (1:500;
Upstate Biotechnology) were used to normalize the amounts of ERG-1,
Src, and SHP-1. Reagents were from Sigma, unless otherwise indicated.
Statistical Analysis--
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. When appropriate, we used the two-tailed Student's paired
t test or ordinary analysis of variance tests with the
Bonferroni corrections multiple-comparison post-test, performed with
INSTAT2 software (GraphPad Instat Software, version 2.04, Sunnyvale,
CA). In either case, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
RESULTS |
SHP-1 Proteins Modulate the ERG Current--
There are two main
mechanisms whereby SHP-1 might modulate ERG functions. (i) An ITIM
consensus sequence is present in the cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus of
the ERG-1 protein (see Introduction). If SHP-1 interacts with ERG-1 via
this ITIM motif, we would expect it to down-regulate the ERG current.
(ii) We showed previously that in MLS-9 cells, activated c-Src, and
transfected, constitutively active v-Src increase the ERG current (1).
It has been reported that SHP-1 relieves the auto-inhibition of c-Src,
thereby activating it (32). Thus, it is possible that SHP-1 would
increase ERG current by activating c-Src. To distinguish between these
possibilities, we used two approaches. To assess the functional role of
SHP-1 in regulating the ERG current in MLS-9 cells, we used whole-cell recordings with purified SHP-1 wt or mutant proteins in the pipette or
transient transfections with SHP-1 wt, mutant constructs.
Recombinant His-tagged SHP-1 wt and mutant SHP-1 S6 and SHP-1 Cys
Ser proteins were purified using Talon® (Clontech)
columns (26). We assessed acute effects of each SHP-1 protein on ERG current by including it in the recording pipette solution. Scrambled src40-58 (src40-58s) peptide, which did not
affect the ERG current (Fig. 1), was used
as a time-matched negative control (1). The peak currents at 30 min
were 374.5 ± 48.5 pA versus 403.6 ± 39 pA with
and without src40-58s, respectively (n = 7, p > 0.05). Spontaneous rundown was <10% at 30 min
compared with the initial current during the first 5 min of recording.
However, with either SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6 in the pipette solution, the
peak ERG currents decreased significantly and to similar plateau levels
(Fig. 1B). With SHP-1 wt, the average decrease was 53%,
i.e. 432.4 ± 50.6 pA for the first 5 min
versus 203 ± 53 pA at 30 min (n = 7, p < 0.01). With SHP-1 S6, the current decreased by
47%, 551.6 ± 68.3 pA for the first 5 min versus
290.8 ± 51 pA at 30 min (n = 6, p = 0.01). Conversely, SHP-1 Cys
Ser, which acts in a
dominant-negative manner, increased the ERG current by 97% from
443.6 ± 27.4 pA in the first 5 min to 872.1 ± 101 pA at 30 min (n = 4, p < 0.01). Thus, active
SHP-1 phosphatase reduces the native ERG current in MLS-9 cells.
Pervanadate, an inhibitor of protein tyrosine phosphatases, prevented
the action of SHP-1 (Fig. 2). The current was decreased by 52% (from 576 ± 86.8 pA in the first 5 min to 277.1 ± 50.3 pA after 30 min of treatment) by SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6 in the pipette (n = 4, p < 0.05).
It was restored to the control level after 500 µM
pervanadate was added to the bath (455.8 ± 97 pA,
n = 4, p > 0.05 versus
control cells).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Recombinant SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase
modulates ERG current in MLS-9 cells. A, ERG channels were
opened by holding the membrane potential at +20 mV (see text for
further explanation), and then inward ERG currents were evoked by
stepping to a test potential of 120 mV. Test pulses were delivered
every 60 s to monitor time-dependent changes in ERG
currents produced by the scrambled peptide (src40-58s) or
one of the SHP-1 recombinant proteins in the pipette (100 µg/ml):
wild type (SHP-1 wt), catalytically active (SHP-1 S6), and
substrate-trapping mutant (SHP-1 Cys Ser). For each cell, the
control current amplitude was calculated as the average of the first
five recordings, i.e. 0-5 min after establishing each
whole-cell recording (open squares). Currents are also shown
25-30 min after beginning each recording (closed squares)
and 10-15 min after bath-applying the HERG-selective blocker, E-4031
(3 µM) (circles). For each cell, the ERG
current was calculated as the E-4031-sensitive component. B,
summary of the peak ERG current at 25-30 min, normalized to the
initial average value (0-5 min). Values are mean ± S.E., with
the number of cells indicated on each bar. *, p < 0.05 compared with src40-58s at 25-30 min; #, p < 0.01 compared with value at 0-5 min with same protein.
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor,
pervanadate, reverses the inhibition by SHP-1. The ERG current was
recorded as in Fig. 1. A, representative current traces at
120 mV; 0-5 min after beginning the recording (open
square) with SHP-1 wt protein in the pipette (0.1 mg/ml), at
25-30 min (closed square), 20 min after adding 500 µM pervanadate to the bath solution (open
circle), and 10 min after adding 3 µM E-4031 to the
bath (closed circle). B, summary of the current
amplitudes after 25-30 min of recordings normalized to the current in
the first 0-5 min. Pipettes contained either SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6
(n = 2 each) proteins (0.1 mg/ml). Values are mean ± S.E. for the number of cells indicated. *, p < 0.05 compared with the current at 0-5 min; #, p < 0.01 compared with the current without pervanadate.
|
|
Modulation of the ERG Current by Transient Transfection with SHP-1
Constructs--
MLS-9 cells were co-transfected with a construct
expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (pEGFP-C1) and an empty
vector (control) or a vector containing SHP-1 wt, SHP-1 S6, or SHP-1 Cys
Ser. We confirmed that transfections increased SHP-1
expression. Compared with vector controls, the amount of SHP-1
immunoreactive protein in cell batches increased by 2.1-fold after
SHP-1 wt and 2.2-fold after SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfection (Fig.
3). This is a modest underestimate of the
increase in protein per cell, because the transfection efficiencies
were 60-75%. At 24-48 h after transfection, recordings were made
from cells expressing green fluorescent protein (Fig.
4). There was no change in cell size with
the different treatments, i.e. the average membrane
capacitance was 17.5 ± 1.8 pF (n = 10) in vector
control cells, 15.6 ± 0.9 pF (n = 21) in SHP-1
wt, 20.3 ± 1.5 pF (n = 12) in SHP-1 S6, and
16.9 ± 0.8 pF (n = 6) in SHP-1 Cys
Ser-transfected cells (Student's t test with Bonferroni
post-hoc test; p > 0.05). However, compared with vector controls (31.3 ± 2.4 pA/pF, n = 10), the
peak ERG current density in SHP-1 wt (20.3 ± 1.8 pA/pF,
n = 21) and SHP-1 S6 transfectants (20.0 ± 1.9 pA/pF, n = 12) was reduced by 35-40%
(p < 0.01 versus vector control). The
current in SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants was unchanged (29.0 ± 2.4 pA/pF, n = 6). Moreover, the changes in current
density were not caused by decreases in channel or Src proteins.
Rather, ERG-1 protein increased by 2.1-fold in SHP-1 wt and 1.8-fold in
SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants (Fig. 3, p < 0.05 versus vector controls), and Src levels were not decreased (data not shown).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
SHP-1 transfections increase expression of
SHP-1 and ERG-1. MLS-9 cells were transfected with vector, SHP-1
wt, or SHP-1 Cys Ser and then lysed 24 h after transfection.
A, Western blots of cell lysates (50 µg of total protein
loaded) were probed with antibodies against SHP-1 (67 kDa), ERG-1 (130 and ~145 kDa), or cyclin D1/D2 (36 kDa).
Normally the upper ERG-1 band is broad (2nd and 3rd
lanes; see also Fig. 8A), and it might obscure a
doublet at about 145 and 147 kDa (e.g. 1st lane).
The reason for two bands of such similar size is not known, but one
possibility is that they represent differential phosphorylation.
B and C, Western blots like those in A
were analyzed by densitometry, and the relative amounts of SHP-1 and
ERG-1 proteins were normalized to cyclin D1/D2.
Values are mean ± S.E. for the number of cells indicated. *,
p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, compared with
vector-transfected cells.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Transfected SHP-1 variants modify the ERG
current. For all transfectants, peak ERG currents at 120 mV,
from a +20 mV holding potential, were monitored 5-10 min after
establishing recordings. Left, representative current traces
from one cell each transfected with vector (open square),
SHP-1 wt (closed square), SHP-1 S6 (closed
circle), and SHP-1 Cys Ser (open circle).
Right, currents from same cells, normalized to cell
capacitance (current densities). At the end of each recording, currents
were blocked with 3 µM E-4031 (not shown).
|
|
Effects of SHP-1 Transfectants on ERG Current Kinetics--
In
principle, an SHP-1-induced decrease in ERG current could result from
changes in voltage dependence or from faster deactivation or
inactivation. We found previously (1) that ERG channel closing was
slower when MLS-9 cells were transfected with an active v-Src tyrosine
kinase, and this contributed to the observed increase in current.
Therefore, we used transiently transfected MLS-9 cells to assess
whether SHP-1 caused changes in biophysical properties of the currents.
By using a voltage protocol (Fig.
5A) previously used to study
HERG current deactivation (channel closing) (11), we found that the
average time constants (Fig. 5C) were the same for vector control, SHP-1 wt, and SHP-1 S6 transfectants at all potentials tested.
For all transfectants, deactivation was well fitted by a
mono-exponential function. At
120 mV, the deactivation time constants
were 98.8 ± 25.8 ms for the vector control (n = 8), 98.1 ± 12.3 ms for SHP-1 wt (n = 15), and
87.0 ± 6.0 ms for SHP-1 S6 (n = 17)
(p > 0.05 (Student's t test with
Bonferroni post hoc test; p > 0.05). The time course
of current activation was not assessed because there was no outward
activating current under the conditions of our study, i.e.
normal internal and high external K+. Current inactivation
was examined using a triple-pulse protocol (1, 8, 33, 34). From
80 to
+40 mV (Fig. 5B), inactivation dominated the current
relaxation, which was well fitted by a mono-exponential function. Below
these voltages, inactivation was not assessed because deactivation was
significant (see Fig. 5A). The time constants were
indistinguishable between control and SHP-1 transfectants over this
voltage range (Fig. 5D). Together, these data suggest that
SHP-1 does not exert its effects by changing the kinetics of channel
closing or inactivation.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SHP-1 transfections do not alter ERG current
deactivation or inactivation kinetics. A, channels were
first activated (and inactivated) during a 300-ms-long pulse to +80 mV
(holding potential, 80 mV), and then inactivation was removed by
pulses to 100, 120, 140, and 160 mV (see inset for
voltage protocol). Scale bars apply to all traces. The
deactivation (closing) time course was monitored by fitting the current
relaxations to a mono-exponential function: It = As
exp( t/ s), where
It is the tail current at time t;
As is the initial current amplitude, and
s is the time constant of deactivation. B, to
monitor inactivation, the membrane potential was first depolarized to
+20 mV for 1 s to fully activate (and inactivate) the channels.
Then, a brief (20 ms) hyperpolarizing step to 160 mV was applied to
allow rapid recovery from inactivation, followed by depolarizing steps
to +40, 0, 40, 80, and 120 mV (see inset for voltage
protocol). Scale bars apply to all traces. The current
relaxation at each voltage was fitted to a mono-exponential, as above.
C, comparison of deactivation time constants for vector
control (n = 8), SHP-1 wt (n = 15), and
SHP-1 S6 (n = 17) transfectants. Values are shown as
mean ± S.E., and the Bonferroni p values were
p > 0.05 at all test voltages. D,
comparison of the inactivation time constants for vector control
(n = 7), SHP-1 wt (n = 9), or SHP-1 S6
(n = 12) transfectants. Values (mean ± S.E.) did
not differ significantly (Bonferroni p values
p > 0.05 for all test voltages).
|
|
SHP-1 Transfection Alters Specific Voltage-dependent
Properties of the ERG Current--
We observed previously (1) that
when Src tyrosine kinase was activated in MLS-9 cells, a negative shift
in the ERG activation versus voltage relation increased the
tonically activated "window" current. Thus, we asked whether SHP-1
decreases the ERG current by an opposite shift in voltage dependence.
The Voltage Dependence of Inactivation Is Not
Changed--
Steady-state inactivation was monitored using a well
established protocol (3, 8) wherein channels were activated (and inactivated) by a 1-s-long pre-pulse to +20 mV, and the peak inward current was measured at various test potentials to assess relief from
inactivation (Fig. 6A). For
each cell, a current versus voltage (I-V) relation was
constructed (not shown), and the maximal slope conductance
(Gmax) was calculated from a linear fit to the
I-V plot between
140 and
80 mV. We then determined the voltage
dependence of the channel rectification factor, which reflects the
deviation of the current from the value expected if there is no
inactivation. The resulting averaged data (Fig. 6B) were
fitted with Boltzmann equations, and no differences in steady-state
inactivation (rectification) were observed for any of the transfection
conditions. The values obtained for the vector control-transfected
cells were very similar to those reported for transfected wild type rat
ERG-1 channels (8). The voltages at which inactivation was half-maximal
(V1/2,inact) were
50.9 ± 3.1 (vector control, n = 11),
51.3 ± 2.9 (SHP-1 wt,
n = 15),
54.4 ± 3.8 (SHP1 S6, n = 12), and
46.7 ± 2.5 mV (SHP-1 Cys
Ser, n = 6). The slope factors describing the steepness of the voltage
dependence (kinact) were 21.5 ± 2.8, 20.6 ± 3.2, 24.5 ± 4.1, and 20.2 ± 2.8 mV for vector,
SHP-1 wt, SHP-1 S6, and SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants,
respectively.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
SHP-1 transfections alter the voltage
dependence of the ERG current. A, steady-state inactivation
was examined by stepping to +20 mV for 1 s and then stepping to
various test voltages, at which the tail currents were measured.
Representative currents are shown for vector control and SHP-1 Cys Ser transfectants before (upper panel) and 10 min after 3 µM E-4031 was added to the bath (lower panel).
B, the rectification factor (R) was calculated by
first constructing the fully activated I-V relationship from data like
those in A. The maximal slope conductance
(Gslope) was calculated from a linear fit to the
I-V relation between 140 and 80 mV (not shown), and R
was calculated from R = I/(Gslope(Vm EK)), where Vm is the test
potential and EK is the K+ reversal
potential ( 6.7 mV). Values shown are mean ± S.E., and the
points were fitted with the Boltzmann equation (see below).
C, activation versus voltage was measured as
before (8, 15). The membrane potential was held for 20 s
(conditioning pre-pulse) at voltages between +40 and 100 mV and then
stepped to the test potential ( 120 mV) to relieve inactivation. The
peak amplitude of each inward tail current reflects channel activation
during the conditioning pulse. Representative currents are shown for
vector control and SHP-1 Cys Ser transfectants in the absence
(upper panel) or presence of 3 µM E-4031
(lower panel). D, peak conductance
versus voltage curves, calculated from data like those in
C. Values are mean ± S.E., fitted with a Boltzmann
equation: G/Gmax = 1/(1 + exp((V V1/2,act)/kact)).
E, steady-state conductance versus voltage
(window current) was calculated by multiplying each fitted
G-V curve (from D) by its respective
rectification factor (R) curve (from B).
|
|
Changes in Voltage Dependence of Activation Alter the "Window
Current"--
Peak conductance versus voltage curves were
measured using a protocol similar to that described previously (5, 15),
i.e. channels were activated during depolarizing pre-pulses
(Fig. 6C), and the peak amplitude of each tail current was
proportional to channel activation during the pre-pulse. These currents
were used to calculate peak conductance versus voltage
curves and then averaged and fit with the Boltzmann equation (see
legend). SHP-1 transfections significantly shifted the peak conductance
versus voltage curves to more positive voltages (Fig.
6D); the midpoints for activation (V1/2,act) were
28.4 ± 1.6 (vector, n = 5),
20.8 ± 0.9 (SHP-1 wt,
n = 9),
22.3 ±1.4 (SHP-1 S6, n = 3),
and
17.5 ± 0.7 mV (SHP-1 Cys
Ser, n = 6) (p < 0.0001). The slope factors were not affected;
kact values were 9.9 ± 1.3, 8.1 ± 0.9, 9.4 ± 1.3, and 8.8 ± 0.7 mV for vector, SHP-1 wt,
SHP-1 S6, and SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants, respectively.
Differences following SHP-1 transfections are relevant to the
physiological functioning of this current. Considering that microglia
do not produce over-shooting action potentials, the steady-state
channel activity (proportion of tonically activated K+
channels) is expected to be a major factor in determining their contribution to cell function. To calculate the steady-state fraction of open channels (window current) (Fig. 6E), the
fraction of channels inactivated at each voltage was multiplied by the
fraction of channels activated at the same voltage. The steady-state
conductance (window current) of ERG in MLS-9 cells (Fig. 6E)
was very similar in shape and amplitude to heterologously expressed
ERG-1 channels (8) with a peak of about 11% of the maximal
conductance. For all SHP-1 transfectants, the steady-state conductance
decreased to 7-9%, and the voltage at which the peak occurred was
shifted by +6 to +10 mV compared with the vector controls. Together,
these changes predict that SHP-1-transfected cells will have less
tonically active current near the membrane potentials reported for
microglia cells.
Pervanadate Changes the Voltage Dependence of ERG
Current--
Because the decrease in peak ERG current by SHP-1 was
reversed by pervanadate (Fig. 2), we asked whether pervanadate also affects the voltage dependence, with or without SHP-1 transfection. In
MLS-9 cells transfected with vector alone (Fig.
7A), pervanadate shifted the
conductance versus voltage (G-V) curve by
16
mV, without changing the slope factor. Specifically, the
V1/2,act shifted from
23.5 ± 0.9 to
39.6 ± 1.2 mV after pervanadate treatment (p < 0.001, n = 3), whereas
kact was 13.6 ± 0.7 mV before and 16.1 ± 1.0 mV after pervanadate (p > 0.05, n = 3). In contrast, the rectification factor (R)
versus voltage curve was not affected by pervanadate:
V1/2,inact was
55.0 ± 3.7 versus
60.3 ± 4.2 mV (p > 0.05, n = 4), and kinact was 24.5 ± 4.4 mV before and 22.6 ± 4.6 mV (p > 0.05, n = 4) after pervanadate. Thus, the significant
hyperpolarizing shift in activation was responsible for increased tonic
channel activity (from 8 to 12% of the maximal conductance, see
Fig. 7A, inset) and the
16.2 mV shift in
the voltage at which the current was maximal (from
22.4 to
38.6
mV). As a result, the current at the end of long test pulses to
120
mV (holding potential, +20 mV) increased by ~1.5-fold (data not
shown). These results suggest that endogenous tyrosine phosphatase(s),
such as SHP-1, counteract the effects on ERG current of endogenous
tyrosine kinases.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor,
pervanadate, abrogates the effect of SHP-1 transfection. The
rectification factor (R) versus voltage,
conductance versus voltage, and steady-state window currents
were calculated as in Fig. 6, for cells transfected with vector alone
(A) or with SHP-1 wt (B). The data represent
mean ± S.E. from 3 to 6 cells. After a control set of recordings
was made (closed symbols), 500 µM pervanadate
was perfused into the bath for 20 min, and the recordings were repeated
(open symbols). Insets, relative changes in the
amplitude and voltage dependence of the window current induced by
pervanadate.
|
|
In cells transfected with SHP-1 wt (Fig. 7B), pervanadate
shifted the midpoint of activation
(V1/2,act) by
15 mV from
21.4 ± 0.8 to
36.8 ± 3.2 mV (p < 0.01, n = 3). Pervanadate greatly increased the slope factor
for activation, kact, i.e. it reduced
the apparent voltage sensitivity from 8.0 ± 0.8 to 23.7 ± 2.5 mV (p < 0.005, n = 3). The
mid-point for inactivation (V1/2,inact) was not
significantly changed,
49.4 ± 5.3 before versus
57.7 ± 7.4 mV after pervanadate (p > 0.05, n = 6), nor was the slope factor for inactivation
changed; kinact was 29.2 ± 6.6 mV before
and 30.7 ± 9.8 mV after pervanadate (p > 0.05, n = 6). Together, these results show that pervanadate increased the voltage range for the window current (Fig. 7B,
inset) mainly by changing the voltage dependence of
activation. Pervanadate increased the peak of the steady-state
conductance from 9 to 12% of the maximal conductance and increased by
~4-fold the current measured at the end of a 750-ms test pulse to
120 mV (from a holding potential of +20 mV) (not shown). Pervanadate
was more effective in SHP-1-transfected cells, producing a
27 mV
shift in the voltage for peak channel activity, compared with a
16 mV
shift in vector control cells.
ERG-1 Protein Constitutively Interacts with SHP-1 and Src in MLS-9
Cells--
We first confirmed key earlier findings (1) for the MLS-9
cell batches used in the present study, i.e. that the
anti-HERG antibody immunoprecipitated ERG-1 protein (Fig.
8A) and that ERG-1 constitutively interacts with Src in these cells (Fig. 8B).
Because an ITIM (Leu-Thr-Tyr(P)829-Cys-Asp-Leu)
motif is present in the cyclic nucleotide-binding domain of ERG-1, and
the current was down-regulated by SHP-1, we next assessed whether SHP-1
associates with ERG-1 protein. MLS-9 lysates were immunoprecipitated
with an anti-HERG antibody, and then the immunoprecipitates were run on
SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with an anti-SHP-1
antibody. SHP-1 was co-immunoprecipitated with ERG-1 in MLS-9 cells
(Fig. 8C). This is the first demonstration of interaction
between SHP-1 and an ion channel. Together with our functional studies
showing that pervanadate reverses the inhibitory effects of SHP-1 wt on
ERG currents, these results suggest that ERG-1 is a substrate for SHP-1. We showed previously (1) that ERG-1 is also a substrate for Src,
but it remains to be established whether all three proteins interact in
a single complex.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
ERG-1 protein constitutively interacts with
SHP-1 and Src in MLS-9 cells. A, rat ERG-1 protein in MLS-9
cells. Anti-HERG polyclonal antibody that recognizes ERG-1 was used to
immunoprecipitate (IP) protein (2nd lane) from
MLS-9 lysates containing ~500 µg of total protein and to probe the
resulting Western blot (WB). Typical ERG-1 bands were
present at about 130 and 145 kDa, with larger amounts of the higher
molecular weight band in both immunoprecipitates and in the MLS-9
lysate (containing 50 µg of total protein, 3rd lane). No
bands were seen when the immunoprecipitating antibody was omitted
(1st lane). B, ERG-1 immunoprecipitates, probed
with a monoclonal anti-Src antibody, contain Src protein tyrosine
kinase (1st lane). Src was also detected in the MLS-9 cell
lysate (2nd lane). C, ERG-1 immunoprecipitates
contained SHP-1 phosphatase (2nd lane), as did the MLS-9
cell lysate (3rd lane). No band was seen when the
immunoprecipitating anti-HERG antibody was omitted (1st
lane).
|
|
Elevated Tyrosine Phosphorylation in SHP-1 Cys
Ser
Transfectants--
As shown above, SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6 transfection
significantly reduced the ERG current density, which was unchanged in
SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants (Fig. 4). Thus, we asked whether SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfection modified the tyrosine
phosphorylation status of the ERG-1 protein. More phosphorylation is
expected if the substrate-trapping mutant, SHP-1 Cys
Ser, protects
phosphotyrosines in the target protein from dephosphorylation by
endogenous phosphatases. The relative phosphotyrosine levels were first
compared between vector control, SHP-1 wt, and SHP-1 Cys
Ser
transfectants by probing Western blots of MLS-9 lysates from these
transfectants with anti-phosphotyrosine or anti-HERG antibody. There
was a characteristic doublet at about 130 and 145 kDa with more
tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in the SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants
(Fig. 9A, lanes
3 and 6). Next, tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins
were immunoprecipitated with an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, run on
SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose, and the Western blot was
probed with an anti-HERG antibody (Fig. 9B). For comparison,
the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated ERG-1 were standardized to the
cyclin D1/D2 levels in the lysates used for
immunoprecipitation. Although cyclin D1/D2 is
commonly used for standardizing Western blots, its expression is linked to the cell cycle (35), likely explaining its variable expression after
SHP-1 wt transfection (compare Fig. 3A with Fig.
9B). However, as another control, we found no change in
levels of the signaling molecules, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase or
SHP-2 phosphatase (data not shown). When compared with vector controls,
the levels of phosphorylated ERG-1 protein increased about 2-fold in
SHP-1 Cys
Ser and decreased about 4-fold in SHP-1 wt transfectants. Thus, ERG-1 protein appears to be a substrate for SHP-1.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
ERG-1 protein is a novel SHP-1
substrate. MLS-9 cells were transfected with vector, SHP-1 wt, or
the substrate-trapping mutant, SHP-1 Cys Ser, and then lysed
24 h after transfection (see "Experimental Procedures").
A, Western blots show differential expression of
tyrosine-phosphorylated ERG-1 protein in SHP-1 wt and SHP-1 Cys Ser
transfectants. The same lane numbers were used for the left
panel (probed with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, 4G10) and
the right panel, which was stripped and re-probed with
anti-HERG. Amounts of total protein loaded are as follows: vector
controls (40 µg, lane 1; 20 µg, lane
4), SHP-1 wt transfectants (40 µg, lane 2; 20 µg,
lane 5), and SHP-1 Cys Ser transfectants (40 µg,
lane 3; 20 µg, lane 6). B, ERG-1
proteins are hyper-phosphorylated at tyrosine in SHP-1 Cys Ser
transfectants, and hypo-phosphorylated in SHP-1 wt transfectants. MLS-9
cell lysates (100 µg of total protein) were immunoprecipitated with
an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20), and Western blots were probed
with the anti-HERG antibody. To standardize the levels, a Western blot
of the MLS-9 lysates (50 µg of total protein) was probed with
anti-cyclin D1/D2 antibody (lower
panel), and the bands were analyzed by densitometry. C,
summary of relative phosphotyrosine levels of ERG-1 protein. Values are
mean ± S.E. for the number of independent determinations
indicated on each bar. #, p < 0.05 versus vector control; **, p < 0.01 versus SHP-1 Cys Ser.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Physiological Relevance of SHP-1 Effects on the ERG
Current--
We observed previously (1) up-regulation of ERG current
by Src, and this corresponded with increased tyrosine phosphorylation of the channel protein. The outcome of SHP-1 treatments cannot be
easily predicted because SHP-1 can up-regulate Src kinase activity, which is expected to have the opposite effect from direct
de-phosphorylation of the ERG protein. Our results are consistent with
an outcome dominated by direct effects of SHP-1 on the channel protein.
Namely, active forms of SHP-1 (SHP-1 wt, SHP-1 S6) are expected to
reduce tyrosine phosphorylation of the channel protein and decrease the ERG current, and these effects should be antagonized by the phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate. Our results are entirely consistent with this
mechanism, i.e. SHP-1 wt transfection decreased the channel phosphorylation, active SHP-1 forms decreased the maximal current (acute application or transfection), and pervanadate restored the
current. Conversely, the substrate-trapping mutant, SHP-1 Cys
Ser,
is expected to protect the channel protein and increase its tyrosine
phosphorylation level, as we observed after transfection. This should
increase the current, as was observed with SHP-1 Cys
Ser in the
pipette. The lack of effect after SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfection would
be expected if the levels of SHP-1 Cys
Ser protein expressed were
insufficient to counteract endogenous active SHP-1 proteins. After
SHP-1 transfection there was more ERG protein, thus an increase in
current was anticipated. The opposite was observed, which suggests that
SHP-1-dependent channel de-phosphorylation dominates under
these conditions. Although it has been reported that Src can be
activated by SHP-1 (32), this would have produced the opposite outcome
to that observed. Specifically, SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 S6 should have
increased the channel tyrosine phosphorylation, thereby increasing the
ERG current. The decrease in current in SHP-1 wt transfectants was not
due to a decrease in ERG-1 or Src protein. After transient transfection
with SHP-1 wt or SHP-1 Cys
Ser, both transfectants had increased
levels of SHP-1 and ERG-1 immunoreactive proteins, and Src was not
decreased. Our results strongly suggest that SHP-1 acts on the ERG-1
protein with functional consequences, and thus, ERG-1 is a novel SHP-1 substrate.
Disruption of SHP-1 tyrosine phosphatase function affects a wide range
of hematopoietic cell functions, usually increasing cell proliferation,
cell adhesion, and oxidative burst and decreasing programmed cell death
(for reviews see Refs. 36 and 37). Moreover, the capacity of SHP-1 to
down-regulate mitogenic signaling cascades is reflected in the
SHP-1-deficient "motheaten" phenotype of mice, whose granulocytes
and macrophages show marked proliferation in response to growth factor
stimulation (19, 38, 39). CSF-1 is a potent mitogen for microglia, and
after brain injury, CSF-1 and its receptor, c-Fms, are up-regulated in
microglia (for review see Ref. 40). Traumatic injury to the
central nervous system activates microglia and strongly
increases expression of SHP-1, which physically associates with and is
activated by c-Fms in these cells (17). Surprisingly, given the effects
of SHP-1 deficiency in the peripheral immune system of
"motheaten-viable" mice (38), decreased microglia proliferation was
observed (17).
Our data are the first to show modulation of an ion channel
by SHP-1, and the regulation we observed may have broader implications. SHP-1 is an important protein tyrosine phosphatase, which negatively regulates many cell-surface receptors, mainly for growth factors. HERG
plays an important role in heart functions (2-4), and we have evidence
it is involved in hematopoietic cancers (7). Thus, it is crucial to
understand how HERG functions are modulated and, in particular, the
role of tyrosine phosphorylation and dephosphorylation in HERG functions.
Biophysical Mechanisms Accounting for Changes in ERG
Current--
In principle, down-regulation of ERG currents by SHP-1
could result from any of several biophysical mechanisms as follows: (i)
decreased membrane area with the same channel density, (ii) decreased
single-channel conductance or number of channels, or (iii) altered
voltage dependence or kinetics of the channels. The first is ruled out
because there was no significant difference in membrane capacitance
among the transfection groups, and the second was not investigated
within the scope of the present study. We found that the third
mechanism contributes significantly.
A decrease in ERG current could result from faster
deactivation, slower activation, a negative shift of the voltage
dependence of inactivation, or a positive shift in the voltage
dependence of activation (41-43). Previously, we showed that
Src-linked tyrosine phosphorylation of ERG-1 increased the current,
partly by shifting the voltage dependence of activation to more
negative potentials and slowing channel closing (1). Kinetic changes do
not appear to account for the present results because active SHP-1
proteins in the pipette slowed deactivation, which is expected to
increase, not decrease, the current, and SHP-1 transfections did not
change either deactivation or inactivation rates. Although slower
channel activation could reduce the current, this is unlikely because the activating pre-pulses (1 or >30 s) were much longer than needed to
fully activate the channels at +20 mV (15). Instead, active SHP-1
enzymes acutely added to the pipette or overexpressed through transfection altered the voltage dependence of ERG activation and
decreased steady-state conductance. Active SHP-1 produced a positive
shift in the conductance versus voltage curve when the
channels were activated at physiologically relevant voltages (
10 mV
and below), making it harder to open the channels. Interestingly, when
the current was activated at positive potentials, no differences in the
conductance versus voltage curve were seen; thus, a decrease in the number of active channels might also occur in this voltage range. SHP-1 transfections did not change the slope factors for activation; therefore, the voltage sensitivity of the activation gate
was not apparently affected. Furthermore, the voltage dependence of
inactivation was not significantly affected by SHP-1 transfections or
pervanadate. Thus, changes in the steady-state conductance (calculated
from the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation) can account
for the reduced ERG current in SHP-1 wt and SHP-1 S6 transfectants and
after acute addition of these enzymes to the pipette. The increased
current in SHP-1 Cys
Ser transfectants cannot be explained by the
same process, because the voltage dependence was not changed in the
opposite direction.
Changes in ERG current activation induced by SHP-1 transfectants were
reversed by the phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate. This is consistent
with a mechanism wherein reducing channel de-phosphorylation by SHP-1
makes the ERG channels more active, just as we observed previously (1)
when channel phosphorylation was increased by Src. Moreover,
pervanadate expanded the steady-state activity over a voltage range
that is relevant to cells like microglia that lack classical action potentials.
Known structure-function relations of the HERG protein can help in
interpreting the effects of SHP-1 on the current in MLS-9 cells.
Activation of many voltage-gated K+ channels involves the
S4-S5 linker and the carboxyl-terminal half of the S6 domain. It is
thought that the voltage-sensing S4 domain changes conformation (44),
and the S4-S5 loop couples S4 movements to the activation gate (45). In
HERG, mutations in the S4-S5 loop shift the voltage dependence of
channel activation to more positive potentials (43, 46). HERG
activation apparently differs in that the amino terminus might bind to
the S4-S5 loop to stabilize the open channel (47). Consequently,
deletions or mutations in the amino terminus of HERG, including the
Per-Arnt-Sim domain, shift the voltage dependence of channel activation
to positive potentials (34, 41, 47-49). HERG inactivation is mediated by a region in or near the outer mouth of the channel (33, 41, 50-52).
The lack of effect of SHP-1 on ERG inactivation is not surprising
because potential targets of SHP-1 should be on the intracellular side
of the channel.
ERG-1 and SHP-1 as Part of a Signaling Complex--
Although we do
not know which site(s) on the ERG-1 channel are dephosphorylated by
SHP-1, the site may involve components of the activation gate because
SHP-1 was selective in shifting the voltage dependence of channel
activation. Our results are consistent with tyrosine phosphorylation
increasing the coupling between the amino terminus and the activation
gate, making the channel easier to open. The lack of effect on the
voltage dependence of inactivation supports earlier work showing that
in HERG, activation and inactivation mechanisms are not directly linked
(46, 52).
We propose the following model: SHP-1 reduces the ERG current by
selectively disrupting interactions between the amino terminus and the
S4-S5 linker through phosphorylation of specific amino-terminal tyrosine residues. Sequence analysis of ERG-1 reveals one
amino-terminal consensus site for tyrosine phosphorylation (RKVEIAFY)
and three sites (54YSRA, 329YRTI, and
405YSPF) corresponding to the YXX hydrophobic
motif responsible for tyrosine phosphorylation or direct binding of SH2
domains by Src family members (53). The 54YSRA sequence is
particularly interesting because it is within the Per-Arnt-Sim domain
(first 135 amino acids), which is thought to mediate protein-protein
interactions in a wide range of proteins (48, 49). In the future, it
will be important to determine whether this site is a target for
endogenous SHP-1. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis revealed physical
associations of SHP-1 with ERG-1 and SHP-1 with Src proteins, and we
previously demonstrated interaction between ERG-1 and Src (1). Our
results are consistent with a multimolecular complex that regulates ERG
channel function, but it remains to be determined whether ERG-1, Src,
and SHP-1 form a multimeric complex, and where the interactions occur.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful for X.-P. Zhu and S. Savedia-Cayabyab for superb assistance with some biochemical
experiments and to A. Martin for technical advice.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Heart and Stroke
Foundation of Ontario Grant T-3726, the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Grant MT-13657 (to L. C. S.), and National Cancer Institute of Canada Grant 11044 (to F. W. L. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Recipient of a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Research
traineeship. Present address: School of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied
Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Academic Quadrangle K9626, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: MC 9-415, Toronto
Western Hospital, 399 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8,
Canada. Tel.: 416-603-5800 (ext. 2052); Fax: 416-603-5745; E-mail:
schlicht@uhnres.utoronto.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208448200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HERG, human
ether-a-go-go-related gene;
Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory
motif;
MEM, minimal essential medium;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
SH2 domain, src homology 2 domain;
MEM, minimal essential medium;
wt, wild type;
M
, megohm;
CSF-1, colony-stimulating factor-1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cayabyab, F. S.,
and Schlichter, L. C.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
13673-13681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Curran, M. E.,
Splawski, I.,
Timothy, K. W.,
Vincent, G. M.,
Green, E. D.,
and Keating, M. T.
(1995)
Cell
80,
795-803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Sanguinetti, M. C.,
Jiang, C.,
Curran, M. E.,
and Keating, M. T.
(1995)
Cell
81,
299-307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Trudeau, M. C.,
Warmke, J. W.,
Ganetzky, B.,
and Robertson, G. A.
(1995)
Science
269,
92-95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Bianchi, L.,
Wible, B.,
Arcangeli, A.,
Taglialatela, M.,
Morra, F.,
Castaldo, P.,
Crociani, O.,
Rosati, B.,
Faravelli, L.,
Olivotto, M.,
and Wanke, E.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
815-822[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Pardo, L. A.,
del Camino, D.,
Sanchez, A.,
Alves, F.,
Bruggemann, A.,
Beckh, S.,
and Stuhmer, W.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5540-5547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Smith, G. A.,
Tsui, H. W.,
Newell, E. W.,
Jiang, X.,
Zhu, X. P.,
Tsui, F. W.,
and Schlichter, L. C.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
18528-18534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Shi, W.,
Wymore, R. S.,
Wang, H.-S.,
Pan, Z.,
Cohen, I. S.,
McKinnon, D.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
9423-9432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Arcangeli, A.,
Bianchi, L.,
Becchetti, A.,
Faravelli, L.,
Coronnello, M.,
Mini, E.,
Olivotto, M.,
and Wanke, E.
(1995)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
489,
455-471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Chiesa, N.,
Rosati, B.,
Arcangeli, A.,
Olivotto, M.,
and Wanke, E.
(1997)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
501,
313-318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Barros, F.,
Gómez-Varela, D.,
Vioria, C. G.,
Palomero, T.,
Giráldez, T.,
and De La Pena, P.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
511,
333-346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Bauer, C. K.,
Schafer, R.,
Schiemann, D.,
Reid, G.,
Hanganu, I.,
and Schwarz, J. R.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
148,
37-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Faravelli, L.,
Arcangeli, A.,
Olivotto, M.,
and Wanke, E.
(1996)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
496,
13-23[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Pennefather, P. S.,
Zhou, W.,
and DeCoursey, T. E.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
111,
795-805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Zhou, W.,
Cayabyab, F. S.,
Pennefather, P. S.,
Schlichter, L. C.,
and DeCoursey, T. E.
(1998)
J. Gen. Physiol.
111,
781-794[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Plutzky, J.,
Neel, B. G.,
and Rosenberg, R. D.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1123-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Horvat, A.,
Schwaiger, F.,
Hager, G.,
Brocker, F.,
Streif, R.,
Knyazev, P.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Kreutzberg, G. W.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
865-874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Yeung, Y. G.,
Berg, K. L.,
Pixley, F. J.,
Angeletti, R. H.,
and Stanley, E. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23447-23450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|