Contribution of the Box 1 and Box 2 Motifs of Cytokine Receptors
to Jak1 Association and Activation*
Anna
Usacheva
,
Raudel
Sandoval
,
Paul
Domanski§,
Sergei V.
Kotenko¶,
Keats
Nelms
,
Mark A.
Goldsmith**, and
Oscar
R.
Colamonici

From the
Department of Pharmacology, University of
Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612, § Inhibitex Inc.,
Alpharretta, Georgia 30004, the ¶ Department of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Dentistry New
Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, the
Immunogenomics Laboratory, John Curtin School of Medical
Research, Canberra City ACT2601, Canberra, Australia, and the
** Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology and School
of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California
94103
Received for publication, June 10, 2002, and in revised form, September 5, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Kinases of the Jak family (Jak1/2/3 and Tyk2)
interact with the membrane proximal domain of different cytokine
receptors and play a critical role in the activation of cytokine and
growth factor signaling pathways. In this report we demonstrate that both the Box 1 and Box 2 motif collaborate in the association and
activation of Jak1 by type I interferons. Mutational analysis of the
chain of type I interferon receptor (IFN
R
L/IFNAR2) revealed
that Box 1 plays a more significant role in activation than in the
association with Jak1. On the contrary, the Box 2 motif contributes
more to the association with Jak1 than to kinase activation.
Additionally, the study of the Jak1 binding sites on the IL2 receptor
(IL2R
), IFN
R
/IFNGR1, and IL10R
/IL10R1 chains suggests
that cytokine receptors have two different kinds of interaction with
Jak1. One form of interaction involves the Box 1 and the previously
described Box 2 motif, which we now designate as Box 2A, characterized
by the VEVI and LEVL sequences present in IFN
R
L/IFNAR2 and
IL2R
subunits, respectively. The second form of interaction requires
a motif termed Box 2B, which is present in the IFN
R
/IFNGR1
(SILLPKS) and IL10R
/IL10R1 (SVLLFKK) chains. Interestingly, Box 2B
localizes close to the membrane region (8-10 amino acids from
the membrane) similar to Box 1, whereas Box 2A is more distal (38-58
amino acids from the membrane).
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Activation of kinases of the Jak family (Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and
Tyk2) plays a pivotal role in signaling through cytokine receptors, including interferons (IFN)1
(1-3). The membrane proximal domain of cytokine and IFN receptors constitutively interacts with Jak kinases (1-3). The interaction between a given receptor and Jak is not specific, because the same Jak
can associate with and be activated by different receptors. However,
the absence of a distinct Jak cannot be compensated by another Jak as
has been demonstrated by the cytokine-specific phenotypes observed in
animals with targeted disruptions of these kinases (4-8).
The interaction between Jak2 and single subunit cytokine receptors
(i.e. erythropoietin receptor (EPOR), growth hormone
receptor, and prolactin receptor (PRL-R)) as well as heterodimeric
receptors (IFN
R and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor
receptor)/interleukin-3 and -5 receptors) has been extensively
characterized (9, 10). The membrane proximal region of cytokine
receptors that interact with Jak2 contains a highly conserved motif
termed Box 1 (see Fig. 1E), which is formed by a
proline-rich sequence located 6-10 amino acids after the transmembrane
domain (11-13). The consensus sequence for the Box 1 motif present in
single-subunit cytokine receptors can be described as follows:

PX(I/V)PXP(E/K) (
= hydrophobic residues). It is also important to point out that a
region within the cytoplasmic domain C-terminal from Box 1 contains a
second motif, Box 2, which is not so well defined. The amino acid
sequence more frequently found in the Box 2 motif is (V/L)E(V/L)L represented by
E
(see also Fig. 1E). The Box 2 motif is also present in single-chain cytokine receptors and is
required in some cases for full activation of Jak2 (14).
Interestingly, the binding sites for Jak1, Jak3, and Tyk2 are not so
well defined. The Tyk2 binding site on the
chain of IFN
R (or
IFNAR1) has only distant homology with other cytokine receptors (15,
16). Jak1 is activated by IFNs (IFN
/
and IFN
) and several
cytokines, including the IL6 (IL6, leukemia inhibitory factor, ciliary
neurotrophic factor, oncostatin M) and IL2 families (IL2, IL4, IL7,
IL9, and IL15) (17-25). The Jak1 binding site has been studied for a
few cytokine receptors and appears to be rather heterogeneous. For
example, the sequence 266LPKS269 of the
chain of IFN
R (or IFNGR1), which has at best distant similarity
to Box 1, revealed that only Pro267 was important for Jak1
binding (19). In the case of the IL2R
chain, a sequence with some
similarity to Box 1 and Box 2 appear to be important for Jak1 binding
(26). Mutations of the Box 2 motif in gp130 and IL2R
chains affect
not only binding but also activity (26-28). In comparison, initial
studies of the Box 1 of the IFN
R
L (or IFNAR2) chain suggested
that this motif by itself has a minimum contribution to Jak1 binding
(21). Interestingly, the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs of IFN
R
L are
separated by only 7 amino acids, whereas the distance between these two
motifs in the IL2R
and gp130 is 38 and 31 residues, respectively.
Although some of the cytokine receptor subunits that activate Jak1 have Box 1 and/or Box 2 motifs (i.e. gp130, IL2R
, and
IFN
R
L), others such as the IL10R
, and possibly the IFN
R
,
do not have easily definable Box 1 or Box 2 motifs. This variability in
the Jak1 binding sites of cytokine receptors also appears to be
accompanied by differences on the corresponding receptor binding
surfaces of Jak1 (29). Although all cytokine receptors require the JH7 and part of the JH6 domains of Jak1 for activation, distinct cytokine receptors interact with a second region of Jak1 that is
receptor-specific. For example, the second area of interaction for the
IL10R
is JH3, whereas IL2R
and IL4R
interact with JH4 and
JH5-6, respectively (29).
This variability in the Jak1 binding site among cytokine receptors
suggests that Jak1 could interact with different motifs in distinct
cytokine receptors. This type of model would be important to develop
therapeutic agents that may block Jak1 binding and/or function within
the context of some cytokine systems without disturbing Jak1 activation
by others. In this report, we sought to address whether there are
differences in Jak1 binding sites among cytokine receptors. We
characterized the kinase binding domain for two different types of
receptors that activate Jak1: (a) receptors such as the
IFN
R
L and IL2R
that contain Box 1 and Box 2 motifs and
(b) receptors that do not have either Box 1 or Box 2 motifs (i.e. IFN
R
and IL10
). Although in the case of the
IFN
R
L, Box 2 appears to contribute to the majority of Jak1
binding, its mutation did not affect Jak1 activation by IFN
.
Surprisingly, some mutations of Box 1 such as Pro289 and
Pro291 affected Jak1 binding and activation, whereas other
alterations such as the addition of a Pro in position 292 (N292P) or the inversion of Box 1 of IFN
R
L did not affect
Jak1 binding but impaired Jak1 activation. The Box 2 motif of the
IL2R
was also critical for binding to Jak1, whereas Box 1 cannot
interact with Jak1 in the absence of Box 2.
Interestingly, IL10R
and IFN
R
, which do not contain either Box
1 or Box 2 motifs, associate with Jak1 through a different motif that
is localized closer to the transmembrane region. Thus, these data
suggest that Jak1 interacts with cytokine receptors in two different
manners. One form of interaction involves both Box 1 and Box 2A motifs
(i.e. IL2R
and IFN
R
L chains). The Box 2A motif,
previously described as Box 2, is represented by a sequence formed by
hydrophobic, charged, hydrophobic, and hydrophobic amino acids
(i.e. VEVI or LEVL). The second form of interaction,
found in the IL10R
and IFN
R
/IFNGR1 chains, involves Box 2B, a
motif that is different from Box1 and Box 2A.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
IFNs and Antibodies--
Human recombinant IFN
2 and IFN
were kindly provided by Drs. M. Brunda (Hoffman-La Roche) and Ronald
Borden (Schering-Plough). The anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) and
the anti-Jak2 serum were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake
Placid, NY). The monoclonal antibodies against Jak1 and STAT1 were
purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).
GST Fusion Proteins--
The following GST fusion proteins
encoding full-length or truncated forms of the cytoplasmic domains of
cytokine receptor subunits were used for this study (see Fig. 1). 1)
GST-IFN
R
L265-515, GST-IFN
R
L265-375, and
GST-IFN
R
L300-375, encoding full-length and the previously
described Jak1 binding site with and without Box 1 of IFN
R
L (Fig.
1A), respectively (21). 2) GST-IL2R
encodes the
full-length cytoplasmic domain of the IL2R
chain, whereas
GST-IL2R
322 and GST-IL2R
265 encode truncations at amino acids 322 and 265 that containing Box 1 and Box 2, and Box 1 alone, respectively
(Fig. 1B). 3) GST-IFN
R
and GST-IFN
R
s
(IFN
R
, short) encode the entire cytoplasmic domain of
the IFN
R
/IFNGR1 chain and an N-terminal truncation that starts at
amino acid 270 after the LPKS sequence important for Jak1 binding (Fig.
1C). 4) GST-IL10R
and GST-IL10R
299 correspond to the
entire cytoplasmic domain of the IL10R
chain and a form truncated at
amino acid 299, respectively (Fig. 1D). Mutations introduced
into the Box 1 motif of IFN
R
L chain (Fig. 1A) include
Pro to Ala in positions 289, 291, and 294 (287AWPFPNLPP295,
mutated residues are underlined). We also produced mutations that make
Box 1 of IFN
R
L (287AWPFPNLPP295) closer
to that observed in receptors that bind Jak2 such as the introduction
of a Pro at position 292 (N292P,
(287AWPFPPLPP295), inversion of Box
1 motif from PXPXXP to
PXXPXP (RV mutation, from
287AWPFPNLPP295 to
287AWPLNPFPP295) and partial
substitution of Box 1 of IFN
R
L for the EPOR
(287AWPFPNLPP295 to
287AWPGIPSPP295). Point mutations
were generated by PCR using the overlap extension method or the
QuikChange kit (Stratagene) and were confirmed by sequencing. All GST
fusion proteins were produced as described previously (21), and the
amount used in each experiment was determined by Coomassie Blue
staining and/or immunoblotting with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody
(Transduction Laboratories).
Expression of Mutant Forms of the
L Subunit of the Type I
IFN-R in MouseL-929 Cells--
A mutation of the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs were generated as described above and subcloned into the
retroviral vector pLXSN. LpR
cells corresponding to mouse L-929
cells, which had been stably transfected with the
subunit of the
IFN
R (21), were infected with the pLXSN
L viruses packaged in
PA317 or BOSC23 cells. Clones were selected and grown in medium
containing G-418 (500 µg/ml) and hygromycin B (500 µg/ml). Receptor
expression was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis
after staining with the specific anti-
L antibody IFNaR
1 (30).
Immunoblotting--
Cells were treated with different
concentrations of the indicated IFNs for 10 min and subsequently
solubilized in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5% Triton X-100,
10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 100 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 200 µM sodium
orthovanadate). Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were performed
as described previously (21).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of a Jak1 Binding Site on the IFN
R
L
Chain--
We previously determined that the region delineated by
amino acids 300-346 contains the Jak1 binding site (21). In addition, the membrane proximal region of the IFN
R
L intracellular domain truncated after Asp315 maintained functional interaction
with Jak1 (31). To identify critical residues for the formation of the
Jak1 binding site, we performed a modified alanine scanning by
introducing two or three mutations into the GST
L300-375 wild type
construct. It is worth mentioning that this construct lacks the Box 1 motif of IFN
R
L (Fig. 1A,
residues 289-295), which was previously found to have a small
contribution to the interaction with Jak1 (21). GST
L300-375
constructs carrying these mutations were used to pull-down Jak1 from
U-266 cell lysates. Fig. 2A (upper
panel) shows that only a mutation involving residues 303-305
(lane 2, EVI) has a significant effect on the ability of
these fusion proteins to interact with Jak1. The lower panel
(Coomassie) shows that equal amounts of the different GST fusion
proteins were used. It is important to point out that the VEVI sequence
resembles the Box 2 motif that regulates Jak1 activity of other
cytokine receptors (see below) (26-28).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the GST fusion
protein encoding wild type and mutant
IFN R L,
IL2R ,
IFN R , and IL10R .
A-D, the wild type cytoplasmic domains (top of
each panel), including the Box 1 (dark box) and
Box 2 (gray box) motifs, are shown. The Pro (P)
critical for Jak1 binding to IFN R is shown in C. The
receptor residues included in each construct are indicated on
top. Deletions within the cytoplasmic domain are indicated
by a thin line. E, alignment of the Box 1 and Box
2 motifs of different cytokine receptors. The conserved residues are in
boldface. The conserved prolines (Pro) within Box 1 are
numbered 1-3, and the kinase associated with the receptor
is indicated on the right column. Notice that Pro #1 or #2
are always present in cytokine receptors that associate with Jak2,
whereas either one is absent in cytokine receptors that bind only Jak1
such as IFN R L, IL4R , and IL2R .
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The Box 2 motif of
IFN R L is critical for
Jak1 binding. A, upper panel,
GST L300-375 fusion proteins encoding two or three alanine mutations
of the indicated amino acids were used to pull down Jak1 from U-266
cells lysates. Jak1 was detected by immunoblotting with an anti-Jak1
monoclonal antibody. Pull-down with GST alone and immunoprecipitation
with an anti-Jak1 antibody were used as negative and positive controls,
respectively. The number of the amino acids mutated and the sequence
are indicated on the top and bottom of each
lane, respectively. Lower panel, Coomassie Blue
staining of the GST fusion proteins used in this experiment. The
migration of the GST L300-375 and GST are indicated. B,
upper panel, a similar experiment as in A, but
using GST L300-375 fusion proteins encoding single amino acid
substitutions. GST fusion proteins encoding full-length cytoplasmic
domain (lane 2, L) and a truncation at amino
acid 375 (lane 8, wt) without mutations were used
as positive controls. Two different clones of the V302A (lanes
4 and 5) and E303A (lanes 6 and
7) mutants were used. Lower panel, Coomassie Blue
staining of the GST fusion proteins used in this experiment.
|
|
To define precisely the individual amino acids involved in the
interaction with Jak1, we made GST
L300-375 constructs carrying individual mutations to Ala of residues 303-305, as well as the flanking residue 302. Fig. 2B shows that mutation of
Val302 (lanes 4 and 5) almost
eliminated Jak1 binding, whereas Ala mutations of Val304
(data not shown) and Ile305 (lanes 3) had a less
significant effect on the interaction between IFN
R
L and this
kinase. Mutation of Glu303 (lanes 6 and
7) had only a modest effect on the interaction with Jak1.
The lower panel (Coomassie) shows that equal amounts of the
different GST fusion proteins were used. Thus, the VEVI motif appears
to be critical for the interaction between Jak1 and IFN
R
L. This
finding was unexpected, because this motif partially overlaps with the
RACK1 binding site (residues 302-304 and 314-327) and expression of
full-length IFN
R
L containing mutations of Box 2 affects
activation of STAT1 and STAT2 but not Jak 1 (32). Thus, the finding
that Jak1 binding is affected by mutation of Box 2 in the context of
residues 300-375, but not in the context of the full-length receptor,
suggests that one or more regions within IFN
R
L other than amino
acids 300-375 should also contribute to Jak1 binding and activation.
Mutations of the Box 1 Motif of IFN
R
L Affect Jak1
Activation--
The logical candidate to contribute or collaborate
with Box 2 in Jak1 binding and activation is the Box 1 motif. The
minimal Jak1 binding previously detected with the Box 1 motif (21), in
the absence of Box 2, could be sufficient to support Jak1 binding and
activation in the context of a full-length receptor containing Box 2 mutations. Therefore, we next assessed the contribution of the Box 1 motif to Jak1 binding by introducing mutations within a GST
L265-375
that also contains the Box 2 motif. Fig.
3 shows that mutation of
Pro289 (lane 3) and Pro291
(lane 4) to Ala in Box 1 eliminated or decreased the
association of IFN
R
L with Jak1, respectively (compare lane
2 with lanes 3 and 4), whereas the mutation
Pro294 to Ala had no effect (compare lanes 2 and
6). Mutations Asn292 to Pro, EPOR, or RV, which
we used in an attempt to make Box 1 similar to the one that binds Jak2
(PXXPXP), did not have an effect on Jak1 binding
(lanes 5, 7, and 8, respectively). The effect on Jak1 binding observed by introducing mutations within Box 1 confirm that this motif plays a role in the interaction with Jak1
(21).

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Role of the Box 1 motif of
IFN R L in Jak1
binding. Mutations of the Box 1 motif were introduced in a GST L
encoding amino acids 265-375 of the cytoplasmic domain. The following
mutations were tested: P289A (Pro289 to Ala), P291A, P294A,
N292P, inversion of Box 1 (RV), and partial substitution of
Box 1 of IFN R L for Box 1 of the EPOR (see "Materials and
Methods"). Pull downs were performed as described in Fig. 2.
Upper panel, Western blot (WB) with anti-Jak1;
lower panel, WB with anti-GST. The solid and
open arrows indicate the migration of the GST L265-375
mutants and GST control, respectively.
|
|
To determine the role of Box 1 on Jak1 activation, mutations of Box 1 were introduced into full-length IFN
R
L and expressed using a
retroviral system. Clones were selected using G-418, and expression of
the different constructs was confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell
sorting analysis using a specific anti-IFN
R
L monoclonal antibody.
Fig. 4 shows representative examples of
the clones obtained. We next examined the activation of Jak1 in
response to human IFN
(huIFN
). Fig.
5A shows that mutation of
Pro289 or Pro291 to Ala produced a significant
decrease in activation of Jak1 by huIFN
when compared with control
muIFN
4 that activates the endogenous mouse receptor (compare
lanes 2 with 3, and 5 with 6). The decrease in Jak 1 activation correlates with the
decrease in binding observed in GST pull-down experiments (see Fig. 3). As expected, mutation of Pro294 did not affect Jak1
activation by huIFN
2 (compare lanes 8 and 9).
Surprisingly, there was no correlation between Jak1 binding and
activity for mutation Asn292 to Pro and RV, because
they did not affect binding but clearly affected kinase activity. The
activation of STAT1 and STAT2 (Fig. 5A, bottom
panels) correlated with the activation of Jak1 in the different
mutants. The finding, that mutations of Box 1 such as N292P do not
affect Jak1 binding in pull-down experiments but have an impact in Jak1
activation, prompted us to determine whether this mutation impairs the
association with the kinase in vivo. We studied the
interaction between IFN
R
L and Jak1 in cells stably expressing
mutation N292P by performing immunoprecipitation with anti-
L
antibodies followed by immunoblotting with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal
antibody. Fig. 5B demonstrates that there are no significant differences in the amount of Jak1 associated with IFN
R
L
mutated in Asn292 or a mutation of the receptor that
does not affect Jak1 activation (Fig. 5B, 292.9 and EPOR.4,
respectively). Moreover, mutation Asn292 to Pro did not
affect binding of STAT1 to IFN
R
L (data not shown) ruling out that
this mutation affects the interaction with other signaling components.
The finding that mutations that do not have a major impact in Jak1
association produced a decrease in kinase activation suggest that,
although the Box 1 motif participates in Jak1 binding, it plays a more
significant role in kinase activation (see "Discussion").

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression of
IFN R L Box 1 mutants
in mouse L-929 cells. Retroviral supernatants were packaged in
BOSC23 or PA317 cells and used to infect LpR cells as described
under "Materials and Methods." After selection in G418 (500 µg/ml), expression of the mutant receptor in different clones was
assessed using a monoclonal antibody directed against the chain of
IFN R (IFNaR 1, dashed line) or control IgG2a
(solid line) as previously described (32).
|
|

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mutations of Box 1 of
IFN R L affect Jak1
activation. A, cell lines expressing different
mutations of Box 1 were treated with huIFN 2 (h ) for 15 min at 37 °C. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP)
and Western blotted (WB) with the indicated antibodies.
MuIFN 4 (m ) was used as a positive control, because it
activates the endogenous mouse receptor. B, mutation N292P
of IFN R L does not affect Jak1 binding. Cell lysates obtained from
L-929 stable transfectants expressing mutations N292P and EPOR were
immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antibodies against IFN R L
( L), Jak1 (J1), or normal rabbit serum
(NR) and immunoblotted with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal
antibody.
|
|
Identification of Jak1 Binding Sites on the IL2R
--
Zhu
et al. (26) previously reported that some residues within
Box 1 and the first Leu within Box 2 affected Jak1 binding. We next
determined whether Box 1 and Box 2 of the IL2R
play the same role in
the association with Jak1. Because Box 1 of IFN
R
L alone is unable
to bind substantial amounts of Jak1, we truncated a GSTIL2R
after
the Box 1 motif to determine if Box 1 of IL2R
alone was able to
associate with Jak1. Fig. 6 shows that
Jak1 interacts with the full-length cytoplasmic domain of IL2R
(lane 2) and with a fusion protein truncated at residue 322 (lanes 3 and 4), which contains the Box 1 and Box
2 motifs. However, Jak1 does not interact with a more proximal
truncation (amino acid 265) that only includes the Box 1 motif
(lane 5). This result indicates that Box 1 of the IL2R
,
like Box 1 of IFN
R
L, is not sufficient for Jak1 binding.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The Box 2 motif of the IL2R
chain is important for Jak1 binding. A,
GSTIL2R wild type (lane 2) with truncation at amino acids
322 (lanes 3 and 4), and 265 containing only the
Box 1 motif (lane 5) were used to pull-down Jak1 from U-266
lysates (upper panel). Jak1 was detected by immunoblotting
with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal antibody. Pull down with GST alone and
immunoprecipitation with an anti-Jak1 antibody were used as negative
and positive control, respectively. Lower panel, Coomassie
Blue staining of the different IL2R chain proteins used in the
upper panel. The migration of the different GST fusion
protein is indicated (asterisk). B, similar
experiment as in A, but using GSTIL2R encoding
single-amino acid substitutions of the Box 2 motif (upper
panel). Lower panels, the filter was stripped and
re-probed with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody to show that similar
levels of GST fusion proteins were used.
|
|
Because the Box 2 motifs of IL2R
and IFN
R
L are very
similar (LEVL and VEVI, respectively), we also wanted to assess the contribution of the different amino acids of Box 2 of IL2R
to Jak1
binding. Fig. 6B (lane 2) shows that as in the
case of IFN
R
L, mutation of the first hydrophobic residue of this
motif (Leu299) results in a marked decrease in Jak1 binding
as previously reported (26), whereas mutations of the two other
hydrophobic amino acids (301VL302) or
Glu300 have a less significant effect (lanes
3-5) on the interaction with the kinase. The lower
panel (Fig. 6B, WB: GST) shows that similar
amounts of GST fusion proteins were used. These data suggest that the
function of the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs of IL2R
and IFN
R
L is
very similar. Box 1 by itself does not sustain efficient Jak1 binding,
and equivalent amino acids within Box 2 are important for the
association with Jak1. However, they differ in the impact that
mutations of Box 2 have on Jak1 activation, because substitution of
Leu299 of IL2R
completely abrogated Jak1 activation (26,
28), whereas the same mutation of IFN
R
L did not have any effect
(see "Discussion").
The IFN
R
and IL10R
Chains Use a Different Jak1 Binding
Motif--
We finally sought to address which regions are
important for Jak1 binding in receptors that do not contain Box 1 or
Box 2 motifs. The previously reported Jak1 binding site of the
IFN
R
is localized very close to the transmembrane region and does
not resemble the Box 1 motif of receptors that activate Jak2 or even the less conserved Box 1 of IFN
R
L or IL2R
(19). We produced GST fusion proteins encoding the entire cytoplasmic domain and a
deletion of the cytoplasmic region containing the previously described
Jak1 binding site (19) of the IFN
R
to confirm that the Jak1
binding site was indeed unique. Deletion of the region containing the
LPKS sequence (IFN
R
s) completely abrogated Jak1 binding (Fig.
7A, compare lanes 1 and 2), confirming that the binding site for this kinase
resides within the first 15 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain of
IFN
R
. This result suggests that Jak1 does not interact in the
same manner with all cytokine receptors. For instance, IFN
R
has a
Jak1 binding site that is very close to the transmembrane region (~10
amino acids) and is different from the typical Box 1 responsible
for Jak2 binding, the less conserved Box 1 observed in IL2R
and
IFN
R
L (Fig. 1E), and the Box 2 motif.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Characterization of the Jak1 binding site of
IFN R and
IL10R . A, Jak1 interact with
the membrane proximal domain of IFN R . The
GST-IFN R s (IFN R S, lane 2) encodes a
deletion of the first 17 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain
containing the LPKS motif. U-266 cell lysates were used as the source
for Jak1 protein. B, GST fusion proteins, encoding the
full-length cytoplasmic domain of L10R (lane 2) or
truncated at amino acid 299 (lanes 3 and 4), were
used to pull down Jak1 from U-266 lysates as in previous experiments.
C and D, characterization of the amino acids
important for Jak1 binding in the IL10R using constructs containing
mutations of three (C) or one (D) amino acid to
alanine. The indicated mutations were introduced in a GST fusion
protein encoding the full-length cytoplasmic region of the IL10R
chain. Lower panels (A-D), filters were stripped
and reprobed with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody. The
arrows in B show degradation products of the
full-length GSTIL10R .
|
|
We finally determined the Jak1 binding sequence used by the IL10R
chain, which, like the IFN
R
, contains neither a Box 1 nor Box 2 motif. Fig. 7B shows that GST fusion proteins,
encoding the full-length IL10R
, associate with Jak1 (Fig. 7,
A and B, lanes 3 and 2,
respectively). A fusion protein containing only the first 39 amino
acids of the cytoplasmic domain of IL10R
bound Jak1 as efficiently
as the full-length receptor (Fig. 7B, lanes 3 and
4). These data suggest that, like in the case of IFN
R
, the Jak1 binding site in the IL10R
may be close to the transmembrane region.
To further define the residues involved in Jak1 binding, we performed
mutagenesis using constructs in which 3 residues were simultaneously
mutated to Ala. Two of these GST fusion proteins carrying mutation of
residues 269-271 and 272-274 showed a significant decrease in Jak1
binding (Fig. 7C, lanes 3 and 4). A
decrease in Jak1 binding observed with a construct containing mutations of amino acids 266-268 (lane 2) is due to lower amounts of
this GST used in this experiment (Fig. 4C, lower
panel). The sequence SVLLFKK in the 269-274 region of the
IL10R
is similar to SIILPKS (amino acids 263-269) found in the
IFN
R
. These motifs are 8 and 10 amino acids from the membrane,
respectively. In the previous characterization of the Jak1 binding site
of IFN
R
(19), the first two hydrophobic residues
(Ile281 and Ile282) were not included in the
mutational analysis. We performed single point mutations of the first
two hydrophobic amino acids present in this motif
(269VL270) and Phe272 in the
IL10R
. Phe272 is in the same position as
Pro267 in the IFN
R
, which is critical for Jak1
binding. Fig. 7D shows that mutations of Leu270 and
Phe272 (lanes 3-5), but not substitution of
Val269 (lane 2), in IL10R
significantly
diminished Jak1 binding. These data suggest that IL10R
and
IFN
R
interact with Jak1 in a similar manner, which differs from
the interaction of Jak1 with IFN
R
L or IL2R
.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Ligand-induced dimerization of receptor subunits brings Jak
kinases into proximity allowing resting or low activity kinases to
become fully activated. This probably occurs through
transphosphorylation of tyrosines in the activation loop. Therefore,
the position of the kinases on cytokine receptor chains may be critical
to allow the proper conformation after receptor dimerization. The Box 1 motif is a proline-rich motif (33) in a hydrophobic context present in
most cytokine receptor chains that interact with Jak2. This motif is
invariably positioned 6-12 residues from the transmembrane domain
(Fig. 1E). The Box 1 motif on single-subunit cytokine
receptors (i.e. GH-R, EPOR, and PRL-R) (Fig. 1) consists of
two hydrophobic amino acids, proline #1, any amino acid, a valine or
isoleucine, proline #2, any amino acid, proline #3, and a charged
residue. In the case of multichain cytokine receptors that interact
with Jak2 such as IL3R
, IL5R
, GMCSFR, and
IFN
R
/IFNGR2, proline #3 may not be present (see Fig. 1,
granulocyte-macrophace colony stimulating factor receptor, IL3R
, and
IFN
R
).
The interaction between Jak1 and cytokine receptor subunits does not
appear to be so well defined. In most cases, the Box 1 motif is not as
conserved (i.e. IL2R
and IL4R
; see Fig. 1E, Box 1) or not present (i.e. IL10R
). In the
case of the IFN
R
chain, analysis of a region proximal to the
membrane (~15 residues) revealed that only mutation of
Pro267, within a motif with little homology to Box 1, affects Jak1 binding and activation. In contrast, the initial mapping
of the Jak1 binding site on the IFN
R
L chain revealed that a
region more distal from the membrane was more important for Jak1
binding than the Box 1 motif (21). These differences led us to question
whether the interaction between cytokine receptors and Jak1 follows
different rules than those for the association between single subunit
receptors and Jak2.
Interaction between Jak1 and IFN
R
L or IL2R
--
The Box 1 and Box2 motifs of the IFN
R
L chain, unlike in the IL2R
, are
very close to each other and probably contribute to the formation of
the binding site. It is likely that the Box 2 motif has the largest
area of contact with Jak1, because GST fusion proteins that do not
contain the Box 1 motif bind Jak1 almost as efficiently as wild type
(21). However, the contribution of Box 1 to the formation of the Jak1
binding site is demonstrated by the finding that mutations of
Pro289 or Pro291 decreases the interaction with
this kinase even in the presence of Box 2. However, even though both
motifs collaborate in Jak1 binding, Box 1 appears to be more important
for the regulation of kinase activity. This is supported by the finding
that kinase activation was affected even by mutations of Box 1 that did
not affect Jak1 binding.
The Box 2 motifs in IL2R
and IFN
R
L are very similar, and Ala
mutations of either motif appear to have equivalent effects on Jak1
binding. Moreover, the use of GST fusion proteins that contain only Box
1 revealed that neither Box 1 of IL2R
nor IFN
R
L could bind
substantial amounts of Jak1 by itself. However, unlike IL2R
(26,
28), mutations of Box 2 of IFN
R
L did not affect Jak1 activation.
It is possible that the distance separating the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs
in these receptors (7 and 38 residues for IFN
R
L and IL2R
,
respectively) results in a different type of interaction with Jak1.
This type of model is supported by the finding that slightly different
regions of Jak1 are required to associate with the IFN
R
L and
IL2R
chains (29).
IFN
R
and IL10R
Use a Different Jak1 Binding
Motif--
Unlike IFN
R
L and IL2R
, IFN
R
and IL10R
do
not have an identifiable Box 1 or Box 2 motif. This prompted us to
further characterize the interaction between Jak1 and these receptors. Our results indicate that the IL10R
has a Jak1 binding site close to
the transmembrane region that has some degree of similarity with
IFN
R
. Moreover, mutation of Phe272 of IL10R
, which
is the equivalent to Pro267 in IFN
R
, significantly
decreased the interaction with Jak1. Altogether, these data suggest
that there are at least two different types of interactions between
Jak1 and cytokine receptors. First, cytokine receptors such as IL2R
and IFN
R
L interact with Jak1 through the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs
that we will call Box 2A characterized by a
hydrophobic-charged-hydrophobic-hydrophobic sequence. The Box 1 in
these receptors is slightly different from Box 1 present in single
subunit receptors that activate Jak2 (see Fig. 1E). Second,
other cytokine receptors such as IL10R
and IFN
R
use a
different motif that is close to the membrane that we will call Box 2B.
The Box 2B motif is characterized by a core of 4 hydrophobic residues
flanked by a Ser and charged residues. However, mapping of the regions
of Jak1 involved in the interaction with cytokine receptors strongly
suggest that a region different from the Box 2B motif of the IL10R
also interacts with Jak1 (29). In the case of IFN
R
, a GST fusion
protein, encoding the entire cytoplasmic domain except Box 2B, failed
to interact with Jak1. These data suggest that Box 2B, at least in
IFN
R
, should be sufficient to sustain Jak1 binding and probably activation.
Contrary to what was observed with the interaction between Jak2 and Box
1, the position of the Jak1 binding domain within the cytoplasmic
region of cytokine receptors was more variable. This raises the
hypothesis that the positioning of the kinase within the cytoplasmic
domain may be important for correct kinase alignment after receptor
dimerization, which would allow transphosphorylation of the tyrosines
in the activation loop. In single subunit receptors, ligand binding
results in homodimerization and, therefore, Jak2 is always at the same
position in both members of the dimer. However, in heterodimeric
receptors, positioning may be more critical. In this scenario, the Jak1
binding site in IFN
R
is closer to the membrane to produce a
correct alignment with Jak2, which also interacts with a binding site
on the IFN
R
chain that is close to the membrane. This suggests
that the proximal Jak1 binding site on IFN
R
evolved to pair the
Jak2 site present in IFN
R
. The Tyk2 (34) and Jak1 binding sites
on the
and
L chains of IFN
R are also at similar distances
from the membrane (32 and 38 amino acids, respectively). This model
would predict that the Tyk2 binding site on the IL10R
(CRFB4) (35,
36) should be proximal to the membrane to match the membrane proximal
Jak1 site present on the IL10R
chain. It should be considered that
what we refer as "distance from the membrane" is only a relative
measurement, because we do not know the secondary and tertiary
structure of the cytoplasmic domain of these receptors. The finding
that dimerization of the EPOR per se is not enough for
activation may support the role of kinase orientation or stereo
conformation in receptor activation (37).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work has been supported by National Institutes of
Health Grants CA55079 and GM54709 (to O. R. C.), GM54351 (to
M. A. G.), and by State of New Jersey Commission of Cancer Research Grant 799-021 (to S. V. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Pharmacology, M/C868, University of Illinois, 835 S. Wolcott Ave.,
E403, Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-413-4113; Fax: 312-413-4140 or
312-996-1225; E-mail: ocolamon@uic.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205757200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IFN, interferon;
R, receptor;
huIFN, human IFN;
muIFN, murine IFN;
IL, interleukin;
EPOR, erythropoietin receptor;
PRL-R, prolactin receptor;
GH-R, growth
hormone receptor;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
STAT, signal transducers and activators
of transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schindler, S.,
and Darnell, J. J. E.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64,
621-651[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Ihle, J. N.
(1995)
Nature
337,
591-594
|
| 3.
|
Ihle, J. E.
(1996)
Cell
84,
331-334[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Rodig, S. J.,
Meraz, M. A.,
White, J. M.,
Lampe, P. A.,
Riley, J. K.,
Arthur, C. D.,
King, K. L.,
Sheehan, K. C. F.,
Yin, L.,
Pennica, D.,
Johnson, J. E. M.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1998)
Cell
93,
373-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Parganas, E.,
Wang, D.,
Stravopodis, D.,
Topham, D. J.,
Marine, J.-C.,
Teglund, S.,
Vanin, E. F.,
Bodner, S.,
Colamonici, O. R.,
van Deursen, J. M.,
Grosveld, G.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
385-395[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Neubauer, H.,
Cumano, A.,
Müller, M., Wu, H.,
Huffstadt, U.,
and Pfeffer, K.
(1998)
Cell
93,
397-409[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Shimoda, K.,
Kato, K.,
Aoki, K.,
Matsuda, T.,
Miyamoto, A.,
Shibamori, M.,
Yamashita, M.,
Numata, A.,
Takese, K.,
Kobayashi, S.,
Shibata, S.,
Asano, Y.,
Gondo, H.,
Sekiguchi, K.,
Nakayama, K.,
Nakayama, T.,
Okamura, T.,
Okamura, S.,
Niho, Y.,
and Nakayama, K.-i.
(2000)
Immunity
13,
561-571[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Karaghiosoff, M.,
Neubauer, H.,
Lassnig, C.,
Kovarik, P.,
Schindler, H.,
Pircher, H.,
McCoy, B.,
Bogdan, C.,
Decker, C.,
Brem, G.,
Pfeffer, K.,
and Muller, M.
(2000)
Immunity
13,
549-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Quelle, F. W.,
Silvennoinen, O., Yi, T.,
Tang, B.,
Miura, O.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1993)
Cell
74,
227-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
He, T.-C.,
Jiang, N.,
Zhuang, H.,
Quelle, D. E.,
and Wojchowski, D. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18291-18294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Miura, O.,
Cleveland, J. L.,
and Ihle, J. N.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1788-1795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Hackett, R. H.,
Wang, Y.-D.,
Sweitzer, S.,
Feldman, G.,
Wood, W. I.,
and Larner, A. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11128-11132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Joneja, B.,
and Wojchowski, D. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11176-11184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Colosi, P.,
Wong, K.,
Leong, S. R.,
and Wood, W. I.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
12617-12623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Yan, H.,
Krishnan, K.,
Lim, J. T. E.,
Contillo, L. G.,
and Krolewski, J. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cel. Biol.
16,
2074-2082[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Colamonici, O. R.,
Uyttendaele, H.,
Domanski, P.,
Yan, H.,
and Krolewski, J. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3518-3522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Stahl, N.,
Boulton, T. G.,
Farruggella, T., Ip, N. Y.,
Davis, S.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Quelle, F. W.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Barbieri, G.,
Pellegrini, S.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Yancopoulos, G. D.
(1994)
Science
263,
92-95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Lütticken, C.,
Wegenka, U. M.,
Yuan, J.,
Buschmann, J.,
Schindler, C.,
Ziemiecki, A.,
Harpur, A. J.,
Wilks, A. F.,
Yasukawa, K.,
Taga, T.,
Kishimoto, T.,
Barbieri, G.,
Pellegrini, S.,
Sendtner, M.,
Heinrich, P. C.,
and Horn, F.
(1994)
Science
263,
89-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Kaplan, D. H.,
Greenlund, A. C.,
Tanner, J. W.,
Shaw, A. S.,
and Schreiber, R. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9-12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Sakatsume, M.,
Igarashi, K.-i.,
Winestock, K. D.,
Garotta, G.,
Larner, A. C.,
and Finbloom, D. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17528-17534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Domanski, P.,
Nadeau, O. W.,
Fish, E.,
Kellum, M.,
Platanias, L. C.,
Pitha, P.,
and Colamonici, O. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26388-26393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Müller, M.,
Briscoe, J.,
Laxton, C.,
Guschin, D.,
Ziemiecki, A.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Harpur, A. G.,
Barbieri, G.,
Witthunh, B. A.,
Schindler, C.,
Pellegrini, S.,
Wilks, A. F.,
Ihle, J. N.,
Stark, G. R.,
and Kerr, I. M.
(1993)
Nature
366,
129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Miyazaki, T.,
Kawahara, A.,
Fujii, H.,
Nakagawa, Y.,
Minami, Y.,
Liu, Z.-J.,
Oishi, I.,
Silveinnoinen, O.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1994)
Science
266,
1045-1047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Yin, T.,
Tsang, M. L.-K.,
and Yang, Y.-C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
26614-26617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Nakamura, Y.,
Russel, S. M.,
Mess, S. A.,
Friedmann, M.,
Erdos, M.,
Francois, C.,
Jacques, Y.,
Adelstein, S.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1994)
Nature
369,
330-333[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Zhu, M.-h.,
Berry, J. A.,
Russell, S. M.,
and Leonard, W. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10719-10725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Narazaki, M.,
Witthuhn, B. A.,
Yoshida, K.,
Silveinnoinen, O.,
Yasukawa, K.,
Ihle, J. N.,
Kishimoto, Y.,
and Taga, T.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2285-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Goldsmith, M. A., Xu, W.,
Amaral, M. C.,
Kuczek, E. S.,
and Greene, W. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14698-14704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Usacheva, A.,
Kotenko, S.,
Witte, M. M.,
and Colamonici, O. R.
(2002)
J. Immunol.
169,
1302-1308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Colamonici, O. R.,
and Domanski, P.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10895-10899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Kotenko, S. V.,
Izotova, L. S.,
Mirochnitchenko, O. V.,
Lee, C.,
and Pestka, S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
96,
5007-5012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Usacheva, A.,
Smith, R.,
Baida, G. E.,
Croze, E.,
and Colamonici, O. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
22948-22953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
O'Neal, K. D.,
and Yu-Lee, L.-Y.
(1993)
Lymphokine Cytokine Res.
12,
309-312[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Yan, H.,
Piazza, F.,
Krishnan, K.,
Pine, R.,
and Krolewski, J. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4046-4051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kotenko, S. V.,
Izotova, L. S.,
Pollack, B. P.,
Muthukumaran, G.,
Paukku, K.,
Silvennoinen, O.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Pestka, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17174-17182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Kotenko, S. V.,
Krause, C. D.,
Izotova, L. S.,
Pollack, B. P., Wu, W.,
and Pestka, S.
(1997)
EMBO
19,
5894-5903[CrossRef]
|
| 37.
|
Livnah, O.,
Johnson, D. L.,
Stura, E. A.,
Farrell, F. X.,
Barbone, F. P.,
You, Y.,
Liu, K. D.,
Goldsmith, M. A., He, W.,
Krause, C. D.,
Pestka, S.,
Jolliffe, L. K.,
and Wilson, I. A.
(1998)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5,
993-1004[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.