JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205757200 on October 8, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 50, 48220-48226, December 13, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/50/48220    most recent
M205757200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Usacheva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Colamonici, O. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Usacheva, A.
Right arrow Articles by Colamonici, O. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Contribution of the Box 1 and Box 2 Motifs of Cytokine Receptors to Jak1 Association and Activation*

Anna UsachevaDagger , Raudel SandovalDagger , Paul Domanski§, Sergei V. Kotenko, Keats Nelms||, Mark A. Goldsmith**, and Oscar R. ColamoniciDagger DaggerDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612, § Inhibitex Inc., Alpharretta, Georgia 30004, the  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Dentistry New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, the || Immunogenomics Laboratory, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra City ACT2601, Canberra, Australia, and the ** Gladstone Institute of Virology and Immunology and School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94103

Received for publication, June 10, 2002, and in revised form, September 5, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Kinases of the Jak family (Jak1/2/3 and Tyk2) interact with the membrane proximal domain of different cytokine receptors and play a critical role in the activation of cytokine and growth factor signaling pathways. In this report we demonstrate that both the Box 1 and Box 2 motif collaborate in the association and activation of Jak1 by type I interferons. Mutational analysis of the beta  chain of type I interferon receptor (IFNalpha Rbeta L/IFNAR2) revealed that Box 1 plays a more significant role in activation than in the association with Jak1. On the contrary, the Box 2 motif contributes more to the association with Jak1 than to kinase activation. Additionally, the study of the Jak1 binding sites on the IL2 receptor beta  (IL2Rbeta ), IFNgamma Ralpha /IFNGR1, and IL10Ralpha /IL10R1 chains suggests that cytokine receptors have two different kinds of interaction with Jak1. One form of interaction involves the Box 1 and the previously described Box 2 motif, which we now designate as Box 2A, characterized by the VEVI and LEVL sequences present in IFNalpha Rbeta L/IFNAR2 and IL2Rbeta subunits, respectively. The second form of interaction requires a motif termed Box 2B, which is present in the IFNgamma Ralpha /IFNGR1 (SILLPKS) and IL10Ralpha /IL10R1 (SVLLFKK) chains. Interestingly, Box 2B localizes close to the membrane region (8-10 amino acids from the membrane) similar to Box 1, whereas Box 2A is more distal (38-58 amino acids from the membrane).

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Activation of kinases of the Jak family (Jak1, Jak2, Jak3, and Tyk2) plays a pivotal role in signaling through cytokine receptors, including interferons (IFN)1 (1-3). The membrane proximal domain of cytokine and IFN receptors constitutively interacts with Jak kinases (1-3). The interaction between a given receptor and Jak is not specific, because the same Jak can associate with and be activated by different receptors. However, the absence of a distinct Jak cannot be compensated by another Jak as has been demonstrated by the cytokine-specific phenotypes observed in animals with targeted disruptions of these kinases (4-8).

The interaction between Jak2 and single subunit cytokine receptors (i.e. erythropoietin receptor (EPOR), growth hormone receptor, and prolactin receptor (PRL-R)) as well as heterodimeric receptors (IFNgamma R and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor receptor)/interleukin-3 and -5 receptors) has been extensively characterized (9, 10). The membrane proximal region of cytokine receptors that interact with Jak2 contains a highly conserved motif termed Box 1 (see Fig. 1E), which is formed by a proline-rich sequence located 6-10 amino acids after the transmembrane domain (11-13). The consensus sequence for the Box 1 motif present in single-subunit cytokine receptors can be described as follows: phi phi PX(I/V)PXP(E/K) (phi  = hydrophobic residues). It is also important to point out that a region within the cytoplasmic domain C-terminal from Box 1 contains a second motif, Box 2, which is not so well defined. The amino acid sequence more frequently found in the Box 2 motif is (V/L)E(V/L)L represented by phi Ephi phi (see also Fig. 1E). The Box 2 motif is also present in single-chain cytokine receptors and is required in some cases for full activation of Jak2 (14).

Interestingly, the binding sites for Jak1, Jak3, and Tyk2 are not so well defined. The Tyk2 binding site on the alpha  chain of IFNalpha R (or IFNAR1) has only distant homology with other cytokine receptors (15, 16). Jak1 is activated by IFNs (IFNalpha /beta and IFNgamma ) and several cytokines, including the IL6 (IL6, leukemia inhibitory factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, oncostatin M) and IL2 families (IL2, IL4, IL7, IL9, and IL15) (17-25). The Jak1 binding site has been studied for a few cytokine receptors and appears to be rather heterogeneous. For example, the sequence 266LPKS269 of the alpha  chain of IFNgamma R (or IFNGR1), which has at best distant similarity to Box 1, revealed that only Pro267 was important for Jak1 binding (19). In the case of the IL2Rbeta chain, a sequence with some similarity to Box 1 and Box 2 appear to be important for Jak1 binding (26). Mutations of the Box 2 motif in gp130 and IL2Rbeta chains affect not only binding but also activity (26-28). In comparison, initial studies of the Box 1 of the IFNalpha Rbeta L (or IFNAR2) chain suggested that this motif by itself has a minimum contribution to Jak1 binding (21). Interestingly, the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs of IFNalpha Rbeta L are separated by only 7 amino acids, whereas the distance between these two motifs in the IL2Rbeta and gp130 is 38 and 31 residues, respectively. Although some of the cytokine receptor subunits that activate Jak1 have Box 1 and/or Box 2 motifs (i.e. gp130, IL2Rbeta , and IFNalpha Rbeta L), others such as the IL10Ralpha , and possibly the IFNgamma Ralpha , do not have easily definable Box 1 or Box 2 motifs. This variability in the Jak1 binding sites of cytokine receptors also appears to be accompanied by differences on the corresponding receptor binding surfaces of Jak1 (29). Although all cytokine receptors require the JH7 and part of the JH6 domains of Jak1 for activation, distinct cytokine receptors interact with a second region of Jak1 that is receptor-specific. For example, the second area of interaction for the IL10Ralpha is JH3, whereas IL2Rbeta and IL4Ralpha interact with JH4 and JH5-6, respectively (29).

This variability in the Jak1 binding site among cytokine receptors suggests that Jak1 could interact with different motifs in distinct cytokine receptors. This type of model would be important to develop therapeutic agents that may block Jak1 binding and/or function within the context of some cytokine systems without disturbing Jak1 activation by others. In this report, we sought to address whether there are differences in Jak1 binding sites among cytokine receptors. We characterized the kinase binding domain for two different types of receptors that activate Jak1: (a) receptors such as the IFNalpha Rbeta L and IL2Rbeta that contain Box 1 and Box 2 motifs and (b) receptors that do not have either Box 1 or Box 2 motifs (i.e. IFNgamma Ralpha and IL10alpha ). Although in the case of the IFNalpha Rbeta L, Box 2 appears to contribute to the majority of Jak1 binding, its mutation did not affect Jak1 activation by IFNalpha . Surprisingly, some mutations of Box 1 such as Pro289 and Pro291 affected Jak1 binding and activation, whereas other alterations such as the addition of a Pro in position 292 (N292P) or the inversion of Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L did not affect Jak1 binding but impaired Jak1 activation. The Box 2 motif of the IL2Rbeta was also critical for binding to Jak1, whereas Box 1 cannot interact with Jak1 in the absence of Box 2.

Interestingly, IL10Ralpha and IFNgamma Ralpha , which do not contain either Box 1 or Box 2 motifs, associate with Jak1 through a different motif that is localized closer to the transmembrane region. Thus, these data suggest that Jak1 interacts with cytokine receptors in two different manners. One form of interaction involves both Box 1 and Box 2A motifs (i.e. IL2Rbeta and IFNalpha Rbeta L chains). The Box 2A motif, previously described as Box 2, is represented by a sequence formed by hydrophobic, charged, hydrophobic, and hydrophobic amino acids (i.e. VEVI or LEVL). The second form of interaction, found in the IL10Ralpha and IFNgamma Ralpha /IFNGR1 chains, involves Box 2B, a motif that is different from Box1 and Box 2A.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

IFNs and Antibodies-- Human recombinant IFNalpha 2 and IFNgamma were kindly provided by Drs. M. Brunda (Hoffman-La Roche) and Ronald Borden (Schering-Plough). The anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) and the anti-Jak2 serum were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). The monoclonal antibodies against Jak1 and STAT1 were purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY).

GST Fusion Proteins-- The following GST fusion proteins encoding full-length or truncated forms of the cytoplasmic domains of cytokine receptor subunits were used for this study (see Fig. 1). 1) GST-IFNalpha Rbeta L265-515, GST-IFNalpha Rbeta L265-375, and GST-IFNalpha Rbeta L300-375, encoding full-length and the previously described Jak1 binding site with and without Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L (Fig. 1A), respectively (21). 2) GST-IL2Rbeta encodes the full-length cytoplasmic domain of the IL2Rbeta chain, whereas GST-IL2Rbeta 322 and GST-IL2Rbeta 265 encode truncations at amino acids 322 and 265 that containing Box 1 and Box 2, and Box 1 alone, respectively (Fig. 1B). 3) GST-IFNgamma Ralpha and GST-IFNgamma Ralpha s (IFNgamma Ralpha , short) encode the entire cytoplasmic domain of the IFNgamma Ralpha /IFNGR1 chain and an N-terminal truncation that starts at amino acid 270 after the LPKS sequence important for Jak1 binding (Fig. 1C). 4) GST-IL10Ralpha and GST-IL10Ralpha 299 correspond to the entire cytoplasmic domain of the IL10Ralpha chain and a form truncated at amino acid 299, respectively (Fig. 1D). Mutations introduced into the Box 1 motif of IFNalpha Rbeta L chain (Fig. 1A) include Pro to Ala in positions 289, 291, and 294 (287AWPFPNLPP295, mutated residues are underlined). We also produced mutations that make Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L (287AWPFPNLPP295) closer to that observed in receptors that bind Jak2 such as the introduction of a Pro at position 292 (N292P, (287AWPFPPLPP295), inversion of Box 1 motif from PXPXXP to PXXPXP (RV mutation, from 287AWPFPNLPP295 to 287AWPLNPFPP295) and partial substitution of Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L for the EPOR (287AWPFPNLPP295 to 287AWPGIPSPP295). Point mutations were generated by PCR using the overlap extension method or the QuikChange kit (Stratagene) and were confirmed by sequencing. All GST fusion proteins were produced as described previously (21), and the amount used in each experiment was determined by Coomassie Blue staining and/or immunoblotting with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories).

Expression of Mutant Forms of the beta L Subunit of the Type I IFN-R in MouseL-929 Cells-- A mutation of the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs were generated as described above and subcloned into the retroviral vector pLXSN. LpRalpha cells corresponding to mouse L-929 cells, which had been stably transfected with the alpha  subunit of the IFNalpha R (21), were infected with the pLXSNbeta L viruses packaged in PA317 or BOSC23 cells. Clones were selected and grown in medium containing G-418 (500 µg/ml) and hygromycin B (500 µg/ml). Receptor expression was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis after staining with the specific anti-beta L antibody IFNaRbeta 1 (30).

Immunoblotting-- Cells were treated with different concentrations of the indicated IFNs for 10 min and subsequently solubilized in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 100 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 200 µM sodium orthovanadate). Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were performed as described previously (21).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of a Jak1 Binding Site on the IFNalpha Rbeta L Chain-- We previously determined that the region delineated by amino acids 300-346 contains the Jak1 binding site (21). In addition, the membrane proximal region of the IFNalpha Rbeta L intracellular domain truncated after Asp315 maintained functional interaction with Jak1 (31). To identify critical residues for the formation of the Jak1 binding site, we performed a modified alanine scanning by introducing two or three mutations into the GSTbeta L300-375 wild type construct. It is worth mentioning that this construct lacks the Box 1 motif of IFNalpha Rbeta L (Fig. 1A, residues 289-295), which was previously found to have a small contribution to the interaction with Jak1 (21). GSTbeta L300-375 constructs carrying these mutations were used to pull-down Jak1 from U-266 cell lysates. Fig. 2A (upper panel) shows that only a mutation involving residues 303-305 (lane 2, EVI) has a significant effect on the ability of these fusion proteins to interact with Jak1. The lower panel (Coomassie) shows that equal amounts of the different GST fusion proteins were used. It is important to point out that the VEVI sequence resembles the Box 2 motif that regulates Jak1 activity of other cytokine receptors (see below) (26-28).


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic representation of the GST fusion protein encoding wild type and mutant IFNalpha Rbeta L, IL2Rbeta , IFNgamma Ralpha , and IL10Ralpha . A-D, the wild type cytoplasmic domains (top of each panel), including the Box 1 (dark box) and Box 2 (gray box) motifs, are shown. The Pro (P) critical for Jak1 binding to IFNgamma Ralpha is shown in C. The receptor residues included in each construct are indicated on top. Deletions within the cytoplasmic domain are indicated by a thin line. E, alignment of the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs of different cytokine receptors. The conserved residues are in boldface. The conserved prolines (Pro) within Box 1 are numbered 1-3, and the kinase associated with the receptor is indicated on the right column. Notice that Pro #1 or #2 are always present in cytokine receptors that associate with Jak2, whereas either one is absent in cytokine receptors that bind only Jak1 such as IFNalpha Rbeta L, IL4Ralpha , and IL2Rbeta .


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The Box 2 motif of IFNalpha Rbeta L is critical for Jak1 binding. A, upper panel, GSTbeta L300-375 fusion proteins encoding two or three alanine mutations of the indicated amino acids were used to pull down Jak1 from U-266 cells lysates. Jak1 was detected by immunoblotting with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal antibody. Pull-down with GST alone and immunoprecipitation with an anti-Jak1 antibody were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. The number of the amino acids mutated and the sequence are indicated on the top and bottom of each lane, respectively. Lower panel, Coomassie Blue staining of the GST fusion proteins used in this experiment. The migration of the GSTbeta L300-375 and GST are indicated. B, upper panel, a similar experiment as in A, but using GSTbeta L300-375 fusion proteins encoding single amino acid substitutions. GST fusion proteins encoding full-length cytoplasmic domain (lane 2, beta L) and a truncation at amino acid 375 (lane 8, wt) without mutations were used as positive controls. Two different clones of the V302A (lanes 4 and 5) and E303A (lanes 6 and 7) mutants were used. Lower panel, Coomassie Blue staining of the GST fusion proteins used in this experiment.

To define precisely the individual amino acids involved in the interaction with Jak1, we made GSTbeta L300-375 constructs carrying individual mutations to Ala of residues 303-305, as well as the flanking residue 302. Fig. 2B shows that mutation of Val302 (lanes 4 and 5) almost eliminated Jak1 binding, whereas Ala mutations of Val304 (data not shown) and Ile305 (lanes 3) had a less significant effect on the interaction between IFNalpha Rbeta L and this kinase. Mutation of Glu303 (lanes 6 and 7) had only a modest effect on the interaction with Jak1. The lower panel (Coomassie) shows that equal amounts of the different GST fusion proteins were used. Thus, the VEVI motif appears to be critical for the interaction between Jak1 and IFNalpha Rbeta L. This finding was unexpected, because this motif partially overlaps with the RACK1 binding site (residues 302-304 and 314-327) and expression of full-length IFNalpha Rbeta L containing mutations of Box 2 affects activation of STAT1 and STAT2 but not Jak 1 (32). Thus, the finding that Jak1 binding is affected by mutation of Box 2 in the context of residues 300-375, but not in the context of the full-length receptor, suggests that one or more regions within IFNalpha Rbeta L other than amino acids 300-375 should also contribute to Jak1 binding and activation.

Mutations of the Box 1 Motif of IFNalpha Rbeta L Affect Jak1 Activation-- The logical candidate to contribute or collaborate with Box 2 in Jak1 binding and activation is the Box 1 motif. The minimal Jak1 binding previously detected with the Box 1 motif (21), in the absence of Box 2, could be sufficient to support Jak1 binding and activation in the context of a full-length receptor containing Box 2 mutations. Therefore, we next assessed the contribution of the Box 1 motif to Jak1 binding by introducing mutations within a GSTbeta L265-375 that also contains the Box 2 motif. Fig. 3 shows that mutation of Pro289 (lane 3) and Pro291 (lane 4) to Ala in Box 1 eliminated or decreased the association of IFNalpha Rbeta L with Jak1, respectively (compare lane 2 with lanes 3 and 4), whereas the mutation Pro294 to Ala had no effect (compare lanes 2 and 6). Mutations Asn292 to Pro, EPOR, or RV, which we used in an attempt to make Box 1 similar to the one that binds Jak2 (PXXPXP), did not have an effect on Jak1 binding (lanes 5, 7, and 8, respectively). The effect on Jak1 binding observed by introducing mutations within Box 1 confirm that this motif plays a role in the interaction with Jak1 (21).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Role of the Box 1 motif of IFNalpha Rbeta L in Jak1 binding. Mutations of the Box 1 motif were introduced in a GSTbeta L encoding amino acids 265-375 of the cytoplasmic domain. The following mutations were tested: P289A (Pro289 to Ala), P291A, P294A, N292P, inversion of Box 1 (RV), and partial substitution of Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L for Box 1 of the EPOR (see "Materials and Methods"). Pull downs were performed as described in Fig. 2. Upper panel, Western blot (WB) with anti-Jak1; lower panel, WB with anti-GST. The solid and open arrows indicate the migration of the GSTbeta L265-375 mutants and GST control, respectively.

To determine the role of Box 1 on Jak1 activation, mutations of Box 1 were introduced into full-length IFNalpha Rbeta L and expressed using a retroviral system. Clones were selected using G-418, and expression of the different constructs was confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis using a specific anti-IFNalpha Rbeta L monoclonal antibody. Fig. 4 shows representative examples of the clones obtained. We next examined the activation of Jak1 in response to human IFNalpha (huIFNalpha ). Fig. 5A shows that mutation of Pro289 or Pro291 to Ala produced a significant decrease in activation of Jak1 by huIFNalpha when compared with control muIFNalpha 4 that activates the endogenous mouse receptor (compare lanes 2 with 3, and 5 with 6). The decrease in Jak 1 activation correlates with the decrease in binding observed in GST pull-down experiments (see Fig. 3). As expected, mutation of Pro294 did not affect Jak1 activation by huIFNalpha 2 (compare lanes 8 and 9). Surprisingly, there was no correlation between Jak1 binding and activity for mutation Asn292 to Pro and RV, because they did not affect binding but clearly affected kinase activity. The activation of STAT1 and STAT2 (Fig. 5A, bottom panels) correlated with the activation of Jak1 in the different mutants. The finding, that mutations of Box 1 such as N292P do not affect Jak1 binding in pull-down experiments but have an impact in Jak1 activation, prompted us to determine whether this mutation impairs the association with the kinase in vivo. We studied the interaction between IFNalpha Rbeta L and Jak1 in cells stably expressing mutation N292P by performing immunoprecipitation with anti-beta L antibodies followed by immunoblotting with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal antibody. Fig. 5B demonstrates that there are no significant differences in the amount of Jak1 associated with IFNalpha Rbeta L mutated in Asn292 or a mutation of the receptor that does not affect Jak1 activation (Fig. 5B, 292.9 and EPOR.4, respectively). Moreover, mutation Asn292 to Pro did not affect binding of STAT1 to IFNalpha Rbeta L (data not shown) ruling out that this mutation affects the interaction with other signaling components. The finding that mutations that do not have a major impact in Jak1 association produced a decrease in kinase activation suggest that, although the Box 1 motif participates in Jak1 binding, it plays a more significant role in kinase activation (see "Discussion").


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of IFNalpha Rbeta L Box 1 mutants in mouse L-929 cells. Retroviral supernatants were packaged in BOSC23 or PA317 cells and used to infect LpRalpha cells as described under "Materials and Methods." After selection in G418 (500 µg/ml), expression of the mutant receptor in different clones was assessed using a monoclonal antibody directed against the beta  chain of IFNalpha R (IFNaRbeta 1, dashed line) or control IgG2a (solid line) as previously described (32).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutations of Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L affect Jak1 activation. A, cell lines expressing different mutations of Box 1 were treated with huIFNalpha 2 (halpha ) for 15 min at 37 °C. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) and Western blotted (WB) with the indicated antibodies. MuIFNalpha 4 (malpha ) was used as a positive control, because it activates the endogenous mouse receptor. B, mutation N292P of IFNalpha Rbeta L does not affect Jak1 binding. Cell lysates obtained from L-929 stable transfectants expressing mutations N292P and EPOR were immunoprecipitated with polyclonal antibodies against IFNalpha Rbeta L (beta L), Jak1 (J1), or normal rabbit serum (NR) and immunoblotted with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal antibody.

Identification of Jak1 Binding Sites on the IL2Rbeta -- Zhu et al. (26) previously reported that some residues within Box 1 and the first Leu within Box 2 affected Jak1 binding. We next determined whether Box 1 and Box 2 of the IL2Rbeta play the same role in the association with Jak1. Because Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L alone is unable to bind substantial amounts of Jak1, we truncated a GSTIL2Rbeta after the Box 1 motif to determine if Box 1 of IL2Rbeta alone was able to associate with Jak1. Fig. 6 shows that Jak1 interacts with the full-length cytoplasmic domain of IL2Rbeta (lane 2) and with a fusion protein truncated at residue 322 (lanes 3 and 4), which contains the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs. However, Jak1 does not interact with a more proximal truncation (amino acid 265) that only includes the Box 1 motif (lane 5). This result indicates that Box 1 of the IL2Rbeta , like Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L, is not sufficient for Jak1 binding.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The Box 2 motif of the IL2Rbeta chain is important for Jak1 binding. A, GSTIL2Rbeta wild type (lane 2) with truncation at amino acids 322 (lanes 3 and 4), and 265 containing only the Box 1 motif (lane 5) were used to pull-down Jak1 from U-266 lysates (upper panel). Jak1 was detected by immunoblotting with an anti-Jak1 monoclonal antibody. Pull down with GST alone and immunoprecipitation with an anti-Jak1 antibody were used as negative and positive control, respectively. Lower panel, Coomassie Blue staining of the different IL2Rbeta chain proteins used in the upper panel. The migration of the different GST fusion protein is indicated (asterisk). B, similar experiment as in A, but using GSTIL2Rbeta encoding single-amino acid substitutions of the Box 2 motif (upper panel). Lower panels, the filter was stripped and re-probed with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody to show that similar levels of GST fusion proteins were used.

Because the Box 2 motifs of IL2Rbeta and IFNalpha Rbeta L are very similar (LEVL and VEVI, respectively), we also wanted to assess the contribution of the different amino acids of Box 2 of IL2Rbeta to Jak1 binding. Fig. 6B (lane 2) shows that as in the case of IFNalpha Rbeta L, mutation of the first hydrophobic residue of this motif (Leu299) results in a marked decrease in Jak1 binding as previously reported (26), whereas mutations of the two other hydrophobic amino acids (301VL302) or Glu300 have a less significant effect (lanes 3-5) on the interaction with the kinase. The lower panel (Fig. 6B, WB: GST) shows that similar amounts of GST fusion proteins were used. These data suggest that the function of the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs of IL2Rbeta and IFNalpha Rbeta L is very similar. Box 1 by itself does not sustain efficient Jak1 binding, and equivalent amino acids within Box 2 are important for the association with Jak1. However, they differ in the impact that mutations of Box 2 have on Jak1 activation, because substitution of Leu299 of IL2Rbeta completely abrogated Jak1 activation (26, 28), whereas the same mutation of IFNalpha Rbeta L did not have any effect (see "Discussion").

The IFNgamma Ralpha and IL10Ralpha Chains Use a Different Jak1 Binding Motif-- We finally sought to address which regions are important for Jak1 binding in receptors that do not contain Box 1 or Box 2 motifs. The previously reported Jak1 binding site of the IFNgamma Ralpha is localized very close to the transmembrane region and does not resemble the Box 1 motif of receptors that activate Jak2 or even the less conserved Box 1 of IFNalpha Rbeta L or IL2Rbeta (19). We produced GST fusion proteins encoding the entire cytoplasmic domain and a deletion of the cytoplasmic region containing the previously described Jak1 binding site (19) of the IFNgamma Ralpha to confirm that the Jak1 binding site was indeed unique. Deletion of the region containing the LPKS sequence (IFNgamma Ralpha s) completely abrogated Jak1 binding (Fig. 7A, compare lanes 1 and 2), confirming that the binding site for this kinase resides within the first 15 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain of IFNgamma Ralpha . This result suggests that Jak1 does not interact in the same manner with all cytokine receptors. For instance, IFNgamma Ralpha has a Jak1 binding site that is very close to the transmembrane region (~10 amino acids) and is different from the typical Box 1 responsible for Jak2 binding, the less conserved Box 1 observed in IL2Rbeta and IFNalpha Rbeta L (Fig. 1E), and the Box 2 motif.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Characterization of the Jak1 binding site of IFNgamma Ralpha and IL10Ralpha . A, Jak1 interact with the membrane proximal domain of IFNgamma Ralpha . The GST-IFNgamma Ralpha s (IFNgamma Ralpha S, lane 2) encodes a deletion of the first 17 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain containing the LPKS motif. U-266 cell lysates were used as the source for Jak1 protein. B, GST fusion proteins, encoding the full-length cytoplasmic domain of L10Ralpha (lane 2) or truncated at amino acid 299 (lanes 3 and 4), were used to pull down Jak1 from U-266 lysates as in previous experiments. C and D, characterization of the amino acids important for Jak1 binding in the IL10Ralpha using constructs containing mutations of three (C) or one (D) amino acid to alanine. The indicated mutations were introduced in a GST fusion protein encoding the full-length cytoplasmic region of the IL10Ralpha chain. Lower panels (A-D), filters were stripped and reprobed with an anti-GST monoclonal antibody. The arrows in B show degradation products of the full-length GSTIL10Ralpha .

We finally determined the Jak1 binding sequence used by the IL10Ralpha chain, which, like the IFNgamma Ralpha , contains neither a Box 1 nor Box 2 motif. Fig. 7B shows that GST fusion proteins, encoding the full-length IL10Ralpha , associate with Jak1 (Fig. 7, A and B, lanes 3 and 2, respectively). A fusion protein containing only the first 39 amino acids of the cytoplasmic domain of IL10Ralpha bound Jak1 as efficiently as the full-length receptor (Fig. 7B, lanes 3 and 4). These data suggest that, like in the case of IFNgamma Ralpha , the Jak1 binding site in the IL10Ralpha may be close to the transmembrane region.

To further define the residues involved in Jak1 binding, we performed mutagenesis using constructs in which 3 residues were simultaneously mutated to Ala. Two of these GST fusion proteins carrying mutation of residues 269-271 and 272-274 showed a significant decrease in Jak1 binding (Fig. 7C, lanes 3 and 4). A decrease in Jak1 binding observed with a construct containing mutations of amino acids 266-268 (lane 2) is due to lower amounts of this GST used in this experiment (Fig. 4C, lower panel). The sequence SVLLFKK in the 269-274 region of the IL10Ralpha is similar to SIILPKS (amino acids 263-269) found in the IFNgamma Ralpha . These motifs are 8 and 10 amino acids from the membrane, respectively. In the previous characterization of the Jak1 binding site of IFNgamma Ralpha (19), the first two hydrophobic residues (Ile281 and Ile282) were not included in the mutational analysis. We performed single point mutations of the first two hydrophobic amino acids present in this motif (269VL270) and Phe272 in the IL10Ralpha . Phe272 is in the same position as Pro267 in the IFNgamma Ralpha , which is critical for Jak1 binding. Fig. 7D shows that mutations of Leu270 and Phe272 (lanes 3-5), but not substitution of Val269 (lane 2), in IL10Ralpha significantly diminished Jak1 binding. These data suggest that IL10Ralpha and IFNgamma Ralpha interact with Jak1 in a similar manner, which differs from the interaction of Jak1 with IFNalpha Rbeta L or IL2Rbeta .

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ligand-induced dimerization of receptor subunits brings Jak kinases into proximity allowing resting or low activity kinases to become fully activated. This probably occurs through transphosphorylation of tyrosines in the activation loop. Therefore, the position of the kinases on cytokine receptor chains may be critical to allow the proper conformation after receptor dimerization. The Box 1 motif is a proline-rich motif (33) in a hydrophobic context present in most cytokine receptor chains that interact with Jak2. This motif is invariably positioned 6-12 residues from the transmembrane domain (Fig. 1E). The Box 1 motif on single-subunit cytokine receptors (i.e. GH-R, EPOR, and PRL-R) (Fig. 1) consists of two hydrophobic amino acids, proline #1, any amino acid, a valine or isoleucine, proline #2, any amino acid, proline #3, and a charged residue. In the case of multichain cytokine receptors that interact with Jak2 such as IL3Ralpha , IL5Ralpha , GMCSFR, and IFNgamma Rbeta /IFNGR2, proline #3 may not be present (see Fig. 1, granulocyte-macrophace colony stimulating factor receptor, IL3Ralpha , and IFNgamma Rbeta ).

The interaction between Jak1 and cytokine receptor subunits does not appear to be so well defined. In most cases, the Box 1 motif is not as conserved (i.e. IL2Rbeta and IL4Ralpha ; see Fig. 1E, Box 1) or not present (i.e. IL10Ralpha ). In the case of the IFNgamma Ralpha chain, analysis of a region proximal to the membrane (~15 residues) revealed that only mutation of Pro267, within a motif with little homology to Box 1, affects Jak1 binding and activation. In contrast, the initial mapping of the Jak1 binding site on the IFNalpha Rbeta L chain revealed that a region more distal from the membrane was more important for Jak1 binding than the Box 1 motif (21). These differences led us to question whether the interaction between cytokine receptors and Jak1 follows different rules than those for the association between single subunit receptors and Jak2.

Interaction between Jak1 and IFNalpha Rbeta L or IL2Rbeta -- The Box 1 and Box2 motifs of the IFNalpha Rbeta L chain, unlike in the IL2Rbeta , are very close to each other and probably contribute to the formation of the binding site. It is likely that the Box 2 motif has the largest area of contact with Jak1, because GST fusion proteins that do not contain the Box 1 motif bind Jak1 almost as efficiently as wild type (21). However, the contribution of Box 1 to the formation of the Jak1 binding site is demonstrated by the finding that mutations of Pro289 or Pro291 decreases the interaction with this kinase even in the presence of Box 2. However, even though both motifs collaborate in Jak1 binding, Box 1 appears to be more important for the regulation of kinase activity. This is supported by the finding that kinase activation was affected even by mutations of Box 1 that did not affect Jak1 binding.

The Box 2 motifs in IL2Rbeta and IFNalpha Rbeta L are very similar, and Ala mutations of either motif appear to have equivalent effects on Jak1 binding. Moreover, the use of GST fusion proteins that contain only Box 1 revealed that neither Box 1 of IL2Rbeta nor IFNalpha Rbeta L could bind substantial amounts of Jak1 by itself. However, unlike IL2Rbeta (26, 28), mutations of Box 2 of IFNalpha Rbeta L did not affect Jak1 activation. It is possible that the distance separating the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs in these receptors (7 and 38 residues for IFNalpha Rbeta L and IL2Rbeta , respectively) results in a different type of interaction with Jak1. This type of model is supported by the finding that slightly different regions of Jak1 are required to associate with the IFNalpha Rbeta L and IL2Rbeta chains (29).

IFNgamma Ralpha and IL10Ralpha Use a Different Jak1 Binding Motif-- Unlike IFNalpha Rbeta L and IL2Rbeta , IFNgamma Ralpha and IL10Ralpha do not have an identifiable Box 1 or Box 2 motif. This prompted us to further characterize the interaction between Jak1 and these receptors. Our results indicate that the IL10Ralpha has a Jak1 binding site close to the transmembrane region that has some degree of similarity with IFNgamma Ralpha . Moreover, mutation of Phe272 of IL10Ralpha , which is the equivalent to Pro267 in IFNalpha Rgamma , significantly decreased the interaction with Jak1. Altogether, these data suggest that there are at least two different types of interactions between Jak1 and cytokine receptors. First, cytokine receptors such as IL2Rbeta and IFNalpha Rbeta L interact with Jak1 through the Box 1 and Box 2 motifs that we will call Box 2A characterized by a hydrophobic-charged-hydrophobic-hydrophobic sequence. The Box 1 in these receptors is slightly different from Box 1 present in single subunit receptors that activate Jak2 (see Fig. 1E). Second, other cytokine receptors such as IL10Ralpha and IFNgamma Ralpha use a different motif that is close to the membrane that we will call Box 2B. The Box 2B motif is characterized by a core of 4 hydrophobic residues flanked by a Ser and charged residues. However, mapping of the regions of Jak1 involved in the interaction with cytokine receptors strongly suggest that a region different from the Box 2B motif of the IL10Ralpha also interacts with Jak1 (29). In the case of IFNgamma Ralpha , a GST fusion protein, encoding the entire cytoplasmic domain except Box 2B, failed to interact with Jak1. These data suggest that Box 2B, at least in IFNgamma Ralpha , should be sufficient to sustain Jak1 binding and probably activation.

Contrary to what was observed with the interaction between Jak2 and Box 1, the position of the Jak1 binding domain within the cytoplasmic region of cytokine receptors was more variable. This raises the hypothesis that the positioning of the kinase within the cytoplasmic domain may be important for correct kinase alignment after receptor dimerization, which would allow transphosphorylation of the tyrosines in the activation loop. In single subunit receptors, ligand binding results in homodimerization and, therefore, Jak2 is always at the same position in both members of the dimer. However, in heterodimeric receptors, positioning may be more critical. In this scenario, the Jak1 binding site in IFNgamma Ralpha is closer to the membrane to produce a correct alignment with Jak2, which also interacts with a binding site on the IFNgamma Rbeta chain that is close to the membrane. This suggests that the proximal Jak1 binding site on IFNgamma Ralpha evolved to pair the Jak2 site present in IFNgamma Rbeta . The Tyk2 (34) and Jak1 binding sites on the alpha  and beta L chains of IFNalpha R are also at similar distances from the membrane (32 and 38 amino acids, respectively). This model would predict that the Tyk2 binding site on the IL10Rbeta (CRFB4) (35, 36) should be proximal to the membrane to match the membrane proximal Jak1 site present on the IL10Ralpha chain. It should be considered that what we refer as "distance from the membrane" is only a relative measurement, because we do not know the secondary and tertiary structure of the cytoplasmic domain of these receptors. The finding that dimerization of the EPOR per se is not enough for activation may support the role of kinase orientation or stereo conformation in receptor activation (37).

    FOOTNOTES

* This work has been supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA55079 and GM54709 (to O. R. C.), GM54351 (to M. A. G.), and by State of New Jersey Commission of Cancer Research Grant 799-021 (to S. V. K.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, M/C868, University of Illinois, 835 S. Wolcott Ave., E403, Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-413-4113; Fax: 312-413-4140 or 312-996-1225; E-mail: ocolamon@uic.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205757200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IFN, interferon; R, receptor; huIFN, human IFN; muIFN, murine IFN; IL, interleukin; EPOR, erythropoietin receptor; PRL-R, prolactin receptor; GH-R, growth hormone receptor; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Schindler, S., and Darnell, J. J. E. (1995) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64, 621-651[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Ihle, J. N. (1995) Nature 337, 591-594
3. Ihle, J. E. (1996) Cell 84, 331-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Rodig, S. J., Meraz, M. A., White, J. M., Lampe, P. A., Riley, J. K., Arthur, C. D., King, K. L., Sheehan, K. C. F., Yin, L., Pennica, D., Johnson, J. E. M., and Schreiber, R. D. (1998) Cell 93, 373-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Parganas, E., Wang, D., Stravopodis, D., Topham, D. J., Marine, J.-C., Teglund, S., Vanin, E. F., Bodner, S., Colamonici, O. R., van Deursen, J. M., Grosveld, G., and Ihle, J. N. (1998) Cell 93, 385-395[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Neubauer, H., Cumano, A., Müller, M., Wu, H., Huffstadt, U., and Pfeffer, K. (1998) Cell 93, 397-409[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Shimoda, K., Kato, K., Aoki, K., Matsuda, T., Miyamoto, A., Shibamori, M., Yamashita, M., Numata, A., Takese, K., Kobayashi, S., Shibata, S., Asano, Y., Gondo, H., Sekiguchi, K., Nakayama, K., Nakayama, T., Okamura, T., Okamura, S., Niho, Y., and Nakayama, K.-i. (2000) Immunity 13, 561-571[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Karaghiosoff, M., Neubauer, H., Lassnig, C., Kovarik, P., Schindler, H., Pircher, H., McCoy, B., Bogdan, C., Decker, C., Brem, G., Pfeffer, K., and Muller, M. (2000) Immunity 13, 549-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Silvennoinen, O., Yi, T., Tang, B., Miura, O., and Ihle, J. N. (1993) Cell 74, 227-236[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. He, T.-C., Jiang, N., Zhuang, H., Quelle, D. E., and Wojchowski, D. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 18291-18294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Miura, O., Cleveland, J. L., and Ihle, J. N. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1788-1795[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Hackett, R. H., Wang, Y.-D., Sweitzer, S., Feldman, G., Wood, W. I., and Larner, A. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11128-11132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Joneja, B., and Wojchowski, D. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 11176-11184[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Colosi, P., Wong, K., Leong, S. R., and Wood, W. I. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12617-12623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Yan, H., Krishnan, K., Lim, J. T. E., Contillo, L. G., and Krolewski, J. J. (1996) Mol. Cel. Biol. 16, 2074-2082[Abstract]
16. Colamonici, O. R., Uyttendaele, H., Domanski, P., Yan, H., and Krolewski, J. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 3518-3522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Stahl, N., Boulton, T. G., Farruggella, T., Ip, N. Y., Davis, S., Witthuhn, B. A., Quelle, F. W., Silvennoinen, O., Barbieri, G., Pellegrini, S., Ihle, J. N., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1994) Science 263, 92-95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Lütticken, C., Wegenka, U. M., Yuan, J., Buschmann, J., Schindler, C., Ziemiecki, A., Harpur, A. J., Wilks, A. F., Yasukawa, K., Taga, T., Kishimoto, T., Barbieri, G., Pellegrini, S., Sendtner, M., Heinrich, P. C., and Horn, F. (1994) Science 263, 89-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Kaplan, D. H., Greenlund, A. C., Tanner, J. W., Shaw, A. S., and Schreiber, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9-12[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Sakatsume, M., Igarashi, K.-i., Winestock, K. D., Garotta, G., Larner, A. C., and Finbloom, D. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 17528-17534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Domanski, P., Nadeau, O. W., Fish, E., Kellum, M., Platanias, L. C., Pitha, P., and Colamonici, O. R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26388-26393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Müller, M., Briscoe, J., Laxton, C., Guschin, D., Ziemiecki, A., Silvennoinen, O., Harpur, A. G., Barbieri, G., Witthunh, B. A., Schindler, C., Pellegrini, S., Wilks, A. F., Ihle, J. N., Stark, G. R., and Kerr, I. M. (1993) Nature 366, 129-135[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Miyazaki, T., Kawahara, A., Fujii, H., Nakagawa, Y., Minami, Y., Liu, Z.-J., Oishi, I., Silveinnoinen, O., Witthuhn, B. A., Ihle, J. N., and Taniguchi, T. (1994) Science 266, 1045-1047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Yin, T., Tsang, M. L.-K., and Yang, Y.-C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 26614-26617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Nakamura, Y., Russel, S. M., Mess, S. A., Friedmann, M., Erdos, M., Francois, C., Jacques, Y., Adelstein, S., and Leonard, W. J. (1994) Nature 369, 330-333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Zhu, M.-h., Berry, J. A., Russell, S. M., and Leonard, W. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10719-10725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Narazaki, M., Witthuhn, B. A., Yoshida, K., Silveinnoinen, O., Yasukawa, K., Ihle, J. N., Kishimoto, Y., and Taga, T. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2285-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Goldsmith, M. A., Xu, W., Amaral, M. C., Kuczek, E. S., and Greene, W. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14698-14704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Usacheva, A., Kotenko, S., Witte, M. M., and Colamonici, O. R. (2002) J. Immunol. 169, 1302-1308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Colamonici, O. R., and Domanski, P. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10895-10899[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Kotenko, S. V., Izotova, L. S., Mirochnitchenko, O. V., Lee, C., and Pestka, S. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96, 5007-5012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Usacheva, A., Smith, R., Baida, G. E., Croze, E., and Colamonici, O. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22948-22953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. O'Neal, K. D., and Yu-Lee, L.-Y. (1993) Lymphokine Cytokine Res. 12, 309-312[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Yan, H., Piazza, F., Krishnan, K., Pine, R., and Krolewski, J. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4046-4051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Kotenko, S. V., Izotova, L. S., Pollack, B. P., Muthukumaran, G., Paukku, K., Silvennoinen, O., Ihle, J. N., and Pestka, S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17174-17182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Kotenko, S. V., Krause, C. D., Izotova, L. S., Pollack, B. P., Wu, W., and Pestka, S. (1997) EMBO 19, 5894-5903[CrossRef]
37. Livnah, O., Johnson, D. L., Stura, E. A., Farrell, F. X., Barbone, F. P., You, Y., Liu, K. D., Goldsmith, M. A., He, W., Krause, C. D., Pestka, S., Jolliffe, L. K., and Wilson, I. A. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 993-1004[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg