|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208141200 on October 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 50, 48395-48402, December 13, 2002
Effect of Charge Reversal Mutations on the Ligand- and
Membrane-binding Properties of Liver Fatty Acid-binding Protein*
Joanna K.
Davies,
Robert M.
Hagan, and
David C.
Wilton
From the Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of
Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East,
Southampton SO16 7PX, United Kingdom
Received for publication, August 9, 2002, and in revised form, October 10, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Liver fatty acid-binding protein (FABP) is able
to bind to anionic phospholipid vesicles under conditions of low ionic
strength. This binding results in the release of ligand, the
fluorescent fatty acid analogue 11-dansylaminoundecanoic acid (DAUDA),
with loss of fluorescence intensity (Davies, J. K., Thumser,
A. E. A., and Wilton, D. C. (1999)
Biochemistry 38, 16932-16940). Using a strategy of charge
reversal mutagenesis, the potential role of specific cationic residues
in promoting interfacial binding of FABP to anionic phospholipid
vesicles has been investigated. Cationic residues chosen included those
within the -helical region (Lys-20, Lys-31, and Lys-33) and
those that make a significant contribution to the positive surface
potential of the protein (Lys-31, Lys-36, Lys-47, Lys-57, and Arg-126).
Only three cationic residues make a significant contribution to
interfacial binding, and these residues (Lys-31, Lys-36, and Lys-57)
are all located within the ligand portal region, where the protein may
be predicted to exhibit maximum disorder. The binding of tryptophan
mutants, F3W, F18W, and C69W, to dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol vesicles, containing 5 mol% of the fluorescent phospholipid
dansyldihexadecanoylphosphatidylethanolamine, was monitored by
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). All three mutants showed
enhanced dansyl fluorescence due to FRET on addition of phospholipid to
protein; however, this fluorescence was considerably greater with the
F3W mutant, consistent with the N-terminal region of the protein coming
in close proximity to the phospholipid interface. These results were
confirmed by succinimide quenching studies. Overall, the results
indicate that the portal region of liver FABP and specifically Lys-31,
Lys-36, and Lys-57 are involved in the interaction with the interface of anionic vesicles and that the N-terminal region of the protein undergoes a conformational change, resulting in DAUDA release.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Liver fatty acid-binding protein
(FABP)1 is a member of a
family of structurally related small (14-15 kDa) cytosolic lipid binding proteins that also include intestinal, heart (muscle), adipocyte, ileal, keratinocyte, and brain FABP (for recent reviews, see
Refs. 1-6). The exact physiological functions of these proteins are
unclear, although it is generally thought that they may have a
potential role in the uptake and targeting of fatty acids to various
intracellular organelles and metabolic pathways. All further sites of
metabolism of long chain fatty acids in the cell involve membrane
proteins. For a targeting role to operate, the FABP must interact with
an intracellular structure such as a membrane interface or
receptor/docking protein.
A process involving membrane binding has been advocated for intestinal,
muscle, and adipose FABP where model fluorescence studies have led to
the proposal of a collisional mechanism for explaining the
FABP-mediated transfer of fatty acids between phospholipid membranes
and vesicles (reviewed in Ref. 3). However, such a process was not
observed to operate for liver FABP under the same assay conditions, and
an aqueous phase diffusion mechanism is proposed, not requiring
interaction of the protein with membrane surfaces (3). In contrast,
using different assay conditions we have reported the apparent binding
of liver FABP to anionic vesicles, monitored as the release of the
fluorescent fatty acid ligand (DAUDA) from the protein (7).
The work of Storch et al. (3) has clearly identified the
-helical region of the muscle and adipose FABP as being involved in
the interaction of FABP with the membrane interface. In particular, certain lysine residues within -helix I of heart (8) and adipose (9)
FABP, which are amphipathic helices, are implicated in the process.
Moreover, in the case of intestinal FABP, a helix-less mutant was
unable to participate in a collisional transfer mechanism (10, 11).
The ability of certain proteins to interact with anionic phospholipid
interfaces under low ionic strength conditions is well known and is
attributed to initial electrostatic interactions followed by a variety
of events involving conformational changes in the peptide or protein,
including possible membrane insertion. For example, a wide range of
antimicrobial peptides bind to the anionic bacterial membrane, whereas
binding to the zwitterionic eukaryotic cell membrane is minimal (12).
The binding of cytochrome c to anionic phospholipids
is an extensively studied model system (13, 14), and the physiological
importance of proteins binding to anionic interfaces has been reviewed
(15). Thus, the interaction of liver FABP with anionic vesicles with
accompanying ligand release provides another important model for such
studies involving, in this case, a -barrel structure. In addition,
the phenomenon provides an interesting potential mechanism for
targeting of ligand (fatty acid) to membranes or membrane proteins.
The cumulative evidence discussed above would suggest that when liver
FABP binds to anionic vesicles, the -helical region must be a strong
contender for this site of interaction. Although the -helix I is
amphipathic in the case of intestinal, heart, and adipose FABP (3) this
is not the case with liver FABP. However, the binding of liver FABP is
highly sensitive to salt concentration and is only seen under
conditions of low ionic strength (7), suggesting that only weak
electrostatic interactions are involved, not requiring strongly
cationic regions on the protein.
In this report we have investigated potential cationic residues on the
surface of liver FABP that are within the -helical region of liver
FABP. This region contains a total of three lysine residues at position
20 in helix I and 31 and 33 in helix II (Fig. 1). In addition we have investigated
those residues most responsible for creating a positive potential on
the surface of the protein, and they are lysine residues at positions
31, 36, 47, and 57 together with arginine 126 (16). These are all
residues that might interact with the anionic interface as a result of
initial electrostatic interactions. The strategy used is one of charge
reversal mutagenesis where surface cationic residues are mutated to
anionic glutamate residues. This strategy has been successfully applied
to study the interfacial and heparin binding properties of human group IIA phospholipase A2 (17) where multiple mutations
involving up to 5 residues were employed. Unlike the case of the human
PLA2 that is highly cationic (pI > 10), liver FABP
has a more neutral pI, and hence the strategy has been initially
restricted to single mutations.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Ribbon diagram of rat liver FABP showing the
position of the bound oleic acid (CPK representation) at site 2 with
the carboxyl group extending into the portal region where it is solvent
exposed. Residues Lys-20, Lys-33, Lys-47, and Arg-126 are shown in
ball-and-stick representation, whereas Lys-31, Lys-36, and
Lys-57 around the portal region are shown in CPK
representation. All models are derived from the crystal structure of
rat liver FABP with two bound oleic acid ligands (23). The protein
molecule is orientated to most clearly show the positions of the three
lysine residues in the portal region.
|
|
The results demonstrate a significant role for the cationic residues,
Lys-31, Lys-36, and Lys-57, which all form part of the mobile ligand
portal region of this protein and are implicated in the ligand binding
process (16, 18). The binding of liver FABP to the phospholipid
interface is accompanied by a conformational change in the N-terminal
region, based on the proximity of the tryptophan of the F3W mutant to
the anionic phospholipid surface after interfacial binding.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
DAUDA and dansyl-DHPE were obtained from
Molecular Probes (Junction City, OR). Phospholipids were obtained from
Avanti Polar Lipids (Birmingham, AL), fatty acids and laboratory
chemicals from Sigma (Poole, Dorset, UK). Restriction enzymes and other molecular biologicals were from Promega (Southampton, UK) and Roche
Molecular Biochemicals (Lewes, E. Sussex, UK). Muta-Gene M13 in
vitro mutagenesis kit was from Bio-Rad (Hemel Hempstead, Herts,
UK). Mutagenic primers were provided by Oswel (Southampton, UK).
Molecular Biology--
The preparation of a synthetic gene for
rat liver FABP (19) and expression using a pET-11a vector (7) have been
described. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using standard
cloning procedures as described previously (20). The oligonucleotide sequences used for the construction of the lysine mutants were as
follows (mutant sequences are underlined): K20E,
5'-TTCGAACCGTTCATGGAAGCCATGGGTCTGCCG-3'; K31E,
5'-GAAGACCTGATCCAGGAAGGTAAAGATATCAAA-3'; K33E,
5'-CTGATCCAGAAAGGTGAAGATATCAAAGGTGTT-3'; K36E,
5'-AAAGGTAAAGATATCGAAGGTGTTTCTGAAATC-3'; K47E,
5'-GTTCACGAAGGTAAAGAAGTTAAACTGACCATC-3'; K57E,
5'-ATCACCTACGGATCCGAAGTTATCCACAACGAG-3'; and R126E,
5'-AAACGTGTTTCTAAAGAAATCTTAATAG-3'. All mutated
liver FABP constructs were verified by sequence analysis that was
carried out by Oswel (Southampton, UK).
Protein Expression and Purification--
Recombinant FABP and
mutants were expressed in normal yield and were purified and
delipidated as described previously (7). Purity was confirmed by silver
staining after SDS-PAGE with a Silver Stain Plus kit (Bio-Rad) used
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein concentrations
were determined by the dye-binding assay of Bradford using bovine serum
albumin as the standard. The Bradford assay overestimates the liver
FABP concentration by 1.69-fold (21).
Ligand and Phospholipid Binding Assays--
DAUDA binding assays
were performed by titrating up to 1 nmol of DAUDA into liver FABP (8 µg) in 10 mM Hepes/NaOH buffer, pH 7.5. The increase in
fluorescence at 500 nm with excitation at 350 nm was monitored.
Titrations are corrected for dilution and for a blank titration
involving addition of DAUDA to buffer only. The Kd
and Bmax (maximum fluorescence) values were determined using Fig P or Sigma Plot software. Oleic acid binding was
determined by DAUDA displacement in which oleic acid in methanol was
titrated into an FABP·DAUDA complex, and the fall in
fluorescence was monitored. Ki apparent values were
determined from the displacement curves using the method of Kane and
Bernlohr (22). The final methanol volume did not exceed 1% (v/v). The binding of an FABP·DAUDA complex to DOPG vesicles and monitoring loss
of fluorescence has been described previously (7). FRET studies were
performed using the tryptophan mutants F3W, F18W, and F69W (20) and 5 mol% dansyl-DHPE in DOPG or DOPC vesicles. Assays were performed in 10 mM Hepes buffer, and fluorescence intensity was monitored
at both 330 and 500 nm after excitation at 280 nm. Fluorescence
quenching studies with succinimide (23) involved titrating succinimide
into 1 µM FABP in 10 mM Hepes buffer up to a
concentration of 0.4 M in the absence or presence of 20 µg of DOPG vesicles. The excitation wavelength was 280 nm, and an
emission scan was performed between 300 and 400 nm. Quenching curves
were analyzed by the modified Stern-Volmer method (23).
Protein Stability--
The CD spectrum of wild type and mutant
FABPs were performed at increasing temperatures using a Jasco J-270
spectropolarimeter. After pre-equilibration of the FABP (0.5 mg/ml) for
20 min, triplicate scans were performed in 10 mM potassium
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, between 180 and 250 nm. The change in the
spectrum at 220 nm for each temperature was recorded as a percentage of
the value at 25 °C.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Ligand Binding Properties of the Mutants K20E, K31E, K33E, K36E,
K47E, K57E, and R126E--
To determine the potential role of cationic
residues that make a significant contribution to the positive surface
potential of FABP in membrane binding (16), these residues (Lys-31,
Lys-36, Lys-47, Lys-57, and Arg-126) were mutated to glutamate. In
addition the two other lysine residues (Lys-20 and Lys-33) were also
subject to charge reversal mutagenesis, because they are within the
-helical region of the protein. The ligand binding properties of the
charge reversal mutants of liver FABP were determined as a first step in confirming overall structural integrity and evaluating their functional properties. The fluorescent fatty acid analogue DAUDA is an
effective probe for the study of ligand binding due to its high
affinity together with a large increase in fluorescence intensity and
spectral shift on binding to this FABP (24) where it binds with a 1:1
stoichiometry (25). The binding characteristics were determined by
performing titrations with DAUDA and monitoring the binding by the
fluorescence enhancement at 500 nm. Analysis of the binding curves
indicated that the proteins had similar affinities for this ligand
(Table I). In all cases the maximum value was at 500 nm, however, a reduction in maximum
fluorescence intensity was observed with the K33E mutant and to a
lesser extent with the K47E mutant. The K36E mutant showed a small
increase in fluorescence intensity.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
The binding properties of wild type and mutant liver FABPs
DAUDA binding was determined by titrating up to 1 nmol of DAUDA into
liver FABP and determining the increase in fluorescence at 500 nm with
excitation at 350 nm as described under "Experiment Procedures."
Oleic acid binding was determined by displacement of DAUDA and
monitoring loss of fluorescence. The maximum fluorescence (arbitrary
units) was normalized to 100 for wild-type FABP. The
Ki apparent was determined using the method of Kane
and Bernlohr (21) and, because of the 2:1 binding
stoichiometry of oleic acid for FABP (23), will
reflect a composite value for the two sites that allows a comparison of
binding affinities between FABP proteins. All values are the mean of
titrations performed in triplicate ± S.D.
|
|
Lys-31 has been implicated in the binding of the carboxyl group at the
second fatty acid-binding site (16, 18), whereas the mutation (K31E)
has minimal affect on DAUDA binding. These observations would support a
proposal that DAUDA occupies primarily the first fatty acid-binding
site with the carboxyl group of the DAUDA buried in the protein and
interacting with a hydrogen-bonding network involving Arg-122.
Conversion of Arg-122 to lysine or glutamine significantly reduces
DAUDA binding 2- to 4-fold (26) consistent with this residue making a
contribution to DAUDA binding.
Fluorescence displacement studies were performed with oleic acid to
determine the effect of the mutations on the binding of fatty acids.
The displacement curves for oleic acid were analyzed by the method of
Kane and Bernlohr (22) to determine Ki apparent
values. The mutations had no major effects on oleic acid binding, and
the Ki apparent values ranged from 0.04 (wild type)
to 0.08 µM (K31E) for all the FABPs (Table I). The small
decrease in affinity of the K31E for oleic acid may reflect a
contribution of Lys-31 on oleic acid binding to the second site (16,
27) and hence on the overall Ki apparent value.
Phospholipid Vesicle Binding Properties of the Mutants, K20E, K31E,
K33E, K36E, K47E, K57E, and R126E, Measured Indirectly by DAUDA
Release--
We have previously shown that native liver FABP is able
to bind stoichiometrically to small anionic vesicles under conditions of low ionic strength but that this interaction was sensitive to salt
concentration and the anionic charge density on the vesicle (7). These
results are consistent with an initial nonspecific electrostatic
component to the binding process. Binding was most conveniently assayed
by monitoring loss of DAUDA fluorescence as the ligand is released from
the FABP (7).
When the binding of the mutant FABPs to 100% DOPG vesicles was
compared with native enzyme, the K20E, K33E, K47E, and R126E (data not
shown) mutants behaved similarly to native enzyme showing tight binding
to the phospholipid vesicles with a stoichiometry consistent with the
protein coating the vesicle surface (7). The curve for the R126E mutant
is not shown for clarity but was essentially identical to that for the
K20E mutant. In contrast, the K31E, K36E, and K57E mutants demonstrated
weaker binding requiring a larger amount of DOPG to produce complete
loss of fluorescence (Fig. 2,
A and B). Under these conditions the amount of
DOPG required to reduce DAUDA fluorescence by 50% was 2.4 nmol for the
wild type, K20E, K33E, K47E, and R126E, whereas the values were 4.4, 4.5, and 3.6 nmol, respectively, for K31E, K36E, and K57E.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Dependence of liver FABP-DAUDA fluorescence
on the concentration of DOPG added as SUVs. To a sample of liver
FABP (0.57 µM) and DAUDA (1 µM) in 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.5 (1 ml), was added 100 mol% DOPG (10 mg/ml
phospholipid in methanol) by titration, and the fall in initial
fluorescence was recorded and corrected for control titrations in the
absence of FABP. A, wild type liver FABP, ; K20E, ;
K31E, ; K33E, . B, wild type liver FABP, ; K36E,
; K47E, ; K57E, . All values are the mean of titrations
performed in triplicate ± S.D.
|
|
The results clearly demonstrate that of the three cationic lysine
residues in the -helical region, only the residue Lys-31 makes a
contribution to the binding of liver FABP to anionic vesicles resulting
in release of DAUDA. It is Lys-31 in -helix II that also makes a
significant contribution to the surface-positive potential of the
protein (16). Moreover, of the other cationic residues that make a
significant contribution to the positive surface potential of the
protein, only Lys-36 and Lys-57 are involved in the binding to anionic
vesicles in addition to Lys-31. The positions of Lys-31, Lys-36, and
Lys-57 correlate exactly to those regions in intestinal FABP that are
disordered, as detected by the NMR studies. In work from the Cistola
laboratory, apparent disorder was most pronounced in residues 29-36
and 54-57 (28, 29). Moreover, the crystallographic studies of liver
FABP (16) also suggest disorder within the C-terminal end of -helix
II and Lys-57, and these regions are implicated as part of the ligand portal region (16, 18). Thus the regions on the liver FABP that can be
directly implicated in binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles with a
resulting conformational change resulting in ligand (DAUDA) release are
the same regions that contribute to the ligand entry portal and are
most disordered. It would appear that electrostatic binding of this
mobile region to the anionic phospholipid interface must facilitate a
degree of protein unfolding effectively disrupting the ligand-binding
cavity of the protein.
Structural Stability of Wild Type and Mutant FABPs--
The charge
reversal mutants showed very similar ligand binding properties to the
native protein (Table I) indicating that there were no major structural
changes in the mutants. However, it was important to ensure that the
differential effects on ligand release seen with the charge reversal
mutants do not simply reflect changes in protein stability of
particular mutants when bound to an anionic interface rather than loss
of specific electrostatic interactions.
Liver FABP does not contain tryptophan, therefore unfolding studies
monitored by changes in tryptophan fluorescence to assess structural
stability were not possible. However, the CD spectra of the wild type
and mutant proteins were measured at 25, 40, 55, and 70 °C, and the
molar ellipticity at 220 nm was measured. The values have been
normalized as a percentage of the value at 25 °C and are shown in
Fig. 3. They clearly demonstrate that all the proteins show a similar structural stability over this temperature range. These results support the proposal that the observed DAUDA release when the proteins bind to an anionic interface is due to
specific electrostatic interactions and is not due to a change in
intrinsic protein stability at such interfaces. Therefore, DAUDA
release cannot be simply explained by factors affecting intrinsic
protein stability at such anionic interfaces, and the release phenomena
are most likely the result of initial specific electrostatic
interactions at the interface.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Measurement of the temperature stability of
wild type and charge reversal mutants of liver FABP using CD.
Spectra of all proteins (0.5 mg/ml) in 10 mM potassium
phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, were taken after equilibration at 25, 40, 55, and 70 °C. After three repetitive scans between 180 and 250 nm, the
change in molar ellipticity at 220 nm at elevated temperature was
determined relative to the value at 25 °C normalized to 100%.
1, wild type; 2, K20E; 3, K31E;
4, K36E, 5, K47E; 6, K57E.
|
|
FRET Studies to Demonstrate Binding of Liver FABP to DOPG
Vesicles--
We have previously reported that two tryptophan
containing mutants of liver FABP, F3W and F18W, showed different
fluorescence responses when these proteins bound to DOPG vesicles (7).
Surprisingly, no changes in fluorescence of the F18W mutant were
detected, whereas, in contrast, a substantial inhibition of
fluorescence of the F3W mutant was observed upon addition of DOPG,
which paralleled binding to the vesicles, as monitored by loss of DAUDA
fluorescence (7). This result suggested that that there was minimal
change in the environment of Trp-18 within -helix I when the protein
binds to the anionic phospholipid interface. In contrast, Trp-3 at the N-terminal region of the protein changes its environment upon binding
to such an interface.
FRET can be used to provide a more direct measure of the proximity of a
tryptophan residue to an appropriate acceptor such as a dansyl group.
The process is not dependent on conformational changes in the
tryptophan donor to detect changes in fluorescence intensity of dansyl
emission, because it is the distance between the tryptophan and the
dansyl group that is of primary importance. Therefore, the binding of
the two mutants F3W and F18W to phospholipid vesicles was determined
under a variety of conditions: excitation at 280 nm and monitoring both
the loss of tryptophan fluorescence and enhanced fluorescence at 500 nm
due to dansyl fluorescence as a result of FRET. Because a third
tryptophan-containing mutant, C69W, was available (20) in which the
tryptophan residue was remote from both the -helical region and the
N-terminal region, studies of this mutant are included for comparison.
The effect of titrating protein into DOPG vesicles containing 5 mol%
dansyl-DHPE is shown in Fig. 4 where it
can be clearly seen that there was considerably enhanced dansyl
fluorescence due to FRET in the case of the F3W mutant compared with
the F18 W and C69W mutants. A parallel loss of tryptophan fluorescence was observed (data not shown). Fluorescence emission spectra are shown
for the F3W mutant (Fig. 5) where no FRET
was seen when titrations were performed in the presence of 200 mM NaCl consistent with previous data that highlighted the
sensitivity of such binding to the ionic strength of the medium. In
contrast, addition of 200 mM NaCl to the assay medium after
protein binding to DOPG vesicles produced only a modest release of
protein (7), and a similar phenomenon was observed with the FRET
studies (Fig. 5). No FRET was observed when the tryptophan-containing
proteins were titrated into DOPC vesicles containing 5 mol%
dansyl-DHPE (data not shown). Overall, these results clearly
demonstrate the ability of the tryptophan-containing mutants to bind to
DOPG vesicles under conditions of low ionic strength but that the
tryptophan residue at position 3 comes in closest proximity to the
phospholipid interface as monitored by FRET. These studies reinforce
our previous data that a tryptophan residue at position 3, but not at
position 18 in -helix I, is more involved in binding to the anionic
interface. Such studies highlight a potential role for the N-terminal
region of this protein in the interaction of FABP with the phospholipid interface resulting in ligand release and are consistent with the lack
of effect with the mutant K20E, a residue also in -helix I.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Measurement of FRET between
tryptophan-containing mutants of liver FABP and dansyl-DHPE in DOPG
vesicles. DOPG vesicles containing 5 mol% dansyl-DHPE were
titrated into 10 mM Hepes buffer containing liver FABP (0.8 mM) of F3W, ; F18W, ; or C69W, . The tryptophan
residues were excited at 280 nm, and the dansyl-DHPE fluorescence was
monitored at 500 nm. All data points are the mean values of titrations
performed in triplicate ± S.D.
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Fluorescence emission spectra of FRET assays
involving the F3W mutant of liver FABP and the effect of NaCl.
DOPG vesicles containing 5 mol% dansyl-DHPE were titrated into 10 mM Hepes buffer containing liver FABP (0.8 mM)
of F3W to achieve maximum binding. The tryptophan residues were excited
at 280 nm, and fluorescence was monitored between 300 and 550 nm.
A, spectrum of F3W where 200 mM NaCl was already
present prior to adding phospholipid. This spectrum is essentially
identical to that of the F3W in buffer alone. B, spectrum of
F3W in the absence of 200 mM NaCl. C, spectrum
of F3W where 200 mM NaCl was added after the
phospholipid.
|
|
Fluorescence Quenching of F3W, F18W, and C69W by
Succinimide--
Succinimide is a fluorescence quencher that has
previously been used to investigate the degree of solvent exposure
shown by tryptophan residues in proteins, including a related FABP,
Sj-cFABP (30). Succinimide is larger than the commonly used quencher, acrylamide, and is more sensitive to the structural location of the
tryptophan (23). Therefore, succinimide quenching should be an
effective method for demonstrating changes in exposure of tryptophan
residues when the protein binds to DOPG vesicles.
The effect of increasing concentrations of succinimide on
tryptophan fluorescence in the presence or absence of DOPG vesicles is
shown in Fig. 6A. It can be
clearly seen that in the presence of DOPG vesicles there is 100%
protection from quenching of the F3W mutant and this is further
highlighted when a standard Stern-Volmer plot of the data is performed
(Fig. 6B). Such a result is consistent with this tryptophan
becoming buried in the phospholipid interface. No such protection is
seen with the F18W, whereas modest protection is seen with the C69W,
because the quenching by succinimide is reduced by 15% in the presence
of DOPG vesicles. A small but variable increase (5-10%) in tryptophan
fluorescence was seen when the C69W mutant bound to DOPG vesicles (data
not shown), whereas the crystal structure (18) showed ambiguity in the
positioning of this cysteine that could reflect conformational
mobility. Therefore, the reduced ability of succinimide to quench the
C69W mutant could reflect a change in environment of this residue not
directly involving the phospholipid interface.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Succinimide quenching of the
tryptophan-containing mutants of liver FABP in the absence and presence
of DOPG vesicles. Succinimide was titrated into 0.8 nmol of either
F3W, F18W, or C69W in 10 mM Hepes buffer in the absence
( ) or presence ( ) of 25 nmol of DOPG. A, the fall in
fluorescence is shown as a percentage of the starting fluorescence.
B, the data from A is shown as a standard
Stern-Volmer plot.
|
|
A Possible Model for the Interfacial Binding of Liver FABP to
Anionic Phospholipids--
To explain the observation described above
and in a previous report (7) in terms of the nature of the
conformational change at the anionic interface, the following model is
proposed (Fig. 7).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Model to illustrate the possible interaction
of liver FABP with an ionic phospholipid interface. The initial
interaction of the cationic residues Lys-31, Lys-36, and Lys-57 (shown
in CPK representation) results in protein unfolding and the
N-terminal moves into the phospholipid interface. The conformational
change disrupts the ligand binding cavity of the liver FABP resulting
in release of ligand (DAUDA). The precise route of ligand release is
not known, however, in addition to the normal ligand portal, movement
of the N-terminal may expose a second portal for ligand exit in this
region as discussed in Ref. 7. The position of F3 is shown in
CPK representation. The two oleic acid molecules in this
crystal structure (18) are shown in ball-and-stick
representation.
|
|
Initial multiple electrostatic interactions involving the more
disordered cationic residues surrounding the ligand portal could allow
a collapse of the central relatively non-polar binding cavity of the
protein into the membrane interface resulting in a degree of membrane
insertion and loss of ligand binding. Such a change in structure would
result in the tryptophan in the mutant F3W coming into close proximity
with the phospholipid interface. This movement of the tryptophan from
the non-polar environment of the protein core to the interfacial region
of the DOPG vesicle should produce the observed reduction in
fluorescence intensity that is observed (7). Moreover, the model is
consistent with the increase in FRET and the prevention of quenching by
succinimide that has been described. The model also places positions 18 and 69 more remote from the phospholipid interface consistent with the
lower FRET values when the F18W and C69W mutants are examined and the
reduced protection from succinimide quenching. The movement of the
N-terminal into the interface may open up a potential second ligand
portal in this region (7), originally observed in the case of
intestinal FABP (31).
The actual release route of bound ligand when liver FABP binds
to anionic vesicles remains to be established. A longer term strategy
must be to insert tryptophan residues elsewhere in the protein to
understand more fully the details of the conformational changes on
interfacial binding that result in ligand release. Of particular
interest would be to produce the Y7W mutation in the first -strand
to determine the extent of conformational change within this -strand
upon binding of liver FABP to anionic vesicles.
General Discussion--
In a previous paper (7) we have shown that
DAUDA release from liver FABP is consistent with a stoichiometric
binding to the surface of small ionic vesicles and that the primary
event in such binding is nonspecific electrostatic interactions. The primary involvement of electrostatic interactions is supported by the observations that the phenomenon (a) is sensitive to
the ionic strength of the medium, (b) is a function of
anionic charge density, and (c) does not demonstrate anionic
head group specificity (7). Therefore, do specific cationic residues on
the surface of the protein contribute to these electrostatic interactions?
In this report we have highlighted, using charge reversal mutagenesis,
specific contributions from only three cationic residues, namely
Lys-31, Lys-36, and Lys-57, in promoting interfacial binding and ligand
release. Because the wild type and all mutant proteins bind DAUDA with
very similar affinities, the differential DAUDA properties of the
mutants in the presence of anionic vesicles cannot reflect the
intrinsic ligand binding of these proteins. The affects must involve
the initial electrostatic binding linked to a conformational change in
the protein. The temperature stability of all proteins is very similar,
as measured by high temperature CD spectra. Therefore, it is unlikely
that the DAUDA release phenomenon being observed is related to changed
protein stability, an effect that would require the Lys-31, Lys-36, and
Lys-57 mutants to be more stable than wild type protein. We believe
that the most reasonable explanation for the DAUDA release phenomenon
is that Lys-31, Lys-36, and Lys-57 interact with the anionic interface
in a process involving initial electrostatic binding followed by
conformational changes resulting in ligand release.
The nature of the conformational changes has yet to be fully defined;
however, it is notable that the crucial residues are all found within
the portal region of the protein and have been highlighted as being
most disordered in structural studies. Moreover, studies with
tryptophan-containing mutants highlight a change in the environment of
Trp-3 in the presence of anionic vesicles, whereas FRET and succinimide
quenching studies with tryptophan mutants confirm binding to anionic
vesicles. A model is presented (Fig. 7), consistent with the
experimental data, that highlights possible conformational changes in
the protein. Potential membrane penetration is consistent with the
observations that, although the initial binding of the FABP to the
anionic phospholipid vesicle is prevented by high salt, the process can
be only partially reversed by the subsequent addition of high salt (7)
and is confirmed by our FRET studies.
The significance of the binding of liver FABP to anionic phospholipid
interfaces under conditions of low ionic strength, in terms of
targeting fatty acids to sites of further metabolism with the cell, has
been discussed previously (7). However, the binding of liver FABP to
anionic vesicles is an example of a more general phenomenon. The recent
description of a triglyceride lipase binding to small anionic vesicles
(32) has remarkable parallels with the data obtained with liver FABP.
In the case of the lipase, lid opening allowing unrestricted
substrate binding/product release is only possible with anionic SUVs,
where quantitative binding to the membrane surface is seen under
conditions of low ionic strength. Lid opening is not seen with either
phosphatidylcholine vesicles or with larger diameter vesicles
prepared from phosphatidylglycerol, whereas we do not observe binding
to multilamellar vesicles prepared from DOPG. The model for interfacial
binding of this lipase (32) involves penetration of the helical lid
into the anionic interface thus producing the required conformational change.
In the case of the liver FABP, the mutagenesis studies described above
suggest that -helix II is most directly involved in membrane
interactions. This is in contrast with other FABPs that have
been studied, where it is the amphipathic nature of the -helix I,
suggesting that this helix is the major site of interaction with the
membrane (3). In the case of heart FABP, mutagenesis of Lys-22 (a
residue present in -helix I and equivalent to Lys-20 in liver FABP)
to glutamate (K22E) caused a 3-fold decrease in rates of collisional
transfer, a similar change also being seen by the neutral mutation K22L
(8). Recently, separate mutagenesis studies involving adipocyte FABP
have again highlighted the importance of lysine residues in the helical
cap domain (33) and, using a triple glycine mutant (V32G,F57G,K58G),
the dynamic nature of the portal region in allowing ligand access
(34).
In more general terms, the binding of proteins and peptides to anionic
membrane interfaces is an area of considerable interest because of the
conformational changes that ensue, which may be linked to membrane
insertion. The precise nature of the conformational changes on this
interfacial binding is unclear and may vary with different examples. In
particular, this is the case with the wide range of anti-microbial
peptides under investigation (35). However, protein unfolding is a
common feature as seen with model studies involving for example,
cytochrome c, where the interface can promote both unfolding
and folding. A partially folded membrane-bound intermediate common to
both unfolding and refolding pathways of cytochrome c has
been proposed (36) that can insert into the membrane under appropriate conditions.
The effect of anionic interfaces on protein structure is relevant to
protein folding/unfolding within the body that may be affected by
anionic phospholipid interfaces linked to amyloid formation (37, 38)
and prion protein folding (39). The binding of prion protein to lipid
membranes highlights a membrane insertion event linked to binding to
anionic but not zwitterionic vesicles and associated with an increase
in -sheet structure (40).
In summary, charge reversal mutations of cationic residues on
the surface of liver FABP that make a significant contribution to the
positive potential highlight differential effects on binding of the
protein to anionic phospholipid vesicles. Only those cationic residues
in the vicinity of the portal region contribute significantly to this
binding, a phenomenon that is linked to conformational change and
ligand release.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biological Sciences,
University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East, Southampton SO16 7PX,
United Kingdom. Tel.: 44-2380-594-308; Fax: 44-2380-594-459; E-mail: D.C.Wilton@soton.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208141200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FABP, fatty
acid binding protein;
DAUDA, 11-((5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulphonyl)amino)undecanoic acid;
DOPC, dioleoylphosphatidylcholine;
DOPG, dioleoylphosphatidylglycerol;
SUV, small unilamellar vesicle;
dansyl-DHPE, dansyl-dihexadecanoylphosphatidylethanolamine;
FRET, fluorescence
resonance energy transfer;
CPK, Corey Pauling
Kultan.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Banaszak, L.,
Winter, N., Xu, Z. H.,
Bernlohr, D. A.,
Cowan, S.,
and Jones, T. A.
(1994)
Adv. Protein Chem.
45,
89-151[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Glatz, J. C.,
and VanderVusse, G. J.
(1996)
Prog. Lipid Res.
35,
243-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Storch, J.,
and Thumser, A. E. A.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1486,
28-44[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Hertzel, A. V.,
and Bernlohr, D. A.
(2000)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
11,
175-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Borchers, T.,
and Spener, F.
(1994)
Curr. Top. Membr.
40,
261-294[CrossRef]
|
| 6.
|
Coe, N. R.,
and Bernlohr, D. A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1391,
287-306[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Davies, J. K.,
Thumser, A. E. A.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
16932-16940[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Herr, F. M.,
Aronson, J.,
and Storch, J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
1296-1303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Herr, F. M.,
Matarese, V.,
Bernlohr, D. A.,
and Storch, J.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11840-11845[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Corsico, B.,
Cistola, D. P.,
Frieden, C.,
and Storch, J.
(1998)
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
95,
12174-12178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Wu, F.,
Corsico, B.,
Flach, C. R.,
Cistola, D. P.,
Storch, J.,
and Mendelsohn, R.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
1976-1983[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Lehrer, R. I.,
and Ganz, T.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
797,
228-239[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Heimburg, T.,
and Marsh, D.
(1995)
Biophys. J.
68,
536-546[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Watts, A.
(1997)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
25,
1119-1124[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Buckland, A. G.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1483,
199-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Thompson, J.,
Reese-Wagoner, A.,
and Banaszak, L.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1441,
117-130[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Snitko, Y.,
Koduri, R. S.,
Han, S. K.,
Othman, R.,
Baker, S. F.,
Molini, B. J.,
Wilton, D. C.,
Gelb, M. H.,
and Cho, W. H.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
14325-14333[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Thompson, J.,
Winter, N.,
Terwey, D.,
Bratt, J.,
and Banaszak, L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7140-7150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Worrall, A. F.,
Evans, C.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
278,
365-368
|
| 20.
|
Thumser, A. E. A.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
300,
827-833
|
| 21.
|
Lowe, J. B.,
Sacchettini, J. C.,
Laposata, M.,
McQuillan, J. J.,
and Gordon, J. I.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
5931-5937[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Kane, C. D.,
and Bernlohr, D. A.
(1996)
Anal. Biochem.
233,
197-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Eftink, M. R.,
and Ghiron, C. A.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
3891-3899[CrossRef]
|
| 24.
|
Wilkinson, T. I.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(1986)
Biochem. J.
238,
419-424[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Wilkinson, T. I.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(1987)
Biochem. J.
247,
485-488[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Thumser, A. E. A.,
Evans, C.,
Worrall, A. F.,
and Wilton, D. C.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
297,
103-107
|
| 27.
|
Thompson, J.,
Ory, J.,
Reese-Wagoner, A.,
and Banaszak, L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
192,
9-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Hodsdon, M. E.,
and Cistola, D. P.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
1450-1460[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Hodsdon, M. E.,
and Cistola, D. P.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
2278-2290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Kennedy, M. W.,
Scott, J. C., Lo, S.,
Beauchamp, J.,
and McManus, D. P.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
349,
377-384[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Sacchettini, J. C.,
Gordon, J. I.,
and Banaszak, L. J.
(1989)
J. Mol. Biol.
208,
327-339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Cajal, Y.,
Svendsen, A.,
Girona, V.,
Patkar, S. A.,
and Alsina, M. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
413-423[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Liou, H. L.,
and Storch, J.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6475-6485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Jenkins, A. E.,
Hockenberry, J. A.,
Nguyen, T.,
and Bernlohr, D. A.
(2002)
Biochemistry
41,
2022-2027[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Zasloff, M.
(2002)
Nature
415,
389-395[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Sanghera, N.,
and Pinheiro, T. T.
(2000)
Prot. Sci.
9,
1194-1202[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Martinez-Senac, M. D.,
Villalain, J.,
and Gomez-Fernandez, J. C.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
265,
744-753[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
McLaurin, J.,
and Chakrabartty, A.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
245,
355-363[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Morillas, M.,
Swietnicki, W.,
Gambetti, P.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36859-36865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Sanghera, N.,
and Pinheiro, T. J. T.
(2002)
J. Mol. Biol.
315,
1241-1256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Hagan, J. Worner-Gibbs, and D. C. Wilton
Tryptophan Insertion Mutagenesis of Liver Fatty Acid-binding Protein: L28W MUTANT PROVIDES IMPORTANT INSIGHTS INTO LIGAND BINDING AND PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTION
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 21, 2005;
280(3):
1782 - 1789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|