|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M209672200 on October 15, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49403-49407, December 20, 2002
Identification of a Potent and Orally Active Non-peptide C5a
Receptor Antagonist*
Hiroshi
Sumichika ,
Kei
Sakata,
Noriko
Sato,
Sanae
Takeshita,
Seigo
Ishibuchi,
Mitsuharu
Nakamura,
Takao
Kamahori,
Syuji
Ehara,
Katsuhiko
Itoh,
Tatsuyuki
Ohtsuka,
Tomoko
Ohbora,
Tadashi
Mishina,
Hirotsugu
Komatsu, and
Yoichi
Naka
From Pharmaceuticals Research Division, Mitsubishi Pharma Co.,
1000, Kamoshida-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama 227-0033, Japan
Received for publication, September 20, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The anaphylatoxin C5a is a potent chemotactic
factor for neutrophils and other leukocytes, and functions as an
important inflammatory mediator. Through a high capacity screening
followed by chemical optimization, we identified a novel non-peptide
C5a receptor antagonist, N-[(4-dimethylaminophenyl)methyl]-N-(4-isopropylphenyl)-7-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1- carboxamide
hydrochloride (W-54011). W-54011 inhibited the binding of
125I-labeled C5a to human neutrophils with a
Ki value of 2.2 nM. W-54011 also
inhibited C5a-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization,
chemotaxis, and generation of reactive super oxide species in human
neutrophils with IC50 values of 3.1, 2.7, and 1.6 nM, respectively. In C5a-induced intracellular
Ca2+ mobilization assay with human neutrophils, W-54011 did
not show agonistic activity at up to 10 µM and shifted
rightward the concentration-response curves to C5a without depressing
the maximal responses. Examination on the species specificity of
W-54011 revealed that it was able to inhibit C5a-induced intracellular
Ca2+ mobilization in neutrophils of cynomolgus monkeys and
gerbils but not mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs. In gerbils, oral administration of W-54011 (3-30 mg/kg) inhibited
C5a-induced neutropenia in a dose-dependent manner. The
present report is the first description of an orally active non-peptide
C5a receptor antagonist that could contribute to the treatment of
inflammatory diseases mediated by C5a.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The complement component C5a is a 74-amino acid peptide generated
during the classical, alternative, and lectin pathways of complement
activation (1, 2). C5a is a potent chemotactic factor for neutrophils
and other leukocytes and is a potent inflammatory mediator. Moreover,
C5a causes histamine release from mast cells, smooth muscle
contraction, increase in vascular permeability, eliciting of superoxide
anion production, enhancement of neutrophil-endothelial cell adhesion,
induction of several cytokines (i.e. IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and
TNF- ) from leukocytes, and augmentation of the humoral and
cell-mediated immune response. C5a exerts these activities by binding
to G-protein-coupled C5a receptor
(C5aR)1 on the plasma
membrane of target cells (3). These biological activities of C5a are
implicated in a variety of diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (4,
5), systemic lupus erythematosus (6-9), reperfusion injury (10),
Alzheimer's disease (11-15), and sepsis (16, 17). The pathogenic
action of C5/C5a is also shown in some animal models. For instance, in
murine collagen-induced arthritis, an animal model of rheumatoid
arthritis (RA), administration of anti-C5 antibody during the disease
induction or after the onset suppresses or ameliorates the disease
(18). Anti-C5 antibody is also effective in a new RA model (19), K/BxN
mouse model induced by anti-glucose 6-phosphate isomerase (GPI)
auto-antibodies, which is detected in 64% of RA patients (20-22).
Furthermore, the anti-GPI antibody-induced arthritis does not occur in
C5aR-deficient mice, indicating that C5a is important in the
development of arthritis rather than C5b, which is another part of C5
and is a component of the membrane attack complex.
Inhibition of C5a function has been attempted with anti-C5a antibodies
and C5aR antagonists (for review, see Refs. 23, 24). Anti-C5a
antibodies inhibit immune complex-induced inflammation and reperfusion
injury and are effective in septic primates and rats (25-27). On the
other hand, although C5aR antagonists, including non-peptides, small
peptides, C5a mutants, and anti-C5aR antibodies, have been studied for
the past 2 decades, only a few candidates have been discovered as
non-peptide antagonists. These non-peptide antagonists, however, are
not so potent (IC50, more than subhundreds nM
in 125I-rhC5a binding assay) and have not been reported on
as to their in vivo activities. As a small peptide
antagonist, hexapeptide (MeFKP-D-ChaWr, C089) was first
reported in 1994 (28). C089 exhibits an IC50 value of 70 nM in 125I-rhC5a binding assay and has been
reported recently to inhibit the late airway response in allergic rats
and inhibit thrombotic glomerulonephritis in rats (29). The recent
reports describe two other types of C5aR antagonists, one of which is a
group of F-[OP-D-ChaWR] derivatives (30-34), cyclized
peptides of modified C089, and the other is a group of C5a mutants
(35-37). Intravenous injection of these C5aR antagonists inhibits
immune complex-induced inflammation and reperfusion injury. Based on
these findings, the appearance of non-peptide C5aR antagonists that can
be used against various human disorders is expected (38). In the
present report, we describe the discovery and pharmacological
characterization of an orally active non-peptide C5aR antagonist.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Recombinant human C5a (rhC5a) was purchased from
Sigma. 125I-labeled recombinant human C5a
(125I-rhC5a) was purchased from Amersham Biosciences.
Anti-C5aR monoclonal antibody (clone: S5/1) (39) was purchased from
Serotec (Oxford, UK). Fresh isolated whole blood of cynomolgus monkeys,
anticoagulated with EDTA, was purchased from Shin-nihonkagaku
(Kagoshima, Japan).
Animals--
BALB/c mice (AnNCrj) and Wistar rats (Crj) were
purchased from Charles River Japan (Kanagawa, Japan). Mongolian gerbils
(MGS/Sea), Hartley guinea pigs (Std), rabbits (KBT JW), and beagle dogs
were purchased from Seac Yoshitomi (Fukuoka, Japan), Japan SLC
(Shizuoka, Japan), Biotec (Saga, Japan), and Keari (Osaka, Japan), respectively.
Synthesis of
Compounds--
N-[(4-dimethylaminophenyl)methyl]-N-(4-isopropylphenyl)-7-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-carboxamide
hydrochloride (W-54011) was synthesized as follows: a solution of
7-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-carbonyl chloride (16.3 g,
72.7 mmol) and [(4-dimethylaminophenyl)methyl](4-isopropylphenyl) amine (19.5 g, 72.7 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (200 ml)
was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was
poured into water and extracted two times with CHCl3. The
combined organic layer was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated. The residue was chromatographed
over silica gel using a mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane (1:4) as
eluent to give a yellow oil (29.9 g, 90.1%). To a solution of the oil
(29.9 g, 63.5 mmol) in ethanol (300 ml) was added hydrogen chloride
(4.0 M solution in 1,4-dioxane, 17.5 ml), and the resulting
solid was filtered, recrystallized from ethanol:water to afford W-54011
(24.2 g, 75.8%) as yellow crystals. The melting point was
147 °C; mass spectrometry (electrospray ionization) was
m/z 457 [M + H]+. The cyclic C5aR
antagonist F-[OP-D-ChaWR] was synthesized according to
the method reported by Finch et al. (31).
Cell Line and Neutrophil Isolation--
The human
histocytic lymphoma line U-937 was obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection. Neutrophils were isolated from whole blood of
various species, anticoagulated with 0.2% EDTA. Whole blood was
collected from healthy volunteers and animals via vein puncture (human,
cynomolgus monkey, dog, and rabbit) or inferior vena cava puncture
(guinea pig, rat, gerbil and mouse under anesthesia). The blood was
then layered on an equal volume of Lympholyte®-poly
(Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd., Hornby, Canada) in a centrifuge tube and
then centrifuged at 500 × g for 30 min at room
temperature. After centrifugation, the polymorphonuclear cells were
harvested, resuspended in Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS,
Invitrogen) containing 1% fetal calf serum (FCS), and used as
neutrophils. Polymorphonuclear cells in this fraction were >95%.
125I-rhC5a Binding Assay--
This assay was
performed in 96-well filtration plates (Multiscreen MADV NOB,
Millipore, Bedford, MA) in a total volume of 100 µl. Human
neutrophils (1 × 105 cells/well) were incubated with
125I-rhC5a (200 pM) and varying concentrations
of test compounds in the binding buffer (50 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2,
0.5% bovine serum albumin, and 0.02% NaN3, adjusted to pH
7.2 with NaOH) at 4 °C for 2 h. Filters were washed four times
by vacuum filtration with 300 µl/well cold binding buffer, then
dried, punched, and measured for radioactivity in a gamma counter
(Packard Cobra, GMI, Inc., Albertville, MI). The nonspecific binding
was defined by the binding in the presence of 20 nM
unlabeled rhC5a.
Intracellular Ca2+ Mobilization
Assay--
Neutrophils (5 × 106 cells/ml) were
loaded with 5 µM Fura-2 AM (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) for
40 min at 37 °C. After two washes, the cells were suspended at a
concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml in HBSS containing
1% FCS. The studies were conducted by a microtiter plate-based assay
using a functional drug screening system (FDSS6000, Hamamatsu
Photonics, Shizuoka, Japan) in black wall 96-well plates
(Corning, Acton, MA) in a total volume of 140 µl. The cells (1 × 105 cells/100 µl/well) and varying concentrations of
test compounds (20 µl/well) in HBSS containing 1% FCS were plated in
black wall 96-well plates. The plates were placed into a FDSS6000, and
then the changes in fluorescence were monitored at 37 °C at
excitation wavelengths of 340 nm and 380 nm and an emission wavelength
of 510 nm. 10 s after the start of monitoring, stimulators (20 µl/well) were added. Calculation of Ca2+ concentration
was performed using a Kd for Ca2+
binding of 224 nM (40). The maximal change in
Ca2+ concentration after stimulator addition was quantitated.
Chemotaxis Assay--
Neutrophils were resuspended in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) containing 25 mM HEPES and 0.1% BSA at a
concentration of 5 × 106 cells/ml and loaded with 5 µM Calcein-AM (Funakoshi, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min at
37 °C. After three washes, the cells were resuspended at a
concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin. The cells (1 × 105 cells/200 µl/well) and varying concentrations of test
compounds (200 µl/well) in RPMI 1640 containing 25 mM
HEPES and 0.1% bovine serum albumin were placed into chemotaxicells
(3-µm pore size, Kurabou, Osaka, Japan) within 24-well plates
containing 100 pM rhC5a (300 µl/well). The plates were
incubated for 90 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After
removing the chemotaxicells, migrated cells were lysed by adding 100 µl/well cell lysing solution (10% SDS, 0.01 N HCl), and
the fluorescence was measured using a fluoro-plate reader (Cyto
FlourII, Perseptive Biosystems, Framingham, MA) at excitation
wavelength of 485 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm.
Reactive Super Oxide Species (ROS) Generation Assay--
The
studies were conducted by a microtiter plate-based assay using a
microplate luminometer (Microlumat Plus LB96V, Berthold, Bad Wildbad,
Germany) in white wall 96-well plates (Berthold) in a total
volume of 200 µl. The cells (1 × 105 cells/150
µl/well) and varying concentrations of test compounds (25 µl/well)
in HBSS containing 1% FCS and 1 mM luminol (Wako, Osaka,
Japan) were plated in white wall 96-well plates. After the plates were
incubated in a Microlumat at 37 °C for 5 min, rhC5a (25 µl/well)
was added at a final concentration of 3 nM, and the
luminescence was monitored for 15 min. The maximal change in
luminescence was quantitated as ROS generation.
Gerbil Neutropenia Assay--
The C5a-induced neutropenia was
based on the observation that neutrophils transiently disappear from
circulation after systemic infusion of chemoattractants such as C5a or
leukotrien B4 (32, 37, 41). Male mongolian gerbils (6-12 weeks)
were orally treated with W-54011 (3, 10, 30 mg/kg) suspended in 0.5%
hydroxypropylmethylcellulose 4 h before rhC5a injection. The
animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital (Abbott Laboratories,
Abbot Park, IL), and the skin was incised to expose the jugular veins
for rhC5a injection and blood collection using syringes. RhC5a was
injected at time 0. Blood was sampled at -1, 1, 3, and 5 min into
EDTA-treated tubes (Capiject, Terumo Medical, Somerset, NJ) and counted
using Technicon H*1E Hematology System (Technicon, Macon, GA). To
determine the levels of C5a-induced neutropenia, data were expressed as
percentages of the neutrophil counts 1 min before rhC5a injection.
 |
RESULTS |
To identify a non-peptide C5aR antagonist, a high capacity
radioligand screening was configured using 125I-rhC5a and
C5aR-expressing U-937 cells. In consequence of the followed chemical
optimization, we identified a novel non-peptide C5aR antagonist,
N-[(4-dimethylaminophenyl)methyl]-N-(4-isopropylphenyl)-7-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-carboxamide (W-54011, Fig. 1). W-54011 inhibited
125I-rhC5a competitive binding to human neutrophils with a
Ki value of 2.2 nM and was more potent
than anti-C5aR antibody (S5/1) with a Ki value of
8.1 nM and F-[OP-D-ChaWR] with a
Ki value of 15 nM (Fig.
2).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of
125I-rhC5a binding to human neutrophils by C5a,
W-54011, anti-C5a R antibody and
F-[OP-D-ChaWR]. Human neutrophils were
incubated with 0.2 nM 125I-rhC5a in the absence
and presence of a range of concentrations of C5a, W-54011, anti-C5a R
antibody, or F-[OP-D-ChaWR], and specific binding was
determined. Data are means ± S.E. of multiple experiments
(n = 3).
|
|
To determine whether W-54011 was a functional antagonist for human C5aR
or not, we measured the ability of this compound to inhibit
rhC5a-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, chemotaxis,
and generation of ROS in human neutrophils. W-54011 inhibited these
responses with IC50 values of 1.6-3.1 nM and
was more potent than F-[OP-D-ChaWR] (Table
I) as was observed in
125I-rhC5a competitive binding. Further, at concentrations
up to 10 µM, W-54011 had no effect on intracellular
Ca2+ mobilization in human neutrophils, indicating that
this compound is a full antagonist (data not shown). Next, to determine
the selectivity for the C5aR, W-54011 was tested for the ability to inhibit Ca2+ mobilization stimulated with other
G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands, such as fMLP,
platelet-activating factor, and IL-8. At concentrations up to 10 µM, W-54011 did not affect Ca2+ mobilization
stimulated with submaximally effective concentrations of fMLP (1 nM), platelet-activating factor (0.3 nM), and
IL-8 (0.1 nM) (data not shown). This result demonstrates
that W-54011 is highly specific for C5aR.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effects of W-54011 and F-[OP-D-ChaWR] on rhC5a-induced
calcium mobilization, chemotaxis, and ROS release in human neutrophils
The assays were performed as described under "Experimental
Procedures." C5a concentration used in each assay, IC50
values, and the 95% confidential limit of tested compounds are
indicated.
|
|
The mechanism of the antagonistic effect of W-54011 was examined with
human neutrophils by Schild analysis (42). The concentration-response curves for Ca2+ mobilization induced by rhC5a were
determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of W-54011
(Fig. 3). W-54011 shifted rightward the
concentration-response curves to C5a without depressing the maximal
responses. This result indicates that W-54011 has a competitive
antagonist-like function, but the response curves at low concentrations
(0.3-3 nM) of W-54011 were not parallel to those at the
other concentrations.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effects of W-54011 on the
concentration-dependent curves of rhC5a-induced
Ca2+ mobilization in human neutrophils.
Ca2+ mobilization in human neutrophils was induced by a
range of rhC5a concentrations in the absence and presence of W-54011 at
the concentrations indicated. Data are expressed as the maximal changes
of the intracellular Ca2+ level. The results shown are
representative from three separate studies.
|
|
The species selectivity of W-54011 was examined in rhC5a-induced
intracellular Ca2+ mobilization of neutrophils in various
species. The responses of neutrophils to rhC5a were different among
these species (Fig. 4A, mice,
rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs; data not shown). The W-54011 was
able to inhibit the response in cynomolgus monkeys and gerbils with
IC50 values of 1.7 and 3.2 nM, respectively
(Fig. 4B) but not in mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, and
dogs (data not shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Species selectivity of rhC5a and W-54011 in
rhC5a-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilizations
of neutrophils in various species. A, Ca2+
mobilization in neutrophils of human, cynomolgus monkey, and gerbil was
induced by a range of rhC5a concentrations. Data are expressed as the
maximal changes of the intracellular Ca2+ level. Data are
means ± S.E. of multiple experiments. B,
Ca2+ mobilization in neutrophils of human, cynomolgus
monkey, and gerbil was induced by rhC5a concentrations of 0.1, 1, and
10 nM, respectively in the absence and presence of a range
of W-54011 concentrations. Data are means ± S.E. of multiple
experiments.
|
|
The in vivo effect of W-54011 was examined in the
C5a-induced neutropenia model of mongolian gerbils. Intravenous
injection of 100 µg/kg rhC5a caused a rapid and transient
neutropenia, which reached nadir at 1 min after the rhC5a injection and
returned to baseline within 5 min. When W-54011 (3-30 mg/kg) was
orally administered 4 h before rhC5a injection, it inhibited the
neutropenia in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
5). This inhibition by W-54011 was also
observed when it was administered 1 or 8 h before rhC5a injection
but not 24 h (data not shown). Because the model described above
was based on the reaction between different species, human C5a and
gerbil C5aR, it is unclear whether the compound inhibits the
interaction between gerbil C5a and C5aR. So, we next used gerbil
zymosan-activated serum (gZAS) as a source of gerbil C5a. Intravenous
injection of gZAS caused a rapid and transient neutropenia in a
dose-dependent manner similar to that of rhC5a (Fig.
6A). When W-54011 (10, 30 mg/kg) was orally administered 4 h before gZAS (5-fold dilution, 2 ml/kg) injection, it inhibited this neutropenia (Fig.
6B).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of W-54011 on rhC5a-induced
neutropenia in gerbils. Gerbils were orally treated with W-54011
(3, 10, 30 mg/kg) 4 h before rhC5a (100 µg/kg,
intravenous) injection. Vehicle control was treated with vehicles of
W-54011 and rhC5a. Neutropenia control was treated with a vehicle of
W-54011 before rhC5a injection. Blood was sampled at -1, 1, 3, and 5 min after rhC5a injection, and neutrophils were counted. Data are
expressed as percentages of the neutrophil counts 1 min before rhC5a
injection and are shown as means ± S.E. (n = 6-8). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, significantly different from neutropenia control (Dunnett's multiple
comparison test). ##, p < 0.01, significantly
different from vehicle control (Student's t test).
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Neutropenia induced by gZAS and effects of
W-54011 on gZAS-induced neutropenia in gerbils. A,
gerbils were treated with gZAS (3-, 10-, and 30-times dilution, 2 ml/kg, intravenous). Blood was sampled at -1, 1, 3, 5 min after gZAS
injection, and neutrophils were counted. B, gerbils were
orally treated with W-54011 (10, 30 mg/kg) 4 h before gZAS
(5 times dilution, 2 ml/kg, intravenous) injection. Vehicle control was
treated with vehicles of W-54011 and gZAS. Neutropenia control was
treated with a vehicle of W-54011 before gZAS injection. Blood was
sampled at -1, 1, 3, 5 min after gZAS injection, and neutrophils were
counted. Data are expressed as percentages of the neutrophil counts 1 min before gZAS injection and are shown as means ± S.E.
(n = 4). ++, p < 0.01, significantly
different from vehicle control (Dunnett's multiple comparison test).
*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, significantly different from neutropenia control (Dunnett's multiple
comparison test); ##, p < 0.01, significantly
different from vehicle control (Student's t test).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present report, we represented a potent and orally active
non-peptide C5aR antagonist, named W-54011, for the first time. W-54011
inhibited C5a binding and C5a-induced functions in human neutrophils
with IC50 values of less than 5 nM and was more
potent than F-[OP-D-ChaWR], which has been considered to be the most potent small C5aR antagonist. The C5aR antagonistic activity of W-54011 was species-specific and C5aR-specific. W-54011 also exhibited C5a antagonistic activity in vivo (gerbils).
The binding site of W-54011 is not fully investigated, but we
considered that it binds to C5aR by the following three observations. 1) In Ca2+ mobilization assay, the inhibitory activity of
W-54011 remained after W-54011-treated cells were washed briefly in
assay buffer to remove this drug (data not shown). This observation
indicates that W-54011 reacts with C5aR-expressing cells, but not C5a.
2) W-54011 does not inhibit IL-8-, PAF-, or fMLP-induced
Ca2+ mobilization. This observation indicates that W-54011
does not inhibit signal machineries commonly used by GPCRs. 3) The
antagonistic action of W-54011 was exhibited only in the neutrophils of
human, cynomolgus monkeys, and gerbils, but not in those of other
examined species. The homology of C5aRs is more than 90% between human and Rhesus monkeys (43) and is about 60-70% between humans and mice
(44), rats (45), rabbits (46), dogs (47), or guinea pigs (48),
suggesting that W-54011 binds to a region that is conserved in the
C5aRs of humans and cynomolgus monkeys and does not exist in those of
other species. Although the C5aR sequence of gerbils has not been
defined, it is considered that the binding site of W-54011 is conserved
similarly to that of humans. On the other hand, in the Ca2+
mobilization assay, W-54011 shifted rightward the
concentration-response curves to C5a without depressing the maximal
responses. The response curves were not parallel between the low
concentrations (0.3-3 nM) of W-54011 and the high
concentrations (10-300 nM), although the curves were
parallel among the high concentrations (10-300 nM) of
W-54011. These results suggest that W-54011 inhibits competitively the
action of C5a at high concentrations, but not at low concentrations. However, the binding mechanism of W-54011 remains to be resolved.
Over the past two decades, many efforts have been exerted to discover
C5aR antagonists, then C-terminal mimic peptides of C5a and C5a mutants
were identified, but potent and non-peptide antagonists had not been
discovered. On this point, Wong (24) and Pellas and Wennogle (23)
review in detail. Briefly, bezodiazepine derivatives and
spiroindane-bearing hydantoin derivatives discovered by de Laszlo
et al. have affinity to C5aR, but they are partial agonists
(49). Lanza et al. also reported substituted
4,6-diaminoquinolines as C5aR antagonists, but their activity is not so
potent (IC50, 2 µg/ml in C5a binding assay) (50). In
addition to these compounds, Astles et al. reported
phenylguanidine derivatives as C5aR antagonist with an IC50
value of 0.8 µM (51), but these compounds seem to be cytotoxic.
Thus, non-peptide C5a binding inhibitors reported previously are not so
potent, and some are partial agonists. Moreover, most of these
compounds are positively charged. That reason is considered since C5a
is a highly cationic polypeptide. C5a binding to its receptor is
predominantly through two-site binding of charge-charge interactions
(3, 52, 53), one of which is an interaction of the positive charged
N-terminal disulfide-linked core of C5a and the negative charged
N-terminal domain of its receptor, and the other, which is an
interaction of the positive charged C-terminal tail of C5a and the
interhelical region of its receptor and which is essential for the
functional response to C5a. Based on this information, we dared to pick
up an uncharged compound to discover a new type of C5a receptor
antagonist after we screened our chemical libraries by binding assay
using 125I-labeled C5a according to the similar method for
C5a inhibitors described previously. In addition to this point, we used
whole cells of stimulated U-937 cells as a source of C5aR in the
binding assay instead of the plasma membrane, which have been used in previously reported C5a inhibitors. Moreover, we used two screening systems for chemical optimization, a binding assay system the same as
for the first screening and a ROS assay system with human neutrophils.
Although it is not clear whether the former contributed to the
discovery of potent C5aR antagonists, the latter is thought to be
important for this study for the following reasons: structure activity
relationships obtained during chemical optimization did not completely
coincide between ROS assay using intact human neutrophils and binding
assay using human tumor line, U-937 cells (data not shown). Namely, it
is thought to be important to use intact human cells.
We discovered a potent and orally active non-peptide C5aR antagonist.
Since C5a is implicated in a variety of diseases, it is anticipated
that an orally active non-peptide C5aR antagonist may have potential as
novel therapeutics.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-45-963-4286; Fax: 81-45-963-3326; E-mail:
sumichika.hiroshi@mg.m-pharma.co.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 15, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209672200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
C5aR, C5a receptor;
RA, rheumatoid arthritis;
GPI, glucose 6-phosphate isomerase;
rhC5a, recombinant human C5a;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
HBSS, Hanks' balanced
salt solution;
ROS, reactive oxide species;
GPCR, G-protein-coupled
receptor;
gZAS, gerbil zymosan-activated serum.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gerard, C.,
and Gerard, N. P.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12,
775-808[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Ember, J. A.,
and Hugli, T. E.
(1997)
Immunopharmacology
38,
3-15[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Wetsel, R. A.
(1995)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
7,
48-53[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Jose, P. J.,
Moss, I. K.,
Maini, R. N.,
and Williams, T. J.
(1990)
Ann. Rheum. Dis.
49,
747-752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Hogasen, K.,
Mollnes, T. E.,
Harboe, M.,
Gotze, O.,
Hammer, H. B.,
and Oppermann, M.
(1995)
J. Rheumatol.
22,
24-28[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Given, W. P.,
Edelson, H. S.,
Kaplan, H. B.,
Aisen, P.,
Weissmann, G.,
and Abramson, S. B.
(1984)
Arthritis Rheum.
27,
631-637[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Belmont, H. M.,
Hopkins, P.,
Edelson, H. S.,
Kaplan, H. B.,
Ludewig, R.,
Weissmann, G.,
and Abramson, S.
(1986)
Arthritis Rheum.
29,
1085-1089[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Spronk, P. E.,
Limburg, P. C.,
and Kallenberg, C. G.
(1995)
Lupus
4,
86-94[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Matsuki, Y.,
Suzuki, K.,
Kawakami, M.,
Ishizuka, T.,
Hidaka, T.,
and Nakamura, H.
(1998)
J. Clin. Apheresis.
13,
108-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Pemberton, M.,
Anderson, G.,
Vetvicka, V.,
Justus, D. E.,
and Ross, G. D.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
150,
5104-5113[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Velazquez, P.,
Cribbs, D. H.,
Poulos, T. L.,
and Tenner, A. J.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
77-79[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Bradt, B. M.,
Kolb, W. P.,
and Cooper, N. R.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
431-438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
O'Barr, S.,
and Cooper, N. R.
(2000)
J. Neuroimmunol.
109,
87-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Gasque, P.,
Dean, Y. D.,
McGreal, E. P.,
VanBeek, J.,
and Morgan, B. P.
(2000)
Immunopharmacology
49,
171-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Cooper, N. R.,
Bradt, B. M.,
O'Barr, S.,
and Yu, J. X.
(2000)
Immunol. Res.
21,
159-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Bengtson, A.,
and Heideman, M.
(1988)
Arch. Surg.
123,
645-649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Nakae, H.,
Endo, S.,
Inada, K.,
and Yoshida, M.
(1996)
Surg. Today
26,
225-229[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Wang, Y.,
Rollins, S. A.,
Madri, J. A.,
and Matis, L. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8955-8959[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Ji, H.,
Ohmura, K.,
Mahmood, U.,
Lee, D. M.,
Hofhuis, F. M.,
Boackle, S. A.,
Takahashi, K.,
Holers, V. M.,
Walport, M.,
Gerard, C.,
Ezekowitz, A.,
Carroll, M. C.,
Brenner, M.,
Weissleder, R.,
Verbeek, J. S.,
Duchatelle, V.,
Degott, C.,
Benoist, C.,
and Mathis, D.
(2002)
Immunity
16,
157-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Schaller, M.,
Burton, D. R.,
and Ditzel, H. J.
(2001)
Nat. Immunol.
2,
746-753[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Kassahn, D.,
Kolb, C.,
Solomon, S.,
Bochtler, P.,
and Illges, H.
(2002)
Nat. Immunol.
3,
411-412[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Schubert, D.,
Schmidt, M.,
Zaiss, D.,
Jungblut, P. R.,
and Kamradt, T.
(2002)
Nat. Immunol.
3,
411[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Pellas, T. C.,
and Wennogle, L. P.
(1999)
Curr. Pharm. Des.
5,
737-755[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Wong, A. K.
(1999)
Investig. Drugs
2,
686-693
|
| 25.
|
Stevens, J. H.,
O'Hanley, P.,
Shapiro, J. M.,
Mihm, F. G.,
Satoh, P. S.,
Collins, J. A.,
and Raffin, T. A.
(1986)
J. Clin. Invest.
77,
1812-1816[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Czermak, B. J.,
Sarma, V.,
Pierson, C. L.,
Warner, R. L.,
Huber-Lang, M.,
Bless, N. M.,
Schmal, H.,
Friedl, H. P.,
and Ward, P. A.
(1999)
Nat. Med.
5,
788-792[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Huber-Lang, M. S.,
Sarma, J. V.,
McGuire, S. R., Lu, K. T.,
Guo, R. F.,
Padgaonkar, V. A.,
Younkin, E. M.,
Laudes, I. J.,
Riedemann, N. C.,
Younger, J. G.,
and Ward, P. A.
(2001)
Faseb J.
15,
568-570[Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Konteatis, Z. D.,
Siciliano, S. J.,
Van Riper, G.,
Molineaux, C. J.,
Pandya, S.,
Fischer, P.,
Rosen, H.,
Mumford, R. A.,
and Springer, M. S.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
4200-4205[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Kondo, C.,
Mizuno, M.,
Nishikawa, K.,
Yuzawa, Y.,
Hotta, N.,
and Matsuo, S.
(2001)
Clin. Exp. Immunol.
124,
323-329[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Paczkowski, N. J.,
Finch, A. M.,
Whitmore, J. B.,
Short, A. J.,
Wong, A. K.,
Monk, P. N.,
Cain, S. A.,
Fairlie, D. P.,
and Taylor, S. M.
(1999)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
128,
1461-1466[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Finch, A. M.,
Wong, A. K.,
Paczkowski, N. J.,
Wadi, S. K.,
Craik, D. J.,
Fairlie, D. P.,
and Taylor, S. M.
(1999)
J. Med. Chem.
42,
1965-1974[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Short, A.,
Wong, A. K.,
Finch, A. M.,
Haaima, G.,
Shiels, I. A.,
Fairlie, D. P.,
and Taylor, S. M.
(1999)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
126,
551-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Strachan, A. J.,
Woodruff, T. M.,
Haaima, G.,
Fairlie, D. P.,
and Taylor, S. M.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
6560-6565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Arumugam, T. V.,
Shiels, I. A.,
Woodruff, T. M.,
Reid, R. C.,
Fairlie, D. P.,
and Taylor, S. M.
(2002)
J. Surg. Res.
103,
260-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Heller, T.,
Hennecke, M.,
Baumann, U.,
Gessner, J. E.,
zu Vilsendorf, A. M.,
Baensch, M.,
Boulay, F.,
Kola, A.,
Klos, A.,
Bautsch, W.,
and Kohl, J.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
985-994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Baumann, U.,
Kohl, J.,
Tschernig, T.,
Schwerter-Strumpf, K.,
Verbeek, J. S.,
Schmidt, R. E.,
and Gessner, J. E.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
1065-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Pellas, T. C.,
Boyar, W.,
van Oostrum, J.,
Wasvary, J.,
Fryer, L. R.,
Pastor, G.,
Sills, M.,
Braunwalder, A.,
Yarwood, D. R.,
Kramer, R.,
Kimble, E.,
Hadala, J.,
Haston, W.,
Moreira-Ludewig, R.,
Uziel-Fusi, S.,
Peters, P.,
Bill, K.,
and Wennogle, L. P.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
5616-5621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Kirschfink, M.
(2001)
Immunol. Rev.
180,
177-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Oppermann, M.,
Raedt, U.,
Hebell, T.,
Schmidt, B.,
Zimmermann, B.,
and Gotze, O.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
3785-3794[Abstract]
|
| 40.
|
Grynkiewicz, G.,
Poenie, M.,
and Tsien, R. Y.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
3440-3450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Pellas, T. C.,
Colombo, C.,
Fryer, L. R.,
Pastor, G.,
Haston, W.,
Raychaudhuri, A.,
Kotyuk, B.,
Greenspan, P. D.,
Healy, C.,
and DiPasquale, G.
(1993)
J. Pharmacol. Toxicol Methods
30,
137-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Arunlakshana, O.,
and Schild, H. O.
(1959)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
14,
48-58
|
| 43.
|
Alvarez, V.,
Coto, E.,
Setien, F.,
Gonzalez-Roces, S.,
and Lopez-Larrea, C.
(1996)
Immunogenetics
44,
446-452[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Gerard, C.,
Bao, L.,
Orozco, O.,
Pearson, M.,
Kunz, D.,
and Gerard, N. P.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
2600-2606[Abstract]
|
| 45.
|
Rothermel, E.,
Zwirner, J.,
Vogt, T.,
Rabini, S.,
and Gotze, O.
(1997)
Mol. Immunol.
34,
877-886[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Bachvarov, D. R.,
Houle, S.,
Bachvarova, M.,
Bouthillier, J., St-,
Pierre, S. A.,
Fukuoka, Y.,
Ember, J. A.,
and Marceau, F.
(1999)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
128,
321-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Perret, J. J.,
Raspe, E.,
Vassart, G.,
and Parmentier, M.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
288,
911-917[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Fukuoka, Y.,
Ember, J. A.,
Yasui, A.,
and Hugli, T. E.
(1998)
Int. Immunol.
10,
275-283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
de Laszlo, S. E.,
Allen, E. E., Li, B.,
Ondeyka, D.,
Rivero, R.,
Malkowitz, L.,
Molineaux, C.,
Siciliano, S. J.,
Springer, M. S.,
Greenlee, W. J.,
and Mantlo, N.
(1997)
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
7,
213-218[CrossRef]
|
| 50.
|
Lanza, T. J.,
Durette, P. L.,
Rollins, T.,
Siciliano, S.,
Cianciarulo, D. N.,
Kobayashi, S. V.,
Caldwell, C. G.,
Springer, M. S.,
and Hagmann, W. K.
(1992)
J. Med. Chem.
35,
252-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Astles, P. C.,
Brown, T. J.,
Cox, P.,
Halley, F.,
Lockey, P. M.,
McCarthy, C.,
McLay, I. M.,
Majid, T. N.,
Morley, A. D.,
Porter, B.,
Ratcliffe, A. J.,
and Walsh, R. J. A.
(1997)
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
7,
907-912[CrossRef]
|
| 52.
|
Siciliano, S. J.,
Rollins, T. E.,
DeMartino, J.,
Konteatis, Z.,
Malkowitz, L.,
Van Riper, G.,
Bondy, S.,
Rosen, H.,
and Springer, M. S.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
1214-1218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Zhang, X.,
Boyar, W.,
Galakatos, N.,
and Gonnella, N. C.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
65-72[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. U. Schraufstatter, R. G. DiScipio, M. Zhao, and S. K. Khaldoyanidi
C3a and C5a Are Chemotactic Factors for Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Which Cause Prolonged ERK1/2 Phosphorylation
J. Immunol.,
March 15, 2009;
182(6):
3827 - 3836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Brodbeck, D. N. Cortright, A. P. Kieltyka, J. Yu, C. O. Baltazar, M. E. Buck, R. Meade, G. D. Maynard, A. Thurkauf, D.-S. Chien, et al.
Identification and Characterization of NDT 9513727 [N,N-bis(1,3-Benzodioxol-5-ylmethyl)-1-butyl-2,4-diphenyl-1H-imidazole-5-methanamine], a Novel, Orally Bioavailable C5a Receptor Inverse Agonist
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 2008;
327(3):
898 - 909.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Waters, R. M. Brodbeck, J. Steflik, J. Yu, C. Baltazar, A. E. Peck, D. Severance, L. Y. Zhang, K. Currie, B. L. Chenard, et al.
Molecular Characterization of the Gerbil C5a Receptor and Identification of a Transmembrane Domain V Amino Acid That Is Crucial for Small Molecule Antagonist Interaction
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 9, 2005;
280(49):
40617 - 40623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Fujita, I. Farkas, W. Campbell, L. Baranyi, H. Okada, and N. Okada
Inactivation of C5a Anaphylatoxin by a Peptide That Is Complementary to a Region of C5a
J. Immunol.,
May 15, 2004;
172(10):
6382 - 6387.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Otto, H. Hawlisch, P. N. Monk, M. Muller, A. Klos, C. L. Karp, and J. Kohl
C5a Mutants Are Potent Antagonists of the C5a Receptor (CD88) and of C5L2: POSITION 69 IS THE LOCUS THAT DETERMINES AGONISM OR ANTAGONISM
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 2, 2004;
279(1):
142 - 151.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|