Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206478200 on October 17, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49488-49494, December 20, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/51/49488    most recent
M206478200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, R.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, R.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

PAX6, Paired Domain Influences Sequence Recognition by the Homeodomain*

Rajnikant Mishra, Ivan P. Gorlov, Lian Y. Chao, Sanjaya Singh, and Grady F. SaundersDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030

Received for publication, June 28, 2002, and in revised form, October 10, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PAX6 functions as a transcription factor and has two DNA-binding domains, a paired domain (PD) and a homeodomain (HD), joined by a glycine-rich linker and followed by a proline-serine-threonine-rich (PST) transactivation region at the C terminus. The mechanism of PAX6 function is not clearly understood, and few target genes in vertebrates have been identified. In this report we described the functional analyses of patient missense mutations from the paired domain region of PAX6 and a paireddomain-less isoform (PD-less) of Pax6 that lacks the paired domain and part of the glycine-rich linker. The PD-less was expressed in the brain, eyes, and pancreas of mouse. The level of expression of this isoform was relatively higher in brain. The mutation sites PAX6-L46R and -C52R were located in the PD of PAX6 on either end of the 5a-polypeptide insert of the alternatively spliced form of PAX6, PAX6-5a. Another PAX6 mutant V53L described in this report was adjacent to C52R. We created corresponding mutations in PAX6 and PAX6-5a, and evaluated their transcriptional activation and DNA binding properties. The PD mutants of PAX6 (L46R, C52R, and V53L) exhibited lower transactivation activities and variable DNA binding ability than wild-type PAX6 with PD DNA-binding consensus sequences. The mutated amino acids containing PAX6-5a isoforms showed unexpected transactivation properties with a reporter containing HD DNA-binding sequences. PAX6-5a-C52R, and -V53L showed lower transactivation activities, but PAX6-5a-L46R had greater transactivation ability than PAX6-5a. The PD-less isoform of Pax6 lost its transactivational ability but could bind to the HD DNA-binding sequences. Functional analysis of the PD-less isoform of Pax6 as well as findings related to missense mutations in the PD suggest that the PD of PAX6 is required for HD function.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PAX6 is considered to be the master control gene for morphogenesis of the eye. It is an evolutionarily conserved gene in both vertebrates and invertebrates (1-6). PAX6 functions as a transcription factor, and complete loss of PAX6 function leads to anophthalmia and nasal hypoplasia, as well as to central nervous system defects that cause postnatal death (2, 7, 8). It is required for lens placode formation, growth of the lens (9), correct placement of a single retina in the eye (10), formation of the iris, maintenance of the corneal epithelium, and fate of retinal progenitor cells (11). It has two DNA-binding domains, paired domain (PD)1 at the N terminus, a paired-like homeodomain (HD) linked by a glycine-rich domain and a transactivation region (PST), which is rich in proline, serine, and threonine amino acids at the C terminus of the PAX6 protein. Biochemical and crystallographic studies have shown that the PD actually consists of independent N-terminal (N subdomain) and C-terminal subdomains (C subdomain), which have significant physiological roles in target DNA recognitions (12-17). Crystal structure of the human PAX6 PD-DNA complex revealed specific roles for the linker region of the PD and C subdomain in DNA binding (18). Amino acid residues of PAX6 are highly conserved in almost all the PD, and various missense mutations have been reported (www.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/Softdata/PAX6) in its domains (19-31). An alternatively spliced form of PAX6, known as PAX6-5a, contains an additional 14 amino acids in the PD (2), which disrupts the N subdomain and alters DNA binding properties (13, 32). Loss-of-function of Pax6-5a in mouse leads to iris-hypoplasia and also defects in the retina, lens, and cornea (33). The PDs of other genes of the Pax family, the Pax2, Pax3, and the binding sequence of Pax-5 (BSAP), and Pax6 proteins can recognize similar DNA sequences (12, 34-39). Our earlier studies showed that the transactivation function is distributed throughout the PST region (40). Although the involvement of PAX6 in ocular development is well known (41, 42), identification of target genes of PAX6 has been hindered by two factors. First, the PD of Pax6 can bind to a broad range of DNA sequences. Second, HDs in other proteins recognize similar sequences, as does the Pax6 HD (43).

In humans, heterozygous mutations in the PAX6 gene are responsible for several phenotypes, including aniridia, foveal hypoplasia, Peters' anomaly, ectopia pupillae, and autosomal dominant keratitis (2, 19, 25, 26, 44, 45). Pax6 mutation in rodents results in small eye (46), which, as in humans, appears to be expressed as highly variable phenotypes. However, it is not clear how mutation of the PAX6 gene results in these various phenotypes, and why the phenotypes are of variable expressivities. Functional studies using PAX6 missense mutations with observed developmental defects are useful in understanding the mechanism of PAX6 function. Missense mutations in the DNA-binding domains of PAX6 may cause failure to properly recognize binding sites in the target genes, resulting in partial or complete loss of protein function (40, 47-49).

In this report, we describe the functional properties of three missense mutations in the PD domain of PAX6 that were identified in the DNA of patients with aniridia, and a PD-less isoform of Pax6 from mouse. Since patients with aniridia also have the PAX6-5a isoform, and Pax6-5a was found to be important in maintaining the normal structure of eyes in adult mice (33), these mutations on either end of the 5a-polypeptide insert have been used to examine the role of the PAX6-5a isoform. The results indicate that the functional properties of PAX6 and the PAX6-5a isoform are unique, and PD of PAX6 is required for the function of HD.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mutation Detection and Luciferase Reporter Constructs-- To identify mutations in the PAX6 gene, genomic DNA samples were isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with aniridia. Each exon and its immediate flanking sequence was amplified by PCR with primer sets described previously (50). Gel analysis and sequence confirmation were performed as described earlier (26). The missense mutations in PAX6 and PAX6-5a were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene). All constructs were assessed by automated sequencing to ensure that no random mutations were introduced during PCR. Construction of the CD19-2(A-ins)-luciferase and P2-luciferse reporter plasmids has been described previously (47). CD19-2(A-ins) (5'-TACTCGAGCTGGGCACTGAGGCGTGACCATTTTCCTGAATTCCA-3') and P2 (5'-TCGAGGGCATCAGGATGCTAATTGATTAGCATCCGATCGGG-3') are consensus DNA-binding sequences of PAX6 PD and HD, respectively.

Cell Culture and Transfections-- NIH/3T3, a murine fibroblast cell line, was maintained in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Transfections were performed with plasmid DNA coated with the polycationic lipid LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each well in a 12-well plate was transfected with 0.2 µg of P2-luciferase or CD19-2 (A-ins)-luciferase reporter plasmid, 0.3 µg of pRc-CMV effector plasmids (containing wild-type or mutant PAX6 and/or PAX6-5a cDNA), and 0.05 µg of pSV2beta -gal plasmid (Promega Corp.) as an internal control. An equivalent amount of vector plasmid pRc-CMV or pcDNA3 vectors were used as vector control. Luciferase and beta -galactosidase assays were performed as described previously (47). Luciferase activities were normalized relative to beta -galactosidase activity. The average values of three independent transfection experiments are shown as mean relative levels of luciferase activity compared with the basal level obtained with empty vectors.

Western Blotting and EMSAs-- Crude nuclear extracts were prepared from transfected NIH/3T3 cells as previously described (51). In vitro-transcribed and -translated proteins were generated using the transcription and translation (TNT)-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega Corp.) with the pRc-CMV construct containing wild-type or mutant PAX6 and/or PAX6-5a cDNA. The amount of PAX6 protein expressed or translated was quantitated by Western blot analysis with antibodies against the linker region of PAX6. The bands on the Western blots were quantitated using a Personal Densitometer Scanner 1.30 and Image Quant 3.3 software (Molecular Dynamics). Occasionally, quantitation of in vitro synthesized 35S-labeled proteins were further confirmed by drying SDS-PAGE gels and analyzing by using a Storm 840 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) and Image Quant 5.0 software (Molecular Dynamics).

EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a isoform proteins bearing patient mutations. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (CD19-2(A-ins) (5'-TACTCGAGCTGGGCACTGAGGCGTGACCATTTTCCTGAATTCCA-3'), P2 (5'-TCGAGGGCATCAGGATGCTAATTGATTAGCATCCGATCGGG-3'), P6CON (5'-GGAATTCAGGAAAAATTTTCACGCTTGAGTTCACAGCTCGAGT-3') (13, 34), Pax-5 (BSAP) Gel Shift oligonucleotides (sc-2589 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (5'-GAATGGGGCACTGAGGCGTGACCACCG-3') (38) and ZPE (xi -protected element) having PD consensus binding sequences (5'-TGCATCTTTTTAGGATGCATCATTGCTAAACCATCCGTGCAAATGCACTGC-3') (52) were end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP and used for EMSA. EMSAs for CD19-2(A-ins) were carried out as described previously (47). The binding reactions for P6CON, BSAP, ZPE, and P2 were carried out, in a volume of 20 µl, with 0.5-4 µl of proteins, 4 fmol of labeled DNA probe (2 fmol for P2), 2 µg of poly(dI-dC), in 20 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 0.4 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.50 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM MgCl2, and 5% glycerol. The reaction mixtures were incubated for 60 min at room temperature and run on 6% non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel in (Tris glycine/EDTA) buffer at 4 °C. For competition experiments, unlabeled double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides probes were used in excess. The in vitro translated PAX6 and PAX6-5a normal and mutant proteins (0.5 and 1 µl for P6CON, 2 and 4 µl for CD19-2(A-ins), BSAP, ZPE, and P2) were used for EMSA. The gels were dried and analyzed with a PhosphorImager followed by autoradiography on Kodak X-Omat AR films.

Plasmid Constructs and Expression Analysis of the PD-less Isoform-- The expression vector with the PD-less isoform of Pax6 was constructed using the PCR approach. PCR products corresponding to the coding region of the PD-less isoform were cloned into a modified pcDNA3 vector (53) harboring the 5'-untranslated region of the herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene. To amplify specifically the PD-less isoform we designed primers that locate the junction between exons 3 and 8: PD-lessF, 5'-CAAAACTCTTGACAGGAAGGAG-3' and reverse primer from exon 12; Pax612R, 5'-ACTTGGACGGGAACTGACAC-3'. These two primers allowed us specifically to amplify the PD-less isoform. RT-PCR products (~500 bp) were detected in the brain, eye, and pancreas. Identity of the band to the Pax6 sequence was confirmed by sequencing. The GenBankTM accession number of the PD-less isoform is AY064175.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this report, we describe the functional analyses of three missense mutations from aniridia patients detected in the PD region of PAX6 and a PD-less isoform of Pax6 from mouse. The results indicate that the functional properties of PAX6 and the PAX6-5a isoform are unique and PD of PAX6 is required for the function of HD.

Missense Mutations in the PD of PAX6 in Aniridia Patients-- Missense mutations change amino acid residues that alter the polarity and conformation of the proteins. The missense mutation L46R causes substitution of a positively charged amino acid, arginine, in place of nonpolar (i.e. hydrophobic) leucine. The patient has atrophy of both pupil and iris. This was a familial case where the mother had congenital cataracts and nystagmus, maternal grandmother had bilateral cataracts, and a misshaped pupil. In the case of missense mutation C52R there was substitution of a positively charged amino acid arginine in place of an uncharged and polar cysteine amino acid residue. The patient had aniridia and cataracts. This was also a familial case, and the mother had juvenile cataracts and glaucoma.2 Another highly conserved amino acid residue of PAX6 valine, is replaced by a bulky leucine without a net charge difference in the case of the missense mutation PAX6-V53L. The patient had moderate photophobia (24) (Fig. 1A). These missense mutations were located in the PD-binding domain of PAX6 and are highly conserved in both PAX6 and the entire paired family (18). The wild-type and mutant PAX6 and PAX6-5a proteins were stable as analyzed by Western blot analyses after in vitro translation (Fig. 1B) or in nuclear extracts (Fig. 1C) prepared after transfection with expression constructs of wild-type and mutant PAX6 and PAX6-5a cDNA.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, the diagram of the PAX6 protein with missense mutations described in the report. B and C, Western blot analyses were performed to verify the amount of protein expressed by various expression constructs: in vitro translated (B), and nuclear extracts (C) (10 and 20 µl) from cells transfected with 1 µg of expression plasmids were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using anti-PAX6 antibodies. The results showed that all the proteins are expressed and are stable.

Analysis of Transcriptional Activation and DNA Recognition Properties of PD Mutants-- To assess the functional significance of the missense mutations in the different domains of PAX6, we compared the mutant and wild-type PAX6 proteins by transcriptional activation assays and DNA binding abilities. NIH/3T3 cells were co-transfected with PAX6 or mutant PAX6 expression plasmids with a luciferase reporter plasmid bearing two copies of either the PD-binding consensus sequences (CD19-2(A-ins)) or the HD-binding consensus sequences (P2). The property of binding site recognition by PAX6 or PAX6-5a was tested by EMSA with consensus binding sequences of PD (CD19-2A), P6CON, (13, 34), ZPE (52), and BSAP (38) or HD (P2) to compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a isoform proteins bearing patient mutations.

Analysis of PD Function-- When the reporter plasmid containing the PD-binding consensus sequence (CD19-2(A-ins) was used, wild-type PAX6 could activate the reporter but PAX6-5a had basal levels of activity (Fig. 2A). The ability of the PAX6-L46R, -C52R, and -V53L mutants to activate transcription of the reporter gene was significantly lower than that of the wild-type PAX6, and PAX6-5a or PAX6-5a mutants failed to activate the luciferase reporter with (CD19-2(A-ins) (Fig. 2B). When CD19-2(A-ins) was used as a probe for EMSA, PAX6 mutants showed variable binding ability. PAX6-L46R and -C52R failed to bind, and PAX6-V53L showed about 50% lower binding ability than wild-type PAX6. PAX6-5a and mutants showed no binding to CD19-2(A-ins) (Fig. 2C). Unlike CD19-2(A-ins) PAX6-L46R showed 40% lower binding to P6CON, PAX6-C52R did not bind, and PAX6-V53L has similar binding ability compared with wild-type PAX6. PAX6-5a and mutants failed to bind P6CON (Fig. 3A). When the BSAP was used as a probe to test the DNA binding capability, PAX6 had binding ability, but the PAX6-5a and mutants failed to bind this consensus sequence. (Fig. 3B). Like CD19-2(A-ins) PAX6 could bind to ZPE, but mutants PAX6-L46R and -C52R failed to bind, and -V53L showed 50% lower binding than the wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 3C).


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Analysis of PD function. NIH/3T3 cells were transiently transfected with 0.2 µg of CD19-2 (A-ins)-luciferase reporter plasmid, 0.3 µg of pRc-CMV effector plasmids (containing PAX6 and/or PAX6-5a cDNA) either wild-type or mutant, and 0.05 µg of pSV2beta -gal plasmid (Promega Corp.) as an internal control. An equivalent amount of vector plasmid pRc-CMV was used as a vector control. The luciferase activity of the reporter construct is shown as the mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments. A, differential transactivation to the luciferase reporter gene containing target DNA sequences CD19-2(A-ins) by PAX6 and PAX6-5a. B, differential transactivation by the PAX6, PAX6-5a, and mutants with the luciferase reporter. C, EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability of wild-type and mutant proteins of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (CD19-2(A-ins) was end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP. The binding reactions were carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures."


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   EMSA for PD function. EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a wild-type and mutant proteins. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides P6CON (A) (13, 34), BSAP (B) (38), and ZPE (C) (52) were end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP. The binding reactions were carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Analysis of HD Function-- Both PAX6 and PAX6-5a could transactivate the reporter containing P2, and the level of activity by the PAX6-5a was about 50% of the wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 4A). Some of the missense mutations in the PD and PST domains also affect HD functions. Activation of a reporter containing the HD-binding sequences (P2) by PAX6 mutants V53L was significantly lower than that of wild-type PAX6. Interestingly mutants C52R and V53L of the PAX6-5a isoform lost their transactivation abilities when used to activate the reporter containing P2, whereas PAX6-5a-L46R exhibited greater transactivation ability than normal PAX6-5a (Fig. 4B). When P2 was used as a probe, PAX6 and PAX6-5a mutant proteins had similar HD binding capabilities (Fig. 4C).


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Analysis of HD function. NIH/3T3 cells were transiently transfected with 0.2 µg of P2-luciferase reporter plasmid, 0.3 µg of pRc-CMV effector plasmids (containing PAX6 and/or PAX6-5a (A) cDNA), either wild type or mutants and 0.05 µg of pSV2beta -gal plasmid (Promega Corp.) as an internal control. An equivalent amount of vector plasmid pRc-CMV was used as a vector control. The luciferase activity of the reporter construct is shown as the mean ± S.D. of results of three separate experiments. Differential transactivation of the luciferase reporter gene containing target DNA (P2) for HD binding by PAX6, PAX6-5a, and mutant PAX6 or mutant PAX6-5a (B). C, EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a wild-type and mutant proteins. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides P2 was end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP. The binding reaction was carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures."

Analysis of the PD-less Isoform of Pax6-- A new alternatively spliced isoform of Pax6 (PD-less) (AY064175) was isolated from mouse brain cDNA. This isoform of Pax6 lacks the promoter 1-specific exon as well as common exons 2, 4-7 and the first 21 nucleotides of exon 8 (Fig. 5A). This isoform resulted from the use of a cryptic acceptor splice site in exon 8 as well as the normal donor/acceptor sites in exon 2(P1) and the normal donor site in exon 3. Conceptual translation of the sequence generated a 221-amino acid protein lacking the paired domain and part of the glycine-rich linker (Fig. 5B). The PD-less isoform of Pax6 was found to be expressed in brain, eyes, and pancreas of mouse. The level of expression of this isoform was relatively higher in brain (Fig. 5C). Translation of this expression vector in cultured cells show that the PD-less isoform is stable (Fig. 5, D and E).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   PD-less of the murine Pax6. A, exons present in the isoform are shown as boxes. Asterisks mark the positions of alternative donor and acceptor sites. B, structure of paired-less Pax6 protein. PD, paired domain; HD, paired-like homeodomain; Linker, glycine-rich region linking the two DNA-binding domains; PST, proline-serine-threonine-rich transactivation domain at the C terminus of Pax6. C, expression analysis of the paired-less isoform. D, nuclear extract from NIH3T3 cells were immunoblotted with anti-Pax6 antibodies following the transfection of the expression plasmid. The results show the expression of paired-less isoform (asterisk). E, in vitro translated proteins. F, transactivation activity of the PD-less isoform to luciferase reporter containing HD-binding consensus sequences (P2) and EMSA (G) with end-labeled P2.

To further verify that both PD- and HD of the Pax6 act cooperatively in the induction of gene expression, we performed the functional analysis of the PD-less isoform of the Pax6. If HD and PD of Pax6 act independently, then one can expect that the removal of the paired domain should not affect the activities of the HD. However, the PD-less isoform of Pax6 fails to activate the reporter containing HD DNA-binding sequences (P2) (Fig. 5F). The PD-less isoform of Pax6 could bind to P2 (Fig. 5G) but failed to bind PD DNA-binding consensus sequences P6CON,CD19-2(A-ins) and ZPE compared with normal Pax6 (Fig. 6, A-C).


View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The binding ability of PD-less of murine Pax6. EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability of the Pax6 and PD-less isoform proteins. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides P6CON (13, 34), CD19-2(A-ins), and ZPE (52) were end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP. EMSAs for CD19-2(A-ins) binding was carried out as described previously (47). The binding reactions for P6CON and ZPE were carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures."


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The DNA-binding domains of PAX6 are highly conserved among animal species. The diverse functions of Pax6 appear to originate from both the complex regulatory mechanisms controlling the tissue-specific transcription and splicing as well as its ability to participate in multiple molecular interactions (54). Missense mutations in the DNA-binding domains of PAX6 may result in failure to properly recognize the binding sites in normal target genes, thus causing partial or complete loss- or gain-of-function. The loss-of-function may also be due to impaired interaction between DNA-binding domains or failure of cofactor-mediated functions. In order to understand the mechanism of PAX6 function we performed functional analysis of missense mutations found in the PD region of PAX6 and alternatively spliced form of PAX6, PAX6-5a, of aniridia patients (Fig. 1). We also performed functional analyses of a PD-less isoform of Pax6 (AY064175), which was found to be expressed in the brain, eyes, and pancreas of mice. The level of expression of PD-less isoform was relatively higher in brain (Fig. 5C).

Missense mutations described in this paper (PAX6 and PAX6-5a) -L46R, -C52R, and -V53L) are found in the DNA-binding region of PD and located on either end of the 5a-polypeptide insert in the PAX6-5a isoform. The expressed proteins were found to be stable (Fig. 1, A-C). Among the mutations in the N subdomain of PD, L46R is present in the alpha 2-helix, and C52R and V53L are located in alpha 3-helix. This N subdomain uses a helix-turn-helix (HTH) unit to dock against the major groove at one end of the binding site (18). As compared with wild-type PAX6, the PAX6-5a isoform could not transactivate the luciferase reporter gene containing target DNA-binding consensus sequences CD19-2(A-ins) for PD (Fig. 2A). PAX6 mutants PAX6-L46R, -C52R, and -V53L showed significantly lower transactivation ability than wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 2B) with luciferase reporter containing CD19-2(A-ins). EMSA results with CD19-2(A-ins) showed that PAX6-L46R and -C52R lost their binding abilities, and -V53L showed significantly lower binding ability than wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 2C). PAX6-5a and its respective mutants did not show transactivation or binding ability with the PD target sequences as insertion of the 5a-polypeptide disrupts its PD binding capability (13, 32). These mutants showed variable DNA binding abilities with other Pax6-binding consensus sequences like P6CON, BSAP, and ZPE (Fig. 3, A-C).

The mutated amino acids of PAX6 described here are highly conserved within the PD and are present in the DNA-binding region of the PD. The missense mutation L46R causes substitution of a positively charged amino acid, arginine, in place of nonpolar leucine, and C52R leads to substitution of a positively charged arginine in place of an uncharged and polar cysteine amino acid residue. These two mutations impaired both DNA binding and transcriptional activation abilities of PAX6. In the case of the V53L missense mutation (24) valine was replaced by the bulky amino acid residue leucine, but the net charge remained the same. The PAX6 mutants L46R, and C52R might have lost their activity as they were unable to bind the DNA, while the V to L substitution at codon 53 retained binding ability but turned the protein into a transcriptional repressor or perhaps lost the conformation used to recruit the all cofactors used for transactivation. The variable properties of these PD mutants led to analysis of their HD function.

The PAX6-5a isoform had about 50% lower transactivation ability compared with the wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 4A) with the luciferase reporter containing HD-binding consensus sequences (P2). The missense mutations in the PD of PAX6 and PAX6-5a showed some unusual transactivation properties (Fig. 4B) with the P2-containing luciferase reporter. These mutants have almost identical HD DNA binding abilities (Fig. 4C) to that of wild-type PAX6 and PAX6-5a, but they show variable transactivation properties. The variable functional properties of PAX6 mutant may be one of the factors for variable phenotype of aniridia patients. PAX6 PD mutant V53L had significantly lower transactivation ability than wild-type PAX6. Thus PD mutant V53L affects both PD and HD functions. Interestingly, PAX6-5a-L46R showed a significantly higher transactivation ability than wild-type PAX6-5a. However, it behaves like wild-type PAX6 as far as HD-related transactivation is concerned. Furthermore, PAX6-5a-C52R, and -V53L mutants showed significantly lower transactivation activities.

The PD-less isoform of Pax6 fails to activate the reporter containing HD DNA-binding sequences (P2) (Fig. 5F) despite its binding ability to the P2 probe (Fig. 5G). It failed to bind the PD DNA-binding consensus sequences P6CON,CD19-2(A-ins) and ZPE as compared with normal Pax6 (Fig. 6, A-C). These results indicate that the HD can bind to DNA but requires the PD for its transactivation function. Additionally, it may have some special regulatory role in the brain, eyes and pancreas as evident from its expression pattern (Fig. 5C). A similar paired-less isoform was identified earlier in two phylogenicaly distinct species, quail (55) and Caenorhabditis elegans (56), and these findings suggest some normal function for the PD-less isoform (57). If HD and PD of Pax6 act independently, then one can expect that the removal of the paired domain should not affect the activities of the HD.

These findings, at the level of in vitro DNA binding and transactivation assays, indicate a complex state of regulation of PAX6 function. The PD mutant V53L affects HD function. PAX6-5a mutants (L46R, C52R, and V53L) also alter activity with HD. These findings support our previous ideas of PD-dependent HD function (51, 58) and are in agreement with a possible cooperative interaction between the PD and HD of PAX6 (59). Recently intradomain and interdomain interactions in PAX6 have also been reported (15, 42) that support the concept that the PD and HD of PAX6 physically interact. Two possibilities of how the PD can influence the function of the HD are the following. Gain-of-function suggests that normally the PD does not interact with the HD and mutations in the PD result in misfolding of the PAX6 protein such that the PD interferes with HD function. Alternatively, loss-of-function suggests that PD and HD of PAX6 physically interact, and mutations within the PD affect the function of HD. Although the different domains of PAX6 are well delineated, their functions appear to be mutually dependent, and the PD of PAX6 is required for HD function.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Lindsey Middleton and Dr. Louise Strong for clinical material. We also thank Drs. R. Mass and M. Busslinger for the recombinant vectors. The DNA sequencing work was done by the core sequencing facility at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.

    FOOTNOTES

* This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY09675, EY10608, and CA 16672.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Box 117, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-792-2690; Fax: 713-791-9478; E-mail: gsaunders@odin.mdacc.tmc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206478200

2 Chao, L. Y., Mishra, R., Strong, L. C., and Saunders, G. F. (2002) Hum. Mutat., in press.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PD, paired domain; HD, homeodomain; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; ZPE, xi -protected element; BSAP, binding sequence of Pax-5.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ton, C. C., Hirvonen, H., Miwa, H., Weil, M. M., Monaghan, P., Jordan, T., van Heyningen, V., Hastie, N. D., Meijers-Heijboer, H., Drechsler, M., Royer-Pokora, B., Collins, F., Swaroop, A., Strong, L. C., and Saunders, G. F. (1991) Cell 67, 1059-1074[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Glaser, T., Walton, D. S., and Maas, R. L. (1992) Nat. Genet. 2, 232-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Halder, G., Callaerts, P., and Gehring, W. J. (1995) Science 267, 1788-1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Tomarev, S. I. (1997) Int. J. Dev. Biol. 41, 835-842[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Altmann, C. R., Chow, R. L., Lang, R. A., and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. (1997) Dev. Biol. 185, 119-123[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Gehring, W. J., and Ikeo, K. (1999) Trends Genet. 15, 371-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Matsuo, T., Osumi-Yamashita, N., Noji, S., Ohuchi, H., Koyama, E., Myokai, F., Matsuo, N., Taniguchi, S., Doi, H., Iseki, S., Ninomiya, Y., Fujiwara, M., Watanabe, T., and Eto, K. (1993) Nat. Genet. 3, 299-304[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Glaser, T., Jepeal, L., Edwards, J. G., Young, S. R., Favor, J., and Maas, R. L. (1994) Nat. Genet. 7, 463-471[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. van Raamsdonk, C. D., and Tilghman, S. M. (2000) Development 127, 5439-5448[Abstract]
10. Ashery-Padan, R., Marquardt, T., Zhou, X., and Gruss, P. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2701-2711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Marquardt, T., Ashery-Padan, R., Andrejewski, N., Scardigli, R., Guillemot, F., and Gruss, P. (2001) Cell 105, 43-55[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Czerny, T., Schaffner, G., and Busslinger, M. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2048-2061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Epstein, J. A., Glaser, T., Cai, J., Jepeal, L., Walton, D. S., and Maas, R. L. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2022-2034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Wilson, D. S., Guenther, B., Desplan, C., and Kuriyan, J. (1995) Cell 82, 709-719[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Mikkola, I., Bruun, J. A., Holm, T., and Johansen, T. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4109-4118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Fortin, A. S., Underhill, D. A., and Gros, P. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 4574-4581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Xu, W., Rould, M. A., Jun, S., Desplan, C., and Pabo, C. O. (1995) Cell 80, 639-650[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Xu, H. E., Rould, M. A., Xu, W., Epstein, J. A., Maas, R. L., and Pabo, C. O. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 1263-1275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Azuma, N., Nishina, S., Yanagisawa, H., Okuyama, T., and Yamada, M. (1996) Nat. Genet. 13, 141-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Azuma, N., and Yamada, M. (1998) Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39, 828-830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Tang, H. K., Chao, L. Y., and Saunders, G. F. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 381-386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Prosser, J., and van Heyningen, V. (1998) Hum. Mutat. 11, 93-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Wolf, M. T., Lorenz, B., Winterpacht, A., Drechsler, M., Schumacher, V., Royer-Pokora, B., Blankenagel, A., Zabel, B., and Wildhardt, G. (1998) Hum. Mutat. 12, 304-313[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Gronskov, K., Rosenberg, T., Sand, A., and Brondum-Nielsen, K. (1999) Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 7, 274-286[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Hanson, I., Churchill, A., Love, J., Axton, R., Moore, T., Clarke, M., Meire, F., and van Heyningen, V. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 165-172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Chao, L. Y., Huff, V., Strong, L. C., and Saunders, G. F. (2000) Hum. Mutat. 15, 332-339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Malandrini, A., Mari, F., Palmeri, S., Gambelli, S., Berti, G., Bruttini, M., Bardelli, A. M., Williamson, K., van Heyningen, V., and Renieri, A. (2001) Clin. Genet. 60, 151-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Sonoda, S., Isashiki, Y., Tabata, Y., Kimura, K., Kakiuchi, T., and Ohba, N. (2000) Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 238, 552-558[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kondo-Saitoh, A., Matsumoto, N., Sasaki, T., Egashira, M., Saitoh, A., Yamada, K., Niikawa, N., and Amemiya, T. (2000) Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 10, 167-172[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Van Heyningen, V., and Williamson, K. A. (2002) Hum. Mol. Genet. 11, 1161-1167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Chi, N., and Epstein, J. A. (2002) Trends Genet. 18, 41-47[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Kozmik, Z., Czerny, T., and Busslinger, M. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6793-6803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Singh, S., Mishra, R., Arango, N. A., Deng, J. M., Behringer, R. R., and Saunders, G. F. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99, 6812-6815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Epstein, J., Cai, J., Glaser, T., Jepeal, L., and Maas, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 8355-8361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Underhill, D. A., and Gros, P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14175-14182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Epstein, J. A., Shapiro, D. N., Cheng, J., Lam, P. Y., and Maas, R. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 4213-4218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Chalepakis, G., Goulding, M., Read, A., Strachan, T., and Gruss, P. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3685-3689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Czerny, T., and Busslinger, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2858-2871[Abstract]
39. Gehring, W. J., Qian, Y. Q., Billeter, M., Furukubo-Tokunaga, K., Schier, A. F., Resendez-Perez, D., Affolter, M., Otting, G., and Wuthrich, K. (1994) Cell 78, 211-223[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Tang, H. K., Singh, S., and Saunders, G. F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7210-7221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Wawersik, S., and Maas, R. L. (2000) Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 917-925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Punzo, C., Kurata, S., and Gehring, W. J. (2001) Genes Dev. 15, 1716-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Wilson, D., Sheng, G., Lecuit, T., Dostatni, N., and Desplan, C. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2120-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Hanson, I. M., Fletcher, J. M., Jordan, T., Brown, A., Taylor, D., Adams, R. J., Punnett, H. H., and van Heyningen, V. (1994) Nat. Genet. 6, 168-173[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Mirzayans, F., Pearce, W. G., MacDonald, I. M., and Walter, M. A. (1995) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 539-548[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Hill, R. E., Favor, J., Hogan, B. L., Ton, C. C., Saunders, G. F., Hanson, I. M., Prosser, J., Jordan, T., Hastie, N. D., and van Heyningen, V. (1991) Nature 354, 522-525[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Singh, S., Stellrecht, C. M., Tang, H. K., and Saunders, G. F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17306-17313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Azuma, N., Yamaguchi, Y., Handa, H., Hayakawa, M., Kanai, A., and Yamada, M. (1999) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65, 656-663[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Yamaguchi, Y., Sawada, J., Yamada, M., Handa, H., and Azuma, N. (1997) Genes Cells 2, 255-261[Abstract]
50. Love, J., Axton, R., Churchill, A., van Heyningen, V., and Hanson, I. (1998) Hum. Mutat. 12, 128-134[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Singh, S., and Saunders, G. F. (1998) Anal. Biochem. 265, 185-187[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Sharon-Friling, R., Richardson, J., Sperbeck, S., Lee, D., Rauchman, M., Maas, R., Swaroop, A., and Wistow, G. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 2067-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Lefebvre, V., Huang, W., Harley, V. R., Goodfellow, P. N., and de Crombrugghe, B. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2336-2346[Abstract]
54. Chauhan, B. K., Reed, N. A., Zhang, W., Duncan, M. K., Kilimann, M. W., and Cvekl, A. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 11539-11548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Carriere, C., Plaza, S., Martin, P., Quatannens, B., Bailly, M., Stehelin, D., and Saule, S. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7257-7266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Zhang, Y., and Emmons, S. W. (1995) Nature 377, 55-59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Dozier, C., Carriere, C., Grevin, D., Martin, P., Quatannens, B., Stehelin, D., and Saule, S. (1993) Cell Growth & Differ. 4, 281-289[Abstract]
58. Singh, S., Tang, H. K., Lee, J. Y., and Saunders, G. F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 21531-21541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Bertuccioli, C., Fasano, L., Jun, S., Wang, S., Sheng, G., and Desplan, C. (1996) Development 122, 2673-2685[Abstract]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. Favor, C. J. Gloeckner, A. Neuhauser-Klaus, W. Pretsch, R. Sandulache, S. Saule, and I. Zaus
Relationship of Pax6 Activity Levels to the Extent of Eye Development in the Mouse, Mus musculus
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1345 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. A. Kim, Y. T. Noh, M.-J. Ryu, H.-T. Kim, S.-E. Lee, C.-H. Kim, C. Lee, Y. H. Kim, and C. Y. Choi
Phosphorylation and Transactivation of Pax6 by Homeodomain-interacting Protein Kinase 2
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7489 - 7497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J.-A. Bruun, E. I. S. Thomassen, K. Kristiansen, G. Tylden, T. Holm, I. Mikkola, G. Bjorkoy, and T. Johansen
The third helix of the homeodomain of paired class homeodomain proteins acts as a recognition helix both for DNA and protein interactions
Nucleic Acids Res., May 10, 2005; 33(8): 2661 - 2675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
N. Azuma, K. Tadokoro, A. Asaka, M. Yamada, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Handa, S. Matsushima, T. Watanabe, Y. Kida, T. Ogura, et al.
Transdifferentiation of the retinal pigment epithelia to the neural retina by transfer of the Pax6 transcriptional factor
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(8): 1059 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
N. Haubst, J. Berger, V. Radjendirane, J. Graw, J. Favor, G. F. Saunders, A. Stoykova, and M. Gotz
Molecular dissection of Pax6 function: the specific roles of the paired domain and homeodomain in brain development
Development, December 15, 2004; 131(24): 6131 - 6140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. N. Cinar and A. D. Chisholm
Genetic Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans pax-6 Locus: Roles of Paired Domain-Containing and Nonpaired Domain-Containing Isoforms
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1307 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. K. Chauhan, Y. Yang, K. Cveklova, and A. Cvekl
Functional interactions between alternatively spliced forms of Pax6 in crystallin gene regulation and in haploinsufficiency
Nucleic Acids Res., March 12, 2004; 32(5): 1696 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
B. K. Chauhan, Y. Yang, K. Cveklova, and A. Cvekl
Functional Properties of Natural Human PAX6 and PAX6(5a) Mutants
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/51/49488    most recent
M206478200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, R.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, R.
Right arrow Articles by Saunders, G. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement