|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M206478200 on October 17, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49488-49494, December 20, 2002
PAX6, Paired Domain Influences Sequence Recognition by the
Homeodomain*
Rajnikant
Mishra,
Ivan P.
Gorlov,
Lian Y.
Chao,
Sanjaya
Singh, and
Grady F.
Saunders
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
77030
Received for publication, June 28, 2002, and in revised form, October 10, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
PAX6 functions as a transcription factor and has
two DNA-binding domains, a paired domain (PD) and a homeodomain
(HD), joined by a glycine-rich linker and followed by a
proline-serine-threonine-rich (PST) transactivation region at the C
terminus. The mechanism of PAX6 function is not clearly understood, and
few target genes in vertebrates have been identified. In this report we
described the functional analyses of patient missense mutations from
the paired domain region of PAX6 and a paireddomain-less isoform
(PD-less) of Pax6 that lacks the paired domain and part of the
glycine-rich linker. The PD-less was expressed in the brain, eyes, and
pancreas of mouse. The level of expression of this isoform was
relatively higher in brain. The mutation sites PAX6-L46R and -C52R were
located in the PD of PAX6 on either end of the 5a-polypeptide insert of the alternatively spliced form of PAX6, PAX6-5a. Another PAX6 mutant
V53L described in this report was adjacent to C52R. We created
corresponding mutations in PAX6 and PAX6-5a, and evaluated their
transcriptional activation and DNA binding properties. The PD mutants
of PAX6 (L46R, C52R, and V53L) exhibited lower transactivation activities and variable DNA binding ability than wild-type PAX6 with PD
DNA-binding consensus sequences. The mutated amino acids containing
PAX6-5a isoforms showed unexpected transactivation properties with a
reporter containing HD DNA-binding sequences. PAX6-5a-C52R, and -V53L
showed lower transactivation activities, but PAX6-5a-L46R had greater
transactivation ability than PAX6-5a. The PD-less isoform of Pax6 lost
its transactivational ability but could bind to the HD DNA-binding
sequences. Functional analysis of the PD-less isoform of Pax6 as
well as findings related to missense mutations in the PD suggest that
the PD of PAX6 is required for HD function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
PAX6 is considered to be the master control gene for morphogenesis
of the eye. It is an evolutionarily conserved gene in both vertebrates
and invertebrates (1-6). PAX6 functions as a transcription factor, and
complete loss of PAX6 function leads to anophthalmia and nasal
hypoplasia, as well as to central nervous system defects that cause
postnatal death (2, 7, 8). It is required for lens placode formation,
growth of the lens (9), correct placement of a single retina in the eye
(10), formation of the iris, maintenance of the corneal epithelium, and
fate of retinal progenitor cells (11). It has two DNA-binding domains,
paired domain (PD)1 at the N
terminus, a paired-like homeodomain (HD) linked by a glycine-rich
domain and a transactivation region (PST), which is rich in proline,
serine, and threonine amino acids at the C terminus of the PAX6
protein. Biochemical and crystallographic studies have shown that the
PD actually consists of independent N-terminal (N subdomain) and
C-terminal subdomains (C subdomain), which have significant
physiological roles in target DNA recognitions (12-17). Crystal
structure of the human PAX6 PD-DNA complex revealed specific roles for
the linker region of the PD and C subdomain in DNA binding (18). Amino
acid residues of PAX6 are highly conserved in almost all the PD, and
various missense mutations have been reported
(www.hgu.mrc.ac.uk/Softdata/PAX6) in its domains (19-31). An
alternatively spliced form of PAX6, known as PAX6-5a, contains an
additional 14 amino acids in the PD (2), which disrupts the N subdomain
and alters DNA binding properties (13, 32). Loss-of-function of Pax6-5a
in mouse leads to iris-hypoplasia and also defects in the retina, lens,
and cornea (33). The PDs of other genes of the Pax family, the Pax2,
Pax3, and the binding sequence of Pax-5 (BSAP), and Pax6 proteins can
recognize similar DNA sequences (12, 34-39). Our earlier studies
showed that the transactivation function is distributed throughout the
PST region (40). Although the involvement of PAX6 in ocular development is well known (41, 42), identification of target genes of PAX6 has been
hindered by two factors. First, the PD of Pax6 can bind to a broad
range of DNA sequences. Second, HDs in other proteins recognize similar
sequences, as does the Pax6 HD (43).
In humans, heterozygous mutations in the PAX6 gene
are responsible for several phenotypes, including aniridia, foveal
hypoplasia, Peters' anomaly, ectopia pupillae, and autosomal dominant
keratitis (2, 19, 25, 26, 44, 45). Pax6 mutation in rodents results in small eye (46), which, as in humans, appears to be expressed
as highly variable phenotypes. However, it is not clear how mutation of
the PAX6 gene results in these various phenotypes, and why
the phenotypes are of variable expressivities. Functional studies using
PAX6 missense mutations with observed developmental defects
are useful in understanding the mechanism of PAX6 function. Missense
mutations in the DNA-binding domains of PAX6 may cause failure to
properly recognize binding sites in the target genes, resulting in
partial or complete loss of protein function (40, 47-49).
In this report, we describe the functional properties of three missense
mutations in the PD domain of PAX6 that were identified in the DNA of
patients with aniridia, and a PD-less isoform of Pax6 from mouse. Since
patients with aniridia also have the PAX6-5a isoform, and Pax6-5a was
found to be important in maintaining the normal structure of eyes in
adult mice (33), these mutations on either end of the 5a-polypeptide
insert have been used to examine the role of the PAX6-5a isoform. The
results indicate that the functional properties of PAX6 and the PAX6-5a
isoform are unique, and PD of PAX6 is required for the function of
HD.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Mutation Detection and Luciferase Reporter Constructs--
To
identify mutations in the PAX6 gene, genomic DNA samples
were isolated from peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with aniridia. Each exon and its immediate flanking sequence was amplified by PCR with primer sets described previously (50). Gel analysis and
sequence confirmation were performed as described earlier (26). The
missense mutations in PAX6 and PAX6-5a were introduced by site-directed
mutagenesis using the QuikChange kit (Stratagene). All constructs were
assessed by automated sequencing to ensure that no random mutations
were introduced during PCR. Construction of the
CD19-2(A-ins)-luciferase and P2-luciferse reporter plasmids has been
described previously (47). CD19-2(A-ins)
(5'-TACTCGAGCTGGGCACTGAGGCGTGACCATTTTCCTGAATTCCA-3') and P2
(5'-TCGAGGGCATCAGGATGCTAATTGATTAGCATCCGATCGGG-3') are consensus DNA-binding sequences of PAX6 PD and HD, respectively.
Cell Culture and Transfections--
NIH/3T3, a murine fibroblast
cell line, was maintained in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Transfections were performed
with plasmid DNA coated with the polycationic lipid LipofectAMINE
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each well
in a 12-well plate was transfected with 0.2 µg of P2-luciferase or
CD19-2 (A-ins)-luciferase reporter plasmid, 0.3 µg of pRc-CMV
effector plasmids (containing wild-type or mutant PAX6 and/or PAX6-5a
cDNA), and 0.05 µg of pSV2 -gal plasmid (Promega Corp.) as an
internal control. An equivalent amount of vector plasmid pRc-CMV or
pcDNA3 vectors were used as vector control. Luciferase and
-galactosidase assays were performed as described previously (47).
Luciferase activities were normalized relative to -galactosidase
activity. The average values of three independent transfection
experiments are shown as mean relative levels of luciferase activity
compared with the basal level obtained with empty vectors.
Western Blotting and EMSAs--
Crude nuclear extracts were
prepared from transfected NIH/3T3 cells as previously described
(51). In vitro-transcribed and -translated proteins were
generated using the transcription and translation
(TNT)-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega Corp.)
with the pRc-CMV construct containing wild-type or mutant PAX6 and/or
PAX6-5a cDNA. The amount of PAX6 protein expressed or translated
was quantitated by Western blot analysis with antibodies against the
linker region of PAX6. The bands on the Western blots were quantitated
using a Personal Densitometer Scanner 1.30 and Image Quant 3.3 software
(Molecular Dynamics). Occasionally, quantitation of in vitro
synthesized 35S-labeled proteins were further confirmed by
drying SDS-PAGE gels and analyzing by using a Storm 840 PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics) and Image Quant 5.0 software (Molecular Dynamics).
EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and
PAX6-5a isoform proteins bearing patient mutations. Double-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotides (CD19-2(A-ins)
(5'-TACTCGAGCTGGGCACTGAGGCGTGACCATTTTCCTGAATTCCA-3'), P2
(5'-TCGAGGGCATCAGGATGCTAATTGATTAGCATCCGATCGGG-3'), P6CON (5'-GGAATTCAGGAAAAATTTTCACGCTTGAGTTCACAGCTCGAGT-3') (13, 34),
Pax-5 (BSAP) Gel Shift oligonucleotides (sc-2589 from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) (5'-GAATGGGGCACTGAGGCGTGACCACCG-3') (38) and ZPE
( -protected element) having PD consensus binding sequences (5'-TGCATCTTTTTAGGATGCATCATTGCTAAACCATCCGTGCAAATGCACTGC-3') (52) were
end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP and used for EMSA. EMSAs
for CD19-2(A-ins) were carried out as described previously (47). The
binding reactions for P6CON, BSAP, ZPE, and P2 were carried out, in a
volume of 20 µl, with 0.5-4 µl of proteins, 4 fmol of labeled DNA
probe (2 fmol for P2), 2 µg of poly(dI-dC), in 20 mM
HEPES (pH 8.0), 0.4 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, 0.50 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM KCl, 0.1 mM MgCl2, and 5% glycerol. The reaction
mixtures were incubated for 60 min at room temperature and run on 6%
non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel in (Tris glycine/EDTA) buffer at
4 °C. For competition experiments, unlabeled double-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotides probes were used in excess. The in
vitro translated PAX6 and PAX6-5a normal and mutant proteins (0.5 and 1 µl for P6CON, 2 and 4 µl for CD19-2(A-ins), BSAP, ZPE, and
P2) were used for EMSA. The gels were dried and analyzed with a
PhosphorImager followed by autoradiography on Kodak X-Omat AR films.
Plasmid Constructs and Expression Analysis of the PD-less
Isoform--
The expression vector with the PD-less isoform of
Pax6 was constructed using the PCR approach. PCR products
corresponding to the coding region of the PD-less isoform were cloned
into a modified pcDNA3 vector (53) harboring the 5'-untranslated
region of the herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase gene. To
amplify specifically the PD-less isoform we designed primers that
locate the junction between exons 3 and 8: PD-lessF,
5'-CAAAACTCTTGACAGGAAGGAG-3' and reverse primer from exon 12; Pax612R,
5'-ACTTGGACGGGAACTGACAC-3'. These two primers allowed us specifically
to amplify the PD-less isoform. RT-PCR products (~500 bp) were
detected in the brain, eye, and pancreas. Identity of the band to the
Pax6 sequence was confirmed by sequencing. The GenBankTM
accession number of the PD-less isoform is AY064175.
 |
RESULTS |
In this report, we describe the functional analyses of three
missense mutations from aniridia patients detected in the PD region of
PAX6 and a PD-less isoform of Pax6 from mouse. The results indicate
that the functional properties of PAX6 and the PAX6-5a isoform are
unique and PD of PAX6 is required for the function of HD.
Missense Mutations in the PD of PAX6 in Aniridia
Patients--
Missense mutations change amino acid residues that alter
the polarity and conformation of the proteins. The missense mutation L46R causes substitution of a positively charged amino acid, arginine, in place of nonpolar (i.e. hydrophobic) leucine. The patient
has atrophy of both pupil and iris. This was a familial case where the
mother had congenital cataracts and nystagmus, maternal grandmother had
bilateral cataracts, and a misshaped pupil. In the case of missense
mutation C52R there was substitution of a positively charged amino acid
arginine in place of an uncharged and polar cysteine amino acid
residue. The patient had aniridia and cataracts. This was also a
familial case, and the mother had juvenile cataracts and
glaucoma.2 Another highly
conserved amino acid residue of PAX6 valine, is replaced by a bulky
leucine without a net charge difference in the case of the missense
mutation PAX6-V53L. The patient had moderate photophobia (24) (Fig.
1A). These missense mutations
were located in the PD-binding domain of PAX6 and are highly conserved
in both PAX6 and the entire paired family (18). The wild-type and
mutant PAX6 and PAX6-5a proteins were stable as analyzed by Western
blot analyses after in vitro translation (Fig.
1B) or in nuclear extracts (Fig. 1C)
prepared after transfection with expression constructs of wild-type and
mutant PAX6 and PAX6-5a cDNA.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, the diagram of the PAX6
protein with missense mutations described in the report. B
and C, Western blot analyses were performed to verify the
amount of protein expressed by various expression constructs: in
vitro translated (B), and nuclear extracts
(C) (10 and 20 µl) from cells transfected with 1 µg of
expression plasmids were resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted
using anti-PAX6 antibodies. The results showed that all the proteins
are expressed and are stable.
|
|
Analysis of Transcriptional Activation and DNA Recognition
Properties of PD Mutants--
To assess the functional significance of
the missense mutations in the different domains of PAX6, we compared
the mutant and wild-type PAX6 proteins by transcriptional activation
assays and DNA binding abilities. NIH/3T3 cells were co-transfected
with PAX6 or mutant PAX6 expression plasmids with a luciferase reporter plasmid bearing two copies of either the PD-binding consensus sequences
(CD19-2(A-ins)) or the HD-binding consensus sequences (P2). The
property of binding site recognition by PAX6 or PAX6-5a was tested by
EMSA with consensus binding sequences of PD (CD19-2A), P6CON, (13, 34),
ZPE (52), and BSAP (38) or HD (P2) to compare the DNA binding ability
of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a isoform proteins bearing patient mutations.
Analysis of PD Function--
When the reporter plasmid containing
the PD-binding consensus sequence (CD19-2(A-ins) was used, wild-type
PAX6 could activate the reporter but PAX6-5a had basal levels of
activity (Fig. 2A). The
ability of the PAX6-L46R, -C52R, and -V53L mutants to activate transcription of the reporter gene was significantly lower than that of
the wild-type PAX6, and PAX6-5a or PAX6-5a mutants failed to activate
the luciferase reporter with (CD19-2(A-ins) (Fig. 2B). When
CD19-2(A-ins) was used as a probe for EMSA, PAX6 mutants showed
variable binding ability. PAX6-L46R and -C52R failed to bind, and
PAX6-V53L showed about 50% lower binding ability than wild-type PAX6.
PAX6-5a and mutants showed no binding to CD19-2(A-ins) (Fig.
2C). Unlike CD19-2(A-ins) PAX6-L46R showed 40% lower
binding to P6CON, PAX6-C52R did not bind, and PAX6-V53L has similar
binding ability compared with wild-type PAX6. PAX6-5a and mutants
failed to bind P6CON (Fig.
3A). When the BSAP was used as
a probe to test the DNA binding capability, PAX6 had binding ability,
but the PAX6-5a and mutants failed to bind this consensus sequence. (Fig. 3B). Like CD19-2(A-ins) PAX6 could bind to ZPE, but
mutants PAX6-L46R and -C52R failed to bind, and -V53L showed 50% lower binding than the wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 3C).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Analysis of PD function. NIH/3T3 cells
were transiently transfected with 0.2 µg of CD19-2 (A-ins)-luciferase
reporter plasmid, 0.3 µg of pRc-CMV effector plasmids (containing
PAX6 and/or PAX6-5a cDNA) either wild-type or mutant, and 0.05 µg
of pSV2 -gal plasmid (Promega Corp.) as an internal control. An
equivalent amount of vector plasmid pRc-CMV was used as a vector
control. The luciferase activity of the reporter construct is shown as
the mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments. A,
differential transactivation to the luciferase reporter gene containing
target DNA sequences CD19-2(A-ins) by PAX6 and PAX6-5a. B,
differential transactivation by the PAX6, PAX6-5a, and mutants with the
luciferase reporter. C, EMSA was performed to compare the
DNA binding ability of wild-type and mutant proteins of the PAX6 and
PAX6-5a. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (CD19-2(A-ins) was
end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP. The binding reactions were
carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
EMSA for PD function. EMSA was
performed to compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a
wild-type and mutant proteins. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides
P6CON (A) (13, 34), BSAP (B) (38), and ZPE
(C) (52) were end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP.
The binding reactions were carried out as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Analysis of HD Function--
Both PAX6 and PAX6-5a could
transactivate the reporter containing P2, and the level of activity by
the PAX6-5a was about 50% of the wild-type PAX6 (Fig.
4A). Some of the missense
mutations in the PD and PST domains also affect HD functions.
Activation of a reporter containing the HD-binding sequences (P2) by
PAX6 mutants V53L was significantly lower than that of wild-type PAX6. Interestingly mutants C52R and V53L of the PAX6-5a isoform lost their
transactivation abilities when used to activate the reporter containing
P2, whereas PAX6-5a-L46R exhibited greater transactivation ability than
normal PAX6-5a (Fig. 4B). When P2 was used as a probe, PAX6
and PAX6-5a mutant proteins had similar HD binding capabilities (Fig.
4C).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Analysis of HD function. NIH/3T3 cells
were transiently transfected with 0.2 µg of P2-luciferase reporter
plasmid, 0.3 µg of pRc-CMV effector plasmids (containing PAX6 and/or
PAX6-5a (A) cDNA), either wild type or mutants and 0.05 µg of pSV2 -gal plasmid (Promega Corp.) as an internal control. An
equivalent amount of vector plasmid pRc-CMV was used as a vector
control. The luciferase activity of the reporter construct is shown as
the mean ± S.D. of results of three separate experiments.
Differential transactivation of the luciferase reporter gene containing
target DNA (P2) for HD binding by PAX6, PAX6-5a, and mutant PAX6 or
mutant PAX6-5a (B). C, EMSA was performed to
compare the DNA binding ability of the PAX6 and PAX6-5a wild-type and
mutant proteins. Double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides P2 was
end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP. The binding reaction was
carried out as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Analysis of the PD-less Isoform of Pax6--
A new alternatively
spliced isoform of Pax6 (PD-less) (AY064175) was isolated from mouse
brain cDNA. This isoform of Pax6 lacks the promoter 1-specific exon
as well as common exons 2, 4-7 and the first 21 nucleotides of exon 8 (Fig. 5A). This isoform resulted from the use of a cryptic acceptor splice site in exon 8 as
well as the normal donor/acceptor sites in exon 2(P1) and the normal
donor site in exon 3. Conceptual translation of the sequence generated
a 221-amino acid protein lacking the paired domain and part of the
glycine-rich linker (Fig. 5B). The PD-less isoform of Pax6
was found to be expressed in brain, eyes, and pancreas of mouse. The
level of expression of this isoform was relatively higher in brain
(Fig. 5C). Translation of this expression vector in cultured
cells show that the PD-less isoform is stable (Fig. 5, D and
E).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
PD-less of the murine
Pax6. A, exons present in the isoform
are shown as boxes. Asterisks mark the positions
of alternative donor and acceptor sites. B, structure of
paired-less Pax6 protein. PD, paired domain; HD,
paired-like homeodomain; Linker, glycine-rich region linking
the two DNA-binding domains; PST,
proline-serine-threonine-rich transactivation domain at the C terminus
of Pax6. C, expression analysis of the paired-less isoform.
D, nuclear extract from NIH3T3 cells were immunoblotted with
anti-Pax6 antibodies following the transfection of the expression
plasmid. The results show the expression of paired-less isoform
(asterisk). E, in vitro translated
proteins. F, transactivation activity of the PD-less isoform
to luciferase reporter containing HD-binding consensus sequences (P2)
and EMSA (G) with end-labeled P2.
|
|
To further verify that both PD- and HD of the Pax6 act cooperatively in
the induction of gene expression, we performed the functional analysis
of the PD-less isoform of the Pax6. If HD and PD of Pax6 act
independently, then one can expect that the removal of the paired
domain should not affect the activities of the HD. However, the PD-less
isoform of Pax6 fails to activate the reporter containing HD
DNA-binding sequences (P2) (Fig. 5F). The PD-less isoform of
Pax6 could bind to P2 (Fig. 5G) but failed to bind PD
DNA-binding consensus sequences P6CON,CD19-2(A-ins) and ZPE compared
with normal Pax6 (Fig. 6,
A-C).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The binding ability of PD-less of murine
Pax6. EMSA was performed to compare the DNA binding ability
of the Pax6 and PD-less isoform proteins. Double-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotides P6CON (13, 34), CD19-2(A-ins), and ZPE (52) were
end-labeled with [ -32P]ATP. EMSAs for CD19-2(A-ins)
binding was carried out as described previously (47). The binding
reactions for P6CON and ZPE were carried out as described under
"Experimental Procedures."
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The DNA-binding domains of PAX6 are highly conserved among animal
species. The diverse functions of Pax6 appear to originate from both
the complex regulatory mechanisms controlling the tissue-specific transcription and splicing as well as its ability to participate in
multiple molecular interactions (54). Missense mutations in the
DNA-binding domains of PAX6 may result in failure to properly recognize
the binding sites in normal target genes, thus causing partial or
complete loss- or gain-of-function. The loss-of-function may also be
due to impaired interaction between DNA-binding domains or failure of
cofactor-mediated functions. In order to understand the mechanism of
PAX6 function we performed functional analysis of missense mutations
found in the PD region of PAX6 and alternatively spliced form of
PAX6, PAX6-5a, of aniridia patients (Fig. 1). We also performed
functional analyses of a PD-less isoform of Pax6 (AY064175), which was
found to be expressed in the brain, eyes, and pancreas of mice. The
level of expression of PD-less isoform was relatively higher in brain
(Fig. 5C).
Missense mutations described in this paper (PAX6 and PAX6-5a) -L46R,
-C52R, and -V53L) are found in the DNA-binding region of PD and located
on either end of the 5a-polypeptide insert in the PAX6-5a isoform. The
expressed proteins were found to be stable (Fig. 1, A-C).
Among the mutations in the N subdomain of PD, L46R is present in the
2-helix, and C52R and V53L are located in 3-helix. This N
subdomain uses a helix-turn-helix (HTH) unit to dock against the major
groove at one end of the binding site (18). As compared with wild-type
PAX6, the PAX6-5a isoform could not transactivate the luciferase
reporter gene containing target DNA-binding consensus sequences
CD19-2(A-ins) for PD (Fig. 2A). PAX6 mutants PAX6-L46R, -C52R, and -V53L showed significantly lower transactivation ability than wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 2B) with luciferase reporter
containing CD19-2(A-ins). EMSA results with CD19-2(A-ins) showed that
PAX6-L46R and -C52R lost their binding abilities, and -V53L showed
significantly lower binding ability than wild-type PAX6 (Fig.
2C). PAX6-5a and its respective mutants did not show
transactivation or binding ability with the PD target sequences as
insertion of the 5a-polypeptide disrupts its PD binding capability (13,
32). These mutants showed variable DNA binding abilities with other
Pax6-binding consensus sequences like P6CON, BSAP, and ZPE (Fig. 3,
A-C).
The mutated amino acids of PAX6 described here are highly conserved
within the PD and are present in the DNA-binding region of the PD. The
missense mutation L46R causes substitution of a positively charged
amino acid, arginine, in place of nonpolar leucine, and C52R leads to
substitution of a positively charged arginine in place of an uncharged
and polar cysteine amino acid residue. These two mutations impaired
both DNA binding and transcriptional activation abilities of PAX6. In
the case of the V53L missense mutation (24) valine was replaced by the
bulky amino acid residue leucine, but the net charge remained the same.
The PAX6 mutants L46R, and C52R might have lost their activity as they
were unable to bind the DNA, while the V to L substitution at codon 53 retained binding ability but turned the protein into a transcriptional repressor or perhaps lost the conformation used to recruit the all
cofactors used for transactivation. The variable properties of these PD
mutants led to analysis of their HD function.
The PAX6-5a isoform had about 50% lower transactivation ability
compared with the wild-type PAX6 (Fig. 4A) with the
luciferase reporter containing HD-binding consensus sequences (P2). The
missense mutations in the PD of PAX6 and PAX6-5a showed some unusual
transactivation properties (Fig. 4B) with the P2-containing
luciferase reporter. These mutants have almost identical HD DNA binding
abilities (Fig. 4C) to that of wild-type PAX6 and PAX6-5a,
but they show variable transactivation properties. The variable
functional properties of PAX6 mutant may be one of the factors for
variable phenotype of aniridia patients. PAX6 PD mutant V53L had
significantly lower transactivation ability than wild-type PAX6. Thus
PD mutant V53L affects both PD and HD functions. Interestingly,
PAX6-5a-L46R showed a significantly higher transactivation ability than
wild-type PAX6-5a. However, it behaves like wild-type PAX6 as far as
HD-related transactivation is concerned. Furthermore, PAX6-5a-C52R, and
-V53L mutants showed significantly lower transactivation activities.
The PD-less isoform of Pax6 fails to activate the reporter containing
HD DNA-binding sequences (P2) (Fig. 5F) despite its binding
ability to the P2 probe (Fig. 5G). It failed to bind the PD
DNA-binding consensus sequences P6CON,CD19-2(A-ins) and ZPE as compared
with normal Pax6 (Fig. 6, A-C). These results indicate that
the HD can bind to DNA but requires the PD for its transactivation function. Additionally, it may have some special regulatory role in the
brain, eyes and pancreas as evident from its expression pattern (Fig.
5C). A similar paired-less isoform was identified earlier in
two phylogenicaly distinct species, quail (55) and Caenorhabditis
elegans (56), and these findings suggest some normal function for
the PD-less isoform (57). If HD and PD of Pax6 act independently, then
one can expect that the removal of the paired domain should not affect
the activities of the HD.
These findings, at the level of in vitro DNA binding and
transactivation assays, indicate a complex state of regulation of PAX6
function. The PD mutant V53L affects HD function. PAX6-5a mutants
(L46R, C52R, and V53L) also alter activity with HD. These findings
support our previous ideas of PD-dependent HD function (51,
58) and are in agreement with a possible cooperative interaction
between the PD and HD of PAX6 (59). Recently intradomain and
interdomain interactions in PAX6 have also been reported (15, 42) that
support the concept that the PD and HD of PAX6 physically interact. Two
possibilities of how the PD can influence the function of the HD are
the following. Gain-of-function suggests that normally the PD does not
interact with the HD and mutations in the PD result in misfolding of
the PAX6 protein such that the PD interferes with HD function.
Alternatively, loss-of-function suggests that PD and HD of PAX6
physically interact, and mutations within the PD affect the function of
HD. Although the different domains of PAX6 are well delineated, their
functions appear to be mutually dependent, and the PD of PAX6 is
required for HD function.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Lindsey Middleton and Dr. Louise
Strong for clinical material. We also thank Drs. R. Mass and M. Busslinger for the recombinant vectors. The DNA sequencing
work was done by the core sequencing facility at the M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants EY09675, EY10608, and CA 16672.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Box 117, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-792-2690; Fax: 713-791-9478; E-mail:
gsaunders@odin.mdacc.tmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 17, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206478200
2
Chao, L. Y., Mishra, R., Strong, L. C., and
Saunders, G. F. (2002) Hum. Mutat., in press.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PD, paired domain;
HD, homeodomain;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
ZPE, -protected element;
BSAP, binding sequence of Pax-5.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ton, C. C.,
Hirvonen, H.,
Miwa, H.,
Weil, M. M.,
Monaghan, P.,
Jordan, T.,
van Heyningen, V.,
Hastie, N. D.,
Meijers-Heijboer, H.,
Drechsler, M.,
Royer-Pokora, B.,
Collins, F.,
Swaroop, A.,
Strong, L. C.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1991)
Cell
67,
1059-1074[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Glaser, T.,
Walton, D. S.,
and Maas, R. L.
(1992)
Nat. Genet.
2,
232-239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Halder, G.,
Callaerts, P.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
1788-1792[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Tomarev, S. I.
(1997)
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
41,
835-842[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Altmann, C. R.,
Chow, R. L.,
Lang, R. A.,
and Hemmati-Brivanlou, A.
(1997)
Dev. Biol.
185,
119-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Gehring, W. J.,
and Ikeo, K.
(1999)
Trends Genet.
15,
371-377[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Matsuo, T.,
Osumi-Yamashita, N.,
Noji, S.,
Ohuchi, H.,
Koyama, E.,
Myokai, F.,
Matsuo, N.,
Taniguchi, S.,
Doi, H.,
Iseki, S.,
Ninomiya, Y.,
Fujiwara, M.,
Watanabe, T.,
and Eto, K.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
3,
299-304[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Glaser, T.,
Jepeal, L.,
Edwards, J. G.,
Young, S. R.,
Favor, J.,
and Maas, R. L.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
7,
463-471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
van Raamsdonk, C. D.,
and Tilghman, S. M.
(2000)
Development
127,
5439-5448[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Ashery-Padan, R.,
Marquardt, T.,
Zhou, X.,
and Gruss, P.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
2701-2711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Marquardt, T.,
Ashery-Padan, R.,
Andrejewski, N.,
Scardigli, R.,
Guillemot, F.,
and Gruss, P.
(2001)
Cell
105,
43-55[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Czerny, T.,
Schaffner, G.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2048-2061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
Glaser, T.,
Cai, J.,
Jepeal, L.,
Walton, D. S.,
and Maas, R. L.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2022-2034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Wilson, D. S.,
Guenther, B.,
Desplan, C.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1995)
Cell
82,
709-719[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Mikkola, I.,
Bruun, J. A.,
Holm, T.,
and Johansen, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
4109-4118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Fortin, A. S.,
Underhill, D. A.,
and Gros, P.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
4574-4581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Xu, W.,
Rould, M. A.,
Jun, S.,
Desplan, C.,
and Pabo, C. O.
(1995)
Cell
80,
639-650[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Xu, H. E.,
Rould, M. A., Xu, W.,
Epstein, J. A.,
Maas, R. L.,
and Pabo, C. O.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1263-1275[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Azuma, N.,
Nishina, S.,
Yanagisawa, H.,
Okuyama, T.,
and Yamada, M.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
141-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Azuma, N.,
and Yamada, M.
(1998)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
39,
828-830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Tang, H. K.,
Chao, L. Y.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1997)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6,
381-386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Prosser, J.,
and van Heyningen, V.
(1998)
Hum. Mutat.
11,
93-108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Wolf, M. T.,
Lorenz, B.,
Winterpacht, A.,
Drechsler, M.,
Schumacher, V.,
Royer-Pokora, B.,
Blankenagel, A.,
Zabel, B.,
and Wildhardt, G.
(1998)
Hum. Mutat.
12,
304-313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Gronskov, K.,
Rosenberg, T.,
Sand, A.,
and Brondum-Nielsen, K.
(1999)
Eur. J. Hum. Genet.
7,
274-286[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Hanson, I.,
Churchill, A.,
Love, J.,
Axton, R.,
Moore, T.,
Clarke, M.,
Meire, F.,
and van Heyningen, V.
(1999)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
8,
165-172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Chao, L. Y.,
Huff, V.,
Strong, L. C.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(2000)
Hum. Mutat.
15,
332-339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Malandrini, A.,
Mari, F.,
Palmeri, S.,
Gambelli, S.,
Berti, G.,
Bruttini, M.,
Bardelli, A. M.,
Williamson, K.,
van Heyningen, V.,
and Renieri, A.
(2001)
Clin. Genet.
60,
151-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Sonoda, S.,
Isashiki, Y.,
Tabata, Y.,
Kimura, K.,
Kakiuchi, T.,
and Ohba, N.
(2000)
Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.
238,
552-558[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Kondo-Saitoh, A.,
Matsumoto, N.,
Sasaki, T.,
Egashira, M.,
Saitoh, A.,
Yamada, K.,
Niikawa, N.,
and Amemiya, T.
(2000)
Eur. J. Ophthalmol.
10,
167-172[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Van Heyningen, V.,
and Williamson, K. A.
(2002)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
11,
1161-1167[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chi, N.,
and Epstein, J. A.
(2002)
Trends Genet.
18,
41-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Kozmik, Z.,
Czerny, T.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6793-6803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Singh, S.,
Mishra, R.,
Arango, N. A.,
Deng, J. M.,
Behringer, R. R.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(2002)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
99,
6812-6815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Epstein, J.,
Cai, J.,
Glaser, T.,
Jepeal, L.,
and Maas, R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
8355-8361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Underhill, D. A.,
and Gros, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14175-14182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Epstein, J. A.,
Shapiro, D. N.,
Cheng, J.,
Lam, P. Y.,
and Maas, R. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4213-4218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Chalepakis, G.,
Goulding, M.,
Read, A.,
Strachan, T.,
and Gruss, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
3685-3689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Czerny, T.,
and Busslinger, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2858-2871[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Gehring, W. J.,
Qian, Y. Q.,
Billeter, M.,
Furukubo-Tokunaga, K.,
Schier, A. F.,
Resendez-Perez, D.,
Affolter, M.,
Otting, G.,
and Wuthrich, K.
(1994)
Cell
78,
211-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Tang, H. K.,
Singh, S.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7210-7221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Wawersik, S.,
and Maas, R. L.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
917-925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Punzo, C.,
Kurata, S.,
and Gehring, W. J.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1716-1723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Wilson, D.,
Sheng, G.,
Lecuit, T.,
Dostatni, N.,
and Desplan, C.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2120-2134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Hanson, I. M.,
Fletcher, J. M.,
Jordan, T.,
Brown, A.,
Taylor, D.,
Adams, R. J.,
Punnett, H. H.,
and van Heyningen, V.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
6,
168-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Mirzayans, F.,
Pearce, W. G.,
MacDonald, I. M.,
and Walter, M. A.
(1995)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
57,
539-548[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Hill, R. E.,
Favor, J.,
Hogan, B. L.,
Ton, C. C.,
Saunders, G. F.,
Hanson, I. M.,
Prosser, J.,
Jordan, T.,
Hastie, N. D.,
and van Heyningen, V.
(1991)
Nature
354,
522-525[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Singh, S.,
Stellrecht, C. M.,
Tang, H. K.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17306-17313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Azuma, N.,
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Handa, H.,
Hayakawa, M.,
Kanai, A.,
and Yamada, M.
(1999)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
65,
656-663[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Yamaguchi, Y.,
Sawada, J.,
Yamada, M.,
Handa, H.,
and Azuma, N.
(1997)
Genes Cells
2,
255-261[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Love, J.,
Axton, R.,
Churchill, A.,
van Heyningen, V.,
and Hanson, I.
(1998)
Hum. Mutat.
12,
128-134[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Singh, S.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1998)
Anal. Biochem.
265,
185-187[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Sharon-Friling, R.,
Richardson, J.,
Sperbeck, S.,
Lee, D.,
Rauchman, M.,
Maas, R.,
Swaroop, A.,
and Wistow, G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2067-2076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Lefebvre, V.,
Huang, W.,
Harley, V. R.,
Goodfellow, P. N.,
and de Crombrugghe, B.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2336-2346[Abstract]
|
| 54.
|
Chauhan, B. K.,
Reed, N. A.,
Zhang, W.,
Duncan, M. K.,
Kilimann, M. W.,
and Cvekl, A.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
11539-11548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Carriere, C.,
Plaza, S.,
Martin, P.,
Quatannens, B.,
Bailly, M.,
Stehelin, D.,
and Saule, S.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7257-7266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Zhang, Y.,
and Emmons, S. W.
(1995)
Nature
377,
55-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Dozier, C.,
Carriere, C.,
Grevin, D.,
Martin, P.,
Quatannens, B.,
Stehelin, D.,
and Saule, S.
(1993)
Cell Growth & Differ.
4,
281-289[Abstract]
|
| 58.
|
Singh, S.,
Tang, H. K.,
Lee, J. Y.,
and Saunders, G. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21531-21541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Bertuccioli, C.,
Fasano, L.,
Jun, S.,
Wang, S.,
Sheng, G.,
and Desplan, C.
(1996)
Development
122,
2673-2685[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Favor, C. J. Gloeckner, A. Neuhauser-Klaus, W. Pretsch, R. Sandulache, S. Saule, and I. Zaus
Relationship of Pax6 Activity Levels to the Extent of Eye Development in the Mouse, Mus musculus
Genetics,
July 1, 2008;
179(3):
1345 - 1355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. A. Kim, Y. T. Noh, M.-J. Ryu, H.-T. Kim, S.-E. Lee, C.-H. Kim, C. Lee, Y. H. Kim, and C. Y. Choi
Phosphorylation and Transactivation of Pax6 by Homeodomain-interacting Protein Kinase 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 17, 2006;
281(11):
7489 - 7497.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-A. Bruun, E. I. S. Thomassen, K. Kristiansen, G. Tylden, T. Holm, I. Mikkola, G. Bjorkoy, and T. Johansen
The third helix of the homeodomain of paired class homeodomain proteins acts as a recognition helix both for DNA and protein interactions
Nucleic Acids Res.,
May 10, 2005;
33(8):
2661 - 2675.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Azuma, K. Tadokoro, A. Asaka, M. Yamada, Y. Yamaguchi, H. Handa, S. Matsushima, T. Watanabe, Y. Kida, T. Ogura, et al.
Transdifferentiation of the retinal pigment epithelia to the neural retina by transfer of the Pax6 transcriptional factor
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
April 15, 2005;
14(8):
1059 - 1068.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Haubst, J. Berger, V. Radjendirane, J. Graw, J. Favor, G. F. Saunders, A. Stoykova, and M. Gotz
Molecular dissection of Pax6 function: the specific roles of the paired domain and homeodomain in brain development
Development,
December 15, 2004;
131(24):
6131 - 6140.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. N. Cinar and A. D. Chisholm
Genetic Analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans pax-6 Locus: Roles of Paired Domain-Containing and Nonpaired Domain-Containing Isoforms
Genetics,
November 1, 2004;
168(3):
1307 - 1322.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Chauhan, Y. Yang, K. Cveklova, and A. Cvekl
Functional interactions between alternatively spliced forms of Pax6 in crystallin gene regulation and in haploinsufficiency
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 12, 2004;
32(5):
1696 - 1709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K. Chauhan, Y. Yang, K. Cveklova, and A. Cvekl
Functional Properties of Natural Human PAX6 and PAX6(5a) Mutants
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
February 1, 2004;
45(2):
385 - 392.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|