|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M208327200 on October 22, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49631-49637, December 20, 2002
Cholesterol Depletion from the Plasma Membrane Triggers
Ligand-independent Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor*
Xu
Chen and
Marilyn D.
Resh
From the Cell Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, New York 10021 and Graduate Program in Biochemistry
and Structural Biology, Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of
Cornell University, New York, New York 10021
Received for publication, August 14, 2002, and in revised form, October 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We recently demonstrated that depletion of plasma
membrane cholesterol with methyl- -cyclodextrin (M CD) caused
activation of MAPK (Chen, X., and Resh, M. D. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 34617-34623). MAPK activation was
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent and involved
increased tyrosine phosphorylation of the p85 subunit of PI3K. We next
determined whether M CD treatment induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
other cellular proteins. Here we report that cholesterol depletion of
serum-starved COS-1 cells with M CD or filipin caused an increase in
Tyr(P) levels of a 180-kDa protein that was identified as the epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR). Cross-linking experiments showed that
M CD induced dimerization of EGFR, indicative of receptor activation.
Reagents that block release of membrane-bound EGFR ligands did not
affect M CD-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR, indicating that M CD activation of EGFR is ligand-independent. Moreover, M CD treatment resulted in increased tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR downstream targets and Ras activation. Incubation of cells with the
specific EGFR inhibitor AG4178 blocked M CD-induced phosphorylation of EGFR, SHC, phospholipase C- , and Gab-1 as well as MAPK
activation. We conclude that cholesterol depletion from the plasma
membrane by M CD causes ligand-independent activation of EGFR,
resulting in MAPK activation by PI3K and Ras-dependent
mechanisms. Moreover, these studies reveal a novel mode of action of
M CD, in addition to its ability to disrupt membrane rafts.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Cholesterol is a membrane lipid that regulates both the
flexibility and the mechanical stability of the membrane bilayer. It
has also been shown that cholesterol plays a critical role in
assembling membrane microdomains, such as rafts and caveolae, in a
separate phase from the rest of the bilayer (1-3). Cholesterol and
lipid rafts are involved in numerous cellular processes, including membrane protein segregation and concentration, protein and lipid sorting, and virus assembly and release (1, 3, 4). However, excess
cholesterol is toxic to cells and can contribute to the development of
diseases such as atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease (5, 6). It is
therefore important for cells to maintain cholesterol homeostasis.
Methyl- -cyclodextrin
(M CD)1 is a water-soluble
cyclic heptasaccharide that has been used to deliver hydrophobic drugs
based on its property of solubilizing non-polar substances (7). This compound has also been demonstrated to bind cholesterol with high specificity (7). Cholesterol from the plasma membrane of cultured cells
is rapidly removed in response to M CD (8-10), and M CD has
therefore been extensively used as a cholesterol-depleting reagent.
Recent studies also indicate that cholesterol depletion by M CD
disrupts membrane rafts (11, 12) and affects signaling pathways at the
cell surface (13, 14).
We recently demonstrated (15) that cholesterol depletion by M CD
induced ERK activation via a PI3K-dependent pathway. How cholesterol removal regulated this pathway was not clear. We had observed that treatment of cells with M CD caused an increase in
tyrosine phosphorylation of the p85 subunit of PI3K. It was therefore
of interest to determine whether cholesterol depletion by M CD
induces tyrosine phosphorylation of other cellular proteins. Here we
show that M CD treatment of cells induced tyrosine phosphorylation of
multiple proteins. A combination of Tyr(P) antibody/agarose affinity
purification and mass spectrometry was used to identify one of the
proteins (180 kDa) as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
M CD treatment induced tyrosine phosphorylation of downstream targets
of EGFR, including SHC, PLC- , and Gab-1 as well as Ras activation.
We conclude that cholesterol depletion from the plasma membrane
triggers signal transduction through ligand-independent activation of
the EGF receptor.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Antibodies and Reagents--
Goat polyclonal anti-p-EGFR
(Tyr-1173), rabbit polyclonal anti-EGFR (1005), anti-ERK2 (C-14), and
anti-Gab-1 (H-198), and monoclonal anti-Tyr(P) (PY99) and anti-p-ERK
(E-4) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa
Cruz, CA). Monoclonal anti-EGFR (neutralizing) and monoclonal
anti-PLC- were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid,
NY). Rabbit anti-p-EGFR (Tyr-1068) and anti-p-EGFR (Tyr-845) were
purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Rabbit
polyclonal anti-SHC and mouse monoclonal anti-SHC were obtained from BD
Biosciences. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse secondary
antibody was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). GM6001 was
obtained from Chemicon International (Temecula, CA).
Bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3) was obtained from
Pierce. Wortmannin, TPA, CRM197, cholesterol, filipin, and
methyl- -cyclodextrin were purchased from Sigma. Tyrphostin AG1478
was obtained from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA). Epidermal growth
factor was obtained from Calbiochem. Trappsol was obtained from
Cyclodextrin Technologies Development Inc.(High Springs, FL).
Cell Culture, Transfection, and Cholesterol Depletion--
COS-1
cells, A431 cells, and 3T3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
(COS-1, A431) or with 10% calf serum (3T3 cells). COS-1 cells were
transfected with LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Cholesterol depletion of cells was
performed as described previously (15). Briefly, cells were serum-starved for 24 h and then incubated with the indicated
concentration of M CD (dissolved in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium) or other indicated cholesterol depletion reagents for 1 h
at 37 °C before lysis. For inhibitor experiments, serum-starved
cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with indicated inhibitors
in the presence of 2% M CD prior to harvest.
Identification of Proteins by Mass Spectrometry--
Six 100-mm
plates of COS-1 cells were serum-starved and then treated with 2%
M CD for 1 h. Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 0.5%
deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 250 µg/ml Pefabloc (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)) and then subjected to affinity purification using an
anti-Tyr(P)/agarose conjugate. Samples were washed three times with
RIPA buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining.
Individual protein bands were excised and digested with trypsin, and
the tryptic peptides were subjected to mass fingerprinting by
matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass
spectrometry by the Sloan-Kettering Microchemistry Facility. Top
"major" experimental masses (m/z) were used
to search a non-redundant human data base using the PeptideSearch
algorithm. A molecular weight range twice the predicted weight was
covered, with a mass accuracy restriction of 40 ppm or better, and a
maximum of one missed cleavage site allowed per peptide. In addition,
mass spectrometric based sequencing (electrospray ionization-mass
spectrometry) of selected peptides was performed using a PE-SCIEX
API300 triple quadrupole instrument, fitted with a continuous flow
nano-electrospray source ("JaFIS").
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
Cells were lysed
with RIPA buffer, and lysates were clarified at 14,000 rpm in an
Eppendorf centrifuge for 10 min at 4 °C. For immunoprecipitation,
lysates were incubated with the indicated antibodies and protein
A-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Samples were washed three times
with RIPA buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Western blotting was
performed using the indicated antibodies. Proteins were detected using
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies and ECL Western
blotting detection reagents following the manufacturer's instructions.
Ras activation was assayed using a Ras Activation Assay Kit (Upstate
Biotechnology) following the manufacturer's instructions.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy--
Immunofluorescence staining
was carried out as described previously (16). COS-1 cells were seeded
onto 25-mm glass coverslips and serum-starved for 24 h before
treatment with 1% M CD for 2 h. The cells were washed twice
with PBS, fixed with 3.7% formalin/PBS for 15 min, permeabilized with
0.2% Triton in PBS for 5 min, and incubated with anti-Tyr(P)
monoclonal antibody for 45 min. Cells were washed four times with PBS
and incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary
antibody for 30 min. Following four 5-min washes, cells were mounted on
microscope slides and visualized with a Zeiss LSM510 confocal microscope.
Cross-linking Studies--
Cross-linking experiments were
performed as described (17) with minor modification. COS-1 cells were
grown to subconfluency and then serum-starved for 24 h. Cells were
treated with 2% M CD for 1 h at 37 °C or as indicated, then
transferred to room temperature, and washed twice in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) buffer. The membrane-impermeable cross-linker
bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate (BS3) was dissolved in PBS
and added to a final concentration of 2 mM for 15 min at
room temperature. The reaction was quenched for 5 min by the addition
of 1 M glycine, pH 8.0 (final concentration of 50 mM). Cells were washed with cold PBS and lysed in buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 0.5% Triton X-100,
1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 250 µg/ml Pefabloc), and the lysate was clarified
at 14,000 rpm in an Eppendorf centrifuge for 10 min at 4 °C.
Supernatants were adjusted to SDS-PAGE sample buffer containing 5%
-mercaptoethanol and subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 5% polyacrylamide
gel, followed by immunoblotting with anti-EGFR polyclonal antibody.
Measurement of Cholesterol Content in the Plasma Membrane
Fraction--
COS-1 cells grown in 100-mm culture dishes were treated
with or without 2% M CD for 1 h. The plasma membrane fraction
was isolated as described previously (18) and suspended in a minimum of
PBS. An aliquot was used for protein measurement. The rest of the
pellet was extracted with 2:1 methanol/chloroform, followed by 0.5 ml
of chloroform and 0.5 ml of water. The chloroform (lipid phase) was
dried under nitrogen. The dry lipid was suspended in 2-propanol, and
membrane cholesterol was assayed using the Sigma Infinity cholesterol
reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions.
 |
RESULTS |
M CD Induces Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Proteins in COS-1
Cells--
Our recent studies (15) showed that treatment of COS-1
cells with M CD activated MAPK via a PI3K-dependent
pathway. Moreover, M CD-treated cells exhibited enhanced tyrosine
phosphorylation of the p85 subunit of PI3K. We therefore examined
whether tyrosine phosphorylation of other cellular proteins was
increased in response to M CD. COS-1 cells were serum-starved for
24 h and then were treated with 1% M CD for 1 h at
37 °C. Cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and anti-Tyr(P)
Western blotting. As shown in Fig. 1A, tyrosine phosphorylation
levels of two prominent proteins, termed p180 and p130, were increased
upon treatment with M CD. Similar results were also observed in NIH
3T3 cells. Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining of COS-1 cells with
anti-Tyr(P) antibody revealed a striking increase in the levels of
cellular protein tyrosine phosphorylation upon treatment of M CD,
compared with control cells, particularly at the plasma membrane and in
the perinuclear region (data not shown). These results demonstrate that
M CD can induce tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
M CD stimulates
tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR. A, serum-starved COS-1
and NIH 3T3 cells were preincubated with or without 1% M CD for
1 h and lysed. The lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by
Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) antibody. B, serum-starved
COS-1 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 2% M CD for
1 h at 37 °C. Cells were lysed and subjected to affinity
purification using an anti-Tyr(P)/agarose conjugate. The samples were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining. The 180-kDa protein
band was excised and analyzed by mass spectrometry as described under
"Materials and Methods," resulting in identification of the p180
protein as EGF receptor. C, serum-starved COS-1 cells were
stimulated with or without 2% M CD for 1 h. The cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated (IP) with the indicated antibodies
followed by Western blotting (WB) with the indicated
antibodies. D, serum-starved A431 cells were incubated in
the absence or presence of 2% M CD for 1 h. The cell lysates
were analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-pEGFR antibody.
|
|
Identification of Tyrosine-phosphorylated Proteins Stimulated by
M CD--
The next set of experiments was designed to identify the
M CD-induced phosphorylated proteins. Serum-starved COS-1 cells were treated with 2% M CD for 1 h, and cell lysates were subjected to affinity purification using an anti-Tyr(P)/agarose conjugate. Bound
protein samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining.
As shown in Fig. 1B, an 180-kDa band was apparent in the
lane from M CD-treated cells. The p180 band was excised and digested
with trypsin. Mass spectrometric fingerprinting analysis was performed
as described under "Materials and Methods," resulting in the
identification of p180 as the EGFR.
To confirm that Tyr(P) 180 was the EGFR, immunoprecipitation and
Western blotting of lysates from M CD-treated COS-1 cells was
performed with anti-EGF receptor and anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. As
depicted in Fig. 1C, treatment of cells with M CD clearly
induced EGFR phosphorylation. Similar results were also observed using an anti-p-EGFR antibody, which recognizes only tyrosine-phosphorylated (Tyr-1173) EGFR. In human A431 cells, which express high levels of EGFR protein, M CD strongly increased EGFR phosphorylation (Fig.
1D). Moreover, the M CD-induced increase in EGFR
phosphorylation was inhibited by AG4178, a specific inhibitor of EGFR
tyrosine kinase activity (19). It is important to note that these
experiments were performed with serum-starved cells, implying that
phosphorylation of EGFR induced by M CD is ligand-independent (see below).
Role of Cholesterol in M CD-induced EGFR Phosphorylation--
We
next examined the concentration dependence of M CD on EGFR
phosphorylation. Serum-starved COS-1 cells were treated with increasing
concentrations of M CD for 1 h at 37 °C and then lysed. Samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using an
anti-pEGFR antibody. M CD induced phosphorylation of EGFR in a
concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
2), with maximal EGFR phosphorylation occurring at 2% M CD. Concentrations of M CD above 2% resulted in
loss of cell viability.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Concentration-dependent effects
of M CD on tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR.
A, serum-starved COS-1 cells were incubated in the presence
of the indicated concentrations of M CD for 1 h. Cell lysates
were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with an anti-pEGFR
antibody. B, quantitation of data from the above experiment
is plotted. Phosphorylation of EGFR stimulated by 2% M CD was
normalized to 100%.
|
|
Quantitation of cholesterol levels revealed that addition of 2% M CD
resulted in an ~40% reduction in membrane cholesterol content (Fig.
3A). In order to determine
whether depletion of cholesterol by M CD was responsible for EGFR
phosphorylation, M CD was preincubated with or without 40 µg/ml
cholesterol and then added to cells for 1 h. The effect of
cholesterol on M CD-induced EGFR phosphorylation was then assessed.
As shown in Fig. 3B, cholesterol addback inhibited
M CD-induced EGFR phosphorylation by 60-70%.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The role of cholesterol in tyrosine
phosphorylation of EGFR induced by M CD.
A, COS-1 cells were treated with or without 2% M CD for
1 h and washed, and the plasma membrane fraction was isolated. The
amount of cholesterol in the membrane fraction was measured by using
Sigma Infinity Cholesterol Reagent (see "Materials and Methods").
Data are expressed as the amount of cholesterol per mg of total plasma
membrane protein. B, 1% M CD was preincubated with or
without 40 µg/ml cholesterol and added to serum-starved COS-1 cells
for 1 h. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by
Western blotting using an anti-pEGFR antibody. Phosphorylation of EGFR
was analyzed and quantitated from three independent experiments. The
level of phosphorylation of EGFR induced by M CD was normalized to
100%. C and D, serum-starved COS-1 cells were
incubated in the absence or presence of 10 µg/ml filipin
(C) or 40 mM Trappsol (D).
Phosphorylation of EGFR was monitored as described in
B.
|
|
Next we examined whether other cholesterol depletion agents can cause
ligand-independent EGFR phosphorylation. COS-1 cells were incubated
with 2-OH-propyl- -cyclodextrin (Trappsol), which is as effective in
depleting cell membrane cholesterol as M CD (20), or filipin, a
cholesterol-binding agent (21). Both Trappsol and filipin caused EGFR
phosphorylation (Fig. 3, C and D). These data
imply that cholesterol depletion from the cell membrane induces EGFR phosphorylation.
M CD Causes Ligand Independent Dimerization and Activation of
EGFR--
It has been established previously that upon EGF binding,
EGFR undergoes ligand-induced dimerization, a prerequisite for normal receptor signaling (22). The tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR induced
by M CD occurs in the absence of EGF addition. We therefore investigated whether M CD can also cause EGFR dimerization,
indicative of EGFR activation. Serum-starved COS-1 cells were
stimulated with 2% M CD for 1 h at 37 °C and then exposed to
the membrane-impermeable cross-linker BS3. As shown Fig.
4, M CD increased dimerization of EGFR
to a similar extent as 25 ng/ml EGF, implying that M CD induced
ligand-independent activation of EGFR.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Ligand-independent dimerization of EGFR.
Serum-starved COS-1 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of
2% M CD for 1 h or 25 ng/ml EGF for 3 min at 37 °C.
Cell-surface receptors were cross-linked in the presence of 2 mM BS3, a membrane-impermeable cross-linker,
for 15 min at room temperature. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE
gels (5% polyacrylamide) followed by Western blotting with anti-EGFR
antibody. The positions of EGFR dimer (D) and monomer
(M) are indicated.
|
|
Previous studies (23-25) have reported that transactivation of EGFR
can occur by release of membrane-anchored EGFR ligands; this event is
mediated by activation of transmembrane metalloproteinases. We
therefore performed two sets of experiments to determine whether M CD
activation of EGFR was truly ligand-independent. First, cells were
treated with a neutralizing antibody that effectively blocks the
ligand-binding site of the EGFR. As depicted in Fig.
5A, antibody addition nearly
completely blocked phosphorylation of the EGFR by EGF but had no effect
on EGFR phosphorylation induced by M CD. Second, addition of the
broad spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors GM6001 (Fig.
5B) or BB-94 (not shown) had no effect on M CD-induced
EGFR activation but blocked EGFR transactivation induced by TPA. A
similar result was obtained with CRM197, a diphtheria toxin mutant that
specifically blocks the action of HB-EGF (26). TPA-induced
transactivation of EGFR was inhibited by CRM197, whereas no effect was
observed in M CD-treated cells (Fig. 5B). Thus, M CD-induced activation of EGFR does not involve release of
membrane-bound ligands.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
EGFR phosphorylation induced by
M CD is ligand independent. A and
B, serum-starved COS-1 cells were pretreated with
neutralizing antibodies (10 µg/ml) against EGFR ( EGFR)
or 5 mM metalloproteinase inhibitor GM6001 or 10 µg/ml
HB-EGF inhibitor CRM197 for 30 min and then treated with 2% M CD for
1 h (in the presence of above-mentioned antibody or inhibitor) or
50 ng/ml EGF for 3 min or 600 ng/ml TPA for 3 min. Cell lysates were
subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with the indicated
antibodies. Ctrl, control. C, serum-starved COS-1
cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 2% M CD for
1 h. Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting
with phospho-specific anti-EGFR antibodies to the indicated
phosphotyrosine residue or with anti-EGFR antibody. D,
serum-starved COS-1 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of
2% M CD and/or 5 µM PP2 or 5 µM PP3
(inactive analog of PP2) for 1 h. Cell lysates were analyzed by
Western blotting using the indicated antibodies.
|
|
An alternative possibility was that M CD activates a
Src-dependent EGFR phosphorylation and transactivation
process (27). Treatment of cells with M CD followed by Western
blotting with phospho-specific EGFR antibodies revealed increases in
tyrosine phosphorylation of two major autophosphorylation sites
Tyr-1173 and Tyr-1068 as well as Tyr-845, a site phosphorylated by Src (Fig. 5C). Addition of PP2, a Src kinase inhibitor, caused a
partial (about 50%) inhibition of M CD-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of Tyr-845. However, PP2 had no effect on the
M CD-induced increase in pERK (Fig. 5D), indicating that
Src was not likely to be involved in MAPK activation by M CD.
Inhibition of EGFR Blocked M CD-induced ERK Activation--
It
is well established that binding of EGF to EGFR causes ERK activation
(22). We therefore investigated whether ligand-independent phosphorylation of EGFR induced by M CD is responsible for ERK activation. Serum-starved COS-1 cells were incubated with or without the specific EGFR inhibitor AG4178 during M CD treatment. The levels
of p-EGFR and p-ERK were then analyzed. Pretreatment with AG4178 almost
completely blocked both EGFR phosphorylation and ERK activation induced
by M CD as well as EGF (Fig. 6). These data demonstrate that EGFR phosphorylation induced by M CD mediates ERK activation.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
EGFR is required for ERK activation induced
by M CD. Serum-starved COS-1 cells were
incubated in the absence or presence of 0.5 µM EGFR
kinase inhibitor AG4178 for 1 h in the presence or absence of
M CD. For positive control experiments, serum-starved COS-1 cells
were preincubated with 0.5 µM AG4178 for 1 h and
then stimulated with 25 ng/ml EGF for 3 min. After cell lysis, the
protein samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting
using the indicated antibodies.
|
|
M CD-induced Tyrosine Phosphorylation of EGFR Targets and Ras
Activation--
We next investigated whether ligand-independent EGFR
activation by M CD caused tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR
targets SHC, PLC- , and Gab-1. Lysates from serum-starved COS-1 cells that were not treated or were treated with M CD were
immunoprecipitated with anti-SHC or PLC- or Gab-1 antibodies,
followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with an anti-Tyr(P) antibody.
As shown in Fig. 7, treatment of cells
with M CD induced tyrosine phosphorylation of all three SHC isoforms
(p66, p52, and p46) as well as PLC- and Gab-1. M CD-induced SHC,
PLC- , and Gab-1 phosphorylation levels were reduced by about 90% in
the presence of the EGFR inhibitor AG4178 (data not shown). Thus,
ligand-independent activation of EGFR results in phosphorylation of
downstream targets of EGFR.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
M CD stimulates SHC,
PLC- and Gab-1 tyrosine phosphorylation.
Serum-starved COS-1 cells were incubated in the absence or
presence of 2% M CD for 1 h. Cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-SHC (A), or anti-PLC-
(B), or anti-Gab-1 (C) antibody followed by
Western blotting with an anti-Tyr(P) antibody. The total amounts of
SHC, PLC- , and Gab-1 were not affected by M CD. The experiment
shown is representative of 2-3 similar independent experiments.
|
|
In order to monitor Ras activation, cells were treated with M CD or
EGF, and the amount of activated Ras was quantitated using a Ras
binding domain-glutathione S-transferase pulldown assay. As
depicted in Fig. 8, 2% M CD induced a
10-13-fold activation of Ras, compared with 20-fold obtained with 25 ng/ml EGF. It is therefore likely that Ras-dependent
pathways contribute to ERK activation by M CD.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
M CD activates
Ras. Serum-starved COS-1 cells were incubated in the absence or
presence of 2% M CD for 1 h or 25 ng/ml EGF for 3 min. Cell
lysates were precipitated with Raf-1 Ras binding domain-conjugated
agarose, followed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with anti-Ras
antibody. The amount of activated Ras was quantitated. Data shown are
representation of four independent experiments.
|
|
The Role of PI3K in M CD-induced EGFR Signaling--
Our
previous study (15) established that M CD induced ERK activation in a
PI3K-dependent manner. We therefore performed experiments
to determine at which stage in the signaling pathway PI3K was involved.
The PI3K inhibitor wortmannin had no effect on M CD-induced tyrosine
phosphorylation of EGFR, SHC, PLC- , and Gab-1 (data not shown).
However, wortmannin did significantly inhibit M CD-induced ERK
activation. Wortmannin caused a 50% reduction in pERK levels in cells
treated with 2% M CD and a 75% reduction in pERK in cells treated
with 1% M CD (Fig. 9, A and
B). In order to determine whether a Ras/Raf/MEK pathway was
responsible for the residual pERK activity, we incubated M CD-treated
cells in the presence, absence, or combination of wortmannin and/or
PD98059, a MEK inhibitor. As depicted in Fig. 9B, the
combination of wortmannin and PD98059 reduced pERK to basal levels.
Taken together, these results suggest that both PI3K and
Ras-dependent pathways contribute to the M CD-induced
activation of EGFR signaling.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
M CD activates MAPK
by PI3K and Ras-dependent pathways. Serum-starved
COS-1 cells were incubated in the absence or presence of 2% M CD
(A) or 1% M CD (B) with or without 200 nM wortmannin or 20 µM PD98059. Following
cell lysis, activated ERK was detected by Western blotting with a
pERK-specific antibody and was normalized to the total amount of ERK.
Data was quantitated from 2 to 3 independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cyclodextrins such as M CD effectively remove cholesterol from
the plasma membrane (8-10, 14, 28, 29). This property has made M CD
an extensively used agent to study the function of rafts, membrane
microdomains whose integrity depends on the presence of cholesterol. In
this report, we show that cholesterol depletion by M CD also has a
striking effect on tyrosine phosphorylation of endogenous cellular
proteins. The data presented here clearly demonstrate that M CD
treatment results in activation of the endogenous EGFR, as evidenced by
increased tyrosine phosphorylation and dimerization of EGFR, increased
tyrosine phosphorylation of downstream substrates of EGFR, including
endogenous SHC, PLC , and Gab-1, and activation of ERK. All of these
events were blocked by AG4178, a specific EGFR kinase inhibitor,
implying that M CD induced EGFR signal transduction.
Several lines of evidence support the hypothesis that depletion of
plasma membrane cholesterol plays a critical role in M CD-mediated EGFR activation. First, multiple cholesterol-binding reagents, including M CD, filipin, and trappsol, caused EGFR phosphorylation (Fig. 3, C and D). Moreover, the M CD effect on
EGFR phosphorylation was blunted by preincubating M CD with
cholesterol (Fig. 3B). Based on these results we conclude
that cholesterol depletion by M CD triggers EGFR signaling.
The data presented in the current study, combined with our
recent report (15), establish a mechanism whereby M CD induces ERK
activation, i.e. activation of EGFR. Moreover, this work
sheds light on the signaling pathways that are induced as a result of M CD-induced EGFR activation. Multiple lines of evidence implicate PI3K as being required for M CD-induced ERK activation. For example, expression of a dominant-negative PI3K mutant blocks M CD-induced ERK
activation (15). In addition, the adaptor protein Gab-1, which links
activated growth factor receptors to PI3K (30, 31), is
tyrosine-phosphorylated in M CD-treated cells (Fig. 7C).
Moreover, both wortmannin and LY294002, specific PI3K inhibitors,
reduce ERK activation by M CD (15). It is interesting to note that the extent of inhibition by wortmannin varied with the concentration of
M CD, with 75% inhibition of ERK activation obtained when cells were
treated with 1% M CD, and only 50% inhibition at 2% M CD (Fig.
9). These results imply that additional, PI3K-independent pathways are
activated by increasing M CD concentrations.
We observed previously (15) that transfection of cells with
dominant-negative Ha-RasN17 had no apparent effect on M CD-induced ERK activation. However, limitations posed by transfection efficiency and/or contributions from other Ras isoforms may have obscured a
potential role for Ras in this system. We therefore utilized a more
sensitive and specific assay, which detects binding of activated Ras to
the Ras binding domain of Raf (32). The data depicted in Fig. 8 reveal
that Ras is indeed activated by M CD, and it is likely that Ras
activation also contributes to pERK formation.
A model that illustrates our current knowledge of M CD-induced ERK
activation is depicted in Fig. 10.
Treatment of cells with M CD causes cholesterol depletion from the
plasma membrane, EGFR dimerization and activation, and EGFR
autophosphorylation. At least two downstream signaling pathways are
then activated. Phosphorylation and recruitment of SHC triggers the
classical Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK cascade. In addition, PI3K is activated,
potentially through Gab-1 (30, 31), leading to MAPK activation via a
still unknown mechanism (33). Inhibiting either pathway, with
wortmannin or PD98059, provides only partial inhibition of
M CD-induced ERK activation, whereas in the presence of both
inhibitors, pERK is reduced to basal levels (Fig. 9). Thus, the Ras and
PI3K pathways apparently operate independently and in parallel.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
A model for M CD
induced MAPK activation. Depletion of plasma membrane cholesterol
by M CD leads to dimerization and activation of EGFR and signaling
via PI3K and Ras-dependent pathways. See text for
details.
|
|
Alterations in Protein Phosphorylation Induced by
M CD--
M CD-triggered increases in protein phosphorylation have
also been observed in other studies. For example, M CD treatment induced transient tyrosine phosphorylation of ZAP-70, LAT, and phospholipase C 1 in T cells (13) and resulted in constitutive phosphorylation of SHC in rat adipocytes (14). Removal of plasma membrane cholesterol by M CD was shown to increase tyrosine
phosphorylation in sperm (34). Moreover, cholesterol depletion by
M CD has been shown to hyperactivate ERK and increase EGFR
phosphorylation (28, 35, 36). The mechanisms responsible for induction
of protein phosphorylation by M CD in these systems have not been
identified. It will be interesting to determine whether activation of
growth factor receptors represents a common signaling mechanism in
response to membrane cholesterol levels.
The effects of M CD on ERK are likely to be dependent on cell type.
ERK activation in response to M CD has been observed in COS-1 (15),
NIH 3T3 (15), PC12 (37), Rat-1 (28), and T lymphocytes (13, 38). In
contrast, M CD inhibits the activation of ERK induced by shear stress
or ischemia in endothelial cells (39, 40) or by insulin in HIRcB cells
(41). However, in rat adipocytes, cholesterol depletion by
-cyclodextrin has no effect on ERK activation (14). The reason for
these differences in cellular responses is not known but may be related
to differences in EGFR abundance.
Ligand-independent Activation of the EGFR--
Activation of EGFR
signaling in the absence of exogenously added ligand has been observed
in several systems. For example, deletions in the extracellular
ligand-binding domains of the EGFR have been found in several human
tumors, including gliomas, as well as in the avian retroviral
oncoprotein vErbB. These mutants trigger oncogenic signals in a
ligand-independent manner (42, 43). Transactivation of EGFR can be
induced by G-protein-coupled receptors (44, 45) or platelet-derived
growth factor (46). In addition, oxidative stress or expression of
E-cadherins in epithelial cells stimulates activation of EGFR and
subsequent activation of MAPK (47, 48). In many of the instances cited above, EGFR activation has been shown to be mediated by stimulated release of membrane-anchored EGF-like ligand precursors (23-25, 49,
50).
EGFR signaling induced by M CD occurred in the absence of exogenous
EGF, suggesting that ligand-independent activation of EGFR was
occurring. Several lines of evidence support the conclusion that EGFR
activation by M CD is truly ligand-independent. First, it is unlikely
that M CD induced the synthesis of EGF, resulting in
autocrine stimulation. When conditioned media from cells treated with
M CD were placed on serum-starved cells, no activation of ERK and
EGFR phosphorylation was observed (data not shown). Second, treatment
with a neutralizing monoclonal antibody, which effectively blocks the
ligand-binding site of the EGFR, blocked the action of exogenously
added EGF but had no effect on M CD-induced EGFR phosphorylation and
activation (Fig 6). Third, addition of broad spectrum matrix
metalloproteinase inhibitors GM6001 or BB-94 had no effect on
M CD-induced EGFR phosphorylation and activation but blocked EGFR
transactivation by TPA (Fig 6). Finally, the Src inhibitor PP2 had
no effect on M CD-induced ERK activation, implying that
Src-dependent transactivation of EGFR was not contributing to signaling. Taken together, these data strongly support the hypothesis that cholesterol depletion triggers ligand-independent EGFR activation.
Several potential mechanisms may account for the ability of M CD to
induce EGFR activation. It has been shown recently (51, 52) that
cholesterol depletion by M CD inhibits clathrin-coated budding and
prevents formation of clathrin-coated endocytic vesicles. Therefore,
one possibility is that endocytosis of EGFR is inhibited by M CD,
resulting in a higher concentration of EGFR at the cell surface. Burke
et al. (53) have provided evidence that EGFR signaling is
regulated by endocytosis and intracellular trafficking. However, it has
been shown that signal transduction from internalized EGFR also occurs
from endosomes (54). For example, Oksvold et al. (55) showed
that a substantial fraction of tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR and Shc,
Grb2, and pERK exists in endosomes and that EGFR signaling is not only
limited to the plasma membrane but also occurs in the early endosome
and late endosome.
Alternatively, perturbation of gross membrane structure may mediate
EGFR activation. For example, Zwick et al. (56) demonstrated that plasma membrane depolarization triggers EGFR activation. Moreover,
cholesterol depletion by M CD has been shown to induce the formation
of large scale domains in living cell membranes (29). It is tempting to
speculate that ligand-independent EGFR activation by cholesterol
depletion may occur in response to formation of these new plasma
membrane domains. Finally, two recent reports showed that cholesterol
may directly affect EGFR kinase activity. Incubation with
water-soluble cholesterol caused decreased EGF-induced EGFR
tyrosine phosphorylation, suggesting that the presence of cholesterol
negatively regulates EGFR kinase activity (35). Moreover, cholesterol
depletion was shown to increase the intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity
of the EGFR in membranes generated from M CD-treated NIH 3T3 cells
(36).
The results obtained with M CD in vitro are likely to have
potential physiological significance for cholesterol depletion in
vivo. Millions of patients are currently being treated with statins to lower serum cholesterol. There is increasing evidence in the
literature that statin treatment also reduces membrane cholesterol
levels (57, 58). It is therefore possible that the effects on signal
transduction observed with acute M CD treatment of cells may be
mimicked by long term statin treatment. Although future work is
required to elucidate the exact mechanism of cholesterol in regulating
EGFR signaling, the data presented in the current study indicate that
cholesterol depletion triggers ligand-independent EGFR activation and
intracellular signaling.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Hediye Erdjument-Bromage and
Paul Tempst for mass spectrometry analyses; Dr. Xiquan Liang and Wolf
Lindwasser for helpful discussions; Raya Louft Nisenbaum for technical
assistance; and Debra Alston for secretarial support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM 57966.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cell Biology Program,
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave., Box 143, New
York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-639-2514; Fax: 212-717-3317; E-mail:
m-resh@ski.mskcc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 22, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208327200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
M CD, methyl- -cyclodextrin;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
EGFR, EGF
receptor;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
BS3, bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
PLC, phospholipase
C.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Simons, K.,
and Ikonen, E.
(1997)
Nature
387,
569-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Brown, D. A.,
and London, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17221-17224[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Brown, D. A.,
and London, E.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
14,
111-136[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Lindwasser, O. W.,
and Resh, M. D.
(2001)
J. Virol.
75,
7913-7924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Simons, M.,
Keller, P., De,
Strooper, B.,
Beyreuther, K.,
Dotti, C. G.,
and Simons, K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6460-6464[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Strittmatter, W. J.,
Saunders, A. M.,
Schmechel, D.,
Pericak-Vance, M.,
Enghild, J.,
Salvesen, G. S.,
and Roses, A. D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1977-1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Pitha, J.,
Irie, T.,
Sklar, P. B.,
and Nye, J. S.
(1988)
Life Sci.
43,
493-502[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Yancey, P. G.,
Rodrigueza, W. V.,
Kilsdonk, E. P.,
Stoudt, G. W.,
Johnson, W. J.,
Phillips, M. C.,
and Rothblat, G. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16026-16034[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Klein, U.,
Gimpl, G.,
and Fahrenholz, F.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
13784-13793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Kilsdonk, E. P.,
Yancey, P. G.,
Stoudt, G. W.,
Bangerter, F. W.,
Johnson, W. J.,
Phillips, M. C.,
and Rothblat, G. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17250-17256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Hooper, N. M.
(1999)
Mol. Membr. Biol.
16,
145-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Ostermeyer, A. G.,
Beckrich, B. T.,
Ivarson, K. A.,
Grove, K. E.,
and Brown, D. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34459-34466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kabouridis, P. S.,
Janzen, J.,
Magee, A. L.,
and Ley, S. C.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
954-963[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Parpal, S.,
Karlsson, M.,
Thorn, H.,
and Stralfors, P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9670-9678[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Chen, X.,
and Resh, M. D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
34617-34623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Okamura, H.,
and Resh, M. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26613-26618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Adelsman, M. A.,
Huntley, B. K.,
and Maihle, N. J.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
2533-2544[Abstract]
|
| 18.
|
Alland, L.,
Peseckis, S. M.,
Atherton, R. E.,
Berthiaume, L.,
and Resh, M. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16701-16705[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Levitzki, A.,
and Gazit, A.
(1995)
Science
267,
1782-1788[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Liao, Z.,
Cimakasky, L. M.,
Hampton, R.,
Nguyen, D. H.,
and Hildreth, J. E.
(2001)
AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses
17,
1009-1019[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
McGookey, D. J.,
Fagerberg, K.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1983)
J. Cell Biol.
96,
1273-1278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
van der Geer, P.,
Hunter, T.,
and Lindberg, R. A.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10,
251-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Prenzel, N.,
Zwick, E.,
Daub, H.,
Leserer, M.,
Abraham, R.,
Wallasch, C.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1999)
Nature
402,
884-888[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Chen, N., Ma, W. Y.,
She, Q. B., Wu, E.,
Liu, G.,
Bode, A. M.,
and Dong, Z.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
46722-46728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Lemjabbar, H.,
and Basbaum, C.
(2002)
Nat. Med.
8,
41-46[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Mitamura, T.,
Higashiyama, S.,
Taniguchi, N.,
Klagsbrun, M.,
and Mekada, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1015-1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Wu, W. G. L.,
Gill, G. N.,
Parsons, S. J.,
and Samet, J. M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
24252-24257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Furuchi, T.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21099-21104[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Hao, M.,
Mukherjee, S.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
13072-13077[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Rodrigues, G. A.,
Falasca, M.,
Zhang, Z.,
Ong, S. H.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1448-1459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Yart, A.,
Laffargue, M.,
Mayeux, P.,
Chretien, S.,
Peres, C.,
Tonks, N.,
Roche, S.,
Payrastre, B.,
Chap, H.,
and Raynal, P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8856-8864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Foschi, M. C. S.,
Dunn, M. J.,
and Sorokin, A.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6439-6451[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Wennstrom, S.,
and Downward, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4279-4288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Visconti, P. E.,
Galantino-Homer, H.,
Ning, X.,
Moore, G. D.,
Valenzuela, J. P.,
Jorgez, C. J.,
Alvarez, J. G.,
and Kopf, G. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3235-3242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Ringerike, T.,
Blystad, F. D.,
Levy, F. O.,
Madshus, I. H.,
and Stang, E.
(2002)
J. Cell Sci.
115,
1331-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Pike, L. J.,
and Casey, L.
(2002)
Biochemistry
41,
10315-10322[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Peiro, S.,
Comella, J. X.,
Enrich, C.,
Martin-Zanca, D.,
and Rocamora, N.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
37846-37852[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Zubiaur, M.,
Fernandez, O.,
Ferrero, E.,
Salmeron, J.,
Malissen, B.,
Malavasi, F.,
and Sancho, J.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
13-22[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Park, H., Go, Y. M., St,
John, P. L.,
Maland, M. C.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
Abrahamson, D. R.,
and Jo, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32304-32311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Wei, Z., Al-,
Mehdi, A. B.,
and Fisher, A. B.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
H2226-H2232
|
| 41.
|
Rizzo, M. A.,
Kraft, C. A.,
Watkins, S. C.,
Levitan, E. S.,
and Romero, G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
34928-34933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Boerner, J. L.,
Danielsen, A.,
McManus, M. J.,
and Maihle, N. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3691-3695[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Boerner, J. L.,
McManus, M. J.,
Martin, G. S.,
and Maihle, N. J.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
935-942[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Daub, H.,
Weiss, F. U.,
Wallasch, C.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1996)
Nature
379,
557-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Tsai, W.,
Morielli, A. D.,
and Peralta, E. G.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4597-4605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Saito, Y.,
Haendeler, J.,
Hojo, Y.,
Yamamoto, K.,
and Berk, B. C.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
6387-6394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Takeyama, K.,
Dabbagh, K.,
Jeong Shim, J.,
Dao-Pick, T.,
Ueki, I. F.,
and Nadel, J. A.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
1546-1552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Pece, S.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
41227-41233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Dent, P.,
Reardon, D. B.,
Park, J. S.,
Bowers, G.,
Logsdon, C.,
Valerie, K.,
and Schmidt-Ullrich, R.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
2493-2506[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Pai, R.,
Soreghan, B.,
Szabo, I. L.,
Pavelka, M.,
Baatar, D.,
and Tarnawski, A. S.
(2002)
Nat. Med.
8,
289-293[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Rodal, S. K.,
Skretting, G.,
Garred, O.,
Vilhardt, F.,
van Deurs, B.,
and Sandvig, K.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
961-974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Subtil, A.,
Gaidarov, I.,
Kobylarz, K.,
Lampson, M. A.,
Keen, J. H.,
and McGraw, T. E.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6775-6780[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Burke, P.,
Schooler, K.,
and Wiley, H. S.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1897-1910[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Wouters, F. S.,
and Bastiaens, P. I.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
1127-1130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Oksvold, M. P.,
Skarpen, E.,
Wierod, L.,
Paulsen, R. E.,
and Huitfeldt, H. S.
(2001)
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
80,
285-294[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Zwick, E.,
Wallasch, C.,
Daub, H.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20989-20996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Takemoto, M.,
and Liao, J. K.
(2001)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
21,
1712-1719[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Lijnen, P.,
Echevaria-Vazquez, D.,
and Petrov, V.
(1996)
Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol.
18,
123-136[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dhungana, B. A. Merrick, K. B. Tomer, and M. B. Fessler
Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Macrophage Rafts Reveals Compartmentalized Activation of the Proteasome and of Proteasome-mediated ERK Activation in Response to Lipopolysaccharide
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
January 1, 2009;
8(1):
201 - 213.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Hofman, M. O. Ruonala, A. N. Bader, D. van den Heuvel, J. Voortman, R. C. Roovers, A. J. Verkleij, H. C. Gerritsen, and P. M. P. van Bergen en Henegouwen
EGF induces coalescence of different lipid rafts
J. Cell Sci.,
August 1, 2008;
121(15):
2519 - 2528.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Chinni, H. Yamamoto, Z. Dong, A. Sabbota, R. D. Bonfil, and M. L. Cher
CXCL12/CXCR4 Transactivates HER2 in Lipid Rafts of Prostate Cancer Cells and Promotes Growth of Metastatic Deposits in Bone
Mol. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2008;
6(3):
446 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Pertusa, C. Morenilla-Palao, C. Carteron, F. Viana, and H. Cabedo
Transcriptional Control of Cholesterol Biosynthesis in Schwann Cells by Axonal Neuregulin 1
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 28, 2007;
282(39):
28768 - 28778.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Raghu, N. Sharma-Walia, M. V. Veettil, S. Sadagopan, A. Caballero, R. Sivakumar, L. Varga, V. Bottero, and B. Chandran
Lipid Rafts of Primary Endothelial Cells Are Essential for Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus/Human Herpesvirus 8-Induced Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and RhoA-GTPases Critical for Microtubule Dynamics and Nuclear Delivery of Viral DNA but Dispensable for Binding and Entry
J. Virol.,
August 1, 2007;
81(15):
7941 - 7959.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Adachi, T. Nagao, H. I. Ingolfsson, F. R. Maxfield, O. S. Andersen, L. Kopelovich, and I. B. Weinstein
The Inhibitory Effect of (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate on Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Is Associated with Altered Lipid Order in HT29 Colon Cancer Cells
Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2007;
67(13):
6493 - 6501.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Fujita, J. Cheng, M. Hirakawa, K. Furukawa, S. Kusunoki, and T. Fujimoto
Gangliosides GM1 and GM3 in the Living Cell Membrane Form Clusters Susceptible to Cholesterol Depletion and Chilling
Mol. Biol. Cell,
June 1, 2007;
18(6):
2112 - 2122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Schley, D. N. Brindley, and C. J. Field
(n-3) PUFA Alter Raft Lipid Composition and Decrease Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Levels in Lipid Rafts of Human Breast Cancer Cells
J. Nutr.,
March 1, 2007;
137(3):
548 - 553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Khare, C. Holgren, and A. M. Samarel
Deoxycholic acid differentially regulates focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation: role of tyrosine phosphatase ShP2
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
December 1, 2006;
291(6):
G1100 - G1112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Jean-Louis, S. Akare, M. A. Ali, E. A. Mash Jr., E. Meuillet, and J. D. Martinez
Deoxycholic Acid Induces Intracellular Signaling through Membrane Perturbations
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 26, 2006;
281(21):
14948 - 14960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Mazie, J. K. Spix, E. R. Block, H. B. Achebe, and J. K. Klarlund
Epithelial cell motility is triggered by activation of the EGF receptor through phosphatidic acid signaling
J. Cell Sci.,
April 15, 2006;
119(8):
1645 - 1654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. C. Li, M. J. Park, S.-K. Ye, C.-W. Kim, and Y.-N. Kim
Elevated Levels of Cholesterol-Rich Lipid Rafts in Cancer Cells Are Correlated with Apoptosis Sensitivity Induced by Cholesterol-Depleting Agents
Am. J. Pathol.,
April 1, 2006;
168(4):
1107 - 1118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-X. Zhu, S. Goldoni, G. Bix, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, C. C. Reed, and R. V. Iozzo
Decorin Evokes Protracted Internalization and Degradation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor via Caveolar Endocytosis
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 16, 2005;
280(37):
32468 - 32479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Dittmann, C. Mayer, B. Fehrenbacher, M. Schaller, U. Raju, L. Milas, D. J. Chen, R. Kehlbach, and H. P. Rodemann
Radiation-induced Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Nuclear Import Is Linked to Activation of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 2, 2005;
280(35):
31182 - 31189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. McLaughlin, S. O. Smith, M. J. Hayman, and D. Murray
An Electrostatic Engine Model for Autoinhibition and Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR/ErbB) Family
J. Gen. Physiol.,
June 27, 2005;
126(1):
41 - 53.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Lin and D. J. Takemoto
Oxidative Activation of Protein Kinase C{gamma} through the C1 Domain: EFFECTS ON GAP JUNCTIONS
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 8, 2005;
280(14):
13682 - 13693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Fessler, S. K. Young, S. Jeyaseelan, J. G. Lieber, P. G. Arndt, J. A. Nick, and G. S. Worthen
A Role for Hydroxy-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase in Pulmonary Inflammation and Host Defense
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
March 15, 2005;
171(6):
606 - 615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Fessler, P. G. Arndt, S. C. Frasch, J. G. Lieber, C. A. Johnson, R. C. Murphy, J. A. Nick, D. L. Bratton, K. C. Malcolm, and G. S. Worthen
Lipid Rafts Regulate Lipopolysaccharide-induced Activation of Cdc42 and Inflammatory Functions of the Human Neutrophil
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 17, 2004;
279(38):
39989 - 39998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Seveau, H. Bierne, S. Giroux, M.-C. Prevost, and P. Cossart
Role of lipid rafts in E-cadherin- and HGF-R/Met-mediated entry of Listeria monocytogenes into host cells
J. Cell Biol.,
August 30, 2004;
166(5):
743 - 753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Danthi and M. Chow
Cholesterol Removal by Methyl-{beta}-Cyclodextrin Inhibits Poliovirus Entry
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2004;
78(1):
33 - 41.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Westover, D. F. Covey, H. L. Brockman, R. E. Brown, and L. J. Pike
Cholesterol Depletion Results in Site-specific Increases in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Phosphorylation due to Membrane Level Effects: STUDIES WITH CHOLESTEROL ENANTIOMERS
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 2003;
278(51):
51125 - 51133.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Odintsova, J. Voortman, E. Gilbert, and F. Berditchevski
Tetraspanin CD82 regulates compartmentalisation and ligand-induced dimerization of EGFR
J. Cell Sci.,
November 15, 2003;
116(22):
4557 - 4566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|