![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49668-49675, December 20, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
andFrom the Department of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
Received for publication, August 22, 2002, and in revised form, October 15, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been well documented that Mdm2 and
its homologue MdmX not only are critical negative regulators of the
tumor suppressor p53 but that both Mdm2 and MdmX interact to affect the
function of the other. The mechanisms through which these effects are
manifested, however, remain unclear. Although Mdm2 has been established
as a RING finger ubiquitin ligase, MdmX has not been shown to possess this activity despite the extensive sequence homology between their
respective RING finger domains. Here we demonstrate that MdmX acts as a
ubiquitin ligase in vitro, being capable of
autoubiquitination, as well as mediating the ubiquitination of p53. The
addition of Mdm2 to in vitro ubiquitination assays
containing MdmX results in a synergistic increase of ubiquitin
conjugation. Analysis of the resulting ubiquitin conjugates reveals
that this observed synergy reflects an increase in Mdm2 ubiquitination.
This study also suggests that ubiquitination of Mdm2 and MdmX may not
serve as a signal for degradation, as we show that each are capable of
synthesizing non-lysine 48 polyubiquitin chains and, in fact, utilize
multiple lysine linkages. Taken together, these findings suggest a more
active role for MdmX in the Mdm2-MdmX-p53 regulatory network than has
been proposed previously.
The covalent attachment of ubiquitin to proteins plays a
fundamental role in the regulation of cellular function and is achieved through three enzymatic steps (1-4). In an ATP-dependent
process, the ubiquitin activating enzyme
(E1)1 catalyzes the formation
of a reactive thiolester bond with ubiquitin, followed by its
subsequent transfer to the active site cysteine of a ubiquitin carrier
protein (E2). The specificity of ubiquitin ligation arises from
the association of the E2-ubiquitin thiolester with ubiquitin-protein
isopeptide ligase (E3), which facilitates the formation of the
isopeptide linkage between ubiquitin and its target protein. Eukaryotes
possess a single ubiquitin activating enzyme and several families of E2
isoforms that are easily identified by conservation of a bipartite E2
consensus motif (1). The recent discovery that RING finger proteins
often exhibit ubiquitin ligase activity has led to the rapid
identification of numerous novel ligases (5-7). One of the first of
these RING finger ubiquitin ligases to be characterized was the
oncoprotein Mdm2 (8). The mdm2 gene is amplified in a broad
range of tumors including breast carcinomas, lung cancers, and
osteosarcomas with the highest frequency (20%) in soft tissue tumors
(9). It is well established that Mdm2 regulates the p53 tumor
suppressor protein by inhibiting p53-mediated transactivation and by
promoting its degradation (10, 11). For both of these mechanisms,
elevated levels of Mdm2 can inhibit the protective functions of p53 and
lead to oncogenesis. The ability of Mdm2 to negatively regulate p53 has
sparked much interest in understanding how Mdm2 levels within the cell
are controlled, demonstrated by numerous studies aimed at developing therapies designed to attenuate Mdm2 activity (12-15). One obvious mechanism to control Mdm2 function is regulation of protein stability. Like several other RING finger ligases, Mdm2 is capable of catalyzing its own ubiquitination thus providing a possible mechanism for autoregulation (8).
The Mdm2-related protein MdmX shares several regions of homology with
Mdm2 including the p53 binding domain, a zinc finger motif, and a
C-terminal RING finger domain (16). Although the RING finger domains of
MdmX and Mdm2 are very similar (46% identity over 52 residues), with
the residues implicated in zinc chelation being absolutely conserved,
there has been no reported ubiquitin ligase activity by MdmX. This
apparent lack of ligase activity has contributed to the ambiguity
surrounding the biological role of MdmX. Although structurally similar,
genetic evidence demonstrates that MdmX cannot compensate for the loss
of Mdm2 expression during embryonic development in mouse (17, 18) nor
can Mdm2 compensate for the loss of MdmX expression (19, 20),
suggesting that the two proteins have non-overlapping functions. The
fact that the embryonic lethal phenotype displayed by MdmX null mice
can be rescued in a p53 null genetic background has further
demonstrated the importance of MdmX as a negative regulator of p53
function (19, 20). The suggestion from these genetic studies that
elevated MdmX levels may contribute to oncogenesis correlates with the recent reports of increased MdmX expression in tumor cell lines and
malignant gliomas (21, 22).
Previous studies have demonstrated that Mdm2 and MdmX form both homo-
and hetero-oligomers in vitro and in vivo, with
hetero-oligomers exhibiting a more stable association; in addition,
deletions that include the RING finger domain of either protein
abrogate this interaction (23). Recent studies have shown that the
half-life of Mdm2 is increased when co-transfected with MdmX and that
this stabilization is dependent on the RING finger of MdmX, suggesting a requirement for hetero-oligomer formation (16). One current model
proposes that this observed stabilization of Mdm2 is the result of the
Mdm2-MdmX interaction inhibiting the E3 ligase activity of Mdm2,
thereby preventing its efficient ubiquitination and stabilizing Mdm2
protein levels.
Here we demonstrate that MdmX possesses ubiquitin ligase activity
requiring the Ubc4/5 family of E2 isozymes and that the RING finger
domain of MdmX is necessary for this activity. We further show that in
addition to its capacity for autoubiquitination, MdmX catalyzes the
ubiquitination of p53 in vitro. Our investigation into the
proposed ability of MdmX to inhibit Mdm2 ubiquitination has revealed
that the interaction between Mdm2 and MdmX results in a synergistic
increase in Mdm2 ubiquitination. That MdmX autoubiquitination, as well
as the MdmX-mediated increase in Mdm2 ubiquitination, may not target
these proteins for degradation is suggested by our demonstration that
both Mdm2 and MdmX are capable of forming non-lysine 48-linked
polyubiquitin chains. These observations challenge the current
hypothesis that the MdmX-mediated stability of Mdm2 reflects a decrease
in Mdm2 ubiquitination and support the classification of MdmX as a new
member of the RING finger family of ligases.
Bovine ubiquitin, creatine phosphokinase, and yeast inorganic
pyrophosphatase were purchased from Sigma. Thrombin, purified from
bovine plasma, was purchased from Amersham Biosciences. The ubiquitin was purified to apparent homogeneity (24) and then radiolabeled by the chloramine T method (25). Alternatively, some of
the purified ubiquitin was modified by reductive methylation (26).
Carrier-free Na125I and [2,8-3H]ATP were
purchased from Amersham Biosciences. Human E1 from outdated human
erythrocytes was purified to apparent homogeneity by modifying affinity
chromatography and FPLC methods (27) and then quantitated by
125I-ubiquitin thiolester assays and confirmed by the
stoichiometric formation of ubiquitin [3H]adenylate (28,
29).
Plasmids--
The entire coding sequence of human MdmX was
amplified from a full-length cDNA (expressed sequence tag
clone 177586) by polymerase chain reaction using Pfu
polymerase (Stratagene). Appropriate primers were used during this
amplification to allow for the in-frame insertion of the MdmX cDNA
into the pGEX 4T-1 vector at the BamHI and XhoI
sites. The construction of pGEX-MdmX
A full-length human Mdm2 cDNA was obtained by polymerase chain
reaction using a pGEX-Mdm2 cDNA construct kindly provided by Dr.
Allan Weissman. Primers used in this amplification facilitated the
insertion of this Mdm2 cDNA into the EcoRI and
XhoI sites of a modified pGEX4T-1 vector containing a FLAG
epitope fused to the C terminus of the GST coding sequence.
Recombinant Protein Production--
The production and
purification of human recombinant E2 proteins was performed as
described previously (30). The concentration of active E2 protein in
each preparation was determined by quantitation of the E1-catalyzed
stoichiometric formation of the corresponding 125I-ubiquitin thiolester. Ubiquitin lysine to arginine
point mutants were produced and purified as described previously (24,
31). DNA sequencing of the open reading frame of each plasmid, as well as mass spectrometry of each of the purified polypeptides, were performed to confirm that the expressed protein contained the appropriate lysine to arginine mutation. The human MdmX, MdmX Ubiquitin Conjugation Assays--
Conjugation reactions were
adapted from earlier kinetic methods (30). Reaction volumes of 25 µl
contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM
ATP, 10 mM creatine phosphate, 20 IU/ml creatine
phosphokinase, 5 nM human ubiquitin activating enzyme, 400 nM of the indicated ubiquitin conjugating enzyme, and the
indicated concentration of Mdm2 or MdmX. Reactions were initiated by
addition of either 125I-ubiquitin (typically
~104 cpm/pmol) or unlabeled ubiquitin and allowed to
proceed for 15 min at 37 °C. Reactions were quenched with 25 µl of
Laemmli sample buffer containing 2% (v/v) Antibodies and Immunoprecipitation Assays--
Commercially
available mouse monoclonal antibodies were used for immunodetection of
human Mdm2 (Ab-1; Oncogene Research Products) and human p53
(IgG2a, clone BP53-12; Upstate Biotechnology). A ubiquitin-specific rabbit polyclonal antibody produced previously in
the laboratory was used for detection of ubiquitin and polyubiquitin chains (32). An MdmX-specific rabbit polyclonal antiserum was produced
against the peptide 142ESSTSRKRTTEDDIP156
synthesized on a four-branch multiple antigenic peptide resin (33). Following confirmation that this antiserum was immunospecific for
MdmX, the antiserum was purified by peptide ligand affinity chromatography and used subsequently for immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting. Immunoprecipitation of MdmX-Ub conjugates was performed
by incubating 20% of a ubiquitin conjugation reaction with a final
concentration of 150 µg/ml anti-MdmX antibody for 2 h at 4 °C
in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 1 mg/ml carrier bovine serum albumin. The antibody-bound protein was
precipitated with protein A-Sepharose CL-4B (Amersham Biosciences) and
washed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% (v/v) Triton
X-100 and 1 mg/ml carrier bovine serum albumin. Bound protein was
eluted from the beads by boiling briefly with Laemmli sample buffer
followed by resolution by SDS-PAGE.
MdmX Is a HsUbc5A-dependent Ubiquitin
Ligase--
Although there has been no E3 activity ascribed to MdmX to
date, the high degree of homology between the RING finger domains of
Mdm2 and MdmX suggested that MdmX might also function as a RING finger
ubiquitin ligase. To investigate this possibility, we performed
in vitro ubiquitin conjugation assays using a bacterially expressed GST-MdmX fusion protein as the only source of ubiquitin ligase activity. Previous studies have reported that E2 isoforms from
the Ubc4/52 and HsUbc7
families interact with RING finger ligases, with Mdm2 displaying
specificity for HsUbc5 family members (5, 34). We assayed the ability
of selected recombinant human E2 isoforms to support MdmX-catalyzed E3
activity. As expected, we observed no E3-mediated ligase activity in
reactions containing HsUbc2B, HsUbc3, or HsUbc7A as the source of E2
(Fig. 1A, lanes
1-4, 7, and 8); however the ability of
HsUbc3 to catalyze its own monoubiquitination is demonstrated by the
presence of a band migrating at ~42 kDa (Fig. 1A,
lanes 3 and 4). In contrast, assays containing
HsUbc5A, a member of the Ubc4/5 family of E2 ubiquitin conjugating
enzymes (1), displayed robust ubiquitin ligation activity in the
presence of GST-MdmX (Fig. 1A, lane 5 versus lane
6). As has been documented with other RING finger ligases, these
ubiquitin conjugates were polyubiquitinated and migrated at the top of
the gel (6). That the conjugates contained polyubiquitin chains was
demonstrated by the complete abrogation of the high molecular
weight adducts when 125I reductively methylated
ubiquitin was substituted for wild-type radiolabeled ubiquitin (data
not shown).
We next addressed the nature of the ubiquitin conjugates by determining
whether they represented MdmX autoubiquitination or the ubiquitination
of trace contaminating proteins present in the enzyme preparations.
After repeating the conjugation reaction of Fig. 1A
(lane 6), we isolated GST-MdmX by immunoprecipitation with
an anti-MdmX polyclonal antibody and found that GST-MdmX-Ub conjugates
represented the majority (~70%) of the total ubiquitin conjugates in
the reaction (Fig. 1B). Because antibody concentrations were
empirically optimized in all instances to ensure quantitative immunoprecipitation, the inability quantitatively to immunoprecipitate the ubiquitin adducts suggests MdmX either is capable of catalyzing the
formation of free polyubiquitin chains, as found for E225K (35), or mediates conjugation to contaminating proteins present in the assay.
MdmX Ubiquitin Ligase Activity Is Dependent on Its RING Finger
Domain--
After we established that MdmX possessed E3 activity, we
sought to confirm that this property was associated with its RING finger. Toward this end, we generated a truncated MdmX construct (MdmX
The ligase activity of MdmX MdmX and Mdm2 Catalyze the Formation of Polyubiquitin Chains
through Multiple Lysine Linkages--
The ability of GST-MdmX to
catalyze autoubiquitination suggests a mechanism for autoregulation.
Because polyubiquitin chains linked via lysine 48 are the
principle signal for targeting proteins for degradation (41) we sought
to determine the linkage utilized by MdmX for chain formation. For this
determination, we utilized our collection of ubiquitin lysine point
mutants (24), each of which had one of the seven lysine residues
contained within human ubiquitin mutated to arginine. These Lys
Given the homology between Mdm2 and MdmX, we asked whether Mdm2 could
also utilize multiple lysine residues for chain formation. Using both
wild-type and reductively methylated ubiquitin we were able to show
that FLAG-Mdm2 catalyzed the formation of large molecular weight
ubiquitin conjugates that were the result of polyubiquitin chain
formation (Fig. 3B, lanes 2 and 3).
Just as was seen with MdmX, when the ubiquitin Lys The Interaction Between Mdm2 and MdmX Enhances Ubiquitin Ligase
Activity--
Several studies have demonstrated through transfection
assays that MdmX overexpression stabilizes Mdm2 in vivo (16,
45). This has led to the suggestion that Mdm2-MdmX association results in the inhibition of Mdm2 autoubiquitination and a concomitant decrease
in the rate of 26 S proteasome-mediated Mdm2 degradation (45, 46). To
test this directly, we examined the ability of MdmX to inhibit
Mdm2-mediated autoubiquitination in vitro. That FLAG-Mdm2
and GST-MdmX associated with each other in our in vitro assays was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation of GST-MdmX with FLAG-Mdm2 in the presence, but not in the absence, of an anti-Mdm2 monoclonal antibody (data not shown). To ensure that the FLAG-Mdm2 in
the conjugation reaction was associated with GST-MdmX and not with
other FLAG-Mdm2 molecules, GST-MdmX was added at a 200-fold molar
excess. This large ratio of MdmX:Mdm2, in addition to the observation
that Mdm2 has a stronger affinity for MdmX than for itself (23), should
promote the formation of Mdm2-MdmX heterocomplexes over Mdm2
homo-oligomers. Instead of an MdmX-mediated reduction in ligase
activity, we found that the addition of full-length MdmX to incubations
containing Mdm2 resulted in a substantial non-additive increase in the
initial rate of ubiquitin conjugate formation when compared with assays
conducted with either protein alone (Fig.
4A, lanes 2 and
3 versus lane 4).
We examined whether this increased activity required the interaction of
Mdm2 and MdmX by substituting MdmX
If the association between Mdm2 and MdmX induces this synergistic
increase in ubiquitin ligation, one would expect to see this same
effect at lower MdmX:Mdm2 ratios than were used in the previous assay.
In the experiment of Fig. 4A, the concentration of GST-MdmX
was twice that of HsUbc5A, leading to the potential that such a large
excess could actually reduce the rate of conjugation in the reaction by
competing with Mdm2-MdmX complexes for HsUbc5A binding. This was
addressed by performing in vitro conjugation reactions in
which the concentration of FLAG-Mdm2 was held constant at 2.5 nM and [GST-MdmX]o varied from 2.5 to 320 nM at a HsUbc5A concentration of 400 nM.
Parallel in vitro conjugation reactions, which did not
include FLAG-Mdm2, were performed to measure the initial rate of
ubiquitin conjugation attributed to GST-MdmX ligase activity at the
various concentrations. These values were then used to correct the
initial rate of ubiquitin ligation in the reactions containing both
FLAG-Mdm2 and GST-MdmX so that Fig. 4C represents the net
initial rate of ubiquitin conjugation because of the interaction
between FLAG-Mdm2 and GST-MdmX. As shown in Fig. 4C, even at
the lowest MdmX:Mdm2 ratio the net initial rate of ubiquitin
conjugation was shown to have doubled when compared with that of
FLAG-Mdm2 alone (vo = 0.21 pmol/min). The net
rate of conjugation continued to increase with a hyperbolic dependence with respect to [GST-MdmX]o and reached near saturation
at an approximate 100-fold excess over FLAG-Mdm2. Separate control
incubations demonstrated that the limiting initial rate at 320 nM MdmX was unaffected by increasing either
[E1]o or [HsUbc5A]o, not shown, indicating
that neither the rate of HsUbc5A charging by the activating enzyme nor
the availability of HsUbc5A was limiting. A nonlinear regression
analysis of the data in Fig. 4C revealed a
K1/2 of 34.0 ± 5.8 nM, which
represents an upper limit to the actual apparent equilibrium constant
for subunit exchange, because active MdmX concentration was estimated
from total MdmX protein. The experiment does not distinguish whether
subunit exchange between Mdm2 and MdmX homodimers occurs through
association of free monomers present at equilibrium in low
concentration or, less likely, through exchange from a transient
Mdm22·MdmX2 heterotetramer; therefore, it is not possible to interpret the physical meaning of the
K1/2 value. However, the data demonstrate that a significant
MdmX-mediated synergistic increase in ubiquitin conjugation occurs at a
modest, presumably physiological, molar excess of MdmX (panel
C) and that sequestering of HsUbc5A is a potential problem in
interpreting the effects of MdmX when in excess over HsUbc5A
(panel B).
MdmX Induces a Synergistic Increase in Mdm2
Ubiquitination--
Although the experiments described in Fig. 4
showed that MdmX had a positive effect on ubiquitin ligation, they did
not address the identity of the substrate for the enhanced ubiquitin
conjugation. The tendency of Mdm2 and MdmX to co-precipitate, because
of the formation of hetero-oligomers, precluded immunoprecipitation as a means to measure the relative ubiquitination of each protein. As an
alternate approach, we performed Western blot analysis of parallel
ligation reactions, using immunospecific anti-MdmX or anti-Mdm2
antibodies to visualize the ubiquitination state of MdmX and Mdm2,
respectively. When we immunostained with anti-MdmX affinity-purified
polyclonal antibody we were unable to detect high molecular
weight MdmX-Ub conjugates, which were readily apparent by
autoradiography (Fig. 5A,
lane 6 versus Fig. 4A, lane
3). This is explained by a marked difference in the limit of
detection for the two methods, because the Western blot reflects the
percentage of MdmX that is ubiquitinated, whereas autoradiography
reflects the number of 125I-ubiquitin molecules ligated
to the substrate, which favors detection of poly-ubiquitinated species
because of the increased specific radioactivity of the ubiquitin chains
with length. Therefore, the high molecular mass MdmX conjugates
observed likely represent a small fraction of the total MdmX in the
reaction and may not be easily detected by immunoblotting. We did,
however, detect a small fraction of monoubiquitinated MdmX when
incubated in the absence of Mdm2 that increased on addition of Mdm2
(Fig. 5A, lane 6 versus lane 4). In
contrast, detection with anti-Mdm2 revealed a dramatic increase in the
formation of polyubiquitinated Mdm2 on addition of MdmX that correlated
with a decrease in non-ubiquitinated Mdm2 (Fig. 5B,
lane 3 versus lane 4). From this observation, we conclude that the Mdm2-MdmX heterocomplex has an enhanced ability to
ubiquitinate Mdm2 over that of the Mdm2 homocomplex. Taken together
with the earlier observation that MdmX increases the overall rate of
ubiquitin ligation (Fig. 4B), these results indicate that
contrary to models based on in vivo overexpression of MdmX, the interaction between MdmX and Mdm2 results in a synergistic increase
in the ubiquitination of Mdm2.
MdmX Catalyzes the Ubiquitination of p53 but Does Not Affect
Mdm2-mediated Ubiquitination of p53--
Because we had demonstrated
that MdmX is a RING finger ubiquitin ligase with similar catalytic
properties to Mdm2, we next addressed whether MdmX could ubiquitinate
p53, a known Mdm2 substrate (5, 8, 47). Conjugation reactions
containing GST-MdmX as the only source of ligase activity and GST-p53
revealed that MdmX was capable of ubiquitinating p53 in
vitro, as detected by immunostaining of GST-p53 (Fig.
6, lane 4). The pattern and
level of p53 ubiquitination by MdmX was similar to that of
FLAG-Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 (Fig. 6, lane 4 versus lane 2); however, it must be noted that MdmX levels
were 100-fold higher than Mdm2 in these assays, because MdmX
consistently displayed lower ligase activity when compared with
Mdm2.
In vivo, Mdm2, MdmX and p53 form a heterotrimeric complex
(45). Our finding that the formation of the Mdm2-MdmX heterocomplex was
associated with increased ligase activity raised the question of
whether this complex, when associated with p53, would enhance the
ubiquitination of the substrate. When both GST-MdmX and FLAG-Mdm2 were
included in the p53 conjugation assay, we found no increase in the
levels of p53-Ub conjugate formation when compared with levels
catalyzed by either MdmX or Mdm2 alone (Fig. 6, lane 6 versus lanes 2 and 4). These results not only
provide the first evidence that MdmX is capable of ubiquitinating p53
in vitro but also suggest that the increased ligase activity
associated with the MdmX-Mdm2 heterocomplex involves its
autoubiquitination and not the ubiquitination of other substrates.
Genetic studies investigating the physiological consequences of
the loss of either Mdm2 or MdmX function have demonstrated the
requirement of both proteins for normal development and that each has
non-overlapping roles (17-20). Although one clear finding from these
genetic studies is that each protein is involved in the negative
regulation of the tumor suppressor p53, how these two related proteins
affect the function of the other remains ambiguous. Recent studies have
demonstrated that overexpression of MdmX stabilizes Mdm2 protein levels
in vivo (16, 45, 46); however, the mechanism by which this
occurs remains unclear. One proposed model asserts that the MdmX-Mdm2
interaction abrogates the E3 ligase activity of Mdm2, thereby reducing
the ability of Mdm2 to target itself for 26 S
proteasome-dependent degradation (45, 46). Central to this
model are the assumptions that MdmX does not possess intrinsic
ubiquitin ligase activity and that the oligomerization of these
proteins, presumably via their RING finger domains, inhibits
Mdm2 ligase activity. Contrary to these assumptions, we have directly
demonstrated in biochemically defined assays that MdmX is a RING finger
ubiquitin ligase (see Figs. 1 and 2) and that the association of MdmX
with Mdm2 results in the increased polyubiquitination of Mdm2 (see
Figs. 4 and 5). At present, we cannot unambiguously distinguish whether
MdmX directly conjugates Mdm2 or whether hetero-oligomer formation
exerts a positive allosteric effect on the ligase activity of Mdm2.
However, observation that heterodimer formation increases initial rates for MdmX, as well as Mdm2 conjugation (Fig. 5), tends to favor a
mechanism of mutual allosteric activation.
The fact that the ligase activity of MdmX has been overlooked until now
may be a reflection of its relatively low activity in
autoubiquitination, ranging from 0.1 to 1% of that observed with Mdm2.
The observed increase in ligase activity of the Mdm2-MdmX complex
correlates with growing evidence that the dimerization of RING finger
ligases does not interfere with their intrinsic E3 activity a
priori. Recent studies with the breast and ovarian cancer tumor
suppressor BRCA1 and one of its interacting proteins, BARD1, both of
which are RING finger proteins possessing E3 activity, demonstrate that
ubiquitin ligation is dramatically enhanced for the heterodimer (44,
48). In fact, the structure of the BRCA1-BARD1 RING-RING complex
reveals that the RING finger domains of the heterodimer make relatively
few contacts (49).
Our finding that MdmX enhances the ubiquitination of Mdm2, as well as
our demonstration of MdmX-mediated ubiquitination of p53, appears to be
in conflict with studies demonstrating MdmX-mediated stabilization of
both Mdm2 and p53, respectively. In the case of Mdm2, this discrepancy
can be resolved by invoking a mechanism other than the inhibition of
Mdm2 ubiquitination to explain the observed increase in the half-life
of Mdm2. One possible mechanism is that MdmX acts to sequester Mdm2 to
a subcellular compartment having a lower rate of Mdm2 degradation. Mdm2
contains a leucine-rich nuclear export sequence that has been shown to
be required for its exit from the nucleus (50, 51). In contrast, MdmX
contains a nuclear export sequence similar to Mdm2 with the exception
of a four-amino acid insertion (52) that could prevent MdmX from interacting with nuclear export machinery and may account for MdmX
predominantly localizing within the nucleus (52). As a result, the
association of MdmX with Mdm2 could impede nuclear export, thereby
increasing the half-life of Mdm2. Stad et al. (46) have
invoked a similar nuclear sequestration scenario to explain the
observed stabilizing effect of MdmX on p53. In this way, the
interaction between MdmX and p53 could stabilize p53 levels even if
MdmX ubiquitinates p53.
Alternatively, resolution of these apparent conflicting observations
may rest in the expression levels of MdmX during transfection assays.
Evidence for the stabilization of Mdm2 by MdmX is predicated on
overexpression of the latter (45, 46); however, MdmX levels within
cells are normally relatively constant (53). Quantitative biochemically
defined rate assays in the present study demonstrate that, like Mdm2,
MdmX is a RING finger ligase requiring ubiquitin conjugating enzymes of
the Ubc4/5 family for activity (Fig. 1). Therefore, stabilization of
Mdm2 by MdmX overexpression may simply represent the sequestering of
Ubc4/5 isoforms by abnormally elevated levels of ectopic MdmX, thus
interfering with the ability of Mdm2 to catalyze Ubc4/5-mediated
autoubiquitination. The potential problems associated with
overexpression of components of the ubiquitin ligation pathways for
cellular dynamics have been discussed previously (1).
It is also important to note we have shown for the first time that both
Mdm2 and MdmX can catalyze the formation of non-lysine 48 polyubiquitin
chains. This strongly suggests that the increase in Mdm2 ubiquitination
in the presence of MdmX also involves noncanonical chains, although
this has not been experimentally established. If the Mdm2-MdmX complex
does synthesize noncanonical chains, it raises the possibility that the
increase in Mdm2 ubiquitination may not, in fact, serve as a signal for
degradation as there is evidence that ubiquitin chains that utilize
noncanonical lysine linkages are not appropriate signals for
degradation (54). Again, a parallel can be drawn between the Mdm2-MdmX
complex and the BRCA1-BARD1 complex, because autoubiquitination of the
latter involves the formation of non-lysine 48 chains resulting in the mutual stabilization of BRCA1 and BARD1 (55).
Although it has clearly been shown in the literature that MdmX
interacts with both p53 and Mdm2, the assignment of a specific biological role for MdmX has yet to be established. Although the function of MdmX remains elusive, its amplification in several tumor
cell lines (22), and its requirement during development (20) leave
little doubt of its biological significance. Indeed, the present
observation that MdmX enhances Mdm2 ubiquitination redefines the
functional relationships within this fundamentally important regulatory
network. Our finding that MdmX is a new member of the RING finger
family of ubiquitin ligases also offers new insights into possible
function(s) of MdmX unrelated to Mdm2 and p53 interactions and suggests
MdmX mediates the ubiquitination of novel substrates yet to be identified.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
394 was achieved by digesting
pGEX-MdmX with EcoRI and XhoI and blunting the
5'-overhangs with Klenow fragment, followed by re-ligation. This
resulted in the deletion of the 96 carboxyl-terminal amino acids of
MdmX. As was done with MdmX, the entire open reading frame of human p53
was amplified from a full-length p53 cDNA (expressed sequence tag
clone 610186) utilizing appropriate primers to allow for the in-frame
insertion of the p53 cDNA into the pGEX 4T-1 vector at the
BamHI and XhoI sites.
394, and FLAG-Mdm2 were expressed as N-terminal GST fusions in logarithmic phase Escherichia coli (RosettaTM; Novagen, Madison, WI)
grown at 30 °C. Expression at 30 °C for 2 h was induced with
0.1 mM isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. Following
purification by glutathione affinity chromatography, the fusion
proteins were further purified by FPLC. The fusion proteins were
adsorbed to a Mono Q HR5/5 anion exchange FPLC column equilibrated with
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and then
eluted with a linear 0-0.5 M NaCl gradient (12.5 mM/min). Fractions containing the fusion protein, as
determined by immunoblotting, were pooled and concentrated using an
Ultrafree-4 centrifugal filtration device with a 5-kDa molecular
mass exclusion (Millipore). The GST-FLAG-Mdm2 fusion protein was
digested with thrombin (30 units/ml) for 3 h at room temperature
to cleave the GST moiety, which was subsequently removed by glutathione
affinity chromatography. Quantitation of GST-MdmX, GST-MdmX
394, and
FLAG-Mdm2 was performed by silver staining using known concentrations
of bovine serum albumin as standards.
-mercaptoethanol and
boiled for 3 min. The conditions for conjugation reactions containing
GST-p53 were similar to those stated above with the following
modifications. Reaction volumes of 50 µl containing 40 nM
human ubiquitin activating enzyme, 150 nM HsUbc5A, 400 nM GST-p53, 4 nM FLAG-Mdm2, and 400 nM GST-MdmX were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C either
in the absence or presence of 10 µM unlabeled ubiquitin.
Reactions were quenched with 50 µl of Laemmli sample buffer
containing 2% (v/v)
-mercaptoethanol and boiled for 3 min.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
GST-MdmX interacts specifically with HsUbc5A
to catalyze the formation of GST-MdmX-Ub conjugates. A,
in vitro conjugation assays containing 5 nM
human E1, 5 µM 125I-ubiquitin, and 400 nM of the indicated E2 paralog were incubated in the
absence or presence of 800 nM GST-MdmX as described under
"Materials and Methods." The 15-min incubation time was empirically
shown to be within the initial velocity region for the assay. The
reactions were resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography.
B, GST-MdmX was immunoprecipitated with an anti-MdmX
polyclonal antibody from a parallel ubiquitin conjugation reaction
identical to panel A (lane 6). Immunoprecipitated
GST-MdmX (IP) was resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by
autoradiography. Samples obtained in the absence (
; lane
2) or presence of anti-MdmX (+; lane 3) were volume
normalized to equal an aliquot of the original reaction
(Input; lane 1). The mobilities of molecular
weight standards are shown to the
left.
394) in which translation was terminated at codon 394, deleting the 96 C-terminal residues of the wild-type protein in which the RING
finger is located (Fig. 2A).
MdmX
394 was expressed as an N-terminal GST fusion and compared with
the full-length GST-MdmX to confirm the deletion of 11 kDa (Fig.
2B, lane 2 versus lane 3). MdmX has been reported
to migrate at ~80 kDa contrary to its theoretical mass of 54 kDa
(36), which is similar to the aberrant migration of Mdm2 (~90-kDa
apparent versus 54-kDa theoretical) (37). The apparent
relative molecular masses of full-length GST-MdmX and of GST-MdmX
394
corresponding to 110 and 97 kDa, respectively, are consistent with the
predicted anomalous migration for deletion of the RING finger domain
from GST-MdmX.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The RING finger domain is necessary for
MdmX-mediated ubiquitin ligase activity. A, schematic
representation of the human MdmX protein and the truncated product
MdmX
394. B, SDS-PAGE resolution of recombinant GST-MdmX
and GST-MdmX
394 following Coomassie Blue staining. Migration of
molecular weight standards is shown to the left and
in lane 1. C, ubiquitin ligase activity of
GST-MdmX
394 was tested in assays identical to Fig. 1A,
lane 6, containing 800 nM full-length GST-MdmX
(lane 2), 800 nM GST-MdmX
394 (lane
3), or 2.4 µM GST-MdmX
394 (lane 4).
The 125I-ubiquitin conjugates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
visualized by autoradiography. D, GST-MdmX was assayed for
ubiquitin ligase activity at the indicated times after the addition of
a final concentration of 2 mM TPEN in 0.5% (v/v) ethanol
or 0.5% (v/v) ethanol carrier alone. Treatment of GST-MdmX with either
a final concentration of 2 mM TPEN or mock treatment with a
final concentration of 0.5% (v/v) ethanol was performed at 4 °C.
Ubiquitin conjugation reactions with TPEN-treated samples contained 800 nM GST-MdmX and were carried out under standard conditions
with the exception that these reactions contained 0.2 mM
ATP and 1.0 mM MgCl2. This 10-fold decrease in
MgCl2 served to minimize levels of contaminating
Zn2+ present in the MgCl2. Parallel control
experiments demonstrated the initial rate of 125I-ubiquitin
conjugation remained GST-MdmX-limiting at the lowered ATP concentration
(not shown).
, incubation with 0.5% ethanol;
, incubation with 2 mM TPEN in 0.5% ethanol.
394 relative to that of full-length MdmX
was assayed using biochemically defined in vitro ubiquitin conjugation reactions. Although full-length MdmX displayed ligase activity, we observed no ubiquitin conjugates formed in the presence of
an equal concentration of MdmX
394 or in the presence of MdmX
394 at a level three times greater than the full-length protein (Fig. 2C, lane 2 versus lanes 3 and 4). In
an effort to determine whether less drastic alterations to MdmX would
also abrogate its E3 activity, we attempted to selectively disrupt its
RING finger. Because Zn2+ stabilizes RING finger domains
(38, 39), we sequestered Zn2+ from our MdmX protein
preparations using the specific Zn2+ chelator TPEN
(40), which abrogates the E3 activity of Mdm2 (8). When MdmX was
treated with 2 mM TPEN, we observed a biphasic decrease in
ligase activity over time, presumably reflecting the time-dependent removal of Zn2+ from the RING
finger domain (Fig. 2D). Disruption of either
Zn2+ within the RING finger results in loss of ubiquitin
ligase activity (8). Therefore, the biphasic kinetics for loss of MdmX
activity most likely reflects different affinities for the two
positions, the loss of either of which abrogates activity. Unlike Mdm2,
whose activity is quantitatively restored after TPEN treatment by
addition of ZnCl2 (8), similar reconstitution of MdmX
activity resulted in only a 4-fold increase in ubiquitin ligase
activity (11% of the initial activity) after an overnight incubation
in the presence of 3 mM ZnCl2, data not shown.
These observations are consistent with an intact RING finger motif
being required for MdmX-mediated ubiquitin ligase activity.
Arg
point mutants have been used successfully in the past to demonstrate
formation of unique chain linkages by ScUbc2/Rad6 and
HsE2epf (24). Using a ubiquitin-specific rabbit polyclonal
antibody to detect the formation of polyubiquitin conjugates, we
reconfirmed the ability of MdmX to form large molecular weight
ubiquitin conjugates (Fig. 3A,
lane 2). That these conjugates reflected the formation of polyubiquitin chains was confirmed by their elimination when
reductively methylated ubiquitin, which is unable to form chains (24),
was used (Fig. 3A, lane 3 versus lane
2). Substitution of ubiquitin Lys
Arg point mutants in these
conjugation reactions revealed that GST-MdmX was capable of using each
mutant to catalyze polyubiquitin chain formation (Fig. 3A,
lanes 4-10). This experiment demonstrates not only that
MdmX is capable of synthesizing non-Lys48 chains but that
MdmX does not use one lysine exclusively for chain formation.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
GST-MdmX and FLAG-Mdm2 utilize multiple
lysine linkages for polyubiquitin chain formation. A,
in vitro ubiquitin conjugation reactions identical to those
in Fig. 1, lane 6, contained either no GST-MdmX (lane
1) or 800 nM GST-MdmX (lanes 2-10) and 10 µM unlabeled wild-type (wt), reductively
methylated (rm), or mutant ubiquitin. The MdmX-ubiquitin
conjugates were resolved by SDS-PAGE (7.5% gel) and then visualized by
Western blot analysis using an anti-ubiquitin polyclonal antibody.
Migration of molecular weight standards is shown to the
left. B, in vitro ubiquitin
conjugation reactions containing either no FLAG-Mdm2 (lane
1) or 4 nM FLAG-Mdm2 (lanes 2-10) as the
source of ligase activity and the indicated unlabeled ubiquitin were
assembled as described in A, with resulting Mdm2-ubiquitin
conjugates being visualized by Western blot analysis using an
anti-ubiquitin polyclonal antibody.
Arg point
mutants were substituted, Mdm2 was able to catalyze polyubiquitin chain
formation (Fig. 3B, lanes 4-10). Recent reports
have shown that HsUbc5A has been associated with the catalysis of
Lys29- and Lys48-linked chains (42, 43);
however, the signaling function of Lys29 ubiquitin chains
remains unclear. It is worthwhile to note that other members of the
RING finger family of ligases have been shown to generate
non-Lys48 ubiquitin chains, although their ability to
utilize multiple lysine linkages have not been examined (44). The
generation of ubiquitin Lys
Arg double mutants will be used in
future experiments to determine whether both Lys29 and
Lys48 are required for MdmX and Mdm2-mediated chain formation.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Ubiquitin conjugate formation is enhanced in
the presence of GST-MdmX and FLAG-Mdm2. A, in
vitro ubiquitin conjugation reactions identical to those of Fig.
1A contained the indicated combinations of 4 nM
FLAG-Mdm2, 800 nM GST-MdmX, or 800 nM
GST-MdmX
394. The resulting ligase activity was visualized by
autoradiography of 125I-ubiquitin conjugates following
SDS-PAGE resolution. The mobility of molecular weight standards
is shown to the left. B, the absolute amounts of
ubiquitin conjugated in the reactions of A were quantitated
by excising the poly-125I-ubiquitin conjugate bands from
the gel and measuring the associated radioactivity by
-counting
(25). C, in vitro ubiquitin conjugation assays
contained 5 nM human E1, 400 nM HsUbc5A, 5 µM 125I-ubiquitin, and 2.5 nM
FLAG-Mdm2. GST-MdmX was added to individual reactions to final
concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 320 nM. Parallel
reactions containing GST-MdmX at each concentration in the absence
FLAG-Mdm2 were also performed to measure the initial rate of GST-MdmX
ligase activity at the various concentrations (not shown). The
resulting ligase activity was visualized by autoradiography of
125I-ubiquitin conjugates following SDS-PAGE resolution. By
excising the poly-125I-ubiquitin conjugate bands from the
gel and measuring the associated radioactivity by
-counting (25),
the rate of ubiquitin conjugation was quantitated. The data are plotted
as the net increase in ubiquitin conjugate formation above that
observed for either Mdm2 or MdmX alone. The line through the
data represents a hyperbolic regression fit of the data.
394 for full-length MdmX in these
assays, because similar MdmX truncations fail to interact with Mdm2
both in vitro and in vivo (23, 45). The failure
of MdmX
394 to induce an increase in ubiquitin conjugation (Fig.
4A, lane 2 versus lane 6) suggests
that the association of Mdm2 and MdmX is necessary for the increased
conjugation and that this increase does not result from conjugation to
contaminating bacterial proteins acting as nonspecific substrates.
Quantitation of the initial rates of ligase activity revealed that the
increase was not simply an additive effect of Mdm2 and MdmX activity
but instead reflected an approximate doubling of total ligase activity (Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate that the Mdm2-MdmX
association does not inhibit E3 activity as proposed in the literature;
rather, it enhances the rate of ubiquitin ligation.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The interaction between GST-MdmX and
FLAG-Mdm2 increases Mdm2 ubiquitination. In vitro
ubiquitin conjugation assays, described under "Materials and
Methods," contained 5 nM human E1, 400 nM
HsUbc5A, 4 nM FLAG-Mdm2, 400 nM GST-MdmX, and
10 µM unlabeled ubiquitin where indicated. A,
MdmX-Ub conjugates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and then visualized by
Western blot analysis using an anti-MdmX polyclonal antibody.
B, a Western blot parallel to that of A was
reacted with an anti-Mdm2 monoclonal antibody to detect Mdm2-Ub
conjugates. An ~124-kDa contaminating protein present in our
preparations of FLAG-Mdm2 and GST-MdmX that reacts with the anti-Mdm2
antibody is denoted by an asterisk (*). Trace amounts of
FLAG-Mdm2 and GST-MdmX degradation products are also observed migrating
below the full-length fusion proteins. Migration of molecular
weight standards is shown to the left.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
GST-MdmX catalyzes the ubiquitination of
GST-p53 but does not induce a synergistic increase in
FLAG-Mdm2-mediated p53 ubiquitination. In vitro
ubiquitin conjugation assays containing 40 nM human E1, 150 nM HsUbc5A, 400 nM GST-p53, 4 nM
FLAG-Mdm2, and 400 nM GST-MdmX were incubated for 2 h
at 37 °C either in the absence or presence of 10 µM
unlabeled ubiquitin. The reactions were resolved by SDS-PAGE (7.5%
gel), and the GST-p53 was visualized by Western blot analysis
using an anti-p53 monoclonal antibody.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. A. M. Weissman for the generous gift of the human Mdm2 cDNA clone and members of our laboratory for helpful discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by United States Public Health Service Grant GM34009 (to A. L. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by an Arthritis Foundation-Wisconsin Chapter
Postdoctoral Fellowship and a Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer
Center Northwestern Mutual Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd., Milwaukee, WI 53226. Tel.: 414-456-8768; Fax: 414-456-6510; E-mail: arthaas@mcw.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M208593200
2 In this and subsequent papers, we shall use the empirical functional/phylogenetic family classification and systematic nomenclature for the E2/Ubc isoforms presented earlier (1).
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: E1, ubiquitin activating enzyme; E2, ubiquitin carrier protein; E3, ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase; FPLC, fast protein liquid chromatography; GST, glutathione S-transferase; TPEN, tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)-ethylenediamine; Ub, ubiquitin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Haas, A. L., and Siepmann, T. J. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 1257-1268[Abstract] |
| 2. | Hershko, A., and Ciechanover, A. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425-479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Pickart, C. M. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503-533[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Strous, G. J., and Govers, R. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 1417-1423[Abstract] |
| 5. | Honda, R., Tanaka, H., and Yasuda, H. (1997) FEBS Lett. 420, 25-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Lorick, K. L.,
Jensen, J. P.,
Fang, S.,
Ong, A. M.,
Hatakeyama, S.,
and Weissman, A. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11364-11369 |
| 7. |
Joazeiro, C. A.,
Wing, S. S.,
Huang, H.,
Leverson, J. D.,
Hunter, T.,
and Liu, Y. C.
(1999)
Science
286,
309-312 |
| 8. |
Fang, S.,
Jensen, J. P.,
Ludwig, R. L.,
Vousden, K. H.,
and Weissman, A. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
8945-8951 |
| 9. |
Momand, J.,
Jung, D.,
Wilczynski, S.,
and Niland, J.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
3453-3459 |
| 10. | Momand, J., Zambetti, G. P., Olson, D. C., George, D., and Levine, A. J. (1992) Cell 69, 1237-1245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Bottger, A., Bottger, V., Sparks, A., Liu, W. L., Howard, S. F., and Lane, D. P. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 860-869[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Chen, L.,
Agrawal, S.,
Zhou, W.,
Zhang, R.,
and Chen, J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
195-200 |
| 14. | Blaydes, J. P., Gire, V., Rowson, J. M., and Wynford-Thomas, D. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1859-1868[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Wasylyk, C., Salvi, R., Argentini, M., Dureuil, C., Delumeau, I., Abecassis, J., Debussche, L., and Wasylyk, B. (1999) Oncogene 18, 1921-1934[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Sharp, D. A.,
Kratowicz, S. A.,
Sank, M. J.,
and George, D. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
38189-38196 |
| 17. | Montes de Oca Luna, R., Wagner, D. S., and Lozano, G. (1995) Nature 378, 203-206[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Jones, S. N., Roe, A. E., Donehower, L. A., and Bradley, A. (1995) Nature 378, 206-208[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Finch, R. A.,
Donoviel, D. B.,
Potter, D.,
Shi, M.,
Fan, A.,
Freed, D. D.,
Wang, C. Y.,
Zambrowicz, B. P.,
Ramirez-Solis, R.,
Sands, A. T.,
and Zhang, N.
(2002)
Cancer Res.
62,
3221-3225 |
| 20. | Parant, J., Chavez-Reyes, A., Little, N. A., Yan, W., Reinke, V., Jochemsen, A. G., and Lozano, G. (2001) Nat. Genet. 29, 92-95[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Riemenschneider, M. J.,
Buschges, R.,
Wolter, M.,
Reifenberger, J.,
Bostrom, J.,
Kraus, J. A.,
Schlegel, U.,
and Reifenberger, G.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
6091-6096 |
| 22. |
Ramos, Y. F.,
Stad, R.,
Attema, J.,
Peltenburg, L. T.,
van der Eb, A. J.,
and Jochemsen, A. G.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
1839-1842 |
| 23. | Tanimura, S., Ohtsuka, S., Mitsui, K., Shirouzu, K., Yoshimura, A., and Ohtsubo, M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 447, 5-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Baboshina, O. V.,
and Haas, A. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2823-2831 |
| 25. |
Haas, A. L.,
and Rose, I. A.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
6845-6848 |
| 26. | Hershko, A., and Heller, H. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128, 1079-1086[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Haas, A. L.,
and Bright, P. M.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
13258-13267 |
| 28. |
Haas, A. L.,
Warms, J. V.,
Hershko, A.,
and Rose, I. A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
2543-2548 |
| 29. |
Haas, A. L.,
and Rose, I. A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
10329-10337 |
| 30. |
Baboshina, O. V.,
Crinelli, R.,
Siepmann, T. J.,
and Haas, A. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
39428-39437 |
| 31. | Burch, T. J., and Haas, A. L. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 7300-7308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Haas, A. L.,
and Bright, P. M.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
12464-12473 |
| 33. |
Tam, J. P.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
5409-5413 |
| 34. |
Yokouchi, M.,
Kondo, T.,
Houghton, A.,
Bartkiewicz, M.,
Horne, W. C.,
Zhang, H.,
Yoshimura, A.,
and Baron, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31707-31712 |
| 35. |
Pickart, C. M.,
Haldeman, M. T.,
Kasperek, E. M.,
and Chen, Z.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14418-14423 |
| 36. | Shvarts, A., Bazuine, M., Dekker, P., Ramos, Y. F., Steegenga, W. T., Merckx, G., van Ham, R. C., van der Houven van Oordt, W., van der Eb, A. J., and Jochemsen, A. G. (1997) Genomics 43, 34-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Chen, J.,
Marechal, V.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4107-4114 |
| 38. | Lai, Z., Freedman, D. A., Levine, A. J., and McLendon, G. L. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17005-17015[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Zheng, N., Wang, P., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavletich, N. P. (2000) Cell 102, 533-539[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Shumaker, D. K., Vann, L. R., Goldberg, M. W., Allen, T. D., and Wilson, K. L. (1998) Cell Calcium 23, 151-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Chau, V.,
Tobias, J. W.,
Bachmair, A.,
Marriott, D.,
Ecker, D. J.,
Gonda, D. K.,
and Varshavsky, A.
(1989)
Science
243,
1576-1583 |
| 42. |
Mastrandrea, L. D.,
You, J.,
Niles, E. G.,
and Pickart, C. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27299-27306 |
| 43. |
You, J.,
and Pickart, C. M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19871-19878 |
| 44. |
Chen, A.,
Kleiman, F. E.,
Manley, J. L.,
Ouchi, T.,
and Pan, Z. Q.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
22085-22092 |
| 45. |
Stad, R.,
Ramos, Y. F.,
Little, N.,
Grivell, S.,
Attema, J.,
van Der Eb, A. J.,
and Jochemsen, A. G.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28039-28044 |
| 46. | Stad, R., Little, N. A., Xirodimas, D. P., Frenk, R., van der Eb, A. J., Lane, D. P., Saville, M. K., and Jochemsen, A. G. (2001) EMBO Rep. 2, 1029-1034[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Honda, R., and Yasuda, H. (2000) Oncogene 19, 1473-1476[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. |
Hashizume, R.,
Fukuda, M.,
Maeda, I.,
Nishikawa, H.,
Oyake, D.,
Yabuki, Y.,
Ogata, H.,
and Ohta, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14537-14540 |
| 49. | Brzovic, P. S., Rajagopal, P., Hoyt, D. W., King, M. C., and Klevit, R. E. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 833-837[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. | Roth, J., Dobbelstein, M., Freedman, D. A., Shenk, T., and Levine, A. J. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 554-564[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Stommel, J. M., Marchenko, N. D., Jimenez, G. S., Moll, U. M., Hope, T. J., and Wahl, G. M. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1660-1672[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. |
Jackson, M. W.,
and Berberich, S. J.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
1001-1007 |
| 53. | Jackson, M. W., and Berberich, S. J. (1999) DNA Cell Biol. 18, 693-700[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. | Hofmann, R. M., and Pickart, C. M. (1999) Cell 96, 645-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 55. |
Joukov, V.,
Chen, J.,
Fox, E. A.,
Green, J. B.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
12078-12083 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. Barboza, T. Iwakuma, T. Terzian, A. K. El-Naggar, and G. Lozano Mdm2 and Mdm4 Loss Regulates Distinct p53 Activities Mol. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 6(6): 947 - 954. [Abstra |