![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49982-49988, December 20, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, September 19, 2002, and in revised form, October 8, 2002
Modification of low density lipoprotein (LDL) can
result in the avid uptake of these lipoproteins via a family of
macrophage transmembrane proteins referred to as scavenger receptors
(SRs). The genetic inactivation of either of two SR family members,
SR-A or CD36, has been shown previously to reduce oxidized LDL uptake in vitro and atherosclerotic lesions in mice. Several other
SRs are reported to bind modified LDL, but their contribution to
macrophage lipid accumulation is uncertain. We generated mice lacking
both SR-A and CD36 to determine their combined impact on macrophage lipid uptake and to assess the contribution of other SRs to this process. We show that SR-A and CD36 account for 75-90% of degradation of LDL modified by acetylation or oxidation. Cholesteryl ester derived
from modified lipoproteins fails to accumulate in macrophages taken
from the double null mice, as assessed by histochemistry and gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry. These results demonstrate that
SR-A and CD36 are responsible for the preponderance of modified LDL
uptake in macrophages and that other scavenger receptors do not
compensate for their absence.
Receptor-mediated endocytosis of modified
LDL1 by macrophages has been
implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. The uptake of
modified lipoproteins by macrophages leads to lipid-laden foam cells
and fatty streak development in the arterial wall, one of the earliest
steps in the progression of the atherosclerotic plaque. Scavenger
receptor family members SR-A and CD36 have been identified as receptors
for modified lipoproteins on macrophages, and their relevance to lipid
uptake has been demonstrated in vitro and in
vivo. Studies with SR-A or CD36 knockout mice show that disruption of either receptor pathway partially inhibits uptake of
acetylated LDL (AcLDL) or oxidized LDL (OxLDL) in macrophages and
retards atherosclerotic progression in hypercholesterolemic mice
(1-3). It is not known, however, whether the major pathways of
modified lipid uptake in macrophages comprise just these two receptors
or whether other, more recently identified, scavenger receptors can
contribute significantly to that process.
Since the cloning of the first two macrophage scavenger receptors (now
called SR-A type I and type II (4, 5)), the broad SR family has grown
considerably (reviewed in Ref. 6). The full range of scavenger receptor
functions is far from clear, but these proteins have been shown to be
involved in innate immune responses, cellular adhesion, and
phagocytosis of apoptotic cells, in addition to their role in
lipid uptake. It is evident that some functions overlap between some
members, providing biological redundancy, but specialized functions are
likely to characterize each receptor. On the basis of functional
studies and evidence for expression in the arterial intima, only some
of the SRs are good candidates for contributing to atherosclerotic foam
cell formation. In addition to SR-A and CD36, these receptors include: 1) CD68 (SR-D class), 2) lectin-like oxidized LDL receptor (LOX-1, SR-E
class), 3) scavenger receptor expressed by endothelial cells (SREC,
SR-F class), and 4) scavenger receptor for phosphotidylserine and
oxidized lipoprotein (SR-PSOX, SR-G class). In vitro studies have demonstrated that LOX-1, SR-PSOX, and SREC bind modified LDL with
dissociation constants in the range of 3-36 µg/ml, comparable with that of SR-A (7-10, 11). The interaction of CD68 with
modified lipoproteins is more controversial. Although OxLDL has been
shown to bind CD68, this binding has been characterized primarily on the basis of ligand blot analysis (12). This methodology may overestimate the importance of the role of CD68 in lipid uptake as the
majority of the protein appears to be localized in intracellular compartments that would not mediate modified lipoprotein uptake from
the extracellular environment. CD68, LOX-1, and SR-PSOX have all been
detected in human atherosclerotic lesions and could, therefore, be
positioned to play a role in foam cell formation in the arterial intima
(13-15). Their relevance to this process, however, remains uncertain.
To quantitate the relative importance of SR-A and CD36 in the
macrophage response to different forms of modified LDL and to assess
compensatory mechanisms for lipid uptake in their absence, we have
generated mice lacking both SR-A and CD36. The binding, uptake, and
degradation of AcLDL, as well as LDL oxidized by copper ions or by
reactive nitrogen species generated by a myeloperoxidase/hydrogen peroxide/nitrite system, were determined in wild type macrophages and
in those lacking either one or both receptors. GC-MS measurements of
cholesterol mass and histochemical staining for neutral lipid uptake
were also performed in these cells. The results of these studies
indicate that SR-A and CD36 are responsible for the preponderance of
modified LDL uptake in macrophages and that other scavenger receptors
do not compensate for their loss.
Reagents--
Cell culture reagents were from Invitrogen.
125I and 32P were obtained from PerkinElmer
Life Sciences.
Animals--
SR-AI/II-deficient mice were generously provided by
Dr. T. Kodama (University of Tokyo) (1). The CD36 Preparation of Peritoneal Macrophages--
Mice were injected
intraperitoneally with 3% thioglycollate broth, and elicited
macrophages were collected after 4 days by peritoneal lavage as
described previously (17). Macrophages were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal calf serum
overnight, and non-adherent cells were removed by washing. Macrophages
prepared in this manner routinely stained positively for CD11b (>95%)
and F4/80 (>70%) by flow cytometry.
Lipoprotein Iodination and Modifications--
Human LDL
(density = 1.019-1.063) was purchased from Biomedical
Technologies (Stoughton, MA). Iodination of LDL was accomplished by a
modified iodine monochloride reaction (18). Acetylation of LDL and
125I-LDL was performed as described previously, (9) and the
specific activity of 125I-acetyl LDL ranged from 400-600
cpm/ng of LDL protein. For copper ion-mediated oxidation, LDL and
125I-LDL (250 µg/ml) were incubated with 5 µM CuSO4 at 37 °C for 8 (mildly oxidized)
or 24 h (extensively oxidized) (17). Oxidation was
terminated by addition of 50 µM butylated
hydroxytoluene and 200 µM EDTA. Mildly OxLDL had a
relative electrophoretic mobility ~2.0 times that of native,
unmodified LDL, whereas extensively OxLDL had a relative mobility of
3.5 times. The specific activity of 125I-copper-oxidized
LDL was 300-600 cpm/ng of protein. LDL oxidized by the
myeloperoxidase/hydrogen peroxide/nitrite system was prepared as
described (19).
Modified LDL Binding, Degradation, and Foam Cell Formation
Assays--
Binding assays were performed at 4 °C using 10 µg/ml
modified 125I-LDL (AcLDL or OxLDL) in the presence or
absence of a 20-fold excess of unlabeled modified LDL competitor as
described previously (9). Specific binding of AcLDL or OxLDL was
calculated as the total binding of modified 125I-LDL minus
binding in the presence of unlabelled modified LDL competitor.
Degradation of modified LDL was assessed at 37 °C for 5 h using
10 µg/ml modified 125I-LDL (AcLDL or OxLDL) in the
presence or absence of a 20-fold excess of unlabeled modified LDL
competitor as described (7). Specific degradation was calculated as the
total degradation of modified 125I-LDL minus degradation in
the presence of unlabelled competitor. All measurements were performed
on triplicate samples and were conducted independently at least three
times. To assess foam cell formation, cells were incubated with 40 µg/ml LDL or OxLDL for 48 h, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and
stained with Oil Red O to visualize lipid accumulation. Staining was
recorded on an Olympus X10 microscope equipped with a digital camera.
Cholesterol Content--
Free and esterified cellular
cholesterol were measured by gas chromatography as described (20, 21).
6 × 106 cells were incubated with 40 µg/ml OxLDL or
AcLDL for 48 h and then extracted with hexane:isopropanol (3:2).
Stigmasterol (Sigma) was added as an internal standard, and lipid
extracts were washed once with water and divided into two equal
aliquots. One lipid aliquot was saponified for determination of total
cholesterol, and the second aliquot was analyzed for free cholesterol
using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. The samples were
injected (splitless) into an Agilent 6890 GC-MS (G2613A system, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a J&W DB17 fused
silica capillary column (15 m × 0.25 mm inner
diameter × 0.5 µm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). The GC
temperature program was as follows: the initial temperature was
260 °C for 5 min, and then it was increased to 280 °C
(5 °C/min) and held at 280 °C for 11 min. A model 5973N
mass-selective detector (Agilent Technologies) was used in scan modes
to identify the samples. Cholesterol measurements were obtained on
triplicate samples and normalized to cellular protein content. The
esterified cholesterol fraction was calculated by subtraction of the
free cholesterol from total cholesterol.
Flow Cytometery--
5 × 105 cells were
preincubated with 1 µg of FcBlock (Pharmingen) in phosphate-buffered
saline, 1% fetal bovine serum for 15 min to block nonspecific antibody
binding to Fc receptors. Cells were then incubated with fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated CD11b (BD Transduction Laboratories), F4/80
(Serotec, Oxford, UK), or isotype control antibody (IgG2b
and IgA, BD Transduction Laboratories) for 30 min on ice. For detection
of CD36, cells were incubated with monoclonal anti-murine CD36
antibody (Cascade Bioscience, Winchester, MA) for 30 min on ice,
washed three times in phosphate-buffered saline, and incubated with
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-IgA secondary antibody for
30 min. After washing extensively with phosphate-buffered saline,
stained cells were analyzed on a Coulter fluorescent cell sorter, and
10,000 events in the live gate were recorded.
Cytokine Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assays--
For
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) experiments, 3 × 106 cells
were stimulated with 100 ng/ml Escherichia coli K12 LPS
(Sigma) for 6 h. Tumor necrosis factor- Mice deficient in both SR-A and CD36
(SR-A Degradation and Binding of Modified LDL--
To define the
contributions of SR-A and CD36 to modified lipid uptake, we
performed binding and degradation studies on macrophages derived
from wild type, SR-A
In contrast to the effect on degradation of the ligand,
specific binding of AcLDL was decreased by only 44% in
SR-A
The evidence demonstrating that both SR-A and CD36 can bind and degrade
oxidized LDL is substantial. The relative affinities of this ligand for
the two receptors appear to be determined by the degree of oxidation of
the LDL. Extensive oxidation of LDL appears to be required for rapid
uptake via SR-A, whereas mildly oxidized LDL is preferentially
internalized via CD36 (2, 3, 22). To assess the contributions of other
receptors to the process of oxidized LDL uptake and degradation, we
performed binding and degradation studies using LDL that had been
subjected to mild or extensive oxidizing conditions. A third form of
oxidation, myeloperoxidase-hydrogen peroxide-nitrite modification,
which may represent a more physiologically relevant pathway of LDL
oxidation, was also tested (3, 19, 23)
The mildly oxidized LDL used in these experiments had a relative
electrophoretic mobility that was twice that of native LDL (data not
shown). This corresponds to a derivatization of 25-30% of its lysine
residues (24, 25). A 68% decrease in degradation and a 90% decrease
in binding, relative to that in wild type macrophages, was measured
when this modified LDL was incubated with CD36
The results obtained with LDL oxidized by the myeloperoxidase/hydrogen
peroxide/nitrite system were concordant with that of LDL mildly
oxidized by copper ions. CD36 was the preferred receptor for this
ligand (Fig. 4). Degradation of this form
of oxidized LDL was reduced by 60%, and binding was reduced by 74% in
CD36 Foam Cell Formation--
To directly assess the potential of the
alternative scavenger receptor pathways to contribute to foam cell
formation, we incubated SR-A Although macrophage foam cell formation is the earliest histologic
hallmark of the atherosclerotic lesion, the mechanism by which intimal
macrophages accumulate cholesterol remains controversial (26-28). As
the family of macrophage scavenger receptors provides a high affinity
uptake mechanism for the accumulation of lipid derived from modified
LDL, it is widely believe that they play a critical role in foam cell
formation. The number of SR family members has grown substantially in
recent years, but because of their redundancy, it has been difficult to
assess the relative contribution of each of these proteins to the lipid
uptake process. We, therefore, sought to characterize the receptor
pathways in macrophages that could mediate modified LDL uptake and
determine their contribution to cholesteryl ester accumulation and foam cell formation.
Mice lacking SR-A or CD36 were intercrossed, producing animals lacking
both receptors. Comparison of these animals with wild type mice and
single null progenitors of the double knockouts permitted us to
quantitate the amount of lipid uptake mediated by each of the two
pathways, as well as all alternative pathways not involving SR-A or
CD36. The results demonstrate that SR-A and CD36 are the critical
contributors to modified lipoprotein uptake in macrophages in
vitro. In the absence of both receptors, lipoprotein uptake and
degradation were reduced by 75-90%, using four different types of
modified LDL. Using LDL mildly oxidized by copper ions, we demonstrate
that lipid accumulation can occur in sufficient quantities to account
for the histologic conversion of macrophages to foam cells. In
addition, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry measurements directly
quantitated this lipid accumulation and found ~200 nmol of total
cholesterol/mg of cellular protein in macrophages incubated with OxLDL
for 48 h. 30 nmol of that total represented esterified
cholesterol. When acetylated LDL was employed as the ligand, the total
cholesterol content was 263 nmol/mg of cellular protein, of which 38 nmol was esterified cholesterol. The alternative receptor pathways,
whose contributions could only be quantitated in the absence of both
CD36 and SR-A, account for a very small percentage of the lipoprotein
degradation measured. Moreover, we were unable to demonstrate
histologic conversion of SR-A Of interest, the process of lipid uptake mediated by SR-A and CD36
appears to be distinct in that SR-A binding of ligand results in a
greater degradation rate than does CD36 binding. Previous studies of
OxLDL and AcLDL uptake have shown trafficking of these lipids to
different intracellular compartments, and Lougheed et al.
(29) have suggested that this difference could arise from the
involvement of separate receptors in the uptake process. Our results
suggest this to be the case with AcLDL uptake predominantly driven by
the action of SR-A, whereas mildly OxLDL uptake is primarily mediated
by CD36 (3). The degree of oxidation, however, strongly influences the
pathway of OxLDL degradation. With more extensively oxidized LDL, the
contribution of the SR-A pathway is enhanced. Interestingly, the
reduction in binding of extensively oxidized LDL to
CD36 The studies reported here utilized in vitro modified
lipoproteins. By employing several forms of oxidized LDL, as well as acetylated LDL, we have tried to examine the full spectrum of modified
lipoproteins that could interact with scavenger receptors. Whether
different forms of modified lipoproteins exist in vivo remains unknown. Thus, our conclusion concerning the limited role of
the alternative SRs does not preclude the possibility that they
participate in the uptake of other forms of lipoproteins or that they
could affect atherogenesis via altogether different mechanisms.
Of note, however, quantitative real-time reverse
transcription-PCR measurements of the mRNA encoding CD68, LOX-1,
SR-PSOX, or SREC showed no increase in the
SR-A The generation of mice lacking both of the critical receptor pathways
necessary for modified lipoprotein uptake should facilitate future
studies of atherogenesis. By intercrossing the
SR-A *
This work was supported by Grant HL53315 (to
H. F. H.) from the National Institutes of Health, a Scientist
Development grant from the American Heart Association (to E. A. P.),
Grant F32HL10366 from the National Institutes of Health (to
V. V. K.), and Grants HL45098 and HL66678 from the National
Institutes of Health (to M. W. F.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 9, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209649200
The abbreviations used are:
LDL, low
density lipoprotein;
AcLDL, acetylated LDL;
OxLDL, oxidized LDL;
SR, scavenger receptor;
SREC, scavenger receptor expressed by endothelial
cells;
SR-PSOX, scavenger receptor for phosphotidylserine and oxidized
lipoprotein;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
GC-MS, gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry.
Scavenger Receptors Class A-I/II and CD36 Are
the Principal Receptors Responsible for the Uptake of Modified Low
Density Lipoprotein Leading to Lipid Loading in Macrophages*
,
,
,
,
,
Lipid Metabolism Unit, Department of
Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, § Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Medical
Oncology and Center for Vascular Biology, Weill Medical College of
Cornell University, New York, New York 10021, and the ¶ Department
of Cell Biology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic
Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
mice
used in these studies were generated as described (16). Both lines were
backcrossed for five generations to C57BL/6J mice prior to
intercrossing of the lines to generate mice lacking both SR-A and CD36.
Double knockout mice (SR-A
/
/CD36
/
) were
generated from heterozygote intercrosses at the expected ration of
1:16. SR-A and CD36 genotypes were verified by PCR analyses of tail DNA
as described previously (1, 16). Mice were maintained on a 12-h
light/dark cycle and given free access to rodent chow and water.
and IL-6 in cell
culture supernatants were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(Pierce) as described previously (17).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
/CD36
/
) were derived in the
expected Mendelian ratios and appeared healthy when compared with wild
type, SR-A (SR-A
/
), or CD36 (CD36
/
)
single null mice. Macrophages from all genotypes (wild type; SR-A
/
; CD36
/
; and
SR-A
/
/CD36
/
) expressed similar levels
of the macrophage cell surface markers, CD11b and F4/80, as assessed by
flow cytometry (Fig. 1A).
Furthermore, macrophages from all genotypes produced similar levels of
tumor necrosis factor-
and IL-6 in response to bacterial LPS
(Fig. 1B). These findings indicate that the absence of both
SR-A and CD36 does not appear to alter the expression of myeloid
differentiation markers, nor does it affect the cytokine responses to
the prototypical stimulator of macrophage inflammatory pathways,
bacterial endotoxin.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Macrophages lacking
SR-AI/II and CD36 express myeloid markers and respond to inflammatory
stimuli. As shown in A, wild type (WT),
SR-AI/II
/
, CD36
/
, and
SR-AI/II
/
/CD36
/
(DKO (double
knock-out)) macrophages were stained for CD11b, CD36, and CD68.
Histograms of each staining (solid line) are overlaid with
isotype control (dashed and dotted lines). As
shown in B, macrophages of all genotypes were stimulated
with 10 ng/ml LPS for 6 h, and supernatants were assayed for tumor
necrosis factor-
and IL-6 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
assay. Data are expressed as the mean of triplicate samples ± standard deviation.
/
, CD36
/
, or
SR-A
/
/CD36
/
mice using LDL modified by
acetylation or oxidation, using either copper ions or a
myeloperoxidase/hydrogen peroxide/nitrite oxidizing system. Fig.
2A shows that during a 5-h
incubation with 125I-AcLDL, SR-A
/
macrophages degraded 70% less ligand than did wild type macrophages (p < 0.0001). CD36, whose role in AcLDL uptake has
been controversial, appears to play a relatively minor role in AcLDL
degradation, as evidenced by the very modest decline (13%) measured in
the CD36
/
macrophages. In macrophages lacking both SR-A
and CD36, AcLDL degradation fell ~80%. Thus, the effect of the loss
of both receptors appears to reflect the summation of their respective
contributions and indicates that these two transmembrane proteins
account for the vast majority of AcLDL uptake and degradation.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Decreased degradation and binding of acetyl
LDL in macrophages lacking SR-AI/II and CD36. As shown in
A, degradation of 125I-acetyl LDL was assessed
in wild type (WT), SR-AI/II
/
,
CD36
/
, and
SR-AI/II
/
/CD36
/
macrophages in the
presence or absence of a 20-fold excess of unlabeled acetyl LDL as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Results are expressed
as nanograms of LDL degraded/milligrams of cell protein in 5 h ± standard deviation. Specific degradation was calculated by subtracting
degradation measured in the presence of excess unlabeled competitor
from that measured in its absence. Samples were measured in triplicate.
As shown in B, binding of 125I-acetyl LDL was
performed in peritoneal macrophages from all genotypes in the presence
or absence of a 20-fold excess of unlabeled competitor at 4 °C for
2 h. Specific binding was calculated as in panel A.
Samples were measured in triplicate. *, p < 0.05 versus wild type; **, p < 0.05 versus SR-AI/II
/
.
/
macrophages (p < 0.0001, Fig.
2B). Somewhat surprisingly, CD36 contributed more to AcLDL
binding than to its degradation as a 28% decrease in binding to
CD36
/
macrophages was observed (Fig. 2B). In
macrophages taken from SR-A
/
/CD36
/
mice, AcLDL binding fell by 54%. These results indicate that alternative mechanisms can contribute to AcLDL binding to macrophages, accounting for nearly half of the total AcLDL bound. Nevertheless, relatively little of this alternatively bound ligand is internalized and degraded, as evidenced by the 80% decrease in degradation in the
SR-A
/
/CD36
/
mouse.
/
macrophages (Fig. 3A). In
contrast, binding and degradation of mildly oxidized LDL were reduced
by only 25 and 40%, respectively, in the SR-A
/
macrophages. A further reduction in binding and degradation (up to
90%) was observed in macrophages lacking both SR-A and CD36 (Fig.
3A). The more extensively oxidized LDL had an
electrophoretic mobility 3.5 times that of native LDL, corresponding to
40-50% derivitization of lysine residues. At this level of oxidation, receptor specificity was altered with the ligand degraded
preferentially through SR-A rather than CD36 (Fig. 3B). A
47% decrease in degradation of this ligand was measured in macrophages
lacking SR-A as compared with a 26% decrease in CD36
/
macrophages. Interestingly, a similar discordance between binding and
degradation, as noted for AcLDL, was again observed.
CD36
/
macrophages showed a much greater decrease in
binding (62%) than did the SR-A
/
cells (13%) despite
the reverse rank order for degradation (Fig. 3B). When both
receptors were inactivated, a 69% decrease in binding and a 78%
decrease in degradation were measured.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Degradation and binding of
Cu2+-modified OxLDL is significantly decreased in
macrophages lacking SR-AI/II and CD36. Peritoneal macrophages were
incubated with 10 µg/ml 125I-Cu2+-oxidized
LDL in the presence or absence of excess unlabeled competitor, using
two different preparations of OxLDL: mildly oxidized (A) and
extensively oxidized (B). Degradation was performed at
37 °C for 5 h, and binding was performed at 4 °C for 2 h as for AcLDL (see the legend for Fig. 2). Samples were measured in
triplicate. Data are representative of at least two independent
experiments. *, p < 0.05 versus wild type
(WT); **, p < 0.05 versus
CD36
/
.
/
macrophages. The corresponding changes in
SR-A
/
macrophages were 30 and 23% decreases for
degradation and binding, respectively. A 75% decrease in both binding
and degradation was measured in the
SR-A
/
/CD36
/
macrophages (Fig. 4). Taken
together, these experiments clearly demonstrate that SR-A and CD36
account for the vast majority of lipid uptake and degradation involving
modified LDL that has been altered either by acetylation or by varying
degrees of oxidation. No more than 25%, and as little as 10%, of
these modified lipoproteins appears to be taken up and degraded by
pathways not involving SR-A or CD36.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Degradation and binding of LDL oxidized by a
myeloperoxidase/hydrogen peroxide/nitrite system is significantly
decreased in macrophages lacking SR-AI/II and CD36. Peritoneal
macrophages were incubated with 10 µg/ml
125I-myeloperoxidase nitrite-modified LDL in the presence
or absence of excess unlabeled competitor. As shown in A,
degradation was performed at 37 °C for 5 h. WT, wild
type. As shown in B, binding was performed at 5 °C for
2 h. Samples were measured in triplicate. Data are representative
of at least two independent experiments. *, p < 0.05 versus wild type.
/
/CD36
/
macrophages with oxidized LDL and assessed lipid accumulation morphologically by Oil Red O staining and quantitatively by GC-MS. Macrophages were incubated with acLDL or mildly oxidized LDL for 48 h and then stained with Oil Red O to detect cholesteryl ester accumulation (Fig. 5). As would be
predicted by our binding and degradation results, the intensity of Oil
Red O staining was dramatically reduced in both the
CD36
/
and SR-A
/
/CD36
/
macrophages. To better quantitate this decline, GC-MS was utilized to
measure cholesterol and cholesteryl ester mass in macrophages incubated with no modified lipoprotein or with AcLDL or OxLDL (Table
I). In wild type cells incubated with
OxLDL, total cholesterol mass increased ~30% with an increase in
cholesteryl ester mass from undetectable levels to 20 µg/mg of
cellular protein. For AcLDL, the comparable numbers were a 70%
increase in total cholesterol mass and the accumulation of 25 µg of
cholesteryl ester from a previously undetectable level. Strikingly, in
SR-A
/
/CD36
/
macrophages, incubation
with OxLDL led to no change in the total cholesterol mass and no
accumulation of cholesteryl ester. Incubation of these cells with AcLDL
produced a 30% increase in total cholesterol mass, but again, no
cholesteryl ester accumulation was detected. These findings demonstrate
that in the absence of both SR-A and CD36, no cholesteryl ester
accumulation occurs in response to incubation with either AcLDL or
OxLDL, confirming the histologic impression of the absence of any foam
cell formation.

View larger version (137K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Comparison of in vitro
foam cell development in elicited peritoneal macrophages from
wild type (A), CD36
/
(B), SR-AI/II
/
(C),
and SR-AI/II
/
/CD36
/
(D) mice in response to exposure to 40 µg/ml mildly oxidized (Cu2+) LDL.
Macrophages were incubated for 48 h, fixed, and stained with Oil
Red O. Nearly all wild type and SR-AI/II
/
cells
demonstrated staining by the lipophilic dye, whereas
CD36
/
and
SR-AI/II
/
/CD36
/
macrophages showed
little or no histochemical stain for neutral lipid accumulation.
Accumulation of total and esterified cholesterol in peritoneal
macrophages
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
/CD36
/
macrophages to foam cells when exposed to OxLDL. This finding was
confirmed by GC-MS, which showed no accumulation of cholesteryl ester
in the SR-A
/
/CD36
/
cells. These results
provide strong evidence that more recently identified SRs, including
CD68, LOX-1, SR-PSOX, and SREC, play a minor role, if any, in modified
LDL uptake by macrophages.
/
macrophages, relative to wild type macrophages,
was greater than that seen with SR-A-deficient cells despite the larger
decline in degradation in the latter. Although this result could be a consequence of a higher recycling rate of internalized SR-A molecules back to the plasma membrane, it is also possible that SR-A links to a
distinct and more efficient pathway of ligand degradation. Studies are
currently underway to explore these differences in greater detail.
/
/CD36
/
macrophages, indicating
that the transcription of these receptors is not up-regulated in
response to the loss of any function that SR-A or CD36 performs in a
macrophage (data not shown). The generation of mice lacking these
alternative SRs will be required to shed light on their other potential
functions, as well as any contribution they may make to in
vivo lipid uptake. In addition, the recent report of Kruth
et al. (30), demonstrating that native LDL can promote lipid
accumulation in vitro in phorbol ester-treated human monocyte-macrophages, suggests that lipid accumulation and foam cell
formation might also arise from non-scavenger receptor-mediated pathways.
/
/CD36
/
mice with hyperlipidemic
mouse strains, it should be possible to determine whether these
receptors are, in fact, required for macrophage foam cell formation
in vivo. These studies are currently in progress. Although
both single null mice showed decreases in atherosclerosis in previous
studies, foam cell formation was not completely abrogated. Our in
vitro data, demonstrating the absence of foam cell formation and
cholesteryl ester accumulation in the double null macrophages, suggest
that the hyperlipidemic SR-A
/
/CD36
/
mouse might indeed fail to generate macrophage foam cells in vivo. The results of these in vivo studies should
therefore clarify both the utility of the in vitro ligands
in predicting in vivo lipid uptake and the potential role of
alternative pathways in macrophage foam cell formation. Through such
experimental approaches, it should be possible to directly test the
hypothesis that foam cell formation plays a causal role in the
pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and is not simply a marker of lipid
deposition in the arterial intima. Should that hypothesis prove
correct, the delineation of the major pathways of lipid uptake in
macrophages provides potential targets for therapies designed to
ameliorate atherosclerotic heart disease.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
617-726-5906; Fax: 617-726-2879; E-mail:
freeman@frodo.mgh.harvard.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Suzuki, H.,
Kurihara, Y.,
Takeya, M.,
Kamada, N.,
Kataoka, M.,
Jishage, K.,
Ueda, O.,
Sakaguchi, H.,
Higashi, T.,
Doi, T.,
Matsumoto, A.,
Azuma, S.,
Noda, T.,
Toyoda, Y.,
Itakura, H.,
Yazaki, Y.,
Horluch, S.,
Takahashi, K.,
Kar Krujit, J.,
van Berkel, T. J. C.,
Steinbrecher, U. P.,
Ishibashi, S.,
Maeda, N.,
Gordon, S.,
and Kodama, T.
(1997)
Nature
386,
292-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Febbraio, M.,
Podrez, E. A.,
Smith, J. D.,
Hajjar, D. P.,
Hazen, S. L.,
Hoff, H. E.,
Sharma, K.,
and Silverstein, R. L.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
1049-1056[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Podrez, E. A.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
1095-1108[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Kodama, T.,
Freeman, M.,
Rohrer, L.,
Zabrecky, J.,
Matsudaira, P.,
and Krieger, M.
(1990)
Nature
343,
531-535[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Rohrer, L.,
Freeman, M.,
Kodama, T.,
Penman, M.,
and Krieger, M.
(1990)
Nature
343,
570-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Peiser, L.,
and Gordon, S.
(2001)
Microbes Infect.
3,
149-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Freeman, M. W.,
Ekkel, Y.,
Rohrer, L.,
Penman, M.,
Freedman, N. J.,
Chisolm, G. M.,
and Kreiger, M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
88,
4931-4935 8.
Adachi, H.,
Tsujimoto, M.,
Arai, H.,
and Inoue, K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31217-31220 9.
Andersson, L. P.,
and Freeman, M. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19592-19601 10.
Moriwaki, H.,
Kume, N.,
Sawamura, T.,
Aoyama, T.,
Hoshikawa, H.,
Ochi, H.,
Nishi, E.,
Masaki, T.,
and Kita, T.
(1998)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
18,
1541-1547 11.
Shimaoka, T.,
Kume, N.,
Minami, M.,
Hayashida, K.,
Kataoka, H.,
Kita, T.,
and Yonehara, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
40663-40666 12.
Ramprasad, M. P.,
Fischer, W.,
Witztum, J. L.,
Sambrano, G. R.,
Quehenberger, O.,
and Steinberg, D.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
92,
9580-9584 13.
Geng, Y. J.,
Holm, J.,
Nygren, S.,
Bruzelius, M.,
Stemme, S.,
and Hansson, G. K.
(1995)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
15,
1995-2002 14.
Kataoka, H.,
Kume, N.,
Minami, M.,
Moriwaki, H.,
Sawamura, T.,
Masaki, T.,
and Kita, T.
(2000)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
902,
328-335 15.
Minami, M.,
Kume, N.,
Shimaoka, T.,
Kataoka, H.,
Hayashida, K.,
Akiyama, Y.,
Nagata, I.,
Ando, K.,
Nobuyoshi, M.,
Hanyuu, M.,
Komeda, M.,
Yonehara, S.,
and Kita, T.
(2001)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
21,
1796-1800 16.
Febbraio, M.,
Abumrad, N. A.,
Hajjar, D. P.,
Sharma, K.,
Cheng, W.,
Pearce, S. F.,
and Silverstein, R. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
19055-19062 17.
Moore, K. J.,
Fabunmi, R. P.,
Andersson, L. P.,
and Freeman, M. W.
(1998)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
18,
1647-1654 18.
Goldstein, J. L.,
Basu, S. K.,
and Brown, M. S.
(1983)
Methods Enzymol.
98,
241-260[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Podrez, E. A.,
Schmitt, D.,
Hoff, H. E.,
and Hazen, S. L.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
1547-1560[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Jacobs, N. L.
(1997)
J. Lipid Res.
38,
1973-1987[Abstract]
21.
Moore, K. J.,
Rosen, E. D.,
Fitzgerald, M. L.,
Randow, F.,
Andersson, L. P.,
Altshuler, D.,
Milstone, D.,
Mortensen, R. M.,
Speigelmen, B. M.,
and Freeman, M. W.
(2001)
Nat. Med.
7,
41-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Lougheed, M.,
Lum, C. M.,
Ling, W.,
Suzuki, H.,
Kodama, T.,
and Steinbrecher, U. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12938-12944 23.
Podrez, E. A.,
Batyreva, E.,
Shen, Z.,
Zhang, R.,
Deng, Y.,
Sun, M.,
Finton, P. J.,
Shan, L.,
Gugiu, B.,
Hoff, H. F.,
Salomon, R. G.,
and Hazen, S. L.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
8,
8
24.
Steinbrecher, U. P.,
Witztum, J. L.,
Parthasarthy, S.,
and Steinberg, D.
(1987)
Arteriosclerosis
7,
135-143 25.
Chang, Y. H.,
Abdalla, D. S. P.,
and Sevanian, A.
(1997)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
23,
202-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Stary, H. C.,
Chandler, A. B.,
Glagov, S.,
Guyton, J. R.,
Insull, W., Jr.,
Rosenfeld, M. E.,
Schaffer, S. A.,
Schwartz, C. J.,
Wagner, W. D.,
and Wissler, R. W.
(1994)
Arterioscler. Thromb.
14,
840-856 27.
Lusis, A. J.
(2000)
Nature
407,
233-241[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Kruth, H. S.
(2001)
Front. Biosci.
6,
D429-455[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Lougheed, M.,
Moore, E. D.,
Scriven, D. R.,
and Steinbrecher, U. P.
(1999)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
19,
1881-1890 30.
Kruth, H. S.,
Huang, W.,
Ishii, I.,
and Zhang, W. Y.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
34573-34580
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-W. Wang, P.-Y. Liu, N. Oyama, Y. Rikitake, S. Kitamoto, J. Gitlin, J. K. Liao, and W. A. Boisvert Deficiency of ROCK1 in bone marrow-derived cells protects against atherosclerosis in LDLR-/- mice FASEB J, October 1, 2008; 22(10): 3561 - 3570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Nagelin, S. Srinivasan, J. Lee, J. L. Nadler, and C. C. Hedrick 12/15-Lipoxygenase Activity Increases the Degradation of Macrophage ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter G1 Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(10): 1811 - 1819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rayner, Y.-X. Chen, M. McNulty, T. Simard, X. Zhao, D. J. Wells, J. de Belleroche, and E. R. O'Brien Extracellular Release of the Atheroprotective Heat Shock Protein 27 Is Mediated by Estrogen and Competitively Inhibits acLDL Binding to Scavenger Receptor-A Circ. Res., July 18, 2008; 103(2): 133 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ouimet, M.-D. Wang, N. Cadotte, K. Ho, and Y. L. Marcel Epoxycholesterol Impairs Cholesteryl Ester Hydrolysis in Macrophage Foam Cells, Resulting in Decreased Cholesterol Efflux Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2008; 28(6): 1144 - 1150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Mauldin, M. H. Nagelin, A. J. Wojcik, S. Srinivasan, M. D. Skaflen, C. R. Ayers, C. A. McNamara, and C. C. Hedrick Reduced Expression of ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter G1 Increases Cholesterol Accumulation in Macrophages of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): 2785 - 2792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-L. Levonen, E. Vahakangas, J. K. Koponen, and S. Yla-Herttuala Antioxidant Gene Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2142 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kuchibhotla, D. Vanegas, D. J. Kennedy, E. Guy, G. Nimako, R. E. Morton, and M. Febbraio Absence of CD36 protects against atherosclerosis in ApoE knock-out mice with no additional protection provided by absence of scavenger receptor A I/II Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2008; 78(1): 185 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sun, B. B. Boyanovsky, M. A. Connelly, P. Shridas, D. R. van der Westhuyzen, and N. R. Webb Distinct mechanisms for OxLDL uptake and cellular trafficking by class B scavenger receptors CD36 and SR-BI J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 2560 - 2570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Napolitano, C. De Pascale, C. Wheeler-Jones, K. M. Botham, and E. Bravo Effects of lycopene on the induction of foam cell formation by modified LDL Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1820 - E1827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Buono, Y. Li, S. W. Waldo, and H. S. Kruth Liver X receptors inhibit human monocyte-derived macrophage foam cell formation by inhibiting fluid-phase pinocytosis of LDL J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 2411 - 2418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Marsche, B. Weigle, W. Sattler, and E. Malle Soluble RAGE blocks scavenger receptor CD36-mediated uptake of hypochlorite-modified low-density lipoprotein FASEB J, October 1, 2007; 21(12): 3075 - 3082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Martin-Fuentes, F. Civeira, D. Recalde, A. L. Garcia-Otin, E. Jarauta, I. Marzo, and A. Cenarro Individual Variation of Scavenger Receptor Expression in Human Macrophages with Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Is Associated with a Differential Inflammatory Response J. Immunol., September 1, 2007; 179(5): 3242 - 3248. [Abstract] |