![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 51, 49989-49997, December 20, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Catenin with
N-cadherin through Binding to an Adjacent and Partially Overlapping
Target Site*
, andFrom the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Received for publication, June 28, 2002, and in revised form, September 4, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nonreceptor tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B
associates with the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin and may regulate
cadherin function through dephosphorylation of Phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on Our laboratory has focused on the role of the nonreceptor tyrosine
phosphatase PTP1B in regulating the phosphorylation of tyrosine
residues on In this paper, we define the target domain for PTP1B on N-cadherin and
show that it is adjacent to, and partially overlaps with, the binding
site for Antibodies--
The anti-N-cadherin antibody NCD-2 (20) was
purified from hybridoma culture medium in our laboratory as described
previously (21). Anti-phosphotyrosine (PY20) monoclonal antibody was
from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY), anti-FLAG was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA), and anti-phosphoserine was from
Zymed Laboratories Inc. (San Francisco, CA).
Anti-PTP1B antibodies were obtained from Transduction Laboratories,
Calbiochem, or Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY).
Anti- Preparation of N-cadherin Constructs and GST Fusion
Proteins--
cDNAs encoding the full cytoplasmic region of
N-cadherin (residues 752-912) and truncated constructs were generated
by PCR using specific oligonucleotide primers flanked by
EcoRI and NcoI restriction sites and chick
N-cadherin cDNA as a template. The PCR products were subcloned in
PGEX-KG (Amersham Biosciences). To create N-cadherin containing the
extracellular, transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain carrying deletions
of amino acids 872-891, 878-891, or 884-891, we used a two-step PCR
procedure. Primers corresponding to the 5'-end of the N-cadherin
cDNA with an added NotI site and the 3'-end with an
added SalI site were used with primers flanking the deletion
site in two separate PCRs. Products from these two reactions were mixed
and used as template for another PCR containing only the 5' and 3'
primers. This reaction generated N-cadherin cDNA with flanking
NotI and SalI and the desired deletions. These
constructs were subcloned in pCMV-FLAG-4A (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
for mammalian expression to generate pCMV-
To prepare N-cadherin fused to green fluorescent protein, N-cadherin
was amplified by PCR using a 5' primer containing a BglII site and 3' primer that excludes the stop codon and contains a XmaI site. The digested PCR product was cloned into the
BglII/XmaI sites of the pEGF-N1 plasmid
(Clontech). To prepare N-cadherin
Catalytically inactive GST-PTP1B (C215S) was produced in
Escherichia coli TKB1 cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) that
constitutively express a tyrosine kinase. GST- Preparation of Synthetic Peptides--
The following peptides
mimicking the PTP1B binding site on N-cadherin were synthesized and
purified to more than 90% by HPLC (BIO-SYNTHESIS, Lewisville, TX):
Peptide 1 (P1), TAGSLSSL (872-879); Peptide 2 (P2), SLNSSSSG
(878-885); Peptide 3 (P3), SGGEQDVD (884-891). Peptide 3R (P3R)
corresponds to the reverse sequence of P3 and was used as a control.
Peptide 4 (P4) (VFDYEGSG) mimics an 8-amino acid sequence within the
Peptides corresponding to amino acids 878-891 (AP2/3) and 884-891
(AP3) of the PTP1B binding region of N-cadherin were synthesized covalently attached to the Antennapedia cell permeation sequence (Genemed, San Francisco, CA). An antennapedia sequence fused to the
reverse of P3 was also prepared and used as control. All peptides were
dissolved in sterile, deionized water and stored in small aliquots at
In Vitro Binding Assays--
Purified GST-N-cadherin deletion
constructs were biotinylated using EZ-link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin
(Pierce), and biotinylation was confirmed by immunoblot using
streptavidin-HRP (Fig. 1A). Binding assays were carried out
as previously described (19). Biotinylated GST-N-cadherin deletion
constructs (3 µg/well in 50 µl of PBS) were applied to
NeutrAvidin-coated 96-well plates (Pierce) and incubated at room
temperature for 1 h. After blocking with 2% BSA (Sigma) in PBS
for 1 h at room temperature and washing three times in PBS,
purified GST-PTP1B or GST-
To determine competition for binding to N-cadherin, increasing
concentrations of peptides mimicking the PTP1B binding sequence or
GST- Phosphorylation of Serine Residues on N-cadherin--
20 µg of
GST-N-cadherin was immobilized on 300 µl of glutathione-Sepharose 4B
and washed in CKII kinase buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM ATP) or GSK-3 Cell Lines and Transfections--
Mouse L cells were used for
both stable and transient transfections with N-cadherin constructs.
Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(Invitrogen) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (Invitrogen)
and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Invitrogen) and transfected with
pCMV- Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
L cells were
transfected with full-length N-cadherin or N-cadherin deletion
constructs using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen), incubated in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium with 5% fetal bovine serum for 24 h, and
lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (2% Nonidet P-40 and 1% protease
inhibitor mixture in PBS). Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at
15,000 × g for 10 min, and aliquots containing equivalent amounts of protein were incubated overnight with 5 µl of
NCD-2 (1 mg/ml) at 4 °C. 50 µl of goat anti-rat IgG magnetic beads
were added, and the mixture was incubated at 4 °C with mixing for
1 h. The magnetic beads were collected using a magnetic stand. For
the secondary immunoprecipitation, 5 µl of polyclonal
anti- Expression of N-cadherin at the Cell Surface--
Cell surface
proteins were labeled with the cell membrane-impermeable reagent,
NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce) at room temperature for 30 min. Cells were
washed three times with ice-cold PBS (pH 8.0) to remove any remaining
biotinylation reagent and lysed as described above. Cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated with NCD-2 as described above, fractionated by
SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with HRP-conjugated streptavidin.
Effect of Cell-permeable Peptides on N-cadherin
Function--
Cell adhesion assays were carried out as described
previously (14). To prepare the substrate for adhesion, purified
N-cadherin-Fc (23) was immobilized on 96-well plates precoated with
anti-mouse IgG (BD Biocoat; BD Biosciences, Bedford, MA) or
poly-L-lysine (Sigma). Plates were washed and blocked with
2% BSA for 1 h. Approximately 104 cells were added to
each well in 50 µl of HBSGKCa, in the presence of the indicated
peptide at 4 µg/ml. After 1 h at 37 °C, nonadherent cells
were removed, the wells were washed gently four times with HBSGKCa, and
adherent cells were quantified by staining with crystal violet.
Substrates for neurite growth were prepared by coating eight-well
slides with polylysine followed by N-cadherin-Fc or laminin, followed
by washing and blocking with 2% BSA. The presence of neurites was
quantitatively assessed in sparse single cell cultures of E8 chick
neural retina. Peptides were added at 8 µM, 2 h
after plating. After overnight culture in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 1% insulin/transferring/selenium (Invitrogen) cells
were fixed in 4% p-formaldehyde, and ~200 cells were
evaluated for the presence of neurites. Neurite growth was visualized
using phase optics.
Mapping the PTP1B Binding Domain on N-cadherin--
PTP1B is
ubiquitous in the cell and can interact with many different partners.
We have previously shown that PTP1B binds directly to the N-cadherin
cytoplasmic domain, controlling the association of N-cadherin with
The PTP1B and
These results suggest that, although the sequence corresponding to
amino acids 872-878 in the cytoplasmic tail of N-cadherin has the
potential to interact with both
There are 11 serine and threonine residues in the combined
Peptides Mimicking the PTP1B Binding Site on N-cadherin Inhibit
N-cadherin-mediated Adhesion and Neurite Outgrowth among Embryonic
Chick Neural Retina Cells--
To be able to perturb the interaction
between N-cadherin and PTP1B in cells that express endogenous
N-cadherin, we designed two cell membrane-permeable peptides containing
the sequences between amino acids 878-891 and 884-891 (AP2/3 and AP3,
respectively; see Figs. 2A and 9) of N-cadherin covalently
linked to the antennapedia "Trojan" peptide (28, 29). These
peptides mimic only the portion of the PTP1B binding domain that does
not overlap the
Loss of association between Deletion of the PTP1B Binding Domain Results in Reduced Expression
of N-cadherin at the Cell Surface and Loss of
To examine the expression of N-cadherin at the cell surface, the cells
were biotinylated with a cell-impermeable reagent and then lysed and
immunoprecipitated with NCD-2. Only cells transfected with the
full-length construct express N-cadherin at the cell surface, although
N-cadherin is present in approximately equal levels in all cell types
(Fig. 7C). Thus, in the absence of bound PTP1B, N-cadherin
does not associate with
In order to visualize the distribution of N-cadherin lacking the
PTP1B binding domain, we transfected L cells with GFP fusions of the
full-length N-cadherin and the N-cadherin deletion construct lacking
the 8 COOH-terminal amino acids of the PTP1B-binding domain ( In this paper, we characterize the binding site on the cytoplasmic
domain of N-cadherin for the nonreceptor tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B and
characterize the biochemical and biological ramifications of
interfering with this site through the use of cell-permeable competitor
peptides and deletion constructs. At the same time, these analyses
further define the COOH-terminal limits of the
-catenin. We have now
identified the domain on N-cadherin to which PTP1B binds and
characterized the effect of perturbing this domain on cadherin
function. Deletion constructs lacking amino acids 872-891 fail to bind
PTP1B. This domain partially overlaps with the
-catenin binding
domain. To further define the relationship of these two sites, we used
peptides to compete in vitro binding. A peptide
representing the most NH2-terminal 8 amino acids of the
PTP1B binding site, the region of overlap with the
-catenin target,
effectively competes for binding of
-catenin but is much less
effective in competing PTP1B, whereas two peptides representing the
remaining 12 amino acids have no effect on
-catenin binding but
effectively compete for PTP1B binding. Introduction into embryonic
chick retina cells of a cell-permeable peptide mimicking the 8 most
COOH-terminal amino acids in the PTP1B target domain, the region most
distant from the
-catenin target site, prevents binding of PTP1B,
increases the pool of free, tyrosine-phosphorylated
-catenin, and
results in loss of N-cadherin function. N-cadherin lacking this same
region of the PTP1B target site does not associate with PTP1B or
-catenin and is not efficiently expressed at the cell surface of
transfected L cells. Thus, interaction of PTP1B with N-cadherin is
essential for its association with
-catenin, stable expression at
the cell surface, and consequently, cadherin function.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Catenin occupies a central position in cell physiology and
development as both a transcriptional co-activator regulated by Wnt
signaling (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 2) and a bridge between the
cytoplasmic domain of cadherin cell-cell adhesion molecules and the
actin-containing cytoskeleton (reviewed in Ref. 3), a connection that
is crucial to function (reviewed in Refs. 4 and 5). It is noteworthy
that distinct gene products may carry out these two key roles in
Caenorhabditis elegans (6). However, in
Drosophila and vertebrates, the same gene products appear to
assume both roles (7). It is not surprising, then, that in the absence
of Wnt stimulus the pool of free
-catenin is subject to rapid
degradation (8, 9), possibly preventing spurious interference between
these two key functions. Whereas the details of how these two roles of
-catenin are regulated to integrate function and maintain the
integrity of the two pathways are not completely clear, tyrosine
phosphorylation of
-catenin may be one key regulatory determinant.
-catenin has repeatedly been
correlated with loss of cadherin adhesive function (reviewed in Refs.
10 and 11). This, in turn, is correlated with instability of the
-catenin-cadherin bond (12), uncoupling of cadherin from the
actin-containing cytoskeleton (13, 14), and an increase in the free
cytosolic pool of tyrosine-phosphorylated
-catenin (15, 16).
Tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin also increases the interaction
of
-catenin with basal transcription factor and increases
transcriptional activity of the
-catenin-Tcf complex (12,
17). The same tyrosine residue, 654, is critical for both instability
of the
-catenin-cadherin bond and for enhanced binding to basal
transcription factor (12, 17), suggesting that the two functions of
-catenin may be coordinated through the creation of a pool of free
-catenin following tyrosine phosphorylation and dissociation of the
-catenin-cadherin link and a concomitant increase in the potential
of this pool to participate in transcription.
-catenin in N-cadherin-expressing cells. Introduction
into L-cells constitutively expressing N-cadherin of a catalytically
inactive, dominant-negative construct of PTP1B results in
hyperphosphorylation of tyrosine residues on
-catenin, an increase
in the free cytosolic pool of tyrosine-phosphorylated
-catenin, and
dissociation of the cadherin-actin connection concomitant with loss of
cadherin function (13, 14). This dominant negative PTP1B construct also
inhibits neurite extension on N-cadherin substrates (18). Consistent
with these observations, PTP1B is present at adherens junctions and
localizes to growth cones (14, 18). Furthermore, PTP1B binds directly
to the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin (13, 14). Because of the key
position PTP1B occupies, it is not surprising that its binding to
N-cadherin is also regulated. Indeed, we have previously shown that
PTP1B must be tyrosine-phosphorylated on tyrosine 152 in order to bind to N-cadherin (13, 14, 19).
-catenin. Introduction into primary embryonic chick neural
retina cells of a cell-permeable, "Trojan" peptide that mimics the
most distant, nonoverlapping portion of the PTP1B binding site in
N-cadherin results in loss of cadherin function and an increase in the
free pool of tyrosine-phosphorylated
-catenin. Furthermore, L-cells
transfected with N-cadherin lacking the entire site or the portion that
does not overlap with the
-catenin binding site show loss of
N-cadherin expression at the cell surface. We suggest that the
proximity of
-catenin and PTP1B binding sites allows for continuous
and rapid removal of phosphate from tyrosine residues, stabilizing and
maintaining the integrity of the cadherin-actin cytoskeletal linkage
and cadherin function.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-catenin antibodies were a mouse monoclonal IgG from
Transduction Laboratories and a rabbit polyclonal antibody directed
against a synthetic 15-amino acid sequence (22).
HRP1-conjugated secondary
antibodies were purchased from Organon Teknika Co. (Durham, NC), and
antibodies conjugated to magnetic beads, used in immunoprecipitations,
were from Polysciences Inc. (Warrington, PA).
872-891 pCMV-
878-891
and pCMV
884-891. All cDNA clones were confirmed by sequencing.
884-891-GFP, the KpnI/ApaI fragment in N-cadherin was replaced
with the equivalent fragment that encompasses the deletion.
-catenin was produced
in H5
cells. Cultures were induced with 0.4 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside and allowed to
express GST fusions for 3 h. The cultures were harvested by
centrifugation at 3000 × g for 10 min, and the pellets were stored at
80 °C until use. Protein was extracted using B-PER (Pierce) containing 1% protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma) and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate (Sigma), according to the
manufacturer's instructions. GST fusion proteins were purified on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Biosciences) and confirmed by
biotinylation and blotting with HRP-avidin (Fig. 1A,
top). Phosphorylation of GST-PTP1B on tyrosine residues was
confirmed by immunoblot using the PY20 antibody (Fig.
1B).
-catenin-binding region and was also synthesized and used as a control.
80 °C for future use.
-catenin (in 50 µl of 0.5% BSA/PBS) was
added to the wells and incubated at room temperature for another 1 h. The wells were then washed with PBS and incubated with anti-PTP1B or
anti-
-catenin (0.1 µg/well) for 1 h at room temperature. The
wells were washed three times with TBST (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20) over a period of 30 min and
incubated with anti-mouse HRP antibody (0.2 µg/ml in 0.5% bovine
serum albumin in TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing
the wells five times with TBST, bound PT1PB was determined using
3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma) as a substrate for HRP, and
absorbance was measured at 492 nm.
-catenin were added to the wells simultaneously with PTP1B, and
the amount of PTP1B or
-catenin bound was determined as above, using
the appropriate antibodies.
kinase buffer (20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, and 0.2 mM ATP). The proteins were
phosphorylated in a total volume of 500 µl for 30-60 min at 30 °C
with 10 units of casein kinase II (Promega, Madison, WI) or 1 unit of
glycogen synthase kinase-3
(Calbiochem). The beads were then washed
with PBS, and bound protein was eluted with 10 mM reduced
glutathione in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 1%
protease inhibitor mixture and 1 mM NaF. Eluted protein was
biotinylated with Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin for immobilization, and the
presence of phosphorylated serine residues was determined by
immunoblots using anti-phosphoserine antibody.
872-891, pCMV-
878-891, or pCMV-
884-891. Stable clones
were selected with 500 µg/ml G418. L cells transfected with empty
pCMV-FLAG-4a were used as control. Expression of N-cadherin was
analyzed by immunoblots using NCD-2 or anti-FLAG antibody.
-catenin was added to the supernatant from the previous step
and incubated at 4 °C for 4 h with rotation. Magnetic beads
conjugated to goat anti-rabbit IgG were added, incubated at 4 °C
with mixing for 1 h, and collected as above. The beads were washed
four times with lysis buffer and one time with TBS, resuspended in SDS
sample buffer, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF
membranes. The membranes were immunoblotted with the antibody indicated
in the figure.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-catenin and therefore its function (13, 14). Furthermore, binding
is dependent on phosphorylation of tyrosine 152 of PTP1B (19). To be
able to specifically perturb the cadherin-PTP1B association, we sought
to identify the sequence in the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin that
is necessary for binding of PTP1B. The full-length cytoplasmic domain
of N-cadherin and several deletion mutants were expressed as GST fusion
proteins (Fig. 1A), and the
purified fusion proteins were biotinylated and immobilized on
streptavidin-coated wells. Catalytically inactive GST-PTP1B,
phosphorylated on tyrosine residues (Fig. 1B), was then
added, and binding was measured using anti-PTP1B antibody in an
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We began with two constructs, C2
(amino acids 752-878) and C3 (amino acids 872-912), which overlap by
7 amino acids. Binding of PTP1B to either construct shows approximately the same dose dependence as binding to the full-length cytoplasmic domain (C1; Fig. 1C), suggesting that the binding site for
PTP1B encompasses the COOH terminus of C2 and the NH2
terminus of C3. A deletion of 8 amino acids from the COOH terminus of
C2 (C4; amino acids 752-870) eliminates binding to PTP1B (Fig.
1C), mapping the NH2 terminus of the binding
domain between amino acid residues 871 and 878. Sequential deletions
from the NH2 terminus of C3 set the COOH terminus of the
binding region at amino acid residues 887-891; construct C5 (amino
acids 887-912) is positive for binding, whereas C6 (amino acids
891-912) is not (Fig. 1C). These results establish the
boundaries of the PTP1B binding region at amino acids 872 and 891 on
the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin. Construct C7 containing just this
sequence (amino acids 872-891) binds PTP1B as well as the full-length
cytoplasmic domain C1 (Fig. 1C), whereas C8, consisting of
the cytoplasmic domain of cadherin lacking this core sequence (C8;
872-891) does not bind (Fig. 1C).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, schematic diagram of GST-N-cadherin
constructs used in this study. The complete cytoplasmic domain of
N-cadherin (C1, corresponding to amino acids 752-912) and the
indicated deletion constructs were expressed as GST fusion proteins,
purified on glutathione-agarose, and covalently labeled with
biotin. Labeled peptides were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
to PVDF membranes, and the membranes were probed with HRP-avidin
(top). A diagram of all of the constructs used in in
vitro binding assays, the corresponding amino acids in N-cadherin,
and their binding to PTP1B is shown (bottom). B,
immunoblots of PTP1B and
-catenin fusion proteins used in in
vitro binding assays. The GST-PTP1B fusion protein used in all
assays is phosphorylated on tyrosine residues as demonstrated by its
reactivity with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (PY20). C,
identification of the PTP1B target site on N-cadherin. The biotinylated
N-cadherin constructs shown in A were immobilized on
Nutravidin-coated wells at a saturating concentration (3 µg/well).
The wells were blocked and reacted with differing concentrations of
GST-PTP1B phosphorylated on tyrosine residues. Bound PTP1B was
determined using anti-PTP1B antibody in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay. Results are shown as a percentage of control (binding of PTP1B
to C1); each value represents the mean ± S.E. of triplicate
wells.
-Catenin Binding Sites in the Cytoplasmic Domain
of N-cadherin Are Adjacent and Overlapping--
The same cadherin
constructs used above to evaluate PTP1B binding were also evaluated for
-catenin binding (not shown). The results are consistent with prior
studies by Simcha et al. (24) (see also Refs. 25-27)
placing the PTP1B binding region NH2-terminal to the
-catenin binding region, with an overlap of about 7 amino acids. To
better understand the relationship between these two binding domains,
we used synthetic peptides as competitors for the in vitro
binding between PTP1B and N-cadherin and between
-catenin and
N-cadherin. Each peptide mimics an 8-amino acid stretch of the PTP1B
binding sequence, from the NH2 to the COOH terminus,
overlapping with the next sequence by 2 amino acids (see diagram in
Figs. 2A and 9). Binding of
PTP1B to the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin is reduced to background
levels at a concentration of 0.8-1.0 µg/well of peptides 2 or 3, corresponding to the COOH-terminal two-thirds of the PTP1B binding
sequence (Fig. 2B). The reverse sequence of peptide 3, P3R,
has no effect on binding. At similar concentrations, peptide 1, corresponding to the NH2 terminus of the PTP1B binding
sequence and the portion overlapping the
-catenin-binding domain,
inhibits only about 20-30% of PTP1B binding to cadherin (Fig.
2B). In contrast, peptide 1 is an effective competitor of the binding of
-catenin to N-cadherin at a concentration of 0.8 µg/well (Fig. 2C), whereas peptides 2 and 3 and the
control peptide 3R, at this same concentration, have no effect on the
-catenin-N-cadherin interaction (Fig. 2C). Peptide P4,
corresponding to the sequence NH2-terminal to the putative
PTP1B-binding domain and well within the reported
-catenin binding
region, does not compete for PTP1B binding to N-cadherin but completely
abolishes
-catenin binding to N-cadherin (Fig. 2, B and
C).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Peptides mimicking portions of the PTP1B
binding site on N-cadherin differentially compete for binding of PTP1B
and
-catenin. A, the sequence
of each peptide competitor is shown. B, effect of increasing
concentrations of each peptide on the binding of PTP1B to C1.
Biotinylated C1 was immobilized on Nutravidin-coated wells and
incubated with 1 µg/well GST-PTP1B for 1 h in the presence of
the indicated peptide. Bound protein was determined using anti-PTP1B
antibody. C, effect of increasing concentrations of each
peptide on the binding of
-catenin to C1. C1 was immobilized as
described above and incubated with 1 µg/well GST-
-catenin in the
presence of increasing concentrations of the indicated peptide. Bound
protein was determined using anti-
-catenin antibody. Results in
B and C are shown as percentage of control
(binding in the absence of peptide), and each value is the mean ± S.E. determined from triplicate wells. D, binding of PTP1B
to N-cadherin as a function of incubation time. GST-PTP1B (1 µg/well)
was incubated with immobilized cadherin fragment (3 µg/well) for the
indicated time. Binding is shown as percentage of control binding to C1
at 1 h, and each value represents the means of triplicate
wells ± S.E.
-catenin and PTP1B, the interaction
with PTP1B is of lower affinity. This is confirmed by comparing the
time course of binding of PTP1B to deletion construct C2, containing
the region of overlap between the PTP1B and
-catenin binding sites,
with the full-length cytoplasmic domain of cadherin (C1), the full
putative PTP1B-binding domain (C7), or the deletion constructs C3 and
C5. PTP1B binds to C2 at a slower rate than to C1 or C7 or to the
COOH-terminal region of the PTP1B binding domain (C3 and C5): 25% of
control values after 30 min for C2, as compared with about 60% for C1,
C3, C5, and C7 (Fig. 2D). In addition,
-catenin and PTP1B
do not compete for binding to C1 (Fig.
3A). However,
-catenin does
compete for binding of PTP1B to the NH2-terminal or
overlapping portion of PTP1B binding region (C2) (Fig.
3B).

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
PTP1B and
-catenin do not compete for
binding to the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin. A,
increasing concentrations of GST-PTP1B have no effect on binding of
-catenin to C1 (left). Likewise, increasing
concentrations of GST-
-catenin have no effect on binding of PTP1B to
C1 (right). Results are represented as percentage of binding
in the absence of competitor and are the mean ± S.E. of
triplicate wells. B, binding of PTP1B and
-catenin to
N-cadherin lacking the COOH-terminal two-thirds of the PTP1B binding
sequence (N-cadherin
878-891). Binding of
-catenin to N-cadherin
878-891 is not affected by the presence of PTP1B (left).
However, increasing concentrations of
-catenin efficiently compete
for binding of PTP1B to the
878-891 construct (right).
Results are represented as percentage of binding in the absence of
competitor and are the mean ± S.E. of triplicate wells.
-catenin/PTP1B binding site in N-cadherin and 7 in the PTP1B site alone. This suggests the possibility that serine/threonine
phosphorylation could modulate the binding of either effector. We do
see an increase in binding of
-catenin to the full-length
cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin after in vitro
phosphorylation of serine residues as reported (24, 27) but no effect
in the binding of PTP1B (Fig. 4,
A and B).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Phosphorylation of N-cadherin on serine
residues does not affect binding of PTP1B to the complete cytoplasmic
domain of N-cadherin but does enhance binding of
-catenin. A, the complete
cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin (C1) was phosphorylated in
vitro on serine residues using a mixture of CKII and GSK.
B, binding of
-catenin and PTP1B to C1 before
(
pS) or after (+pS) phosphorylation of serine
residues. The presence of phosphoserines enhances binding of
-catenin to C1 but has no effect on the binding of PTP1B. Results
are represented as percentage of binding in the absence of competitor
and are the mean ± S.E. of triplicate wells.
-catenin binding domain. To confirm that peptides
AP2/3 and AP3 can indeed prevent the stable association of PTP1B with
N-cadherin, E8 chick neural retina cells were incubated with AP2/3,
AP3, or a control peptide consisting of the antennapedia permeation
sequence fused to the reverse of P3 (AP3R) for 4 h; cell lysates
were immunoprecipitated with NCD-2 and analyzed by Western blot with
anti-PTP1B antibody (Fig. 5A).
Immunoprecipitates from the cells incubated with AP3, but not AP3R,
have greatly reduced N-cadherin-associated PTP1B (Fig. 5A).
Among cells treated with AP3, the amount of
-catenin associated with
N-cadherin is also reduced (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, the pool
of
-catenin phosphorylated on tyrosine residues is enriched in cells
treated with AP3 but not AP3R (Fig. 5B). The amount of cell
surface N-cadherin is not affected during the time course of the
experiment (Fig. 5C); thus, the cell-permeable peptide AP3,
by competing for binding of PTP1B to N-cadherin, effectively uncouples
or destabilizes the association between N-cadherin and
-catenin.
Furthermore, this occurs without compromising the actual
-catenin
target site on N-cadherin. Similar results were obtained when cells
were treated with peptide AP2/3 (not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Introduction into embryonic chick neural
retina cells of peptides that mimic the PTP1B binding site on
N-cadherin results in loss of bound PTP1B and
-catenin. A, E8 neural retina cells
were incubated for 4h in the presence of the indicated peptide, lysed
in nonionic detergent, and immunoprecipitated with NCD-2. The
immunoprecipitates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF
membranes, and immunoblotted with the indicated antibody. B,
E8 neural retina cells were incubated for 4 h in the presence of
the indicated peptide, lysed in nonionic detergent, and
immunoprecipitated with anti-
-catenin antibody. The
immunoprecipitates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody or anti-
-catenin antibody, as
indicated in the figure. C, E8 neural retina
cells were incubated in the presence of the indicated peptide,
biotinylated, lysed in nonionic detergent, and incubated with
streptavidin-conjugated agarose. Bound material was fractionated by
SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and immunoblotted with
anti-N-cadherin antibody NCD-2. COP, control peptide
consisting of the antennapedia cell permeation sequence only.
AP3, antennapedia sequence fused to amino acids 884-891.
Numbers to the left represent the migration of
molecular markers (× 10
6).
-catenin and N-cadherin is correlated
with loss of N-cadherin-mediated adhesion and neurite outgrowth among
embryonic neural retina cells (10). E8 chick neural retinas were
assayed for their ability to adhere to immobilized N-cadherin (Fc-N-cadherin chimera) in the presence of AP2/3 or AP3. Both peptides
result in loss of N-cadherin-mediated adhesion (Fig. 6A). To assay for
N-cadherin-mediated neurite outgrowth, E8 chick neural retina cells
were plated on Fc-N-cadherin-coated slides, and cell-permeable peptides
were added at 2 h when all or a great majority of the cells were
adherent, and the cells were incubated for another 10-12 h (25, 30).
Both AP2/3 and AP3 significantly reduce N-cadherin-mediated neurite
growth, whereas control peptides consisting of the Antennapedia
permeation sequence alone, the reverse of P3 (COP and AP3R,
respectively; Fig. 6, B and C), or the
Antennapedia sequence fused to an unrelated sequence in the cytoplasmic
domain of N-cadherin (SBP (see Ref. 25); not shown). The loss of
N-cadherin-mediated adhesion and neurite outgrowth is not due to a
significant reduction in the amount of cell surface N-cadherin during
the assay period (not shown) and therefore is most likely due to loss
of N-cadherin function. In addition, AP2/3 (not shown) and AP3 have no
effect on neurite outgrowth on a laminin-coated substrate (Fig.
6C).

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Introduction into embryonic chick neural
retina cells of peptides that mimic the PTP1B binding site on
N-cadherin results in loss of cadherin-mediated adhesion and neurite
outgrowth. Peptides that mimic the carboxyl-terminal regions of
the PTP1B binding motif on N-cadherin, AP2/3 and AP3, fused to the
antennapedia cell permeation sequence, were introduced into retina
cells, and cadherin-mediated adhesion and neurite outgrowth were
assayed. A, adhesion to Fc-N-cadherin. E8 embryonic chick
neural retina cells were plated on 96-well plates coated with
Fc-N-cadherin extracellular domain chimera in the presence of the
indicated peptide. After 1 h, adherent cells were quantified using
crystal violet. Results are shown as percentage of control (adhesion to
Fc-N-cadherin in the presence of control peptide (COP));
each value represents the mean ± S.E. of triplicate wells.
COP, control peptide consisting of the antennapedia
cell-permeable sequence only; Ap2/3, the antennapedia cell
permeation sequence fused to the sequence from amino acid 878 to 891 on
the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin; AP3, the antennapedia
cell permeation sequence fused to the sequence from amino acid 884 to
891; AP3R, the antennapedia sequence fused to the reverse of peptide 3 (amino acids 891-884). B, quantitation of neurite
outgrowth. E8 retina cells were plated on six-well slides coated with
Fc-N-cadherin. After 2h, the indicated peptide was added, and the cells
were cultured for an additional 12 h. Cells bearing neurites
longer than two cell diameters were counted as positive. A minimum of
200 cells were analyzed for each treatment, and results are expressed
as the mean ± S.E. C, images of E8 retina cells
cultured on Fc-N-cadherin- or laminin-coated slides in the presence of
the indicated peptides.
-Catenin from the
N-cadherin Complex--
We next looked at the effect of eliminating
the PTP1B binding domain in live cells by transfecting L cells with the
cDNAs for full-length N-cadherin (FL cells) and N-cadherin lacking
the complete PTP1B binding sequence (
872-891) or the 8 carboxyl-terminal amino acids (
884-891), the residue most distant
from the
-catenin binding domain. N-cadherin expression at the cell
surface and association with PTP1B and
-catenin were analyzed in
both stable lines and cells transiently expressing these constructs,
with similar results (Fig. 7 shows
results for transient cultures). To determine whether PTP1B is present
in N-cadherin complexes, the cells were lysed in nonionic detergent and
immunoprecipitated with NCD-2, and the immunoprecipitates were assayed
for the presence of PTP1B by immunoblot (Fig. 7A). PTP1B is
not detected in N-cadherin precipitates lacking the complete PTP1B
binding region (
872-891) or the carboxyl-terminal portion of the
PTP1B binding region (
884-891; Fig. 7B; total amounts of
PTP1B are shown as a loading control). The absence of the entire PTP1B
binding domain or the carboxyl-terminal portion of the domain also
correlates with loss of
-catenin from the N-cadherin complex (Fig.
7B). Furthermore, there is a notable increase in the
reactivity of the pool of free or unbound
-catenin with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies when PTP1B is absent from the
N-cadherin complex (Fig. 7B). Thus, in the absence of even the most carboxyl-terminal 8 amino acids of the PTP1B binding domain,
the region most distant from the
-catenin binding site, N-cadherin
does not efficiently associate with
-catenin.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Expression of N-cadherin lacking the PTP1B
binding domain in L-cells. L cells were transiently transfected
with pCMV-FLAG containing full-length N-cadherin cDNA
(FL) or N-cadherin lacking the complete PT1B binding domain
(
872-891), or the COOH-terminal 8 amino acids (
884-891) of the
PTP1B binding sequence. A, N-cadherin lacking the PTP1B
target sequence fails to associate with PTP1B. L cells expressing each
N-cadherin construct were lysed in nonionic detergent and
immunoprecipitated with anti-cadherin antibody. The imunoprecipitates
were fractionated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and
blotted with anti-PTP1B. Aliquots of total lysate were also
immunoblotted with anti-PTP1B as a loading control. B, lack
of PTP1B binding results in loss of
-catenin from the N-cadherin
complex. The NCD-2 immunoprecipitates above were also immunoblotted
with anti-
-catenin antibody (top). Supernatants from the
above NCD-2 precipitations were further immunoprecipitated with
anti-
-catenin, and the precipitates treated as above and blotted
with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody PY20 (bottom).
C, expression of cell surface N-cadherin. Intact cells were
labeled with biotin, and cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with
NCD-2, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, and
reacted with HRP-avidin. L cells transfected with
872-891 or with
the partial PTP1B binding region deletion (
884-891) do not express
N-cadherin at the cell surface. The same precipitates were
immunoblotted with NCD-2 to determine total expression of N-cadherin in
transfected cells.
-catenin and does not reach the cell surface
and/or is rapidly degraded.
884-891). After 24 h, cells were fixed and reacted with
anti-
-catenin followed by fluorescent second antibody. Cells
expressing full-length N-cadherin show co-localization of
-catenin
and N-cadherin at the cell periphery and areas of cell-cell contact. In
the absence of the 8 COOH-terminal amino acids of the PTP1B binding
domain, N-cadherin is largely localized intracellularly, as is
-catenin, showing only minimal overlap (Fig.
8; compare A, C,
and E with B, D, and
F).

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
The cellular distribution of GFP-full-length
N-cadherin, GFP-Ncadherin
884-891, and
-catenin by confocal microscopy. L cells were
transfected with GFP-full-length N-cadherin (A,
C, and E) or GFP-Ncadherin
884-891
(B, D, and F) and visualized after
24 h. A and B, distribution of
-catenin.
Cells were fixed and incubated with anti-
-catenin monoclonal
antibody followed by Alexa Fluor 568-conjugated secondary antibody.
C and D, distribution of wild type or mutant
GFP-N-cadherin. E and F, merged images. Each
image represents the projection of four confocal sections (0.4 µm each) near the equator of the cells. Note that GFP-full-length
N-cadherin colocalizes with
-catenin at the cell surface, whereas
GFP-N-cadherin
884-891 does not colocalize with
-catenin.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-catenin target site.
Fig. 9 is a diagram of the entire region and the peptides and constructs important in defining this region. The
binding site for PTP1B, determined by in vitro binding to deletion constructs (Fig. 1), encompasses amino acids 872-891, a
region that is adjacent to and overlaps with a portion of the
-catenin binding site (24-27). Analysis of the PTP1B target site also leads us to conclude that the
-catenin binding site includes residues 872-878, since a peptide mimicking these amino acids (P1,
Fig. 9) is an effective competitor for binding of
-catenin to
N-cadherin in vitro. And deletion of the nonoverlapping
portion of the PTP1B target site (
878-891, Fig. 9) results in
competition between
-catenin and PTP1B for binding to N-cadherin.
Thus, the target sites for
-catenin and PTP1B overlap by ~6 amino
acids.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Diagramatic representation of the
-catenin and PTP1B target region of the cytoplasmic
domain of N-cadherin, the peptides used to analyze in vitro
binding (P1, P2, P3, and P4), and those used as antennapedia
fusions for introduction into embryonic chick neural retina cells
(AP2/3 and AP3). Shown is a diagram of the deletion constructs
used for analysis of cell surface expression of N-cadherin following
transfection into L cells.
We show that introduction into primary embryonic chick neural retina
cells of a cell-permeable peptide carrying an 8-amino acid sequence
mimicking the region of the PTP1B binding domain in N-cadherin that is
most distant from the
-catenin target site (AP3, Fig. 9) results in
loss of N-cadherin-mediated adhesion and neurite outgrowth. Concomitant
with inhibition of adhesion,
-catenin is no longer associated with
N-cadherin, and the pool of free, tyrosine-phosphorylated
-catenin
is increased. Among these primary embryonic neural retina cells, with a
full complement of cell surface N-cadherin, we do not find that the
amount of N-cadherin at the cell surface is significantly reduced
during 4 h of exposure to the peptide, a time period exceeding
that required to complete the adhesion assay. Thus, in retina cells we
can conclude that compromising the binding of PTP1B to N-cadherin
affects its function through retention of phosphate on tyrosine
residues of
-catenin, reduced binding of
-catenin to N-cadherin,
and thus loss of the crucial link to the cytoskeleton. Furthermore,
either deletion of the entire PTP1B target domain (
872-891,
Fig. 9) or of the most distant nonoverlapping portion (
884-891,
Fig. 9) results in a reduction in bound
-catenin and reduced
expression at the cell surface. It is interesting to note that
introduction of the cell-permeable PTP1B competitor peptide into a
population of cells already expressing N-cadherin at the cell surface
results in loss of PTP1B,
-catenin, and thus cadherin function
without immediately affecting cell surface expression; however,
de novo synthesized N-cadherin lacking even a portion of the
PTP1B target site compromises expression at the cell surface. This
suggests that PTP1B, through its role in maintaining
-catenin in a
dephosphorylated state, and thus bound to N-cadherin, plays two
distinct roles, one involving the functional connection of cell surface
N-cadherin to the cytoskeleton (10) and a second involving transport to the cell surface (31). This reduction in cell surface expression may be
due to reduced transport in the absence of
-catenin (31) and/or
enhanced degradation due to the absence of bound
-catenin (32).
Alignment of several type I and type II cadherin cytoplasmic domains shows a high degree of conservation of the PTP1B binding domain (10). This suggests that PTP1B interacts with many different cadherins and may regulate function in a manner analogous to that shown for N-cadherin (13, 14). We are at present testing this supposition. It is interesting to note that PTPµ, the sole transmembrane tyrosine phosphatase thus far shown to interact directly with cadherins, binds to the carboxyl-terminal 38 amino acids of E-cadherin (33), a region that includes most of the PTP1B binding domain.
Our working hypothesis is that PTP1B is constitutively associated with
N-cadherin and possibly other cadherins and ensures the integrity of
the cadherin-mediated adhesions through continuous dephosphorylation of
-catenin. However, the rapid uncoupling of cadherins from the
cytoskeleton and the concomitant loss of function may be essential
aspects of development. For example, during the conversion of
epithelial cells to a motile mesenchymal phenotype, cadherin-mediated
adhesions are lost, and transcriptional regulation may be too slow to
effect such a change in a timely fashion (10). Similarly,
N-cadherin-mediated neurite outgrowth guidance may depend on rapid
inactivation of N-cadherin-mediated adhesions at pathway boundaries
(34). Regulation of phosphotyrosine content of
-catenin is one means
of affecting such changes. Several kinases and phosphatases have the
potential to alter the phosphotyrosine content of
-catenin,
suggesting that multiple kinases and phosphatases are involved,
possibly depending on the tissue and time of development. Overexpression of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinases Src (35-37) and Fer
(38) has been demonstrated to target
-catenin and increase its
tyrosine phosphorylation. Furthermore, a dominant negative Src that
interferes with Src function or an Src-specific tyrosine kinase
inhibitor induces cell-cell adhesion (39). Two transmembrane tyrosine
kinases, the epidermal growth factor receptor (40-42) and hepatocyte
growth factor/scatter factor receptor (43), have also been shown to
target
-catenin. Additionally, treatment of a squamous carcinoma
cell line (44) or a mammary carcinoma cell line (45) with epidermal
growth factor results in reduced cadherin-mediated adhesion and
increased phosphorylation of
-catenin. Furthermore, suppression of
the association of the epidermal growth factor receptor with
-catenin increases the association of
-catenin with cadherin (46)
and suppresses in vitro and in vivo invasion of a
gastric cancer cell line, presumably by increasing cadherin-mediated adhesions (47). Finally, activated Ras, often coupled to transmembrane tyrosine kinases, also results in an increase in the phosphorylation of
-catenin and reduces the stability of the cadherin-
-catenin bond
(15, 48).
There are also a number of phosphatases that have the potential to
alter the state of phosphorylation of
-catenin. Members of three
distinct families of receptor PTPs (RPTP) have been reported to
interact with
-catenin and/or be correlated with the state of
phosphorylation of cadherin itself: LAR-PTP, the chondroitin sulfate
proteoglycan PTP
/
, and the MAM (Meprin/A5/Mu) domain-containing family members:
,
, and µ. LAR-PTP (16, 49) has been shown to
interact with and dephosphorylate
-catenin. Additionally, overexpression of LAR-PTP correlates with prevention of
-catenin phosphorylation and inhibition of epithelial cell migration (16). Similarly, PTP
/
interacts with and dephosphorylates
-catenin (50), and interaction with its ligand, pleiotrophin, results in
inactivation of intrinsic catalytic activity and enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of
-catenin (50). The RPTPs
,
, and µ are very closely related (51), and thus it is interesting that they appear to play two different roles with respect to cadherin function. PTP
(52) and PTP
(53) interact directly with
-catenin, and
PTP
has been shown to dephosphorylate
-catenin (52). PTPµ does
not interact directly with
-catenin but does coimmunoprecipitate with the N-, E-, and R-cadherin complexes (33, 54). Furthermore, it
interacts directly with E-cadherin through a 38-amino acid carboxyl-terminal region. PTPµ does not alter the phosphorylation of
-catenin, but, under conditions where E-cadherin is
tyrosine-phosphorylated, PTPµ is no longer associated with the
cadherin complex of proteins (33).
Placing the many tyrosine kinases and phosphatases shown to have the
potential to alter the phosphotyrosine content of
-catenin in
developmental context will present some significant challenges, since
most of the signaling intermediates involved in regulating phosphotyrosine content are used in multiple pathways at many times
during development. We believe that perturbing specific protein-protein
interactions through the use of peptide competitors provides one means
of disrupting specific interactions without affecting others.
Consistent with this, our goal has been to develop such competitors
that can be added to specific tissues at specific developmental times
for each of the effectors regulating cadherin function.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant EY12132 (to J. L. and J. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 319-353-2969;
Fax: 319-335-0081; E-mail: jack-lilien@uiowa.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 10, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M206454200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HRP, horseradish peroxidase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide; GFP, green fluorescent protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Peifer, M.,
and Polakis, P.
(2000)
Science
287,
1606-1609 |
| 2. | Seidensticker, M. J., and Behrens, J. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1495, 168-182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Wheelock, M. J., Knudsen, K. A., and Johnson, K. R. (1996) Curr. Top. Membr. 43, 169-185 |
| 4. | Yap, A. S., Brieher, W. M., Pruschy, M., and Gumbiner, B. M. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 308-315[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Adams, C. L., and Nelson, W. J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 572-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Korswagen, H. C., Herman, M. A., and Clevers, H. C. (2000) Nature 406, 527-532[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Peifer, M. (1995) Trends Cell Biol. 5, 224-229[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Hart, M. J., de los Santos, R., Albert, I. N., Rubinfeld, B., and Polakis, P. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 573-581[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Henderson, B. R. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 653-660[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Lilien, J., Balsamo, J., Arregui, C., and Xu, G. (2002) Dev. Dyn. 224, 18-29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Daniel, J. M., and Reynolds, A. B. (1997) Bioessays 19, 883-891[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Roura, S.,
Miravet, S.,
Piedra, J.,
de Herreros, A. G.,
and Duñach, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36734-36740 |
| 13. |
Balsamo, J.,
Arregui, C.,
Leung, T-C.,
and Lilien, J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
523-532 |
| 14. |
Balsamo, J.,
Leung, T-C.,
Ernst, H.,
Zanin, M. K. B.,
Hoffman, S.,
and Lilien, J.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
801-813 |
| 15. |
Kinch, M. S.,
Clark, G. J.,
Der, C. J.,
and Burridge, K.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
130,
461-471 |
| 16. |
Müller, T.,
Choidas, A.,
Reichmann, E.,
and Ulrich, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10173-10183 |
| 17. |
Piedra, J.,
Martinez, D.,
Castaño, J.,
Miravet, S.,
Duñach, M.,
and de Herreros, A. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
20436-20443 |
| 18. | Pathre, P., Arregui, C., Wampler, T., Kue, I., Leung, T-C., Lilien, J., and Balsamo, J. (2001) J. Neurosci Res. 63, 143-150[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Rhee, J.,
Lilien, J.,
and Balsamo, J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
6640-6644 |
| 20. | Hatta, K., and Takeichi, M. (1986) Nature 320, 447-449[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Balsamo, J.,
Thiboldeaux, R.,
Swaminathan, N.,
and Lilien, J.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
113,
429-436 |
| 22. |
Balsamo, J.,
Ernst, H.,
Zanin, M. K.,
Hoffman, S.,
and Lilien, J.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1391-1401 |
| 23. | Lambert, M., Padilla, F., and Mege, R. M. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 2207-2219[Abstract] |
| 24. |
Simcha, I.,
Kirkpatrick, C.,
Sadot, E.,
Shtutman, M.,
Polevoy, G.,
Geiger, B.,
Peifer, M.,
and Ben-Ze'ev, A.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1177-1188 |
| 25. |
Arregui, C.,
Pathre, P.,
Lilien, J.,
and Balsamo, J.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1263-1273 |
| 26. |
Jou, T-S.,
Stewart, D. B.,
Stappert, J.,
Nelson, W. J.,
and Marrs, J. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5067-5071 |
| 27. | Stappert, J., and Kemler, R. (1994) Cell Adhes. Commun. 2, 319-327[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Derossi, D, Chassaing, G., and Prochiantz, A. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 84-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Prochiantz, A. (1996) Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 629-634[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Li, H.,
Leung, T-C.,
Balsamo, J.,
and Lilien, J.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1275-1288 |
| 31. |
Chen, Y. T.,
Stewart, D. B.,
and Nelson, W. J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
687-699 |
| 32. |
Huber, A. H.,
Stewart, D. B.,
Laurents, D. V.,
Nelson, W. J.,
and Weis, W. I.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
12301-12309 |
| 33. |
Brady-Kalnay, S. M.,
Mourton, T.,
Nixon, J. P.,
Pietz, G. E.,
Kinch, M.,
Chen, H.,
Brackenbury, R.,
Rimm, D. L.,
Del Vecchio, R. L.,
and Tonks, N. K.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
287-296 |
| 34. | Lilien, J., Arregui, C., Li, H., and Balsamo, J. (1999) J. Neurosci. Res. 58, 727-734[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Matsuyoshi, N.,
Hamaguchi, M.,
Taniguchi, S.,
Nagafuchi, A.,
Tsukita, S.,
and Takeichi, M.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
118,
703-714 |
| 36. | Hamaguchi, M., Matsuyoshi, N., Ohnishi, Y., Gotoh, B., Takeichi, M., and Nagai, Y. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 307-314[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Behrens, J.,
Vakaet, L.,
Friis, R.,
Winterhager, E.,
Van Roy, F.,
Mareel, M. M.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
757-766 |
| 38. | Rosato, R., Veltmaat, |