|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M205781200 on October 21, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 52, 50396-50402, December 27, 2002
Processing of Escherichia coli Alkaline
Phosphatase
SEQUENCE REQUIREMENTS AND POSSIBLE CONFORMATIONS OF THE 6 TO
4 REGION OF THE SIGNAL PEPTIDE*
Andrey V.
Kajava §,
Sergey N.
Zolov¶,
Konstantin I.
Pyatkov ,
Andrey E.
Kalinin¶**, and
Marina A.
Nesmeyanova§¶
From the Center for Molecular Modeling, CIT, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, the
¶ Laboratory of Protein Secretion in Bacteria, Skryabin Institute
of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Russian Academy
of Sciences, 142290 Pushchino, Moscow Region, Russia, and the
Institute of Cellular Biophysics, 142290 Pushchino,
Russia
Received for publication, June 11, 2002, and in revised form, September 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Analysis of the precursors of bacterial exported
proteins revealed that those having bulky hydrophobic residues at
position 5 have a high incidence of Pro residues at positions 6 and
4, Val at position 3, and Ser at positions 4 and 2. This led to a hypothesis that the previously observed inhibition of processing by
bulky residues at position 5 can be suppressed by introduction of
Pro, Ser, or Val in the corresponding nearby positions. Subsequent mutational analysis of Escherichia coli alkaline
phosphatase showed that, as it was predicted, Pro on either side of
bulky hydrophobic 5 Leu, Ile, or Tyr completely restores efficiency
of the maturation. Introduction of Val at position 3 also partially
suppresses the inhibition imposed by 5 Leu, while a Ser residue at
position 4 or 2 does not restore processing. In addition, effective
maturation of a mutant with Pro residues at positions from 6
throughout 4 proved that polyproline conformation of this region is
permissive for processing. To understand the effects of the mutations,
we modeled a peptide substrate into the active site of the signal peptidase using the known position of the -lactam inhibitor. The
inhibitory effect of the 5 residue and its suppression by either Pro
6 or Pro 4 can be explained if we assume that Pro-containing 6 to
4 regions adopt a polyproline conformation whereas the region without
Pro residues has a -conformation. These results permit us to
specify sequence requirements at 6, 5, and 4 positions for
efficient processing and to improve the prediction of yet unknown
cleavage sites.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In prokaryotes and eukaryotes, most exported proteins are
synthesized as precursors with an amino-terminal extension called the
leader or signal peptide. The signal peptide directs protein translocation across membranes and is removed by a membrane-bound peptidase after transition through the membrane (1). Despite their
common purpose, signal peptides have very little amino acid sequence
similarity, although they do share general features. Typically 15-30
amino acids long, signal peptides of prokaryotic proteins consist of
three distinct regions: a 1-5-residue amino-terminal positively
charged segment, a 10-15-residue central hydrophobic core, and a more
polar 5-7-residue carboxyl-terminal cleavage region
(c-region)1 (2, 3). In
addition, most bacterial proteins have a 14-18-residue region in the
mature part immediately downstream of the signal sequence, which has a
negative or neutral net charge (4-6). As a result of extensive
research over the last two decades, the role of each region of the
exported proteins has been mainly elucidated (for review see Ref. 7).
The export of proteins is initiated by interactions of the positively
charged amino terminus with negatively charged phospholipid headgroups
of the cytoplasmic membrane (8-12) and by insertion of the hydrophobic
core of the signal peptide into the apolar environment of the membrane
(3, 13). The insertion of the signal peptide into the lipid bilayer proceeds in association with proteins of the Sec translocation machinery (7, 14, 15). The positive charge of the amino terminus can
also govern the Nin-Cout orientation of the
signal peptide within the membrane (16). In this orientation, the
c-region of the signal peptide is exposed on the periplasmic side where it can be recognized and cleaved by the signal peptidase (SPase) between positions 1 and +1 (1, 17, 18). A sequence motif with small
residues at positions 3 and 1 defines the cleavage site (2, 3, 19).
The conformational characteristics of the signal peptide are also
mainly established. There is a consensus view based on several in
vitro experimental studies (20, 21) that the region of the signal
peptide inserted into the membrane adopts a -helical conformation.
It is now known that the 3 to 1 region has an extended
-structural conformation, which is recognized by SPase (19, 22).
Despite this progress, the critical physical and structural
characteristics of residues 6, 5, and 4 that delineate the
hydrophobic core and peptidase recognition site of the signal peptide
are still poorly understood. Bacterial signal peptides frequently have
-helix-breaking residues such as proline and glycine at 6 to 4
positions (16), and this suggested that the disruption of the helical
conformation in this region is an important requirement for efficient
processing. A number of experimental data supported this conclusion
(23, 24). Based on the analysis of natural sequences (16) and
experimental evidence, it was also proposed that the hydrophilicity of
this region rather than its conformation may be important for the
maturation (25). However, none of these rules has absolute
support from the recent collection of natural sequences: there
are exported proteins with c-regions consisting of only apolar or
helix-fostering residues. The conformation of the 4 to 6 region is
also unknown. The Pro, Gly, and Ser residues that frequently occupy
4, 5, and 6 positions (2, 16) are typical for -turns of
globular proteins (26). This observation resulted in a widely accepted opinion that this region has a -turn conformation (2, 27). Furthermore, some mutagenesis studies of exported proteins showed that
a decrease of the processing efficiency in mutant proteins correlates
with a low probability of -turn formation (24, 28). However, it was
shown that when Pro residues are simultaneously present at both the 5
and 4 positions of alkaline phosphatase from E. coli, this
protein is processed properly (29). The steric constraints of this
Pro-Pro tandem allow only a -conformation of the 5 residue, and,
as a consequence, this result cast doubt on the presence of the
-turn in the 6 to 4 region. Rather, it was suggested that the
c-region has an extended -conformation (29). In this conformation,
the 5 residue may have contact with SPase, and this can explain why
the processing is sensitive to the size of the 5 residue (29). The
determination of the three-dimensional structure of the bacterial type
I SPase co-crystallized with its inhibitor (19) allows a final
rejection of the -turn hypothesis and favors the extended
conformation of the c-region. However, despite the knowledge of the
active site of the SPase and docking of the peptide substrate into its
binding pocket, the exact conformation of the 6 to 4 region remains
unknown. This could be considered a minor academic problem if it was
not known that amino acid substitutions within this region can
significantly diminish or even block the maturation of exported
proteins (23, 29-31).
The goal of this work is to define the sequence requirements and
conformation of the 6 to 4 region and its interactions with SPase
during the processing. We approached this problem by using sequence
analysis of exported proteins, mutational analysis, and molecular modeling.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Sequence Analysis--
Sequences from Gram-negative bacteria
were taken from SwissProt using Sequence Retrieval System software
(www.ebi.ac.uk/srs/) and then checked manually. They were 110 proteins from E. coli (68 with known and 42 with
well-predicted cleavage sites) and 81 proteins from other Gram-negative
bacteria with known cleavage sites. The collection did not include
highly homologous sequences with more than 80% identity. Anomalous
signal sequences (those whose lengths of the hydrophobic core did not
fall into the range between 7 and 17 residues), and proteins, secreted
by other or modified secretion machineries (hydrogenases having
a RR**F*K pattern within the signal sequence, where * denotes
any residue Ref. 32; pili, Ref. 15; and lipoproteins) were also
excluded. The collection of the 191 sequences is available over
the World Wide Web (cmm.cit.nih.gov/kajava/gram-negat.dat). The data
sets of 114 exported proteins from Gram-positive bacteria and 1011 human exported proteins have been taken from the SIGNALP data base
www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/sp_matrices.html (33).
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids--
E. coli strain
E15 (Hfr phoA8 fadL701
tonA22 garB10 ompF627 relA1
pit-10spoT1T2) (34) was used as a host
strain for the expression of wild-type and mutant phoA genes
cloned in plasmids. E. coli strain Z85 (thi (lac-proAB) (srl-recA)
hsdR::Tn10 (F' traD proAB
lacIq ZM15)) (35) was used to construct mutant
phoA genes.
Wild-type alkaline phosphatase gene (phoA) was cloned into
HindIII/BamHI sites of vector p15SK( )
containing multiple cloning sites identical to pBluescript SK
(Stratagene), p15A ori of replication and
chloramphenicol-acetyltransferase
gene.2 The resulting phagemid
was used to construct and express mutant phoA genes. Helper
phage R408 was used to isolate single-strand recombinant phagemids. The
plasmid harboring the gene of amber suppressor
tRNA from E. coli in the
vector pGFIB (36) was provided by Dr. J. Miller.
Media and Culture Conditions--
Bacteria for cloning and
oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis were grown on LB or 2YT medium at
37 °C. All media were supplemented with 25 µg/ml chloramphenicol
to either select for or maintain phoA-containing plasmids.
To screen for colonies expressing active alkaline phosphatase, E. coli cells were grown on agar plates made of LB medium free of
inorganic phosphate and containing 40 µg/ml
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (37). For alkaline phosphatase
expression, cells were grown on minimal medium (38) with 1 mM K2HPO4 and 0.1% peptone to the
mid-log phase and transferred to medium without orthophosphate and peptone.
Oligonucleotide-directed Mutagenesis--
To generate mutant
forms of phoA, we used a new two step method, which allowed
us to omit hybridization with labeled nucleotides during selection of
clones containing mutant genes (6, 39). Isolation of single-strand
phagemid DNA and plasmid DNA, electrophoresis of DNA fragments in agar
gels, phosphorylation of oligonucleotides, and transformation of
E. coli cells were performed by standard procedures (40).
Mutations (Table I) were confirmed by DNA sequencing (41).
Alkaline Phosphatase Maturation--
Pulse-chase experiments
were used to analyze the alkaline phosphatase maturation. E. coli cells grown to the mid-log phase in the minimal medium with 1 mM K2HPO4 were harvested, washed, and incubated for 10 min in the same medium without orthophosphate to
induce alkaline phosphatase synthesis. The cells were labeled with 50 µCi/ml [35S]methionine for 60 s and chased for
0.1, 1.0, 5.0, or 60.0 min by addition of unlabeled methionine to a
final concentration of 0.05%. Proteins were precipitated with 10%
trichloroacetic acid. Alkaline phosphatase and its precursor were
immunoprecipitated with rabbit antibodies and separated by 10%
SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Proteins were quantified using a
LKB UltroScan laser densitometer. The relative quantity of mature
alkaline phosphatase and its precursor was calculated with adjustment
for the difference in number of methionine residues between the
precursor and mature form.
Alkaline Phosphatase Isoforms and Activity--
Cells expressing
alkaline phosphatase were harvested and converted to spheroplasts in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM sucrose, and 1 mg/ml lysozyme for 15 min on ice.
Periplasmic fraction was separated from the cell debris by
centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 5 min. The samples
were analyzed by non-denaturing electrophoresis in 7.5% PAGE (42).
Staining of the alkaline phosphatase isoforms was performed by
incubation of the gel with -naphthyl phosphate (Sigma, N-7255) and
Fast Red Dye TR (Chemapol, Czech Republic) (43). The alkaline
phosphatase activity was determined by measuring the rate of
p-nitrophenylphosphate hydrolysis, taking the activity of
hydrolysis of 1 µmol of substrate per 1 min at 37 °C as a unit of
enzymatic activity (unit). Total cell protein was assayed by the Lowry
method (44).
Molecular Modeling--
Initial docking of a peptide
corresponding to the 3 to +1 region of the alkaline phosphatase into
the active site of SPase was made manually based on the known position
of the -lactam inhibitor and using Insight II program (45). Possible
conformations of the region 6 to 4 were selected based on two
constraints: first, the absence of steric clashes within the peptide
chain and between the peptide and SPase; second, direction of signal peptide -helix (residues 21 to 7) into the cytoplasmic membrane. Then the complexes between SPase and alkaline phosphatase precursor ( 21 to +2) were subjected to energy minimization using DISCOVER module of Insight II (300 steps of minimization based on the steepest descent algorithm and the next 500 steps using conjugate gradients algorithm). The CHARMM force field (46) and the
distance-dependent dielectric constant were used for the
energy calculations. During the minimization (i) the backbone atoms of
SPase were tethered to their positions in the crystal structure, (ii) a
carbonyl carbon atom in the 1 residue was covalently linked to the
oxygen atom of the Ser-90 side chain forming a tetrahedral
intermediate, and (iii) several hydrogen bonds (between the oxygen of
the peptide group of 1 residue and hydroxyl group of Ser-88, between
the backbone oxygen of 2 residue and NH group of Ile-144, between the
backbone nitrogen of 2 residue and backbone oxygen of Asp-142) were
enforced by setting the distance constraints with moderate force
(K = 50), in order to improve their geometry. In addition, when
the region 6 to 4 in the -conformation was energy minimized the
distance constraints were imposed on hydrogen bonds between the
backbone CO group of Gln-85 and NH group of the 3 residue; the
backbone NH group of Gln-85 and CO group of 4 residue; the CO group
of Pro-83 and NH group of 5 residue. To allay the concern that these
constraints generated significant tension in the minimized structure,
the last calculation was performed without any restrictions to an RMS
derivative of 0.4 kcal/(mol·Å). A module "Struct_Check" of
Insight II program (45) was used to check the quality of the modeled
complexes. The figures were generated with Molscript (47).
 |
RESULTS |
Rationale of the Selected Amino Acid Substitutions in the 6 to
4 Region--
Our previous study showed that the introduction of
bulky residues at position 5 of E. coli alkaline
phosphatase causes a decrease in the efficiency of its maturation (29).
In agreement with this result, the occurrence of large hydrophobic
residues Trp, Ile, Phe, Leu, Met, and Tyr (written in the order of
decreasing hydrophobicity, Ref. 48) at position 5 for the c-regions
of eukaryotic and Gram-positive bacterial proteins is lower than at
positions 6 and 4 (17% versus 45 and 27%, and 7%
versus 20 and 18% correspondingly). Surprisingly, the
exported proteins of Gram-negative bacteria have an opposite
distribution: 21% of large residues at position 5 against 14 and
17% at positions 6 and 4. We analyzed a subset of bacterial
proteins with bulky hydrophobic residues at position 5 and found that
they have a higher incidence of Pro residue at positions 6 and 4,
Val residue at position 3, and a Ser residue at positions 4 and 2
compared with the complete collection of these proteins (Fig.
1). This observation led to the
hypothesis that the inhibitory effect of bulky hydrophobic residue in
position 5 can be suppressed by introducing Pro, Ser, or Val in the
corresponding nearby positions. In accordance with this, a series of
mutant E. coli alkaline phosphatases were obtained (Table
I) to test the hypothesis. In addition, a
mutant having Pro residues in all 6, 5, and 4 positions was also
obtained. The 6 to 4 region of such a protein is sterically constrained in the polyproline conformation, and it was of interest to
determine whether it was processed. The fact that this tandem of three
Pro was not found in natural sequences provided an additional motivation to study this mutant.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The difference between frequencies of amino
acids ( f) calculated for all exported
proteins of Gram-negative bacteria and a subset of these proteins
having bulky hydrophobic residues (Trp, Ile, Phe, Leu, Met, and Tyr) at
the 5 position. faa = (faa_bulky faa_total) × 100, where faa_total is a count of a given
amino acid in a complete collection of the bacterial proteins divided
by the number of proteins in this collection;
faa_bulky is a count of a given amino acid among
the bacterial proteins with 5 bulky hydrophobic residues divided by
the number of such proteins.
|
|
Effect of the Mutations on Translocation and Processing of the
Alkaline Phosphatase--
All mutant proteins were enzymatically
active in cells (data not shown). This result implies that the mutants
were translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane, because it is known
that alkaline phosphatase becomes active only after translocation into
the periplasm, where disulfide bond formation and enzyme dimerization
take place (49).
The effect of the amino acid substitutions on alkaline phosphatase
maturation was assessed by the rate of conversion of a pulse-labeled
mutant protein precursor into the mature form in vivo using
the standard pulse-chase method. As shown in Fig.
2, the presence of bulky Leu, Ile, or Tyr
residue at position 5 (proteins L( 5), I( 5) and Y( 5)) notably
impaired the maturation of the precursor in comparison with wild-type
protein. Even after 60 min of chase almost half of the mutant protein
precursor remained unprocessed. In agreement with our hypothesis,
introduction of a Pro residue on either side of 5 Leu, Ile, or Tyr
restored efficiency of maturation (proteins P( 6)L( 5),
L( 5)P( 4), P( 6)I( 5), I( 5)P( 4), P( 6)Y( 5), and
Y( 5)P( 4)). Introduction of a Ser residue at position 4 or 2 or
Val residue at position 3 also partially suppressed the effect of the
5 Leu mutation (proteins L( 5)S( 4), L( 5)S( 2) and L( 5)V( 3),
correspondingly). Pre-PhoA with a stretch of Pro residues in positions
from 6 to 4 (protein P( 6, 5, 4)), was converted into the
mature form with almost the same efficiency as the wild-type
precursor.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The dynamics of maturation of
wild-type and mutant alkaline phosphatases. Cells were
pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 60 s, and the
radioactivity was chased for indicated periods of time (0, 1, 5, and 60 min). Pulse-labeled alkaline phosphatase and its precursor were
immunoprecipitated using affinity-purified rabbit antibodies against
the alkaline phosphatase and resolved on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by
autoradiography.
|
|
An unprocessed protein can reside in the cytoplasm or be translocated
to the periplasmic side. It is known that the unprocessed but
translocated precursor of E. coli alkaline phosphatase has an enzymatic activity, while precursor, which remains in the cytoplasm, does not (50). This property of alkaline phosphatase was used to
distinguish which of these two situations is true for the unprocessed portions of the analyzed mutants. We visualized alkaline phosphatase isoforms (I, II, and III) in gel after electrophoresis under
non-denaturing conditions. Active alkaline phosphatase can be stained
in the gel by treatment with the enzyme substrate -naphthyl
phosphate and an appropriate dye. Furthermore, active mature protein
and the translocated precursor can be distinguished on non-denaturing gel, since they have different electrophoretic mobilities (29, 51). The
precursor translocated across the membrane can be found at the top of
the gel, probably due to aggregation caused by the presence of
hydrophobic signal peptide. Such active precursor was detected (Fig.
3, a series of mutants containing Leu in
5 position are shown) in all cases when significant amount of
unprocessed pre-PhoA was present after 60 min of chase (Fig. 2,
proteins L( 5), I( 5), Y( 5), L( 5)S( 4), and L( 5)S( 2)). This
implies that these mutant precursors are located at the periplasmic
side of the cytoplasmic membrane. Thus, we showed that inefficient
processing of L( 5), I( 5), Y( 5), L( 5)S( 4), and L( 5)S( 2)
proteins is due to the failure of their recognition or cleavage by
SPase, but not translocation across the membrane.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Isozymic spectra of wild-type and mutant
alkaline phosphatases. Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis
(7.5% PAGE) under nondenaturing conditions, and the active enzyme was
revealed by treatment of the gel with -naphthyl phosphate as the
alkaline phosphatase substrate and Fast Red Dye RR. Positions of
alkaline phosphatase isoforms (I, II, III) and active precursor
(pre-PhoA) are indicated. A mutant with Val in position 1 is shown as
an example of the precursor translocated to the periplasmic side
(51).
|
|
Molecular Docking of the Peptide Substrate into the Binding Pocket
of SPase--
Docking of the signal peptide into the SPase active site
was used to understand the molecular mechanism of the effects caused by
the mutations. We modeled a peptide corresponding to the c-region of
the alkaline phosphatase precursor into the active site of the enzyme
by using the known position of the -lactam inhibitor (19). The 3
to 1 region of the peptide substrate fits the binding pocket only
when it has an extended -conformation (Fig. 4) similar to one already proposed in the
previous works (19, 29, 52). In this arrangement, the oxygen of the
peptide groups of the 1 residue forms hydrogen bonds with the NH
group of Ser-90 and hydroxyl group of Ser-88, and backbone nitrogen and
oxygen of the 2 residue interact with the CO group of Asp-142 and NH group of Ile-144, respectively. The model explains the cleavage-site Ala-X-Ala specificity: the side chain at 1 position points
into the apolar pocket formed by residues Ile-86, Met-91, Leu-95, and Ile-144, the side chain at 2 position points out of the pocket, and
the side chain at position 3 is located in the apolar pocket mostly
formed by Phe-84, Ile-86, Ile-144, and Asp-142. The modeling also shows
that the peptide can bind SPase only if +1 residue adopts a
-conformation with dihedral angle ranged between 170° and
115°. This constraint can explain the absence of the Pro residue
(with its angle restricted between 90° and 50°) at +1
position of exported proteins. The extended 3 to +1 region bends at
position 1.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Stereoview of a model of the signal peptide
bound to the active site of the E. coli SPase.
The 6 to +2 region of the signal peptide having a -conformation
and TSVTKART sequence corresponding to a well-processed alkaline
phosphatase mutant (29) is shown by ball-and-stick
representation. Sticks of this peptide are in gray. Another
peptide fragment with black sticks represents the 6 to 4
region having three Pro residues in a polyproline conformation
(residues 3 to +2 are not shown). Side chains Ser-90 and Lys-145 of
SPase are also in ball-and-stick representation. Oxygen
atoms are in white, nitrogen atoms are in gray,
carbon atoms are in black. Potential hydrogen-bonding
interactions between the signal peptide and SPase are shown by dotted
lines. A temporary covalent bond between oxygen of Ser-90 and carbon of
1 residue in the tetrahedral intermediate is hatched.
|
|
The region 6 to 4 of the signal peptide points out of the active
site and this makes it impossible to find its unique conformation based
exclusively on the constraints imposed by the enzyme. Nevertheless, we
succeeded in the identification of at least one conformation by using a
P( 6, 5, 4) mutant. In a tandem of several Pro residues with
trans peptide groups, the dihedral angles are fixed
around 70° ± 20° by the pyrrolidine ring while dihedral angles
are restrained around 145° ± 20° by steric interactions
between Pro residues. As a result of these steric constraints, the
region 6 to 4 of the P( 6, 5, 4) mutant can only have a
polyproline conformation in the pocket of SPase (Fig. 4). Our
experiments show that the P( 6, 5, 4) mutant can be processed by
SPase (Fig. 2), and this result proves that the polyproline
conformation of the 6 to 4 region is permissive for processing.
The location of the signal peptide within the membrane and flatness of
the SPase surface surrounding the active site make it possible to
imagine the overall spatial arrangement of the membrane, SPase, and
signal peptide (Fig. 5). The 6 to 4
region should have a conformation that orients the N-terminal -helix of the signal peptide ( 21 to 7 residue) out of SPase and into the
membrane. This provides an additional constraint on possible conformation. The polyproline conformation is in agreement with this
condition (N2 on Fig. 5). Previously, it was also suggested that the
whole c-region has an extended -conformation (N1 on Fig. 5) (20,
29). Indeed, if the region 6 to 4 does not have Pro residues, it
can adopt a -conformation and form several hydrogen bonds with the
-strand of SPase (Fig. 4). The backbone of Gln-85 is hydrogen-bonded
to the NH group of the 3 residue and the CO group of the 4 residue,
and the CO group of Pro-83 interacts with the NH group of the 5
residue. This hydrogen bonding can induce a -conformation of
residues 4 and 5, while residue 6 needs to adopt a
-conformation to direct the -helix of the signal peptide ( 21 to
7 residue) out of the active site and into the membrane. This
arrangement of peptide in the binding pocket is similar to the one that
has been already suggested for the 6 to 4 region (19) based on the
crystal structure of the analogous enzyme LexA with its bound cleavage
site region (52). Our stereochemical analysis shows that there are at
least two other conformations of the 6, 5, 4 region
( -6 -5 -4 and
-6 -5 -4 where and denote -helical and -structural conformations of individual
residues), which meet the basic constraints: absence of steric clashes
with SPase and direction of signal peptide -helix (residues 21 to
7) into the membrane (N3 and N4 on Fig. 5). The occurrence of these
conformations cannot be completely ruled out.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
A model of the overall spatial arrangement of
signal peptide and SPase relative to the membrane. The backbone of
the crystal structure of SPase is shown as a gray coiled
rope. N1, N2, N3, and N4 denote signal peptides with 6 to 4
region in -conformation, polyproline conformation,
-6 -5 -4 and
-6 -5 -4 conformations,
correspondingly. The N-terminal hydrophobic regions of signal peptides
having the 6 to 4 region in - and polyproline conformations are
outlined by ribbon. Traces of two other signal peptides are
shown by dotted lines. Asterisk marks the cleavage site of
the signal peptide. The two polar regions of the membrane, constituted
by phospholipid heads and by glycerol backbones, are shaded darker
compared with the middle nonpolar layer. The dimensions of the membrane
and the proteins are shown in scale, and the proportions of the layers
are taken from Ref. 54. Two transmembrane -helices of SPase
(residues 1-22 and 58-77) were modeled.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previously, based on the observed inhibitory effect of bulky
residues at position 5 and molecular modeling, we suggested a
-conformation for the c-region of the signal peptide bound by SPase
(29). Knowing that Pro residues can break not only -helices but also
-structures, we assumed that proline-containing c-regions can have
different conformation and sequence requirements compared with
c-regions without prolines. The sequence analysis, performed in this
work, suggested that the inhibitory effect of bulky residues at
position 5 (29) can be suppressed by the introduction of Pro at
either position 6 or 4. The subsequent mutational analysis of
E. coli alkaline phosphatase strongly supported the
predicted effect of the Pro residue. A search of the literature revealed additional proof of inhibition by bulky hydrophobic 5 residue and alleviation of this inhibition by 4 Pro residue. A
-lactamase from Salmonella typhimurium has a Leu at
position 5 and Pro at position 4. Substitutions of Pro 4 with the
other residues (Ser, Phe, or Leu) lead to partial or complete block of
its maturation (23, 31). Furthermore, randomization of the 4 to +2
positions (AAFCLXXXX/XX, where X is a randomized position) and selection of functional signal peptides from a library of
the random sequences, revealed that the c-region of the selected proteins had a consensus AAFCLPAXA/XX (30). This
result shows that the preservation of Pro after Leu ( 5) is essential
for processing. It is worth mentioning that the original studies did
not connect these results with the correlation between bulky residues
at position 5 and Pro at position 4.
Molecular docking of the signal peptide into the binding pocket of the
SPase opens the possibility of better understanding the molecular
mechanism of the effects revealed by our mutational analysis. Along
this line, we designed a mutant that provides information about the
conformation of the 6 to 4 region during processing. Indeed, the
mutant with the 6 to 4 sequence that entirely consists of Pro
residues can only have the conformation of a polyproline helix. It was
shown that this mutant can be processed. Thus, to assume that the
conformation of the 6 to 4 region is unique for all exported
proteins, then our results indicate that it should be the polyproline
conformation. On the other hand, the polyproline conformation alone
cannot explain the inhibition by bulky 5 residues and its suppression
by Pro at position 6 or 4. Previously, it was suggested that the
c-region has -conformation, and the inhibition was explained by the
inability of the corresponding pocket of SPase to accommodate the large
5 residue (29). However, the analysis of the newly available
structure of SPase (19) shows that although the -conformation of the
c-region directs the 5 residue toward the enzyme (Fig. 4), there is
enough room to accommodate such residues as Leu or Met. Knowing this
data, we suggest the following explanation for the observed
relationship between residues of the 6 to 4 region. Initially, an
apolar membrane environment favors an -helical conformation of the
signal peptide, including the c-region. In order to be recognized by SPase, the -helical conformation of the c-region needs to be unfolded. This unfolding can be facilitated by hydrogen bonding with
the -strand (residues 84-86) of SPase (Fig. 4). This unfolding into
a -conformation is accompanied by a transposition of the 5 residue
from the apolar environment of the membrane to the more hydrophilic
surface of SPase. In this situation, the inhibition by a large
hydrophobic residue at position 5 can be explained by its reluctance
to leave the membrane that hampers the unfolding. We were able to
understand the suppression of this inhibition by Pro residues by
suggesting that an introduction of Pro residues in the adjacent
positions of residue 5 generates the polyproline conformation. In
contrast to the -conformation, the unfolding of the -helical
region 6 to 4 into the polyproline conformation is not accompanied
by the transition of the 5 residue from the membrane to SPase (Fig.
4). The 5 hydrophobic side chain resides in the membrane and,
therefore, will not hamper the unfolding and subsequent processing of
the polypeptide. It is worth mentioning that the unfolding of the
Pro-containing 6 to 4 region can be facilitated by the
helix-breaking property of Pro residues rather than by formation of the
hydrogen bonds with the -strand (residues 84-86) of SPase. This
explanation of our experimental results is based on molecular modeling
and, therefore, needs further support from x-ray crystallography.
The sequence analysis also indicated that Val at position 3 or Ser at
position 4 or 2 may lead to suppression of the inhibition by the
5 bulky residue. Our experiments show that Val at position 3
partially suppresses the inhibition while Ser at position 4 or 2
does not. Minor recovery of the processing for the L( 5)S( 4) mutant
can be accounted for by the higher hydrophilicity and, therefore, an
easier unfolding of its c-region compared with the L( 5) protein. The
known structure of SPase, however, does not provide a simple
explanation for a partial recovery of the L( 5) inhibition in the case
of the L( 5)V( 3) mutant, and processing of this mutant requires
further investigation. Another observation that will need further study
is the presence of a bulky Leu at position 5 and non-proline residues
at both adjacent positions in few exported bacterial proteins.
Supposedly, they are efficiently processed despite the fact that we
observed an inhibition of processing for mutants of alkaline
phosphatase with similar c-regions (29).
It is worth mentioning that if our hypothesis about at least two
possible conformations of the 6 to 4 region is true, the hydrophobic region of the signal peptide should not have a fixed position relative to the SPase (Fig. 5). This implies that SPase and
the hydrophobic region of the signal peptide may not be connected with
each other by rigid protein structures (e.g. translocase), and one or both of them float in the membrane at the moment of recognition. Experimental study supports this conclusion (53).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. A. L. Karamyshev for discussion
and assistance and Dr. U. Blum-Tirouvanziam for critical reading of the article.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported in part by Grants 99-04-48153, 02-04-06304, and 02-04-49765 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence may be addressed: CRBM-CNRS UPR 1086, 1919, route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France. Fax: 33-4-67521559;
E-mail: kajava@crbm.cnrs-mop.fr or E-mail:
aniram@ibpm.serpukhov.su (for biological samples).
**
Present address: Laboratory of Skin Biology, NIAMS, National
Institutes of Health, Bldg. 50, Rm. 1527, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M205781200
2
R. Fischer and W. Hengstenberg,
unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
c-region, cleavage
region;
PhoA, alkaline phosphatase;
pre-PhoA, alkaline phosphatase
precursor;
SPase, bacterial type I signal peptidase;
RMS, root-mean-square.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Dalbey, R. E.,
and Von Heijne, G.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci
17,
474-478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Perlman, D.,
and Halvorson, H. O.
(1983)
J. Mol. Biol.
167,
391-409[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
von Heijne, G.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
184,
99-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Summers, R. G.,
and Knowles, J. R.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
20074-20081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Kuhn, A.,
Kiefer, D.,
Kohne, C.,
Zhu, H. Y.,
Tschantz, W. R.,
and Dalbey, R. E.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
226,
891-897[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Kajava, A. V.,
Zolov, S. N.,
Kalinin, A. E.,
and Nesmeyanova, M. A.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
2163-2169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Fekkes, P.,
and Driessen, A. J.
(1999)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63,
161-173[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Nesmeyanova, M. A.,
and Bogdanov, M. V.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
257,
203-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
de Vrije, T.,
de Swart, R. L.,
Dowhan, W.,
Tommassen, J.,
and de Kruijff, B.
(1988)
Nature
334,
173-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Killian, J. A.,
de Jong, A. M.,
Bijvelt, J.,
Verkleij, A. J.,
and de Kruijff, B.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
815-819[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Nesmeyanova, M. A.,
Karamyshev, A. L.,
Karamysheva, Z. N.,
Kalinin, A. E.,
Ksenzenko, V. N.,
and Kajava, A. V.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
403,
203-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Van Voorst, F.,
and De Kruijff, B.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
347,
601-612[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Chou, M. M.,
and Kendall, D. A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2873-2880[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lill, R.,
Dowhan, W.,
and Wickner, W.
(1990)
Cell
60,
271-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Pugsley, A. P.
(1993)
Microbiol. Rev.
57,
50-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Von Heijne, G.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
192,
287-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Zimmermann, R.,
Watts, C.,
and Wickner, W.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
6529-6536[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Dalbey, R. E.,
Lively, M. O.,
Bron, S.,
and van Dijl, J. M.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
1129-1138[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Paetzel, M.,
Dalbey, R. E.,
and Strynadka, N. C.
(1998)
Nature
396,
186-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Izard, J. W.,
and Kendall, D. A.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
13,
765-773[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Plath, K.,
Mothes, W.,
Wilkinson, B. M.,
Stirling, C. J.,
and Rapoport, T. A.
(1998)
Cell
94,
795-807[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Paetzel, M.,
Dalbey, R. E.,
and Strynadka, N. C.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
9512-9519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Koshland, D.,
Sauer, R. T.,
and Botstein, D.
(1982)
Cell
30,
903-914[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Barkocy-Gallagher, G. A.,
Cannon, J. G.,
and Bassford, P. J., Jr.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13609-13613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Laforet, G. A.,
and Kendall, D. A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1326-1334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Chou, P. Y.,
and Fasman, G. D.
(1979)
Biophys. J.
26,
367-373[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Rosenblatt, M.,
Beaudette, N. V.,
and Fasman, G. D.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
3983-3987[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Shen, L. M.,
Lee, J. I.,
Cheng, S. Y.,
Jutte, H.,
Kuhn, A.,
and Dalbey, R. E.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
11775-11781[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Karamyshev, A. L.,
Karamysheva, Z. N.,
Kajava, A. V.,
Ksenzenko, V. N.,
and Nesmeyanova, M. A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
277,
859-870[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Palzkill, T., Le, Q. Q.,
Wong, A.,
and Botstein, D.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
563-568[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.,
Pluckthun, A.,
and Knowles, J. R.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
16192-16199[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Niviere, V.,
Wong, S. L.,
and Voordouw, G.
(1992)
J. Gen. Microbiol.
138,
2173-2183[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Nielsen, H.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
von Heijne, G.,
and Brunak, S.
(1996)
Proteins
24,
165-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Bachmann, B. J.
(1987)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and molecular biology
(Neidhardt, F. C., ed)
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 35.
|
Zaitsev, E. N.,
Zaitseva, E. M.,
Bakhlanova, I. V.,
Gorelov, V. N.,
and Kuz'min, N. P.
(1986)
Genetika
22,
2721-2727[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Kleina, L. G.,
Masson, J. M.,
Normanly, J.,
Abelson, J.,
and Miller, J. H.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
213,
705-717[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Inouye, H.,
Michaelis, S.,
Wright, A.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1981)
J. Bacteriol.
146,
668-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Torriani, A.
(1966)
in
Procedures in nucleic acid research
(Cantoni, G. L.
, and Davis, R., eds)
, pp. 224-234, Harper and Row, New York
|
| 39.
|
Kalinin, A. E.,
Mikhaleva, N. I.,
Karamyshev, A. L.,
Karamysheva, Z. N.,
and Nesmeyanova, M. A.
(1999)
Biochemistry-Russia
64,
1021-1029
|
| 40.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
|
| 41.
|
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
and Coulson, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Davis, B. J.
(1964)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
121,
404-427[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Lojda, Z.,
Grossrau, R.,
and Schibler, T. H.
(1979)
Enzyme histochemistry: A laboratory manual.
, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
|
| 44.
|
Lowry, O. H.,
Rosebrough, N. J.,
Farr, A. L.,
and Randall, R. J.
(1951)
J. Biol. Chem.
193,
265-275[Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Dayring, H. E.,
Tramonato, A.,
Sprang, S. R.,
and Fletterick, R. J.
(1986)
J. Mol. Graphics
4,
82-87[CrossRef]
|
| 46.
|
Brooks, B. R.,
Bruccoleri, R. E.,
Olafson, B. D.,
States, D. J.,
Swaminathan, S.,
and Karplus, M.
(1983)
J. Computat. Chem.
4,
187-217[CrossRef]
|
| 47.
|
Kraulis, P. J.
(1991)
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
24,
946-950[CrossRef]
|
| 48.
|
Fauchere, J.,
and Pliska, V.
(1983)
Eur. J. Med. Chem.
18,
369-375
|
| 49.
|
Michaelis, S.,
Inouye, H.,
Oliver, D.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
154,
366-374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Boyd, D.,
Guan, C.-D.,
Willard, S.,
Wright, W.,
Strauch, K.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1987)
in
Phosphate Metabolism and Cellular Regulation in Microorganisms
(Torriani-Gorini, A.
, Rothman, F. G.
, Silver, S.
, Wright, A.
, and Yagil, E., eds)
, pp. 89-93, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 51.
|
Karamyshev, A. L.,
Kalinin, A. E.,
Tsfasman, I. M.,
Ksenzenko, V. N.,
and Nesmeianova, M. A.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. (Mosk)
28,
362-373[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Luo, Y.,
Pfuetzner, R. A.,
Mosimann, S.,
Paetzel, M.,
Frey, E. A.,
Cherney, M.,
Kim, B.,
Little, J. W.,
and Strynadka, N. C.
(2001)
Cell
106,
585-594[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Martoglio, B.,
Hofmann, M. W.,
Brunner, J.,
and Dobberstein, B.
(1995)
Cell
81,
207-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Venable, R. M.,
Zhang, Y.,
Hardy, B. J.,
and Pastor, R. W.
(1993)
Science
262,
223-226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Nilsson, A. E. Johnson, and G. von Heijne
How Hydrophobic Is Alanine?
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 8, 2003;
278(32):
29389 - 29393.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|