![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 52, 50607-50611, December 27, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institute for Cancer Genetics, and Department of Pathology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
Received for publication, October 15, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In response to DNA damage, the activity of the
p53 tumor suppressor is modulated by protein stabilization and
post-translational modifications including acetylation. Interestingly,
both acetylation and ubiquitination can modify the same lysine residues
at the C terminus of p53, implicating a role of acetylation in the
regulation of p53 stability. However, the direct effect of acetylation
on Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 is still lacking because of technical difficulties. Here, we have developed a method to obtain pure
acetylated p53 proteins from cells, and by using an in
vitro purified system, we provide the direct evidence that
acetylation of the C-terminal domain is sufficient to abrogate its
ubiquitination by Mdm2. Importantly, even in the absence of DNA damage,
acetylation of the p53 protein is capable of reducing the
ubiquitination levels and extending its half-life in vivo.
Moreover, we also show that acetylation of p53 can affect its
ubiquitination through other mechanisms in addition to the site
competition. This study has significant implications regarding a
general mechanism by which protein acetylation modulates
ubiquitination-dependent proteasome proteolysis.
The p53 tumor suppressor exerts antiproliferative effects,
including growth arrest, apoptosis, and cell senescence, in response to
various types of stress (1-4). Inactivation of p53 function appears to
be critical to tumorigenesis in all different types of human cancers
(5). p53 is a short-lived protein whose activity is maintained at low
levels in normal cells (3). Tight regulation of p53 is essential for
its effect on tumorigenesis as well as maintaining normal cell growth.
The precise mechanism by which p53 is activated by cellular stress is
not completely understood; it is generally thought to involve mainly
post-translational modifications of p53, including ubiquitination,
phosphorylation, and acetylation (1-4).
Early studies demonstrated that
CBP1/p300, a
histone acetyl-transferase (HAT),
acts as a coactivator of p53 and potentiates its transcriptional
activity as well as biological function in vivo;
significantly, the observation of functional synergism between p53 and
CBP/p300 together with its intrinsic HAT activity led to the discovery
of a novel FAT (transcriptional factor
acetyl-transferase) activity of CBP/p300 on p53
(5-7). p53 is specifically acetylated at multiple lysine residues
(Lys-370, Lys-371, Lys-372, Lys-381, Lys-382) of the C-terminal
regulatory domain by CBP/p300. The acetylation of p53 can dramatically
stimulate its sequence-specific DNA binding activity, possibly as a
result of an acetylation-induced conformational change (6-8). By
developing site-specific acetylated p53 antibodies, CBP/p300-mediated
acetylation of p53 was further confirmed in vivo by a number
of studies (9-11). In addition, p53 can also be acetylated at Lys-320
by another HAT cofactor, p300/CBP-asssociated factor, although
the in vivo functional consequence needs to be further
elucidated (9, 10, 12). Significantly, the steady-state levels of
acetylated p53 are stimulated in response to various types of stress,
indicating the important role of p53 acetylation in stress response
(11).
By serving as a signal for specific cellular protein degradation,
ubiquitination plays a critical role in physiological regulation of
many cellular processes (13, 14). The ubiquitination of p53 was first
discovered in papilloma virus-infected cells through the functions
mediated by the viral E6 protein (15); however, in normal cells, Mdm2
functions as an ubiquitin ligase and plays a major role in p53
ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (16-18). Like in the case of
acetylation, the Plasmid Construction--
To construct the p53, UbcH5c, and
Mdm2, ubiquitin expression vectors, the DNA sequences corresponding to
the full-length proteins were amplified by PCR from Marathon-Ready HeLa
cDNA (Clontech) or other templates and
subcloned either into a pGEX (GST) vector or pET-11(His) or
pET-FLAG for expression in bacteria or a pCIN4 vector for
expression in mammalian cells (23-25). Regarding the different mutant
constructs, DNA sequences corresponding to different regions were
amplified by PCR from above constructs and subcloned into respective
expression vectors. Site-directed mutations were generated by using the
Gene Edit system (Promega).
Protein Purification of Acetylated p53 and Other Components for
in Vitro Ubiquitination Assays--
To prepare the purified components
for the in vitro ubiquitination assay, GST-p53, E2
(GST-Ubc5Hc), and E3 (GST-Mdm2) were induced in BL21 cells at room
temperature and extracted with buffer BC500 (20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.5 mM EDTA, 500 mM KCl, 20%
glycerol, 1 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM PMSF) containing
1% Nonidet P-40 and purified on glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham
Biosciences). His-Ub was induced in the same manner and purified
on the His-Bind column. The rabbit E1 was purchased as a
purified protein from Calbiochem. To improve their activities, each
protein was further purified on the Suprose-12 column by the
SMART/fast protein liquid chromatography system (Amersham
Biosciences). For the purification of acetylated p53 proteins, H1299
cells were cotransfected with FLAG-p53 and p300. 20 h after the
transfection, the cells were treated with 1 µM TSA and 5 mM nicotinamide for 6 h, then lysed in FLAG-lysis
buffer (50 mM Tris, 137 mM NaCl, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.2%
Sarkosyl, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, pH 7.8, and fresh
proteinase inhibitors) with mild sonication, and the cell extracts were
immunoprecipitated with FLAG monoclonal antibody beads (M2, Sigma).
After eluted with the FLAG peptide, the total p53 proteins were loaded
on the PAb421 antibody column. The unacetylated portion of the p53
protein was depleted by the PAb421 column after the total proteins were passed through the column several times. The unbound proteins were
purified acetylated p53 and were further tested for their purity by
Western blot with In Vitro Ubiquitination Assays--
The in vitro
ubiquitination assay was performed as described previously (18) with
some modifications. For a standard reaction, 10 ng of the bacteria
produced GST-p53 or 5 µl of the purified acetylated p53 proteins from
H1299 cells or 5 µl of the labeled substrates from a TNT reaction
were mixed with other purified components, including E1 (12 ng), E2
(GST-UbcH5C) (200 ng), E3 (GST-Mdm2) (500 ng), and 2 µg of
His-ubiquitin in 20 µl of reaction buffer (40 mM Tris, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM ATP, 2 mM DTT, pH 7.6). The reaction was stopped after 60 min at
37 °C by addition of SDS sample buffer, and subsequently resolved by
either 6% SDS-PAGE gels or 4-12% gradient gels for either Western
blot analysis with Ubiquitination Levels of p53 in Human Cells--
The assay for
detecting the ubiquitination levels of endogenous p53 proteins was
performed as described previously (25). The human Burkitt lymphoma
cells (BL2) were treated with 20 µM MG132 for 4 h
before harvesting, and the cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet
P-40, 0.1% SDS, Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM PMSF)
with mild sonication. To avoid p53 deacetylation by either HDAC1- or
Sir2-mediated deacetylases during the preparation, 1 µM
TSA and 5 mM nicotinamide were added in each step (29, 30).
For preparing the total p53 protein, the cell extracts were
immunoprecipitated with a p53 antibody against the full-length protein
(Santa Cruz). For preparing the acetylated p53 protein, the cell
extracts were first depleted by the PAb421 antibody and then
immunoprecipitated by the acetylated p53-specifc antibody (23). The
immunoprecipitates were subsequently resolved on 6% SDS-PAGE gels and
analyzed by Western blot with Measuring the Half-life of Endogenous p53 Proteins--
For
measuring the half-life of the total p53 protein in unstressed cells,
the human Burkitt lymphoma cells (BL2) were maintained in Iscove medium
with 10% fetal bovine serum. After pretreated with cyclohexamide (20 µM), BL2 cells were harvested at different time points as
indicated and extracted with the RIPA buffer. For the half-life of the
acetylated p53 protein, the cell extracts were immunoprecipitated by
the acetylated p53-specific antibody (23). To preserve the acetylation
levels of p53 proteins during the treatment with cyclohexamide (20 µM), 1 µM TSA and 5 mM
nicotinamide were also added to prevent the deacetylation by endogenous
deacetylases (23, 24). Both crude extracts and immunoprecitates were
subsequently resolved by 6% SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot with
One of the major obstacles in elucidating the precise role of
acetylation in the regulation of protein function is obtaining the pure
acetylated form. Since the acetylated non-histone proteins are
inseparable from the unacetylated forms on the regular SDS-PAGE gel,
thus far, most of the functional studies on newly identified acetylated
substrates, including p53, are derived from the "acetylated proteins" without any quantitative analysis of their contents (6-12). Therefore, it is very difficult to provide consistent results
about the functional differences between the "unacetylated form"
and the "acetylated form" of these proteins as the acetylated form may be heavily contaminated with the unacetylated form. To provide direct evidence that acetylation of p53 can modulate its ubiquitination by Mdm2, we had to obtain the pure form of acetylated p53 from cells. Interestingly, our preliminary data indicated that the
acetylated p53 protein reacts poorly to PAb421, one of the p53
antibodies, although it can be recognized perfectly well by several
other p53 antibodies including DO-1 (data not shown, also see Fig.
1). Since the PAb421 antibody was raised
specifically against the C-terminal domain of p53, overlapping with the
sites for acetylation (Fig. 1a), it is very likely that
acetylation of the C-terminal domain may prevent p53 from binding to
the PAb421 antibody. This piece of information provided an important
clue, that the unacetylated p53 form can be specifically removed from the acetylated p53 fractions through the differential bindings with the
PAb421 antibody, for purification of the acetylated p53 form.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-amino group of the substrate lysine residue is
also the target for ubiquitination (13, 14). Significantly, recent
studies have indicated that the lysine residues at the C-terminal
domain of p53, five of which are the acetylation sites, play a critical
role in Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination and subsequent degradation
(19-22). Furthermore, increasing the levels of p53 acetylation with
deacetylase inhibitors in the cell also prevents p53 from degradation
in vivo (11). Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that
acetylation of p53 may directly regulate its ubiquitination levels
in vivo. However, thus far, there is no direct evidence
regarding how p53 acetylation affects its ubiquitination, mainly
because of the technical difficulties. In this study, we have developed
several assays to establish an important mechanism that p53 acetylation
is directly involved in the regulation of its ubiquitination and
subsequent proteolysis induced by Mdm2.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-p53 (DO-1, PAb421, or acetylated p53-specific
antibody). To avoid p53 deacetylation by both HDAC1- and Sir2-mediated
deacetylases (23, 24), 1 µM TSA and 5 mM nicotinamide were added in each step. The labeled p53
substrates were produced in an in vitro
transcription/translation system (TNT kit, Promega) with 2 µg of the
pCIN4 expression vectors in a standard reaction.
-p53 (DO-1) or autoradiography.
-p53 (DO-1).
-p53 (DO-1) and
-actin.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purification of the pure form of acetylated
p53 proteins from human cells. a, schematic
representation of the functional domains, the acetylation sites, and
the antibody recognition sites. b, schematic representation
of the purification steps for acetylated p53 proteins from human cells.
c, enhancement of p53 acetylation levels by p300 in human
cells. Western blot analysis of the crude extract from the H1299 cells
transfected with FLAG-p53 alone (lane 1) or cotransfected
with FLAG-p53 and p300 (lane 2). d, Western blot
analysis of the purified acetylated p53 (lane 2) and
unacetylated p53 (lane 1) proteins with the antiacetylated
p53-specific antibody (upper panel) or the DO-1 antibody
(middle panel) or the PAb421 antibody (lower
panel).
Thus, we applied a two-step strategy to purify the pure form of acetylated p53 from human cells. First, we purified total p53 proteins from cell extracts, and second, we isolated the acetylated p53 from the total p53 proteins by the PAb421 antibody column (Fig. 1b). As indicated in Fig. 1c, the acetylation levels of p53 were enhanced significantly when the FLAG-tagged p53 protein was coexpressed with p300 in H1299 cells (lane 2 versus lane 1), and these transfected cells provided a good resource for the purification of acetylated p53 proteins. By using the M2/FLAG column, the total p53 proteins were purified from these cell extracts, but heavily contaminated with unacetylated p53 proteins (data not shown). Then, we loaded them on the PAb421 antibody column to deplete the unacetylated form of p53 (Fig. 1b), and the purified acetylated p53 proteins were finally tested for their purities. As shown in Fig. 1d, the purified acetylated p53 was easily detected by the acetylated p53-specific antibody (lane 2 versus lane 1, upper panel). Both acetylated and unacetylated forms of p53 reacted equally well to the DO-1 antibody (lane 2 versus lane 1, middle panel), which is against the N-terminal domain of p53 (Fig. 1a). Significantly, the purified acetylated p53 protein could not be detected by the PAb421 antibody at all (lane 2 versus lane 1, lower panel). These data indicate that acetylation of the p53 protein by p300 can block the recognition site for the PAb421 antibody. More importantly, we have obtained the pure form of acetylated p53 from cells without obvious contamination from unacetylated p53 proteins.
To provide the direct evidence that acetylation of p53 affects its
ubiquitination, we set up a reconstitution system for p53 ubiquitination by Mdm2. As indicated in Fig.
2a, the E2 (GST-UbcH5c) and E3
(GST-Mdm2) were expressed in bacteria as GST fusion proteins and
purified to near homogeneity (lanes 5 and 3),
ubiquitin was expressed as a His-tagged protein and obtained by a
similar manner (lane 7), and the E1 was purchased as a
purified protein (lane 2). The highly purified in
vitro system was used in this assay to avoid any possible indirect
effect by other factors on p53 ubiquitination. To define the purified
system for p53 ubiquitination, we first tested whether all purified
components can support Mdm2-dependent ubiquitination of an
unmodified form of p53 in vitro. Indeed, as shown in Fig.
2b, the bacteria-produced p53 protein was specifically ubiquitinated only in the presence of Mdm2 (lane 5).
Importantly, as shown in Fig. 2c, the total p53 protein
purified from human cells (Fig. 1), like the bacteria produced p53
protein, was strongly ubiquitinated (lane 2); however, the
same amount of the acetylated p53 protein was barely ubiquitinated by
Mdm2 under the same conditions (lane 4 versus
lane 2). These results demonstrate directly that acetylation
of p53 strongly inhibits its ubiquitination mediated by Mdm2.
|
To further confirm the above findings, we searched for an
acetylation-mimicking mutant for p53. Interestingly, it was previously reported that the histone H4 protein with the Lys
Gln mutation at
the H4 acetylation site functionally behaved as the acetylated form to
prevent Sir3p from binding H4 and spreading to form heterochromatin in
yeast (26). In fact, a Lys
Gln mutation can mimic the acetylated state of lysine (K) mainly because of the structure similarity between
the Gln (Q) residue and the acetylated-lysine residue (Fig.
3a). Thus, a p53(K-Q) mutant,
in which all five acetylation sites (Lys-370, Lys-371, Lys-372,
Lys-381, Lys-382, see Ref. 6) were replaced by the glutamine residues,
may mimic the acetylated form of p53. Interestingly, several studies
have shown that the Lys
Arg mutation at the C-terminal
acetylation sites only partially block Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of
the whole p53 polypeptide (18, 19), indicating that there are
additional lysine residues that can be ubiquitinated by Mdm2. Thus, the
mechanism by which acetylation of p53 inhibits its ubiquitination by
Mdm2 may contain two folds. First, acetylation of the p53 C-terminal
domain blocks the
-amino group of these acetylated lysine residues
for ubiquitination, and second, acetylation of p53 may also induce
protein conformation change to inhibit the ubiquitination of additional
lysine residues that are not the acetylation targets. To test the above
hypothesis, we examined whether the Lys
Gln mutation can
effectively inhibit Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of the whole p53
protein in vitro. Since the Lys
Arg mutation only
eliminates the
-amino group of these acetylation sites for
ubiquitination without a neutralization of positive charges, we
included a p53(K-R) mutant in the same assay as a comparison, in which
the five acetylation sites were replaced by arginine residues (Fig.
3b).
|
For better quantitative analysis of the ubiquitination activities, we
used the 35S-labeled, in vitro translated p53
proteins as substrates for the ubiquitination assay. Thus, similar
reactions as described above (Fig. 2b) were set up by
incubating labeled p53 substrates, E1, E2 (GST-UbcH5c), E3 (GST-Mdm2),
and ubiquitin. As shown in Fig. 3c, the wild type p53
protein was strongly ubiquitinated by Mdm2 (lane 2 versus lane 1), whereas the p53(K-R) mutant protein had a
significant, but only partial, reduction on Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination (~60% decrease) (lane 6 versus
lane 2), consistent with the previously published results
(18, 19). Strikingly, however, the Lys
Gln mutation on the same
lysine residues induced a much stronger resistance to Mdm2-mediated
ubiquitination, and the ubiquitination levels produced by the p53(K-Q)
mutant protein were almost undetectable under the same conditions
(lane 4). These results clearly demonstrate a much more
effective inhibitory effect on Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination by the
Lys
Gln mutation than the effect by the Lys
Arg mutation of
these acetylation sites of p53. Based on the facts that the
Lys
Gln mutation mimics the acetylated form of the lysine
residue, whereas the Lys
Arg mutation only eliminates the
-amino group of the acetylation sites for ubiquitination, our data
further suggest that acetylation of p53, in addition to blocking the
ubiquitination sites of these acetylated lysine residues, may also
inhibit Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of other lysine residues, possibly
through inducing a protein conformational change.
To examine the role of acetylation in the regulation of p53
ubiquitination in vivo, we tested the effect of acetylation
on ubiquitination levels of endogenous p53 proteins. The acetylated p53
protein is much more easily obtained from the cells treated with the
DNA damage reagents; however, to avoid other factors (e.g.
p53 phosphorylation) that may also be involved in p53 stabilization under the DNA damage conditions (12), we chose to purify the acetylated
form of endogenous p53 proteins from unstressed cells. As indicated in
Fig. 4a, high levels of
ubiquitinated p53 proteins were present in the total p53 protein
prepared from human Burkitt lymphoma cells (BL2) by
immunoprecipitations with a p53 antibody against the full-length
protein (lane 2). In contrast, the ubiquitinated p53 was
almost undetectable in the acetylated form of the endogenous p53
protein (lane 1, Fig. 4a), which was purified by
immunoprecipitations with the antiacetylated p53-specific antibody from
the same cells (see "Experimental Procedures"). Furthermore, we
also examined the effect of acetylation on the half-life of p53
in vivo. As indicated in Fig. 4b, the half-life
of the total p53 protein was less than 30 min. Strikingly, the
acetylated form of p53, which constitutes only a very small portion of
the total p53 protein in unstressed cells, appeared very stable; the
half-life of the acetylated p53 was more than 2 h (Fig.
4c). The above results demonstrate that acetylation of p53
can abrogate its ubiquitination and stabilize the p53 protein under
physiological conditions.
|
Thus, with several technical breakthroughs, we have demonstrated for
the first time that acetylation of p53 directly inhibits ubiquitination-dependent proteolysis. More importantly, we
have also provided further evidence elucidating a novel mechanism for acetylation-induced effects on p53 ubiquitination: acetylation of p53
not only blocks the
-amino group of the acetylated lysine residues
for ubiquitination, but also attenuates Mdm2-mediated ubiquitination of
other unacetylated lysine residues, possibly through inducing a protein
conformational change. Stabilization of p53 is critical for its effects
on cell growth repression and apoptosis (1-5). Numerous studies imply
the existence of multiple pathways involved in p53 stabilization in
response to DNA damage or other types of stress (1-5, 25, 27). It is
generally thought that p53 is phosphorylated at multiple sites (mainly
Ser-15 or Ser-20) and that these phosphorylation events promote p53
stabilization by preventing the binding with Mdm2 and rendering p53
more resistant to Mdm2-mediated degradation (28, 29). Interestingly,
however, several groups recently reported that mutations of these
phosphorylation sites on p53 do not significantly inhibit the ability
of DNA damage to stabilize p53 (30-33). Furthermore, some genotoxic
drugs, such as actinomycin D, can stabilize p53 without provoking
either Ser-15 or Ser-20 phosphorylation (33), raising the possibility
that p53 can be stabilized without the modification of its N-terminal domain by phosphorylation. Our findings clearly support such notion by
providing an alternative mechanism by which p53 can be stabilized through its acetylation.
Acetylation, which modifies the lysine residue of target proteins
including histone and non-histone proteins, is now recognized as an
important regulatory step in transcriptional regulation (6-8). A large
number of the non-histone transcriptional factors have been
demonstrated as bona fide substrates for acetyltransferases, suggesting that acetylation may represent another type of general protein modifications involved in functional regulation of
transcriptional factors. Interestingly, both acetylation and
ubiquitination modify the
-amino group of the substrate lysine
residues. Moreover, many of these identified acetylated substrates are
involved in ubiquitination-dependent proteasome
proteolysis, and several identified acetylation lysine residues are
also potential ubiquitination sites (7, 8, 34, 35). Thus, this study on
p53 acetylation may also establish a general mechanism by which protein
acetylation modulates the ubiquitination-dependent protein
degradation pathway. It is likely that the cross-talk between the
acetylation and ubiquitination pathways cooperatively controls both
activities and stabilities of the target proteins.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We especially thank R. Baer, Jun Qin, and R. Dalla-Favera for critical discussions. We thank F. Baer, J. Chen, and Z.-Q. Pan for technical expertise and many colleagues in the field for providing antibodies, cell lines, and plasmids. We also thank other members of the laboratory of W. Gu for sharing unpublished data and critical comments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Training Grant 5-T32-CAO9503-17 (to C. L. B.) and by grants from Avon Foundation, the Stewart Trust, the Irma T. Hirschl Trust, and NCI/NIH (to W. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar. To whom correspondence
should be addressed: Berrie Research Pavilion, Rm. 412C, Inst. for
Cancer Genetics, Columbia University, 1150 St. Nicholas Ave., New York,
NY 10032. Tel.: 212-851-5282 (office) or 212-851-5285/5286 (laboratory); Fax: 212-851-5284; E-mail:
wg8@columbia.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 5, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200578200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: CBP, CREB-binding protein (where CREB is cAMP-response element-binding protein); HAT, histone acetyl-transferase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; DTT, dithiothreitol; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; TSA, trichostatin A; E1, ubiquitin-activating enzyme; E2, ubiquitin carrier protein; E3, ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Appella, E., and Anderson, C. W. (2000) Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 48, 227-245[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Prives, C., and Manley, J. L. (2001) Cell 107, 815-818[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Ashcroft, M., and Vousden, K. H. (1999) Oncogene 18, 7637-7643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Pearson, M., Carbone, R., Sebastiani, C., Cioce, M., Fagioli, M., Saito, S., Higashimoto, Y., Appella, E., Minucci, S., Pandolfi, P. P., and Pelicci, P. G. (2000) Nature 406, 207-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Vogelstein, B., Lane, D., and Levine, A. J. (2000) Nature 408, 307-310[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Gu, W., and Roeder, R. G. (1997) Cell 90, 595-606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Kouzarides, T. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 1176-1179[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Sterner, D. E.,
and Berger, S. L.
(2000)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
64,
435-459 |
| 9. |
Sakaguchi, K.,
Herrera, J. E.,
Saito, S.,
Miki, T.,
Bustin, M.,
Vassilev, A.,
Anderson, C. W.,
and Appella, E.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2831-2841 |
| 10. |
Liu, L.,
Scolnick, D. M.,
Trievel, R. C.,
Zhang, H. B.,
Marmorstein, R.,
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Berger, S. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1202-1209 |
| 11. |
Liu, Y.,
Colosimo, A. L.,
Yang, X. J.,
and Liao, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
5540-5553 |
| 12. | Ito, A., Lai, C. H., Zhao, X., Saito, S., Hamilton, M. H., Appella, E., and Yao, T. P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1331-1340[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Pickart, C. M. (2001) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503-533[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Hershko, A., Ciechanover, A., and Varshavsky, A. (2000) Nat. Med. 6, 1073-1081[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Scheffner, M., Huibregtse, J. M., Vierstra, R. D., and Howley, P. M. (1993) Cell 75, 495-505[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Kubbutat, M. H., Jones, S. N., and Vousden, K. H. (1997) Nature 387, 299-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Honda, R., Tanaka, H., and Yasuda, H. (1997) FEBS Lett. 420, 25-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Rodriguez, M. S.,
Desterro, J. M.,
Lain, S.,
Lane, D. P.,
and Hay, R. T.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
8458-8467 |
| 20. |
Nakamura, S.,
Roth, J. A.,
and Mukhopadhyay, T.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
9391-9398 |
| 21. |
Gu, J.,
Nie, L.,
Wiederschain, D.,
and Yuan, Z. M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
8533-8546 |
| 22. |
Lohrum, M. A.,
Woods, D. B.,
Ludwig, R. L.,
Balint, E.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
8521-8532 |
| 23. | Luo, J., Su, F., Chen, D., Shiloh, A., and Gu, W. (2000) Nature 408, 377-381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Luo, J., Nikolaev, A. Y., Imai, S., Chen, D., Su, F., Shiloh, A., Guarente, L., and Gu, W. (2001) Cell 107, 137-148[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Li, M., Chen, D., Shiloh, A., Luo, J., Nikolaev, A. Y., Qin, J., and Gu, W. (2002) Nature 416, 648-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Hecht, A., Laroche, T., Strahl-Bolsinger, S., Gasser, S. M., and Grunstein, M. (1995) Cell 80, 583-592[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Sherr, C. J., and Weber, J. D. (2000) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 10, 94-99[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Shieh, S. Y., Ikeda, M., Taya, Y., and Prives, C. (1997) Cell 91, 325-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Maya, R.,
Balass, M.,
Kim, S. T.,
Shkedy, D.,
Leal, J. F.,
Shifman, O.,
Moas, M.,
Buschmann, T.,
Ronai, Z.,
Shiloh, Y.,
Kastan, M. B.,
Katzir, E.,
and Oren, M.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1067-1077 |
| 30. |
Ashcroft, M.,
Kubbutat, M. H.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1751-1758 |
| 31. | Blattner, C., Tobiasch, E., Litfen, M., Rahmsdorf, H. J., and Herrlich, P. (1999) Oncogene 18, 1723-1732[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Dumaz, N., and Meek, D. W. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 7002-7010[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Ashcroft, M.,
Taya, Y.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3224-3233 |
| 34. | Martinez-Balbas, M. A., Bauer, U. M., Nielsen, S. J., Brehm, A., and Kouzarides, T. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 662-671[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Grönroos, E., Hellman, U., Heldin, C.-H., and Ericsson, J. (2002) Mol. Cell. 10, 483-493[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Wang, Y. Zhao, L. Li, M. A. McNutt, L. Wu, S. Lu, Y. Yu, W. Zhou, J. Feng, G. Chai, et al. An ATM- and Rad3-related (ATR) Signaling Pathway and a Phosphorylation-Acetylation Cascade Are Involved in Activation of p53/p21Waf1/Cip1 in Response to 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine Treatment J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2008; 283(5): 2564 - 2574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zou, J. Marjanovic, M. V. Kisseleva, M. Wilson, and P. W. Majerus Type I phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 4-phosphatase regulates stress-induced apoptosis PNAS, October 23, 2007; 104(43): 16834 - 16839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sandoval, M. Morales, R. Tapia, L. del Carmen Alarcon, M. Sordo, P. Ostrosky-Wegman, A. Ortega, and E. Lopez-Bayghen p53 Response to Arsenic Exposure in Epithelial Cells: Protein Kinase B/Akt Involvement Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2007; 99(1): 126 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Huang and D. J. Tindall Dynamic FoxO transcription factors J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2007; 120(15): 2479 - 2487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Tu and K. Luo Acetylation of Smad2 by the Co-activator p300 Regulates Activin and Transforming Growth Factor beta Response J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2007; 282(29): 21187 - 21196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Harms and X. Chen Histone Deacetylase 2 Modulates p53 Transcriptional Activities through Regulation of p53-DNA Binding Activity Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3145 - 3152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Sasaki, E. C. Gan, A. Wakeham, S. Kornbluth, T. W. Mak, and H. Okada HLA-B-associated transcript 3 (Bat3)/Scythe is essential for p300-mediated acetylation of p53 Genes & Dev., April 1, 2007; 21(7): 848 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nag, A. Germaniuk-Kurowska, M. Dimri, M. A. Sassack, C. B. Gurumurthy, Q. Gao, G. Dimri, H. Band, and V. Band An Essential Role of Human Ada3 in p53 Acetylation J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 8812 - 8820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Abida, A. Nikolaev, W. Zhao, W. Zhang, and W. Gu FBXO11 Promotes the Neddylation of p53 and Inhibits Its Transcriptional Activity J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1797 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. I. Cesena, J.-R. Cardinaux, R. Kwok, and J. Schwartz CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein (C/EBP) beta Is Acetylated at Multiple Lysines: ACETYLATION OF C/EBPbeta AT LYSINE 39 MODULATES ITS ABILITY TO ACTIVATE TRANSCRIPTION J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 956 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. WESIERSKA-GADEK, M. GUEORGUIEVA, I. HERBACEK, and C. RANFTLER Effect of Distinct Anticancer Drugs on the Phosphorylation of p53 Protein at Serine 46 in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., January 1, 2007; 1095(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. RANFTLER, M. GUEORGUIEVA, and J.ÒZ. WESIERSKA-GADEK Prevention of p53 Degradation in Human MCF-7 Cells by Proteasome Inhibitors Does Not Mimic the Action of Roscovitine Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2006; 1090(1): 234 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kulikov, M. Winter, and C. Blattner Binding of p53 to the Central Domain of Mdm2 Is Regulated by Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28575 - 28583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chao, Z. Wu, S. J. Mazur, H. Borges, M. Rossi, T. Lin, J. Y. J. Wang, C. W. Anderson, E. Appella, and Y. Xu Acetylation of Mouse p53 at Lysine 317 Negatively Regulates p53 Apoptotic Activities after DNA Damage. Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(18): 6859 - 6869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhao, S. Lu, L. Wu, G. Chai, H. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Sun, Y. Yu, W. Zhou, Q. Zheng, et al. Acetylation of p53 at Lysine 373/382 by the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Depsipeptide Induces Expression of p21Waf1/Cip1. Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2006; 26(7): 2782 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. White, K. E. Talbott, N. C. Arva, and J. Bargonetti Mouse Double Minute 2 Associates with Chromatin in the Presence of p53 and Is Released to Facilitate Activation of Transcription. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3463 - 3470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Donev, D. S. Cole, B. Sivasankar, T. R. Hughes, and B. P. Morgan p53 Regulates Cellular Resistance to Complement Lysis through Enhanced Expression of CD59 Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2451 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Solomon, R. Pasupuleti, L. Xu, T. McDonagh, R. Curtis, P. S. DiStefano, and L. J. Huber Inhibition of SIRT1 Catalytic Activity Increases p53 Acetylation but Does Not Alter Cell Survival following DNA Damage Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2006; 26(1): 28 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Chan, M. C. Mak, T. K. Fung, A. Lau, W. Y. Siu, and R. Y.C. Poon Ubiquitination of p53 at Multiple Sites in the DNA-Binding Domain Mol. Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 4(1): 15 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Lassot, E. Estrabaud, S. Emiliani, M. Benkirane, R. Benarous, and F. Margottin-Goguet p300 Modulates ATF4 Stability and Transcriptional Activity Independently of Its Acetyltransferase Domain J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41537 - 41545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Perrot and M. M. Rechler The Coactivator p300 Directly Acetylates the Forkhead Transcription Factor Foxo1 and Stimulates Foxo1-Induced Transcription Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 19(9): 2283 - 2298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, J. Wang, C. Liu, W. E. Grizzle, S. Yu, S. Zhang, S. Barnes, W. J. Koopman, J. D. Mountz, R. P. Kimberly, et al. Cleavage of p53-Vimentin Complex Enhances Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand-Mediated Apoptosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Fibroblasts Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2005; 167(3): 705 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Matsuzaki, H. Daitoku, M. Hatta, H. Aoyama, K. Yoshimochi, and A. Fukamizu Acetylation of Foxo1 alters its DNA-binding ability and sensitivity to phosphorylation PNAS, August 9, 2005; 102(32): 11278 - 11283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Feng, T. Lin, H. Uranishi, W. Gu, and Y. Xu Functional Analysis of the Roles of Posttranslational Modifications at the p53 C Terminus in Regulating p53 Stability and Activity Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2005; 25(13): 5389 - 5395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||