![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 52, 50636-50642, December 27, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for
Theoretical Medicine, Institute for Cellular Signal Transduction,
Martinistr. 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
Received for publication, September 5, 2002, and in revised form, September 19, 2002
In Jurkat T cells, the type 3 ryanodine receptor
(RyR) was knocked-down by stable integration of plasmid expressing type
3 ryanodine receptor antisense RNA. Stable integration of the antisense plasmid in individual clones was demonstrated by PCR of genomic DNA,
expression of antisense RNA by reverse transcriptase PCR, and
efficiently reduced expression of type 3 ryanodine receptor protein by
Western blot. Selected clones were successfully used to analyze T cell
receptor/CD3 complex-mediated Ca2+ signaling. Reduced
expression of the type 3 RyR resulted in (i) significantly decreased
Ca2+ signaling in the sustained phase and (ii) in
permeabilized cells in a significantly impaired response toward cyclic
ADP-ribose but not to D-myo-inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate. For the first time, the role of the type 3 RyR in
sustained Ca2+ signaling was directly visualized by
confocal Ca2+ imaging as a significant contribution to the
number and the magnitude of subcellular Ca2+ signals. These
data suggest that the type 3 ryanodine receptor is essential in the
sustained Ca2+ response in T cells.
Ca2+ signaling by ligation of the T cell receptor
(TCR)/CD31 complex is a
complicated process involving the formation and breakdown of the second
messengers D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
(IP3) and cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose (cADPR) in a
temporally coordinated fashion (1-3). In addition to IP3
and cADPR, nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) is an
essential regulator of T cell Ca2+ signaling (4), although
the exact role of this nucleotide has not yet been clarified. Jurkat T
cells preincubated with the specific, membrane-permeant cADPR
antagonist 7-deaza-8-Br-cADPR (5) showed characteristic defects in the
onset and in the long-lasting phase of TCR/CD3- and
In T cells, expression of the RyR has been demonstrated by
[3H]ryanodine binding (2, 10, 11), Western blot analysis (2, 10, 12), and immunohistochemical staining (10, 12). Ca2+ signaling activated by caffeine, ryanodine, and/or
suramin also provided evidence for a functional role of RyR in T cells
(11, 13, 14). Inhibition of cADPR-mediated Ca2+ release by
ruthenium red and high Mg2+ concentrations in permeabilized
T cell preparations indicate an involvement of RyR in cADPR-mediated
Ca2+ release (15, 16).
From our kinetic and pharmacological data, we have hypothesized
recently that one of the essential Ca2+ release events in
the sustained phase of TCR/CD3-activated Ca2+ signaling is
cADPR-mediated release of Ca2+ via RyR (17). To directly
prove the involvement of RyR in this phase, we intended to knock-down
the type 3 RyR by an antisense RNA approach; the type 3 RyR was
chosen because it appeared to be the major isoform of RyR in Jurkat T
cells (2, 18). Antisense approaches have recently been successfully
used to demonstrate the importance of the type 1 receptor for
IP3 (IP3R) in Jurkat T cells (19) or the role
of types 1 and 2 RyR in Ca2+-induced Ca2+
release (CICR) in portal vein myocytes (20). Although the mechanisms underlying antisense approaches are under intense discussion (21-25), the successful study by Jayaraman et al. (19) in Jurkat T
cells prompted us to establish Jurkat subclones with stable integration of a type 3 RyR antisense construct.
Materials--
Fetal calf serum (tetracyclin-free) was obtained
from Biochrom (Berlin, Germany). Primers were purchased from MWG
Biotech (Ebersberg, Germany). Chemicals were obtained at highest
quality available from Mallinckrodt Baker (Griesheim, Germany), Merck, Sigma, Biomol (Hamburg, Germany), Serva (Heidelberg, Germany), FMC
Bioproducts, Biozym (Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany), PeqLab (Erlangen, Germany), or Applichem (Darmstadt, Germany).
Cell Culture--
Tet-On Jurkat T cells stably transfected with
the regulatory pTet-On plasmid were obtained from
Clontech. The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with Glutamax I, 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (free of
tetracyclin, Biochrom), 25 mM Hepes, 100 units/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 µg/ml G418-Sulfat
(termed "complete" RPMI 1640 medium later on). Culturing was done
at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2 in air.
Preparation of Plasmids and Transfection--
Total RNA was
prepared from Jurkat T cells using Tri-reagent (Sigma), and a 511-bp
fragment specific for the human type 3 RyR was amplified by
RT-PCR using the Titan one-Tube RT-PCR system (Roche Diagnostics)
followed by a nested PCR step using Pfu Turbo DNA polymerase
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and the following pairs of primers: GTG AAG
AGG AAT GTC ACC/CAA CCT TCT GAC CAC ACC (forward PCR/reverse PCR) and
CTA AAG CTT TCC AGT TGC TCT TCA CCA TCC/CTA GGA TCC CAC AGG TAC TCA GCT
TGC TCC (forward nested PCR/reverse nested PCR). The 250-bp control
fragment was amplified from pEGFP-N1 (Clontech)
using the following pairs of primers: TGA AGT TCG AGG GCG GAC ACC/GTG
ATC GCG CTT CTC GTT GG (forward PCR/reverse PCR) and CTA AAG CTT TGG
TGA ACC GCA TCG AGC/CTA GGA TCC CTC AGG TAG TGG TTG TCG (forward nested
PCR/reverse nested PCR). The amplicons were digested using
BamHI and HindIII and cloned in reverse
(antisense) orientation into the eukaryotic expression vector pTRE2
(Clontech). The identity of the inserts was checked
by automated DNA sequencing.
Before transfection of Tet-On Jurkat cells, the plasmids were
linearized using AatII (pTRE2 plasmids) and
HindIII (selection plasmid pTK-Hyg), purified by
phenol-chloroform extraction, and dissolved in sterile water.
Transfection was done by electroporation of 2 × 107
cells in 400 µl of medium using 40 µg of pTRE2 plasmids plus 2 µg
of pTK-Hyg; electroporation parameters were 0.2 kV of voltage and 960 microfarads of capacity. The cells were then left in the electroporation cuvette for another 20 min and then resuspended in 10 ml of complete RPMI 1640 medium and cultured.
Cloning Procedure--
At 48 h past electroporation,
hygromycin-resistant cells were selected first in bulk culture.
Hygromycin concentration was 50 µg/ml in the first week, then
increased to 100 µg/ml for 3 days, again increased to 200 µg/ml for
another 4 days, and then left at 50 µg/ml for another 2 weeks.
Surviving cells were then subcloned using the limiting dilution
procedure: cells were seeded at 0.3 cells/well in 96-well plates in
complete RPMI 1640 medium additionally supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 50 µg/ml hygromycin for 4 weeks.
Surviving clones were then expanded in the same medium.
PCR of Genomic DNA--
Stable integration of pTRE2
plasmids was analyzed by genomic PCR (500 ng of template DNA, 40 cycles) after preparation of genomic DNA from each individual clone
using the Invisorb® Cell DNA Mini HTS 96-Kit/V (Invitek, Crispin
Biomedical Supply, Houston, TX) according to the manufacturer's
instructions. The forward primer (AGA GCT CGT TTA GTG AAC CG) was
specific for a portion of the promoter region of pTRE2, and the
reverse primer (CTC ACC CTG AAG TTC TCA GC) was specific for the
multiple cloning site of pTRE2, thereby spanning a 208-bp fragment for
pTRE, a 681-bp fragment for pTRE-511, and a 420-bp fragment for
pTRE-EGFP.
RT-PCR--
Total RNA was prepared from all clones with
stable integration of pTRE2 plasmids using the RNeasy-Kit (Qiagen,
Hilden, Germany) and on-column DNase digest according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Primers were designed as follows. The
forward primers for the different pTRE2 plasmids (pTRE2-511, CTA GGA
TCC CAC AGG TAC TCA GCT TGC TCC; pTRE2-EGFP, CTA GGA TCC CTC AGG TAG
TGG TTG TCG) both recognized a specific region within the 5'-end of the
insert, whereas the reverse primer was specific for the polyadenylation site of pTRE2 (CTC ACC CTG AAG TTC TCA GC). Thus, the expected amplicon
sizes were different from endogenous RNA.
Preparation of Subcellular Fractions--
Subcellular fractions
were prepared from the different Tet-On Jurkat clones as described in
previous publications (2, 33).
SDS-PAGE and Western Blot--
P10 membranes (50 µg of
protein/lane) were subjected to reducing SDS-PAGE on a 6% separation
gel (3% stacking gel) as detailed earlier (2). Protein transfer to
nitrocellulose membrane was carried out by tank blotting at 7 mA/cm2 (total of 400 mA) for 3 h at 10 °C.
Unspecific binding to the membrane was then blocked by 5% (w/v) dry
milk powder in Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 at room temperature for 45 min. Immunostaining was done with anti-RyRcommon and
anti-IP3Rcommon monoclonal antibodies (Calbiochem and BD Biosciences-Transduction Laboratories) incubated overnight in 2.5% (w/v) dry milk powder in Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 at 10 °C with repeated rinsing and a further 1-h incubation using
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antiserum. Then, the
membranes were washed by a complex protocol and developed using
the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Determination of Intracellular Ca2+
Concentration--
Tet-On Jurkat T cell clones were loaded with
Fura2/AM as described (13). [Ca2+]i was
determined in aliquots of 1.5 × 106 Fura2-loaded
cells in a Hitachi F-2000 spectrofluorimeter operated in the ratio mode
(alternating excitation wavelengths, 340 and 380 nm; emission
wavelength, 495 nm). Each tracing was calibrated for the maximal ratio
by addition of ionomycin (1 µM) and for the minimal ratio
by addition of EGTA/Tris (4 mM/40 mM) at the end of each measurement.
Confocal Ca2+ Imaging--
Confocal Ca2+
imaging was carried out exactly as will be published
elsewhere2 except that the
period of image acquisition with maximal rate was done at a late
point (at about 15 min). In brief, stacks of three images at 0.5 µm
distance at each excitation wavelength (340 and 380 nm) were acquired
using an Improvision system (Heidelberg, Germany) centered around an
inverted microscope (Leica DMIRE2). Grayscale images were captured at 8 bits and 640 × 512 pixels using a Hamamatsu CCD camera (type ORCA
ER C4742-95-ER). The stacks of three images at a given wavelength were
then used to calculate a confocal image using the nearest neighbor
algorithm of the Openlab software module "volume
deconvolution" (Improvision). Finally, ratio images were constructed
pixel-by-pixel, calibrated, and converted into pseudocolor images using
the Openlab sofware modules "ratio" and "density calibration" (Improvision).
Determination of Ca2+ Release in Permeabilized
Cells--
Permeabilized cells were prepared, and [Ca2+]
was determined in the presence of Fura2, ATP, an
ATP-regenerating system in a Hitachi F-2000 spectrofluorimeter operated
in the ratio mode as described recently (34). In brief, Tet-On Jurkat T
cell clones (2 × 108 cells) were permeabilized by
saponin (40 µg/ml, 22 min) in an intracellular buffer, washed, and
left on ice for 2 h to allow for resealing of intracellular
membrane vesicles. Then, aliquots of 3.3 × 107 cells
were analyzed in the presence of 1 µM Fura2/free acid at alternating excitation wavelengths (340 and 380 nm) and at 495-nm emission wavelength. Loading of intracellular Ca2+ stores
was performed in the presence of creatine kinase (final concentration,
20 units/ml), creatine phosphate (final concentration, 20 mM) and ATP (final concentration, 1 mM). Then,
cADPR (10 µM), IP3 (4 µM), and
ionomycin (1 µM) were added successively. Finally, each
tracing was calibrated for [Ca2+] by addition of 1 mM CaCl2 and 4 mM EGTA/40
mM Tris.
To generate Jurkat T cell clones with reduced expression of the
type 3 RyR, the Tet-On system (26) was used. Commercially available
Jurkat T cells stably transfected with the regulatory pTet-On plasmid
(Clontech) were further transfected by
electroporation with the responsive plasmid pTRE2
(Clontech). The following cDNA fragments were
cloned in antisense orientation into the plasmid pTRE2: a 511-bp
cDNA fragment from the human type 3 RyR corresponding to
base pairs 12657-13167 (NCRI nucleotide data base accession number
NM_001036.1) of the type 3 RyR mRNA (pTRE2-511) and an irrelevant
control 250-bp cDNA fragment from EGFP (pTRE2-EGFP). The cells were
co-transfected with the hygromycin resistance plasmid pTK-Hyg to allow
for hygromycin resistance selection.
After electroporation selection was first carried out in bulk culture
and, after the death of the majority of cells (about 95%), stable,
hygromycin-resistant clones were obtained by limiting dilution (for
details, see "Experimental Procedures"). For the type 3 RyR
antisense plasmid pTRE2-511, 57 clones out of 400 wells were obtained;
for the control plasmid pTRE2-EGFP, 29 clones out of 266 wells
were obtained. The clones were selected according to the following
strategy: first, the stable integration of the plasmids into the genome
of the Tet-On Jurkat T cells was analyzed by PCR of genomic DNA;
secondly, expression of antisense mRNA was determined by RT-PCR;
and thirdly, reduced expression of the type 3 RyR was checked by
SDS-PAGE and Western blot.
PCR of genomic DNA was conducted 3 months after transfection, assuring
that the plasmids were either stably integrated or degraded. PCR
of genomic DNA data from a selection of individual clones (clones
21-41) demonstrates that a sufficient number of stably transfected
clones for the type 3 RyR antisense plasmid pTRE2-511 was generated
(Fig. 1A, left
panel). Similarly, for the control plasmid pTRE2-EGFP and for
vector-transfected cells (pTRE2), sufficient stably transfected clones
were obtained (Fig. 1A, right panel). In total,
56% of pTRE2-511 clones and 72% of pTRE2-EGFP clones were stably
transfected.
RT-PCR was conducted with total RNA prepared from clones that showed
stable integration of the respective plasmids during genomic PCR. To
analyze for inducibility, clones were cultured in the absence or
presence of doxycyclin (1 µg/ml) for 2 days. Seven clones
expressing antisense mRNA were obtained for pTRE2-511, and five
clones for pTRE2-EGFP. Unfortunately, in almost all cases, no
inducibility was found as exemplified for clone pTRE2-511#25 (Fig.
1B, left panel) and the clones pTRE2-EGFP#E2 and
#E4 (Fig. 1B, right panel). However, since all
clones were growing at reasonable rates, our initial concern that
permanent suppression of RyR expression might be cytotoxic and thus
that the cells might not be sufficiently expandable turned out not to
be a serious problem. Thus, for further detailed characterization, only
a few clones were selected: type 3 RyR antisense clone pTRE2-511#25 and
control clones pTRE2-EGFP#E1 and #E2.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of clone pTRE2-511#25 revealed a
greatly reduced expression of RyR as compared with the parent Tet-On
Jurkat cell and with the control clones pTRE2-EGFP#E1 (Fig.
2) and pTRE2-EGFP#E2 (data not shown). In
contrast, there was no change in expression of the IP3R
(Fig. 2), suggesting that expression of other proteins essentially
involved in Ca2+ signaling was not altered by transfection
with pTRE2 plasmids.
Knock-down of the Type 3 Ryanodine Receptor Impairs Sustained
Ca2+ Signaling via the T Cell Receptor/CD3 Complex*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1-integrin-mediated Ca2+ signaling
(2, 6). In addition, in peripheral human T cells, 7-deaza-8-Br-cADPR
efficiently blocked expression of the activation antigens CD25 and
MHCII and blocked proliferation upon CD3 ligation (2). These data
suggested that cADPR plays an essential role in the sustained phase of
T cell Ca2+ signaling. Although the molecular target for
cADPR is still a controversial issue (reviewed in Ref. 7), in many cell
systems, the pharmacology of cADPR-mediated Ca2+ release
points strongly toward ryanodine receptors (RyR) as the intracellular
Ca2+ channels involved (Ref. 8 and reviewed in Ref. 9).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Genomic integration and mRNA expression
of type 3 RyR antisense construct. As shown in A,
genomic integration of the type 3 RyR antisense plasmid pTRE2-511, the
control plasmid pTRE2-EGFP, and the plasmid pTRE2 (without insert) was
analyzed by genomic PCR using 500 ng of DNA as template and 40 cycles.
Aliquots of the PCR reactions were then analyzed on a 2% agarose gel.
The forward primer was localized in the promoter region of pTRE2, and
the reverse primer was localized in the multiple cloning site of pTRE2.
Expected amplicon sizes were 681 bp for pTRE2-511 (left
panel), 208 bp for pTRE2, and 420 bp for pTRE2-EGFP (right
panel). As shown in B, RT-PCR was performed using 500 ng of total RNA as template and 28 cycles. The forward primers were
specific for the insert, whereas the reverse primer recognized a
portion of the polyadenylation site of pTRE2. Aliquots of the RT-PCR
reactions were then analyzed on a 2% agarose gel. Expected amplicon
lengths were 558 bp for pTRE2-511 (left panel) and 297 bp
for pTRE2-EGFP (right panel). Lanes marked with i
indicate that the cells had been cultured with 1 µg/ml doxycyclin for
48 h before the preparation of RNA. Lanes marked with M
indicate a 100-bp DNA ladder with a dominant band at 500 bp.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Western blot analysis of expression of RyR
and IP3R. Parent Jurkat Tet-On Jurkat cells and
clones pTRE2-511#25 and pTRE2-EGFP#E1 were homogenized, and P10
membranes were prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Protein (50 µg/lane) was separated on reducing
SDS-PAGE (3% stacking, 6% separating gel). The proteins were
tank-blotted (see "Experimental Procedures") onto a
nitrocellulose membrane. This membrane was cut into two pieces
according to the relative position of RyR and IP3R. The
channels were made visible by incubation with specific primary
antibodies followed by secondary, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
goat anti-mouse antiserum using the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences)
according to the manufacturer's protocol. Lanes marked
with Dox and + indicate that the cells had been
cultured in the presence of doxycyclin (1 µg/ml) for 6 days before
preparation of P10 membranes. For comparison of protein mass, type 1 RyR highly purified from heavy sarcoplasmic reticulum of rabbit
muscle (kind gift of Prof. M. Hohenegger, Vienna, Austria) was
analyzed in parallel.
TCR/CD3 complex-mediated Ca2+ signaling was first analyzed in cell suspension in a dual-wavelength spectrophotometer (Table I and Fig. 3). The basal [Ca2+]i was slightly but not significantly elevated in the clones pTRE2-511#25, pTRE2-EGFP#E1, and #E2 (Table I), indicating that the Ca2+ clearance mechanisms of the cells, e.g. the Ca2+ pumps of the endoplasmic reticulum and the plasma membrane, were unaltered by the transfection process. Upon stimulation with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody OKT3, the parent Tet-On Jurkat T cells and all clones showed the typical biphasic pattern of Ca2+ signaling (17). Most importantly, the sustained Ca2+ signal of the type 3 RyR antisense clone pTRE2-511#25 was significantly reduced as compared with the parent Tet-On Jurkat T cell or with control clones pTRE2-EGFP#E1 and #E2 (Fig. 3). In accordance with suppression of type 3 RyR expression already occurring without induction by doxycyclin (Fig. 2), there was no difference between cells preincubated without (Fig. 3A) or with doxycyclin (Fig. 3B). A second TET-On Jurkat T cell clone stably transfected with a different antisense construct against the type 3 RyR showed a similar reduction of the sustained Ca2+ signal (data not shown). These data suggest that the type 3 RyR is involved in the sustained phase of T cell Ca2+ signaling. In contrast, the initial rapid Ca2+ peak was not different between the different clones, except for a slightly increased Ca2+ peak in clone pTRE2-EGFP#E1.
|
|
Confocal Ca2+ imaging was then applied to analyze TCR/CD3
complex-mediated Ca2+ signaling on the subcellular level. A
deconvolution-based confocal Ca2+ imaging technique was
recently developed in our laboratory and applied to the analysis of
pacemaking subcellular Ca2+ signals that appear
between stimulation and the first global Ca2+ signal in
Jurkat T cells.2 In the current study, a modified protocol
was used for the first time to analyze subcellular Ca2+
signals at a much later time point, e.g. in the sustained
phase where a significant difference between the type 3 RyR antisense clone pTRE2-511#25 and the control clones pTRE2-EGFP#E1 and #E2 was
already observed in cell suspension (Fig. 3). Stimulation of both clone
pTRE2-EGFP#E1 and clone pTRE2-511#25 by solid-phase bound OKT3
activated a rapid, global, and high Ca2+ response in almost
all cells (Fig. 4, A and
D). However, as already seen in suspension (Fig. 3), there
was a significantly reduced phase of sustained Ca2+
signaling in type 3 RyR antisense clone pTRE2-511#25 as compared with
control clone pTRE2-EGFP#E1 (Fig. 4, A and D).
Analysis of the subcellular Ca2+ signals of two single
cells (Fig. 4, A and D, red lines)
representative of the average of clone pTRE2-511#25 and clone
pTRE2-EGFP#E1 (Fig. 4, A and D, green
lines) revealed a drastically reduced number of individual
Ca2+ signals with amplitudes >115 nM (Fig. 4,
B and E, dotted lines in C
and F). Most importantly, both the total number and the
amplitudes of the subcellular Ca2+ signals in three
different regions of the cell were significantly lower for clone
pTRE2-511#25 as compared with clone pTRE2-EGFP#E1 (Fig. 4, C
and F). These data represent the first characterization of
subcellular Ca2+ signals in type 3 RyR-deficient T cells
and demonstrate that the type 3 RyR is necessary for amplification of
local Ca2+ signals during the sustained phase of T cell
Ca2+ signaling.
|
Since evidence has been presented that the type 3 RyR is the target
Ca2+ channel for the calcium-mobilizing second messenger
cADPR (2), permeabilized cells were prepared, and the
Ca2+-releasing effect of cADPR and IP3 was
analyzed. Fig. 5 (left panel)
shows typical Ca2+ release tracings obtained by addition of
10 µM cADPR in the type 3 RyR antisense clone
pTRE2-511#25 as compared with the parent Tet-On Jurkat T cell and the
control clone pTRE2-EGFP#E1. The response to cADPR was significantly
reduced, whereas IP3 released Ca2+ at a similar
magnitude in the three different clones (Fig. 5, right
panel). These data demonstrate directly that knock-down of the
type 3 RyR significantly decreases the Ca2+-mobilizing
effect of cADPR.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the current study, we have generated a novel, stably transfected Jurkat T cell clone with greatly reduced expression of the type 3 RyR as shown by Western blot analysis. Stable integration of the antisense plasmid was demonstrated by genomic PCR, and expression of antisense mRNA was demonstrated by RT-PCR. The clone was successfully used to analyze the role of type 3 RyR in TCR/CD3 complex-mediated Ca2+ signaling. Reduced expression of the type 3 RyR resulted in significantly decreased Ca2+ signaling in the sustained phase and a significantly impaired response toward cADPR but not IP3. For the first time, the role of the type 3 RyR in sustained Ca2+ signaling was directly visualized as a significant contribution to the number and the magnitude of subcellular Ca2+ signals.
Although complementary RNA and DNA have been widely used for gene silencing, the mechanisms underlying these antisense approaches were not well understood (reviewed in Ref. 21). However, the discoveries that (i) double-stranded RNA was a better gene silencer than antisense RNA (23), (ii) double-stranded RNA is cleaved to small interfering RNA (24), and (iii) such small interfering RNA then activates specific digest of the original mRNA by the so-called RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) (27) likely suggest that the antisense RNA acts via small interfering RNA. For intracellular Ca2+ channels, different antisense approaches have been used. Macrez and co-workers (20) injected chemically modified (phosphorothioate) antisense DNA oligomers directed toward each single subtype of RyR into single rat portal vein myocytes in primary culture, and after a few days, they analyzed the efficacy of their antisense approach by RT-PCR and staining of single cells by BODIPY FL-X ryanodine. Knock-down of both type 1 and type 2 RyR efficiently decreased local and global Ca2+ responses activated by membrane depolarization or angiotensin II, whereas caffeine-activated global Ca2+ signaling was only partially reduced (20). Interestingly, knock-down of type 3 RyR had no effect on these activation pathways (20). However, under conditions of Ca2+ overload, type 3 RyR was activated by caffeine or local increases in [Ca2+]i (28). These impressive studies showed for the first time by a molecular approach the function of the different RyR subtypes in portal vein smooth muscle cells. However, a disadvantage of the experimental strategy of Macrez and co-workers (20) was that only a limited number of cells could be injected with antisense oligomers, making Western blot analysis of the proteins impossible. In addition, no stable cell lines were established, requiring repeated laborious injections of antisense oligomers. A different approach toward the IP3R was carried out by Marks and colleagues (19): Jurkat T cells were stably expressed with a vector, allowing for constitutive expression (pREP10) containing a fragment of the human type 1 IP3R in antisense orientation. Although the proliferation rate of these cells decreased by about 75%, it was impressively demonstrated that deletion of the IP3R almost completely impaired TCR/CD3-mediated Ca2+ signaling but not capacitative Ca2+ signaling activated by the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticular Ca2+ ATPase inhibitor thapsigargin (19). These important results suggest that (i) the whole machinery of T cell Ca2+ signaling depends on rapid, IP3-mediated Ca2+ release in the first minutes of T cell activation and that (ii) additional Ca2+ channels are present in Jurkat T cells allowing for passive Ca2+ leak from the endoplasmic reticulum in case of thapsigargin stimulation. Both results were confirmed recently: microinjection of the IP3 antagonist D-myo-inositol 1,4,6-phosphorothioate before TCR/CD3 stimulation completely abolished Ca2+ signaling (2), whereas microinjection a few minutes after the first Ca2+ spike had no effect (2), confirming that IP3 acts to deliver the first global Ca2+ responses, which are then used as co-activators of the subsequent systems. Secondly, the expression of additional intracellular Ca2+ release channels that would carry the leak current from the endoplasmic reticulum of type 1 IP3R-deficient cells in case of sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticular Ca2+ ATPase inhibition was demonstrated: on the one hand, the expression of types 2 and 3 IP3R was almost unaltered by the type 1 IP3R-specific antisense construct (29), and on the other hand, sufficient evidence for RyR expression in Jurkat T cells has been obtained in the meantime (2, 10-18).
Importantly, Jayaraman and Marks (29) showed that although the type 1 IP3R antisense cDNA had at least 60% identity with types 2 and 3 IP3R, there was almost no effect on the protein expression of these additional IP3R isoforms. In our study, the type 3 RyR antisense fragment used had a homology of only about 29% to the types 1 and 2 RyR, assuring that any interference with expression of these other RyR subtypes could be excluded.
The data presented in this study suggest that the type 3 RyR plays an essential role as a Ca2+ release system in the sustained phase of TCR/CD3-mediated Ca2+ signaling. The fact that cADPR is elevated during this phase (2) and that the membrane-permeant cADPR antagonist 7-deaza-8-Br-cADPR decreased Ca2+ signaling in this phase (2) indicates that during sustained Ca2+ signaling, cADPR controls CICR via the type 3 RyR. Our confocal Ca2+ imaging data (Fig. 4) demonstrate directly that in cells with largely reduced expression of the type 3 RyR, the subcellular Ca2+ release events are much smaller and less abundant as compared with the control cells, indicating that cADPR-controlled CICR acts as an amplification system to increase the magnitude of the sustained Ca2+ response. The fact that the sustained Ca2+ signal in T cells requires permanent Ca2+ entry can be easily connected to our model: first, we have shown previously that microinjection of cADPR into Jurkat T cells activates sustained Ca2+ entry (30), and secondly, it was shown recently that in IP3R-deficient DT40 cells that express types 1 and 3 RyR, capacitative Ca2+ entry was regulated by these RyR subtypes and cADPR (31).
Since no complete knock-out of type 3 RyR expression could be achieved
in our experimental model, the remaining Ca2+ signal in
intact T cells (Fig. 3), but also in permeabilized T cells stimulated
by cADPR (Fig. 5), may be due to residual type 3 RyR expression, but
more likely, additional systems, such as the IP3R system in
intact cells or additional cADPR-sensitive Ca2+ channels
may be involved. Similarly, in muscles from type 3 RyR
/
mice, effects of cADPR could be still
detected and were explained by an effect of cADPR on the type 1 RyR
(32). However, it is remarkable that three different ways to interfere
with the cADPR/RyR signaling pathway in Jurkat T cells, namely (i)
cADPR antagonism (2), (ii) inhibition of ADP-ribosyl cyclase
activity,3 and (iii) knock-down
of the type 3 RyR, resulted in a very similar reduction (around 50%)
on the long-lasting global Ca2+ signal.
In conclusion, we have generated and characterized a novel Jurkat T
cell line with greatly reduced expression of the type 3 RyR. Analysis
of TCR/CD3-mediated Ca2+ signaling in cell suspensions and
on the subcellular level indicate that during sustained
Ca2+ signaling, cADPR controls CICR via the type 3 RyR by
significant amplification of local Ca2+ signals.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Prof. Martin Hohenegger, University of Vienna, for a gift of purified skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor and to Martin Kalkstein and Sandra Frederichs for expert technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschugsgemeinschaft (GU 360/2-4 and 2-5 to A. H. G. and to G. W. M.), the Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst (VIGONI-program Grant 314-vigoni-dr to A.H.G.), the Forschungsförderungsfonds of the Medical Faculty (Grant F-408-1 to A. H. G.), and the Wellcome Trust (Research Collaboration Grants 51326 and 068065 to A. H. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-40-42803-2828; Fax: 49-40-42803-9880; E-mail:
guse@uke.uni-hamburg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209061200
2 S. Kunerth, G. W. Mayr, F. Koch-Nolte, and A. H. Guse, unpublished data.
3 K. Schweitzer, B. V. L. Potter, and A. H. Guse, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TCR/CD3, T cell receptor/CD3; cADPR, cyclic adenosine diphosphoribose; CICR , Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; IP3, D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; IP3R, IP3 receptor; RISC, RNA-induced silencing complex; RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR; RyR, ryanodine receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Guse, A. H.,
and Emmrich, F.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24498-24502 |
| 2. | Guse, A. H., da Silva, C. P., Berg, I., Skapenko, A. L., Weber, K., Heyer, P., Hohenegger, M., Ashamu, G. A., Schulze-Koops, H., Potter, B. V. L., and Mayr, G. W. (1999) Nature 389, 70-73 |
| 3. | da Silva, C. P., and Guse, A. H. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1498, 122-133[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Berg, I.,
Potter, B. V. L.,
Mayr, G. W.,
and Guse, A. H.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
581-588 |
| 5. |
Sethi, J. K.,
Empson, R. M.,
Bailey, V. C.,
Potter, B. V. L.,
and Galione, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16358-16363 |
| 6. | Schöttelndreier, H., Mayr, G. W., and Guse, A. H. (2001) Cell. Signal. 13, 895-899[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Guse, A. H. (2002) Curr. Mol. Med. 2, 273-282[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Galione, A.,
Lee, H. C.,
and Busa, W. B.
(1991)
Science
253,
1143-1146 |
| 9. | Lee, H. C. (2001) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 41, 317-345[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Bourguignon, L. Y.,
Chu, A.,
Jin, H.,
and Brandt, N. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17917-17922 |
| 11. | Ricard, I., Martel, J., Dupuis, L., Dupuis, G., and Payet, M. D. (1997) Cell. Signal. 9, 197-206[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Guse, A. H.,
Tsygankov, A. Y.,
Weber, K.,
and Mayr, G. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
34722-34727 |
| 13. | Guse, A. H., Roth, E., and Emmrich, F. (1993) Biochem. J. 291, 447-451[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Hohenegger, M., Berg, I., Weigl, L., Mayr, G. W., Potter, B. V. L., and Guse, A. H. (1999) Br. J. Pharmacol. 128, 1235-1240[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Guse, A. H., da Silva, C. P., Emmrich, F., Ashamu, G. A., Potter, B. V. L., and Mayr, G. W. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3353-3359[Abstract] |
| 16. |
Guse, A. H.,
da Silva, C. P.,
Weber, K.,
Ashamu, G. A.,
Potter, B. V. L.,
and Mayr, G. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23946-23953 |
| 17. | Guse, A. H. (2002) in Cyclic ADP-ribose and NAADP: structures, metabolism and functions (Lee, H. C., ed) , Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, in press |
| 18. | Hakamata, Y., Nishimura, S., Nakai, J., Nakashima, Y., Kita, T., and Imoto, K. (1994) FEBS Lett. 352, 206-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Jayaraman, T.,
Ondriasova, E.,
Ondrias, K.,
Harnick, D. J.,
and Marks, A. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6007-6011 |
| 20. |
Coussin, F.,
Macrez, N.,
Morel, J.-L.,
and Mironneau, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9596-9603 |
| 21. | Nellen, W., and Liechtenstein, C. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 419-423[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Novottny, J., Diegel, S., Schirmacher, H., Mohrle, A., Hildebrandt, M., Oberstrass, J., and Nellen, W. (2001) Methods Enzymol. 342, 193-212[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Fire, A., Xu, S., Montgomery, M. K., Kostas, S. A., Driver, S. E., and Mello, C. C. (1998) Nature 391, 806-811[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Elbashir, S.,
Lendeckel, W.,
and Tuschl, W.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
188-200 |
| 25. | Bernstein, E., Caudy, A. A., Hammond, S. M., and Hannon, G. J. (2001) Nature 409, 363-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Gossen, M.,
Freundlieb, S.,
Bender, G.,
Muller, G.,
Hillen, W.,
and Bujard, H.
(1995)
Science
268,
1766-1769 |
| 27. | Hammond, S. M., Bernstein, E., Beach, D., and Hannon, G. J. (2000) Nature 404, 293-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Mironneau, J.,
Coussin, F.,
Jeyakumar, L. H.,
Fleischer, S.,
Mironneau, C.,
and Macrez, N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
11257-11264 |
| 29. | Jayaraman, T., and Marks, A. R. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3005-3012[Abstract] |
| 30. |
Guse, A. H.,
Berg, I.,
da Silva, C. P.,
Potter, B. V. L.,
and Mayr, G. W.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8546-8550 |
| 31. | Kiselyov, K., Shin, D. M., Shcheynikov, N., Kurosaki, T., and Muallem, S. (2001) Biochem. J. 360, 17-22[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Fulceri, R., Rossi, R., Bottinelli, R., Conti, A., Intravaia, E., Galione, A., Benedetti, A., Sorrentino, V., and Reggiani, C. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 288, 697-702[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Schweitzer, K., Mayr, G. W., and Guse, A. H. (2001) Anal. Biochem. 15, 218-226 |
| 34. | Guse, A. H., Cakir-Kiefer, C., Fukuoka, M., Shuto, S., Weber, K., Bailey, V. C., Matsuda, A., Mayr, G. W., Oppenheimer, N., Schuber, F., and Potter, B. V. L. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 6744-6751[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dadsetan, L. Zakharova, T. F. Molinski, and A. F. Fomina Store-operated Ca2+ Influx Causes Ca2+ Release from the Intracellular Ca2+ Channels That Is Required for T Cell Activation J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 12512 - 12519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Moreschi, S. Bruzzone, R. A. Nicholas, F. Fruscione, L. Sturla, F. Benvenuto, C. Usai, S. Meis, M. U. Kassack, E. Zocchi, et al. Extracellular NAD+ Is an Agonist of the Human P2Y11 Purinergic Receptor in Human Granulocytes J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 2006; 281(42): 31419 - 31429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Wedagedera and N. J. Burroughs T-Cell Activation: A Queuing Theory Analysis at Low Agonist Density Biophys. J., September 1, 2006; 91(5): 1604 - 1618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gasser, S. Bruhn, and A. H. Guse Second Messenger Function of Nicotinic Acid Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Revealed by an Improved Enzymatic Cycling Assay J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 16906 - 16913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Dammermann and A. H. Guse Functional Ryanodine Receptor Expression Is Required for NAADP-mediated Local Ca2+ Signaling in T-lymphocytes J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21394 - 21399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-Y. Rah, K.-H. Park, M.-K. Han, M.-J. Im, and U.-H. Kim Activation of CD38 by Interleukin-8 Signaling Regulates Intracellular Ca2+ Level and Motility of Lymphokine-activated Killer Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2005; 280(4): 2888 - 2895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Stokes, J. Gordon, and G. Grafton Non-voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ Channels in Human T Cells: PHARMACOLOGY AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MAJOR {alpha} PORE-FORMING AND AUXILIARY {beta}-SUBUNITS J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 19566 - 19573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kunerth, M. F. Langhorst, N. Schwarzmann, X. Gu, L. Huang, Z. Yang, L. Zhang, S. J. Mills, L.-h. Zhang, B. V.L. Potter, et al. Amplification and propagation of pacemaker Ca2+ signals by cyclic ADP-ribose and the type 3 ryanodine receptor in T cells J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2004; 117(10): 2141 - 2149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||