Chemokine-independent Preference for T-helper-1 Cells in
Transendothelial Migration*
Tomoya
Katakai
,
Takahiro
Hara
,
Manabu
Sugai
,
Hiroyuki
Gonda
,
Yukiko
Nambu
,
Eishou
Matsuda
,
Yasutoshi
Agata
, and
Akira
Shimizu
§¶
From the
Center for Molecular Biology and Genetics,
Kyoto University, and the § Translational Research
Center, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
Received for publication, April 29, 2002, and in revised form, October 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
We analyzed differences in the transendothelial
migration (TEM) ability of T-helper (Th)-1 and Th2 cells across a
murine endothelial cell line (F-2) under static conditions. The TEM
abilities of Th1 cells from mice bearing autoimmune diseases and
antigen-specific Th1 cell lines were severalfold higher than those of
Th2 cells and lines of the same origin. These preferences were observed without exogenous chemoattractant and were insensitive to pertussis toxin, which completely blocks TEM induced by exogenous
chemoattractants. Antibodies against LFA-1 and ICAM-1 as well as CD44
markedly blocked the TEM of Th1 cells. TEM ability was also blocked by
pharmacological inhibitors of Src family protein-tyrosine kinases
(PP2 and herbimycin A), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(wortmannin), and phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C
(U73122). Cross-linking of CD44 strongly induced highly elongated
morphology in Th1 lines, but weakly in Th2 lines. The pharmacological
inhibitors that blocked TEM also inhibited this morphological change,
whereas pertussis toxin did not. These data indicate that there are
signaling pathways for TEM independent of chemokine attraction, but
through adhesion molecules including CD44, and that the preferential
TEM ability of Th1 over Th2 cells is formed, at least in part, by
intrinsic differences in these pathways.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
T-helper (Th)1-1 cells
are the key effector subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes; produce
interferon-
(IFN-
); and mediate cytotoxic cellular immunity in
situations such as parasitic infection, tumor eradication, allograft
rejection, and autoimmune diseases. In contrast, Th2 cells produce
interleukin (IL)-4 and regulate humoral immunity and allergic responses
(1-5). As Th1 and Th2 cells inhibit the functions of each other, a
balance of the two subsets influences disease pathology. Also, their
differential localization may control the effectiveness of pathogen
eradication. It has been shown that a preferential accumulation of Th1
cells occurs in lesions with few Th2 cells present (5-9). This
accumulation may increase efficiency in eliminating allografts,
pathogens, or pathogen-infected cells via a positive feedback loop.
Once Th1-dominated infiltration occurs, the released cytokines and
chemokines are thought to further selectively attract and support type
1 effectors, including Th1 cells, and the collected effectors may act
more efficiently without inhibition by Th2 cells. However, if an immune
response directed against self-components develops, a vicious circle
develops, as accumulated effector cells destroy tissue, resulting in
release of more autoantigen. Indeed, our previous studies
indicated such a vicious circle in an experimental model for autoimmune
gastritis (AIG) (6, 7), but it is not clear how it is triggered. We suggested that a preferential transendothelial migration of Th1 cells
over Th2 cells in this model may be one of the mechanisms regulating
the preferential accumulation of Th1 cells and type 1 effectors (6).
Thus, understanding the detailed mechanisms of Th1 cell infiltration
into tissues is an important issue for the immune regulation or
therapeutic trials.
Migration of T cells into tissues occurs via a complex and sequential
interaction between T cells and endothelial cells (10, 11). If T cells
and the endothelium express pairs of tethering molecules such as L-,
P-, and E-selectins and their sialylated carbohydrate ligands, T cells
flowing through the blood stream become tethered to a vessel wall and
can roll along the endothelium (10, 12). Subsequently, integrin
activation and cell arrest in the endothelium are induced by
chemokines, soluble or matrix-bound chemotactic factors produced by the
surrounding tissue or endothelial cells and presented on the luminal
surface of the vessel wall (10, 15). A large number of
chemokines have been discovered in recent decades, and each chemokine
acts upon a different set of immune cells, including Th1 and Th2 cells,
according to their expression of specific receptors (9, 13, 14). Some
chemokines such as RANTES (CCL5), MIP-1
(CCL4), and IP-10 (CXCL10)
selectively attract Th1 cells, whereas MDC (CCL22) and TARC (CCL17)
attract Th2 cells (14). Chemokines deliver downstream signals via
heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptors and not only increase
the affinity of integrins for their ligands, but also stimulate cell
motility (13, 15). Several modes of integrin-mediated interaction
between T cells and endothelial cells have been documented,
e.g. between LFA-1 (
L
2), VLA-4
(
4
1), and
4
7 on T cells and their major receptors,
ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and MAdCAM-1, respectively, on endothelial cells (10,
11). Adhesion of CD44 to hyaluronan is also important for the
extravasation of activated T cells into inflamed tissues (16, 17).
Therefore, not only the combination of chemokine receptors, but also
adhesion molecules expressed on immune cell subsets can determine their
selective migration toward a particular site (10). Subsequent to arrest
in the endothelium, T cells pass through the endothelial barrier and
migrate into the tissue mesenchyme along a chemokine gradient. However,
the details of the molecular mechanisms and signal mediators in this
final "transendothelial migration" (TEM) step of each T cell subset
are poorly understood.
The coordination of chemoattractant- or adhesion-induced signals, cell
movement, and detachment from endothelial cells is thought to be
crucial for lymphocyte transmigration across the endothelium. A number
of studies have demonstrated that tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins
and phosphatidylinositol metabolism play pivotal roles in cell adhesion
as well as in cell motility (18-26). Chemokines are known to activate
both pathways through G-protein-coupled receptors by heterotrimeric
G-protein signaling (27-33). However, the roles of the enzymes
mediating these pathways in the TEM of T cell subsets remain to be characterized.
Using CD4+ T cells from AIG mice containing substantial
numbers of Th1 and Th2 cells, we have reported that IFN-
(but not IL-4)-producing cells were markedly enriched after passing through the
cell monolayer of the murine endothelial cell line F-2, without exogenous chemoattractants (6). In this study, using this unique experimental model suitable for investigating the TEM of Th cells, we
examined the chemokines, adhesion molecules, and signaling pathways
involved. To understand the detailed mechanisms by analyzing the two
subsets separately, we also used the Th1 and Th2 cell lines of a single
known antigen specificity established from T cell receptor
transgenic mice. We found that there is a G
i-independent signal for TEM mediated by adhesion through LFA-1 and CD44 probably connected to Src family protein-tyrosine kinases (Src-PTKs),
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), and
phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC). There may
be intrinsic differences in these pathways between the two subsets,
resulting in the preferential TEM ability of Th1 cells over Th2 cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Mice--
BALB/c mice were purchased from Japan SLC Inc.
(Shizuoka, Japan). A transgenic mouse cell line carrying an ovalbumin
(ovalbumin-(323-339))-specific, I-Ad-restricted T cell
receptor gene on a BALB/c background (Tg-d mice) (34) was provided by
Dr. S. Habu (Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan).
Mice were maintained in the animal facility at the Center for Molecular
Biology and Genetics of Kyoto University. Experimental AIG was induced
by neonatal thymectomy of BALB/c mice 3 days after birth and diagnosed
by the detection of autoantibody in sera as described previously (6,
7).
Cells--
Spleen cells were prepared from AIG mice or Tg-d mice
by Lympholight-M (Cedarlane, Ontario, Canada). CD4+ T cells
were isolated cells not bound to monoclonal antibodies against
the class II major histocompatibility complex (TIB120), heat-stable antigen (J11D), Fc
receptor II/III (2.4G2), and
CD8 (HO-2.2) using goat anti-rat IgG (Rockland Inc., Gilbertsville, PA)-coated plates. These monoclonal antibodies were used as a mixture
of hybridoma culture supernatants. Memory CD4+ cells
were further enriched as the flow-through fraction of a magnetic cell
sorter (MACS, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) using
biotin-labeled anti-CD45RB antibody (Pharmingen) followed by
streptavidin-MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified Tg-d
CD4+ T cells were stimulated with 20-50 µg/ml ovalbumin
(Sigma) and 2 ng/ml IL-2 (Genzyme Corp., Cambridge, MA) with irradiated
BALB/c mice spleen cells in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS
(FCS/RPMI). Th1 and Th2 cell lines were established from Tg-d
CD4+ T cells by repeated stimulation once a week
with ovalbumin and irradiated spleen cells under each biased culture
condition: 1 ng/ml IL-2, 5 ng/ml IL-12 (Genzyme Corp.), and anti-IL-4
antibody (11B11 supernatant, 0.1 volume) for Th1 cells and 50 ng/ml
IL-4 (Peprotec, Rocky Hill, NJ) and anti-IFN-
antibody (R4.6A2
supernatant, 0.1 volume) for Th2 cells. Once established, cell lines
were maintained without antibodies.
Flow Cytometry Analysis--
T cells or F-2 cells, a murine
endothelial cell line (35, 36), were stained with the following rat
monoclonal antibodies. For primary reagents, hybridoma supernatants
against LFA-1
(FD441.8), CD44 (KM201), ICAM-1 (YN1/1.7.4), and
VCAM-1 (MK2) and purified antibodies against MAdCAM-1 (Serotec Ltd.,
Oxford, England); P-selectin, E-selectin, and VE-cadherin (Pharmingen);
and PECAM-1 (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were used.
Biotin-labeled anti-rat IgG and allophycocyanine-labeled streptavidin
(both from Caltag Laboratories) were used as secondary and tertiary
reagents, respectively. For CD4+ T cells, two-color
staining was performed using phycoerythrin-labeled anti-CD4
antibody (BD Biosciences) in combination with the antibodies described
above. Cells were then analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using
Cell Quest software (BD Biosciences).
Transendothelial Migration Assay--
F-2 cells (2 × 104) were cultured on an FCS-precoated Transwell insert
(6.5-mm diameter, 5-µm pore size, Corning Costar, Tokyo) with 10%
FCS-containing Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium for 38-40 h to
make a confluent monolayer. Dead cells were removed by Lympholight-M
from the cultured CD4+ T cells at 6 days after stimulation.
Then, 5 × 104 cells in 100 µl of FCS/RPMI were
applied to the F-2 cell monolayer, and the lower chamber was filled
with 0.5 ml of FCS/RPMI. After the proper incubation time, the migrated
cells were collected from the lower compartments and counted with a
FACScalibur flow cytometer as the flow-through cell number over a
constant time period (60 s). Most of the TEM assays were carried out
over a 4-h incubation of cells on the F-2 cell monolayer because the rate of TEM was almost constant up to 8 h, but the stability of the fast growing F-2 cell monolayer was disturbed after a longer time
period (see Fig. 2D). Purified rat monoclonal antibodies against adhesion molecules such as LFA-1
(M17/4), ICAM-1 (3E2), VLA-4
(R1-2), P-selectin (RB40.34), and E-selectin (10E9.6)
(Pharmingen); VCAM-1 (MK2, Immunotech, Marseilles, France); and CD44
(KM201, IQ Products, Groningen, The Netherlands) were added to the
upper chamber for the inhibition assay. Normal rat IgG (Caltag
Laboratories) was used as a control, and all antibodies were used at 10 µg/ml. Alternatively, T cells were preincubated with 1 µg/ml
pertussis toxin (PTx; Sigma), 0.5 µM wortmannin
(Nakalai Tesque), 30 µM PP2, 10 µM herbimycin A, 2 µM U73122, 20 µM D609 (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany), or diluted
Me2SO for 30 min at 37 °C. For cytochalasin D (CytD)
treatment, T cells were preincubated with 10 µM CytD for
4 h at 37 °C, or the TEM assay was performed in medium
containing CytD at the same concentration.
Intracellular Cytokine Staining--
Production of IFN-
and
IL-4 in T cells was examined by an intracellular staining method (37)
using a Cytostain kit (Pharmingen). Cells were transiently stimulated
with 50 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, 500 ng/ml ionomycin, and
0.6 µl of GolgiStop (Pharmingen) in 1 ml of FCS/RPMI for 4 h.
After staining with anti-CD4 antibody (GK1.5) followed by
biotin-labeled anti-rat IgG/allophycocyanine-labeled streptavidin,
cells were fixed and permeabilized with Cytofix/Cytoperm solution
(Pharmingen). Cells were then stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-IFN-
antibody (Caltag Laboratories) and
phycoerythrin-labeled anti-IL-4 antibody (Pharmingen) and analyzed with
a FACScalibur flow cytometer.
Reverse Transcription-PCR--
Total RNA was extracted from
cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). 2 µg of total RNA were
reverse-transcribed with SuperScript II (Invitrogen) using
oligo(dT)12-18 (Amersham Biosciences, Tokyo) as a primer.
Specific cDNAs were amplified by PCR with Taq polymerase
(Takara Shuzou, Otsu, Japan) and specific primers in 20 µl of
reaction mixture. All PCRs were carried out with 35 cycles of
denaturation (95 °C, 20 s), annealing (55 °C, 2 min), and
extension (72 °C, 1 min, with 2-s increments in each cycle) followed
by one step of polymerization (10 min, 72 °C) using a DNA thermal
cycler (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The primer pairs used in this study
were as follows: RANTES, 5'-TCTGAGACAGCACATGCATC-3' and
5'-CCTAGCTCATCTCCAAATAG-3'; MIP-1
, 5'-CAGCTCTGTGCAAACCTAAC-3' and
5'-TCAGTTCAACTCCAAGTCAC-3'; IP-10, 5'-AGACATCCCGAGCCAACCTT-3' and
5'-GTTAAGGAGCCCTTTTAGAC-3'; MDC, 5'-CTGGTCATTAGACACCTGAC-3' and
5'-CCCTAGGACAGTTTCTGGAG-3'; TARC, 5'-TCTGCTTCTGGGGACTTTTC-3' and
5'-GTTCGCCTGTAGTGCATAAG-3'; PECAM-1, 5'-AGAATTCAGCTGAGGTGGGCCTCA-3' and
5'-AGGATCCATACTGGGCTTCGAGAGCAT-3'; CCR4, 5'-AGACGCTGGTGGAGCTTGAA-3' and
5'-GGACATGTCAGCCGAGTAGA-3'; CCR5, 5'-CTGACCACCTTCCAGGAATT-3' and
5'-TGCACGATCAGGATTGTCTT-3'; CXCR3, 5'-GTGGATATCCTCATGGATGT-3' and
5'-TTCTCTCCGTGAAGATGACG-3'; and
-actin, 5'-TCAGAAGGACTCCTATGTGG-3' and 5'-TCTCTTTGATGTCACGCACG-3'.
Cross-linking Assay--
After labeling of T cells with the
fluorescent dye CMFDA (20 µM; Molecular Probes, Inc.,
Eugene, OR) at 37 °C for 20 min, cells were washed and stained with
antibodies against cell-surface molecules such as LFA-1, CD44, VLA-4,
CD4, or control rat IgG for 20 min at 4 °C. Cells were then placed
onto a culture plate precoated with 100 µg/ml goat anti-rat IgG and
incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were fixed with
paraformaldehyde and examined under a Nikon TND330 fluorescence
microscope. Digital images obtained with a 3CCD camera (C5810,
Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) were prepared using Adobe
Photoshop software. Higher magnification views stained with anti-CD44
antibody and Alexa Fluor 546-phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Inc.) were
obtained with a confocal laser scanning microscope (MRC-1024, Bio-Rad,
Osaka, Japan). Cells with roughly >2.5 of ellipticity (the ratio
between longer and shorter axes) were considered to bear the
"elongated morphology." To measure the effect of inhibitors, cells
were treated for 30 min at 37 °C before antibody staining.
Adhesion Assay--
CMFDA-labeled, inhibitor-treated or
-untreated T cells (5 × 104) were placed onto F-2
cell monolayers on 24-well culture plates and incubated for 1 h at
37 °C. After removing unbound cells and washing once with
phosphate-buffered saline, bound cells and F-2 cells were trypsinized
to a single cell suspension and analyzed with a FACScalibur flow
cytometer over a constant time period (60 s) to count labeled T cells.
Digital images were obtained with a fluorescence microscope and a 3CCD
camera after washing unbound cells and fixation and were prepared using
Adobe Photoshop software.
 |
RESULTS |
Th1 Cells Preferentially Transmigrate across the Monolayer of
Endothelial Cells Compared with Th2 Cells--
To test whether there
are any differences between Th1 and Th2 cells in their ability to
transmigrate across endothelial cells, we performed the TEM assay under
static conditions using a monolayer of F-2 cells as the separator. Th1
and Th2 cells were identified as IFN-
and IL-4 producers,
respectively, as determined by intracellular staining. As reported
previously, neonatal thymectomized BALB/c mice develop AIG at a high
frequency, and the spleen cells of the disease-bearing mice (AIG mice)
contain a substantial number of both Th1 and Th2 cells (6). The
splenocytes of AIG mice were loaded onto the F-2 cell monolayer in a
Transwell chamber without exogenous chemoattractant. 4 h later,
transmigrated cells in the lower compartment were examined regarding
surface CD4 and intracellular cytokine staining to assess the Th1/2
ratio. Compared with the input cells, the percentage of
IFN-
+ cells in the CD4+ fraction was
elevated in transmigrated cells, whereas IL-4+ cells were
decreased (Fig. 1A);
therefore, the Th1/2 ratio was enhanced 3.5-fold after TEM. Similar
results were obtained using memory CD4+ T cells from Tg-d
mice activated in vitro, which also contained both subsets
or a Th1/2-mixed cell line established from the same mice and
maintained upon restimulation in vitro (Fig. 1, B
and C). Assessing Th1/2 ratios at different time points
other than 4 h did not basically change the results.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Preferential TEM of Th1 cells over Th2
cells. Cytokine profiles are shown before and after TEM of
CD4+ T cells from AIG spleen (A), memory
CD4+ T cells prepared from Tg-d mice activated in
vitro (B), and a Th1/2-mixed line established from Tg-d
mice (C). Intracellular IFN- and IL-4 were stained and
examined by FACS analysis. CD4+-gated cells (A)
or all cells (B and C) are shown in dot plots,
and Th1 or Th2 cells are represented by percentages in the upper
left or lower right gates, respectively. -Fold
increments in Th1/2 ratios are shown to the right of each FACS profile.
Data shown are representative of two or three independent
experiments.
|
|
To investigate the TEM ability of the subsets independently, we
established multiple lines of each type of cell from Tg-d mice by
culturing and maintaining them in vitro for a long time period under biased conditions for Th1 or Th2 cells. The cell lines
might be heterogeneous because we did not clone them. However, each
cell line consisted almost entirely of Th1 or Th2 cells as assessed by
staining of IFN-
and IL-4 (Fig.
2A). When a mixture of the Th1
and Th2 cell lines was subjected to the TEM assay, Th1 cells
transmigrated preferentially compared with Th2 cells, in agreement with
the findings above (Fig. 2B). In separate experiments with
each cell line, the number of cells that transmigrated into the lower
chamber revealed that Th1 cells have 3-10-fold greater ability for
transmigration than Th2 cells (Fig. 2C). Because F-2 cells
fixed with paraformaldehyde, which showed no apparent change in
morphology, did not pass any T cells, the TEM of T cells in our
system is not due to leakage through an incompletely formed monolayer,
but is an active process depending on the live cell monolayer. Time
courses of TEM in each cell type were nearly linear for as long as
8 h, with severalfold higher counts of Th1 cells over Th2 cells
(Fig. 2D), indicating that the Th1 cell line has a higher
TEM ability per any time period than the Th2 cell line. We occasionally
found a decrease in TEM ability in Th1 cell lines when maintained
without IL-12 (data not shown). The above results show that Th1 cells
not only from autoimmune disease-bearing mice but also in
general have a potentially higher ability for TEM than Th2 cells, and
our experimental system is useful to study the behavior of Th cells
during TEM.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Th1 cell lines more efficiently transmigrate
than Th2 cell lines. A, shown are cytokine profiles of
individual Th1 (upper panels) and Th2 (lower
panels) cell lines. B, one Th1 cell line was mixed with
one Th2 cell line, and the TEM assay was performed. Cytokine profiles
and -fold increments in Th1/2 ratios are shown. C, shown is
the TEM ability of individual Th cell lines. After the TEM assay,
transmigrated cells were counted using a FACScalibur flow
cytometer, and the results are shown as percent of input cells.
Alternatively, an F-2 cell monolayer was fixed with 3%
paraformaldehyde for 30 min and washed three times with
phosphate-buffered saline before the TEM assay. D, shown is
the time course of the TEM of Th1 (1L2) and Th2 (2L1) cells.
Transmigrated cells were counted at specific time points over 8 h
of the assay.
|
|
The Chemokine or G
i Signaling Pathway Only Partly
Contributes to the Th1 Cell Preference in TEM--
As no exogenous
chemoattractant was added to our system, there are two major
possibilities to account for the preference for Th1 cells over Th2
cells in TEM ability. First, the separator endothelial cells (F-2)
themselves may produce the chemokines that selectively attract Th1
cells, and the preference resides in the exogenous environment. Second,
there may be some intrinsic differences other than chemokine signaling
for transmigration per se in Th cells. We first checked the
expression of several chemokines possessing the differential effect in
the two subsets by reverse transcription-PCR. mRNAs for typical Th1
attractants, including RANTES, MIP-1
, and IP-10, were detectable in
F-2 cells, whereas mRNAs for Th2 attractants such as MDC and
TARC were barely detectable (Fig.
3A). We also detected CCR5 (a
receptor for RANTES and MIP-1
) as well as CXCR3 (a receptor for
IP-10) and a low level of CCR4 (a receptor for MDC and TARC) in the Th1
cell lines (Fig. 3B). In contrast, the Th2 cell lines showed
an opposite profile: a strong band for CCR4, but little or undetectable
levels of CCR5 and CXCR3. These findings support the first
possibility that the chemokines produced by F-2 cells as well as the
receptor profiles of T cells may determine the TEM selectivity of our
system. If the majority of the signals that drive the TEM of T cells
are from chemokines, the blockage of G
i-coupled signals
of chemokine receptors by pretreating the T cells with PTx should
abolish the TEM ability and Th1 cell preference in our system.
Surprisingly, however, PTx-treated Th1 cells still had a significant
TEM ability (30~80% of the ability of untreated Th1 cells, depending
on the experiments and cell lines), and clear preferences over
PTx-treated Th2 cells were retained (Fig. 3C). In contrast,
PTx completely abolished the increased selective TEM activity induced
by exogenous recombinant RANTES and MDC, which are selective for Th1
and Th2 cells, respectively (Fig. 3D), indicating that the
signaling through G
i-coupled chemokine receptors was
completely blocked. These results of TEM induction by the exogenous
chemoattractants and blockage by PTx confirmed that the cell lines used
in this study retained the responsiveness to appropriate chemokine
stimuli and that the signals from such stimuli were mediated in a
G
i-coupled process. More importantly, these results
strongly support the second possibility that there are differences
between Th1 and Th2 cells in pathways driving TEM other than those
regulated by chemokines.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Th1 cell TEM is partially mediated by
chemokine signals. A, expression of mRNAs for
chemokines in F-2 cells assessed by reverse transcription-PCR. Mouse
peripheral lymph node (PLN) was used as a positive control.
B, expression of mRNAs for chemokine receptors in Th
cell lines assessed by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR.
Samples were standardized with -actin mRNA as an internal
control. C, effect of PTx treatment on the TEM of Th cell
lines. D, selective TEM of Th cell lines induced by RANTES
or MDC and blocked by PTx. Recombinant mouse chemokines were added to
the lower compartment at the indicated concentrations (10 or 100 ng/ml).
|
|
Chemokine-independent TEM Preference for Th1 cells from AIG
Mice--
To confirm that the preference for Th1 cells in the
chemokine-independent TEM process is not specific to the cell lines
established in vitro, but is general to cells activated
in vivo, we tested the PTx sensitivity of splenic
CD4+ T cells from AIG mice in our TEM assay system. Th1
cell dominance after transmigration was not abolished at all, but was
instead enhanced by PTx treatment compared with untreated controls; and as expected, the number of transmigrated cells was partially reduced (Fig. 4, A and B).
These results indicated that almost half of migrating Th cells from AIG
mice that had been activated in vivo were driven by
chemokine-independent signaling pathways.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of inhibitors on the TEM of
CD4+ T cells from AIG spleen. A, cytokine
profiles of PTx-treated T cells from AIG spleen before and after TEM.
Intracellular IFN- and IL-4 were stained and examined by FACS.
CD4+-gated cells are shown in dot plots, and Th1 or Th2
cells are represented by percentages in the upper left or
lower right gates, respectively. B, Th1/2 ratios
of input (in) and transmigrated (low) untreated
and PTx-treated T cells. Data are from Fig. 1A and
A (this figure), respectively. -Fold increments after TEM
are shown with arrows. C, effect of
pharmacological inhibitors and antibody against adhesion molecules on
TEM. CD4+ T cells from AIG spleen were treated with PTx,
wortmannin (Wort.), U73122, and anti-CD44 antibody followed
by the TEM assay; and cells were counted using a FACScalibur
flow cytometer. Results are shown as percent of untreated (control)
cells.
|
|
To identify the signaling pathways that drive TEM and that contribute
to the Th1 cell preference, we tested whether pharmacological inhibitors that block intracellular signaling and antibodies against cell adhesion molecules have any effects on the TEM of T cells from
AIG mice. Among them, anti-CD44 antibody inhibited the TEM of
these cells more effectively than PTx. Inhibitors of the
phosphatidylinositol signaling pathway (wortmannin and U73122) markedly
inhibited the migration of AIG CD4+ T cells (Fig.
4C). Therefore, signals through these molecules and pathways
are good candidates for contributing to the Th1 cell preference in TEM,
but it is difficult to assess the effects of these treatments
separately on each cell type using the mixture of cells activated
in vivo.
LFA-1 and CD44 Mediate the TEM of Th1 Cells--
Using the Th cell
lines, we next explored what kinds of adhesion molecules are involved.
F-2 cells showed a typical endothelial character, expressing PECAM-1
and VE-cadherin and, in addition, expressing the adhesion receptors for
lymphocytes such as ICAM-1, VCAM-1, CD44, P-selectin, and E-selectin,
and were negative for MAdCAM-1 (Fig.
5A). A panel of antibodies
were tested for inhibition of TEM. Among them, anti-LFA-1
as well as
anti-ICAM-1 markedly inhibited the TEM of Th1 cells (Fig.
5C). We also found a marked reduction of TEM by anti-CD44
antibody (Fig. 5D). Antibodies against VLA-4
, VCAM-1,
P-selectin, and E-selectin had no inhibitory effect (Fig.
5E). As both Th1 and Th2 cell lines expressed comparable levels of LFA-1 and CD44, respectively (Fig. 5B), the
preferential TEM ability found for Th1 cells is not explained simply by
the level of expression of these molecules.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
LFA-1/ICAM-1 and CD44 are involved in the TEM
of Th1 cells. A and B, surface expression of
adhesion molecules on F-2 cells (A) and Th1 (1L2) and Th2
(2L1) cells (B). Cells were stained with various antibodies
and examined by FACS. C-E, inhibitory effects of
anti-LFA-1 and anti-ICAM-1 antibodies (C) and anti-CD44
antibody (Ab) (D) and the absence of effect of
other antibodies (E) on the TEM of Th1 (1L2) and Th2 (2L1)
cells. F, synergistic activity of antibodies and PTx effects
on the TEM of the Th1 cell line (1L2). The basal TEM ability of the Th2
cell line (2L1) is also shown. P-sel and E-sel,
P-selectin and E-selectin, respectively.
|
|
Single blockage by LFA-1/ICAM-1 or CD44 seemed to be more
efficient than PTx treatment. In addition, treatment with a combination of anti-LFA-1/ICAM-1 antibody, anti-CD44 antibody, and PTx resulted in almost complete inhibition of the TEM of Th1 cells below the basal
level of Th2 cells (Fig. 5F). These findings therefore
suggest that signals via these molecules are sufficient for the TEM of Th1 cells, although the adhesion-mediated pathways seem to be more
important than the chemokine-mediated pathways.
Src-PTKs, PI3K, and PI-PLC Mediate the TEM of Th1
Cells--
To evaluate the contribution of Src-PTKs, PI3K,
or PLC to TEM signaling, T cells were pretreated with various
pharmacological inhibitors. PP2 and herbimycin A, inhibitors of
Src-PTKs, significantly reduced the TEM of Th1 cells (Fig.
6A), indicating that Src-PTKs are involved in TEM signaling. When T cells were treated with wortmannin, U73122, and D609 (inhibitors of PI3K, PI-PLC, and phosphatidylcholine-specific PLC, respectively), wortmannin and U73122
dramatically inhibited the TEM of Th1 cells, whereas D609 showed no
obvious inhibitory effect (Fig. 6B). These results suggest
that Src-PTK-mediated protein phosphorylation and phosphoinositide signaling pathways play a pivotal role in Th1 cell TEM.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Src-PTKs, PI3K, PI-PLC, and actin remodeling
are involved in the TEM of Th1 cells. A and
B, effect of inhibitors of Src-PTKs (A) and
phosphoinositide metabolism (B) on the TEM of Th1 (1L2) and
Th2 (2L1) cell lines. C, effect of CytD treatment on the TEM
of the Th1 cell line (1L2). T cells (T), F-2 cells
(E), or both (T,E) were pretreated with CytD for
4 h followed by the TEM assay, or the TEM assay was
performed in medium containing CytD. Wort.,
wortmannin.
|
|
Before or during the TEM assay, Th1 cells were also treated with CytD,
an inhibitor of actin polymerization. Pretreatment of Th1 cells for
4 h resulted in only a slight inhibition of TEM, whereas almost no
effect was seen upon F-2 cell pretreatment (Fig. 6C). On the
contrary, the TEM assay performed in the presence of CytD prevented Th1
cell TEM. This suggests that the dynamic remodeling of the actin
cytoskeleton is required during the TEM of Th1 cells, although we did
not segregate the effect of CytD on T cells or F-2 cells in this case.
CD44 Cross-linking Induces a Morphological Change in Th1
Cells--
It is possible that adhesion itself can transduce
the chemokine-independent motility signals to Th1 cells. We therefore
examined the cross-linking of cell-surface receptors using a specific
antibody and a secondary antibody-coated plate, which can mimic
adhesion-induced molecular assembly (Fig.
7A). We tested several
molecules, including LFA-1, CD44, VLA-4, and CD4. Among these, the
cross-linking of CD44 induced a highly elongated morphology for
~30-40% of the Th1 1L2 cells, but had a weak effect on the Th2 2L1
cells (Fig. 7, B-D). The elongated cells showed a clear
polarity with morphologically distinct cell portions such as an
antibody-sticking rear section, a long rod-like stem region, and
a leading edge of the cell body containing the nucleus (Fig.
7E). Thus, it was thought to be an enhanced shape of
the migrating T cells that also have polarity. Only the combination of
anti-CD44 antibody and an anti-rat IgG antibody-coated plate
induced this morphological change, whereas the soluble secondary
antibody did not (data not shown), indicating that the attachment of
cells to the plate through concentrated CD44 molecules on the cell
surface forced the change in cell shape. This change might have
occurred because one end of the cell started moving by the
signal through CD44, but the other end of the cell where CD44 molecules
were cross-linked was fixed on the plate. The cross-linking of LFA-1
and CD4 (but not VLA-4) also induced a small but significant elongation
of Th1 cells, but poor elongation for Th2 cells. Although the extent of
the shape change of Th1 cells induced by CD44 cross-linking varied
among the Th1 cell lines we tested (for instance, 1L1 showed a weaker
ability for elongation (data not shown)), all Th2 cell lines were less
inducible regarding shape change compared with Th1 cell lines.
Elongation was blocked by pretreatment of T cells with PP2, herbimycin
A, wortmannin, and U73122, whereas PTx showed no effect (Fig. 8, A and B). The
cross-linking of T cells in the presence of CytD abolished cell
elongation, although pretreatment did not block it, indicating that
actin remodeling is required during the elongation (Fig.
8D). These findings suggest that a proportion of Th1 cells respond to CD44-induced motility signals and that this
adhesion-driven motility seems to be higher in Th1 cells than in Th2
cells.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Elongated morphology of Th1 cells induced by
CD44 cross-linking. A, schematic diagram of the
cross-linking assay. Cross-linking of cell-surface molecules can mimic
adhesion-induced molecular assembly and signals. B,
elongated morphology of Th1 cells (1L2) by CD44 cross-linking.
Red circles indicate identified individual cell bodies.
Cells with elongated shape were observed (arrowheads).
C, morphologies of T cells upon cross-linking of surface
receptors. Fluorescence images of CMFDA-labeled T cells after
cross-linking and fixation were obtained and prepared for analysis. Rat
IgG (RtIg) was used as a negative control. D,
morphological changes of Th1 (1L2) and Th2 (2L1) cells upon
cross-linking (X-L) of various cell-surface receptors.
Results are provided as percent elongated cells of the total identified
cells. E, higher magnification view of the elongated
morphology of Th1 cells induced by CD44 cross-linking and stained with
anti-CD44 antibody/biotin-labeled anti-rat IgG/allophycocyanine-labeled
streptavidin as well as Alexa Fluor 546-phalloidin. Upon cross-linking,
CD44 molecules accumulated at the attachment position
(arrowhead), from which filopodial membrane protrusions
(F) radiated, and a long rod-like stem (S) with a
leading head containing a cell nucleus (N) projected in one
direction (arrows). F-actin-rich lamellipodial membrane
ruffles (L) appeared at the leading edge.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Src-PTKs, PI3K, PI-PLC, and actin remodeling
(but not chemokine signals) are involved in the elongation of Th1 cells
upon CD44 cross-linking. A and B, wortmannin
(Wort.) and U73122 (but not PTx) inhibited the elongated
morphology of Th1 cells upon CD44 cross-linking (X-L). Th1
(1L2) and Th2 (2L1) cells were CMFDA-labeled and treated with
inhibitors followed by CD44 cross-linking. Control experiments in which
cells were stained with anti-CD44 antibody with (X-L (+)) or
without (X-L ( )) a secondary antibody-coated plate
are shown. C, shown are the inhibitory effects of Src-PTK
inhibitors on the elongated morphology of Th1 cells. D, CytD
treatment during CD44 cross-linking (CytD in.), but not CytD
pretreatment (CytD pre.), inhibited the elongated morphology
of Th cells. The control was CD44 cross-linking without drug treatment
(C and D). HerA, herbimycin A.
|
|
Th1 Cells Preferentially Adhere to Endothelial Cells with Polarized
Morphology--
Fluorescently labeled T cells were placed on
endothelial cells to examine the morphology of adherent T cells. Th1
cells exhibited a severalfold higher binding ability compared with Th2
cells (Fig. 9, A and
B). Adherent Th1 cells included cells with polarized morphology, whereas such morphology was rarely observed in adherent Th2
cells (Fig. 9A, arrows). Interestingly, the
adhesion of Th1 cells to endothelial cells was markedly inhibited by
PP2, herbimycin A, or U73122 pretreatment; however, only a partial
effect was observed with PTx or wortmannin (Fig. 9, C and
D). The migrating morphology of adherent Th1 cells on an F-2
cell monolayer was not obviously influenced by PTx treatment, whereas
wortmannin markedly inhibited it (Fig. 9B). This suggests a
differential role of Src-PTKs or PI-PLC versus PI3K in
adhesion and migration steps, especially that PI3K might play a
major role in cell motility driving TEM in our system.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Preferential adhesion of Th1 cells to
endothelial cells. A, morphologies of T cells
upon adhesion to F-2 cells. Fluorescence images were obtained after
1 h of incubation of CMFDA-labeled Th1 (1L2) or Th2 (2L1) cells
with F-2 cells, and non-adherent cells were removed. B,
effect of PTx or wortmannin (Wort) pretreatment on the
morphologies of Th1 cells (1L2) attached to the F-2 cell
monolayer. Images are composites of fluorescence and phase-contrast
views and adherent T cells with the migrating morphology indicated by
arrows (A and B). C, effect
of Src-PTK inhibitors on the adhesion of T cells to F-2 cells.
D, effect of PTx, wortmannin, or U73122 on the adhesion of T
cells. E, schematic diagram of a model for TEM signals of
Th1 cells. HerA, herbimycin A; HA, hyaluronic
acid; ECM, extracellular matrix; PIP2,
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate; PIP3,
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate; IP3,
inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate; DAG, diacylglycerol.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
It is well known that type 1 reactions dominate over type 2 reactions in lesions of chronic inflammation including organ-specific autoimmune diseases (5-9). We also confirmed such inflammatory status
in AIG, a useful experimental model of organ-specific autoimmunity (6,
7). This suggested that there is a vicious circle formed at the
autoimmune lesion; the microenvironment formed by the infiltrated type
1 effector cells including Th1 cells further enabled the same
effectors to infiltrate into the lesion.
In this study, we characterized the preferential TEM of Th1 cells
observed in our in vitro system using a murine endothelial cell line and several types of Th cells. F-2 cells, the endothelial cell line used here, show characteristics typical of endothelial cells (35. 36). However, these cells are thought to be in some activated state, as they constitutively express P-selectin and E-selectin on their surface as well as chemokines such as RANTES and
IP-10, all of which are normally induced by inflammatory stimuli (12,
38, 39). Therefore, F-2 cells could serve as a model for
inflammation-activated endothelial cells. The Th cells used in
this study were 1) directly taken from mice with AIG or 2) independently established cell lines from a T cell receptor transgenic mouse and maintained in vitro as a heterogeneous population
without cloning. With both cell types used, we observed a preference in TEM for Th1 cells over Th2 cells, suggesting that such a preference is
not a specific character of autoimmune-derived Th cells, but is a
common property of Th cells in some
activation/differentiation stages. The Th cells differentiated from
naive CD4+ T cells in a primary culture peeled off the
monolayer of F-2 cells from polycarbonate membrane; and thus, we could
not assess whether there were any differences in TEM ability between
the two subsets in this case. In contrast, we consistently observed the
Th1-dominated TEM of cytokine-producing, memory CD4+ T
cells directly taken from mice in the previous study (6) and this
study. Therefore, the Th cell lines showing a similar preference in TEM
are thought to be of more fixed phenotypes that resemble the memory
cells in vivo rather than transiently induced Th cell
subsets. As we employed a static condition without shear flow, the
phenomenon that we observed could simply mimic the passing process
across the endothelial wall, without the rolling or flow-induced mechanical effect. Therefore, despite several differences from physiological conditions, our system is thought to represent some aspect of "trans-motility" of Th cell subsets.
One possible mechanism for the differential TEM ability of Th1 and Th2
cells in our system is attraction via chemokines produced by F-2 cells.
Among a large number of chemokines, several kinds have been shown to
affect each subset differently; therefore, it is widely believed that
differential expression of those chemokines at lesions is
involved in many types of Th1- or Th2-biased pathologies (9,
14). The Th1-dominated TEM without exogenous attractant in this study
could also be explained by the action of those Th1 tropic chemokines
derived from F-2 cells. Indeed, we could detect mRNAs for typical
Th1 tropic chemokines such as RANTES, MIP-1
, and IP-10, but not Th2
tropic chemokines such as MDC and TARC in F-2 cells. Furthermore, each
Th cell line appeared to express appropriate receptors. Addition of
exogenous chemokines such as RANTES and MDC to the lower compartment
augmented the TEM of T cells in a subset-selective,
G
i-dependent manner; there is little doubt
that chemokines exert powerful selectivity upon Th cell subsets
during extravasation, and our system can reproduce such selectivity. In
contrast to previous belief, PTx treatment of input cells,
which completely blocked G
i-coupled chemokine receptors, only partly inhibited the TEM of Th1 cells and did not abolish Th1 cell
preference in the TEM of in vivo cells or of lines
established in vitro. Therefore, the selectivity is only
partially due to the F-2 cell-derived chemokines preferentially
affecting Th1 cells. These results also indicate that there are
signaling pathways for TEM mediated by chemokine-independent mechanisms
and strongly suggest some intrinsic differences in these pathways
between Th1 and Th2 cells.
We demonstrated that both LFA-1- and CD44-dependent
adhesion is involved in the TEM of Th1 cells. LFA-1 binds to ICAM-1
(10), whereas CD44 binds to many kinds of extracellular matrix,
including hyaluronan (16). Both adhesion pathways play
important roles in T cell activation and function (16, 40, 41). The
affinity for the ligands of each molecule is regulated by the
activation states of the cells in an "inside-out" manner (15, 16,
42). Especially, chemokine signaling induces a rapid
conformational change in LFA-1 to convert its low affinity state into a
high one (10, 15). We actually showed that PTx treatment partially reduced Th1 cell adhesion to F-2 cells as well as TEM. However, because
blocking LFA-1 or CD44 function inhibited Th1 cell TEM more effectively
than PTx treatment, G
i-independent pathways using both
molecules are thought to be more important for interaction between Th1
and endothelial cells than a chemokine-induced event. Both LFA-1 and
CD44 can transmit adhesion-induced signals to cells via an
"outside-in" manner (41, 43-50). We thought that the
G
i-independent TEM of Th1 cells might be due to the
adhesion-induced activation of Th1 cells after interaction with
endothelial cells and that differences in this process could contribute
to the Th1 cell preference in TEM. Indeed the cross-linking of CD44
and, to a lesser extent, LFA-1 induced the elongated morphology of Th1
cells. Moreover, this induction of cell shape change was blocked by
several signaling inhibitors that also inhibit TEM, but not by PTx,
indicating the link between cell adhesion signals and TEM in a
chemokine signal-independent manner. CD44 transduces motility signals
in fibroblasts or tumor cells (45, 50). In lymphocytes, CD44 associates
with a Src-PTK (Lck) and transduces signals by tyrosine phosphorylation
(47-49). Our findings strongly suggest that CD44 can transmit
a migration signal to Th1 cells through Src-PTKs, although we still do
not know the fine molecular mechanisms that activate T cells by the signals through CD44 during the interaction with the endothelium.
We also showed a higher binding activity of Th1 cells compared with Th2
cells for endothelial cells. LFA-1/ICAM-1-dependent homotypic aggregation in Th1 cells was reported to be much stronger than that in Th2 cells (4). Furthermore, osteopontin, a ligand of CD44,
is reported to be necessary for type 1 immunity (51). Thus, the
affinity for ligands or the activity for signal transduction of LFA-1
and/or CD44 might be intrinsically augmented more preferentially in Th1
cells than in Th2 cells.
PI3K is well known to play a pivotal role in cell motility, not only in
hematopoietic cells, but also in many other lineages (13, 15, 20, 21).
Activated PI3K produces phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate from
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, which further activates the
guanine nucleotide exchange factor for the Rho family of small
G-proteins containing pleckstrin homology domains, which bind to
phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate and induce actin remodeling
(20). Moreover, PI3K activates
-subtypes of PLC that have pleckstrin
homology domains (52). PLCs are also involved in a broad spectrum of
cellular phenomena, including cell motility, by producing
diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate from
phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (23, 24, 28, 29). It is of
importance that both PI3K and PLC are probably involved in the
signaling for TEM of Th1 cells. PI3K may be coupled with PLC for this
signaling because selective inhibitors of PI3K and PLC effectively
blocked TEM in our model. Both enzymes can be activated by the

-subunit of heterotrimeric G-protein released from the chemokine
receptor or tyrosine phosphorylation through Src-PTKs (18, 19, 27-33).
In addition, PI3K or PLC is involved in several LFA-1- and
CD44-mediated cellular events (43-45, 49, 50). Therefore, not only
G
i-dependent chemokine signals, but also
LFA-1- and/or CD44-mediated adhesion stimuli may activate the cascade
of Src-PTKs, PI3K, and PLC in Th1 cells.
From our recent findings, we would like to propose a model of the
molecular signaling pathways for Th1 cell TEM, as shown in Fig.
9E, which were poorly understood so far. Th cells
interacting with endothelial cells are activated by the chemokines
presented on the luminal surface of the vessel as well as by the
G
i-independent adhesion-induced signals via LFA-1 and/or
CD44. Signals are then integrated into actin rearrangement and cell
movement for transmigration through Src-PTKs and phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate-based phosphoinositide metabolism. It is strongly
suggested that there are some differences in the adhesion and migration
signaling between Th1 and Th2 cells through the above pathways, and
detailed analysis is now ongoing. Similar intrinsic differences in the
intracellular signaling between two subsets have also pointed out by
several groups (53-56).
It has been thought that cell rolling using P-selectin ligands and firm
adhesion induced by Th1 tropic chemokines and their appropriate
receptors mainly contribute to the selective accumulation of Th1 cells
in chronic inflamed tissue (8, 9, 14). It is clear that the selectin
system and chemokine stimulus work as key players in the initial T
cell/endothelial cell interaction under shear flow (12, 15, 57-59) and
that they may be sources of Th cell subset selectivity. However, in
this study, we found another possible mechanism: higher TEM or tissue
invasive activity of Th1 cells per se in the later steps of
extravasation compared with that of Th2 cells. Thus, the differences at
several steps of extravasation between the two subsets may bring
further disparity to their final tissue distribution. It is probable
that differentiated Th1 pools in the periphery contain cells with
higher basal mobility than Th2 cells resulting from intrinsic
differences in the G
i-independent signaling pathway(s).
This difference gives us new insight into the establishment of Th1 cell
dominance in inflamed lesions especially at early stages of lymphocytic
infiltration, when the concentration of specific chemokines around the
target tissue is still low. The chemokine-independent, high
extravasation, and tissue-invasive potential of Th1 cells possibly can
trigger a type 1 inflammatory loop, i.e. IFN-
from Th1
cells induces Th1 tropic chemokine production from surrounding cells
and further attracts Th1 cells. Therefore, Th1-primed immune responses
tend to create a vicious circle of selective accumulation of type 1 effector cells at the lesion and following excessive type 1 immunity
with tissue injury, especially in autoimmune diseases.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. T. Masuda and N. Kanazawa for
useful discussion, Dr. S. Fraser for critical reading of this
manuscript, Dr. S. Habu for the gift of Tg-d mice, and S. Hirano and T. Ohfuji for technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid from the
Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for
Molecular Biology and Genetics, Kyoto University, 53 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Tel.:
81-75-751-4191; Fax: 81-75-751-4190; E-mail:
shimizu@virus.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M204133200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Th, T-helper;
IFN-
, interferon-
;
IL, interleukin;
AIG, autoimmune gastritis;
RANTES, regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted;
MIP-1
, macrophage inflammatory protein-1
;
IP-10, interferon-
-inducible protein-10;
MDC, macrophage-derived chemokine;
TARC, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine;
LFA-1, lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1;
VLA-4, very late antigen-4;
ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1;
VCAM-1, vascular
cell adhesion molecule-1;
MAdCAM-1, mucosal adressin cell
adhesion molecule-1;
TEM, transendothelial migration;
Src-PTK, Src
family protein-tyrosine kinase;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase;
PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase
C;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
PECAM-1, platelet endothelial cell
adhesion molecule-1;
PTx, pertussis toxin;
CytD, cytochalasin D;
CCR, CC chemokine receptor;
CXCR, CXC chemokine receptor;
CMFDA, 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Seder, R. A.,
and Paul, W. E.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12,
635-673[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Abbas, A. K.,
Murphy, K. M.,
and Sher, A.
(1996)
Nature
383,
787-793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Liblau, R. S.,
Singer, S. M.,
and McDevitt, H. O.
(1995)
Immunol. Today
16,
34-38[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Nishimura, T.,
Iwakabe, K.,
Sekimoto, M.,
Ohmi, Y.,
Yahata, T.,
Nakui, M.,
Sato, T.,
Habu, S.,
Tashiro, H.,
Sato, M.,
and Ohta, A.
(1999)
J. Exp. Med.
190,
617-627[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Maloy, K. J.,
Burkhart, C.,
Junt, T. M.,
Odermatt, B.,
Oxenius, A.,
Piali, L.,
Zinkernagel, R. M.,
and Hengartner, H.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
2159-2170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Katakai, T.,
Mori, K. J.,
Masuda, T.,
and Shimizu, A.
(1998)
Int. Immunol.
10,
1325-1334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Katakai, T.,
Mori, K. J.,
Masuda, T.,
and Shimizu, A.
(2002)
Int. Immunol.
14,
167-175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Austrup, F.,
Vestweber, D.,
Borges, E.,
Löhning, M.,
Bräuer, R.,
Herz, U.,
Renz, H.,
Hallmann, R.,
Scheffold, A.,
Radbruch, A.,
and Hamann, A.
(1997)
Nature
385,
81-83[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
D'Ambrosio, D.,
Iellem, A.,
Colantonio, L.,
Clissi, B.,
Pardi, R.,
and Sinigaglia, F.
(2000)
Immunol. Today
21,
183-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Springer, T. A.
(1994)
Cell
76,
301-314[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Butcher, E. C.,
Williams, M.,
Youngman, K.,
Rott, L.,
and Briskin, M.
(1999)
Adv. Immunol.
72,
209-253[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Mayadas, T. N.,
Johnson, R. C.,
Rayburn, H.,
Hynes, R. O.,
and Wagner, D. D.
(1993)
Cell
74,
541-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Ward, S. G.,
Bacon, K.,
and Westwick, J.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
1-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Sallusto, F.,
Lanzavecchia, A.,
and Mackay, C. R.
(1998)
Immunol. Today
19,
568-574[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Constantin, G.,
Majeed, M.,
Giagulli, C.,
Piccio, L.,
Kim, J. Y.,
Butcher, E. C.,
and Laudanna, C.
(2000)
Immunity
13,
759-769[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Borland, G.,
Ross, J. A.,
and Guy, K.
(1998)
Immunology
93,
139-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
DeGrendele, H. C.,
Estess, P.,
and Siegelman, M. H.
(1997)
Science
278,
672-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Thomas, S. M.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
13,
513-609[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Korade-Mirnics, Z.,
and Corey, S. J.
(2000)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
68,
603-613[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Vanhaesebroeck, B.,
Leevers, S. J.,
Ahmadi, K.,
Timms, J.,
Katso, R.,
Driscoll, P. C.,
Woscholski, R.,
Parker, P. J.,
and Waterfield, M. D.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
72,
535-602[CrossRef]
|
| 21.
|
Keely, P. J.,
Westwick, J. K.,
Whitehead, I. P.,
Der, C. J.,
and Parise, L. V.
(1997)
Nature
390,
632-636[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Chen, P.,
Xie, H.,
Sekar, M. C.,
Gupta, K.,
and Wells, A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
847-857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Godwin, S. L.,
and Soltoff, S. P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11307-11312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Rönnstrand, L.,
Siegbahn, A.,
Rorsman, C.,
Johnell, M.,
Hansen, K.,
and Heldin, C.-H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22089-22094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Rosenkranz, S.,
DeMali, K. A.,
Gelderloos, J. A.,
Bazenet, C.,
and Kazlauskas, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28335-28343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Singer, W. D.,
Brown, H. A.,
and Sternweis, P. C.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
66,
475-509[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Kehrl, J. H.
(1998)
Immunity
8,
1-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Vicente-Manzanares, M.,
Rey, M.,
Jones, D. R.,
Sancho, D.,
Mellado, M.,
Rodriguez-Frade, J. M.,
del Pozo, M. A.,
Yanez-Mo, M.,
de Ana, A. M.,
Martinez, A. C.,
Merida, I.,
and Sanchez-Madrid, F.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
4001-4012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Turner, S. J.,
Domin, J.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
Ward, S. G.,
and Westwick, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25987-25995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Hirsch, E.,
Katanaev, V. L.,
Garlanda, C.,
Azzolino, O.,
Pirola, L.,
Silengo, L.,
Sozzani, S.,
Mantovani, A.,
Altruda, F.,
and Wymann, M. P.
(2000)
Science
287,
1049-1053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Jiang, H.,
Kuang, Y., Wu, Y.,
Smrcka, A.,
Simon, M. I.,
and Wu, D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13430-13434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Ali, H.,
Richardson, R. M.,
Haribabu, B.,
and Snyderman, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6027-6030[Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Rhee, S. G.,
and Bae, Y. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15045-15048[Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Sato, T.,
Sasahara, T.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Osaki, T.,
Hasegawa, T.,
Tadakuma, T.,
Arata, Y.,
Kumagai, Y.,
Katsuki, M.,
and Habu, S.
(1994)
Eur. J. Immunol.
24,
1512-1516[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Toda, Y.,
Tsujioka, K.,
Maruguchi, Y.,
Ishii, K.,
Miyauchi, Y.,
Kuribayashi, K.,
and Imamura, S.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
5526-5530[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Maruyama, H.,
Toda, K.,
Uno, K.,
Miyake, K.,
Matsushima, K.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Mori, K. J.,
and Masuda, T.
(1993)
Microbiol. Immunol.
37,
895-903[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Openshaw, P.,
Murphy, E. E.,
Hosken, N. A.,
Maino, V.,
Davis, V.,
Murphy, K.,
and O'Garra, A.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1357-1367[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Devergne, O.,
Marfaing-Koka, A.,
Schall, T. T.,
Leger-Ravet, M.-B.,
Sadick, M.,
Peuchmaur, M.,
Crevon, M.-C.,
Kim, T.,
Galanaud, P.,
and Emilie, D.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
179,
1689-1694[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Kaplan, G.,
Luster, A. D.,
Hancock, G.,
and Cohn, Z. A.
(1987)
J. Exp. Med.
166,
1098-1108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Sprent, J.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
4629-4636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Galandrini, R.,
Galluzzo, E.,
Albi, N.,
Grossi, C. E.,
and Velardi, A.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
21-31[Abstract]
|
|