![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 52, 50973-50979, December 27, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
, and
From
INSERM Unité 366, Département
Réponse et Dynamique Cellulaires/Cytosquelette, Commissariat
à l'Energie Atomique/Grenoble, 17 rue des Martyrs,
38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France, § Equipe "Structure et
Dynamique du Cytosquelette," UMR 6026 CNRS, Université de
Rennes 1, Campus Beaulieu Bâtiment 13, Rennes, 35042, France, and
the ¶ Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolécules
Végétales, CNRS-UPR 5301, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
Received for publication, September 23, 2002, and in revised form, October 17, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Microtubule assembly from purified tubulin
preparations involves both microtubule nucleation and elongation.
Whereas elongation is well documented, microtubule nucleation remains
poorly understood because of difficulties in isolating molecular
intermediates between tubulin dimers and microtubules. Based on kinetic
studies, we have previously proposed that the basic building blocks of
microtubule nuclei are persistent tubulin oligomers, present at the
onset of tubulin assembly. Here we have tested this model directly by isolating nucleation-competent cross-linked tubulin oligomers. We show
that such oligomers are composed of 10-15 laterally associated tubulin
dimers. In the presence of added free tubulin dimers, several oligomers
combine to form microtubule nuclei competent for elongation. We provide
evidence that these nuclei have heterogeneous structures, indicating
unexpected flexibility in nucleation pathways. Our results suggest that
microtubule nucleation in purified tubulin solution is mechanistically
similar to that templated by Microtubules are fibrous elements in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic
cells, where they perform a wide variety of functions. The microtubule
building block is the tubulin A salient feature of microtubule nucleation is that its rate depends on
the high power of the initial GTP-tubulin concentration. This power
currently varies from 6 to12 (7-12). In classical models, nucleation
exponents are supposed to correspond to the number of tubulin molecules
that assemble to form a filament from which a tubulin sheet arises. A
compelling prediction of these models is that microtubule nucleation
should rapidly drop to undetectable levels during tubulin assembly
because of the resulting drop in the free GTP-tubulin concentration,
and, a fortiori, of the 6th-12th
power of this concentration. This prediction has been tested only
recently by systematic measurements of microtubule length and number
concentration during tubulin assembly (13). Surprisingly, the rate of
microtubule nucleation turned out to be constant during tubulin
assembly, despite the large drop in the free tubulin concentration. These observations led to a model in which the building blocks of
microtubule nuclei are persistent tubulin oligomers present at the
onset of tubulin assembly. This model implies that microtubule nuclei
contain several of these oligomers to account for the nucleation exponent, whereas in previous models microtubules were supposed to
nucleate from a single tubulin oligomer (8-10, 14).
Here we provide direct evidence that microtubules can indeed nucleate
from combinations of stable tubulin oligomers. Our data indicate that
there is not a unique and fully determined way to integrate oligomers
in microtubule nuclei. Instead the nucleation process appears to be
flexible with a nucleation exponent that represents an average between
alternative pathways.
Preparation of 1/1 GTP-Tubulin Complexes--
Tubulin
purification from bovine brain was performed as described (13).
Purified tubulin (100-150 µM) was incubated in PEM buffer (100 mM
Pipes,1 pH 6.7, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2) for 10 min at
4 °C in the presence of 1 mM GTP. Free nucleotides were
removed using Biogel P30 chromatography. The GTP-tubulin concentration
was adjusted in PEM buffer, and the aliquots were stored in liquid nitrogen.
Fluorescent Labeling of Tubulin--
Tubulin was labeled with
carboxytetramethylrhodamine succinimidyl ester as described (15), with
one recycling step.
Microtubule Assembly and Length Measurements--
Microtubule
assembly was carried out in PEM buffer with purified tubulin (12 µM), GTP (1 mM), and various amounts of
ethylene glycol bis succinimidylsuccinate (EGS) suspension. Assembly
was monitored at 350 nm, 35 °C, in a spectrophotometer.
Alternatively, the microtubules were assembled from
[3H]GTP-labeled tubulin (18 µM). The
assembly conditions, procedures designed to measure assembled tubulin
concentration, determination of microtubule mean length. and
microtubule number concentration are described in Ref. 13.
Procedures for Electron Microscopy--
Vitreous ice-embedded
samples were prepared as described previously (16). 4 µl of sample
(EGS suspension or microtubules assembled at 37 °C from tubulin (20 µM), GTP (1 mM), and EGS suspension (0.1 µM)) were pipetted onto a holey carbon grid, briefly
blotted, and plunged quickly into liquid ethan (for microtubules, the
grid was maintained in a humid atmosphere at 37 °C before blotting). The specimens were stored in liquid nitrogen and observed in a Philips
CM 12. Images were recorded on Kodak S.O 163 film under low dose
conditions at 28,000× and 35,000× magnifications and ~2.3 µm
underfocused. The micrographs were digitized with the UPRES-A 6026 CNRS
scanner and with the Machine A Mesurer en Astronomie (M.A.M.A.)
microdensitometer (Centre d'Analyse des Images Institut des
Sciences de l'Univers/CNRS/Observatoire de Paris). The diameter and
length of particles in the EGS suspension were measured using NIH Image software.
Light Scattering--
Static light scattering (SLS) and dynamic
light scattering (DLS) experiments were performed by means of a
spectrometer equipped with an argon ion laser (Spectra Physics model
2020) operating at
In the SLS experiments, the excess of scattered intensity
I(q) was measured with respect to the solvent,
where the magnitude of the scattering wave vector q is given
by the following equation.
The plots of c/I(q,c)
versus q2 were extrapolated to
q = 0 to give intercepts
c/I(0,c), where c is the
concentration of the scattering objects. If the length scale
q
In DLS experiments, the normalized time autocorrelation function
g(2)(q,t) of the scattered
intensity is measured (18). The latter can be expressed in terms of the
field autocorrelation function or equivalently in terms of the
autocorrelation function of the concentration fluctuations
g(1)(q,t) through the
following equation.
In our experiments, inspection of the angular dependence shows that the
relaxations are diffusive with characteristic time
To determine the average relaxation time Assay of Nucleotide Exchange--
Various amounts of EGS
suspension were incubated with GTP and [ Quantitative Analysis of Rhodamine Spot
Fluorescence--
Contours of spots were determined with a detection
threshold higher than the mean background value measured around the
spot. The threshold was adjusted near the sharp rise of the spot
region, to reject the flat outer wings of diffused light. This strategy slightly underestimated the integrated intensity of the spot, but it
minimized uncertainties caused by background fluctuations. The
fluorescence intensities of spots were calculated as the sums of pixel
values contained inside the selected contours after subtracting the
corresponding background.
To determine the number of dimers contained in individual spots, we
estimated the mean fluorescence intensity value corresponding to one
dimer. For this, rhodamine-labeled microtubules were assembled with the
same batch of rhodamine tubulin as the one used for preparation of EGS
oligomers. Measurements of fluorescence intensity per microtubule length unit yielded an estimation of the mean fluorescence intensity per tubulin dimer, assuming 1625 dimers/µm of microtubule length (20).
The number of tubulin dimers in a spot was determined by dividing the
integrated fluorescence intensity inside the contour of the spot by the
fluorescence intensity of one tubulin dimer. The number of
oligomers/spot was finally deduced from the number of tubulin dimer in
one EGS oligomer.
Preparation of Stable Tubulin Oligomers--
It is
well known that microtubule disassembly produces a profusion of
oligomers of various sizes and forms (21, 22). To stabilize, isolate,
and characterize tubulin oligomers with microtubule nucleation
capacity, we developed procedures in which microtubules were
cross-linked and then disassembled. Cross-linked oligomers were
recovered from disassembly products. For microtubule cross-linking, we
followed previously published methods (23-25). Purified tubulin (100 µM) was assembled for 20 min at 37 °C in a buffer
containing 80 mM Pipes (pH 6.7), 1 mM EGTA,
50% (v/v) glycerol, 5 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM GTP. EGS was then added at 3.4 mM final
concentration for 15 min. To quench the EGS in excess, the mixture was
diluted into 9 volumes of a buffer containing 80 mM Pipes
(pH 6.7), 1 mM EGTA, 50% sucrose, 10 mM
glutamate, and 1 mM MgCl2 and incubated for
1 h at room temperature. The solution was then centrifuged at
200,000 × g for 30 min. The pellet containing
cross-linked microtubules was resuspended in PEM buffer. In a standard
experiment, the microtubule pellet obtained from 400 µl of purified
tubulin (100 µM) was resuspended in 180 µl of PEM at a
final tubulin concentration of 150 µM. The resuspended
microtubules were then subjected to a freezing-thawing cycle (freezing
at EGS Cross-linked Tubulin Oligomers Nucleate Microtubules--
For
assay of microtubule nucleation activity, aliquots of the EGS
suspension were mixed with 12 µM tubulin in the presence of 1 mM GTP. Tubulin assembly was monitored by optical
density measurements (Fig.
2A). To directly verify
microtubule production, 20 µl of the suspensions were centrifuged on
coverslips and labeled by indirect immunofluorescence with anti-tubulin
antibody. In the absence of EGS suspension, no microtubule assembly
occurred. Significant microtubule nucleation was observed at a 1:120
oligomeric tubulin/total tubulin ratio (Fig. 2A,
curve observed at 0.1 µM oligomer
concentration). The structure of the microtubules nucleated from the
cross-linked oligomers was assessed using cryoelectron microscopy (Fig.
2B). Most of the microtubules were composed of 13 or 14 protofilaments with a small proportion (~5%) composed of 12 or 15 protofilaments. These proportions corresponded to those previously
observed in microtubule suspensions assembled in standard conditions
(26).
Alternatively, EGS suspension was prepared as previously described,
except that the experiment was performed at 4 °C. In this case, the
tubulin suspension did not assemble in microtubules, and the resulting
EGS suspensions did not display any microtubule nucleation activity
(data not shown). Thus, active oligomers could only be obtained from
disassembly of cross-linked microtubules.
Light Scattering Analysis of EGS Suspension--
Electron
microscopy experiments showed that EGS suspension contained oligomers
in the form of small linear filaments. Quantitative information on the
size of the components of EGS suspensions and on their relative
concentrations was obtained using both DLS and SLS experiments.
Fig. 3A shows the results
obtained from the DLS experiment. After application of the Contin
method (see "Experimental Procedures"), the measured time
autocorrelation function of the scattered intensity could be described
by a sum of two relaxation times widely separated in time, suggesting
that the EGS suspensions contained two main molecular species. The fast
relaxation time corresponded to a hydrodynamic radius of 8 ± 1 nm, which is the size of the tubulin dimer. Thus, this relaxation time
could be ascribed to the diffusive mode of tubulin dimers. The slow
relaxation time corresponded to a hydrodynamic radius of 60 ± 6 nm. This value was in good agreement with the size of the tubulin
oligomers seen in electron microscopy (20-60 nm).
The radius of gyration measured using SLS experiments was found to be
equal to 50 ± 10 nm. Within the error bars, this value was in
good agreement with the value of hydrodynamic radius found for EGS oligomers.
These experiments indicated that EGS suspensions were composed
exclusively of tubulin dimers and EGS cross-linked oligomers. The
relative concentrations of free tubulin dimers
(cdimers) and tubulin dimers in the form of EGS
oligomers (cEGS oligomers) in the solution
could be deduced from the following equation (27).
MEGS oligomers and
Mdimers were the weight-average molecular
masses of EGS oligomers and dimers, respectively.
Adimers(q) and
AEGS oligomers(q) were the relative
amplitudes of the relaxations associated with tubulin dimers and EGS
oligomers, respectively (Fig. 3A). Their corresponding ratio
in Equation 7 extrapolated at q = 0 was equal to 100.
The relative concentrations of free tubulin dimers
(cdimers) versus tubulin dimers in
the form of EGS oligomers (cEGS oligomers) could be calculated for two different values of p
corresponding to the possibility that the oligomers consisted of
laterally or longitudinally associated tubulin dimers, respectively. In
the case of EGS oligomers composed of longitudinally associated tubulin dimers, 7% of total tubulin would be in the form of free tubulin dimers, and 93% would be in the form of EGS cross-linked tubulin dimers. For EGS oligomers composed of laterally associated tubulin dimers, 13% of tubulin would be in the form of free tubulin dimers, and 87% would be in the form of EGS cross-linked tubulin dimers.
EGS Oligomers Can Exchange Nucleotides--
We used a nucleotide
exchange assay to determine whether tubulin oligomers in EGS
suspensions consisted of laterally or longitudinally associated tubulin
dimers. It is known from both biochemical and structural data that GTP
at the exchangeable site in
Taken together with the electron microscopy observations, the light
scattering and nucleotide exchange experiments indicate that EGS
suspensions contain tubulin dimers, a large proportion (87%) of which
are laterally associated to form nucleation competent oligomers
composed of ~15 tubulin molecules.
Light Scattering Study of EGS Oligomers during Microtubule
Nucleation and Assembly--
When EGS suspensions were incubated at
25 °C in the presence of GTP alone, we did not observe any
modification of the spectrum shown in Fig. 3A. Thus, EGS
oligomers apparently did not aggregate in the presence of GTP alone.
In the presence of added free tubulin, microtubule assembly occurred
and was studied at 25 °C using SLS experiments (Fig. 3B)
and DLS experiments (Fig. 3C). The variation of the scattered intensity, I, at
The two relaxations corresponding to tubulin dimers and EGS oligomers
were still observed during tubulin assembly and in fully assembled
tubulin suspensions (Fig. 3C, time = 540 s and
time = 1600 s), together with a third relaxation. The
characteristic relaxation time and the corresponding amplitude of this
relaxation increased with time. This relaxation was ascribed to growing
microtubules. Because the size of the microtubules was larger than the
scattering length scale q Kinetic Analysis of Nucleation from Stable Tubulin
Oligomers--
Each EGS oligomer might be able to nucleate a
microtubule (first order reaction), or several oligomers might have to
be incorporated in microtubule nuclei (nth order
reaction). To distinguish between these possibilities and estimate the
n value, we determined the relationship between the oligomer
concentration and the initial rate of microtubule nucleation in the
presence of GTP-tubulin complexes without GTP in excess (Fig.
4A). The procedures for
determination of microtubule concentration number from tubulin assembly
data and microtubule mean lengths were as in Ref. 13.
Slopes of microtubule concentration plots during the initial fast
increase phase were plotted against the oligomer concentration on a
log-log plot (Fig. 4B). The slope of the regression line is
an estimate of n and was equal to 4.1. This result strongly indicates that several oligomers are incorporated in a single microtubule nucleus.
Microtubule Nucleation from Fluorescent Tubulin Oligomers--
If
several EGS oligomers associated to nucleate a microtubule, we reasoned
that it could be possible to detect directly fluorescent EGS oligomers
in microtubules by light microscopy and to quantify corresponding
fluorescent intensities. EGS oligomers were produced from microtubules
obtained using rhodamine-labeled tubulin. Rhodamine-labeled EGS
oligomers (1 µM tubulin concentration) were incubated
with unlabeled tubulin (18 µM) for 30 min at 37 °C in
the presence of 1 mM GTP. The suspension was then
centrifuged on coverslips and labeled by indirect immunofluorescence
using anti-tubulin primary antibody and fluorescein-labeled secondary
antibody. Remarkably, rhodamine-labeled oligomers formed red or yellow
(by superposition of green and red colors) spots located either within
or at one end of microtubules (Fig.
5A, arrows),
strongly indicating that microtubules had indeed polymerized on a seed
formed by combined oligomers. The precise location of some spots at one
end suggested that the stable seed inhibited microtubule disassembly
from the minus end. Some red spots were unconnected with microtubules. In control experiments in which rhodamine-EGS oligomers (1 µM) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in PEM buffer
with GTP (1 mM) without added tubulin, such orphan spots
did not form (not shown). This result suggests that in fitting with the
light diffusion experiments, no oligomer complexes form in the absence
of free tubulin and that orphan spots represent unproductive
microtubule seeds.
The apparent size of the spots showed conspicuous variability both for
spots incorporated in microtubules and for orphan spots. A quantitative
analysis of spot fluorescence was carried out on spots associated with
microtubules (see "Experimental Procedures"). The threshold
selected for spot detection was ~10% higher than the mean background
value and spot contours determined areas in the range of 1-17 pixels.
The mean fluorescence intensity/spot was estimated, assuming 15 tubulin
dimers/oligomer. The results indicated that the number of
oligomers/spot was variable, ranging from 3 to 40 with a mean value of
14 (Fig. 5B), much higher than the nucleation exponent
estimated from kinetic data. This apparent discrepancy may in part
result from technical limitations. The fluorescence intensity of pixels
in small size spots (lower than 3 pixels) was close to the detection
threshold. The number of such spots was therefore probably
underestimated and a proportion of these spots, containing five
oligomers or less, might have been neglected in our analysis. However,
this difference may also result from the fact that large aggregates do
not need to form in one step, by simultaneous interaction of dozens of
oligomers. Rather, oligomer aggregates might grow in successive steps,
and this would account for the apparent discrepancy between
fluorescence and kinetic data.
Taken together these data support the view that cross-linked oligomers
aggregated in distinct microtubule nuclei in the presence of free
tubulin molecules. They also reveal an unexpected variability in the
size of such nuclei.
Although suitable conditions for microtubule assembly in
vitro have been discovered decades ago (31), the pathway of
microtubule nucleation in purified tubulin solutions has remained
poorly understood because of the absence of suitable procedures to
isolate molecular intermediates between tubulin dimers and tubulin
sheets. This report describes the isolation and characterization of
stabilized linear tubulin oligomers that represent such molecular intermediates.
Our data indicate a lateral association of tubulin molecules in the EGS
oligomers. Apparently, whereas in the absence of cross-linker microtubule breakdown in longitudinal filaments, EGS treatment preferentially stabilizes lateral dimer-dimer interactions, and microtubule disassembly by freezing-thawing procedures yields laterally
associated tubulin filaments. It is possible that other types of
tubulin oligomers could also nucleate microtubule assembly. We have
tried a number of other procedures to derive assembly competent tubulin
oligomers either from tubulin solutions kept in the cold, which contain
abundant linear and circular oligomers (data not shown), or from the
disassembly products of microtubules generated during complete
microtubule oscillations (22), without success. We cannot exclude the
existence of nucleation centers whose structure is altered by
cross-linking. It is also possible that natural non-cross-linked
oligomers similar to those that we used in the present study would
combine somewhat differently to form microtubule seeds. In any case,
our results yield new information regarding the possibility and
pathways of microtubule nucleation from tubulin oligomers.
We have used the EGS oligomers for a direct test of the pertinence of a
model of microtubule nucleation from stable tubulin oligomers that we
have previously proposed (13). In classical nucleation models, the slow
step is the aggregation of several tubulin molecules into a filament.
The rapid step consists in the formation of microtubule from this
filament. There is essentially no filament free in solution, and a
single filament is incorporated in each polymer (14). In contrast, our
model postulated that nucleation-competent tubulin filaments formed
very rapidly at the onset of tubulin assembly to yield an excess pool
of nucleation competent oligomers that subsequently combined slowly to
form microtubule nuclei (13). This study shows that the model that we
proposed is sound. Light scattering experiments as well as microscopy
studies showed that several EGS oligomers were needed to form a
microtubule nucleus and that microtubule nucleation from these
oligomers did not proceed in one step, with a pool of oligomers
remaining free in solution during the assembly process. However, our
study also revealed surprising features of the nucleation process.
The first unexpected observation was that microtubule nuclei do not
form from the oligomers themselves but from complexes of these
oligomers with free tubulin dimers. Both microscopy and light
scattering data provided evidence that the oligomers themselves had no
tendency to combine into larger structure, in the absence of tubulin
dimers. Upon the addition of tubulin dimers, the same oligomers
coalesced into large nucleation complexes visible in light microscopy.
It may be that the basic building blocks combining to form productive
nucleation complexes are small tubulin sheets arising from one oligomer.
The second surprise was the apparently conflicting flexibility and
reliability of the nucleation process. Because in vitro tubulin assembly produces bona fide microtubules, it is
generally thought that microtubule seeds have a rather strictly defined organization and that the nucleation exponent in the nucleation reaction has a clear structural meaning. Our data strongly support a
different view. Apparently, the EGS oligomer-tubulin nucleation building blocks form all kinds of complexes, in a presumably flexible succession of association events. Some complexes are unproductive and
are visible in microscopy as orphan spots. Other complexes expose a
suitable shape to sustain microtubule growth, and this can happen with
only a few building blocks or can need the association of a large
number of building blocks. The nucleation exponent does not correspond
to a strictly defined structure but is an average between many
alternative association pathways. We believe that the ultimate
reliability of the nucleation process producing bona fide
microtubules from heterogeneous nuclei requires an efficient selection
process. Probably, many tubulin assembly attempts occur on imperfect
microtubule nuclei, but the structures formed are eliminated because of
their instability. Thus, the general dynamic instability of microtubule
assemblies may be as central for the reliability of microtubule
assembly as for microtubule function.
The lateral tubulin oligomers that nucleate microtubule assembly in our
study bear obvious similarity with the tubulin assemblies that form on
-tubulin ring complexes with the
exception that in the absence of
-tubulin complexes the production
of productive microtubule seeds from tubulin oligomers involves trial
and error and a selection process.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

heterodimer. Within the
microtubule, tubulin dimers aggregate through longitudinal interactions
into protofilaments. Protofilaments are associated laterally to form a
25-nm-diameter cylindrical structure. Microtubule assembly from
purified tubulin involves both microtubule nucleation and microtubule
elongation (for a review, see Ref. 1). In fully assembled microtubule
solutions, individual polymers exhibit spontaneous length fluctuations
involving polymer assembly and disassembly events. Microtubule
elongation and disassembly are both well documented at the structural
level (2-5). By comparison, microtubule nucleation is still poorly
documented, mainly because the molecular species that form during
nucleation are small sized and short-lived. The earliest structures
observed by time-resolved electron microscopy during microtubule
assembly are two-dimensional sheets of protofilaments (reviewed in Ref.
6), which subsequently close to form integral microtubules. Earlier
steps of microtubule nucleation have hitherto been deduced from kinetic
data (7-9), the interpretation of which is
model-dependent.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
= 488 nm, an ALV-5000 correlator
(ALV, Langen-Germany Instruments), a computer-controlled and
stepping motor-driven variable angle detection system, and a
temperature-controlled sample cell. The scattering spectrum was
measured through a band pass filter (488 nm) and a pinhole (200 µm
for the static experiments and 100 µm for the dynamic experiments)
with a photomultiplier tube (ALV).
where n is the refractive index of the solvent (1.34 for the water at 25 °C),
(Eq. 1)
is the wavelength of light in the
vacuum, and
is the scattering angle. In our experiments, the
scattering angle
varied between 20° and 150°, which corresponds
to scattering wave vectors q in the range from 6 × 10
4 to 3.2 × 10
3 Å
1.
The absolute scattering intensities I(q)
(i.e. the excess Rayleigh ratio) were deduced using a
toluene sample reference for which the Rayleigh ratio is well known.
1 is sufficiently large compared with the
radius of gyration RG of the objects, the form
factor obeys Guinier's law, and the radius of gyration
RG can be determined from the intercept and the
initial slope of these plots using a scattering inverse Lorentzian law of the form (17).
where K = 4
(Eq. 2)
2n2(dn/dc)2/NA
4
is the scattering constant, dn/dc is the
refractive index increment, and NA is
Avogadro's number. The apparent radius of gyration is obtained by a
mean square linear fit of the inverse of the scattered intensity
versus q2.
where A is the base line, and
(Eq. 3)
is the coherence
factor, which in our experiments is equal to 0.7-0.9. The normalized
dynamical correlation function
g(1)(q,t) of concentration
fluctuations is defined as follows.
where
(Eq. 4)
c(q,t) and
c(q,0) represent fluctuations of polymer
concentration at time t and time 0, respectively.
inversely
proportioned to q2. It is then possible to
determine diffusion constant D. The latter is related to the
average hydrodynamic radius RH of the objects through the following equation.
where k is the Boltzman constant,
(Eq. 5)
s is
the solvent viscosity, and T is the absolute temperature.
, we used the Contin
method based on the inverse Laplace transform of
g(1)(q,t) (19). If the
spectral profile of the scattered light can be described by a
multi-Lorentzian curve, then g(1)(q,t) can be
written as follows.
where G(
(Eq. 6)
= 1/
) is the normalized decay
constant distribution. This method is appropriate for solutions
characterized by several relaxation mechanisms.
-32P]GTP for
15 min at 4 °C. The mix was filtered by Biogel P30 chromatography. The protein concentration and radioactivity of the eluate fraction were
measured. The eluted radioactivity corresponded to the fraction of the
nucleotide associated with EGS oligomers.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
80 °C overnight). Following thawing, the EGS cross-linked
microtubules had disassembled, and the suspension mainly contained
curved filamentary structures of various size, the longest ones looking
like open circles (Fig. 1A).
Suspensions also contained large protein aggregates (not shown) and,
occasionally, residual microtubule fragments. To eliminate such
fragments and the large protein aggregates, the suspension (diluted 1:5
in PEM) was subsequently filtered on a 0.1-µm Millipore filter to
eliminate residual microtubule fragments. Approximately 5% of the
protein was recovered in the filtrate, called "EGS suspension" hereafter, and could be stored at
80 °C for several weeks prior to
further processing. Prior to use, the EGS suspension was centrifuged at
200,000 × g for 30 min, and the pellet was recovered
in 390 µl of PEM buffer. The EGS suspension mainly contained tubulin oligomers that appeared as curved filaments of 20-60 nm in size, whereas the longest circular tubulin assemblies were largely eliminated (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (140K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Electron micrographs of EGS oligomers.
EGS suspension was examined before (A) or following
(B) filtration on a 100-nm Millipore filter. Curved
filamentary structures of various sizes were detected
(arrows). Bar, 30 nm.

View larger version (72K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Microtubule nucleation from EGS
suspension. A, tubulin (12 µM) was
assembled at 37 °C in PEM buffer containing 1 mM GTP in
the presence of various concentrations of EGS suspension protein, as
indicated. EGS oligomer concentrations are expressed in molarity of
tubulin dimers. Tubulin assembly was followed by optical density at 350 nm at the spectrophotometer. B, cryoelectron microscopy
images of the microtubules assembled from tubulin (20 µM)
and GTP (1 mM) in the presence of EGS suspension (1 µM).

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Light scattering experiments.
A, distribution function of decay time
A(t) obtained using the Contin method for an EGS
suspension at 7.5 µM,
= 90°, and at 35 °C.
B, scattered intensity during microtubule assembly in the
presence of tubulin (18 µM), EGS suspension (3 µM, expressed in molarity of tubulin dimers), and GTP (1 mM). C, distribution function
A(t) at
= 90° and at 25 °C for time
0, 540, and 1600 s.
where p is the number of tubulin dimers in EGS
oligomers. Assuming that the tubulin dimer was 8 nm in length and 4 nm
in width, for oligomers of 60 nm p is equal to 7.5 for
longitudinally associated tubulin dimers and to 14 for laterally
associated tubulin dimers.
(Eq. 7)
-tubulin is not accessible in
longitudinally associated tubulin dimers (28-30). In contrast the same
exchangeable sites should be fully accessible in laterally associated
oligomers. For nucleotide exchange assay, filtered EGS suspension was
prepared with nonradioactive GTP and then incubated in the presence of
radioactive [3H]GTP. Free GTP was removed by filtration
on Biogel P30 chromatography, and the stoichiometry of GTP binding to
tubulin was determined. The results of three independent experiments
yielded stoichiometry estimates varying from 0.91 to 0.99 (Table
I), suggesting that the exchangeable
GTP-binding sites were exposed in the vast majority of tubulin dimers,
including those associated in oligomers. This is a strong indication
that the nucleating tubulin oligomers consist of laterally associated
tubulin dimers.
Nucleotide exchange between tubulin from EGS suspension and buffer
-32P]-GTP (second column). The concentration of
associated radioactive nucleotide was measured after elimination of
free GTP using chromatography (third column; n, number of
experiments). The percentages of tubulin dimer having exchanged
nucleotide had been deduced (fourth column).
= 90° with time showed a typical
microtubule assembly curve (Fig. 3B). The normalized
distribution function of decay times A(t) at
= 90° obtained by applying the Contin method is presented in
Fig. 3C at three different times of microtubule assembly. At
the beginning of the assembly (time = 0 s), Fig. 3C shows the two diffusive modes of tubulin dimers and EGS
oligomers. At time 0, the results are in agreement with the results
presented in Fig. 3A, although the percentages of diffusive
mode intensities in Fig. 3C were qualitative and not
quantitative. In fact, the measurement time course was here shorter
than in experiments providing Fig. 3A, because the spectra
were obtained during assembly process and in only one direction
(90°).
1 (~200 nm), it was
not possible to determine their size using light scattering
experiments. These observations mainly showed that only a proportion of
the EGS oligomers were incorporated in microtubules during assembly.
They did not allow detection of intermediates between oligomers and
microtubules, possibly because such intermediates would yield a
relaxation overlapping with the microtubule relaxation.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Kinetics of microtubule nucleation from EGS
oligomers. 18 µM GTP-tubulin was assembled in the
presence of various concentrations of EGS suspension protein (2 µM (triangles), 3 µM
(diamonds), and 4 µM (circles),
expressed in molarity of tubulin dimers). A, plots of
microtubule number concentration versus time. B,
log-log plot of microtubule number concentrations versus EGS
oligomers concentration (expressed in molarity of tubulin
dimers).

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Light microscopy examination of microtubule
suspensions nucleated from fluorescent EGS oligomers.
A, microtubule nucleation assay with 1 µM
fluorescent EGS oligomers (expressed in molarity of tubulin dimers)
with GTP (1 mM) in the presence of added tubulin (12 µM). EGS cross-linked oligomers marked one end of
microtubule or were apparently incorporated in microtubules
(arrows). B, histogram showing the number of EGS
oligomers/spot. 50 spots were examined.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-TuRCs and can seed microtubule assembly both in vitro
and in vivo.
-TuRCs template the assembly of a laterally associated tubulin oligomer on which microtubule subsequently elongate
(32-34). However, whereas several EGS oligomers are needed for
nucleation, a single oligomer is sufficient when templated on a
-TuRC. A likely explanation is that
-tubulin complexes specify
precisely both the subunit number and the curvature of the tubulin
oligomer used for microtubule seeding. With EGS oligomers, exposing
laterally associated tubulin dimers with the proper arrangement in
space at the surface of microtubule nuclei is apparently achieved through the association and overlap of several tubulin-oligomer complexes. Thus, ultimately, microtubule nucleation in purified tubulin
solutions and from
-TuRCs could be very similar processes, with the
exception that
-tubulin complexes render deterministic and efficient
a process that involves trial and error in purified tubulin solutions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Chesnel and P. Toupet (Centre d'Analyse des Images) for plate scanning.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer and from La Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
ovaliron@cea.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M209753200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
Pipes, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
EGS, ethylene glycol bis
succinimidylsuccinate;
-TuRC,
-tubulin ring complex;
SLS, static
light scattering.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Valiron, O., Caudron, N., and Job, D. (2001) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58, 2069-2084[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Simon, J. R.,
and Salmon, E. D.
(1990)
J. Cell Sci.
96,
571-582 |
| 3. |
Mandelkow, E. M.,
Mandelkow, E.,
and Milligan, R. A.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
114,
977-991 |
| 4. |
Chrétien, D.,
Fuller, S. D.,
and Karsenti, E.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1311-1328 |
| 5. |
Arnal, I.,
Karsenti, E.,
and Hyman, A. A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
767-774 |
| 6. |
Erickson, H. P.,
and Stoeffler, D.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
135,
5-8 |
| 7. | Johnson, K. A., and Borisy, G. G. (1977) J. Mol. Biol. 117, 1-31[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Flyvbjerg, H.,
Jobs, E.,
and Leibler, S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5975-5979 |
| 9. |
Carlier, M. F.,
Didry, D.,
and Pantaloni, D.
(1997)
Biophys. J.
73,
418-427 |
| 10. |
Voter, W. A.,
and Erickson, H. P.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
10430-10438 |
| 11. | Fygenson, D. K., Braun, E., and Libchaber, A. (1994) Phys. Rev. E 50, 1579-1588[CrossRef] |
| 12. | Fygenson, D. K., Flyvbjerg, H., Sneppen, K., Libchaber, A., and Leibler, S. (1995) Phys. Rev. E 51, 5058-5063[CrossRef] |
| 13. | Caudron, N., Valiron, O., Usson, Y., Valiron, P., and Job, D. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 297, 211-220[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Leguy, R.,
Melki, R.,
Pantaloni, D.,
and Carlier, M. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
21975-21980 |
| 15. | Hyman, A., Drechsel, D., Kellogg, D., Salser, S., Sawin, K., Steffen, P., Wordeman, L., and Mitchison, T. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 196, 478-485[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Dubochet, J., Adrian, A., Lepault, J., and McDowall, A. W. (1985) Trends Biochem. Sci. 6, 143-146 |
| 17. | Schmitz, K. S. (1990) An Introduction to Dynamic Light Scattering by Macromolecules , Academic Press, London |
| 18. | Cummins, H. Z., and Pike, E. R. (1974) Photon Correlation and Light Beating Spectroscopy , Plenum Press, New York |
| 19. | Provencher, S. W. (1982) Comput. Phys. Commun. 27, 213-242[CrossRef] |
| 20. | Bayley, P. M., Sharma, K. K., and Martin, S. R. (1994) in Microtubules (Hyams, J. S. , and Lloyd, C. W., eds) , pp. 111-137, Wiley-Liss, New York |
| 21. | Mandelkow, E., and Mandelkow, E. M. (1989) Cell Movement , Vol. 2 , pp. 23-45, Alan Liss, Inc., New York |
| 22. | Wade, R. H., Pirollet, F., Margolis, R. L., Garel, J. R., and Job, D. (1989) Biol. Cell 65, 37-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Koshland, D. E., Mitchison, T. J., and Kirschner, M. W. (1988) Nature 331, 499-504[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Symmons, M. F., Martin, S. R., and Bayley, P. M. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 2755-2766[Abstract] |
| 25. | Fanara, P., Oback, B., Ashman, K., Podtelejnikov, A., and Brandt, R. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 565-577[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Wade, R. H., Chrétien, D., and Job, D. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 212, 775-786[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Buhler, E., Dobrynin, A. V., DeSimone, J. M., and Rubinstein, M. (1998) Macromolecules 31, 7347-7355[CrossRef] |
| 28. | Mandelkow, E. M., Lange, G., Jagla, A., Spann, U., and Mandelkow, E. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 357-365[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Mitchison, T. J.
(1993)
Science
261,
1044-1047 |
| 30. | Nogales, E. (1999) Cell. Mol. Cell Sci. 59, 133-142 |
| 31. |
Weisenberg, R. C.
(1972)
Science
177,
1104-1105 |
| 32. | Moritz, M., Braunfeld, M. B., Guénébaut, V., Heuser, J., and Agard, D. A. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 365-370[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Keating, T. J., and Borisy, G. G. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 352-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Wiese, C., and Zheng, Y. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 358-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Bonfils, N. Bec, B. Lacroix, M.-C. Harricane, and C. Larroque Kinetic Analysis of Tubulin Assembly in the Presence of the Microtubule-associated Protein TOGp J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5570 - 5581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fourest-Lieuvin, L. Peris, V. Gache, I. Garcia-Saez, C. Juillan-Binard, V. Lantez, and D. Job Microtubule Regulation in Mitosis: Tubulin Phosphorylation by the Cyclin-dependent Kinase Cdk1 Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2006; 17(3): 1041 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lee, M. Gravel, R. Zhang, P. Thibault, and P. E. Braun Process outgrowth in oligodendrocytes is mediated by CNP, a novel microtubule assembly myelin protein J. Cell Biol., August 15, 2005; 170(4): 661 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hamada, H. Igarashi, T. J. Itoh, T. Shimmen, and S. Sonobe Characterization of a 200 kDa Microtubule-associated Protein of Tobacco BY-2 Cells, a Member of the XMAP215/MOR1 Family Plant Cell Physiol., September 15, 2004; 45(9): 1233 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||