Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M210466200 on October 14, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 52, 51025-51032, December 27, 2002
Cdc42 and Rac1 Regulate Late Events in Salmonella
typhimurium-induced Interleukin-8 Secretion from Polarized
Epithelial Cells*
Michael E.
Hobert
§,
Kara A.
Sands
,
Randal J.
Mrsny¶, and
James L.
Madara
From the
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
30322 and ¶ Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way,
South San Francisco, California 94080
Received for publication, October 11, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Salmonella typhimurium colonization
of the intestinal epithelium initiates biochemical cross-talk between
pathogen and host that results in the secretion of chemokines, such as
interleukin (IL)-8, that direct neutrophil migration to the site of
infection. In nonpolarized cells, Rac1 and Cdc42 have been shown to
regulate both bacterial invasion and signaling events leading to
nuclear responses and IL-8 secretion. However, because the underlying actin cytoskeleton and the associated signaling machinery are distributed much differently in polarized epithelial cells, we used
polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney monolayers to investigate the role of Rac1 and Cdc42 in S. typhimurium-induced
pro-inflammatory responses in the more physiologically relevant
polarized state. In Madin-Darby canine kidney monolayers expressing
dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42, both Salmonella- and tumor
necrosis factor
-induced activation of NF
B and mitogen-activated
protein kinase signaling cascades proceeded normally, but IL-8
secretion was inhibited. We found that Rac1 and Cdc42 were not involved
in early pro-inflammatory signaling events, as in nonpolarized cells,
but rather regulated the basolateral exocytosis and secretion of IL-8.
In contrast, dominant-negative Rac1 inhibited apical actin pedestal
formation, indicating that pedestal formation and nuclear signaling for
pro-inflammatory activation are not linked. These findings indicate
that there are significant differences in the requirements of
pathogen-induced host cell signaling pathways in polarized and
nonpolarized cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The intestinal epithelium provides a selectively permeable barrier
that maintains internal homeostasis by separating the internal environment from the external milieu. Intestinal epithelial cells have
coevolved over millions of years of close contact with normal gut flora
and have developed mechanisms to discriminate between pathogenic and
nonpathogenic organisms. It is this ability of the epithelium to
discriminate between nonpathogenic intestinal flora and pathogenic
bacteria that is central to the host mounting an effective immune
response. During colonization of the gut by enteropathogenic bacteria
like Salmonella typhimurium, the intestinal epithelium is
the first line of defense against the invading microorganisms and
reacts to the colonization with a rapid innate immune response. This highly localized response involves the polar secretion of cytokines, predominantly interleukin-8
(IL-8),1 that sets up a
subepithelial chemotactic gradient directing polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) to the site of infection (1, 2), a response
that is paramount to the inflammatory diarrhea associated with S. typhimurium infection (3). The initiation of this rapid innate
immune response requires two-way biochemical cross-talk between host
and pathogen.
During its coevolution with the intestinal epithelium, S. typhimurium has developed mechanisms to subvert host cell
functions allowing it to enter the normally nonphagocytic epithelial
cells and multiply (for reviews see Refs. 4-6). Physical contact
between S. typhimurium and the apical epithelial surface, in
addition to poorly understood biochemical signals, induce the
activation of a specialized protein-secretion system, known as a type
III secretory system (7-9). It is by way of this highly complex
secretory system, comprised of multiple protein components, that
Salmonella delivers bacterial effector proteins into the
eukaryotic host cell cytoplasm (for review see Ref. 9). Lately, much
attention has been directed at understanding the functions of the
S. typhimurium type III secretory proteins on host cell
cytoskeletal remodeling and nuclear signaling events. Microinjection
and overexpression of recombinant type III proteins have been shown to
cause the rapid reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and membrane
ruffling (10, 11) that are similar to that seen during S. typhimurium invasion of the host cell. Some type III secretory
proteins, like SipB, SipC, and SipD, are required for translocation
other type III proteins into the cell (12), and others, like SipA, have been shown to have actin bundling abilities (10), whereas yet others,
like SopE, SopB, and SptP, may act in concert to disrupt the
cytoskeleton and regulate GDP-GTP exchange on the small GTPases Rac1
and Cdc42 (11, 13). In nonpolarized cells these latter type III
proteins seem to also regulate nuclear signal transduction pathways
within the host cell in a Cdc42/Rac1-dependent manner (11).
However, it is not known whether these same pathways are required for
Salmonella-induced events in fully polarized epithelial monolayers where the underlying actin cytoskeleton and signaling machinery are quite different. Evidence from recent studies in polarized cells suggests that Salmonella-induced nuclear
signaling events as well as basolateral IL-8 secretion requires the
translocation of flagellin across the epithelium where it interacts
with the basolateral surface receptor (14-17).
The Rho subfamily of small GTPases are known to regulate a wide variety
of cellular processes including actin cytoskeletal changes, the
modulation of signaling pathways, and vesicle transport (see reviews in
Refs. 18-20). Consisting of at least 14 known members, the Rho
subfamily is regulated by an ever increasing number of guanine
nucleotide exchange factors, GTPase-activating proteins, and GDP
dissociation inhibitors, all of which not only regulate activity but
also actively participate in signal transduction (20). These complex
connections produce a signaling system full of promiscuity and
redundancy that is both cell type-specific and dependent on the nature
of the original stimulus. The role of Rho GTPases in
Salmonella-induced cytoskeletal changes and invasion of
nonpolarized cells has been well documented (9, 21); however, recent
findings in polarized cells (22) raise concern about the physiological
relevance of studies done in nonpolarized or cell-free systems.
To examine the involvement of Rho GTPases in S. typhimurium-induced basolateral IL-8 secretion from polarized
epithelial cells, we have adapted a Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK)
cell system with inducible expression of Rac1 and Cdc42
dominant-negative mutants. MDCK cell lines with doxycycline-repressible
expression of the dominant-negative mutants of Rac1 and Cdc42 have
previously been established to examine the role of these small GTPases
in the early events leading to epithelial development of polarity and
tight junction formation (23, 24). These same cell lines provide a
unique tool to examine the role of Rho GTPases in the signal
transduction pathways activated during Salmonella
colonization of polarized epithelial monolayers. Using this inducible
MDCK cell system has several advantages over the nonpolarized cell systems that have been previously used to investigate S. typhimurium-induced cell signaling events. MDCK cell monolayers
have long been used in the study of S. typhimurium-epithelial cell interactions such as adherence and
invasion (25, 26), cytoskeletal rearrangements (27), bacterial
translocation across the monolayer (28-31), and polymorphonuclear
transmigration in response to bacterial invasion. MDCK cell monolayers
also mirror the responses of the T84 human intestinal epithelial
monolayers and more closely represent the in vivo conditions
during infection of intestinal enterocytes than do nonpolarized
epithelial cells.
Using this more physiologically relevant system, we demonstrated a
significant difference between the signaling mechanisms employed by
nonpolarized cells and those used in polarized epithelial monolayers in
response to S. typhimurium colonization. Overexpression of
dominant-negative Rac1 and Cdc42 in nonpolarized cells has been
previously shown to regulate early events in S. typhimurium-induced signaling (11, 21); however, we find that this
is not the case in polarized epithelia expressing these
dominant-negative GTPases. In polarized epithelial monolayers
expressing dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42, S. typhimurium-induced activation of MAPK, p38-MAPK, JNK, I
B
kinase, translocation of NF
B to the nucleus, and production of IL-8
message all proceed normally; however, basolateral IL-8 secretion is
inhibited, suggesting that the small GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42 may
regulate exocytosis and thus control the basolateral secretion of IL-8.
This also suggests that both Rac1 and Cdc42 play a much different role
during S. typhimurium infection depending on the polarity of
the cell line being used in the experiments.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
MDCK epithelial cells (T23 clone) expressing
dominant-negative Myc-tagged Rac1N17 or Cdc42N17 under the control of a
tetracycline-repressible transactivator were grown as previously
described (23). Briefly, the cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids
(Invitrogen), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 20 ng/ml doxycycline (Sigma) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. MDCK cells were seeded on 0.45 µM pore Transwell Clear inserts (Corning-Costar,
Cambridge, MA) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/fetal bovine
serum medium containing doxycycline and refed 24 h later and every
2 days thereafter. Monolayers were induced to express mutant GTPases
4-6 days after seeding by incubating monolayers in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium/fetal bovine serum medium lacking doxycycline
and containing 2.5 mM sodium butyrate for 24 h. The
parental cell line transfected with an empty plasmid and treated in an
identical manner served as the control; additionally, noninduced mutant
cells were also used and produced similar results. All of the
antibiotics were washed out prior to incubation with bacteria and had
no effect on Salmonella viability. Human T84 intestinal
epithelial cells (passages 70-95) were maintained as confluent
monolayers on collagen-coated permeable supports (32, 33).
Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions--
S.
typhimurium
3306 is a naladixic acid-resistant (gyrA1816)
strain derived from S. typhimurium strain SR-11 (34). LB was made as previously described (35). L agar is LB containing 7 g of
Bacto Agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI)/liter. Bacterial growth
conditions were as follows: nonagitated microaerophilic bacterial
cultures were prepared by inoculating 10 ml of LB with 0.01 ml of a
stationary phase culture followed by overnight incubation (~18 h) at
37 °C, as previously detailed (1, 36).
Antibodies and Fluorescent Markers--
The following reagents
were used: mouse anti-Rac1, mouse anti-Cdc42, mouse anti-NF
B p65,
(BD Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY); rabbit anti-c-Myc,
rabbit anti-I
-B antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa
Cruz, CA); mouse anti-rabbit IL-8 and rabbit anti-canine IL-8
antibodies (Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA); goat
anti-Salmonella, peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD); peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse, peroxidase-conjugated donkey
anti-rabbit antibodies (Amersham Biosciences); rabbit
anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK, phospho-p38 MAPK, phosphorylated
stress-activated protein kinase/JNK, peroxidase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit antibodies (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA);
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (ICN Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., Aurora, OH); FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse, FITC-conjugated
rabbit anti-goat, rhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated rabbit
anti-goat, FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA); and rhodamine
phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich).
Salmonella-induced IL-8 Secretion--
Confluent monolayers of
T84 cells and MDCK cells, grown on 6.5-mm-diameter collagen-coated
Transwell inserts, were washed three times with HBSS and placed into
300 µl of HBSS and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. The monolayers
were placed in dry wells, and 25 µl of
Salmonella-containing HBSS (1.6 × 1010
bacteria/ml) was placed on the apical surface of each monolayer. This
inoculum has been previously shown to correspond to 30 associated bacteria/cell (1). 1 h later, the monolayers were returned to the
wells containing 300 µl of HBSS. 5 h after adding the bacteria, basolateral cell supernatants were removed and assayed for IL-8. Human
IL-8 from T84 cells were measured by ELISA as previously described (1).
Canine IL-8 from MDCK cells was measured by ELISA in 96-well plates
(Linbro/Titertek; ICN Biochemicals, Costa Mesa, CA) coated overnight
with 1 µg/ml anti-rabbit IL-8 monoclonal antibody and detected with
rabbit anti-canine IL-8 polyclonal antibody from Dr. Randal Mrsny
(Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA). Canine fibronectin from MDCK
cells was measured by ELISA in 96-well plates (Linbro/Titertek; ICN
Biochemicals) coated overnight with basolateral supernatants and
detected with a monoclonal anti-fibronectin antibody (Transduction Laboratories).
Cell Extraction and Immunoblotting--
Filter-grown cells were
rinsed twice in ice-cold HBSS, lysed in protein loading buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2%
SDS, 0.1% bromphenol blue, 10% glycerol), and sonicated using a
Branson Sonifier 450 (Branson, Danbury, CT). Equal amounts of total
cell protein were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (37), transferred to nitrocellulose according to standard procedure (38), and processed for immunoblotting with specific antibodies. Immune
complexes were visualized with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated antibodies and developed using an ECL kit (Amersham Biosciences). Chemiluminescent signals were collected and scanned from ECL Hyperfilm (Amersham Biosciences) with a Fluor-S MultiImager (Bio-Rad) or a UMAX
Astra 1200S flatbed scanner (UMAX Technologies, Inc., Fremont, CA). For
figures, the contrast of images was adjusted, arranged, and labeled in
Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San
Jose, CA). The digital images are representative of the original data.
GTPase Activation Assay--
GTP-bound Rac1 and Cdc42 were
isolated from MDCK cell lysates using a Rac/Cdc42 activation assay kit
(Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake Placid, NY) according to the
manufacturer's protocol. Filter-grown MDCK cell monolayers were washed
in HBSS+ at 4 °C and lysed at 4 °C in cell lysis
buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM
MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10%
glycerol) supplemented with a protease inhibitor mixture (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at
4,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, and a fraction (1/100) of the total
cell lysate was saved to be probed for total Rac1 or Cdc42. The
remaining supernatant was incubated with gentle mixing for 1 h at
4 °C with glutathione S-transferase-PAK1 beads (Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc.). The beads were washed extensively, and proteins
bound to the beads were separated on 12% acrylamide gels and
transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were incubated with either
an anti-Rac1 (BD Transduction Laboratories) or anti-Cdc42 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) antibody, followed by a
peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse or donkey anti-rabbit antibody
(Amersham Biosciences). Immune complexes were visualized by ECL as
described above.
Northern Blots--
MDCK cell monolayers were induced to express
the mutant GTPases and treated as indicated. Two hours after treatment,
the cells were lysed with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) for 5 min at room temperature and then extracted with chloroform. RNA was precipitated with isopropanol, washed with 75% ethanol, and resuspended in distilled H2O treated with 0.01% diethylpyrocarbonate. 30 µg of total RNA was denatured, fractionated by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel, and transferred to BrightStar-Plus membrane (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX) using NorthernMax-Gly Northern blotting kit procedures (Ambion, Inc.). Canine IL-8 cDNA and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probes were labeled with
BrightStar psoralen-biotin nonisotopic labeling kit (Ambion, Inc.). The
blots were prehybridized for 60 min at 42 °C in ULTRAhyb solution
(Ambion, Inc.). The blots were hybridized with 1.0 pM
psoralen-biotin-labeled, heat-denatured cDNA probe in the same
solution for 24 h at 42 °C. The blots were washed one time in
low stringency wash at room temperature and two times in high
stringency wash at 42 °C followed by detection using a BioDetect kit
(Ambion, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions and
exposed to film. The blots were stripped for10 min in 1% SDS-SSC at
100 °C and reprobed as above with a biotinylated DECAtemplateTM-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mouse (905 bp)
probe (Ambion Inc.).
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy--
Monolayers of MDCK cells
were rinsed three times in PBS, fixed for 10 min in 3.7%
paraformaldehyde, and then rinsed three times in PBS. The cells were
then permeabilized for 10 min with 0.2% Triton X-100 and rinsed three
times with PBS containing 10% bovine serum albumin. Permeabilized
cells were then incubated with either goat anti-Salmonella
antibody (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories) for 20 min at room
temperature or mouse anti-NF
B p65 (Transduction Laboratories) or
rabbit anti-c-Myc (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) antibodies for
1 h at 37 °C. After staining with primary antibodies, the cells
were rinsed three times with PBS and incubated with the appropriate
FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies for 20 min to 1 h at
37 °C. In some experiments, actin filaments were stained with
rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin for 45 min at 37 °C and rinsed three
times in PBS. Monolayers attached to membranes were excised from the
inserts and mounted cell side up on a glass slide. The membrane was
covered with 10 µl of SlowFade reagent (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR)
followed by a coverslip, and the edges were sealed to prevent drying.
Specimens were examined with a Zeiss LSM410 scanning laser confocal
microscope using the 488/568 nm wavelength lines of an argon-krypton
laser. The cell monolayer was optically section every 0.5 µm. Image
resolution using a Zeiss 100× Neofluor objective. Zeiss LSM software
was 512 × 512 pixels.
 |
RESULTS |
Apical Colonization by S. typhimurium Induces Basolateral IL-8
Secretion from MDCK Cell Monolayers--
Recent studies have relied on
nonpolarized cells and in vitro assays to investigate the
molecular mechanisms by which Salmonella stimulates IL-8
secretion from host cells. Here, we have instead chosen the well
characterized MDCK polarized epithelial cell model system to
investigate the interactions between host and pathogen. We began by
comparing the Salmonella-induced IL-8 secretion in both
human T84 and canine MDCK polarized monolayers using human- and
canine-specific ELISAs. Both T84 and MDCK cells form polarized monolayers with physically and biochemically distinct apical and basolateral membranes when grown on porous Transwell cell culture inserts (39-41). When filter-grown monolayers were infected with wild-type S. typhimurium (
3306) added to the apical
surface, significant IL-8 secretion was detected in the basolateral
supernatant at levels comparable with that stimulated by the addition
of basolateral TNF
(Fig. 1). Untreated
monolayers did not secrete IL-8 during the same time period (Fig. 1).
These results confirm that, despite differences in origin, MDCK cell
monolayers respond to Salmonella colonization in a manner
identical to T84 cells and thus provide an excellent model system for
the study of pathogen-epithelial cell interactions.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
S. typhimurium induces
IL-8 secretion from polarized monolayers of human T84 cells and canine
MDCK cells. Filter-grown monolayers of human intestinal epithelial
cells (T84) and canine kidney epithelial cells
(MDCK) were incubated at 37 °C for 5 h in either
HBSS+ alone (No treatment), TNF (100 ng/ml)
added basolaterally (TNF ), or wild-type S. typhimurium added apically (WT ( 3306)). After 5 h, the basolateral supernatants were collected, and IL-8 was quantified
using human and canine specific ELISAs. The data represent the means of
triplicate experiments ± S.D.
|
|
Expression of Dominant-negative Rac1 Inhibits Salmonella-induced
Apical Pedestal Formation, whereas Both Dominant-negative Cdc42 and
Rac1 Inhibit Basolateral IL-8 Secretion--
Recent studies in
nonpolarized cells have indicated that Cdc42 and to a lesser extent
Rac1 were directly involved in the Salmonella-induced membrane ruffling, signaling cascades leading to nuclear responses and
ultimately IL-8 secretion (11). As a result, our first objective was to
determine whether expression of the dominant-negative Cdc42 or Rac1
molecules were capable of inhibiting Salmonella-induced membrane ruffling and IL-8 secretion in our polarized epithelial cell
system. We began by examining the expression of the dominant-negative Cdc42 or Rac1 in polarized monolayers both by immunoblot and confocal laser scanning microscopy. When monolayers were incubated in the presence of doxycycline, only the lower molecular weight endogenous GTPases were observed in immunoblots of total cellular protein (Fig.
2A, MDCK).
Filter-grown monolayers expressing the dominant-negative Cdc42 or Rac1
had higher molecular weight bands corresponding to the Myc-tagged
mutant proteins, with expression levels equal to or slightly greater
than that of the endogenous GTPase (Fig. 2A,
arrow). We also examined the expression in filter-grown
monolayers stained with an anti-Myc antibody that recognizes only the
mutant GTPases, followed by a secondary FITC-conjugated antibody. Once again we found that monolayers incubated in the presence of doxycycline expressed only the endogenous GTPases and lacked expression of the
Myc-tagged dominant-negative mutants (Fig. 2B,
MDCK). Monolayers expressing the dominant-negative Cdc42N17
or Rac1N17 exhibited cytoplasmic staining that was consistent with
observations made previously by others (Fig. 2B) (22).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of dominant-negative Rac1 and
Cdc42 inhibit Salmonella and
TNF -induced IL-8 secretion. A,
filter-grown MDCK cell monolayers induced to express transgenes were
lysed, and equal amounts of total cellular protein were separated by
SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were probed
with anti-Rac1 or Cdc42 monoclonal antibodies followed by horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse antibody and bands were visualized
with ECL. Mutant, Myc-tagged proteins are indicated by the
arrow. B, monolayers grown as above were fixed,
permeabilized, and labeled with anti-c-Myc followed by FITC-conjugated
secondary antibody and visualized by confocal microscopy. C,
monolayers were incubated with apically applied wild-type S. typhimurium ( 3306) (+), or HBSS+ alone ( ), for
30min at 37 °C, fixed, permeabilized, and labeled with goat
anti-Salmonella antibody followed by FITC-conjugated
anti-goat antibody and rhodamine phalloidin to visualize actin
filaments. D, MDCK monolayers expressing the transgenes were
incu bated at 37 °C for 5 h in either HBSS+ alone
(No treatment), TNF (100 ng/ml) added basolaterally
(TNF ), or wild-type S. typhimurium added
apically (WT ( 3306)). After 5 h, basolateral
supernatants were collected, and IL-8 was quantified using a canine
specific ELISA. The data represent the means of triplicate
experiments ± S.D. The data labeled MDCK represent
results seen in noninduced mutant cells and cells transfected with an
empty plasmid.
|
|
The functional ability of the dominant-negative Cdc42 and Rac1 to
inhibit endogenous GTPase activity and affect
Salmonella-induced actin cytoskeleton reorganization was
examined in MDCK monolayers. Previous reports in nonpolarized cells
indicate that predominantly Cdc42 and to a lesser extent Rac1 regulate
the rapid actin cytoskeletal rearrangements needed for bacterial
invasion (11, 21); however, more recent studies in polarized MDCK
monolayers have found that only Rac1 is involved in this process at the
apical surface (22). Our results concur with the latter. Although both
dominant-negative MDCK cell lines express levels of mutant GTPase
roughly equivalent to the endogenous proteins, only Rac1N17 was able to
inhibit the local Salmonella-induced actin cytoskeletal
reorganization at the apical membrane (Fig. 2C). These
results are consistent with the distinct phenotypic differences seen in
polarized monolayers expressing the dominant-negative Cdc42 and Rac1
GTPase (22).
We next compared the Salmonella-induced basolateral IL-8
secretion from filter-grown monolayers expressing dominant-negative Rac1N17 and Cdc42N17 with monolayers expressing only the endogenous GTPases. In all cell lines, the cells incubated with buffer alone did
not secrete IL-8; however, cells expressing only endogenous GTPases
secreted significant amounts of IL-8 when incubated with apical
S. typhimurium or basolateral TNF
(Fig. 2D).
Cells expressing dominant-negative Cdc42 or Rac1 showed approximately a
70% reduction in the wild-type Salmonella-induced IL-8
secretion and a 75% to almost complete reduction in TNF
-induced
IL-8 secretion (Fig. 2D).
To confirm that only Rac1 was activated during apical invasion by
Salmonella, we next examined the time course of GTPase
activity for Rac1 and Cdc42 in infected monolayers. Using an affinity
precipitation assay that relies on the specific interaction of
activated, GTP bond Rac1 or Cdc42 with the protein-binding domain (PBD)
of P21-activated kinase (PAK-1) linked to agarose beads to precipitate
the activated GTPases, we compared the amount GTP-bound Rac1 or Cdc42
isolated from infected monolayers with that from uninfected controls.
Prior to measuring the GTPase activity induced by apical
Salmonella colonization, we established the capacity of our
assay by precipitating Rac1 and Cdc42 that were activated in
vitro by incubation with GTP
S. We found that the PAK-1 PBD
beads had the capacity to bind activated Rac1 or Cdc42 at least 50-fold
greater than basal levels (data not shown) and thus were more than
sufficient to precipitate the GTPases activated by
Salmonella. In monolayers incubated for various times with
apical Salmonella, we saw a rapid, transient, activation of
Rac1 that was initiated as early as 10 min after the addition of
bacteria, peaked between 20 and 30 min, and returned to basal levels
between 30 and 60 min of incubation (Fig.
3). During the remainder of the
incubation (60-240 min), Rac1 activity remained constant at basal
levels (Fig. 3). We observed similar results in four separate
experiments. In concurrence with a report from another lab (22), we
found that apical colonization did not activate Cdc42 at any time
during the incubation (data not shown), which is in complete agreement
with the inability of Cdc42N17 to inhibit apical membrane ruffling
(Fig. 2C). These results demonstrate that only Rac1 was
activated by apical colonization and that this activity was transient,
occurring for only 30-60 min during the early membrane ruffling
phase.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Apical Salmonella
colonization transiently activates endogenous Rac1.
Filter-grown MDCK cell monolayers were incubated at 37 °C with
apically applied wild-type 3306, or HBSS+ alone
(No treatment) for the times indicated. Activated GTP-bound
Rac1 was isolated from cell lysates by affinity precipitation with
PBD-PAK1 beads (see "Experimental Procedures"). GTPase pull-downs
(upper panel), as well as one-tenth of the total cellular
lysates (lower panel) were separated by SDS-PAGE and
transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were probed with anti-Rac1
monoclonal antibody followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
antibody, and the bands were visualized with ECL.
|
|
Early Salmonella-induced Nuclear Signaling Cascades Are Unaffected
by Expression of Dominant-negative Cdc42 or Rac1--
To determine
whether the effects of dominant-negative Rac1 and Cdc42 were inhibiting
early nuclear signaling events as well as localized cortical actin
rearrangements at contact sites, we examined several mediators known to
be involved in stimulating IL-8 secretion, including the I
B kinase
(42), p44-42 MAPK, p38, and JNK (43). Filter-grown monolayers of
Rac1N17 and Cdc42N17 cells were grown in medium supplemented with or
without doxycycline to prevent or induce dominant-negative GTPase
expression respectively. Monolayers incubated with doxycycline
expressed only the endogenous GTPases, whereas both Rac1N17 and
Cdc42N17 monolayers incubated without doxycycline had high levels of
expression of the dominant-negative GTPases (Fig.
4). Degradation of I
B
in
proteosomes is an early step, mediated by I
B kinase, known to be
required for nuclear signaling events leading to activation of the
transcription factor NF
B and stimulation of IL-8 synthesis (42).
When monolayers were incubated with buffer alone, I
B
remained
intact in all of the cell lines (Fig. 4, No treatment).
However, when monolayers were incubated with apical S. typhimurium (
3306) or basolateral TNF
, I
B
levels were
significantly reduced compared with monolayers that received no
treatment (Fig. 4). These results are identical to those obtained from
T84 monolayers treated in the same manner (data not shown). We next
determined the effect of the dominant-negative GTPases on S. typhimurium activation of MAPK, p38 MAPK, and JNK by examining the
phosphorylated, active forms of these kinases. Prior to
experimentation, filter-grown monolayers were serum-starved for 48 h by incubation in medium containing 0.5% fetal bovine serum to reduce
the background level of phosphorylated kinases because of growth
factors in the serum. In both mutant expressing and nonexpressing
monolayers, the level of phosphorylated (activated) MAPK, p38, and JNK
was very low (Fig. 4). However, after incubation with apical S. typhimurium (
3306) or basolateral TNF
, each of the
monolayers responded in a similar manner with increased activation of
MAPK, p38, and JNK (Fig. 4). Interestingly, both S. typhimurium and TNF
seem to be activating the same early
pathways even though the initial signaling event is
Ca2+-dependent for Salmonella, but
Ca2+-independent for TNF
(44). These results support the
idea that neither Rac1 nor Cdc42 are involved in the early
Salmonella-induced nuclear signaling events in polarized
epithelial monolayers and are in direct contrast to results previously
obtained in nonpolarized cells.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Salmonella-induced signaling
cascades are not inhibited by dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42.
Filter-grown MDCK cell monolayers induced to express transgenes were
incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in either HBSS+ alone
(No treatment) or with wild-type S. typhimurium
added apically (WT ( 3306)) or for 30 min with TNF (100 ng/ml) added basolaterally (TNF ). The cells were lysed,
and equal amounts of total cellular protein were separated by SDS-PAGE
and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were probed with
anti-Rac1, Cdc42, I B , phospho-p44/42 MAPK, phospho-p38 MAPK, or
phospho-JNK monoclonal antibodies followed by horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse antibody, and the bands were
visualized with ECL. The data labeled MDCK represent results
seen in noninduced mutant cells and cells transfected with an empty
plasmid. The data are representative of multiple experiments.
|
|
Salmonella-induced NF
B Nuclear Translocation and IL-8 Message
Production Are Not Inhibited by Dominant-negative Cdc42 or
Rac1--
The next critical step central to
Salmonella-induced innate immune response and IL-8 secretion
is the translocation of the transcription factor NF
B to the cell
nucleus (45). We therefore used confocal microscopy to examine NF
B
nuclear translocation in monolayers expressing dominant-negative Rac1
and Cdc42. Filter-grown monolayers were incubated in the presence or
absence of apical S. typhimurium (
3306) followed by an
additional 1-h incubation at which time the monolayers were fixed,
permeabilized, and stained with anti-p65 (NF
B) antibody and a
secondary FITC-conjugated antibody and mounted on slides. In monolayers
that received no treatment, NF
B was localized in the cytoplasm in
monolayers expressing only endogenous GTPases as well as those
expressing dominant-negative Rac1 and Cdc42 (Fig.
5, top row). This cytoplasmic
localization of inactive NF
B is identical to staining seen in T84
monolayers (not shown). When monolayers were instead incubated with
apical S. typhimurium (
3306), NF
B was released from
its inactive, I
B
-bound state and translocated from the cytoplasm
to the nucleus. This occurred in each of the cell lines, regardless of
whether the dominant-negative GTPases were being expressed (Fig. 5,
bottom row).

View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Salmonella-induced nuclear
translocation of NF B is not inhibited by
dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42. Filter-grown MDCK cell monolayers
induced to express transgenes were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h
in either HBSS+ alone (No Treatment) or with
wild-type S. typhimurium added apically (WT
( 3306)). After an additional 1-h incubation, the cells were
washed, fixed, and permeabilized. The cells were stained with an
anti-NF B monoclonal antibody followed by a FITC-conjugated
anti-mouse antibody, mounted on slides, and visualized by laser
scanning confocal microscopy.
|
|
We next focused our attention on the S. typhimurium-induced
transcription of the IL-8 message to determine whether Rac1N17 and
Cdc42N17 may be having an effect at the level of transcription. Northern blot analysis revealed that monolayers incubated with either
apical S. typhimurium or basolateral TNF
were capable of
transcribing IL-8 mRNA (Fig. 6,
top row), with no discernable difference between control
monolayers and monolayers expressing Rac1N17 or Cdc42N17. Hybridization
with a glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe was equivalent
under all experimental conditions, indicating that each lane was loaded
with the same amount of total RNA (Fig. 6, bottom row). Our
results thus far indicate that S. typhimurium-induced
signaling events proceeding through IL-8 transcription were not
affected by expression of dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42, forcing us
to examine later events in IL-8 secretion.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Salmonella-induced IL-8 message is
not inhibited by dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42. Filter-grown
monolayers of MDCK cells induced to express the transgenes were
incubated at 37 °C for 3 h in either HBSS+ alone
(No treatment), TNF (100 ng/ml) added basolaterally
(TNF ), or wild-type S. typhimurium added
apically (WT ( 3306)). Total RNA was isolated and
quantified, and equal amounts were separated by agarose gel
electrophoresis, transferred to Bright-Star Plus (Ambion, Inc.) nylon
membrane, probed with biotinylated canine IL-8 cDNA, stripped, and
probed with biotinylated glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
probe. The bands were visualized using the BioDetect Kit (Ambion, Inc.)
according to the manufacturer's instructions and exposed to film. The
data are representative of multiple experiments. The data labeled
MDCK represent results seen in noninduced mutant cells and
cells transfected with an empty plasmid.
|
|
Expression of Dominant-negative Cdc42 and Rac1 Reduce Basolateral
Secretion of the Marker Protein, Fibronectin--
Recent studies have
indicated a potential role for Cdc42 and Rac1 in the biosynthetic,
endocytic, and secretory pathways (46-50). To determine whether
dominant-negative Cdc42 and Rac1 may have compromised the secretion of
S. typhimurium-induced IL-8, we examined the constitutive
basolateral secretion of fibronectin under the same conditions. Using
an ELISA to detect basolateral fibronectin secretion, we compared
monolayers expressing Rac1N17 and Cdc42N17 with nonexpressing
monolayers. We found that during the same time course in which IL-8 was
collected, constitutive basolateral fibronectin secretion was also
reduced. In RacN17 monolayers we found that fibronectin secretion was
reduced to ~65% of control monolayers, and in Cdc42N17 it was
reduced even further to ~40% of control monolayers (Fig.
7). These results provide strong evidence
that Cdc42 and Rac1 are involved in the basolateral secretion both of
constitutively secreted proteins like fibronectin and of transiently expressed proteins like IL-8.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Expression of dominant-negative Cdc42
inhibits constitutive fibronectin secretion. Filter-grown
monolayers of MDCK cells induced to express the transgenes were
incubated at 37 °C for 5 h in HBSS+. After 5 h, the basolateral supernatants were collected, and fibronectin was
quantified using a fibronectin-specific ELISA. The data are presented
as the percentages of fibronectin secretion from control monolayers and
are the means of triplicate experiments ± S.D.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Interactions between S. typhimurium and epithelia
stimulate the production and secretion of bacterial effector molecules
that allow the bacterium to enter the normally nonphagocytic host
cells, a process that is essential for bacterial colonization. As a
result, the host cell mounts a rapid innate immune response via the
polar secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, ultimately recruiting neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes) to the site of infection. In
nonpolarized cells, the bacterial effector protein, SopE, has been
shown to catalyze the activation of Cdc42 and Rac1, mediating both the
actin cytoskeletal rearrangements necessary for bacterial entry as well
as nuclear signaling events leading to pro-inflammatory cytokine
release (11, 21); however, in polarized cells the host cell
requirements for membrane ruffling and bacterial invasion are quite
different (22). Therefore, in the present study, we tested the
hypothesis that polarized epithelia would have different molecular
requirements for Salmonella-induced nuclear signaling events
necessary for IL-8 secretion than those reported in nonpolarized cells.
Interestingly, we have found that neither Cdc42 nor Rac1 are necessary
for Salmonella-induced nuclear signaling events in polarized
epithelia but rather are required for basolateral secretion of IL-8.
These results are particularly relevant to future studies of
bacterial-host cell interactions and demonstrate the vital importance
of host cell polarity on these interactions. Understanding the process
by which the host epithelium recognizes the invading pathogen and
mounts a pro-inflammatory response is paramount to understanding how
they cause disease.
MDCK monolayers respond to apical Salmonella colonization in
a manner that is both morphologically and biochemically identical to
intestinally derived T84 monolayers. At the site of bacterial attachment, there is a rapid actin cytoskeletal reorganization that
results in the formation of membrane ruffles that are also seen in
nonpolarized cells infected with Salmonella (5). This highly
localized cytoskeletal rearrangement and subsequent bacterial invasion
require the injection of several bacterial Type III effector proteins
that can activate host cell Rho GTPases and bundle actin filaments (for
review see Ref. 51). It is at this point when Salmonella-host cell interactions in nonpolarized and
polarized cells begin to diverge. In nonpolarized cells the
Salmonella effector protein SopE has been shown to activate
the GTPase activity of Cdc42 and Rac1, inducing both membrane ruffling
and nuclear signaling events leading to pro-inflammatory responses (11,
21). It is important to remember that nonpolarized cells lack the
segregation of membrane receptors and signaling molecules as well as
the highly organized actin cytoskeleton common to polarized cells. A
recent study of the requirements for invasion in polarized epithelia eloquently demonstrates these differences. In contrast to previous reports, the authors found that Cdc42 is not necessary for apical invasion and is not even activated by Salmonella
colonization (22). Instead, they show that SopE activation of Rac1 is
required for membrane ruffle formation and bacterial entry at the
apical surface of polarized epithelia, which is similar to our results in Figs. 2 and 3. These important differences are explained by the
likelihood that SopE only activates GTPases in the immediate area
surrounding the site of bacterial-epithelial contact where Rac1 is
localized. Cdc42, on the other hand, is far removed from the site of
bacterial invasion and seems to be functioning at the
trans-Golgi network and basolateral membrane in polarized epithelia (46-48, 52, 53). Interestingly, both Cdc42 and Rac1 are
activated by Salmonella invasion of the basolateral
membrane, but neither is required for invasion to occur at that surface (22).
Recent studies have begun to examine the potential regulatory role of
both Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton in the endocytic, biosynthetic, and secretory processes. The actin-binding proteins ankyrin, spectrin, and myosin II have all been found to be closely associated with the Golgi and the trans-Golgi network and have been
implicated in vesicle budding and fusion (54) that may be regulated by
the polymerization state of actin. Because both Cdc42 and Rac1 can
direct the reorganization of actin filaments, it is likely that the
dominant-negative mutants of these GTPases may affect the transient
actin filaments that have recently been shown to be associated with
vesicle budding at the Golgi and the trans-Golgi network (54, 55). It
is still unclear whether Cdc42 and Rac1 directly regulate vesicle
budding or simply modulate pathways required for the maintenance of
epithelial polarity (Fig. 8) (46-48,
53).

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Rac1 and Cdc42 regulate the basolateral
secretion of Salmonella-induced IL-8 in polarized
epithelial cells. During apical colonization of intestinal
epithelial cells, Salmonella type III effector molecules
reorganize the underlying actin cytoskeleton and regulate bacterial
invasion in a Rac1-dependent manner. Salmonella
flagellin is transcytosed across the monolayer to interact with
basolateral TLR5 receptors in both infected and noninfected cells,
activating MAPK, p38, JNK, and I B kinase. Subsequently, I B is
degraded in proteosomes, releasing NF B to translocate to the nucleus
and stimulate IL-8 transcription. Cdc42 and Rac1 regulate basolateral
exocytosis of IL-8.
|
|
Early studies of Salmonella-host cell interactions in
nonpolarized cells have prompted the formation of a paradigm of
Salmonella-induced inflammation in which the type III
effector protein SopE is solely responsible for the activation of
signaling cascades that result in nuclear responses and ultimately IL-8
secretion (11, 21). This early archetype appears to be an
oversimplification of the process that occurs in polarized epithelia.
Recent studies have demonstrated that nonflagellated
Salmonella, capable of invading host cells and possessing
intact type III apparatus, lacks the ability to induce nuclear
signaling and IL-8 secretion (17). Still other studies have
demonstrated that flagellin alone can activate nuclear signaling in
polarized cells, but only from the basolateral surface (14), by
exclusively activating the basolaterally localized Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) (Fig. 8) (16, 56). The mechanism by which flagellin activates
TLR5 and pro-inflammatory signaling cascades is still unclear, but the
importance of cell polarity in Salmonella-induced
inflammation has become increasingly evident. These results fit very
well with our own, because we find that Salmonella induces
IL-8 secretion independent of SopE activation of Cdc42 or Rac1.
Additionally, we have shown that Salmonellae focally infect
monolayers, and yet all cells in the monolayer respond with
translocation of NF
B to the nucleus. This is completely consistent
with the idea that soluble transcytosed flagellin interacts with the
basolateral TLR5 on all cells, initiating the pro-inflammatory response
(Fig. 8). Although bacterial effectors are necessary for the early
events of membrane ruffling and invasion at the apical membrane, it is
now clear that Salmonella-induced nuclear signaling events
require the activation of basolateral TLR5 by flagellin in polarized
epithelial cells (Fig. 8).
In summary, the work presented here demonstrates a clear role for Cdc42
and Rac1 in the Salmonella-induced transit of IL-8 from the
trans-Golgi network to the basolateral membrane. These findings are in
complete accordance with other recent work in which Cdc42 was found to
regulate both biosynthetic and endocytic protein traffic to the
basolateral membrane (46, 47). Additionally, our results fit nicely
with recent studies that demonstrate significant differences between
polarized and nonpolarized cells in their requirements for
Salmonella internalization (22). However, our results
contrast previous work in nonpolarized cells (11, 21) and suggest that
the mediators of Salmonella-induced nuclear signaling are
dependent on the degree of cell polarity. Our results indicate that
Salmonella-induced alteration of the actin cytoskeleton and induction of nuclear signaling events have very different requirements in polarized epithelia and nonpolarized cells. The precise mechanisms by which Cdc42 and Rac1 regulate the basolateral secretion of IL-8 have
yet to be characterized.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank W. James Nelson (Stanford
University, Stanford, CA) for providing the MDCK cell lines and Randal
J. Mrsny (Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA) for providing the
anti-canine IL-8 and anti-rabbit IL-8 antibodies. We also thank our
colleagues for thoughtful comments and critical reading of this manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK-10085-01 (to M. E. H.) and DK-35932 and DK-47622
(to J. L. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology,
Univ. of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-4869; Fax: 773-702-5251; E-mail:
mhobert@bsd.uchicago.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M210466200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IL, interleukin;
MDCK, Madin-Darby canine kidney;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution;
ELISA, enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
TLR, Toll-like
receptor;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
McCormick, B. A.,
Colgan, S. P.,
Delp-Archer, C.,
Miller, S. I.,
and Madara, J. L.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
895-907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
McCormick, B. A.,
Hofman, P. M.,
Kim, J.,
Carnes, D. K.,
Miller, S. I.,
and Madara, J. L.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1599-1608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
McCormick, B. A.,
Miller, S. I.,
Carnes, D.,
and Madara, J. L.
(1995)
Infect. Immun.
63,
2302-2309[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Galan, J. E.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
2,
46-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Galan, J. E.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
20,
263-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Galan, J. E.,
and Collmer, A.
(1999)
Science
284,
1322-1328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Zierler, M. K.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1995)
Infect. Immun.
63,
4024-4028[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Collazo, C. M.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
192,
51-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Galan, J. E.,
and Zhou, D.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8754-8761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Zhou, D.,
Mooseker, M. S.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1999)
Science
283,
2092-2095[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Hardt, W. D.,
Chen, L. M.,
Schuebel, K. E.,
Bustelo, X. R.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1998)
Cell
93,
815-826[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Collazo, C. M.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1997)
Mol. Microbiol.
24,
747-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Fu, Y.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1999)
Nature
401,
293-297[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Gewirtz, A. T.,
Simon, P. O., Jr.,
Schmitt, C. K.,
Taylor, L. J.,
Hagedorn, C. H.,
O'Brien, A. D.,
Neish, A. S.,
and Madara, J. L.
(2001)
J. Clin. Invest.
107,
99-109[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Eaves-Pyles, T.,
Murthy, K.,
Liaudet, L.,
Virag, L.,
Ross, G.,
Soriano, F. G.,
Szabo, C.,
and Salzman, A. L.
(2001)
J. Immunol.
166,
1248-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Hayashi, F.,
Smith, K. D.,
Ozinsky, A.,
Hawn, T. R., Yi, E. C.,
Goodlett, D. R.,
Eng, J. K.,
Akira, S.,
Underhill, D. M.,
and Aderem, A.
(2001)
Nature
410,
1099-1103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Reed, K. A.,
Hobert, M. E.,
Kolenda, C. E.,
Sands, K. A.,
Rathman, M.,
O'Connor, M.,
Lyons, S.,
Gewirtz, A. T.,
Sansonetti, P. J.,
and Madara, J. L.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
13346-13353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Hall, A.
(1998)
Science
279,
509-514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Der, C. J.,
and Balch, W. E.
(2000)
Nature
405,
751-752[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Scita, G.,
Tenca, P.,
Frittoli, E.,
Tocchetti, A.,
Innocenti, M.,
Giardina, G.,
and Di Fiore, P. P.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
2393-2398[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Chen, L. M.,
Hobbie, S.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1996)
Science
274,
2115-2118[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Criss, A. K.,
Ahlgren, D. M.,
Jou, T. S.,
McCormick, B. A.,
and Casanova, J. E.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
1331-1341[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Jou, T. S.,
and Nelson, W. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
85-100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Jou, T. S.,
Schneeberger, E. E.,
and Nelson, W. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
101-115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Finlay, B. B.,
Heffron, F.,
and Falkow, S.
(1989)
Science
243,
940-943[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Reed, K. A.,
Booth, T. A.,
Hirst, B. H.,
and Jepson, M. A.
(1996)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
145,
233-238[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Finlay, B. B.,
Ruschkowski, S.,
and Dedhar, S.
(1991)
J. Cell Sci.
99,
283-296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Finlay, B. B.,
Starnbach, M. N.,
Francis, C. L.,
Stocker, B. A.,
Chatfield, S.,
Dougan, G.,
and Falkow, S.
(1988)
Mol. Microbiol.
2,
757-766[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Finlay, B. B.,
Gumbiner, B.,
and Falkow, S.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
221-230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Finlay, B. B.,
Fry, J.,
Rock, E. P.,
and Falkow, S.
(1989)
J. Cell Sci.
11 (suppl.),
99-107
|
| 31.
|
Garcia-del Portillo, F.,
Foster, J. W.,
Maguire, M. E.,
and Finlay, B. B.
(1992)
Mol. Microbiol.
6,
3289-3297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Dharmsathaphorn, K.,
and Madara, J. L.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
192,
354-389[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Madara, J. L.,
Parkos, C.,
Colgan, S.,
MacLeod, R. J.,
Nash, S.,
Matthews, J.,
Delp, C.,
and Lencer, W.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
89,
1938-1944[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Gulig, P. A.,
and Curtiss, R., 3rd.
(1987)
Infect. Immun.
55,
2891-2901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Revel, M.,
and Gros, F.
(1966)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
25,
124-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Lee, C. A.,
and Falkow, S.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4304-4308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Dharmsathaphorn, K.,
McRoberts, J. A.,
Mandel, K. G.,
Tisdale, L. D.,
and Masui, H.
(1984)
Am. J. Physiol.
246,
G204-G208[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Madara, J. L.,
Stafford, J.,
Barenberg, D.,
and Carlson, S.
(1988)
Am. J. Physiol.
254,
G416-G423[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Nelson, W. J.,
Hammerton, R. W.,
Wang, A. Z.,
and Shore, E. M.
(1990)
Semin. Cell Biol.
1,
359-371[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Chen, Z.,
Hagler, J.,
Palombella, V. J.,
Melandri, F.,
Scherer, D.,
Ballard, D.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1586-1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Hobbie, S.,
Chen, L. M.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Galan, J. E.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
5550-5559[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Gewirtz, A. T.,
Rao, A. S.,
Simon, P. O., Jr.,
Merlin, D.,
Carnes, D.,
Madara, J. L.,
and Neish, A. S.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
79-92[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Elewaut, D.,
DiDonato, J. A.,
Kim, J. M.,
Truong, F.,
Eckmann, L.,
and Kagnoff, M. F.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
1457-1466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Kroschewski, R.,
Hall, A.,
and Mellman, I.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
8-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Musch, A.,
Cohen, D.,
Kreitzer, G.,
and Rodriguez-Boulan, E.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
2171-2179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Jou, T. S.,
Leung, S. M.,
Fung, L. M.,
Ruiz, W. G.,
Nelson, W. J.,
and Apodaca, G.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
287-304[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Hong-Geller, E.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
481-494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Doussau, F.,
Gasman, S.,
Humeau, Y.,
Vitiello, F.,
Popoff, M.,
Boquet, P.,
Bader, M. F.,
and Poulain, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7764-7770[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Lesser, C. F.,
Scherer, C. A.,
and Miller, S. I.
(2000)
Trends Microbiol.
8,
151-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Erickson, J. W.,
Zhang, C.,
Kahn, R. A.,
Evans, T.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26850-26854[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Rojas, R.,
Ruiz, W. G.,
Leung, S. M.,
Jou, T. S.,
and Apodaca, G.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
2257-2274[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Heimann, K.,
Percival, J. M.,
Weinberger, R.,
Gunning, P.,
and Stow, J. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
10743-10750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Valderrama, F.,
Luna, A.,
Babia, T.,
Martinez-Menarguez, J. A.,
Ballesta, J.,
Barth, H.,
Chaponnier, C.,
Renau-Piqueras, J.,
and Egea, G.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1560-1565[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
|