![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 6, 3857-3862, February 8, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§,
,
,
From the
Institute of High Polymer Research, Faculty
of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Ueda
386-8567, Japan and the ¶ School of Molecular and Cell Biology,
University of the Witwatersrand, Wits 2050, South Africa
Received for publication, August 13, 2001, and in revised form, September 28, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ribosomal L10·L7/L12 protein complex and
L11 bind to a highly conserved RNA region around position 1070 in
domain II of 23 S rRNA and constitute a part of the GTPase-associated
center in Escherichia coli ribosomes. We replaced these
ribosomal proteins in vitro with the rat counterparts
P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, and tested them for ribosomal activities.
The core 50 S subunit lacking the proteins on the 1070 RNA domain was
prepared under gentle conditions from a mutant deficient in ribosomal
protein L11. The rat proteins bound to the core 50 S subunit through
their interactions with the 1070 RNA domain. The resultant hybrid
ribosome was insensitive to thiostrepton and showed poly(U)-programmed polyphenylalanine synthesis dependent on the actions of both eukaryotic elongation factors 1 The "GTPase center" of the ribosome is a region
involved in interaction with GTP-bound translation factors, GTP
hydrolysis (1), and post-GTPase events including tRNA movements on the ribosome (2, 3). Translation elongation is markedly stimulated by the
interaction of this region with two elongation factors in a
GTP-dependent manner. The GTPase center includes two
essential RNA regions around positions 1070 and 2660 (Escherichia
coli numbering) of the 23 S/28 S rRNA (4), which appear to bind to
the elongation factors (5, 6). Despite the highly conserved structure
of the 1070 and 2660 RNA regions, ribosomes show a
kingdom-dependent accessibility for translation factors,
i.e., prokaryotic ribosomes do not engage in translation
elongation with the eukaryotic factors instead of the prokaryotic
factors (7-9). Furthermore, there are differences in the rate of
GTPase turnover between the two systems; in vitro
eukaryotic eEF-21/80 S
ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis is 10-fold slower than the prokaryotic EF-G/70 S ribosome system (10). This may reflect, in
part, the elaborate regulation of eukaryotic translation.
The other important component of the GTPase center is the acidic stalk
protein, termed L7/L12 in prokaryotes (11-15). Four copies of this
proteins bind to protein L10 and form a stable complex (16), designated
here as L10·L7/L12. This protein complex and another protein, L11,
are assembled on the 1070 RNA domain (17). Flexible property of L7/L12
protein in the ribosome (16, 18-20) seems to be correlated with the
fast turnover of EF-G-dependent GTPase. The eukaryotic
counterparts of the prokaryotic L7/L12 and L10 are P1/P2 and P0,
respectively (21, 22). Although formation of the complex, termed
P0·P1/P2, has been clarified (21, 23-26), its structure and function
have not been characterized extensively. We previously tried
replacement of the acidic stalk protein complex L10·L7/L12 in the
E. coli ribosome with rat P0·P1/P2 in vitro and
showed, by this replacement, that the ribosome acquired GTPase activity
dependent on the eukaryotic translocase eEF-2 instead of prokaryotic
EF-G (10). This activity was comparable with that of the rat 80 S
ribosome. Meanwhile, other groups exchanged the 1070 RNA region within
23 S/26 S rRNA, with which the acidic stalk protein complex interacts
between E. coli and yeast, and this showed no major
functional effect (27, 28). These studies suggest that P0·P1/P2
protein complex on the 1070 RNA domain, but not the RNA itself, are
important for the kingdom-specific function.
The E. coli ribosome in which L10·L7/L12 was
replaced with rat P0·P1/P2, however, showed no significant activity
of eEF-1 E. coli Core Ribosomes Lacking L10·L7/L12 and
L11. E. coli--
AM68, lacking ribosomal protein L11 (29), was grown
to late exponential stage in phosphate-buffered medium (pH 7.1)
containing 2 mM sodium citrate, 0.4 mM
MgSO4, 0.5% glucose, 10 g/liter tryptone, and 5 g/liter
yeast extract and harvested. Salt-washed ribosomes were prepared as
described (10). The 50 S and 30 S subunits were isolated by
density gradient centrifugation using a 10-28% sucrose gradient in
buffer (0.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM
NH4Cl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) at 24,000 rpm and 4 °C for 14 h with a Hitachi P28-S rotor. To remove the L10·L7/L12 complex, the
50 S subunits were incubated in 50% ethanol, 0.5 M
NH4Cl solution as described previously (10), except that
the incubation was performed at 0 °C and the solution contained 5 mM MgCl2. The 50 S core subunit and the
released L10·L7/L12 complex were recovered as described (11). The
intact 70 S ribosomes were from E. coli Q13 (10).
Rat Ribosomal Proteins and Their Binding to the E. coli Core
Ribosome--
The rat P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, counterparts of
E. coli L10·L7/L12 complex and L11, respectively, were
prepared as described previously (24, 30). In a typical experiment, 10 pmol of the 50 S subunit cores were incubated with 2 µg of P0·P1/P2
complex and 0.4 µg of RL12 in a solution (25 µl) containing 10 mM MgCl2, 75 mM NH4Cl,
20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, at 37 °C for 5 min and used for
various assays. In some experiments, E. coli L10·L7/L12
and L11 (30) were added instead of the rat proteins. Incorporation of
these proteins was confirmed by sucrose density gradient (10) and
native agarose-acrylamide composite gel (see below).
Elongation Factors--
Eukaryotic eEF-1 Polyphenylalanine Synthesis--
The eukaryotic
eEF-1 GTPase Activity--
For eEF-1 Agarose-Acrylamide Composite Gel--
Formation of the
hybrid 50 S subunits was confirmed by agarose-acrylamide composite gels
as described by Tokimatsu et al. (34) with some
modifications. Our gel was composed of 3% acrylamide, 0.5% agarose
(SeaKem LE, BMA), 1 mM MgCl2, 25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and running buffer contained 1 mM
MgCl2 and 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0.
We have characterized rat ribosomal proteins
P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, counterparts of the E. coli
acidic stalk protein complex L10·L7/L12 and L11, respectively (24,
30). To investigate the functional significance of these rat proteins
in eukaryotic translational mechanism, here we attempted to substitute
the proteins for L10·L7/L12 and L11 in E. coli 50 S
ribosomal subunits. The E. coli core particle lacking
L10·L7/L12 and L11 assembled on the domain around 1070 of 23 S rRNA
was prepared with the 50 S subunit of the L11-deficient AM68 strain
(Fig. 1A, lane 2).
L10·L7/L12 was easily and selectively removed from the mutant 50 S
subunit (Fig. 1A, lanes 3 and 4) in
50% ethanol, 0.5 M NH4Cl at 0 °C. Binding
of the rat proteins to the E. coli core particle was
examined by native agarose-acrylamide composite gel electrophoresis
(Fig. 1B). The mobility of the core particle (lane
2) was much higher than the intact 50 S subunit (lane
1). The addition of the rat proteins changed the gel mobility of
the core particle (lane 3). This mobility shift by rat
proteins was prevented by adding an excess amount of an RNA fragment
containing residues 1029-1127 of E. coli 23 S rRNA to which
rat P0·P1/P2 complex (10) and RL12 (30) cross-bind (lane
4), suggesting that the rat proteins bind to the 1070 RNA domain
within the E. coli 50 S core particle. The binding of rat
proteins to the 1070 RNA region was also confirmed by chemical
footprinting.3 The region of
the gel with the shifted ribosomal band (lane 3) was cut out
and tested by immunoblotting for reactivity with autoimmune serum that
recognizes rat ribosomal proteins P0, P1, P2, and RL12 (35) (Fig.
1C). Fig. 1C, lane 2, clearly shows
that all of the added rat proteins comigrated with the E. coli core particle. From these results, we concluded that E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11 are replaced with rat protein
counterparts on the 1070 RNA domain of 23 S rRNA in the 50 S subunit,
as illustrated in Fig. 1D.
(eEF-1
) and 2 (eEF-2) but not of the
prokaryotic equivalent factors EF-Tu and EF-G. The results from
replacement of either the L10·L7/L12 complex or L11 with rat protein
showed that the P0·P1/P2 complex, and not RL12, was responsible for
the specificity of the eukaryotic ribosomes to eukaryotic elongation factors and for the accompanying GTPase activity. The presence of
either E. coli L11 or rat RL12 considerably stimulated the polyphenylalanine synthesis by the hybrid ribosome, suggesting that
L11/RL12 proteins play an important role in post-GTPase events of
translation elongation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/eEF-2-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis in
our previous study.2 This may
be due to damage caused during preparation of the core ribosome lacking
both L10 and L7/L12, using 50% ethanol, 0.5 M NH4Cl at 30 °C. To prepare the core ribosome employing
milder conditions, we use here an L11-lacking ribosomal mutant from
which L10·L7/L12 complex is easily removed at 0 °C. Both rat
P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12 (rat counterpart of E. coli L11)
are incorporated into the core ribosome. This hybrid ribosome has
appreciable activity in polyphenylalanine synthesis dependent on the
two eukaryotic elongation factors. The present results clearly show
that the eukaryotic ribosomal proteins bound to the 1070 RNA domain
play crucial roles in translation elongation regulated by the
eukaryotic factors.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and eEF-2 were
isolated from pig liver as described by Iwasaki and Kaziro (31).
E. coli EF-Tu (32) and EF-G (33) were prepared as described.
/eEF-2-dependent reaction was performed in a
mixture of 100 µl containing 10 pmol of hybrid 50 S subunits, 50 pmol of 30 S subunits (optimum for the activity), 10 µg of poly(U), 80 µg of E. coli tRNA precharged with 40 pmol of
[14C]phenylalanine (400 cpm/pmol), 0.2 mM
GTP, 10 mM MgCl2, 75 mM NH4Cl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.6, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 5 pmol of eEF-2, and 40 pmol of
eEF-1
, which was incubated at 37 °C for 2.5-15 min. The
prokaryotic EF-Tu/EF-G-dependent reaction was performed
under the same conditions, except that the reaction mixture contained 5 mM MgCl2, 120 mM NH4Cl,
5 pmol of EF-G, and 40 pmol of EF-Tu. The polymerized radioactivity was
counted as described by Möller et al. (12).
-dependent
activity, the reaction mixture (30 µl) contained 10 pmol of hybrid 50 S subunits, 30 pmol of 30 S subunits, 300 pmol of
[
-32P]GTP (400-500 cpm/pmol), 10 µg of poly(U), 20 pmol of Phe-tRNA, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM
NH4Cl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 40 pmol of eEF-1
and was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The
eEF-2-dependent GTPase activity was assayed using 2.5 pmol
of hybrid 50 S subunits, 7.5 pmol of 30 S subunits, 3 nmol of
[
-32P]GTP (40-50 cpm/pmol), and 5 pmol of eEF-2 as
described previously (10).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Preparation of a hybrid ribosome composed of
the E. coli core ribosome and rat P0·P1/P2 complex
and RL12. A, preparation of the core 50 S subunit
lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11. Proteins from 0.4 A260 unit of intact ribosomal 50 S subunit
(lane 1), L11-deficient AM-68 50 S subunits (lane
2), 50% ethanol-treated AM-68 50 S subunits (lane 3),
and 1.5 µg of 50% ethanol-extracted proteins (lane 4)
were separated by SDS-16.5% PAGE (54). The gel was stained with
0.2% Coomassie Brilliant Blue. B, formation of the hybrid
ribosome composed of the E. coli core 50 S subunit, rat
P0·P1/P2 complex, and RL12. Ribosomal samples (0.15 A260 unit each) were analyzed with an 0.5%
agarose, 3% acrylamide composite gel: lane 1, the intact 50 S subunits; lane 2, 50% ethanol-treated AM-68 50 S subunit
core; lanes 3, AM-68 50 S subunit core preincubated with 1.1 µg of rat P0·P1/P2 complex and 0.24 µg of RL12; lane
4, same as lane 3 except the sample contained 20 pmol
of RNA fragments corresponding to positions 1029-1127 of 23 S rRNA
(10). C, detection of P0·P1/P2 and RL12 proteins bound to
the hybrid ribosome. The gel band of panel B (lane
3), marked with a square bracket, was cut out
and subjected to SDS-16.5% PAGE (lane 2), together with an
0.1 A260 unit of rat 80 S ribosome (lane
1). The gel was then analyzed by immunoblotting using serum
containing anti-RL12 as well as anti-P (31). D, schematic
representation of preparation of the hybrid ribosome.
The hybrid ribosomes were tested for activity in
poly(U)-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis. Unlike
intact E. coli ribosomes, hybrid ribosomes showed activity
to be dependent on eukaryotic eEF-1
and eEF-2 (Fig.
2A) but not on prokaryotic
EF-Tu and EF-G (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the ribosomal
specificity for elongation factors was changed by replacing E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11 on the 50 S subunit with rat
counterparts. This eEF-1
/eEF-2-dependent activity was
suppressed by the addition of the RNA competitor (data not shown),
which prevented the hybrid formation (Fig. 1B, lane
4). The polyphenylalanine synthetic activity of the hybrid ribosome was not as high as that of the rat intact ribosome (Fig. 2C); the initial rate of polymerization by the hybrid
ribosome was about one-third that of the rat 80 S ribosome. To confirm whether the polymerization activity of the hybrid ribosome depends on
the actions of both eEF-1
and eEF-2, the activity was assayed without either eEF-1
or eEF-2. As shown in Fig. 2D, the
polymerization activity of the hybrid ribosome was detected only when
both eEF-1
and eEF-2 were present, indicating that the hybrid
ribosome allow functional access to both the eukaryotic elongation
factors.
|
To investigate individual contributions of P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12
to translation elongation by the hybrid ribosome, we performed partial
replacement of either L10·L7/L12 or L11 in E. coli 50 S
subunit with the respective rat counterparts. The core ribosome lacking
L10·L7/L12 and L11 (Fig. 1A) was incubated with L10·L7/L12-like proteins (E. coli L10·L7/L12 or rat
P0·P1/P2) and of L11-like proteins (E. coli L11 or rat
RL12), and we tested the ribosomal functions dependent on eukaryotic
elongation factors (Fig. 3). The GTPase
activities dependent on eEF-2 (Fig. 3A) and eEF-1
(Fig.
3B) were markedly stimulated by addition of rat P0·P1/P2 to the core ribosome. The addition of E. coli L11 or rat
RL12, together with P0·P1/P2, slightly enhanced
eEF-2-dependent GTPase (Fig. 3A) but had no
effect on eEF-1
-dependent GTPase (Fig. 3B). In contrast to GTPase, polyphenylalanine synthetic activity with eEF-1
and eEF-2 was stimulated to only a small extent by the addition of P0·P1/P2 complex alone to the core ribosome (Fig. 3C). This activity was, however, enhanced 3-fold by
the further addition of E. coli L11 and more than 4-fold by
the addition of rat RL12. Replacement of E. coli L11 alone
with RL12 gave no appreciable effect on the polyphenylalanine synthesis
as well as GTPase.
|
The hybrid ribosomes were tested for sensitivity to the antibiotic
thiostrepton, which recognizes the E. coli 1070 RNA domain associated with L11 (1). The E. coli ribosomes in which
L10·L7/L12 alone was replaced with rat P0·P1/P2 retained
thiostrepton sensitivity, as described previously (10). Replacement of
both L10·L7/L12 and L11 with P0·P1/P2 and RL12 resulted in
ribosomes insensitive to the drug (Fig.
4), suggesting that rat RL12 is
responsible for the thiostrepton insensitivity of the hybrid
ribosome.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ribosomal proteins L10·L7/L12 and L11 bind to the 1070 RNA
region in domain II of 23 S rRNA, forming a mobile region that constitutes a part of the GTPase-related functional center of the
E. coli ribosome. We here performed in vitro
replacement of L10·L7/L12 complex and L11 in the 50 S subunit with
rat counterparts P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, respectively. By this
replacement, ribosomal specificity for elongation factors is changed;
the hybrid ribosome is engaged in polypeptide synthesis by the actions
of two eukaryotic elongation factors, eEF-1
and eEF-2, but not of prokaryotic EF-Tu and EF-G. It has been shown since the earliest work
that prokaryotic 70 S ribosomes do not engage in protein synthesis with
the eukaryotic translation factors and that eukaryotic 80 S ribosomes
are inactive with the prokaryotic factors (7-9). The present results
strongly suggest that a limited number of ribosomal proteins assembled
on the 1070 RNA domain are major components responsible for the
kingdom-dependent specificity between ribosomes and
GTP-bound translation factors.
Functional contributions of rat P0·P1/P2 and RL12 in the hybrid
ribosome were clarified by their individual substitutions for E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11, respectively (Fig. 3). P0·P1/P2 complex, but not RL12, contributes substantially to the
specificity for the eukaryotic factors and GTPase. Not only rat RL12
but also E. coli L11, however, stimulates polyphenylalanine
synthetic activity dependent on eEF-1
and eEF-2, although the
stimulation level by RL12 is higher than that of E. coli
L11. The availability of mutants deficient in L11-type proteins in
bacteria (29, 36, 37) and yeast (38) indicates that L11-like proteins
are not essential for cell viability. However, the growth rate of
E. coli mutant AM68 lacking L11 was very slow; its doubling
time was five times longer than strain Q13, which does have L11 (data
not shown). This finding suggests that the efficiency of protein
synthesis by ribosomes lacking L11 is quite low within cell, in line
with the present in vitro data on poly(Phe) synthesis.
RL12/L11 appears to participate in improving the efficiency of a step
in post-GTPase events such as translocation of tRNAs. There is a clear
difference between E. coli L11 and rat RL12. L11 but not
RL12 binding to the 1070 RNA domain makes the ribosome sensitive to the
antibiotic thiostrepton (Fig. 4). This is consistent with our previous
binding experiment, i.e., thiostrepton stabilizes a complex
between L11 and the E. coli 1070 RNA domain but not the
RL12-RNA complex (30). The difference in thiostrepton sensitivity may
be due to N-terminal differences in amino acid sequences between
L11 and RL12 around residue 22, which is important for thiostrepton
binding (39). Despite the divergence of the sequences, a conformation
important for function appears to be conserved between the two proteins.
The present results clearly show that P0·P1/P2 complex plays a
crucial role in the functions of the two eukaryotic elongation factors.
The involvement of P1/P2 proteins in translation elongation has been
suggested previously by immunochemical inhibition assays (40) and
partial reconstitution studies with rat and yeast ribosomes (23, 41).
An essential role of P0 for cell viability has been demonstrated in
yeast (23). Cryoelectron microscopic studies of the complex containing
E. coli ribosome EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA (42), as well as
the ribosome·EF-G complex (43, 44), have demonstrated direct contacts
of these factors (GTP-binding domain) with the L7/L12 stalk and
also with its base region. Considering these previous data and the
present results together, eukaryotic P1/P2 stalk and P0/RL12
constituting its base region seem to bind directly to eEF1
and
eEF-2. This view is also supported by chemical cross-linking of
eEF-2 with P2, P0 (LA33), and RL12 (45) and of eEF1
with
RL12 (46). Therefore, the ribosome factor specificity may be explained
by the direct interaction between the ribosomal proteins and elongation factors.
In addition to interactions with the translation factors, P0·P1/P2
complex and RL12 have another important function, which is rRNA
binding. Because rRNAs appear to play essential roles in translational
mechanism (47), it is important to know the effect of the protein
binding on rRNA. P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12 bind to overlapping
regions of the 1070 (E. coli numbering) domain of 28 S rRNA
and affect the RNA conformation (24). In the 1070 RNA region, there is
also a site for eEF-2 binding as detected by footprinting (48). It is
likely that adjustment of the 1070 RNA region by protein binding may be
important for the functional interaction of eEF-2 with the RNA. This is
also the case in the hybrid ribosome. Because rat P0·P1/P2 and RL12
cross-bind to the E. coli 1070 RNA domain (10, 30) and
stimulate the ribosome function dependent on eEF1
and eEF-2 (present
study), these rat proteins appear to affect the structure and function
of the 1070 RNA region within the E. coli ribosome. An
important and interesting point yet to be addressed is the effect of
protein binding on the 2660 RNA region (sarcin/ricin loop), another
important RNA region to which elongation factors bind. Because the 1070 and 2660 RNA regions are neighbors in the 50 S subunit (4), it is also
likely that bindings of rat proteins to the 1070 region may affect the
interactions of elongation factors with the 2660 region.
The activity of our hybrid ribosomes in translational elongation implies that tRNA movement as well as its binding occur properly in this artificial construction. It has been shown that translocation of the A-site tRNA to the P-site is stimulated by GTP hydrolysis on EF-G (2) and possibly by the interaction of EF-G with several sites including the decoding region of the E. coli ribosome (43, 44, 49). Our results demonstrate from a functional aspect that ribosomal compartments engaging in translational elongation, except for the acidic stalk protein complexes, are highly conserved between E. coli and rat. This is in agreement with structural evidence from crystallographic studies, i.e., the ribosomal intersubunit space, including peptidyltransferase and decoding sites, is constructed mainly with conserved rRNA moieties (50, 51). Furthermore, cryoelectronmicroscopic studies showed structural resemblance in the interface surfaces of both large and small subunits between rat and E. coli (52). Meanwhile, it is highly likely that there is strong similarity in domains 3, 4, and 5 of the translocases that appear to mimic the structure of tRNA (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 53) between EF-G and eEF-2, although amino acid identity between them is low (26.4% between E. coli EF-G and rat eEF-2). We infer that the basic mechanism of the factor-dependent translocation of tRNAs, which occurs in the RNA-rich intersubunit space of ribosomes, is identical between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The acidic stalk protein complex located at the outer side of the ribosome appears to participate in the kingdom-specific regulation with its mobile property. This protein complex may regulate the action of translocase not only by its direct binding to translocase and triggering GTP hydrolysis but also through interaction with functional regions of rRNA. Further detailed knowledge on the characteristic features of P0·P1/P2 complex could provide insights into eukaryote-specific regulation of translational elongation.
It has been difficult to determine the precise functional roles
of eukaryotic ribosomal proteins in vitro. The present
replacement studies, "molecular plantation," as it were, of
mammalian proteins into the E. coli ribosome, provide a
novel methodology for the researches of eukaryotic ribosomal proteins.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research (12029211 and 12660053) and for Center of Excellence research (10CE2003) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan and by a fund of The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS-RFTF96100305).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Tel.: +81-268-21-5575 Fax: +81-268-21-5571; E-mail: uchiumi@giptc.shinshu-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107730200
2 T. Uchiumi, S. Honma, and A. Hachimori, unpublished results.
3 T. Uchiumi, S. Honma, Y. Endo, and A. Hachimori, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
eEF-2, eukaryotic
elongation factor 2;
eEF-1
, eukaryotic elongation factor 1
;
EF-Tu, prokaryotic elongation factor Tu;
EF-G, prokaryotic elongation
factor G;
RL12, rat ribosomal protein L12 (equivalent of E. coli L11).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Cundliffe, E. (1986) in Structure, Function and Genetics of Ribosomes (Hardesty, B. , and Kramer, G., eds) , pp. 586-604, Springer-Verlag, New York |
| 2. | Rodnina, M. V., Savelsbergh, A., Katunin, V. I., and Wintermeyer, W. (1997) Nature 385, 37-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Wilson, K. S., and Noller, H. (1998) Cell 92, 337-349[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Capel, M., Moore, P., B., and Steitz, T. A. (1999) Nature 400, 841-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Moazed, D., Robertson, J. M., and Noller, H. F. (1988) Nature 334, 362-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Munishkin, A.,
and Wool, I. G.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
12280-12284 |
| 7. |
Nathans, D.,
and Lipmann, F.
(1961)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
47,
497-504 |
| 8. |
Randi, R.,
and Ochoa, S.
(1962)
J. Biol. Chem.
237,
3707-3710 |
| 9. | Parisi, B., Milanesi, G., Van Etten, J. L., Perani, A., and Ciferri, O. (1967) J. Mol. Biol. 28, 295-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Uchiumi, T.,
Hori, K.,
Nomura, T.,
and Hachimori, A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27578-27582 |
| 11. |
Hamel, E.,
Koka, M.,
and Nakamoto, T.
(1972)
J. Biol. Chem.
247,
805-814 |
| 12. | Möller, W., Schrier, P. I., Maassen, J. A., Zantema, A., Schop, E., Reinalda, H., Cremers, A. F., and Mellema, J. E. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 63, 553-573 |
| 13. | Möller, W., and Maassen, L. A. (1986) in Structure, Function, and Genetics of Ribosomes (Hardesty, B. , and Kramer, G., eds) , pp. 309-325, Springer-Verlag, New York |
| 14. | Gudkov, A. T. (1997) FEBS Lett. 407, 253-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Savelsbergh, A.,
Mohr, D.,
Wilden, B.,
Wintermeyer, W.,
and Rodnina, M. V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
890-894 |
| 16. | Liljas, A., and Gudkov, A. T. (1987) Biochimie (Paris) 69, 1043-1047[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Egebjerg, J., Douthwaite, S., and Garrett, R. A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 607-611[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Traut, R. R.,
Lambert, J. M.,
and Kenny, J. W.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
14592-14598 |
| 19. | Traut, R. R., Dey, D., Bochkariov, D. E., Oleinikov, A. V., Jokhadze, G. G., Hamman, B., and Jameson, D. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 949-958[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Montesano-Roditis, L.,
Glitz, D. G.,
Traut, R. R.,
and Stewart, P. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14117-14123 |
| 21. |
Rich, B. E.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
4065-4074 |
| 22. | Wool, I. G., Chan, Y.-L., and Glück, A. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 933-947[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Remacha, M., Jimenez-Diaz, A., Santos, C., Briones, E., Zambrano, R., Gabriel, M. A. R., Guarinos, E., and Ballesta, J. P. G. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 959-968[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Uchiumi, T.,
and Kominami, R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3302-3308 |
| 25. | Ballesta, J. P., Guarinos, E., Zurdo, J., Parada, P., Nusspaumer, G., Lalioti, V. S., Perez-Fernandez, J., and Remacha, M. (2000) in The Ribosome: Structure, Function, Antibiotics and Cellular Interactions (Garrett, R. A. , Douthwaite, S. R. , Liljas, A. , Matheson, A. T. , Moore, P. B. , and Noller, H. F., eds) , pp. 115-125, ASM Press, Washington D. C. |
| 26. |
Gonzalo, P.,
Lavergne, J.-P.,
and Reboud, J.-P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19762-19769 |
| 27. |
Musters, W.,
Gonçalves, P. M.,
Boon, K.,
Raué, H. A.,
van Heerikhuizen, H.,
and Planta, R. J.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1469-1473 |
| 28. | Thompson, J., Musters, W., Cundliffe, E., and Dahlberg, A. E. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1499-1504[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Dabbs, E. R.
(1979)
J. Bacteriol.
140,
734-737 |
| 30. |
Uchiumi, T.,
Wada, A.,
and Kominami, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29889-29893 |
| 31. | Iwasaki, K., and Kaziro, Y. (1979) Methods Enzymol. 60, 657-676[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Arai, K.,
Kawakita, M.,
and Kaziro, Y.
(1974)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
76,
283-292 |
| 33. |
Kaziro, Y.,
Inoue-Yokosawa, N.,
and Kawakita, M.
(1972)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
72,
853-863 |
| 34. | Tokimatsu, H., Strycharz, W. A., and Dahlberg, A. E. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 152, 397-412[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Sato, T., Uchiumi, T., Kominami, R., and Arakawa, M. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172, 1681-1684 |
| 36. | Stark, M. J., Cundliffe, E., Dijk, J., and Stöffler, G. (1980) Mol. Gen. Genet. 180, 11-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Zhang, S.,
Scott, J. M.,
and Haldenwang, W. G.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
2316-2321 |
| 38. |
Briones, E.,
Briones, C.,
Remacha, M.,
and Ballesta, J. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31956-31961 |
| 39. | Porse, B. T., Leviev, I., Mankin, A. S., and Garrett, R. A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 276, 391-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Van Agthoven, A. J., Maassen, J. A., and Möller, W. (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 77, 989-998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
MacConnell, W. P.,
and Kaplan, N. O.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
5359-5366 |
| 42. | Stark, H., Rodnina, M. V., Rinke-Appel, J., Brimacombe, R., Wintermeyer, W., and van Heel, M. (1997) Nature 389, 403-406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Agrawal, R. K., Heagle, A. B., Penczek, P., Grassucci, R. A., and Frank, J. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 643-647[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Stark, H., Rodnina, M. V., Wieden, H. J., van Heel, M., and Wintermeyer, W. (2000) Cell 100, 301-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Uchiumi, T., Kikuchi, M., Terao, K., Iwasaki, K., and Ogata, K. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 156, 37-48[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Uchiumi, T.,
and Ogata, K.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
9663-9667 |
| 47. | Noller, H. F. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 191-227[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 48. | Uchiumi, T., and Kominami, R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3389-3394[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 49. | Wilson, K. S., and Noller, H. (1998) Cell 92, 131-139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 50. |
Ban, N.,
Nissen, P.,
Hansen, J.,
Moore, P. B.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(2000)
Science
289,
905-920 |
| 51. | Wimberly, B. T., Brodersen, D. E., Clemons, W. M. Jr., Morgan-Warren, R. J., Carter, A. P., Vonrhein, C., Hartsch, T., and Ramakrishnan, V. (2000) Nature 407, 327-339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Dube, P., Wieske, M., Stark, H., Schatz, M., Stahl, J., Zemlin, F., Lutsch, G., and van Heel, M. (1998) Structure 6, 389-399[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. | Czworkowski, J., and Moore, P. B. (1996) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 54, 293-332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Nechifor, M. Murataliev, and K. S. Wilson Functional Interactions between the G' Subdomain of Bacterial Translation Factor EF-G and Ribosomal Protein L7/L12 J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2007; 282(51): 36998 - 37005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Maki, T. Hashimoto, M. Zhou, T. Naganuma, J. Ohta, T. Nomura, C. V. Robinson, and T. Uchiumi Three Binding Sites for Stalk Protein Dimers Are Generally Present in Ribosomes from Archaeal Organism J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2007; 282(45): 32827 - 32833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Naganuma, K. Shiogama, and T. Uchiumi The N-terminal regions of eukaryotic acidic phosphoproteins P1 and P2 are crucial for heterodimerization and assembly into the ribosomal GTPase-associated center Genes Cells, April 1, 2007; 12(4): 501 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S.B. Chan, L.-O. Chu, K.-M. Lee, P. H.M. Too, K.-W. Ma, K.-H. Sze, G. Zhu, P.-C. Shaw, and K.-B. Wong Interaction between trichosanthin, a ribosome-inactivating protein, and the ribosomal stalk protein P2 by chemical shift perturbation and mutagenesis analyses Nucleic Acids Res., March 12, 2007; 35(5): 1660 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hagiya, T. Naganuma, Y. Maki, J. Ohta, Y. Tohkairin, T. Shimizu, T. Nomura, A. Hachimori, and T. Uchiumi A Mode of Assembly of P0, P1, and P2 Proteins at the GTPase-associated Center in Animal Ribosome: IN VITRO ANALYSES WITH P0 TRUNCATION MUTANTS J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 39193 - 39199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Bausch, E. Poliakova, and D. E. Draper Interactions of the N-terminal Domain of Ribosomal Protein L11 with Thiostrepton and rRNA J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29956 - 29963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. G. Faux, S. P. Bottomley, A. M. Lesk, J. A. Irving, J. R. Morrison, M. G. de la Banda, and J. C. Whisstock Functional insights from the distribution and role of homopeptide repeat-containing proteins Genome Res., April 1, 2005; 15(4): 537 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uchiumi, S. Honma, Y. Endo, and A. Hachimori Ribosomal Proteins at the Stalk Region Modulate Functional rRNA Structures in the GTPase Center J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 41401 - 41409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimizu, M. Nakagaki, Y. Nishi, Y. Kobayashi, A. Hachimori, and T. Uchiumi Interaction among silkworm ribosomal proteins P1, P2 and P0 required for functional protein binding to the GTPase-associated domain of 28S rRNA Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2002; 30(12): 2620 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||