JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107730200 on November 29, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 6, 3857-3862, February 8, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/6/3857    most recent
M107730200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uchiumi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hachimori, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uchiumi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hachimori, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Translation Elongation by a Hybrid Ribosome in Which Proteins at the GTPase Center of the Escherichia coli Ribosome Are Replaced with Rat Counterparts*

Toshio UchiumiDagger §, Sachiko HonmaDagger , Takaomi NomuraDagger , Eric R. Dabbs, and Akira HachimoriDagger

From the Dagger  Institute of High Polymer Research, Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, Ueda 386-8567, Japan and the  School of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits 2050, South Africa

Received for publication, August 13, 2001, and in revised form, September 28, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ribosomal L10·L7/L12 protein complex and L11 bind to a highly conserved RNA region around position 1070 in domain II of 23 S rRNA and constitute a part of the GTPase-associated center in Escherichia coli ribosomes. We replaced these ribosomal proteins in vitro with the rat counterparts P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, and tested them for ribosomal activities. The core 50 S subunit lacking the proteins on the 1070 RNA domain was prepared under gentle conditions from a mutant deficient in ribosomal protein L11. The rat proteins bound to the core 50 S subunit through their interactions with the 1070 RNA domain. The resultant hybrid ribosome was insensitive to thiostrepton and showed poly(U)-programmed polyphenylalanine synthesis dependent on the actions of both eukaryotic elongation factors 1alpha (eEF-1alpha ) and 2 (eEF-2) but not of the prokaryotic equivalent factors EF-Tu and EF-G. The results from replacement of either the L10·L7/L12 complex or L11 with rat protein showed that the P0·P1/P2 complex, and not RL12, was responsible for the specificity of the eukaryotic ribosomes to eukaryotic elongation factors and for the accompanying GTPase activity. The presence of either E. coli L11 or rat RL12 considerably stimulated the polyphenylalanine synthesis by the hybrid ribosome, suggesting that L11/RL12 proteins play an important role in post-GTPase events of translation elongation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The "GTPase center" of the ribosome is a region involved in interaction with GTP-bound translation factors, GTP hydrolysis (1), and post-GTPase events including tRNA movements on the ribosome (2, 3). Translation elongation is markedly stimulated by the interaction of this region with two elongation factors in a GTP-dependent manner. The GTPase center includes two essential RNA regions around positions 1070 and 2660 (Escherichia coli numbering) of the 23 S/28 S rRNA (4), which appear to bind to the elongation factors (5, 6). Despite the highly conserved structure of the 1070 and 2660 RNA regions, ribosomes show a kingdom-dependent accessibility for translation factors, i.e., prokaryotic ribosomes do not engage in translation elongation with the eukaryotic factors instead of the prokaryotic factors (7-9). Furthermore, there are differences in the rate of GTPase turnover between the two systems; in vitro eukaryotic eEF-21/80 S ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis is 10-fold slower than the prokaryotic EF-G/70 S ribosome system (10). This may reflect, in part, the elaborate regulation of eukaryotic translation.

The other important component of the GTPase center is the acidic stalk protein, termed L7/L12 in prokaryotes (11-15). Four copies of this proteins bind to protein L10 and form a stable complex (16), designated here as L10·L7/L12. This protein complex and another protein, L11, are assembled on the 1070 RNA domain (17). Flexible property of L7/L12 protein in the ribosome (16, 18-20) seems to be correlated with the fast turnover of EF-G-dependent GTPase. The eukaryotic counterparts of the prokaryotic L7/L12 and L10 are P1/P2 and P0, respectively (21, 22). Although formation of the complex, termed P0·P1/P2, has been clarified (21, 23-26), its structure and function have not been characterized extensively. We previously tried replacement of the acidic stalk protein complex L10·L7/L12 in the E. coli ribosome with rat P0·P1/P2 in vitro and showed, by this replacement, that the ribosome acquired GTPase activity dependent on the eukaryotic translocase eEF-2 instead of prokaryotic EF-G (10). This activity was comparable with that of the rat 80 S ribosome. Meanwhile, other groups exchanged the 1070 RNA region within 23 S/26 S rRNA, with which the acidic stalk protein complex interacts between E. coli and yeast, and this showed no major functional effect (27, 28). These studies suggest that P0·P1/P2 protein complex on the 1070 RNA domain, but not the RNA itself, are important for the kingdom-specific function.

The E. coli ribosome in which L10·L7/L12 was replaced with rat P0·P1/P2, however, showed no significant activity of eEF-1alpha /eEF-2-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis in our previous study.2 This may be due to damage caused during preparation of the core ribosome lacking both L10 and L7/L12, using 50% ethanol, 0.5 M NH4Cl at 30 °C. To prepare the core ribosome employing milder conditions, we use here an L11-lacking ribosomal mutant from which L10·L7/L12 complex is easily removed at 0 °C. Both rat P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12 (rat counterpart of E. coli L11) are incorporated into the core ribosome. This hybrid ribosome has appreciable activity in polyphenylalanine synthesis dependent on the two eukaryotic elongation factors. The present results clearly show that the eukaryotic ribosomal proteins bound to the 1070 RNA domain play crucial roles in translation elongation regulated by the eukaryotic factors.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

E. coli Core Ribosomes Lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11. E. coli-- AM68, lacking ribosomal protein L11 (29), was grown to late exponential stage in phosphate-buffered medium (pH 7.1) containing 2 mM sodium citrate, 0.4 mM MgSO4, 0.5% glucose, 10 g/liter tryptone, and 5 g/liter yeast extract and harvested. Salt-washed ribosomes were prepared as described (10). The 50 S and 30 S subunits were isolated by density gradient centrifugation using a 10-28% sucrose gradient in buffer (0.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NH4Cl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) at 24,000 rpm and 4 °C for 14 h with a Hitachi P28-S rotor. To remove the L10·L7/L12 complex, the 50 S subunits were incubated in 50% ethanol, 0.5 M NH4Cl solution as described previously (10), except that the incubation was performed at 0 °C and the solution contained 5 mM MgCl2. The 50 S core subunit and the released L10·L7/L12 complex were recovered as described (11). The intact 70 S ribosomes were from E. coli Q13 (10).

Rat Ribosomal Proteins and Their Binding to the E. coli Core Ribosome-- The rat P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, counterparts of E. coli L10·L7/L12 complex and L11, respectively, were prepared as described previously (24, 30). In a typical experiment, 10 pmol of the 50 S subunit cores were incubated with 2 µg of P0·P1/P2 complex and 0.4 µg of RL12 in a solution (25 µl) containing 10 mM MgCl2, 75 mM NH4Cl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, at 37 °C for 5 min and used for various assays. In some experiments, E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11 (30) were added instead of the rat proteins. Incorporation of these proteins was confirmed by sucrose density gradient (10) and native agarose-acrylamide composite gel (see below).

Elongation Factors-- Eukaryotic eEF-1alpha and eEF-2 were isolated from pig liver as described by Iwasaki and Kaziro (31). E. coli EF-Tu (32) and EF-G (33) were prepared as described.

Polyphenylalanine Synthesis-- The eukaryotic eEF-1alpha /eEF-2-dependent reaction was performed in a mixture of 100 µl containing 10 pmol of hybrid 50 S subunits, 50 pmol of 30 S subunits (optimum for the activity), 10 µg of poly(U), 80 µg of E. coli tRNA precharged with 40 pmol of [14C]phenylalanine (400 cpm/pmol), 0.2 mM GTP, 10 mM MgCl2, 75 mM NH4Cl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH7.6, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 5 pmol of eEF-2, and 40 pmol of eEF-1alpha , which was incubated at 37 °C for 2.5-15 min. The prokaryotic EF-Tu/EF-G-dependent reaction was performed under the same conditions, except that the reaction mixture contained 5 mM MgCl2, 120 mM NH4Cl, 5 pmol of EF-G, and 40 pmol of EF-Tu. The polymerized radioactivity was counted as described by Möller et al. (12).

GTPase Activity-- For eEF-1alpha -dependent activity, the reaction mixture (30 µl) contained 10 pmol of hybrid 50 S subunits, 30 pmol of 30 S subunits, 300 pmol of [gamma -32P]GTP (400-500 cpm/pmol), 10 µg of poly(U), 20 pmol of Phe-tRNA, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NH4Cl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 40 pmol of eEF-1alpha and was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. The eEF-2-dependent GTPase activity was assayed using 2.5 pmol of hybrid 50 S subunits, 7.5 pmol of 30 S subunits, 3 nmol of [gamma -32P]GTP (40-50 cpm/pmol), and 5 pmol of eEF-2 as described previously (10).

Agarose-Acrylamide Composite Gel-- Formation of the hybrid 50 S subunits was confirmed by agarose-acrylamide composite gels as described by Tokimatsu et al. (34) with some modifications. Our gel was composed of 3% acrylamide, 0.5% agarose (SeaKem LE, BMA), 1 mM MgCl2, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, and running buffer contained 1 mM MgCl2 and 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have characterized rat ribosomal proteins P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, counterparts of the E. coli acidic stalk protein complex L10·L7/L12 and L11, respectively (24, 30). To investigate the functional significance of these rat proteins in eukaryotic translational mechanism, here we attempted to substitute the proteins for L10·L7/L12 and L11 in E. coli 50 S ribosomal subunits. The E. coli core particle lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11 assembled on the domain around 1070 of 23 S rRNA was prepared with the 50 S subunit of the L11-deficient AM68 strain (Fig. 1A, lane 2). L10·L7/L12 was easily and selectively removed from the mutant 50 S subunit (Fig. 1A, lanes 3 and 4) in 50% ethanol, 0.5 M NH4Cl at 0 °C. Binding of the rat proteins to the E. coli core particle was examined by native agarose-acrylamide composite gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1B). The mobility of the core particle (lane 2) was much higher than the intact 50 S subunit (lane 1). The addition of the rat proteins changed the gel mobility of the core particle (lane 3). This mobility shift by rat proteins was prevented by adding an excess amount of an RNA fragment containing residues 1029-1127 of E. coli 23 S rRNA to which rat P0·P1/P2 complex (10) and RL12 (30) cross-bind (lane 4), suggesting that the rat proteins bind to the 1070 RNA domain within the E. coli 50 S core particle. The binding of rat proteins to the 1070 RNA region was also confirmed by chemical footprinting.3 The region of the gel with the shifted ribosomal band (lane 3) was cut out and tested by immunoblotting for reactivity with autoimmune serum that recognizes rat ribosomal proteins P0, P1, P2, and RL12 (35) (Fig. 1C). Fig. 1C, lane 2, clearly shows that all of the added rat proteins comigrated with the E. coli core particle. From these results, we concluded that E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11 are replaced with rat protein counterparts on the 1070 RNA domain of 23 S rRNA in the 50 S subunit, as illustrated in Fig. 1D.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Preparation of a hybrid ribosome composed of the E. coli core ribosome and rat P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12. A, preparation of the core 50 S subunit lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11. Proteins from 0.4 A260 unit of intact ribosomal 50 S subunit (lane 1), L11-deficient AM-68 50 S subunits (lane 2), 50% ethanol-treated AM-68 50 S subunits (lane 3), and 1.5 µg of 50% ethanol-extracted proteins (lane 4) were separated by SDS-16.5% PAGE (54). The gel was stained with 0.2% Coomassie Brilliant Blue. B, formation of the hybrid ribosome composed of the E. coli core 50 S subunit, rat P0·P1/P2 complex, and RL12. Ribosomal samples (0.15 A260 unit each) were analyzed with an 0.5% agarose, 3% acrylamide composite gel: lane 1, the intact 50 S subunits; lane 2, 50% ethanol-treated AM-68 50 S subunit core; lanes 3, AM-68 50 S subunit core preincubated with 1.1 µg of rat P0·P1/P2 complex and 0.24 µg of RL12; lane 4, same as lane 3 except the sample contained 20 pmol of RNA fragments corresponding to positions 1029-1127 of 23 S rRNA (10). C, detection of P0·P1/P2 and RL12 proteins bound to the hybrid ribosome. The gel band of panel B (lane 3), marked with a square bracket, was cut out and subjected to SDS-16.5% PAGE (lane 2), together with an 0.1 A260 unit of rat 80 S ribosome (lane 1). The gel was then analyzed by immunoblotting using serum containing anti-RL12 as well as anti-P (31). D, schematic representation of preparation of the hybrid ribosome.

The hybrid ribosomes were tested for activity in poly(U)-dependent polyphenylalanine synthesis. Unlike intact E. coli ribosomes, hybrid ribosomes showed activity to be dependent on eukaryotic eEF-1alpha and eEF-2 (Fig. 2A) but not on prokaryotic EF-Tu and EF-G (Fig. 2B). Therefore, the ribosomal specificity for elongation factors was changed by replacing E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11 on the 50 S subunit with rat counterparts. This eEF-1alpha /eEF-2-dependent activity was suppressed by the addition of the RNA competitor (data not shown), which prevented the hybrid formation (Fig. 1B, lane 4). The polyphenylalanine synthetic activity of the hybrid ribosome was not as high as that of the rat intact ribosome (Fig. 2C); the initial rate of polymerization by the hybrid ribosome was about one-third that of the rat 80 S ribosome. To confirm whether the polymerization activity of the hybrid ribosome depends on the actions of both eEF-1alpha and eEF-2, the activity was assayed without either eEF-1alpha or eEF-2. As shown in Fig. 2D, the polymerization activity of the hybrid ribosome was detected only when both eEF-1alpha and eEF-2 were present, indicating that the hybrid ribosome allow functional access to both the eukaryotic elongation factors.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Polyphenylalanine synthesis by the hybrid ribosome dependent on eukaryotic elongation factors. The eukaryotic eEF1alpha /eEF-2-dependent (A) and prokaryotic EF-Tu/EF-G-dependent (B) polyphenylalanine syntheses were assayed at individually determined times with 10 pmol of E. coli core ribosomes lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11 (triangle ), hybrid ribosomes formed by preincubation of E. coli cores with rat P0·P1/P2 and RL12 (), and intact E. coli ribosomes () as described under "Materials and Methods." C, comparison of polypeptide synthetic activity between the hybrid () and rat 80 S (open circle ) ribosomes. Polyphenylalanine synthesis by 10 pmol of hybrid ribosomes was assayed at individually determined times as described under "Materials and Methods." The activity was also assayed with 10 pmol of rat 80 S ribosomes (37) under the same conditions except the salt concentrations used were 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NH4Cl, 100 mM KCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol (optimum for rat ribosomes). D, functional accessibility of the hybrid ribosome to both eukaryotic elongation factors eEF-1alpha and eEF-2. The hybrid ribosomes (10 pmol) were tested for polyphenylalanine synthesis with both 5 µg of eEF-1alpha and 1 µg of eEF-2 and without either factor.

To investigate individual contributions of P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12 to translation elongation by the hybrid ribosome, we performed partial replacement of either L10·L7/L12 or L11 in E. coli 50 S subunit with the respective rat counterparts. The core ribosome lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11 (Fig. 1A) was incubated with L10·L7/L12-like proteins (E. coli L10·L7/L12 or rat P0·P1/P2) and of L11-like proteins (E. coli L11 or rat RL12), and we tested the ribosomal functions dependent on eukaryotic elongation factors (Fig. 3). The GTPase activities dependent on eEF-2 (Fig. 3A) and eEF-1alpha (Fig. 3B) were markedly stimulated by addition of rat P0·P1/P2 to the core ribosome. The addition of E. coli L11 or rat RL12, together with P0·P1/P2, slightly enhanced eEF-2-dependent GTPase (Fig. 3A) but had no effect on eEF-1alpha -dependent GTPase (Fig. 3B). In contrast to GTPase, polyphenylalanine synthetic activity with eEF-1alpha and eEF-2 was stimulated to only a small extent by the addition of P0·P1/P2 complex alone to the core ribosome (Fig. 3C). This activity was, however, enhanced 3-fold by the further addition of E. coli L11 and more than 4-fold by the addition of rat RL12. Replacement of E. coli L11 alone with RL12 gave no appreciable effect on the polyphenylalanine synthesis as well as GTPase.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Functional effect of replacement of either L10-L7/L12 or L11 with the rat counterpart. The E. coli core 50 S subunits lacking L10-L7/L12 and L11 were preincubated with L10-L7/L12-like proteins, E. coli L10·L7/L12 (E) or rat P0·P1/P2 (R), and L11-like proteins, E. coli L11 (E) or rat RL12 (R), as shown at the bottom of the figure. These ribosomal samples were tested in eEF-2-dependent GTPase (A), eEF-1alpha -dependent GTPase (B), and polyphenylalanine synthesis dependent on both the factors (C) as described under "Materials and Methods." The assay for eEF-1alpha -dependent GTPase activity was performed without the GDP/GTP exchange factor, eEF-1beta gamma . Its low activity (B) compared with eEF-2 (A) is apparently due to a single round of GTP hydrolysis on eEF-1alpha .

The hybrid ribosomes were tested for sensitivity to the antibiotic thiostrepton, which recognizes the E. coli 1070 RNA domain associated with L11 (1). The E. coli ribosomes in which L10·L7/L12 alone was replaced with rat P0·P1/P2 retained thiostrepton sensitivity, as described previously (10). Replacement of both L10·L7/L12 and L11 with P0·P1/P2 and RL12 resulted in ribosomes insensitive to the drug (Fig. 4), suggesting that rat RL12 is responsible for the thiostrepton insensitivity of the hybrid ribosome.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Altered sensitivity of hybrid ribosomes to thiostrepton. E. coli core 50 S subunits lacking L10·L7/L12 and L11 were preincubated with rat P0·P1/P2 and RL12 () or with E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11 (). The ribosomal samples were then incubated with the indicated amounts of thiostrepton and assayed for eEF-2-dependent and EF-G-dependent GTPase activities, respectively.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The ribosomal proteins L10·L7/L12 and L11 bind to the 1070 RNA region in domain II of 23 S rRNA, forming a mobile region that constitutes a part of the GTPase-related functional center of the E. coli ribosome. We here performed in vitro replacement of L10·L7/L12 complex and L11 in the 50 S subunit with rat counterparts P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12, respectively. By this replacement, ribosomal specificity for elongation factors is changed; the hybrid ribosome is engaged in polypeptide synthesis by the actions of two eukaryotic elongation factors, eEF-1alpha and eEF-2, but not of prokaryotic EF-Tu and EF-G. It has been shown since the earliest work that prokaryotic 70 S ribosomes do not engage in protein synthesis with the eukaryotic translation factors and that eukaryotic 80 S ribosomes are inactive with the prokaryotic factors (7-9). The present results strongly suggest that a limited number of ribosomal proteins assembled on the 1070 RNA domain are major components responsible for the kingdom-dependent specificity between ribosomes and GTP-bound translation factors.

Functional contributions of rat P0·P1/P2 and RL12 in the hybrid ribosome were clarified by their individual substitutions for E. coli L10·L7/L12 and L11, respectively (Fig. 3). P0·P1/P2 complex, but not RL12, contributes substantially to the specificity for the eukaryotic factors and GTPase. Not only rat RL12 but also E. coli L11, however, stimulates polyphenylalanine synthetic activity dependent on eEF-1alpha and eEF-2, although the stimulation level by RL12 is higher than that of E. coli L11. The availability of mutants deficient in L11-type proteins in bacteria (29, 36, 37) and yeast (38) indicates that L11-like proteins are not essential for cell viability. However, the growth rate of E. coli mutant AM68 lacking L11 was very slow; its doubling time was five times longer than strain Q13, which does have L11 (data not shown). This finding suggests that the efficiency of protein synthesis by ribosomes lacking L11 is quite low within cell, in line with the present in vitro data on poly(Phe) synthesis. RL12/L11 appears to participate in improving the efficiency of a step in post-GTPase events such as translocation of tRNAs. There is a clear difference between E. coli L11 and rat RL12. L11 but not RL12 binding to the 1070 RNA domain makes the ribosome sensitive to the antibiotic thiostrepton (Fig. 4). This is consistent with our previous binding experiment, i.e., thiostrepton stabilizes a complex between L11 and the E. coli 1070 RNA domain but not the RL12-RNA complex (30). The difference in thiostrepton sensitivity may be due to N-terminal differences in amino acid sequences between L11 and RL12 around residue 22, which is important for thiostrepton binding (39). Despite the divergence of the sequences, a conformation important for function appears to be conserved between the two proteins.

The present results clearly show that P0·P1/P2 complex plays a crucial role in the functions of the two eukaryotic elongation factors. The involvement of P1/P2 proteins in translation elongation has been suggested previously by immunochemical inhibition assays (40) and partial reconstitution studies with rat and yeast ribosomes (23, 41). An essential role of P0 for cell viability has been demonstrated in yeast (23). Cryoelectron microscopic studies of the complex containing E. coli ribosome EF-Tu and aminoacyl-tRNA (42), as well as the ribosome·EF-G complex (43, 44), have demonstrated direct contacts of these factors (GTP-binding domain) with the L7/L12 stalk and also with its base region. Considering these previous data and the present results together, eukaryotic P1/P2 stalk and P0/RL12 constituting its base region seem to bind directly to eEF1alpha and eEF-2. This view is also supported by chemical cross-linking of eEF-2 with P2, P0 (LA33), and RL12 (45) and of eEF1alpha with RL12 (46). Therefore, the ribosome factor specificity may be explained by the direct interaction between the ribosomal proteins and elongation factors.

In addition to interactions with the translation factors, P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12 have another important function, which is rRNA binding. Because rRNAs appear to play essential roles in translational mechanism (47), it is important to know the effect of the protein binding on rRNA. P0·P1/P2 complex and RL12 bind to overlapping regions of the 1070 (E. coli numbering) domain of 28 S rRNA and affect the RNA conformation (24). In the 1070 RNA region, there is also a site for eEF-2 binding as detected by footprinting (48). It is likely that adjustment of the 1070 RNA region by protein binding may be important for the functional interaction of eEF-2 with the RNA. This is also the case in the hybrid ribosome. Because rat P0·P1/P2 and RL12 cross-bind to the E. coli 1070 RNA domain (10, 30) and stimulate the ribosome function dependent on eEF1alpha and eEF-2 (present study), these rat proteins appear to affect the structure and function of the 1070 RNA region within the E. coli ribosome. An important and interesting point yet to be addressed is the effect of protein binding on the 2660 RNA region (sarcin/ricin loop), another important RNA region to which elongation factors bind. Because the 1070 and 2660 RNA regions are neighbors in the 50 S subunit (4), it is also likely that bindings of rat proteins to the 1070 region may affect the interactions of elongation factors with the 2660 region.

The activity of our hybrid ribosomes in translational elongation implies that tRNA movement as well as its binding occur properly in this artificial construction. It has been shown that translocation of the A-site tRNA to the P-site is stimulated by GTP hydrolysis on EF-G (2) and possibly by the interaction of EF-G with several sites including the decoding region of the E. coli ribosome (43, 44, 49). Our results demonstrate from a functional aspect that ribosomal compartments engaging in translational elongation, except for the acidic stalk protein complexes, are highly conserved between E. coli and rat. This is in agreement with structural evidence from crystallographic studies, i.e., the ribosomal intersubunit space, including peptidyltransferase and decoding sites, is constructed mainly with conserved rRNA moieties (50, 51). Furthermore, cryoelectronmicroscopic studies showed structural resemblance in the interface surfaces of both large and small subunits between rat and E. coli (52). Meanwhile, it is highly likely that there is strong similarity in domains 3, 4, and 5 of the translocases that appear to mimic the structure of tRNA (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 53) between EF-G and eEF-2, although amino acid identity between them is low (26.4% between E. coli EF-G and rat eEF-2). We infer that the basic mechanism of the factor-dependent translocation of tRNAs, which occurs in the RNA-rich intersubunit space of ribosomes, is identical between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The acidic stalk protein complex located at the outer side of the ribosome appears to participate in the kingdom-specific regulation with its mobile property. This protein complex may regulate the action of translocase not only by its direct binding to translocase and triggering GTP hydrolysis but also through interaction with functional regions of rRNA. Further detailed knowledge on the characteristic features of P0·P1/P2 complex could provide insights into eukaryote-specific regulation of translational elongation.

It has been difficult to determine the precise functional roles of eukaryotic ribosomal proteins in vitro. The present replacement studies, "molecular plantation," as it were, of mammalian proteins into the E. coli ribosome, provide a novel methodology for the researches of eukaryotic ribosomal proteins.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific research (12029211 and 12660053) and for Center of Excellence research (10CE2003) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan and by a fund of The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS-RFTF96100305).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Tel.: +81-268-21-5575 Fax: +81-268-21-5571; E-mail: uchiumi@giptc.shinshu-u.ac.jp.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107730200

2 T. Uchiumi, S. Honma, and A. Hachimori, unpublished results.

3 T. Uchiumi, S. Honma, Y. Endo, and A. Hachimori, manuscript in preparation.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: eEF-2, eukaryotic elongation factor 2; eEF-1alpha , eukaryotic elongation factor 1alpha ; EF-Tu, prokaryotic elongation factor Tu; EF-G, prokaryotic elongation factor G; RL12, rat ribosomal protein L12 (equivalent of E. coli L11).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Cundliffe, E. (1986) in Structure, Function and Genetics of Ribosomes (Hardesty, B. , and Kramer, G., eds) , pp. 586-604, Springer-Verlag, New York
2. Rodnina, M. V., Savelsbergh, A., Katunin, V. I., and Wintermeyer, W. (1997) Nature 385, 37-41[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Wilson, K. S., and Noller, H. (1998) Cell 92, 337-349[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Capel, M., Moore, P., B., and Steitz, T. A. (1999) Nature 400, 841-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Moazed, D., Robertson, J. M., and Noller, H. F. (1988) Nature 334, 362-364[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Munishkin, A., and Wool, I. G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 12280-12284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Nathans, D., and Lipmann, F. (1961) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 47, 497-504[Free Full Text]
8. Randi, R., and Ochoa, S. (1962) J. Biol. Chem. 237, 3707-3710[Free Full Text]
9. Parisi, B., Milanesi, G., Van Etten, J. L., Perani, A., and Ciferri, O. (1967) J. Mol. Biol. 28, 295-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Uchiumi, T., Hori, K., Nomura, T., and Hachimori, A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 27578-27582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Hamel, E., Koka, M., and Nakamoto, T. (1972) J. Biol. Chem. 247, 805-814[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Möller, W., Schrier, P. I., Maassen, J. A., Zantema, A., Schop, E., Reinalda, H., Cremers, A. F., and Mellema, J. E. (1983) J. Mol. Biol. 63, 553-573
13. Möller, W., and Maassen, L. A. (1986) in Structure, Function, and Genetics of Ribosomes (Hardesty, B. , and Kramer, G., eds) , pp. 309-325, Springer-Verlag, New York
14. Gudkov, A. T. (1997) FEBS Lett. 407, 253-256[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Savelsbergh, A., Mohr, D., Wilden, B., Wintermeyer, W., and Rodnina, M. V. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 890-894[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Liljas, A., and Gudkov, A. T. (1987) Biochimie (Paris) 69, 1043-1047[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Egebjerg, J., Douthwaite, S., and Garrett, R. A. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 607-611[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Traut, R. R., Lambert, J. M., and Kenny, J. W. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 14592-14598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Traut, R. R., Dey, D., Bochkariov, D. E., Oleinikov, A. V., Jokhadze, G. G., Hamman, B., and Jameson, D. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 949-958[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Montesano-Roditis, L., Glitz, D. G., Traut, R. R., and Stewart, P. L. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14117-14123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Rich, B. E., and Steitz, J. A. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 4065-4074[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Wool, I. G., Chan, Y.-L., and Glück, A. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 933-947[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Remacha, M., Jimenez-Diaz, A., Santos, C., Briones, E., Zambrano, R., Gabriel, M. A. R., Guarinos, E., and Ballesta, J. P. G. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 73, 959-968[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Uchiumi, T., and Kominami, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3302-3308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Ballesta, J. P., Guarinos, E., Zurdo, J., Parada, P., Nusspaumer, G., Lalioti, V. S., Perez-Fernandez, J., and Remacha, M. (2000) in The Ribosome: Structure, Function, Antibiotics and Cellular Interactions (Garrett, R. A. , Douthwaite, S. R. , Liljas, A. , Matheson, A. T. , Moore, P. B. , and Noller, H. F., eds) , pp. 115-125, ASM Press, Washington D. C.
26. Gonzalo, P., Lavergne, J.-P., and Reboud, J.-P. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 19762-19769[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Musters, W., Gonçalves, P. M., Boon, K., Raué, H. A., van Heerikhuizen, H., and Planta, R. J. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1469-1473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Thompson, J., Musters, W., Cundliffe, E., and Dahlberg, A. E. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1499-1504[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Dabbs, E. R. (1979) J. Bacteriol. 140, 734-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Uchiumi, T., Wada, A., and Kominami, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29889-29893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Iwasaki, K., and Kaziro, Y. (1979) Methods Enzymol. 60, 657-676[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Arai, K., Kawakita, M., and Kaziro, Y. (1974) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 76, 283-292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Kaziro, Y., Inoue-Yokosawa, N., and Kawakita, M. (1972) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 72, 853-863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Tokimatsu, H., Strycharz, W. A., and Dahlberg, A. E. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 152, 397-412[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Sato, T., Uchiumi, T., Kominami, R., and Arakawa, M. (1990) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 172, 1681-1684
36. Stark, M. J., Cundliffe, E., Dijk, J., and Stöffler, G. (1980) Mol. Gen. Genet. 180, 11-15[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Zhang, S., Scott, J. M., and Haldenwang, W. G. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 2316-2321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Briones, E., Briones, C., Remacha, M., and Ballesta, J. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31956-31961[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Porse, B. T., Leviev, I., Mankin, A. S., and Garrett, R. A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 276, 391-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Van Agthoven, A. J., Maassen, J. A., and Möller, W. (1977) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 77, 989-998[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. MacConnell, W. P., and Kaplan, N. O. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 5359-5366[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Stark, H., Rodnina, M. V., Rinke-Appel, J., Brimacombe, R., Wintermeyer, W., and van Heel, M. (1997) Nature 389, 403-406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Agrawal, R. K., Heagle, A. B., Penczek, P., Grassucci, R. A., and Frank, J. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 643-647[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Stark, H., Rodnina, M. V., Wieden, H. J., van Heel, M., and Wintermeyer, W. (2000) Cell 100, 301-309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Uchiumi, T., Kikuchi, M., Terao, K., Iwasaki, K., and Ogata, K. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 156, 37-48[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Uchiumi, T., and Ogata, K. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 9663-9667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Noller, H. F. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 191-227[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Uchiumi, T., and Kominami, R. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3389-3394[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Wilson, K. S., and Noller, H. (1998) Cell 92, 131-139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Ban, N., Nissen, P., Hansen, J., Moore, P. B., and Steitz, T. A. (2000) Science 289, 905-920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Wimberly, B. T., Brodersen, D. E., Clemons, W. M. Jr., Morgan-Warren, R. J., Carter, A. P., Vonrhein, C., Hartsch, T., and Ramakrishnan, V. (2000) Nature 407, 327-339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Dube, P., Wieske, M., Stark, H., Schatz, M., Stahl, J., Zemlin, F., Lutsch, G., and van Heel, M. (1998) Structure 6, 389-399[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Czworkowski, J., and Moore, P. B. (1996) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 54, 293-332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Nechifor, M. Murataliev, and K. S. Wilson
Functional Interactions between the G' Subdomain of Bacterial Translation Factor EF-G and Ribosomal Protein L7/L12
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2007; 282(51): 36998 - 37005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Maki, T. Hashimoto, M. Zhou, T. Naganuma, J. Ohta, T. Nomura, C. V. Robinson, and T. Uchiumi
Three Binding Sites for Stalk Protein Dimers Are Generally Present in Ribosomes from Archaeal Organism
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2007; 282(45): 32827 - 32833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
T. Naganuma, K. Shiogama, and T. Uchiumi
The N-terminal regions of eukaryotic acidic phosphoproteins P1 and P2 are crucial for heterodimerization and assembly into the ribosomal GTPase-associated center
Genes Cells, April 1, 2007; 12(4): 501 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
D. S.B. Chan, L.-O. Chu, K.-M. Lee, P. H.M. Too, K.-W. Ma, K.-H. Sze, G. Zhu, P.-C. Shaw, and K.-B. Wong
Interaction between trichosanthin, a ribosome-inactivating protein, and the ribosomal stalk protein P2 by chemical shift perturbation and mutagenesis analyses
Nucleic Acids Res., March 12, 2007; 35(5): 1660 - 1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Hagiya, T. Naganuma, Y. Maki, J. Ohta, Y. Tohkairin, T. Shimizu, T. Nomura, A. Hachimori, and T. Uchiumi
A Mode of Assembly of P0, P1, and P2 Proteins at the GTPase-associated Center in Animal Ribosome: IN VITRO ANALYSES WITH P0 TRUNCATION MUTANTS
J. Biol. Chem., November 25, 2005; 280(47): 39193 - 39199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. L. Bausch, E. Poliakova, and D. E. Draper
Interactions of the N-terminal Domain of Ribosomal Protein L11 with Thiostrepton and rRNA
J. Biol. Chem., August 19, 2005; 280(33): 29956 - 29963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome Res.Home page
N. G. Faux, S. P. Bottomley, A. M. Lesk, J. A. Irving, J. R. Morrison, M. G. de la Banda, and J. C. Whisstock
Functional insights from the distribution and role of homopeptide repeat-containing proteins
Genome Res., April 1, 2005; 15(4): 537 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Uchiumi, S. Honma, Y. Endo, and A. Hachimori
Ribosomal Proteins at the Stalk Region Modulate Functional rRNA Structures in the GTPase Center
J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 41401 - 41409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
T. Shimizu, M. Nakagaki, Y. Nishi, Y. Kobayashi, A. Hachimori, and T. Uchiumi
Interaction among silkworm ribosomal proteins P1, P2 and P0 required for functional protein binding to the GTPase-associated domain of 28S rRNA
Nucleic Acids Res., June 15, 2002; 30(12): 2620 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/6/3857    most recent
M107730200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uchiumi, T.