|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107797200 on November 27, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 6, 3993-4002, February 8, 2002
T Cell Receptor-mediated Signal Transduction Controlled by
the Chain Transmembrane Domain
APOPTOSIS-DEFICIENT CELLS DISPLAY UNBALANCED MITOGEN-ACTIVATED
PROTEIN KINASES ACTIVITIES UPON T CELL RECEPTOR ENGAGEMENT*
Emma
Teixeiro §,
Patricia
Fuentes §,
Begoña
Galocha¶,
Balbino
Alarcón , and
Rafael
Bragado **
From the Department of Immunology, Fundación
Jiménez Díaz, Avenida. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain, the ¶ Hospital Clínico San
Carlos, Unidad de Investigación, Profesor Martín Lagos
s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain, and the Centro de
Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de
Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de
Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
Received for publication, August 14, 2001, and in revised form, November 13, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The bases that support the versatility of the T
cell receptor (TCR) to generate distinct T cell responses remain
unclear. We have previously shown that mutant cells in the
transmembrane domain of TCR chain are impaired in TCR-induced
apoptosis but are not affected in other functions. Here we describe the
biochemical mechanisms by which this mutant receptor supports some T
cell responses but fails to induce apoptosis. Extracellular
signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK) is activated at higher and
more sustained levels in TCR -mutated than in wild type cells.
Conversely, activation of both c-Jun N-terminal kinase and p38
mitogen-activated protein kinase is severely reduced in mutant cells.
By attempting to link this unbalanced induction to altered upstream
events, we found that ZAP-70 is normally activated. However, although
SLP-76 phosphorylation is normally induced, TCR engagement of mutant
cells results in lower tyrosine phosphorylation of LAT but in
higher tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav than in wild type cells. The
results suggest that an altered signaling cascade leading to an
imbalance in mitogen-activated protein kinase activities is involved in
the selective impairment of apoptosis in these mutant cells.
Furthermore, they also provide new insights in the contribution of TCR
to decipher the signals that mediate apoptosis distinctly from proliferation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The TCR1 expressed in
the majority of peripheral T lymphocytes is a complex composed of the
clonotypic TCR  heterodimer, responsible for antigen and
superantigen recognition, linked to the monomorphic CD3- , - , -
and - chains, which are involved in signal transduction. This
structural complexity, in comparison with other families of cytokines
and growth receptors, might be responsible for the different outcomes
of TCR engagement. The fact that TCR engagement triggers either
cytokine-driven proliferation or cell death is particularly intriguing
and raises the question of how these outcomes are differentially
regulated. It has promoted the concept that the TCR does not function
as a simple on-off switch upon activation. In fact, several approaches
have provided evidence that TCR could signal to some activation while
keeping other pathways functionally inactive (reviewed in Ref. 1). Because of the short length of the cytoplasmic tails and the apparent lack of inherent activity of both clonotypic chains, it is assumed that
the heterodimer transmits the signal through the CD3/ chains. In
this context, questions that remain to be answered are the following.
1) How do engaged TCR transfer signals to initiate signal transduction?
2) Which domains of the TCR conserved regions are involved in such
transmission? 3) What effector functions are modulated through the
integrity of such domains?
Only a few reports have stressed the contribution of individual
structural domains of the  clonotypic module to specific signal
transduction. TCR chain tail seems to be required for down-regulation of the TCR-CD3 complex (2), and chimeric TCRs containing clonotypic instead of residues in the
connecting peptide of the TCR chain fail to trigger IL-2
production upon cell activation (3). In addition, double positive
thymocytes bearing this chimeric TCR undergo negative, but not
positive, selection because of a failure in the activation of the
extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) (4, 5). A single mutation in the chain connecting peptide results in a TCR that is
specifically deficient in activating both the calcium pathway and IL-2
secretion (6). Furthermore, individual mutations at either of the two conserved Tyr residues in chain transmembrane domain allow TCR-CD3 expression and are compatible with normal signaling. On the contrary, dual mutations affected signaling efficiency to a greater extent than
predicted by surface expression alone and resulted in severe reductions
in IL-2 production and apoptosis (7, 8). Notwithstanding, although
different mouse T cell hybridomas dramatically differed in their
functional response to the same mutations, these results suggest that
membrane-spanning domains in TCR are relevant for signal
transduction (8). In all works, however, information on how mutations
might affect biochemical events involved in the activation of upstream
intermediates and signaling pathways is basically lacking.
The ability of the TCR to transduce quantitatively and qualitatively
different signals is strongly supported by the existence of partial
agonists, peptide analogues that can selectively stimulate only some T
cell effector functions (9). Partial agonists, usually related to low
affinity ligands, have been proved to be a useful tool to understand
mechanisms regulating TCR differential signaling. In fact, a broad
variety of such peptides has been described that trigger TCR to usually
result in anergy, cytokine production, cytolytic activity, or
Fas-mediated cytotoxicity as opposed to perforin-dependent
cytotoxicity or proliferation (10-12). Analogues that selectively
impair triggering to apoptosis have not been reported, but, singularly,
TCR ligands that uniquely trigger apoptosis in CD4+
lymphocytes have been described (13). No similar selective peptides
have been reported for CD8+ cells. However, some partial
agonists, being inducers of T cell cytotoxicity, can dissociate the
induction of Fas-L-dependent CTL death from CTL
activation and perforin-dependent (14) or Fas-L-dependent target cell death (10, 11). In some
experimental systems, the ability to divorce killing of the targets and
Fas-L-mediated CTL apoptosis has been demonstrated to occur by blocking
CD8/MHC class I interaction (15). Two major biochemical events are
characteristics of triggering with partial agonist: 1) the
phosphorylation of CD3- chains, which results in the predominant
phosphorylation of the higher mobility phospho- isoform with
the almost absent phosphorylation of the lower mobility isoform, was
incomplete, and 2) although ZAP-70 was seen to bind to CD3-
following signaling, the ZAP-70 molecule itself was not phosphorylated,
and its kinase activity was not induced (16, 17). In this regard, the
fact that a consistent pattern of early signaling is not elicited by ligands capable of inducing similar functional responses (9, 13)
suggests that differential signaling would take place after CD3- and
ZAP-70 phosphorylation.
Signal transduction through the TCR is initiated by Src
kinase-mediated phosphorylation of the ITAMs of the CD3 and chains, followed by the recruitment, phosphorylation, and activation of ZAP-70. The coordinated action of Src kinases and ZAP-70 results in the
phosphorylation of multiple substrates. Among these substrates, LAT
becomes heavily tyrosine-phosphorylated upon TCR activation, a fact
that endows LAT with the capacity for recruiting multiple signaling
molecules. It has been hypothesized that signaling through Ras is
exquisitely dependent on tyrosine-phosphorylated LAT (18). However,
several lines of evidence suggest that Ras activation involves
additional interactions and that the Ras-MAPK activation can occur
through alternative pathways independent of LAT phosphorylation (19).
These alternative interactions might lead to distinct patterns of ERK
activation, which could be associated with the regulation of T cell
death or survival (20, 21). In addition to Ras, other small GTPases
belonging to the Rho family (Rac-1, Cdc42, and RhoA) are activated upon
stimulation of the TCR. These GTPases can activate other MAPK cascades,
such as the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38MAPK
activation pathways that have also been related to apoptosis (22). Vav
is a guanosine nucleotide exchange factor for Rho family GTPases whose
exchange activity can be modulated by TCR signaling. Such a mechanism,
on operating over Rac-1, has been reported to link the TCR to the
activation of JNK and p38MAPK (23, 24). LAT phosphorylation
appears to play a critical role on the assembly of ZAP-70-LAT-Vav
complexes in lipids rafts and on its translocation in the vicinity of
Vav downstream effectors (25). Additionally, it has been reported that
Vav plays TCR-mediated roles other than acting as the GDP/GTP exchanger
(26-28), but the mechanisms involved are poorly understood.
We have previously reported that Jurkat-derived mutant T cell clones,
bearing a mutation (Tyr to Leu) in the C-terminal tyrosine of the
conserved ITAM-like motif of the transmembrane domain of TCR chain, show normal ability: to secrete cytokines (IL-2 and interferon- ); to express activation markers; to down-modulate their
TCR-CD3 complex; and to mobilize intracellular Ca2+ upon
TCR activation. However, these mutant cells show a resistance to
TCR-induced apoptosis, a defect that is not observed upon direct Fas
stimulation or after stimulating with reagents that bypass TCR
engagement (i.e. phorbol esters plus calcium ionophore)
(29-31). Altogether, these findings prompted us to further investigate the effects of the mutation on TCR signaling, in an attempt to clarify
the mechanisms by which the integrity of the transmembrane domain of
the TCR chain contributes to the early biochemical events and MAPK
activation pathways associated with TCR-mediated signaling efficiency.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Lines
Wild type and mutant clones have been previously described (29,
30). Briefly, they were obtained by reconstitution of the
TCR -negative Jurkat variant 31.13 with either a wild type V 3 TCR
cDNA or with a mutant cDNA that contains a tyrosine to leucine
mutation in the C-terminal tyrosine of the transmembrane domain. No
clonal variation was observed between different clones derived from
independent wild type or mutant cDNA transfections (29, 30). The
cells were maintained in RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
and antibiotics. Expression of TCR-CD3 complex was routinely tested by
flow cytometry before each assay.
Antibodies and Reagents
The following antibodies were used: 1) for cytometry,
anti-CD3 (UCHT-1-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Caltag, Burlingame,
CA); anti-TCRV 3 (JOVI-3, a gift from Dr. M. Owen); and
anti-CD69-fluorescein isothiocyanate (Becton Dickinson, Madrid, Spain);
2) for stimulation, anti-CD3 (UCHT-1, Immunokontact, Switzerland;
used for stimulation at 10 µg/ml); anti-CD28 (Pharmingen, San Diego,
CA; used for stimulation at 1 µg/ml); and the cross-linking antibody
goat anti-mouse (Pierce; used for stimulation at 10 µg/ml); 3) for
immunoprecipitation assays, anti-ZAP-70 (ZAP-4, a gift from Dr. S. Ley,
NIMR, London); anti-LAT and anti-Vav (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc., Lake
Placid, NY); and anti-SLP-76 (kindly provided by Dr. G. Koretzky,
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine); 4) for Western blot,
anti-PLC 1 and anti-Vav (BD Transduction Laboratories, Lexington,
KY); anti-c-Cbl and anti-Raf-1 kinase (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA);
anti-SLP-76 (kindly provided by Dr. G. Koretzky); anti-ERK
(Zymed Laboratories Inc., San Francisco, CA);
anti-phospho-p44/42MAPK, anti-phospho-p38MAPK,
anti-p38MAPK, and anti-JNK (New England Biolabs, Beverly,
CA); anti- -tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich); and anti-LAT, anti-Ras, and
anti-phosphotyrosine 4G10 (Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.).
Staphylococcal enterotoxin B was purchased from Toxin Technology
(Sarasota, FL; used for stimulation at 10 µg/ml). Biotinylated
annexin-V was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals, and
phycoerythrin-labeled streptavidin was from Caltag (Burlingame, CA).
The construct for the glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion
protein containing the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of Raf was from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc.
TCR Stimulation
0.5-2.5 × 107 cells/ml were resuspended in
RPMI containing 15 mM HEPES. Unless otherwise detailed,
stimulation was performed by incubation with anti-CD3 (10 µg/ml)
together with anti-CD28 (1 µg/ml) antibodies for 10 min on ice
followed by cross-linking with goat anti-mouse antibodies at 37 °C
for the indicated times.
Flow Cytometry
106 cells were incubated on ice for 1 h with a
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated specific antibody, washed, and
analyzed in a flow cytometer (EPICS-XL MCL, Coulter).
Immunoprecipitations
2.5 × 107 cells were unstimulated or
stimulated as described and lysed for 30 min at 4 °C in a buffer
containing 1% Brij-96 (or 1% Nonidet P-40), 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, leupeptin, pepstatin, and
aprotinin (1 µg/ml each), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 mM NaF, and 1 mM
NaVO4. After centrifugation, the lysates were precleared
sequentially with Sepharose beads and with protein A- or G-Sepharose
beads coated with the appropriate control antibody and afterward
subjected to immunoprecipitation for 4 h at 4 °C with protein
A- or G-Sepharose beads coated with specific antibodies.
Immunoprecipitates were then washed four times with lysis buffer and
subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by standard immunoblot analysis with the
indicated antibodies.
Subcellular Fractionation
Upon stimulation, the cells were resuspended in ice-cold
hypothonic buffer (42 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH
7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 µg/ml each aprotinin and
leupeptin) and incubated on ice for 15 min. The cells were transferred
to a 1-ml syringe and sheared by being passed five times through a
30-gauge needle. Whole cell lysates were centrifuged at 200 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to remove nuclei and cell debris,
and the supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (cytosol) was
collected, and the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet
P-40, and 10 µg/ml each aprotinin and leupeptin), vortexed for 5 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged again at 13,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C. The supernatant representing the particulate (membrane)
fraction was then saved. Each fraction was then diluted to a final
concentration of 1× Laemmli buffer and separated by SDS-PAGE, and the
Western blots were analyzed with anti-PKC antibodies.
Kinase Activity Assays
Raf Kinase, ERK, and p38MAPK
Activities--
106 cells/time point were unstimulated or
stimulated for the indicated times and lysed for 30 min at 4 °C in
50 µl of a buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 20 mM
HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 40 mM -glycerophosphate, 1 mM dithiothreitol,
and the following protease and phosphatase inhibitors (1 µg/ml each):
leupeptin, pepstatin, and aprotinin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 mM NaF, and 1 mM NaVO4. Lysates were then centrifuged, and the supernatants were subjected to standard 10% SDS-PAGE for ERK and
p38MAPK or 8% (acrylamide/bisacrylamide 24/0.6) for Raf kinase
to improve resolution of phosphorylated band shifts. Electrophoresed
proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane for immunoblot
analysis with specific antibodies. In the cases of ERK and
p38MAPK, their phosphorylation status, as determined by
immunoblotting with antibodies that specifically recognize the
phosphorylated forms of these kinases, is assumed to be an indication
of their activation state. Raf kinase activation was evaluated by the
band shifts corresponding to the protein phosphorylated forms, which can be detected by immunoblotting with specific anti-Raf-1 kinase antibodies.
Ras Activity--
5 × 106 cells/time point
were not stimulated or stimulated for the indicated times and lysed for
30 min at 4 °C in 300 µl of a buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40,
0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 25 mM NaF, 10 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, leupeptin, pepstatin,
and aprotinin (1 µg/ml each), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 1 mM NaVO4. The lysates were then
centrifuged, and the supernatants were mixed with 20 µl of a freshly
prepared GST fusion protein containing the Ras-binding domain of Raf-1
(GST-RBD), immobilized in glutathione-Sepharose beads (Amersham
Biosciences, Inc.). The samples were incubated by rotating for 90 min
at 4 °C, and the beads were then washed three times with lysis
buffer. The bound Ras-GTP protein was eluted in Laemmli sample buffer
and subjected to 12.5% SDS-PAGE. The levels of active (GTP-bound) Ras
were assessed by immunoblotting with specific anti-Ras antibodies.
JNK Activity--
5 × 106 cells were not
stimulated or stimulated for the indicated times and lysed for 15 min
at 4 °C in 200 µl of lysis buffer ( 0.1% Triton X-100, 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 20 mM -glycerolphosphate, 0.1 mM NaVO4, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After centrifuging,
solid phase kinase assays were performed on supernatants by pull-down
precipitation as previously described (32). Briefly, cell extracts were
mixed with 10 µl of immobilized GST-c-Jun 1-79, and the samples were
rotated at 4 °C for 3 h. After centrifugation,
GST-c-Jun-Sepharose beads were washed four times and resuspended in 30 µl of kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.6, 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM
-glycerophosphate, 0.1 mM NaVO4, 2 mM dithiothreitol) supplemented with 20 µM
ATP and 5 µCi of [ -32P]ATP. After incubation for 20 min at 30 °C, the reaction was stopped by washing with kinase
buffer, and the proteins were eluted in Laemmli buffer and subjected to
SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The phosphorylation of GST-c-Jun
was quantified using a laser densitometer (Molecular Dynamics, Kent,
UK) and normalized to JNK as a loading control.
 |
RESULTS |
Impaired in Vivo Tyrosine Phosphorylation of LAT in TCR Chain
Mutant Cells--
We have previously shown that T cell clones bearing
a single replacement in the ITAM-like motif of the TCR chain
transmembrane domain express high amounts of TCR-CD3 complexes, similar
to those of wild type cells. In these mutant clones, ZAP-70 becomes
normally tyrosine-phosphorylated upon TCR activation. Furthermore,
ZAP-70 activity was similar in wild type and mutant cells, as shown in an in vitro kinase assay using an exogenous specific
substrate (29, 30). To further characterize the effects of the mutation in TCR-mediated signal transduction, we tested whether this alteration might affect the in vivo tyrosine phosphorylation of ZAP-70
substrates in mutant cells. Among these substrates, LAT is an adapter
protein that constitutes the foremost scaffold that links the proximal and distal events of the TCR signaling pathway. Immunoprecipitation with specific anti-LAT antibodies followed by immunoblot with anti-phosphotyrosine showed that in comparison with wild type cells,
TCR-inducible tyrosine phosphorylation of LAT was clearly diminished in
mutant cells (Fig. 1A). A
longer exposure of the LAT immunoprecipitation membrane revealed the
presence of previously described tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins that
coprecipitate with LAT upon TCR triggering (33) identified as PLC 1,
c-Cbl, Vav, and SLP76. Interestingly, although the levels of
LAT-associated tyrosine-phosphorylated SLP76, Vav, and PLC 1 were
reduced in mutant cells, the levels of LAT-associated phospho-c-Cbl
were higher. Furthermore, blotting with specific antibodies indicated that mutant cells are defective in the recruitment of PLC 1, Vav, and
SLP-76 to LAT and in a lesser extent in the recruitment of c-Cbl (Fig.
1B).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Stimulated mutant cells show an impaired LAT
phosphorylation compared with wild type cells. Wild type
(WT) and mutant (MUT) clones were unstimulated or
stimulated for the indicated times and lysed in 1% Brij96-containing
buffer. A, cell lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-LAT antibodies and
analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the antibody 4G10 to
phosphotyrosine (pTyr). Because of the notable difference in
the developing times, the immunoblotting of phospho-LAT and that of the
other phospho-proteins correspond to different exposures. As a control
that similar amounts of LAT were immunoprecipitated in all samples, an
immunoblot with anti-LAT antibodies is shown. B, after
stripping, blots were reprobed with specific antibodies to identify
individual LAT-associated proteins. C, cell lysates
were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-ZAP-70 antibodies and
analyzed by immunoblotting with the antibody 4G10. The identity of
p-LAT and p-ZAP-70 was confirmed by reprobing the blot with anti-LAT
(not shown) and anti-ZAP-70 antibodies. NRS, preimmune
normal rabbit serum used as control for immunoprecipitation.
|
|
Because ZAP70 was not detectable in LAT immunoprecipitates (33) and we
had reported that ZAP-70 was scarcely recruited to the plasma membrane
in TCR-activated mutant cells (30), we performed reverse
immunoprecipitation with specific anti-ZAP-70 antibodies to determine
whether the low level of induced phospho-LAT in mutant cells was the
result of poor activity of ZAP-70 on its membrane substrate. The
immunoprecipitation revealed lower levels of coprecipitated phospho-LAT
in mutant cells than in wild type cells (Fig. 1C). Furthermore and as expected, the immunoprecipitation revealed similar
levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated ZAP-70 in both stimulated cells (Fig.
1C). Thus, despite the fact that both the tyrosine phosphorylation level of ZAP-70 and in vitro ZAP-70 activity
were similar in both cell types, our results show that the in
vivo phosphorylation of LAT and the recruitment to LAT of other
signaling molecules are impaired in TCR-stimulated mutant cells.
TCR Triggering in Mutant Cells Results in a Higher Activation of
the Ras-ERK Pathway than That in Wild Type Cells--
Most of the
current evidence suggests that the activation of the Ras-Raf-ERK
pathway, after TCR signaling, requires tyrosine-phosphorylated LAT
(18). If this dependence were absolute, in light of the aforementioned
results, we would expect that the impaired LAT phosphorylation would
lead downstream to a deficient activation of the ERK pathway in mutant
cells. We therefore studied whether the mutation could influence the
activation of the Ras-ERK signaling pathway.
ERK is the last member in the MAPK cascade that is initiated when Raf
is activated after its recruitment by the activated form of Ras. The
analysis of the phosphorylation status of ERK, an indication of their
activation state (34), upon TCR engagement revealed not only that the
induced ERK activity was higher in mutant cells than in wild type cells
but also that this activity lasted longer. Thus, although both
activities peaked at 5 min, a high phosphorylation in both p42 and p44
bands was still observed at 60 min in mutant cells, whereas in wild
type cells, ERK phosphorylation was almost undetectable after 20 min of
stimulation (Fig. 2A). Expression of ERK, assessed by immunoblotting with anti-ERK antibodies, was unaffected by TCR stimulation. As controls, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate alone or in combination with ionomycin induced similar kinetics and ERK activities in both wild type and mutant cells (not
shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
TCR triggering of mutant cells results in
overactivation of the Ras/Raf/ERK pathway. A, wild type
(WT) and mutant (MUT) cells were unstimulated or
stimulated for the indicated times and lysed in 1% Nonidet
P-40-containing buffer. The cell lysates were subjected to 10%
SDS-PAGE, and the proteins were transferred to a membrane. The blot was
probed with anti-pERK to determine ERK activity. Both short
(SE) and long (LE) exposures are shown to
illustrate more adequately the normal activation kinetics in wild type
cells. After developing, the blot was stripped and reprobed with
anti-ERK antibodies to verify that ERK levels were not affected by
stimulation. An additional loading control is shown as determined by
immunoblotting (IB) of the same membrane with
anti- -tubulin antibodies. B, upon stimulation for the
indicated times, lysates from wild type and mutant cells were subjected
to 8% (acrylamide:bisacrylamide 24:0.6) SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting was
then performed with antibodies to Raf kinase to detect kinase activity.
The shift in the mobility of this protein to a slower migrating form of
higher apparent molecular weight is caused by phosphorylation, and it
is indicative of its activation. The shift is readily seen upon
extended electrophoresis. After stripping, the blot was reprobed with
anti- -tubulin antibodies to control for loading. C, wild
type and mutant cells were unstimulated or stimulated for the indicated
times and lysed in 1% Nonidet P-40-containing buffer. Cell lysates
were then subjected to pull-down assays with GST-RBD-Sepharose followed
by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an anti-Ras antibody to detect
active (GTP-bound) Ras. Aliquots of the same total lysates were
independently analyzed by immunoblotting with anti- -tubulin
antibodies to control for loading and with an antibody to
phosphotyrosine (pTyr) to evaluate LAT phosphorylation.
Representative results of three independent experiments of each type
performed with different wild type and mutant clones are shown.
|
|
It was then reasonable to test whether this altered activity of ERK in
mutant cells could be the consequence of a similar activation pattern
of the upstream intermediates Raf and Ras. Interestingly, the
activation of Raf in mutant cells was higher and was sustained longer
compared with that in wild type cells, as evidenced by the band shift
corresponding to the phosphorylated forms of Raf (Fig. 2B).
Finally, we evaluated the levels of active (GTP-bound) Ras by pull-down
experiments using an immobilized GST fusion protein containing the RBD
of Raf. As shown in Fig. 2C (upper panels), the
levels of Ras-GTP significantly increased as early as 1 min in mutant
cells, were similarly maintained for 2 min, and were detectable after
at least 15 min post-stimulation. In contrast, TCR triggering in wild
type cells resulted in a modest increase in the level of Ras-GTP at 1 min, which peaked at 2 min and was undetectable at 15 min of
stimulation. As an additional control that Ras activation follows an
opposite pattern to that of LAT phosphorylation in mutant cells, a
phosphotyrosine Western blotting performed on the same lysates showed
that LAT phosphorylation was more weakly induced in mutant cells than
in wild type cells (Fig. 2C, bottom strip).
Similar results were obtained with different wild type and mutant
clones that were derived from independent transfections (not shown).
These data suggest a role for the TCR chain transmembrane region in
modulating the Ras-ERK cascade and also support the notion that ERK
activation can be modulated by LAT-independent pathways.
CD69 Expression Is Highly Induced in Mutant Cells--
To further
assess whether the differences in the activation of the Ras-Raf-ERK
signaling pathway between wild type and mutant cells might have a
functional relevance, we used CD69 expression as a readout that is
clearly dependent on the activation of the Ras-ERK pathway (26). We
previously showed that TCR-mediated induction of CD69 expression
measured after 18 h of stimulation was similar in both cell types
(30). However, CD69 is an early activation marker that can be detected
by flow cytometry a few hours after TCR engagement. The time course of
CD69 expression revealed that CD69 was more strongly induced in mutant
cells than in wild type cells after 3-7 h post-stimulation (Fig.
3), consistent with the increased ERK
activity in mutant cells (Fig. 2). As expected, the levels of CD69
expression in both cell types equalized at longer stimulation times
(Fig. 3).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CD69 is more strongly induced in mutant than
in wild type cells. After stimulation for the indicated times,
wild type (WT) and mutant (MUT) clones were
stained with an anti-CD69 fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled antibody.
CD69 expression was measured by flow cytometry. The results are
expressed as arbitrary units (A.U.), corresponding to the
product of the mean value of CD69 fluorescence and the percentage of
CD69 positive cells. This experiment is representative of five
independent experiments performed in triplicate with different wild
type and mutant clones.
|
|
JNK and p38MAPK Activities Are Substantially Decreased
in TCR-stimulated Mutant Cells--
Given the unexpected
aforementioned effect of the TCR mutation on the activation of the
Ras-ERK pathway, we reasoned that the mutation would also affect the
activation of the other MAPKs, JNK and p38MAPK. Solid phase
kinase analysis were performed to study JNK activity induced by
coligation of CD3 and CD28. We found that JNK activity in wild type
cells peaked at 15 min and was maintained at high level for at least 30 min; meanwhile, the induction of JNK activity in mutant cells was
drastically reduced both in intensity and time (Fig.
4A). JNK activity was not
naturally altered on mutant cells, and it was only influenced by
TCR-mediated stimuli, because its response to phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate plus ionomycin was similar in both wild type and mutant
cells (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
JNK and p38MAPK activities are
substantially reduced in TCR-stimulated mutant cells. Wild type
(WT) and mutant (MUT) clones were unstimulated or
stimulated for the indicated times. A, cell lysates were
subjected to pull-down assays with GST-Jun-Sepharose followed by solid
phase kinase assays. The autoradiograph (upper strip)
corresponds to a blot showing phosphorylation of the JNK substrate,
c-Jun. Simultaneously, aliquots removed from the same pull-down
precipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with an
anti-JNK as control for loading (bottom strip).
B, cell lysates in 1% Nonidet P-40-containing buffer were
subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The
membrane was probed with anti-pp38MAPK antibodies to
determine p38MAPK activity and with anti- -tubulin to
control for loading. P/I, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
plus ionomycin. The right panels show the induced JNK
(A) and p38MAPK (B) activities after
normalization to the densitometric values of their respective loading
controls and to the relative activation level in unstimulated cells.
The results shown are representative of three similar experiments
performed with different wild type and mutant clones.
|
|
The induction of the p38MAPK activity was studied by
immunoblotting with antibodies that recognize the phosphorylated form,
an indication of its activation state. Similarly to JNK, the activity of p38MAPK was severely reduced in TCR-stimulated mutant
cells (Fig. 4B). Clonal variation was not observed when
using different wild type or mutant clones in these assays (not shown).
These results, together with those described for ERK activation (Fig.
2), show that the mutation in TCR differentially affects the
activation of different MAPKs induced through the TCR, increasing ERK
but decreasing both JNK and p38MAPK activities.
TCR Mutation Results in Higher than Normal Tyrosine
Phosphorylation of Vav--
The results reported above suggest that
other ZAP-70 substrates than LAT might contribute to the unbalanced
MAPKs activation in mutant cells. Moreover, we did not know whether the
TCR mutation was also affecting the in vivo ZAP-70
activity on other substrates than LAT. SLP-76 is also a major ZAP-70
substrate and an important linker of the TCR to cellular activation.
Furthermore, both SLP76 and Vav are also considered to play critical
roles in ERK activation. In fact, ERK activation is blocked in
Vav-deficient mice as well as in SLP76-deficient cells (35, 36). In
addition, it has been demonstrated that in T cells Vav can regulate not
only Ras-dependent responses, such as ERK activation and
CD69 expression (26, 27), but also the activation of JNK and
p38MAPK through its GDP-GTP exchange activity (23, 24).
Therefore, we performed immunoprecipitation with anti-SLP-76-specific
antibodies. The immunoprecipitation from TCR+CD28 costimulated cells
revealed similar levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated SLP-76 in both
mutant and wild type cells (Fig.
5A). Furthermore, although in
LAT immunoprecipitation we observed a slight decrease in the
recruitment of phospho-SLP-76 to LAT in mutant cells with respect to
wild type cells (Fig. 1A), we have found no substantial
differences in the levels of phospho-LAT associated to SLP-76 between
wild type and mutant cells (Fig. 5A). Remarkably, however,
the levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated Vav coprecipitated with
SLP-76 were found to be notably higher in mutant than in wild type
cells (Fig. 5A). Western blot analysis with specific
anti-Vav antibodies revealed that the recruitment of Vav to
phospho-SLP-76 was similar in both cell types (not shown), in agreement
with the similar levels of induced phospho-SLP-76 in wild type and
mutant cells. These data, together with those shown in Fig. 1,
demonstrate that TCR mutation does not lead to a poor in
vivo ZAP70 activity resulting in a generalized deficient phosphorylation of its substrates, consistent with our previous in vitro kinase experiments (30). More plausibly, our data
suggest that TCR mutation seems to differentially affect the
accessibility of ZAP70 to specific substrates (e.g. LAT
versus SLP-76).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
TCR stimulation in mutant cells
result in higher than normal Vav phosphorylation. Wild type
(WT) and mutant (MUT) clones were unstimulated or
stimulated for the indicated times and lysed in 1% Nonidet
P-40-containing buffer. A, cell lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with antibodies to SLP-76 and
analyzed by immunoblotting (IB) with the antibody 4G10 to
phosphotyrosine (pTyr). Individual
phosphotyrosine-containing proteins were identified by reprobing the
blot with antibodies to LAT and Vav (not shown) and to SLP-76.
NGS, preimmune normal goat serum used as control for
immunoprecipitation. B, cell lysates were immunoprecipitated
with antibodies to Vav and analyzed by immunoblotting with the antibody
4G10 to phosphotyrosine. The identity of phospho-Vav
(p-Vav) was confirmed by reprobing the blot with an anti-Vav
antibody. The numbers below the phosphotyrosine blot
represent the relative induction of tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav
normalized to Vav loading in each lane and to the relative
amount of p-Vav in the second lane (unstimulated wild type
cells). NRS, preimmune normal rabbit serum used as control
for immunoprecipitation.
|
|
To examine whether the high phosphorylation of Vav associated with
SLP-76 in mutant cells was a feature of such association or was
reflecting an alteration of the total phosphorylation status of Vav
upon TCR triggering, we performed immunoprecipitation with anti-Vav
antibodies. In stimulated mutant cells, we found that Vav becomes
tyrosine-phosphorylated at higher levels compared with wild type
cells. Furthermore, the tyrosine-phosphorylated Vav signal was
sustained for a longer period in mutant than in wild type cells (Fig.
5B). Altogether, the results shown in Figs. 1 and 5 indicate
that the mutation in the transmembrane domain of TCR had opposite
effects on different mediators of signaling pathways: higher
TCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Vav and lower tyrosine
phosphorylation of LAT, compared with those in wild type cells.
In Mutant Cells, the Translocation of PKC to Plasma Membrane Was
Sustained Longer than in Wild Type Cells--
Both the activation of
the Ras/ERK pathway and CD69 up-regulation have been shown to be
dependent on Vav activation (26, 37). Furthermore, it has been reported
that PKC is selectively required in the Vav signaling pathway that
mediates up-regulation of CD69 expression (37). Additionally, it has
been suggested that PKC acts as an intermediate between Vav and Ras
(26). Given that the activation of the Ras/ERK pathway and the
up-regulation of CD69 are both increased in stimulated mutant cells
(Figs. 3 and 5), we decided to test whether PKC might also
contribute as intermediate to these altered activation readouts
observed in mutant cells. To do that, wild type and mutant cells were
stimulated and subjected to subcellular fractionation to compare the
translocation of PKC to cell membrane, a phospho-Vav dependent event
that is assumed to be directly associated with the kinase activation
and with its localization in the supramolecular activation complex together with the TCR (38, 39).
Analyzing the PKC immunoblots of membrane and cytosolic fractions,
we found significant differences between the patterns in wild type and
those of mutant cells. They revealed that PKC remained translocated
in the cell membrane for longer time in mutant cells than in wild type
cells (Fig. 6). Both cell types showed a
similar and pronounced loss of PKC in the cytosolic fraction after 5 min of stimulation, correlating with a increase in the amount of PKC
translocated to the membrane. However, a consistent level of the kinase
was only observed in mutant cells after 20 min of stimulation. In fact,
the return of PKC to the cytosol was quicker in wild type cells, and
consequently PKC was almost undetectable on the membrane of these
cells after 20 min of stimulation. Expression of PKC , assessed by
immunoblotting on whole cell lysates, was unaffected by TCR
stimulation. In light of the above reports (26, 37), these data not
only support the notion that PKC is an intermediate in both
Vav-dependent Ras/ERK pathway activation and CD69
up-regulation, but also they suggest that the long lasting
translocation of PKC is contributing to the enhanced activation of
these pathways in mutant cells.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The translocation of PKC
to plasma membrane is sustained longer in mutant than in wild
type cells. Wild type (WT) and mutant (MUT)
cells were unstimulated or stimulated for the indicated times.
Whole cell lysates (W.C.E.), cytosol, and membrane fractions
were prepared, and the aliquots were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The
expression of PKC in each sample was determined by immunoblotting
with a specific antibody. The results are representative of three
similar experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The role played by constant domains of clonotypic TCR chains in
TCR-mediated signaling is poorly understood. We describe here that the
transmembrane domain of chain is crucial in controlling signaling
efficiency by coupling properly TCR stimulation to downstream effectors. Thus, engagement of a TCR bearing a single replacement in
such a domain results in higher and more sustained ERK activation but
in lower JNK and p38MAPK activation than in wild type
cells. We have traced these defects as being due to a compendium of
altered upstream events including low phosphorylation of LAT and high
and long lasting phosphorylation of Vav. Because mutant cells are
apoptosis-defective but IL-2-producing cells, our results provide new
evidence for TCR-mediated differential signaling and shows that a
combined effect of altered phosphorylation events is likely responsible
for the impaired apoptosis in mutant cells but seems to be not relevant
for IL-2 secretion. Further, the model emphasizes the role of
phosphorylated linkers in dissociating signaling pathways leading to
the development of effector T cell responses.
The most unexpected result has been the high and sustained activation
of ERK in mutant cells compared with that in wild type cells. This
sustained activation correlates with the activation time course of the
upstream intermediates Ras and Raf (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the
overactivation of this pathway in mutant cells was consistent with a
higher up-regulation of CD69 (Fig. 3), a downstream response that is
dependent on the activation of Ras (40), Raf (41), and
ERK.2 Current evidence
suggests that TCR-induced Ras activation is likely determined by the
recruitment of adapter molecules to phosphorylated LAT (18, 42, 43).
However, TCR-stimulated mutant cells show a significant defect on
TCR-induced LAT phosphorylation, which consequently results in a
defective recruitment of SLP-76 and PLC 1 (Fig. 1A), which
are both important for Ras activation (44, 45). Therefore, alternative
pathways must contribute to elicit Ras-MAPK activation in mutant cells.
In this regard, recent studies have shown that TCR-induced Ras-MAPK
activation can occur through phospho-LAT-independent pathways. Thus,
TCR triggering of SLP-76 deficient cells results in a blockade of ERK
activation, although these cells show normal phospho-LAT (36).
Furthermore, in ZAP-70-deficient cells, the Ras-MAPK pathway can be
almost normally activated upon TCR engagement (46). Moreover, normal
ERK activity can be induced in ZAP-70 mutant cells, Y/F 319, although
they show a defective LAT phosphorylation (47). Additionally, TCR
partial agonist ligands use a phospho-LAT-independent pathway to
selectively activate the Ras-MAPK pathway (19).
The following question arises: If LAT is not involved, what other
molecules can be invoked to explain the activation pattern of the
Ras-MAPK pathway in TCR mutant cells? c-Cbl should be discarded,
because the phosphorylation of this adapter has been correlated with
the inhibition of the Ras-MAPK pathway (48). On the other hand, SLP-76,
which has been shown to be required for ERK activity (36),
is similarly phosphorylated in wild type and mutant cells (Fig.
5A). We also dismiss the putative contribution of Ras-GRP to
Ras activation, because this event is
phospho-PLC 1-dependent, and we found a low level of
phospho-PLC 1 associated with LAT in mutant cells (Fig.
1A). The most probable candidate is Vav, based on two facts:
1) Vav is more highly phosphorylated in TCR mutant cells than in
wild type cells and 2) Vav recruited to the relevant adapter SLP-76 is
more phosphorylated in mutant than in wild type cells (Fig. 5). Two
additional observations support this hypothesis: 1) the time course for
Vav phosphorylation and Ras activation correlate much better in mutant
than in wild type cells (Figs. 2 and 5) and 2) the intense induction of
phospho-Vav in mutant cells matches the strong induction of CD69
expression in these cells (Figs. 3 and 5). Interestingly, Vav has been
shown to play a relevant role in both ERK activation and CD69
up-regulation by acting upstream of Ras, through a Rac-1-independent
pathway (26, 27).
The intermediates and the mechanisms relating Vav and Ras are presently
unknown. However, in light of our results, one putative intermediate
would be SLP-76, provided that it could perform a ZAP-70-dependent, but LAT-independent, function not
previously reported. An alternative intermediate is PKC . Upon TCR
engagement, this protein is activated by a
phospho-Vav-dependent mechanism and induces CD69
up-regulation (37). In this regard, our cell fractionation experiments
(Fig. 6) show that in TCR-stimulated mutant cells, PKC remains
located in the membrane for a longer period than in stimulated wild
type cells, indicating that PKC contributes to the enhanced
activation of the Ras/ERK pathway and to the high up-regulation of CD69
in mutant cells.
Therefore, according to our data, it is tempting to speculate about two
putative roles of Vav. Its recruitment to LAT-including complexes would
be closely related to its role as a guanosine nucleotide exchange
factor for Rho family GTPases and, consequently, to the JNK and
p38MAPK activation (23, 24). This would explain the low
level of activation of these kinases in mutant cells where Vav is
poorly recruited to LAT. This role of Vav could be consistent with the previously described Rac-1-independent modulating effect of Vav on the
Ras/Raf/ERK signaling pathway and on CD69 up-regulation (26). The
latter function could be mediated by an inducible interaction with
SLP-76 not necessarily in association with LAT. How the Vav-SLP-76
complex elicits Ras-ERK activation and how the two putative roles of
Vav are balanced to contribute to a physiological response in normal
cells are unknown.
In mutant cells, despite the fact that the induced association between
ZAP-70 and is very poor, ZAP-70 is inducibly
tyrosine-phosphorylated at levels similar to those in wild type cells.
Moreover, this protein shows comparable kinase activity in both cell
types upon TCR activation. In addition, in TCR-activated mutant cells,
ZAP-70 is incompletely concentrated near the plasma membrane, where the ZAP-70/ association is impaired (30). Thus, it can be hypothesized that subsequent defects following TCR triggering in mutant cells might
be accounted for by the partial mislocation of this kinase. Further,
TCR stimulation of mutant cells could resemble the interaction of
altered ligands with normal TCRs. In this regard, it has been suggested
that an altered signaling may derive from the different orientations
adopted by membrane-associated ZAP-70 because this kinase somehow
senses the nature of the TCR-ligand interaction and assumes a
configuration that is differentially effective on its substrates (49).
Alternatively, the phosphorylation of ZAP-70 could not be critical for
Fas-L induction.
All of our studies have been performed without overexpressing
constitutively active or dominant negative signaling proteins. Because
the cause/effect relationships of these modified proteins is commonly
examined many hours following their introduction, whereas most
signaling molecules are normally only active for minutes, compensation
and indirect effects are sometimes impossible to distinguish from
direct effects. Therefore, in the absence of these studies, our results
more than tentatively provide evidence that the serial biochemical
alterations observed in mutant clones is responsible for the specific
TCR-mediated apoptosis-defective phenotype of these cells. Two facts
support this notion: 1) TCR-mediated apoptosis is the only activation
outcome that is defective in mutant cells and 2) we have not observed
significant differences between mutant clones derived from independent
transfections in both functional and biochemical assays. Furthermore,
our data would suggest that TCR transmembrane region imparts a
specific signaling function to T cells and/or serves to assure a proper balance in the activation of the various MAPK involved in TCR signaling. Indeed, a function where this balance is more strongly regulated is the TCR-mediated cell death (activation-induced
cell death). In this regard, several studies have reported
relationships between ERK, JNK, and p38MAPK activities and
the up-regulation of Fas-L and apoptosis (20, 22, 50).
Elucidating whether the functional and biochemical events we described
here are relevant in the context of a physiological TCR is a hard task.
In the absence of similar biological and biochemical studies, the more
comparable situation is that provided by the stimulation of normal TCR
with altered peptide ligands. Indeed, in both cases it is possible to
activate some, but not all, functional features of the response
elicited on wild type cells with cognate ligands. Although is not clear
why a consistent pattern of early signaling is not elicited by ligands
capable of inducing similar functional responses (9, 13), the
functional evidence that a TCR can interpret subtle changes in its
ligand unequivocally highlights the exquisite sensitivity that the
TCR-CD3 complex has in its recognition unit. In this sense, our results
and previous works addressing the role of the TCR itself in controlling
signaling efficiency (2-8, 29, 30) provide complementary evidence that the different domains of the TCR constitutes a support to differential signaling, at least from the point of view of its structural integrity.
Despite the functional similarities, two major biochemical differences
distinguish the mutant cells from the altered peptide ligand system.
First, stimulation with altered peptide ligands usually results in the
absence of phosphorylation of the lower mobility phospho- isoform, a
fact that is not observed in stimulated mutant cells (30). It has been
reported the ability of chain to promote apoptosis (51); however,
the comparison between the similar phosphorylation of the two
phospho- isoforms in stimulated mutant cells (30) with the partial
phosphorylation in T cells selectively induced to apoptosis (13) would
indicate that functional ITAMs could be dispensable for
antigen-mediated up-regulation of Fas-L and apoptosis. Indeed, it has
been suggested that apoptosis does not depend on co-operative
interaction between CD3- and CD3-  modules, being the last
one sufficient for qualitatively normal signaling (52, 53). Further
support for this notion is the fact that although blocking of CD8
substantially reduces phosphorylation of the CTL TCR chain, CTLs are
still fully competent to up-regulate Fas-L and undergo
activation-induced cell death (15). Second, and similarly, the
normal phosphorylation of ZAP-70 in stimulated mutant cells and the
absence of such event in T cells selectively induced to apoptosis with
a partial agonist ligand (9) would also suggest that the
phosphorylation of the kinase is not critical in the apparent
specificity engaged in TCR-stimulated cells to prevent or induce Fas-L
induction and apoptosis.
If the early phosphorylation of both chains and ZAP-70 does not
explain differential signaling, what other events are responsible for
such kind of cell activation? Although the possibility of engagement of
specific signaling pathways could exist, our results and those obtained
with partial agonist could also be interpreted in the light of a new
kinetic model of TCR signaling (54). By using partial agonists with
similar occupancy to agonist ligands, it has been shown that all T cell
responses can be triggered by a cumulative signal that is reached at
different time points for different TCR ligands, even in the absence of
full phosphorylation of early intermediates. In fact, TCR-stimulated
mutant cells show significant apoptosis but at a much more delayed time
than do wild type cells (54). In this regard, the transmembrane region could help the overall TCR to sense the ligand affinity.
Notwithstanding, a question remains on how to conceal the fact that an
inefficient signal emanating from the mutant TCR simultaneously results
in an inefficient activity of some signaling intermediates, such as JNK
and p38 activities, but in overactivation of others such as ERK. We do
not know whether the functional phenotype and signaling events
displayed by the agonist stimulation of mutant cells could be triggered
in normal cells by stimulating with partial agonists. By assuming the
existence of such ligands, our results would support a model of
dissociated activation, such as previously described (19, 55), in which
activation of Ras/ERK cascade could occur through the
phospho-LAT-independent pathway we describe here, emphasizing the
importance of ZAP-70 recruitment in determining the location of
specific signaling complexes. In this case, the alternative pathway for
ERK activation would be also triggered upon agonist TCR stimulation as
a transient mechanism to control the risky decision to cell death
commitment. However, it would not be detectable because the full signal
provided by the agonist would interfere with that mechanism to induce
the balanced MAPK activation related to a full spectrum of T cell
effector functions.
The role played by altered peptide ligands has been enigmatic.
Recently, it has been shown that these analogues could take part in
mature T cell apoptosis as a mechanism of tolerance to self-peptides
in vivo (56). Our data, however, preclude any conclusion
regarding the putative role in vivo of T cells displaying a
mutant cell-like phenotype induced by a self-peptide. Whether this
phenotype mimics the "competence to die" signal delivered by some
partial agonist self-peptides to promote the specific and benign
deletion by apoptosis of the responding cells (56) deserves further investigation.
The present study was carried out in a Jurkat cell model,
and therefore we cannot draw definite conclusions on how the TCR mutation could affect thymic selection. Furthermore, it remains unclear
whether the signals mediated by the TCR during the selection of
thymocytes and the activation of mature T cells are quantitatively or
qualitatively different. This notwithstanding and in light of recent
studies that report the direct contribution of the chain connecting
peptide domain (4, 5) and the conserved CD3 chain (57) in selective
coupling the TCR to activation of the ERK signaling pathway, our
results support the notion that different constant/conserved structural
domains of the TCR complex might contribute to the fine balance of MAPK
activation involved in thymic selection.
In conclusion, the results herein describe the signaling pathways
affected by a mutation in the transmembrane domain of TCR . The data
demonstrate how the mutation promotes an unbalanced phosphorylation of
different adapters that leads to an unbalanced activations of the
different MAPKs. Further, the data provide biochemical evidence to
explain the ability for differential signaling of the mutant TCR to
support some T cell responses but to impair the induction to apoptosis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. X. Bustelo for critically
reading the manuscript, Drs. M. Villalba and A. Altman for technical
support and discussion, and Drs. G. Koretzky and S. Ley for providing reagents.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Comisión
Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología and the Fondo de
Investigaciones Sanitarias Grants PM98/0063 and 01/0272 (to R. B.), and by the Fundación Rodriguez Pascual.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Fellow of the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax:
34-915448246; E-mail: rbragado@fjd.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 27, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107797200
2
E. Teixeiro and R. Bragado, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TCR, T cell
receptor;
IL, interleukin;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
RBD, Ras-binding domain;
PKC, protein kinase
C;
PLC, phospholipase C;
ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation
motif.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Germain, R. N.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
35223-35226[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Backstrom, B. T.,
Rubin, B.,
Peter, A.,
Tiefenthaler, G.,
and Palmer, E.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
1433-1441[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Backstrom, B. T.,
Milia, E.,
Peter, A.,
Jaureguiberry, B.,
Baldari, C. T.,
and Palmer, E.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
437-447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Backstrom, B. T.,
Muller, U.,
Hausmann, B.,
and Palmer, E.
(1998)
Science
281,
835-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Werlen, G.,
Hausmann, B.,
and Palmer, E.
(2000)
Nature
406,
422-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Backstrom, B. T.,
Hausmann, B. T.,
and Palmer, E.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1933-1938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Fuller-Espie, S.,
Hoffman, T. P.,
Wiest, D. L.,
Tietjen, I.,
and Spain, L. M.
(1998)
Int. Immunol.
10,
923-933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Kunjibettu, S.,
Fuller-Espie, S.,
Carey, G. B.,
and Spain, L. M.
(2001)
Int. Immunol.
13,
211-222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Sloan-Lancaster, J.,
and Allen, P. M.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
1-27[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Brossart, P.,
and Bevan, M. J.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
2449-2458[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Cao, W.,
and Braciale, T. J.
(1996)
J. Mol. Med.
74,
573-582[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Sloan-Lancaster, J.,
Evavold, B. D.,
and Allen, P. M.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
1195-1205[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Combadiere, B.,
Sousa, C. R.,
Germain, R. N.,
and Lenardo, M. J.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
349-355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Wei, C. H.,
Beeson, C.,
Masucci, M. G.,
and Levitsky, V.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
2601-2609[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Xu, X. N.,
Purbhoo, M. A.,
Chen, N.,
Mongkolsapaya, J.,
Cox, J. H.,
Meier, U. C.,
Tafuro, S.,
Dunbar, P. R.,
Sewell, A. K.,
Hourigan, C. S.,
Appay, V.,
Cerundolo, V.,
Burrows, S. R.,
McMichael, A. J.,
and Screaton, G. R.
(2001)
Immunity.
14,
591-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Chau, L. A.,
Bluestone, J. A.,
and Madrenas, J.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1699-1709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Madrenas, J.,
Wange, R. L.,
Wang, J. L.,
Isakov, N.,
Samelson, L. E.,
and Germain, R. N.
(1995)
Science
267,
515-518[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Finco, T. S.,
Kadlecek, T.,
Zhang, W.,
Samelson, L. E.,
and Weiss, A.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
617-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Chau, L. A.,
and Madrenas, J.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
1853-1858[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Xia, Z.,
Dickens, M.,
Raingeaud, J.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Science
270,
1326-1331[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Penninger, J. M.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1999)
Cell
96,
9-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Zhang, J.,
Gao, J. X.,
Salojin, K.,
Shao, Q.,
Grattan, M.,
Meagher, C.,
Laird, D. W.,
and Delovitch, T. L.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
1017-1030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Salojin, K. V.,
Zhang, J.,
and Delovitch, T. L.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
844-853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Kaminuma, O.,
Deckert, M.,
Elly, C.,
Liu, Y. C.,
and Altman, A.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
3126-3136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Salojin, K. V.,
Zhang, J.,
Meagher, C.,
and Delovitch, T. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5966-5975[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Villalba, M.,
Hernandez, J.,
Deckert, M.,
Tanaka, Y.,
and Altman, A.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
1587-1596[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Monthouel, M. N.,
Charvet, C.,
Foucault, I.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
Bernard, A.,
Altman, A.,
and Deckert, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
20849-20857[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Fischer, K. D.,
Kong, Y. Y.,
Nishina, H.,
Tedford, K.,
Marengere, L. E.,
Kozieradzki, I.,
Sasaki, T.,
Starr, M.,
Chan, G.,
Gardener, S.,
Nghiem, M. P.,
Bouchard, D.,
Barbacid, M.,
Bernstein, A.,
and Penninger, J. M.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
554-562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Rodriguez-Tarduchy, G.,
Sahuquillo, A. G.,
Alarcon, B.,
and Bragado, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30417-30425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Sahuquillo, A. G.,
Roumier, A.,
Teixeiro, E.,
Bragado, R.,
and Alarcon, B.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1179-1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Teixeiro, E.,
Garcia-Sahuquillo, A.,
Alarcon, B.,
and Bragado, R.
(1999)
Eur. J. Immunol.
29,
745-754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Hibi, M.,
Lin, A.,
Smeal, T.,
Minden, A.,
and Karin, M.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2135-2148[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Zhang, W.,
Sloan-Lancaster, J.,
Kitchen, J.,
Trible, R. P.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(1998)
Cell
92,
83-92[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Schaeffer, H. J.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2435-2444[Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Costello, P. S.,
Walters, A. E.,
Mee, P. J.,
Turner, M.,
Reynolds, L. F.,
Prisco, A.,
Sarner, N.,
Zamoyska, R.,
and Tybulewicz, V. L.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3035-3040[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Yablonski, D.,
Kuhne, M. R.,
Kadlecek, T.,
and Weiss, A.
(1998)
Science
281,
413-416[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Villalba, M.,
Coudronniere, N.,
Deckert, M.,
Teixeiro, E.,
Mas, P.,
and Altman, A.
(2000)
Immunity
12,
151-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Meller, N.,
Altman, A.,
and Isakov, N.
(1998)
Stem Cells
16,
178-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Monks, C. R.,
Kupfer, H.,
Tamir, I.,
Barlow, A.,
and Kupfer, A.
(1997)
Nature
385,
83-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
D'Ambrosio, D.,
Cantrell, D. A.,
Frati, L.,
Santoni, A.,
and Testi, R.
(1994)
Eur. J. Immunol.
24,
616-620[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Taylor-Fishwick, D. A.,
and Siegel, J. N.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
25,
3215-3221[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Zhang, W.,
Irvin, B. J.,
Trible, R. P.,
Abraham, R. T.,
and Samelson, L. E.
(1999)
Int. Immunol.
11,
943-950[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Martelli, M. P.,
Lin, H.,
Zhang, W.,
Samelson, L. E.,
and Bierer, B. E.
(2000)
Blood
96,
2181-2190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Puente, L. G.,
Stone, J. C.,
and Ostergaard, H. L.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
6865-6871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Boerth, N. J.,
Sadler, J. J.,
Bauer, D. E.,
Clements, J. L.,
Gheith, S. M.,
and Koretzky, G. A.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
1047-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Griffith, C. E.,
Zhang, W.,
and Wange, R. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10771-10776[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Williams, B. L.,
Irvin, B. J.,
Sutor, S. L.,
Chini, C. C.,
Yacyshyn, E.,
Bubeck, W. J.,
Dalton, M.,
Chan, A. C.,
and Abraham, R. T.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1832-1844[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Bos, J. L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6776-6782[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Graef, I. A.,
Holsinger, L. J.,
Diver, S.,
Schreiber, S. L.,
and Crabtree, G. R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5618-5628[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
van den Brink, M. R.,
Kapeller, R.,
Pratt, J. C.,
Chang, J. H.,
and Burakoff, S. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11178-11185[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Combadiere, B.,
Freedman, M.,
Chen, L.,
Shores, E. W.,
Love, P.,
and Lenardo, M. J.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
2109-2117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Ardouin, L.,
Boyer, C.,
Gillet, A.,
Trucy, J.,
Bernard, A. M.,
Nunes, J.,
Delon, J.,
Trautmann, A., He, H. T.,
Malissen, B.,
and Malissen, M.
(1999)
Immunity
10,
409-420[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
She, J.,
Matsui, K.,
Terhorst, C.,
and Ju, S. T.
(1998)
Int. Immunol.
10,
1733-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Rosette, C.,
Werlen, G.,
Daniels, M. A.,
Holman, P. O.,
Alam, S. M.,
Travers, P. J.,
Gascoigne, N. R.,
Palmer, E.,
and Jameson, S. C.
(2001)
Immunity
15,
59-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Chau, L. A.,
Tso, J. Y.,
and Madrenas, J.
(2001)
Transplant. Proc.
33,
528-529[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Combadiere, B.,
Sousa, C.,
Trageser, C.,
Zheng, L. X.,
Kim, C. R.,
and Lenardo, M. J.
(1998)
Immunity
9,
305-313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Delgado, P.,
Fernandez, E.,
Dave, V.,
Kappes, D.,
and Alarcon, B.
(2000)
Nature
406,
426-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Roth, C. Nasarre, S. Dirrig-Grosch, D. Aunis, G. Cremel, P. Hubert, and D. Bagnard
Transmembrane Domain Interactions Control Biological Functions of Neuropilin-1
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2008;
19(2):
646 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Chen, A. Coffey, S. G. Bourgoin, and M. Gadina
Cytohesin Binder and Regulator Augments T Cell Receptor-induced Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells{middle dot}AP-1 Activation through Regulation of the JNK Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 21, 2006;
281(29):
19985 - 19994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Alonso, M. C. Rodriguez, J. Pindado, E. Merino, I. Merida, and M. Izquierdo
Diacylglycerol Kinase {alpha} Regulates the Secretion of Lethal Exosomes Bearing Fas Ligand during Activation-induced Cell Death of T Lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 5, 2005;
280(31):
28439 - 28450.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Petersen, S. Gulland, E. Bettelli, V. Kuchroo, E. Palmer, and B. T. Backstrom
A chimeric T cell receptor with super-signaling properties
Int. Immunol.,
July 1, 2004;
16(7):
889 - 894.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|