JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110651200 on November 29, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 6, 4056-4061, February 8, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An addition or correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/6/4056    most recent
M110651200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roje, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roje, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, A. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Metabolic Engineering in Yeast Demonstrates That S-Adenosylmethionine Controls Flux through the Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Reaction in Vivo*

Sanja RojeDagger§, Sherwin Y. ChanDagger, Fatma Kaplan§, Rhonda K. Raymond||, Donald W. Horne**, Dean R. Appling, and Andrew D. Hanson§DaggerDagger

From the § Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611,  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, and ** Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212

Received for publication, November 6, 2001, and in revised form, November 21, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

One-carbon flux into methionine and S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) is thought to be controlled at the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) step. Mammalian MTHFRs are inhibited by AdoMet in vitro, and it has been proposed that methyl group biogenesis is regulated in vivo by this feedback loop. In this work, we used metabolic engineering in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to test this hypothesis. Like mammalian MTHFRs, the yeast MTHFR encoded by the MET13 gene is NADPH-dependent and is inhibited by AdoMet in vitro. This contrasts with plant MTHFRs, which are NADH-dependent and AdoMet-insensitive. To manipulate flux through the MTHFR reaction in yeast, the chromosomal copy of MET13 was replaced by an Arabidopsis MTHFR cDNA (AtMTHFR-1) or by a chimeric sequence (Chimera-1) comprising the yeast N-terminal domain and the AtMTHFR-1 C-terminal domain. Chimera-1 used both NADH and NADPH and was insensitive to AdoMet, supporting the view that the C-terminal domain is responsible for AdoMet inhibition. Engineered yeast expressing Chimera-1 accumulated 140-fold more AdoMet and 7-fold more methionine than did the wild-type and grew normally. Yeast expressing AtMTHFR-1 accumulated 8-fold more AdoMet. This is the first in vivo evidence that the AdoMet sensitivity and pyridine nucleotide preference of MTHFR control methylneogenesis. 13C labeling data indicated that glycine cleavage becomes a more prominent source of one-carbon units when Chimera-1 is expressed. Possibly related to this shift in one-carbon fluxes, total folate levels are doubled in yeast cells expressing Chimera-1.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR)1 catalyzes the reduction of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2-THF) to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (CH3-THF), which serves as a methyl donor for the synthesis of methionine. Methionine gives rise to S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet), which is used for numerous methylation reactions. Because the MTHFR reaction commits the methyl group carried by THF to methyl group biogenesis, the regulation of MTHFR is crucial for one-carbon (C1) metabolism in all organisms (1, 2). The MTHFR reaction in mammalian liver is NADPH-dependent and is consequently physiologically irreversible due to the high cytosolic NADPH/NADP ratio and the large standard free energy change for the reduction of CH2-THF (3-5). This reaction therefore has the potential to deplete the cytosolic CH2-THF pool (1, 2). Mammalian MTHFRs have been shown to be inhibited by AdoMet (6, 7), and this sensitivity is considered to be a key regulatory feature that prevents CH2-THF depletion (1, 2, 6). However, there is no direct evidence for the existence of this regulation in vivo.

Plant MTHFRs are NADH-dependent and are thought to be cytosolic. Due to the high cytosolic NAD/NADH ratio (8), the MTHFR reaction in planta is likely to be reversible, obviating a need for regulation by AdoMet (9). Consistent with this, plant MTHFRs are AdoMet-insensitive (9). Both Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe have two divergent copies of the MTHFR gene. The MTHFR genes of S. cerevisiae (MET12 and MET13) have been cloned and shown to encode functional enzymes (10), but neither their pyridine nucleotide requirement nor their AdoMet sensitivity has been investigated. Strains in which MET13 is disrupted require methionine for growth. However, met12 disruptants have no methionine requirement, and overexpressing Met12p does not eliminate the methionine requirement of met13 disruptants. These data indicate that the Met13p isozyme provides most of the MTHFR activity in yeast cells (10).

All known eukaryotic MTHFRs comprise an N-terminal domain that contains the catalytic site and a C-terminal domain that is implicated in the regulation of enzymatic activity (11-13). The C-terminal domain of mammalian MTHFRs contains the AdoMet-binding site and is therefore considered responsible for the enzyme's sensitivity to this effector (11-14). The function of the C-terminal domain of plant MTHFRs, which are insensitive to AdoMet, is unknown (9). The NADH-dependent, AdoMet-insensitive MTHFR of Escherichia coli (MetF) lacks the C-terminal domain (15-17).

In this study, we first showed that S. cerevisiae Met13p is NADPH-dependent and inhibited by AdoMet, like mammalian MTHFRs. We then constructed a chimeric yeast-plant MTHFR (Chimera-1) and characterized its pyridine nucleotide dependence and AdoMet sensitivity. Finally, we used metabolically engineered yeast strains expressing AdoMet-insensitive MTHFRs (AtMTHFR-1 or Chimera-1) to establish the importance of the AdoMet feedback loop in vivo.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Chemicals and Reagents-- [14C]Formaldehyde (53 mCi/mmol) was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences PerkinElmer Life Sciences, and (6R,6S)-[methyl-14C]CH3-THF (56 mCi/mmol) was obtained from Amersham Biosciences, Inc.; specific radioactivities were adjusted to the desired values with unlabeled compound. THF and (6R,6S)-CH3-THF were obtained from Schircks Laboratories (Jona, Switzerland). [13C]Formic acid (99% 13C) was from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (recombinant Leuconostoc mesenteroides enzyme) and all other biochemicals were from Sigma. Glass beads were acid-etched.

CHIMERA-1 DNA Construction and Overexpression in Yeast-- CHIMERA-1 was constructed using gene splicing by overlap extension (18). DNA fragments were amplified by high-fidelity PCR using recombinant Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The Met13p N-terminal domain (residues 1-333) was amplified from the MET13-pVT101-U plasmid using primers 5'-CATGAAGATCACAGAAAAATTAGAGC-3' (forward) and 5'-GGTTTGCCCAGAAGATAGGTCTGACTTCC-3' (reverse). The AtMTHFR-1 C-terminal domain (residues 327-592) was amplified from the AtMTHFR1-pVT103-U plasmid using primers 5'-CCTATCTTCTGGGCAAACCGTCCAAAGAGC-3' (forward) and 5'-TGCACTGCAGTCAAGCAAAGACAGAGAAG-3' (reverse). The two amplified fragments were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and joined by PCR using MET13 forward and AtMTHFR-1 reverse primers to generate the CHIMERA-1 DNA. The CHIMERA-1 DNA was inserted into yeast expression vector pVT103-U. The resulting construct was introduced by electroporation into E. coli DH10B cells. After verification by sequencing, the construct was introduced as described previously (10) into yeast strain RRY3 (Delta met12 Delta met13) for enzyme studies and into strain SCY1 (MET12 Delta met13) for complementation.

Yeast Strains, Plasmids, and Growth Conditions-- Synthetic minimal medium (YMD medium) contained 0.7% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (DIFCO Bacto®), 2% glucose, and the following supplements when indicated: L-serine (375 mg/liter), L-leucine (30 mg/liter), L-histidine (20 mg/liter), L-tryptophan (20 mg/liter), uracil (20 mg/liter), glycine (20 mg/liter), formate (250 mg/liter), and L-methionine (20 mg/liter). Cultures were grown at 30 °C in a rotary shaker at 250 rpm. Pre-sporulation medium contained 0.8% Bacto-yeast extract, 0.3% Bacto-peptone, 10% glucose, and 2% Bacto-agar. Minimal sporulation medium contained 1% potassium acetate and 2% Bacto-agar. The S. cerevisiae strains used were DAY4 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4), RRY1 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4 Delta met13), and RRY3 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4 Delta met12 Delta met13) (9). The plasmids were pVT101-U and pVT103-U (19), pVT101-U containing the yeast MET13 gene (10), and pVT103-U containing a cDNA encoding MTHFR from the plant Arabidopsis thaliana (AtMTHFR-1) (9). The CHIMERA-1-pVT103-U plasmid was used as template to construct strain RRY5 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4 Delta met12 Delta met13::CHIMERA-1) by gene replacement. The CHIMERA-1 open reading frame was amplified with primers 5'-CAACAGGTTCATGCCACTGG-3' and 5'-ACAATGGAAAAGGAAGGAGCAAAATCTGGTAAAAATTCTCGGAGATCAAGCA-3'. The 1.4-kbp CHIMERA-1 fragment was gel-purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and used to transform the methionine-requiring strain RRY3. Transformants were selected by methionine prototrophy indicating successful integration of the CHIMERA-1 fragment. Correct integration at the disrupted met13 locus was confirmed by PCR. SCY1 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4 Delta met13) and SCY4 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4 Delta met13::CHIMERA-1) were constructed by crossing RRY1 and RRY5. The resulting diploids were sporulated by incubation on pre-sporulation medium at 30 °C for 2 days, followed by transfer to minimal sporulation medium supplemented with serine, uracil, tryptophan, leucine, and histidine and incubation for 5-7 days at 25 °C. Tetrads were dissected as described previously (10). SCY6 (ser1 ura3-52 trp1 leu2 his4 Delta met13::AtMTHFR-1) was constructed by gene replacement. The AtMTHFR-1 open reading frame was amplified with primers 5'-AACAGAACCACCACAGTTACTACTACAACCACATCGCAATATGAAGGTGGTTGATAAGAT-3' and 5'-TGACAATTCTGTTAAAGAACTGTTATCGTTGTCTGTGTTATCAAGCAAAGACAGAGAAGA-3'. The amplified 1.9-kbp DNA fragment was used to transform the methionine-requiring strain RRY1; transformants were selected by methionine prototrophy and confirmed by PCR as described above.

Enzyme Isolation and Assays for MTHFR Activity-- Yeast cells were grown, washed, and extracted as described previously (9). Desalted, concentrated extracts were also prepared as described previously (9). MTHFR activity was assayed in the reductive direction using the NAD(P)H-CH2-THF oxidoreductase radioassay described previously (9). The assay buffer was 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.2. Unless otherwise noted, substrates were saturating, and product formation was proportional to enzyme concentration and time.

Determination of AdoMet and Methionine-- Yeast cells were grown in YMD medium supplemented with glycine, formate, leucine, histidine, tryptophan, and uracil. Cells were harvested in mid-log growth and washed with water. To measure AdoMet, the cell pellet (300 mg wet weight) was resuspended in 500 µl of water and lysed by vortexing with glass beads for 5 × 30 s. Protein from clarified lysates was precipitated with ethanol (final concentration, 70%) at -20 °C for 15 min and removed by centrifugation (13,000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was evaporated to dryness in vacuo, dissolved in water, and analyzed by isocratic HPLC (20) using a Waters Spherisorb ODS2 column (4.6 × 250 mm) with a Beckman Coulter System Gold 126 Solvent Module and 168 Detector and a Rheodyne 7725i Injector. The mobile phase was 50 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM 1-heptanesulfonic acid, and 20% methanol, pH 4.4; column temperature was 22 °C, flow rate was 0.8 ml min-1, and run time was 30 min. To determine methionine, 200-mg samples of wet cells were suspended in 180 µl of water and heated at 100 °C for 5 min. After cooling on ice, cells were extracted essentially as described above, except that protein was precipitated with 5-sulfosalicylic acid (final concentration, 3.5%). The deproteinized samples were submitted to Biosynthesis Inc. (Lewisville, TX) for amino acid analysis using a Beckman 7300 analyzer.

Preparation of Extracts for NMR Analysis-- Yeast cells were grown in 500-ml cultures supplemented with [13C]formate (250 mg/liter) and unlabeled glycine, harvested at an A600 of 3-5, and washed with water. Extracts were prepared by resuspending the cell pellet from the whole culture in 500 µl of water and lysing with glass beads by continuous vortexing at 4 °C for 20-30 min. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation, and proteins were precipitated with ethanol as described above. The deproteinized supernatant was dried in vacuo and redissolved in 1 ml of D2O.

NMR Analysis-- NMR spectra were obtained on a Varian Unity-Inova Spectrometer with a 1H frequency of 500 MHz and a 13C frequency of 125 MHz. 13C data were collected with an acquisition time of 1.3 s with a 3-s delay and 90° pulse angle. Two-level composite pulse was used for proton decoupling with a power level of 48 dB during acquisition and 40 dB during delay. A total of 200-2000 scans of 64,000 data points were acquired over a sweep width of 25 kHz. Data processing included exponential line broadening of 1 Hz. [methyl-13C]AdoMet was quantified by comparing NMR peak heights with a standard sample of known concentration.

Folate Determination-- Yeast strains were grown, harvested, and washed as described for AdoMet and methionine determination. Pelleted cells were suspended in twice their wet weight of extraction buffer (50 mM HEPES, 50 mM 2-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic acid, 0.2 M 2-mercaptoethanol, and 2% (w/v) sodium ascorbate, pH 7.9). Glass beads were added at 1.5 times the wet weight of the pellet. The samples were heated at 100 °C for 10 min and lysed by vortexing for 4 min. After centrifugation (20,000 × g, 30 min), supernatants were decanted, their volumes were measured, and they were stored at -70 °C until analysis. Folate species were separated by HPLC and quantified using the Lactobacillus casei microbiological assay (21, 22).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

NADPH Dependence and AdoMet Sensitivity of Yeast MTHFR Met13p-- Recombinant Met13p was overexpressed in RRY3, a met12 met13 double disruptant that totally lacks MTHFR activity and is a methionine auxotroph (10). The pyridine nucleotide preference and AdoMet sensitivity of recombinant Met13p were tested by measuring enzyme activity radiometrically in the forward (reductive) direction in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2 (9). Met13p was found to be strictly NADPH-dependent and to be inhibited by AdoMet (Fig. 1A). Activity with NADH as reductant was below the detection limit of the assay (<2% of activity with NADPH).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Pyridine nucleotide preferences and S-adenosylmethionine sensitivities of recombinant MTHFRs. Desalted crude extracts of RRY3 (Delta met12 Delta met13) yeast cells expressing Met13p (A), Chimera-1 (B), or AtMTHFR-1 (C) were assayed for NAD(P)H-CH2-THF oxidoreductase activity using NADH or NADPH (200 µM) as reductant, plus or minus 1 mM AdoMet; CH2-THF concentration was 0.5 mM. Extracts were preincubated for 15 min at 24 °C with buffer or AdoMet before the assays. Data are means ± S.E. (n >=  3).

Construction of a Chimeric Yeast-Plant MTHFR-- A chimeric MTHFR (Chimera-1) was constructed by fusing the N-terminal (catalytic) domain of Met13p to the C-terminal domain of a plant MTHFR (AtMTHFR-1 from Arabidopsis thaliana; Ref. 9). The domains were spliced together by overlap extension PCR (18) within a short, conserved amino acid sequence (VRPIFW) that is immediately downstream of a region identified as the interdomain bridge in mammalian MTHFRs (12). Fig. 2A shows the domain structure of the chimeric enzyme and its parents schematically; Fig. 2B shows the sequence of the Chimera-1 polypeptide.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The primary structure of Chimera-1 and its parent enzymes. A, schematic representations of Chimera-1 and its parents, Met13p (black) and AtMTHFR-1 (white). The pyridine nucleotide specificity of each enzyme is indicated. Chimera-1 comprises the N-terminal domain of Met13p and the C-terminal domain of AtMTHFR-1. The gray bar marks the hydrophilic bridge region between the domains, and the white triangle shows the position of the AdoMet-binding site identified by photoaffinity labeling of mammalian MTHFR (11, 13). B, amino acid sequence of Chimera-1. The sequence from Met13p is in black, and the sequence from AtMTHFR-1 is in gray.

Complementation of a Yeast Delta met13 Mutant by CHIMERA-1-- The CHIMERA-1 DNA was cloned into the yeast expression vector pVT103-U and introduced into strain SCY1 (MET12 Delta met13). A MET12+ strain was used to avoid any possible growth effects of a met12 mutation. The transformation yielded methionine-independent colonies whose growth was comparable with that of the wild-type strain DAY4, or SCY1 transformed with MET13-pVT101-U (Fig. 3). No complementation was observed with the vector alone, and retransformation of SCY1 with rescued plasmid containing CHIMERA-1 restored methionine prototrophy, confirming that the complementation is due to the plasmid-encoded chimeric enzyme (data not shown). Arabidopsis MTHFR (AtMTHFR-1), expressed from pVT103-U, was previously shown to complement the methionine requirement of a yeast met13 mutation (9).


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Functional complementation of yeast MTHFR mutants by Chimera-1. Similar numbers of cells of DAY4 (wild-type) (1), SCY1 (MET12 Delta met13) (2), or SCY1 transformed with pVT101-U containing MET13 (3) or pVT103-U containing CHIMERA-1 (4) were plated on synthetic minimal medium plus or minus methionine. Strain SCY4, whose chromosomal copy of MET13 is replaced by CHIMERA-1, is shown (5).

Pyridine Nucleotide Preference and AdoMet Insensitivity of Chimera-1-- Recombinant Chimera-1 overexpressed in yeast strain RRY3 was tested for pyridine nucleotide preference and AdoMet sensitivity as described above for Met13p. Chimera-1 was found to use both NADH and NADPH (Fig. 1B), which was unexpected because its yeast and plant parents use either one or the other (Fig. 1, A and C). However, as anticipated, Chimera-1 was totally insensitive to AdoMet (Fig. 1B), like the plant enzyme that contributes its C-terminal region (Fig. 1C).

Kinetic Properties of Met13p, AtMTHFR-1, and Chimera-1-- Velocity versus [S] plots for both Met13p and AtMTHFR-1 showed substrate inhibition by CH2-THF that was especially marked in the case of Met13p (Fig. 4). The Km and Ki values of these two enzymes for CH2-THF were accordingly calculated as described by Cleland (23). Chimera-1 showed no inhibition by CH2-THF within the range tested (Fig. 4). Its Km values for CH2-THF were therefore estimated from Hanes plots; these values were similar whether NADH or NADPH was the reductant and fell midway between those of the parent enzymes (Table I). Because the activities of Met13p and AtMTHFR-1 were inhibited by CH2-THF, apparent Km values of these enzymes for NADPH and NADH were compared with those of Chimera-1 using a nonsaturating CH2-THF concentration of 50 µM (Table I). The apparent Km values of Chimera-1 for both NADPH and NADH were closer to that of AtMTHFR than to that of Met13p.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Dependence of recombinant MTHFR activity on CH2-THF concentration. Desalted extracts of RRY3 (Delta met12 Delta met13) yeast cells expressing Met13p, AtMTHFR-1, or Chimera-1 were assayed for NAD(P)H-CH2-THF oxidoreductase activity using an NADH or NADPH concentration of 100 µM and CH2-THF concentrations of 10-1500 µM. Enzyme activities are expressed as a percentage of the maximum activity obtained for each. Maximum activities (in nmol min-1 mg-1 protein) were as follows: Met13p, 12.1; AtMTHFR-1, 27.9; and Chimera-1, 92.2. Only the values obtained with NADPH as reductant are shown for Chimera-1; values with NADH were very similar. All data shown are means of duplicate observations; S.E. bars were smaller than the data points.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Apparent Km and Ki values of MTHFRs for NADPH, NADH, and CH2-THF
MTHFR activity was assayed in desalted extracts of yeast cells. Apparent Km values for CH2-THF were estimated using 100 µM NADPH or NADH and 25-1500 µM (6R,6S)-CH2-THF; values for NAD(P)H were estimated using 50 µM (6R,6S)-CH2-THF and 2.5-20 µM NAD(P)H. The Km and Ki values of Met13p and AtMTHFR-1 for CH2-THF were calculated graphically as described by Cleland (23); other values were obtained from Hanes plots.

Construction of Yeast Strains with a Chromosomal Copy of CHIMERA-1 or AtMTHFR-1-- To study how AdoMet sensitivity and pyridine nucleotide specificity impact the function of MTHFR in vivo, we engineered strains in which the coding sequence of AtMTHFR-1 or Chimera-1 replaced that of the chromosomal MET13 gene. The introduced sequences were thus present as single chromosomal copies under the control of the native promoter, ensuring an expression level comparable to that of MET13. Replacement of the MET13 open reading frame with Chimera-1 and AtMTHFR-1 gave strains SCY4 and SCY6, respectively. The growth rates of these strains in YMD medium supplemented with serine, histidine, leucine, tryptophan, and uracil were similar to that of the wild-type (doubling times, 2.5 ± 0.2 h). Thus, both the chimeric enzyme and the plant enzyme complemented the methionine requirement when expressed from the chromosomal MET13 promoter.

Levels of AdoMet and Methionine in DAY4, SCY4, and SCY6 Yeast Strains-- AdoMet and free methionine were determined by HPLC. In the experiment shown in Fig. 5, strain SCY6 expressing the AdoMet-insensitive, NADH-dependent AtMTHFR-1 accumulated 8-fold more AdoMet than the DAY4 strain expressing the native Met13p enzyme. Strain SCY4 expressing the AdoMet-insensitive, NADH- or NADPH-dependent enzyme Chimera-1 accumulated even more AdoMet (140-fold more AdoMet than DAY4) (Fig. 5A). Along with the greatly elevated AdoMet level, strain SCY4 accumulated 7-fold more methionine than DAY4 (Fig. 5B). AdoMet hyperaccumulation was seen in SCY4 cultures harvested at a range of cell densities; its magnitude varied from 75-fold to 254-fold above wild-type in four independent experiments (data not shown).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   AdoMet and methionine levels in yeast expressing native Met13p or AdoMet-insensitive MTHFRs. Intracellular levels of AdoMet (A) and free methionine (B) in yeast strains DAY4 (MET13), SCY6 (Delta met13::AtMTHFR-1), and SCY4 (Delta met13::CHIMERA-1). Cells were grown in synthetic minimal medium supplemented with glycine, formate, leucine, histidine, tryptophan, and uracil and harvested at A600 of 2.6-2.9. AdoMet data are means of duplicate determinations on the same samples; S.E. values were <= 1% of the means.

Origin of the C1 Units Used for AdoMet Synthesis-- The yeast strains used in this study are all ser1 strains that are blocked at phosphoserine aminotransferase and thus require serine for growth; glycine (or glycine plus formate) can substitute for serine. Use of ser1- strains allows controlled introduction of C1 units via the cytosolic C1-THF synthase by providing formate or via the mitochondrial glycine cleavage system by providing glycine (24). To identify the source(s) of C1 units for production of AdoMet, we determined the methyl-13C enrichment of AdoMet in cultures supplemented with [13C]formate and unlabeled glycine. The methyl-13C enrichment under these conditions measures the relative contributions to methyl group synthesis of C1 units originating from cytosol and mitochondria (25, 26). The methyl-13C enrichment values were 0.92 for the wild-type expressing Met13p and 0.54 for a strain expressing Chimera-1. These data show that with wild-type Met13p, >90% of AdoMet comes from [13C]formate, whereas only 54% comes from [13C]formate when Chimera-1 replaces Met13p. Thus, AdoMet hyperaccumulation is associated with a far greater contribution from mitochondrial glycine cleavage to the C1 unit pool.

Intracellular Folate Levels in Yeast Strains DAY4, SCY4, and SCY6-- The pools of 10-formyltetrahydrofolate, 5-formyltetrahydrofolate, 5-CH3-THF, and THF were determined by HPLC combined with microbiological assay (21, 22). The most abundant folate in all strains was 5-CH3-THF, constituting >= 68% of the total folate pool. The other folates (10-formyltetrahydrofolate, 5-formyltetrahydrofolate, and THF) each represented <15% of the total in all strains (Table II). The most striking difference between the strains was that SCY4 expressing Chimera-1 had more than twice the total folate content of the wild-type strain DAY4 (156 versus 66 nmol g-1 wet weight), although the relative amounts of the individual folates were essentially unchanged. Another difference was that strain SCY6 expressing AtMTHFR-1 showed only a slight increase in total folate relative to the wild-type DAY4, but its 10-formyltetrahydrofolate and THF pools were doubled.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Folate levels in DAY4, SCY4, and SCY6 yeast strains
Yeast were grown in minimal medium supplemented with glycine, formate, leucine, histidine, tryptophan, and uracil. Folate species were determined by HPLC; data are means of duplicates.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Characterization of yeast Met13p shows that its properties are very much like those of mammalian MTHFRs: Met13p is AdoMet-sensitive, NADPH-dependent, and susceptible to substrate inhibition by CH2-THF. Photoaffinity labeling evidence indicates that the AdoMet-binding site of porcine and human MTHFRs lies in the C-terminal domain, within a stretch of about 30 residues starting 30 residues after the junction between the domains (12, 14). The sequence of Met13p in this region is far closer to that of human MTHFR (41% identity and 66% similarity) than to that of the AdoMet-insensitive plant enzyme AtMTHFR-1 (20% identity and 44% similarity). Outside this region, all three MTHFRs share about ~40% identity. The primary structure of Met13p is thus consistent with the AdoMet-binding site being in the proximal part of the C-terminal domain.

The effects of allosteric inhibition by AdoMet and pyridine nucleotide preference on the in vivo control of MTHFR activity were assessed in metabolically engineered yeast strains SCY6 and SCY4. Strain SCY6 expresses an AdoMet-insensitive, NADH-dependent plant enzyme, AtMTHFR-1. Strain SCY4 expresses the chimeric enzyme Chimera-1, comprising the Met13p N-terminal domain and the AtMTHFR-1 C-terminal domain. Chimera-1 is an active, AdoMet-insensitive enzyme that uses both NADPH and NADH. The AdoMet insensitivity of Chimera-1 is consistent with the C-terminal domain of MTHFR being responsible for sensitivity to AdoMet. Because the determinants for pyridine nucleotide binding are located in the N-terminal domain (27), the loss of selectivity for NADPH in Chimera-1 could reflect distortion in the tertiary structure of its Met13p N-terminal domain caused by fusion to a foreign C terminus. Another possibility is that interaction between the catalytic and C-terminal domains guides the specificity of the enzyme for its pyridine nucleotide substrate. In either case, it is noteworthy that porcine MTHFR can use NADH as a substrate if the assay is carried out in the presence of phosphate, for this shows that the enzyme's pyridine nucleotide specificity can be readily altered (28). The apparent lack of substrate inhibition of Chimera-1 by CH2-THF may likewise be explained by distorted tertiary structure or by modified domain interaction.

The overaccumulation of methionine and AdoMet in yeast strains engineered with the AdoMet-insensitive AtMTHFR-1 or Chimera-1 (8- and 140-fold more AdoMet, respectively) provides the first in vivo evidence that allosteric inhibition of MTHFR by AdoMet controls the commitment of C1 units to methylneogenesis. The more dramatic effect of Chimera-1 may be explained by its ability to utilize NADPH as well as NADH (Fig. 6). The redox state of the NAD(P) pool is known to affect the reversibility of the MTHFR reaction. In mammals, the almost completely reduced NADP pool (NADPH/NADP ratio of ~107) ensures that the MTHFR reaction is practically irreversible (3-5). In plants, the NAD pool is highly oxidized (NADH/NAD ratio of ~10-3) and is thought to make the MTHFR reaction freely reversible (9). Reliable measurements of cytosolic NAD(P)H/NAD(P) ratios in yeast are lacking. However, studies with yeast cytosolic CH2-THF dehydrogenase show that the NADP-dependent reaction is reversible in vivo, whereas the NAD-dependent reaction runs only in the oxidative direction (29). This indirect evidence suggests that the yeast cytosolic NADP pool is far more reduced than the NAD pool. An AdoMet-insensitive MTHFR that is driven by the aggregate cytosolic NAD(P)H/NAD(P) ratio might therefore be expected to direct more C1 units to CH3-THF, and thence to AdoMet, than one driven solely by the NADH/NAD ratio.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Proposed mechanism of AdoMet accumulation in engineered yeast strains. A, in the wild-type strain DAY4 expressing Met13p, the MTHFR reaction is irreversibly driven toward CH3-THF formation by a high cytosolic NADPH/NADP, as in mammals. AdoMet overaccumulation is prevented by allosteric feedback inhibition (dotted line). B, in strain SCY6 expressing AtMTHFR-1, there is moderate AdoMet accumulation due to the lack of feedback inhibition by AdoMet. The relatively low cytosolic NADH/NAD ratio may limit the extent of this accumulation. C, in strain SCY4 expressing Chimera-1, adding the capacity to use NADPH as well as NADH to the lack of AdoMet feedback inhibition results in more CH3-THF synthesis (and hence AdoMet accumulation) because the aggregate cytosolic NAD(P)H/NAD(P) ratio (by which Chimera-1 is driven) is higher than the NADH/NAD ratio.

The finding that expressing an NADH-dependent, AdoMet-insensitive plant MTHFR in yeast causes methionine and AdoMet overaccumulation raises the question of what prevents this from occurring in plants. Plants have the S-methylmethionine cycle, an auxiliary feature exclusive to plant C1 metabolism (30, 31). In this apparently futile cycle, AdoMet donates a methyl group to methionine, giving S-methylmethionine. S-Methylmethionine then donates a methyl group to homocysteine, yielding two molecules of methionine. The net effect of the cycle is thus to convert AdoMet back to methionine. In vivo radiolabeling data and metabolic modeling have recently indicated that the S-methylmethionine cycle serves to stop accumulation of unutilized AdoMet and that it may be the main mechanism whereby plants achieve short-term control of AdoMet levels (31). Because S. cerevisiae does not have this cycle, AdoMet might be expected to accumulate in yeast expressing the plant enzyme, as in fact occurs.

The 140-fold hyperaccumulation of AdoMet has no apparent ill-effect on yeast growth, at least under our culture conditions. A likely reason is that most of the excess AdoMet is sequestered in the vacuole and hence excluded from the metabolically active pool, as occurs when AdoMet is overproduced in yeast cultured with a high level of methionine in the medium (32). It should be noted that although AdoMet hyperaccumulation was a robust phenomenon in strain SCY4 grown as we describe in medium containing formate and glycine, it did not occur when these supplements were replaced by serine. The basis for this effect is now being investigated.

In wild-type yeast, the dominant methylated products are phosphatidylcholine head groups in membranes (~12 µmol methyl units g-1 wet weight) and protein-bound methionine (~14 µmol g-1 wet weight, assuming 100 mg protein g-1 wet weight and a methionine content of 2 mol %) (33) (Proteome Analysis at EBI, 2001, www.ebi.ac.uk/proteome). The total level of methyl end products is therefore at least 26 µmol g-1 wet weight. In relation to this, the AdoMet pool in the wild-type strain DAY4 (31 nmol g-1 wet weight) is very small (<0.2%). However, in the AdoMet-hyperaccumulating strain, the AdoMet pool expands to ~4 µmol g-1 wet weight, which adds ~15% to the methyl budget. To investigate the source of the extra methyl groups, we compared the 13C-enrichment of the AdoMet methyl group in these two strains supplied with [13C]formate and unlabeled glycine. In the wild-type, DAY4, formate was the principal source of the AdoMet methyl group, consistent with the previous data on the origin of choline methyl groups in this strain (29). Surprisingly, even though the production of methyl groups in the AdoMet-hyperaccumulating strain changed by only ~15%, the formate contribution to the AdoMet methyl group dropped dramatically from >90% to 54%, with the remainder presumably coming from glycine cleavage in the mitochondria. If we make the reasonable assumption that AdoMet methyl-13C enrichment faithfully reflects that of methionine, this finding shows that AdoMet hyperaccumulation is associated with a profound change in the relative importance of cytosolic and mitochondrial C1 fluxes.

Consistent with the above inference, and equally surprising, strain SCY4 expressing Chimera-1 showed a doubling of total cellular folate content compared with the wild-type. This folate pool expansion could be a response to the shift in C1 fluxes occasioned by unregulated AdoMet synthesis. Whatever the mechanism, the data imply that cross-talk between C1 metabolism and folate synthesis or degradation is an important factor in control of intracellular folate levels.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the Florida Agricultural Experimental Station, by an endowment from the C. V. Griffin, Sr. Foundation, and by grants from the National Science Foundation (to A. D. H.), the National Institutes of Health (to D. R. A.), and the Department of Veterans Affairs, National Institutes of Health DK32189, Clinical Nutrition Research Unit DK26657 (to D. W. H.) and approved for publication as Journal Series no. R-08516.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF441241.

Dagger Both authors contributed equally to this work.

|| Present address: Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry, McMurry University, McMurry Station, Box 158, Abilene, TX 79697.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Horticultural Sciences Dept., University of Florida, P. O. Box 110690, Gainesville, FL 32611. Tel.: 352-392-1928, Ext. 334; Fax: 352-392-6479; E-mail: adha@mail.ifas.ufl.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110651200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: MTHFR, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (EC 1.5.1.20 and 1.7.99.5); AdoMet, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; CH2-THF, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; CH3-THF, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate; THF, (6R,6S)-tetrahydrofolic acid; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Appling, D. R. (1991) FASEB J. 5, 2645-2651[Abstract]
2. Bagley, P. J., and Selhub, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13217-13220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Vanoni, M. A., and Matthews, R. G. (1984) Biochemistry 23, 5272-5279[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Green, J. M., Ballou, D. P., and Matthews, R. G. (1988) FASEB J. 2, 42-47[Abstract]
5. Wohlfarth, G., and Diekert, G. (1991) Arch. Microbiol. 155, 378-381
6. Jencks, D. A., and Matthews, R. G. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 2485-2493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Kutzbach, C., and Stokstad, E. L. R. (1971) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 250, 459-477[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Heineke, D., Riens, B., Grosse, H., Hoferichter, P., Peter, U., Flugge, U.-I., and Heldt, H. W. (1990) Plant Physiol. 95, 1131-1137
9. Roje, S., Wang, H., McNeil, S. D., Raymond, R. K., Appling, D. R., Shachar-Hill, Y., Bohnert, H. J., and Hanson, A. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36089-36096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Raymond, R. K., Kastanos, E. K., and Appling, D. R. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 372, 300-308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Matthews, R. G., Vanoni, M. A., Hainfeld, J. F., and Wall, J. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 11647-11650[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Goyette, P., Sumner, J. S., Milos, R., Duncan, A. M., Rosenblatt, D. S., Matthews, R. G., and Rozen, R. (1994) Nat. Genet. 7, 195-200[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Matthews, R. G., Sheppard, C., and Goulding, C. (1998) Eur. J. Pediatr. 157, S54-S59
14. Sumner, J., Jencks, D. A., Khani, S., and Matthews, R. G. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 7697-7700[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Katzen, H. M., and Buchanan, J. M. (1965) J. Biol. Chem. 240, 825-835[Free Full Text]
16. Saint-Girons, I., Duchange, N., Zakin, M. M., Park, I., Margarita, D., Ferrara, P., and Cohen, G. N. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 6723-6732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Sheppard, C. A., Trimmer, E. E., and Matthews, R. G. (1999) J. Bacteriol. 181, 718-725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Horton, R. M., Ho, S. N., Pullen, J. K., Hunt, H. D., Cai, Z., and Pease, L. R. (1993) Methods Enzymol. 217, 270-279[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Vernet, T., Dignard, D., and Thomas, D. Y. (1987) Gene (Amst.) 52, 225-233[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Wise, C. K., Cooney, C. A., Ali, S. F., and Poirier, L. A. (1997) J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 696, 145-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Wilson, S. D., and Horne, D. W. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 142, 529-535[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Horne, D. W., and Patterson, D. (1988) Clin. Chem. 34, 2357-2359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Cleland, W. W. (1971) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D., ed), Vol. 2 , pp. 35-43, Academic Press, New York and London
24. Appling, D. R., Kastanos, E., Pasternack, L. B., and Woldman, Y. Y. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 281, 218-231[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Pasternack, L. B., Laude, D. A., and Appling, D. R. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 74-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Pasternack, L. B., Littlepage, L. E., Laude, D. A., and Appling, D. R. (1996) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 326, 158-165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Guenther, B. D., Sheppard, C. A., Tran, P., Rozen, R., Matthews, R. G, and Ludwig, M. L. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 359-365[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Matthews, R. G., and Kaufman, S. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 6014-6017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. West, M. G., Horne, D. W., and Appling, D. R. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 3122-3132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Mudd, S. H., and Datko, A. H. (1990) Plant Physiol. 93, 623-630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ranocha, P., McNeil, S. D., Ziemak, M. J., Li, C., Tarczynski, M. C., and Hanson, A. D. (2001) Plant J. 25, 575-584[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Schlenk, F. (1965) in Transmethylation and Methionine Biosynthesis (Shapiro, S. K , and Schlenk, F., eds) , pp. 48-65, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London
33. Murakami, Y., Yokoigawa, K., Kawai, F., and Kawai, H. (1996) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 60, 1874-1876[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. J. Vickers, G. Orsomando, R. D. de la Garza, D. A. Scott, S. O. Kang, A. D. Hanson, and S. M. Beverley
Biochemical and Genetic Analysis of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase in Leishmania Metabolism and Virulence
J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38150 - 38158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
M. Krajinovic, S. Lamothe, D. Labuda, E. Lemieux-Blanchard, Y. Theoret, A. Moghrabi, and D. Sinnett
Role of MTHFR genetic polymorphisms in the susceptibility to childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood, January 1, 2004; 103(1): 252 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Y. Chan and D. R. Appling
Regulation of S-Adenosylmethionine Levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43051 - 43059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
I. Sarvari Horvath, C. J. Franzen, M. J. Taherzadeh, C. Niklasson, and G. Liden
Effects of Furfural on the Respiratory Metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Glucose-Limited Chemostats
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2003; 69(7): 4076 - 4086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. L. Guinotte, M. G. Burns, J. A. Axume, H. Hata, T. F. Urrutia, A. Alamilla, D. McCabe, A. Singgih, E. A. Cogger, and M. A. Caudill
Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase 677C->T Variant Modulates Folate Status Response to Controlled Folate Intakes in Young Women
J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1272 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
M. G. Kocsis, P. Ranocha, D. A. Gage, E. S. Simon, D. Rhodes, G. J. Peel, S. Mellema, K. Saito, M. Awazuhara, C. Li, et al.
Insertional Inactivation of the Methionine S-Methyltransferase Gene Eliminates the S-Methylmethionine Cycle and Increases the Methylation Ratio
Plant Physiology, April 1, 2003; 131(4): 1808 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An addition or correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/6/4056    most recent
M110651200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roje, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed