![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 4609-4617, February 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the George Whipple Laboratory for Cancer Research, Departments of Pathology, Urology, and Radiation Oncology, and the Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642
Received for publication, August 28, 2001, and in revised form, October 18, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ligand-bound androgen receptor (AR)
regulates target genes via a mechanism involving coregulators such as
androgen receptor-associated 54 (ARA54). We investigated whether the
interruption of the AR coregulator function could lead to
down-regulation of AR activity. Using in vitro mutagenesis
and a yeast two-hybrid screening assay, we have isolated a mutant ARA54
(mt-ARA54) carrying a point mutation at amino acid 472 changing a
glutamic acid to lysine, which acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of
AR transactivation. In transient transfection assays of prostate cancer
cell lines, the mt-ARA54 suppressed endogenous mutated AR-mediated and
exogenous wild-type AR-mediated transactivation in LNCaP and PC-3
cells, respectively. In DU145 cells, the mt-ARA54 suppressed exogenous
ARA54 but not other coregulators, such as ARA55-enhanced or
SRC-1-enhanced AR transactivation. In the LNCaP cells stably
transfected with the plasmids encoding the mt-ARA54 under the
doxycycline inducible system, the overexpression of the mt-ARA54
inhibited cell growth and endogenous expression of prostate-specific
antigen. Mammalian two-hybrid assays further demonstrated that
the mt-ARA54 can disrupt the interaction between wild-type ARA54
molecules, suggesting that ARA54 dimerization or oligomerization may
play an essential role in the enhancement of AR transactivation.
Together, our results demonstrate that a dominant-negative AR
coregulator can suppress AR transactivation and cell proliferation in
prostate cancer cells. Further studies may provide a new therapeutic
approach for blocking AR-mediated prostate cancer growth.
There is a substantial amount of evidence to indicate that steroid
hormone receptors function as a tripartite system involving the
receptor, its ligands, and its coregulator proteins (1-5). The
androgen receptor (AR),1 a member of this receptor
superfamily, is a
ligand-dependent transcriptional factor that mediates the
biological effects of androgens in a variety of target tissues
including the prostate. AR involvement is also associated with a number
of pathological conditions, notably prostate cancer (6-9). Recently, a
number of steroid receptor coactivators including steroid receptor
coactivator-1 (SRC-1) (10), GRIP1/TIF2 (11, 12),
pCIP/ACTR/AIB1/RAC3/TRAM-1 (13-16), TIF1 (17), RIP140 (18), TAFII30
(19), PGC-1 (20), SNURF (21), and others (2, 3, 22) has been identified as being able to modulate steroid receptor transactivation. We have
also isolated and characterized several coregulators as AR-associated (ARA) proteins that enhance AR transcriptional activation by
interacting with AR in a ligand-dependent manner (23-29).
One of the AR coregulators, ARA54, can enhance the transactivation of
wild-type AR and a mutant AR derived from LNCaP prostate cancer cells
in prostate cancer cells by 2-6-fold in the presence of androgens or
the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide (HF) (26, 29).
Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in aging
males. In 2001, it is estimated that there will be 198,100 new cases of
prostate cancer and 31,500 deaths from this disease in the United
States. (30). The most significant palliative treatment of prostate
cancer is hormonal therapy involving androgen ablation by surgical or
medical castration and/or the administration of antiandrogens.
Nonetheless, no curative treatment exists for patients with metastatic
prostate cancer. Indeed, most of the patients with advanced prostate
cancer eventually develop androgen-independent disease. Additionally,
some patients with androgen-dependent disease develop a
withdrawal syndrome that is associated with an agonist effect of
antiandrogens, resulting in antiandrogen treatment promoting prostate
cancer progression (31). Our previous studies have suggested that AR
coactivators promote the agonist activity of antiandrogens through the
interaction with AR (5, 29, 32). The interruption of this
AR-coregulator interaction may therefore provide a target for the
development of novel treatment strategies for advanced prostate cancer.
In our previous study (26), the C-terminal region (amino acids
361-474) of ARA54 (C'-ARA54), which was originally isolated from a
human prostate cDNA library, interacted with AR. We found that
full-length ARA54 (fl-ARA54) but not C'-ARA54 enhanced AR transactivation (26, 29). This study was undertaken to search for a
potential strategy that can suppress AR transactivation induced by
fl-ARA54 in prostate cancer cells. We hypothesized that mutant ARA54,
which has lost the ability to bind to AR, might be able to act as a
dominant-negative inhibitor of AR transcription. Using a chemical
mutagenesis method to create a mutated C'-ARA54 library for two-hybrid
screening in yeast, we isolated a mutant ARA54 (mt-ARA54), a C-terminal
fragment of ARA54 with a point mutation that functions in a
dominant-negative manner. This dominant-negative clone disrupts the
ability of wild-type ARA54 to interact with itself, suggesting that
ARA54 dimerization or oligomerization may play an important role in the
enhancement of AR transactivation. The hydroxylamine-mediated
mutagenesis screening technique used in this study can be used to
isolate additional dominant-negative coregulators that are able to
inhibit a broad spectrum of receptor-coregulator interactions. Such
dominant-negative coregulators may ultimately be used in gene therapy
as part of a therapeutic option in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Chemicals and Plasmids--
5 Mutated Library Construction--
An ARA54-mutated library was
generated by incubating 100 µg of pACT2-C'-ARA54 with 1 M
hydroxylamine (Sigma) at 70° C for 1 h followed by DNA extraction.
Yeast Two-Hybrid Screening--
Plasmids with pAS2-AR and the
mutated ARA54 library were sequentially transformed into the yeast
strain Y190 harboring reporter genes (i.e. lacZ and
His-3) according to the CLONTECH
Yeast Protocols Handbook. The transformed yeast cells were plated with
100 nM DHT on synthetic dropout plates lacking tryptophan
and leucine. Colonies were filter-assayed for Cell Culture, Transient Transfections, and Reporter Gene
Assays--
The human prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP, PC-3, and
DU145, were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 5% fetal calf serum. Transfections using the calcium
phosphate precipitation method and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
(CAT) and luciferase (Luc) assays were performed as described
previously (5, 29, 34). 1-4 × 105 cells were plated
on 35- or 60-mm dishes 24 h before adding the precipitation mix
containing a CAT or Luc reporter gene and a Establishment of LNCaP Cell Lines Stably Transfected with the
Plasmids Encoding the Mutant ARA54 under the Inducible
Promoter--
The pBIG2i vector contains all of the elements required
for tetracycline-responsive gene expression and a selective marker conferring resistance to hygromycin B for the generation of stable cell
lines (35). We first constructed pBIG2i-C'-ARA54, pBIG2i-mt-ARA54, and
pBIG2i-fl-ARA54 and then transfected each plasmid into LNCaP or PC-3
cells using SuperFect transfection reagent (Qiagen). After transfection, cells were cultured in the presence of 100 µg/ml hygromycin B (Invitrogen) to select for stably transfected cells that had incorporated the pBIG2i-based construct. After growth for an
additional two weeks, individual clones were picked. We then confirmed
the stable expression of the mutant (C-terminal fragment) or wild-type
(full-length) ARA54 induced by doxycycline using Northern blot
analysis. Northern blotting was performed using total RNAs from the
stable LNCaP or PC-3 cells and C-terminal fragment of ARA54 as a DNA
probe as described previously (25, 26).
Western Blot--
Western blotting analysis was performed in the
stable LNCaP cells using NH27 polyclonal antibody for the AR and
monoclonal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) antibody (DAKO) as described
previously (5). An antibody for Mammalian Two-hybrid Assay--
DU145 cells were transiently
cotransfected with a GAL4-hybrid expression plasmid, a VP16-hybrid
expression plasmid, the reporter plasmid pG5-CAT, and the
pCMV- Isolation of Dominant-Negative Mutant ARA54--
To screen for
dominant-negative forms of ARA54, we used an in vitro
mutagenesis strategy combined with the yeast two-hybrid system. ARA54
was initially isolated from a human prostate cDNA library as a
C-terminal fragment that interacted with AR (26). This C-terminal
region of ARA54 (amino acids 361-474) was cloned into pACT2 and
mutagenized with 1 M hydroxylamine to create the mutant
ARA54 library for yeast two-hybrid screening. This library was screened
against pAS2-AR for the selection of clones that did not interact with
AR. We selected 11 colonies that showed no interaction between pAS2-AR
and the pACT2-ARA54 mutant from ~50,000 yeast colonies. We confirmed
the interactions with AR by subcloning each clone into pACT2 and yeast
two-hybrid assay with sequential transformation with pAS2-AR and
pACT2 mutant clone. These 11 pACT2 constructs were then subcloned into
pSG5 to assess their effect on AR-mediated transactivation in the
prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP (AR-positive and ARA54-positive), PC-3
(AR-negative and ARA54-positive), and DU145 (AR-negative and
ARA54-negative) (26) using a reporter gene assay. We have previously
shown that the transcriptional activity of a mutant AR or wild-type AR
could be induced in LNCaP or PC-3 cells in response to both androgen, DHT, and the antiandrogen, HF, and that fl-ARA54 can enhance the AR
transactivation in DU145 cells (26, 29, 34, 36, 37). Fig.
1 shows that C'-ARA54 suppresses
DHT-mediated or HF-mediated AR transcriptional activity. One mutant
ARA54 clone was found to have a stronger dominant-negative effect both
for endogenous fl-ARA54 in LNCaP and PC-3 cells and for exogenous
fl-ARA54 in DU145 cells. However, both mutants, C'-ARA54 and
mt-ARA54, showed an only marginal effect on AR transactivation in the
absence of fl-ARA54 in DU145 cells (Fig. 1, E and
F). The suppression of AR transactivation by either C'-ARA54
or mt-ARA54 was not the result of down-regulation of AR protein
expression. LNCaP cells transfected with C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54 showed
little change in endogenous AR expression compared with non-transfected
cells (data not shown). These results suggest that a mutant ARA54
dominant-negatively suppresses endogenous AR-mediated and exogenous
AR-mediated transactivation. Sequencing analysis revealed that mt-ARA54
contained a single point mutation (a guanine to adenine
transition) at the first position of codon 472, resulting in a glutamic
acid to lysine substitution.
Effect of the Dominant-Negative ARA54 Mutant on the
Transactivation Mediated by Different Steroid Receptors--
Our
previous studies demonstrated ARA54 had a marginal transcriptional
effect on the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) but could enhance the
transcriptional activity of the progesterone receptor (PR) by up to
4-fold (26). We examined the effect of mt-ARA54 on PR and GR
transactivation in the presence of endogenous or exogenous fl-ARA54.
Both C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 had only a marginal effect on
PR-mediated transactivation in the presence of progesterone in the PC-3
cell line. Similarly, GR transactivation was only marginally repressed
by either C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54 (Fig.
2A). When fl-ARA54 was
cotransfected with PR or GR into DU145 cells, fl-ARA54 induced PR
transcription by 2.9-fold and GR transcriptional activity by 1.6-fold
(Fig. 2B). In DU145 cells, mt-ARA54 suppressed fl-ARA54-induced PR transactivation by 43% but only marginally suppressed GR transactivation. C'-ARA54 showed little effect on PR or
GR transcription.
Coregulator Specificity of the Dominant-Negative ARA54
Mutant--
To determine whether C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 inhibited only
wild-type ARA54-mediated transactivation, we examined their effect in
DU145 cells in the presence of other AR coregulators. C'-ARA54 or
mt-ARA54 was cotransfected with AR and ARA55, ARA70, retinoblastoma (Rb), or SRC-1 into DU145 cells. As shown in Fig.
3A and consistent with our
previous reports (23-26, 29), these coactivators alone enhanced AR
transcriptional activity by an additional 2.9-6.0-fold in the presence
of DHT. C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 showed only marginal or slight
suppressive effects on ARA55-, ARA70-, Rb-, or SRC-1-enhanced AR
transactivation. Similar results were also obtained when mt-AR877, codon 877 mutation threonine to serine derived from a prostate cancer
(33), was substituted for wild-type AR (Fig. 3B). These results suggest that the suppressive effect of mt-ARA54 or C'-ARA54 is
relatively specific for fl-ARA54-enhanced AR transactivation.
Effect of the Dominant-Negative ARA54 Mutant on Growth of Prostate
Cancer Cells and PSA Expression--
To develop a system that allows
us to investigate the effect of the dominant-negative ARA54 mutant on
cell proliferation, we have established prostate cancer cell lines
stably transfected with the plasmids encoding the mutant ARA54
(C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54) or fl-ARA54 under the doxycycline
(doxy)-inducible promoter. We first confirmed the stable expression of
the ARA54 induced by doxy using Northern blotting (data not shown). The
LNCaP or PC-3 cell-expressed endogenous ARA54 (wild-type) bands
appeared at 3 kb, and strong shorter bands (2 kb) suggestive of
C-terminal fragment transcript (C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54) were detected
only in the presence of doxy. Similarly, a stronger 3-kb band was
detected in the LNCaP cells stably transfected with fl-ARA54 when
treated with doxy compared with no doxy treatment or transfection with vector (pBIG2i) alone.
Next, we tested the effect of the dominant-negative mutants of ARA54 on
cell proliferation of the stable LNCaP cells, which had endogenous AR
and wild-type ARA54. As shown in Fig.
4A, the expression of the mt-ARA54 (+ doxy) resulted in a significant decrease
in cell growth. As a control, we also tested the effects of fl-ARA54 in
LNCaP and mt-ARA54 in AR-negative PC-3 cells. The results show that
fl-ARA54 or mt-ARA54 without AR does not suppress prostate cancer cell
growth. The Luc assay also demonstrated that using transient
transfection of a reporter gene into these stable cell lines, the
expression of the mt-ARA54 (+ doxy) significantly decreased AR
transcriptional activity in the presence of DHT (Fig. 4B).
These results confirm and strengthen our transient transfection data as
described earlier.
The PSA is an AR target gene and presently the most useful marker to
monitor the progression of prostate cancer. Therefore, it is of
interest to determine whether the overexpression of the mutant ARAs as
dominant-negative inhibitors of AR transcription suppresses PSA
expression in prostate cancer cells. The Western blotting assay showed
that endogenous PSA expression in the LNCaP cells was decreased to 60 and 87% when the mt-ARA54 and C'-ARA54 were expressed in the cells (+ doxy), respectively (Fig. 4C). There were no differences in
AR protein levels in the LNCaP cells cultured with or without doxy
(data not shown). These results suggest that a dominant-negative mutant
ARA54 can inhibit AR-mediated prostate cancer progression.
Effect of the Dominant-Negative ARA54 Mutant on AR-ARA54 and
ARA54-ARA54 Interactions--
To investigate the potential mechanism
through which mt-ARA54 suppresses ARA54-enhanced AR transactivation, we
used a mammalian two-hybrid assay. DU145 cells were cotransfected with
a GAL4 DBD and a VP16 activation domain fusion protein. Protein-protein
interaction was assessed by measuring the activity of the pG5-CAT
reporter gene. First, we tested the influence of mt-ARA54 on the
interaction between AR and fl-ARA54. As shown in Fig.
5A, AR interacted with fl-ARA54 in an androgen-dependent manner (lanes
1-4) as reported previously (26). The addition of C'-ARA54 or
mt-ARA54 resulted in very little change in AR-ARA54 interaction
(lanes 5 and 6). Also, AR still interacted with
C'-ARA54 but not with mt-ARA54 (lanes 7 and 8),
consistent with our yeast two-hybrid screening results. We next tested
whether ARA54 forms oligomers possibly in the dimeric form and the
possible influence of mt-ARA54. As shown in Fig. 5B,
GAL4-fl-ARA54 interacted with VP16-fl-ARA54 in the presence or absence
of androgen (lanes 1-4), suggesting fl-ARA54 can form
homodimers in an androgen-independent manner. When cotransfected with
C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54, CAT activities returned to the basal levels
(lanes 5 and 6). Interestingly, fl-ARA54 can still interact with C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54 (lanes 7 and
8). These results suggest that C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 may
function in a dominant-negative manner through blocking the
homodimerization of fl-ARA54.
In this study, we have identified a dominant-negative mutant of an
AR coactivator, ARA54, using in vitro mutagenesis and a yeast two-hybrid screening assay. We generated a mutated C-terminal ARA54 library using hydroxylamine-mediated mutagenesis to induce random
transition mutations (38). The mutant ARA54, mt-ARA54, carrying a
glutamic acid to lysine substitution at codon 472 has lost its binding
ability to AR and significantly suppressed the ability of endogenous or
exogenous fl-ARA54 to enhance AR transcription in prostate cancer
cells. The inhibitory effect was more obvious for exogenously expressed
fl-ARA54 in DU145 cells than for endogenously expressed ARA54 in PC-3
and LNCaP cells. This result may be attributed to the presence of other
AR coactivators, such as ARA70 and ARA55, which are slightly influenced
by the mt-ARA54 in PC-3 and LNCaP cells. Importantly, although C'-ARA54
has been shown to have a weak dominant-negative effect, the mutant
derived from this C-terminal fragment had a stronger suppressive effect
on AR transactivation as well as on AR-mediated prostate cancer proliferation.
ARA54 has the ability to form homodimers as determined by using a
mammalian two-hybrid assay. Because C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54 did not
influence fl-ARA54-AR interaction but did influence the interaction
between fl-ARA54 and fl-ARA54, the molecular mechanism of these
dominant-negative mutants appears to involve the formation of inactive
dimers with fl-ARA54. In Fig. 6, we
present a working model for the repression of AR transcriptional
activity by C'-ARA54 or mt-ARA54. AR transactivation is induced by
androgen and further enhanced through the interaction of AR with ARA54.
For it to enhance AR transactivation, ARA54 may need to form
homodimers. When fl-ARA54 dimerizes with C-ARA54 or with mt-ARA54, the
capacity of ARA54 to enhance transcription is reduced, resulting in a
decrease in the observed AR-mediated transactivation. It has been
proposed that nuclear receptors may interact with a complex of
coregulators involving coregulator-coregulator interactions in addition
to coregulator-receptor interactions (39, 40). Dimerization between fl-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 may not be productive because of a reduced ability to interact with CBP or the basal transcriptional
machinery.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Dihydrotestosterone (DHT),
progesterone, and dexamethasone were obtained from Sigma, and HF was
from Schering. pAS2-AR containing the C terminus of the ligand binding
domain from wild-type AR fused to the GAL4 DNA binding domain (DBD) was
constructed as described previously (25). pACT2-C'-ARA54 fused with the GAL4 activation domain was the clone identified originally from prostate cDNA library (26). pSG5-AR, pSG5-C'-ARA54, pSG5-fl-ARA54, pSG5-ARA55, pSG5-ARA70, and pSG5-SRC-1 were constructed as described previously (4, 23, 25, 26). pSV-mutant AR877 (33) and pSG5-Rb were
provided by Drs. S. Balk and W. Kaelin, Jr., respectively. pGAL0-AR
containing the AR ligand binding domain fused with the GAL4 DBD and
pCMX-VP16-fl-ARA54 fused to the activation domain of VP16 were
constructed as described previously (26, 29). pCMX-GAL4 DBD-fl-ARA54
was constructed by inserting the EcoRI/SacI fragment of ARA54 in frame to the GAL4DBD. pCMX-VP16-C'-ARA54 and
pCMX-VP16-mt-ARA54 were constructed using the C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54
BamHI fragments.
-galactosidase
activity, and white colonies that indicated no interaction between the
AR bait and mutant ARA54 were selected. The mutant ARA54 plasmid DNAs were isolated from the yeast cells that have spontaneously lost the
cycloheximide-bearing plasmid (pAS2-AR) by plating the selected white
colonies on synthetic dropout (-leucine) in the presence of 10 µg/ml
cycloheximide (Sigma). The mutant ARA54 clones were then subcloned into
the pSG5 mammalian expression vector (Stratagene).
-galactosidase
expression plasmid (pCMV-
-galactosidase) as an internal control for
normalization of transfection efficiency. The medium was changed to
phenol-red-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 5%
charcoal-stripped fetal calf serum 1 h before transfection. In
each experiment, the total amount of transfected DNA/dish was
maintained as a constant by the addition of empty expression vector
(pSG5 or pVP16, as appropriate). The medium was changed again 24 h
after transfection, and the cells were treated with 1 nM
DHT or 1 µM HF for 24 h. The cells were then harvested, and whole cell extracts were used for CAT or Luc assay. The
CAT activity was quantitated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). The Luc assay was determined using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) and luminometer.
-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
was used as the internal control.
-galactosidase internal control plasmid. Transfections and CAT
assays were performed as described above.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (62K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The dominant-negative effects of C'-ARA54 and
mt-ARA54 on AR transcriptional activity in human prostate cancer cell
lines. LNCaP (A and B), PC-3 (C
and D), or DU145 (E and F) cells were
transfected with mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)-CAT plasmid (2.5 µg) and increasing amounts of pSG5-C'-ARA54 or pSG5-mt-ARA54 as
indicated. The wild-type AR expression plasmid pSG5-AR was
cotransfected in PC-3 and DU145 cells (1.0 µg for PC-3 and 0.75 µg
for DU145). DU145 cells were also transfected with 2.25 µg of
pSG5-fl-ARA54. The total amount of DNA was adjusted to 11.5-13.25 µg
with pSG5 for each transfection. 24 h after transfection, cells
were cultured for an additional 24 h in the presence or absence of
1 nM DHT (A, C, and E) or
1 µM HF (B, D, and F).
The CAT activity is presented relative to that of vector alone with DHT
or HF in each panel (black bars, set as 100%). Values
represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three determinations.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The dominant-negative effects of C'-ARA54 and
mt-ARA54 on the transcriptional activity of AR, PR, and GR. PC-3
(A) or DU145 (B) cells were transfected with
MMTV-CAT (2.5 µg), steroid receptor expression plasmid (AR, PR, or
GR) (1.0 µg for PC-3 and 0.75 µg for DU145), and pSG5-C'-ARA54
(C') or pSG5-mt-ARA54 (mt) (8.0 µg for PC-3 and
6.75 µg for DU145) with pSG5-fl-ARA54 (2.25 µg) (for DU145) or
without pSG5-fl-ARA54 (2.25 µg) (for PC-3). The total amount of DNA
was adjusted to 12.5-13.25 µg with pSG5 for each transfection.
24 h after transfection, cells were cultured for an additional
24 h in the presence or absence of 1 nM DHT, 10 nM progesterone, or 10 nM dexamethasone
(Dex) as indicated. The CAT activity is presented relative
to that of vector alone with cognate ligand in each panel
(black bars, set as 100%). Values represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three determinations.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The effects of C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 on AR
transcriptional activity in the presence of different AR
coactivators. DU145 cells were transfected with 2.5 µg of
MMTV-CAT, 0.75 µg of AR expression plasmid (wild-type (A)
and mtAR877 (B)), 2.25 µg of different AR coactivators
(ARA54, ARA55, ARA70, Rb, or SRC-1), and 6.75 µg of pSG5-C'-ARA54
(C') or pSG5-mt-ARA54 (mt). The total amount of
DNA was adjusted to 13.25 µg with pSG5 for each transfection.
Twenty-four h after transfection, cells were cultured for an additional
24 h in the presence or absence of 1 nM DHT as
indicated. The CAT activity is presented relative to that of vector
alone with DHT in each panel (black bars, set as
100%). Values represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three
determinations.


View larger version (89K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The effects of the mutant ARA54 in the LNCaP
cells stably transfected with pBIG2i-C'-ARA54 or pBIG2i-mt-ARA54 under
tetracycline-inducible system. A, the effects of
C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 on cell proliferation. LNCaP cells stably
transfected with pBIG2i (vector alone), pBIG2i-C'-ARA54,
pBIG2i-mt-ARA54, or pBIG2i-fl-ARA54, and PC-3 cells stably transfected
with pBIG2i (vector alone) or pBIG2i-fl-ARA54 were cultured in the
presence or absence of 2 µg/ml doxy with 1 nM DHT. Total
cell number was counted by hemocytometer. Values represent the
mean ± S.D. of at least three determinations. B, the
effects of C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 on AR transcriptional activity. LNCaP
cells stably transfected with pBIG2i (vector alone), pBIG2i-C'-ARA54,
pBIG2i-mt-ARA54, or pBIG2i-fl-ARA54 were transiently transfected with
MMTV-Luc. After transfection, cells were cultured in the presence or
absence of 2 µg/ml doxy and 1 nM DHT as indicated. The
Luc activity is presented relative to that in the absence of doxy and
in the presence of DHT in each panel (black bars,
set as 100%). Values represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three
determinations. C, the effects of C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 on
PSA expression. Cell extracts from LNCaP cells stably transfected with
pBIG2i (vector alone), pBIG2i-C'-ARA54, or pBIG2i-dn-mt-ARA54 cultured
for 48 h with 1 nM DHT in the presence or absence of 2 µg/ml doxy as indicated were analyzed on Western blots using an
antibody to the PSA. The 33-kDa protein was detected as indicated and
quantitated by Collage image analysis software (Fotodyne). The
normalized expression level in the first lane (vector alone
without doxy treatment) was set as 100%. Values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three separate experiments.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The effects of C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54 on
AR-ARA54 and ARA54-ARA54 interactions. DU145 cells were
transfected with 2.5 µg of GAL4-hybrid expression plasmid pGAL0-AR
(A) or pCMX-GAL4-DBD-fl-ARA54 (B), 2.5 µg of
VP16-hybrid expression plasmid pCMX-VP16-fl-ARA54, and 2.5 µg of
pG5-CAT with or without 2.5 µg of pSG5-C'-ARA54 (C') or
pSG5-mt-ARA54 (mt). pCMX-VP16-C'-ARA54 and
pCMX-VP16-mt-ARA54 were also cotransfected to test the interactions
with AR (A) and fl-ARA54 (B). The total amount of
DNA was adjusted to 11.0 µg with pSG5 and/or pVP16 for each
transfection. The CAT activity was determined, and each CAT activity is
presented relative to that of lane 4 in each
panel (black bars, set as 100%). Values
represent the mean ± S.D. of at least three determinations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Model for suppression of AR activity by
C'-ARA54 and mt-ARA54. Fine and bold lines
indicate the strength of transcription or inhibition. See text for
detailed description.
Both normal prostate development and prostate cancer growth are largely dependent on the presence of androgens. Consequently, androgen ablation and/or blockage of androgen action through AR produces a brief response in most prostate cancer patients. However, in some cases prostate tumors are induced to proliferate by antiandrogens exerting an agonistic effect (5, 31), and androgen dependence is eventually lost during treatment (41). It has been suggested that because of changing the activity, i.e. altering ligand specificity by AR variations and abnormalities, the activation of AR pathway probably remains important in most prostate cancer cells from patients with clinically defined androgen-independent disease (42). Thus, in addition to current endocrine therapy, new approaches leading to the inhibition of AR-mediated prostate cancer growth are needed. Currently, several in vivo gene therapies involving the insertion of suicide genes, the replacement of mutated tumor suppressor genes, and antisense strategies are being evaluated in prostate cancer model systems as potential treatments (43). We here propose that the suppression of AR coactivator function may result in AR inactivation. Indeed, a recent report showed the physiological necessity of an AR coactivator. A loss of the function resulted in a complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome patient in whom the AR gene was completely normal (44). Because mt-ARA54 suppresses androgen-mediated and antiandrogen-mediated AR transactivation and PSA expression in prostate cancer cells, these results may lead to the development of new types of gene therapy strategies using mutant ARA54 or other suppressive mutant coactivators. For this strategy to be feasible, we first should clarify the expression levels of ARA54, the ratios of AR and ARA54 expression, and the mutations of ARA54 in prostate cancer tissues. Because the effect of mt-ARA54 was specific for ARA54-induced AR activity and that ARA54 is not the only coactivator to enhance AR activity, it may be necessary to identify dominant-negative mutants of other AR coactivators to obtain maximal AR suppression. Furthermore, antitumor activities of the dominant-negatives in vivo need to be evaluated.
In conclusion, it is suggested that ARA54 enhances AR transactivation
by interacting with AR and dimerizing with itself. We found that a
mutant form of the C-terminal fragment of ARA54 suppressed AR
transactivation in a dominant-negative manner in prostate cancer cells
by blocking the homodimerization of fl-ARA54. Its overexpression also
inhibited AR-mediated prostate cancer proliferation. The mt-ARA54 thus
represents a feasible new approach to inhibiting AR-/ARA54-mediated
bioactivities. The use of dominant-negative coregulators such as
mt-ARA54 may ultimately contribute to the control of AR-mediated
prostate tumor progression.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. S. P. Balk, W. Kaelin, Jr., and C. A. Strathdee for providing plasmids and C. A. Heinlein and K. Wolf for manuscript preparation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant CA71570.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed:
University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave., Box
626, Rochester, NY 14642. Tel.: 585-275-9994; Fax: 585-756-4133;
E-mail: chang@urmc.rochester.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, October 22, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108312200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
AR, androgen
receptor;
ARA, androgen receptor-associated;
HF, hydroxyflutamide;
C'-ARA54, C-terminal region of ARA54;
fl-ARA54, full-length ARA54;
mt-ARA54, mutant ARA54;
DHT, 5
-dihydrotestosterone;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
Luc, luciferase;
PSA, prostate-specific antigen;
GR, glucocorticoid receptor;
PR, progesterone receptor;
doxy, doxycycline;
MMTV, mouse mammary tumor
virus;
RB, retinoblastoma;
SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Katzenellenbogen, J. A., O'Malley, B. W., and Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 119-131[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Torchia, J., Glass, C., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 373-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | McKenna, N. J., Xu, J., Nawaz, Z., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M.-J., and O'Malley, B. W. (1999) J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 69, 3-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Yeh, S., Miyamoto, H., Shima, H., and Chang, C. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 5524-5532 |
| 5. |
Miyamoto, H.,
Yeh, S.,
Wilding, G.,
and Chang, C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7379-7384 |
| 6. |
Chang, C.,
Kokontis, J.,
and Liao, S.
(1988)
Science
240,
324-326 |
| 7. |
Evans, R. M.
(1988)
Science
240,
889-895 |
| 8. | Montie, J. E., and Pienta, K. J. (1994) Urology 43, 892-899[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Ruijter, E.,
van de Kaa, C.,
Miller, G.,
Ruiter, D.,
Debruyne, F.,
and Schalken, J.
(1999)
Endocr. Rev.
20,
22-45 |
| 10. |
Onate, S. A.,
Tsai, S. Y.,
Tsai, M.-J.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(1995)
Science
270,
1354-1357 |
| 11. |
Hong, H.,
Kohli, K.,
Trivedi, A.,
Johnson, D. L.,
and Stallcup, M. R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
4948-4952 |
| 12. | Voegel, J. J., Heine, M. J. S., Zechel, C., Chambon, P., and Gronemeyer, H. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 3667-3675[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Torchia, J., Rose, D. W., Inostroza, J., Kamei, Y., Westin, S., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1997) Nature 387, 677-684[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Chen, H., Lin, R. J., Schiltz, R. L., Chakravarti, D., Nash, A., Nagy, L., Privalsky, M. L., Nakatani, Y., and Evans, R. M. (1997) Cell 90, 569-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Anzick, S. L.,
Kononen, J.,
Walker, R. L.,
Azorsa, D. O.,
Tanner, M. M.,
Guan, X.-Y.,
Sauter, G.,
Kallioniemi, O.-P.,
Trent, J. M.,
and Meltzer, P. S.
(1997)
Science
277,
965-968 |
| 16. |
Li, H.,
Gomes, P. J.,
and Chen, J. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8479-8484 |
| 17. | Le Douarin, B., Zechel, C., Garnier, J.-M., Lutz, Y., Tora, L., Pierrat, B., Heery, D., Gronemeyer, H., Chambon, P., and Losson, R. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2020-2033[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Cavailles, V., Dauvois, S., L'Horset, F., Lopez, G., Hoare, S., Kushner, P. J., and Parker, M. G. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3741-3751[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Verrier, C. S.,
Roodi, N.,
Yee, C. J.,
Bailey, L. R.,
Jensen, R. A.,
Bustin, M.,
and Parl, F. F.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
1009-1019 |
| 20. | Puigserver, P., Wu, Z., Park, C. W., Graves, R., Wright, M., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1998) Cell 92, 829-839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Moilanen, A.-M.,
Poukka, H.,
Karvonen, U.,
Hakli, M.,
Janne, O. A.,
and Palvimo, J. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5128-5139 |
| 22. | Di Croce, L., Okret, S., Kersten, S., Gustafsson, J.-A., Parker, M., Wahli, W., and Beato, M. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6201-6210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Yeh, S,
and Chang, C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5517-5521 |
| 24. | Yeh, S., Miyamoto, H., Nishimura, K., Kang, H., Ludlow, J., Hsiao, P., Wang, C., Su, C., and Chang, C. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 248, 361-367[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Fujimoto, N.,
Yeh, S.,
Kang, H.-Y.,
Inui, S.,
Chang, H.-C.,
Mizokami, A.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8316-8321 |
| 26. |
Kang, H.-Y.,
Yeh, S.,
Fujimoto, N.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8570-8576 |
| 27. |
Hsiao, P.-W.,
Lin, D.-L.,
Nakao, R.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20229-20234 |
| 28. |
Hsiao, P.-W.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22373-22379 |
| 29. | Yeh, S., Kang, H.-Y., Miyamoto, H., Nishimura, K., Chang, H.-C., Ting, H.-J., Rahman, M., Lin, H.-K., Fujimoto, N., Hu, Y.-C., Mizokami, A., Huang, K.-E., and Chang, C. (1999) Endocrine 11, 195-202[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Greenlee, R. T.,
Hill-Harmon, M. B.,
Murray, T.,
and Thun, M.
(2001)
CA-Cancer J. Clin.
51,
15-36 |
| 31. | Kelly, W. K., Slovin, S., and Scher, H. I. (1997) Urol. Clin. North Am. 24, 421-431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Yeh, S., Miyamoto, H., and Chang, C. (1996) Lancet 349, 852-853 |
| 33. |
Taplin, M.-E.,
Bubley, G. J.,
Shuster, T. D.,
Frantz, M. E.,
Spooner, A. E.,
Ogata, G. K.,
Keer, H. N.,
and Balk, S. P.
(1995)
N. Engl. J. Med.
332,
1393-1398 |
| 34. |
Miyamoto, H.,
Yeh, S.,
Lardy, H.,
Messing, E.,
and Chang, C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11083-11088 |
| 35. | Strathdee, C. A., McLeod, M. R., and Hall, J. R. (1999) Gene (Amst.) 229, 21-29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. |
Chang, H.-C.,
Miyamoto, H.,
Marwah, P.,
Lardy, H.,
Yeh, S.,
Huang, K.-E.,
and Chang, C.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11173-11177 |
| 37. | Miyamoto, H., and Chang, C. (2000) Int. J. Urol. 7, 32-34[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Narusaka, Y.,
Narusaka, M.,
Satoh, K.,
and Kobayashi, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
23270-23275 |
| 39. | Kamei, Y., Xu, L., Heinzel, T., Torchia, J., Kurokawa, R., Gloss, B., Lin, S.-C., Heyman, R. A., Rose, D. W., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1996) Cell 85, 403-414[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Chakravarti, D., LaMorte, V. J., Nelson, M. C., Nakajima, T., Schulman, I. G., Juguilon, H., Montminy, M., and Evans, R. M. (1996) Nature 383, 99-103[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Goktas, S., and Crawford, D. (1999) Semin. Oncol. 26, 162-173[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Jenster, G. (1999) Semin. Oncol. 26, 407-421[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Hrouda, D., Perry, M., and Dalgleish, A. G. (1999) Semin. Oncol. 26, 455-471[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Adachi, M.,
Takayanagi, R.,
Tomura, A.,
Imasaki, K.,
Kato, S.,
Goto, K.,
Yanase, T.,
Ikuyama, S.,
and Nawata, H.
(2000)
N. Engl. J. Med.
343,
856-862 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Yang, Y.-J. Chang, H. Miyamoto, S. Yeh, J. L. Yao, P. A. di Sant'Agnese, M.-Y. Tsai, and C. Chang Suppression of Androgen Receptor Transactivation and Prostate Cancer Cell Growth by Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A1 via Interaction with Androgen Receptor Coregulator ARA54 Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1340 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang, Y.-J. Chang, H. Miyamoto, J. Ni, Y. Niu, Z. Chen, Y.-L. Chen, J. L. Yao, P. A. di Sant'Agnese, and C. Chang Transgelin Functions as a Suppressor via Inhibition of ARA54-Enhanced Androgen Receptor Transactivation and Prostate Cancer Cell Growth Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 21(2): 343 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Z. Lu, S. E. Wardell, K. L. Burnstein, D. Defranco, P. J. Fuller, V. Giguere, R. B. Hochberg, L. McKay, J.-M. Renoir, N. L. Weigel, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. LXV. The Pharmacology and Classification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Glucocorticoid, Mineralocorticoid, Progesterone, and Androgen Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 58(4): 782 - 797. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Logan, L. Gaughan, S. R. C. McCracken, V. Sapountzi, H. Y. Leung, and C. N. Robson Human PIRH2 Enhances Androgen Receptor Signaling through Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 1 and Is Overexpressed in Prostate Cancer. Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6502 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Lin, Y.-C. Hu, D. K. Lee, and C. Chang Regulation of Androgen Receptor Signaling by PTEN (Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog Deleted on Chromosome 10) Tumor Suppressor through Distinct Mechanisms in Prostate Cancer Cells Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2409 - 2423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ko, H. M. Theobald, R. W. Moore, and R. E. Peterson Evidence that Inhibited Prostatic Epithelial Bud Formation in 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-Exposed C57BL/6J Fetal Mice Is Not Due to Interruption of Androgen Signaling in the Urogenital Sinus Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2004; 79(2): 360 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Marin, J. I. Lucas, A.-C. Gradilla, and A. Ferrus Parkin and relatives: the RBR family of ubiquitin ligases Physiol Genomics, May 19, 2004; 17(3): 253 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2004; 25(2): 276 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rahman, H. Miyamoto, and C. Chang Androgen Receptor Coregulators in Prostate Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 10(7): 2208 - 2219. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Marshall, K. A. Link, C. E. Petre-Draviam, and K. E. Knudsen Differential Requirement of SWI/SNF for Androgen Receptor Activity J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30605 - 30613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Rahman, H. Miyamoto, H. Takatera, S. Yeh, S. Altuwaijri, and C. Chang Reducing the Agonist Activity of Antiandrogens by a Dominant-negative Androgen Receptor Coregulator ARA70 in Prostate Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 19619 - 19626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Miyamoto, P. Marwah, A. Marwah, H. Lardy, and C. Chang 3beta -Acetoxyandrost-1,5-diene-17-ethylene ketal functions as a potent antiandrogen with marginal agonist activity PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4440 - 4444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-K. Lin, S. Altuwaijri, W.-J. Lin, P.-Y. Kan, L. L. Collins, and C. Chang Proteasome Activity Is Required for Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activity via Regulation of Androgen Receptor Nuclear Translocation and Interaction with Coregulators in Prostate Cancer Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36570 - 36576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Heinlein and C. Chang Androgen Receptor (AR) Coregulators: An Overview Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2002; 23(2): 175 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||