|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106574200 on November 28, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 4845-4852, February 15, 2002
Inhibition of Insulin Receptor Catalytic Activity by the
Molecular Adapter Grb14*
Véronique
Béréziat ,
Anne
Kasus-Jacobi§,
Dominique
Perdereau,
Bertrand
Cariou,
Jean
Girard, and
Anne-Françoise
Burnol¶
From Endocrinologie et Métabolisme, CNRS UPR 1524 Institut
Cochin de Genetique Moleculaire, 24 rue du Faubourg
Saint-Jacques, 75674 Paris Cedex 14, France
Received for publication, July 13, 2001, and in revised form, November 20, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Grb14 belongs to the Grb7 family of adapters and
was recently identified as a partner of the insulin receptor (IR). Here
we show that Grb14 inhibits in vitro IR substrate
phosphorylation. Grb14 does not alter the Km for
ATP and behaves as an uncompetitive inhibitor for the IR substrate.
Similar experiments performed with other members of the Grb7 family,
Grb7 and Grb10, and with IGF-1 receptor argue in favor of a specific
inhibition of the IR catalytic activity by Grb14. The IR-interacting
domain of Grb14, the PIR, is sufficient for the inhibitory effect of Grb14, whereas the SH2 domain has no effect on IR catalytic activity. In Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells overexpressing both IR and Grb14,
Grb14 binds to the IR as early as 1 min after insulin stimulation, and
the two proteins remain associated. When interacting with Grb14, the IR
is protected against tyrosine phosphatases action and therefore
maintained under a phosphorylated state. However, the binding of Grb14
to the IR induces an early delay in the activation of Akt and ERK1/2 in
CHO-IR cells, and ERK1/2 are less efficiently phosphorylated. These
findings show that Grb14 is a direct inhibitor of the IR catalytic
activity and could be considered as a modulator of insulin signaling.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases by ligand binding results
in the autophosphorylation of multiple tyrosine residues of the
cytoplasmic domain of the receptors. Phosphotyrosyl residues act then
as binding motifs for multiple intracellular effectors, which interact
through their Src homology 2 (SH2)1 domains, and initiate
various signaling pathways (1). Among the receptor tyrosine kinases,
the insulin receptor (IR) behaves specifically since the main
effectors, the IRSs and Shc families of proteins, bind through their
phosphotyrosine binding domains (2). IRSs and Shc act then as
scaffolding proteins, recruiting SH2-containing effectors. Searching
for new proteins able to bind to the intracellular domain of the IR led
to the identification of a new family of proteins, the Grb7 family of
molecular adapters. This family comprises Grb7, Grb10, and Grb14 (3).
These proteins possess a C terminus SH2 domain, which is implicated in
the interaction with a number of receptor tyrosine kinases and also
with different signaling proteins (for a review, see Ref. 3). However,
in addition to the SH2 domain, another region of the protein is
required for the binding to the IR. This region, located upstream from the SH2 domain, was called BPS (for between pleckstrin homology (PH)
and SH2 (4)) or PIR (for phosphorylated insulin receptor-interacting region (5)). The BPS/PIR domain is only conserved among the Grb7 family
of proteins (4-6). Although the SH2 domain is sufficient for the
association between Grb7 and the IR, the binding of Grb10 is mediated
by both domains SH2 and BPS/PIR (4, 6-10). In the case of Grb14, the
SH2 domain is dispensable for the interaction with the IR, the PIR
being the main interacting region (5). Interestingly, Grb14 interacts
specifically with the IR regulatory tyrosine kinase loop (5). By
contrast, Grb7 and Grb10 interact with the IR through distinct domains
since, in addition to the activation loop, they also bind to the
juxtamembrane site and to the C terminus (6, 8-10).
The biological role of the members of the Grb7 family of proteins is
not yet elucidated. Various studies have suggested a role for Grb7 in
the regulation of cell migration (11-15). Grb10 is expressed as six
different isoforms (16). It is found associated with mitochondria where
it interacts with Raf1 and is likely to be involved in the regulation
of apoptosis (17, 18). The role of the Grb7 family of proteins in the
insulin signal transduction is still not fully understood. At the
present time, available data are discordant suggesting either a
positive or a negative role of Grb10 on insulin-induced mitogenesis
(16, 19). We recently identified Grb14 as a novel effector of insulin
signaling (5). Grb14 is specifically expressed in insulin-sensitive
tissues, and insulin induces Grb14 binding to the IR in vivo
in rat liver. In CHO-IR cells, the overexpression of Grb14 leads to an
inhibition of insulin actions such as DNA and glycogen synthesis or
tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins (5, 20). However, as already reported for IRS-1, this inhibitory effect could be due to the sequestration of downstream insulin signaling effectors (21, 22). Thus,
the positive or negative role of Grb14 on insulin signaling has not
been clearly established.
The present study focuses on the elucidation of the molecular
mechanisms implicated in the effects of Grb14 on insulin signaling. To
get insight on the role of the association between Grb14 and the IR
regulatory kinase loop, we determined whether Grb14 binding could alter
the IR catalytic activity in an in vitro system. We demonstrate here that Grb14 inhibits the IR substrate phosphorylation activity and that this inhibitory effect is mediated through the PIR
domain. In vivo in CHO-IR cells, Grb14 overexpression
induces alterations in the activation by insulin of the Akt and ERK
pathways. In addition, experiments performed with Grb7 and Grb10 and
with the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor argue in favor of a specific inhibitory effect of Grb14 on the IR catalytic activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Oligonucleotides were purchased from Invitrogen.
Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
antibodies and polyclonal antibodies against the IR -subunit were
respectively from Amersham Biosciences, Inc. and Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Polyclonal antibodies directed against the
phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2 and Akt (Ser-473) were from Promega and
New England Biolabs, respectively. Polyclonal antibodies against ERK1/2
and Akt were from Transduction Laboratories and Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Monoclonal anti-Myc and anti-PTP1B antibodies
were from Invitrogen and Oncogene Science, respectively. Polyclonal
anti-Grb14 antibodies were described previously (5). All chemicals were
from Sigma. Culture media and geneticin (G418) were from Invitrogen,
and hygromycin was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Cell Lines and Culture Conditions--
CHO-IR and CHO-IR/Grb14
cell lines were described previously (5). They were grown in Ham's
F-12 medium supplemented with 1 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml
penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum in
the presence of 75 µg/ml geneticin (CHO-IR) and with the addition of
100 µg/ml hygromycin (CHO-IR/Grb14). NIH-IGF-1R cells, which are
NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblast cells overexpressing wild-type IGF-1
receptors, were a kind gift from D. Le Roith. Cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (4.5 g/liter glucose) supplemented
with 1 mM glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml
streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum in the presence of 75 µg/ml geneticin.
Production of the GST Fusion Proteins--
The GST-Grb14 (Grb14,
PIR, SH2), GST-Grb7 (Grb7, PIR, SH2), and GST-Shc constructs were
described previously (5, 6). The mouse GST-Grb10 was a gift from J. Finidori. Grb10 PIR and SH2 domains were generated by PCR and inserted
at the BamHI site of pGEX3X (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
The SH2-B C-terminal domain cloned previously (amino acids 452-682,
Ref. 23) was inserted in the pGEX3X vector. GST fusion proteins were
produced as described previously (23). Briefly, induced bacteria were
lysed by sonication in PLC lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH
7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM pyrophosphate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Clarified lysates were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose beads overnight at 4 °C in PLC lysis buffer. Beads were then washed three times with HNTG buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The fusion proteins were
eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) containing 10 mM glutathione and quantified by SDS-PAGE analysis.
Partial Purification of Insulin and IGF-1 Receptors--
IGF-1
and insulin receptors were partially purified by affinity
chromatography on wheat germ agglutinin (WGA). Briefly, CHO-IR and
NIH-IGF-1R cells were serum-starved for 24 h, washed twice with
ice-cold 1× phosphate-buffered saline (Invitrogen), and solubilized for 60 min at 4 °C in a buffer containing 30 mM HEPES
(pH 7.6), 30 mM NaCl, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1% Triton X-100, and a standard mixture of protease
inhibitors (Complete, Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Lysates were
cleared by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 60 min at
4 °C, and the supernatants were recycled three times through a WGA
column. Glycoproteins were eluted with 0.3 M
N-acetyl-D-glucosamine in 30 mM
HEPES (pH 7.6), 30 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100. The protein
content of the eluates was measured, and receptors were quantified by
Scatchard analysis of 125I-insulin or
125I-IGF-1 binding.
In Vitro Insulin Receptor
Autophosphorylation--
Reaction mixtures with equal amounts
of insulin binding activity were preincubated for 60 min at room
temperature in the presence of 100 nM insulin in 50 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.6) containing 150 mM
NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.06% bovine serum albumin.
Phosphorylation was initiated by adding the kinase buffer (8 mM MgCl2, 4 mM MnCl2, 50 µM ATP, and 5 µCi/sample [ -32P]ATP)
in the presence or absence of 1 µg of GST-Grb14 (120 nM final concentration). After various periods of time at room temperature the reaction was stopped by addition of 4× stop buffer (200 mM EDTA, 400 mM NaF, 40 mM sodium
pyrophosphate, 20 mM ATP), 0.3% -globulins, and 25%
polyethylene glycol and incubated for 15 min at 4 °C. The samples
were centrifuged for 5 min, and then the pellets were washed in
ice-cold H2O and boiled in 20 µl of Laemmli sample buffer
(24). The samples were separated by reducing SDS-PAGE (10% resolving
gels) and visualized by autoradiography. Blots were analyzed by
densitometry and quantified (Quantity One from Bio-Rad).
Tyrosine Kinase Activity in Vitro Assays--
The IR and IGF-1
receptor (IGF-1R) tyrosine kinase activity was measured essentially as
described previously (25). Aliquots of the WGA-purified receptors (0.3 nM final concentration) were incubated for 1 h at room
temperature in the presence or absence of 100 nM insulin or
IGF-1 in 30 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.6), 30 mM
NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.03% bovine serum albumin. The autophosphorylation of the receptors was performed during 30 min (IR)
or 20 min (IGF-1R) at room temperature in the presence of variable
amounts of the GST-Grb proteins in the kinase buffer (8 mM
MgCl2, 4 mM MnCl2, 20 µM ATP, and 5 µCi/sample [ -32P]ATP).
Substrate phosphorylation was carried out using 2 µM of the synthetic substrate poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) (Sigma) and stopped after
30 min by spotting the reaction mixture onto 2- × 2-cm Whatman ET31
filter paper squares and immersing in 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid
containing 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate. Papers were washed several times in 5% trichloroacetic acid containing 10 mM
sodium pyrophosphate, and the radioactivity incorporated into the
synthetic peptide was determined by Cerenkov counting. Results were
expressed as percentage of the maximal insulin effect measured in the
absence of GST fusion proteins. Similar experiments were performed
using different GST-Grb14 concentrations and 5-100 µM
ATP (in the presence of 2 µM poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1)) or
0.25-10 µM poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) (in the presence of 20 µM ATP) to calculate the Km and Vmax for ATP and poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) using a
double-reciprocal plot (Lineweaver-Burk).
Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase in Vitro Assays--
Aliquots of
the WGA-purified IR were activated by insulin as described above and
phosphorylated for 30 min at room temperature in a kinase buffer (30 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 30 mM NaCl, 8 mM
MgCl2, 4 mM MnCl2, 100 mM ATP) in the presence or absence of 1 µg of GST-Grb14
(120 nM final concentration). The dephosphorylation reaction was performed using 1.5 µg of the protein tyrosine
phosphatase PTP1B (Upstate Biotechnology) for 40 min at room
temperature in an assay buffer containing 30 mM HEPES (pH
7.6), 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 2.5 mM EDTA, and 0.7% bovine serum albumin in the presence or
absence of 2 mM orthovanadate. The reaction was stopped by
addition of 4× stop buffer, and the samples were separated by reducing
SDS-PAGE. IR phosphorylation was visualized by Western blotting using
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies, analyzed by densitometry, and
quantified (Quantity One from Bio-Rad).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting--
Confluent CHO-IR
or CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were serum-deprived for 24 h and stimulated
or not with insulin (100 nM) for various periods of time.
Cells were solubilized at 4 °C in lysis buffer (20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 30 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM NaF, 1% Triton
X-100, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 2 µg/ml
leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 1 mM orthovanadate). Lysates were cleared by
a centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C.
For direct Western blots equal amounts of proteins were subjected to
SDS-PAGE analysis and immunodetected with the indicated antibodies. The
immunoreactive bands were revealed using the ECL detection kit
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.). The autoradiograms were analyzed by
densitometry and quantified (Quantity One from Bio-Rad). For immunoprecipitations, after a preclearing step the lysates were incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-Grb14 or anti-PTP1B antibodies in the presence of protein A-agarose (Upstate Biotechnology) or protein
G-Sepharose (Sigma). After extensive washing in lysis buffer, the
resulting immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Grb14 Inhibits the IR Substrate Phosphorylation--
A role for
Grb14 on IR catalytic activity was investigated in vitro
using partially purified IR and recombinant GST-Grb14. The effect of
Grb14 was first tested in vitro on the kinetics of IR
autophosphorylation (Fig. 1A).
In the absence of Grb14, IR was markedly phosphorylated after 2 min of
exposure to insulin. A maximal increase was observed after 5 min, and
the phosphorylation was maintained for 30 min. The addition of 120 nM GST-Grb14 induced a slight decrease in IR
autophosphorylation, which was significant only after 30 min (Fig.
1A). The IR kinase activity was then measured as the
phosphorylation of the synthetic substrate poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) in the
presence of increasing concentrations of GST-Grb14. As shown in Fig.
1B, GST-Grb14 strikingly inhibited IR catalytic activity. A
40% inhibition was observed for the addition of 2 nM
GST-Grb14, and the activity was abolished for a concentration of 20 nM. The addition of up to 200 nM GST did not
modify IR catalytic activity. Thus, the inhibitory effect of GST-Grb14
was specific to the Grb14 protein. The molecular adaptors Shc and SH2-B
are also known to bind to the phosphorylated IR (5, 26-29). As shown on Fig. 1B, these adapters did not alter IR catalytic
activity, suggesting that Grb14 acts as a direct and potent inhibitor
of IR substrate phosphorylation.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Grb14 effect on IR tyrosine kinase
activity. A, kinetics of IR autophosphorylation.
WGA-purified IRs (0.3 nM) were exposed to insulin (100 nM) and allowed to autophosphorylate in the presence or
absence of 120 nM GST-Grb14 fusion proteins. After SDS-PAGE
analysis the IR autophosphorylation was analyzed by autoradiography.
The blots from six different experiments were quantified by
densitometry scanning analysis and expressed in arbitrary units as
percentage of the basal value at time 0. Empty bars, in the
absence of GST-Grb14; gray bars, in the presence of 120 nM GST-Grb14. Values obtained in the absence and presence
of GST-Grb14 were compared using the Student's t test for
significance (*, p < 0.05). B, IR substrate
phosphorylation. WGA-purified IRs were exposed to insulin and
preincubated for 30 min in a phosphorylation mixture containing
[ -32P]ATP and the indicated GST fusion proteins. The
synthetic substrate poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) was added, and the
radioactivity incorporated during a 30-min reaction was quantified by
Cerenkov counting. Results are expressed as percentage of the
insulin-stimulated activity measured in the absence of GST proteins and
are the mean ± S.E. of five to nine determinations from six
different experiments.
|
|
As the phosphorylation of IR induces a conformational change that
allows access to the ATP and to the substrate binding sites (30), we
determined whether the binding of Grb14 altered the kinetic parameters
of the IR catalytic activity. First, increasing concentrations of ATP
were tested in the presence or absence of 4 nM GST-Grb14
fusion protein. In the absence of Grb14, kinetics data obtained were in
the range of values reported in the literature (31, 32). In the
presence of Grb14 the Km for ATP was not altered,
but the Vmax was decreased by 30%, suggesting that Grb14 acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor for ATP (Fig.
2A). Similar experiments were
then performed using increasing amounts of the synthetic substrate
poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) in the presence of 0, 4, and 16 nM
GST-Grb14. Three parallel straight lines were obtained on the
Lineweaver-Burk plot, indicating that Grb14 modified both
Km and Vmax values (Fig.
2B). The Km for the synthetic substrate
was only slightly reduced by Grb14, but the Vmax
was decreased by 70-80%. These kinetics data are representative of an
uncompetitive inhibitor. Taken together these results show that Grb14
reduces IR-catalyzed reactions without blocking the access to the ATP
and to the substrate binding sites.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of Grb14 on ATP and synthetic
substrate binding. IR tyrosine kinase activity was measured as
described in Fig. 1B, and data are presented as
Lineweaver-Burk plots. A, experiments performed in the
presence (empty squares) or absence (filled
diamonds) of 4 nM Grb14 using 2 µM
poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) and 5-100 µM ATP. B,
experiments performed using 20 µM ATP and 0.25-10
µM poly(Glu:Tyr) (4:1) in the absence of Grb14
(filled diamonds) or presence of 4 nM
(empty squares) or 16 nM (filled
circles) GST-Grb14. Results are the mean of three to four
independent experiments. Values obtained in the absence and presence of
GST-Grb14 were compared using the Student's t test for
significance (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001).
|
|
Grb14 Is a Specific Inhibitor of the IR Catalytic
Activity--
The IGF-1R is a member of the tyrosine kinase family of
growth factor receptors and is closely related to the IR (33). Grb14 interacts with the activated IGF-1R in vitro and in the
two-hybrid system (not shown). The effect of GST-Grb14 was then tested
on in vitro IGF-1R catalytic activity. As reported in Fig.
3, the IGF-1R catalytic activity was less
sensitive than IR to the inhibitory effect of Grb14: the addition of 6 nM GST-Grb14 decreased by 35% the IGF-1R catalytic
activity compared with 80% for the IR. Thus, Grb14 is a weaker
inhibitor of the IGF-1R than of the IR kinase activity.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Grb14 inhibitory effect on IGF-1R catalytic
activity. WGA-purified receptors were stimulated with insulin or
IGF-1 (100 nM). Tyrosine kinase activity was measured as
described in Fig. 1B in the presence of GST-Grb14 as
indicated. Results are the mean ± S.E. of seven determinations
from four different experiments. Activities obtained with IGF-1
receptors were compared with IR using the Student's t test
for significance (**, p < 0.01).
|
|
Grb7 and Grb10 are closely related to Grb14. To determine whether these
two proteins could also act as IR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the
effect of the three Grb proteins was measured in the same assays and
illustrated in Fig. 4. Whatever the
amount of GST-Grb7 tested, the inhibitory effect was less than 50%,
showing that Grb7 is a poor inhibitor of IR catalytic activity. In the case of Grb10, increasing the amount of Grb10 to 60 nM of
fusion protein allowed a maximal inhibition of 80%. However, the
entire dose-response curve was shifted to the right when compared with the Grb14 curve, indicating that the IR was less sensitive to the
inhibitory effect of Grb10. The half-maximal inhibition of IR kinase
activity was obtained for 11 nM Grb10 compared with 3-4
nM for Grb14. These results are in favor of a
specific inhibitory effect of Grb14 on IR catalytic activity.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of Grb7/10/14 on IR tyrosine kinase
activity. IR tyrosine kinase activity was measured as described in
Fig. 1B. Empty circles, GST-Grb7; empty
triangles, GST-Grb10; filled circles, GST-Grb14.
Results are the mean ± S.E. of four to eight assays from four
different experiments.
|
|
The in Vitro Inhibitory Effect of Grb7/10/14 Is Mediated by the
PIR--
The Grb7/10/14 proteins are characterized by a succession of
interacting domains: an N-terminal proline-rich motif (PP), a central
PH domain, a PIR (or BPS) (4, 5), and a C-terminal SH2 domain (3) (Fig.
5A). To determine whether a
particular domain of Grb14 was responsible for its inhibitory effect,
the IR catalytic activity was measured in the presence of increasing amounts of the various Grb14 domains expressed as GST fusion proteins. The Grb14 N-terminal region, deleted of the PIR and SH2 domains, did
not modify the in vitro IR catalytic activity (data not
shown). However, as shown in Fig. 5B, the GST-PIR of Grb14
strongly inhibited the IR kinase activity: a 55% inhibition was
observed for 12 nM GST-PIR, and the kinase activity was
fully inhibited for a concentration of 120 nM. In contrast,
the GST-SH2 Grb14 fusion protein did not alter the IR catalytic
activity (Fig. 5C). Similar experiments were performed using
the different domains of Grb7 and Grb10. As reported for Grb14, the
inhibitory effect of Grb7 and Grb10 on the IR kinase activity was due
to the PIR, the SH2 domain alone having no effect (Fig. 5). Moreover,
as reported for the full-length proteins, the PIR domains of Grb7 and
Grb10 were less efficient than the PIR of Grb14.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Identification of the Grb7/10/14 domains
implicated in their inhibitory effect. A, schematic
representation of the primary structure of the proteins. B,
effect of the PIR on IR catalytic activity. C, effect of the
SH2 domain on IR catalytic activity. IR catalytic activity was measured
as described in Fig. 1B. Results are the mean ± S.E.
of 5-10 determinations from three to six different experiments. Values
obtained for Grb7 and Grb10 were compared with those of Grb14 for the
same concentration of GST-PIR fusion using the Student's t
test for significance (*, p < 0.05; **,
p < 0.01). PP, N-terminal proline-rich
motif.
|
|
All together these results show that the members of the Grb7 family of
proteins inhibit in vitro the IR catalytic activity. Since
Grb14 is more efficient on IR catalytic activity than on IGF-1Rs, we
suggest that Grb14 is a specific IR inhibitor. Interestingly, PIR, the
new interacting domain, is implicated in the inhibitory effect of these proteins.
Grb14 Rapidly and Stably Associates with the Activated IR--
To
further delineate the mechanism of Grb14 inhibition in a cellular
model, we studied the kinetics of Grb14 effects in the CHO-IR/Grb14
cell line. We first determined the kinetics of binding of Grb14 to the
IR. CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were exposed to insulin for various periods of
time. Cell lysates were then immunoprecipitated using anti-Grb14
antibodies and immunodetected using anti-IR antibodies (Fig.
6A). The interaction between
IR and Grb14 was increased 1 min upon insulin stimulation, reached a
maximum after 2 min, and unexpectedly persisted throughout the 90 min
of the experiment. To test whether the presence of insulin in the
culture medium was required to maintain the IR-Grb14 association, the
cells were exposed to insulin for 5 min and then incubated in fresh
medium without the hormone. Under these conditions, the maximal
IR-Grb14 interaction was also observed after 2 min, and this
interaction remained present for the 90 min of the experiment (data not
shown). This suggests that insulin is able to rapidly induce the
association between Grb14 and IR and that this binding remains stable
even after withdrawal of the hormonal stimulus.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
A, kinetics of Grb14 binding to IR
receptors. CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were stimulated with insulin (100 nM) for various periods of time as indicated. Lysates were
immunoprecipitated with anti-Grb14 antibodies and immunodetected with
anti-IR antibodies (upper blot). After stripping, the blot
was reprobed with anti-Myc antibodies to verify the efficiency of the
immunoprecipitation (Grb14 contained a Myc tag). These blots are
representative of four different experiments. B and
C, kinetics of IR tyrosine phosphorylation. CHO-IR and
CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were stimulated with insulin (100 nM)
for various periods of time and solubilized. Cell lysates were
immunodetected with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (B)
and then with anti-IR antibodies (C). These blots
are representative of four different experiments. pY,
phosphotyrosine.
|
|
The IR phosphorylation state was then investigated in CHO-IR and
CHO-IR/Grb14 cells, both cell lines expressing similar amounts of IR
(Fig. 6C). In CHO-IR cells, insulin induced a rapid and transient IR tyrosyl phosphorylation, which is consistent with previous
reports (34). IR phosphorylation was maximal 1 min after exposure to
insulin, decreased after 10-15 min, and returned to basal levels at 60 min (Fig. 6B). In CHO-IR/Grb14 cells, IR phosphorylation was
delayed. IR phosphorylation was maximal only after 10 min and then
remained maximal throughout the 90 min of the experiment.
Since the rapid dephosphorylation of the IR after insulin stimulation
in CHO-IR cells could be due to the action of tyrosine phosphatases, we
then tested whether the interaction of Grb14 with the phosphorylated IR
could block the tyrosine phosphatase action. For this experiment, we
used the tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B, which was reported to bind to the
activated IR and to inhibit insulin action (35-37). WGA-purified IRs
were activated by insulin, and the autophosphorylation reaction was
performed in the presence of either 200 nM GST or 60 nM GST-Grb14. The phosphorylation state of the IR was
measured 40 min after addition of the PTP1B recombinant using
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig.
7A). In agreement with recent
studies (38), PTP1B strikingly decreased IR tyrosine phosphorylation
(Fig. 7A, lanes 2 and 3). The
dephosphorylation was similar in the presence or absence of GST (data
not shown). However, in the presence of GST-Grb14, IR dephosphorylation
by PTP1B was decreased by 47% compared with 72% in the presence of GST (Fig. 7A, lanes 5 and 6). In each
condition, the IR phosphorylation was restored by the addition of
orthovanadate, a tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor (Fig. 7A,
lanes 4 and 7). We verified that GST-Grb14 did
not alter the dephosphorylation activity of PTP1B on a synthetic substrate, p-nitrophenyl phosphate (data not shown).
We then tested the effect of Grb14 on IR-PTP1B association in the CHO
cell lines. As reported in Fig. 7B, IRs were
co-immunoprecipitated with anti-PTP1B antibodies in insulin-stimulated
CHO-IR cells but not in CHO-IR/Grb14 cells. The control experiment
confirmed that similar amounts of PTP1B were precipitated (not shown).
Thus, insulin induced the IR-PTP1B interaction, but the expression of
Grb14 suppressed this effect. All together these experiments suggest
that, in vitro and in cell lines, the binding of Grb14 on
the activated IR hinders the action of tyrosine phosphatases, therefore
maintaining the IR under a phosphorylated state.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of Grb14 on insulin-induced PTP1B
action. A, in vitro PTP1B dephosphorylation
of IR. WGA-purified IR were stimulated (lanes 2-7) or not
(lane 1) with insulin (100 nM) and
phosphorylated as described under "Experimental Procedures" in the
presence of 1 µg of GST (lanes 1-4) or 1 µg of
GST-Grb14 (lanes 5-7). Dephosphorylation was performed by
the addition of 1.5 µg of the recombinant PTP1B (lanes 3 and 4 and lanes 6 and 7) in
the presence or absence of orthovanadate (lanes 4 and
7). After SDS-PAGE analysis IR autophosphorylation was
visualized by Western blotting using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.
This blot is representative of five different experiments.
B, insulin-induced IR-PTP1B interaction. CHO-IR and
CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were stimulated with insulin (100 nM)
for 20 min. Lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-PTP1B antibodies
and immunodetected with anti-IR antibodies. This blot is representative
of two different experiments. IP,
immunoprecipitation.
|
|
Grb14 Impairs Insulin Signaling Pathways--
The effect of Grb14
overexpression on the activation of two main insulin signaling
effectors, Akt and ERKs, was studied in the CHO-IR and CHO-IR/Grb14
cell lines. Whole cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using
antibodies directed against the activated phosphorylated forms of the
proteins. In the CHO-IR cell line, the kinetics of Akt and ERK1/2
activation observed are in agreement with previous reports (Fig.
8) (39-42). Maximal insulin-induced Akt
phosphorylation was not different in the two cell lines. However, the
overexpression of Grb14 delayed by 5-10 min the maximal activation of
Akt (Fig. 8, A and B). The activation of ERK1 and
ERK2 was also delayed in the presence of Grb14: maximal phosphorylation
was observed after 5 min of insulin stimulation in CHO-IR cells,
whereas it was only observed after 10 min in CHO-IR/Grb14 cells (Fig.
8, C-E). In addition, while insulin induced a 3- and 5-fold
increase, respectively, in ERK1 and ERK2 phosphorylation in CHO-IR
cells, a 2- and 2.5-fold increase was only observed in CHO-IR/Grb14
cells. Thus, the activation of ERKs was significantly decreased in the
presence of Grb14. These effects could not be attributed to variations
in the total amounts of Akt and ERK1/2 since they were similarly
expressed in both CHO-IR and CHO-IR/Grb14 cells (data not shown). All
the experiments in CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were reproduced in different
clones expressing various levels of Grb14 and led to similar
conclusions (data not shown). All together these experiments show that
the presence of Grb14 can modulate the activation and the
phosphorylated state of insulin effectors.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of Grb14 on the kinetics of insulin
activation of Akt (A and B) and
ERK1/2 (C-E). CHO-IR or CHO-IR/Grb14 cells were
stimulated with insulin (100 nM) for various periods of
time and solubilized. Lysates were immunodetected with anti-phospho-Akt
antibodies (A) and anti-phospho-ERK1/2 antibodies
(C). The blots of three (Akt) or four (ERKs) similar
experiments were quantified by densitometry scanning analysis using
Quantity One (Bio-Rad) and expressed in arbitrary units as percentage
of the basal value at time 0 in the absence of insulin. B,
phospho-Akt; D, phospho-ERK1; E, phospho-ERK2.
Values obtained in CHO-IR cells (empty bars) and
CHO-IR/Grb14 cells (gray bars) were compared using the
Student's t test for significance (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The molecular adapter Grb14 was recently identified as a binding
partner of the IR. The interaction between Grb14 and IR involves a new
interaction domain, the PIR, which specifically binds to the regulatory
kinase loop of the IR (5). To investigate whether this novel
interaction had functional consequences, we studied the IR kinase
activity in the presence of purified recombinant Grb14 in
vitro and showed that Grb14 is a direct inhibitor of the IR
catalytic activity.
Crystallographic studies have shown that the IR regulatory kinase loop
adopts a different conformation when it is phosphorylated. In the basal
state, one of the tyrosine residues of the dephosphorylated regulatory
kinase loop is bound to the active site and exerts an autoinhibition on
the receptor (43). After autophosphorylation, this autoinhibition is
released, and the phosphorylated regulatory kinase loop is stabilized
in an open conformation, allowing access to the ATP and to the
substrate binding sites (30). This open conformation facilitates the
interaction between the regulatory kinase loop and downstream signaling
proteins like Grb14. Indeed, Grb14, which binds to the phosphorylated
IR, only slightly decreases IR autophosphorylation. In the presence of
Grb14, the Km for ATP is not modified, whereas the
Vmax is decreased. In addition, increasing
concentrations of Grb14 decrease both the Km and
Vmax for a synthetic substrate, suggesting that
Grb14 behaves as an uncompetitive inhibitor (44). Thus, the binding of
Grb14 does not block the access of ATP and of the substrate to their respective sites but rather maintains the kinase under an inactive form. A possible explanation for the inhibitory effect of Grb14 could
be that conformational modifications occur during the phosphorylation reaction and that Grb14 binding alters these modifications and blocks
the phosphoryl transfer from ATP to the substrate.
The inhibitory effect of Grb14 is mediated through its PIR, the
IR-interacting domain. The Grb14 SH2 domain, which binds very poorly to
the IR, did not alter its catalytic activity. The adaptor SH2-B was
also described to interact with the activated IR, and this association
is mediated by the SH2 domain, which binds to the activation loop of
the receptors (5, 28, 29). Interestingly, the binding of SH2-B does not
modify the in vitro IR catalytic activity. This implies that
a protein bound to the activated IR tyrosine kinase loop does not
necessarily inhibit the kinase activity. The interaction of SH2-B and
Grb14 with the activated IR is then likely to involve different
mechanisms. It has been shown that mutations of the same tyrosine
residues of the kinase loop alter the interaction of both Grb14 and
SH2-B (Refs. 28 and 29 and data not shown). The SH2 domain of SH2-B
binds to phosphorylated tyrosine residues. This suggests that either
the PIR of Grb14 does not bind to phosphorylated tyrosine residues or
that it uses another mechanism in addition to a phosphotyrosine
association. In favor of the first hypothesis, a recent paper reported
that a tris-phosphorylated peptide of the IR, containing the three tyrosine residues of the regulatory loop, was unable to compete for the
interaction between the PIR of Grb10 and the phosphorylated IR kinase
domain (45). However, a definitive answer should be given by
crystallographic studies of the PIR domain bound to the phosphorylated
IR regulatory loop.
It was recently shown that PTP1B selectively recognized the
Tyr(P)-1162 phosphotyrosyl residue of the tyrosine kinase loop (46). In addition, the IR binding of PTP1B is necessary for its
dephosphorylating effect (47). As Grb14 is known to bind to the same
motif, a competition for binding, and thus for IR dephosphorylation, is
then likely to occur. In the CHO-IR/Grb14 cell line, the overexpression
of Grb14 should favor the IR-Grb14 interaction and thus decrease IR
dephosphorylation by PTP1B. Accordingly, we observed in
vitro and in CHO-IR cells that IR interacting with Grb14 was
maintained under its phosphorylated form because the presence of Grb14
prevented the tyrosine phosphatases action. Protein tyrosine
phosphatases and Grb14 are then two kinds of inhibitors of the IR that
act through different mechanisms. Phosphatases inactivate the receptor
by dephosphorylation, whereas the binding of Grb14 on the
phosphorylated tyrosine kinase loop inhibits its catalytic activity.
The role of these two kinds of inhibitors is likely to be determined by
their respective level of expression and affinity for the receptor.
The in vitro inhibitory effect of Grb14 on IR catalytic
activity is reflected in vivo in insulin signaling in a
CHO-IR/Grb14 cell line. In these cells, Grb14 rapidly binds to the IR.
This leads to a significant delay in the insulin-induced activation of
ERKs and a decrease in their maximal phosphorylation. This alteration
can account for the decrease in DNA synthesis previously reported in
this cell line (5). Grb14 also induces a delay in Akt phosphorylation
but does not affect its maximal phosphorylation. This defect is weak
when compared with the huge inhibition of glycogen synthesis measured
in CHO-IR/Grb14 cells (5). Two hypotheses can explain this apparent
discrepancy. First, insulin-mediated activation of glycogen synthesis
implicates other signaling pathways in addition to the
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway (48). On the other hand, the
activation state of Akt was estimated using anti-phospho-Ser-473.
However, as recently shown, Ser-473 phosphorylation of Akt does not
always correlate with its activity (49). Thus, the direct inhibitory
effect of Grb14 on IR catalytic activity documented in vitro
is likely to be responsible for the alterations in the early steps of
insulin signaling and to account for the inhibition of the distal
actions of insulin.
The Grb14 inhibitory effect is less pronounced in CHO-IR/Grb14 cells
than in vitro using purified proteins. In addition to the
presence of the cellular machinery that could interfere with the
IR-Grb14 association in the CHO model, this difference could also be
attributed to variations in the ratio of Grb14 and IR expression in the
two systems. In vitro the inhibitory effect of Grb14 on the
IR tyrosine kinase activity was observed for a stoichiometry of
IR-Grb14 ranging from 1:6 to 1:20, which could be compatible with a
physiological phenomenon. However, the ratio of Grb14 and IR expression
in CHO-IR/Grb14, as well as in animal tissues, cannot be easily
determined. It should be noted that the expression of Grb14 is
restricted to insulin-sensitive tissues and that insulin induces
in vivo Grb14 binding to liver IR, suggesting that this
interaction is physiologically relevant (5).
IGF-1R and IR are two closely related receptors. Insulin and IGF-1 bind
to their specific receptors with high affinity but can also bind to the
reciprocal receptor with a lower affinity. The stimulation of IGF-1R
and IR induces the activation of the same intracellular effectors (50).
Furthermore, both receptors display the same heterotetrameric structure
and an amino acid similarity in the range of 40-85% in different
domains, the highest degree of homology being found in the tyrosine
kinase domain (51). Interestingly, in the in vitro kinase
assay Grb14 is 3-10 times less effective on IGF-1R than on IR
catalytic activity. This suggests that Grb14 is a more specific
inhibitor of the IR kinase activity. Grb14 was recently identified as a
new binding partner of the FGF receptor (52). Overexpression of Grb14
induced only a slight decrease in FGF-stimulated DNA synthesis, but the
expression of the Grb14 R466K mutant, containing an inactive SH2
domain, led to an enhanced DNA synthesis in response to FGF. Since this
Grb14 mutant did not bind to the FGF receptor, the improvement of
FGF-induced proliferation is likely to be due to interactions with
downstream effectors (52). This suggests that Grb14 can inhibit
receptor tyrosine kinase signaling through distinct mechanisms and
further supports the idea of a specific inhibition of IR catalytic
activity by Grb14.
We demonstrated that Grb14 is the most potent inhibitor of the Grb7
family of adapters toward the IR kinase activity. Grb7 induces a
maximal inhibition of 40%, and the IR catalytic activity is less
sensitive to the inhibitory effect of Grb10 than to that of Grb14.
However, remarkably for all three Grbs the inhibitory effect on IR
catalytic activity is mediated by the PIR, in agreement with a recent
paper reporting an in vitro inhibitory effect of the BPS
domain of Grb10 on the IR catalytic activity (45). It has been shown
that the PIR and SH2 domains of the various Grb proteins are
differentially implicated in the interaction with the IR (6). The SH2
domain is responsible for the binding of Grb7 to the IR, whereas both
PIR and SH2 are equally important in the Grb10-IR interaction, and the
PIR is the main binding domain in the IR-Grb14 interaction. In
addition, the analysis of the interaction between IR tyrosine mutants
and the PIR revealed that for the three Grb proteins the PIR
preferentially associates with the phosphorylated kinase domain (4-6).
All together these observations support a direct link between the
binding ability and inhibitory action of the PIRs, and also a greater
specificity of Grb14 among the Grb proteins in the inhibition of the IR
catalytic activity.
The mechanism of inhibition of Grb14 on IR catalytic activity displays
analogies with the SOCS inhibition of JAK2 signaling (53, 54). The SOCS
family of proteins is a family of negative regulators of cytokine
signal transduction (55, 56). It has been shown that SOCS-1 and SOCS-3
specifically bind to the phosphorylated activation loop of JAK2 and
inhibit JAK2 signaling and tyrosine kinase activity. The association
with JAK2 requires the SH2 domain and the immediate N-terminal region
of SOCS-1 (extended SH2 subdomain), and the inhibitory effect requires
an additional N-terminal domain (tyrosine kinase inhibitory region)
(53, 54). In contrast, the SH2 domain is dispensable for the Grb14-IR
interaction. In addition, another difference is that Grb14 does not
seem to be inducible by insulin (data not shown). Interestingly, it was
recently reported that the SOCS proteins SOCS-1, SOCS-3, and SOCS-6 can also act as negative regulators of insulin signaling (57, 58). SOCS-3
expression is induced by insulin (59) and, by competition for binding
to the same site on the IR, SOCS-3 inhibits insulin-induced STAT-5B
activation (57). SOCS-1 and SOCS-6 inhibit insulin signaling through a
different mechanism: they inhibit IR-directed phosphorylation of IRS-1
in vitro and insulin-dependent activation of
ERK1/2 and Akt in transfected hepatoma cells (58).
In conclusion, these data allow us to propose that Grb14 exerts a rapid
negative feedback loop modulating insulin signal transduction. After
insulin receptor activation, Grb14 rapidly binds to the phosphorylated
kinase loop through its PIR, inhibits the IR catalytic activity, and
decreases intracellular insulin signaling. This study describes the
molecular mechanism of Grb14 action, and further experiments are
currently under way to delineate the effect of Grb14 under
physiological conditions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge C. Auzan and T. Issad for helpful advices. We also thank M.-G. Catelli, C. Postic, A. Leturque, and F. Mauvais-Jarvis for critically reading the manuscript.
We thank B. Margolis for the mouse Grb10 cDNA and J. Finidori
for the GST-Grb10 construct. NIH-IGF-1R cells were a kind gift from D. LeRoith.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Association pour la Recherche sur
le Cancer Grants 9111 and 5237 (to A.-F. B.) and by LIPHA S.A.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a fellowship from the Ministère de la Recherche.
§
Current address: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas,
Southwestern Medical Center, 5325 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX
75235-9046.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-1-53-73-27-09; Fax: 33-1-53-73-27-03; E-mail:
burnol@cochin.inserm.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 28, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106574200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SH2, Src homology 2;
IR, insulin receptor;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
PIR, phosphorylated IR-interacting region;
IRS, IR substrate;
BPS, between PH (pleckstrin homology) and SH2;
PTP1B, protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B;
IGF, insulin-like growth factor;
IGF-1R, IGF-1 receptor;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
WGA, wheat germ agglutinin;
FGF, fibroblast growth factor;
SOCS, suppressors
of cytokine signaling.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schlessinger, J.
(2000)
Cell
103,
211-225[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Myers, M. J., Jr.,
and White, M. F.
(1995)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
6,
209-215
|
| 3.
|
Daly, R. J.
(1998)
Cell. Signal.
10,
613-618[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
He, W.,
Rose, D. W.,
Olefsky, J. M.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6860-6867[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Kasus-Jacobi, A.,
Perdereau, D.,
Auzan, C.,
Clauser, E.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
Mauvais-Jarvis, F.,
Girard, J.,
and Burnol, A.-F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26026-26035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Kasus-Jacobi, A.,
Béréziat, V.,
Perdereau, D.,
Girard, J.,
and Burnol, A.-F.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
2052-2059[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Liu, F.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10287-10291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
O'Neill, T. J.,
Rose, D. W.,
Pillay, T. S.,
Hotta, K.,
Olefsky, J. M.,
and Gustafson, T. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22506-22513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Frantz, J. D.,
Giogetti-Peraldi, S.,
Ottinger, E. A.,
and Shoelson, S. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2659-2667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Hansen, H.,
Svensson, U.,
Zhu, J.,
Laviola, L.,
Giorgino, F.,
Wolf, G.,
Smith, R. J.,
and Riedel, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8882-8886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Han, D. C.,
and Guan, J.-L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24425-24430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Tanaka, S.,
Mori, M.,
Akiyoshi, T.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Mafune, K.-I.,
Wands, J. R.,
and Sugimachi, K.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
821-827[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Vayssiere, B.,
Zalcman, G.,
Mahe, Y.,
Mirey, G.,
Ligensa, T.,
Weidner, K. M.,
Chardin, P.,
and Camonis, J.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
467,
91-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Han, D. C.,
Shen, T. L.,
and Guan, J. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28911-28917[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lee, H.,
Volonte, D.,
Galbiati, F.,
Iyengar, P.,
Lublin, D. M.,
Bregman, D. B.,
Wilson, M. T.,
Campos-Gonzalez, R.,
Bouzahzah, B.,
Pestell, R. G.,
Scherer, P. E.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1750-1775[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Morrione, A.
(2000)
Int. J. Mol. Med.
5,
151-154[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Nantel, A.,
Mohammad-Ali, K.,
Sherk, J.,
Posner, B. I.,
and Thomas, D. Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10475-10484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Nantel, A.,
Huber, M.,
and Thomas, D. Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35719-35724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Wang, J.,
Dai, H.,
Yousaf, N.,
Moussaif, M.,
Deng, Y.,
Boufelliga, A.,
Swamy, O. R.,
Leone, M. E.,
and Riedel, H.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
6217-6228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Hemming, R.,
Agatep, R.,
Badiani, K.,
Wyant, K.,
Arthur, G.,
Gietz, R. D.,
and Triggs-Raine, B.
(2001)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
79,
21-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Sun, X. J.,
Miralpeix, M.,
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
Glasheen, E. M.,
Backer, J. M.,
Kahn, C. R.,
and White, M. F.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22662-22672[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Yamauchi, K.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4427-4434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Kasus-Jacobi, A.,
Perdereau, D.,
Tartare-Deckert, S.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
Girard, J.,
and Burnol, A.-F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17166-17170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Burnol, A.-F.,
Loizeau, M.,
and Girard, J.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
259,
E828-E834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Gustafson, T. A., He, W.,
Craparo, A.,
Schaub, C. D.,
and O'Neill, T. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2500-2508[Abstract]
|
| 27.
|
Wang, J.,
and Riedel, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3136-3139[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Kotani, K.,
Wilden, P.,
and Pillay, T. S.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
335,
103-109
|
| 29.
|
Nelms, K.,
O'Neill, T. J., Li, S.,
Hubbard, S. R.,
Gustafson, T. A.,
and Paul, W. E.
(1999)
Mamm. Genome
10,
1160-1167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Hubbard, S. R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5572-5581[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
White, M. F.,
Haring, H. U.,
Kasuga, M.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
255-264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Nemenoff, R. A.,
Kwok, Y. C.,
Shulman, G. I.,
Blackshear, P. J.,
Osathanondh, R.,
and Avruch, J.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
5058-5065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Fantl, W. J.,
Johnson, D. E.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
453-481[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
Diabetes
43,
1066-1084[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Seely, B. L.,
Staubs, P. A.,
Reichart, D. R.,
Berhanu, P.,
Milarski, K. L.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
Kusari, J.,
and Olefsky, J. M.
(1996)
Diabetes
45,
1379-1385[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Bandyopadhyay, D.,
Kusari, A.,
Kenner, K. A.,
Liu, F.,
Chernoff, J.,
Gustafson, T. A.,
and Kusari, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1639-1645[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Elchebly, M.,
Payette, P.,
Michaliszyn, E.,
Cromlish, W.,
Collins, S.,
Loy, A. L.,
Normandin, D.,
Cheng, A.,
Himms-Hagen, J.,
Chan, C. C.,
Ramachandran, C.,
Gresser, M. J.,
Tremblay, M. L.,
and Kennedy, B. P.
(1999)
Science
283,
1544-1548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Calera, M. R.,
Vallega, G.,
and Pilch, P. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6308-6312[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Kohn, A. D.,
Kovacina, K. S.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4288-4295[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Somwar, R.,
Sumitani, S.,
Taha, C.,
Sweeney, G.,
and Klip, A.
(1998)
Am. J. Physiol.
275,
E618-E625[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Pang, L.,
Lazar, D. F.,
Moller, D. E.,
Flier, J. S.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
196,
301-310[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Waters, S. B.,
Holt, K. H.,
Ross, S. E.,
Syu, L. J.,
Guan, K. L.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
Koretzky, G. A.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20883-20886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Hubbard, S. R.,
Wei, L.,
Ellis, L.,
and Hendrickson, W. A.
(1994)
Nature
372,
746-754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Duggleby, R. G.
(1988)
Biochem. Med. Metab. Biol.
40,
204-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Stein, E. G.,
Gustafson, T. A.,
and Hubbard, S. R.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
493,
106-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Salmeen, A.,
Andersen, J. N.,
Myers, M. P.,
Tonks, N. K.,
and Barford, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
1401-1412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Dadke, S.,
Kusari, J.,
and Chernoff, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
23642-23647[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Lawrence, J. C., Jr.,
and Roach, P. J.
(1997)
Diabetes
46,
541-547[Abstract]
|
| 49.
|
Hill, M. M.,
Andjelkovic, M.,
Brazil, D. P.,
Ferrari, S.,
Fabbro, D.,
and Hemmings, B. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25643-25646[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Blakesley, V. A.,
Scrimgeour, A.,
Esposito, D.,
and Le Roith, D.
(1996)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
7,
153-159[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Adamo, M.,
Roberts, C. T., Jr.,
and LeRoith, D.
(1992)
Biofactors
3,
151-157[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Reilly, J. F.,
Mickey, G.,
and Maher, P. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7771-7778[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Yasukawa, H.,
Misawa, H.,
Sakamoto, H.,
Masuhara, M.,
Sasaki, A.,
Wakioka, T.,
Ohtsuka, S.,
Imaizumi, T.,
Matsuda, T.,
Ihle, J. N.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1309-1320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Sasaki, A.,
Yasukawa, H.,
Suzuki, A.,
Kamizono, S.,
Syoda, T.,
Kinjyo, I.,
Sasaki, M.,
Johnston, J. A.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(1999)
Genes Cells
4,
339-351[Abstract]
|
| 55.
|
Hilton, D. J.
(1999)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
55,
1568-1577[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Yasukawa, H.,
Sasaki, A.,
and Yoshimura, A.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18,
143-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Emanuelli, B.,
Peraldi, P.,
Filloux, C.,
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Hilton, D.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
15985-15991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Mooney, R. A.,
Senn, J.,
Cameron, S.,
Inamdar, N.,
Boivin, L. M.,
Shang, Y.,
and Furlanetto, R. W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25889-25893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Peraldi, P.,
Filloux, C.,
Emanuelli, B.,
Hilton, D. J.,
and Van Obberghen, E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
24614-24620[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Goenaga, C. Hampe, N. Carre, K. Cailliau, E. Browaeys-Poly, D. Perdereau, L. J. Holt, R. J. Daly, J. Girard, I. Broutin, et al.
Molecular Determinants of Grb14-Mediated Inhibition of Insulin Signaling
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 2009;
23(7):
1043 - 1051.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Carre, M. Cauzac, J. Girard, and A.-F. Burnol
Dual Effect of the Adapter Growth Factor Receptor-Bound Protein 14 (Grb14) on Insulin Action in Primary Hepatocytes
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2008;
149(6):
3109 - 3117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Bai and S.-W. Luoh
GRB-7 facilitates HER-2/Neu-mediated signal transduction and tumor formation
Carcinogenesis,
March 1, 2008;
29(3):
473 - 479.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rajala, R. E. Anderson, J.-X. Ma, J. Lem, M. R. Al-Ubaidi, and R. V. S. Rajala
G-protein-coupled Receptor Rhodopsin Regulates the Phosphorylation of Retinal Insulin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
9865 - 9873.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-J. Park, J. R. Berggren, M. W. Hulver, J. A Houmard, and E. P. Hoffman
GRB14, GPD1, and GDF8 as potential network collaborators in weight loss-induced improvements in insulin action in human skeletal muscle
Physiol Genomics,
October 11, 2006;
27(2):
114 - 121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. J. Ramos, P. R. Langlais, D. Hu, L. Q. Dong, and F. Liu
Grb10 mediates insulin-stimulated degradation of the insulin receptor: a mechanism of negative regulation
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
June 1, 2006;
290(6):
E1262 - E1266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Hsiao, M. F. Poitras, B. D. Cook, Y. Liu, and S. Smith
Tankyrase 2 Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Domain-Deleted Mice Exhibit Growth Defects but Have Normal Telomere Length and Capping.
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 2006;
26(6):
2044 - 2054.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. King and A. C. Newton
The Adaptor Protein Grb14 Regulates the Localization of 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent Kinase-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 3, 2004;
279(36):
37518 - 37527.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Barr, I. Boehm, P. V. Attwood, P. M. Watt, and M. A. Bogoyevitch
The Critical Features and the Mechanism of Inhibition of a Kinase Interaction Motif-based Peptide Inhibitor of JNK
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 27, 2004;
279(35):
36327 - 36338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Deng, S. Bhattacharya, O. R. Swamy, R. Tandon, Y. Wang, R. Janda, and H. Riedel
Growth Factor Receptor-binding Protein 10 (Grb10) as a Partner of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase in Metabolic Insulin Action
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 10, 2003;
278(41):
39311 - 39322.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Vecchione, A. Marchese, P. Henry, D. Rotin, and A. Morrione
The Grb10/Nedd4 Complex Regulates Ligand-Induced Ubiquitination and Stability of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 1, 2003;
23(9):
3363 - 3372.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Stein, R. Ghirlando, and S. R. Hubbard
Structural Basis for Dimerization of the Grb10 Src Homology 2 Domain. IMPLICATIONS FOR LIGAND SPECIFICITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 4, 2003;
278(15):
13257 - 13264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Wick, E. D. Werner, P. Langlais, F. J. Ramos, L. Q. Dong, S. E. Shoelson, and F. Liu
Grb10 Inhibits Insulin-stimulated Insulin Receptor Substrate (IRS)-Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Signaling Pathway by Disrupting the Association of IRS-1/IRS-2 with the Insulin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 28, 2003;
278(10):
8460 - 8467.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Dupont, S. E. Dunn, J. C. Barrett, and D. LeRoith
Microarray Analysis and Identification of Novel Molecules Involved in Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor Signaling and Gene Expression
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.,
January 1, 2003;
58(1):
325 - 342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|