Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108154200 on December 4, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 4981-4988, February 15, 2002
A High Affinity HSF-1 Binding Site in the 5'-Untranslated Region
of the Murine Tumor Necrosis Factor-
Gene Is a Transcriptional
Repressor*
Ishwar S.
Singh
§,
Ju-Ren
He
,
Stuart
Calderwood¶, and
Jeffrey D.
Hasday
**
From the
Department of Medicine, Division of
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and the
Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
Pathology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, the
** University of Maryland Biopolymer Cytokine Core
Laboratory, and the Medical and Research Services of the Baltimore
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 and
the ¶ Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Joint Center for Radiation
Therapy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
Received for publication, August 23, 2001, and in revised form, November 13, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF
) is
a pivotal early mediator of host defenses that is essential for
survival in infections. We previously reported that exposing
macrophages to febrile range temperatures (FRT) (38.5-40 °C)
markedly attenuates TNF
expression by causing abrupt and premature
cessation of transcription. We showed that this inhibitory effect of
FRT is mediated by an alternatively activated repressor form of heat
shock factor 1 (HSF-1) and that a fragment of the TNF
gene comprising a minimal 85-nucleotide (nt) proximal promoter and the
138-nt 5'-untranslated region (UTR) was sufficient for mediating this
effect. In the present study we have used an electrophoretic mobility
shift assay (EMSA) to identify a high affinity binding site for HSF-1
in the 5'-UTR of the TNF
gene and have used a chromosome
immunoprecipitation assay to show that HSF-1 binds to this region of
the endogenous TNF
gene. Mutational inactivation of this
site blocks the inhibitory effect of overexpressed HSF-1 on activity of
the minimal TNF
promoter (
85/+138) in Raw 264.7 murine
macrophages, identifying this site as an HSF-1-dependent
repressor. However, the same mutation fails to block repression of a
full-length (
1080/+138) TNF
promoter construct by
HSF-1 overexpression, and HSF-1 binds to upstream sequences in the
regions
1080/
845,
533/
196, and
326/
39 nt in EMSA,
suggesting that additional HSF-1-dependent repressor elements are present upstream of the minimal
85-nt promoter. Furthermore, although mutation of the HSF-1 binding site in the minimal
TNF
promoter construct abrogates HSF-1-mediated
repression, the same mutation fails to abrogate repression of this
construct by high levels of HSF-1 overexpression or exposure to
39.5 °C. This suggests that HSF-1 might repress TNF
transcription
through redundant mechanisms, some of which might not require high
affinity binding of HSF-1.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF
)1 is an early pivotal
mediator expressed in response to infection and injury (1). Although TNF
is essential for optimal host defense, persistent or
inappropriately high TNF
expression has grave consequences,
including multiorgan failure and death (2-5). The pleiotropic nature
of TNF
has lead to the evolution of stringent and redundant
regulatory mechanisms imposed at transcriptional, translational, and
posttranslational levels (6-11).
We reported that exposure to febrile range hyperthermia suppresses
TNF
expression in murine peritoneal macrophages, Kupffer cells,
precision-cut liver slices, the murine Raw 264.7 macrophage cell
line, human monocyte-derived macrophages, and the THP1 monocyte cell
line (10, 12-16). We showed that the predominant mechanism of
suppression of TNF
expression is by an abrupt and early cessation of
TNF
transcription, and that the TNF
gene sequence
between
85 and +138 is sufficient to confer temperature
responsiveness in murine macrophages (15). We also showed that the heat
stress-activated transcription factor, heat shock transcription factor
1 (HSF-1) is activated at febrile range temperatures (FRT) to an
alternate DNA binding form that acts as a repressor of gene expression
(15) and binds to the minimal temperature-responsive TNF
gene sequence (nt
85/+138). Furthermore, overexpression of
HSF-1 represses the activity of a luciferase reporter
construct-driven minimal TNF
promoter sequence (15).
HSF-1 is activated in response to various chemical and thermal stresses
through a cascade of posttranslational modifications, including
trimerization, nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and phosphorylation
of its transactivation domain, the result being the activation of heat
shock protein gene transcription (17-19). HSF-1 binds to conserved
regulatory sequences known as heat shock response elements (HRE), a
pentanucleotide nGAAn element that forms stable binding sites for HSF-1
when oriented in inverted dyad repeats (20). Recently, several studies
have shown that HSF-1 can also act as a negative regulator of certain
non-heat shock genes, including interleukin
(IL)-1
, c-fos,
urokinase, and TNF
(15, 21, 22). In the case
of IL-1
, this effect requires stable binding of HSF-1 to
the IL-1
promoter adjacent to an essential NF-IL-6
binding element (21), whereas, in the case of urokinase and
c-fos the effect apparently does not require stable DNA
binding (22).
The minimal temperature-responsive TNF
gene sequence
(
85/+138) was also inhibited by HSF-1 overexpression, but this
sequence did not contain a complete cognate HSF-1 binding sequence. It does, however, contain multiple nGAAn elements positioned in critical locations, including adjacent to an essential Sp-1 binding site, at the transcription start site, and 35 nucleotides downstream of the
transcription start site. In the present study we have identified the
high affinity binding site for HSF-1 in the minimal temperature-responsive TNF
gene sequence and showed that
inactivating the site by mutation reverses the repression of this
promoter fragment by HSF-1 overexpression.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Primers, Oligonucleotides, and Probes--
All oligonucleotides
were synthesized by Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD. Fig. 1 (see below)
shows the sequences of each oligonucleotide used for electrophoretic
mobility shift assays (EMSA). Complementary oligonucleotides were
synthesized, annealed, and used as probe for EMSA. Primers for
PCR-directed mutagenesis were Luc_5, 5'-ctttatgtttttggcgtcttca-3' (5'
pGL3 backbone); Luc_3, 5'-ctagcaaaataggctgtccc-3' (luciferase open
reading frame); 49_Mut forward primer,
5'-ggggagaacagaaactccaccccatcttggaaatagctc-3' and 49_Mut reverse
primer, 5'-gagctatttccaagatggggtggagtttctgttctcccc3', respectively. For EMSA spanning of the
1080 to
85 region of the TNF
gene sequence five partially overlapping PCR
amplified fragments used as probes: I,
1080 to
845; II,
889 to
652; III,
686 to
494; IV,
533 to
196; and V,
326 to
39.
The respective forward and reverse primers used for amplification were
1080/
845 (5'-ttggtccatgggatccg-3' and
5'-ccccggtcttccaaggattcccctcccccaccctcc-3'),
889/
652
(5'-ttaggagtgggagggtggg-3' and 5'-tcagccctgggaattcacggacctcac-3'),
686/
494 (5'-gaaggcttgtgaggtccgt-3' and 5'-ggagacatgatattgaggag-3'),
533/
196 (5'-actcaaacagggggctttccctcctca-3' and
5'-ggggacacccaggcatcaaggaatctctccccc-3'), and
326/
39
(5'-gtcctatacaacacacacac-3' and 5'-tagcccttggggaagagggc-3'). The
amplified PCR fragments were gel-purified and 32P-labeled
for use as probe in EMSA.
Plasmids--
TNF
promoter-luciferase reporter
constructs used in the study have been described earlier (15). Three
constructs in the pGL3 vector (Promega, Madison, WI), namely
pTNF
1080/+138 (
1080 to +138 nt),
pTNF
244+138 (
244/+138 nt), and
pTNF
85/+138 (
85/+138 nt), respectively, were
used in this study. For mutated constructs, mutations were introduced
into pTNF
1080/+138 plasmid
(Mut-pTNF
1080/+138) using a modification of the
overlap extension PCR method. In the first step, the 5' and 3'
partially overlapping fragments containing the desired mutant were
amplified using Pfu DNA polymerase. Outside primers Luc_5
and Luc_3 that correspond to flanking pGL3 backbone sequences and
complementary internal primers (49_Mut forward and reverse primers),
which generated a 36-nt overlap in the gene fragment and introduced a
3-base (GAA to CCC at +50 to +52 nt) substitution (see Fig. 4), were
used for the amplification. Following first step PCR, the products were
gel-purified and the second amplification was performed with equal
concentrations of the two first step products as template and the
outside primers Luc5 and Luc3 using Taq polymerase. The
final product was digested with KpnI and HindIII,
gel-purified, and cloned into the KpnI/HindIII site of pGL3. Mutated constructs corresponding to
pTNF
244/+138 and pTNF
85/+138
(Mut-pTNF
244/+138 and
Mut-pTNF
85/+138, respectively) were prepared by
amplifying the respective fragments from
Mut-pTNF
1080/+138 using Taq polymerase
and cloning the product into pGL3 vector as described earlier (15). The
sequences of all constructs were confirmed by automated dideoxy
sequencing (University of Maryland Biopolymer Core Laboratories).
Recombinant Human HSF-1--
A glutathione
S-transferase-human HSF-1 fusion construct in pGEX-2T (Amersham
Biosciences, Inc., Piscataway, NJ) was expressed and purified over a
glutathione-Sepharose 4B column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) according
to the manufacturer's instructions. The fusion protein was cleaved
using thrombin, and the purified HSF-1 protein was used in the study.
Cell Culture--
The Raw 264.7 mouse macrophage cell line was
purchased from the American Type Cell Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD)
and maintained in complete RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 50 units/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM
L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES buffer (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD), pH 7.3, and containing 10% defined fetal bovine serum (fetal bovine serum, HyClone, Logan, UT) at 37 °C in 5% CO2-enriched air.
Cells were routinely tested for Mycoplasma infection using a
commercial assay system (MycoTest, Invitrogen), and new cultures were
established monthly from frozen stocks. All media and reagents
contained less than 0.1 ng/ml endotoxin as determined by
Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Associates of Cape Cod,
Falmouth, MA). Cell viability was determined by trypan blue dye
exclusion. Cells were stimulated with LPS that was prepared by
trichloroacetic acid precipitation from Escherichia coli
0111:B4 (Difco, Detroit, MI).
EMSA--
Nuclear extract from Raw cells were prepared according
to the method of Schreiber et al. (23) as we previously
described (15), and total protein was measured using a commercial
reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with bovine serum albumin as standard. Double-stranded oligonucleotides were radiolabeled using T4
polynucleotide kinase (Promega) and [
-32P]ATP
according to the manufacturer's protocol. EMSA reactions containing 5 µg of nuclear extract or the indicated amount of recombinant HSF-1,
0.035 pmol of radiolabeled oligonucleotide, 1 µg of poly(dI/dC), 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 10% glycerol, 60 mM NaCl,
1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol in volume of
20 µl were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Where indicated, excess unlabeled competitor double-stranded oligonucleotide or 1 µl
of anti-HSF-1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were
incubated with the nuclear extracts for 30 min at room temperature
before the addition of the radiolabeled probe. The DNA·protein
complexes were then electrophoretically resolved on 4%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels. The dried gels were analyzed by
phosphorimaging (PhosphorImager, Molecular Dynamics) and subsequently exposed to x-ray film.
Chromosomal Immunoprecipitation Assay--
ChIP assay was
performed using a kit from Upstate Biotechnology Inc. (Lake Placid,
NY). Unless otherwise stated, all reagents were provided in the kit. In
brief, Raw 264.7 cells were incubated at 39.5 °C for 1 h and
fixed by adding formaldehyde (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) to the
medium to a final concentration of 1%. After 15 min the cells were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline containing 1 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 2 µg/ml aprotinin and were
collected by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended in SDS lysis
buffer and sonicated for three 10-s bursts using a Branson Sonifier 450 (duty cycle and output settings were 30 and 3, respectively). Sonicated
cell lysates were diluted 10-fold using ChIP dilution buffer and
precleared for 1 h at 4 °C using 80 µl of a 50% salmon sperm
DNA saturated protein A-agarose beads. Immunoprecipitation was carried
out at 4 °C overnight, and immune complexes were collected with
salmon sperm DNA saturated protein A-agarose beads. Antibodies used
included two rabbit anti-HSF-1 antibodies (from Santa Cruz
Biotechnologies and Stressgen) or, to control for nonspecific
interaction, rabbit anti-IL-13 (R&D) or no antibody. After washing
three times with immune complex wash buffer and twice with TE buffer,
the complexes were eluted with 0.1 M NaHCO3 and
1% SDS. Protein-DNA cross-links were reverted by incubating at
65 °C for 4 h, and after proteinase K digestion, DNA was
extracted with phenol-chloroform and precipitated using ethanol. PCR
was performed (30 cycles, denaturing at 94 °C for 45 s,
annealing at 63 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s) using primers specific for the murine TNF
sequence between
85 and +138: 5'-ggatcctgtgctagcttccgagggttgaatgaga
(forward) and 5'-ttcgaagcttggagatgtgcgccttg (reverse). As a positive
control, immunoprecipitated DNA was also amplified using PCR primers
specific for an HRE-containing 180-nt fragment of the murine
HSP70 promoter: 5'-aactccgattactcaagggaggc (forward) and
5'-gattctgagtagctgtcagcg (reverse) using the same PCR conditions as for
TNF
except for a 60 °C annealing temperature.
Transfection and Reporter Gene Analysis--
Cells were
transfected using FuGENE 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). 4 µg of
each test plasmid and 0.5 µg of control (pRL-SV40, Promega) plasmid
DNA were mixed with 15 µl of FuGENE 6 in 100 µl of medium. The
mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min and then added to
cells in 60-mm dishes. After 24 h, the cells were split into
24-well plates (1:12 per 60-mm plate). After an additional 24 h,
the cells were stimulated with LPS at 37° or 39.5 °C for 6 h.
Cells were lysed, and reporter gene expression was analyzed using the
Dual Luciferase Reporter assay kit (Promega) according to the
manufacturer's protocol.
Statistical Analysis--
Data are presented as mean ± S.E. Differences between two groups of data were analyzed using the
unpaired Student t test. Differences among more than two
groups were tested by applying the Fisher protected least significant
differences test applied to a one-way analysis of variance.
 |
RESULTS |
Organization of the Murine Minimal Promoter and 5'-Untranslated
Region--
We previously reported that the murine TNF
gene sequence spanning
85 to +138 nt bound HSF-1 in EMSA competition
assays and, when transfected into Raw 264.7 macrophages, conferred
transcriptional repression by febrile range temperature (FRT;
39.5 °C) or HSF-1 overexpression (15). The high affinity binding
sequence for HSF-1 comprises a minimum of two nGAAn elements arranged
as an inverted dyad repeat (20) (Fig.
1A). Fig. 1 shows the location of nGAAn elements in the
85 to +138 nt region of the murine
TNF
promoter (Fig. 1C), the sequence of the
heat shock response element (HRE) from the human HSP70 promoter (24)
(Fig. 1B) and the sequences of each of the TNF
oligonucleotides used for the EMSA analysis of HSF-1 binding (Fig.
1C, underlined sequences). This fragment of the
TNF
gene contains 10 nGAAn elements, but none arranged with perfect inverted dyad symmetry. Single nGAAn elements are positioned next to the Sp-1 binding site (
65 nt), at the
transcription start site (
8 nt), and at nt +72 and +108 in the
5'-UTR. The 5'-UTR sequence spanning +30 to +68 contains an array of
four nGAAn elements, three of which would form a perfect HRE if the "CT" sequence at nt +57 and +58 were inverted to "TC." In our EMSA analysis, we probed with oligonucleotides spanning
83/
43 and
containing three nGAAn elements and the Sp-1 binding sequence,
15/+5
containing one nGAAn and the transcription start site, +30/+68 and
containing the imperfect HRE, and +65/+85 and +101/+121, each
containing one nGAAn element.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
List of DNA sequences used.
A, HRE consensus sequence; B, HRE sequence from
human HSP70 promoter; C, minimal TNF
promoter/5'-UTR sequence ( 85/+138). The Sp-1 binding site, TATA box,
and transcription start site are identified. The oligonucleotide
sequences used in this study are underlined. D,
alignment of murine TNF sequence +30/+68 and the
comparable human TNF sequence. The basic HRE
pentanucleotide sequences are in boldface.
|
|
Identification of the High Affinity HSF-1 Binding Sites in the
Murine TNF
Gene--
The capacity of each nGAAn-containing sequence
in the minimal TNF
promoter/5'-UTR to bind HSF-1 was
analyzed by EMSA using the oligonucleotides listed in Fig. 1 using the
following three-step strategy. First, the capacity of a 100-fold excess
of each oligonucleotide to compete and block HSF binding to a consensus
HSF binding sequence was analyzed using the sequence from the human
HSP70 promoter as radiolabeled probe and nuclear extracts
from Raw 264.7 macrophages exposed to 39.5 °C for 1 h as a
source of HSF-1 (Fig. 2A). Of the murine TNF
oligonucleotides analyzed, only +30/+68
blocked HSF-1 binding to the labeled HSP70 HRE sequence probe (Fig.
2A, lane 5). Competition for binding by this
TNF
oligonucleotide was as complete as that of a
comparable concentration of the HSP70 sequence itself (lane
2). By comparison, each of the other TNF
oligonucleotides studied (lanes 3, 4,
6, 7) failed to compete for HSF-1 binding. To
confirm that HSF-1 binds with high affinity to the +30/+68
TNF
sequence, we repeated the EMSA analysis using each
TNF
oligonucleotide as a radiolabeled EMSA probe (Fig.
2B). Of the TNF
sequences studied, only
+30/+68 bound HSF-1 (lane 4), forming a complex that
comigrated with the complex that formed on the HRE sequence from the
HSP70 promoter (lane 1). Supershifting with anti-HSF-1
antibody (lane 7) confirmed that the observed complex
contained HSF-1. To further confirm that HSF-1 could directly bind to
TNF
+30/+68, we repeated the EMSA analysis with purified recombinant human HSF-1 (Fig. 3).
TNF
+30/+68 bound rHSF-1 (lanes 7-10), but to
a lesser degree than the HSP70 HRE (lanes 2-5). By
comparison, the other TNF
sequence oligonucleotides
failed to detectably bind rHSF-1 (data not shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
EMSA analysis of HSF binding to
TNF oligonucleotides. Nuclear
extracts from Raw 264.7 cells exposed to 39.5 °C for 1 h were
used as a source of HSF-1. A, competition for binding to HSF
binding sequence from the human HSP70 promoter
(HRE). Indicated unlabeled oligonucleotides were added at a
100-fold molar excess. The HSF doublet bands are indicted by the
arrows. B, direct binding of HSF to radiolabeled
HRE or individual TNF oligonucleotides. In lane
7, the HRE-containing complex was supershifted with anti-HSF-1
(supershifted complex is indicated by the arrowhead).
|
|

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
EMSA analysis of recombinant HSF-1 binding to
the HSF binding sequence from the human HSP70 promoter
and TNF oligonucleotide +30/+68.
Radiolabeled oligonucleotide comprising the HSF binding sequence from
the human HSP70 gene (HRE; lanes 1-5)
or the TNF +30/+68 sequence (lanes 6-10) was
incubated with the indicated concentration of recombinant human HSF-1.
The doublet bands representing the HSF·DNA complex are indicted by
the arrows.
|
|
Mutational Inactivation of the HSF-1 Binding Site in TNF
30/68--
The +30/+68 TNF
sequence contains four nGAAn
sites that form two possible partially overlapping HREs centered on nt
+49 and +59, respectively (Fig. 1C). To further define the
binding site for HSF-1 in this sequence we replaced the GAA sequences
at either 50-52 nt (49_Mut) or 60-62 nt (59_Mut) with CCC (Fig.
4A) and analyzed the ability
of the mutated +30/+68 oligonucleotides to bind HSF-1 in an EMSA
competition assay (Fig. 4B). Using the wild-type +30/+68
oligonucleotide as the radiolabeled probe and nuclear extracts from Raw
264.7 cells exposed to 39.5 °C for 1 h as a source of HSF-1, we
found that unlabeled wild-type +30/+68 added at a 10-fold molar excess
was sufficient to abrogate binding to radiolabeled +30/+68 (lane
2). Mutating the nGAAn sequence at +59 (59_Mut, lanes
9-12) did not change the capacity of +30/+68 to compete for HSF-1
binding. In striking contrast, 49_Mut failed to compete for HSF-1
binding when added at 10- to 100-fold excess (lanes 5-7)
and only partially competed when added at 1000-fold excess (lane
8). Direct binding of HSF-1 to radiolabeled probe containing the
wild-type and mutated +30/+68 sequences (Fig. 3C) confirmed
the results of the EMSA competition analysis. Although 59_Mut formed a
complex (lane 4) similar to that formed on wild-type +30/+68
(lane 1), 49_Mut failed to bind HSF-1 under these conditions (lane 3). We extended these observations by introducing the
GAA to CCC substitution at +50/
52 into the full-length
TNF
promoter/5'-UTR (
1080/+138) sequence and analyzing
HSF-1 binding to a PCR-amplified
85/+138 fragment of the wild-type
and mutated gene (Fig. 5). EMSA was
performed by using each PCR product as radiolabeled probe, and nuclear
extracts from Raw 264.7 cells exposed to 39.5 °C for 1 h as a
source of HSF-1. The wild-type TNF
PCR product formed a
complex (lane 1) that was competed for by unlabeled
wild-type +30/+68 oligonucleotide (lane 3) but not by 49_Mut
oligonucleotide (lane 4) and was supershifted by
anti-HSF-1 antibody (lane 5). In contrast, the comparable
TNF
sequence containing the GAA to CCC mutation at
+50/
52 failed to form a detectable complex (lane 2). Thus,
it appears that the HRE-like sequence centered on nt +49 in the 5'-UTR
is the only site in the minimal promoter/5'-UTR sequence (
85/+138)
that forms high affinity complexes with HSF-1 under these
cell-free assay conditions.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
EMSA analysis of HSF binding to wild-type and
mutated TNF oligonucleotide
+30/+68. A, the sequences of the wild-type and two
mutated +30/+68 oligonucleotides. B, competition for binding
to wild-type +30/+68. Nuclear extracts from Raw 264.7 cells exposed to
39.5 °C for 1 h were used as a source of HSF-1 and probed with
radiolabeled wild-type +30/+68. Each unlabeled oligonucleotide was
added at the indicated molar excess. The HSF·DNA doublet band is
indicted by the arrow. C, direct binding of HSF
to radiolabeled wild-type and mutated TNF
oligonucleotides. The complex on +30/+68 was supershifted
with anti-HSF-1 antibody (lane 2), and the supershifted
complex is represented by the arrowhead.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
EMSA analysis of HSF binding to wild-type and
mutated TNF fragment 85/+138.
Nuclear extracts from Raw 264.7 cells exposed to 39.5 °C for 1 h were used as a source of HSF-1. PCR products containing the wild-type
TNF 85/+138 sequence (lane 1) or with GAA to
CCC sequences at nt +49 (lane 2) were end-labeled and used
as EMSA probes. Competition with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled
+30/+68 wild-type (lane 3) and 49_Mut (lane 4)
oligonucleotides was measured. The complex binding to the wild-type
probe was supershifted with anti-human HSF-1 (lane 5), and
the supershifted complex is represented by the
arrowhead.
|
|
Binding of HSF-1 to the Endogenous TNF
Gene--
Although we
have demonstrated that HSF-1 binds to naked DNA under artificial
cell-free conditions, its ability to repress TNF
transcription in
the cell requires it to bind to the endogenous TNF
gene
in vivo. We used the ChIP assay to determine if HSF-1 binds
to the TNF
gene in vivo in Raw 264.7 cells
incubated at 39.5 °C for 60 min. DNA was sonicated to yield
fragments of ~500-nt length. PCR with primers specific for the
HRE-containing murine HSP70 promoter sequence amplified detectable
product of the predicted 180-nt length in samples immunoprecipitated
with each of the anti-HSF-1 antibodies (Fig.
6, lanes 3, 4),
whereas no PCR product was detectable in samples immunoprecipitated
without antibody (lane 5) or with an irrelevant rabbit
anti-IL-13 antibody (lane 2), thereby validating the ChIP
assay in this model. PCR amplification using primers specific for the
TNF
sequence spanning
85 to +138, which includes the
putative HSF-1 binding site, generated a detectable product of the
predicted 223-nt length in samples immunoprecipitated with the
anti-HSF-1 antibodies (Fig. 6, lanes 8, 9) but
not in samples immunoprecipitated without antibody (lane 10)
or with anti-IL-13 antibody (lane 7).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of in vivo
interactions between HSF-1 and the TNF
gene. Raw 264.7 cells were incubated at 39.5 °C for 60 min, cross-linked in situ with 1% (v/v) formaldehyde,
sonicated to generate approximately 500-nt DNA fragments and analyzed
by ChIP assay. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by PCR using primers
specific for the HRE-containing HSP70 promoter sequence
(lanes 1-5) or the TNF sequence between 85
and +138 containing the putative HSF-1 binding site (lanes
6-10). Samples were immunoprecipitated either without antibody
(lane 5, 10), with anti-HSF-1 antibody from two
different sources, Stressgen (H1, lanes 3,
8) or Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (H2, lanes
4, 9), or with an irrelevant anti-human IL-13 antibody
(lanes 2, 7). Lane 11 contains a
100-bp ladder. Lanes 1 and 6 contain the product
of the PCR reaction with plasmid containing either the HSP70
promoter or the TNF gene, respectively, added as
template.
|
|
Effect of Mutational Inactivation of HSF-1 Binding on TNF
Transcriptional Activity--
The functional significance of
abrogating high affinity HSF-1 binding to the TNF
5'-UTR in comparison with transcriptional repression was analyzed by
introducing the GAA to CCC mutation at nt 50-52 into each of three
TNF
promoter-driven luciferase reporter constructs: 1)
the minimal promoter/5'-UTR
(pTNF
85/+138)
(Fig. 7A); 2) a 382-nt
promoter/5'-UTR fragment
(pTNF
244/+138)
containing the most proximal NF-
B response element (Fig.
7B); and 3) a full-length 1.2-kb promoter/5'-UTR fragment
(pTNF
1080/+138)
(Fig. 7C). Each of these promoter fragments was cloned into the NheI/HindIII site of pGL3, transiently
transfected into Raw 264.7 cells, and the promoter activity was
compared in 37° and 39.5 °C cell cultures and in the presence of
increasing concentrations of an HSF-1 expression plasmid at 37 °C
(15). The analysis was performed in both the presence and absence of
LPS. Although TNF
promoter activity was higher in the
presence of LPS, the pattern of FRT- and HSF-1-induced effects on
wild-type and mutated TNF
reporter constructs was
comparable in LPS-stimulated and unstimulated cells. The data from the
LPS-stimulated cells are shown. HSF-1 overexpression reduced the
activity of both wild-type
pTNF
1080/+138
(Fig. 7C) and
pTNF
85/+138
(Fig. 7A), as we have previously reported (15), and
similarly reduced the activity of pTNF
244/+138
(Fig. 7B). Mutation of the high affinity HSF-1 binding site
(at nt +50/
52) in pTNF
85/+138 seemed to
interfere with the inhibitory effect of HSF-1 overexpression (Fig.
7A). At 1 and 2 µg of HSF-1 expression plasmid, the
activity of the wild-type pTNF
85/+138 construct
was decreased by 28 and 40%, respectively; whereas, activity of the
mutant construct was unchanged. However, cotransfection with 3 µg of
HSF-1 plasmid or incubation at 39.5 °C inhibited the activity of the
wild-type and mutated pTNF
85/+138 construct by a
similar extent.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of HSF-1 overexpression on activity of
reporter constructs driven by wild-type or nt +49-mutated
TNF promoter/5'-UTR. The wild-type
(W/T) TNF gene fragment 85/+138
(A), 244/+138 (B), or 1080/+138
(C) and comparable fragments with a GAA to CCC mutation at
nt +50/ 52 (MUT) were introduced into the PGL3 luciferase
reporter construct and cotransfected into Raw 264.7 cells with the
control plasmid pRL-SV40 alone or along with the indicated amount of
HSF-1 expression plasmid. Cells transfected without the HSF-1
transfection plasmid were incubated at either 37° or 39.5 °C. All
cells were stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS and harvested 6 h later.
The ratio of experimental to control luciferase activity was
calculated, and data were calculated as percentage of control values in
cells cultured at 37 °C without HSF-1. Mean ± S.E.;
n = 6. *, p < 0.05 versus 0 HSF-1; , p < 0.05 versus comparably
treated wild-type-transfected cells.
|
|
HSF-1 overexpression inhibited both wild-type and mutated
pTNF
244/+138 (Fig. 7B), but the extent
of inhibition of the mutated construct was significantly less than that
of the wild-type construct at 2 µg (22 versus 42%;
p < 0.05) and 3 µg of HSF-1 plasmid (36 versus 59%; p < 0.05). Both constructs
were inhibited to a similar extent by exposing cells to 39.5 °C. In
contrast, in the full-length promoter
(pTNF
1080/+138, Fig. 7C), mutation of
the high affinity HSF-1 binding site in the 5'-UTR had no detectable
effect on the inhibitory effects of HSF-1 overexpression or exposure to
39.5 °C.
Interaction of HSF-1 with TNF
Promoter Sequences Upstream of
85--
The transfection results suggested that additional
HSF-1-responsive repressor elements might be present in the
TNF
sequence upstream of the minimal promoter. To
determine if HSF-1 binds to sequences upstream of
85, we prepared
five partially overlapping fragments by PCR amplification spanning the
region
39 to
1080. The amplified fragments were radiolabeled and
used as a probe in EMSA using purified rHSF-1 (Fig.
8). The PCR fragments
1080/
845 (235 bp, lane 1),
533/
196 (337 bp, lane 4), and
326/
39 (287 bp, lane 5) formed complexes with rHSF-1,
whereas fragments
889/
652 (237 bp, lane 2) and
686/
494 (192 bp, lane 3) failed to form any detectable
complex with rHSF-1.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
EMSA scanning of upstream
TNF sequences for binding to HSF-1.
The indicated TNF sequences were generated by PCR,
end-labeled, and incubated with 3 µg of rhHSF-1. HSF-1·DNA
complexes were detectable in lanes 1, 4, and
5 and are indicated by arrows.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In our earlier studies, we showed that TNF
expression is reduced in human and murine macrophages upon exposure to
febrile temperature (10, 12, 15, 16) and that the effect is largely caused by a reduction in TNF
transcription in the warmer cells. We
showed that exposing Raw 264.7 cells to febrile range temperature (39.5 °C) activates the heat stress-activated transcription factor HSF-1, but although HSF-1 in the 39.5 °C cell culture binds to its
cognate DNA binding site, it fails to activate transcription from the
HSP70 promoter. We showed that HSF-1 activation correlates with
cessation of TNF
transcription in 39.5 °C Raw 264.7 cell culture
and HSF-1 overexpression reduces TNF
promoter activity in
37 °C Raw 264.7 cell culture. Together, these data offered a
persuasive argument that HSF-1 might act as a repressor of macrophage TNF
expression during exposure to febrile temperatures. This hypothesis was further supported by the studies of Xiao et
al. (25) who showed that HSF-1 knockout mice demonstrated
exaggerated TNF
expression following challenge with LPS compared
with HSF-1-sufficient littermates. We previously showed that HSF-1
binds to the murine TNF
proximal promoter/5'-UTR sequence
spanning nt
85 to +138 under EMSA conditions. We have extended these
findings in our present study by localizing the HSF-1 binding site
between nt +30 and 68 in the 5'-UTR of the murine TNF
gene. The sequence between nt +49 and +58, AGAACATCTT, with
the exception of a simple inversion of the 3'-terminal CT dinucleotide
(underlined), is the canonical HSF-1 binding sequence. We used EMSA
analysis to show that this sequence specifically binds HSF-1 and that
mutation of the nGAAn pentanucleotide at nt +49/+53 prevents
binding of HSF-1, whereas the same substitution in a downstream GAAn
sequence (nt +60/
62) had no effect on HSF-1 binding. However, the
inability of DNA·protein complexes to form under EMSA conditions does
not necessarily exclude an interaction in vivo. To provide
further evidence that HSF-1 might bind to and repress the
TNF
gene in vivo, we using the ChIP assay to
determine if HSF-1 interacts with the TNF
gene in the
living cell. We incubated Raw 264.7 cells for 1 h at 39.5 °C,
conditions that we have shown activate HSF-1 to a form that binds HSP70
promoter and TNF
gene sequences under cell-free EMSA
conditions. We showed that two different anti-HSF-1 antibodies
coimmunoprecipitated both HRE-containing HSP70 promoter
sequence and TNF
sequence containing the putative HSF-1
binding site. Negative controls, immunoprecipitated without antibody or
with an irrelevant antibody (anti-IL-13) from the same species
(rabbit), did not contain detectable HSP70 or
TNF
gene fragments demonstrating the specificity of the technique.
In transient transfection studies, the TNF
85/+138 reporter
construct containing a GAA to CCC substitution at nt +50/
52 was significantly less sensitive to the inhibitory effect of overexpressed HSF-1 than was the wild-type construct. In fact, cotransfection of this
mutated construct with 1 or 2 µg of HSF-1 expression plasmid had no
inhibitory effect on luciferase activity whereas the wild-type construct was inhibited by 30-40% when cotransfected with the same
amount of HSF-1 expression plasmid. These data suggest that HSF-1
represses transcription from the minimal TNF
promoter/5'-UTR fragment, in part, by binding to the HRE-like sequence
at +49/
58 nt within the 5'-UTR. The capacity of elements within the
5'-UTR region of genes to repress transcription has been reported to occur in other genes, including the collagen
1 gene and the
potassium channel Kv3.1 gene (26, 27). Based on the location of the putative repressor site in the murine TNF
gene, only
30-60 nt downstream of the transcription start site, HSF-1 might
repress TNF
transcription by blocking RNA polymerase processivity,
as has been shown in the phage T7 model system in which binding
of the lac repressor 13-15 nucleotides downstream of the initiation site blocks T7 RNA polymerase processivity (28).
Interestingly, cotransfection with 3 µg of HSF-1 or incubation at
39.5 °C caused comparable reductions in activity of the mutated and
wild-type TNF
85/+138 reporter constructs. The capacity of
higher HSF-1 levels to repress the TNF
85/+138 construct
containing the mutation at +50/+52 suggests that there might be
additional pathways through which HSF-1 represses expression of the
minimal TNF
promoter. These include lower affinity
binding of HSF-1 to non-canonical HSF-1 binding sites elsewhere in this
gene fragment that is not detected by EMSA yet still might block
transcription complex formation. Alternatively, HSF-1 might repress
TNF
transcription without directly binding to DNA. Chen
et al. (22) have suggested that HSF-1 could interact either
with an upstream signal transduction component or with a coactivating
factor to specifically repress genes such as c-fos and
urokinase-type plasminogen activator.
In contrast to the minimal TNF
promoter, the full-length
1.2-kb TNF
promoter construct was comparably inhibited by
1-3 µg of HSF-1, and this inhibition was unaffected by the presence
or absence of the GAA to CCC mutation at +50/+52. The intermediate length construct, TNF
244/+138, exhibited a third pattern
of responsiveness to the GAA to CCC mutation at +50/
52 and to
overexpression of HSF-1. The activity of the wild-type and mutated
TNF
244/+138 was comparably inhibited by the lowest HSF-1
expression but, when cotransfected with 2 and 3 µg of HSF-1
expression plasmid, the wild-type construct was inhibited to a greater
extent than the mutated construct. On the other hand, exposure to
39.5 °C reduced the activity of all three constructs, and the
repression was unaffected by mutational inactivation of the HSF-1
binding site at nt +49/+58.
The different patterns of response of each of the three constructs to
HSF-1 overexpression and the mutational inactivation of the HSF-1
binding site at nt +49/
58 suggest that additional sequences upstream
of nt
85 might mediate transcriptional repression by HSF-1. Using
overlapping ~200-nt PCR-generated fragments of TNF
upstream sequence, the sequence upstream of nt
85 was scanned for
HSF-1 binding. Complex formation with rHSF-1 was detectable to the
regions
1080/
845,
533/
196, and
326/
39 suggesting that
redundant HSF-1 binding sites might be active in the TNF
gene. Alternatively, or in addition to direct binding to DNA, HSF-1
might interfere with transcription by binding to transcriptional activators as has been shown for STAT (29, 30), TFIID, and related factors (31).
In summary, we identified a unique HRE-like sequence in the murine
TNF
5'-UTR that binds HSF-1 and is required for
HSF-1-mediated transcriptional repression in the minimal mouse
TNF
promoter. This offers proof of the concept that HSF-1
can repress gene transcription by binding to the 5'-UTR. Although the
5'-UTR HRE-like sequence of the mouse TNF
gene is not
present in the human TNF
5'-UTR, the results of this
study suggest a number of additional redundant pathways through which
exposure to febrile range temperature might inhibit transcription of
both murine and human TNF
.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Dr. Steven Georas for his technical
help with the ChIP assay.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Veterans Administration Merit
Review Grant 128444285-0005 (to J. D. H.), the Passano Foundation (to J. D. H.), United States Public Health Services Grant AI42117 (to
J. D. H.), and a grant from the Baltimore Research and Education Foundation (to I. S. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Baltimore VA Medical
Center, Rm. 3D127, 10 N. Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201. Tel.:
410-605-7197; Fax: 410-605-7915; E-mail: isingh@umaryland.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 4, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108154200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TNF
, tumor
necrosis factor
;
LPS, bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide;
HSP, heat shock protein;
HSF, heat shock factor;
rHSF, recombinant HSF;
HRE, heat shock response element;
UTR, untranslated region;
IL, interleukin;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
FRT, febrile range
temperature;
nt, nucleotide(s);
NF, nuclear factor;
ChIP, chromosomal
immunoprecipitation;
STAT, signal transducers and activators of
transcription.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Beutler, B.
(1995)
J. Invest. Med.
43,
227-235[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Chollet-Martin, S.,
Montravers, P.,
Gilbert, C.,
Elbim, C.,
Desmonts, J. M.,
Fagon, J. Y.,
and Gougerot-Pocidalo, M. A.
(1993)
Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
164,
990-996
|
| 3.
|
Beutler, B.,
Milsark, I.,
and Cerami, A.
(1985)
Science
229,
869-871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Cross, A. S.,
Sadoff, J. C.,
Kelly, N.,
Bernton, E.,
and Gemski, P.
(1989)
J. Exp. Med.
169,
2021-2027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Cross, A.,
Asher, L.,
Seguin, M.,
Yuan, L.,
Kelly, N.,
Hammack, C.,
and Sadoff, J.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
676-686
|
| 6.
|
Sariban, E.,
Imamura, K.,
Luebbers, R.,
and Kufe, D.
(1988)
J. Clin. Invest.
81,
1506-1510
|
| 7.
|
Jongeneel, C. V.,
Shakhov, A. N.,
Nedospasov, S. A.,
and Cerottini, J.-C.
(1989)
Eur. J. Immunol.
19,
549-552[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Biragyn, A.,
and Nedospasov, S. A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
674-683[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Lieberman, A. P.,
Pitha, P. M.,
and Shin, M. L.
(1990)
J. Exp. Med.
172,
989-992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Ensor, J. E.,
Crawford, E. K.,
and Hasday, J. D.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
C1140-C1146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Beutler, B.,
Krochin, N.,
Milsark, I. W.,
Luedke, C.,
and Cerami, A.
(1986)
Science
232,
977-979[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Ensor, J. E.,
Wiener, S. M.,
McCrea, K. A.,
Viscardi, R. M.,
Crawford, E. K.,
and Hasday, J. D.
(1994)
Am. J. Physol.
266,
C967-C974[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Jiang, Q.,
DeTolla, L.,
Kalvakolanu, I.,
Van Roojien, N.,
Singh, I. S.,
Fitzgerald, B.,
Cross, A. S.,
and Hasday, J. D.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
1539-1546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Jiang, Q.,
DeTolla, L.,
Kalvakolanu, I.,
Fitzgerald, B.,
and Hasday, J. D.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
R1653-R1660[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Singh, I. S.,
Calderwood, S.,
Kalvakolanu, I.,
Viscardi, R.,
and Hasday, J. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
9841-9848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Fairchild, K. D.,
Viscardi, R. M.,
Hester, L.,
Singh, I. S.,
and Hasday, J. D.
(2000)
J. Interferon Cytokine Res.
20,
1049-1055[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Sorger, P. K.
(1991)
Cell
65,
363-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Sarge, K. D.,
Murphy, S. P.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1392-1407[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Cotto, J. J.,
Kline, M.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3355-3358[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Perisic, O.,
Xiao, H.,
and Lis, J. T.
(1989)
Cell
59,
797-806[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Cahill, C. M.,
Warerman, W. R.,
Xie, Y.,
Auron, P. E.,
and Calderwood, S. K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24874-24879[Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Chen, C.,
Xie, Y.,
Stevenson, M. A.,
Auron, P. E.,
and Calderwood, S. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26803-26806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Schreiber, E.,
Matthias, P.,
Muller, M. M.,
and Schaffner, W.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
6419[Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Wu, B. J.,
Kingston, R. E.,
and Morimoto, R. I.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
629-633[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Xiao, X.,
Zuo, X.,
Davis, A. A.,
McMillan, D. R.,
Curry, B. B.,
Richardson, J. A.,
and Benjamin, I. J.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
5943-5952[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Hernandez, I.,
de la Torre, P.,
Rey-Campos, J.,
Garcia, I.,
Sanchez, J. A.,
Munoz, R.,
Rippe, R. A.,
Munoz-Yague, T.,
and Solis-Herruzo, J. A.
(2000)
DNA Cell Biol.
19,
341-352[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Gan, L.,
Hahn, S. J.,
and Kaczmarek, L. K.
(1999)
J. Neurochem.
73,
1350-1362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Lopez, P. J.,
Guillerez, J.,
Sousa, R.,
and Dreyfus, M.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
276,
861-875[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Stephanou, A.,
Isenberg, D. A.,
Nakajima, K.,
and Latchman, D. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1723-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Stephanou, A.,
and Latchman, D. S.
(1999)
Gene Expr.
7,
311-319[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Yuan, C. X.,
and Gurley, W. B.
(2000)
Cell Stress Chaperones
5,
229-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. S. Singh, A. Gupta, A. Nagarsekar, Z. Cooper, C. Manka, L. Hester, I. J. Benjamin, J.-r. He, and J. D. Hasday
Heat Shock Co-Activates Interleukin-8 Transcription
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
August 1, 2008;
39(2):
235 - 242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Inouye, M. Fujimoto, T. Nakamura, E. Takaki, N. Hayashida, T. Hai, and A. Nakai
Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Opens Chromatin Structure of Interleukin-6 Promoter to Facilitate Binding of an Activator or a Repressor
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 9, 2007;
282(45):
33210 - 33217.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Fionda, F. Nappi, M. Piccoli, L. Frati, A. Santoni, and M. Cippitelli
Inhibition of Trail Gene Expression by Cyclopentenonic Prostaglandin 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-Prostaglandin J2 in T Lymphocytes
Mol. Pharmacol.,
November 1, 2007;
72(5):
1246 - 1257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|