![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 5047-5053, February 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Heritable Disorders Branch, NICHD, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, October 31, 2001
Glycogen storage disease type 1a is caused by a
deficiency in glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase), a nine-helical
endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane protein required for maintenance of
glucose homeostasis. To date, 75 G6Pase mutations have been
identified, including 48 mutations resulting in single-amino acid
substitutions. However, only 19 missense mutations have been
functionally characterized. Here, we report the results of structure
and function studies of the 48 missense mutations and the Glycogen storage disease type 1 (GSD-1),1 also known as von
Gierke disease, is a group of autosomal recessive metabolic disorders that occur approximately once in every 100,000 live births (reviewed in
Refs. 1-3). GSD-1a (MIM 232 200), the major subtype representing over
80% of GSD-1 cases, is caused by a deficiency in glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase; EC 3.1.3.9), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of
glucose-6-phosphate to glucose and phosphate, the terminal steps
in gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis. Patients afflicted with GSD-1a
cannot maintain glucose homeostasis and manifest hypoglycemia,
hepatomegaly, kidney enlargement, growth retardation, hyperlipidemia,
hyperuricemia, and lactic acidemia. Long-term complications include
gout, hepatic adenomas with risk for malignancy, osteoporosis, platelet
dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, and renal failure.
The cloning of the G6Pase gene has enabled researchers to
show that GSD-1a individuals are homozygotes or compound heterozygotes for loss of function mutations in the gene (4-11). To date, 75 G6Pase mutations (including 2 reported here) have been
identified in GSD-1a patients on the basis of their absence from the
normal population and/or their co-segregation with the disease
phenotype (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3). Interestingly, 48 candidate mutations are missense mutations that result in single-amino acid substitutions. Characterization of these mutations will provide critical information on functionally important residues of the protein.
In this study, we functionally characterize all 48 missense mutations
by site-directed mutagenesis and transient expression assays. A data
base of residual enzymatic activity retained by the G6Pase mutants will
serve as a reference for evaluating genotype-phenotype relationships
and the minimal G6Pase activity required to correct the GSD-1a phenotype.
Sequence alignment suggests that mammalian G6Pases, lipid phosphatases,
acid phosphatases, and vanadium haloperoxidases share a conserved
phosphatase signature motif, and in G6Pase, this occurs between
residues 76 and 180 (12, 13). The crystal structure of the
vanadium-containing chloroperoxidase from the plant pathogenic fungus
Curvularia inaequalis has been resolved (14). The results show the active site residues in vanadium-containing chloroperoxidase are contained within the phosphatase signature motif. Based on the
crystal structure and mechanism of action of vanadium-containing chloroperoxidase (13, 14), the amino acids predicted to
participate in G6Pase catalysis include Lys76,
Arg83, His119, Arg170, and
His176. Five mutations that alter active site residues in
G6Pase, K76N, R83C, R83H, H119L, and R170Q, have been identified in
GSD-1a patients (4, 6, 15-17). R83C and R83H were shown to abolish
phosphatase activity in transient expression assays (4, 6). In this study, we show that K76N, H119L, and R170Q also completely abolish G6Pase activity, demonstrating the importance of these residues in
G6Pase catalysis.
Very little is known about the structural requirements for the correct
folding and catalytic activity of G6Pase. We have shown that human
G6Pase is anchored to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by nine
transmembrane helices with the amino terminus in the lumen and the
carboxyl terminus in the cytoplasm (18, 19). Therefore, the large
collection of G6Pase mutations can now be studied in the context of
their positions with respect to the ER and the cytoplasm. In this
study, we undertake structure-function analysis of G6Pase. We show that
amino acid residues that comprise the catalytic center and nonhelical
regions in G6Pase play no essential role in the stability of the
enzyme. On the other hand, the structural integrity of transmembrane
helices is critical for the correct folding, stability, and
enzymatic activity of G6Pase.
Proteins with abnormal conformation are rapidly eliminated through
intracellular protein degradation, which represents a quality control
system in cells (20). Cytosolic proteasomes are responsible for rapid
degradation of many membrane proteins, including cystic fibrosis
transmembrane conductance regulator (21, 22), the major
histocompatibility complex class I molecule, and the Mutational Analysis--
The G6Pase gene in GSD-1a
patients was characterized by single-strand conformational polymorphism
analysis (28) on mutation detection enhancement gels (AT Biochem,
Malvern, PA) containing 5% glycerol. Exon-containing fragments were
amplified by PCR using primers containing intronic, 5'-, and
3'-untranslated sequences of the human G6Pase gene as
described previously (6). The mutation-containing fragments identified
by single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis were subcloned
and characterized by DNA sequencing.
Construction of G6Pase Mutants and Expression in COS-1
Cells--
Human G6Pase-DraIII (29) cDNA was used as a
template for mutant construction by PCR. The eight-amino acid FLAG
marker peptide, DYKDDDDK (Scientific Imaging Systems, Eastman Kodak,
CT) was used to tag the amino or carboxyl terminus of G6Pase as
described previously (18). The two outside PCR primers for G6Pase
mutants that contain mutations upstream of the DraIII site
are nucleotides 77-96 (G1; sense) and nucleotides 625-602 of
G6Pase-DraIII (I2; antisense) (29), and the two outside PCR
primers for mutants that contain mutations downstream of the
DraIII site are nucleotides 611-634 (I1; sense) and
nucleotides 1150-1133 of G6Pase-DraIII (G2;
antisense). The two outside primers for G6Pase R170Q, G184E, G184V,
G188D, and G188R mutants are G1 and G2. After PCR, the amplified
fragment was ligated into either the pSVLhG6Pase-DraIII-3'
fragment, the pSVLhG6Pase-DraIII-5' fragment, or the pSVL fragment.
The mutant primers are: M5R (nucleotides 83-103), ATG
COS-1 cells were grown at 37 °C in HEPES-buffered Dulbecco's
modified minimal essential medium supplemented with 4% fetal bovine
serum. Cells in 25-cm2 flasks were transfected with 10 µg
of wild-type (WT) or mutant construct in a pSVL vector by the
DEAE-dextran/chloroquine method as described previously (30). To
correct for transfection efficiency, 2 µg of pCMV Phosphohydrolase and
Northern Blot, Western Blot, and in Vitro
Transcription-Translation Analyses--
Total RNA was isolated using
the RNeasy total RNA isolation kit (Qiagen), fractionated by
electrophoresis through a 1.2% agarose gel containing 2.2 M formaldehyde, and transferred to a Hybond-N+ membrane
(Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) by electroblotting. The membranes were
hybridized with either a G6Pase or
For Western blot analysis of FLAG-tagged G6Pase, proteins in
transfected COS-1 lysates were separated by electrophoresis through a
13% polyacrylamide-SDS gel and trans-blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore). The membranes were first incubated with
a monoclonal antibody against the FLAG epitope (Scientific Imaging
Systems) and then incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG antibody (Kirkegarrd & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). The immunocomplex was detected with the horseradish peroxidase-linked chemiluminescence system containing the SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent substrate obtained from Pierce.
In vitro transcription-translation of G6Pase cDNA
constructs in a pGEM-11Zf(+) vector was performed using the troponin
T-coupled reticulocyte lysate system obtained from Promega
Biotech (Madison, WI). L-[35S]methionine was
used as the labeled precursor. The in vitro synthesized proteins were analyzed by 12% polyacrylamide-SDS gel electrophoresis and fluoro-autoradiography.
Mutations Identified in the G6Pase Gene of GSD-1a
Patients--
Single-strand conformational polymorphism and DNA
sequencing analyses were used to identify mutations in the
G6Pase gene of four GSD-1a patients. Six different mutations
were identified, including T255I, 158delC, 836delA, W70X, Q347X, and
G6Pase Mutations That Cause GSD-1a--
Characterization of
missense mutations that result in single-amino acid substitutions will
provide valuable information on functionally important residues in
G6Pase. The 48 missense G6Pase mutations identified in
GSD-1a patients are scattered throughout the primary sequence (Fig.
1). Nineteen missense mutations,
including D38V (8), W77R (9), R83C (4), R83H (6), E110K (3), E110Q (8),
A124T (9), V166G (7), P178S (6), G184E (9), G188S (6), G188R (10),
L211P (9), G222R (5), W236R (6), P257L (11), G270V (6), R295C (4), and
L345R (6), were shown to abolish or greatly reduced G6Pase activity by
site-directed mutagenesis and transient expression assays. In this
study, we constructed 35 mutants carrying G6Pase missense mutations,
including 29 mutations that have not been characterized and 6 of the
previously characterized mutations, W77R, A124T, G184E, L211P, G188R,
and P257L. Glucose-6-phosphate hydrolytic activities of these mutants
were examined after transient expression of WT or mutant G6Pase
cDNA into COS-1 cells. We also included in this study the single
codon deletion mutation,
The amino acids predicted to be critical to glucose-6-phosphate binding
and hydrolysis include Lys76, Arg83,
His119, Arg170, and His176
(12-14). Five active site mutations, K76N (16), R83C (4), R83H (6),
H119L (17), and R170Q (15), have been identified in the
G6Pase gene of GSD-1a patients. In earlier studies (4, 6),
we have shown that R83C and R83H mutants were devoid of G6Pase activity
(Table II). In this study, we demonstrate
that K76N, H119L, and R170Q mutations also completely abolished
phosphohydrolase activity (Table II), demonstrating the importance of
these residues in G6Pase catalysis.
Twelve of the 13 nonhelical G6Pase mutations are situated inside the ER
lumen, and 1 (Q54P) is located in cytoplasmic loop 1 (Fig. 1). Earlier
studies have shown that the E110K (2) mutation totally inactivated
G6Pase, but the E110Q (8), W236R (6), and P257L (11) mutations only
markedly reduced phosphatase activity. This was confirmed in the
present study demonstrating that eight nonhelical mutants, M5R, T16A,
E110Q, T111I, W236R, A241T, T255I, and P257L, retained residual
phosphohydrolase activity (Table III).
Four mutants, T16A, E110Q, T111I, and A241T, possessed
Thirty missense mutations (excluding the active site mutation K76N in
helix 2) and the The Active Site and Nonhelical Residues Play No Essential
Role in the Stability of G6Pase--
Structure-function analyses of
G6Pase would be greatly facilitated by specific antibodies to G6Pase.
However, polyclonal antibodies to human G6Pase are not specific. As an
alternative strategy to monitor biosynthesis of mutated G6Pase, we have
constructed all 48 missense and the
In WT construct-transfected COS-1 cells, polypeptides of 41 and 37 kDa,
representing glycosylated and nonglycosylated G6Pase, were synthesized
(Fig. 2A). In the presence of
a glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin (32), only the 37-kDa
nonglycosylated G6Pase was detected, confirming their identities. We
have previously shown that both forms of G6Pase are enzymatically
active and that the nonglycosylated G6Pase retains ~40% activity
(19). Immunoblot analyses showed that the active site mutants, K76N,
R83C, R83H, H119L, and R170Q (Fig. 2), as well as the 13 nonhelical
mutants (Fig. 3) supported the synthesis
of similar amounts of G6Pase proteins as the WT construct. The results
suggest that amino acid residues that comprise the catalytic center and
nonhelical regions of the enzyme do not play an essential role in the
correct folding and stability of G6Pase. Whereas the 41-kDa
glycoprotein was the major form in WT-transfected cells, the 37-kDa
nonglycosylated G6Pase became the major form in M5R-, Q20R-, Q54P-,
T108I-, and W236R-transfected cells, suggesting the accumulation of
incompletely processed protein in G6Pase mutant-transfected cells.
The FLAG-tagged active site mutants, like the respective parental
constructs, were devoid of G6Pase activity (Table II). Similarly, comparable amounts of phosphohydrolase activities were obtained with
the tagged and nontagged G6Pase nonhelical mutants (Table III). Again,
Q20R, Q54P, T108I, E110K, and P113L are the only nonhelical mutations
that completely abolished G6Pase activity.
The Structural Integrity of Transmembrane Helices Is Vital to the
Stability of G6Pase--
The majority (64.5%) of helical mutants,
including D38V (H1), W63R/G68R (H2), V166A
(H4), G188D/G188S/G188R (H5), L211P/G222R (H6), N264K/L265P/G266V/G270V/G270R (H7),
R295C/S298P (H8), and
Northern blot analysis confirmed that similar levels of G6Pase
transcripts were expressed in WT or mutant G6Pase-transfected COS-1
cells (data not shown). Our results, therefore, demonstrate that the
decrease in G6Pase biosynthesis was not due to a decrease in efficiency
of expression of the transfected cDNA construct. Moreover, the
helical mutant constructs, like WT G6Pase, directed the synthesis of
similar amounts of G6Pase proteins in a cell-free transcription-translation system (Fig. 4). The results indicate that
transmembrane helices in G6Pase play a vital role in the correct
folding of the enzyme and that the abnormal mutant proteins are rapidly
degraded in the cell.
Comparable amounts of G6Pase activities were obtained with FLAG-tagged
or nontagged G6Pase helical mutants (Table IV). Again, 22 of the 31 helical mutants were devoid of enzymatic activity, and 9 mutants (D38V,
G122D, A124T, W156L, V166A, P178S, L211P, G222R, and F322L) retained
residual G6Pase activity.
The Proteasome Inhibitor Lactacystin Induces the Accumulation of WT
and Mutant G6Pase--
The effect of a proteasome inhibitor,
lactacystin (26), on steady-state levels of G6Pase was assessed by
immunoblot analysis of COS-1 cells transfected with WT or mutant G6Pase
construct. In WT-transfected cells, the steady-state levels of both
41-kDa and 37-kDa G6Pases were markedly increased in the presence of lactacystin (Fig. 5), indicating that
G6Pase is predominantly degraded in cells through the proteasome
pathway. Lactacystin inhibits degradation of both glycosylated and
nonglycosylated G6Pases, suggesting that this metabolite does not
inhibit the processing and maturation of G6Pase. In the presence of
lactacystin, a fast-migrating band of 23 kDa was also accumulated (Fig.
5). The nature of this polypeptide is unknown. It is also unclear whether additional intermediates are accumulated in the presence of
lactacystin because the antibody recognizes the FLAG tag at the
carboxyl terminus of the enzyme.
In the absence of lactacystin, the steady-state levels of mutant
proteins in D38V-, G68R-, G188R-, L265P-, R295C-, and L345R-transfected cells were lower than that in WT G6Pase-transfected cells (Fig. 5).
However, in the presence of lactacystin, a marked increase in the
accumulation of both the 41- and 37-kDa mutant G6Pases comparable to
that of WT G6Pase was observed (Fig. 5), indicating that proteasomes
also participate in the degradation of G6Pase mutants. In the absence
of lactacystin, the G184E construct supported the synthesis of
increased levels of G6Pase protein rather than that of WT
construct. In the presence of lactacystin, comparable amounts of
G184E and WT G6Pase were accumulated (Fig. 5), again suggesting that
the G184E mutation increased the stability of G6Pase.
Human G6Pase is anchored to the ER by nine transmembrane helices
with the amino terminus and catalytic center facing inward in the lumen
and the carboxyl terminus facing outward in the cytoplasm (18, 19). In
this study, we examined phosphohydrolase activities of G6Pase mutants
carrying 48 missense mutations and the Based on the crystal structure of vanadium-containing chloroperoxidase
(13, 14), the amino acids predicted to participate in G6Pase catalysis
include Lys76, Arg83, His119,
Arg170, and His176. As expected, the five
active site mutations, K76N, R83C, R83H, H119L, and R170Q, completely
inactivated the enzyme, confirming the importance of these residues in
G6Pase catalysis. Whereas 22 of the 31 (71%) helical mutations
completely abolished G6Pase activity, only 5 of the 13 (38%)
nonhelical mutants were devoid of enzymatic activity, suggesting that
an active G6Pase depends upon the structural integrity of its
transmembrane helices. Luminal loop 1 may also play a crucial role in
catalytic activity of the enzyme because T108I, E110K, and P113L
mutations, which totally inactivated G6Pase, are located within this
loop. The nine helical mutants that retain residual G6Pase activity
include D38V, G122D, A124T, W156L, V166A, P178S, L211P, G222R, and
F322L. Earlier studies have shown that D38V (8), P178S (6), and A124T
(9) mutants were devoid of G6Pase activity. The observed difference may
result from the low levels of G6Pase activity retained by these
mutants. Currently, we are adapting a recombinant adenoviral
vector-mediated expression system, which has been widely used for
high-level protein expression in mammalian cells (33), to increase the
sensitivity of the expression assays.
It is interesting to note that a Japanese patient homozygous for the
P257L mutation, a nonhelical mutation that only partially inactivates
G6Pase, had a very mild phenotype (11). The patient experienced no
hypoglycemic episodes and required no dietary therapy. The data base of
residual phosphohydrolase activity retained by the 49 G6Pase codon
mutants should facilitate future genotype-phenotype delineations. It is
important to document the results of phenotypic studies of GSD-1a
patients carrying leaky G6Pase mutations. Knowledge of the
minimal G6Pase activity needed to prevent hypoglycemic episodes in
GSD-1a patients will facilitate the development of novel therapeutic
approaches for this disorder.
Virtually nothing is known about the structural requirements for the
correct folding and stability of G6Pase. We therefore undertook
structure-function analyses of this phosphatase, taking advantage of
the large collection of G6Pase missense mutations identified
in GSD-1a patients. We show that amino acid residues comprised of the
active center and nonhelical regions of G6Pase played no essential role
in the stability of the protein. On the other hand, evidence present in
this study indicates that the structural integrity of transmembrane
helices is vital to the correct folding and stability G6Pase.
Immunoblot analysis demonstrate that whereas all active site and
nonhelical mutants supported the synthesis of WT levels of G6Pase
protein in COS-1 cells, 20 of the 31 (64%) helical mutants supported
the synthesis of reduced levels of G6Pase as compared with the WT
construct. In a cell-free translation system, WT and the helical mutant
transcripts direct the synthesis of similar amounts of G6Pase proteins.
Because folding of nascent proteins occurs during their in
vitro synthesis on rabbit reticulocyte ribosomes, our data
strongly suggest that mutations that alter the helical structure in
G6Pase cause misfolding and degradation of the mutant protein.
Proteins with abnormal conformations that arise by mutations or
intracellular denaturation are rapidly degraded, which represents a
quality control system in the cell (20, 34). Most intracellular protein
degradation is catalyzed by lysosomal proteases or the ubiquitin-proteasome system (reviewed in Ref. 24). Many membrane proteins, including cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator
(21, 22), the major histocompatibility complex class I molecule, and
In summary, we have generated a data base of residual G6Pase activity
retained by 49 codon mutations to facilitate genotype-phenotype delineation, elucidated a number of structural requirements for the
stability and enzymatic activity of G6Pase, and demonstrated that
proteasomes mediate degradation of this phosphatase.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 5, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110486200
The abbreviations used are:
GSD-1, glycogen
storage disease type 1;
G6Pase, glucose-6-phosphatase;
WT, wild-type;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
The Molecular Basis of Glycogen Storage Disease Type 1a
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION ANALYSIS OF MUTATIONS IN
GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATASE*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
F327 codon
deletion mutation, grouped as active site, helical, and
nonhelical mutations. The 5 active site mutations and 22 of the 31 helical mutations completely abolished G6Pase activity, but only 5 of
the 13 nonhelical mutants were devoid of activity. Whereas the active
site and nonhelical mutants supported the synthesis of G6Pase protein
in a manner similar to that of the wild-type enzyme, immunoblot
analysis showed that the majority (64.5%) of helical mutations
destabilized G6Pase. Furthermore, we show that degradation of both
wild-type and mutant G6Pase is inhibited by lactacystin, a potent
proteasome inhibitor. Taken together, we have generated a data
base of residual G6Pase activity retained by G6Pase mutants,
established the critical roles of transmembrane helices in the
stability and activity of this phosphatase, and shown that G6Pase is a
substrate for proteasome-mediated degradation.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-chains of
T-cell antigen receptor (reviewed in Refs. 23-25). The proteasome pathway can be inhibited by the Streptomyces metabolite,
lactacystin (26), which inhibits the proteasome specifically without
inhibiting other proteases (reviewed in Ref. 27). The
availability of proteasome inhibitor allows a rapid analysis in intact
cells of the possible contributions of protein breakdown by the
proteasomes. In this study, we show that wild-type and mutant G6Pases
are predominantly degraded in the ER through the proteasome pathway.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
AGG
at position 5; T16A (nucleotides 116-136), ACA
GCA at
position 16; Q20R (nucleotides 128-148), CAG
CGG at position 20; Q54P (nucleotides 230-250), CAG
CCG at
position 54; W63R (nucleotides 257-277), TGG
CGG at
position 63; G68R (nucleotides 272-292), GGA
CGA at
position 68; K76N (nucleotides 296-316), AAG
AAC at
position 76; W77R (nucleotides 299-319), TGG
CGG at
position 77; G81R (nucleotides 311-331), GGA
CGA at
position 81; T108I (nucleotides 392-412), ACC
ATC at
position 108; T111I (nucleotides 401-421), ACT
ATT at position 111; P113L (nucleotides 407-427), CCA
CTA at
position 113; H119L (nucleotides 425-445), CAT
CTT at
position 119; G122D (nucleotides 434-454), GGC
GAC at
position 122; A124T (nucleotides 440-460), GCA
ACA at
position 124; W156L (nucleotides 535-555), TGG
TTG at
position 156; V166A (nucleotides 566-586), GTC
GCC at
position 166; R170Q (nucleotides 578-598), CGA
CAA at
position 170; H179P (nucleotides 605-625), CAT
CCT at position 179; G184E (nucleotides 620-640), GGA
GAA at
position 184; G184V (nucleotides 620-640), GGA
GTA at
position 184; G188D (nucleotides 632-652), GGC
GAC at
position 188; G188R (nucleotides 632-652), GGC
CGC at
position 188; L211P (nucleotides 701-721), CTC
CCC at
position 211; A241T (nucleotides 791-811), GCC
ACC at
position 241; T255I (nucleotides 833-853), ACC
ATC at
position 255; P257L (nucleotides 839-859), CCC
CTC at position 257; N264K (nucleotides 860-880), AAC
AAA at
position 264; L265P (nucleotides 863-883), CTG
CCG at
position 265; G266V (nucleotides 866-886), GGC
GTC at
position 266; G270R (nucleotides 878-898), GGC
CGC at
position 270; S298P (nucleotides 962-982), TCT
CCT at
position 298; F322L (nucleotides 1034-1054), TTC
CTC at
position 322; V338F (nucleotides 1082-1102), GTC
TTC at
position 338; and I341N (nucleotides 1091-1111), ATC
AAC
at position 341. The antisense primer for each mutant has the
corresponding complementary sequence. Bold letters indicate
nucleotide changes. We have also constructed carboxyl-terminal FLAG-tagged human G6Pase mutants, R83C, R83H, E110K, E110Q, V166G, G188S, G222R, W236R, G270V, R295C,
F327, and L345R, as described previously (4-6). The nucleotide sequence in all constructs was verified by DNA sequencing. D38V-3'-FLAG and P178S-3'-FLAG mutants have
been described previously (19).
(BD Biosciences,
CLONTECH) was cotransfected with WT or mutant
G6Pase cDNA construct. After incubation at 37 °C for 2 days, the
transfected cultures were harvested for phosphohydrolase and
-galactosidase assays, Western blot analysis, or RNA isolation.
-Galactosidase
Assays--
Phosphohydrolase activity was determined essentially as
described previously (4). Reaction mixtures (100 µl) contained 50 mM cacodylate buffer, pH 6.5, 10 mM
glucose-6-phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, and appropriate amounts of
cell homogenates and were incubated at 30 °C for 10 min. Sample
absorbance was determined at 820 nm and is related to the amount of
phosphate released using a standard curve constructed by a stock of
inorganic phosphate solution. Nonspecific phosphatase activity was
estimated by preincubating cell homogenates at pH 5 for 10 min at
37 °C, a condition that inactivates the thermolabile G6Pase
(31).
-Galactosidase activity was measured by the release of
O-nitrophenol from
O-nitrophenyl-
-galactopyranoside at 37 °C in a reaction mixture containing 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer,
pH 7.3, 1 mM MgCl2, 50 mM
-mercaptoethanol, and 0.665 mg/ml
O-nitrophenyl-
-galactopyranoside.
-Galactosidase
activity was estimated by absorbance at 420 nm using a
-galactosidase standard obtained from Promega Biotech.
-actin probe labeled by random priming.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
F327 (Table I). Two novel mutations
identified in this study are T255I and 836delA.
Mutations identified in the G6Pase gene of GSD-1a patients
F327, shown to be devoid of enzymatic
activity (5). To facilitate structure-function analysis, we have
grouped these mutations into three categories (active site, helical,
and nonhelical mutations) based on their predicted catalytic,
transmembrane helical, luminal, and cytoplasmic locations in G6Pase
(Fig. 1).

View larger version (43K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Location of missense and
F327 mutations identified in the G6Pase
gene of GSD-1a patients. Human G6Pase is anchored to the ER
by nine transmembrane helices (18, 19). The mutations are indicated and
shown in black. Amino acid residues comprising the
phosphatase signature motif are denoted by large shaded
circles.
Phosphohydrolase activity of G6Pase active site mutant constructs
10% WT G6Pase
activity. The five nonhelical mutations that completely abolished
G6Pase activity include Q20R, Q54P, T108I, E110K, and P113L (Table
III). Q20R and Q54P are located within the amino terminus and
cytoplasmic loop 1, respectively, and E110K, T108I, and P113L are all
situated within luminal loop 1 (Fig. 1).
Phosphohydrolase activity of G6Pase nonhelical mutant constructs
F327 mutation are scattered throughout the
nine transmembrane helices (Fig. 1). Earlier mutational studies have
shown that 13 helical mutations, including D38V, W77R, A124T, V166G,
P178S, G184E, G188S, G188R, L211P, G270V, R295C,
F327, and L345R,
completely abolished G6Pase activity, and 1 helical mutation, G222R,
retained residual activity (reviewed in Refs. 2 and 3). In this study,
we extended this analysis and showed that 22 helical mutations
completely inactivated the enzyme (Table IV). The nine helical mutants that retain
residual G6Pase activity include D38V, G122D, A124T, W156L, V166A,
P178S, L211P, G222R, and F322L. It is interesting to note that only two
mutants, G122D (helix 3) and F322L (helix 9), retained >10% WT G6Pase
activity. Also, G122D and A124T are the only mutations identified in
helix 3.
Phosphohydrolase activity of G6Pase helical mutant constructs
F327 G6Pase mutants with the
eight-amino acid FLAG marker peptide (DYKDDDDK) at their carboxyl
termini. The FLAG tag does not interfere with the expression,
stability, or activity of WT G6Pase and has been used successfully to
tag human G6Pase (18, 19) for topological studies. G6Pase biosynthesis in COS-1 cells was examined by Western blot analysis using a monoclonal antibody against the FLAG epitope.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Western blot analysis of G6Pase in COS-1
cells transfected with WT or an active site mutant cDNA construct
containing a 3' FLAG tag. A, effects of tunicamycin. COS-1
cells transfected with the G6Pase-WT construct were incubated in the
absence or presence of tunicamycin (1 µg/ml) for 24 h before
harvesting for Western blot analysis. B, Western blot
analysis of active site mutants. Mock-transfected cells were used as
controls. The G6Pase proteins on the Western membranes were visualized
by an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody; each lane contained 20 µg of
proteins.
![]()
View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Western blot analysis of G6Pase in COS-1
cells transfected with WT or a nonhelical mutant cDNA construct
containing a 3' FLAG tag. Mock-transfected cells were used as
controls. The G6Pase proteins on the Western membranes were visualized
by an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody; each lane contained 20 µg of
proteins.
F327/V338F/I341N/L345R
(H9), supported the synthesis of reduced levels of G6Pase
proteins in COS-1 cells as compared with the WT construct (Fig.
4). Moreover, the 41-kDa G6Pase was
preferentially reduced, indicating that mutations that altered the
structural integrity of transmembrane helices destabilize G6Pase.
Interestingly, the steady-state level of the G184E mutant, which is
devoid of G6Pase activity, was higher than that of WT G6Pase,
suggesting that the G184E mutation increased the stability of this
phosphatase.

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Synthesis of WT or helical G6Pase mutant
analyzed by Western blot hybridization or by in vitro
transcription-translation. For Western blot analysis, COS-1
cells were transfected with WT or a helical G6Pase mutant cDNA
construct containing a 3' FLAG tag. Mock-transfected cells were used as
controls. The G6Pase proteins on the Western membranes were visualized
by an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody; each lane contained 20 µg of
proteins. For in vitro transcription-translation analysis,
in vitro synthesis of G6Pase directed by 3' FLAG-tagged WT
or a mutant G6Pase construct in a pGEM-11Zf(+) vector was performed
using the troponin T-coupled reticulocyte lysate system.
L-[35S]Methionine was used as the labeled
precursor, and after electrophoresis, the proteins were
visualized by fluoroautoradiography.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The effect of the proteasome inhibitor
lactacystin on degradation of G6Pase. Two sets of COS-1 cells were
transfected with 3' FLAG-tagged WT and mutant G6Pase constructs. After
34 h of incubation at 37 °C, 10 µM lactacyctin
was added to one set of cultures, and the incubation was continued for
an additional 12-14 h. The steady-state levels of G6Pase in
transfected cultures were examined by Western blot analysis using an
anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody; each lane contained 20 µg of
proteins.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
F327 codon deletion mutation
grouped into three categories based on their predicted catalytic,
helical, and nonhelical locations in this phosphatase. We have also
undertaken structure-function analysis of human G6Pase. We show that
mutations that altered the active center in G6Pase completely
inactivated the enzyme but had no deleterious effects on the folding
and stability of the protein. Eight of the 13 nonhelical mutants
retained residual G6Pase activity, and most, it not all, supported the
synthesis of WT levels of G6Pase protein in COS-1 cells, suggesting
that nonhelical mutants also play no essential role in the stability of
G6Pase. On the other hand, of the 31 helical mutations characterized,
22 (71%) completely abolished G6Pase activity, and 20 (64%)
destabilized this phosphatase. Taken together, the results indicate
that the structural integrity of transmembrane helices is vital to the stability and enzymatic activity of G6Pase. We have also provided evidence indicating that G6Pase is degraded predominantly through the
proteasome pathway.
-chains of T-cell antigen receptor, are degraded in cells by the
proteasome system (reviewed in Refs. 23-25). The 26S proteasome, an
ATP-dependent proteolytic complex, contains the central 20S
proteasome, in which proteins are degraded, and two 19S complexes,
which provide substrate specificity and regulation (reviewed in Refs.
23-25). The active site nucleophil of the proteasome is the hydroxyl
group of a threonine at the amino terminus of the
subunit of
proteasome. Lactacystin, a specific proteasome inhibitor, blocks
proteasome function by becoming covalently linked to the hydroxyl group
of threonine (26, 27). In this study, we show that the steady-state
levels of WT and mutant G6Pase were markedly increased by lactacystin,
indicating that degradation of G6Pase is mediated predominantly by the
proteasome pathway. The marked increase in the levels of WT G6Pase by
lactacystin suggests that folding of G6Pase is relatively inefficient,
a phenomenon also observed for the cystic fibrosis transmembrane
conductance regulator (35, 36).
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 10, Rm. 9S241,
Heritable Disorders Branch, NICHD, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, MD 20892-1830. Tel.: 301-496-1094; Fax: 301-402-6035; E-mail: chou@helix.nih.gov.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Chen, Y.-T.
(2001)
in
The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease
(Scriver, C. R.
, Beaudet, A. L.
, Sly, W. S.
, Valle, D.
, Childs, B.
, Kinzler, K. W.
, and Vogelstein, B., eds), 8th Ed.
, pp. 1521-1551, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
2.
Chou, J. Y.,
and Mansfield, B. C.
(1999)
Trends Endocrinol. Metab.
10,
104-113[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Chou, J. Y.
(2001)
Curr. Mol. Med.
1,
25-44[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Lei, K.-J.,
Shelly, L. L.,
Pan, C.-J.,
Sidbury, J. B.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1993)
Science
262,
580-583 5.
Lei, K.-J.,
Shelly, L. L.,
Lin, B.,
Sidbury, J. B.,
Chen, Y.-T.,
Nordlie, R. C.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
234-240
6.
Lei, K.-J.,
Chen, Y.-T.,
Chen, H.,
Wong, L.-J. C.,
Liu, J.-L.,
McConkie-Rosell, A.,
Van Hove, J. L. K., Ou, H. C.-Y.,
Yeh, N. J.,
Pan, L. Y.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1995)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
57,
766-771[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Parvari, R.,
Lei, K.-J.,
Bashan, N.,
Hershkovitz, E.,
Korman, S. H.,
Barash, V.,
Lerman-Sagie, T.,
Mandel, H.,
Chou, J. Y.,
and Moses, S. W.
(1997)
Am. J. Med. Genet.
72,
286-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Parvari, R.,
Lei, K.-J.,
Szonyi, L.,
Narkis, G.,
Moses, S.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1997)
Eur. J. Hum. Genet.
5,
191-195[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Bruni, N.,
Rajas, F.,
Montano, S.,
Chevalier-Porst, F.,
Maire, I.,
and Mithieux, G.
(1999)
Ann. Hum. Genet.
63,
141-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Weston, B. W.,
Lin, J. L.,
Muenzer, J.,
Cameron, H. S.,
Arnold, R. R.,
Seydewitz, H. H.,
Mayatepek, E.,
Van Schaftingen, E.,
Veiga-da-Cunha, M.,
Matern, D.,
and Chen, Y. T.
(2000)
Pediat. Res.
48,
329-334[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Akanuma, J.,
Nishigaki, T.,
Fujii, K.,
Matsubara, Y.,
Inui, K.,
Takahashi, K.,
Kure, S.,
Suzuki, Y.,
Ohura, T.,
Miyabayashi, S.,
Ogawa, E.,
Iinuma, K.,
Okada, S.,
and Narisawa, K.
(2000)
Am. J. Med. Genet.
91,
107-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Stukey, J.,
and Carman, G. M.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
469-472[Abstract]
13.
Hemrika, W.,
and Wever, R.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
409,
317-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Hemrika, W.,
Renirie, R.,
Dekker, H. L.,
Barnett, P.,
and Wever, R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2145-2149 15.
Huner, G.,
Podskarbi, T.,
Schutz, M.,
Baykal, T.,
Sarbat, G.,
Shin, Y. S.,
and Demirkol, M.
(1998)
J. Inherit. Metab. Dis.
21,
445-446[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Kozak, L.,
Francova, H.,
Hirabincova, E.,
Stastna, S.,
Peskova, K.,
and Elleder, M.
(2000)
Hum. Mutat.
16,
89[CrossRef]
17.
Wu, M.-C.,
Tsai, F.-J.,
Lee, C.-C.,
Tsai, C.-H.,
and Wu, J.-Y.
(2000)
Hum. Mutat.
16,
447[CrossRef]
18.
Pan, C.-J.,
Lei, K.-J.,
Annabi, B.,
Hemrika, W.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6144-6148 19.
Pan, C.-J.,
Lei, K.-J.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21658-21662 20.
Wickner, S.,
Maurizi, M. R.,
and Gottesman, S.
(1999)
Science
286,
1888-1893 21.
Ward, C. L.,
Omura, S.,
and Kopito, R. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
121-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Jensen, T. J.,
Loo, M. A.,
Pind, S.,
Williams, D. B.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
and Riordan, J. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
129-135[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Brodsky, J. L.,
and McCracken, A. A.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
151-156
24.
Lee, D. H.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
397-403[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Lecker, S. H.,
Solomon, V.,
Mitch, W. E.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1999)
J. Nutr.
129,
227S-237S 26.
Fenteany, G.,
Standaert, R. F.,
Lane, W. S.,
Choi, S.,
Corey, E. J.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1995)
Science
268,
726-731 27.
Fenteany, G.,
and Schriber, S. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8545-8548 28.
Orita, M.,
Iwahana, H.,
Kanazawa, H.,
Hayashi, K.,
and Sekiya, T.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
2766-2770 29.
Lei, K.-J.,
Shelly, L. L.,
Pan, C.-J.,
Liu, J.-L.,
and Chou, J. Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11882-11886 30.
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1992)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, pp. 9.2.1-9.2.6, Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York
31.
Hers, H. G.
(1964)
in
Advances in Metabolic Disorders
(Levine, R.
, and Luft, L., eds), Vol. 1
, pp. 1-44, Academic Press, London
32.
Struck, D. K.,
and Lennarz, W. J.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
1007-1013 33.
Antinozzi, P. A.,
Berman, H. K.,
O'Doherty, R. M,
and Newgard, C. B.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
19,
511-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Bross, P.,
Corydon, T. J.,
Andersen, B. S.,
Jorgensen, M. M.,
Bolund, L.,
and Gregersen, N.
(1999)
Hum. Mutat.
14,
186-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Cheng, S. H.,
Gregory, R. J.,
Marshall, J.,
Paul, S.,
Souza, D. W.,
White, G. A.,
O'Riordan, C. R.,
and Smith, A. E.
(1990)
Cell
63,
827-834[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Kopito, R. R.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
S167-S173
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Ghosh, J.-J. Shieh, C.-J. Pan, and J. Y. Chou Histidine 167 Is the Phosphate Acceptor in Glucose-6-phosphatase-{beta} Forming a Phosphohistidine Enzyme Intermediate during Catalysis J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12479 - 12483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Shieh, C.-J. Pan, B. C. Mansfield, and J. Y. Chou A Glucose-6-phosphate Hydrolase, Widely Expressed Outside the Liver, Can Explain Age-dependent Resolution of Hypoglycemia in Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2003; 278(47): 47098 - 47103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-Y. Chen, C.-J. Pan, J.-J. Shieh, and J. Y. Chou Structure-function analysis of the glucose-6-phosphate transporter deficient in glycogen storage disease type Ib Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2002; 11(25): 3199 - 3207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Foster and R. C. Nordlie The Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of the Glucose-6-Phosphatase System Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2002; 227(8): 601 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ghosh, J.-J. Shieh, C.-J. Pan, M.-S. Sun, and J. Y. Chou The Catalytic Center of Glucose-6-phosphatase. HIS176 IS THE NUCLEOPHILE FORMING THE PHOSPHOHISTIDINE-ENZYME INTERMEDIATE DURING CATALYSIS J. Biol. Chem., August 30, 2002; 277(36): 32837 - 32842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||