![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 5187-5193, February 15, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Molecular Virology Section, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0460
Received for publication, October 25, 2001, and in revised form, November 27, 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) is
the causative agent for adult T-cell leukemia (ATL). Molecularly, ATL
cells have extensive aneugenic abnormalities that occur, at least in part, from cell cycle dysregulation by the HTLV-I-encoded Tax oncoprotein. Here, we compared six HTLV-I-transformed cells to Jurkat
and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in their
responses to treatment with microtubule inhibitors. We found that both Jurkat and PBMCs arrested efficiently in mitosis when treated
with nocodazole. By contrast, all six HTLV-I cells failed to arrest
comparably in mitosis, suggesting that ATL cells have a defect in the
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. Mechanistically, we observed that
in HTLV-I Tax-expressing cells human spindle assembly checkpoint
factors hsMAD1 and hsMAD2 were mislocated from the nucleus to the
cytoplasm. This altered localization of hsMAD1 and hsMAD2 correlated
with loss of mitotic checkpoint function and chemoresistance to
microtubule inhibitors.
In vivo infection by human T-lymphotropic virus type I
(HTLV-I)1 engenders adult
T-cell leukemia (ATL) in a minority of individuals after a prolonged
latent period. The pathological course of ATL suggests a multistage
process of transformation beginning from clonal expansion of an
HTLV-I-bearing T-cell followed by the accumulation of cellular genetic
lesions that likely inactivate several tumor-suppressor genes (1-7).
ATL cells harbor significant clastogenic as well as aneugenic
chromosomal abnormalities (8, 9). HTLV-I has been found to subvert
several cellular checkpoints that guard against loss of genome
integrity (10). Indeed, in a process that possibly explains aneuploidy
in ATL cells, it was recently shown that the HTLV-I Tax oncoprotein
inactivates the function of the human spindle assembly checkpoint
protein, MAD1 (11).
Aneuploidy is seen in ~70% of all cancers. Genetic studies in yeast
have implicated at least seven genes (MAD (mitotic arrest deficiency)-1, -2, -3; BUB (budding uninhibited by benomyl)-1, -2, -3;
and MPS1 (monopolar spindle 1)) (12) in the mitotic spindle checkpoint,
which censors against aneuploidy. These checkpoint proteins form
complexes that regulate orderly chromosomal segregation and nuclear
division (13-15). Interestingly, despite the high frequency of
aneuploidy in human cancers, only rarely have genetic defects in
mitotic checkpoint genes been found (16, 17). This suggests that events
other than genetic changes may abrogate mitotic spindle checkpoint
function and account for aneugenic alterations.
We have employed HTLV-I-transformed human T-cells as a model to
investigate the biology of the mitotic spindle checkpoint in cancers.
Here, we report the prevalent loss of mitotic spindle checkpoint in six
out of six HTLV cells. We further show that this defect in mitotic
checkpoint function correlated with resistance by ATL cells to MTI agents.
Cell Lines and Cell Cycle Analysis--
MT-1, MT-4, TL-Omi,
TL-Su, ILT-Hod, and C8166 are human HTLV-1-transformed T-cell lines
(MT-1, MT-4, TL-Omi, TL-Su, and C8166 are IL-2-independent; ILT-Hod is
IL-2-dependent). IL-2-independent cells and Jurkat cells
were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(RPMI-FCS). ILT-Hod was cultured in RPMI-FCS with 1 nM
IL-2. HeLa and SW480 were cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS. Primary human
PBMCs from anonymous normal donors were obtained from the NIH blood
bank. PBMCs were activated to proliferate by treatment with 20 units/ml
of recombinant human IL-2 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and
0.25 µg/ml phytohemagglutinin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in
RPMI-FCS for 3 days prior to nocodazole assays.
Mitotic Index and Apoptosis Analysis--
Nocodazole (Sigma) was
added to medium at final concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 µM, as indicated. Cells were harvested at 12-h time
intervals up to 36 h. After harvesting, the cells were pelleted
(1500 rpm, 5 min) and washed with PBS. Cell pellets were resuspended in
50 µl of 1% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde. 20 µl of the cell
suspension were dried onto a poly-L-lysine-coated slide,
washed with PBS, and stained with PBS containing 10 µg/ml of Hoechst
33258 (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature. Fluorescent microscopy
was used to visualize viable cells arrested in mitosis. To measure the
mitotic index, at least 300 cells were counted in each assay. All
assays were repeated two to three times. Quantitations of
apoptosis by Hoechst dye staining and by TUNEL assay (not shown) were
also similarly performed. Cytogenetic analyses of cells, where
reported, were performed by the Cell Culture Laboratory of the
Children's Hospital of Michigan.
[3H]Thymidine Incorporation--
Suspension cells
were incubated at 1 × 105 cells/ml. Twenty hours
after the addition of nocodazole, [3H]thymidine was added
(10 µCi/ml). Four hours later cells were pelleted and washed with 0.5 ml of PBS, then methanol/acetic acid (3:1) was added for 15 min to fix
cells, followed by two washes with 0.5 ml of methanol/acetic acid. The
cell pellet was solubilized with 0.25 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and
transferred to scintillation vials. After addition of 5 ml of
scintillant, incorporated [3H]thymidine was measured by
scintillation spectroscopy.
Cell Viability Assay--
Cells (5 × 104
cells/ml) were treated with nocodazole (0.5 µM) or
vincristine (0.5 µM) or 300 nM of
flavopiridol and harvested at indicated intervals. Cell viability
was measured by a modified MTT dye reduction assay using WST-8
(2-(2-methoxy- 4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt) (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD).
Fraction viable cells represent the ratio of WST-8 values from cells
treated with drugs relative to that from untreated cells.
Western Blotting--
Cells were collected by centrifugation at
1500 rpm, washed in PBS, then resuspended into 0.25 M
Tris-HCl. After three freeze/thaws, the cells were centrifuged at
14,000 rpm; the supernatants were saved as the cytoplasmic fractions.
The pellets were resuspended into 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, sonicated to fragment DNA and were saved as the nuclear fractions. To
inactivate potentially infectious HTLV particles, all fractions were
adjusted to 0.1% Nonidet P-40. Protein concentrations were determined
using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad). Anti-hsMAD2 and anti-hsMAD1
were raised in rabbit to GST-hsMAD2 and GST-hsMAD1 fusion proteins.
Mouse monoclonal anti-actin (clone AC-15) was from Sigma.
Chemiluminescent immunoblotting was according to manufacturer's
procedures (Tropix, Bedford, MA). Visualized bands were detected by
scanning and quantified using ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA).
HTLV-I-transformed Cells Are Defective in Mitotic Spindle Assembly
Checkpoint--
To understand how proliferative dysregulation of ATL
cells might correlate with aneuploidy, we investigated mitotic spindle checkpoint function in HTLV-I transformed cells. The mitotic index of
cells in response to MTIs (e.g. nocodazole or vincristine) reflects the status of this checkpoint. To verify our assays, we first
examined two well characterized cancer cells, HeLa (a cervical
epithelial cancer) and SW480 (a colon cancer), known to be spindle
checkpoint-intact and spindle checkpoint-defective (16), respectively.
In our hands, at any given time, 5% of asynchronously propagated HeLa
or SW480 cells were in mitosis (M) (Fig.
1A). However, when exposed to
nocodazole, the two cells responded quite differently. 24 h after
treatment,
We extended the measurements of MTI-induced mitotic arrest to four
additional HTLV-I-transformed T-cells (C8166, ILT-Hod, TL-Omi, and
TL-Su; Fig. 2A). In our
asynchronous cultures, usually between 1.8 and 3.2% of these
suspension cells were in M-phase (Fig. 2B). Since normal
PBMCs were relatively difficult to obtain frequently in large amounts
for the many repetitions over which we performed these experiments, and
since Jurkat cells had phenotypically intact spindle assembly
checkpoint (Fig. 1B), we employed the latter cells as
positive control. When the HTLV-I and Jurkat cells were treated with
0.5 µM nocodazole and examined serially over time, we
found that by 24 h of treatment >60% of Jurkat cells arrested in
M (Fig. 2A). By contrast, 80-95% of each of the six HTLV
cells escaped arrest and exited mitosis (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that most, if not all, HTLV-transformed cells may be
pervasively defective in the spindle assembly checkpoint.
Spindle Checkpoint-defective Cells Resist MTI-induced
Apoptosis--
To assess the role of spindle checkpoint on MTI
treatment outcome, we measured the apoptotic indices of
nocodazole-treated cells. Quantitation of apoptosis based on Hoechst
staining and TUNEL assays (data not shown) showed a variance in MTI
sensitivity between Jurkat and HTLV cells. At early times after
treatment (12 h, Fig. 3A), all
cells shared similar values. However, by 24-36 h after exposure to
MTI, a high extent of apoptosis was observed for Jurkat but not for the
HTLV cells (Fig. 3A). Thus, when considered together with
the data above on mitotic indices, apoptotic sensitivity to MTI
correlated inversely with intactness of spindle checkpoint.
Two control experiments excluded that the HTLV cells might have
responded to MTI through non-apoptotic cell death or quiescence. First,
we measured [3H]thymidine incorporation by
nocodazole-treated cells. Relative to Jurkat, each of the six HTLV
cells (Fig. 3B) incorporated significantly higher amounts of
[3H]thymidine. An interpretation of these results is that
nocodazole induced the arrest of Jurkat cells in mitosis (Figs.
1B and 2A) and that prolonged arrest leads to
apoptosis (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, because of their
spindle checkpoint defect, the HTLV cells were not arrested by MTI and
instead progressed unimpeded from M into the next S-phase
(i.e. DNA synthesis and [3H]thymidine
incorporation). Second, using the MTT colorimetric assay for cellular
viability, we further quantitated the robustness of growth of cells
treated with either nocodazole (Fig.
4A) or vincristine (Fig.
4B). The MTT findings confirmed the differential viabilities
of Jurkat and HTLV cells propagated in the presence of MTIs.
Mislocation of MAD1 and MAD2 Proteins in HTLV Cells--
To better
understand the reasons for spindle checkpoint loss, we inquired whether
the human MAD1 or MAD2 checkpoint proteins might be mutated in the six
HTLV cell lines. Full-length cDNAs for MAD1 and MAD2 from Jurkat as
well as the six HTLV cells were sequenced. Surprisingly, except for
sporadic polymorphic changes, MAD1 and MAD2 cDNAs from all the
cells revealed intact open reading frames with no gross deletions or
nonsense substitutions.2 This
absence of overt mutation prompted us to consider mechanisms other than
gross genetic changes for explaining spindle checkpoint loss in HTLV cells.
We, then, examined the protein expression patterns of MAD1 and MAD2.
Intact spindle checkpoint requires nuclear congression of MAD1 and MAD2
(18). Interestingly, in surveying many different ambiently propagated
animal cells, we found that in every cell type the great preponderance
of MAD1 and MAD2 appeared in the cytoplasm (data not shown). Thus,
nuclear migration of MAD1/MAD2 proteins potentially represents a
regulatory step in checkpoint function. To ask whether this step might
be defective in HTLV cells, we fractionated (by freeze-thawing)
mock-treated and nocodazole-treated cells into insoluble "nuclear"
(N) and soluble "cytoplasmic" (C) portions
and probed for MAD1 and MAD2 proteins using specific antisera (Fig.
5). Western blotting revealed that Jurkat
cells, both constitutively and in a nocodazole-inducible manner, had higher amounts of nuclear MAD1 and MAD2 (Fig. 5A) when compared with each of the six HTLV-cells. Consistently, the
"nuclear/cytoplasmic" (N/C) ratios for both MAD1 and
MAD2 in the HTLV cells were ~50% of that found for Jurkat cells
(Fig. 5, B and C).
Because physical fractionation of cells can be inexact, we sought to
confirm the observation of reduced nuclear presence of MAD1 in HTLV
cells by immunostaining. Fig. 6 compares
the immunofluorescent images of Jurkat and HTLV-I-transformed C8166
cells using monospecific anti-MAD1 serum. In these confocal analyses,
the Jurkat cells stained for MAD1 prominently in the nucleus with a
punctate distribution (Fig. 6, top), while similarly stained
C8166 cells showed a nuclear-excluded MAD1 pattern (Fig. 6,
bottom). Nuclear sparing of MAD1 was also seen in the other
five HTLV cells (data not shown).
Enhanced Sensitivity of HTLV-transformed Cells to Combination
Therapy with MTI Plus Flavopiridol--
In principle, defects in cell
cycle checkpoint might be exploited chemotherapeutically to the
disadvantage of cancer cells. Here, spindle checkpoint-intact cells
(i.e. Jurkat) when treated with MTI arrest transiently in M,
while checkpoint-deficient cells (i.e. HTLV cells) do not
arrest and continue into the subsequent G1. We reasoned
that this difference could confer to the latter a heightened
sensitivity to a combination of MTI plus a G1-specific inhibitor, while the former would be protected from G1
toxicity as a result of MTI-induced M arrest.
To check this reasoning, we treated in parallel Jurkat and
HTLV-I-transformed MT4 cells with nocodazole alone, nocodazole followed
by flavopiridol, or nocodazole simultaneous with flavopiridol (Fig.
7). Cellular viabilities were assessed by
MTT assay. Jurkat cells, as expected, were more sensitive than MT4
cells to nocodazole alone (Fig. 7A). However, opposite
relative susceptibility profiles were seen when a G1-potent
inhibitor, flavopiridol (19), was added to nocodazole (Fig. 7,
B and C). Checkpoint-defective MT4 cells exposed to either
nocodazole followed by flavopiridol or nocodazole simultaneous with
flavopiridol were significantly less viable than checkpoint-intact
Jurkat cells. These effects relate to spindle checkpoint status and are
independent of p53 activity, since both Jurkat (20) and
HTLV-I-transformed cells lack p53 function (21).
Cancer cells differ from normal cells at multiple genetic loci. In
evolving from a normal to a cancerous state, cells lose some or many of
the biological checkpoints which monitor the fidelity of DNA
replication, repair, and segregation (22). In different cancers,
different losses in cell cycle control appear to be emphasized. For
instance, most breast cancers have mutated p53 or pRb, leading to a
defective G1/S control (23), while most colorectal cancers (85%) have lost the ability to censor against aneuploidy (24). Here,
we report that ATL cells are prevalently defective in the spindle
assembly checkpoint that monitors for fidelity of chromosomal segregation during mitosis.
What are some implications of checkpoint loss? A practical one applies
to the treatment of cancers. Most current anti-cancer drugs have low
therapeutic indices (25) (i.e. toxic dose per therapeutic
dose). In vivo, chemotherapy of tumors is limited by drug
toxicity for normal cells. Molecular differences in checkpoint functions between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues potentially permit selective drug designs that could target cancers while sparing
normal counterparts. For example, initial results from model cell
systems had encouraged the idea that loss of p53 (26) or p21 (27)
proteins might potentiate cellular sensitivity to MTIs such as taxol
and vincristine. Unfortunately, this was subsequently called into
question by difficulties in reproducing enhanced MTI susceptibility in
bona fide human cancers (28, 29). Further exacerbating the
confusion were reports that loss of p53 increased (30) and decreased
(31) sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. It, thus, remains unclear how
p53 defects in cancers might be used to guide the chemotherapy of tumors.
The spindle assembly checkpoint monitors integrity of chromosomal
segregation during mitosis (12, 31, 32) in a p53-independent manner.
This checkpoint, activated in cells by exposure to MTIs, plays a
central role in guarding against the emergence of aneuploidy. Current
thinking assumes two links between the spindle checkpoint and
oncogenesis: 1) defective spindle checkpoint is frequent in cancers
(33), and 2) defects arise from mutations in one of seven known spindle
checkpoint genes (12). Interestingly, a recent study has questioned the
presumed prevalence of spindle checkpoint loss in cancers (17), and
intensive searches for mutations in the spindle checkpoint genes have
so far shown such changes to be exceedingly rare in human tumors (16,
34-37). Hence, three questions remain to be clarified. What is the
true nature of the spindle checkpoint in human cancers? How could
frequent checkpoint loss be reconciled with the rarity of mutations in checkpoint genes? And if spindle checkpoint functions differ between normal and cancer cells, could this difference, in analogy to the
thinking with p53, play a role in the clinical response of cancers to
chemotherapeutic agents?
Our findings here from HTLV-I-transformed cells begin to address the
above questions. In studying six ATL cell lines, we found that 100% of
the samples were defective in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. This
suggests that loss of this M function is common, if not universal, in
ATLs and argues that a similar defect could contribute to other tumors.
Intriguingly, in HTLV-I cells, checkpoint loss does not require
mutation in checkpoint genes. In these cells a not yet
understood mechanism, which mislocates MAD1 and MAD2 proteins into the
cytoplasm (Fig. 5 and 6), appears to explain loss-of-function.
Cytoplasmic sequestration has also been reported for p53 in breast
cancers (38). This type of mechanism potentially reconciles the paradox
of frequent spindle checkpoint loss in cancers unaccompanied by
mutations in checkpoint genes (16, 34-37).
In good agreement with our findings of mitotic checkpoint loss, in a
review elsewhere of 107 ATL cases, Kamada et al. (8) found
all HTLV-I leukemic samples to be karyotypically abnormal. We have
independently verified Kamada's conclusion of aneuploidy in ATL cells
by direct cytogenetic examination of some of the HTLV-I cell lines used
here (data not shown). For example, our MT-1 cell line showed a modal
chromosome number of 83, and our TL-Omi cells had a modal number of 45. The TL-Su cells existed as two populations, one having a modal number
of 48 chromosomes and a second having 94 chromosomes. By contrast, our
particular Jurkat sample was largely tetraploid with a modal chromosome
number of 92. Mechanisms for generating aneuploidy and polyploidy are not the same (39). Our cytogenetic results are consistent with HTLV-I
cells being defective in the mitotic spindle checkpoint and Jurkat
cells being lost in a different checkpoint, which guards against polyploidy.
From a practical perspective, the prevalent M spindle checkpoint loss
in ATLs is both daunting and potentially useful in structuring cancer
chemotherapy. Current ATL treatments are challenging and largely
ineffective (40). Projected 4-year survival rates for acute- and
lymphoma-type ATLs stand at 5 and 5.7%, respectively (41). Our
findings here offer some insight into the chemoresistance of ATL cells.
Thus, we can explain for the first time why MTIs unto themselves have
no apoptosis-inducing capacity and are of little therapeutic value for
ATLs. Considering this mechanistic explanation and the empirically
dismal treatment outcomes as well as potentially significant neuro and
myeloid toxicities (42), one may wish to re-examine the use of MTIs
(e.g. vincristine) as a standard component of most ATL
chemotherapy (43). On the other hand, our study does reveal that
judicious combination of MTI with a G1 toxin could spare
M-arrested normal cells while killing selectively non-arrested ATL
cancer cells (Fig. 7). This aspect of spindle checkpoint loss merits
further investigation and could potentially be important in the design
of future cancer drugs that exploit this cellular phenotype.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
75% of HeLa cells arrested (i.e. mitotic index
75%) in M-phase (Fig. 1A). By contrast,
75% of SW480
cells failed to arrest (i.e. mitotic index
25%) in M and
exited mitosis (Fig. 1A). These results are consistent with the reported phenotypes for HeLa and SW480. Next, we compared dose-titrated responses of normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells,
Jurkat cells (a non-HTLV-I-transformed T-cell leukemia), and two HTLV-I
leukemic cell lines, MT-1 and MT-4, to treatment with nocodazole (Fig.
1B). PBMCs were first stimulated to proliferate with IL-2 + phytohemagglutinin for 3 days. Subsequently, PBMC, Jurkat, MT-1, and
MT-4 cells were separately exposed to nocodazole at final
concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, or 1 µM, respectively.
24 h later, cells were assessed for mitotic indices. In the
presence of MTI, both PBMC and Jurkat arrested in M, while MT-1 and
MT-4 cells did not (Fig. 1B). These findings support that
the former, but not the latter, cells are spindle assembly
checkpoint-intact.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Mitotic indices of adherent and suspension
cells. A, serial mitotic indices of HeLa and
SW480 cells treated with or without 0.5 µM of nocodazole.
B, dose-titrated response of primary PBMC, Jurkat, and
HTLV-I-transformed MT-1 and MT-4 cells to 0.1, 0.5, and 1 µM nocodazole. All values represent averages from three
independent assays.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Comparison of nocodazole-induced mitotic
indices in Jurkat and six HTLV-I transformed cell lines.
A, mitotic indices of Jurkat and six HTLV-I-transformed
cells that were treated as in Fig. 1B. B, ambient
percentages of cells in mitosis from asynchronously propagated
cultures. For each of the indicated cell lines, all values represent
averages from three independent assays.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Comparison of MTI-induced apoptosis in Jurkat
and HTLV-cells. A, serial quantitations over time of
apoptosis in the presence of nocodazole (0.5 µM) are
shown. Jurkat cells were compared with six HTLV-I-transformed cell
lines. B, HTLV-I-transformed cells show increased
[3H]thymidine incorporation in the presence of
nocodazole. [3H]Thymidine was added to nocodazole-treated
cells 4 h before harvest. The bars represent the ratio
of [3H]thymidine incorporation in cells treated with
nocodazole for 24 h relative to untreated control cells. Values
are averages from two independent assays.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Resistance of HTLV cells to vincristine or
nocodazole. Jurkat and six HTLV-I-transformed cell lines were
treated with nocodazole 0.5 µM (A) or
vincristine 0.5 µM (B). Samples were taken at
0, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment. Cell viability represents the
ratio of WST-8 dye reduction activity of cells treated with nocodazole
or vincristine relative to untreated control cells. Values are averages
from three assays.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Reduced presence of MAD1 and MAD2 in the
nuclear fraction of HTLV-I-transformed cells. A,
Western blotting of cytoplasmic and nuclear extract using antisera to
either MAD1 or MAD2. N and C represent nuclear
and cytoplasmic fractions, respectively, as defined by pelletable and
soluble fractions after three freeze-thaws of cells. Actin
(bottom) signals provide controls for equivalence of sample
loading. Reduced nuclear/cytoplamic ratios of MAD1 (B) and
MAD2 (C) after treatment with nocodazole in
HTLV-I-transformed cells compared with Jurkat cells were seen.
MAD1/actin and MAD2/actin ratios were calculated first, then
nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios were derived. The bars represent
the N/C ratios in cells treated with drugs relative to untreated
control cells.

View larger version (99K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Immunostaining of MAD1 in Jurkat and HTLV-I
transformed C8166 cells. Methanol-fixed cells were incubated with
monospecific anti-MAD1 serum and visualized using a Carl-Zeiss confocal
microscope. Fluorescent images are shown at the left; phase
contrast images are shown at the right.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Different relative susceptibilities of Jurkat
and HTLV cells to nocodazole alone or nocodazole with
flavopiridol. Cells were treated in several ways: mock-treated for
48 h, 0.5 µM nocodazole alone for 48 h, 0.5 µM nocodazole
for 12 h and then 300 nM flavopiridol for 36 h,
and 0.5 µM nocodazole + 300 nM flavopiridol for 48 h. The viability of cells was measured by a modified MTT dye reduction
assay using WST-8. Fraction viable cells represents the ratio of WST-8
value from treated cells divided by the counterpart value from
mock-treated cells. Data are averages from three independent
assays.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank M. Kannagi and M. Fujii for providing HTLV-cells and L. Lin for preparation of manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular Virology
Section, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 4, Rm. 306, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-0460. Tel.: 301-496-6680; Fax: 301-480-3686; E-mail: kj7e@nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110295200
2 Y. Iwanaga, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HTLV, human T-cell leukemia virus; ATL, adult T-cell leukemia; MTI, microtubule inhibitor; MAD, mitotic arrest deficiency; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; WST-8, 2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt; M, mitosis; IL, interleukin; FCS, fetal calf serum; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Whang-Peng, J., Bunn, P. A., Knutsen, T., Kao-Shan, C. S., Broder, S., Jaffe, E. S., Gelmann, E., Blattner, W., Lofters, W., Young, R. C., and Gallo, R. C. (1985) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 74, 357-369 |
| 2. | Nagai, H., Kinoshita, T., Imamura, J., Murakami, Y., Hayashi, K., Mukai, K., Ikeda, S., Tobinai, K., Saito, H., Shimoyama, M., and Shimotohno, K. (1991) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 82, 1421-1427[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Cesarman, E.,
Chadburn, A.,
Inghirami, G.,
Gaidano, G.,
and Knowles, D. M.
(1992)
Blood
80,
3205-3216 |
| 4. |
Sakashita, A.,
Hattori, T.,
Miller, C. W.,
Suzushima, H.,
Asou, N.,
Takatsuki, K.,
and Koeffler, H. P.
(1992)
Blood
79,
477-480 |
| 5. | Yamato, K., Oka, T., Hiroi, M., Iwahara, Y., Sugito, S., Tsuchida, N., and Miyoshi, I. (1993) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 84, 4-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Hatta, Y.,
Hirama, T.,
Miller, C. W.,
Yamada, Y.,
Tomonaga, M.,
and Koeffler, H. P.
(1995)
Blood
85,
2699-2704 |
| 7. |
Yamada, Y.,
Hatta, Y.,
Murata, K.,
Sugawara, K.,
Ikeda, S.,
Mine, M.,
Maeda, T.,
Hirakata, Y.,
Kamihira, S.,
Tsukasaki, K.,
Ogawa, S.,
Hirai, H.,
Koeffler, H. P.,
and Tomonaga, M.
(1997)
J. Clin. Oncol.
15,
1778-1785 |
| 8. |
Kamada, N.,
Sakurai, M.,
Miyamoto, K.,
Sanada, I.,
Sadamori, N.,
Fukuhara, S.,
Abe, S.,
Shiraishi, Y.,
Abe, T.,
Kaneko, Y.,
and Shimoyama, M.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
1481-1493 |
| 9. | Sadamori, N. (1991) Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 51, 131-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Kibler, K. V.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1999)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
91,
903-904 |
| 11. | Jin, D. Y., Spencer, F., and Jeang, K. T. (1998) Cell 93, 81-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Gillet, E., and Sorger, P. (2001) Dev. Cell 1, 162-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Livingston, D. M. (2001) Nature 410, 536-537[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Orr-Weaver, T. L., and Weinberg, R. A. (1998) Nature 392, 223-224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Wassmann, K., and Benezra, R. (2001) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 83-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Cahill, D. P., Lengauer, C., Yu, J., Riggins, G. J., Willson, J. K. V., Markowitz, S. D., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Nature 392, 300-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Tighe, A., Johnson, V. L., Albertella, M., and Taylor, S. S. (2001) EMBO Rep. 2, 609-614[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Chen, R. H.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Mann, M.,
and Murray, A. W.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
283-295 |
| 19. | Senderowicz, A. M. (2000) Oncogene 19, 6600-6606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Yamato, K., Yamamoto, M., Hirano, Y., and Tsuchida, N. (1995) Oncogene 11, 1-6[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Yoshida, M. (2001) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19, 475-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Hartwell, L. H., and Kastan, M. B. (1994) Science 166, 1821-1828 |
| 23. | Stewart, Z. A., and Pietenpol, J. A. (1999) J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4, 389-400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1996) Cell 87, 159-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
1503-1606 |
| 26. | Wahl, A. F., Donaldson, K. L., Fairchild, C., Lee, F. Y., Foster, S. A., Demers, G. W., and Galloway, D. A. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 72-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Stewart, Z. A.,
Mays, D.,
and Pietenpol, J. A.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
3831-3837 |
| 28. | Fan, S., Cherney, B., Reinhold, W., Rucker, K., and O'Connor, P. M. (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4, 1047-1054[Abstract] |
| 29. | Blagosklonny, M. V., and Fojo, T. (1999) Int. J. Cancer 83, 151-156[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Bunz, F.,
Hwang, P. M.,
Torrance, C.,
Waldman, T.,
Zhang, Y.,
Dillehay, L.,
Williams, J.,
Lengauer, C.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
263-269 |
| 31. |
Fan, S., El-,
Deiry, W. S.,
Bae, I.,
Freeman, J.,
Jondle, D.,
Bhatia, K.,
Fornace, A. J., Jr.,
Magrath, I.,
Kohn, K. W.,
and O'Connor, P. M.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
5824-5830 |
| 32. | Rudner, A. D., and Murray, A. W. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 773-780[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Nature 396, 643-649[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Imai, Y., Shiratori, Y., Kato, N., Inoue, T., and Omata, M. (1999) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 90, 837-840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. | Myrie, K. A., Percy, M. J., Azim, J. N., Neeley, C. K., and Peety, E. M. (2000) Cancer Lett. 152, 193-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Sato, M., Sekido, Y., Horio, Y., Takahashi, M., Saito, H., Minna, J. D., Shimokata, K., and Hasegawa, Y. (2000) Cancer Res. 91, 504-509 |
| 37. | Yamaguchi, K., Okami, K., Hibi, K., Wehage, S. L., Jen, J., and Sidransky, D. (1999) Cancer Lett. 139, 183-187[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Moll, U. M.,
Riou, G.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
7262-7266 |
| 39. | Zimmet, J., and Ravid, K. (2000) Exp. Hematol. 28, 3-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Ohshima, K., Suzumiya, J., Sato, K., Kanda, M., Simazaki, T., Kawasaki, C., Haraoka, S., and Kikushi, M. (1999) J. Pathol. 189, 539-545[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Shimoyama, M., and Lymphoma Study Group. (1991) Br. J. Haematol. 79, 428-437[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Dumontet, C.,
and Sikic, B. I.
(1999)
J Clin. Oncol.
17,
1061-1070 |
| 43. | Matsushita, K., Matsumoto, T., Ohtsubo, H., Fujiwara, H., Imamura, N., Hidaka, S., Kukita, T., Tei, C., Matsumoto, M., and Arima, N. (1999) Leuk. Lymphoma 36, 67-75[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G P Taylor Molecular aspects of HTLV-I infection and adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1392 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Sheleg, J.-M. Peloponese, Y.-H. Chi, Y. Li, M. Eckhaus, and K.-T. Jeang Evidence for Cooperative Transforming Activity of the Human Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene and Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax J. Virol., August 1, 2007; 81(15): 7894 - 7901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tsuji, N. Sheehy, V. W. Gautier, H. Hayakawa, H. Sawa, and W. W. Hall The Nuclear Import of the Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type I (HTLV-1) Tax Protein Is Carrier- and Energy-independent J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13875 - 13883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Boyapati, M. Yan, L. F. Peterson, J. R. Biggs, M. M. Le Beau, and D.-E. Zhang A leukemia fusion protein attenuates the spindle checkpoint and promotes aneuploidy Blood, May 1, 2007; 109(9): 3963 - 3971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Y. Yamada and G. J. Gorbsky Spindle checkpoint function and cellular sensitivity to antimitotic drugs Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 2963 - 2969. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Chin and R. Herbst Induction of apoptosis by monastrol, an inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin Eg5, is independent of the spindle checkpoint. Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2006; 5(10): 2580 - 2591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tabakin-Fix, I. Azran, Y. Schavinky-Khrapunsky, O. Levy, and M. Aboud Functional inactivation of p53 by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax protein: mechanisms and clinical implications Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 673 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Peloponese Jr., K. Haller, A. Miyazato, and K.-T. Jeang Abnormal centrosome amplification in cells through the targeting of Ran-binding protein-1 by the human T cell leukemia virus type-1 Tax oncoprotein PNAS, December 27, 2005; 102(52): 18974 - 18979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Skladanowski, M.-G. Come, M. Sabisz, A. E. Escargueil, and A. K. Larsen Down-Regulation of DNA Topoisomerase II{alpha} Leads to Prolonged Cell Cycle Transit in G2 and Early M Phases and Increased Survival to Microtubule-Interacting Agents Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2005; 68(3): 625 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Matsuoka and K.-T. Jeang Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type I at Age 25: A Progress Report Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 65(11): 4467 - 4470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vogel, A. Kienitz, R. Muller, and H. Bastians The Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Is a Critical Determinant for Topoisomerase-based Chemotherapy J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4025 - 4028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. V. Kibler, A. Miyazato, V. S. R. K. Yedavalli, A. I. Dayton, B. L. Jacobs, G. Dapolito, S.-j. Kim, and K.-T. Jeang Polyarginine Inhibits gp160 Processing by Furin and Suppresses Productive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49055 - 49063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-M. Peloponese Jr., H. Iha, V. R. K. Yedavalli, A. Miyazato, Y. Li, K. Haller, M. Benkirane, and K.-T. Jeang Ubiquitination of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Modulates Its Activity J. Virol., November 1, 2004; 78(21): 11686 - 11695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-T. Jeang, C.-z. Giam, F. Majone, and M. Aboud Life, Death, and Tax: Role of HTLV-I Oncoprotein in Genetic Instability and Cellular Transformation J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 31991 - 31994. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Bani, M. I. Nicoletti, N. W. Alkharouf, C. Ghilardi, D. Petersen, E. Erba, E. A. Sausville, E. T. Liu, and R. Giavazzi Gene expression correlating with response to paclitaxel in ovarian carcinoma xenografts Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2004; 3(2): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Masuda, K. Maeno, T. Nakagawa, H. Saito, and T. Takahashi Association between Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Impairment and Susceptibility to the Induction of Apoptosis by Anti-Microtubule Agents in Human Lung Cancers Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 163(3): 1109 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Liu, M.-H. Liang, Y.-l. Kuo, W. Liao, I. Boros, T. Kleinberger, J. Blancato, and C.-Z. Giam Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Oncoprotein Tax Promotes Unscheduled Degradation of Pds1p/Securin and Clb2p/Cyclin B1 and Causes Chromosomal Instability Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(15): 5269 - 5281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Alefantis, K. Barmak, E. W. Harhaj, C. Grant, and B. Wigdahl Characterization of a Nuclear Export Signal within the Human T Cell Leukemia Virus Type I Transactivator Protein Tax J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21814 - 21822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Okada and K.-T. Jeang Differential Requirements for Activation of Integrated and Transiently Transfected Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Long Terminal Repeat J. Virol., November 13, 2002; 76(24): 12564 - 12573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||