JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110295200 on November 29, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 5187-5193, February 15, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/7/5187    most recent
M110295200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jeang, K.-T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Jeang, K.-T.

Prevalent Loss of Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint in Adult T-cell Leukemia Confers Resistance to Microtubule Inhibitors*

Takefumi Kasai, Yoichi Iwanaga, Hidekatsu Iha, and Kuan-Teh JeangDagger

From the Molecular Virology Section, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0460

Received for publication, October 25, 2001, and in revised form, November 27, 2001

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human T-cell leukemia virus type I (HTLV-I) is the causative agent for adult T-cell leukemia (ATL). Molecularly, ATL cells have extensive aneugenic abnormalities that occur, at least in part, from cell cycle dysregulation by the HTLV-I-encoded Tax oncoprotein. Here, we compared six HTLV-I-transformed cells to Jurkat and primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in their responses to treatment with microtubule inhibitors. We found that both Jurkat and PBMCs arrested efficiently in mitosis when treated with nocodazole. By contrast, all six HTLV-I cells failed to arrest comparably in mitosis, suggesting that ATL cells have a defect in the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. Mechanistically, we observed that in HTLV-I Tax-expressing cells human spindle assembly checkpoint factors hsMAD1 and hsMAD2 were mislocated from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. This altered localization of hsMAD1 and hsMAD2 correlated with loss of mitotic checkpoint function and chemoresistance to microtubule inhibitors.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In vivo infection by human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I)1 engenders adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) in a minority of individuals after a prolonged latent period. The pathological course of ATL suggests a multistage process of transformation beginning from clonal expansion of an HTLV-I-bearing T-cell followed by the accumulation of cellular genetic lesions that likely inactivate several tumor-suppressor genes (1-7). ATL cells harbor significant clastogenic as well as aneugenic chromosomal abnormalities (8, 9). HTLV-I has been found to subvert several cellular checkpoints that guard against loss of genome integrity (10). Indeed, in a process that possibly explains aneuploidy in ATL cells, it was recently shown that the HTLV-I Tax oncoprotein inactivates the function of the human spindle assembly checkpoint protein, MAD1 (11).

Aneuploidy is seen in ~70% of all cancers. Genetic studies in yeast have implicated at least seven genes (MAD (mitotic arrest deficiency)-1, -2, -3; BUB (budding uninhibited by benomyl)-1, -2, -3; and MPS1 (monopolar spindle 1)) (12) in the mitotic spindle checkpoint, which censors against aneuploidy. These checkpoint proteins form complexes that regulate orderly chromosomal segregation and nuclear division (13-15). Interestingly, despite the high frequency of aneuploidy in human cancers, only rarely have genetic defects in mitotic checkpoint genes been found (16, 17). This suggests that events other than genetic changes may abrogate mitotic spindle checkpoint function and account for aneugenic alterations.

We have employed HTLV-I-transformed human T-cells as a model to investigate the biology of the mitotic spindle checkpoint in cancers. Here, we report the prevalent loss of mitotic spindle checkpoint in six out of six HTLV cells. We further show that this defect in mitotic checkpoint function correlated with resistance by ATL cells to MTI agents.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Lines and Cell Cycle Analysis-- MT-1, MT-4, TL-Omi, TL-Su, ILT-Hod, and C8166 are human HTLV-1-transformed T-cell lines (MT-1, MT-4, TL-Omi, TL-Su, and C8166 are IL-2-independent; ILT-Hod is IL-2-dependent). IL-2-independent cells and Jurkat cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (RPMI-FCS). ILT-Hod was cultured in RPMI-FCS with 1 nM IL-2. HeLa and SW480 were cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS. Primary human PBMCs from anonymous normal donors were obtained from the NIH blood bank. PBMCs were activated to proliferate by treatment with 20 units/ml of recombinant human IL-2 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and 0.25 µg/ml phytohemagglutinin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in RPMI-FCS for 3 days prior to nocodazole assays.

Mitotic Index and Apoptosis Analysis-- Nocodazole (Sigma) was added to medium at final concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, or 1.0 µM, as indicated. Cells were harvested at 12-h time intervals up to 36 h. After harvesting, the cells were pelleted (1500 rpm, 5 min) and washed with PBS. Cell pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of 1% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde. 20 µl of the cell suspension were dried onto a poly-L-lysine-coated slide, washed with PBS, and stained with PBS containing 10 µg/ml of Hoechst 33258 (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature. Fluorescent microscopy was used to visualize viable cells arrested in mitosis. To measure the mitotic index, at least 300 cells were counted in each assay. All assays were repeated two to three times. Quantitations of apoptosis by Hoechst dye staining and by TUNEL assay (not shown) were also similarly performed. Cytogenetic analyses of cells, where reported, were performed by the Cell Culture Laboratory of the Children's Hospital of Michigan.

[3H]Thymidine Incorporation-- Suspension cells were incubated at 1 × 105 cells/ml. Twenty hours after the addition of nocodazole, [3H]thymidine was added (10 µCi/ml). Four hours later cells were pelleted and washed with 0.5 ml of PBS, then methanol/acetic acid (3:1) was added for 15 min to fix cells, followed by two washes with 0.5 ml of methanol/acetic acid. The cell pellet was solubilized with 0.25 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and transferred to scintillation vials. After addition of 5 ml of scintillant, incorporated [3H]thymidine was measured by scintillation spectroscopy.

Cell Viability Assay-- Cells (5 × 104 cells/ml) were treated with nocodazole (0.5 µM) or vincristine (0.5 µM) or 300 nM of flavopiridol and harvested at indicated intervals. Cell viability was measured by a modified MTT dye reduction assay using WST-8 (2-(2-methoxy- 4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt) (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Fraction viable cells represent the ratio of WST-8 values from cells treated with drugs relative to that from untreated cells.

Western Blotting-- Cells were collected by centrifugation at 1500 rpm, washed in PBS, then resuspended into 0.25 M Tris-HCl. After three freeze/thaws, the cells were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm; the supernatants were saved as the cytoplasmic fractions. The pellets were resuspended into 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, sonicated to fragment DNA and were saved as the nuclear fractions. To inactivate potentially infectious HTLV particles, all fractions were adjusted to 0.1% Nonidet P-40. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad). Anti-hsMAD2 and anti-hsMAD1 were raised in rabbit to GST-hsMAD2 and GST-hsMAD1 fusion proteins. Mouse monoclonal anti-actin (clone AC-15) was from Sigma. Chemiluminescent immunoblotting was according to manufacturer's procedures (Tropix, Bedford, MA). Visualized bands were detected by scanning and quantified using ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

HTLV-I-transformed Cells Are Defective in Mitotic Spindle Assembly Checkpoint-- To understand how proliferative dysregulation of ATL cells might correlate with aneuploidy, we investigated mitotic spindle checkpoint function in HTLV-I transformed cells. The mitotic index of cells in response to MTIs (e.g. nocodazole or vincristine) reflects the status of this checkpoint. To verify our assays, we first examined two well characterized cancer cells, HeLa (a cervical epithelial cancer) and SW480 (a colon cancer), known to be spindle checkpoint-intact and spindle checkpoint-defective (16), respectively. In our hands, at any given time, 5% of asynchronously propagated HeLa or SW480 cells were in mitosis (M) (Fig. 1A). However, when exposed to nocodazole, the two cells responded quite differently. 24 h after treatment, >= 75% of HeLa cells arrested (i.e. mitotic index >= 75%) in M-phase (Fig. 1A). By contrast, >= 75% of SW480 cells failed to arrest (i.e. mitotic index <= 25%) in M and exited mitosis (Fig. 1A). These results are consistent with the reported phenotypes for HeLa and SW480. Next, we compared dose-titrated responses of normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Jurkat cells (a non-HTLV-I-transformed T-cell leukemia), and two HTLV-I leukemic cell lines, MT-1 and MT-4, to treatment with nocodazole (Fig. 1B). PBMCs were first stimulated to proliferate with IL-2 + phytohemagglutinin for 3 days. Subsequently, PBMC, Jurkat, MT-1, and MT-4 cells were separately exposed to nocodazole at final concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, or 1 µM, respectively. 24 h later, cells were assessed for mitotic indices. In the presence of MTI, both PBMC and Jurkat arrested in M, while MT-1 and MT-4 cells did not (Fig. 1B). These findings support that the former, but not the latter, cells are spindle assembly checkpoint-intact.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Mitotic indices of adherent and suspension cells. A, serial mitotic indices of HeLa and SW480 cells treated with or without 0.5 µM of nocodazole. B, dose-titrated response of primary PBMC, Jurkat, and HTLV-I-transformed MT-1 and MT-4 cells to 0.1, 0.5, and 1 µM nocodazole. All values represent averages from three independent assays.

We extended the measurements of MTI-induced mitotic arrest to four additional HTLV-I-transformed T-cells (C8166, ILT-Hod, TL-Omi, and TL-Su; Fig. 2A). In our asynchronous cultures, usually between 1.8 and 3.2% of these suspension cells were in M-phase (Fig. 2B). Since normal PBMCs were relatively difficult to obtain frequently in large amounts for the many repetitions over which we performed these experiments, and since Jurkat cells had phenotypically intact spindle assembly checkpoint (Fig. 1B), we employed the latter cells as positive control. When the HTLV-I and Jurkat cells were treated with 0.5 µM nocodazole and examined serially over time, we found that by 24 h of treatment >60% of Jurkat cells arrested in M (Fig. 2A). By contrast, 80-95% of each of the six HTLV cells escaped arrest and exited mitosis (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that most, if not all, HTLV-transformed cells may be pervasively defective in the spindle assembly checkpoint.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Comparison of nocodazole-induced mitotic indices in Jurkat and six HTLV-I transformed cell lines. A, mitotic indices of Jurkat and six HTLV-I-transformed cells that were treated as in Fig. 1B. B, ambient percentages of cells in mitosis from asynchronously propagated cultures. For each of the indicated cell lines, all values represent averages from three independent assays.

Spindle Checkpoint-defective Cells Resist MTI-induced Apoptosis-- To assess the role of spindle checkpoint on MTI treatment outcome, we measured the apoptotic indices of nocodazole-treated cells. Quantitation of apoptosis based on Hoechst staining and TUNEL assays (data not shown) showed a variance in MTI sensitivity between Jurkat and HTLV cells. At early times after treatment (12 h, Fig. 3A), all cells shared similar values. However, by 24-36 h after exposure to MTI, a high extent of apoptosis was observed for Jurkat but not for the HTLV cells (Fig. 3A). Thus, when considered together with the data above on mitotic indices, apoptotic sensitivity to MTI correlated inversely with intactness of spindle checkpoint.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Comparison of MTI-induced apoptosis in Jurkat and HTLV-cells. A, serial quantitations over time of apoptosis in the presence of nocodazole (0.5 µM) are shown. Jurkat cells were compared with six HTLV-I-transformed cell lines. B, HTLV-I-transformed cells show increased [3H]thymidine incorporation in the presence of nocodazole. [3H]Thymidine was added to nocodazole-treated cells 4 h before harvest. The bars represent the ratio of [3H]thymidine incorporation in cells treated with nocodazole for 24 h relative to untreated control cells. Values are averages from two independent assays.

Two control experiments excluded that the HTLV cells might have responded to MTI through non-apoptotic cell death or quiescence. First, we measured [3H]thymidine incorporation by nocodazole-treated cells. Relative to Jurkat, each of the six HTLV cells (Fig. 3B) incorporated significantly higher amounts of [3H]thymidine. An interpretation of these results is that nocodazole induced the arrest of Jurkat cells in mitosis (Figs. 1B and 2A) and that prolonged arrest leads to apoptosis (Fig. 3A). On the other hand, because of their spindle checkpoint defect, the HTLV cells were not arrested by MTI and instead progressed unimpeded from M into the next S-phase (i.e. DNA synthesis and [3H]thymidine incorporation). Second, using the MTT colorimetric assay for cellular viability, we further quantitated the robustness of growth of cells treated with either nocodazole (Fig. 4A) or vincristine (Fig. 4B). The MTT findings confirmed the differential viabilities of Jurkat and HTLV cells propagated in the presence of MTIs.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Resistance of HTLV cells to vincristine or nocodazole. Jurkat and six HTLV-I-transformed cell lines were treated with nocodazole 0.5 µM (A) or vincristine 0.5 µM (B). Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment. Cell viability represents the ratio of WST-8 dye reduction activity of cells treated with nocodazole or vincristine relative to untreated control cells. Values are averages from three assays.

Mislocation of MAD1 and MAD2 Proteins in HTLV Cells-- To better understand the reasons for spindle checkpoint loss, we inquired whether the human MAD1 or MAD2 checkpoint proteins might be mutated in the six HTLV cell lines. Full-length cDNAs for MAD1 and MAD2 from Jurkat as well as the six HTLV cells were sequenced. Surprisingly, except for sporadic polymorphic changes, MAD1 and MAD2 cDNAs from all the cells revealed intact open reading frames with no gross deletions or nonsense substitutions.2 This absence of overt mutation prompted us to consider mechanisms other than gross genetic changes for explaining spindle checkpoint loss in HTLV cells.

We, then, examined the protein expression patterns of MAD1 and MAD2. Intact spindle checkpoint requires nuclear congression of MAD1 and MAD2 (18). Interestingly, in surveying many different ambiently propagated animal cells, we found that in every cell type the great preponderance of MAD1 and MAD2 appeared in the cytoplasm (data not shown). Thus, nuclear migration of MAD1/MAD2 proteins potentially represents a regulatory step in checkpoint function. To ask whether this step might be defective in HTLV cells, we fractionated (by freeze-thawing) mock-treated and nocodazole-treated cells into insoluble "nuclear" (N) and soluble "cytoplasmic" (C) portions and probed for MAD1 and MAD2 proteins using specific antisera (Fig. 5). Western blotting revealed that Jurkat cells, both constitutively and in a nocodazole-inducible manner, had higher amounts of nuclear MAD1 and MAD2 (Fig. 5A) when compared with each of the six HTLV-cells. Consistently, the "nuclear/cytoplasmic" (N/C) ratios for both MAD1 and MAD2 in the HTLV cells were ~50% of that found for Jurkat cells (Fig. 5, B and C).


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Reduced presence of MAD1 and MAD2 in the nuclear fraction of HTLV-I-transformed cells. A, Western blotting of cytoplasmic and nuclear extract using antisera to either MAD1 or MAD2. N and C represent nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions, respectively, as defined by pelletable and soluble fractions after three freeze-thaws of cells. Actin (bottom) signals provide controls for equivalence of sample loading. Reduced nuclear/cytoplamic ratios of MAD1 (B) and MAD2 (C) after treatment with nocodazole in HTLV-I-transformed cells compared with Jurkat cells were seen. MAD1/actin and MAD2/actin ratios were calculated first, then nuclear/cytoplasmic ratios were derived. The bars represent the N/C ratios in cells treated with drugs relative to untreated control cells.

Because physical fractionation of cells can be inexact, we sought to confirm the observation of reduced nuclear presence of MAD1 in HTLV cells by immunostaining. Fig. 6 compares the immunofluorescent images of Jurkat and HTLV-I-transformed C8166 cells using monospecific anti-MAD1 serum. In these confocal analyses, the Jurkat cells stained for MAD1 prominently in the nucleus with a punctate distribution (Fig. 6, top), while similarly stained C8166 cells showed a nuclear-excluded MAD1 pattern (Fig. 6, bottom). Nuclear sparing of MAD1 was also seen in the other five HTLV cells (data not shown).


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Immunostaining of MAD1 in Jurkat and HTLV-I transformed C8166 cells. Methanol-fixed cells were incubated with monospecific anti-MAD1 serum and visualized using a Carl-Zeiss confocal microscope. Fluorescent images are shown at the left; phase contrast images are shown at the right.

Enhanced Sensitivity of HTLV-transformed Cells to Combination Therapy with MTI Plus Flavopiridol-- In principle, defects in cell cycle checkpoint might be exploited chemotherapeutically to the disadvantage of cancer cells. Here, spindle checkpoint-intact cells (i.e. Jurkat) when treated with MTI arrest transiently in M, while checkpoint-deficient cells (i.e. HTLV cells) do not arrest and continue into the subsequent G1. We reasoned that this difference could confer to the latter a heightened sensitivity to a combination of MTI plus a G1-specific inhibitor, while the former would be protected from G1 toxicity as a result of MTI-induced M arrest.

To check this reasoning, we treated in parallel Jurkat and HTLV-I-transformed MT4 cells with nocodazole alone, nocodazole followed by flavopiridol, or nocodazole simultaneous with flavopiridol (Fig. 7). Cellular viabilities were assessed by MTT assay. Jurkat cells, as expected, were more sensitive than MT4 cells to nocodazole alone (Fig. 7A). However, opposite relative susceptibility profiles were seen when a G1-potent inhibitor, flavopiridol (19), was added to nocodazole (Fig. 7, B and C). Checkpoint-defective MT4 cells exposed to either nocodazole followed by flavopiridol or nocodazole simultaneous with flavopiridol were significantly less viable than checkpoint-intact Jurkat cells. These effects relate to spindle checkpoint status and are independent of p53 activity, since both Jurkat (20) and HTLV-I-transformed cells lack p53 function (21).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Different relative susceptibilities of Jurkat and HTLV cells to nocodazole alone or nocodazole with flavopiridol. Cells were treated in several ways: mock-treated for 48 h, 0.5 µM nocodazole alone for 48 h, 0.5 µM nocodazole for 12 h and then 300 nM flavopiridol for 36 h, and 0.5 µM nocodazole + 300 nM flavopiridol for 48 h. The viability of cells was measured by a modified MTT dye reduction assay using WST-8. Fraction viable cells represents the ratio of WST-8 value from treated cells divided by the counterpart value from mock-treated cells. Data are averages from three independent assays.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cancer cells differ from normal cells at multiple genetic loci. In evolving from a normal to a cancerous state, cells lose some or many of the biological checkpoints which monitor the fidelity of DNA replication, repair, and segregation (22). In different cancers, different losses in cell cycle control appear to be emphasized. For instance, most breast cancers have mutated p53 or pRb, leading to a defective G1/S control (23), while most colorectal cancers (85%) have lost the ability to censor against aneuploidy (24). Here, we report that ATL cells are prevalently defective in the spindle assembly checkpoint that monitors for fidelity of chromosomal segregation during mitosis.

What are some implications of checkpoint loss? A practical one applies to the treatment of cancers. Most current anti-cancer drugs have low therapeutic indices (25) (i.e. toxic dose per therapeutic dose). In vivo, chemotherapy of tumors is limited by drug toxicity for normal cells. Molecular differences in checkpoint functions between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues potentially permit selective drug designs that could target cancers while sparing normal counterparts. For example, initial results from model cell systems had encouraged the idea that loss of p53 (26) or p21 (27) proteins might potentiate cellular sensitivity to MTIs such as taxol and vincristine. Unfortunately, this was subsequently called into question by difficulties in reproducing enhanced MTI susceptibility in bona fide human cancers (28, 29). Further exacerbating the confusion were reports that loss of p53 increased (30) and decreased (31) sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. It, thus, remains unclear how p53 defects in cancers might be used to guide the chemotherapy of tumors.

The spindle assembly checkpoint monitors integrity of chromosomal segregation during mitosis (12, 31, 32) in a p53-independent manner. This checkpoint, activated in cells by exposure to MTIs, plays a central role in guarding against the emergence of aneuploidy. Current thinking assumes two links between the spindle checkpoint and oncogenesis: 1) defective spindle checkpoint is frequent in cancers (33), and 2) defects arise from mutations in one of seven known spindle checkpoint genes (12). Interestingly, a recent study has questioned the presumed prevalence of spindle checkpoint loss in cancers (17), and intensive searches for mutations in the spindle checkpoint genes have so far shown such changes to be exceedingly rare in human tumors (16, 34-37). Hence, three questions remain to be clarified. What is the true nature of the spindle checkpoint in human cancers? How could frequent checkpoint loss be reconciled with the rarity of mutations in checkpoint genes? And if spindle checkpoint functions differ between normal and cancer cells, could this difference, in analogy to the thinking with p53, play a role in the clinical response of cancers to chemotherapeutic agents?

Our findings here from HTLV-I-transformed cells begin to address the above questions. In studying six ATL cell lines, we found that 100% of the samples were defective in the mitotic spindle checkpoint. This suggests that loss of this M function is common, if not universal, in ATLs and argues that a similar defect could contribute to other tumors. Intriguingly, in HTLV-I cells, checkpoint loss does not require mutation in checkpoint genes. In these cells a not yet understood mechanism, which mislocates MAD1 and MAD2 proteins into the cytoplasm (Fig. 5 and 6), appears to explain loss-of-function. Cytoplasmic sequestration has also been reported for p53 in breast cancers (38). This type of mechanism potentially reconciles the paradox of frequent spindle checkpoint loss in cancers unaccompanied by mutations in checkpoint genes (16, 34-37).

In good agreement with our findings of mitotic checkpoint loss, in a review elsewhere of 107 ATL cases, Kamada et al. (8) found all HTLV-I leukemic samples to be karyotypically abnormal. We have independently verified Kamada's conclusion of aneuploidy in ATL cells by direct cytogenetic examination of some of the HTLV-I cell lines used here (data not shown). For example, our MT-1 cell line showed a modal chromosome number of 83, and our TL-Omi cells had a modal number of 45. The TL-Su cells existed as two populations, one having a modal number of 48 chromosomes and a second having 94 chromosomes. By contrast, our particular Jurkat sample was largely tetraploid with a modal chromosome number of 92. Mechanisms for generating aneuploidy and polyploidy are not the same (39). Our cytogenetic results are consistent with HTLV-I cells being defective in the mitotic spindle checkpoint and Jurkat cells being lost in a different checkpoint, which guards against polyploidy.

From a practical perspective, the prevalent M spindle checkpoint loss in ATLs is both daunting and potentially useful in structuring cancer chemotherapy. Current ATL treatments are challenging and largely ineffective (40). Projected 4-year survival rates for acute- and lymphoma-type ATLs stand at 5 and 5.7%, respectively (41). Our findings here offer some insight into the chemoresistance of ATL cells. Thus, we can explain for the first time why MTIs unto themselves have no apoptosis-inducing capacity and are of little therapeutic value for ATLs. Considering this mechanistic explanation and the empirically dismal treatment outcomes as well as potentially significant neuro and myeloid toxicities (42), one may wish to re-examine the use of MTIs (e.g. vincristine) as a standard component of most ATL chemotherapy (43). On the other hand, our study does reveal that judicious combination of MTI with a G1 toxin could spare M-arrested normal cells while killing selectively non-arrested ATL cancer cells (Fig. 7). This aspect of spindle checkpoint loss merits further investigation and could potentially be important in the design of future cancer drugs that exploit this cellular phenotype.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank M. Kannagi and M. Fujii for providing HTLV-cells and L. Lin for preparation of manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular Virology Section, Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 4, Rm. 306, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892-0460. Tel.: 301-496-6680; Fax: 301-480-3686; E-mail: kj7e@nih.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 29, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110295200

2 Y. Iwanaga, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HTLV, human T-cell leukemia virus; ATL, adult T-cell leukemia; MTI, microtubule inhibitor; MAD, mitotic arrest deficiency; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; WST-8, 2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, monosodium salt; M, mitosis; IL, interleukin; FCS, fetal calf serum; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Whang-Peng, J., Bunn, P. A., Knutsen, T., Kao-Shan, C. S., Broder, S., Jaffe, E. S., Gelmann, E., Blattner, W., Lofters, W., Young, R. C., and Gallo, R. C. (1985) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 74, 357-369
2. Nagai, H., Kinoshita, T., Imamura, J., Murakami, Y., Hayashi, K., Mukai, K., Ikeda, S., Tobinai, K., Saito, H., Shimoyama, M., and Shimotohno, K. (1991) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 82, 1421-1427[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Cesarman, E., Chadburn, A., Inghirami, G., Gaidano, G., and Knowles, D. M. (1992) Blood 80, 3205-3216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Sakashita, A., Hattori, T., Miller, C. W., Suzushima, H., Asou, N., Takatsuki, K., and Koeffler, H. P. (1992) Blood 79, 477-480[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Yamato, K., Oka, T., Hiroi, M., Iwahara, Y., Sugito, S., Tsuchida, N., and Miyoshi, I. (1993) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 84, 4-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Hatta, Y., Hirama, T., Miller, C. W., Yamada, Y., Tomonaga, M., and Koeffler, H. P. (1995) Blood 85, 2699-2704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Yamada, Y., Hatta, Y., Murata, K., Sugawara, K., Ikeda, S., Mine, M., Maeda, T., Hirakata, Y., Kamihira, S., Tsukasaki, K., Ogawa, S., Hirai, H., Koeffler, H. P., and Tomonaga, M. (1997) J. Clin. Oncol. 15, 1778-1785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Kamada, N., Sakurai, M., Miyamoto, K., Sanada, I., Sadamori, N., Fukuhara, S., Abe, S., Shiraishi, Y., Abe, T., Kaneko, Y., and Shimoyama, M. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 1481-1493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Sadamori, N. (1991) Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 51, 131-136[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Kibler, K. V., and Jeang, K. T. (1999) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91, 903-904[Free Full Text]
11. Jin, D. Y., Spencer, F., and Jeang, K. T. (1998) Cell 93, 81-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Gillet, E., and Sorger, P. (2001) Dev. Cell 1, 162-164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Livingston, D. M. (2001) Nature 410, 536-537[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Orr-Weaver, T. L., and Weinberg, R. A. (1998) Nature 392, 223-224[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Wassmann, K., and Benezra, R. (2001) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 83-90[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Cahill, D. P., Lengauer, C., Yu, J., Riggins, G. J., Willson, J. K. V., Markowitz, S. D., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Nature 392, 300-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Tighe, A., Johnson, V. L., Albertella, M., and Taylor, S. S. (2001) EMBO Rep. 2, 609-614[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Chen, R. H., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M., and Murray, A. W. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 283-295[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Senderowicz, A. M. (2000) Oncogene 19, 6600-6606[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Yamato, K., Yamamoto, M., Hirano, Y., and Tsuchida, N. (1995) Oncogene 11, 1-6[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Yoshida, M. (2001) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19, 475-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Hartwell, L. H., and Kastan, M. B. (1994) Science 166, 1821-1828
23. Stewart, Z. A., and Pietenpol, J. A. (1999) J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 4, 389-400[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1996) Cell 87, 159-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kaelin, W. G., Jr. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 104, 1503-1606[Free Full Text]
26. Wahl, A. F., Donaldson, K. L., Fairchild, C., Lee, F. Y., Foster, S. A., Demers, G. W., and Galloway, D. A. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 72-79[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Stewart, Z. A., Mays, D., and Pietenpol, J. A. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 3831-3837[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Fan, S., Cherney, B., Reinhold, W., Rucker, K., and O'Connor, P. M. (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4, 1047-1054[Abstract]
29. Blagosklonny, M. V., and Fojo, T. (1999) Int. J. Cancer 83, 151-156[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Bunz, F., Hwang, P. M., Torrance, C., Waldman, T., Zhang, Y., Dillehay, L., Williams, J., Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1999) J. Clin. Invest. 104, 263-269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Fan, S., El-, Deiry, W. S., Bae, I., Freeman, J., Jondle, D., Bhatia, K., Fornace, A. J., Jr., Magrath, I., Kohn, K. W., and O'Connor, P. M. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 5824-5830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Rudner, A. D., and Murray, A. W. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 773-780[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1998) Nature 396, 643-649[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Imai, Y., Shiratori, Y., Kato, N., Inoue, T., and Omata, M. (1999) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 90, 837-840[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Myrie, K. A., Percy, M. J., Azim, J. N., Neeley, C. K., and Peety, E. M. (2000) Cancer Lett. 152, 193-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Sato, M., Sekido, Y., Horio, Y., Takahashi, M., Saito, H., Minna, J. D., Shimokata, K., and Hasegawa, Y. (2000) Cancer Res. 91, 504-509
37. Yamaguchi, K., Okami, K., Hibi, K., Wehage, S. L., Jen, J., and Sidransky, D. (1999) Cancer Lett. 139, 183-187[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Moll, U. M., Riou, G., and Levine, A. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 7262-7266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Zimmet, J., and Ravid, K. (2000) Exp. Hematol. 28, 3-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Ohshima, K., Suzumiya, J., Sato, K., Kanda, M., Simazaki, T., Kawasaki, C., Haraoka, S., and Kikushi, M. (1999) J. Pathol. 189, 539-545[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Shimoyama, M., and Lymphoma Study Group. (1991) Br. J. Haematol. 79, 428-437[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Dumontet, C., and Sikic, B. I. (1999) J Clin. Oncol. 17, 1061-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Matsushita, K., Matsumoto, T., Ohtsubo, H., Fujiwara, H., Imamura, N., Hidaka, S., Kukita, T., Tei, C., Matsumoto, M., and Arima, N. (1999) Leuk. Lymphoma 36, 67-75[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
G P Taylor
Molecular aspects of HTLV-I infection and adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma
J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2007; 60(12): 1392 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
S. V. Sheleg, J.-M. Peloponese, Y.-H. Chi, Y. Li, M. Eckhaus, and K.-T. Jeang
Evidence for Cooperative Transforming Activity of the Human Pituitary Tumor Transforming Gene and Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax
J. Virol., August 1, 2007; 81(15): 7894 - 7901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Tsuji, N. Sheehy, V. W. Gautier, H. Hayakawa, H. Sawa, and W. W. Hall
The Nuclear Import of the Human T Lymphotropic Virus Type I (HTLV-1) Tax Protein Is Carrier- and Energy-independent
J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2007; 282(18): 13875 - 13883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Boyapati, M. Yan, L. F. Peterson, J. R. Biggs, M. M. Le Beau, and D.-E. Zhang
A leukemia fusion protein attenuates the spindle checkpoint and promotes aneuploidy
Blood, May 1, 2007; 109(9): 3963 - 3971.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
H. Y. Yamada and G. J. Gorbsky
Spindle checkpoint function and cellular sensitivity to antimitotic drugs
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 2963 - 2969.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
G. M. Chin and R. Herbst
Induction of apoptosis by monastrol, an inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin Eg5, is independent of the spindle checkpoint.
Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2006; 5(10): 2580 - 2591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
Y. Tabakin-Fix, I. Azran, Y. Schavinky-Khrapunsky, O. Levy, and M. Aboud
Functional inactivation of p53 by human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax protein: mechanisms and clinical implications
Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 673 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-M. Peloponese Jr., K. Haller, A. Miyazato, and K.-T. Jeang
Abnormal centrosome amplification in cells through the targeting of Ran-binding protein-1 by the human T cell leukemia virus type-1 Tax oncoprotein
PNAS, December 27, 2005; 102(52): 18974 - 18979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Skladanowski, M.-G. Come, M. Sabisz, A. E. Escargueil, and A. K. Larsen
Down-Regulation of DNA Topoisomerase II{alpha} Leads to Prolonged Cell Cycle Transit in G2 and Early M Phases and Increased Survival to Microtubule-Interacting Agents
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2005; 68(3): 625 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Matsuoka and K.-T. Jeang
Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type I at Age 25: A Progress Report
Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 65(11): 4467 - 4470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Vogel, A. Kienitz, R. Muller, and H. Bastians
The Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Is a Critical Determinant for Topoisomerase-based Chemotherapy
J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4025 - 4028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. V. Kibler, A. Miyazato, V. S. R. K. Yedavalli, A. I. Dayton, B. L. Jacobs, G. Dapolito, S.-j. Kim, and K.-T. Jeang
Polyarginine Inhibits gp160 Processing by Furin and Suppresses Productive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49055 - 49063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J.-M. Peloponese Jr., H. Iha, V. R. K. Yedavalli, A. Miyazato, Y. Li, K. Haller, M. Benkirane, and K.-T. Jeang
Ubiquitination of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Modulates Its Activity
J. Virol., November 1, 2004; 78(21): 11686 - 11695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K.-T. Jeang, C.-z. Giam, F. Majone, and M. Aboud
Life, Death, and Tax: Role of HTLV-I Oncoprotein in Genetic Instability and Cellular Transformation
J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 31991 - 31994.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. R. Bani, M. I. Nicoletti, N. W. Alkharouf, C. Ghilardi, D. Petersen, E. Erba, E. A. Sausville, E. T. Liu, and R. Giavazzi
Gene expression correlating with response to paclitaxel in ovarian carcinoma xenografts
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2004; 3(2): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Masuda, K. Maeno, T. Nakagawa, H. Saito, and T. Takahashi
Association between Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Impairment and Susceptibility to the Induction of Apoptosis by Anti-Microtubule Agents in Human Lung Cancers
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 163(3): 1109 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. Liu, M.-H. Liang, Y.-l. Kuo, W. Liao, I. Boros, T. Kleinberger, J. Blancato, and C.-Z. Giam
Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Oncoprotein Tax Promotes Unscheduled Degradation of Pds1p/Securin and Clb2p/Cyclin B1 and Causes Chromosomal Instability
Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(15): 5269 - 5281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Alefantis, K. Barmak, E. W. Harhaj, C. Grant, and B. Wigdahl
Characterization of a Nuclear Export Signal within the Human T Cell Leukemia Virus Type I Transactivator Protein Tax
J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21814 - 21822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Okada and K.-T. Jeang
Differential Requirements for Activation of Integrated and Transiently Transfected Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Long Terminal Repeat
J. Virol., November 13, 2002; 76(24): 12564 - 12573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/7/5187    most recent
M110295200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend