Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110535200 on December 3, 2001
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 7, 5194-5202, February 15, 2002
Promoter Sequences Targeting Tissue-specific Gene Expression
of Hypothalamic and Ovarian Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone in
Vivo*
Helen H.
Kim
§¶,
Andrew
Wolfe§,
Geary R.
Smith§,
Stuart
A.
Tobet
, and
Sally
Radovick§
From the
Section of Reproductive Endocrinology and
Infertility, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the
§ Section of Endocrinology, the Department of Pediatrics,
The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, and the
Department of Biomedical Science, the Shriver Center,
Waltham, Massachusetts 02452
Received for publication, November 2, 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Molecular mechanisms directing tissue-specific
expression of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) are difficult to
study due to the paucity and scattered distribution of GnRH neurons. To
identify regions of the mouse GnRH (mGnRH) promoter that are critical
for appropriate tissue-specific gene expression, we generated transgenic mice with fragments (
3446/+23 bp,
2078/+23 bp, and
1005/+28 bp) of mGnRH promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene.
The pattern of mGnRH promoter activity was assessed by measuring luciferase activity in tissue homogenates. All three 5'-fragments of
mGnRH promoter targeted hypothalamic expression of the luciferase transgene, but with the exception of the ovary, luciferase expression was absent in non-neural tissues. High levels of ovarian luciferase activity were observed in mice generated with both
2078 and
1005 bp
of promoter. Our study is the first to define a region of the GnRH gene
promoter that directs expression to both neural and non-neural tissues
in vivo. We demonstrate that DNA sequences contained within
the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter are sufficient to direct
mGnRH gene expression to both the ovary and hypothalamus. Our results
also suggest that DNA sequences distal to
2078 bp mediate the
repression of ovarian GnRH.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Appropriate tissue-specific expression of gonadotropin-releasing
hormone (GnRH)1 is critical
for establishing and maintaining reproductive competence. It has long
been recognized that hypothalamic GnRH controls gonadal steroidogenesis
and ovarian follicular development by stimulating the production of
gonadotropins from the pituitary. More recently, the presence of
extra-pituitary GnRH has been appreciated. Low levels of GnRH
expression have been found in peripheral reproductive tissues, such as
placenta (1), breast, ovary, and testes (2).
The molecular mechanisms that direct the appropriate tissue-specific
expression of the GnRH gene are only beginning to be elucidated. The
extremely low levels of expression in the peripheral tissues along with
the paucity and scattered distribution of GnRH neurons have limited the
in vivo study of GnRH gene regulation. In the adult mouse
brain, it has been estimated that GnRH expression is limited to only
800 neurons (3). In the adult, the vast majority of the GnRH neurons
are located in the basal hypothalamus and septum, but GnRH neurons have
been described along the migratory pathway from the olfactory bulbs, as
well as in the cerebral cortex and limbic system (3, 4). A similar
anatomic organization is found in all mammals (5).
Several in vitro studies have used mouse-derived
immortalized GnRH-secreting neuronal cell lines to investigate the
neuronal expression of the rat and mouse GnRH gene. Transient
transfection studies using the rat GnRH (rGnRH) gene promoter
identified a 173-bp proximal promoter region (6) and a 300-bp region
located 1.8 kb upstream from the transcription start site that
conferred cell-specific expression (7). Both these sites were reported to be important for the correct neuronal expression of the rGnRH gene
in vitro (8). These in vitro studies have
identified several transcription factors that interact with these
promoter regions to regulate rGnRH expression: C/EBP
(9), GATA (10,
11), Oct-1 (12, 13), Otx 2 (14), and SCIP/Oct-6/Tst-1 (15). These two
promoter regions are highly conserved between the rat and mouse, and
in vitro studies with the mouse GnRH (mGnRH) gene promoter
suggest that Oct-1 may also regulate the neuronal expression of the
mGnRH gene (16).
Ultimately, these in vitro studies are unlikely
to reflect the elaborate intricacy of in vivo GnRH gene
regulation. In the brain, GnRH neurons are dispersed and are influenced
by the growth factors, steroids, and neurotransmitters secreted by the
various adjacent cell types. Our laboratory has developed previously an in vivo model to study the regulation of the human GnRH
(hGnRH) gene in transgenic mice and localized a cell-specific element between
1131 bp and
484 bp of the hGnRH gene (17). A transgenic mouse study identified the critical elements for expression of the
mGnRH gene between
2.1 kb and
1.7 kb of the distal 5'-sequence (18). Interestingly, the human and mouse cell-specific regions bear
little homology to each other, and neither share homology with the
critical rat promoter regions identified in the in vitro studies.
To reconcile these discrepant observations, we constructed transgenic
mice with fragments of the mGnRH gene promoter fused to the luciferase
(LUC) reporter gene (19). Here we report that the proximal
1005 bp of
the mGnRH promoter contains the critical elements for hypothalamic
expression of mGnRH. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the DNA sequences
contained within the proximal
1005 bp are also sufficient to direct
mGnRH expression to the ovary. Our study in the mGnRH-LUC mice is the
first to define a region of the GnRH promoter that directs GnRH
expression to both neural and non-neural tissues in
vivo.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Chemicals and Reagents--
Unless otherwise indicated, all
chemicals and reagents were obtained from Sigma. Restriction enzymes
were obtained from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA) unless otherwise specified.
Construction of the mGnRH Promoter-Luciferase DNA
Constructs--
A GnRH promoter-luciferase construct containing
3446
to +23 bp of the mouse GnRH promoter fused to pSV0aL
5' luciferase
was kindly provided by Dr. Donald B. DeFranco (University of
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA). The
2078/+23-bp construct was produced
by restriction enzyme digestion with BamHI and
BglII to remove the sequences between
3446 bp and
2078
bp of the mGnRH promoter. The resulting DNA was re-ligated to generate
a BamHI/BglII site. Appropriate ligation was
verified by DNA sequencing analysis.
The
1005/+28-bp mGnRH-luciferase construct was generated as a
HindIII fragment using PCR and the
3446/+23
mGnRH-pSV0aL
5' construct as template. PCR was performed in a
thermocycler (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, GeneAmp PCR System 9600), and
reaction mixtures contained 5 units of Taq polymerase
(DisplayTaq, Display Systems Biotech, Vista, CA) and 0.5 mM
dNTPs. The PCR product was restriction enzyme-digested with
HindIII and ligated into a HindIII-linearized, alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)-dephosphorylated pA3LUC reporter vector (20, 21). Orientation was checked by sequencing
constructs using a primer annealing to the 5' end of the luciferase gene.
For the
3446mGnRH-LUC and
2078mGnRH-LUC DNA constructs, the
surrounding plasmid was removed from the mGnRH-luciferase fragment by
NdeI and Xmn1 double digestion. For the
1005
mGnRH-LUC construct, PvuI digestion was used to isolate it
from the surrounding plasmid. The resulting DNA was electrophoresed,
and the linear mGnRH-luciferase DNA fragment was excised from the gel,
isolated by electroelution into a dialysis membrane (Invitrogen), and
purified on an Elutip-D column (Schleicher & Schuell).
Construction and Identification of Transgenic
Animals--
Transgenic animals were constructed by the Beth Israel
Transgenic Facility by pronuclear injection. Fertilized mouse oocytes from FVB-N mice were injected with the purified linear mGnRH-LUC DNA
fragment. The resulting embryos were transferred into pseudo-pregnant foster mothers. Transgenic animals were identified with Southern blot
analysis as described previously (17). Briefly, DNA was isolated from
tail snips, and restriction enzyme was digested with EcoRI
and separated with gel electrophoresis. DNA was then transferred to
GeneScreen Plus hybridization transfer membrane (PerkinElmer Life
Sciences). A 32P-labeled 1.2-kb probe for luciferase was
used to detect transgenic animals that incorporated the luciferase
transgene. For identification of luciferase-expressing transgenic
lines, neonatal brains were removed from pups, homogenized, and assayed
for the mGnRH-luciferase transgene as described below.
All procedures were carried out in accordance with the Animal Care and
Use Committees of Children's Hospital, Boston, and The University of Chicago.
Assay of mGnRH-Luciferase Transgene--
From adult mice, the
hypothalamus was dissected in a single fragment consisting of tissue
from 1 mm caudal to the mammillary bodies to a point just anterior of
the optic chiasm, 1 mm laterally beyond the lateral aspect of the
median eminence, and 3 mm dorsally. The olfactory tissue was dissected
to include both olfactory bulbs and the tissue rostral to the
hypothalamic section. Small representative sections were taken from the
remaining tissues. In the case of the gonads, entire gonads were used
due to their small size. Similarly, for examination of neonatal
luciferase expression, the entire brain was removed from 2- to
3-day-old pups bearing the mGnRH-LUC transgene.
Tissues were placed in 1 ml of lysis buffer (25 mM
glycylglycine, 15 mM MgSO4, 4 mM
EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 mM dithiothreitol) and
homogenized with a Polytron tissue homogenizer (Brinkmann Instruments).
The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g, and the
supernatant was assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase assays were
done using a Lumat LB9501 luminometer (Berthold Systems Inc.,
Pittsburgh, PA). Samples were injected with 100 µl of 0.75 mM luciferin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), dissolved in
lysis buffer, and 100 µl of assay buffer (25 mM
glycylglycine, 15 mM MgSO4, 4 mM
EGTA, 15 mM KPO4, 3 mM
dithiothreitol, and 3 mM ATP), and luminescence was
measured for 20 s as relative light units (RLU). For some
experiments, RLU were normalized for tissue size by correcting for
protein content. Protein assays were done using Bio-Rad reagent and
bovine serum albumin standards.
Tissue Preparation for Histology--
Brains and ovaries were
fixed in situ by perfusing adult mice with a 10% buffered
formalin phosphate solution (Fisher). After perfusion, the brains or
ovaries were removed and stored overnight in the perfusion solution
with 10-15% sucrose. Frozen sections were obtained using a Leica
SM2000R sliding microtome. Brain (30 µM) and ovarian (20 µM) sections were collected in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS).
Histology--
Immunocytochemistry using antibodies specific for
luciferase and GnRH peptides was performed to co-localize these
peptides in the hypothalamus. All incubations were done on a shaking
platform. Brain sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with goat
anti-luciferase antibody (Cortex Biochemical, San Leandro, CA) at a
concentration of 1-3 µg/ml diluted in PBS with 0.3% Triton X and
1% bovine serum albumin. Sections were washed in PBS, and luciferase
immunoreactivity was amplified by incubating with biotinylated horse
anti-goat IgG (Vector Laboratories; Burlingame, CA) at room temperature for 2 h at a concentration of 6.75 µg/ml PBS with 0.3%
Triton-X. Sections were washed in PBS and then incubated with
streptavidin-conjugated Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR)
for 2 h at a concentration of 5 µg/ml PBS. After washing with
PBS, sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a 1:5,000
dilution of GnRH antibody (LR5 rabbit anti-GnRH decapeptide antibody
kindly provided by Robert Benoit) in blocking solution of PBS with
0.3% Triton X and 1% bovine serum albumin. Sections were washed with
PBS at room temperature and then were incubated with 3 µl/ml
Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West
Grove, PA) for 2 h and followed by a PBS wash.
For the detection of luciferase protein in the ovaries, ovarian
sections were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit
anti-luciferase antibody (Cortex Biochemical, San Leandro, CA) at a
concentration of 1 µg/ml diluted in PBS with 0.3% Triton-X and 1%
bovine serum albumin. Sections were washed in PBS and then incubated
with 3 µl/ml Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson
ImmunoResearch) for 2 h and followed by a PBS wash.
Microscopy--
Tissue sections were mounted on slides and
coverslipped with vectashield mounting reagent (Vector Laboratories,
Burlingame, CA). The edges of the coverslips were then sealed with
standard nail polish. The double fluorescence histology sections were
analyzed on a Zeiss Axiovert SS100TV inverted fluorescent microscope,
and images were captured with a Zeiss video camera with a CCD chip. The Cy3 and Alexa Fluor 488 fluorescences were visualized using the appropriate filters.
 |
RESULTS |
3446 bp of the mGnRH Gene Promoter Appropriately Targets
Luciferase Expression to GnRH Neurons--
A DNA construct containing
the region from
3446 bp to +23 bp of the mGnRH promoter fused to the
luciferase reporter gene was used to generate transgenic mice
(
3446mGnRH-LUC). As shown in Table I,
Southern blot analysis identified four separate founder lines that
incorporated the luciferase transgene. Because luciferase expression is
under the control of the mGnRH promoter, mGnRH promoter activity can be
detected easily by measuring the luciferase activity in tissue
homogenates. To identify founder lines expressing the mGnRH-LUC
transgene, whole brain homogenates were obtained from neonatal mice and
assayed for luciferase activity. Luciferase activity was measured as
RLU. Two
3446mGnRH-LUC founder lines were found to express
luciferase. In brain homogenates from 2- to 3-day-old pups, luciferase
activity was 22,309 ± 1042 RLU in the lower expressing line and
43,488 ± 4762 in the higher expressing line. Luciferase activity
in the founder lines that did not express luciferase (19.3 ± 7.4 RLU) did not differ from background levels.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of mGnRH promoter fragment on expression of luciferase transgene
in the neonatal mouse brain
Three different mouse GnRH promoter fragments were fused to the
luciferase reporter gene and used to generate transgenic mouse lines.
Transgenic lines were identified by Southern blot analysis. Luciferase
expression was determined by performing luciferase assays in whole
brain homogenates from neonatal mice. Luciferase activity was measured
as RLU. Luciferase assays were performed in a total of 506 neonatal
mice from the 27 different founder lines. Overall, luciferase activity
was detected in 48% (13/27) of founder lines containing the luciferase
transgene. The table shows the range of luciferase activity seen in
different founder lines generated with the same mGnRH-LUC DNA
construct. The mean ± S.E. of luciferase activity found in whole
brain homogenates from 2-3-day-old pups is shown for the lowest and
highest luciferase-expressing founder lines. Luciferase activity, in
brain homogenates from non-luciferase expressing lines, was similar to
background levels.
|
|
In the mGnRH-LUC mice, the anatomic pattern of luciferase expression is
an assay of mGnRH promoter activity. As illustrated in Fig.
1A, a similar anatomic pattern
of luciferase expression was found in offspring from both founders that
expressed the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene. Data from three female
offspring of founder 1 and four female offspring of founder 2 are shown. As expected, high levels of luciferase activity were seen in
the hypothalamus (20,148 ± 6093 and 21,263 ± 8214) and
olfactory lobes (10,255 ± 1117 and 15,957 ± 3782) when
luciferase expression is under the control of the mGnRH promoter.
Luciferase activity was detected in the cortex (2771 ± 1505 and
12,572 ± 4027), cerebellum (893 ± 214 and 3807 ± 1255), and midbrain (668 ± 184 and 1427 ± 773). With the
exception of the ovary, which had low levels of luciferase activity
(154 ± 24 and 41 ± 13), luciferase levels in the other tissues, including the testes, as shown in Fig.
2A, did not differ from
background levels. These two lines of
3446mGnRH-LUC mice demonstrate
that
3446 bp of the mGnRH promoter targets luciferase expression
appropriately to GnRH-containing regions of the mouse brain.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Luciferase expression in
3446mGnRH-LUC and 1005mGnRH-LUC mice. A shows the
anatomic pattern of luciferase expression in tissue homogenates from
the 3446mGnRH-LUC mice, generated with 3446/+23 bp of the mGnRH
promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene. Luciferase expression
was measured in RLU. Data from founder 1 (three females) and founder 2 (four females) are shown. In these mice, luciferase expression was
detected at high levels in the hypothalamus and olfactory bulbs. Low
levels of luciferase activity were detected in the cortex, cerebellum,
midbrain, and minimally, in the ovary. Luciferase levels in the other
tissues did not differ from background levels. B
shows co-localization of luciferase and GnRH in a representative neuron
from the 3446mGnRH-LUC mouse. Coronal brain sections were incubated
with an anti-luciferase antibody and an anti-GnRH antibody. In the
left panel, the red Cy3 fluorescence represents
GnRH peptide. In the middle panel, the green
Alexa Fluor 488 fluorescence represents luciferase peptide. In the
right panel, an overlay of the red and
green fluorescence demonstrates co-localization of
luciferase and GnRH. C shows the anatomic pattern of
luciferase expression in tissue homogenates from the 1005mGnRH-LUC
mice, generated with 1005/+23 bp of the mGnRH promoter fused to the
luciferase reporter gene. Luciferase expression was measured in RLU. A
total of 10 female mice were used to generate this graph (two from
founder 1 and four each from founders 2 and 3). Luciferase expression
was measured in RLU. Luciferase activity was detected in the
hypothalamus and olfactory lobes but at lower levels than were seen in
transgenic mice bearing the 3446mGnRH-LUC transgene. Luciferase
expression was found at very high levels in the ovaries, but luciferase
activity in the other non-neural tissues was similar to background
levels. These findings suggest that DNA sequences contained in the
proximal 1005 bp are sufficient to direct both hypothalamic and
ovarian mGnRH expression. Additionally, removal of the mGnRH promoter
region distal to 1005 bp unmasks mGnRH expression in the ovary.
D shows co-localization of luciferase and GnRH in a
representative neuron from the 1005mGnRH-LUC mouse. In the left
panel, the red Cy3 fluorescence represents GnRH
peptide, and in the middle panel, the green Alexa
Fluor 488 fluorescence represents luciferase protein. In the
right panel, an overlay of the red and
green fluorescence shows co-localization of the two proteins
and demonstrates that luciferase expression faithfully reflects mGnRH
expression.
|
|

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Ovarian luciferase expression in
1005mGnRH-LUC mice. Ovarian sections were incubated with rabbit
anti-luciferase antibody or nonspecific rabbit IgG. Immunoreactivity
was detected by anti-rabbit Cy3, which is seen as red
fluorescence. A shows a low power (×100) magnification of a
representative ovarian section. Luciferase immunoreactivity is seen
specifically within two follicles. B and C show
the two luciferase-containing follicles at higher magnification
(×200). At this higher magnification, it is clear that Cy3
fluorescence is contained within the ovarian granulosa cells.
D and E show similar follicles from an ovarian
section incubated with nonspecific rabbit IgG. No specific staining of
the granulosa cells is seen. There does, however, appear to be some
nonspecific staining of the oocyte.
|
|
To confirm that luciferase expression was confined to GnRH neurons in
the hypothalamus, double-labeling immunocytochemistry experiments were
performed in the
3446mGnRH-LUC mice. Brain sections from the
3446mGnRH-LUC mice were labeled with antibodies specific for
luciferase and GnRH peptides. A representative neuron is shown in Fig.
1B. Luciferase expression was found only in association with
GnRH-containing neurons demonstrating that luciferase expression does
faithfully reflect mGnRH expression.
The GnRH Hypothalamic Specific Element Is Located within the
Proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH Promoter--
To define further the
promoter element necessary to target hypothalamic luciferase
expression, transgenic mice were generated using the proximal
1005 bp
of the mGnRH promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene
(
1005mGnRH-LUC). As shown in Table I, six separate founder lines
bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene were generated, and three
transgenic lines were found to express luciferase in the neonatal
brain. In brain homogenates from 2- to 3-day-old pups, luciferase
levels were 7044 ± 472 RLU in the lowest luciferase-expressing
line and 22,259 ± 5872 in the highest luciferase-expressing line.
In founder lines that incorporated, but did not express the luciferase
transgene, luciferase activity was 29.3 ± 9.1 RLU in neonatal
brain homogenates.
As shown in Fig. 1C, the anatomic pattern of luciferase
expression was similar in the three luciferase-expressing lines. Data from two female offspring of founder 1 and four female offspring of
founders 2 and 3 are shown. This smaller fragment of the mGnRH promoter, containing the proximal
1005 bp, also targets luciferase expression to the hypothalamus (584 ± 77, 1221 ± 353, and
1244 ± 104), but lower levels were seen. Hypothalamic luciferase
levels were 16-36-fold higher in the transgenic mice bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene (20,148 ± 6093 and 21,263 ± 8214).
Although the mice generated with the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene
expressed much lower levels of luciferase, immunocytochemistry studies
detected luciferase in GnRH-containing neurons, and a representative
neuron is shown in Fig. 1D. As with the transgenic mice
generated with
3446 bp of the mGnRH gene promoter, luciferase expression in the hypothalamus was found only in association with GnRH-containing neurons demonstrating that luciferase expression does
faithfully reflect mGnRH expression.
Analysis of the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice demonstrates that the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter targets luciferase expression to
hypothalamic GnRH-containing neurons, suggesting that the mGnRH hypothalamic specific element is located within the proximal
1005 bp
of the mGnRH promoter.
Deletion of the mGnRH Promoter Region Distal to
1005 bp Unmasks
mGnRH Promoter Activity in the Ovary--
Interestingly, as shown in
Fig. 1C, offspring from the three luciferase-expressing
founder lines of the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice demonstrated very high levels
of luciferase activity in their ovarian homogenates (13,641 ± 652, 12,432 ± 1477, and 32,893 ± 5557). Luciferase activity
in the other non-neural tissues was similar to background levels,
indicating that ovarian luciferase was not an artifact of where the
luciferase transgene incorporated into the mouse genome.
The high level of ovarian luciferase expression seen in the mice
bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene was somewhat surprising because
there was minimal ovarian expression (154 ± 24 and 41 ± 13)
found in the transgenic mice bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene
(Fig. 1A). No significant ovarian luciferase expression was
detected in the
3446mGnRH-LUC mice even after additional female mice
(n = 22) from both founder lines bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene were examined (data not shown). The
additional female mice ranged from 24 to 296 days in age and included
lactating (n = 4), pregnant (n = 3),
pre-pubertal (n = 4), and cycling females (n = 11).
These findings demonstrate that the proximal
1005 bp of
the mGnRH promoter targets luciferase expression to the ovary, as well
as the hypothalamus, suggesting that the GnRH ovarian-specific element
is also located within the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter.
Furthermore, removal of the distal mGnRH promoter region, between
3446 bp and
1005 bp, unmasks ovarian luciferase activity in the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice. Our results suggest that the ovary may expresses
GnRH at low levels because low levels of luciferase expression were
detected in the
3446mGnRH-LUC mice. This finding suggests that DNA
sequences in the distal mGnRH promoter, between
3446 bp and
1005
bp, may normally act as an ovarian GnRH repressor element to mediate
the repression of ovarian GnRH.
The mGnRH Promoter Targets Luciferase to the Granulosa Cells of
Specific Ovarian Follicles--
To identify the luciferase-expressing
cells in the ovary, immunocytochemistry experiments were performed
using adult cycling female mice bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene.
Initially, ovarian sections were labeled with antibodies specific for
luciferase and GnRH peptides using the staining protocol used for the
brain sections. Luciferase immunoreactivity was amplified using
biotinylated secondary antibody with streptavidin-conjugated Alexa
Fluor 488. GnRH immunoreactivity was visualized using Cy3 fluorescence.
In these studies, no immunostaining for GnRH was detected (data not shown). Additionally, immunostaining for luciferase could not be
determined because there was a great deal of nonspecific Alexa Fluor
488 fluorescence seen in our control sections, presumably from the
endogenous biotin present in the ovary (data not shown).
The immunocytochemistry protocol was modified to eliminate the
biotinylated secondary antibody. Ovarian sections were obtained from an
adult cycling female mouse. Experimental sections were incubated with
an anti-luciferase antibody, whereas control sections were incubated
with nonspecific rabbit IgG. Immunoreactivity was detected by Cy3
fluorescence. Representative ovarian follicles are shown in Fig. 2. In
the mice bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene, no ovarian staining was
found in mice labeled with nonspecific IgG. In sections incubated with
the anti-luciferase antibody, fluorescence was detected in the
granulosa cells of some ovarian follicles. The fact that only certain
follicles within the ovary contained labeled granulosa cells suggests
that the luciferase expression seen in these mice is not the result of
nonspecific transgene expression. Our findings suggest that increased
GnRH promoter activity occurs in the granulosa cells of certain ovarian follicles, either at particular stages of follicular development or
within a particular cohort of ovarian follicles.
The Ovarian GRH Repressor Element Is Located between
3446 and
2078 bp of the mGnRH Promoter--
To define further the
promoter element necessary to repress ovarian luciferase expression,
transgenic mice were generated with the region between
2078 bp and
+23 bp of the mGnRH promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene
(
2078mGnRH-LUC). As shown in Table I, Southern blot analysis
identified 17 separate founders bearing the
2078mGnRH-LUC transgene,
and luciferase expression was detected in neonatal brains from 8 of
these founder lines. In brain homogenates from 2-day-old pups,
luciferase activity was 1500 ± 104 RLU in the lowest
luciferase-expressing line and 12,983 ± 599 RLU in the highest
luciferase-expressing line. In neonatal brain homogenates from founder
lines that incorporated, but did not express the luciferase transgene,
luciferase activity was 25.2 ± 8.7 RLU. The founder line that
consistently expressed the highest level of neonatal hypothalamic
luciferase was examined in greater detail.
In an attempt to correct for differences in cellular
content so that ovarian and hypothalamic luciferase expression could be
compared more directly, the RLU values were corrected for protein content. Fig. 3 shows the anatomic
pattern of luciferase expression, corrected for protein content, in
mice generated with each of the three mGnRH-LUC constructs, and the
data are summarized in Table II. For each
of the mGnRH-LUC constructs, both male and female offspring from a
representative founder were examined. Fig. 3A depicts the
anatomic pattern of luciferase expression in mice generated with the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene. Six offspring (three male and three female)
from founder 1 were used to generate the data. Fig. 3B shows
data from six (three male and three female) mice from the
2078mGnRH-LUC founder line that consistently expressed the highest
level of neonatal hypothalamic luciferase. Fig. 3C demonstrates the anatomic pattern of luciferase expression found in
transgenic mice bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene. Five offspring
(two female and three male) from founder 1 of the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice
were used to generate the data.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Luciferase expression, corrected for protein
content, in 3446mGnRH-LUC, 2078mGnRH-LUC, and 1005mGnRH-LUC
mice. In an attempt to correct for differences in cellular content
so that ovarian and hypothalamic luciferase expression could be
compared more directly, the RLU values were corrected for protein
content. Fig. 3 shows the anatomic pattern of luciferase expression,
corrected for protein content, in mice generated with each of the three
mGnRH-LUC constructs. Please note that a different scale is used for
each of the graphs. The data are also summarized in Table II. For each
of the mGnRH-LUC constructs, both male and female offspring from a
representative founder were examined. A depicts the anatomic
pattern of luciferase expression in mice generated with the
3446mGnRH-LUC construct. Six offspring (three male and three female)
from founder 1 were used to generate the data. B shows data
from six (three male and three female) mice from the 2078mGnRH-LUC
founder line that consistently expressed the highest level of neonatal
hypothalamic luciferase. C demonstrates the anatomic pattern
of luciferase expression found in transgenic mice bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC construct. Five offspring (two female and three male)
from founder 1 of the 1005mGnRH-LUC mice were used to generate these
data. It appears that correcting for protein
content did not qualitatively change the results. Mice bearing the 2078mGnRH-LUC and the 1005mGnRH-LUC
constructs exhibited low levels of luciferase expression in the
hypothalamus and high levels of expression in the ovary. Luciferase
expression in the non-reproductive, non-neural tissues (including the
testes) was similar to background levels. These findings suggest that
DNA sequences contained in the proximal 1005 bp are sufficient to
direct both hypothalamic and ovarian mGnRH expression. The high levels
of ovarian luciferase expression in the 2078mGnRH-LUC mice suggest
that the ovarian GnRH repressor element is located in the distal region
of the mGnRH gene promoter, between 3446 and 2078 bp.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Effect of mGnRH promoter fragment on expression of luciferase transgene
in the hypothalamus and ovary
Three different mouse GnRH promoter fragments were fused to the
luciferase reporter gene and used to generate transgenic mice.
Luciferase-expressing lines were identified, and adult mice were
examined to analyze the anatomic pattern of luciferase expression. For
each mGnRH-LUC construct shown in the table, data were obtained from
mice derived from a single founder. Offspring from founder 1 of the
3446 mGnRH-LUC mice and the 1005 mGnRH-LUC mice were used. For the
mice generated with 2078 mGnRH-LUC transgene, the line that expressed
luciferase at the highest levels in the neonatal brain was used.
Luciferase activity was measured as RLU corrected for mg of protein in
the sample. Hypothalamic luciferase activity was detected in transgenic
mice generated with all three mGnRH-LUC constructs. In mice generated
with 2078 bp and 1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter, high levels of
luciferase activity were detected in the ovaries but not in the testes.
Outside the central nervous system, luciferase levels in
non-reproductive tissues (heart, lung, kidney, liver, and spleen) did
not differ from background levels.
|
|
Correcting for protein content did not qualitatively change the
results. Mice bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene expressed hypothalamic luciferase at high levels (8114 ± 1465 RLU/mg
protein), but minimal luciferase activity was detected in their ovaries (85.7 ± 17.1 RLU/mg protein). Luciferase activity in the
non-neural tissues, including the testes (1.67 ± 1.7 RLU/mg
protein), did not differ from background level (1.87 ± 0.7 RLU/mg
protein). When luciferase expression was under the control of the mGnRH promoter region between
1005 to +28 bp, low levels of activity were
detected in the hypothalamus (474 ± 86 RLU/mg protein), and high
levels were detected in the ovary (32,379 ± 7441 RLU/mg protein). Luciferase activity was not seen in the testes (33.0 ± 0.6 RLU/mg protein) or in the other peripheral tissues (7.04 ± 2.0 RLU/mg protein).
The anatomic pattern of luciferase expression in the mice bearing the
2078mGnRH-LUC transgene are qualitatively similar to the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice. The
2078mGnRH-LUC mice exhibited low levels of
luciferase expression in the hypothalamus (1688 ± 444 RLU/mg
protein) and olfactory lobes (410 ± 60 RLU/mg protein) and high
levels of expression in the ovary (14,066 ± 1030 RLU/mg protein).
Luciferase expression in the non-reproductive, non-neural tissues,
including the testes (7.00 ± 3.8 RLU/mg protein), was similar to
background levels (7.46 ± 3.2 RLU/mg protein). The high levels of
ovarian luciferase expression in the
2078mGnRH-LUC mice suggested
that the ovarian GnRH repressor element is located in the distal region
of the mGnRH gene promoter, between
3446 and
2078 bp.
The Distal Region of the mGnRH Promoter, between
3446 and
2078
bp, May Contain a Critical Enhancer Region for the Expression of
Hypothalamic mGnRH--
As shown in Table I, eight founder mice were
found to express the
2078mGnRH-LUC transgene in the neonatal
hypothalamus. In Fig. 3, the
2078mGnRH-LUC founder line that
expressed neonatal luciferase at the highest level was compared with
the
3446mGnRH-LUC founder line that expressed lower levels of
neonatal luciferase. Even in the
2078mGnRH-LUC transgenic line that
expressed hypothalamic luciferase at the highest level, luciferase
activity in the hypothalamus (1688 ± 444 RLU/mg protein) was
5-fold lower than was seen in the transgenic mice bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene (8114 ± 1465 RLU/mg protein).
As shown in Fig. 3 and Table II, transgenic mice bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC transgene exhibited higher levels of hypothalamic luciferase (8114 ± 1465 RLU/mg protein) than mice bearing either the
2078mGnRH-LUC transgene (1688 ± 444 RLU/mg protein) or the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene (474 ± 86 RLU/mg protein). The fact
that ovarian luciferase expression is found at high levels in the
transgenic mice bearing these shorter fragments of the mGnRH promoter
argues against a general insertion effect, chromatin configuration, or lower transgene copy number as the cause of the lower hypothalamic expression seen in these lines. These data suggest that the mGnRH promoter region between
3446 and
2078 bp contains a critical enhancer for the in vivo expression of hypothalamic mGnRH.
 |
DISCUSSION |
A Hypothalamic Specific Element for the in Vivo Expression of
mGnRH--
In this study, we used various segments of the mGnRH
promoter fused to the luciferase reporter gene as a marker for in
vivo mGnRH gene expression. The luciferase gene is an extremely
sensitive reporter, and because luciferase expression is under the
control of the mGnRH promoter, the anatomic pattern of mGnRH gene
promoter activity can be detected easily by measuring the luciferase
activity in tissue homogenates. All three 5'-fragments of the mGnRH
promoter that we studied,
3446/+23,
2078/+23, and
1005/+28 bp,
targeted expression of the luciferase transgene to the hypothalamus.
Our study in the mGnRH-LUC transgenic mice is the first to demonstrate that sequences contained within the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter are sufficient to target hypothalamic expression of mGnRH.
Our findings differ from a recent transgenic mouse study in which the
mGnRH promoter fused to a lacZ reporter localized the critical elements for expression of the mGnRH gene between
2.1 and
1.7 kb of the promoter (18). In these mice, deletion of mGnRH
promoter sequences 5' to 1.7 kb resulted in a complete absence of
detectable
-galactosidase expression within the brain, whereas we
detected luciferase expression in transgenic mice bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene. As shown in Table I, luciferase expression in whole brain homogenates from 2- to 3-day-old pups was as high in the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice as in the
2078mGnRH-LUC mice. In the adult, the
proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH targeted luciferase to the hypothalamus
in the
1005mGnRH-LUC mice, but expression levels were lower (474 ± 86 RLU) compared with the levels seen in the
2078mGnRH-LUC mice
(1,688 ± 444 RLU). Perhaps the mGnRH promoter region between
2.1 and
1.7 kb, although not critical for targeting hypothalamic
expression, contains sequences that enhance hypothalamic expression of
GnRH.
The differences observed between the mice bearing the lacZ
and luciferase transgene may be due to reporter sensitivity or to the
difference in the number of animals examined. Measurement of luciferase
activity in tissue homogenates may be a more sensitive assay for the
detection of low levels of transcription than
-galactosidase immunocytochemistry. Alternatively, it is possible that examination of
additional mGnRH-lacZ mice would reveal
-galactosidase expression within GnRH neurons because the integration site into the chromosome has been shown to repress the expression of a foreign gene in transgenic mice (22). In our study, we generated six founder lines that
incorporated the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene, but only three transgenic
lines expressed luciferase. As shown in Table I, only 48% (13/27) of
the founder lines incorporating the luciferase transgene expressed
luciferase in the neonatal mouse brain.
The mGnRH promoter (
3446 to +23 bp) has been shown to target
faithfully reporter expression to GnRH neurons. The
3446/+23 bp mGnRH
promoter fragment was used to generate transgenic mice in which green
fluorescent protein (GFP) was targeted to GnRH neurons (23). In the GFP
mice, 99.5% of GFP-expressing neurons were found in association with
immunodetectable GnRH peptide. Similarly, when we performed
double-labeling immunocytochemistry studies in our
3446mGnRH-LUC and
1005mGnRH-LUC mice using antibodies specific for both luciferase and
GnRH, we detected luciferase protein only within neurons containing the
GnRH peptide.
In our mGnRH-LUC mice, low levels of luciferase expression were
detected in tissue homogenates obtained from the cortex, cerebellum, and midbrain. The luciferase expression seen in these tissues may
reflect low levels of GnRH expression rather than ectopic luciferase
expression. GnRH has been described in extra-hypothalamic brain regions
(24), and because the assay for luciferase activity in tissue
homogenates is a very sensitive measure of mGnRH promoter activity, it
would be able to detect low levels of expression in transgenic mice.
The low levels of luciferase activity seen in these tissues may
actually reflect an embryological pattern of GnRH gene expression. Transgenic mice bearing a GnRH-lacZ reporter construct were found also
found to express low levels of
-galactosidase in extra-hypothalamic regions of the brain, and further study demonstrated GnRH expression in
these non-hypothalamic regions during normal embryological development
(25). Alternatively, the lack of the 3'-sequences in the mGnRH-LUC
construct may lead to aberrant regulation of the luciferase transgene
so that luciferase activity persists in the absence of GnRH peptide. It
has been noted that the 3'-element distal to exon II appears to repress
GnRH expression in other neurons but has no effect in targeting the
mGnRH gene (18).
Our findings also differ from observations made in studies of the rGnRH
promoter in GT1-7 cells. In these studies, both a 173-bp proximal
promoter region (6) and a 300-bp region located 1.8 kb upstream from
the transcription start site (7) were described to be important for
neuronal expression of the rGnRH gene in vitro (8). In our
studies, the sequences contained in the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH
promoter were sufficient to direct luciferase expression to the
hypothalamus. Overall, our mouse GnRH hypothalamic specific element,
located within the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter, shares
90% sequence homology with the rat gene and contains the proximal
173-bp region of the rGnRH promoter that is conserved across species
(6). The discrepancy between the mouse and rat data may reflect the
species-specific differences in regulation of GnRH gene or may reflect
the difference between data obtained in vivo
versus in vitro.
Distal to the proximal
173-bp conserved region, there is ~50%
overall homology between the proximal
1005 bp of the human and mouse
GnRH promoters. Studies of the hGnRH gene in transgenic mice localized
a hypothalamic specific element between
1131 and
484 bp of the
hGnRH gene (17). Within the human hypothalamic specific element, there
are several regions that share greater homology with the mGnRH gene,
and further study of these homologous regions may elucidate the
critical factors that target hypothalamic GnRH expression.
A Critical Enhancer Region for the in Vivo Expression of
Hypothalamic mGnRH--
The mGnRH promoter fragments containing
2078
and
1005 bp of 5'-sequence targeted luciferase transgene expression
to the hypothalamus, but at lower levels than the transgenic mice
generated with
3446 bp of mGnRH promoter. In general, comparison of
transgene expression levels between different founder lines must be
done cautiously because transgene expression levels are affected by the
chromosomal integration site and transgene copy number (22). Nevertheless, transgenic mice derived from eight different embryos bearing the
2078mGnRH-LUC transgene were examined. It is striking that even in the transgenic line that expressed luciferase at the
highest level, luciferase activity in the hypothalamus was ~5-fold
lower than was seen in the transgenic mice bearing the
3446mGnRH-LUC
transgene. Furthermore, the fact that ovarian luciferase expression is
found at high levels in the transgenic mice bearing these shorter
fragments of the mGnRH promoter suggests that chromosomal integration
site or lower transgene copy number is unlikely to be the cause of the
lower hypothalamic expression. These data would suggest that an
enhancer for the in vivo expression of hypothalamic mGnRH is
contained in the mGnRH promoter region between
3446 and
2078 bp.
Our in vivo observations corroborate in vitro
studies performed in the GT1-7 cell line, a GnRH-secreting cell line
that was developed by targeting the SV40 T antigen oncogene to GnRH
neurons using the 5'-flanking region of the rGnRH gene in transgenic
mice. Deletion analysis of the rGnRH gene promoter in the GT1-7 cell line identified a neuron-specific enhancer, located between
1863 and
1571 bp, that was found to be critical for the expression of the
rGnRH gene in vitro. This region of the rat promoter shares 90% homology to the region of the mouse GnRH promoter located between
2384 and
2081 bp. Although the region between
2384 bp and
2081
bp was not found to be essential for targeting mGnRH expression to the
hypothalamus in our mGnRH-LUC mice, deletion of sequences 5' to
2078
bp resulted in a dramatic decrease in hypothalamic luciferase
expression levels. These results would support the hypothesis that
critical enhancer sequences for the in vivo expression of
hypothalamic mGnRH are located between
2384 and
2081 bp of the
mGnRH promoter.
Additional studies with the rGnRH promoter in GT1-7 cells identified
Oct-1 (12) and GATA-4 (10, 11) as important transcription factors that
bind to the neuron-specific enhancer, located between
1863 and
1571
bp, and regulate rGnRH expression in vitro. Analysis of the
corresponding mouse gene sequences, between
2384 and
2081 bp,
however, reveal differences in the presumed transcription factor
recognition sites. There is some unpublished evidence that these
changes may eliminate binding to the mGnRH promoter in vitro (26). Further study is need to determine whether Oct-1 and GATA-4 also
have a role in enhancing the in vivo expression of mGnRH and
whether other transcription factors are involved.
Identification of an Ovarian GnRH Repressor
Element--
Interestingly, when the mGnRH promoter region distal to
2078 bp was deleted, high levels of ovarian luciferase were detected, and even higher levels of ovarian luciferase were detected in mice
bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene. Our studies demonstrate that
sequences contained within the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter
are sufficient to target ovarian, as well as hypothalamic, expression
of mGnRH. Our data also suggest that an ovarian GnRH repressor element
may be located in the distal region of the mGnRH promoter between
3446 and
2078 bp, because deletion of this region unmasks
luciferase expression in the ovaries of transgenic mice bearing the
mGnRH-LUC transgene. We speculate that repressor proteins in the ovary
normally interact with this ovarian GnRH repressor element and permit
GnRH expression only in certain physiologic situations.
In the transgenic mice in which luciferase is under the control of
1005 to +28 bp of the mGnRH promoter, luciferase peptide was detected
in the granulosa cells of certain ovarian follicles. The fact that the
luciferase protein is restricted to the granulosa cells of specific
ovarian follicles suggests that ovarian luciferase expression is
regulated and is not the result of nonspecific transgene expression.
Our findings indicate that mGnRH promoter activity is increased in the
granulosa cells of certain ovarian follicles. Perhaps under certain
physiologic conditions, granulosa cells, in a particular cohort of
follicles, are stimulated to release repressor proteins from the mGnRH
promoter to allow mGnRH gene expression to occur.
Our finding of high levels of ovarian luciferase expression was
initially surprising because no ovarian luciferase activity was
detected in our previous studies (17) using the hGnRH promoter to
direct luciferase expression. This discrepancy may be due to species-specific differences in the role of GnRH in follicular development or in the ovarian proteins that may interact to regulate ovarian GnRH expression. Alternatively, it is possible that an ovarian
GnRH repressor element exists in the human GnRH promoter as well but
has not yet been identified. Further studies may reveal the identity of
the specific repressor proteins and the specific physiologic states in
which ovarian GnRH expression is increased.
The function of ovarian GnRH is not known, but there is increasing
evidence that GnRH may function in a paracrine or autocrine manner in
the ovary. GnRH has been shown to modulate directly ovarian
steroidogenesis (27-29) and follicular development (30). Ovarian GnRH
is also thought to have a regulatory role in ovulation (31-33),
luteinization (34), and corpus luteum function (35-37). In
vitro studies also suggest that GnRH may also act as a
meiosis-stimulating factor in the rat oocyte (38).
The presence of specific ovarian GnRH-binding sites was first suggested
by radioligand binding studies (35, 39), and GnRH receptor messenger
RNA has since been demonstrated in rat (40, 41) and human (42) ovaries.
By using RT-PCR, GnRH messenger RNA has been detected in rat (43-45)
and human ovaries (2).
The intra-ovarian location of GnRH is not yet well established in the
literature. GnRH messenger RNA has been identified in human luteinized
granulosa cells (46) and in human ovarian surface epithelium (47). One
in situ hybridization histochemistry study localized GnRH
expression to both the theca and granulosa cells of rat ovaries with
GnRH messenger RNA being more abundant in the granulosa cells (48).
This is in contrast to our immunocytochemistry experiments, which were
unable to detect any GnRH peptide in the mouse ovary. Additionally, in
mice bearing the mGnRH-LUC transgene, luciferase was detected only in
the granulosa cells. It is possible that in situ
hybridization is a more sensitive detection method than
immunocytochemistry. It is also possible, however, that the detection
of GnRH messenger RNA may not reflect the pattern of GnRH protein expression.
In both the human and rat ovary, transcription of GnRH is initiated
from a more upstream promoter initiation site than used for the
transcription of hypothalamic GnRH messenger RNA (2, 43). It also
appears that a longer GnRH transcript retaining hypothalamic intron
sequences is generated in the ovary (43). It is possible that the GnRH
peptide produced in the ovary differs from hypothalamic GnRH and has a
different protein conformation, which may explain why there are no
immunocytochemistry studies of GnRH in the ovary. Our
immunocytochemistry studies, using the LR5 anti-GnRH decapeptide
antibody, detected GnRH in the hypothalamus, but not in the ovary, of
mice bearing the
1005mGnRH-LUC transgene.
In conclusion, our model of tissue-specific expression of hypothalamic
and ovarian GnRH expression is shown in Fig.
4. Our results clearly demonstrate that
DNA sequences contained within the proximal
1005 bp of the mGnRH
promoter are sufficient to direct mGnRH gene expression to both the
ovary and hypothalamus. Our data also suggest that an enhancer for the
in vivo expression of hypothalamic mGnRH is contained in the
mGnRH promoter region between
3446 bp and
2078 bp. Specific
proteins, in the hypothalamus, may interact with DNA sequences in the
enhancer region to increase hypothalamic mGnRH expression.
Additionally, we have identified a region of the mGnRH promoter,
between
3446 bp and
2078 bp, that appears to mediate repression of
GnRH expression in the ovary. In the ovary, specific repressor proteins
interact with the ovarian GnRH repressor element to repress ovarian
GnRH expression. Ovarian GnRH expression will occur only when these
repressor proteins are released by specific stimuli. Our study is the
first to define regions of the mGnRH gene promoter that regulate
expression of GnRH in both neural and non-neural tissues in
vivo. Further study is needed to elucidate the specific mechanisms
by which hypothalamic and ovarian GnRH expression are differentially
regulated.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Model of tissue-specific expression of
hypothalamic and ovarian GnRH. This model represents our
understanding of tissue-specific expression of hypothalamic and ovarian
GnRH. Our data demonstrate that the DNA sequences contained within the
proximal 1005 bp of the mGnRH promoter are sufficient to direct mGnRH
gene expression to both the ovary and hypothalamus. Our data also
support the presence of an enhancer region for the in vivo
expression of hypothalamic mGnRH in the mGnRH promoter region between
3446 and 2078 bp. We speculate that in the hypothalamus, specific
enhancer proteins interact with the enhancer region to increase mGnRH
expression. In the ovary, our data suggest that an ovarian GnRH
repressor element may be located in the distal region of the mGnRH
promoter between 3446 and 2078 bp. We speculate that repressor
proteins in the ovary normally interact with this ovarian GnRH
repressor element to repress ovarian GnRH expression. It is possible
that this may be a mechanism for regulating ovarian GnRH expression.
Under certain physiologic situations, these repressor proteins may be
released to allow ovarian GnRH expression.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Donald DeFranco for kindly
providing the mouse GnRH promoter luciferase vector and Dr. Robert
Benoit for the kind gift of the LR5 antibody. We also thank Guiandre L. Joseph, Robyn M. Deneau, and Sally Hall their excellent technical
assistance. We are also grateful to Dr. Ronald N. Cohen for the
thoughtful review of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the Reproductive
Scientist Development Program (to H. H. K.), the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Foundation (to H. H. K.), and National Institutes of Health Grant R01 HD34551 (to S. R.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section of
Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave., MC
2050 Chicago, IL 60637. Tel.: 773-702-6642; Fax: 773-702-0840; E-mail:
hkim@babies.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 3, 2001, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110535200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone;
hGnRH, human GnRH, mGnRH, mouse GnRH;
rGnRH, rat GnRH;
RLU, relative light units;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
LUC, luciferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Radovick, S.,
Wondisford, F. E.,
Nakayama, Y.,
Yamada, M.,
Cutler, G. B., Jr.,
and Weintraub, B. D.
(1990)
Mol. Endocrinol.
4,
476-480[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Dong, K. W., Yu, K. L.,
and Roberts, J. L.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
1654-1666[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Wray, S.,
Grant, P.,
and Gainer, H.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
8132-8136[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Schwanzel-Fukuda, M.,
and Pfaff, D. W.
(1989)
Nature
338,
161-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
King, J. C.,
and Rubin, B. S.
(1994)
in
Serono Symposia: Modes Of Action Of GnRH And GnRH Analogs
(Crowley, W. F.
, and Conn, P. M., eds)
, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
| 6.
|
Eraly, S. A.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
848-859[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Whyte, D. B.,
Lawson, M. A.,
Belsham, D. D.,
Eraly, S. A.,
Bond, C. T.,
Adelman, J. P.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
467-477[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Nelson, S. B.,
Lawson, M. A.,
Kelley, C. G.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1509-1522[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Belsham, D. D.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
212-228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Lawson, M. A.,
Whyte, D. B.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3596-3605[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Lawson, M. A.,
Buhain, A. R.,
Jovenal, J. C.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
364-377[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Clark, M. E.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6169-6177[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Eraly, S. A.,
Nelson, S. B.,
Huang, K. M.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
469-481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kelley, C. G.,
Lavorgna, G.,
Clark, M. E.,
Boncinelli, E.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1246-1256[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Wierman, M. E.,
Xiong, X.,
Kepa, J. K.,
Spaulding, A. J.,
Jacobsen, B. M.,
Fang, Z.,
Nilaver, G.,
and Ojeda, S. R.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1652-1665[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Chandran, U. R.,
Warren, B. S.,
Baumann, C. T.,
Hager, G. L.,
and DeFranco, D. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2372-2378[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Wolfe, A. M.,
Wray, S.,
Westphal, H.,
and Radovick, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20018-20023[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Pape, J. R.,
Skynner, M. J.,
Allen, N. D.,
and Herbison, A. E.
(1999)
Mol. Endocrinol.
13,
2203-2211[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
de Wet, J. R.,
Wood, K. V.,
DeLuca, M.,
Helinski, D. R.,
and Subramani, S.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
725-737[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Maxwell, I. H.,
Harrison, G. S.,
Wood, W. M.,
and Maxwell, F.
(1989)
BioTechniques
7,
276-280[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Wood, W. M.,
Kao, M. Y.,
Gordon, D. F.,
and Ridgway, E. C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14840-14847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
al-Shawi, R.,
Kinnaird, J.,
Burke, J.,
and Bishop, J. O.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
1192-1198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Suter, K. J.,
Song, W. J.,
Sampson, T. L.,
Wuarin, J. P.,
Saunders, J. T.,
Dudek, F. E.,
and Moenter, S. M.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
412-419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Seeburg, P. H.,
Mason, A. J.,
Stewart, T. A.,
and Nikolics, K.
(1987)
Recent Prog. Horm. Res.
43,
69-98
|
| 25.
|
Skynner, M. J.,
Slater, R.,
Sim, J. A.,
Allen, N. D.,
and Herbison, A. E.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
5955-5966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Chandran, U. R.,
and DeFranco, D. B.
(1999)
Behav. Brain Res.
105,
29-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Tilly, J. L.,
LaPolt, P. S.,
and Hsueh, A. J.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
1296-1302[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Hsueh, A. J.,
and Erickson, G. F.
(1979)
Science
204,
854-855[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Vaananen, J. E.,
Tong, B. L.,
Vaananen, C. M.,
Chan, I. H.,
Yuen, B. H.,
and Leung, P. C.
(1997)
Biol. Reprod.
57,
1346-1353[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Billig, H.,
Furuta, I.,
and Hsueh, A. J.
(1994)
Endocrinology
134,
245-252[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Corbin, A.,
and Bex, F. J.
(1981)
Life Sci.
29,
185-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Ny, T.,
Liu, Y. X.,
Ohlsson, M.,
Jones, P. B.,
and Hsueh, A. J.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
11790-11793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Wong, W. Y.,
and Richards, J. S.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
3512-3521[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Morris, J. K.,
and Richards, J. S.
(1993)
Endocrinology
133,
770-779[Abstract]
|
| 35. |